The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had become a global concern because of its unexpectedly high pathogenicity and transmissibility. SARS-CoV-2 variants that reduce the immune protection elicited from previous vaccination or natural infection raise challenges in controlling the spread of the pandemic. The development of universal vaccines against these variants seems to be a practical solution to alleviate the physical and economic effects caused by this disease, but it is hard to achieve. In this review, we describe the high mutation rate of RNA viruses and dynamic molecular structures of SARS-CoV-2 variants in several major neutralizing epitopes, trying to answer the question of why universal vaccines are difficult to design. Understanding the biological basis of immune evasion is crucial for combating these obstacles. We then summarize several advancements worthy of further study, including heterologous prime-boost regimens, construction of chimeric immunogens, design of protein nanoparticle antigens, and utilization of conserved neutralizing epitopes. The fact that some immunogens can induce cross-reactive immune responses against heterologous coronaviruses provides hints for universal vaccine development. We hope this review can provide inspiration to current universal vaccine studies.
Introduction to SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 20191,2. Since the initial outbreak of COVID-19, it has been declared a pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) and has taken the lives of over 6.5 million people globally (https://covid19.who.int/), bringing serious threats to economic and social stability.
SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the Orthocoronavirinae subfamily, which can be subdivided into Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Gammacoronavirus, and Deltacoronavirus genera based on their genomic structures3. Coronaviruses mainly caused mild respiratory symptoms until SARS-CoV, first reported in 2003, which resulted in a 10% mortality4,5. Both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are members of the subgenus Sarbecovirus of the genus Betacoronavirus. Although the protein structure of the immunodominant region of SARS-CoV-2 is similar to that of SARS-CoV, the antibodies elicited from a particular strain are more prone to have cross-reaction instead of cross-neutralization activity to a heterologous virus6,7. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), another highly pathogenic Betacoronavirus (subgenus Merbecovirus) that still circulates, was discovered in Saudi Arabia in 20128. The emergence of these viruses and their serious consequences make coronavirus a main focus of human disease prevention research.
Consistent with many other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 utilizes its surface spike (S) glycoprotein to enter into the host cell9,10,11. The homotrimer S can be proteolytically cleaved into two parts, with the S1 subunit responsible for binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the cell surface, and the S2 subunit responsible for the fusion of viral and cellular membranes (Fig. 2)12. The receptor binding domain (RBD), C-terminal domain of the S1 subunit, is immunodominant so that it is the major target of the neutralizing antibodies13,14. Morphological changes of S between pre- and post-fusion states have been characterized. In the pre-fusion state, the RBD exhibits its “up” conformation, allowing the RBD to bind to the receptor15. The S1 subunit is then released by furin cleavage at the boundary between S1 and S216,17. Next, cellular transmembrane serine proteinase 2 (TMPRSS2) is recruited for viral priming by cleaving part of the S2 subunit upstream from the fusion peptide, resulting in the exposure of hydrophobic fusion peptide and insertion into host membranes15,18,19.
The vaccine is a powerful tool to tackle the pandemic. As of October 2022, WHO has listed twelve licensed vaccines for emergency use, the majority of which are produced based on the index virus (https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/vaccines/vaccinescovid-19-vaccine-eul-issued/). More than half of the countries have started programmatic implementation of booster vaccination, while some low-income countries are still trying to improve primary vaccination coverage (https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#explore-the-global-situation/). Despite these efforts, nearly three years since the outbreak of COVID-19, the causative SARS-CoV-2 is continuously evolving and generating variants. Existing vaccine-induced antibodies cannot fully neutralize the variants, especially the newly isolated Omicron variants20,21,22,23. For example, sera samples from two-dose BNT162b2 vaccine recipients show a 34-fold decrease of efficiency in inhibiting Omicron BA.1 spike entry compared with the D614G mutant strain22. Attention to emerging Omicron subvariants BA.4, BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1.1, and XBB is on the rise since they display distinct antibody evasion potentials24,25. There is an urgent need to develop universal vaccines with enhanced magnitude and breadth of neutralizing antibodies against emerging variants that show distinct immune escape abilities and even against other Betacoronaviruses. In this review, we summarize the reasons why universal vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 variants are difficult to produce and elaborate on several novel suggestions for SARS-CoV-2 universal vaccine designs.
Challenges in universal vaccine design against SARS-CoV-2
The development of a new vaccine is a long-distance race between the virus and humans. Although tremendous progress has been made in reducing the viral transmission and fatality rate via vaccine administration, the emerging variants are challenging the protective efficacy of vaccines against symptomatic illness.
High mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 genome continually produces variants of concern
SARS-CoV-2 is a positive, single-stranded RNA virus that possesses the largest genome among the known RNA viruses that infect humans26,27. One notable feature of RNA viruses is their high mutation rate. Unlike DNA viruses which utilize the host replication machinery to detect and repair base-pairing errors during replication, RNA viruses use RNA-dependent RNA polymerases that lack proofreading ability and, therefore, are intrinsically error prone28. Although virus-encoded nonstructural protein 14 (nsp14) demonstrating exonuclease proofreading activity lowers SARS-CoV-2 mutation rate compared with other RNA viruses, SARS-CoV-2 variants accumulate over time29. SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to have 0.8–2.38 × 10−3 nucleotide substitutions per site per year, which is within the range of RNA virus mutation rate, but is one or more orders of magnitudes higher than that of DNA viruses30,31. High sequence variability of the S protein is a major obstacle in developing vaccines conferring broad protection.
SARS-CoV-2 variants with higher transmissibility, or other distinct characteristics that seriously affect public health are designated Variants of Concern (VOCs), namely Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron (https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/) (Fig. 1a). The Alpha variant, firstly detected in early Autumn 2020, was more transmissible and caused more severe cases than the index virus32,33. Both the Beta and Gamma variants can escape from naturally acquired and vaccine-induced immunity34,35,36. The Delta variant emerged in India at the end of 2020 and caused a surge in confirmed cases37. The S protein of the Delta variant evolved to optimize cell entry by accelerating membrane fusion38. The Omicron variant outcompeted the previously prevalent Delta variant and became dominant worldwide soon after its discovery due to its higher transmissibility (Fig. 1b)39,40. According to WHO epidemiological reports, the Omicron BA.5, BA.4, and BA.2.75 descendent lineages remain the dominant strains circulating globally (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports).
Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants leading to immune escape
Subtle structural differences of S protein in variants may facilitate viral immune escape, making it difficult to develop S-based universal vaccines41,42. The alignment of mutation sites of prevalent variants is shown in Fig. 2. The Beta and Omicron variants hold significant signs of immune escape, so the structural dynamics of these two variants will be introduced in detail.
There are only ten amino acid changes in the S protein of the Beta variant (Fig. 2), but it is reported to have an increased risk of immune escape according to testing showing nondetectable neutralizing activities in three classes of antibodies and convalescent plasma, as well as a 10.3- to 12.4-fold decrease in antibody neutralizing activities elicited by mRNA vaccines43,44. The L18F and D80A mutations produce a structural rearrangement of the N-terminal segment, while the triple deletion (L242del, A243del, and L244del) shifts segment 172-188 up 17 angstroms, affecting the interaction of antibodies that bind to this loop region45. A few hotspots during mutation accumulation can also be found in the Beta variant. Lys417 is crucial for interacting with a negatively charged residue in neutralizing antibodies; thus, a K417N mutation disturbs a salt bridge that forms during binding and leads to immune escape46. The E484K mutation results in both steric clashes and a charge change in the antibody-binding site in the receptor binding motif (RBM) region, which is considered to be an effective modification that reduces neutralizing sensitivity44,47.
The Omicron variant carries more than thirty mutations in the S protein and half of these changes are located in the antigenically important RBD region (Fig. 2)48,49. Even the sera from those who have recovered from COVID-19 or are vaccinated and boosted have poor neutralizing activities against the Omicron variant50,51,52,53. Critically, the Omicron variant causes less severe illness and fewer intensive care unit admissions compared with the Delta variant, indicating a long-term coexistence with infected or asymptomatic infected persons54. Several representative changes that can alter the antigenic characteristics of Omicron were found. For example, mutation G142D together with deletion 143–145 causes the N3 loop to change from a hair-pin shape to a loose loop, which in turn affects the conformation of the N4 and N5 loop55. This finding explains why Omicron has resistance to NTD-targeting neutralizing antibodies. Disruption of hydrophobic environment by G446S and induction of steric clash by N440K also reduce antibody binding affinities dramatically46,55. In addition, a previously unidentified combination of immune escape sites was described; mutations in S371L, S373P, and S375F cause a dramatic conformational change in the loop region that connects α2 and β255. Remarkably, this antigenic site is always conserved in other Sarbecoviruses. Unique mutations exist in newly-isolated Omicron subvariants are dodging the immune system. BA.2.75 carries nine additional mutations in spike compared with BA.2, among which the D339H substitution causes a neutralization reduction56. One noteworthy mutation of BA.4/BA.5 in S is F486V, of which the location is near to S-ACE2 interaction site which is the main target for neutralizing antibodies57. In Omicron sublineages BA.1, BA.2, and BA.2.12.1, mutation Q493R with a longer side chain induces steric clashes that directly resist binding of antibodies, while reversion mutation R493Q in BA.2.75 and BA.4/BA.5 subvariants show opposite consequence, which may be a compromise strategy to confer more significant immune evasion together with other mutations than Q493R could have alone51,55,57,58. Another important mutation point R346T found in three Omicron subvariants BA.2.75, BA.4.6, and BF.7 (also known as BA.188.8.131.52) had shown extensive antibody-binding evasion and they appear to have increased prevalence over current dominant BA.4 and BA.559,60,61,62.
The findings above suggest that high mutation rates provide SARS-CoV-2 with broader chances to survive via immune evasion, and the intension of mutation post great challenges to current universal vaccine studies and therapeutic antibody productions.
Novel approaches in universal vaccine design against SARS-CoV-2
To date, vaccination is still the most effective method for reducing the morbidity and mortality rate, especially in the immunocompromised population that may facilitate viral evolution. The composition of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines needed to be updated in compensate of lower protection against symptomatic diseases and Omicron infection. The design of variant-specific vaccine candidates is more complicated. Apart from evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of the variant-specific vaccine candidate itself, more data is needed on efficacy, durability, and interval time in combination with currently available vaccines as a booster dose. Here, we list several important achievements, from clinically approved vaccines to vaccine designs that have shown broad-neutralizing abilities. We hope these findings will bring inspiration to current universal vaccine studies.
Heterologous prime-boost regimens
The neutralization activity of antibodies induced by vaccination wanes gradually over time63,64. Furthermore, the emergence of new variants with stronger immune escape abilities increases the need for those who have received a COVID-19 primary series to get booster shots that contain updated vaccine compositions. Actions such as optimizing the use of currently available vaccines and increasing the protective efficacy of vaccines against evolving variants with booster vaccines are highlighted by WHO. Compared with homologous vaccination, mixing vaccines from different platforms or different SARS-CoV-2 strains may evoke greater cellular and humoral immune responses and achieve broader immunity against emerging variants.
Several heterologous booster administrations using licensed vaccines or vaccines in clinical trials have been widely implemented (Table 1). Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strategies can be grouped by vaccine platforms. One popular combination at this stage is an adenovirus-based vector vaccine followed by boosting with an mRNA vaccine, which has been proven to induce strong cellular and humoral immune responses65,66,67,68,69,70. Neutralizing antibodies against the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma variants were induced by vaccinating participants with single dose of replication-deficient chimpanzee adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1) nCoV-19 vaccine and boosting with a mRNA vaccine BNT162b271. In reverse, heterologous boosting with Ad26.COV2.S after BNT162b2 prime vaccination can also induce durable humoral and cellular immune responses72. An inactivated vaccine plus a recombinant adenovirus vectored vaccine or a recombinant protein subunit vaccine or a mRNA vaccine are additional heterologous vaccine regimens73,74,75,76,77. For example, initial vaccination with two doses of CoronaVac followed by heterologous boosting with the Ad5-nCoV induced significantly higher neutralizing antibody levels against the index virus and the Delta variant than did homologous boosting (5.9-fold and 6.7-fold, respectively)73. Cross-neutralizing antibody titers to the Delta or Omicron BA.4/5 variant elicited by aerosolized Ad5-nCoV booster vaccine is 18.1–24 or 7.88 times higher than that elicited by homologous booster vaccine74,78. Moreover, inhalation of aerosolized Ad5-nCoV elicited IgA and resident memory B and T cells around the mucosal area, which provided an effective antiviral barrier at respiratory tracks74.
Another approach to combat the potential immune escape of SARS-CoV-2 variants is to design variant-specific booster vaccines (Table 2). Apart from one mRNA vaccine targeting both the index virus and the Omicron BA.1 variant from BioNTech was recently issued emergency use listing by WHO, bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (mRNA-1273.222 and Omicron BA.4/5 bivalent) from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech targeting SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5 in addition to index virus have been authorized for emergency use as a booster dose by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Neutralizing BA.4/5 titers increase by more than 4- and 2.6-fold respectively after booster dose compared with their parental, monovalent vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b279. Different neutralizing performance may due to primary doses and the interval time between booster injection and bleeding. Immuno-bridging trial of these bivalent vaccines is recommended to further access their protective efficacy against the same subvariant. Heterologous boosting with Beta adjuvanted vaccine MVB.1.351 from Sanofi-GSK resulted in at least 1.5-fold higher antibody responses against index SARS-CoV-2, Beta, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 variants than boosting with a homologous BNT162b2 vaccine or a recombinant protein vaccine based on the original strain (NCT05124171)80. Omicron-specific inactivated vaccine candidates from China National Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd. (Sinopharm) and Sinovac Biotech Ltd. were also approved for clinical studies (NCT05374954 and NCT05381350) among adults who have received two or three doses of COVID-19 wild-type inactivated vaccines.
Other variant-updated candidate vaccines have entered different phases of clinical trials. A phase 3 clinical study has been activated to test the safety and immunogenicity of a two booster doses of the recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine (NVX-CoV2373 for prototype plus NVX-CoV2515 for the Omicron variant) from Novavax (NCT05372588). SCTV01C, which is designed based on the extracellular domain of trimeric S of the Alpha and Beta variants, is found to have cross-neutralizing activities against not only the Alpha and Beta variants but twelve other variants81. An updated COVID-19 Alpha/Beta/Delta/Omicron variants S-trimer vaccine named SCTV01E from the Sinocelltech Ltd. elicits 1.4-fold higher neutralizing titers against Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 than SCTV01C in a phase 3 clinical trial study (NCT05308576, NCT05323461). Another protein subunit bivalent vaccine V-01-351/V-01D produced by Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc. comprises two variant-targeted antigens (V-01-351 for the Beta variant and V-01D for the Delta variant). This vaccine candidate showed higher neutralizing antibody titers against the Omicron variant as a booster dose compared with monovalent prototype or variant reference vaccines (NCT05273528)82.
Protein subunit vaccines are widely promoted because of their simple formulation. Monomeric, dimeric, and trimeric RBD subunit vaccines appear to be immunogenic and well-tolerated, but their efficacy to SARS-CoV-2 variants is found dissatisfactory83,84,85,86. Another novel method by which antigens elicit cross-protective antibodies assembles key immunogens from different SARS-CoV-2 strains into a single protein subunit. Chimeric antigen vaccine candidates that contain either prototype-Beta or Delta-Omicron RBD dimer were designed (Fig. 3a)87. Both chimeric protein subunit vaccines elicited greater breadth in the neutralizing activities against SARS-CoV-2 variants than homotypic prototype dimer or variant-specific dimer87. A vaccine named NVSI-06-08 (annotated as mul-tri-RBD in Fig. 3a) containing a mutation-integrated trimeric form of RBDs was generated88. The hybrid immunogen formed by prototype, Beta, and Kappa RBDs induced significantly higher titers of neutralizing antibody responses against the Beta and Delta variants than a homotrimer constructed from the prototype strain alone88.
The idea of chimeric immunogen construction can also be applied to the complete spike ectodomain. A bivalent vaccine candidate (prototypic STFK plus STFK1628x) can elicit high titers of broad-spectrum antibodies against the majority of the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants89. STFK1628x (annotated as chimeric S in Fig. 3b) is a monomeric spike ectodomain protein that harbors several mutations gathered from different variants using inter-lineage chimera and mutation patch strategies: B.1.620-derived NTD and Gamma-derived RBD-S2, with RBD additionally patched by mutation points from the Delta variant89. Recently, a chimeric immunogen called Delta RBD-Omicron was constructed by inserting the Delta variant RBD upstream of Omicron RBD in an Omicron spike skeleton (with furin cleavage site mutation) (Fig. 3b)90. Compared to mice immunized with Omicron Spike mRNA, the neutralizing antibody titers elicited by this immunogen were significantly higher against the Delta variant and similar to the Omicron variants, including BA.1, BA.2, and R346K mutation90.
These designs provide a complementary approach to broaden the cross-variants antigenic coverage. Ideas such as these can be applied to develop universal vaccines against the Sarbecovirus subgenus. For example, the mRNA sequences of chimeric spikes that encode the NTD, RBD, and S2 domains from SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and bat CoV were gathered in different combinations (Fig. 3c)91. These mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccines containing chimeric spikes induced high levels of broad-neutralizing antibodies (BnAbs) against several Sarbecovirus strains.
Protein nanoparticle antigens
Chimeric antigens do provide cross-reactive protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, some antigens are too small to raise robust immune responses, novel techniques need be applied to ensure that protein subunits are capable of being captured and presented by the host immune system. Nanoparticles with protein antigens embedded on the surface facilitate drainage to lymph nodes and enhance the possibility they will be taken up by antigen-presenting cells, leading to a more robust neutralization response and higher cross-reactive antibody protection compared with the antigen alone92,93,94,95. Self-assembling nanoparticles together with immunogenic epitopes (RBD or full-length S protein or their modified versions) elicited long-lasting antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 and its VOCs, and with persistent memory B cells96,97,98,99. NVX-CoV2373 is a recombinant nanoparticle vaccine that is composed of trimeric S and Matrix-MTM adjuvant. Two doses of NVX-CoV2373 can elicit immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Beta variants100,101,102. Joyce et al. developed a spike ferritin nanoparticle (SpFN) vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 using the S sequence of index virus. The adjuvanted vaccine was confirmed to induce a Th1-biased cellular response and elicited neutralizing antibodies against original SARS-CoV-2, Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta variants in nonhuman primates99. It has completed its phase 1 clinical trial at the end of December, 2021 (NCT04784767).
There are many technological breakthroughs in antigen-nanoparticle construction (Fig. 4). The plug-and-play platform, in which protein antigens and nanoparticle scaffolds can be produced simultaneously but independently, has been widely used as a versatile product to improve the inefficiencies in protein subunit vaccine production. Aquifex aeolicus lumazine synthase (LuS) is chosen as a nanoparticle scaffold in SpyCatcher/SpyTag antigen conjugation system to stimulate particularly potent neutralizing responses92. Antigen RBD can be presented in dimeric form automatically via fusing with a Fc tag103,104. The FNP-Fc-RBDOmicron protects mice from infections by the BA.1 and BA.2 variants, offering great potentials to generate vaccines targeting other emerging variants103. For site-specific integration of antigen proteins to ferritin nanoparticles, Saunders et al. choose Sortase A reaction and found that this SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based nanoparticle vaccine candidate elicited high titers of cross-neutralizing antibodies against bat coronaviruses, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 (including the Alpha, Beta and Gamma variants) in macaques105. In addition, SpyTag003/SpyCatcher003, an updated version of SpyTag/SpyCatcher system that overcomes the symmetry mismatch problem, is more thermostable and immunogenic and has been engineered for presenting RBDs on the surface through covalent isopeptide bonds106,107.
Efforts are not merely limited to generating larger immunogens. Research groups are evaluating various combinations that multivalently display the antigens on a single nanoparticle surface, which paves the way for developing pan-sarbecovirus and pan-betacoronavirus vaccines (Fig. 4)108,109,110,111,112,113. For example, mosaic-8 RBD nanoparticles made by Cohen et al. provide potential strategies to protect against emerging zoonotic coronaviruses and Sarbecoviruses108,109. The highly conserved heptad repeat (HR) region was incorporated into a nanoparticle vaccine candidate. RBD and HR fused with SpyTag were expressed and purified separately and were then covalently conjugated to Helicobacter pylori ferritin at a 7:3 ratio (ST-RBD to ST-HR), and the construct was found to reduce viral load in the lungs after SARS-CoV-2 challenge110. More importantly, neutralizing antibodies induced by RBD-HR nanoparticles contributed to cross-protective immunity against other coronaviruses110. Similarly, a bivalent nanoparticle vaccine candidate constructed by Yuan et al. via displaying the RBDs of the D614G and Beta variants onto ferritin nanoparticle can elicit cross-neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants in rhesus macaques after three doses of infection111. Based on a computationally designed, symmetrical icosahedral I53-50 system, Walls et al. constructed a nanoparticle containing multivalent RBD epitopes112. Trimeric I53-50A and pentameric I53-50B constituted this system and RBDs were connected to multiple I53-50A using linkers comprising 8, 12 or 16 glycine and serine residues, ensuring a flexible spatial extension on the nanoparticle surface112. Pseudovirus and serum neutralization assay results showed that it elicited a 10-fold higher neutralizing antibody titer that recognized multiple RBD regions at very low injection doses compared to the one using a prefusion-stabilized S112. They further designed an I53-50A trimer-based RBD cocktail using RBDs from SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and two bat coronaviruses113. This multivalent RBD vaccine protected mice from a heterotypic Sarbecovirus challenge113.
Conserved neutralizing epitopes
Progress in the isolation of broadly neutralizing antibodies among coronaviruses also provides an innovative approach in vaccine design. These antibodies target multiple conserved neutralizing epitopes in spike, especially S1-RBD and S2 regions. Although S1 in S is antigenically important and the S1-ACE2 interaction is crucial for viral entry, its high mutation rate contributes to viral escape from antibody neutralization114,115,116,117,118. S2, the stem region of the S homotrimer, is more conserved than S1 in terms of sequence and structure, which offers a novel path for universal COVID-19 vaccine design (Fig. 5a)119. Universal vaccine studies of influenza viruses have verified the effectiveness of antibodies elicited by the conserved stalk region of the surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin in inhibiting viral entry120,121. The latest study suggests that sera from SARS-CoV-2 S2 immunized mice can broadly neutralize different human and animal CoVs as well as ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and some VOCs122.
However, the coronavirus spike protein is covered by numerous N-linked glycans controlling protein correct folding123. Similar to SARS-CoV, the S2 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 is more decorated by N-linked glycan shielding than the S110, which results in less accessibility for immune recognition and, therefore, low immunogenicity124. Besides, conformational changes around fusion peptide that is initiated by S1 cap removal are needed for mAb binding125. Thus, using conserved epitopes of the S2 subunit as potential targets in peptide-based universal vaccine development is a trade-off between breadth and efficacy.
Reported neutralizing antibodies targeting the S2 subunit of coronaviruses can be divided into two groups according to the hosts they were isolated from: mice origin, such as B6, B10 and 3A3, and patient origin, such as CC40.8, S2P6 and CV3-25126,127,128,129,130,131,132. These mAbs together cover distinct epitopes of the S2 subunit (Fig. 5b). The stalk region is the main target for S2-specific mAbs. In one recent study, Zhou et al. isolated a BnAb named CC40.8 from a SARS-CoV-2 convalescent127. CC40.8 exhibited effective neutralizing activities against SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and other Betacoronaviruses. Furthermore, CC40.8 also neutralize the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta variants, which is a consequence of a highly conserved 25-residue peptide within the S2 stem helix127. CC40.8 around the stalk region of S2 produces a high atom density that may hinder protein refolding from the pre- to post-fusion state, and thus block viral entry. The binding motifs of B6, S2P6 and CV3-25 mAb overlap with the epitopes of CC40.8126,128,129. In addition, Dacon et al. identified several mAbs (named COV44) binding to the fusion peptide region of the S2 subunit which is located immediately adjacent to the S2’ cleavage site and is highly conserved among four coronavirus genera125. The 3A3 mAb binds the apex of the S2 domain which is distal to the viral envelope and the binding is influenced by the RBD position131.
Utilization of these conserved neutralizing epitopes discovered in S2 represents opportunities for universal vaccine development. The broadly neutralizing peptide P4, which is located at the stalk region of S2, is conserved among BatCoV-RaTG13, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and its variants.132. Sera from mice immunized with the purified trimeric peptide P4 effectively neutralized SARS-CoV-2 S-pseudovirus, indicating its potential value as a universal vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2132. Some other broad-spectrum neutralizing epitopes, including S2’ cleavage site and the apex of the S2 domain, also deserve further exploration as broad-spectrum vaccine targets.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, a great many groups have conducted rapid vaccine studies. The experience accumulated from vaccine studies for coronavirus strains such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV support the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Unlike most vaccines that require more than ten years to launch, accelerated production and delivery of SARS-CoV-2, to some extent, help reduce the mortality rate. However, new variants with uncertain evolutionary directions are constantly reported, which is directly linked to unpredictable epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 and thus hinders the progress of terminating the global pandemic. We suggest to expedite regulatory approval to develop and produce pan-SARS-CoV-2 or pan-betacoronavirus. Councils like the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation (CEPI) have announced to provide more fundings on pan-betacoronavirus vaccine creation. More vaccine manufacture groups are turning their sights on emerging variants or vaccines designs that can provide broader protection.
In this review, we speculate that the limited development of universal SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is highly related to frequent mutations that occur in the SARS-CoV-2 genome and the resulting structural reshaping of major epitopes. Four advances from distinct fields that widen neutralizing antibody protection against variants were summarized, including heterologous prime-boost vaccination regimens, construction of chimeric immunogens, design of protein nanoparticle antigens, and utilization of the conserved neutralizing epitopes (Fig. 6). Among all the approaches mentioned above, heterologous prime-boost regimen is a ready-to-use but passive or temporal hysteresis method in response to variants. That is to say, only when new variants occur, variant-specific vaccines will be produced. By comparison, chimeric antigen constructions and antigen presented by nanoparticles show superiority in combating emerging variants by assembling different immunogens or conserved neutralizing epitopes into a single particle. The main technique used in these two methods is purification of recombinant protein subunits, which enables large-scale production and, at the same time, emphasizes the importance of building a favorable protein expression system. Although less sensitive in inducing effective neutralizing antibodies as RBD or S does, the neutralizing epitopes discovered in S2 show great exploration value to serve as targets for universal vaccines, which has been proven to be conserved among coronaviruses or at least within SARS-CoV-2 variants. We highly expect new vaccines from the later three novel approaches could enter clinical trials for further investigation.
This review does not cover all the developments in universal vaccine design of SARS-CoV-2, other novel ideas and updated clinical trial results are reported continually. Universal vaccine design is not restricted to elicitation of neutralizing antibodies, new aspects that can provide broader immune responses, for example, vaccines generating robust cellular responses, are encouraged133,134. Protein subunit vaccines designed based on conserved T-cell epitopes from S, Nucleocapsid (N), and Membrane (M) proteins show high potential value as universal vaccines135,136. Novel adjuvants not listed here offer great help as well100,137,138,139. Furthermore, intramuscular administration of vaccines are less likely to block viral transmission at upper respiratory tracts140. Vaccinees can benefit from the induction of a mucosal immune response (mainly sIgA) in respiratory tracts by a nasal vaccine that mimics the natural infection process141.
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have upgraded from the traditional inactivated to genetically engineered vaccines including protein subunit vaccines, DNA/mRNA vaccines and viral vectored vaccines. They have witnessed the advancements that each generation of vaccines has made, but they still have not accomplished the goal of defeating the COVID-19 pandemic. WHO and other entities have urged that it is critically important to proceed with the development of pan-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines or vaccines that might stimulate BnAbs against multiple coronaviruses in human bodies. Work in universal vaccine development should also be extended to other infectious diseases that may pose pandemic threats. If we prepare in advance, the production time for effective vaccines will be reduced and more lives will be saved.
Data sharing is not applicable to this review since no data was generated or analyzed.
Zhu, N. et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727–733 (2020).
Wu, F. et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579, 265–269 (2020).
Cui, J., Li, F. & Shi, Z. L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 181–192 (2019).
Drosten, C. et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1967–1976 (2003).
Ksiazek, T. G. et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1953–1966 (2003).
Lv, H. et al. Cross-reactive antibody response between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infections. Cell Rep. 31, 107725 (2020).
Yang, R. et al. Lack of antibody-mediated cross-protection between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infections. EBioMedicine 58, 102890 (2020).
Zaki, A. M., van Boheemen, S., Bestebroer, T. M., Osterhaus, A. D. & Fouchier, R. A. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1814–1820 (2012).
Walls, A. C. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimer. Nature 531, 114–117 (2016).
Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 183, 1735 (2020).
Ke, Z. et al. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature 588, 498–502 (2020).
Qi, H., Liu, B., Wang, X. & Zhang, L. The humoral response and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Immunol. 23, 1008–1020 (2022).
Piccoli, L. et al. Mapping neutralizing and immunodominant sites on the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain by structure-guided high-resolution serology. Cell 183, 1024–1042.e1021 (2020).
Zost, S. J. et al. Potently neutralizing and protective human antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Nature 584, 443–449 (2020).
Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020).
Coutard, B. et al. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antivir. Res. 176, 104742 (2020).
Johnson, B. A. et al. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature 591, 293–299 (2021).
Turonova, B. et al. In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges. Science 370, 203–208 (2020).
Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280.e278 (2020).
Garcia-Beltran, W. F. et al. Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity. Cell 184, 2523 (2021).
Cele, S. et al. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature 602, 654–656 (2022).
Hoffmann, M. et al. The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: Implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cell 185, 447–456.e411 (2022).
Andrews, N. et al. Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1532–1546 (2022).
Cao, Y. et al. Imprinted SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity induces convergent Omicron RBD evolution. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.15.507787v3 (2022).
Qu, P. et al. Distinct neutralizing antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BQ.1, BQ.1.1, BA.4.6, BF.7 and BA.2.75.2. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.19.512891v1 (2022).
Kim, D. et al. The Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 Transcriptome. Cell 181, 914–921.e910 (2020).
de Wilde, A. H., Snijder, E. J., Kikkert, M. & van Hemert, M. J. Host factors in coronavirus replication. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 419, 1–42 (2018).
Venkataraman, S., Prasad, B. & Selvarajan, R. RNA dependent RNA polymerases: insights from structure, function and evolution. Viruses-Basel 10, 76 (2018).
Robson, F. et al. Coronavirus RNA proofreading: molecular basis and therapeutic targeting. Mol. Cell 80, 1136–1138 (2020).
Banerjee, A., Mossman, K. & Grandvaux, N. Molecular determinants of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Trends Microbiol. 29, 871–873 (2021).
Domingo, E., Garcia-Crespo, C., Lobo-Vega, R. & Perales, C. Mutation rates, mutation frequencies, and proofreading-repair activities in RNA virus genetics. Viruses 13, 1882 (2021).
Galloway, S. E. et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 Lineage - United States, December 29, 2020-January 12, 2021. Morbidity Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 70, 95–99 (2021).
Davies, N. G. et al. Increased mortality in community-tested cases of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7. Nature 593, 270–274 (2021).
Zhou, D. et al. Evidence of escape of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.351 from natural and vaccine-induced sera. Cell 184, 2348–2361.e2346 (2021).
Faria, N. R. et al. Genomics and epidemiology of the P.1 SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus, Brazil. Science 372, 815–821 (2021).
Wang, P. et al. Increased resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variant P.1 to antibody neutralization. Cell Host Microbe 29, 747–751.e744 (2021).
Singh, J., Rahman, S. A., Ehtesham, N. Z., Hira, S. & Hasnain, S. E. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are emerging in India. Nat. Med. 27, 1131–1133 (2021).
Zhang, J. et al. Membrane fusion and immune evasion by the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. Science 374, 1353–1360 (2021).
Callaway, E. Heavily mutated Omicron variant puts scientists on alert. Nature 600, 21–21 (2021).
Dyer, O. Covid-19: omicron is causing more infections but fewer hospital admissions than delta, South African data show. Brit. Med. J. 375, n3104 (2021).
Liu, Z. et al. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations that attenuate monoclonal and serum antibody neutralization. Cell Host Microbe 29, 477–488.e474 (2021).
Barrett, A. D. T. et al. The rapid progress in COVID vaccine development and implementation. NPJ Vaccines 7, 20 (2022).
Wibmer, C. K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 escapes neutralization by South African COVID-19 donor plasma. Nat. Med. 27, 622–625 (2021).
Wang, P. et al. Antibody resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7. Nature 593, 130–135 (2021).
Cai, Y. et al. Structural basis for enhanced infectivity and immune evasion of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Science 373, 642–648 (2021).
Cao, Y. et al. Omicron escapes the majority of existing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. Nature 602, 657–663 (2022).
Weisblum, Y. et al. Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. Elife 9, e61312 (2020).
Viana, R. et al. Rapid epidemic expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in southern Africa. Nature 603, 679–686 (2022).
Rossler, A., Riepler, L., Bante, D., von Laer, D. & Kimpel, J. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant neutralization in serum from vaccinated and convalescent persons. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 698–700 (2022).
Planas, D. et al. Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature 602, 671–675 (2022).
Liu, L. et al. Striking antibody evasion manifested by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 602, 676–681 (2022).
Lu, L. et al. Neutralization of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron Variant by Sera From BNT162b2 or CoronaVac Vaccine Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 75, e822–e826 (2022).
Cameroni, E. et al. Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift. Nature 602, 664–670 (2022).
Modes, M. E. et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes among adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during periods of B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant predominance - One Hospital, California, July 15-September 23, 2021, and December 21, 2021-January 27, 2022. Morbidity Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 71, 217–223 (2022).
Cui, Z. et al. Structural and functional characterizations of infectivity and immune evasion of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Cell 185, 860–871.e813 (2022).
Cao, Y. et al. Characterization of the enhanced infectivity and antibody evasion of Omicron BA.2.75. Cell Host Microbe 30, 1527–1539.e1525 (2022).
Maxmen, A. Are new Omicron subvariants a threat? Here’s how scientists are keeping watch. Nature 604, 605–606 (2022).
Cao, Y. et al. BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection. Nature 608, 593–602 (2022).
Hachmann, N. P. et al. Neutralization escape by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 86–88 (2022).
Wang, Q. et al. Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariant BA.4.6 to antibody neutralisation. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, 1666–1668 (2022).
Sheward, D. J. et al. Omicron sublineage BA.2.75.2 exhibits extensive escape from neutralising antibodies. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, 1538–1540 (2022).
Jian, F. et al. Further humoral immunity evasion of emerging SARS-CoV-2 BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, 1535–1537 (2022).
Crawford, K. H. D. et al. Dynamics of neutralizing antibody titers in the months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. J. Infect. Dis. 223, 197–205 (2021).
Townsend, J. P., Hassler, H. B., Sah, P., Galvani, A. P. & Dornburg, A. The durability of natural infection and vaccine-induced immunity against future infection by SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2204336119 (2022).
Hillus, D. et al. Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of homologous and heterologous prime-boost immunisation with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 9, 1255–1265 (2021).
Borobia, A. M. et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 booster in ChAdOx1-S-primed participants (CombiVacS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 398, 121–130 (2021).
Schmidt, T. et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/mRNA vaccination. Nat. Med. 27, 1530–1535 (2021).
Liu, X. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous versus homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Com-COV): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 398, 856–869 (2021).
Suntronwong, N. et al. Effects of boosted mRNA and adenoviral-vectored vaccines on immune responses to omicron BA.1 and BA.2 following the heterologous CoronaVac/AZD1222 vaccination. J. Med. Virol. 94, 5713–5722 (2022).
Accorsi, E. K. et al. Effectiveness of homologous and heterologous Covid-19 boosters against Omicron. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 2433–2435 (2022).
Barros-Martins, J. et al. Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous and homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination. Nat. Med. 27, 1525–1529 (2021).
Tan, C. S. et al. Durability of heterologous and homologous COVID-19 vaccine boosts. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2226335 (2022).
Li, J. et al. Heterologous AD5-nCOV plus CoronaVac versus homologous CoronaVac vaccination: a randomized phase 4 trial. Nat. Med. 28, 401–409 (2022).
Li, J. X. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunisation with an orally administered aerosolised Ad5-nCoV after two-dose priming with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, open-label, single-centre trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 10, 739–748 (2022).
Zhao, X. et al. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 neutralization from inactivated and ZF2001 vaccines. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 277–280 (2022).
Perez-Then, E. et al. Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants following heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 booster vaccination. Nat. Med. 28, 481–485 (2022).
Liu, X. et al. Safety and superior immunogenicity of heterologous boosting with an RBD-based SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults. Cell Res. 32, 777–780 (2022).
Zhong, J. et al. Heterologous booster with inhaled adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccine generated more neutralizing antibodies against different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 11, 2689–2697 (2022).
Scheaffer, S. M. et al. Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines increase breadth of neutralization and protect against the BA.5 Omicron variant in mice. Nat. Med. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02092-8.
Launay, O. et al. Immunogenicity and safety of beta-adjuvanted recombinant booster vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 374–376 (2022).
Wang, R. et al. A bivalent COVID-19 vaccine based on alpha and beta variants elicits potent and broad immune responses in mice against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Vaccines-Basel 10, 702 (2022).
Zhang, Z. et al. A heterologous V-01 or VAriant-matched Bivalent V-01D-351 booster following primary series of inactivated vaccine enhances the neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron strains. J. Clin. Med. 11, 4164 (2022).
Yang, J. et al. A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity. Nature 586, 572–577 (2020).
Yang, S. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tandem-repeat dimeric RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) against COVID-19 in adults: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, 1107–1119 (2021).
Routhu, N. K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 RBD trimer protein adjuvanted with Alum-3M-052 protects from SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune pathology in the lung. Nat. Commun. 12, 3587 (2021).
Zhao, X. et al. Effects of a prolonged booster interval on neutralization of omicron variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 894–896 (2022).
Xu, K. et al. Protective prototype-Beta and Delta-Omicron chimeric RBD-dimer vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Cell 185, 2265–2278.e2214 (2022).
Liang, Y. et al. Design of a mutation-integrated trimeric RBD with broad protection against SARS-CoV-2. Cell Discov. 8, 17 (2022).
Wu, Y. et al. Lineage-mosaic and mutation-patched spike proteins for broad-spectrum COVID-19 vaccine. Cell Host Microbe 30, 1–13 (2022).
Hu, Q. et al. Chimeric mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine induces protective immunity against Omicron and Delta variants. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 30, 465–476 (2022).
Martinez, D. R. et al. Chimeric spike mRNA vaccines protect against Sarbecovirus challenge in mice. Science 373, 991–998 (2021).
Zhang, B. et al. A platform incorporating trimeric antigens into self-assembling nanoparticles reveals SARS-CoV-2-spike nanoparticles to elicit substantially higher neutralizing responses than spike alone. Sci. Rep. 10, 18149 (2020).
Kanekiyo, M. et al. Self-assembling influenza nanoparticle vaccines elicit broadly neutralizing H1N1 antibodies. Nature 499, 102–106 (2013).
Sliepen, K. et al. Presenting native-like HIV-1 envelope trimers on ferritin nanoparticles improves their immunogenicity. Retrovirology 12, 82 (2015).
Gomes, A. C., Mohsen, M. & Bachmann, M. F. Harnessing nanoparticles for immunomodulation and vaccines. Vaccines 5, 6 (2017).
Wang, W., Huang, B., Zhu, Y., Tan, W. & Zhu, M. Ferritin nanoparticle-based SARS-CoV-2 RBD vaccine induces a persistent antibody response and long-term memory in mice. Cell Mol. Immunol. 18, 749–751 (2021).
Sun, W. et al. The self-assembled nanoparticle-based trimeric RBD mRNA vaccine elicits robust and durable protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in mice. Signal Transduct. Tar. 6, 340 (2021).
Powell, A. E. et al. A single immunization with spike-functionalized ferritin vaccines elicits neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in mice. Acs Cent. Sci. 7, 183–199 (2021).
Joyce, M. G. et al. A SARS-CoV-2 ferritin nanoparticle vaccine elicits protective immune responses in nonhuman primates. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabi5735 (2022).
Keech, C. et al. Phase 1-2 trial of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein nanoparticle vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2320–2332 (2020).
Heath, P. T. et al. Safety and efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 1172–1183 (2021).
Dunkle, L. M. et al. Efficacy and safety of NVX-CoV2373 in adults in the United States and Mexico. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 531–543 (2022).
Tai, W. et al. Development of a ferritin-based nanoparticle vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Signal Transduct. Tar. 7, 173 (2022).
Sun, S. et al. Recombinant vaccine containing an RBD-Fc fusion induced protection against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman primates and mice. Cell Mol. Immunol. 18, 1070–1073 (2021).
Saunders, K. O. et al. Neutralizing antibody vaccine for pandemic and pre-emergent coronaviruses. Nature 594, 553–559 (2021).
Tan, T. K. et al. A COVID-19 vaccine candidate using SpyCatcher multimerization of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain induces potent neutralising antibody responses. Nat. Commun. 12, 542 (2021).
Rahikainen, R. et al. Overcoming symmetry mismatch in vaccine nanoassembly through spontaneous amidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 321–330 (2021).
Cohen, A. A. et al. Mosaic nanoparticles elicit cross-reactive immune responses to zoonotic coronaviruses in mice. Science 371, 735–741 (2021).
Cohen, A. A. et al. Mosaic RBD nanoparticles protect against challenge by diverse sarbecoviruses in animal models. Science 377, eabq0839 (2022).
Ma, X. et al. Nanoparticle vaccines based on the receptor binding domain (RBD) and heptad repeat (HR) of SARS-CoV-2 elicit robust protective immune responses. Immunity 53, 1315–1330.e1319 (2020).
Yuan, Y. et al. A bivalent nanoparticle vaccine exhibits potent cross-protection against the variants of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Rep. 38, 110256 (2022).
Walls, A. C. et al. Elicitation of potent neutralizing antibody responses by designed protein nanoparticle vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. Cell 183, 1367–1382.e1317 (2020).
Walls, A. C. et al. Elicitation of broadly protective sarbecovirus immunity by receptor-binding domain nanoparticle vaccines. Cell 184, 5432–5447.e5416 (2021).
Rogers, T. F. et al. Isolation of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and protection from disease in a small animal model. Science 369, 956–963 (2020).
Alsoussi, W. B. et al. A potently neutralizing antibody protects mice against SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Immunol. 205, 915–922 (2020).
Wang, Z. et al. mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants. Nature 592, 616–622 (2021).
Yuan, M. et al. Structural basis of a shared antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Science 369, 1119–1123 (2020).
Yuan, M. et al. Structural and functional ramifications of antigenic drift in recent SARS-CoV-2 variants. Science 373, 818–823 (2021).
Shah, P., Canziani, G. A., Carter, E. P. & Chaiken, I. The case for S2: the potential benefits of the S2 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as an immunogen in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Immunol. 12, 637651 (2021).
Dreyfus, C., Ekiert, D. C. & Wilson, I. A. Structure of a classical broadly neutralizing stem antibody in complex with a pandemic H2 influenza virus hemagglutinin. J. Virol. 87, 7149–7154 (2013).
Nachbagauer, R. et al. A chimeric hemagglutinin-based universal influenza virus vaccine approach induces broad and long-lasting immunity in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase I trial. Nat. Med. 27, 106–114 (2021).
Ng, K. W. et al. SARS-CoV-2 S2-targeted vaccination elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabn3715 (2022).
Walls, A. C. et al. Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 899–905 (2016).
Watanabe, Y., Allen, J. D., Wrapp, D., McLellan, J. S. & Crispin, M. Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Science 369, 330–333 (2020).
Dacon, C. et al. Broadly neutralizing antibodies target the coronavirus fusion peptide. Science 377, 728–735 (2022).
Sauer, M. M. et al. Structural basis for broad coronavirus neutralization. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 478–486 (2021).
Zhou, P. et al. A human antibody reveals a conserved site on beta-coronavirus spike proteins and confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabi9215 (2022).
Pinto, D. et al. Broad betacoronavirus neutralization by a stem helix-specific human antibody. Science 373, 1109–1115 (2021).
Hurlburt, N. K. et al. Structural definition of a pan-sarbecovirus neutralizing epitope on the spike S2 subunit. Commun. Biol. 5, 342 (2022).
Wang, C. et al. A conserved immunogenic and vulnerable site on the coronavirus spike protein delineated by cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies. Nat. Commun. 12, 1715 (2021).
Huang, Y. et al. Identification of a conserved neutralizing epitope present on spike proteins from all highly pathogenic coronaviruses. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.31.428824v2 (2021).
Li, T. et al. A novel linear and broadly neutralizing peptide in the SARS-CoV-2 S2 protein for universal vaccine development. Cell Mol. Immunol. 18, 2563–2565 (2021).
Liu, J. et al. Vaccines elicit highly conserved cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Nature 603, 493–496 (2022).
Keeton, R. et al. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike cross-recognize Omicron. Nature 603, 488–492 (2022).
Coleon, S. et al. Design, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a pan-sarbecovirus dendritic-cell targeting vaccine. EBioMedicine 80, 104062 (2022).
Wang, S. et al. A novel RBD-protein/peptide vaccine elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies and protects mice and macaques against SARS-CoV-2. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 11, 2724–2734 (2022).
Bekele, Y., Sui, Y. & Berzofsky, J. A. IL-7 in SARS-CoV-2 infection and as a potential vaccine adjuvant. Front. Immunol. 12, 737406 (2021).
Zhang, L. et al. A proof of concept for neutralizing antibody-guided vaccine design against SARS-CoV-2. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwab053 (2021).
Liu, Z. et al. A novel STING agonist-adjuvanted pan-sarbecovirus vaccine elicits potent and durable neutralizing antibody and T cell responses in mice, rabbits and NHPs. Cell Res. 32, 269–287 (2022).
Krammer, F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature 586, 516–527 (2020).
Tiboni, M., Casettari, L. & Illum, L. Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? Int. J. Pharm. 603, 120686 (2021).
This work was partially supported by the grant from the Defense Industrial Technology Development Program (JCKY2020802B001). We would like to grateful thanks to Dr. Lihua Hou, Dr. Jun Zhang, and Dr. Yilong Yang for their useful discussion.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, F., Zai, X., Zhang, Z. et al. Challenges and developments in universal vaccine design against SARS-CoV-2 variants. npj Vaccines 7, 167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-022-00597-4
This article is cited by
Scientific Reports (2023)