npj Vaccines

Article
Open access
Published: 20 December 2021

Preclinical evaluation of a candidate naked plasmid DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2

npj Vaccines volume 6, Article number: 156 (2021) Cite this article

5355 Accesses
15 Citations
6 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

New generation plasmid DNA vaccines may be a safe, fast and simple emergency vaccine platform for preparedness against emerging viral pathogens. Applying platform optimization strategies, we tested the pre-clinical immunogenicity and protective effect of a candidate DNA plasmid vaccine specific for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The DNA vaccine induced spike-specific binding IgG and neutralizing antibodies in mice, rabbits, and rhesus macaques together with robust Th1 dominant cellular responses in small animals. Intradermal and intramuscular needle-free administration of the DNA vaccine yielded comparable immune responses. In a vaccination-challenge study of rhesus macaques, the vaccine demonstrated protection from viral replication in the lungs following intranasal and intratracheal inoculation with SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, the candidate plasmid DNA vaccine encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is immunogenic in different models and confers protection against lung infection in nonhuman primates. Further evaluation of this DNA vaccine candidate in clinical trials is warranted.

Similar content being viewed by others

Vaccination impairs de novo immune response to omicron breakthrough infection, a precondition for the original antigenic sin

Article Open access 10 April 2024

Age-specific nasal epithelial responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection

Article Open access 15 April 2024

A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments

Article 22 December 2020

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan, China around December 2019. It has since caused a global pandemic that has to date, resulted in over 160 million confirmed infections and 3.5 million deaths (WHO COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update; 1 June 2021), although the numbers are likely underestimated¹. Developing safe and effective vaccines and testing new vaccine platforms to control the pandemic are paramount.

The simplicity and stability of plasmid DNA vaccines make it an attractive immunization platform for emerging viral threats. The DNA vaccines can be designed and produced quickly once the genetic sequence is known and adapted rapidly to new emerging viral variants of concern. Clinically, the DNA vaccine modality is generally regarded as safe and is immunogenic in many different mammalian species including man^2,3. Inducing both broad antibody and cellular immune responses, DNA vaccines have the potential to reduce both infection and disease. Intrinsically, the DNA vaccines are stable and can be freeze-dried, allowing for long-term storage at ambient temperature⁴. The plasmid DNA does not induce vector-specific antibodies, thus permitting multiple booster vaccinations including mixed modality prime-boost strategies⁵.

Historically, first-generation DNA vaccines performed poorly in primates. This was compounded by the application of the platform to complex pathogens where the correlates of protection are undefined and where other traditional vaccines have similarly failed, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, continued platform optimization has seen to the improved performance of DNA vaccines in nonhuman primates and man. For example, a candidate Zika virus DNA vaccine protected rhesus macaques against viremia following Zika virus challenge and induced neutralizing antibody titers >300 when delivered intramuscularly with the needle-free Stratis Device (PharmaJet®)^6,7. A different flavivirus DNA vaccine, targeting West Nile virus, is FDA approved for horses but also induced T cell and neutralizing antibody responses in humans⁸. Furthermore, an influenza trivalent DNA vaccine conferred protection against influenza challenge in a phase 1b clinical trial⁹ and, through cell-mediated immunity, a human papillomavirus DNA vaccine aided the regression of lesions and viral clearance in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-3 patients¹⁰.

Considering the success of mRNA vaccines and DNA delivered by recombinant viruses and the intrinsic advantages and recent improved performances of plasmid DNA vaccines, an evaluation of the plasmid DNA platform is warranted in the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Here we describe the pre-clinical evaluation of a candidate DNA vaccine that targets the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Using platform optimization strategies to improve safety, antigen expression, potency, and immunogenicity, we address shortcomings associated with first-generation DNA vaccines. These optimization strategies include using: (i) a vector that lacks any antibiotic resistance genes¹¹; (ii) an optimally reduced size vector¹²; (iii) vaccine antigen codon optimization¹³; (iv) co-expression of an immune stimulatory Retinoic-acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) agonist that facilitates a type 1 interferon response¹⁴; (v) high yield antibiotic-free production in a current Good Manufacturing Practice process^11,15; and (vi) needle-free jet administration to the skin or muscle¹⁶.

Multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being developed at an unprecedented speed. To ensure thorough evaluation of the safety risks, potential autoimmune or hyper-immune reactions, and enhanced infection and/or disease, for as many different platforms as possible, all vaccines need to be thoroughly assessed for safety and immunogenicity and protection from viral challenge in animal models prior to clinical evaluation. Here we describe the evaluation of the immunogenicity of an optimized DNA plasmid vaccine candidate in mice, rabbits, and nonhuman primates, as well as an assessment of the protective effect in rhesus macaques, the most extensively used model for evaluation of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccine protection.

Results

The DNA vaccine candidate

The DNA vaccine candidate hereafter referred to as pNTC-Spike, expresses an unmodified, wild-type full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein derived from the Wuhan-hu-1 reference strain. The human codon optimized nucleotide sequence was subcloned into the NTC8685-eRNA41H (Fig. 1a), a nano-plasmid eukaryotic expression vector approved for clinical use¹⁷. Considerations for the vector design are described in detail elsewhere¹². Notable features of this vector backbone include: (i) the lack of any antibiotic resistance genes to improve DNA vaccine safety¹⁵; (ii) improved transgene expression over vectors containing antibiotic resistance genes¹⁸; (iii) co-expression of a RIG-I agonist that facilitates a type 1 interferon response and increases DNA vaccine-induced antibody and cellular responses¹⁴; and (iv) a reduced size (3.6 kb). NTC8685-eRNA41H has an established toxicity and bio-distribution profile and a documented history of testing in humans with other vaccine-gene inserts¹⁷. In order to demonstrate expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein encoded by this optimized vector, we generated highly specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the S1- or S2-domain of SARS-CoV-2 using hybridoma technology. Based on a stringent selection procedure, mAbs S1-1047 and S2-1254 were obtained that showed an excellent specificity against their respective target domain and no cross-reactivity against the related spike proteins of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV or any of the four Coronaviruses pathogenic to humans (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine.

Using these mAbs, Western blot analysis of Vero E6 cells transfected with pNTC-Spike confirmed the expression of a full-length spike protein of ~190 kDa with an intact cleavage site, as suggested by the concurrent detection of the S1 and S2 subunits at ~110 kDa and S2 at ~100 kDa (Fig. 1b). The spike protein fragment sizes correspond to that observed by others and reflect the glycosylation of the full-length spike protein and its S1 and S2 subunits with all fragments migrating higher than the predicted 141 kDa, 77 kDa/, and 65 kDa, respectively¹⁹. Additional fragments of <100 kDa may be cleavage products produced by other cellular proteases such as cathepsin B and L, elastase, and trypsin, which have been demonstrated to cleave coronavirus spike proteins^20,21, although this warrants further characterization. The cellular distribution of expressed proteins from pNTC-Spike was visualized with immunofluorescence staining of Vero E6 cells 48 h post-transfection (Fig. 1c). SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 and S2 labeling with mAbs S1-1047 and S2-1254, respectively, showed cytoplasmic distribution for both proteins as reported²².

Immunogenicity in mice

The immunogenicity of the candidate DNA vaccine, pNTC-Spike, was first assessed in CB6F1 mice. These filial generation hybrid mice are a cross between C57BL/6 males and BALB/c females. With the parental strains each biased towards Th1 and Th2 responses, respectively, the cross confers a balanced Th1/Th2 responsiveness in the CB6F1 mice. The animals were immunized with either pNTC-Spike, in 10 µg (N = 5) or 50 µg (N = 5) doses, or vector control in a 50 µg dose (N = 5) without adjuvant at weeks 0, 2, and 4 by intradermal injection (Fig. 2a). Both 10 µg and 50 µg doses of pNTC-Spike elicited IgG responses specific to the SARS-CoV-2 spike ectodomain and receptor-binding domain (RBD) after the second immunization (week 4), which were further boosted by a subsequent immunization in a dose-dependent manner (week 6) (Fig. 2b). At week 6, the median end-point titer of antibodies specific for the spike ectodomain were 1547 (range: 10–17906) and 9887 (range: 167–27922) for the 10 µg and 50 µg group, respectively. All animals that developed spike- and RBD-specific binding IgG by ELISA also developed neutralizing antibodies as determined at week 6 in a SARS-CoV-2 virus microneutralization assay (Fig. 2c). Neutralizing antibody titers directly correlated with spike binding antibody titers (Spearman r = 0.758, P = 0.015) and RBD binding antibody titers (Spearman r = 0.818, P = 0.006). The limited volume of serum obtained from animals after the first and second immunization precluded an evaluation of neutralizing antibody responses at week 2 and week 4.

Fig. 2: Humoral and cellular immune responses to pNTC-Spike in mice.

For mice immunized with pNTC-Spike, restimulation of splenocytes with the spike and RBD protein induced high levels interferon gamma (IFN-γ), indicative of a T helper (Th) 1 response, and comparatively low levels of interleukin (IL)−5 and IL-17 that represent Th2 and Th17 responses, respectively (Fig. 2c). To confirm the observed Th1 dominance, we measured SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG subclass responses since the proportions of the different subclasses are dictated by the prevailing cytokine environment. IgG2a and IgG2c, which increase in response to the Th1 cytokine IFN-γ, occurred at notably higher titers relative to IgG1, which increases in response to the Th2 cytokine IL-4 (Fig. 2e). Overall, the ratio of IgG2a:IgG1 was 21.3 and the IgG2c:IgG1 ratio 9.2; thus, confirming the Th1 dominant vaccine response induced by the pNTC-Spike.

Immunogenicity and safety in rabbits

The small size of mice precludes the evaluation of needle-free jet administration in this animal model. Therefore, to determine the effect of needle-free administration of the candidate DNA vaccine, we evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of pNTC-Spike in rabbits using either needle-and-syringe injection or needle-free jet-injection administrations to skin or muscle. New Zealand white rabbits (10 weeks old) received three immunizations of 125 µg DNA without adjuvant at weeks 0, 2, and 4 by the intradermal route using needle-and-syringe injection intradermal (N = 3) or the PharmaJet® Tropis ID device (N = 4) or via the intramuscular route using the PharmaJet® Stratis IM device (N = 5; Fig. 3a) in separate experiments. While calibrated for human use, the devices deliver liquid to the skin (Tropis ID) and muscle (Stratis IM) of rabbits as determined empirically using a liquid dye (Supplementary Fig. 3). Overall, needle-free administration of the vaccine via the intradermal and intramuscular route induced comparable binding IgG and neutralizing antibody responses that were higher and more consistent than intradermal injection using needle and syringe (Figs. 3b and 3c).

Fig. 3: Humoral and cellular immune responses to pNTC-spike vaccination in rabbits.

The pNTC-Spike vaccine-induced IgG responses specific to the spike ectodomain and RBD after the first immunization (week 2) and were boosted by subsequent immunizations (Fig. 3b). At week 6, the median spike ectodomain-specific end-point titer were 398 (range: 209–11349), 10975 (range: 4667–15880), and 11956 (range: 8349–15242) for the groups immunized using needle and syringe, needle-free Tropis ID, and needle-free Stratis IM, respectively. Virus-specific neutralizing antibodies were detected after the second immunization and increased following the third immunization reaching median 50% neutralization titers of 88 (range: 13–165), 111 (21–176), and 125 (67–144) at week 6 in the aforementioned groups, respectively (Fig. 3c). Neutralizing antibody titers directly correlated with spike binding antibody titers (Spearman r = 0.886, P < 0.001; Fig. 3d) and RBD binding antibody titers (Spearman r = 0.874, P < 0.001). For animals immunized intramuscularly and by needle-and-syringe, T cell induced immunity was also evaluated. Data for the Tropis ID group are unavailable. Restimulation of splenocytes with the spike and RBD protein induced IFN-γ responses as measured by both IFN-γ ELISPOT and IFN-γ cytokine ELISA (Fig. 3e). In these animals, the smaller RBD protein (234 amino acids) induced a lower IFN-γ response compared to the full-length spike protein (1209 amino acids). In contrast to that observed for antibody responses, the IFN-γ responses were comparable for animals immunized with intradermal needle-and-syringe administration and intramuscular needle-free jet administration.

Vaccine safety was observed in the rabbits that were immunized intramuscularly by monitoring temperature, body weight, clinical signs, and behavior. No cases of death, impending death, or obvious clinical signs were observed in any of the animals. Local site reactions were rare to absent. Only one animal developed slight swelling at the injection site 2 days after the second immunization that resolved 4 days later. All animals continued to gain weight throughout the study, and none suffered acute weight loss following any of the immunizations (Fig. 3f). None of the animals developed a fever (≥40 °C) on the day of immunization or in the days thereafter (Fig. 3g). The studies that evaluated intradermal administration of pNTC-Spike were not specifically designed to monitor safety. Nonetheless, there were no cases of death or impending death. Based on observations during standard care of the animals, there were no obvious clinical signs, and immunizations were well tolerated.

Immunogenicity in rhesus macaques

We next evaluated pNTC-Spike immunogenicity and protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a nonhuman primate model. Rhesus macaques (2–8 years old) were immunized with pNTC-Spike (N = 6) or were untreated sham controls (N = 2). The animals received three immunizations of 2 mg DNA without adjuvant at weeks 0, 2, and 4 by the intradermal route using the needle-free Tropis ID device (Fig. 4a). The immunizations were well tolerated based on daily cage-side observations of the animals during the study period. No adverse reactions at the injection sites were observed.

Fig. 4: Humoral immune responses to pNTC-Spike in nonhuman primates.

The candidate vaccine induced an increase in spike-specific binding IgG antibodies from baseline in all vaccinated animals after the second immunization (week 4; median end-point titer = 7440, range: 1509–13371) that were boosted by a third immunization (week 6; median end-point titer = 10494, range: 5569–16252) (Fig. 4b). One of the vaccinated animals had binding antibodies by ELISA at week 0. We speculate this might reflect the cross-reactivity of other natural primate coronaviruses. The pNTC-Spike vaccine nonetheless increased SARS-CoV-2-specific binding antibodies by ELISA in this animal. The ability of vaccine elicited antibodies to neutralize virus infection was evaluated with a live virus plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Neutralizing antibodies capable of reducing plaque-forming units (PFU) by more than 50% at a serum dilution ≥1:20, were observed in five out of six vaccinated animals after the second immunization (median: PRNT₅₀ = 34, range:10–60), and a 90% reduction (PRNT₉₀) in three out of six vaccinated animals (Fig. 4c). Neutralizing antibody responses were boosted by the third immunization, with all vaccinated animals having developed neutralizing antibodies by week 6 measured as PRNT₅₀ (median: PRNT₅₀ = 92, range: 30–125) and the more stringent PRNT₉₀ (median: PRNT₉₀ = 46, range: 22–68), 2 weeks before virus challenge. Overall, the spike-specific binding IgG titers correlated with the PRTN₅₀ titers (Spearman r = 0.790, P = 0.003; Fig. 4d).

Protective effects of pNTC-Spike plasmid vaccine

At week 8, 4 weeks after the final immunization, all animals were challenged with 1.0 × 10⁵ TCID₅₀ SARS-CoV-2 by the intranasal and intratracheal routes. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was measured in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) and nasal swabs using an RT-PCR specific for subgenomic messenger RNA (sgmRNA), which are viral RNA intermediates believed to represent replicating virus^23,24,25. The sham controls had a median peak of 3.74 log₁₀ sgmRNA copies/mL in BAL (range: 2.5–4.03; Fig. 5a), which is consistent with a 4-5 log₁₀ sgmRNA copies/mL peak observed in other studies conducted at the same facility with the same challenge dose and virus strain^26,27,28. The vaccinated animals had a 2.04 log₁₀ reduction in viral RNA in BAL. In particular, five out of six animals had viral loads below the quantitation limit of the assay (1.69 log₁₀ sgmRNA copies/mL), one animal had a detectable low positive measure of 1.91 log₁₀ sgmRNA copies/mL on one time point, day 4 post-challenge. In nasal swabs, vaccinated animals had a median peak viral load of 3.10 log₁₀ sgmRNA copies/mL (range < 1.69–4.71; Fig. 5b). Varied viral loads measured for the two sham controls (6.41 and <1.69 log₁₀ sgmRNA copies/mL) preclude a direct comparison to vaccinates. However, rhesus macaque sham controls challenged with the same dose and virus strain in the same facility had higher average peak viral loads (5.59–7.00 log₁₀ sgmRNA copies/mL)^23,26,27,28 in nasal swabs compared to the vaccinates in the present study. All vaccinated animals were SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive on the day of challenge (week 8); the anti-spike IgG titers increased the following challenge and was significantly higher 10 days post-challenge (median = 84775, range: 12669–148518) compared to 2 weeks after the third immunization (week 6; median = 10494, range: 5569–16525; P = 0.009) and on the day of challenge (week 8; median = 8314, range: 4598–11950; P = 0.002) (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5: Viral load and anamnestic responses in rhesus macaques following challenge with SARS-CoV-2 by the intranasal and intratracheal route.

Breadth of neutralizing antibody responses

Cross-neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern were determined for pNTC-Spike immunized rabbits and rhesus macaques after three immunizations (Fig. 6). The variants tested depending on the viral isolates available at the facilities where the animal studies were conducted. In rabbits, for all vaccine administration methods, pNTC-spike induced cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies against the Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants in 91.7%, 66.7%, and 91.7% of vaccinated animals, respectively. With the optimized needle-free intradermal and intramuscular administrations, cross-neutralizing antibody responses increased to 100%, 77.7%, and 100%, respectively. Overall, the neutralization titers for the Alpha variant (median: 139, range: 5–136) and Delta variant (median: 108, range: 5–688) did not differ significantly from the early pandemic strain (median: 166, range: 10–275; p > 0.05 for both comparisons). However, the neutralization titers against the Beta variant (median: 27, range: 5–136) were reduced 6.1-fold (p = 0.0001). In rhesus macaques, pNTC-spike induced neutralizing antibodies against the Beta variant in 66.7% of animals; the neutralization titers for the early pandemic strain (median: 92, range: 30–95) and Beta variant (median: 87, range: 10–302) did not differ significantly (p = 0.563).

Fig. 6: SARS-CoV-2 variant cross-neutralizing antibody responses induced by the pNTC-Spike vaccine after three immunizations (week 6).

Discussion

We developed a SARS-CoV-2-specific plasmid DNA vaccine candidate using platform optimization strategies to improve vaccine safety, antigen expression, potency, and immunogenicity. The candidate DNA vaccine is immunogenic in three different animal species, with a relatively small difference between smaller animals and nonhuman primates. The increased potency in nonhuman primates is likely attributed to a combination of improved vector design, optimization of antigen expression, and vaccine delivery through needle-free jet injection. Of note, the vaccine was equally immunogenic following administration, either intradermal or intramuscular, using needle-free jet delivery and were both superior to needle-and-syringe injection intradermal. The safety evaluation of pNTC-Spike in rabbits reiterated the known and established excellent safety profile of DNA vaccines in general.

We evaluated the protective effect of pNTC-Spike in a vaccination-challenge study of nonhuman primates. The macaque monkey is considered a suitable model for studying SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protection^23,29,30. The animal species are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and develops virus-specific humoral and cellular immunity that may confer protection against subsequent infection. Naïve animals develop a systemic infection with high levels of SARS-CoV-2 replication in the upper and lower airways^23,30. The disease course is generally mild and self-limiting, although pathological evidence of pneumonia is observed. Several, including now approved, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have undergone evaluation in nonhuman primates. These include inactivated vaccines (PiCoVacc and BBIBP-CorV)^31,32, viral vectored vaccines (ChAdOx1 and Ad26.COV2.S)^26,33, mRNA vaccines (mRNA1273 and BNT162b2)³⁴, DNA vaccines (INO-4800 and prototypes)^27,28, and a subunit vaccine (NVX-CoV3273)³⁵.

pNTC-Spike is one of three similar SARS-CoV-2 spike DNA vaccine candidates tested in rhesus macaques to date. The other includes a prototype vaccine expressing unmodified full-length wild-type spike (S) from within pcDNA3.1 + (a vector not approved for clinical use)²⁸ and Inovio’s INO-4800 vaccine that comprises a clinical plasmid vector (pGX0001) encoding the full-length spike with an N-terminal IgE leader sequence and delivers intramuscularly by electroporation²⁷. These vaccines were independently evaluated at the same nonhuman primate facility using the same challenge strain and challenge dose. The three DNA vaccines, administered intramuscular or intradermal, as two or three doses of 1–5 mg (without adjuvant) 2–4 weeks apart, all induced SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific immune responses in rhesus macaques and conferred protection against lower respiratory disease. Protection was not sterilizing, but likely the result of rapid control of viremia following challenge, as suggested by anamnestic antibody responses in protected prototype S and INO-4800 vaccinated animals^27,28. In the present study, a 2 week interval between immunizations was deemed necessary to address the urgency for rapid vaccination during the pandemic; however, longer immunization intervals may likely increase immunogenicity and protection^36,37,38. The previously reported SARS-CoV-2 plasmid DNA vaccines tested in nonhuman primates were well tolerated and none resulted in vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD)^27,28. Moreover, pNTC-Spike induced comparable antibody responses in small animals and nonhuman primates. These data support the known excellent safety profile of DNA vaccines and demonstrate that different SARS-CoV-2 spike DNA vaccines are immunogenic under various conditions without any adjuvants.

All SARS-CoV-2 vaccine formulations tested in nonhuman primates have conferred a substantial degree of protection to the immunized animals; however, sterilizing immunity was rarely achieved²⁶. The common outcome, which extends to DNA vaccines, is a reduction of disease severity marked by lower viral loads, shorter duration of virus shedding, and reduced pathology in the lungs compared to control animals. The correlates of protection against infection and disease are currently unknown. Preliminary analyses suggest an important role for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in vaccine protection^26,28. However, current macaque-challenge studies are insufficiently powered to conclude with confidence that NAbs levels at the time of challenge determine the outcome. Due to differences in neutralization assays used in the various vaccine studies, it is difficult to precisely compare NAb levels induced by the different vaccines; however, there is a trend towards other DNA vaccines inducing lower NAb titers compared to viral vectored vaccines, mRNA vaccines, and subunit vaccines³⁹. Nevertheless, DNA vaccines were similarly efficacious to the majority of their counterparts in protecting vaccinated nonhuman primates against lower respiratory disease from SARS-CoV-2. This suggests either that low neutralizing antibody responses are sufficient or that other immune mechanisms such as cellular immunity or antibody Fc-mediated effector functions contribute to protection. Considering the presence of neutralizing antibodies following two immunizations with pNTC-Spike in rhesus macaques, we speculate that the DNA vaccine candidate may confer partial protection after two immunizations.

In the present study of vaccine-induced immunogenicity and protective effect, the nonhuman primate experiment was not designed specifically to assess safety, VAERD, or antibody-dependent enhancement of infection⁴⁰. However, it is worth noting that the DNA vaccine elicited a Th1-biased rather than a Th2-biased T cell response in a Th1/Th2-balanced mouse (CB6F1) model alongside neutralizing antibodies; both features that associate with reduced histopathology in animal models^40,41,42. Furthermore, pNTC-Spike vaccinated rhesus macaques did not demonstrate enhanced viral replication or clinical disease but complete or near-complete protection in BAL samples likely mediated by rapid immunological control of viral replication. To date, all approved and protective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have a similar Th1-biased response⁴³, and none of the human SARS-CoV-2 vaccines clinical trials testing nucleic acid vaccines, including mRNA and needle-free delivered plasmid DNA, has reported VAERD. On the contrary, these approved nucleic acid vaccines proved protective against disease^44,45,46,47.

In addition to the homologous prime-boost regimen used, DNA vaccines can also complement other vaccines modalities in heterologous prime-boost strategies⁵. DNA is reportedly an excellent priming modality for both viral vector and protein subunit vaccines^48,49. A DNA prime with a viral vector boost can circumvent or reduce the appearance of vector-specific neutralizing antibodies that may decrease viral vector vaccine efficacy. In the context of HIV vaccines, the modality combination has enhanced polyfunctional T cell responses in humans. Similarly, an HIV-specific DNA prime with a protein boost or co-administration of DNA and protein notably expanded the repertoire of functional antibody immune responses and enhanced CD4 + T cell responses compared to a protein prime—DNA boost regimen^5,50.

Evaluating the improved DNA vaccine platform in clinical trials is warranted. It is well established this vaccine modality is safe in humans and demonstrated in independent studies that SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccines are both immunogenic and protective in nonhuman primates. Clinical trials beyond phase I/II will be necessary to determine if this platform is a viable option in the emergency response to SARS-CoV-2, emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, or ‘Disease X’, the unknown future emergent pathogens that may potentially be equally or more devastating than COVID-19. Considerations to further optimize a vaccine regimen may include increasing the dose amount to reduce the number of doses required to induce sufficient quality immunity, although in affluent countries three immunizations may be feasible.

Methods

DNA vaccine

The study vaccine, pNTC-Spike, contains a DNA plasmid encoding an unmodified SARS-CoV-2 spike protein derived from the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain (MN908947). The human codon optimized SARS-CoV-2 spike sequence was synthesized by GeneArt (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) and subcloned using EcoRI and XhoI into the NTC8685-eRNA41H vector backbone (Nature Technology Corporation, Lincoln, NE, USA). pNTC-Spike was produced by Nature Technology Corporation using an antibiotic-free selection procedure in NTC4862 E. coli cells (DH5α attλ::P5/6 6/6-RNA-IN-SacV, Cm^r)¹² at 10 mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The plasmid preparation contained <2.0 EU/mg endotoxin, as determined by a Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) test using the Endosafe nexgen-PTS LAL assay (Charles River, Wilmington, MA, USA). The construct was sequenced and tested for expression prior to use.

Generation of antibodies specific for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

Handling of laboratory animals for the production of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies complied with the regulations of the German Animal Welfare Act and European legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (Directive 2010/63/EU). Immunizations of mice to generate monoclonal antibodies S1-1047 (IgG1) and S2-1254 (IgG1) received ethical approval by the State Office for Health and Social Affairs in Berlin (LAGeSo Berlin, Germany) under the registration number H129/19 (approval date 03/07/2019). NMRI mice (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were immunized three times with intervals of 3 weeks with 30 µg of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike domains S1 or S2, respectively (S1 = Cat. # REC31806, S2 = Cat. # REC31807, The Native Antigen Company, Oxford, UK) in Gerbu Adjuvans MM (GERBU Biotechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer´s instructions and finally boosted with 15 µg of the antigens in PBS at the last 3 days prior to fusion. Hybridoma cells were generated by the fusion of splenocytes from immunized mice with myeloma cells (P3-X63-Ag8.653, American Type Culture Collection)⁵¹. Cells were fused at 37 °C at a ratio of 4: 1 in polyethylene glycol 1500 (PEG, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) by slowly adding PEG (1 mL per 100 × 10⁶ splenocytes) to the pelleted cells, slow addition of RPMI 1640 (4 mL per 100 × 10⁶ splenocytes) and final addition of a larger volume of RPMI 1640 (10 mL per 100 × 10⁶ splenocytes). Cells were plated in a density of 20,000 splenocytes together with 20,000 BALB/c thymocytes as feeder cells in a volume of 200 µL per well of 96 well cell culture plates in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 U/mL recombinant murine IL-6, 1% glutamine, 5.7 µM azaserine and 100 µM hypoxanthine. Starting at day 10 after fusion, antibodies from hybridoma supernatants underwent a stringent screening procedure employing e.g. ELISA and surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy to identify hybridoma clones with superior specificity, affinity, and broad applicability in different assays; selected clones were subcloned twice to ensure clonality. A rabbit polyclonal antibody (KSpike) was generated by subcutaneous immunization of a New Zealand rabbit with 25 µg of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike S1S2 protein (Cat. # 40589-V08B1, Sino biological, Bejing, China) for two times with an interval of 4 weeks. The IgG fractions were affinity purified from hybridoma culture supernatants or rabbit serum using Protein A or G columns, respectively, on an ÄKTA LC-instrument (ÄKTA, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The monoclonal antibodies S1-1047 and S2-1254 showed high specificity for their respective target domain in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 as shown by indirect ELISA using the rabbit pAb KSpike as control reagent (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Western blot

The day before transfection, 1.2 × 10⁵ Vero E6 cells were seeded per well in a six well tissue culture plate with glass coverslips and incubated overnight at 37° C, 5% CO₂. Vero E6 cells were transfected with 2 µg of pNTC-Spike using Fugene HD Transfection Reagent (Cat. # E2311, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Cells were harvested 48 h post-transfection in lysis buffer (0.125 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 0.5% Igepal). The protein content was determined by the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Cat. # 23227, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and 25 µg cell lysate was separated on a Novex 10% Tris-Glycine Mini Gel (Cat. # XP00105BOX, Thermo Fisher) with the PageRuler™ Prestained Protein Ladder, 10 to 180 kDa (Cat. # 26616, Thermo Fisher). SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression was detected with a 1:5000 dilution of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 and anti-SARS-CoV-2 S2 mouse monoclonal antibodies (S1-1047 and S2-1254, respectively) and visualized with a 1:5000 dilution of an HRP conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody (Cat. # P0161, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (1:5000 dilution; Cat. # A1978, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was used to verify equal loading. As positive controls, a lysate preparation from Vero E6 cells infected with a SARS-CoV-2 clinical isolate and a commercial SARS-CoV-2 spike expressing plasmid (Cat. # VG40589-UT, Sino Biological, China) were used. The white light and chemoluminescence channel overlay of uncropped blots with molecular weight marker are presented in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Immunofluorescence assay and microscopy

Vero E6 cells were seeded on coverslips in six-well plates and transfected with 2 µg of pNTC-Spike using Fugene HD Transfection Reagent (Cat. # E2311, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) or Polyfect Transfection reagent (Cat. # 301105, Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, cells were fixed at room temperature for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde (Cat. # HT501128-4L, Sigma-Aldrich), permeabilized at −20 °C for 10 min in 100% methanol. Cells were washed three times with Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) and blocked for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (5% BSA in DPBS). The blocking buffer was aspirated, and cells were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with a 1:1000 dilution of primary antibody in blocking buffer (S1-1047 or S2-1254). Cells were washed three times with DPBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in the dark with an Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) Trial Superclonal™ antibody (1:1000 dilution, Cat. # A28175, Thermo Fisher) in blocking buffer. Coverslips were washed three times with DPBS, dried on a paper towel, mounted with VECTASHIELD medium containing 4, 6-diamino-2-phenylindole hydrochloride (DAPI) (Cat. # H-1200-10, VECTOR Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and sealed with nail polish. Immunostained cells were observed with an Olympus BX61 fluorescence microscope, using the cellSens Entry software version 1.11 for image capture. Imaging software Image J, version 1.53j (NIH, USA) was used to merge images and visualize the results.

Animals and study design

Mice

Eight week old female CB6F1 mice (Envigo, Netherlands), offspring of a cross between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, were randomly assigned to receive either 10 µg pNTC-Spike (N = 5), 50 µg pNTC-Spike (N = 5) or 50 µg of a vector control (N = 5). The unadjuvanted vaccine doses were prepared in PBS in a final volume of 50 µl and administered in two 25 µL injections per immunization. The mice were immunized via the intradermal route with needle injection at the base of the tail at weeks 0, 2, and 4.

Rabbits

Nine to ten week old female New Zealand white rabbits (Charles River, France) were immunized with 125 µg pNTC-Spike in PBS without adjuvant at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Three administration routes were evaluated in independent studies in the following order: intradermal route using the Tropis ID Needle-free Injection System (PharmaJet, Inc.) (N = 4); intradermal route using needle-and-syringe (N = 3); intramuscular route in a single dose of 500 µL using the Stratis Needle-free Injection System (PharmaJet, Inc.) (N = 5). In the latter study, vaccine safety was observed.

Nonhuman primates

Eight male and female adult rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), 2–8 years old (mean: 4 years), were randomly divided into two groups: pNTC-Spike vaccinates (N = 6) and sham controls (N = 2). Animals received three immunizations of 2 mg DNA each at weeks 0, 2, and 4. The unadjuvanted vaccine was administered via the intradermal route using the Tropis ID needle-free injection system (PharmaJet, Inc.) with four 100 μL doses per immunization, equally distributed over the left and right scapula region. The interval between last immunization to viral challenge varies for the different SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates (adenoviral vector, mRNA, live attenuated, protein and DNA) evaluated in nonhuman primates (median: 25 days; range: 14–77 days)³⁹. To enable comparison with the latter, we selected an interval of 28 days between the last immunization and challenge. At week 8, all eight animals were challenged with 1.0 × 10⁵ TCID₅₀ (1.2 × 10⁸ RNA copies, 1.1 × 10⁴ PFU) SARS-CoV-2 (strain nCoV-WAI-2020; MN985325.1; BEI Resources, Manassas, VA, USA). In similar studies conducted at the same facility, BIOQUAL, Inc., the 1.0 × 10⁵ TCID₅₀ challenge dose consistently resulted in infection of SARS-CoV-2 immune naïve rhesus macaques (N = 28, total) with detectable viral loads by 2 days post-challenge in BAL and nasal swabs.^23,26,27,28 The challenge stock was propagated at BIOQUAL, Inc. in Vero E6 cells from a seed stock obtained by Kenneth Plante, World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses, UTMB, Galveston, TX (lot no. TVP 23156). The stock was deep sequenced (SRA accession no. SRR12749718) by Shelby O’Connor’s laboratory, Univ. Wisconsin-Madison, WI. Sequencing confirmed the expected sequence identity. The virus was diluted in PBS and administered as 1 mL by the intranasal (IN) route and 1 mL by the intratracheal (IT) route.

The mice and rabbits were housed in a pathogen-free and climate-controlled animal facility at Statens Serum Institut, Denmark. All cages were provided with bedding material and environmental enrichment. Animals had access to water and a standard pelleted diet ad libitum. Animal husbandry and procedures comply with the Danish legislation, which is based on the EU Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. The experiments received ethical approval by The Animal Experimentation Council, the National Competent Authority within this field (approval number 2017-15-0201-01322), and were supervised by the laboratory animal veterinarians at Statens Serum Institut. The nonhuman primates were housed at BIOQUAL Inc. (Rockville, MD) and associated animal studies conducted in compliance with relevant local, state, and federal regulations and received ethical approval by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The assays used to quantitate vaccine-induced immune responses in the small animals and rhesus macaques were performed at Statens Serum Institut and BIOQUAL, Inc., respectively, and were depended on the assays available at each institute.

Mouse and rabbit antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Spike- and RBD-specific binding immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers were determined by standard ELISA. In brief, Nunc™ MaxiSorp™ plates were coated with 100 µL of 4 µg/mL recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike S1S2 protein (Cat. # 40589-V08B1; Sino biological) or 4 µg/mL SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD protein (Cat. # 40592-V08B; Sino biological) at 4 °C overnight. In consecutive order, with wash steps in between, plates were incubated at room temperature on an orbital shaker with 150 µL of blocking buffer (SSI Dilution Buffer [Cat. # 1322, SSI Diagnostica], 2% skim milk), 100 µL of 5-fold serial dilutions of a mouse or rabbit sera (1:20 to 1:1562500), 100 µL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:10000 dilution) or mouse-anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:2000 dilution) (Cat. # A4416 and A1949, respectively; Sigma-Aldrich), and 3,3′, 5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) One Substrate (Cat. # 4380, KemEnTec, Denmark). TMB reaction was stopped with H₂SO₄, and absorbance read at 450 nm using 620 nm as a reference on a FLUOstar Microplate Reader (BMG LABTECH, Germany). Each wash step comprised three washes with 250 µL wash buffer (PBS with 0.05% Tween20) for 1 min.

Spike ectodomain-specific antibody ELISA

White Nunc™ MaxiSorp™ microtiter plates were coated with 100 µL of 1 µg/mL recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike His-tag protein (Cat. # 10549-CV-100; R&D Systems) at 4 °C overnight. In consecutive order, with wash steps in between, plates were incubated with 150 µL of blocking buffer (Dilution Buffer pH 7.2 [Cat. # 1322, SSI Diagnostica], 2% bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% Tween20), 100 µL of 5-fold serial dilutions of rabbit sera (1:20 to 1:1562500), 100 µL of HRP conjugated mouse-anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:2000 dilution) (Cat. # A1949 Sigma-Aldrich), and BM Chemiluminescent Substrate (Cat. # 11582950001, Sigma-Aldrich). Luminescence was read on a FLUOstar Microplate Reader (BMG LABTECH, Germany). Each wash step comprised three washes with 250 µL wash buffer (PBS with 0.05% Tween20) for 30 s. ELISA end-point titers were calculated from a four-parameter logistic regression curve in GraphPad Prism 8.3.0, using the reciprocal serum dilution that yielded an absorbance above a positive cut-off value calculated for each group of animals based on absorbances measured on day 0 at a serum dilution of 1:20 that is (mean absorbance for all animals) + (3 × standard deviation of the absorbance measured for all animals).

Virus microneutralization test

A 2-fold serial dilution of heat-inactivated serum/plasma samples were mixed with 300 × TCID₅₀ SARS-CoV-2 virus, as determined from a virus titration 96 h post-inoculation. The solution was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, 5% CO₂, and added to Vero E6 cells (kindly provided by Bjoern Meyer, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) in a 96 well tissue culture plate seeded with 10⁴ cells per well the day prior. The inoculated cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO₂ for 24 h, and the inhibition of virus infection in the presence of serum measured in a standard ELISA targeting the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. The culture medium was removed from the infected Vero E6 cell monolayers and the cells washed twice with 100 μL PBS. The cells were fixed with cold 80% (v/v) acetone in PBS for 10 min. Following three wash steps with wash buffer (PBS containing 1% (v/v) Triton-X100) for 30 s, a 100 μL of a SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein monoclonal antibody was added and incubated for 5 min on an orbital shaker (300 rpm) at room temperature and subsequently for 1 h at 37°C. For testing rabbit sera, the mouse monoclonal antibody clone 7E1B was used (1:4000 dilution; Cat. # BSM-41414M, Bioss, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA); for testing mouse sera, a rabbit monoclonal antibody was used (1:2500; Cat. # 40143-R019, Sino Biological, China). The plates were washed and incubated with 100 μL of either a 1:6000 diluted mouse-anti-rabbit IgG HRP conjugate antibody (Cat. # A1949, Sigma-Aldrich) or a 1:10000 diluted goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) cross-adsorbed HRP conjugate antibody (Cat. # A16078; Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) for 5 min on an orbital shaker (300 rpm) at room temperature and subsequently for 1 h at 37 °C. The plates were washed five times with wash buffer for 30 s, followed by three washes with deionized water. A 100 μL TMB One Substrate (Cat. # 4380, KemEnTec, Denmark) was added and incubated for 15 min. The reaction was stopped with H₂SO₄, and absorbance read at 450 nm using 620 nm as a reference on a FLUOstar Microplate Reader (BMG LABTECH, Germany).

Included on each microneutralization plate were quadruplicate wells containing cells with 300 × TCID₅₀ SARS-CoV-2 virus without serum (virus control) and quadruplicate wells containing cells with virus diluent only (cell control). The neutralization antibody titer was determined for each serum sample as the interpolation of a four-parameter logistic regression curve with the 50% virus level cut-off calculated for each assay plate: [(mean OD of virus control wells) + (mean OD of cell control wells)]/2. The reciprocal serum dilution corresponding to that well is reported as the 50% neutralization antibody titer for that sample. The microneutralization assay is validated and has comparable performance to other live virus neutralization assays established at different European laboratories (laboratory 4 in ref. ⁵²). Virus neutralization was measured for the following SARS-CoV-2 viruses: early pandemic (lineage B.1) strain SARS-CoV-2/Hu/Denmark/SSI-H1; Alpha variant (lineage B.1.1.7) strain SARS-CoV-2/Hu/Denmark/SSI-H14; Beta variant (lineage B.1.351) strain hCoV-19/Netherlands/NoordHolland_10159/2021 (Cat. # 014V-04058, European Virus Archive—Global, Marseille, France); and the Delta variant (lineage B.1.617.2) strain SARS-CoV-2/Hu/Denmark/SSI-H11. Strains from Denmark were isolated at Statens Serum Institut from clinical samples on Vero E6 cells. All virus stocks were deep sequenced to confirm identity, confirm the absence of cell culture-derived mutations, and the presence of lineage-specific mutations in the spike protein. The comparison between strains was done on the same day using a single dilution for each serum sample.

Mouse and rabbit splenocyte isolation, restimulation, and cytokine quantification

Following excision, the spleens were submerged in RPMI medium and processed aseptically within an hour. The spleens were homogenized through a 70 µm cell strainer using a syringe plunger. The single-cell suspensions were washed twice with cold PBS followed by lysis of red blood cells using Red Blood Cell Lysis buffer (Cat. # R7757, Sigma-Aldrich). The splenocytes were resuspended in culture medium (RPMI containing 10 % fetal bovine serum, 1 % Penicillin and Streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES and 50 µM 2-Mercaptoethanol). A total of 8 × 10⁵ splenocytes were stimulated in duplicate with 2 µg/mL SARS-CoV-2 spike S1S2 protein (Cat. # 40589-V08B1; Sino biological), 2 µg/mL SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD protein (Cat. # 40592-V08B; Sino biological), 5 µg/mL concanavalin A (Cat. # C0412, Sigma-Aldrich) as a positive control, or culture media as mock stimulated control. The re-stimulated splenocytes were kept under standard tissue culture conditions (37˚C with 5% CO₂) for 48 h. The level of secreted interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin 5 (IL-5), or interleukin 17 (IL-17) in clarified cell culture supernatants were determined by cytokine ELISA (Cat. # 3321-1H-6, 3391-1H-6, 3521-1H-6, 3110-1H-6; MABTECH AB, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For the rabbit IFN-γ ELISpot (Cat. # 3110-4HPW-10; MABTECH AB, Sweden), a total of 1 × 106 splenocytes were stimulated for 18 h using the aforementioned antigen stimulations and tissue culture conditions. The secretion of IFN-γ was determined according to the manufacturer’s instructions and spots were counted using CTL Immunospot® analyzer and ImmunSpot® Software (version 7.0.22.1).

Nonhuman primate antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific IgG in serum was quantified in duplicate by ELISA. In brief, Nunc™ MaxiSorp™ microtiter plates were coated with 50 µL of 2 μg/mL recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike S1S2 protein (Cat. # 40589-V08B1, Sino Biological) in PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed five times with wash buffer (0.05% Tween20 in PBS) and blocked with 100 μL 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The block solution was discarded and 100 μL of serial 4-fold dilutions of serum starting at a 1:20 dilution were added to the wells, followed by a 1 h incubation at room temperature. Plates were washed three times with wash buffer and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with 50 µL a 1:10000 dilution of goat anti-monkey IgG (H + L) (Cat. # PA1-84631, Invitrogen). Plates were washed five times with wash buffer and once with PBS, followed by the addition of 100 μL of SureBlue TMB 1-Component Microwell Peroxidase Substrate (Cat. # 5120-0075, SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA). The reaction was stopped after 10 min with the addition of 100 μL TMB Stop solution per well. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using 620 nm as a reference. ELISA end-point titers were defined as the highest reciprocal serum dilution that yielded an absorbance >0.300.

Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT)

The PRNT was performed in six-well tissue culture plates seeded with 1.75 × 10⁵ Vero E6 cells (Cat. # CRL-1586, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) per well the day before. Serum samples were heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min and tested in duplicate in a three-fold serial dilution ranging from 1:20 to 1:4860. Each serum dilution was pre-incubated with 30 PFU SARS-CoV-2 for 1 h at 37 °C before addition to the Vero76 monolayers. After an incubation of 1 h at 37 °C, the supernatants containing the serum/virus mixture were removed and the monolayer washed once with PBS before overlaying with a semi-solid culture medium. Following a 3 day incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO₂, the cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet. The reciprocal of the serum dilutions causing plaque reductions of 90% (PRNT₉₀) and 50% (PRNT₅₀) were recorded as titers. Virus neutralization was measured for the early pandemic SARS-CoV-2 strain nCoV-WAI-2020 (Cat. # NR-52281, BEI Resources, Manassas, VA, USA) and the Beta variant (lineage B.1.351) strain 2019-nCoV/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 (Cat. # NR-54009, BEI Resources). All virus stocks were deep sequenced to confirm identity.

Subgenomic SARS-CoV-2 RNA assay

Replicating the SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected and measured using a real-time RT-PCR assay targeting viral replication intermediates not packaged into virions²⁴. RNA was extracted using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat. # 52904, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The SARS-CoV-2 E gene subgenomic messenger RNA (sgmRNA) was detected using a leader-specific primer (SG-F: 5′-CGATCTTGTAGATCTGTTCCTCAAACGAAC-3′) located upstream of SARS-CoV-2 ORF1a and a reverse primer (SG-R: 5′-ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACACA-3′) and probe (FAM-5′-ACACTAGCCATCCTTACTGCGCTTCG-3′-BHQ) specific to the E gene. PCR amplification was performed using the SensiFAST™ Probe Lo-ROX One-Step Kit (Cat. # BIO-78005, Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR instrument with the following program: 48 °C for 30 min, 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 1 min at 55 °C. Subgenomic RNA copies were calculated from a standard curve representing serially diluted plasmid DNA containing the target sequence.

Statistical analyses

Each measurement represents a single animal. Antibody positive and negative responses were determined using a 99.9% confidence interval cut-off value calculated for each serum dilution from the serum controls included in the assays⁵³. Variation in paired continuous variables between multiple time points were compared using the non-parametric Friedman test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons. For the latter, adjusted p-values are reported. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed where data for only two time points were available. All statistical tests were two-tailed. Statistical analyses and graphing were done with GraphPad PRISM version 8.3.0. (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

Weinberger, D. M. et al. Estimation of excess deaths associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, March to May 2020. JAMA Intern. Med. 180, 1336–1344 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fomsgaard, A. & Liu, M. A. The key role of nucleic acid vaccines for one health. Viruses 13, 258 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, L. Y. Y., Izzard, L. & Hurt, A. C. A review of DNA vaccines against influenza. Front. Immunol 9, 1568 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van der Heijden, I., Beijnen, J. H. & Nuijen, B. Long term stability of lyophilized plasmid DNA pDERMATT. Int. J. Pharm. 453, 648–650 (2013).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rouphael, N. G. et al. DNA priming and gp120 boosting induces HIV-specific antibodies in a randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Investig. 129, 4769–4785 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dowd, K. A. et al. Rapid development of a DNA vaccine for Zika virus. Science 354, 237–240 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gaudinski, M. R. et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of two Zika virus DNA vaccine candidates in healthy adults: randomised, open-label, phase 1 clinical trials. Lancet 391, 552–562 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ledgerwood, J. E. et al. A West Nile virus DNA vaccine utilizing a modified promoter induces neutralizing antibody in younger and older healthy adults in a phase I clinical trial. J. Infect. Dis. 203, 1396–1404 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jones, S. et al. DNA vaccination protects against an influenza challenge in a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled phase 1b clinical trial. Vaccine 27, 2506–2512 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, T. J. et al. Clearance of persistent HPV infection and cervical lesion by therapeutic DNA vaccine in CIN3 patients. Nat. Commun. 5, 5317 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nelson, J., Rodriguez, S., Finlayson, N., Williams, J. & Carnes, A. Antibiotic-free production of a herpes simplex virus 2 DNA vaccine in a high yield cGMP process. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 9, 2211–2215 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Williams, J. A. Improving DNA vaccine performance through vector design. Curr. Gene Ther. 14, 170–189 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Narum, D. L. et al. Codon optimization of gene fragments encoding Plasmodium falciparum Merzoite proteins enhances DNA vaccine protein expression and immunogenicity in mice. Infect. Immun. 69, 7250–7253 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Luke, J. M. et al. Coexpressed RIG-I agonist enhances humoral immune response to influenza virus DNA vaccine. J. Virol. 85, 1370–1383 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Luke J. M., Carnes A. E., & Williams J. A. DNA Vaccines: Methods and Protocols (Springer New York, 2014).
Graham, B. S. et al. DNA vaccine delivered by a needle-free injection device improves potency of priming for antibody and CD8+ T-Cell responses after rAd5 boost in a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 8, e59340 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Teixeira, L. et al. A first-in-human phase I study of INVAC-1, an optimized human telomerase DNA vaccine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 588–597 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Luke, J. et al. Novel nonviral plasmid vectors with minimalized bacterial backbones dramatically increase transgene expression level in vivo. Mol. Ther. 22, S42 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y., Allen, J. D., Wrapp, D., McLellan, J. S. & Crispin, M. Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Science 369, 330–333 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ou, X. et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1620 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pillay, T. S. Gene of the month: the 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2 novel coronavirus spike protein. J. Clin. Pathol 73, 366–369 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. A systemic and molecular study of subcellular localization of SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 269 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chandrashekar, A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 812–817 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dagotto, G. et al. Comparison of subgenomic and total RNA in SARS-CoV-2-challenged rhesus macaques. J. Virol. 95, e02370–02320 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wölfel, R. et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature 581, 465–469 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mercado, N. B. et al. Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature 586, 583–588 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Patel, A. et al. Intradermal-delivered DNA vaccine provides anamnestic protection in a rhesus macaque SARS-CoV-2 challenge model. Cell Rep. Med 2, 100420 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 806–811 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Deng, W. et al. Primary exposure to SARS-CoV-2 protects against reinfection in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 818–823 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, S. et al. Comparison of nonhuman primates identified the suitable model for COVID-19. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 157 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gao, Q. et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science 369, 77–81 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2. Cell 181, 894–904 (2020). e899.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Doremalen, N. et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature 586, 578–582 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Corbett, K. S. et al. Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1544–1555 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guebre-Xabier, M. et al. NVX-CoV2373 vaccine protects cynomolgus macaque upper and lower airways against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Vaccine 38, 7892–7896 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brice, G. T. et al. Extended immunization intervals enhance the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of plasmid DNA vaccines. Microbes Infect. 9, 1439–1446 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Voysey, M. et al. Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials. Lancet 397, 881–891 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mahase, E. Covid-19: Longer interval between Pfizer doses results in higher antibody levels, research finds. BMJ 374, n1875 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Klasse, P. J., Nixon, D. F. & Moore, J. P. Immunogenicity of clinically relevant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in nonhuman primates and humans. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe8065 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Graham, B. S. Rapid COVID-19 vaccine development. Science 368, 945–946 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brocato, R. L. et al. Protective efficacy of a SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine in wild-type and immunosuppressed Syrian hamsters. npj Vaccines 6, 16 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leventhal, S. S., Clancy, C., Erasmus, J., Feldmann, H. & Hawman, D. W. An intramuscular DNA vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 decreases viral lung load but not lung pathology in Syrian hamsters. Microorganisms 9, 1040 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jeyanathan, M. et al. Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 615–632 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Momin, T. et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of a DNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (ZyCoV-D): results of an open-label, non-randomized phase I part of phase I/II clinical study by intradermal route in healthy subjects in India. EClinicalMedicine 38, 101020 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Candila Healthcare Ltd. Zydus Applies to the DCGI for EUA to Launch ZyCoV-D, the World’s First Plasmid DNA Vaccine for COVID-19 https://www.zyduscadila.com/public/pdf/pressrelease/ZyCoV_D_Press_Release_1_7_2021.pdf (2021).
Baden, L. R. et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 403–416 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Polack, F. P. et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2603–2615 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lu, S., Wang, S. & Grimes-Serrano, J. M. Current progress of DNA vaccine studies in humans. Expert Rev. Vaccines 7, 175–191 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harari, A. et al. An HIV-1 clade C DNA prime, NYVAC boost vaccine regimen induces reliable, polyfunctional, and long-lasting T cell responses. J. Exp. Med. 205, 63–77 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lu, S. Heterologous prime–boost vaccination. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 21, 346–351 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pauly, D. et al. Simultaneous quantification of five bacterial and plant toxins from complex matrices using a multiplexed fluorescent magnetic suspension assay. Analyst 134, 2028–2039 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. et al. SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody testing in Europe: towards harmonisation of neutralising antibody titres for better use of convalescent plasma and comparability of trial data. Eurosurveillance 26, 2100568 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Frey, A., Di Canzio, J. & Zurakowski, D. A statistically defined endpoint titer determination method for immunoassays. J. Immunological Methods 221, 35–41 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The following reagents were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281, deposited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020, NR-54009, contributed by Alex Sigal and Tulio de Oliveira. We acknowledge the support from European Virus Archive—GLOBAL project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement No 871029, for providing SARS-Related Coronavirus 2 strain hCoV-19/Netherlands/NoordHolland_10159/2021 contributed by Chantal Reusken and Johannes Brug, RVIM, Bilthoven, NL. We thank the skilled technical assistance of Randi Thøgersen, Birgit Knudsen, Dennis Jelsbak Schmidt, and Louise Borup. We are grateful to Katarina Berg, Lars Vibe Andreasen, Per Skallerup, Lone Pridal and Peter Bang for expert advice on pre-clinical vaccine safety. We also thank James Williams and Aaron Barnes (Nature Technology Corporation, NE USA), and Marilyn Dysart (PharmaJet, Inc., CO, USA) for generous advice, assistance, and reagents. We gratefully acknowledge the staff at the animal facility at Statens Serum Institut and BIOQUAL Inc. for their excellent care of the animals.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Ria Lassaunière, Charlotta Polacek.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Virus and Microbiological Special Diagnostic, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
Ria Lassaunière, Charlotta Polacek, Anders Frische, Jeanette Linnea Tingstedt & Anders Fomsgaard
Department of Business Support and Campus, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
Gregers J. Gram
Biological Toxins (ZBS 3), Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
Maren Krüger & Brigitte G. Dorner
BIOQUAL Inc., Rockville, DM, 20850, USA
Anthony Cook, Renita Brown, Tatyana Orekov, Tammy Putmon-Taylor, Tracey-Ann Campbell, Jack Greenhouse, Laurent Pessaint, Hanne Andersen & Mark G. Lewis
Infectious Disease Research Unit, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Anders Fomsgaard

Authors

Ria Lassaunière
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Charlotta Polacek
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gregers J. Gram
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anders Frische
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jeanette Linnea Tingstedt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Maren Krüger
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Brigitte G. Dorner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anthony Cook
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Renita Brown
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tatyana Orekov
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tammy Putmon-Taylor
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tracey-Ann Campbell
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jack Greenhouse
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Laurent Pessaint
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hanne Andersen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mark G. Lewis
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anders Fomsgaard
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.Fo., G.J.G., and C.P. designed the study. R.L., C.P., A.Fr., and J.L.T. designed experiments and analyzed the data. A.Fr. and J.L.T. performed experiments. R.L. prepared the figures and manuscript. M.K. and B.G.D. developed, characterized, and validated the anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies. A.C., R.B., T.O., T.PT., T.-A.C., J.G., L.P., H.A., and M.G.L. conducted the nonhuman primate study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Fomsgaard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.Fo. and C.P. are co-inventors on a patent application covering a SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine; all rights to the vaccine have been assigned to Statens Serum Institut (SSI), a Danish national not-for-profit governmental public health institute. Other authors declare no competing interests. No particular funding was obtained for this work, which was a part of the Danish national health response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lassaunière, R., Polacek, C., Gram, G.J. et al. Preclinical evaluation of a candidate naked plasmid DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. npj Vaccines 6, 156 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00419-z

Download citation

Received: 12 June 2021
Accepted: 24 November 2021
Published: 20 December 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00419-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing