Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Malaria vaccine research & innovation: the intersection of IA2030 and zero malaria

This collection of malaria vaccine research and innovation papers highlights the intersection of efforts to: (1) achieve the pan-African1 and global goal2 of “Zero Malaria”; and (2) make the compelling case for immunization3 as a set of new tools for malaria control and elimination.

Problem and opportunity statement

Despite a ~30% reduction in clinical cases and ~60% reduction in lives lost from Plasmodium ssp. infections over the past two decades, malaria continues to relentlessly sap the well-being of an estimated 228 million people worldwide (95% confidence interval [CI]: 206–258 million) and result in the global demise of an estimated 405,000 persons annually. The effort, supported by a US$ 2.7–3.2 billion annual investment, to “bend the curve” towards zero malaria by 2030 has stalled over the past five years4. This plateau is reminiscent of the decades-long effort to break through the ~80% ceiling on reaching the goal of fully immunizing every child worldwide. Despite immunization of 116 million children annually, 20 million infants fail to receive a full course of essential vaccines and 13 million infants receive no vaccines whatsoever—these “zero dose” children are highlighted in the Immunization Agenda 20303 (IA2030), recently adopted by the World Health Assembly5. The shared state of stalled progress towards equity and coverage of effective malaria interventions and essential vaccines has a common solution—new tools.

The early promise of innovative vector control and single-dose radical cure for malaria have yet to deliver the impact needed to achieve “zero malaria”. That said, steadily over the last two decades, as reviewed by Duffy and Gorres, a pipeline of vaccine candidates against the most lethal human malaria, P. falciparum, and the most prevalent, P. vivax, has been assembled6. Novel vaccine platforms (e.g., P. berghei sporozoite-based human vaccine candidates7), better defined correlates of protection in non-human primates8, and orthogonal learnings from other mosquito-transmitted pathogens (e.g., West Nile Virus)9 portend an even more robust pipeline of needed new tools, if adequate investments are made.

P. falciparum vaccine development stage-by-stage and step-by-step

Malaria vaccine targets are typically assigned to one of three sequential stages of the parasite’s lifecycle: blood stage—through which the parasite causes all human pathology; sexual and sporogony stage—through which the parasite is transmitted from human host to female mosquito vector; and, pre-erythrocytic stage—through which the parasite infects humans during a subsequent bloodmeal by an infected mosquito (see Fig. 1, ref. 6). Despite decades of efforts directed against targets throughout the lifecycle, only one vaccine candidate, the pre-erythrocytic circumsporozoite (CSP)-based RTS,S/AS01E, has advanced through licensure and pilot implementation6. A myriad of biological and technical barriers have been encountered; however, step-by-step, these barriers have been chipped away. Advances include: new insights into the evolution of the immune response to the major pre-erythrocytic target, CSP10, and into the role of complement-fixing antibodies in blood stage clinical immunity11; the ability to express and manufacture full length versions of blood stage targets, e.g., the highly promising, highly conserved reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5 (PfRH5)12, as well as the 196-kDa merozoite surface protein 1 (the primary structure first described by Holder, et al. in 198513), the latter of which demonstrated favorable safety and immunogenicity in a first-in human study14; and, the delivery of target malaria parasite antigens by measles vectors to overcome the barrier of waning immune responses, resulting in durable memory and protection, at least in a murine model15.

To be clear, significant challenges remain—for example, immune interference when concomitantly administering other vaccines, such as BCG for tuberculosis16, or administering multi-stage targets by multiple vaccine platforms, as observed with an adjuvanted virus-like particle, RTS,S/AS01B, and viral-vectors expressing the multiple-epitope thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (ME-TRAP)17. That said, molecular approaches to identify and direct immune responses to specific promising epitopes18 and use of novel particle-forming lipid-based adjuvants19 provide paths forward for poorly immunogenic targets, including those designed to interrupt transmission from human to mosquito.

Malaria vaccine use cases—pregnancy malaria must not be left behind

The longstanding mindset that vaccine evaluation during pregnancy should be delayed to post-licensure studies is obsolete. Even when pregnant women and their offspring do not have a higher risk of disease, there is an ethical rationale to evaluate at least vaccine safety pre-licensure20. Pregnancy malaria presents an even clearer case for prioritizing vaccine development as both mother and offspring have a well-described higher risk of disease6. More than two decades ago, antibodies to VAR2CSA, a member of the P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) family, were associated with protection, identifying VAR2CSA as a promising vaccine target21. Placenta malaria vaccine (PMVs) research and innovation continues to progress6, including through the development of new animal models22 and down-selection of lead PVM candidates23.

P. vivax—the other malaria

Despite being the most prevalent human malaria parasite, investments in P. vivax vaccine development have been significantly smaller than that in the more lethal, albeit similarly morbid, falciparum cousin. Many P. falciparum vaccine targets have homologs in P. vivax6, so a fast follow-on vivax malaria vaccines based on safe, effective, affordable falciparum malaria vaccines have a reasonable, high likelihood of success. That said, several distinct differences in P. vivax biology, such as liver stage hypnozoites and rapid development of sexual stages directly from liver schizonts, require a P. vivax-specific vaccine research and innovation strategy. A critical differential feature of blood-stage vivax parasites is the use of Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARCs) on human reticulocytes as a major invasion pathway. Recent insights into the structural basis of anti-P. vivax Duffy Binding Domain (PvDBP) immunity24,25 and early clinical results from a PvDBP vaccine candidate26 are encouraging; however, given the parasite’s gene amplification mechanisms to evade anti-PvDBP immunity27, developing a blood stage vivax malaria vaccine won’t be trivial.

Research and Innovation as a driver for creating a compelling value proposition for malaria vaccines

The promising P. falciparum and P. vivax vaccine pipeline faces a significant resource shortfall as candidates head into late-stage development—this increasingly more apparent resource gap, or second “Valley of Death”, is also faced by most, if not all, late stage vaccine candidates for pathogens afflicting primarily those living in low resource settings28. Hopefully, the recent global adoption of the Research and Innovation pillar of IA2030 and the growing African continent-led commitment to zero malaria will lead to the investments needed to generate the evidence that support the compelling value proposition required to build bridges for promising malaria vaccine candidates to become affordable, effective, sustainable new tools—part of the solution to regain the prior trajectory towards zero malaria.


  1. 1.

    RBM. Zero Malaria Starts with Me (RBM & UNOPS, Geneva, 2018);

  2. 2.

    RBM. RBM Partnership to End Malaria Annual Report 2019 (RBM & UNOPS, Geneva, 2020);

  3. 3.

    WHO. Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind (WHO, Geneva, 2020);

  4. 4.

    WHO. World malaria report 2019 (WHO, Geneva, 2019);

  5. 5.

    WHO. Seventy-third World Health Assembly WHA73(9) Agenda item 11.3: Immunization Agenda 2030 (WHO, Geneva, 2020);

  6. 6.

    Duffy, P. E. & Patrick Gorres, J. Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products. NPJ Vaccines 5, 48 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mendes, A. M. et al. A Plasmodium berghei sporozoite-based vaccination platform against human malaria. NPJ Vaccines 3, 33 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Douglas, A. D. et al. A defined mechanistic correlate of protection against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in non-human primates. Nat. Commun. 10, 1953 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Uraki, R., Hastings, A. K., Brackney, D. E., Armstrong, P. M. & Fikrig, E. AgBR1 antibodies delay lethal Aedes aegypti-borne West Nile virus infection in mice. NPJ Vaccines 4, 23 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Murugan, R. et al. Evolution of protective human antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein repeat motifs. Nat. Med. 26, 1135–1145 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Reiling, L. et al. Targets of complement-fixing antibodies in protective immunity against malaria in children. Nat. Commun. 10, 610 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jin, J. et al. Production, quality control, stability, and potency of cGMP-produced Plasmodium falciparum RH5.1 protein vaccine expressed in Drosophila S2 cells. NPJ Vaccines 3, 32 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Holder, A. A. et al. Primary structure of the precursor to the three major surface antigens of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. Nature 317, 270–273 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Blank, A. et al. Immunization with full-length Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1 is safe and elicits functional cytophilic antibodies in a randomized first-in-human trial. NPJ Vaccines 5, 10 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mura, M. et al. Recombinant measles vaccine expressing malaria antigens induces long-term memory and protection in mice. NPJ Vaccines 4, 12 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Walk, J. et al. Outcomes of controlled human malaria infection after BCG vaccination. Nat. Commun. 10, 874 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rampling, T. et al. Safety and efficacy of novel malaria vaccine regimens of RTS,S/AS01B alone, or with concomitant ChAd63-MVA-vectored vaccines expressing ME-TRAP. NPJ Vaccines 3, 49 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Canepa, G. E. et al. Antibody targeting of a specific region of Pfs47 blocks Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission. NPJ Vaccines 3, 26 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Huang, W.-C. et al. Antibody response of a particle-inducing, liposome vaccine adjuvant admixed with a Pfs230 fragment. NPJ Vaccines 5, 23 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Krubiner, C. B. et al. Pregnant women & vaccines against emerging epidemic threats: ethics guidance for preparedness, research, and response. Vaccine S0264-410X, 30045–3 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fried, M., Nosten, F., Brockman, A., Brabin, B. J. & Duffy, P. E. Maternal antibodies block malaria. Nature 395, 851–852 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Doritchamou, J., Teo, A., Fried, M. & Duffy, P. E. Malaria in pregnancy: the relevance of animal models for vaccine development. Lab Anim. 46, 388–398 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chêne, A. et al. Down-selection of the VAR2CSA DBL1-2 expressed in E. coli as a lead antigen for placental malaria vaccine development. NPJ Vaccines 3, 28 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rawlinson, T. A. et al. Structural basis for inhibition of Plasmodium vivax invasion by a broadly neutralizing vaccine-induced human antibody. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1497–1507 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Urusova, D. et al. Structural basis for neutralization of Plasmodium vivax by naturally acquired human antibodies that target DBP. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1486–1496 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Singh, K. et al. Malaria vaccine candidate based on Duffy-binding protein elicits strain transcending functional antibodies in a Phase I trial. NPJ Vaccines 3, 48 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Popovici, J. et al. Amplification of Duffy binding protein-encoding gene allows Plasmodium vivax to evade host anti-DBP humoral immunity. Nat. Commun. 11, 953 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kaslow, D. C. et al. Vaccine candidates for poor nations are going to waste. Nature 564, 337–339 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [OPP1180199]. The funder had no role in preparation of the manuscript or decision to publish.

Author information




DCK conceived, wrote, reviewed, approved submission of, and is accountable for this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Kaslow.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DCK is an employee of PATH (a not-for-profit organization), has no financial interest in any for-profit organization, and declares no competing interests. PATH is funded to innovate and partner in developing and implementing malaria vaccines and other interventions to control and eliminate malaria.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaslow, D.C. Malaria vaccine research & innovation: the intersection of IA2030 and zero malaria. npj Vaccines 5, 109 (2020).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing