Plague vaccine: recent progress and prospects



Three great plague pandemics, resulting in nearly 200 million deaths in human history and usage as a biowarfare agent, have made Yersinia pestis as one of the most virulent human pathogens. In late 2017, a large plague outbreak raged in Madagascar attracted extensive attention and caused regional panics. The evolution of local outbreaks into a pandemic is a concern of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in plague endemic regions. Until now, no licensed plague vaccine is available. Prophylactic vaccination counteracting this disease is certainly a primary choice for its long-term prevention. In this review, we summarize the latest advances in research and development of plague vaccines.


Plague is caused by the facultative, intracellular Gram-negative bacterial pathogen, Yersinia pestis. As one of the oldest and most notorious infectious diseases, plague’s notoriety came from the estimated 200 million deaths that were claimed throughout recorded human history, and the extensive devastation that was imparted on societies which subsequently shaped the progress of human civilization.1,2 Currently, plague is less active than other well-known infectious diseases, e.g., AIDS, malaria, influenza, tuberculosis, dengue, and certain antibiotic-resistant superbugs ( However, its role as a serious public health concern should not be relegated to antiquity. Lingering fears of future outbreaks are justifiable as plague persists in rodent hosts, has significantly increased its geographical range, remains endemic to many regions around the globe, and is responsible for several thousand annual human cases worldwide.3 In 2015, 15 human cases of plague were reported in the US, resulting in 4 deaths4 and in late 2017, the island of Madagascar had experienced a large outbreak of plague, where a total of 2348 confirmed, probable and suspected cases of plague (~70% are pneumonic form) occurred, including 202 deaths (case fatality rate 8.6%),5,6,7 inciting regional panics. Moreover, there are increasing concerns of multiply antibiotic resistant Y. pestis8,9,10,11,12 due to the intrinsic genetic plasticity of bacterium.13,14 Thus, plague is internationally recognized as a re-emerging disease.15,16,17

Additionally, Y. pestis has been used intentionally as a biological weapon clearly recorded in human history,5,6 and is considered one of the most likely biothreat agents.7,8 During the Cold War, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognized aerosolized Y. pestis as a potent biological weapon, and classified the bacteria as a tier 1 select agent.18 In nature, following the bite of an infected flea, the mammalian host will typically manifest infection in the bubonic form, and may develop septicemic or secondary pneumonic infection if not promptly treated. Direct inhalation of aerosolized Y. pestis can result in an extremely lethal form of primary pneumonic plague.1 The short incubation period (1–3 days) of pneumonic plague allows rapid disease progression with a high fatality rate, and historically, victims often become sources of secondary infections as the disease spreads throughout a population.1,4

As a countermeasure against the above scenarios, it is imperative to develop a safe and efficacious vaccine against plague. Vaccination is believed to be an efficient strategy for long-term protection. Previous reviews have comprehensively summarized different kinds of plague vaccine developments, including live recombinant, subunit, vectored, and other formulated vaccines before 2016 (see reviews19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32). Here, we only update the most recent advances of vaccine development (listed in Table 1) and assess the likely prophylactic and therapeutic plague vaccines.

Table 1 Vaccine evaluation against plague

Subunit vaccine

Many studies have established that the low calcium response protein V (LcrV), a multifunctional virulence protein, is an indispensable protective antigen against Y. pestis infection.24,28,33 Vaccine research found that recombinant LcrV, alone or combination with F1, in mixed cocktail and fusion formats, was able to provide superior protection against bubonic and pneumonic plague infections in different animal models (i.e., mice, rat, guinea pig, and Cynomolgus macaques).34,35,36,37 Clinical trials of LcrV and F1 subunit vaccines (RypVax™ and rF1V) began around a decade ago.27 RypVax™ manufactured by PharmAthene Inc. was a recombinant plague vaccine comprising separate recombinant F1 (rF1) and V (rV) antigens produced in Escherichia coli ( The rF1-V fusion vaccine was developed by The United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)38 and currently being further developed by Dynport Vaccine Company, LLC.27 The rV10, a truncated LcrV antigen developed by Schneewind’s group in 2011, is currently undergoing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pre-Investigational New Drug authorization review for a future phase I trial.27 In comparison to rF1-V, immunization with rV10 revealed no substantial differences in protection efficacy against pneumonic plague infection in mice, guinea pigs or Cynomolgus macaques. However, both rF1-V39,40 and rV1034 vaccines were unable to protect African green monkeys against pneumonic plague uniformly as Cynomolgus macaques, despite eliciting robust antibody response. The inconsistent efficacy of these subunit vaccines in African green monkeys and Cynomolgus macaques was speculated to be due to a deficiency in innate or cellular immunity, resulting in a lack of effective synergistic action between humoral and cell-mediated immune response to defend against pneumonic plague.41 Recently, several groups are trying to enhance immunogenicity of the subunit vaccines using different means.

The heat shock protein 70 domain II [HSP70(II)] of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as an immunomodulator was able to stimulate effective T-cell responses42 and ovalbumin-HSP70(II) fusion protein was sufficient to elicit ovalbumin specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes.43 Based on these findings, Tuteja’s group44,45 fused the F1 and LcrV antigens of Y. pestis with the HSP70(II) [F1-LcrV-HSP70(II) protein] as a plague vaccine to enhance cell-mediated immune response. A group of BALB/c mice immunized with F1-LcrV-HSP70(II) protein had significantly increased percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells producing IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ in comparison to the group of mice immunized with F1-LcrV fusion protein. However, immunization either with F1-LcrV-HSP(II) or F1-LcrV afforded complete protection for mice against intraperitoneal (i.p.) challenge with 100 LD50 of virulent Y. pestis S1 strain. A possible reason is that the lower dose of i.p. challenge might not differentiate the protective efficacy contributed from cellular immunity elicited by F1-LcrV-HSP(II).

Gregg et al.46 generated an Y. pestis KIM6+ derived mutant strain, Yp ΔmsbB pagPYpRep, in which the mutant disrupts the secondary lauryl acyl-transferase (MsbB) and restores the palmitate transferase (PagP) of Y. pestis. The mutant strain yielded a structurally distinct lipooligosaccharide molecule (BECC438) that can elicit Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) activation. C57BL/6J mice intramuscularly (i.m.) immunized with BECC438 adjuvated rF1-V using a prime-boost regimen were fully protected against i.p. challenge with 20 × LD50 of Y. pestis CO92 Δpgm strain.47

Intramuscular injection of Flagellin/F1/V in a dose escalation manner was conducted in healthy individuals from aged 8 through 45 years in a phase I trial. Sixty healthy subjects were enrolled; 52% males, 100% non-Hispanic, 91.7% white and mean age 30.8 years. Positive antibody responses were observed to F1, V, and flagellin with no severe reactogenicity.48 Rao’s group has developed a rF1mutV-PA recombinant subunit vaccine consisting of Y. pestis F1 and LcrV dual antigens, and Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (PA) adjuvanted with Alhydrogel®.49 The tri-valent vaccine elicited robust antibody responses in mice, rats, and rabbits and conferred complete protection in mice and rats against simultaneous intranasal (i.n.) challenge with Y. pestis CO92 and lethal intravenous (i.v.) injection of B. anthracis toxin.49 The F1mutV-PA was the first subunit vaccine showing complete protection against simultaneous challenge with Y. pestis and lethal B. anthracis toxin challenge in a variety of animal models, and demonstrated a potential prophylactic vaccine for preventing a bioterror attack with weaponized B. anthracis and/or Y. pestis.49

VypVaxDuo is a novel vaccine developed by Moore et al.50 and composed of the recombinant F1 and V proteins mixed with different formulations using a subcutaneous (s.c.) prime and an oral booster regimen. An early onset antibody response (IgG and IgA) was observed 14 days post-primary immunization, and full protection against s.c. challenge with 2 × 104 LD50 of Y. pestis CO92 was observed upon regimen completion in BALB/c mice. Moreover, Moore et al. approached their vaccine design with the goal of creating a practical solution for low- and middle-income countries endemic to plague. In this regard, VypVaxDuo is a strong potential vaccine as the primary vaccine formulation was exceptionally stable in vialled form under thermostressed conditions, circumventing the need for a cold chain for distribution and storage. Additionally, the prime-boost regimen requires only one clinic visit for the s.c. priming vaccination, as the oral boost vaccine formulation can be self-administered and minimizes the need for medical personnel and intervention.

A novel subunit plague vaccine developed by Liu et al. is composed of a native F1 and recombinant V (F1 + rV) antigens absorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. The F1 + rV vaccine induced a very strong humoral immune response and a low level of cell-mediated immune response in cynomolgus macaques.51 Subsequently, the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC) and the Jiangsu Provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted a one-year immunogenicity and vaccine safety study where 240 healthy adults aged 18–55 years were F1 + rV-immunized with 15 μg at day 0 or 20 μg at day 28. Results showed that anti-F1 titers and seroconversion rates were maintained at high levels up to 12 months, while anti-V titers and seroconversion rates decreased sharply at 6 months and continued to decrease at 12 months. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were observed during immunization. Overall, human clinical trials show the F1 + rV subunit vaccine induces a robust humoral immune response up to 12 months and has a good safety profile in humans.52

Attenuated Yersinia vaccine

Lipoprotein NlpD of Y. pestis is an essential virulence factor for the development of bubonic and pneumonic plague.53,54 Subcutaneous administration of the ΔnlpD Y. pestis Kimberley53 mutant conferred protection to mice against bubonic and pneumonic plague better than the EV76 vaccine strain.53 Dentovskaya et al. generated a variety of ΔnlpD mutant strains based on three Yersinia parental strains (i.e., subsp. pestis bv. antiqua strain 231; subsp. microtus bv. altaica strains I-3455 and I-2359). In comparison to the reference vaccine strain EV NIIEG, immunization with the ΔnlpD mutant strains provided potent protective immunity against plague in BALB/c mice challenged with 200 LD100 of virulent Y. pestis 231 strain, but failed to do so in the guinea pig model.54 The intrinsic reasons are not clear yet, but the inconsistent protection observed in different animal models diminishes the possibility of ΔnlpD Y. pestis mutant as one of the live plague vaccine candidates.

Chopra’s group characterized effects of the conserved quorum-sensing system (autoinducer-2, AI-2) on pulmonary Y. pestis infection in mice.55 In a series of mouse studies, they demonstrated that the deletion of ABC transport systems components (rbsA and lsrA genes) synergistically disrupted AI-2 signaling patterns and reduced more than 50-fold virulence of Y. pestis strain CO92 by pulmonary challenge in mice. However, deletion of luxS or lsrK (encoding AI-2 kinase) on top of the ΔrbsA ΔlsrA background strain restored the virulence phenotype as that of the wild-type Y. pestis CO92 or the ΔrbsA ΔlsrA mutant complemented with the rbsA and lsrA genes. The administration of synthetic AI-2 in mice could rescue the virulence of ΔrbsA ΔlsrA ΔluxS mutant equal to that of the ΔrbsA ΔlsrA strain, but couldn’t rescue the virulence of AI-of ΔrbsA ΔlsrA ΔluxS ΔlsrK mutant.55 More recently, the same group evaluated the long-term immunity of the Y. pestis mutant strains ΔlppΔmsbBΔail and ΔlppΔmsbB::ailL2lpp lacks the Braun lipoprotein, Lpp; ΔmsbB lacks an acetyltransferase, MsbB; Δail lacks the attachment invasion locus, Ail; ailL2 is a modified Ail with diminished virulence). Immunization of mice and rats with Y. pestis Δlpp ΔmsbB Δail, Δlpp ΔmsbB::ailL2 or Δlpp ΔmsbB Δpla mutations generated long-term humoral and cellular immune responses and afforded comprehensive protection against pulmonary challenge of Y. pestis CO92 on day 120.56 Due to high attenuation of Y. pestis Δlpp ΔmsbB Δpla mutant in mice and rats, the strain was recently excluded from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention select agent list.56 In a subsequent study, Chopra’s group tested additional mutants with combinations of different gene deletions based on results from an in vivo signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM) screening, and found that immunization with these mutant strains conferred protection against pneumonic plague of varying levels.57

Zauberman et al. assessed whether immunization with the EV76 live vaccine can stimulate rapid and effective protective immunity against immediate challenge of virulent Y. pestis KIM53 strain. C57BL/6 mice were s.c. challenged with 100 CFU (100 LD50) of virulent KIM53; s.c. immunization with 107 CFU of EV76 at the time of challenge conferred 91% protection, whereas s.c. immunization at 5 h post-challenge conferred 34% protection. Subsequently, the group assessed whether EV76-administration might promote rapid protection against pneumonic plague. C57BL/6 mice were s.c. immunized with 1 × 107 CFU of EV76, then i.n. challenged with 1 × 104 CFU (10 LD50) of KIM53 either concomitantly or 2 days post-immunization (dpi). The concomitantly immunized mice merely extended survival duration from 3 to 6.8 days, ultimately succumbing to infection, whereas the 2 dpi challenged mice had a 60% survival rate. Ex vivo analysis of Y. pestis growth in serum derived from EV76-immunized mice revealed that the rapid antibacterial activity was mediated by host heme- and iron-binding proteins hemopexin and transferrin, resulting in iron deprivation and further limiting the propagation of virulent Y. pestis in the host milieu, a form of host defense termed nutritional immunity.58 Based on current studies,59,60,61,62 vaccination with EV76 strain elicits a rapid and potent innate immune memory that could potentially provide considerable and immediate protection against bubonic and pneumonic plague, prior to mounting an adaptive immune response, which supports a novel therapeutic strategy for post-outbreak emergency responses.

The less virulent ancestor to Y. pestis,63 Y. pseudotuberculosis, typically causes a limited enteric disease in human and animals. Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis are remarkably similar in that they are >95% genetically identical and share a virulence plasmid, and they are different in that Y. pestis carries the additional plasmids pPCP1 and pMT1.64 Therefore, recombinant attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strains as a plague vaccine would be safer alternatives. Demeure’s group and our group developed different attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis either heterologous synthesizing capsule antigen F165,66 or delivering LcrV by Type three secretion system.67 Both groups demonstrated that a single dose of oral immunization with live attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis induced potent antibody and cell-mediated responses, and significant Th17 response in mice, and moreover provided significant protection against pulmonary challenge with high-dose virulent Y. pestis strains.65,66,67 However, protective efficacy and safety of these live attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strain should be evaluated further in other animal models. Altogether, those recent studies contribute to the growing evidences supporting development of live Yersinia vaccines as countermeasures for preventing plague.

Live vectored plague vaccines

An improved Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Vaccine (RASV) strain expressing multiple plasmid-encoded Y. pestis antigens, including LcrV196 (aa residues 131–326), Psn (pestisin receptor) and F1, has been studied by our group. Synthesis of multiple antigens did not cause adverse effects on bacterial growth. BALB/c mice were orally immunized with the RASV strain, χ12094(pYA5383). High antibody titers specific for rLcrV, Psn, and F1 were developed. Complete protection was conferred against s.c. challenge with 5700 CFU (~570 LD50) of Y. pestis CO92, and 60% survival against i.n. challenge with 5000 CFU (~50 LD50) of Y. pestis CO92.68 Oral immunization with χ12094(pYA5383) did not caused any deaths or disease symptoms in SCID mice over a 60-day period.68

Horwitz’s group investigated an F. tularensis LVS ΔcapB mutant strain and an attenuated Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) strain as vectors to deliver multiple protective antigens from B. anthracis and Y. pestis as a novel vaccine platform to combat three Tier 1 select agents, B. anthracis, Y. pestis, and F. tularensis.69 Homologous prime-boost with the LVS ΔcapB-vectored vaccines or heterologous prime-boost with LVS ΔcapB and Lm-vectored vaccines induced robust antigen-specific humoral immune responses, conferred protective immunity against lethal pulmonary challenge with B. anthracis Ames spores and F. tularensis Schu S4, but only afforded 50% protection against intranasal challenge with 1900 CFU of Y. pestis CO92 (~8 LD50).69 This study provided a proof of concept for an all-in-one vaccine providing protection against several tier 1 pathogens simultaneously.

In addition, Chopra’s group utilized a replication-defective human type 5 adenovirus (Ad5) vector for expression of a codon-optimized fusion gene YFV (ycsF, caf1, and lcrV). A heterologous prime-boost of mice and cynomolgus macaques with the trivalent rAd5-YFV vaccine conferred 100% protection against a stringent aerosol challenge dose of Y. pestis CO92.70 Arnaboldi et al. evaluated two distinct mucosal delivery platforms, a live bacterial vector, Lactobacillus plantarum, and a tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) vector for the intranasal administration of LcrV and F1 antigens.71 Both LcrV/F1-expressing vectors induced similarly high titers of IgG antibodies and proinflammatory cytokine secretion. Only the TMV-conjugated LcrV or F1, however, protected against subsequent lethal challenge with Y. pestis. These results suggest that mucosal delivery of TMV synthesizing F1-LcrV might induce complete protection against a lethal pneumonic infection of Y. pestis in mice.

Researchers at the United States Geological Survey’s National Wildlife Health Center have developed a Sylvatic Plague Vaccine (SPV) comprised of raccoon poxvirus (RCN) expressing both F1 and truncated V protein (V307) antigens, designed as a bait vaccine to protect Prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.).72,73 Prairie dogs are highly susceptible to Y. pestis and as such are potential sources of plague transmission to humans.74 Most recently, field trials showed that consumption of SPV-laden baits can protect prairie dogs against plague,75,76 which offers an additional approach for controlling plague transmission in epidemic areas.

Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are nano-sized vesicles (20–200 nm) released by a diverse range of Gram-negative bacteria and enriched in protein, polysaccharide, and lipid components, including an abundance of potent immunogens.77 By retaining the pathogen antigenic surface composition, OMVs elicit an innate immune response as well as prime the adaptive immune response.78 Since a licensed OMV vaccine against Neisseria meningitides has been proven safe and protective in humans,79 OMVs as vaccine development have received more attention recently. OMVs provide an economically-favorable vaccine platform due to their relatively inexpensive preparation and high stability. Moreover, OMVs encase a broad spectrum of immunogens, providing the theoretical advantages of simultaneously priming immunity against many antigens and thereby reducing the likelihood of antigen circumvention. In 2018 WHO plague vaccine workshop, one research team intended to utilize Bacteroides OMVs to deliver Y. pestis LcrV antigen as a new vaccine candidate. In the preliminary findings, non-human primates (NHPs) intranasally immunized with LcrV-containing OMVs generated considerable anti-LcrV IgG response in sera and anti-LcrV IgA response in salivary glands and broncho alveolar fluids (BAL).80

Monoclonal antibodies as therapeutic vaccines

LcrV- or F1-specific humoral immune responses alone can be effective in protection against Y. pestis.81,82 Previous studies showed that anti-LcrV or F1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can passively protect mice against plague challenge.83,84,85 Intratracheal delivery of aerosolized LcrV-specific and F1-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs 7.3 and F1-04-A-G1) protected mice in a model of pneumonic plague.86 Dimitrov’s group identified one F1-specific human mAb (m252) and two LcrV-specific human mAbs (m253, m254), and demonstrated that m252 affords better protection in mice against s.c. challenge with 25–40 LD50 of Y. pestis CO92 than the other two mAbs.87 Recently, Liu et al. identified four anti-F1 mAbs. Three of the mAbs (F5C10, F6E5, and F2H5) provided different levels of protection in mice subcutaneously challenged with 600 CFU of Y. pestis 141 strain. Among then, F2H5 provided complete protection in Balb/c mice subcutaneously challenged with Y. pestis 141 strain.88 Collectively, it would be possible that mAbs specific to F1 or LcrV can be utilized as a fast-acting post-exposure treatment for humans against Y. pestis infection.

Efficacy and safety of plague vaccine. Where is the cut-off?

Half a century ago, the USA developed and approved a formalin-killed whole cell Y. pestis vaccine (USP) which was used to vaccinate military during the Vietnam War.89,90 This vaccine afforded effective protection against bubonic plague, but the vaccine was highly reactogenic and failed to provide long-term protection and any protection against pneumonic plague,33,89,91,92 thus limiting its application against weaponized pneumonic plague. The rF1-V and RYpVax are safe and have passed through Phase I and II clinical trials,27,36 but the results of these Phase II trials are not yet available. In 2017, the FDA granted Orphan Drug status for the rF1-V plague vaccine ( that is proposed for marketing in 2020, which will provide effective prophylaxis to individuals at high risk of exposure to virulent Y. pestis. However, concerns of inefficacy arise due to the presence of F1-negative strains in natural reservoirs that have caused fatal disease in mice and Africa green monkey.93,94 The Δcaf1 Y. pestis CO92 was not only fully virulent to mice by bubonic and pneumonic plague challenge but also surpassed immune responses mounted from live-attenuated strains or F1 subunit vaccines.95,96 Andrews et al. showed that immunization of sole F1 capsular antigen provided significant protection against Y. pestis CO92 challenge, but failed to protect mice against Y. pestis C12 strain (F1- strain) by s.c. infection.97,98 Batra et al. also showed that vaccination with recombinant F1 alone failed to protect mice against Y. pestis S1 strain challenge by the intraperitoneal route.45 Altogether, these results dampen the reliability of F1 antigen as a sole antigen vaccine, despite the existence of many studies that demonstrated the immunization with F1 antigen alone,97,99 transfer of anti-F1 serum,100 or one dose of F1 formulated in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) microparticles101,102 significantly afforded protection against F1+ Y. pestis challenge.

In addition, the existence of lcrV polymorphisms in the Y. pestis subspecies103 might alter the protective efficacy of vaccines only composed of LcrV and F1, although these variations in the LcrV did not alter the lethality of these strains in mice and their natural hosts so far. In consideration of this reduced efficacy, Miller et al. investigated impact of polymorphisms in the lcrV gene of Y. enterocolitica on plague protective immunity. Their results showed that polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies raised against LcrV of Y. pestis KIM D27 were unable to block the type III injection of Y. pestis expressing LcrV(W22703) from Y. enterocolitica O:9 strain W22703 or LcrV(WA-314) from O:8 strain WA-314. Fortunately, the results showed these strains were unable to escape LcrV-mediated plague protective immunity in the intravenous challenge model.104 Thus, combination of multiple antigens was tested to prevent this risk.68,70,105 Studies have suggested that vaccine efficacy may be different when measuring protection against bubonic or pneumonic plague infection. Th1-skewed and Th17-skewed immune responses from vaccines provide better protection against the pulmonary Y. pestis infection than Th2-skewed responses from subunit vaccine.106,107,108,109,110,111 Therefore, vaccines formulations employing different Th1-skewing and Th17-skewing adjuvants, such as MPLA112 or CAF0150,113 could potentially achieve greater protection.

The live attenuated Y. pestis vaccines, EV series, made in 1920s, have been administered to millions of people in Madagascar, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Soviet Union.114,115 Single dose prime vaccination with the EV NIIEG live vaccine was able to induce immune responses that lasted one year against bubonic and, to some extent, pneumonic plague.25,116 Theoretically, the live EV series of vaccines are much better than the killed vaccine. However, the live vaccines were somewhat pathogenic in non-human primates and reactogenicity in humans,91,117,118,119 retained virulence when administered intranasally (i.n.) and intravenously (i.v.)107,118,120 or to persons carrying hemochromatosis.121 The lack of transparent protection and safety data in previous large-scale human immunization, and the lack of genetically uniformity of the vaccine strain due to many passages,118 has prevented the EV series of vaccines from gaining worldwide acceptance, especially in the US and Europe.89 As research efforts continue to construct live attenuated Y. pestis vaccine strains with specifically defined mutations, so do reaching the goal of balancing safety with protective efficacy. Moreover, the rational alteration of a live attenuated Y. pestis vaccine strains for induction of both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses toward several Y. pestis antigens will theoretically provide stronger protection than vaccines based on a combination of a few antigens.

Recently, the WHO conceptualized a Plague Vaccine Target Product Profile (TPP) at the WHO Plague Vaccine Workshop in 2018.80 In this map, there exists at least 17 plague vaccine candidates in the pipeline, including subunit (F1/V-based with adjuvant), bacterial vector-based (e.g., OMV-delivered, Salmonella-expressed), viral vector-based (e.g., Ad5-based, Chad-based), E. coli T4 bacteriophage-based, and live attenuated (e.g., Y. pseudotuberculosis-based or Y. pestis-based) vaccines expressing one or several primary antigens of Y. pestis (e.g., F1 capsular protein antigen, LcrV antigen, YscF antigen, and/or pesticin coagulase), which have been tested in different animal models. Two of these candidates have completed a Phase 2 clinical trial and are moving toward FDA licensure, and several candidates have plans to enter clinical trials in 2019.

The requirements and considerations of the WHO TPP80 for a prophylactic plague vaccine include elicitation of long lasting immunity, and feasible administration in populations living in endemic areas or health workers involved in plague outbreak investigation or surveillance. The requirements and considerations for a therapeutic vaccine includes elicitation of a rapid protective immunity after the first dose within a narrow window, and protection of individuals in outbreak areas to block transmission chains. Mechanisms of protective immunity are complex and vary depending on the vaccine design and the route of administration, in addition to variations in the immune response induced by the intrinsic attributes of different vaccine candidates. Many recent studies have demonstrated that heterologous prime-boost immunizations could potentially be more immunogenic than homologous prime-boost immunizations.70,122,123,124,125 Thus, combinations of different vaccine forms using a heterologous primer-boost strategy, such as a subunit vaccine with a live attenuated Y. pestis vaccine or live vectored plague vaccine, might overcome current limitations of plague vaccines and would effectively prevent the potential plague outbreak.


  1. 1.

    Perry, R. D. & Fetherston, J. D. Yersinia pestis—etiologic agent of plague. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10, 35–66 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stenseth, N. C. et al. Plague: past, present, and future. PLoS Med. 5, e3 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Gage, K. L. & Kosoy, M. Y. Natural history of plague: perspectives from more than a century of research. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50, 505–528 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    CDC: 4 deaths, 15 cases of bubonic plague in U.S. this year.

  5. 5.

    WHO. Plague—Madagascar. (2017).

  6. 6.

    Mead, P. S. Plague in Madagascar—a tragic opportunity for improving public health. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 106–108 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tsuzuki, S. et al. Dynamics of the pneumonic plague epidemic in Madagascar, August to October 2017. Eur. Surveill. 22, 17–00710 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Galimand, M. et al. Multidrug resistance in Yersinia pestis mediated by a transferable plasmid. N. Engl. J. Med. 337, 677–680 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Guiyoule, A. et al. Transferable plasmid-mediated resistance to streptomycin in a clinical isolate of Yersinia pestis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 43–48 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hinnebusch, B. J., Rosso, M. L., Schwan, T. G. & Carniel, E. High-frequency conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes to Yersinia pestis in the flea midgut. Mol. Microbiol. 46, 349–354 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Welch, T. J. et al. Multiple antimicrobial resistance in plague: an emerging public health risk. PLoS ONE 2, e309 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kiefer, D. et al. Phenotypical characterization of Mongolian Yersinia pestis strains. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 12, 183–188 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guiyoule, A. et al. Recent emergence of new variants of Yersinia pestis in Madagascar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 2826–2833 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Radnedge, L., Agron, P. G., Worsham, P. L. & Andersen, G. L. Genome plasticity in Yersinia pestis. Microbiology 148, 1687–1698 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mackey, T. K. et al. Emerging and reemerging neglected tropical diseases: a review of key characteristics, risk factors, and the policy and innovation environment. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 949–979 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Boire, N. A., Riedel, V. A. A., Parrish, N. M. & Riedel, S. Lessons learned from historic plague epidemics: the relevance of an ancient disease in modern times. J. Anc. Dis. Prev. Rem. 2, 114 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Eisen, R. J. et al. Early-phase transmission of Yersinia pestis by unblocked fleas as a mechanism explaining rapidly spreading plague epizootics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15380–15385 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Riedel, S. Biological warfare and bioterrorism: a historical review. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. Proc. 17, 400–406 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Verma, S. K. & Tuteja, U. Plague vaccine development: current research and future trends. Front. Immunol. 7, 602 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Oyston, P. C. & Williamson, E. D. Prophylaxis and therapy of plague. Expert. Rev. Anti-Infective 11, 817–829 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang, X., Zhang, X., Zhou, D. & Yang, R. Live-attenuated Yersinia pestis vaccines. Expert. Rev. Vaccin. 12, 677–686 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Williamson, E. D. & Oyston, P. C. Protecting against plague: towards a next-generation vaccine. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 172, 1–8 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Feodorova, V. A. & Motin, V. L. Plague vaccines: current developments and future perspectives. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 1, e36 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sun, W., Roland, K. L. & Curtiss, R. 3rd Developing live vaccines against plague. J. Infect. Dev. Count. 5, 614–627 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Feodorova, V. A. & Corbel, M. J. Prospects for new plague vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccine 8, 1721–1738 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Alvarez, M. L. & Cardineau, G. A. Prevention of bubonic and pneumonic plague using plant-derived vaccines. Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 184–196 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Quenee, L. E. & Schneewind, O. Plague vaccines and the molecular basis of immunity against Yersinia pestis. Hum. Vaccine 5, 817–823 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smiley, S. T. Current challenges in the development of vaccines for pneumonic plague. Expert. Rev. Vaccine 7, 209–221 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cornelius, C., Quenee, L., Anderson, D. & Schneewind, O. Protective immunity against plague. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 603, 415–424 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Huang, X. Z., Nikolich, M. P. & Lindler, L. E. Current trends in plague research: from genomics to virulence. Clin. Med. Res. 4, 189–199 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Calhoun, L. N. & Kwon, Y. M. Salmonella-based plague vaccines for bioterrorism. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 39, 92–97 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sun, W. Plague vaccines: status and future. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 918, 313–360 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Titball, R. W. & Williamson, E. D. Yersinia pestis (plague) vaccines. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 4, 965–973 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Quenee, L. E., Ciletti, N. A., Elli, D., Hermanas, T. M. & Schneewind, O. Prevention of pneumonic plague in mice, rats, guinea pigs and non-human primates with clinical grade rV10, rV10-2 or F1-V vaccines. Vaccine 29, 6572–6583 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jones, S. M., Griffin, K. F., Hodgson, I. & Williamson, E. D. Protective efficacy of a fully recombinant plague vaccine in the guinea pig. Vaccine 21, 3912–3918 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Williamson, E. D. et al. Human immune response to a plague vaccine comprising recombinant F1 and V antigens. Infect. Immun. 73, 3598–3608 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nakajima, R., Motin, V. L. & Brubaker, R. R. Suppression of cytokines in mice by protein A-V antigen fusion peptide and restoration of synthesis by active immunization. Infect. Immun. 63, 3021–3029 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Heath, D. G. et al. Protection against experimental bubonic and pneumonic plague by a recombinant capsular F1-V antigen fusion protein vaccine. Vaccine 16, 1131–1137 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pitt, M. L. Animals models and correlates of protection for plague vaccines workshop (Gaithersburg, MD, 2004).

  40. 40.

    Bashaw, J. et al. Development of in vitro correlate assays of immunity to infection with Yersinia pestis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 14, 605–616 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kummer, L. W. et al. Antibodies and cytokines independently protect against pneumonic plague. Vaccine 26, 6901–6907 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Huang, Q., Richmond, J. F. L., Suzue, K., Eisen, H. N. & Young, R. A. In vivo cytotoxic T lymphocyte elicitation by mycobacterial heat shock protein 70 fusion proteins maps to a discrete domain and is CD4(+) T cell independent. J. Exp. Med. 191, 403–408 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Flaherty, K. M., DeLuca-Flaherty, C. & McKay, D. B. Three-dimensional structure of the ATPase fragment of a 70K heat-shock cognate protein. Nature 346, 623–628 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Verma, S. K., Batra, L. & Tuteja, U. A Recombinant trivalent fusion protein F1-LcrV-HSP70(II) augments humoral and cellular immune responses and imparts full protection against Yersinia pestis. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1053 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Batra, L. et al. HSP70 domain II of Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates immune response and protective potential of F1 and LcrV antigens of Yersinia pestis in a mouse model. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e3322 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gregg, K. A. et al. Rationally designed TLR4 Ligands for vaccine adjuvant discovery. mBio 8, 17 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Gregg, K. A. et al. A lipid A-based TLR4 mimetic effectively adjuvants a Yersinia pestis rF-V1 subunit vaccine in a murine challenge model. Vaccine 36, 4023–4031 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Frey, S. E. et al. A phase I safety and immunogenicity dose escalation trial of plague vaccine, Flagellin/F1/V, in healthy adult volunteers (DMID 08-0066). Vaccine 35, 6759–6765 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tao, P. et al. A Bivalent anthrax-plague vaccine that can protect against two tier-1 bioterror pathogens, Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis. Front. Immunol. 8, 687 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Moore, B. D. et al. Dual route vaccination for plague with emergency use applications. Vaccine 36, 5210–5217 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Liu, L. et al. A safety and immunogenicity study of a novel subunit plague vaccine in cynomolgus macaques. J. Appl. Toxicol. 38, 408–417 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hu, J. et al. One year immunogenicity and safety of subunit plague vaccine in Chinese healthy adults: an extended open-label study. Hum. Vaccine Immunother. 41, 2701–2705 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tidhar, A. et al. The NlpD lipoprotein is a novel Yersinia pestis virulence factor essential for the development of plague. PLoS ONE 4, e7023 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dentovskaya, S. V. et al. Selective protective potency of Yersinia pestis ΔnlpD mutants. Acta Nat. 7, 102–108 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Fitts, E. C. et al. New insights into autoinducer-2 signaling as a virulence regulator in a mouse model of pneumonic plague. mSphere 1, e00342–16 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tiner, B. L. et al. Immunisation of two rodent species with new live-attenuated mutants of Yersinia pestis CO92 induces protective long-term humoral- and cell-mediated immunity against pneumonic plague. NPJ Vaccine 1, 16020 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Andersson, J. A. et al. Identification of new virulence factors and vaccine candidates for Yersinia pestis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7, 448 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zauberman, A. et al. Host iron nutritional immunity induced by a live Yersinia pestis vaccine strain is associated with immediate protection against plague. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7, 277 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Quintin, J. et al. Candida albicans infection affords protection against reinfection via functional reprogramming of monocytes. Cell Host Microbe 12, 223–232 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Barton, E. S. et al. Herpesvirus latency confers symbiotic protection from bacterial infection. Nature 447, 326–329 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Netea, M. G. et al. Trained immunity: a program of innate immune memory in health and disease. Science 352, aaf1098 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kaufmann, E. et al. BCG educates hematopoietic stem cells to generate protective innate immunity against tuberculosis. Cell 172, 176–190 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Achtman, M. et al. Yersinia pestis, the cause of plague, is a recently emerged clone of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14043–14048 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Chain, P. S. et al. Insights into the evolution of Yersinia pestis through whole-genome comparison with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13826–13831 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sun, W., Sanapala, S., Rahav, H. & Curtiss, R. Oral administration of a recombinant attenuated Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strain elicits protective immunity against plague. Vaccine 33, 6727–6735 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Demeure, C. E., Derbise, A. & Carniel, E. Oral vaccination against plague using Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Chem. Biol. Interact. 267, 89–95 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sun, W. et al. LcrV delivered via type III secretion system of live attenuated Yersinia pseudotuberculosis enhances immunogenicity against pneumonic plague. Infect. Immun. 82, 4390–4404 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Sanapala, S., Rahav, H., Patel, H., Sun, W. & Curtiss, R. Multiple antigens of Yersinia pestis delivered by live recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccine strains elicit protective immunity against plague. Vaccine 34, 2410–2416 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Jia, Q. et al. Single vector platform vaccine protects against lethal respiratory challenge with Tier 1 select agents of anthrax, plague, and tularemia. Sci. Rep. 8, 7009 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Sha, J. et al. A replication-defective human type 5 adenovirus-based trivalent vaccine confers complete protection against plague in mice and nonhuman primates. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 23, 586–600 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Arnaboldi, P. M. et al. Intranasal delivery of a protein subunit vaccine using a tobacco mosaic virus platform protects against pneumonic plague. Vaccine 34, 5768–5776 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Rocke, T. E. et al. Consumption of baits containing raccoon pox-based plague vaccines protects black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Vector Borne. Zoonotic Dis. 10, 53–58 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Rocke, T. E., Kingstad-Bakke, B., Berlier, W. & Osorio, J. E. A recombinant raccoon poxvirus vaccine expressing both Yersinia pestis F1 and truncated V antigens protects animals against lethal plague. Vaccines 2, 772–784 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Abbott, R. C., Osorio, J. E., Bunck, C. M. & Rocke, T. E. Sylvatic plague vaccine: a new tool for conservation of threatened and endangered species? Ecohealth 9, 243–250 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Rocke, T. E. et al. Sylvatic plague vaccine partially protects Prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) in field trials. Ecohealth 14, 438–450 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Tripp, D. W., Rocke, T. E., Runge, J. P., Abbott, R. C. & Miller, M. W. Burrow dusting or oral vaccination prevents plague-associated prairie dog colony collapse. Ecohealth 14, 451–462 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Kulp, A. & Kuehn, M. J. Biological functions and biogenesis of secreted bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 163–184 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Ellis, T. N. & Kuehn, M. J. Virulence and immunomodulatory roles of bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74, 81–94 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Holst, J. et al. Properties and clinical performance of vaccines containing outer membrane vesicles from Neisseria meningitidis. Vaccine 27, B3–B12 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    W. H. O. Workshop. Efficacy trials of Plague vaccines: endpoints, trial design, site selection. (2018).

  81. 81.

    Anderson, G. W. et al. Short- and long-term efficacy of single-dose subunit vaccines against Yersinia pestis in mice. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58, 793–799 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Williamson, E. D. et al. An IgG1 titre to the F1 and V antigens correlates with protection against plague in the mouse model. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 116, 107–114 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Anderson, G. W. et al. Protection of mice from fatal bubonic and pneumonic plague by passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies against the F1 protein of Yersinia pestis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 56, 471–473 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Hill, J., Leary, S. E., Griffin, K. F., Williamson, E. D. & Titball, R. W. Regions of Yersinia pestis V antigen that contribute to protection against plague identified by passive and active immunization. Infect. Immun. 65, 4476–4482 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Hill, J. et al. Synergistic protection of mice against plague with monoclonal antibodies specific for the F1 and V antigens of Yersinia pestis. Infect. Immun. 71, 2234–2238 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Hill, J. et al. Administration of antibody to the lung protects mice against pneumonic plague. Infect. Immun. 74, 3068–3070 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Xiao, X. et al. Human anti-plague monoclonal antibodies protect mice from Yersinia pestis in a bubonic plague model. PLoS ONE 5, e13047 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Liu, W. C. et al. Identification and characterization of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody that provides complete protection against Yersinia pestis. PLoS ONE 12, e0177012 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Meyer, K. F. Effectiveness of live or killed plague vaccines in man. Bull. World Health Organ. 42, 653–666 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Cavanaugh, D. C. et al. Plague immunization. V. Indirect evidence for the efficacy of plague vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 129, S37–S40 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Meyer, K. F., Cavanaugh, D. C., Bartelloni, P. J. & Marshall, J. D. Jr. Plague immunization. I. Past and present trends. J. Infect. Dis. 129, S13–S18 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Cohen, R. J. & Stockard, J. L. Pneumonic plague in an untreated plague-vaccinated individual. JAMA 202, 365–366 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Meka-Mechenko, T. V. F1-negative natural Y. pestis strains. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 529, 379–381 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Davis, K. J. et al. Pathology of experimental pneumonic plague produced by fraction 1-positive and fraction 1-negative Yersinia pestis in African green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 120, 156–163 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Quenee, L. E., Cornelius, C. A., Ciletti, N. A., Elli, D. & Schneewind, O. Yersinia pestis caf1 variants and the limits of plague vaccine protection. Infect. Immun. 76, 2025–2036 (2008).

  96. 96.

    Cornelius, C. A., Quenee, L. E., Elli, D., Ciletti, N. A. & Schneewind, O. Yersinia pestis IS1541 transposition provides for escape from plague immunity. Infect. Immun. 77, 1807–1816 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Andrews, G. P., Heath, D. G., Anderson, G. W. Jr, Welkos, S. L. & Friedlander, A. M. Fraction 1 capsular antigen (F1) purification from Yersinia pestis CO92 and from an Escherichia coli recombinant strain and efficacy against lethal plague challenge. Infect. Immun. 64, 2180–2187 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Andrews, G. P. et al. Protective efficacy of recombinant Yersinia outer proteins against bubonic plague caused by encapsulated and nonencapsulated Yersinia pestis. Infect. Immun. 67, 1533–1537 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Simpson, W. J., Thomas, R. E. & Schwan, T. G. Recombinant capsular antigen (fraction 1) from Yersinia pestis induces a protective antibody response in BALB/c mice. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 43, 389–396 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Meyer, K. F., Hightower, J. A. & McCrumb, F. R. Plague immunization. VI. Vaccination with the fraction I antigen of Yersinia pestis. J. Infect. Dis. 129, S41–S45 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Reddin, K. M. et al. Comparison of the immunological and protective responses elicited by microencapsulated formulations of the F1 antigen from Yersinia pestis. Vaccine 16, 761–767 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Huang, S. S., Li, I. H., Hong, P. D. & Yeh, M. K. Development of Yersinia pestis F1 antigen-loaded microspheres vaccine against plague. Int. J. Nanomed. 9, 813–822 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Anisimov, A. P. et al. Amino acid and structural variability of Yersinia pestis LcrV protein. Infect. Genet. Evol. 10, 137–145 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Miller, N. C., Quenee, L. E., Elli, D., Ciletti, N. A. & Schneewind, O. Polymorphisms in the lcrV gene of Yersinia enterocolitica and their effect on plague protective immunity. Infect. Immun. 80, 1572–1582 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Tao, P. et al. Mutated and bacteriophage T4 nanoparticle arrayed F1-V immunogens from Yersinia pestis as next generation plague vaccines. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003495 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Lin, J. S., Kummer, L. W., Szaba, F. M. & Smiley, S. T. IL-17 contributes to cell-mediated defense against pulmonary Yersinia pestis infection. J. Immunol. 186, 1675–1684 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Smiley, S. T. Immune defense against pneumonic plague. Immunol. Rev. 225, 256–271 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Smiley, S. T. Cell-mediated defense against Yersinia pestis infection. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 603, 376–386 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Comer, J. E. et al. Transcriptomic and innate immune responses to Yersinia pestis in the lymph node during bubonic plague. Infect. Immun. 78, 5086–5098 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Dinc, G., Pennington, J. M., Yolcu, E. S., Lawrenz, M. B. & Shirwan, H. Improving the Th1 cellular efficacy of the lead Yersinia pestis rF1-V subunit vaccine using SA-4-1BBL as a novel adjuvant. Vaccine 32, 5035–5040 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Bi, Y. J. et al. IL-17A produced by neutrophils protects against pneumonic plague through orchestrating IFN-gamma-activated Macrophage programming. J. Immunol. 192, 704–713 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Toussi, D. N. & Massari, P. Immune adjuvant effect of molecularly-defined toll-like receptor ligands. Vaccines 2, 323–353 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Ciabattini, A. et al. Modulation of primary immune response by different vaccine adjuvants. Front. Immunol. 7, 427 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Demeure, C. in Yersinia: Systems Biology and Control (eds E. Carniel & B. J. Hinnebusch) 123–142 (Caister Academic Press, Wymondham, 2012).

  115. 115.

    Williamson, E. D. & Oyston, P. C. F. in Yersinia: Systems Biology and Control. (eds E. Carniel & B. J. Hinnebusch) 143–168 (Caister Academic Press, Wymondham, 2012).

  116. 116.

    Saltykova, R. A. & Faibich, M. M. Experience from a 30-year study of the stability of the properties of the plague vaccine strain EV in the USSR. Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 6, 3–8 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Russell, P. et al. A comparison of Plague vaccine, USP and EV76 vaccine induced protection against Yersinia pestis in a murine model. Vaccine 13, 1551–1556 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Meyer, K. F., Smith, G., Foster, L., Brookman, M. & Sung, M. Live, attenuated Yersinia pestis vaccine: virulent in nonhuman primates, harmless to guinea pigs. J. Infect. Dis. 129, S85–S120 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Hallett, A. F., Isaacson, M. & Meyer, K. F. Pathogenicity and immunogenic efficacy of a live attentuated plaque vaccine in vervet monkeys. Infect. Immun. 8, 876–881 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Une, T. & Brubaker, R. R. In vivo comparison of avirulent Vwa- and Pgm- or Pstr phenotypes of yersiniae. Infect. Immun. 43, 895–900 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fatal laboratory-acquired infection with an attenuated Yersinia pestis strain—Chicago, Illinois, 2009. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 60, 201–205 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Hu, S. L. et al. Protection of macaques against SIV infection by subunit vaccines of SIV envelope glycoprotein gp160. Science 255, 456–459 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Cottingham, M. G. et al. Different levels of immunogenicity of two strains of Fowlpox virus as recombinant vaccine vectors eliciting T-cell responses in heterologous prime-boost vaccination strategies. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 13, 747–757 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Lu, S. Heterologous prime-boost vaccination. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 21, 346–351 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Vordermeier, H. M. et al. Cellular immune responses induced in cattle by heterologous prime-boost vaccination using recombinant viruses and bacille Calmette-Guerin. Immunology 112, 461–470 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Derbise, A. et al. Complete protection against pneumonic and bubonic plague after a single oral vaccination. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0004162 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Sun, W. et al. A live attenuated strain of Yersinia pestis KIM as a vaccine against plague. Vaccine 29, 2986–2998 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Lathem, W. W. et al. Progression of primary pneumonic plague: a mouse model of infection, pathology, and bacterial transcriptional activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17786–17791 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Agar, S. L. et al. Characterization of a mouse model of plague after aerosolization of Yersinia pestis CO92. Microbiology 154, 1939–1948 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Okan, N. A. et al. The smpB-ssrA mutant of Yersinia pestis functions as a live attenuated vaccine to protect mice against pulmonary plague infection. Infect. Immun. 78, 1284–1293 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Ms. Yasmine Karma for language editing. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI125623 to WS and Albany Medical College start-up fund.

Author information




The manuscript was written by Wei Sun and Amit K. Singh. Each author has contributed to, seen and approved this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, W., Singh, A.K. Plague vaccine: recent progress and prospects. npj Vaccines 4, 11 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing