Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Common health conditions in childhood and adolescence, school absence, and educational attainment: Mendelian randomization study

Abstract

Good health is positively related to children’s educational outcomes, but relationships may not be causal. Demonstrating a causal influence would strongly support childhood and adolescent health as important for education policy. We applied genetic causal inference methods to assess the causal relationship of common health conditions at age 10 (primary/elementary school) and 13 (mid-secondary/mid-high school) with educational attainment at 16 and school absence at 14–16. Participants were 6113 children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Exposures were symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), depression, asthma, migraines and BMI. Genetic liability for these conditions and BMI was indexed by polygenic scores. In non-genetic, multivariate-adjusted models, all health conditions except asthma and migraines were associated with poorer attainment and greater school absence. School absence substantially mediated effects of BMI (39.9% for BMI at 13) and migraines (72.0% at 10), on attainment with more modest mediation for emotional and neurodevelopmental conditions. In genetic models, a unit increase in standardized BMI at 10 predicted a 0.19 S.D. decrease (95% CI: 0.11, 0.28) in attainment at 16, equivalent to around a 1/3 grade lower in all subjects, and 8.7% more school absence (95% CI:1.8%,16.1%). Associations were similar at 13. Genetic liability for ADHD predicted lower attainment but not more absence. Triangulation across multiple approaches supports a causal, negative influence on educational outcomes of BMI and ADHD, but not of ASD, depression, asthma or migraine. Higher BMI in childhood and adolescence may causally impair educational outcomes.

Introduction

Good health in childhood predicts better educational attainment1,2,3 but associations may not be causal. Less advantaged children have worse health4, so associations could be confounded by socioeconomic conditions5 or, especially for mental health, reflect reverse causation6. But if childhood health does causally influence attainment, it may play an important role in intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic (dis)advantage7.

Impact on education of behavioural, emotional and physical health may differ8. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) predicts lower educational attainment, as measured by test scores and grade repetition9,10,11, including where sibling-fixed effects are used to control for family-level confounding10. Evidence is more mixed for depressive symptoms6,12,13,14,15,16, which in some studies show a negative association with years of schooling but in others do not. For autism spectum disorder (ASD), evidence suggests substantial heterogeneity in educational outcomes, even after considering variability in IQ17,18. For BMI, evidence is mixed. Among longitudinal studies, plausibly less affected by reverse causation, and other causal inference studies, only some support a detrimental impact of overweight/obesity in childhood on educational outcomes19,20,21,22. There is also mixed evidence for asthma23,24,25,26,27 and rarer health conditions23,24,25,28,29. The impact on school absence, and any mediating role of school absence in explaining associations of health with educational attainment, also likely differs by condition30,31,32. A link with school absence is clearer for migraine26,33 and depression34, than for asthma23,27,31, ADHD24,35, ASD24,36 or obesity37,38,39,40.

Approaches have been developed to circumvent confounding and reverse causation by using genetic variants associated with health conditions as proxies or instrumental variables. Genetic variants associated with health conditions are, conditional on certain assumptions, assigned randomly at conception and cannot be influenced by later environmental influences or health41. Methods using genetic variants are therefore unaffected by classical kinds of bias or reverse causation which affect traditional observational study designs, and for this reason are often compared to a randomized controlled trial42. These approaches support a causal influence on educational attainment of ADHD9,43, but are inconclusive for body weight44,45,46. Results for ASD are null43, or point to existence of high-functioning subgroups47. One study has examined depression, reporting null results48.

The aim of this study was to assess the causal influence of common health conditions in childhood and adolescence on educational attainment, on school absence, and the extent to which school absence mediates health-attainment associations. We applied genetic methods to the impact of six aspects of childhood and adolescent health on educational attainment and on school absence: ADHD, ASD, depressive symptoms, BMI, asthma, and migraines, in an English birth cohort49. We considered health conditions which are prevalent enough to be of considerable importance in current child and adolescent public health, and which have known genetic markers, to allow application of genetic methods. To avoid the confounding and reverse causation, which have affected previous investigation, we use polygenic scores (PGSs) capturing genetic liability for health conditions. We explore associations of health with educational attainment, associations with absenteeism, and mediation of associations with attainment by absenteeism. In all cases we avoid recall bias by using linked records for school absence and educational attainment. We consider health at age 10 and 13, to examine whether influence of health on attainment differs with age. Finally, we conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization for influence of the same conditions on educational attainment in independent adult samples.

Results

Socioeconomic background, GCSEs, and school absence

Reflecting the regional nature of the cohort, the analytic sample showed differences from national averages, for example in a slightly higher maternal age (28.3 years, compared to 27.7 nationally in 1991). Participants in the analytic sample had a higher average GCSE capped score (around 332 points) than the national average at the time (308 points), consistent with differences previously described for the cohort as a whole49. Within the analytic sample, GCSEs and school absence (Table 1) varied by gender and socioeconomic background (Supplementary Table 6). GCSE points scores were higher for girls than boys: 345.6 (95% CI: 338.7, 352.5) compared to 319 (95% CI: 311.0, 327.1), as was school absence: 7.8% (95% CI: 7.2%, 8.4%) compared to 7.2% (95% CI: 6.6%, 7.7%). Maternal education was associated positively with attainment, and negatively with school absence. Children whose mothers had a degree had an average GCSE point score of 392.9 (95% CI: 387.0, 398.9) and school absence of 6.1% (95% CI: 5.0%, 7.3%). For children whose mothers had the least qualifications, average GCSE points score was 275.7 (95% CI: 266.9, 284.5) and school absence 9.9% (95% CI: 9.0%, 10.7%). GCSE points scores were negatively associated with school absence. Adjusting for gender, an increase in absence corresponding to an extra day/year was associated with −2.6 (−3.2,−2.1) fewer GCSE points.

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of analytic sample (N = 6113)a.

Phenotypic models: health, GCSEs and school absence

In phenotypic models (Table 2), all aspects of child and adolescent health were associated with GCSE points score except migraines and asthma. All were associated with school absence (Table 2). Depressive symptoms at 10 showed a considerably stronger association with GCSEs than depressive symptoms at 13 (GCSE points scores: −16.4 (95% CI: −19.7, −13.1) compared to −6.8 (95% CI: −9.9, −3.8) per SD MFQ score). Otherwise, associations did not differ substantially by age. In mediation analyses, associations between all aspects of health and educational attainment were mediated by school absence except for asthma (Table 3). Percent of associations mediated was lowest for ADHD (7.1% at age 10, 8.4% at 13) and highest for BMI (39.9% at age 10, 32.6% at 13) and migraine (72.0% at age 10). (Table 3). Results were similar restricting to participants in mainstream state schools. For other school types, small numbers of participants led to imprecise estimates (Supplementary Tables 7 and 8).

Table 2 Phenotypic associations of health conditions with educational attainment at 16 and school absence at 14–16 (N = 6113).
Table 3 Mediation by absenteeism at age 14–16 of associations of health conditions with educational attainment at 16.

Genetic models: health, GCSEs and school absence

Predictive power of the PGSs varied considerably. The proportion of variance explained by the PGS (R2 or pseudo-R2 for binary exposures) was 7.6% and 7.9% for BMI at 10–11 and 13, respectively, but <1% for ADHD, migraine and asthma, and <0.1% for ASD and depressive symptoms (Supplementary Table 9). Tests for instrument strength (Supplementary Table 9) confirmed only the BMI PGS could be used as an instrumental variable.

For ADHD and BMI, higher values of the PGS predicted lower GCSE points (Table 4). Each SD increase in the PGS for ADHD corresponded to a decrease of 2.70 (95% CI: −4.83, −0.58) GCSE points. A one SD increase in the BMI PGS corresponded to a decrease of 5.37 (95% CI: −7.78, −2.96) GCSE points and a 2.72% (95% CI: 0.57, 4.91) increase in school absence. Using the BMI PGS as an instrumental variable showed that, for each unit increase in BMI z-score at age 10, GCSE points scores were 16.79 lower (95% CI: −24.38, −9.19) and absences were 8.73% greater (95% CI: 1.82, 16.12). For each unit increase in age-standardized and gender-standardized BMI at age 13, GCSE points scores were 15.90 lower (95% CI: −23.09, −8.72) and absences were 8.25% greater (95% CI: 1.75, 15.17).

Table 4 Association of polygenic scores with educational attainment at 16 and school absence at age 14–16a.

Results were again similar restricting to participants in mainstream state schools, with estimates for other school types imprecise (Supplementary Table 10). Tests of instrument validity applying two-sample methodology in ALSPAC (Supplementary Table 11) were consistent with main results, and there was no evidence of bias due to pleiotropy for associations with GCSEs. Although there was evidence of pleiotropy for effect of BMI on absenteeism (MR-Egger intercept 0.004, p = 0.02), additional SNP-specific checks50 could not identify particular SNPs responsible (Supplementary Table 12). Results did not differ using a BMI PGS excluding 24 SNPs identified as outliers in two-sample MR (Supplementary Table 13).

Results of two-sample MR analyses using published GWAS for educational attainment (years of schooling) were broadly consistent with results from ALSPAC (Table 5). Previous two-sample MR analysis reported evidence of an effect of ADHD43 but not ASD43 or depression48. Our analyses supported an influence of BMI, with a one-unit increase in BMI associated with 0.16 (p < 0.001) and 0.11 (p < 0.001) fewer years of schooling in IVW and weighted median models, respectively. These models also support a negative influence of asthma on years of schooling (−0.02, p < 0.001 and −0.02, p = 0.01, respectively). There was little evidence of a causal impact of migraine. For BMI, the MR-Egger constant (−0.002, p < 0.001) indicated an influence of pleiotropy. Outliers were therefore identified by comparing SNP-specific estimates with the overall IVW estimate, and analyses repeated with these SNPs excluded. This did not change conclusions (Supplementary Table 14). We checked associations of these SNPs with other phenotypes but none stood out as clear confounders (Supplementary Table 15).

Table 5 Results from two-sample summary-level Mendelian randomizationa.

Discussion

In phenotypic analysis, all aspects of poorer health at ages 10 and 13 predicted greater school absences at ages 14–16, and all except asthma and migraines predicted lower educational attainment at 16. Depressive symptoms at 10 were more strongly associated with GCSEs than were depressive symptoms at 13. This supports previous work indicating that emotional health around the time of transition from primary school to secondary school may be important for later educational outcomes51. For ADHD, ASD, and depressive symptoms, we explored the effect of an incremental increase in symptoms rather than a diagnosis, and relationships of diagnoses with educational outcomes may differ. Lack of associations of asthma and migraine with GCSEs may reflect binary measures unable to capture the full range of symptoms, or misclassification of exposures as diagnosis can occur later. Results of mediation analysis are consistent with a recent UK study52 which reported substantial mediation of by parent-reported long-term absence and truancy of the impact of long-term health conditions and of mental health on educational attainment. Our findings indicate such results do not only reflect recall bias and add to current knowledge by showing that school absence additionally mediates the association between BMI and educational attainment. However, phenotypic associations are vulnerable to reverse causation and residual confounding by family-level and individual-level characteristics not captured by covariates. For this reason, we applied genetic causal inference approaches to the relationships.

Consistent with previous work in ALSPAC9, genetic liability for ADHD was associated with worse GCSEs, but it was not associated with greater school absence. This is consistent with extensive evidence for the influence of other factors on academic attainment, including how well a child ‘fits’ with the expectations of the school environment, teacher views and attitudes, and bullying by peers53. Genetic liability for higher BMI was associated with both attainment and school absence, and using the BMI PGS as an instrument supported these findings. MR analyses using ALSPAC found some evidence of pleiotropy in BMI-absenteeism associations, although no individually pleiotropic SNPs were identified. Mechanisms should be explored in samples large enough to investigate SNP-specific pathways. Two-sample summary-level Mendelian randomization based on older individuals also supported a negative influence of higher BMI on educational attainment. These results indicate that, for BMI, associations with attainment and school absence do not simply reflect confounding. Results from previous observational studies have been mixed, which may reflect heterogeneity in the quality of studies20. Previous genetic causal inference work in unrelated adults has suggested that higher BMI reduces likelihood of having a university degree54. Our results are consistent with those findings and indicate that any negative impact of BMI on educational attainment may begin long before university. Recent work using genetic data on adult sibling pairs has investigated the influence of family-level factors which could bias results of MR studies using samples of unrelated individuals, for example the influence of parental genotype on offspring phenotype via environmental pathways, or assortative mating46. This study found that, when these biases are accounted for, the estimated impact of BMI on educational attainment attenuates. The results in the current study of BMI with educational outcomes may therefore partly be due to assortative mating or parental effects. Investigating these mechanisms requires genetic data on large numbers of related individuals (e.g. siblings or parent–offspring trios), not available in the current study.

Causal mechanisms besides absenteeism linking BMI to attainment are likely complex. Cross-sectional research has suggested negative neurocognitive correlates of obesity, but has not established causal influence55 and evidence from longitudinal studies is less clear19. Socially mediated processes by which weight could influence educational outcomes involve weight bias by teachers56 and bullying by peers57. Further work using genetic and qualitative approaches will be required to unpick these mechanisms. That IV coefficients were larger than OLS coefficients for the (negative) influence of BMI on GCSEs may point to an offsetting mechanism causing suppression of effects in observational models. In UK children, both thinness and obesity are associated with deprivation58, so a nonlinear relationship between BMI and socioeconomic hardship could bias downwards estimates of the impact of BMI on attainment. IV estimates could also be inflated due to family-level processes, such as the influence of parents’ genotype on offspring via environmental pathways59, which may bias MR estimates based on samples of unrelated individuals46.

Negative associations of depressive symptoms at age 1260, ADHD symptoms in preschool61 and obesity at 11 and 16 with GCSEs22 have been previously shown in ALSPAC. Our results are consistent with a causal interpretation of the latter two. They are also consistent with studies into educational impact of ADHD and depression using within-sibling comparison10,12, which addresses confounding at the level of the family, but not the individual. Two-sample MR suggested an additional influence of asthma on educational attainment. This was observed in a recent study using UK Biobank, where genetically instrumented asthma corresponded to a 17% lower probability (CI: −25.3% to −8.7%) of holding a degree62. Since in the two-sample analysis the outcome was measured in a substantially older population63, the discrepancy with ALSPAC could reflect better treatment available to younger cohorts, or asthma diagnoses made in adulthood.

A key strength of this study is triangulation across several methodological approaches to investigate if associations are causal. A limitation concerns the differential strength of the genetic instruments. For ADHD, ASD and depression, the low proportion of variance in the phenotype explained by the PGS limited the degree to which genetic methods could be meaningfully applied. For ASD, a more lenient threshold was required for SNPs included in the PGS. Thus, genetic results for ASD and depressive symptoms should not be interpreted as evidence of no effect. Rather, associations may become clearer as the genetics of these conditions becomes better understood. Migraine could only be examined at age 10, not 13, where effects may be greater. Recent evidence points to bias due to family-level processes in genetic studies of BMI46. Such effects could have influenced results, potentially overestimating BMI’s causal influence on attainment. Work using genetic data on related family members will be required to investigate this further. ALSPAC is not a national survey, and over-representation of affluent groups and young people with comparatively high educational attainment49 may limit generalizability. Analysis was restricted to individuals of European ancestry, and results may not be generalizable to other groups. A major strength was use of linked records for educational attainment and school absence, meaning associations were not influenced by recall bias. A limitation is that absence data was restricted to age 14–16, but absence earlier in school may differently affect attainment.

Our results add to the evidence for the importance of health for educational outcomes. They indicate that children and adolescents with a high BMI, and those affected by ADHD, are at particular risk of not fulfilling their educational potential. They may therefore benefit from extra support. Difficulties experienced by children with ADHD result from an interaction or a poor ‘fit’ of the child with a school environment in which neurodiversity is not able to thrive, for instance, where large class sizes are the norm53, and teachers are stressed and under pressure64. Given this complexity, a more nuanced approach at the school level may be necessary rather than directly targeting the affected children themselves. With a number of possible social and biological mechanisms linking BMI to educational outcomes, including the psychological effects of weight-based stigma or bullying victimization57,65, this may also be the case for BMI.

In an English cohort born in the early 1990s, analyses supported a negative, causal influence of high BMI on educational attainment and school absence. Mediation analysis supported mediation by school absence for BMI and for ADHD, but their influence on attainment was not fully explained. Results therefore highlight the need for better understanding of social and biological mechanisms by which BMI and ADHD negatively influence attainment.

Methods

One and two-sample Mendelian randomization

Since SNPs are assigned at conception, associations with SNPs cannot be due to reverse causation or classical confounding41. Multiple SNPs associated with a health condition can be combined into a PGS representing genetic liability for a condition. Relative to single SNPs, this improves statistical power. In one-sample Mendelian randomization, causal influence of an exposure is estimated using the PGS as an instrumental variable for the exposure in a two-stage least-squares model. Two-sample Mendelian randomization requires only summary-level results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS)66. This compares associations of individual SNPs with an exposure and with an outcome (here, educational attainment). If the exposure causally influences the outcome, the same SNPs should associate with both.

Study participants

Data came from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a birth cohort of children born in south-west England between April 1991 and December 1992 (Supplementary Fig. 1). The total ALSPAC sample comprised 15,454 pregnancies, with 14,901 children alive at 12 months. Data was collected from pregnancy onwards49,67. After excluding related individuals, 7856 ALSPAC participants had genetic data, of whom 6113 had GCSE records. These participants comprised the analytic sample. For participants with genetic and GCSE data but missing data on school absence, imputed values of school absence were used. Observed characteristics differed between participants with and without full data (Supplementary Table 1), and multiple imputation with chained equations (m = 50) was used to impute remaining missing data (Supplementary Table 2). Power calculations assuming an R2 for instrument strength of 0.06 (taken from the BMI GWAS68) showed that in our sample there was 80% power to detect a causal effect on GCSEs of 0.15 SD with an SD difference in BMI69.

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Consent for biological samples has been collected in accordance with the Human Tissue Act (2004). Informed consent for the use of data collected via questionnaires and clinics was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time. Completion of individual questionnaires was taken as consent for use of data from that questionnaire, with additional written consent from parents for use of clinic data. At age 16, young people and their parents gave written informed consent for use of the young person’s genetic information. At age 18, study children were sent ‘fair processing’ materials describing ALSPAC’s intended use of their health and administrative records and were given clear means to consent or object via a written form. Education data were not extracted for participants who objected, or who were not sent fair processing materials70,71.

Measures

ADHD symptoms were based on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire hyperactivity subscale (SDQ-HI), completed by the child’s main carer (usually the child’s mother) in questionnaires administered when children were aged 9 and 13. The SDQ is a validated screening tool for psychiatric disorders at these ages72. Depressive symptoms were measured using a validated screening tool, the short-form Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)73, completed by children at 10 and 13. For autism, a continuous measure of autistic social traits was derived from the Social Communication Disorder Checklist (SCDC)74, a validated measure completed by the child’s main carer when the children were aged 10 and 13. BMI (in kg/m2) was obtained from height and weight measurements at 10 and 13 and standardized to the 1990 UK Growth Reference by gender and age with STATA’s zanthro package75. Resulting z-scores, representing SD difference from reference means, were used as continuous variables. Asthma in the past 12 months (yes/no) was defined using mother’s reports of diagnoses, medication use and wheezing symptoms, at 10 and 13. At age 10, but not later, mothers were asked if their children had experienced migraine (yes/no). The study website contains details of available data through a searchable data dictionary and variable search tool: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/.

We consider educational attainment at the end of year 11 (equivalent to 10th grade), when most participants were aged 16, and the end of compulsory education in the UK at the time. Attainment and school absence came from linkage to the National Pupil Database (NPD). Attainment was based on General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) qualifications, compulsory qualifications usually taken at age 16. We used the total GSCE and equivalents points score, a continuous measure (range 0–540), based on a pupil’s best eight subjects, where a one-grade difference in one GCSE subject equates to 6 points. A small number of scores above 464 (8A* grades) reflect pupils who took AS levels early. More information is available from the Department of Education76. Absence data was available for academic years 2006–7, 2007–8, and 2008–9, corresponding to school years 9, 10 and 11 for different ALSPAC participants, whose birth dates span almost 2 years. Absence data was available for all sub-cohorts for year 11, most for year 10, but only a small minority for year 9. We therefore considered school absence during years 10 and 11, by imputing each separately and calculating an average post-imputation. (GCSEs are awarded at the end of year 11, so always following the period over which absence was considered.) Absences were analysed as the number of half-day sessions recorded as missed, divided by the number of sessions on which data was available. For most participants, data was available each year for between 280 and 320 sessions, not the 390 of a standard school year, as records cover early September until the end of May. A small minority had data corresponding to fewer sessions (2.3% in year 10, 4.8% in year 11).

ALSPAC children were genotyped using the Illumina HumanHap550 platform, and standard quality control procedures applied. Individuals were excluded for gender mismatches, minimal or excessive heterozygosity, disproportionate individual missingness (>3%) and insufficient sample replication (IBD < 0.8). During genetic quality controls individuals with non-European ancestry were removed, which is standard practice in genetic studies to minimize bias due to ancestral population stratification77. SNPs with a minor allele frequency of <1%, call rate of <95% or evidence of Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium (p-value < 5 × 10−7) were removed. Cryptic relatedness was measured as proportion of identity by descent (IBD > 0.1). Imputation was performed using Impute v2.2.2 to the 1000Genomes reference panel, and SNPs with poor imputation quality (infoscore < 0.08) removed.

GWAS were used to identify SNPs associated with ADHD, ASD, depression, asthma, migraine, and BMI. We obtained SNP associations for ADHD78, depression48, ASD47, asthma79 and migraine80 from GWAS including child and adult-onset conditions, since GWAS specifically of child-onset conditions were unavailable. For BMI, we used the largest GWAS of adult BMI. A GWAS of BMI in children exists81, but ALSPAC comprised a substantial component of the discovery sample, and such sample overlap can cause bias82. When choosing SNPs to include in each PGS, the conventional threshold of genome-wide significance of p < 5 × 10−8 was applied, except for ASD. As too few SNPs meet that threshold to permit meaningful analysis, a more liberal threshold of p < 5 × 10−7 was used. Among SNPs available in ALSPAC which had passed standard quality control, we removed non-independent SNPs (linkage disequilibrium clumping threshold r2 = 0.01, distance = 10,000 kb). Each PGS was calculated in PLINK 1.9 by summing trait-increasing alleles. These were weighted by each allele’s regression coefficient from the relevant GWAS, so that genetic variants with greater effects contributed more to the scores, and standardized (details of GWAS and SNPs are provided in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).

Statistical analysis

Analyses in ALSPAC were conducted using Stata v15. The proportion of school sessions missed was considerably skewed, so for analysis was log-transformed after adding 0.01. Coefficients for absence therefore represent percentage change. Linear regression was used to examine associations of health conditions with the two outcomes, attainment and logged school absence. All analyses adjusted for gender and family socioeconomic confounders at birth: maternal age (in years) and parity (categorized as 0, 1, 2, or 3+), maternal educational qualifications (none, CSE, vocational qualifications, O-level, A-level, or university degree), maternal smoking during pregnancy (yes/no), and maternal housing tenure (owner-occupier/council rented/private or housing association rented/other). Sensitivity analyses stratified by school type: mainstream state schools, independent (fee-paying) and other schools (community special schools, pupil referral units, further education colleges). Mediation analysis using STATA’s paramed package considered associations of health with attainment via school absence (the indirect effect) and unexplained by school absence (the direct effect). Models were run separately within imputed datasets and estimates combined across imputations. All analyses clustered standard errors by school. All hypothesis tests were two-sided.

Linear regression was used to examine associations of each PGS with GCSEs and school absence. Genetic models adjusted for gender and 20 principal ancestry components42. Where there was evidence of an association and the PGS was a sufficiently strong instrument (first-stage F-statistics > 10), PGSs were used as instruments for health conditions at age 10 and 13. A concern in MR studies is pleiotropy, which can bias exposure-outcome causal estimates. This is when alleles related to the exposure influence the outcome via other pathways. Validity of instruments was checked using Stata’s MRRobust package. This applies two-sample MR methodology to the SNPs in each PGS, producing MR-median, MR-modal and MR-Egger estimates83.

Using the TwoSampleMR package in R84, summary-level MR analyses were performed to assess causal influence of asthma, migraine and BMI on educational attainment in independent adult samples. SNPs associated with educational attainment came from the most recent GWAS of years of schooling in European-ancestry individuals63, except for BMI where an earlier GWAS85 was used to avoid bias due to sample overlap. Details of GWAS used are given in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.

Data availability

The informed consent obtained from ALSPAC participants does not allow the data to be made freely available through any third party maintained public repository. However, data used for this submission can be made available on request to the ALSPAC Executive. The ALSPAC data management plan describes in detail the policy regarding data sharing, which is through a system of managed open access. Full instructions for applying for data access can be found here: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/access/. The GWAS Summary Statistics on which this analysis drew are available from the EBI GWAS Catalog, https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/. Accession numbers are: GCST005839 (depression), GCST007543 (ADHD), GCST007556 (ASD), GCST000804 (asthma), GCST003720 (migraine), GCST006900 (BMI), GCST006442 and GCST003676 (educational attainment).

Code availability

Stata code used in this analysis is available at https://github.com/ammhughes/childhood-health-and-educational-outcomes.

References

  1. 1.

    Case, A. & Paxson, C. Causes and consequences of early-life health. Demography https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2010.0007 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Case, A., Fertig, A. & Paxson, C. The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. J. Health Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.008 (2005).

  3. 3.

    Brekke, I. Health and educational success in adolescents: a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1966-0 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Delaney, L. & Smith, J. P. Childhood health: trends and consequences over the life course. Future Child. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2012.0003 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Eide, E. R. & Showalter, M. H. Estimating the relation between health and education: what do we know and what do we need to know? Econ. Educ. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.03.009 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Esch, P. et al. The downward spiral of mental disorders and educational attainment: a systematic review on early school leaving. BMC Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0237-4 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Currie, J. Healthy, wealthy, and wise: Socioeconomic status, poor health in childhood, and human capital development. J. Econ. Lit. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.87 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Suhrcke, M. & de Paz Nieves, C. The Impact of Health and Health Behaviours on Educational Outcomes in High Income Countries: a Review of the Evidence. 19–26. (WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011). At https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/134671/e94805.pdf.

  9. 9.

    Stergiakouli, E. et al. Association between polygenic risk scores for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and educational and cognitive outcomes in the general population. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw216 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Currie, J. & Stabile, M. Child mental health and human capital accumulation: the case of ADHD. J. Health Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.03.001 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Fletcher, J. & Wolfe, B. Child mental health and human capital accumulation: the case of ADHD revisited. J. Health Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.10.010 (2008).

  12. 12.

    Fletcher, J. M. Adolescent depression and educational attainment: results using sibling fixed effects. Health Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1526 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Veldman, K. et al. Mental health problems and educational attainment in adolescence: 9-Year follow-up of the TRAILS study. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101751 (2014).

  14. 14.

    McLeod, J. D., Uemura, R. & Rohrman, S. Adolescent mental health, behavior problems, and academic achievement. J. Health Soc. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512462888 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Evensen, M., Lyngstad, T. H., Melkevik, O. & Mykletun, A. The role of internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescence for adult educational attainment: evidence from sibling comparisons using data from the young HUNT study. Eur. Sociol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw001 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Brière, F. N. et al. Depressive and anxious symptoms and the risk of secondary school non-completion. Br. J. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.117.201418 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Keen, D., Webster, A. & Ridley, G. How well are children with autism spectrum disorder doing academically at school? An overview of the literature. Autism https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315580962 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Estes, A., Rivera, V., Bryan, M., Cali, P. & Dawson, G. Discrepancies between academic achievement and intellectual ability in higher-functioning school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1127-3 (2011).

  19. 19.

    Martin, A. et al. Longitudinal Associations Between Childhood Obesity and Academic Achievement: Systematic Review with Focus Group Data. Curr. Obesity Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-017-0272-9 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Santana, C. C. A., Hill, J. O., Azevedo, L. B., Gunnarsdottir, T. & Prado, W. L. The association between obesity and academic performance in youth: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12582 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Segal, A. B., Huerta, M. C., Aurino, E. & Sassi, F. The impact of childhood obesity on human capital in high-income countries: a systematic review. Obes. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13104 (2020).

  22. 22.

    Booth, J. N. et al. Obesity impairs academic attainment in adolescence: findings from ALSPAC, a UK cohort. Int. J. Obes. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.40 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Champaloux, S. W. & Young, D. R. Childhood chronic health conditions and educational attainment: a social ecological approach. J. Adolesc. Heal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.016 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Crump, C. et al. Chronic health conditions and school performance among children and youth. Ann. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.01.001 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Lum, A. et al. Understanding the school experiences of children and adolescents with serious chronic illness: a systematic meta-review. Child: Care Health Dev. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12475 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Mikkonen, J., Moustgaard, H., Remes, H. & Martikainen, P. The Population Impact of Childhood Health Conditions on Dropout from Upper-Secondary Education. J. Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.034 (2018).

  27. 27.

    Hamilton, V., Holland, P., Milton, B. & Whitehead, M. The social and economic consequences of childhood asthma across the lifecourse: a systematic review. Child: Care Health Dev. (2004).

  28. 28.

    Maslow, G. R., Haydon, A., McRee, A. L., Ford, C. A. & Halpern, C. T. Growing up with a chronic illness: Social success, educational/vocational distress. J. Adolesc. Health https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.001 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Ruijsbroek, A., Wijga, A. H., Gehring, U., Kerkhof, M. & Droomers, M. School performance: a matter of health or socio-economic background? Findings from the PIAMA birth cohort study. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134780 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Berg, I. Absence from school and mental health. Br. J. Psychiatry 161, 154–66, https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.161.2.154 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kearney, C. A. School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: a contemporary review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.012 (2008).

  32. 32.

    Egger, H. L., Costello, E. J. & Angold, A. School refusal and psychiatric disorders: a community study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CHI.0000046865.56865.79 (2003).

  33. 33.

    Rees, D. I. & Sabia, J. J. The effect of migraine headache on educational attainment. J. Hum. Resour. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.2.317 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Finning, K. et al. The association between child and adolescent depression and poor attendance at school: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.055 (2019).

  35. 35.

    Fleming, M. et al. Educational and health outcomes of children treated for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. JAMA Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0691 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Munkhaugen, E. K., Gjevik, E., Pripp, A. H., Sponheim, E. & Diseth, T. H. School refusal behaviour: are children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder at a higher risk? Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2017.07.001 (2017).

  37. 37.

    Taras, H. & Potts-Datema, W. Obesity and student performance at school. J. School Health https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb07346.x (2005).

  38. 38.

    An, R., Yan, H., Shi, X. & Yang, Y. Childhood obesity and school absenteeism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12599 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Zhang, J., Hansen, A. R., Duncan, D. T., Li, Y. & Tedders, S. H. Actual body weight or perceived body weight? Comment on ‘childhood obesity and school absenteeism: a systematic review and meta-analysis’. Obes. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12651 (2018).

  40. 40.

    An, R. & Yang, Y. Response to “actual body weight or perceived body, comments on ‘childhood obesity and school absenteeism: a systematic review and meta-analysis’”. Obes. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12650 (2018).

  41. 41.

    Pingault, J. B. et al. Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research. Nat. Rev. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0020-3 (2018).

  42. 42.

    Davies, N. M., Holmes, M. V. & Davey Smith, G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k601.

  43. 43.

    Dardani, C. et al. Is genetic liability to ADHD and ASD causally linked to educational attainment? Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.11.944041v1 (2020).

  44. 44.

    von Hinke, S., Davey Smith, G., Lawlor, D. A., Propper, C. & Windmeijer, F. Genetic markers as instrumental variables. J. Health Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.10.007 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Tyrrell, J. et al. Height, body mass index, and socioeconomic status: Mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i582 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Brumpton, B. et al. Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17117-4 (2020).

  47. 47.

    Grove, J. et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8 (2019).

  48. 48.

    Wray, N. R. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0090-3 (2018).

  49. 49.

    Boyd, A. et al. Cohort profile: The ‘Children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys064 (2013).

  50. 50.

    Teumer, A. Common methods for performing Mendelian randomization. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00051 (2018).

  51. 51.

    West, P., Sweeting, H. & Young, R. Transition matters: Pupils’ experiences of the primary-secondary school transition in the West of Scotland and consequences for well-being and attainment. Res. Pap. Educ. 25, 21–50 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hale, D. R. & Viner, R. M. How adolescent health influences education and employment: Investigating longitudinal associations and mechanisms. J. Epidemiol. Community Health https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-209605 (2018).

  53. 53.

    Richardson, M. et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) delivered in school settings: Systematic reviews of quantitative and qualitative research. Health Technol. Assess. (Rockv). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19450 (2015).

  54. 54.

    Howe, L. D. et al. Effects of body mass index on relationship status, social contact and socio-economic position: Mendelian randomization and within-sibling study in UK Biobank. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz240 (2019).

  55. 55.

    Liang, J., Matheson, B. E., Kaye, W. H. & Boutelle, K. N. Neurocognitive correlates of obesity and obesity-related behaviors in children and adolescents. Int. J. Obes. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.142 (2014).

  56. 56.

    Nutter, S. et al. Weight bias in educational settings: a systematic review. Curr. Obes. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-019-00330-8 (2019).

  57. 57.

    Puhl R. & King K. Weight discrimination and bullying. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2012.12.002 (2013).

  58. 58.

    Pearce, A., Rougeaux, E. & Law, C. Disadvantaged children at greater relative risk of thinness (as well as obesity): a secondary data analysis of the England National Child Measurement Programme and the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Int. J. Equity Health https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0187-6 (2015).

  59. 59.

    Kong, A. et al. The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes. Science (80-.). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan6877 (2018).

  60. 60.

    Davies, J., Sullivan, S. & Zammit, S. Adverse life outcomes associated with adolescent psychotic experiences and depressive symptoms. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1496-z (2018).

  61. 61.

    Washbrook, E., Propper, C. & Sayal, K. Pre-school hyperactivity/attention problems and educational outcomes in adolescence: prospective longitudinal study. Br. J. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123562 (2013).

  62. 62.

    Harrison, S. et al. The causal effects of health conditions and risk factors on social and socioeconomic outcomes: Mendelian randomization in UK Biobank. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa114 (2020).

  63. 63.

    Lee, J. J. et al. Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3 (2018).

  64. 64.

    Kidger, J. et al. Teachers’ wellbeing and depressive symptoms, and associated risk factors: a large cross sectional study in English secondary schools. J. Affect. Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.054 (2016).

  65. 65.

    Puhl, R. M. et al. Experiences of weight teasing in adolescence and weight-related outcomes in adulthood: a 15-year longitudinal study. Prev. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.023 (2017).

  66. 66.

    Burgess, S., Scott, R. A., Timpson, N. J., Smith, G. D. & Thompson, S. G. Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors. Eur. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0011-z (2015).

  67. 67.

    Fraser, A. et al. Cohort profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys066 (2013).

  68. 68.

    Yengo, L. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in 700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 3641–3649 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Brion, M. J. A., Shakhbazov, K. & Visscher, P. M. Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt179 (2013).

  70. 70.

    Boyd, A. et al. Professionally designed information materials and telephone reminders improved consent response rates: Evidence from an RCT nested within a cohort study. J. Clin. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.014 (2015).

  71. 71.

    Teyhan, A., Boyd, A., Wijedasa, D. & MacLeod, J. Early life adversity, contact with children’s social care services and educational outcomes at age 16 years: UK birth cohort study with linkage to national administrative records. BMJ Open https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030213 (2019).

  72. 72.

    Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R. & Meltzer, H. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Int. Rev. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000046128 (2003).

  73. 73.

    Angold, A., Costello, J., Van Kämmen, W. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. Development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents: factor composition and structure across development. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. (1996).

  74. 74.

    Skuse, D. H., Mandy, W. P. L. & Scourfield, J. Measuring autistic traits: Heritability, reliability and validity of the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist. Br. J. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.187.6.568 (2005).

  75. 75.

    Vidmar, S. I., Cole, T. J. & Pan, H. Standardizing anthropometric measures in children and adolescents with functions for egen: update. Stata J. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1301300211 (2013).

  76. 76.

    Department for Education. Examination Point Scores (Department for Education, 2015).

  77. 77.

    Morris, T. T., Davies, N. M., Hemani, G. & Smith, G. D. Population phenomena inflate genetic associations of complex social traits. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay0328 (2020).

  78. 78.

    Demontis, D. et al. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0269-7 (2019).

  79. 79.

    Moffatt, M. F. et al. A large-scale, consortium-based genomewide association study of asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0906312 (2010).

  80. 80.

    Gormley, P. et al. Meta-analysis of 375,000 individuals identifies 38 susceptibility loci for migraine. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3598 (2016).

  81. 81.

    Felix, J. F. et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new susceptibility loci for childhood body mass index. Hum. Mol. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddv472 (2016).

  82. 82.

    Burgess, S., Davies, N. M. & Thompson, S. G. Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization. Genet. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21998 (2016).

  83. 83.

    Spiller, W., Davies, N. M. & Palmer, T. M. Software application profile: Mrrobust—a tool for performing two-sample summary Mendelian randomization analyses. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy195 (2019).

  84. 84.

    Hemani, G. et al. The MR-base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408 (2018).

  85. 85.

    Okbay, A. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17671 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. GWAS data was generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe. This publication is the work of the authors, who will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). This research was specifically funded by the Health Foundation. The Medical Research Council (MRC) and the University of Bristol support the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit [MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/9, MC_UU_00011/1]. The Economics and Social Research Council (ESRC) support NMD via a Future Research Leaders grant [ES/N000757/1] and a Norwegian Research Council Grant number 295989. L.D.H. is supported by a Career Development Award from the UK Medical Research Council (MR/M020894/1). K.H.W. is supported by the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol and the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund [204813/Z/16/Z]. This work is part of a project entitled ‘Social and economic consequences of health: causal inference methods and longitudinal, intergenerational data’, which is part of the Health Foundation’s Efficiency Research Programme (Award number 807293). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.H. reviewed existing literature, prepared the data, carried out analysis and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. K.H.W. carried out additional analysis. L.D.H. and N.M.D. obtained funding for this work. All authors contributed to study design and interpretation of results and made important revisions to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Hughes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hughes, A., Wade, K.H., Dickson, M. et al. Common health conditions in childhood and adolescence, school absence, and educational attainment: Mendelian randomization study. npj Sci. Learn. 6, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00080-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00080-6

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing