Multichannel bridges and NSC synergize to enhance axon regeneration, myelination, synaptic reconnection, and recovery after SCI

Nekanti, Usha; Sakthivel, Pooja S.; Zahedi, Atena; Creasman, Dana A.; Nishi, Rebecca A.; Dumont, Courtney M.; Piltti, Katja M.; Guardamondo, Glenn L.; Hernandez, Norbert; Chen, Xingyuan; Song, Hui; Lin, Xiaoxiao; Martinez, Joshua; On, Lillian; Lakatos, Anita; Pawar, Kiran; David, Brian T.; Guo, Zhiling; Seidlits, Stephanie K.; Xu, Xiangmin; Shea, Lonnie D.; Cummings, Brian J.; Anderson, Aileen J.

doi:10.1038/s41536-024-00356-0

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 18 March 2024

Multichannel bridges and NSC synergize to enhance axon regeneration, myelination, synaptic reconnection, and recovery after SCI

Usha Nekanti ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-7135^1,2,
Pooja S. Sakthivel^1,2^na1,
Atena Zahedi¹^na1,
Dana A. Creasman^1,2,
Rebecca A. Nishi ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-6668¹,
Courtney M. Dumont³,
Katja M. Piltti ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-0442¹,
Glenn L. Guardamondo¹,
Norbert Hernandez¹,
Xingyuan Chen¹,
Hui Song¹,
Xiaoxiao Lin²,
Joshua Martinez¹,
Lillian On¹,
Anita Lakatos¹,
Kiran Pawar ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7475-6570⁴,
Brian T. David⁵,
Zhiling Guo⁶,
Stephanie K. Seidlits⁷,
Xiangmin Xu^2,8,
Lonnie D. Shea ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-9673³,
Brian J. Cummings ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3628-5290^1,2,9,10^na2 &
…
Aileen J. Anderson^1,2,9,10^na2

npj Regenerative Medicine volume 9, Article number: 12 (2024) Cite this article

2536 Accesses
8 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Regeneration in the injured spinal cord is limited by physical and chemical barriers. Acute implantation of a multichannel poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) bridge mechanically stabilizes the injury, modulates inflammation, and provides a permissive environment for rapid cellularization and robust axonal regrowth through this otherwise inhibitory milieu. However, without additional intervention, regenerated axons remain largely unmyelinated (<10%), limiting functional repair. While transplanted human neural stem cells (hNSC) myelinate axons after spinal cord injury (SCI), hNSC fate is highly influenced by the SCI inflammatory microenvironment, also limiting functional repair. Accordingly, we investigated the combination of PLG scaffold bridges with hNSC to improve histological and functional outcome after SCI. In vitro, hNSC culture on a PLG scaffold increased oligodendroglial lineage selection after inflammatory challenge. In vivo, acute PLG bridge implantation followed by chronic hNSC transplantation demonstrated a robust capacity of donor human cells to migrate into PLG bridge channels along regenerating axons and integrate into the host spinal cord as myelinating oligodendrocytes and synaptically integrated neurons. Axons that regenerated through the PLG bridge formed synaptic circuits that connected the ipsilateral forelimb muscle to contralateral motor cortex. hNSC transplantation significantly enhanced the total number of regenerating and myelinated axons identified within the PLG bridge. Finally, the combination of acute bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation exhibited robust improvement in locomotor recovery. These data identify a successful strategy to enhance neurorepair through a temporally layered approach using acute bridge implantation and chronic cell transplantation to spare tissue, promote regeneration, and maximize the function of new axonal connections.

Neural stem cell delivery via porous collagen scaffolds promotes neuronal differentiation and locomotion recovery in spinal cord injury

Article Open access 15 June 2020

Strategies and prospects of effective neural circuits reconstruction after spinal cord injury

Article Open access 08 June 2020

Transplanting neural progenitor cells to restore connectivity after spinal cord injury

Article 09 June 2020

Introduction

Penetrating spinal cord injury (SCI), which accounts for a significantly smaller proportion of injuries, offers little opportunity for acute neuroprotection, and may require true axonal regeneration for repair. Axons in the spinal cord do retain some growth capacity; however, this potential is limited by the presence of inhibitory scar tissue, growth-inhibitory molecules, and myelin-associated glycoprotein molecules^1,2,3,4,5. Decades of research on SCI regeneration have made it clear that this multifactorial problem is likely to require a combinatorial solution^6,7,8,9,10.

Implanted biomaterial scaffolds are one path by which to attempt to restore function after SCI. Functionalization of an injectable hydrogel matrix with an enzyme to degrade CSPGs and injection into an SCI cavity has been shown to enable serotonergic axon growth through the biomaterial, with an exit into the caudal-spared parenchyma and evidence of locomotor recovery; however, the hydrogel alone showed neither axon growth nor functional recovery¹¹. Similarly, acute implantation of a 3D-printed scaffold pre-seeded with neural cells resulted in improvement of joint movements; locomotor improvement in this model was proposed to result from the formation of a bridge circuit within the pre-seeded scaffold, in part because implantation of the scaffold alone did not yield recovery¹². Finally, acute injection of bioactive scaffolds has been shown to promote regeneration through the site of a severe SCI in mice with recovery of function; however, as locomotor improvement is evident within one week, this is likely to reflect tissue sparing and not regeneration¹³. In an alternative approach, we have shown that implantation of an empty multi-lumen poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) bridge enables corticospinal tract (CST) axons to regenerate through the full length of the bridge and cross into the spared parenchyma below the implantation site, producing functional locomotor recovery on a ladder task beginning 10 weeks later, a timeline consistent with a mechanism that requires axon regeneration as opposed to tissue sparing¹⁴.

Whether axons that regenerate into implanted biomaterials become remyelinated has not received a great deal of attention. In the PLG bridge, for example, only 5–10% of regenerated axons are associated with oligodendrocyte-derived myelin^15,16,17. While myelination may not be required for spontaneous recovery after contusion SCI¹⁸, it is an essential factor for efficient transmission of signals from the motor cortex to the spinal cord in the healthy CNS; indeed, 86% of the rodent CST and 99% of the normal human CST is myelinated^19,20. The impact of myelination of regenerated axons on function is unknown. Endogenous CNS stem cells become activated in response to SCI^21,22, but the capacity of these cells for remyelination is limited by both time and distance from the lesion epicenter^23,24, with steady declines in these populations by 4 weeks post-injury^21,24,25,26. This suggests that the endogenous progenitor response to the injury goes quiescent before axonal regeneration is achieved through the PLG bridge, identifying a temporal mismatch. We sought to address this gap by investigating acute bridge implantation paired with chronic hNSC transplantation. To accomplish this, rather than implanting a seeded bridge as other studies have tested, we delayed hNSC delivery by transplanting into the spared parenchyma adjacent to the bridge 30 days later, analyzing migration of donor cells into axon-containing bridge channels and recovery of function.

Critically, transplanted hNSC migrating into the PLG bridge will encounter an altered immune microenvironment^16,27,28. We have previously shown that immune cells influence the fate, migration, functional integration, and efficacy of NSC transplanted after SCI^{29,30,31,32,33}. We therefore first tested the effect of the PLG bridge on the time course of the innate immune response after SCI in vivo (Fig. 1a). We further tested the effect of the PLG biomaterial on hNSC fate in vitro, alone or in combination with immune factors (Fig. 1b). Finally, we evaluated the effect of combining PLG bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation in vivo (Fig. 1c), analyzing hNSC fate, CST regeneration and myelination, and locomotor recovery. Our data identify the enhancement of neurorepair through a temporally layered approach using acute bridge implantation and chronic hNSC transplantation to spare tissue, promote regeneration, and maximize the function of new axonal connections.

**Fig. 1: Experimental design schematic.**

Results

PLG bridge implantation modulates the cellular immune response in vivo by prolonging the macrophage (MØ)/microglial response

We have previously shown that SCI is associated with a multiphasic immune cell response and that the SCI inflammatory microenvironment modulates hNSC fate, migration, and potential for repair after in vivo transplantation^31,32,34. In parallel, we have reported that macrophages migrate to and phagocytose implanted biodegradable PLG bridges^14,28. Critically, no deleterious effects of PLG are observed in vitro, or in vivo after bridge implantation^{14,16,17,28,35,36,37}, and lactate, a PLG biodegradation product, polarizes immune cells towards tolerogenic phenotypes^38,39. Accordingly, we first tested how PLG bridge implantation modulates the innate immune cell response within the bridge and surrounding spared spinal cord tissue at different time points following injury. We utilized a quantitative flow cytometry-based method to characterize this multiphasic response in a hemisection injury model for PLG bridge and SCI control animals (Fig. 1a) and flow cytometric plots representing the gating strategies shown in Supplemental Fig. 1. First, we analyzed the total myeloid population (CD45 + CD11b+) for both PLG and SCI control mice. Then within the myeloid population, we further investigated the proportions of Ly6G⁺ polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and CD68⁺ MØ/microglia subpopulations at different time points post-injury (Figs. 1a, 2a–c).

**Fig. 2: PLG bridge implantation modulates innate immune cell response and time course in the injured C57B/6 mouse spinal cord.**

PLG bridge and SCI control groups behaved similarly until 24 weeks post-injury (WPI), where the number of myeloid cells were significantly reduced in PLG vs. SCI control mice (Fig. 2d). We next investigated the proportion of Ly6G⁺ polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) and CD68⁺ MØ/microglia in the total myeloid population. As demonstrated previously, after contusion SCI in rodents³⁴, the epicenter environment was dominated by PMN in both SCI control and PLG groups at 1 day post-injury (DPI) (Fig. 2e). PMN were dramatically reduced in both groups at 1 and 4 WPI. Similarly, there a delayed re-emergence of the PMN population observed at 8 and 24 WPI. This second phase of PMN infiltration was still present, but significantly reduced, in PLG bridge vs. SCI control mice (Fig. 2e). As expected from previous analysis in contusion SCI, MØ/microglia populations were sparsely detected at 1 DPI (Fig. 2f) and exhibited a later peak in response to injury. However, while the PLG bridge and SCI control groups were similar at 1 WPI, the MØ/microglia subpopulation peak was significantly extended in PLG bridge vs. SCI control mice (Fig. 2f). The observation of an extended phase of MØ/microglia recruitment after PLG bridge implantation is consistent with the known role for the MØ population in phagocytosis and biodegradation of PLG⁴⁰. Analysis of PMN and MØ/microglia populations as a ratio is a useful way to visualize the dynamic balance of these immune populations within the spinal cord³⁴, highlighting an enhanced PMN response in the SCI control group (Fig. 2g) and an extended phase of MØ /microglia recruitment in the PLG bridge group (Fig. 2h). Thus, the subacute/chronic injury time point of 4–24 WPI represents a window in which the PLG bridge modulates the cellular inflammatory response.

hNSC culture on PLG substrate in the presence or absence of immune factors enhances oligodendroglial lineage selection

Given the impact of the PLG bridge on innate immune cell time course, we next assessed the effect of the PLG bridge on hNSC fate in the absence or presence of immune cues. Studies have shown that the physical, mechanical, and biochemical properties of biomaterial scaffolds can influence NSC differentiation, neurite extension, and cell morphology, as well as change actin structure and focal adhesion molecules^41,42,43. The potential for multipotent donor hNSC to elicit repair after transplantation is strongly linked to fate selection^29,31,32,44. Accordingly, we tested the effect of PLG vs. poly-l-ornithine/laminin (PLO/LAM) control substrate on hNSC fate (Fig. 1b). Additionally, innate immune cells and their secreted components within the microenvironment have been shown to influence the outcome of hNSC transplantation, resulting in changes in fate, migration, and efficacy^30,31,32. We therefore also tested the effect of PLG on hNSC fate in the presence of innate immune cues, utilizing PMN and MØ conditioned media (CM) (Fig. 1b and Supplemental Fig. 3a–c). We assessed tri-lineage potential by immunocytochemistry for Tubulinß III (Tubß III, neural), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, astroglial), and nuclear Olig2 (oligodendroglial) in hNSC. Although transcriptomic analysis could reveal additional features regarding differentiation, these three markers identified 100% of human NSC in this paradigm (Supplemental Fig. 3d).

As reported previously, both PMN-CM and MØ-CM suppressed oligodendroglial fate on PLO/LAM (Fig. 3a–c, g)³². While hNSC cultured on PLG scaffold exhibited a similar effect, PLG drove a highly significant increase in oligodendroglial fate under baseline conditions, and rescued oligodendroglial fate under PMN-CM and MØ-CM conditions Fig. 3d–f, g). Consistent with our previous observation, PMN-CM enhanced astroglial fate and suppressed neuronal fate, while MØ-CM had no effect on astroglial fate and enhanced neuronal fate on PLO/LAM³². hNSC cultured on PLG substrate modulated these effects, reducing astroglial fate at baseline and in response to PMN-CM and MØ-CM, and enhancing neuronal fate in response to PMN-CM and MØ-CM (Fig. 3h–u). However, PLG showed no significant effect vs. PLO/LAM on the total number of cells after 14 days in vitro (DIV) in differentiation media (DM) via nuclei (Fig. 3v). Collectively, these data indicate that PLG substrate alters hNSC fate at baseline and in response to immune cues.

**Fig. 3: PLG substrate alters hNSC fate at baseline and in response to immune cues in vitro, enhancing oligodendroglial fate.**

The enhancement of baseline oligodendroglial fate by culture on PLG scaffold vs. PLO/LAM indicates that direct signaling to hNSC via cell-substrate contact plays an important role in the modulation of differentiation. PLG could also sequester soluble molecules contained within the differentiation media as well as in CM derived from these immune cell populations. We tested this possibility via a preincubation (PI) paradigm, focusing on oligodendroglial fate in response to MØ-CM as a readout. Treatment of hNSC cultured on PLO/LAM with MØ-CM collected after preincubation with PLG scaffold (MØ-CM-PI) produced a partial restoration of oligodendroglial fate (Fig. 3w). In parallel, quantification of protein concentration in MØ-CM and MØ-CM-PI showed a reduction in total protein concentration (Fig. 1x). We have previously demonstrated that complement component C1q is a key mediator of the effects of PMN-CM and MØ-CM on hNSC fate, and that C1q neutralizing antibodies reverse the effect of CM on hNSC fate³². We therefore further tested for sequestration of soluble molecules by ELISA analysis of C1q protein levels present in MØ-CM cultures on PLG substrate, identifying a ~40% reduction in available C1q (Fig. 3y). Together, these data suggest that the PLG scaffold supports modulation of donor stem cell fate via altering the bioavailability of immune cell or hNSC secreted factors in addition to the physical and mechanical properties of the biomaterial substrate^{41,42,43,45,46,47}.

PLG bridge implantation supports robust hNSC engraftment in the spared tissue parenchyma rostral and caudal to the lesion site

We selected the timing of chronic hNSC transplantation based on the following considerations. First, axons enter and extend into the channels of the PLG bridge by 4 WPI³⁶. We predicted that these newly formed axons would strongly cue hNSC to migrate and undergo oligodendroglial lineage selection, enabling myelination of axons within the PLG bridge^48,49. Second, the SCI epicenter environment is dominated by MØ rather than PMN at 4 WPI (Fig. 2). In vitro testing showed that, in the presence of MØ-derived cues, hNSC oligodendroglial lineage selection was rescued, astroglial lineage selection was reduced, and neural lineage selection was maximized by PLG scaffold optimizing potential for repair. Third, chronic transplants are a more clinically relevant time period for delivery of cellular therapies in humans, enabling both improved informed consent and a more medically stable population given the requirement for immunosuppression in an allogeneic transplant setting, minimizing serious adverse effects⁵⁰.

We have reported that immunodeficient models lacking functional T-cells are required to enable both xenogeneic and allogeneic CNS engraftment at levels sufficient to analyze the sustained effects of donor NSC in the host environment^29,51. These models are similar to the translational setting, in which allogeneic stem cell transplantation requires long-term administration of pharmacological immunosuppressants in humans, which similarly target lymphoid cells. Accordingly, these studies utilized Rag1 mice, which lack mature T and B cells but retain a functional innate immune cell response⁵². We first confirmed that the innate immune cell profile in Rag1 mice for the hemisection injury (Supplemental Fig. 2) is similar to the profile observed in C57BL/6 mice (shown in Fig. 2). As expected, Rag1 mice have fewer innate immune cells (CD45⁺CD11b⁺ cells) in comparison to C57BL/6 mice, since they lack mature T-cells which orchestrate the innate immune response (Fig. 2d and Supplemental Fig. 2a). Importantly, however, PMN and MØ/microglia cell proportions closely paralleled that of C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 2g, h and Supplemental Fig. 2b, c) after SCI, from 1 DPI through 24 WPI, demonstrating that innate immune responses are, in essence, conserved between these models, which would be predicted to be similar to pharmacological immunosuppression in humans.

hNSC were transplanted into the spared parenchyma rostral and caudal to the SCI control or PLG bridge implanted lesion site. We therefore first evaluated hNSC engraftment, migration, and fate in these regions at 16 weeks post-transplantation (WPT) (Figs. 1c, 4). Transplanted hNSC were engrafted and distributed across the spinal cord in both control (Fig. 4b) and PLG-implanted groups (Fig. 4c and Supplemental Fig. 4). Spinal cord transverse sections were aligned relative to the lesion epicenter and the distribution of transplanted hNSC at defined section distances was analyzed using unbiased stereology (see Methods, Fig. 4a). Quantification in Fig. 4 excludes the site of implantation since distribution within this region is non-uniform and not accessible by stereology; these data are quantified separately in Fig. 5.

**Fig. 4: Stereological analysis of hNSC fate and distribution along the spinal cord.**

**Fig. 5: PLG bridge implantation creates a permissive environment for hNSC engraftment and enhances oligodendroglial and neuronal fate.**

Total hNSC engraftment as quantified by a total number of STEM121⁺ cells within the rostral and caudal-spared tissue segments in PLG vs. SCI control groups was comparable (Fig. 4d, e), however, small but significant increases in STEM121⁺ hNSC as well as hNSC tri-lineage cell fate markers (Olig2⁺ oligodendrocytes, DCX⁺ or NeuN⁺ neurons, and GFAP⁺ astrocytes), were detected in the spared tissue ipsilateral to the SCI and site of bridge implantation (Fig. 4f–s). No consistent trends were observed for any of these human cell makers contralaterally. Overall, our results suggest that there is a selective ipsilateral increase in the number of transplanted donor hNSC in the PLG group, and that the combination of PLG scaffold implantation with hNSC transplantation has a small effect on the modulation of cell fate within the spared SCI tissue.

hNSC preferentially localize within PLG bridge channels and exhibit tri-lineage differentiation

We next determined whether donor hNSC were competent to migrate into the SCI control or PLG bridge implanted lesion site (Fig. 5a, c). Few human cells were detected in the lesion site of the SCI control group (mean = 9 STEM121⁺ cells/section; Fig. 5a, b, f), but this was dramatically increased in the PLG group (mean = 145 STEM121⁺ cells/section; Fig. 5c–f). There were too few engrafted human cells for fate quantification in the SCI control group, however, STEM121⁺ hNSC in the PLG-implanted group exhibited tri-lineage differentiation by 16 WPT. Cell fate analysis of STEM121⁺ cells within the lesion site identified 21.6% Olig2⁺ cells (Fig. 5g, h), 27.7% DCX⁺ cells (Fig. 5g, i), 8.45% NeuN⁺ (Fig. 5g, j) cells, and 24.9% GFAP⁺ cells (Fig. 5g, k). 17.19% of STEM121⁺ cells were unlabeled for the tested markers (Fig. 5g). hNSC were highly localized within the channels of the PLG bridge adjacent to regenerated axons (Fig. 5c–e), while other cell types (e.g., fibroblasts, macrophages, Schwann cells, oligodendrocytes, and endothelial cells) localized to the porous bridge structure²⁸ (Fig. 5c). These data demonstrate that hNSC in the bridge differentiates into all three neural lineages, and that hNSC migrate into the PLG bridge along the same channels in which axons are localized.

Both total hNSC engraftment and the number of hNSC-derived oligodendrocytes are increased in the contralateral spared tissue in PLG bridge vs. SCI control mice

We have previously shown that PLG bridge implantation stabilizes adjacent spinal cord tissues¹⁴. We sought to test whether hNSC that engrafted in the spared tissue directly contralateral to the site of PLG bridge implantation vs. SCI control exhibited differences in engraftment or fate. The number of total engrafted STEM121⁺ hNSC was significantly increased in the PLG group compared to the SCI control (Fig. 5l), as well as the number of STEM121⁺/Olig2⁺ oligodendrocytes (Fig. 5m). While there was a parallel trend for an increase in the number of immature STEM121⁺/DCX⁺ immature neurons (p value = 0.06, Fig. 5n), this was not observed for either mature STEM121⁺/NeuN⁺ mature neurons (Fig. 5o) or STEM121⁺/GFAP⁺ astrocytes (Fig. 5p). Critically, the proportion of hNSC adopting different lineages was not significantly different between the PLG bridge vs. SCI control groups for STEM121⁺/Olig2⁺ cells (p value = 0.9597), STEM121⁺/DCX⁺ cells (p value = 0.1258), STEM121⁺/GFAP⁺ cells (p value = 0.2663), and STEM121⁺/NeuN⁺ cells (p value = 0.0863). These data suggest that the principal effect of the PLG bridge was on overall survival/engraftment of hNSC in the spared tissue, which is consistent with the stabilization of this region in the acute period after injury. This difference in engraftment cannot be ascribed to an increased area/volume but may rather reflect a change in the molecular microenvironment and/or mechanostability of this region.

hNSC within PLG bridge channels exhibit altered fate vs. contralateral spared tissue in SCI epicenter sections

In previous studies using contusion SCI models, we have shown that hNSC that are localized adjacent to the SCI epicenter are directed towards the astroglial lineage, but that these cells do not migrate into the SCI epicenter per se^29,31,44. As described above, hNSC that migrated along the PLG channels retained tri-lineage potential. Here, we asked whether the fate of hNSC that migrated into the PLG bridge and inflammatory environment of the SCI epicenter was similar to or different from hNSC that engrafted in contralateral spared tissue in the same tissue sections. While hNSC that migrated into the PLG bridge retained the capacity to differentiate along the oligodendroglial lineage (STEM121⁺/Olig2⁺; Fig. 5q), they exhibited increased neuronal lineage selection (STEM121⁺/DCX⁺; Fig. 5r). In contrast, mature neuron (STEM121⁺/NeuN⁺) and astroglial (STEM121⁺/GFAP⁺) proportions were unchanged (Fig. 5s, t). These data are consistent with the observation that the PLG bridge is dominated by MØ/microglia in the chronic post-SCI phase (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Fig. 2), and the influence of PLG and macrophage-derived immune factors on hNSC fate selection (Fig. 3).

hNSC transplantation enhances axonal regeneration and remyelination in the PLG bridge

We next investigated axon regeneration and myelination status in these mice by immunostaining SCI control and PLG-implanted spinal cord tissues for neurofilament (NF-H). Consistent with our previous reports describing that acute PLG bridge implantation reduces glial scar formation and supports regeneration of both descending motor and ascending sensory axons^{14,17,28,36,37,53}, NF-H⁺ fibers were readily observed entering PLG bridge channels at both the rostral (Fig. 6a, b) and caudal (Fig. 6a, c) margins by 6 WPI and bridge implantation.

**Fig. 6: Combination of PLG bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation enhances axonal regeneration and oligodendrocytic myelination.**

NF-H⁺ fibers were extremely rare in the lesion site of SCI control animals, even by 20 WPI (16 WPT; Fig. 6d, e, n). In contrast, PLG bridge implantation supported robust regeneration of NF-H⁺ axons within the bridge at this time point (Fig. 6f, g). We quantified the total volume of NF-H+ axons (Fig. 6h–m), as well as the proportions of axons that were ether unmyelinated (Fig. 6h, j), myelinated by MBP⁺P0⁻ oligodendrocyte (Fig. 6i, k), and/or P0⁺ Schwann cell populations (Fig. 6l, m). Analysis of NF-H⁺ axon volume suggests that hNSC transplantation enhanced both regeneration and the myelination status of these axons (Fig. 6n). This effect was substantiated quantitatively by comparison of Imaris volumetric data for PLG bridge alone vs. PLG bridge + hNSC groups (NF-H⁺ regeneration, Fig. 6o; MBP⁺P0⁻ oligodendrocyte-derived myelination, Fig. 6p; MBP⁺P0⁺ plus MBP⁻P0⁺ Schwann cell-derived myelination, Fig. 6q).

Although histological quantification was predominantly performed at 16 WPT, a subset of animals was assessed at 26 WPT. We hypothesized that this additional engraftment time would optimize for the maturation and integration of transplanted hNSC as myelinating cells within the PLG bridge. We, therefore, tested whether hNSC that entered the bridge channels (white dotted lines in Fig. 6r) were capable of myelinating regenerated axons. Indeed, there was an abundant association of STEM121⁺ hNSC labeling aligned with and in close proximity to NF-H⁺ axons (Fig. 6r, arrowheads). Further, high magnification clearly identified MBP⁺/STEM121⁺ co-labeling of NF-H⁺ axons (Fig. 6s), indicating that hNSC contribute to the myelination of axons that regenerate into PLG bridge channels.

We confirmed this observation and tested whether donor NSC myelinated regenerating descending motor axons using CRYM reporter mice. We have previously employed these mice to specifically visualize CST axons in the spinal cord (Supplemental Fig. 5a), including in the PLG bridge after SCI¹⁴. Fully functional compact myelin excludes oligodendrocyte cytoplasm, preventing the detection of human cells by STEM121²⁹. We, therefore, derived neural stem cells from mice that ubiquitously express a membrane-targeted fluorescent tandem dimer Tomato (tdTomato) reporter (mT-mNSC)⁵⁴ (Supplemental Fig. 5b). This approach allowed mature, compact myelin from donor mT-mNSC to be visualized in association with regenerated CST axon targets within the PLG bridge. We employed pharmacological immunosuppression for these allogeneic transplants because CST-GFP-reporter mice were not on a constitutively immunodeficient background. While this resulted in reduced mT-mNSC survival and migration in comparison with transplantation into Rag1 mice, we were able to identify mT-mNSC aligning with and ensheathing NF-H⁺ (Fig. 6t) and GFP⁺ CST (Fig. 6u) axons in the PLG bridge. Orthogonal projections clearly indicated that mT-mNSC surrounds GFP⁺ CST fibers (Fig. 6v, blue arrowhead).

The PLG bridge supports the regeneration of a synaptic circuit connecting the forelimb muscle to the motor cortex

An advantage of the PLG bridge implantation model is that axons can only reach the channels by regenerating; they cannot represent spared fibers. However, observation of axons in this region, even CST reporter axons, does not mean that these fibers have integrated into synaptic circuitry. We sought to test this key aspect of regeneration via transsynaptic PRV tracing. We injected GFP-reporter PRV virus into the forelimb triceps muscle ipsilateral to the SCI hemisection (Fig. 1c). PRV is retrogradely transported from the neuromuscular junction, sequentially infecting synaptically connected neurons to enable circuit tracing; we sought to use this method to identify whether neuronal wiring between injected muscle cells, spinal motor neurons, and sensorimotor cortical pyramidal neurons is re-established after PLG bridge implantation. Approximately 90% of CST axons originating from sensorimotor cortical pyramidal neurons decussate at the level of the pyramids. Thus, if CST motor axons have regenerated through the implanted PLG bridge and formed synaptic connections with spinal motor neurons, a majority of PRV labeling should be visualized in the contralateral motor cortex. In contrast, some brain nuclei (e.g., the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, PVN), would be expected to exhibit ipsilateral predominance of retrogradely labeled axons. PRV transsynaptic tracing was validated by injection into the triceps of 2-month-old naive (uninjured) mice, demonstrating a majority of labeling in contralateral motor cortex pyramidal neurons (Supplemental Fig. 6a, c), sparse labeling in ipsilateral cortex pyramidal neurons (Supplemental Fig. 6a, b), and predominant ipsilateral labeling of the PVN (Supplemental Fig. 6a, d, e). These observations are consistent with previous reports of PRV circuit tracing^{55,56,57,58,59}. Because of the chronic nature of the hNSC transplants and analyses in these experiments, we further validated PRV tracing in this injection paradigm in 10-month-old naive mice (Supplemental Fig. 6f). Surprisingly, we found a reduction of retrograde PRV labeling in 10-month-old naive mice (Supplemental Fig. 6f, g–i), despite the detection of PRV-GFP labeling in the spinal cord below the pyramidal decussation, and localization of that labeling ipsilateral to the triceps injection site (Supplemental Fig. 6j, k). These data suggest that age impacts PRV labeling efficiency in the brain. This result could reflect a loss of initial viral infection efficiency at the muscle, a shift in the efficiency or timeline of retrograde viral transport, a weakening of synaptic connections in the spinal cord, or other factors⁶⁰.

We next assessed PRV transsynaptic tracing in lateral hemisected spinal cords within the lesion site as well as in the contralateral and ipsilateral motor cortex at 26 WPT (30 WPI). At this experimental time point, the mice were ~10 months of age. No PRV labeling was detected in the lesion site of SCI control mice (Fig. 7a, b). In contrast, robust PRV labeling was detected in regenerated axons within the channels of PLG bridge implanted mice (Fig. 7c, e–g), as well as crossing the caudal-bridge and bridge-rostral tissue interface (Fig. 7c, d, h). As observed for NF-H⁺ (Fig. 6o), comparison of Imaris volumetric data demonstrated that hNSC transplantation enhanced PRV⁺ axon regeneration (Fig. 7i). PRV labeling was also identified in choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) motor neurons (Supplemental Fig. 6l), but not calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) labeled sensory fibers (Supplemental. Fig. 6m), consistent with formation of a spinal motor neuron relay circuit. We next analyzed PRV labeling in the brain (Fig. 7j–m). The contralateral motor cortex exhibited clear evidence of PRV⁺ neurons in the PLG bridge implanted vs. SCI control groups (Fig. 7j–l). While not significant, there was a trend for fewer PRV⁺ neurons in the PLG bridge + hNSC combination vs. PLG bridge + vehicle group (Fig. 7l). hNSC in the spinal cord were also PRV⁺, suggesting stable integration of donor human cells into mouse host circuitry (Fig. 7n), which could have diluted PRV transport to the brain because of an increased number of intermediate synaptic connections. PRV⁺ neurons were not observed in the ipsilateral motor cortex of PLG bridge or SCI control groups (Fig. 7m). The lesion model employed makes it unlikely that PRV labeling in the motor cortex derives from spared motor neurons and/or CST crossing fibers innervating the triceps muscle above the level of the lesion. While the motor neuron pool innervating the forelimb extends from C2 through T1 in the rodent, motor neurons specifically innervating the triceps (the site of PRV injection) extend only from C5 through C8⁶¹. Thus, the motor neurons innervating the triceps lie below the level of the C4/5 lesion site in our model. In this regard, the data shown in Fig. 7a, in which no PRV⁺ axons are observed within or above the level of the lesion in control animals, are consistent with a complete lesion of this connection. Similarly, it is unlikely that PRV labeling in the motor cortex represents a bypass of the lesion via spared contralateral spinal cord and crossing fibers. We have shown previously that we do not observe the entry of axons from the contralateral spinal cord into the implanted bridge¹⁴; we replicated this in the Crym reporter mice employed in the present study. Thus, in this model, the contribution of any CST crossing fibers would have to take place below the level of the lesion. In this event: (1) PRV⁺ axons would be observed running in the spinal cord contralateral to the lesion/bridge; and (2) because over 90% of the CST decussates at the level of the pyramids, one would predict that a contralateral CST bypass would be observed primarily in the cortex ipsilateral to the lesion. However, PRV⁺ axons were absent in the rostral spared tissue contralateral to the injury, and no PRV⁺ neurons were observed in the motor cortex ipsilateral to the lesion. In sum, therefore, we interpret these data to demonstrate that motor cortex axons can regenerate through the PLG bridge and form synaptic connections with forelimb muscle, reconstituting motor circuitry. Moreover, we demonstrate the capacity of donor hNSC to similarly exhibit synaptic integration within a mouse host. Consistent with findings in Crym reporter mice (Fig. 6u, v), PRV⁺ axons exhibited close proximity to STEM121⁺ hNSC labeling, suggesting donor-cell interaction and myelination of synaptically connected host axons (Fig. 7o).

**Fig. 7: CST axons that regenerate through the PLG bridge are synaptically connected.**

PLG bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation improve locomotor recovery

Mice were assessed for locomotor recovery using horizontal ladder beam and CatWalk kinematic function tasks (Fig. 8)^14,62,63,64. CatWalk enables assessment of a wide range of locomotor function, including forelimb placement, and the ladder task has also clearly been demonstrated to be sensitive to the recovery of skilled forelimb movements that are dependent on the CST^65,66,67. We previously demonstrated that selective ablation of engrafted hNSC ablates gains in the recovery of locomotor function²⁹, demonstrating a requirement for hNSC survival in repair. While we have shown that PLG bridge implantation post-SCI supports robust CST regeneration that is temporally linked to motor recovery¹⁴, whether axonal regeneration is the underlying mechanism for repair has not been established. Therefore, we first used the same experimental SCI model, comparing SCI control, PLG bridge implantation, and retransection through the PLG bridge 10 weeks post-implantation. Catwalk kinematic analysis at 12 weeks post-implantation demonstrated that retransection through the PLG bridge reversed locomotor performance to that of SCI control animals (Supplemental Fig. 7a–e), consistent with a requirement of regeneration through the bridge for recovery of function.

Additionally, we have previously reported that PLG bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation as separate interventions require 10–16 weeks to observe functional recovery^14,29,68,69, consistent with a requirement for regeneration into and through the bridge, or donor cell migration/differentiation, respectively. Two-way ANOVA analysis of horizontal ladder beam errors at 16 WPT with a bridge (with/without) and cells (with/without) as variables demonstrated significant main effects for both PLG bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation; multiple comparison corrected t-tests also demonstrated a significant reduction in errors for PLG bridge alone, hNSC alone, and PLG bridge + hNSC groups (Fig. 8a). However, because hNSC were transplanted 30d after bridge implantation, we posited that further analysis could reveal the unique contribution of cell transplantation. To test the change in task performance after the addition of hNSC, horizontal ladder beam performance data collected pre-transplantation (4 WPI), was incorporated in a three-way ANOVA with time (pre-transplantation vs. 16 WPT), bridge, and cells as variables, identifying significant main effects for each of these; however, multiple comparison corrected t-tests demonstrated that within this experimental window, only the combination of bridge + cells exhibited additional recovery of function compared to all pre-transplantation groups and the 16 WPT control group (Fig. 8b).

We also conducted CatWalk kinematic gait analysis (Fig. 8c), applying an unbiased multivariate approach to test whether the effect of PLG bridge implantation on locomotion could be separated from that of hNSC transplantation on locomotion. This approach avoids a priori assumptions about which variables are meaningful to recovery. Univariate two-way ANOVAs were conducted in R using the “aov” (Analysis of Variance) function to analyze the independent effects of PLG bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation, identifying variables that had a p value ≤0.05 (Fig. 8c). PLG bridge implantation and hNSC transplantation exhibited no overlap in the subset of variables identified in this analysis. hNSC transplantation altered four variables, three of which related to contralateral (right) forepaw movement. In contrast, PLG bridge implantation altered six variables, five of which related to ipsilateral (left) hind or forepaw movement. These data suggest parallel mechanisms on locomotor recovery, in which PLG bridge implantation exerts a predominant effect at the lesion, whereas hNSC transplantation exerts a predominant effect on the intact side of the spinal cord.

Discussion

Previous studies combining biomaterials and cell transplants have generally implanted seeded scaffold materials. Here, we investigated whether hNSC transplantation 30 days after an acutely implanted PLG bridge could migrate into the bridge channels when regenerated axons are located, enabling dissociation of the timing of these interventions. Consistent with our previous studies, transplanted hNSC migrated extensively in the spared parenchyma. PLG bridge implantation increased the total number of engrafted hNSC ipsilateral to the bridge for all three lineages vs. SCI control. This increase in ipsilateral engraftment may be due to increased mechanostability and tissue sparing adjacent to the injury after PLG bridge implantation, as we have reported previously¹⁴. It is also possible that the pro-regenerative environment driving axon regeneration into the PLG bridge also influenced hNSC engraftment. Most importantly, donor hNSC were preferentially associated with regenerating axons, migrating selectively within PLG bridge channels and distributing throughout the length of the bridge.

Donor NSC-derived oligodendrocytes contributed directly to the myelination of mouse host axons, including corticospinal axons. This report identifies that donor NSC are capable of migrating along axons, regenerating into a biomaterial scaffold, and contributing to the myelination of those axons. Moreover, we have previously shown that hNSC transplanted directly into the SCI epicenter become fate-locked to generate astrocytes within and proximal to the lesion site⁷⁰. In contrast, hNSC transplantation in spared spinal parenchyma does not alter the GFAP astroglial scar in either subacute (9dpi) or chronic (30dpi) mouse SCI models^44,69. Consistent with our previous observation, few human astrocytes were observed within or adjacent to the PLG bridge. These data indicate that multipotent hNSC that enter the PLG bridge follow a beneficial developmental program after transplantation, exhibiting the capacity to follow newly grown axons long distances and differentiate in a lineage-appropriate manner.

PRV tracing demonstrated that CST axons that traversed the PLG bridge were synaptically connected to the ipsilateral forelimb muscle below the level of injury. This report demonstrates the re-establishment of synaptic neural circuitry between the brain and neuromuscular junction after SCI via regeneration through a biomaterial bridge alone.

Previous studies have not demonstrated evidence of a synaptic circuit after biomaterial implantation without either cell transplantation into the lesion epicenter to create a bridge circuit, or pharmacological manipulation to lure axons into the caudal-spared spinal cord^12,71. hNSC transplantation did not increase the number of PRV⁺ neurons detected in the motor cortex. However, some hNSC-derived neurons in the spinal cord had integrated into mouse host spinal synaptic circuitry by 26 WPT. These data show that multipotent hNSC that enter the PLG bridge exhibit the potential to integrate with host circuitry via differentiation into, not only myelinating oligodendrocytes but also into synaptically connected neurons. Integration of hNSC into synaptic circuitry within the spinal cord could have affected the detection of synaptically connected motor cortex neurons by creating a viral ‘sink’. hNSC can also secrete factors that enhance endogenous regenerative mechanisms^50,72,73,74, potentially diverting PRV labeling across other brain regions. This is supported by the observation that hNSC transplantation enhanced axon volume in the PLG bridge, as well as the observation that while hNSC do not generate Schwann cells, Schwann cell-derived myelination within the PLG bridge was increased in mice receiving hNSC transplants. While we were particularly interested in the CST and motor cortex because this projection is important for hand function in humans and refractory to regeneration, the integration of other brain areas could also contribute to repair. For example, brainstem motor pathways, including reticulospinal and rubrospinal tracts, play a major role in controlling rodent locomotion⁷⁵.

Achieving efficacy after hNSC transplantation in the chronic period post-SCI is widely considered to be a challenging goal. Here, we show that both acute bridge implantation and chronic hNSC transplantation impact functional locomotor recovery. Critically, statistical analysis factoring time (pre-transplantation vs. 16 WPT), bridge, and cells as variables to focus on the contribution of hNSC transplantation on recovery of function, suggested an overall combinatorial effect of acute bridge implantation and chronic hNSC transplantation on recovery of function. Kinematic analysis suggested that motor recovery in the combination group is mediated in part through parallel mechanisms, in which PLG bridge implantation supported ipsilateral improvement, whereas hNSC treatment supported contralateral improvement. In this context, hNSC are likely to exert pleiotropic mechanisms of repair that may include strengthening of spared motor circuity as well as enhancement of host axon regeneration and myelination of regenerated axons. In this regard, while behavioral data were collected at 16 WPT, identification of evidence for hNSC myelination of host axons in PLG bridge channels and hNSC integration into host circuitry by 26 WPT suggests that longer time points of analysis could be required to fully assess the impact of cell transplantation combined with PLG bridge implantation.

In sum, we demonstrate that hNSC transplanted in the chronic period after acute PLG bridge implantation are capable of migrating along regenerating axons into the PLG bridge channels, and enabling both donor cell-mediated myelination of regenerated host axons and donor cell integration into synaptic circuitry, along with gains in locomotor function. Alternative models, e.g. non-human primates, in which an extended time course of study is possible, may be necessary in order to reveal the full potential for this approach to spare tissue, promote regeneration, and maximize the function of new axonal connections. Regardless, these data identify a strategy that could open a new therapeutic window for SCI, particularly in cases of penetrating injury, where strategies that can enable true axonal regeneration may be required to open a path for recovery of function.

Methods

Ethics statements

Animal care, behavior acquisition, and data analysis were performed by investigators blinded to the experimental groups. All animal housing conditions, procedures, and animal care were approved by the UCI Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Derivation and usage of human neural stem cell line UCI 161 for all in vitro and in vivo work was reviewed and approved by the UCI Human Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (hSCRO).

Animal models

Profiling of the innate inflammatory microenvironment following SCI was performed using adult female C57BL/6 mice (JAX mice # 000664, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) (Fig. 2) and Rag1 mice (JAX mice # 002216, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) (Supplemental Fig. 1). hNSC transplantation studies were conducted in immunodeficient female Rag1 mice (Figs. 4–8). Multipotent cell membrane-localized tdTomato mouse neural stem cell (mT-mNSC) transplantation studies were conducted in Crym-ZsGreen1 transgenic mice (Fig. 6t–v and Supplemental Fig. 5). Transgenic CRYM-ZsGreen1 mice were generated by crossing Crym^cre transgenic mice (MMRRC_036627-UCD) with Ai6 mice that contain a CAG promoter-driven enhanced green fluorescent protein variant (ZsGreen1) (JAX mice # 007906, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). Mu-Crystallin (Crym) is expressed in a diverse array of tissues, including layer V-VI of the motor cortex in the brain. Cre recombinase-mediated excision of a floxed STOP enabled the expression of CrymCre: ZsGreen1 specifically in CST axons in the spinal cord; we have demonstrated previously that reporter expression is localized exclusively to CST axons in the spinal cord in these mice¹⁴. PLG bridge retransection study was performed in female transgenic EMX1:ROSA-CRYM-RFP mice. All mice were group housed with two to four cage mates.

Spinal cord injury

Mouse C5 hemisection injury and postoperative care was performed as previously described¹⁴. Briefly, mice were anesthetized using 2% isoflurane for 5 min before surgery. After C5 laminectomy, mice received a lateral hemisection on the left side with the removal of a 1 mm spinal cord segment followed by immediate implantation of the PLG bridge. The laminectomy site was covered with sterile gel foam (Pfizer, New York, NY) to prevent muscle adhesion to the PLG bridge. SCI control groups received only gel foam at the lesion site. All mice were 11–19 weeks of age at the time of injury. Mice were randomly allocated to different treatment groups. The exposed muscle was sutured using a 5-0 chromic gut, and the skin was closed using wound clips. All mice were placed in cages on top of heating pads at 37 °C overnight with clean Alpha-Dri bedding. The following subcutaneous injections were administered post-op: Baytril (2.5 mg/kg) once a day for 2 weeks, lactated ringers (50 mL/kg) once a day for 5 days, and buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) every 12 h for 3 days. Throughout the course of the study, bladder expression was performed manually twice per day. Because Rag1 mice are immunodeficient and CRYM-ZsGreen1 transgenic mice were on an immunosuppression paradigm, rotating antibiotics were given for the duration of the study to avoid bladder infections. Oral antibiotics dissolved in drinking water consisted of ciprofloxacin (10 mg/100 mL), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (2 mL/100 mL), and/or ampicillin (20 mg/mL) and were each administered for 2 weeks, before rotation next antibiotic.

Immune cell isolation post-injury and flow cytometric analysis

Innate immune cell time course profiling following SCI was performed in C57BL/6 (JAX #000664, Bar Harbor ME) and Rag1 (JAX #002216, Bar Harbor ME) mice that received a C5 hemisection with bridge and gel foam implantation or gel foam only as above. C4-C6 vertebral dissection was performed 1 day post-injury (DPI), 1 week post-injury (WPI), 4 WPI, 8 WPI, or 24 WPI. Spinal cord tissue was dissociated using mechanical and enzymatic methods as previously described⁷⁶. Myelin debris was removed with a Myelin Removal Magnetic Beads II kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and an auto-MACS Pro Separator according to manufacturer instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Cells collected after myelin removal were suspended in 0.85% ammonium chloride (diluted in sterile water) for 5 min to lyse red blood cells. The cell suspension was resuspended in PBS supplemented with 2% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Then the cells were stained with 7AAD viability dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), CD45, CD11b, Ly6G, and CD68 antibodies as previously described⁷⁶. The data were acquired using a BD FACS Aria II Flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) and analyzed with FlowJo 10.8.2. software. To ensure the detection of a true positive signal for each fluorescence channel, we used single stain compensation controls and fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls. For analysis, FSC-A vs. SSC-A scatter was used to the gate for a bulk cell population, then FSC-A vs. FSC-H was applied to minimize doublet selection. Next, 7AAD negative live cells were gated to analyze the number of CD45⁺CD11b⁺ myeloid events. Total myeloid cells were further gated to analyze the proportion of Ly6G+ PMN (e), and CD68 + MØ/microglia subpopulations. Figure exemplifying the gating strategy is shown in Supplemental Fig. 1. Antibody sources, dilutions, and specificity are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

Fabrication of multiple channel bridges for in vivo implantation studies

PLG bridges were generated using a gas foaming/particulate leaching method as previously described^17,37. The final bridge dimensions were 1.15 mm in length, 1.25 mm in width, and 2 mm in height and contained nine channels.

PLG scaffold fabrication for in vitro hNSC differentiation assays

PLG pellets were comprised of a 75:25 lactide:glycolide ratio, with a molecular weight of 66,000–107,000 and an inherent viscosity of 0.55–0.75 (Sigma-Aldrich Inc, Saint Louis, MO). PLG pellets were placed in a silicone mold (8 × 9 × 1 mm diameter) and melted at a high temperature (130 ^oC) on a hot plate. The liquid was compressed with a 1 kg weight while the temperature was reduced to 30 ^oC every hour. Once the PLG cooled to room temperature, PLG scaffolds were peeled from the mold and sterilized for in vitro experiments with 70% ethanol, followed by one wash with sterile water and UV exposure in a laminar flow hood.

hNSC line derivation and cell culture

The multipotent human neural stem cell line, UCI 161 (referred to as hNSC), was established by the Anderson lab from 16-week gestational human fetal brain tissue with UCI hSCRO and IRB oversight, and enriched for the CD133 + stem cell population. CD133 enriched hNSC exhibits a stable growth rate, sustained neurosphere-initiating capacity, retains tri-lineage multipotency in vitro and in vivo, and exhibits responsiveness to migration cues in vitro and in vivo^30,77. These cells were derived prior to June 5, 2019 (NIH NOT-OD-19-128).

hNSC were cultured as monolayers on poly-l-ornithine (PLO)/laminin (LAM) coated flasks in hNSC growth medium (GM). hNSC GM consists of X-VIVO 15 (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) medium supplemented with 20 ng/mL bFGF (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA), 2 ng/mL EGF (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA), 2 ng/mL Heparin (Sigma-Aldrich Inc, Saint Louis, MO), 63 µg/mL N-acetylcysteine (NAC; Sigma-Aldrich Inc, Saint Louis, MO), 1x N2 supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and 10 ng/mL LIF (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA).

mT-mNSC line generation and cell culture

mT-mNSC line was established from cortices of 24Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(ACTB-tdTomato-EGFP)Luo/J mouse (JAX mice #007576, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) at embryonic day 11.5 (E11.5) as previously described³⁰. mT-mNSC ubiquitously expresses a membrane-targeted tdTomato reporter²¹, which allows for visualization and identification of donor cell-derived myelin within the PLG bridge. mT-mNSC were cultured as a monolayer under the same growth conditions as hNSC. Similar to hNSC, mT-mNSC exhibits sustained neurosphere-initiating capacity and responsiveness to migration cues in vitro, as well as the capacity to differentiate into three neural cell lineage cells upon transplantation in vivo. Both hNSC and mT-mNSC were fed twice a week and passaged every 1–2 weeks at 80% confluency.

Generation of PMN or MØ conditioned media (CM) for hNSC in vitro fate analysis

To assess whether immune cues impact hNSC after SCI in the Rag1 mice, we quantified the effect of innate immune cell CM on hNSC fate in vitro. PMN and MØ were isolated from peritoneal cavities of adult female Rag1 immunodeficient mice, as previously described⁷⁸. Briefly, mice were stimulated with 12% sodium caseinate (i.p. injection) and were sacrificed either 12–16 h (to collect PMN) or 5 days (to collect MØ) post-injection (Fig. 1b and Supplemental Fig. 3). PMN and MØ (5,000,000 cells/ml) were cultured in hNSC differentiation media (DM). hNSC DM is X-VIVO 15-based media (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 10 ng/mL GDNF (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ), 10 ng/mL BDNF (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ), 0.1 ng/mL bFGF, 10 μg/mL Ciprofloxacin (Cellgro), 2 ng/mL Heparin, 63 µg/mL NAC, and 1x N2 and 1x B27 supplements (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). PMN-CM was collected only once after 24 h in culture. MØ-CM was collected once a day for 3 days, and the culture was replenished with fresh media after each collection. Both conditioned media were diluted (1:1) with fresh DM media and used for the hNSC differentiation experiments (UCI 161 cell line, passage 6).

hNSC differentiation assays and fate analysis in vitro

To investigate the effect of PLG bridge on hNSC differentiation in the presence of immune cues, hNSC were plated on either PLO/LAM coated PLG scaffolds or glass chamber slides (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and cultured for 14 DIV with DM, PMN-CM, or MØ-CM. hNSC differentiated on glass or PLG scaffolds were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min. hNSC were permeabilized and blocked with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich Inc, Saint Louis, MO) and 10% donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) in PBS. Next, hNSC were immunostained for neuronal marker Tubulinß III (Tubß III), astrocytic marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and oligodendrocyte marker (Olig2). hNSC were counterstained with nuclear dye Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/mL dilution; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA). Antibody sources and the dilutions were used as listed in Supplemental Table 1. Images were captured with a 10X objective using random sampling with a ZEISS Axio Imager II light microscope with an Apotome2 image processor (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Imaris software (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, United Kingdom) was used to quantify hNSC fate. Image acquisition and quantification were conducted by researchers who were blinded to the experimental groups. All experiments were conducted in biological triplicates or quadruplicates with a minimum of technical duplicates. All images for fate analysis were acquired and quantified with the same experimental parameters per substrate. Images in Fig. 3 were adjusted for brightness and contrast to account for the high fluorescent background from the PLG scaffold. However, the same settings were applied to each fate marker per substrate.

Preincubation of PLG scaffold in MØ condition media and sequestration effect assessment

The sterile PLG scaffold was incubated in MØ-CM at 37 °C for one week. Total protein concentration was quantified using a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in control groups (MØ-CM) and MØ-CM + PLG scaffold preincubation (MØ-CM-PLG). Next, we assessed how the PLG scaffold affects C1q concentration in both groups using a C1q ELISA kit (Hycult Biotech, Uden, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

NSC transplantation in vivo

Four WPI, a second surgery was performed to transplant hNSC in Rag1 mice or mT-mNSC in CRYM-ZsGreen1 transgenic mice as previously described^29,31,44. After re-exposure of the spinal cord at C5, cells were injected using a NanoInjector with a micromanipulator (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) and siliconized beveled glass micropipettes (outer diameter = 100–110 mm; inner diameter = 70 mm; Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). A total of 75,000 cells or vehicle (X-VIVO media) in 1 uL total volume was delivered to the spared spinal parenchyma at four sites, two rostral and two caudal to the lesion, 250 nL per site (schematic in Fig. 1c). All mice received postoperative care as described above.

Immune suppression in CRYM-ZsGreen1 transgenic mice

Mouse-to-mouse allogeneic transplantation requires a pharmacological immunosuppression protocol to enable the survival of transplanted mNSC within the host. To establish our immunosuppression protocol, we tested combined treatment with both Cyclosporin A (CsA; Perrigo, Minneapolis, MN) and anti-CD4 (Invitrogen, Waltham) in C57Bl/6 mice that received a C5 hemisection SCI (Supplemental Fig. 5c). The final immunosuppression regimen was as follows: 10 mg/kg s.c. CsA 2 days prior to mNSC transplantation continued daily until sacrifice, combined with 5 mg/kg i.p. anti-CD4 1 day prior to mNSC transplantation, continued bi-weekly until sacrifice.

Pseudorabies virus (PRV) tracing

PRV-152-GFP transsynaptic tracer (2.48 × 10⁹ pfu/ml; in collaboration with Dr. Xiangmin Xu, UCI) was injected into the ipsilateral (left) forelimb triceps muscle of the animals at 30 WPI. This allowed for retrograde labeling of cortical pyramidal neurons and validation of functional connectivity after PLG bridge implantation. Following anaesthesia (1.5% isoflurane in O₂ for 10 min), a skin incision was made to expose the left triceps forelimb muscle. Using a stereotaxic Hamilton syringe with a 26-gauge needle, 5 µL PRV was injected into two sites of the left triceps forelimb muscle at different depths with a 5-min wait period between each injection. The skin was closed using tissue adhesive (Vetbond, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA). Animals received subcutaneous injections of carprofen (5 mg/kg) and bladder care twice a day. Four days post-PRV injection, mice were perfused, and the spinal cord segment (C3 to C7) and brain tissues were dissected for further analysis.

Perfusion, tissue collection, and sectioning

Mice were anaesthetized using pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) and transcardially perfused with PBS (15 mL) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (100 mL) at 16 WPT (hNSC differentiation fate and regeneration assessment) or 26 WPT (PRV connectivity tracing). Brain tissue and spinal cord segments corresponding to C2–C8 roots were dissected and post-fixed/cryoprotected overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde + 20% sucrose. The tissue was then flash frozen using −60 ^oC isopentane and stored at −80 ^oC. Brains were transversely sectioned using a sliding microtome, and 30 µm serial sections were collected in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.02% sodium azide and stored at 4 °C until further use. Spinal cords were embedded in Neg50 Frozen Section Medium (Fisher Scientific International, Hampton, NH) to be processed into 30 μm thick sections with a cryostat and CryoJane tape transfer system (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Spinal cords were sectioned either transversely or horizontally, and the slides were stored at −20 °C until processed for immunohistochemistry.

Immunohistochemistry and imaging

Slides with spinal cord tissue sections (CryoJane tape transfer slides) were thawed at room temperature for 30 min and then incubated at 60 °C on a hot plate for 2 h, dipped in Histo-Clear II clearing agent (National Diagnostics, Atlanta, Georgia) for 20 min, rehydrated in a descending ethanol gradient (100%, 95%, 80%, and 70%) 5 min in each solution, and hydrated in distilled water for 10 min. Then for antigen retrieval, slides were immersed in a preheated sodium citrate antigen retrieval solution (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) for 30 min at 96 °C in a water bath. Following a 20-min cool down at room temperature, the slides were rinsed in water and processed for immunohistochemistry as described below. Spinal cord sections (CryoJane tape transfer slides-post antigen retrieval process) and brain sections (microtome, free-floating tissue sections) were washed with PBS for 5 minutes. Following the wash, they were incubated with blocking buffer (1.5% donkey serum and 0.1% Triton × in PBS) for an hour at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibody (diluted in blocking solution) overnight at room temperature. After three 5-minutes washes (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS), tissue was incubated with appropriate fluorescent-dye conjugated secondary antibodies and nuclear dye Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/mL dilution; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) for 2 hours at room temperature. Following three final 5-minutes washes PBS, slides were mounted with Fluoromount G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL). Images were captured using a ZEISS Axio Imager II light microscope with an Apotome2 image processor or a ZEISS LSM 900 with an Airyscan 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

hNSC fate quantification in vivo

For hNSC fate quantification, 16 WPT transverse tissue sections (1/12 sampling interval) were processed for immunohistochemistry in the following sets: STEM121⁺/Olig2⁺ (human oligodendrocytes), STEM121⁺/DCX⁺ (human neuronal precursors), STEM121⁺/NeuN⁺ (human mature neurons), and STEM121⁺/GFAP⁺ (human astrocytes). Zeiss ApoTome microscope system and 20x objective were used to capture 30–40 μm Z-stacks of optical slices in 2 μm intervals were acquired using Stereo Investigator imaging software (MicroBrightField, Williston, VT). Migration of human cells in the rostral and caudal parenchyma was determined with unbiased stereology using systematic random sampling, an optical fractionator probe, and a Stereo Investigator (version 2020.1.3, MicroBrightField, Williston, VT). Although hNSC migration was observed throughout the isolated spinal cord section (collected from C2–C8 segments), stereological quantification of hNSC in the spared parenchyma was performed within a range of 2160 μm rostral and 2160 μm caudal to the lesion site (approximately C3–C7). Parameters for analysis were: grid size of 450 μm × 450 μm, frame size of 70 μm × 70 μm, and guard zone of 2 μm. Probe grid size and counting frame size were empirically determined to yield average cumulative error values <0.1. In contrast, quantification at the lesion site was performed in single sections, because (1) hNSC distribution was not homogeneous within the bridge, localizing to the channels; (2) the number of sections was limited because of the small lesion size and post-fixation shrinkage, yielding only ~10 total sections through the bridge per mouse. Within the bridge, all hNSC were manually quantified, while systematic random sampling with Stereo Investigator was used to quantify hNSC within the spared tissue contralateral to the lesion.

Axonal regeneration and myelination quantification

To assess total regenerated and myelinated neurofilaments within the SCI lesion site and PLG bridge, we used transverse sections from spinal cords collected at 16 WPT. Because the number of spinal cord sections with lesion was limited, as noted above, analysis was performed on one section per animal. Triple immunostaining was performed using NF-H (Neurofilament Heavy Chain, axonal marker), MBP (Myelin Basic Protein, pan myelination marker), and P0 (Myelin Protein Zero, Schwann cell myelin). Antibody sources and dilutions used are listed in Supplemental Table 1. For quantification, four to six random optical fields within the lesion per section were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 900 with Airyscan super-resolution microscope. For each optical field, 6 μm Z stack images (0.3 μm Z-step) were captured using a 60X oil objective. 3D surface volume rendering was performed using Imaris v9.6 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, United Kingdom). Briefly, all three volumes of total neurofilament, total MBP positive myelinated neurofilament, and total P0 positive myelinated neurofilament were masked using the Surface feature. To exclude excess noise, a filter was made to a minimum voxel size of around 1000 for each image. Next, the NF-H positive surface volume of neurofilament that was associated with the oligodendrocyte-derived myelin (MBP⁺PO⁻ volume) and Schwann cell-derived myelin (MBP⁺P0⁺ and MBP⁻P0⁺) was masked using the object-to-object shortest distance (0.4 um) filter in Imaris software.

PRV-GFP labeling quantification

Spinal cord tissue for these analyses was collected at 30 WPI and sectioned horizontally at 30-μm thickness using the CryoJane tape transfer method. Immunostaining for 1/6 sampling interval sections was performed to detect PRV-GFP labeled fibers. For quantification, five to six random optical fields within the lesion site per section were imaged using Zeiss LSM 900 with an Airyscan super-resolution microscope. The antibody source and the dilutions were used as listed in Supplemental Table 1. For each optical field, 24 μm Z stack images (0.4 μm Z-step) were captured using a 60X oil objective. PRV-GFP labeled filament volumes were manually traced using Imaris v9.6 filament manual tracing software (Oxford Instruments, A Abingdon, United Kingdom). Brain sections were sectioned coronally at 30 μm using a sliding microtome. Immunostaining (all sections containing motor cortex, no sampling) was performed to detect PRV-GFP cell bodies. All PRV⁺ cell bodies within the motor cortex were counted manually. Quantification was performed at 20X magnification using a ZEISS Axio Imager II light microscope with an Apotome2 image processor. Image acquisition and quantifications were performed by investigators blinded to the experimental groups.

Behavioral testing and locomotor recovery assessment

All behavioral data was collected and analyzed by observers blinded to the experimental groups. The total number of animals per group (n) is indicated under the statistical analysis and exclusions section below. Horizontal ladder beam and CatWalk Gait Acquisition were performed to quantify changes in motor recovery and kinetic parameters after injury. For horizontal ladder beam task, mice were acclimated to the environment for 5 minutes and then recorded walking across the horizontal ladder beam for three trials. Video analysis quantified each left forepaw placement error, as previously described⁶². For CatWalk gait acquisition, mice were acclimated to the environment for 5 minutes and then each animal performed three runs across the LED lighted glass stage of CatWalk XT (Noldus Information Technology Inc., Leesburg, VA). A successful run contained ten consecutive steps, a consistent walking speed, and no paw placement on the stage walls. Runs were auto-classified using the CatWalk software version 10.1⁷⁹. For the bridge retransection study, Catwalk data analysis, we utilized Gradient Booster Machine (GBM), a decision tree algorithm, implemented in the R package (“gbm” version 2.1.8.1) analysis⁸⁰, which has been successfully applied to Catwalk measurements⁸¹ and was used to select a subset of the most informative variables to predict the therapeutic outcomes. Consequently, fifteen variables of the original Catwalk data were used as input to a linear discriminate (LD) function implemented in R package (“klaR, version 1.7–2)⁸² to define the linear boundary that separates the treatment groups in the reduced feature space. The outcome result was visualized by using the ggcord/ggplot2 R package (version 3.4.1)⁸³ and the LD weights were retrieved for each variable.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism GraphPad Prism version 9.2.0. Mice were randomized across groups to ensure an unbiased distribution by age and weight by an investigator not involved directly in the study. The sample size (n), statistical tests conducted, and statistical significance are indicated in the figure legend for each figure. All data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Data collection and analysis were performed by investigators blinded to experimental groups. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s T-tests were applied when comparing two experimental groups, with the exception of Fig. 7i. For In Fig. 7i, a one-tailed test was applied based on the observation that hNSC increased NF-H labeled axons in the bridge (Fig. 6o) and thus the prediction that the combination of PLG+hNSC group would similarly enhance, and not decrease, PRV-labeled fibers within the bridge. ANOVA analysis was applied when comparing three or more groups. One-way, two-way, and three-way ANOVA were used as appropriate based on the number of factors, as described in the figure legends. Sample size (n) for statistical analysis were as detailed in the figures and legends, as well as below for individual groups.

Figure 2:

Figure 2d–h: Mice in SCI control group- 1 DPI (n = 4), 1 WPI (n = 5), 4WPT (n = 5), 8 WPI (n = 4), and 24 WPI (n = 4); Mice in PLG bridge group-1 DPI (n = 5), 1 WPI (n = 4), 4WPT (n = 5), 8 WPI (n = 5), and 24 WPI (n = 5).

Figure 3: All groups in Fig. 3a–u (n = 4), except In the PMN-CM-PLG scaffold group for oligodendrocyte fate in Fig.3g (n = 3); Fig. 3v,w, & y (n = 4). Figure 3x (n = 3).

PLG bridge and hNSC transplantation in vivo study

Exclusions: 18 Rag1 mice in the main transplantation study were excluded using pre hoc criteria by an investigator blinded to the experimental groups and not involved directly in the study. Exclusion criteria: excessive weight loss, autophagy, staphylococcus infection of the hair follicles, or surgical complication (n = 12); anatomical defect (n = 2); failed bridge apposition (n = 1); failed transplantation/engraftment (n = 1); and Grubbs’ test for outliers (n = 2).

The final Ns for the histological and behavior analysis were, therefore, as follows.

Figure 4: In some cases, section loss during staining results in a variation of Ns within a group at different anatomical locations.

Figure 4d SCI control group (n = 3) and PLG group (n = 4).

Figure 4e–m: SCI control group −2160 (n = 4), −1440 (n = 5), −720 (n = 5), +720 (n = 5), +1440 (n = 5), and +2160 (n = 5); PLG group −2160 (n = 6), −1440 (n = 6), −720 (n = 6), +720 (n = 6), +1440 (n = 6), and +2160 (n = 6), except Fig. 4m & J SCI control group −2160 (n = 3).

Figure 4o: SCI control group −2160 (n = 4), −1440 (n = 5), −720 (n = 5), +720 (n = 5), +1440 (n = 5), and +2160 (n = 3); PLG group −2160 (n = 6), −1440 (n = 6), −720 (n = 6), +720 (n = 6), +1440 (n = 6), and +2160 (n = 5).

Figure 4p: SCI control group −2160 (n = 4), −1440 (n = 5), −720 (n = 5), +720 (n = 5), +1440 (n = 5), and +2160 (n = 5); PLG group −2160 (n = 6), −1440 (n = 6), −720 (n = 6), +720 (n = 6), +1440 (n = 6), and +2160 (n = 5).

Figure 4r: SCI control group −2160 (n = 3), −1440 (n = 5), −720 (n = 5), +720 (n = 3), +1440 (n = 4), and +2160 (n = 3); PLG group −2160 (n = 6), −1440 (n = 6), −720 (n = 6), +720 (n = 6), +1440 (n = 6), and +2160 (n = 4).

Figure 4s: SCI control group −2160 (n = 3), −1440 (n = 5), −720 (n = 5), +720 (n = 3), +1440 (n = 4), and +2160 (n = 5); PLG group −2160 (n = 6), −1440 (n = 6), −720 (n = 6), +720 (n = 6), +1440 (n = 6), and +2160 (n = 6).

Figure 5:

Figure 5f: SCI control group (n = 6) and PLG group (n = 5); Fig. 5g: for all fate markers (n = 5); Fig. 5l–p: SCI control group (n = 5) and PLG group (n = 6); Fig. 5q–t: Spared tissue (n = 6) and PLG bridge (n = 5).

Figure 6:

Figure 6n: SCI + Vehicle (n = 5), SCI + hNSC (n = 4), PLG Bridge + Vehicle (n = 5), and PLG Bridge + hNSC (n = 6). Figure 6o, p: PLG Bridge + Vehicle (n = 5) and PLG Bridge + hNSC (n = 6).

Figure 7:

Figure 7i: SCI + Vehicle (n = 4), SCI + hNSC (n = 4), PLG Bridge + Vehicle (n = 3), and PLG Bridge + hNSC (n = 3). Figure 7l, m: SCI + Vehicle (n = 5), SCI + hNSC (n = 5), PLG Bridge + Vehicle (n = 3), and PLG Bridge + hNSC (n = 3).

Figure 8:

Figure 8a, b: SCI control + Vehicle (n = 10), SCI control + hNSC (n = 10), PLG bridge + Vehicle (n = 9), and PLG bridge + hNSC (n = 12). Figure 8c Catwalk analysis: SCI control + Vehicle (n = 8), SCI control + hNSC (n = 9), PLG bridge + Vehicle (n = 9), and PLG bridge + hNSC (n = 12). For Catwalk, two mice in the SCI control + Vehicle group and one mouse in the SCI control + hNSC group could not perform the task and were excluded from statistical analysis for this task but were retained for horizontal ladder beam analysis and histology.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Human neural stem cell line UC161 is available from the Aileen J. Anderson upon request.

References

Fawcett, J. W., Schwab, M. E., Montani, L., Brazda, N. & Muller, H. W. Defeating inhibition of regeneration by scar and myelin components. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 109, 503–522 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Anwar, M. A., Al Shehabi, T. S. & Eid, A. H. Inflammogenesis of secondary spinal cord injury. Front. Cell Neurosci. 10, 98 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Richardson, P. M., McGuinness, U. M. & Aguayo, A. J. Axons from CNS neurons regenerate into PNS grafts. Nature 284, 264–265 (1980).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bunge, M. B. Bridging areas of injury in the spinal cord. Neuroscientist 7, 325–339 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kadoya, K. et al. Combined intrinsic and extrinsic neuronal mechanisms facilitate bridging axonal regeneration one year after spinal cord injury. Neuron 64, 165–172 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, T., Anandakumaran, P. N. & Shoichet, M. S. Combinatorial therapies after spinal cord injury: how can biomaterials help? Adv. Healthc. Mater https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601130 (2017).
Gomes, E. D., Silva, N. A. & Salgado, A. J. Combinatorial therapies for spinal cord injury: strategies to induce regeneration. Neural. Regen. Res. 14, 69–71 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsintou, M., Dalamagkas, K. & Seifalian, A. M. Advances in regenerative therapies for spinal cord injury: a biomaterials approach. Neural. Regen. Res. 10, 726–742 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Saremi, J. et al. Advanced approaches to regenerate spinal cord injury: the development of cell and tissue engineering therapy and combinational treatments. Biomed. Pharmacother. 146, 112529 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, W. et al. Spinal cord tissue engineering via covalent interaction between biomaterials and cells. Sci. Adv. 9, eade8829 (2023).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Park, H. H. et al. Dual-functional hydrogel system for spinal cord regeneration with sustained release of arylsulfatase B alleviates fibrotic microenvironment and promotes axonal regeneration. Biomaterials 284, 121526 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koffler, J. et al. Biomimetic 3D-printed scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair. Nat. Med. 25, 263–269 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alvarez, Z. et al. Bioactive scaffolds with enhanced supramolecular motion promote recovery from spinal cord injury. Science 374, 848–856 (2021).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pawar, K. et al. Biomaterial bridges enable regeneration and re-entry of corticospinal tract axons into the caudal spinal cord after SCI: association with recovery of forelimb function. Biomaterials 65, 1–12 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thomas, A. M. et al. Sonic hedgehog and neurotrophin-3 increase oligodendrocyte numbers and myelination after spinal cord injury. Integr. Biol. 6, 694–705 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Park, J. et al. Local immunomodulation with anti-inflammatory cytokine-encoding lentivirus enhances functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Mol. Ther. 26, 1756–1770 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tuinstra, H. M. et al. Multifunctional, multichannel bridges that deliver neurotrophin encoding lentivirus for regeneration following spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 33, 1618–1626 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Duncan, G. J. et al. Locomotor recovery following contusive spinal cord injury does not require oligodendrocyte remyelination. Nat Commun. 9, 3066 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lemon, R. N. & Griffiths, J. Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization? Muscle Nerve 32, 261–279 (2005).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Olivares-Moreno, R. et al. The rat corticospinal system is functionally and anatomically segregated. Brain Struct. Funct. 222, 3945–3958 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Powers, B. E. et al. Remyelination reporter reveals prolonged refinement of spontaneously regenerated myelin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4075–4080 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Barnabe-Heider, F. et al. Origin of new glial cells in intact and injured adult spinal cord. Cell Stem Cell 7, 470–482 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kotter, M. R., Li, W. W., Zhao, C. & Franklin, R. J. Myelin impairs CNS remyelination by inhibiting oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation. J. Neurosci. 26, 328–332 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Horky, L. L., Galimi, F., Gage, F. H. & Horner, P. J. Fate of endogenous stem/progenitor cells following spinal cord injury. J. Comp. Neurol. 498, 525–538 (2006).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Blakemore, W. F. & Irvine, K. A. Endogenous or exogenous oligodendrocytes for remyelination. J. Neurol. Sci. 265, 43–46 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Piao, J. H., Larsen, E. C., Kondo, Y. & Duncan, I. D. Migration and remyelination by oligodendrocyte progenitor cells transplanted adjacent to focal areas of spinal cord inflammation. J. Neurosci. Res. 89, 1737–1746 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Margul, D. J. et al. Reducing neuroinflammation by delivery of IL-10 encoding lentivirus from multiple-channel bridges. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 1, 136–148 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. Multiple channel bridges for spinal cord injury: cellular characterization of host response. Tissue Eng. Part A 15, 3283–3295 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cummings, B. J. et al. Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14069–14074 (2005).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Benavente, F. et al. Novel C1q receptor-mediated signaling controls neural stem cell behavior and neurorepair. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55732 (2020).
Nguyen, H. X. et al. Systemic neutrophil depletion modulates the migration and fate of transplanted human neural stem cells to rescue functional repair. J. Neurosci. 37, 9269–9287 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hooshmand, M. J. et al. Neutrophils induce astroglial differentiation and migration of human neural stem cells via C1q and C3a synthesis. J. Immunol. 199, 1069–1085 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Piltti, K. M., Salazar, D. L., Uchida, N., Cummings, B. J. & Anderson, A. J. Safety of human neural stem cell transplantation in chronic spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2, 961–974 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beck, K. D. et al. Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment. Brain 133, 433–447 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Park, J. et al. Intravascular innate immune cells reprogrammed via intravenous nanoparticles to promote functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14947–14954 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tuinstra, H. M. et al. Long-term characterization of axon regeneration and matrix changes using multiple channel bridges for spinal cord regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 20, 1027–1037 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thomas, A. M. et al. Channel density and porosity of degradable bridging scaffolds on axon growth after spinal injury. Biomaterials 34, 2213–2220 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, H. C. et al. Lactic acid in macrophage polarization: the significant role in inflammation and cancer. Int. Rev. Immunol. 41, 4–18 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Makadia, H. K. & Siegel, S. J. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers 3, 1377–1397 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van Apeldoorn, A. A. et al. Raman imaging of PLGA microsphere degradation inside macrophages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13226–13227 (2004).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L. et al. Structural properties of scaffolds: crucial parameters towards stem cells differentiation. World J. Stem Cells 7, 728–744 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Arulmoli, J. et al. Combination scaffolds of salmon fibrin, hyaluronic acid, and laminin for human neural stem cell and vascular tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 43, 122–138 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ortinau, S. et al. Effect of 3D-scaffold formation on differentiation and survival in human neural progenitor cells. Biomed. Eng. Online 9, 70 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Salazar, D. L., Uchida, N., Hamers, F. P., Cummings, B. J. & Anderson, A. J. Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in an early chronic spinal cord injury NOD-scid mouse model. PLoS ONE 5, e12272 (2010).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lim, S. H., Liu, X. Y., Song, H., Yarema, K. J. & Mao, H. Q. The effect of nanofiber-guided cell alignment on the preferential differentiation of neural stem cells. Biomaterials 31, 9031–9039 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stukel, J. M. & Willits, R. K. The interplay of peptide affinity and scaffold stiffness on neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells. Biomed. Mater. 13, 024102 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Niari, S. A., Rahbarghazi, R., Geranmayeh, M. H. & Karimipour, M. Biomaterials patterning regulates neural stem cells fate and behavior: the interface of biology and material science. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 110, 725–737 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McMahon, S. S. & McDermott, K. W. Proliferation and migration of glial precursor cells in the developing rat spinal cord. J. Neurocytol. 30, 821–828 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Simons, M. & Nave, K. A. Oligodendrocytes: myelination and axonal support. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a020479 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Riegger, T. et al. Immune depression syndrome following human spinal cord injury (SCI): a pilot study. Neuroscience 158, 1194–1199 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sontag, C. J. et al. Immunosuppressants affect human neural stem cells in vitro but not in an in vivo model of spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2, 731–744 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mombaerts, P. et al. RAG-1-deficient mice have no mature B and T lymphocytes. Cell 68, 869–877 (1992).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dumont, C. M. et al. Aligned hydrogel tubes guide regeneration following spinal cord injury. Acta Biomater. 86, 312–322 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Powers, B. E. et al. Axonal thinning and extensive remyelination without chronic demyelination in spinal injured rats. J. Neurosci. 32, 5120–5125 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ueno, M. et al. Corticospinal circuits from the sensory and motor cortices differentially regulate skilled movements through distinct spinal interneurons. Cell Rep. 23, 1286–1300 e1287 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vizzard, M. A., Erickson, V. L., Card, J. P., Roppolo, J. R. & de Groat, W. C. Transneuronal labeling of neurons in the adult rat brainstem and spinal cord after injection of pseudorabies virus into the urethra. J. Comp. Neurol. 355, 629–640 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Zhang, R. L., Li, Y., Cui, Y. & Chopp, M. Remodeling of the corticospinal innervation and spontaneous behavioral recovery after ischemic stroke in adult mice. Stroke 40, 2546–2551 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu, Z. et al. Skilled movements require non-apoptotic Bax/Bak pathway-mediated corticospinal circuit reorganization. Neuron 94, 626–641.e624 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. The identification and neurochemical characterization of central neurons that target parasympathetic preganglionic neurons involved in the regulation of choroidal blood flow in the rat eye using pseudorabies virus, immunolabeling and conventional pathway tracing methods. Front. Neuroanat. 9, 65 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seidler, R. D. et al. Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 721–733 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tosolini, A. P. & Morris, R. Spatial characterization of the motor neuron columns supplying the rat forelimb. Neuroscience 200, 19–30 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cummings, B. J., Engesser-Cesar, C., Cadena, G. & Anderson, A. J. Adaptation of a ladder beam walking task to assess locomotor recovery in mice following spinal cord injury. Behav. Brain Res. 177, 232–241 (2007).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Koopmans, G. C. et al. The assessment of locomotor function in spinal cord injured rats: the importance of objective analysis of coordination. J. Neurotrauma 22, 214–225 (2005).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Nishi, R. A. et al. The effects of mouse strain and age on a model of unilateral cervical contusion spinal cord injury. PLoS ONE 15, e0234245 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jin, D. et al. Restoration of skilled locomotion by sprouting corticospinal axons induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3. Nat. Commun. 6, 8074 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Balbinot, G. et al. Segmental motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury relates to density and integrity of corticospinal tract projections. Nat. Commun. 14, 723 (2023).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun, W. et al. Gabapentinoid treatment promotes corticospinal plasticity and regeneration following murine spinal cord injury. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 345–358 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cummings, B. J., Uchida, N., Tamaki, S. J. & Anderson, A. J. Human neural stem cell differentiation following transplantation into spinal cord injured mice: association with recovery of locomotor function. Neurol. Res. 28, 474–481 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hooshmand, M. J. et al. Analysis of host-mediated repair mechanisms after human CNS-stem cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: correlation of engraftment with recovery. PLoS ONE 4, e5871 (2009).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Piltti, K. M., Salazar, D. L., Uchida, N., Cummings, B. J. & Anderson, A. J. Safety of epicenter versus intact parenchyma as a transplantation site for human neural stem cells for spinal cord injury therapy. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2, 204–216 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anderson, M. A. et al. Required growth facilitators propel axon regeneration across complete spinal cord injury. Nature 561, 396–400 (2018).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pajer, K., Bellak, T. & Nogradi, A. Stem cell secretome for spinal cord repair: is it more than just a random baseline set of factors? Cells https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113214 (2021).
Shao, A., Tu, S., Lu, J. & Zhang, J. Crosstalk between stem cell and spinal cord injury: pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10, 238 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lu, P., Jones, L. L., Snyder, E. Y. & Tuszynski, M. H. Neural stem cells constitutively secrete neurotrophic factors and promote extensive host axonal growth after spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol. 181, 115–129 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ishida, A. et al. Dynamic interaction between cortico-brainstem pathways during training-induced recovery in stroke model rats. J. Neurosci. 39, 7306–7320 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. X., Beck, K. D. & Anderson, A. J. Quantitative assessment of immune cells in the injured spinal cord tissue by flow cytometry: a novel use for a cell purification method. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/2698 (2011).
Uchida, N. et al. Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14720–14725 (2000).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. X. & Tidball, J. G. Expression of a muscle-specific, nitric oxide synthase transgene prevents muscle membrane injury and reduces muscle inflammation during modified muscle use in mice. J. Physiol. 550, 347–356 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vrinten, D. H. & Hamers, F. F. CatWalk’ automated quantitative gait analysis as a novel method to assess mechanical allodynia in the rat; a comparison with von Frey testing. Pain 102, 203–209 (2003).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Boehmke, B. Greenwell, B. Hands-On Machine Learning with R; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA (2019).
Frohlich, H., Claes, K., De Wolf, C., Van Damme, X. & Michel, A. A machine learning approach to automated gait analysis for the noldus catwalk system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65, 1133–1139 (2018).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Garczarek, U. M. Classification Rules in Standardized Partition Spaces. Univ. Dortmund. (2002).
Huang, H., Zhou, L., Chen, J. & Wei, T. ggcor: extended tools for correlation analysis and visualization. R package version 0.9.7 (2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Charles L.S. Wu, Javier Lepe, Chris Nelson, Cherie Anne Stringer, Andrea Anzalone, Francisca Benavente, Mario Quintero Salazar, and Joshua David for assistance with animal surgery, animal care, and behavioral assessments. We gratefully acknowledge Anthony Hieu Ngotran, Lindsey Lawmaster, James Cordova, and Nathaniel Addonizio for their technical assistance. We thank Hal X. Nguyen for his assistance with the PMN and MØ conditioned media generation. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [R01NS117103, RO1EB005678, and R01FD007478]. We acknowledge Dr. Lorna Carlin and the UCI School of Medicine for supporting our research through an Excellence in Research Award to U.N, and the Johnson family for supporting stem cell research to A.J.A. The PRV seeding reagent was kindly provided by the Center for Neuroanatomy with Neurotropic Viruses at the University of Pittsburgh (NIH grant P40OD010996) to X.X. Figure 1 and 4a were created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Pooja S. Sakthivel, Atena Zahedi.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Brian J. Cummings, Aileen J. Anderson.

Authors and Affiliations

Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Usha Nekanti, Pooja S. Sakthivel, Atena Zahedi, Dana A. Creasman, Rebecca A. Nishi, Katja M. Piltti, Glenn L. Guardamondo, Norbert Hernandez, Xingyuan Chen, Hui Song, Joshua Martinez, Lillian On, Anita Lakatos, Brian J. Cummings & Aileen J. Anderson
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Usha Nekanti, Pooja S. Sakthivel, Dana A. Creasman, Xiaoxiao Lin, Xiangmin Xu, Brian J. Cummings & Aileen J. Anderson
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Courtney M. Dumont & Lonnie D. Shea
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Kiran Pawar
Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
Brian T. David
Department of Medicine & Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Zhiling Guo
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Stephanie K. Seidlits
Center for Neural Circuit Mapping, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
Xiangmin Xu
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Brian J. Cummings & Aileen J. Anderson
Institute for Memory Impairments & Neurological Disorder, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
Brian J. Cummings & Aileen J. Anderson

Authors

Usha Nekanti
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pooja S. Sakthivel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Atena Zahedi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dana A. Creasman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rebecca A. Nishi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Courtney M. Dumont
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Katja M. Piltti
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Glenn L. Guardamondo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Norbert Hernandez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xingyuan Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hui Song
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaoxiao Lin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Joshua Martinez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lillian On
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anita Lakatos
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kiran Pawar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Brian T. David
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhiling Guo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Stephanie K. Seidlits
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiangmin Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lonnie D. Shea
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Brian J. Cummings
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Aileen J. Anderson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization and design of the study: U.N., X.X., L.D.S., B.J.C. and A.J.A.; Methodology: U.N., P.S.S., A.Z., D.A.C., R.A.N., C.M.D., K.M.P., S.K.S., A.K., X.X., L.D.S., B.J.C. and A.J.A.; Investigation and analysis: U.N., P.S.S., A.Z., D.A.C., R.A.N., C.M.D., G.L.G., N.H., X.C., H.S., X.L., J.M., L.O., A.K., K.P., B.T.D. and Z.G.; Manuscript writing: U.N., A.Z., P.S.S. and A.J.A.; Supervision: B.J.C. and A.J.A. Funding acquisition: U.N., X.X., L.D.S., B.J.C. and A.J.A. All authors read and revised the manuscript, provided suggestions, and approved the final version. These authors contributed equally: P.S.S. and A.Z.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Usha Nekanti or Aileen J. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplemental Material

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nekanti, U., Sakthivel, P.S., Zahedi, A. et al. Multichannel bridges and NSC synergize to enhance axon regeneration, myelination, synaptic reconnection, and recovery after SCI. npj Regen Med 9, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-024-00356-0

Download citation

Received: 09 June 2023
Accepted: 15 February 2024
Published: 18 March 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-024-00356-0