Applying Systems Thinking to Regenerative Medicine—A Workshop was organized by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Forum on Regenerative Medicine. The meeting brought together leaders from government, academia, industry, professional associations, foundations, patient communities, and other stakeholder groups to address the potential for cross-disciplinary systems thinking to advance regenerative medicine. Discussions during the meeting covered the role of data science in regenerative medicine and the importance of data science training and data literacy for the current and future regenerative medicine workforce.
Regenerative Medicine and Advanced Therapies (RMAT) are complex products and often include “living” cellular materials. Every patient—and, for some applications, every product—is unique, and product manufacturing entails lengthy, complicated processes. Intricate relationships exist between the patient’s disease state, the donor starting material, the manufacturing process, supply-chain logistics, and the clinical response. RMAT products are stimulating a paradigm shift in biopharma manufacturing because it means understanding interrelated systems at multiple scales—from molecular and cellular processes to optimization of the manufacturing parameters and workflow, supply-chain logistics, and patient queuing. Therefore, the RMAT enterprise is well-suited to applications of systems thinking, i.e., the use of systems theory and system sciences to analyze relationships and develop effective action in complex contexts. The next-generation workforce can be prepared for this environment with modern data tools and methods and a systems-thinking mindset to extract insights using techniques like data mining and machine learning.
Cooperation between biologists, engineers, and computational scientists is important to achieving the promise of RMAT products as personalized therapeutics. Systems thinking leverages large, multifaceted datasets to establish reliable manufacturing and distribution methods and to define cellular identities that match intended applications in patients1. Data science, data-driven models, and mathematics can link various disciplines, such as stem cell biology, physiology, immunology, and engineering, in effective transdisciplinary research2. It would be beneficial to prepare a workforce of “integrators” who can apply sophisticated computational approaches to regenerative medicine research, interpret multidimensional data across sectors of the RMAT enterprise, and translate results of basic research to manufacturing, effective regulations, and the clinic (Fig. 1).
Given the complexity of RMAT products, the Forum on Regenerative Medicine of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) held a workshop called Applying Systems Thinking to Regenerative Medicine3. The workshop examined long-standing challenges associated with characterizing patient-specific RMAT therapies to enable successful products, processes, analytics, and supply-chain logistics. Discussions made clear that this field presents significant data-related challenges. The data take many forms, including multi-omics data, functional data, analytical data from processes and manufactured products, supply-chain and healthcare logistics, and patient data. The variety of data requires combining and harmonizing data across sources and formats, and the small size of some first-in-human clinical trials limits analytical power and augments the need for data sharing. These demands create technical challenges like handling, integrating, and interpreting a “system” of large, diverse, and complex datasets, as well as challenges associated with maintaining privacy, cybersecurity, and proprietary information.
Interpretation of data to characterize RMAT products and predict clinical success involves advanced statistical methods and mechanistic models. Advanced quantitative methods may be essential knowledge for the modern technical expert, yet these are not currently a core component of biological research training. Indeed, concepts such as entropy, stochasticity, and critical phenomena are relatively new to cell biology applications4. Efforts to integrate process and product analytics with quality control and to integrate manufacturing data with patient-queuing and supply-chain logistics could benefit from systems-level thinking that is currently unprecedented in biopharma and bioengineering. Providing broad-based coursework, hands-on training, and real-life experiences to support the well-versed RMAT practitioner may be challenging but could be advantageous for the clinical and commercial success of the industry. Although not everyone in the RMAT workforce need be a data science and modeling expert, all workers may need a basic understanding of data handling, analytics, and interpretation.
A recent series of NASEM meetings highlighted the intersection of data science with traditional domain sciences and how this interplay impacts data science teaching5. Rooted in disciplines such as computer science, statistics, and mathematics, data science is an interdisciplinary field enriched by collaborations between several disciplines. In addition to the technical aspects of data science and applications to specific scientific domains, the societal considerations of data science merit special attention for RMAT practitioners. Societal and ethical issues include how data and communities interact and the role of inclusion and equity in collection, interpretation, and application of data.
In this perspective, we discuss the challenges facing the next-generation RMAT workforce in utilizing data encountered in this field. We consider a wide range of data issues that will be critical for the diverse field of RMAT products. Our goal is to raise awareness of this critical aspect of RMAT for educators and industry professionals. We believe that training the future workforce may occur in traditional and nontraditional ways, and can include 2-year colleges, research universities, graduate and postdoctoral training as well as training opportunities for the existing biopharma workforce.
Aspects of data science of special relevance to RMAT
Areas of the RMAT development enterprise where data science will play an important role include both technical, scientific issues and related social and ethical issues (Fig. 1).
Societal and ethical considerations in data science
Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) algorithms are increasingly applied to analyze data and make predictions in regenerative medicine6,7,8,9. As has been widely acknowledged, such algorithms can be biased6,10. Since AI/ML strategies contain proxies for true variables of interest, label-choice bias can exist. Recent studies applying AI/ML to healthcare are instructive for the regenerative medicine field because “health”—like “cell quality”—is inherently subjective, holistic, and multidimensional; there is no single, precise way to measure it. A recent study in healthcare, for example, found that bias occurs when an AI/ML algorithm uses health costs as a proxy for health needs11. Further, datasets may be biased in terms of demographics like race, gender, or socioeconomic status. Bias can occur during labeling of training data, as a result of how data are collected, or due to self-selection by members of the target populations. For instance, in one study, 87% of patients were white, and most were relatively affluent12. The preponderance of data from this demographic may not provide an adequate training set to apply to non-white, non-affluent populations.
To begin addressing these issues, guides were developed about how to define, measure, and mitigate bias in algorithms10,13. Privacy, accountability, safety, transparency, fairness and non-discrimination, human control of technology, professional responsibility, and effectiveness are among the key elements14. These playbooks and principles could be adapted for regenerative medicine contexts and incorporated into workforce training. Data science training can also prepare the workforce to work with large datasets and leverage other efforts to alleviate health data disparities15,16.
The RMAT workforce should be prepared to address issues of cybersecurity. Biotech has been the target of cyberattacks, putting the health of patients in jeopardy17. Protecting patient and company data, including intellectual property and sensitive health information, is critical and challenging. Cybersecurity is a critical feature of establishing a robust RMAT supply chain. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) defined a framework for cybersecurity in 2018 and has since updated guidance18,19. The framework provides general guidance for assessing cybersecurity risk, managing cybersecurity within the supply chain, and reducing risk to critical infrastructure. Again, adapting this framework for regenerative medicine could help assure secure RMAT supply chains in accord with federal and institutional standards.
Data sharing and data integration
A systems-based approach to solving the complex challenges faced in regenerative medicine requires data sharing across stakeholders, and the up-and-coming workforce can be instrumental in achieving that aim. Although encouraged by some funding agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH)20,21,22, widespread data sharing has been uncommon to-date in cell biology, clinical research, and manufacturing. Data sharing can advance regenerative medicine by enabling studies with greater statistical power, a wider range of variables, and a more diverse patient base than single studies can achieve. Collaboration can harness new and existing data sources to promote data-driven scientific discovery and innovation across the private and public sectors globally23,24. Incorporating FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reuse of digital assets) in research practices and workforce training encourages open access and furthers the public good25. Such approaches can provide advantages for RMAT akin to those from the Bermuda Principles, which enabled the Human Genome Project to share data shortly after sequencing and strengthened international cooperation26,27.
Data sharing also facilitates comparability studies and the development of standards for RMAT products. Reproducibility remains a challenge in RMAT research and product development and is largely attributable to complex and highly manual manufacturing processes, variability in donor and patient cells, reagent quality variability, and the lack of standards and comparability metrics. Data sharing and standardization could alleviate these issues and significantly improve outcomes in trials with RMAT products. Finally, the regenerative medicine workforce should be cognizant of the legal challenges of data sharing related to intellectual property and how data sharing may impact the security of patient data28,29. Data sharing could substantially advance the field but remains contingent on appropriate data management and security practices; creating such infrastructure is ongoing30.
Data science education pathways
Education pathways must continue to evolve so that students are data-literate and prepared for careers in domains like regenerative medicine. Integration of data science perspectives into data-intensive domain courses can yield transformative researchers and practitioners educated in both the foundations and domain-specific applications of data science. Integrating data science education throughout the RMAT training pipeline can assure that students are versed in the language of data collection, analysis, interpretation, management, and security.
Implementation of data literacy programs ensures a critical mass of workforce talent. Indeed, many universities have launched data science institutes, programs, or schools. The 2018 Moore-Sloan Foundation’s report on the status of data science highlights approaches to data science at universities. Approaches vary across investment strategy (e.g., campus and private funding), curricular emphasis (e.g., engineering, information/computer sciences, business, mathematics/statistics), and organization (e.g., institute, school, department/division)31.
Many institutions recognize the increasing role of data in the workplace and the commensurate importance of data literacy for new graduates. Attempts to meet the need for data science training range from specialized coursework housed in existing statistics or computer science departments to new programs and majors, such as the Data Theory Major at the University of California, Los Angeles32. A 2018 NASEM report details various routes for data science training at the undergraduate level33, yet training opportunities could be expanded.
Competencies for these programs comprise data science foundations and applications and may incorporate ethics, legal and regulatory issues, and social concerns. Flexibility and incentives for sharing courses, materials, and faculty would support nascent programs. A key challenge of incorporating additional data science courses in undergraduate curricula is the constraint of not increasing the total credit hours for degree programs—i.e., another course must be removed to accommodate the data science course(s). Gaining consensus among programs on reallocating course content would be challenging, but doable, and advantageous. An alternative or complementary approach could be adding data science training and projects to existing courses with domain-specific examples.
Graduate education could include innovative programs in data science, delivered through modular and nontraditional methods, including applying asynchronous pedagogical strategies to residential and non-residential digital learning. Masters and doctoral students could enroll in data science programs or domain-specific programs with a data science certificate. Possibilities include modular, stackable graduate certificate programs and three graduate degrees in data science: (i) professional science masters, (ii) masters, and (iii) doctoral.
Graduates of data science programs work in all job sectors and serve in many roles. Although not everyone in the RMAT workforce needs data science expertise, most workers—across all levels—should understand the language of data science well enough to interpret analysis of RMAT products and to communicate with data science specialists. Students will acquire data science literacy through exposure to data science throughout the graduate and undergraduate curriculum.
Complementary opportunities for data science education
Complementary educational pathways could fill gaps in the RMAT training pipeline. Community or technical colleges are one avenue for providing data science training and guiding individuals into regenerative medicine. Two-year colleges are already developing courses, certificates, and associate degrees in data science, analytics, and data management to meet the demand for a data-literate workforce5. For example, the Northeast Wisconsin Technical College offers a Data Analytics Associate’s Degree to prepare students to work in fields like advanced manufacturing and healthcare. Through partnerships with 4-year colleges and national or regional centers focused on biomanufacturing or data sciences (e.g., BiofabUSA, BioMADE), biotechnology programs at 2-year colleges can offer experiential, project-based learning and enhanced training opportunities for entry-level workforce. For example, the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Cell Manufacturing Technologies (CMaT) offers hands-on research and training opportunities for 2-year college students in Georgia and Wisconsin and works with 2-year college instructors to develop curriculum.
Data science boot camps, which are intensive skill-building programs, can complement other academic or industry experience and better connect participants with industry demands5. Internships can also supplement the education of new graduates from traditional academic programs who may lack industry experience. Experienced employees might benefit from continuing education programs that leverage and repurpose the on-the-job workforce5,34. The future of workforce development will also include educational opportunities outside of academic institutions, and online workshops, webinars, and courses could be further expanded and supported by various sectors of the regenerative medicine field. Moreover, virtual learning opportunities may be accessed anywhere by individuals with varying levels of experience and education, and asynchronous options may be accessed anytime, thus supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workforce. An example is a recent 12-lecture virtual and asynchronous course launched jointly by the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT) and CMaT; the course covers concepts in regenerative medicine and cell manufacturing, is open to anyone around the world, and is co-taught by academic and industry leaders35.
Creating synergy through multisector involvement
The demand for a data-literate workforce creates a need for synergy between stakeholders across sectors (e.g., industry, academia, and government) of the RMAT enterprise. In academic settings, curricula to prepare data scientists for work in regenerative medicine fields might include topics in regulatory affairs, clinical development, and manufacturing. These topics will equip students to understand the unique context of regenerative medicine and appreciate systems thinking. Academia can also bolster the RMAT ecosystem by increasing the knowledge base of educators and providing resources for students interested in nonacademic careers. Synergy occurs from sectors working together on key areas of interest and providing both formal and informal educational opportunities that bridge data science and regenerative medicine. The organizations mentioned below are examples of strong multisector activities that can play an effective role in developing the RMAT workforce.
Workforce development in data-dependent regulatory issues warrants special attention. Because RMAT products are highly variable and customizable, the regulatory landscape continually evolves, and the regulatory sector must keep pace with advancements. To facilitate crosstalk and opportunities to use data science for regulatory decision-making, the regulatory affairs workforce needs to understand data science fundamentals, and the data science workforce needs a basic understanding of regulatory issues. Now is a key time to train a data science workforce to manage the regulatory environment of a rapidly evolving product and application space.
Regulatory training can begin through academic courses and degree programs36. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) interfaces with several academic institutions within the Centers of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program to help train students in regulatory science37. However, regulatory instruction could also be incorporated into existing courses. Reallocating modest portions of curricula across multiple academic stages could better prepare students to interact with regulatory guidance and to prepare documents for regulatory agencies. Statistics courses could train students to analyze large datasets with the goal of introducing regulatory concepts such as critical quality attributes (CQAs), critical process parameters (CPPs), normal operating range (NOR), and proven acceptable range (PAR). Lab-based courses could teach students to prepare process descriptions in accordance with FDA guidance documents and to describe theoretical process-characterization strategies based on risk-assessment exercises conducted in class. Advanced courses could encourage students to discuss the applicability of data science approaches (e.g., real-world data, digital transformation, AI/ML) for regulatory decision-making through answering questions such as:
How can real-world data address regulatory filing requirements from clinical, preclinical, and manufacturing perspectives?
How can data science tools help establish the safety and efficacy of a regenerative medicine product?
Clinical and translational science
Discoveries in stem cell biology and associated technologies often occur in basic science laboratories, but the promise of regenerative medicine is realized in the clinic. Academia can prepare students with interest in clinically oriented roles by emphasizing data science and theoretical analysis in programs like the Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, which offers minors in Clinical Investigation for PhD students, or the Georgia Clinical & Translational Science Alliance (CTSA), an NIH-funded program across Georgia-based universities that offer a Master of Science in Clinical Research and certificate program in translational research for PhD trainees. Such programs encourage students to consider the human impact of scientific discoveries and promote translational research.
Ranging from data acquisition and harmonization to patient privacy, data-related challenges can impede the translation of regenerative medicine discoveries to the clinic. Small sample sizes often limit research in the rare disease space, and data integration among research groups and datasets can hamper progress. To contend with these issues, several institutions established their own data-sharing capabilities, including Johns Hopkins, the Mayo Clinic38, CMaT39, and others. CMaT, for example, works to standardize methods across its eight-university ecosystem and partners with companies to record data in a unified format via batch recording software. Data can be stored in the cloud for collaborators across partner organizations to access and analyze.
Started by nine medical research organizations, another initiative, the National Center for Data to Health (CD2H), facilitates data sharing and collaboration across the community of health informatics researchers34. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), including the NIH-wide Regenerative Medicine Innovation Project (RMIP)40, also established a data-sharing platform for NIH-funded projects—the Biodata Catalyst—which is intended to serve as a central data repository for open sharing among eligible researchers20. Moreover, a workforce that can manage, interpret, and deploy data science efficiently and securely will allow the RMAT industry to capitalize on potential benefits, both nationally and globally41.
As the RMAT industry grows and new, increasingly complex products enter the pipeline, highly trained and appropriately certified workers will be in-demand to manufacture high-quality products, at scale, with low batch failure rates and maximal reproducibility—all while ensuring efficacy and patient safety and maintaining strict regulatory standards. Biomanufacturing is increasingly digital and therefore requires proficiency in both quantitative methods and biology-based lab techniques. Moreover, a potential future model of manufacturing is decentralized, remote manufacturing in hospital settings. To support this scheme and other distributed manufacturing approaches in the future, understanding remote access, digital networks, and AI would benefit the workforce.
Academia can leverage guidance documents designed for industry to better prepare students for roles in manufacturing regenerative medicines42. When designing curricula, academic entities could integrate discussions with industry and clinical manufacturers to better understand the skillsets needed for biomanufacturing. Manufacturing sciences as a separate discipline is only available at a few academic centers; rather, manufacturing is often taught through mechanical or chemical engineering departments. Collaboration between experts in manufacturing sciences and other specialized domains (e.g., cell therapy, biofabrication) would help ensure curricula and training materials reflect domain knowledge in the context of broader manufacturing principles. This collaborative, transdisciplinary effort across engineering, cell biology, clinical translation, and industrial manufacturing will be critical to prepare the next generation of RMAT workforce.
Beyond educational efforts, academic scientists can better coordinate with industry by considering manufacturing guidelines, such as Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) regulations, in their research. To facilitate translation from bench to bedside and increase uptake of innovations in the clinic, academic laboratories and researchers could aim to develop new devices, tools, software, and technologies that are GMP-compatible, follow Quality-by-Design principles, incorporate standardized analytical tools and measurements, and implement regulatory constraints.
Finally, key technology hubs and public-private partnerships play an important role in integrating data knowledge into workforce development. Organizations focused on RMAT manufacturing include the aforementioned CMaT, Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing (MC3M), National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL), BioFabUSA by the Advanced Regenerative Manufacturing Institute (ARMI), the Catapult Network in the UK, and the Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine (CCRM) in Canada. Examples of important steps these organizations have taken to build a dynamic workforce include:
Collaborative course module development for both technical and ethics/regulatory competencies.
Collaborations with 2-year college systems for hands-on training and curriculum development.
NSF-funded Future Manufacturing Network (FMNet) Consortium for “Building a Network to create the Workforce Foundation, Actionable Roadmap, and Infrastructure Design to Integrate Data Science, AI, and Predictive Analytics throughout Biomanufacturing”.
Notably, most of these efforts are in the early stages and need investment to scale up nationally or internationally. Community-based, distributed workforce training programs that build industry-identified skillsets and incorporate robust certification could significantly advance the successful use of large-scale data in regenerative medicine.
The rapidly evolving field of RMAT requires a workforce trained to take full advantage of data from different sources and at scale. Addressing the challenges of the complex systems that define the RMAT enterprise may entail forming large, unbiased datasets for statistically meaningful analysis. A workforce equipped with both the scientific and technical knowledge and the collaboration skills to integrate expertise can move the field forward in all aspects of regenerative medicine, including basic research, regulation, and manufacturing.
To deliver on the promise of regenerative medicine relies on the field to work together across sectors to train the future workforce to leverage modern tools of data science and facilitate the success of RMAT products as science and technology continue to progress. This paper is a call to bring attention to the integration of data science and the application of systems thinking for addressing the challenges faced in developing regenerative medicines.
Data sharing is not applicable to this article type, as no datasets were generated or analyzed.
Del Sol, A., Thiesen, H. J., Imitola, J. & Carazo Salas, R. E. Big-data-driven stem cell science and tissue engineering: vision and unique opportunities. Cell Stem Cell 20, 157–160 (2017).
Waters, S. L., Schumacher, L. J. & El Haj, A. J. Regenerative medicine meets mathematical modelling: developing symbiotic relationships. npj Regen. Med. 6 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00134-2 (2021).
National Academies of Sciences, E. & Medicine. Applying Systems Thinking to Regenerative Medicine: Proceedings of a Workshop (The National Academies Press, 2021).
Teschendorff, A. E. & Feinberg, A. P. Statistical mechanics meets single-cell biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 459–476 (2021).
National Academies of Sciences, E. & Medicine. Roundtable on Data Science Postsecondary Education: A Compilation of Meeting Highlights (The National Academies Press, 2020).
Eaneff, S., Obermeyer, Z. & Butte, A. J. The case for algorithmic stewardship for artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 324, 1397 (2020).
Sniecinski, I. & Seghatchian, J. Artificial intelligence: a joint narrative on potential use in pediatric stem and immune cell therapies and regenerative medicine. Transfus. Apheresis Sci. 57, 422–424 (2018).
Hart, M. et al. Shaping the cell and the future: recent advancements in biophysical aspects relevant to regenerative medicine. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 3, 2 (2017).
Yan, R., Fan, C., Yin, Z., Wang, T. & Chen, X. Potential applications of deep learning in single-cell RNA sequencing analysis for cell therapy and regenerative medicine. Stem Cells 39, 511–521 (2021).
Obermeyer, Z. et al. Algorithmic Bias Playbook (The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 2021).
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. & Mullainathan, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 447–453 (2019).
Kilgore, K. M. et al. Medicare patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a first real-world look at patient characteristics, healthcare utilization and costs. Blood 134, 793 (2019).
Smith, G. & Rustagi, I. Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence: An Equity Fluent Leadership Playbook (Berkeley Haas School of Business, 2020).
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Standardization Empowering AI-enabled Systems in Healthcare: Workshop Report. https://share.ansi.org/Shared%20Documents/News%20and%20Publications/Links%20Within%20Stories/Empowering%20AI-Enabled%20Systems,%20Workshop%20Report.pdf (2021).
Hudson, K. L. & Collins, F. S. The 21st century cures act—a view from the NIH. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 111–113 (2017).
Tcheandjieu, C. et al. Large-scale genome-wide association study of coronary artery disease in genetically diverse populations. Nat. Med. 28, 1679–1692 (2022).
Smith, J. Biotech startups face a growing wave of cyberattacks. https://www.labiotech.eu/in-depth/cyberattack-biotech-startups-covid/ (2021).
National Institute of Standards and Technology. Cybersecurity Framework. https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework (2022).
National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Releases Version 1.1 of its Popular Cybersecurity Framework. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2018/04/nist-releases-version-11-its-popular-cybersecurity-framework (2018).
National Heart, L., and Blood Institute,. BioData Catalyst: What Is BioData Catalyst? https://biodatacatalyst.nhlbi.nih.gov/ (2022).
National Institutes of Health. Final NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-013.html#:~:text=October%2029%2C%202020-,January%2025%2C%202023,-Related%20Announcements (2020).
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. Science Initiative Privacy Principles. https://chanzuckerberg.com/privacy/science-privacy-principles/ (2018).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Recommendation of the council on enhancing access to and sharing of data. OECD/LEGAL/0463. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0463 (2022).
OECD. Data Governance: enhancing access to and sharing of data. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/enhanced-data-access.htm (2021).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
U.S. Department of Energy. Human Genome Project Information Archive. https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/research/bermuda.shtml (2002).
Marshall, E. Bermuda rules: community spirit, with teeth. Science 291, 1192–1192 (2001).
Roberts, M. et al. The global intellectual property landscape of induced pluripotent stem cell technologies. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 742–748 (2014).
Zachariades, N. A. Stem cells: intellectual property issues in regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Dev. 22, 59–62 (2013).
Wirth, F. N., Meurers, T., Johns, M. & Prasser, F. Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01602-x (2021).
Katz, L. Evaluation of the Moore-Sloan Data Science Environments: Final Report. https://doi.org/10.6069/x07z-vj63 (2019).
UCLA. Data Theory at UCLA. https://datatheory.ucla.edu/ (2022).
National Academies of Sciences, E. & Medicine. Data Science for Undergraduates: Opportunities and Options (The National Academies Press, 2018).
CD2H: Harmonizing the Informatics Community. https://cd2h.org/ (2022).
International Society for Cell & Gene Therapies. Workforce Development in Biomanufacturing: A Global Partnership with ISCT and CMaT. https://www.isctglobal.org/resources/training-programs/workforce-development-in-biomanufacturing (2022).
MS in Regulatory Science. https://pharmacyschool.usc.edu/program/ms-in-regulatory-science/ (2022).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Centers of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSIs). https://www.fda.gov/science-research/advancing-regulatory-science/centers-excellence-regulatory-science-and-innovation-cersis (2021).
Ross, C. At Mayo Clinic, sharing patient data with companies fuels AI innovation—and concerns about consent. https://www.statnews.com/2020/06/03/mayo-clinic-patient-data-fuels-artificial-intelligence-consent-concerns/ (2020).
CMaT. NSF Engineering Research Center for Cell Manufacturing Technologies. https://cellmanufacturingusa.org/ (2022).
National Institutes of Health. Regenerative Medicine Innovation Project. https://www.nih.gov/rmi (2017).
Cuggia, M. & Combes, S. The French Health Data Hub and the German Medical Informatics Initiatives: two national projects to promote data sharing in healthcare. Yearb. Med. Inform. 28, 195–202 (2019).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry: Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. https://www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Q7-Good-Manufacturing-Practice-Guidance-for-Active-Pharmaceutical-Ingredients-Guidance-for-Industry.pdf (2016).
The authors are affiliated with the Forum on Regenerative Medicine of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Forums at the National Academies bring together leaders across government, industry, academia, professional societies, and other interest groups. This article is meant to summarize the individual views of the authors but does not represent consensus views of the Forum, official recommendations, or endorsements by the National Academies or other organizations with which the authors are affiliated. K.R. was partially supported by the NSF Engineering Research Center for Cell Manufacturing Technologies (CMaT) and the Marcus Center for Therapeutic Cell Characterization and Manufacturing.
The authors declare the following competing interests: K.T. is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson and a stockholder of Johnson & Johnson. K.S. receives sponsored research support from Synthego and Spotlight Therapeutics. K.R. directs the NSF Engineering Research Center for Cell Manufacturing Technologies (CMaT), which has workforce training programs. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Plant, A.L., Piscopo, N., Saha, K. et al. Implementing systems thinking and data science in the training of the regenerative medicine workforce. npj Regen Med 7, 76 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-022-00271-2