Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cellularized small-caliber tissue-engineered vascular grafts: looking for the ultimate gold standard


Due to the lack of efficacy of synthetic vascular substitutes in the replacement of small-caliber arteries, vascular tissue engineering (VTE) has emerged as a promising solution to produce viable small-caliber tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVG). Previous studies have shown the importance of a cellular intimal layer at the luminal surface of TEVG to prevent thrombotic events. However, the cellularization of a TEVG seems to be a critical approach to consider in the development of a TEVG. To date, no standard cellularization method or cell type has been established to create the ideal TEVG by promoting its long-term patency and function. In this review, advances in VTE are described and discussed with a particular focus on the construction approaches of cellularized small-caliber TEVGs, the cell types used, as well as their preclinical and clinical applications.


Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the major cause of death worldwide1,2, representing 32% of all global deaths3. These diseases are often associated with a dysfunctional vasculature caused by inflammatory, metabolic and proliferative alterations leading to the narrowing or complete obstruction of blood vessels. Thus, tissue damage is induced by diseased blood vessels that are unable to convey oxygen and essential nutrients to cells. Common presentations of CVD are coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, deep vein thrombosis, and cerebrovascular disease4.

Consequently, CVD have resulted in an increasing need for vascular grafts in order to reconstruct or bypass vascular stenosis. Vascular bypass grafting remains one of the most effective treatment approaches for patients who need long-term revascularization5,6. For the case of myocardial revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the most common cardiac surgery procedure in the world, with about 200,000 CABGs performed annually in the US, while in Western European countries an average incidence of 62 per 100,000 people is reported7. It is worth mentioning that vascular conduits are also required to create arterial–venous fistulas for frequent hemodialysis access.

Although autologous arteries and veins are the preferable conduits for vascular grafting, their use may be impossible due to their limited availability, their variable quality (e.g., varicose veins), and the complications associated with their removal (i.e., infections, tissue damage, time consuming procedures, and long-term recovery). As an alternative to autografts, synthetic vascular grafts can be used as they have shown a long-term efficacy in the replacement of large—(>8 mm) and medium—(6–8 mm) diameter arteries. However, they present poor patency rates when used for bypassing small-diameter arteries (<6 mm)4.

Globally, small vascular graft failures are commonly due to intimal hyperplasia, thrombosis, atherosclerosis, or even through infections. Indeed, one of their major limitations is the absence of their luminal cellularization, leading to thrombosis via the adherence of blood proteins and the activation of clotting mechanisms8,9.

The limitations of small-diameter vascular grafts are a real obstacle to the vascular bypass substitutes, making this a real public health issue4,10. The production of a tissue-engineered vascular graft (TEVG) for the replacement of small-diameter vessels has become the most heavily investigated and challenging areas of vascular tissue engineering (VTE). A TEVG with long-term patency, capable of being remodeled by the host organism, and showing self-repair capacities in vivo would be of great benefit11. Such a TEVG may represent a major advance in the field of cardiovascular surgery by providing an allogeneic “off-the-self” solution for clinical use allowing a new therapeutic option in various pathological states such as myocardial and lower limbs revascularization, pediatric vascular disease, useful also as arteriovenous bridges for hemodialysis. Furthermore, an “off-the-shelf” TEVG will be perfectly adapted for mini-invasive surgeries performed by robots. In fact, surgical robotic technology has emerged to perform remote operations in limited spaces and activities and is considered as the surgically invasive version of coronary bypass, avoiding a complete thoracotomy or sternotomy, thus preserving the thoracic integrity and suffering of the patient, and significantly reducing hospitalization period and costs.

The first TEVG developed was reported by Weinberg and Bell in 1986. It was produced by mimicking the blood vessel architecture using bovine aortic endothelial cells (ECs), smooth muscle cells (SMCs), thin Dacron® mesh, and collagen to create a tubular scaffold. On this scaffold, ECs, SMCs, and bovine adventitial fibroblasts were co-seeded on the luminal surface, the internal wall and on the external side, respectively12.

Since this first TEVG, several small-diameter cellularized vessel substitutes have been elaborated and tested with different production approaches which are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1: Fabrication approaches to produce a small-diameter TEVG.

Dotted frames represent optional steps found in the literature. *Cells can be seeded using cellularized gel or cell suspension. TEVG Tissue-Engineered Vascular Graft, HAV Human Acellular Vessel, SBTE Sheet-Based Tissue Engineering.

A variety of scaffolds from natural sources can be used, such as decellularized vessels or in vitro developed scaffolds, e.g., synthetic or biosynthetic grafts. Associations of different cell sources and different combinations of microenvironmental conditions to lead cell differentiation or maintain cell integrity have also been described. Despite these considerable advances in VTE, only few grafts have reached clinical studies and the perfect TEVG has not been yet developed.

A key factor to consider in the development of a TEVG is the cellular component. In fact, a very recent meta-analysis of preclinical studies using small-diameter TEVG has found that recellularized grafts were more patent than acellular grafts (85.1% vs. 64.4% respectively)13.

The cell adhesion, proliferation, as well as differentiation and several other contributions to hemostasis is crucial to create a hemocompatible small-diameter vascular graft. In physiological conditions, the blood vessel hemocompatibility is ensured by a monolayer of ECs localized at its luminal surface (termed the “endothelium”). This blood contact surface maintains hemostasis through several antithrombogenic mechanisms, such as the synthesis of plasminogen activator (tPA); inhibition of platelet aggregation via secretion of nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin; and by the presence of glycosaminoglycans on the endothelial cellular surface preventing blood coagulation14,15. Thus, in order to ensure optimal hemostasis, a continuous cell layer on the luminal surface of the vascular substitute is required. For this purpose, different cellularization approaches are described in the literature, using variable amounts of cells according to the seeding technique and the maturation period of the graft. The cell adhesion and retention can be highly improved by a prior coating deposit on the luminal surface of the graft. The addition of a luminal coating in the TEVG manufacture protocol is highly recommended as it can modify the microenvironment and guide cell behavior by promoting cell adhesion, proliferation and/or differentiation16. Several types of coatings have been used, composed of one or a combination of proteins which are in most cases of animal origin. Our team has recently developed an innovative approach to coating surfaces using a natural extracellular matrix (ECM) of human origin, extracted from the umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly (WJ) and is totally natural, biocompatible, and perfectly controllable17.

This review will focus on the cellularized vascular grafts described in the literature, the different manufacturing protocols, the various quality control tests, the preclinical in vivo evaluation in several animal models and different implantation sites, as well as the few human clinical trials. The results will be presented and discussed critically, with an emphasis on the weak points for each TEVG and the proposition of solutions for their improvement.

Preclinical trials

Several approaches have been described for the cellularization of TEVG using different types of cells in order to recreate the intimal and medial layers. Cells used in VTE can be from autologous or heterologous origins, as discussed in the following paragraphs of this review.

Substitutes using autologous cells

The advantage of using autologous cells is the avoidance of any host immunological reaction which induces the graft rejection. Two cellularization approaches have already been reported in the literature: (1) an in vitro method involving the harvesting of autologous animal cells before the preparation of the substitute and (2) an in vivo method which uses the animal model as an “incubator” by placing an acellular tube in the animal before vascular grafting. These studies are part of a proof-of-concept approach; they propose TEVG manufactured using autologous animal cells that are not directly transferrable to human implantations. Moreover, the use of this cell type requires fairly long preparation times of up to several months18, which may be incompatible with the critical situation of the patient.

Endothelial cells (ECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)

Ma et al. have reported the use of mature autologous canine ECs in the manufacture of their graft19. Cells were harvested from the left external jugular vein. Cells were cultured until the 4th passage and then seeded by rotational precipitation into a decellularized aortae of fetal pigs, clamped on both sides (arteries are rotated 120° every 10 min for 30 min). After the EC deposit the graft was placed in a bioreactor for 7 days, allowing a step of dynamic culture where the perfusion rate was increased from 10 to 60 mL/min, followed by 3 days of static culture. The autologous graft was then implanted as a carotid graft replacement in seven dogs for a period of up to 6 months. Results showed an absence of thrombi and stenosis and all the grafts remained patent over the period of the study. After 6 months, the intimal layer of the graft was composed by EPCs and ECs whose origin has not been precisely determined. Moreover, the graft was remodeled by host cells, notably muscular fibroblasts which settled in a “media-like” layer. Although the graft has shown satisfactory results, some issues could be addressed further, especially in regards to the animal model used in the study. Thrombogenesis mechanisms and vascular viscoelastic properties in dogs are very different from the human physiological parameters20. Thus, these results cannot necessarily be transferrable to humans.

ECs can also be obtained from EPCs that are collected non-invasively from the host’s peripheral blood. These cells can be used directly to cellularize a scaffold or can be subjected to a prior differentiation step before being seeded.

In 2001, Kaushal et al. evaluated the in vivo efficiency of a TEVG built from a pig decellularized iliac artery in a sheep model. The artery was seeded with autologous EPCs harvested from the internal jugular vein of 1 to 2 week(s) old sheep21. Seeding was accomplished under dynamic rotating conditions for 6 h. The graft was then matured in a laminar flow bioreactor for 6 days with a gradually increasing shear stress and implanted in an end-to-end carotid artery replacement model. Two groups of animals were compared under the same grafting conditions: seven animals receiving seeded grafts vs. four animals with unseeded grafts. The grafts patency was monitored by ultrasound Doppler every day, for a period ranging from 15 to 130 days. In the first 5 days of implantation, three of the four unseeded grafts were 100% clogged. The 4th graft was 50% clogged 15 days after the implantation. Concurrently, all seeded grafts remained patent over the entire study period (n = 3 at 15 days; n = 4 at 130 days). At 15 days, a layer of ECs derived from originally seeded EPCs was present, however the media of the substitute remained acellular. At 130 days, the results showed a thickening of the media that was infiltrated by host cells void of smooth muscle alpha-actin (α-SMA) expression, as well as an intimal layer colonized by α-SMA+ cells. Only 10% of the ECs identified at the luminal surface at 130 days were derived from the originally seeded EPCs. After 130 days, collected grafts showed a vasoconstriction capacity following exposure to serotonin and norepinephrine, reflecting the functionality of SMCs found in the intimal layer. On the other hand, these same grafts showed a relaxing capacity probably mediated by the release of NO, similar to that found in the native carotid artery.

Otherwise, EPCs can be subjected to a prior differentiation step before seeding, as achieved by Tillman et al. in 201222. In their study, the substitute was developed by seeding differentiated autologous circulating EPCs on a decellularized porcine carotid artery segment. The seeding was carried out in a bioreactor by injecting the cells into the lumen of the vessels for 2 h. The graft was then subjected to a gradually increasing nonpulsatile flow for 5 days. Graft maturation was then completed after 9 days under pulsatile flow. This substitute was evaluated for arteriovenous flow and needle punctures in the ovine model. “Short-term” and “long-term” groups were monitored. The “short-term” group, consisting of a study period of 2 months, included seven grafted animals. Grafts of this group were punctured 3 times a week during the second month. In the “long-term” group, eight animals were implanted and followed for 6 months. From the 5th month, grafts were punctured 3 times a week. During this experiment, of the total number of grafts, four were stunted in the first month of transplantation (the healing month) and occlusions appeared from 3.3 months. This type of graft using decellularized blood vessels as scaffolds have shown resistance deficiencies to repeated punctures. Other scaffolds, such as those built by mesh construction could be more effective in needle resistance.

Combination of EPCs and SMCs

Previous studies have described a co-seeding method with a combined cellularization, using autologous ECs and SMCs to improve the TEVG resistance. This approach was evaluated by Neff et al. in a carotid artery interposition grafting model in pigs for 4 months23. Results were compared with those obtained from TEVG seeded only with ECs. The manufacture of this graft consisted of the decellularization of a pig carotid artery, followed by an incubation with a SMC suspension under rotation into an outer chamber. Then, the graft was placed in a bioreactor where the lumen was perfused with a suspension of ECs for 10 to 14 days. Results have shown that the addition of SMCs to the graft wall allowed a better cellularization of the graft after implantation. This method of combined cellularization also reinforced the TEVG contractility without a negative impact on its permeability. However, this contraction capacity was much weaker than that of a native carotid artery (15–20%).

Koch et al.24 and Ju et al.25 have applied the co-seeding technique to a fibrin scaffold supported by a poly(L/D)lactide 96/4 [P(L/D)LA 96/4)] mesh and an electrospun bilayered vascular scaffold, respectively. The same cellularization protocol as previously described was utilized by Ju et al. Koch et al. produced their scaffold by a SMC/fibroblasts/fibrinogen suspension that was left to polymerize inside a mold. After polymerization, the luminal surface was cellularized with an ECs suspension into a rotating chamber26. Both TEVG were evaluated in a sheep carotid arterial interposition model. After an implantation period of 6 months, promising results have shown that the TEVG remained patent and well-integrated into the host tissue. Although these grafts appear to be suitable for clinical applications, some issues must be addressed, such as the long processing time. In fact, the scaffold preparation requires 7 days, followed by several weeks of autologous cell expansion until the 3rd–5th passage. An evaluation of this graft in a CABG or peripheric vascular bypass model would be beneficial to validate its efficiency in different representative clinical situations.

Modified cells

Another approach to obtain suitable efficient TEVGs is to modify seeded cells to confer them an additional functionality or to enhance a specific function. McIlhenny et al. have proposed a TEVG consisting of a decellularized human saphenous vein seeded with rabbit autologous adipose derived stem cells (ASCs). Cells were obtained from dorsal fat pads and seeded by a rotating perfusion of the graft’s luminal surface. The cellularized graft was then matured for 1 week in a bioreactor with a linearly increasing shear stress rate, thereby inducing the ASCs differentiation toward endothelial-like cells (ELCs)27. A first implantation attempt showed a high thrombogenicity due to a weak production of NO by ELCs. Therefore, in order to increase the NO production by ELCs, a transfection of ASC was achieved with an adenoviral vector containing the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)28. The TEVG with modified cells was tested in five rabbits in an abdominal aortic interposition graft model. The control group consisted of five rabbits implanted with unseeded grafts. After 2 months of implantation, all grafts, seeded and unseeded, had remained patent. Histological analyses have demonstrated that unseeded grafts exhibited a thrombus formation and/or a thrombin and fibrin staining at their luminal surface. Seeded grafts on the other hand, presented a smooth luminal surface without any traces of thrombin or fibrin. Although transfected cells have allowed the improvement of the graft characteristics via the overexpression of eNOS, the long-term patency and efficiency need to be evaluated in larger animal models which have a more similar physiology to humans. Moreover, the originality of this graft seems to be a major default since gene editing for clinical applications is at the center of ethical debates29.

Graft production in situ by host cells

Grafts developed according to this method are called “biotubes” and are derived from the “in-body tissue architecture technology”. The preparation consists of a natural or synthetic rod implanted subcutaneously into the host tissue and left to be colonized/encapsulated by host cells. After the in vivo incubation period, the encapsulated rod is harvested. The rod is then removed, and the host tissue surrounding the rod is used as a TEVG. Different kinds of tubes were used in this context, such as a PGA tube30, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) tube31, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVS)31, etc. Watanabe et al.32 developed a biotube by subcutaneously implanting a silicone rod of 3 mm diameter into rabbits for 2 months. In their previous study, the resultant biotube was described as an autologous connective tissue of 76 ± 37 µm of thickness, composed of collagen and fibroblasts33. This biotube was then evaluated in a carotid implantation model in the same rabbit, for 26 months. Histomorphological analyses of explanted grafts showed the absence of neointimal thickening. The luminal surface was entirely covered with PECAM-1 positive ECs, under which α-SMA positive cells and elastic fibers were found. Also, these α-SMA positive cells and collagen were remarkably oriented. Although these results seem promising, this study focused more on the manufacturing protocol than on the arterial implantation, since the latter was achieved in only one rabbit. Results need to be confirmed in a larger study including more animals with a control group. In 2016, the same fabrication approach was performed in vivo by Rothuizen et al. in pigs34. Rods were subcutaneously implanted for 4 weeks and harvested with the surrounding tissue. The biotubes produced were principally composed of collagen (type I and III) and glycosaminoglycans. Despite an important graft wall colonization mostly by fibroblasts and leukocytes, no endothelium-like layer was observed. 8 TEVGs have been studied in 4 female Landrace pigs (bilateral carotid artery interposition) for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks of vascular integration, 7/8 grafts were still patent. The described occlusion was presumably due to a pre-anastomotic intimal hyperplasia which was absent in the contralateral graft. Histological analyses of the integrated graft have shown an increase in the wall thickness and an acquisition of a contractile phenotype by fibroblasts. Interestingly, a confluent layer of lectin positive cells on the graft luminal surface was present, which may suggest a graft endothelialization had occured during vascular integration. However, the major inconvenience of this “biotube” technique remains the long in vivo maturation period and the complicated transposition for clinical application. To overcome these limits, very recently, Yamanami et al.35 used the same principle by testing biotube cellularization in Beagle dogs for 4 weeks. After explantation, biotubes were decellularized and stored at −20 °C for 1 week. Before implantation, decellularized grafts were treated with a direct thrombin inhibitor—argatroban, to confer antithrombogenic properties to the graft. Grafts were then implanted at the infrarenal abdominal aorta in three adult male Wistar rats. At 1-month post implantation, grafts were still patent, and seemed to be infiltrated by host cells. However, the tested grafts were only 1 cm long. To meet clinical needs, longer grafts should be tested in larger animal models and in different implantation sites to evaluate their patency over long periods.

Substitutes using allogeneic cells

In order to address the issue of small-diameter vascular substitutes, numerous studies have included allogeneic cells in the fabrication protocol of TEVG. The main advantage of these cells is the possibility of obtaining a “ready-to-use” cellularized graft. However, two limitations arise: (1) the host immunological reaction towards foreign cells and (2) the storage conditions of cellularized grafts before their use. Different solutions are proposed to overcome these obstacles and to produce readily available “universal” small vascular grafts. Various models are described in the literature, such as grafts manufactured directly using modified or unmodified allogeneic cells, or using several cell types of mixed allogeneic and autologous sources. Moreover, some authors are trying to provide an “off the shelf” graft by promoting allogeneic cells to produce their own ECM that will constitute the graft’s scaffold. The latter will be subjected to a decellularization step and can be recellularized with patient autologous cells just before the implantation. This approach provides a “personalized” cellularized graft for the patient18. Production methods described in this section will be divided into conventional and innovative production techniques.

Conventional TEVGs production approaches using allogeneic cells can be produced directly by a single “simple cellularization”. Several cell types have been evaluated, such as bone-marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs), EPCs, SMCs, ECs, and induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)36. Modified cells were also used in order to enhance the proliferation capacity of allogeneic cells (which decline with the donor age) or to confer antithrombogenic properties to the used cells.

Bone-marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs)

The BMMCs population is known to have a differentiation potential in both endothelial and SMCs, meaning they are widely used in VTE37. To create their own small-diameter vascular graft, Roh et al.38 used commercial human BMMCs (hBMMCs) that were suspended into a fibrin gel solution and seeded onto a biodegradable Polyglycolic Acid–Poly-L-Lactide and -ε-Caprolactone (PGA-P(CL/LA)) scaffold (with an internal diameter of 0.7 mm and a wall thickness of 250 μm)39. The in vivo study consisted of an inferior vena cava interposition into 3–4-month-old female SCID/bg mice for up to 24 weeks. At the end of the study, 9 of 10 seeded grafts were still patent. Histological analysis has shown an endothelial cell layer at the luminal surface and two layers of smooth vascular cells. However, cells composing the graft were exclusively from murine origin. Authors have suggested that the graft colonization by host cells was mediated by MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) released by hBMMCs. The MCP-1 release led to monocyte infiltration and to inflammatory mechanisms involved in blood vessel formation and remodeling. Regarding the immunodeficient small animal model used, results do not allow the evaluation of the grafts immunological state. Indeed, several extensive studies are required to assess the host immune response triggered towards the graft. Furthermore, hBMMCs have not shown expected results concerning their differentiation potential into vascular cells in order to remodel the graft. This may be due to the inappropriate animal model used, lacking immunomodulatory cells that may be involved in blood vessel remodeling.

In an another study, Fukunishi et al.40 tested a PGA-PLCL TEVG (inner diameter of 1 mm) in an inferior vena cava interposition model in C57BL/6 mice for 6 months. Seeded grafts were studied in comparison with unseeded grafts to determine the role of BMMCs. Grafts were seeded with allogeneic BMMCs and harvested from donor mice, followed by a perfusion of the cell suspension into the scaffold lumen for 10 min. Seeded grafts were then incubated overnight at 37 °C prior to the implantation. At the end of the study, 9 of 10 seeded grafts remained patent. Moreover, this study demonstrated that the BMMCs seeding prevented the graft narrowing and stenosis that were observed in unseeded grafts. This phenomenon seems to be mediated by a macrophage modulation and a prevention of platelet activation, induced by seeded BMMCs. This study complements other studies that have reached clinical trials for arteriovenous grafts with an inner diameter of 10 mm and could provide a new cellularization approach for next generation grafts.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)

In addition to their differentiation potential into vascular phenotypes, MSCs exhibit important immunomodulatory capacities, such as T cell41,42, the generation of a regulatory T-cell population and the modulation of Natural Killer cells (NK) and macrophage responses43. In order to demonstrate the antithrombogenic potential of MSCs, Hashi et al.44 produced a cellularized small TEVG by seeding human bone-marrow MSCs on an electrospun nanofibrous membrane for 1 day. This cellularized membrane was then rolled and sutured around a 0.7 mm diameter mandrel. After removal of the mandrel, the graft was kept in culture for 2 days and then implanted for up to 60 days as a common carotid artery replacement in 6–8 week athymic rats. Results suggested that MSCs can modulate the host inflammatory response by preventing platelet adhesion and aggregation. These cells also showed antithrombogenic capacities by decreasing platelet aggregation (similar to ECs capacity) compared to unseeded graft controls. This was supported by a low and stable intimal thickening in seeded grafts 1-month post implantation, whereas a significantly higher thickening of the vascular wall was observed in unseeded implanted grafts. Both unseeded and seeded grafts showed an efficient recruitment of host ECs and SMCs which led to an organized layered vascular wall similar to a native artery. The data seems to demonstrate a short-term engraftment activity and efficacy of MSCs which are rarely found 2 months post implantation. MSCs appear to have beneficial effects, making them a promising cell source to consider in VTE. MSCs seeded grafts should be further evaluated under more challenging conditions, with immunocompetent larger animal models, longer implantation periods and at different implantation sites. Moreover, a more in-depth analysis regarding the fate of MSCs in the graft would also be interesting in order to understand their specific effects on the vascular wall remodeling, the recruitment of host cells, the modulation of the inflammation induced by the graft and their in vivo differentiation potential.

Inspired by the human coronary artery structure, a study has described a TEVG produced by an innovative approach, involving the deposition of layers of cell-laden hydrogel, by combining a dip-spinning technology with a solution blow spinning device (dip-spinning-SBS technology) within 30 min45. The substitute wall was composed of BM-MSC cellularized gelatin hydrogels and PCL fibers which were automatedly arranged to reproduce the J-shaped mechanical response and compliance of human coronary arteries. Preliminary in vivo tests were conducted in six rabbits, as a carotid replacement model, divided into three groups: animals receiving cellularized grafts, animals receiving acellularized grafts and a control group consisting of an incision-anastomosis. Histological studies were performed at 14 days and 30 days post implantation to particularly observe the graft remodeling. Although a thrombus development was observed in both grafts (cellularized and acellularized), complete vascular wall remodeling was achieved at only 30 days in cellularized grafts. This study encourages the consideration of MSCs for TEVG cellularization as they prevent inflammation and promote graft remodeling after implantation.

MSCs seem to be a promising cell source for VTE46. These cells are preferentially harvested from bone marrow, but they are also found abundantly in many other tissues such as dental pulp, adipose tissues, or perinatal tissues. For VTE, MSCs derived from perinatal sources, such as the WJ of the umbilical cord, may be an appropriate cell type for VTE applications. Wharton’s jelly derived MSCs (WJ-MSCs) have all the characteristics of MSCs, possess a more primitive phenotype than other mature MSCs and their use is totally safe as they do not induce teratoma formation47. They were shown to differentiate toward vascular phenotypes48,49,50. Moreover, for VTE purposes, our team has already shown that WJ-MSCs subjected to an endothelial differentiation, conserved their immumodulatory properties after differentiation and remained immunosuppressive by inhibiting the proliferation of T cells, reducing the toxicity of NK cells and generating a population of regulatory T cells51.

Muscle derived stem cells (MDSCs)

MDSCs have also been integrated in the cellularization protocol of some TEVGs. MDSCs are known for their high proliferation rates, a low expression of major histocompatibility complex class I and their in vivo and in vitro multilineage differentiation potentials toward muscle, neural, and ECs52. Nieponice et al.53 compared three different TEVGs: (1) unseeded Poly(ester urethane)urea biodegradable tubular scaffolds produced by thermally induced phase separation (unseeded TIPS-PEUU), (2) TIPSS PEUU seeded with MDSCs (TIPS-PEUU), and (3) a MDSC seeded graft manufactured by combining TIPS with an electrospinning technique (ES-TIPS-PEUU). Autologous MDSCs were isolated, labeled by transfection with the LacZ reporter gene (to allow their postimplantation detection) and amplified, before being seeded on grafts of 15 mm length and 1.5 mm inner diameter, with a rotational vacuum seeding device54. Grafts were then cultured for 48 h under agitation. After 8 weeks of implantation in a rat aorta interposition model in Lewis rats, results reported that 73% of seeded TIPS-PEUU grafts showed signs of stenosis or aneurysmal dilatations and 65% of ES-TIPS-PEUU were patent without aneurysms, whereas only 10% of unseeded TIPS-PEUU grafts remained patent. Grafts were colonized by host cells, with von Willebrand factor positive cells at the luminal surface and cells with a contractile phenotype in the graft tissue. Moreover, a few transfected cells were still found in the grafts. Thus, the ES-TIPS-PEUU construct produced by double processing techniques could provide a promising solution for VTE. However, further analyses are required in larger animal models with an adaptation of the construction protocol to meet the clinical requirements.


iPSCs are among cells that have been investigated by several teams for the cellularization of small-caliber TEVG. Hibino et al.55 have used commercial male mouse iPSCs that were differentiated into sheets of ECs and SMCs, before being seeded onto PGA-P(CL/LA) with a diameter of 0.8 mm. This graft was implanted as an infrarenal inferior vena cava in female SCID/bg mice. After 10 weeks of implantation, all grafts were still patent with no signs of aneurysms or calcification. Immunohistological analysis of collected grafts revealed the gradual loss of the originally seeded cells and their replacement by host ECs at their luminal surface and SMCs at the inner layer. Wang et al.56 have also described an in vivo study where the TEVG were cellularized with iPSCs derived from primary human aortic fibroblasts which differentiated into proliferative SMCs. The cell seeding was carried out by an incubation of 24 h on PLLA scaffold. The vascular graft was placed in the subcutaneous pocket into nude mice for up to 2 weeks. This study has not evaluated the graft capacities and function but has explored an original approach, allowing the obtention of a personalized TEVG using the patient autologous cells.

Although iPSCs seem to be a very promising source for new therapeutic strategies and regenerative medicine, due to the major ethical concerns around the use of embryonic stem cells, their use is still debated. Human iPSCs are produced with poor efficiency, moreover, the reprogramming protocols involve viral vectors that lead to safety issues for clinical applications48. In addition, even after differentiation, a residual presence of undifferentiated cells represents a high risk of tumorigenicity that may lead to the development of teratomas and malignant tumors, which affects their safety for human medical applications57.

Multicell spheroid (MultiCS)

Bio-printing is a biomedical application using the principles of 3D printing to artificially produce living biological tissue. Bio-printing is a fast-growing field today because its potential applications are vast and promising in the medical field as well as in research58. Itoh et al. have used this technology to produce a TEVG in 4 days by assembling 500 multicell spheroids as a tube of 1.5 mm inner diameter and 7 mm in length59. These MultiCS (size of 615 ± 51.3 µm) were randomly composed of commercial human umbilical vein ECs (40%), human aortic SMCs (10%), and human dermal fibroblasts (50%). The tubular construct was matured in a bioreactor with a triple medium mix for 4 days under an increasing perfusion rate. It was then integrated in an abdominal aorta replacement model in nude rats for a period of 2 to 5 days. At the end of the study, ECs that were originally integrated into MultiCS were found at the luminal surface of the graft, forming an intima-like layer. Interestingly, an increase of the graft inner diameter was also observed. Although the immunodeficient model is essential to avoid immune rejection when using mature adult cells, it did not allow investigations into TEVG safety and the interactions between MultiCS and the host immune cells, in addition to the potential modulation of the host inflammatory response. Moreover, the graft length was only 7 mm which is incompatible with clinical applications (bypasses, vessel replacement, arteriovenous fistula, etc.,). As already mentioned for other studies, this graft should be adapted for clinical use regarding its length and the origin of the integrated cells. A deeper characterization should be conducted around its safety, its patency and efficiency.

In the VTE field, allogeneic cells are widely studied. In fact, the cell type is an essential and determining criterion in the construction of TEVG with regard to the required functionality. TEVG with mature ECs and SMCs are still in the preliminary study phases, in which nude animals are used to allow the observation of the graft development once integrated into the blood circulation. However, several problems inherent to the use of mature cells are to be considered. First of all, mature cells cultured in vitro over long periods present the risk of dedifferentiation60. Moreover, in allogeneic implantation models, they may induce a strong host immune response against the foreign graft. In order to allow advanced studies in the context of allogeneic implantations in immunocompetent animals, undifferentiated stem cells are more appropriate. BMNCs seem to be a potential suitable candidate for TEVG cellularization because of their differentiation potential into both types of vascular cells. However, BMNCs are a heterogenous population composed of a large mix of cells, among them EPCs, ECs, MSCs, hematopoietic stem cells, T cells, and B cells, which induce complex interactions with host cells that are difficult to fully decipher and understand. This excessive heterogeneity could be a real obstacle for potential clinical applications where total control of the graft production is required, as well as a complete understanding of graft–host interactions. Several homogeneous stem cells populations possess the same differentiation potential as MDSCs or MSCs. Only a few studies on MDSCs are found in the literature compared to MSCs, which seem to be more appropriate for TEVG production. Indeed, their use could be more relevant since they have a homogeneous population, having adhesion capacity and differentiation potentials into both SMCs and ECs. Moreover, these cells are easily harvested from different tissues and are known to have important immunomodulatory properties which can be relevant to modulate the host immune system and avoid the graft rejection in the case of allogeneic cells61.

VTE combines cells, biomaterials and a suitable microenvironment for the production of small-caliber TEVG and aims to optimize the graft cellularization together with the biomechanical signals and scaffold structure. As described above, many studies have proposed the cellularization of a scaffold which will then be matured and implanted. Besides, other teams have developed innovative approaches to address several problems related to the TEVG production time and storage. The major challenge with cellularized TEVG is to find a suitable system and the combination of appropriate conditions for their storage without affecting the cell viability or the scaffold structure. Innovative cell-mediated production approaches concern the “Off-the-Shelf” and “Precast” grafts.

Off-the-shelf graft

Several teams are trying to produce a “ready-to-use” and storable graft that can be implanted in any patient, i.e., a “universal” or “off-the-shelf” graft. In order to propose such a graft, Tranquillo’s team has developed a decellularized graft originally composed by synthetic ECM62. They evaluated this original approach in several in vivo bypass models as a femoral bypass in sheep for 24 weeks63 and more recently as an arteriovenous bypass in baboons for up to 6 months64. In the last study, the graft was manufactured by seeding commercial human dermal fibroblasts into a bovine fibrinogen solution. The cell suspension was then injected into a tubular mold carrying a glass mandrel. Grafts were then cultured for 2 weeks and matured in a bioreactor for 3 supplementary weeks62. After maturation, grafts were decellularized and then stored in PBS at 4 °C. Grafts implanted as arteriovenous fistulas in baboons were evaluated by ultrasound assessments at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, then scanned by angiography at the end of the study, just prior to collection. Graft patency rates were estimated at 83% at 3 months and 60% at 6 months. Moreover, an increase of the graft diameter was observed. This was probably induced by a remodeling of the graft tissue by vimentin and/or α-SMA positive cells and the colonization of the luminal surface by CD31 positive cells. However, some early thrombosis problems have been detected, probably due to the implantation site which has been changed to address these events in eight baboons. This led to a considerable reduction of the cohort. Results are promising and are similar to actual clinical solutions for arteriovenous fistula based on an ePTFE substitute. This model, although encouraging, is not representative of the small-diameter vessel bypass clinical situations, where grafts are subjected to challenging conditions like the blood pressure, the resistance to sutures and mechanical strains.

“Precast graft”

The use of autologous cells is limited by the lengthy manufacturing time, which may be incompatible with the clinical situation of the patient. In order to reduce the production delay, Quint et al.18 have proposed a storable decellularized graft which can be recellularized with autologous cells. Here, the graft was tested in a porcine carotid replacement model for a period of 30 days. A 4 mm diameter PGA mesh scaffold was seeded with a suspension of porcine aortic SMCs for 10 weeks under pulsatile conditions. The graft was then decellularized. Two cells sources were studied for the recellularization, either autologous ECs or EPCs, which were seeded onto the graft under pulsatile and rotational conditions for 2 h, followed by 2 h of static culture. The graft was then preconditioned in a bioreactor under a progressively increasing shear stress for 4–5 days. Three EPC-seeded grafts and two EC-seeded grafts were implanted and compared with a control group of three unseeded grafts and another control group consisting of 8 internal jugular veins. All the seeded grafts were still patent at 30 days post implantation compared to three control grafts (0/3 unseeded graft and 3/8 internal jugular veins). Unseeded grafts implantations have confirmed that the recellularized “precast graft” did not induce substantial inflammation. Moreover, a slow host cell colonization of the seeded graft matrix was highlighted by the presence of α-actin positive cells into the graft wall. In addition, tissue remodeling was also observed on the luminal surface where seeded cells were partially replaced by host ECs. Although the “precast graft” innovative approach seems to reduce the time required for the TEVG development, there is still a considerable amount of time for the patient autologous cell culture, plus 6 days of seeding and preconditioning. Moreover, the authors did not set up and define the storage conditions of their TEVG, which is one of the main criteria of this promising approach.

A relatively similar approach is reported by Dahl et al.65 by seeding a PGA scaffold with allogeneic canine SMCs (harvested from carotid and femoral arteries) for 7 to 10 days, followed by a decellularization step. The decellularized matrix was then washed and stored at 4 °C. The endothelialization step was performed by a fibronectin coating of the luminal surface of the TEVG followed by an autologous EC seeding under rotational conditions. The graft was then matured before implantation, by an increased shear stress preconditioning in a bioreactor for 35 h. The potential alterations of the grafts due to the storage conditions have been studied by mechanical characterizations, before and after a period of 12 months storage in PBS at 4 °C. After this storage period, no significant change was observed for burst pressure, compliance or suture strength. Eight grafts have been tested in vivo in dog models as follows: five in a carotid bypass model for up to 12 months and 3 grafts in a coronary bypass model for up to 1 month. During the study, two animals died with a patent graft and only one graft occluded at 1 week. Despite the histological analysis showing an incomplete EC coverage of the grafts luminal surface, 5 out of 6 grafts remained patent until the end of the study. Patent grafts showed a considerable remodeling, notably by α-SMA cells presumably derived from adjacent native vasculature.

Clinical trials

This part of the review focuses on TEVGs with an inner diameter smaller than 6 mm that have progressed beyond the preclinical studies to phase I clinical trials and discusses the reported results as well as the encountered obstacles. Several medium (6–8 mm) and large (>8 mm)-diameter TEVGs have reached clinical trials such as the one of 8 mm of diameter developed by Olausson et al. consisting on a decellularized iliac artery seeded with autologous ECs and SMCs66, and the graft of 18 mm of diameter produced by Shin’oka et al. by autologous mononuclear BMCs seeded on a polymer tube67. Nevertheless, due to their specific clinical contexts, different from the problematic of this review, they will be excluded from this part of the review.

The most commonly used model in clinical trials is the arteriovenous fistula model, which allows the graft to be evaluated under nonlethal conditions. Moreover, this is a clinical situation in which TEVG would be of a great interest since the substitutes currently used are expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). In fact, ePTFE have a limited lifespan due to the damage of the graft wall by numerous punctures, thrombosis, infections and intimal hyperplasia in the long term68. However, the mechanical behavior, i.e., the blood pressure applied to TEVG in an arteriovenous shunt model, is much less compared to that found in other potential applications of the graft in blood vessel bypass grafting models, which makes it difficult to evaluate its effectiveness and performance under more challenging conditions.

Endothelialized synthetic graft

Following in vivo preclinical studies on dogs69 and nonhuman primates70, the first clinical trial performed with a TEVG was between 1989 and 199171. The study evaluated an endothelialized ePTFE graft in a femoropopliteal bypass model in 49 patients, in whom saphenous vein bypass was not applicable71. ECs were harvested from the right external jugular vein. An ePTFE graft with a diameter of 6 mm and a length of 60 cm was precoated with fibrin glue and seeded with autologous ECs, by filling the lumen with the cell suspension under rotation for 3 h. Then, the graft was implanted after 11.6 ± 3.0 days of a maturation period. Graft patency was determined by duplex sonography and Doppler ultrasonography after 9 days, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year of implantation. After 32 months, patency rates were estimated at 84.7% for endothelialized grafts vs. 55.4% for control non-endothelialized grafts. This endothelialized ePTFE TEVG was then included in a more generalized study involving 310 patients over a period of 15 years. Patients were divided into two groups, one group having a TEVG with a diameter of 6 mm, the other receiving a 7 mm diameter graft. The 6 mm diameter graft group has shown patency rates of 62% at 5 years and 55% at 10 years, vs. 78% and 71%, respectively, for the 7 mm diameter group72. Histological analysis of occluded grafts suggested that occlusions were not induced by an endothelialization defect but by large inflammatory foci located under the endothelium, causing a hyperplastic narrowing. Overall, the study demonstrates the interest of the integration of a VTE procedure as a routine therapy and confirms the benefit of autologous endothelialization of ePTFE grafts in clinical cases of infrainguinal bypass where no autologous vein is available. Major limitations of this graft include the use of an ePTFE synthetic scaffold that forms a static structure, preventing any possibility of growth and thereby excluding the graft use in a pediatric context. Moreover, the cellularization by autologous ECs implies several inconveniencies, such as the invasive collection of cells and the long-term in vitro culture that may increase the risk of contamination and loss of EC phenotype73.

The Humacyte graft

Before performing clinical trials with the “Humacyte graft”, which is a complete “off the shelf” small-caliber graft, Niklason and her team tested a preliminary version of their TEVG using harvested human aorta SMCs. This graft has been evaluated in a baboon model of arteriovenous bypass for 1 to 6 months and has presented a patency rate of 88%65.

This Humacyte graft, a “human acellular vessel” (HAV), was produced by seeding human SMCs onto a biodegradable polymer scaffold (PGA) of 32 to 45 cm in length, for 8 weeks. The construction was matured in a bioreactor, applying pulsatile cyclic distension to allow the expansion of cells and the synthesis of their own ECM. The graft was then decellularized in order to obtain a tube of secreted ECM composed of different matrix proteins, such as collagens (I and III), fibronectin and vitronectin.

In 2014, enrollment of phase II trials (USA and Poland) was completed and 60 patients with end-stage renal disease (not candidates for fistula) had been grafted with the HAV “Humacyte graft” as an arteriovenous bypass for a period of 16 or 24 months74. The patency rates were checked by intraoperative ultrasound or Doppler and were valued at 63% and 28% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, (mostly due to thrombosis). The graft diameter increased during the implantation and reached 8.63 mm. During the clinical trial, some grafts at 16 to 55 weeks were collected after surgical revision procedures. Histological analysis revealed that at 16 weeks, the region near the vein anastomosis was colonized by myocytic cells expressing CD68 and α-SMA conjointly or separately, including myofibroblasts from surrounding tissue. The endothelialization of the graft was demonstrated by the detection of cells expressing CD31, VE-Cadherin, and eNOS at the luminal surface. At 46 weeks, the presence of these cells in the middle of the collected grafts seems to confirm that this phenomenon occurs from circulating blood and not from native adjacent vasculature. These two clinical studies have been extended to include 240 patients with a follow-up until 200 weeks75. Further histopathological analyses were conducted on collected grafts at different implantation times during the study to evaluate the HAV in vivo remodeling. These studies have revealed a tissue remodeling similar to that observed during embryonic vasculogenesis, which was characterized by the presence of Nestin+/CD34+ cells in the vascular wall at early stages. The number of these cells had decreased over time during implantation. In conclusion, the permeability results obtained with the “Humacyte” graft are substantially similar to those obtained with endothelialized ePTFE grafts. Despite its mechanical characteristics, similar or even superior to those of mammary arteries or saphenous veins, it suffers from the same shortcomings as synthetic grafts regarding repeated punctures. Indeed, several pseudoaneurysms were mentioned during these studies which are well-known complications of dialysis access with fistula or grafts.

The Lifeline graft

L’Heureux and his team have developed an allogeneic small vascular graft called the “Lifeline graft” through “Sheet-Based Tissue Engineering” (SBTE). The TEVG was developed as follows: autologous fibroblasts were cultured and expanded, then the sheet of fibroblasts was decellularized (by dehydratation) and rolled up around a tube for 10 weeks, in order to obtain a homogenous cylinder. Another sheet of autologous fibroblasts was then used to cover the cylinder and the graft was kept in culture for a further 10 weeks. Autologous ECs were seeded into the graft several days before implantation (3–7 days), during which the graft was submitted to an increasing pulsatile flow in a bioreactor76,77. This graft was clinically tested in an arteriovenous shunt model in 10 end-stage renal disease patients. Patency rates were 78% and 60% at 1 and 6 months, respectively. The principal inconvenience of this autologous graft is the production time which reaches up to 26 weeks. Considering this limitation, the authors have recently proposed a SBTE graft with a shorter production time, manufactured with only allogeneic fibroblasts without ECs at the luminal surface78. This allogeneic graft was tested in the same model of hemodialysis access in three patients. Despite the nuclear debris that remained in the graft’s outer layer after decellularization, this study has shown that the Lifeline allogeneic graft did not induce deleterious immune responses. Grafts were implanted for up to 11 months, during which no aneurysms were detected, however surgical interventions were required to ensure secondary patency (2/3) and only one graft was patent for 7 months. These disappointing results could be due to an incomplete endothelialization of the graft which could have more severe consequences in coronary or peripheric bypass models. Currently, Magnan et al. are working on a new TEVG manufactured with a “textile approach”, also based on an ECM fibroblast sheet which is transformed into ribbons79. These ribbons are actually threads used to produce a TEVG of a diameter of 4.2 mm which is resistant to burst pressure. The first study on its immunogenicity and efficacy was carried out in a sheep carotid bypass model for 1 day and did not induce any complications.


Currently, vascular replacement techniques using synthetic substitutes are successfully used for the replacement of large and medium diameter arteries. However, these substitutes are not suitable for the replacement of small-diameter arteries (<6 mm), principally due to a compliance mismatch and a lack of endothelialization of their luminal surface, leading to thrombotic events. Thus, one of the greatest challenges in VTE is to develop and propose to cardiovascular surgeons an effective endothelialized vascular prosthesis able to replace small-diameter arteries.

Since the first TEVG produced in 1986, the field of VTE seems devoted to a strong development and has never stopped to evolve, in order to create the “gold standard”, “readily available”, and “off-the-shelf” TEVG.

Recellularization of TEVG is one of the major factors that contributes to a better patency in a clinically relevant context13. As previously discussed, cells are widely used in the development of a small-caliber TEVG, in order to confer them with essential capacities that determine their success, such as hemocompatibility, patency, contractility, remodeling, growth or robustness. However, it should be noted that the cell types used in the TEVG manufacturing protocols are highly variable and can be from xenogeneic, allogeneic or autologous sources (summarized in Table 1), depending on the context of use of the TEVG. Indeed, there is no standardization or recommendation for the “best” cell origin, type and phenotype, allowing the development of the “perfect” TEVG. Although several cell types appear to be suitable for use in VTE, MSCs seem to be a promising choice for several reasons, such as their differentiation potential into vascular cells, their relatively easy collection and their immunomodulatory properties, allowing them to avoid immune rejection after transplantation.

Table 1 Overview of in vivo studied small-diameter TEVG produced by using cells.

When using autologous cells, the cellularization of TEVG involves several issues, such as the very long production time, high manufacturing costs, and the storage conditions for allogeneic grafts. The storage factor can be addressed by a decellularization step after ECM production. Grafts tested in the last two described clinical trials were developed according to this method and appear to be efficient as arteriovenous shunts. However, the use of these TEVGs in other arterial bypass contexts, such as coronary or femoral arteries bypasses, have still not been evaluated, even though these are among the most challenging situations for demonstrating the performance of a vascular graft.

In addition, grafting technology is in constant progress. In fact, robotic surgery is potentially the most advanced medical technology and has been well documented in recent years80,81. In the long term, minimally-invasive robotic surgery should be accessible and performed for bypass surgeries on a daily basis. Thus, the development of a “gold standard” TEVG could supply a bank of ready-to-use grafts that would be available to cardiovascular surgeons.

In conclusion, our review shows the large heterogeneity of data produced in the study of cellularized small-diameter TEVG. This reflects the important need of small-diameter grafts and the considerable progress made in the VTE field in order to address this issue. However, this huge amount of data complicates the TEVG efficiency evaluation and the choice of the best development approach. There is an urgent need for standard guidelines for developing and testing TEVG in large animal models, at least regarding the cell type used for the recellularization. This would allow a proper comparison of the different strategies for the production of vascular grafts. The journey for finding the “gold standard” TEVG is on track to succeed, but there is still a long way to go for both research and clinical applications in the VTE field.


  1. 1.

    Writing Group Members. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133, e38–e360 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Roth, G. A. et al. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 1333–1341 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [Internet]. World Health Organization (2021). Available from:

  4. 4.

    Pashneh-Tala, S., MacNeil, S. & Claeyssens, F. The tissue-engineered vascular graft-past, present, and future. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 22, 68–100 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Antoniou, G. A. et al. A meta-analysis of endovascular versus surgical reconstruction of femoropopliteal arterial disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 57, 242–253 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Conte, M. S. Critical appraisal of surgical revascularization for critical limb ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 57, 8S–13S (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Melly, L., Torregrossa, G., Lee, T., Jansens, J.-L. & Puskas, J. D. Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Dis. 10, 1960–1967 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Song, H.-H. G., Rumma, R. T., Ozaki, C. K., Edelman, E. R. & Chen, C. S. Vascular tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and clinical promise. Cell Stem Cell 22, 340–354 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Radke, D. et al. Tissue engineering at the blood-contacting surface: a review of challenges and strategies in vascular graft development. Adv. Health. Mater. 7, e1701461 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Seifu, D. G., Purnama, A., Mequanint, K. & Mantovani, D. Small-diameter vascular tissue engineering. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10, 410–421 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deutsch, M., Meinhart, J., Fischlein, T., Preiss, P. & Zilla, P. Clinical autologous in vitro endothelialization of infrainguinal ePTFE grafts in 100 patients: a 9-year experience. Surgery 126, 847–855 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Weinberg, C. B. & Bell, E. A blood vessel model constructed from collagen and cultured vascular cells. Science 231, 397–400 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Skovrind, I. et al. Concise Review: Patency of Small-Diameter Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts: a Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Trials. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 8, 671–680 (2019).

  14. 14.

    Yau, J. W., Teoh, H. & Verma, S. Endothelial cell control of thrombosis. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 15, 130 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Reitsma, S., Slaaf, D. W., Vink, H., van Zandvoort, M. A. M. J. & oude Egbrink, M. G. A. The endothelial glycocalyx: composition, functions, and visualization. Pflug. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 454, 345–359 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ma, J. & Huang, C. Composition and mechanism of three-dimensional hydrogel system in regulating stem cell fate. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 26, 498–518 (2020).

  17. 17.

    Dan, P., Velot, É., Francius, G., Menu, P. & Decot, V. Human-derived extracellular matrix from Wharton’s jelly: An untapped substrate to build up a standardized and homogeneous coating for vascular engineering. Acta Biomater. 48, 227–237 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Quint, C. et al. Decellularized tissue-engineered blood vessel as an arterial conduit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 9214–9219 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ma, X. et al. Development and in vivo validation of tissue-engineered, small-diameter vascular grafts from decellularized aortae of fetal pigs and canine vascular endothelial cells. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 12, 101 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Swartz, D. D. & Andreadis, S. T. Animal models for vascular tissue-engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 916–925 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kaushal, S. et al. Functional small diameter neovessels using endothelial progenitor cells expanded ex vivo. Nat. Med. 7, 1035–1040 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tillman, B. W. et al. Bioengineered vascular access maintains structural integrity in response to arteriovenous flow and repeated needle puncture. J. Vasc. Surg. 56, 783–793 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Neff, L. P. et al. Vascular smooth muscle enhances functionality of tissue-engineered blood vessels in vivo. J. Vasc. Surg. 53, 426–434 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Koch, S. et al. Fibrin-polylactide-based tissue-engineered vascular graft in the arterial circulation. Biomaterials 31, 4731–4739 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ju, Y. M. et al. Electrospun vascular scaffold for cellularized small diameter blood vessels: a preclinical large animal study. Acta Biomater. 59, 58–67 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tschoeke, B. et al. Tissue-engineered small-caliber vascular graft based on a novel biodegradable composite fibrin-polylactide scaffold. Tissue Eng. Part A 15, 1909–1918 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    McIlhenny, S. E. et al. Linear shear conditioning improves vascular graft retention of adipose-derived stem cells by upregulation of the alpha5beta1 integrin. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 245–255 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    McIlhenny, S. et al. eNOS transfection of adipose‐derived stem cells yields bioactive nitric oxide production and improved results in vascular tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regenerative Med. 9, 1277–1285 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ormond, K. E. et al. The clinical application of gene editing: ethical and social issues. Per. Med. 16, 337–350 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chue, W.-L. et al. Dog peritoneal and pleural cavities as bioreactors to grow autologous vascular grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 39, 859–867 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nakayama, Y., Ishibashi-Ueda, H. & Takamizawa, K. In vivo tissue-engineered small-caliber arterial graft prosthesis consisting of autologous tissue (biotube). Cell Transplant. 13, 439–449 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Watanabe, T. et al. Long-term animal implantation study of biotube-autologous small-caliber vascular graft fabricated by in-body tissue architecture. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 98B, 120–126 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Watanabe, T., Kanda, K., Ishibashi-Ueda, H., Yaku, H. & Nakayama, Y. Autologous small-caliber ‘biotube’ vascular grafts with argatroban loading: a histomorphological examination after implantation to rabbits. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 92, 236–242 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rothuizen, T. C. et al. Development and evaluation of in vivo tissue engineered blood vessels in a porcine model. Biomaterials 75, 82–90 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yamanami, M. et al. Development of xenogeneic decellularized biotubes for off-the-shelf applications. Artif. Organs 43, 773–779 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Krawiec, J. T. & Vorp, D. A. Adult stem cell-based tissue engineered blood vessels: a review. Biomaterials 33, 3388–3400 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Roh, J. D. et al. Tissue-engineered vascular grafts transform into mature blood vessels via an inflammation-mediated process of vascular remodeling. PNAS 107, 4669–4674 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Roh, J. D. et al. Small-diameter biodegradable scaffolds for functional vascular tissue engineering in the mouse model. Biomaterials 29, 1454–1463 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fukunishi, T. et al. Formation of neoarteries with optimal remodeling using rapidly degrading textile vascular grafts. Tissue Eng. Part A. 25, 632–641 (2018).

  41. 41.

    Bartholomew, A. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and prolong skin graft survival in vivo. Exp. Hematol. 30, 42–48 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Djouad, F. et al. Immunosuppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cells favors tumor growth in allogeneic animals. Blood 102, 3837–3844 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sotiropoulou, P. A., Perez, S. A., Gritzapis, A. D., Baxevanis, C. N. & Papamichail, M. Interactions between human mesenchymal stem cells and natural killer cells. Stem Cells 24, 74–85 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hashi, C. K. et al. Antithrombogenic property of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in nanofibrous vascular grafts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 104, 11915–11920 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Akentjew, T. L. et al. Rapid fabrication of reinforced and cell-laden vascular grafts structurally inspired by human coronary arteries. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–15 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Afra, S. & Matin, M. M. Potential of mesenchymal stem cells for bioengineered blood vessels in comparison with other eligible cell sources. Cell Tissue Res. 380, 1–13 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Jyothi Prasanna, S. & Sowmya Jahnavi, V. Wharton’s Jelly mesenchymal stem cells as off-the-shelf cellular therapeutics: a closer look into their regenerative and immunomodulatory properties. Open Tissue Eng. Regenerative Med. J. 4, 28–38 (2011).

  48. 48.

    Rammal, H. et al. Stem cells: a promising source for vascular regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Dev. 23, 2931–2949 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    El Omar, R. et al. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: the new gold standard for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies? Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 20, 523–544 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bajpai, V. K. & Andreadis, S. T. Stem cell sources for vascular tissue engineering and regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 18, 405–425 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    El Omar, R. et al. Immunomodulation of endothelial differentiated mesenchymal stromal cells: impact on T and NK cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 94, 342–356 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Qu-Petersen, Z. et al. Identification of a novel population of muscle stem cells in mice. J. Cell Biol. 157, 851–864 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Nieponice, A. et al. In vivo assessment of a tissue-engineered vascular graft combining a biodegradable elastomeric scaffold and muscle-derived stem cells in a rat model. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 1215–1223 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Soletti, L. et al. A seeding device for tissue engineered tubular structures. Biomaterials 27, 4863–4870 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hibino, N. et al. Evaluation of the use of an induced puripotent stem cell sheet for the construction of tissue-engineered vascular grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 143, 696–703 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wang, Y. et al. Engineering vascular tissue with functional smooth muscle cells derived from human iPS cells and nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials 35, 8960–8969 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Doss, M. X. & Sachinidis, A. Current challenges of iPSC-based disease modeling and therapeutic implications. Cells 8, 403 (2019).

  58. 58.

    Fricain, J.-C. et al. Impression 3D en médecine régénératrice et ingénierie tissulaire. Med. Sci. 33, 52–59 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Itoh, M. et al. Scaffold-free tubular tissues created by a Bio-3D printer undergo remodeling and endothelialization when implanted in rat aortae. PLoS ONE 10, e0136681 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Buttery, L. D. K. & Bishop, A. E. 18—Introduction to tissue engineering. In: Biomaterials, Artificial Organs and Tissue Engineering. Hench, L. L. & Jones, J. R. (Eds.), Woodhead Publishing, 193–200 (2005).

  61. 61.

    Weiss, A. R. R. & Dahlke, M. H. Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells (mscs): mechanisms of action of living, apoptotic, and dead MSCs. Front. Immunol. 10:1191 (2019).

  62. 62.

    Syedain, Z. H., Meier, L. A., Bjork, J. W., Lee, A. & Tranquillo, R. T. Implantable arterial grafts from human fibroblasts and fibrin using a multi-graft pulsed flow-stretch bioreactor with noninvasive strength monitoring. Biomaterials 32, 714–722 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Syedain, Z. H., Meier, L. A., Lahti, M. T., Johnson, S. L. & Tranquillo, R. T. Implantation of completely biological engineered grafts following decellularization into the sheep femoral artery. Tissue Eng. Part A 20, 1726–1734 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Syedain, Z. H. et al. A completely biological ‘off-the-shelf’ arteriovenous graft that recellularizes in baboons. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaan4209 (2017).

  65. 65.

    Dahl, S. L. M. et al. Readily available tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 68ra9 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Olausson, M. et al. Transplantation of an allogeneic vein bioengineered with autologous stem cells: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet 380, 230–237 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Shin’oka, T. et al. Midterm clinical result of tissue-engineered vascular autografts seeded with autologous bone marrow cells. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 129, 1330–1338 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Roy-Chaudhury, P. et al. Venous neointimal hyperplasia in polytetrafluoroethylene dialysis grafts. Kidney Int. 59, 2325–2334 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Shindo, S., Takagi, A. & Whittemore, A. D. Improved patency of collagen-impregnated grafts after in vitro autogenous endothelial cell seeding. J. Vasc. Surg. 6, 325–332 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Zilla, P. et al. In vitro-lined endothelium: initial integrity and ultrastructural events. Surgery 116, 524–534 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Zilla, P. et al. Clinical in vitro endothelialization of femoropopliteal bypass grafts: an actuarial follow-up over three years. J. Vasc. Surg. 19, 540–548 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Deutsch, M. et al. Long-term experience in autologous in vitro endothelialization of infrainguinal ePTFE grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 49, 352–362 (2009). discussion 362.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Bachetti, T. & Morbidelli, L. Endothelial cells in culture: a model for studying vascular functions. Pharmacol. Res. 42, 9–19 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lawson, J. H. et al. Bioengineered human acellular vessels for dialysis access in patients with end-stage renal disease: two phase 2 single-arm trials. Lancet 387, 2026–2034 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kirkton, R. D. et al. Bioengineered human acellular vessels recellularize and evolve into living blood vessels after human implantation. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaau6934 (2019).

  76. 76.

    L’Heureux, N. et al. Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat. Med. 12, 361–365 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    McAllister, T. N. et al. Effectiveness of haemodialysis access with an autologous tissue-engineered vascular graft: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet 373, 1440–1446 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Wystrychowski, W. et al. First human use of an allogeneic tissue-engineered vascular graft for hemodialysis access. J. Vasc. Surg. 60, 1353–1357 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Magnan, L. et al. Human Textiles: a cell-synthesized yarn as a truly ‘bio’ material for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 105, 111–120 (2020).

  80. 80.

    Stadler, P., Dvoracek, L., Vitasek, P. & Matous, P. The da Vinci Robot in the field of vascular surgery. J. Vasc. Surg. 61, 584 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Gong, W. et al. Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Dis. 8, 459–468 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the “Fondation Recherche Médicale” No. 20170638051. We would like to thank the federation 3209 BMCT (Nancy, France) and the BioSE Doctoral scholarship for A.F.

Author information




A.F. reviewed bibliography, wrote the paper, prepared the figure and the table; R.E. and P.M. reviewed bibliography and revised the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Menu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fayon, A., Menu, P. & El Omar, R. Cellularized small-caliber tissue-engineered vascular grafts: looking for the ultimate gold standard. npj Regen Med 6, 46 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing