Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The stem cell revolution: on the role of CD164 as a human stem cell marker

Abstract

Accurately defining hierarchical relationships between human stem cells and their progeny, and using this knowledge for new cellular therapies, will undoubtedly lead to further successful treatments for life threatening and chronic diseases, which represent substantial burdens on patient quality of life and to healthcare systems globally. Clinical translation relies in part on appropriate biomarker, in vitro manipulation and transplantation strategies. CD164 has recently been cited as an important biomarker for enriching both human haematopoietic and skeletal stem cells, yet a thorough description of extant human CD164 monoclonal antibody (Mab) characteristics, which are critical for identifying and purifying these stem cells, was not discussed in these articles. Here, we highlight earlier but crucial research describing these relevant characteristics, including the differing human CD164 Mab avidities and their binding sites on the human CD164 sialomucin, which importantly may affect subsequent stem cell function and fate.

Discovery of human CD164 as a haematopoietic and skeletal stem cell biomarker

Just over two decades ago, human (h) CD164 was identified as a functional biomarker on human haematopoietic precursors and their associated bone marrow stromal cells1,2,3. Importantly, a 1998 special focus report in ‘Blood’3,4 highlighted the findings that hCD164 was a sialomucin involved in human haematopoietic progenitor-stromal interactions, and that engagement of specific glycosylated hCD164 epitopes on quiescent human CD34+ haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) could prevent their recruitment into the cell cycle3,5. Two decades on, by analysing human bone marrow Lineage (Lin)neg, CD34+, CD34low, and CD34neg HSPCs with single cell RNAseq and improved surrogate transplantation models, Pellin and colleagues, in their article ‘A comprehensive single cell transcriptional landscape of human hematopoietic progenitors’ identified hCD164 as an important, reliable biomarker for defining the earliest branch points of hHSPC specification, which incorporates the basophil lineage and shows close similarities to murine lineage specification6. Interestingly, just prior to this observation, Chan and colleagues, in their paper entitled ‘Identification of the human skeletal stem cell’ meticulously purified, from hypertrophic zones of the growth plate in long bones, a subset of human PDPN+CD73+CD164+ skeletal stem cells (hSSC), which were negative for CD45, CD146, CD235, Tie2 and CD31, and at the apex of a hierarchy of stem cells that could transition into an early bone-cartilage-stromal progenitor7,8. These cells were demonstrated to meet the rigorous definition of hSSCs9,10, as being locally restricted to the bone, with the ability to clonally self-renew, differentiate into multiple lineages and reconstitute a haematopoietic microenvironment both in vitro and in vivo in surrogate serial transplantation models7,8,11. Importantly, and reminiscent of initial studies3,4, regulatory cross-talk was shown to exist between CD164+ hHSCs and these CD164+ hSSCs7,8,11.

While it is gratifying to see hCD164 identified as a potentially improved biomarker for hHSPC and hSSC isolation, we wish to highlight a critical issue not addressed in the three recent manuscripts cited above3,4,5, namely the choice of hCD164 antibody used for these purposes. As described below, at least three epitopes defined by three distinct Classes of hCD164 antibodies (Mabs) exist on hCD164 and representative of each class do not stain cells equivalently.

The structure of the human CD164 biomarker

hCD164 was cloned from a bone marrow stromal cDNA expression library using two Mabs, 103B2/9E10 and 105A53,5, and was demonstrated to be partially homologous to the MGC-24 cDNA5,12. The hCD164 gene spans at least 22 kb of genomic DNA, is located on chromosome 6q21, comprises six exons (E1–6) interspersed with five introns, and encodes a sialomucin2,3,5,13,14,15. Its extracellular domain comprises two highly O-glycosylated mucin domains interrupted by a cysteine-rich non-mucin domain3,5,13,14,16,17. Four splice variants exist, three involving differential splicing of complete exons and one involving splicing in the 3′ UTR3,5,13,14,16,17. The former comprises hCD164(E1–6) containing all six exon-encoded domains, hCD164(EΔ5) lacking the exon 5-encoded domain and hCD164(EΔ4) lacking the exon-4-encoded domain, and comprising the respective 197, 178, and 184 amino acid polypeptides (Fig. 1). The major isoform hCD164(E1–6), and hCD164(EΔ5) are present on both hHSPCs and human mesenchymal stem-stromal/skeletal stem cells (hMSC/hSSC)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31.

Fig. 1: hCD164 structure, epitopes and splice variants.
figure1

The hCD164 gene is located on chromosome 6q21, comprises six exons (E1–6) and encodes a type 1 integral transmembrane sialomucin. a hCD164(E1–6) amino acid sequence, with exons (E), glycosylation, mucin domains and motifs. TM transmembrane region. The hCD164(E1–6) isoform with 9 N-linked and 32 O-linked glycans, and a glycosaminoglycan (GAG) attachment site at the end of E5 and beginning of E6. The first mucin domain is encoded by E1, the cysteine rich non-mucin domain by E2 and E3, the second mucin domain by E4 to part of E6, and the transmembrane region, cytoplasmic domain and 3′UTR by the remainder of E6. A cytokine binding pocket is predicted to lie in the non-mucin domain. b Diagrammatic representation of hCD164, indicating regions where the Class I, II, and III hCD164 Mabs bind, and putative intra-molecular disulphide bridges. The molecular mass of the hCD164 monomer or homodimer varies from 80–100 kD to 160–180 kD under respective non-reducing and reducing conditions, while the molecular mass of the GAG modified hCD164 or the hCD164 tetramer exceeds 220 kD. Epitope recognition sites are also shown for representatives of each Class of CD164 Mabs and further elaborated in Fig. 2.

The full length hCD164(E1–6) isoform is predicted to contain 9 N-linked and 32 O-linked glycans, and a glycosaminoglycan (GAG) attachment site at the end of E5 and beginning of E63,5,13,14,15,16,17. E1 encodes the first mucin domain, E2 and E3 encode the cysteine rich non-mucin domain, E4 to part of E6 encode the second mucin domain, and the remainder of E6 the transmembrane region, cytoplasmic domain containing a YHTL endocytic motif and 3′UTR. A cytokine binding pocket (reminiscent of TpoR, IL-4R, IL-6R, EpoR, G-CSFR, and GM-CSFR) is located in its non-mucin domain (Fig. 1a). Figure 1b shows a diagrammatic representation of hCD164 and showing putative intra-molecular disulphide bridges between four cysteines in the non-mucin domain3,5,13,14,15,16,17. A total of eight cysteines are present and the remaining four may also contribute to intra-molecular or inter-molecular disulphide bridges. The hCD164 glycoprotein has a molecular mass of 80–100 kD under reducing conditions and, under non-reducing conditions, can exist as a homodimer of 160–180 kD. A GAG attachment at the E5–E6 junction (TSGT), association with other components (e.g., the cytoskeleton, growth factors) or the existence of an hCD164 tetrameric form may increase the molecular weight to >220 kD3,5,13,14,15,16,17.

hCD164 monoclonal antibodies and epitopes

Nine Mabs (of varying isotypes; Table 1) were initially generated to hCD1642,3,5,13,14,15,16,17,23. While our initial studies defined the epitope reactivity of four Mabs, 103B2/9E10, 105A5, N6B6, and 67D2 with the hCD164 sialomucin, our further studies identified an additional five hCD164 Mabs, 96.1H5, 96.2D2, 96.3F5, 96.10H10, and 96.12H11, which had been produced against hCD34+ cells3,17. Cross‐competition experiments between these different hCD164 Mabs indicated that the 105A5 or 103B2/9E10 Mabs were not in hibited in their binding to the hCD164+ hHSPC line KG1A by each other nor by any of the other hCD164 Mabs. Conversely, the N6B6, 67D2, 96.1H5, 96.2D2, 96.3F5, 96.10H10, and 96.12H11 Mabs all cross competed with each other suggesting that they recognise very similar or identical epitopes17.

Table 1 The characteristics of nine hCD164 monoclonal antibodies.

Further, we demonstrated that hCD164 resembled a subgroup of sialomucins, which include the hHSPC biomarker CD34. While this heavily glycosylated protein subset, like other sialomucins, is rich in serine and threonine residues, it is encoded by multiple exons2,3,5,13,14,15,16,17,32. Earlier studies had also demonstrated that CD34 Mabs could be grouped into three Classes based on the resistance or susceptibility of their cognate epitopes to cleavage by the enzymes neuraminidase, chymopapain, and a glycoprotease from Pasteurella haemolytica33,34,35. For example, the CD34 epitope recognised by the My10 Class I CD34 Mab was sensitive to both C. perfringens sialidase and O-sialoglycoprotease treatments; the CD34 epitope identified by the QBEND 10 Class II Mab was sensitive to O-sialoglycoprotease, but not to C. perfringens sialidase; the CD34 epitope defined by the Tük3 Class III Mab was insensitive to both C. perfringens sialidase and O-sialoglycoprotease enzymes33,34,35.

Given this, we examined the glycosidase sensitivities of the cell surface hCD164 sialomucin and subsequently of recombinant soluble chimaeric domain-truncation hCD164-Fc/hCD164-His-tagged constructs13,14,16,17. We also analysed the global glycosylation patterns (lectin binding, HPLC, and mass spectrometry) of chimaeric recombinant domain-truncation constructs17. These latter studies revealed that hCD164 contains sialic acid moieties in both α2-3 and α2-6 linkages on O-glycans and N-glycans, but with O-glycans having a much higher degree of sialylation. Sialyl LewisX (sLeX) was not detected17. The N-glycans are more complex than the O-glycans, with high mannose, hybrid and mono-antennary, di-antennary, tri-antennary, and tetra-antennary complex forms (with or without bisecting GlcNAC). Most O-glycans are small core 1 or 2. Predominantly large neutral tri-antennary and tetra-antennary structures occur on N-glycans in mucin domain II, while smaller, bi-antennary structures are present in mucin domain I17.

Using a set of nine soluble hCD164 domain truncation mutants comprising different exons (E) but lacking the transmembrane region, namely hCD164E1‐Fc, hCD164E1‐2‐Fc, hCD164E1‐3‐Fc, hCD164E1‐4‐Fc, hCD164E1‐5‐Fc, hCD164EΔ5‐Fc, hCD164E1‐6′‐Fc, hCD164E1,2,4‐Fc, and hCD164E1,3,4‐Fc, we demonstrated that the 103B2/9E10 and 105A5 Mabs recognised all nine soluble proteins, indicating that they react with the region encoded by exon 115,16,17. The N6B6, 67D2 and 96 series Mabs reacted with the hCD164E1‐3‐Fc, hCD164E1‐4‐Fc, hCD164E1‐5‐Fc, hCD164E1‐6′‐Fc and hCD164EΔ5‐Fc proteins, but not the hCD164E1‐Fc, hCD164E1‐2‐Fc, hCD164E1,2,4‐Fc, and hCD164E1,3,4‐Fc constructs, demonstrating that they require at least exons 2 and 3 for epitope recognition15,16,17. Notably however, none of these Mabs distinguish between the four known hCD164 splice variants15,16,17.

Deglycosylation experiments followed by analyses with hCD164 Mabs were carried out on the hCD164(E1–3)-Fc soluble protein and hCD164 purified from KG1A cells using N-glycanase, O-glycosidase, sialidase, α-fucosidase, and O-sialoglycoprotease treatments, either separately or together (Fig. 2)13,14,15,16,17. The epitope recognised by the 105A5 Mab was sialic acid dependent, with sialic acid moieties situated on O-glycosylated chains attached to the exon 1-encoded peptide, but not on N-linked oligosaccharides. O-glycosidase and O-sialoglycoprotease significantly reduced 103B2/9E10 and 105A5 Mab binding to hCD164, but this was not seen with the other hCD164 Mabs. The hCD164 epitope recognised by the103B2/9E10 Mab was sensitive to N-glycanase treatment, and hence is dependent on the N-linked carbohydrates of exon. In contrast, the epitopes recognised by the remaining hCD164 MAbs were not removed by the deglycosylation procedures used. Thus, by comparing hCD164 Mabs with the CD34 Mab Classes, the hCD164 Mabs could be classified into three analogous categories13,14,15,16,17. Hence, the epitope recognised by the Class I 105A5 Mab is present on hCD164 mucin domain I and is associated with long chain sialylated O-linked glycans. The epitope recognised by the Class II 103B2/9E10 Mab is also present on mucin domain I and is dependent on N-linked and O-linked glycans, but independent of sialylation. The remaining seven Class III Mabs react with conformation-dependent epitopes that require the co-expression of the cysteine-rich domain, encoded by E2 and E3, which lies between mucin domains I and II. Their binding relies on intramolecular disulphide bridges, which are resistant to glycosidase cleavage and principally encompass the hCD164 peptide backbone13,14,16,17. The Class III Mabs are further divided into closely associated Class IIIA and IIIB Mabs, with the seven Mabs partially or completely cross-competing with each other13,14,16,17. Class IIIA Mabs (N6B6, 96.1H5, and 96.10H10), like their Class I and II counterparts, identify hCD164 monomers or homodimers, while the Class IIIB antibodies (67D2, 96.12H11, 96.3F5, and 96.2D2) also bind to a > 220 kD hCD164 protein species13,14,16,17. As indicated earlier, the latter may be an hCD164 tetramer, a hCD164 monomer or homodimer in association with other, possibly cytoskeletal or growth factor, components, or a GAG containing hCD164 species, an issue not yet resolved (Fig. 1)3,5,13,14,15,16,17.

Fig. 2: Defining hCD164 epitopes by glycosidase treatments.
figure2

Schematic representation of hCD164 epitopes deduced from different glycosidase treatments of the hCD164 molecule and the binding of representative Class I (105A5), Class II (103B2/9E10), and Class III (N6B6, 67D2) hCD164 Mabs. □, exon encoded domains; , potential N-linked carbohydrates; horizontal bars with or without arrows, potential O-linked carbohydrates; arrows, potential sialic acid motifs on O-linked carbohydrates. (Originally published in The Journal of Immunology. Doyonnas R, Yi-Hsin Chan J, Butler LH, Rappold I, Lee-Prudhoe JE, Zannettino AC, Simmons PJ, Bühring HJ, Levesque JP, Watt SM. 2000. CD164 monoclonal antibodies that block hemopoietic progenitor cell adhesion and proliferation interact with the first mucin domain of the CD164 receptor. J. Immunol. 165, 840–851. Copyright © 2000.The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.).

Cellular distribution of hCD164 epitopes

Assessment of the cellular distribution of Class I and II hCD164 epitopes2,3,5,23,26,31 revealed their expression on CD45+CD34+ hHSPCs throughout ontogeny. Notably, they are present on CD34+ clusters located on the ventral floor of the dorsal aorta in the week 5–6 developing human embryo, and on a proportion of CD34+ cells from foetal liver, cord blood, bone marrow, and mobilised peripheral blood23. Furthermore, LinnegCD34lo/neg or CD34int+extnegCD38lo/neg, CD133hiCD34hiCD38lo/neg, and CD133hiCD34lo/neg repopulating HSPCs express abundant hCD164, of which the CD34+CD164hi HSPCs expand more in ex vivo cultures than bulk CD34+ HSPCs3,5,6,19,20,21,22,28,29,31. Recent studies by Pellin’s group used the Class IIIB 67D2 Mab to demonstrate that CD34+CD164hi, but not CD34+CD164lo, cells sustained early and late in vivo human haematopoietic reconstitution in NBSGW immunodeficient mice6. Importantly, hCD164 is also a biomarker for hMSCs/hSSCs, including CD271hiCD45lo/neg and CD56+ or CD56neg primary bone marrow hMSC7,8,25,26. Notably, the Class IIIB Mab (67D2) has been used to identify and isolate PDPN+CD146neg CD73+CD164+ self-renewing, serially transplantable hSSCs with multipotent (osteogenic, chondrogenic, and haematopoietic supporting stromal) potential from the human bone growth plate and diaphyseal zones7. Significantly, these hSSCs exist at the apex of the human skeletogenic differentiation hierarchy, are present in human foetal and adult bones, can be generated from BMP-2 stimulated human adipose MSCs and iPSCs, expand locally following acute skeletal injury and maintain human haematopoiesis7,8,11.

While all the hCD164 epitopes described to date are present on hCD34+ and hCD133+ hHSPC subsets and on hBM MSCs, this is in direct contrast to their differential expression in other postnatal haematopoietic and non-haematopoietic tissues2,3,5,13,14,15,16,17,23. We observed that the epitopes detected by the Class I and II Mabs can be differentially expressed and distributed on reciprocal cell subsets in some tissues, while the Class III Mabs stained cells that bound both or either of the Class I and/or II hCD164 Mabs23. For example, the epitope recognised by the 103B2/9E10 Class II Mab, but not that by the 105A5 Class I Mab, is present on most vascular endothelium, on some high endothelial venules in lymphoid tissues, on the venous sinuses in spleen, on the thymic subcapsular epithelia which is associated with pre-T lymphoid cell trafficking and on the basal-layer epithelia of the tonsil and skin. In contrast, the epitope recognised by the 105A5 Class I Mab is present on lymphoid cells in tissues that are involved in lymphoid/blood cell recirculation, such as in the tonsil, spleen, and gut23. However, the CD1+ and cortical and medullary CD43+ thymic lymphoid cells stain weakly with the Class I, but not at all with the Class II, hCD164 Mabs, while thymic macrophages express both the hCD164 epitopes defined by the Class I and II Mabs23.

The role of hCD164 in regulating cell fate

The epitopes defined by the different Classes of hCD164 Mabs are implicated in possessing functional roles in haematopoiesis as illustrated by in vitro studies or based on hCD164 structural studies. Engaging the hCD164 molecule with specific hCD164 Mabs can modulate CD34+ or CD133+hHSPC proliferation, differentiation, adhesion to, and retention or migration in different microenvironmental niches. As a first exemplar, the hCD164 103B2/9E10 Class II Mab-defined epitope partially blocks adhesion of CD34+ and CD133+ hHSPCs to bone marrow MSCs3,5,13,14,31. Ligating this epitope with the 103B2/9E10 Class II Mab also inhibits cytokine-driven (IL-3, IL-6, SCF, and G-CSF) recruitment of single CD34+CD38lo/neg hHSPCs into the cell cycle in vitro3,5,13,14. Such effects are indicative of cognate ligands for hCD164 acting in cis or trans, albeit not yet fully defined. Our findings show that hCD164 lacks sLeX moieties required for P-selectin or E-selectin binding, while its sialylation in the absence of fucosylation suggests that hCD164 is a potential Siglec ligand, with preliminary studies indicating hSiglec-5 (but not hSiglec-3, hSiglec-7, hSiglec-8, hSiglec-9, or hSiglec-10) binding13,14,15,17. The second example demonstrates that culturing hBM CD34+ cells with IL-1β, IL-3, IL-6, G-CSF, GM-CSF, and SCF for 21 days in the presence of the Class I 105A5 or Class II 103B2/9E10 hCD164 Mabs reduces the absolute number of both total nucleated cells generated, and, when erythropoietin is added as well, decreases the development of clonogenic BFU-E and CFU-GM13,14,15. Furthermore, hCD164 is a key component of the CXCR4-VLA-4-VLA-5 complex, regulating CD133+ hHSPC CXCL12-mediated migration or retention in the hHSC niche and promoting CXCR4-mediated signalling, a process inhibited by the 103B2/9E10 Class II hCD164 Mab31. Although functional effects of engaging the hCD164 epitopes with Class III Mabs have not been fully assessed, the full length hCD164 contains a potential cytokine binding pocket located in its non-mucin domain, as well as a potential GAG attachment site at the E5-E6 junction of hCD1642,3,5,13,14,15,16,17, that could act in concert to modulate cytokine-mediated, chemokine-mediated, or adhesion-mediated effects on the same or opposing cells. While this is purely hypothelical, it is important to keep in mind that these and other Mabs chosen to isolate hHSCs might inadvertently affect the function or fate of the hHSCs when assessed in vitro or in vivo.

Biomarkers and lineage hierarchies

Biomarkers that identify definitive, but rare, repopulating human bone marrow stem cells have been the “holy grail” of stem cell research since the seminal discovery of monoclonal antibodies by Koehler and Milstein over 5 decades ago36. These, when coupled with the increasingly sophisticated technological developments37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44 of cell sorting, surrogate in vivo models, gene editing, single cell barcoding, single cell deep sequencing, lineage tracing and fate mapping in vitro and in vivo, and human transplantation or regenerative medicine, have fuelled a series of debates on the hierarchical relationships of these human stem cells with their immediate progeny, and on selecting the best biomarkers and cell subsets for therapeutic use. To this end, biomarkers, lineage trees and lineage relationships have been constantly changing with progressive technological developments and research. Examples of these are indicated in the attached references6,7,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62.

Deciphering lineage commitment processes with biomarkers is critical to our understanding of human haematopoiesis3,7,8,30,37,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62, and must not be hindered by the use of reagents that modulate hHSPC function in vivo. Hypotheses are hotly debated; the classical model describes a structured hierarchy of lineage commitment, with early branching of lymphoid and erythro-myeloid lineages. Other hypotheses include lineage-biased HSCs, early megakaryocyte lineage branching followed by erythroid, myeloid, and lymphoid lineage transitions, early branching of erythroid-megakaryocyte precursors from lymphoid–myeloid precursors, and a continuum of low-primed hHSPCs from which unilineage cells differentiate (CLOUD-HSPCs)41,42,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,59,61,62. Pellin et al.6 have stated that hCD164 can ‘preserve the resolution of the single-cell events of the more-primitive compartments, whereas at the same time maintaining a full representation of the late cell fate branching’, leading them to propose a modification of the classical hierarchical model, in which ‘human hematopoiesis develops along early cell fate bifurcations occurring in a continuum of states forming a hierarchical-like structure’ with early priming to either lymphoid/dendritic cell/monocyte/granulocyte or erythroid/megakaryocyte /basophil commitment.

When defining lineage hierarchies and developing new cellular products with hCD164 as a biomarker, it is important to remember that, while Pellin et al.6 and Chan et al.7 used the 67D2 Class IIIB hCD164 antibody to identify hHSCs and hSSCs, different classes of hCD164 antibodies possess different avidities for this molecule and, by interfering with ligand binding sites, these may alter human hHSPC and hSSC function and hence fate. The information garnered from previous research should be carefully reviewed when considering the choice of hCD164 antibodies in future clinical studies. This said, Class II, and to a lesser extent, Class I hCD164 antibodies, with isotypes distinct from the Class III antibodies, may prove beneficial for confirming the purity of and hence establishing release criteria for the hCD164 Class III-enriched hHSC and hSSC subsets for in vivo therapy.

In conclusion, using this knowledge in association with new cellular therapies will undoubtedly contribute to successful treatments for life threatening and chronic diseases, which are substantial burdens on both patient quality of life and healthcare systems globally63,64.

References

  1. 1.

    Rappold, I. et al. Functional and phenotypic characterization of cord blood and bone marrow subsets expressing FLT3 (CD135) receptor tyrosine kinase. Blood 90, 111–125 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Watt, S. M. et al. CD164, a novel sialomucin on CD34(+) and erythroid subsets, is located on human chromosome 6q21. Blood 92, 849–866 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zannettino, A. C. et al. The sialomucin CD164 (MGC-24v) is an adhesive glycoprotein expressed by human hematopoietic progenitors and bone marrow stromal cells that serves as a potent negative regulator of hematopoiesis. Blood 92, 2613–2628 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Verfaillie, C. M. Adhesion receptors as regulators of the hematopoietic process. Blood 92, 2609–2612 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zannettino, A. C. W. Molecular definition of stromal cell-stem cell interactions. Ph.D. thesis (University of Adelaide, 1996).

  6. 6.

    Pellin, D. et al. A comprehensive single cell transcriptional landscape of human hematopoietic progenitors. Nat. Commun. 10, 2395–2408 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chan, C. K. F. et al. Identification of the human skeletal stem cell. Cell 175, 43–56 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ambrosi, T. H., Longaker, M. T. & Chan, C. K. F. A revised perspective of skeletal stem cell biology. Front Cell. Dev. Biol. 7, 189–209 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bianco, P. & Robey, P. G. Skeletal stem cells. Development 142, 1023–1027 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kassem, M. & Bianco, P. Skeletal stem cells in space and time. Cell 160, 17–19 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu, J. Q., Li, Q. W. & Tan, Z. New insights on properties and spatial distributions of skeletal stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 9026729 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Masuzawa, Y. et al. A novel core protein as well as polymorphic epithelial mucin carry peanut agglutinin binding sites in human gastric carcinoma cells: sequence analysis and examination of gene expression. J. Biochem. 112, 609–615 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chan, J. Y.-H. The regulation and characterization of the CD164 gene, a negative regulator of hematopoiesis. D.Phil. thesis (University of Oxford, 1997).

  14. 14.

    Chan, J. Y. et al. Relationship between novel isoforms, functionally important domains, and subcellular distribution of CD164/endolyn. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2139–2152 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Watt, S. M. & Chan, J. Y. CD164–a novel sialomucin on CD34+ cells. Leuk. Lymphoma 37, 1–25 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Doyonnas, R. et al. CD164 monoclonal antibodies that block hemopoietic progenitor cell adhesion and proliferation interact with the mucin domain of the CD164 receptor. J. Immunol. 165, 840–851 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jorgensen-Tye, B. et al. Epitope recognition of antibodies that define the sialomucin, endolyn (CD164), a negative regulator of hematopoiesis. Tissue Antigens 65, 220–239 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Muramatsu, T. & Muramatsu, H. Carbohydrate antigens expressed on stem cells and early embryonic cells. Glycoconj. J. 21, 41–45 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    McGuckin, C. P. et al. Colocalization analysis of sialomucins CD34 and CD164. Stem Cells 21, 162–170 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McGuckin, C. P. et al. Multiparametric analysis of immature cell populations in umbilical cord blood and bone marrow. Eur. J. Hematol. 71, 341–350 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kuçi, S. et al. Identification of a novel class of human adherent CD34- stem cells that give rise to SCID-repopulating cells. Blood 101, 869–876 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zannettino, A. C. CD164. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 15, 394–396 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Watt, S. M. et al. Functionally defined CD164 epitopes are expressed on CD34(+) cells throughout ontogeny but display distinct distribution patterns in adult hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic tissues. Blood 95, 3113–3124 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Almeida-Porada, G. et al. CD164 defines an immature subset of human bone marrow CD34neg stem cells. Blood 94, 462a (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vogel, W. et al. Heterogeneity among human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and neural progenitor cells. Haematologica 88, 126–133 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bühring, H. J. et al. Phenotypic characterization of distinct human bone marrow-derived MSC subsets. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1176, 124–134 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wimazal, F. et al. Expression of homing receptors and related molecules on human mast cells and basophils: a comparative analysis using multi-color flow cytometry and toluidine blue/immunofluorescence staining techniques. Tissue Antigens 54, 499–507 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Giesert, C. et al. The monoclonal antibody W7C5 defines a novel surface antigen on hematopoietic stem cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 938, 175–183 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vodyanik, M. A., Bork, J. A., Thomson, J. A. & Slukvin, I. I. Human embryonic stem cell-derived CD34+ cells: efficient production in the coculture with OP9 stromal cells and analysis of lymphohematopoietic potential. Blood 105, 617–626 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hennersdorf, F. et al. Identification of CD13, CD107a, and CD164 as novel basophil-activation markers and dissection of two response patterns in time kinetics of IgE-dependent upregulation. Cell Res. 15, 325–335 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Forde, S. et al. Endolyn (CD164) modulates the CXCL12-mediated migration of umbilical cord blood CD133+ cells. Blood 109, 1825–1833 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Satterthwaite, A. B., Burn, T. C., Le Beau, M. M. & Tenen, D. G. Structure of the gene encoding CD34, a human hematopoietic stem cell antigen. Genomics 12, 788–794 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Watt, S. M. et al. Distribution and epitope analysis of the cell membrane glycoprotein (HPCA-1) associated with human hemopoietic progenitor cells. Leukemia 1, 417–426 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sutherland, D. R. et al. Structural and partial amino acid sequence analysis of the human hemopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34. Leukemia 2, 793–803 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sutherland, D. R. et al. Differential sensitivity of CD34 epitopes to cleavage by Pasteurella haemolytica glycoprotease: implications for purification of CD34-positive progenitor cells. Exp. Hematol. 20, 590–599 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Köhler, G. & Milstein, C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256, 495–497 (1975).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pinho, S. & Frenette, P. S. Hematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 303–320 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hulett, H. R., Bonner, W. A., Barrett, J. & Herzenberg, L. A. Cell sorting: automated separation of mammalian cells as a function of intracellular fluorescence. Science 166, 747–749 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kamel-Reid, S. & Dick, J. E. Engraftment of immune-deficient mice with human hematopoietic stem cells. Science 242, 1706–1709 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Shi, P. A., Hematti, P., von Kalle, C. & Dunbar, C. E. Genetic marking as an approach to studying in vivo hematopoiesis: progress in the non-human primate model. Oncogene 21, 3274–3283 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Scala, S. & Aiuti, A. In vivo dynamics of human hematopoietic stem cells: novel concepts and future directions. Blood Adv. 3, 1916–1924 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Velten, L. et al. Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 271–281 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Thomas, E. D. The Nobel Lectures in Immunology. The Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine, 1990. Bone marrow transplantation–past, present and future. Scand. J. Immunol. 39, 339–345 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Doulatov, S., Notta, F., Laurenti, E. & Dick, J. E. Hematopoiesis: a human perspective. Cell Stem Cell 10, 120–136 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Laurenti, E. et al. The transcriptional architecture of early human hematopoiesis identifies multilevel control of lymphoid commitment. Nat. Immunol. 14, 756–763 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sanjuan-Pla, A. et al. Platelet-biased stem cells reside at the apex of the haematopoietic stem-cell hierarchy. Nature 502, 232–236 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Biasco, L. et al. In vivo tracking of human hematopoiesis reveals patterns of clonal dynamics during early and steady-state reconstitution phases. Cell Stem Cell 19, 107–119 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Notta, F. et al. Distinct routes of lineage development reshape the human blood hierarchy across ontogeny. Science 351, aab2116 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Integrated single-cell analysis maps the continuous regulatory landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation. Cell 173, 1535–1548 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Carrelha, J. et al. Hierarchically related lineage-restricted fates of multipotent haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 554, 106–111 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Karamitros, D. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals the continuum of human lympho-myeloid progenitor cells. Nat. Immunol. 19, 85–97 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Psaila, B. & Mead, A. J. Single-cell approaches reveal novel cellular pathways for megakaryocyte and erythroid differentiation. Blood 133, 1427–1435 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Laurenti, E. & Göttgens, B. From haematopoietic stem cells to complex differentiation landscapes. Nature 553, 418–426 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    O’Byrne, S. et al. Discovery of a CD10-negative B-progenitor in human fetal life identifies unique ontogeny-related developmental programs. Blood 134, 1059–1071 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bühring, H. J. et al. The monoclonal antibody 97A6 defines a novel surface antigen expressed on human basophils and their multipotent and unipotent progenitors. Blood 94, 2343–2356 (1999).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bühring, H. J. et al. The basophil activation marker defined by antibody 97A6 is identical to the ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 3. Blood 97, 3303–3305 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Crane, G. M., Jeffery, E. & Morrison, S. J. Adult hematopoietic stem cell niches. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 573–590 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sumide, K. et al. A revised road map for the commitment of human cord blood CD34-negative hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 2202–2219 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yin, A. H. et al. AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 90, 5002–5012 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Görgens, A. et al. Revision of the human hematopoietic tree: granulocyte subtypes derive from distinct hematopoietic lineages. Cell Rep. 3, 1539–1552 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Tusi, B. K. et al. Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies. Nature 555, 54–60 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    James, S. L. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1789–1858 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    The Impact of Musculoskeletal Disorders on Americans—Opportunities for Action. http://www.boneandjointburden.org/docs/BMUSExecutiveSummary2016.pdf. Bone and Joint Initiative USA (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to dedicate this manuscript to the memory of Professor James Y-H Chan, who contributed substantially to our knowledge of CD164, Professor Cesar Milstein, who taught us the monoclonal antibody techniques, and Sir David J. Weatherall, who provided the opportunity to conduct the CD164 studies carried out in Oxford.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M.W., H.J.B., P.J.S. and A.C.W.Z.: 1) Substantially contributed to the conception or design of the review, and analysis or interpretation of the data, 2) Drafted and/or revised the review critically for important intellectual content, 3) Gave final approval of the completed version, 4) Are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne M. Watt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors, H.J.B. and S.M.W., have previously held a patent EP98108845A/ DE19727815C1 on the 67D2 monoclonal antibody to hCD164, and all authors have published on CD164. The authors declare no current financial or non-financial competing interests related to CD164.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watt, S.M., Bühring, HJ., Simmons, P.J. et al. The stem cell revolution: on the role of CD164 as a human stem cell marker. npj Regen Med 6, 33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00143-1

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing