Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Using cell sheets to regenerate mouse submandibular glands


Temperature-responsive polymer grafted tissue culture dishes release cells as confluent living sheets in response to small changes in temperature, with recovered cell sheets retaining cell–cell communications, functional extracellular matrices and tissue-like behaviors. These features promote tissue regeneration and improve transplantation efficacy in various tissues including cartilage, heart, kidney, liver, endometrium, cornea, middle ear, periodontium, and esophageal living sheet transplants. However, the functional effects of cell sheets for salivary gland regeneration to treat hyposalivation have not yet been studied. Thus, the present study aims to both establish the viability of thermoresponsive cell sheets for use in salivary glands and then explore the delivery option (i.e., single vs. multiple layers) that would result in the most complete tissue growth in terms of cell differentiation and recovered tissue integrity. Results indicate that single cell sheets form polarized structures that maintain cell–cell junctions and secretory granules in vitro while layering of two-single cell sheets forms a glandular-like pattern in vitro. Moreover, double layer cell sheets enhance tissue formation, cell differentiation and saliva secretion in vivo. In contrast, single cell sheets demonstrated only modest gains relative to the robust growth seen with the double layer variety. Together, these data verify the utility of thermoresponsive cell sheets for use in salivary glands and indicates the double layer form to provide the best option in terms of cell differentiation and recovered tissue integrity, thereby offering a potential new therapeutic strategy for treating hyposalivation.


Xerostomia is the sensation of having a dry mouth and is commonly associated with a reduction of saliva flow (i.e., hyposalivation).1,2 Several conditions have been linked to hyposalivation including the following: (a) Sjögren’s syndrome, the second most common rheumatic disease after rheumatoid arthritis affecting more than 4 million people in the US,3,4 (b) γ-irradiation therapy that affects ~60,000 head and neck cancer patients in the US,5 (c) genetic diseases including lacrimo-auriculodentodigital syndrome, autosomal dominant salivary gland hypoplasia, salivary glands agenesis and chronic recurrent sialadenitis that are less frequent but cause a significant burden in many patients,6,7 and (d) side effects of more than 50 commonly used medications.8,9 Causes of hyposalivation are thus seen to be multiple but with presenting symptoms typically including unresolved inflammation and/or impaired tissue homeostasis and regeneration.10 Moreover, hyposalivation is a known risk factor for a variety of other serious oral health conditions including tooth decay, oral mucositis, and fungal infections.11,12

Current treatments for hyposalivation include the use of artificial saliva and secretory agonists such as pilocarpine and cevimeline; however, they provide only temporary relief and result in significant side effects, respectively.13,14 In the search for novel alternatives, some promise has been shown with the use of gene therapy for aquaporin 1 (AQP1) directed to improve water secretion in ductal cells. Although this therapy has indeed proven to be somewhat successful in addressing hyposalivation, it still does not offer a replacement for salivary proteins.15,16 Other studies pursuing alternative treatments include the use a variety of scaffolds using natural (e.g., fibrin hydrogel,17,18,19 collagen,20 hyaluronic acid,21 silk,22 and alginate23) as well as synthetic polymers (e.g., poly-glycolic acid, poly-lactic acid, and polyethylene glycol24,25,26), all of which have been shown to promote salivary gland regeneration, both in vitro and in vivo. Nonetheless, the longstanding problem in this area is how to achieve growth (i.e., proliferation of differentiated tissue) without that growth becoming uncontrolled (i.e., development of tumorigenic cells), and studies are ongoing in an attempt to achieve such a balance with each of the scaffolds listed above. Additional efforts have involved the use stem cells,27,28,29 which appear to promote glandular regeneration; however, this therapy alone is insufficient to adequately treat hyposalivation for two reasons. First, it is difficult to transplant stem cell suspensions into a targeted area, as they disperse throughout the tissue once injected, which in turn can lead to dilution of cell suspension into the blood stream and a related decrease in regenerative effects.30,31 Additionally, the use of proteolytic enzymes during stem cell isolation damages extracellular matrix proteins and may result in loss of differentiated phenotype.32 Despite the shortcomings of stem cells noted above, this technology nonetheless remains very attractive due to the possibility of providing for a steady stream of host tissue.

Emerging cell sheet technology, in which cells are transplanted onto a thermoresponsive plate that rapidly attach to desired tissue and subsequently merge with that target tissue, offers just such sourcing advantages without the risks associated with stem cells, as noted above.33,34 Moreover, this technology has been employed extensively in a wide variety of organs (e.g., cartilage,35 heart,36 kidney,37 liver,38 endometrium,39 cornea,40 middle ear,41 periodontium,42 and esophageal living sheet transplants43). However, cell sheets have not yet been demonstrated to be effective in salivary glands (i.e., they have not been transplanted and shown to induce salivary gland regeneration) and, beyond the issue of viability of the procedure itself, technical questions related to the particular constitution of the cell sheets to be used (e.g., single vs. multiple layers) must also be resolved. Specifically, early studies demonstrated that single cell sheet implantation can be used for repairing periodontal ligament,44 skin45 as well as corneal40 and bladder tissues,46 while later studies suggest that multiple layer cell sheets may be even more effective for repairing these same tissues47,48,49 in addition to myocardium,50 smooth muscle,51 liver,38 and other 3D tissues.52 Thus, the present study aims to both establish and then later test the viability of thermoresponsive cell sheets for use in salivary glands and then explore the delivery option (i.e., single vs. multiple layer cell sheets) that would result in the most complete tissue growth in terms of cell differentiation and recovered tissue integrity.


Submandibular gland (SMG) cells form polarized cell sheets in vitro

To investigate whether freshly isolated mouse SMG cells were able to form a cell sheet, cells were cultured on a polystyrene dish covalently covered with a temperature-responsive polymer poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PIPAAm) (i.e., thermoresponsive cell culture dish) for eight days as described in Methods and depicted in Fig. 1a. Our results showed that cells form a single layer capable of detaching from the culture dish when the temperature is decreased from 37 °C to 25 °C (Fig. 1b), while a single layer cell sheet (Fig. 1c) likewise displayed a closely packed columnar pattern with a flat basolateral side and a protrusive apical side (Fig. 1c). Together, these results demonstrate that SMG are capable of forming polarized cell sheets in vitro when cultured on thermoresponsive plates.

Fig. 1

SMG cells form single sheets. a SMG tissue was dissociated using a GentleMACS and plated on a thermoresponsive culture dish at 37 °C for eight days, as described in Methods. Dish temperature was then reduced to 25 °C, which in turn caused the cells to detach from the surface and subsequently maintained intact the extracellular matrix proteins as compared to a traditional cell isolation method using trypsin, in which these proteins quickly disperse. b Sequence of cells detaching from the thermoresponsive plate depicted at 3, 5, and 8 min, with complete detachment occurring after 30 min. White bars represent 200 µm. c Single layer cell sheets were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, stained with H&E and imaged using a Leica DMI6000B inverted microscope at 10×. Black bars represent 100 µm. The diagram was drawn by author Kihoon Nam

Single layer cell sheets maintain tight junctions (TJ) and secretory granules (SG) in vitro

Since SMG cells formed single layer sheets, we determined whether they displayed a polarized secretory phenotype as well. As shown in Fig. 2a, single cell sheets were able to form structures consistent with intercellular junctions including tight junctions (TJ), adherence junctions (AJ) as well as desmosomes (DS). Additionally, we detected microvilli-like structures on the apical side of the cell sheet (Fig. 2a) and SG located towards the apical membrane (Fig. 2b) similar to mouse native SMG specimen (Fig. 2c). Thus, a SMG-derived single layer cell sheet has features consistent with polarized secretory epithelia.

Fig. 2

SMG-derived single layer cell sheets maintain tight junctions and secretory granules. Shown are transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of SMG cells grown on thermoresponsive plates for 8 days. Cells were processed for morphological analysis, as described in the “Methods” section and cell junctions (a) and secretory granules (b) detected and compared to native SMG (c). Data are representative of results from three experiments. Microvilli (Mi), tight junction (TJ), adherence junction (AJ), desmosomes (DS), secretory granules (SG)

Single layer cell sheets polarize and differentiate in vitro

To confirm the presence of TJ proteins and detect markers of SMG differentiation, we analyzed cell sheet sections by confocal microscopy. Our results showed that single layer cell sheets display a columnar epithelial-like arrangement (Fig. 3a) expressing epithelial junctions including the apical TJ protein zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1, Fig. 3b, green) as well as the basolateral protein E-cadherin (Fig. 3b, red). Moreover, single layer cell sheets expressed the salivary gland acinar marker aquaporin 5 (AQP5, Fig. 3c, green) with F-actin (Fig. 3c, red). These results suggest that SMG cells are capable of forming single layer sheets that polarize and differentiate but do not display the typical three-dimensional glandular-like arrangements of a salivary gland.

Fig. 3

Single layer cell sheets polarize and differentiate while double layer cell sheets form a glandular-like appearance. SMG-derived single or double cell sheets were imaged using a differential interference contrast microscopy (a, d) scale bars = 200 μm as well as using a Carl Zeiss 700 confocal microscope at 40× (scale bars = 50 μm) with the following specifications rabbit anti-ZO-1 (b and e, green) and mouse anti-E-cadherin (b and e, red), rabbit anti-aquaporin 5 (c and f, green) and F-actin (c and f, red). Data are representative of results from three experiments

Double layer cell sheets form a glandular-like appearance in vitro

Since single cell sheets did not form a glandular appearance, we investigated whether a combination of two-single layer cell sheets promotes formation of a glandular-like appearance tissue in vivo. As shown in Fig. 3d, placing two-single cell sheets on top of each other for one day led to the formation of a double layer cell sheet with a glandular-like appearance in which the majority of cells displayed organized round structures consistent with epithelial lumens, as indicated by the intense ZO-1 staining on the apical region (Fig. 3e). Moreover, acinar differentiation marker expression, AQP5, was significantly increased after one day of layering (Fig. 3f). Together, these results indicate that double layer cell sheets display a more organized pattern as compared to single cell sheets and therefore could be used for in vivo studies.

Double layer cell sheets show a higher intracellular calcium signaling in response to carbachol in vitro

To determine whether cell sheets elicit intracellular calcium signaling pathways in response to secretory agonists, we investigated whether carbachol was able to induce increases in [Ca2+]i responses cell sheets in vitro. As shown in Fig. 4, both single and double layer cell sheets displayed a significant increase in [Ca2+]i signaling in response to carbachol. However, double layer cell sheets (Fig. 4b) showed a significantly higher intracellular calcium increase as compared to single layer cell sheets (Fig. 4a). Together, these results indicate that while both single and double cell sheets are functional, double layer cell sheets show a stronger agonist-mediated response (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4

Double layer cell sheets display a more robust functionality. Both a single and b double layer cell sheets were stimulated with carbachol (Cch, 100 μM). c Then, changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored in single (black line) and double (red line) layer cell sheets as described in the “Methods” section. Data are representative of results from 3 experiments. White bars representing 50 μm

Double layer cell sheets promote tissue organization in vivo

Given that double layer cell sheets formed a glandular-like structures in vitro, we decided to use double layer cell sheets for regeneration studies in vivo by transplanting SMG double layer cell sheets into a wounded mouse model (Fig. 5), as described in the “Methods” section. Our results indicate that untreated SMG surgical wounds displayed fibrotic tissue (Fig. 6a) at post-surgery day 8. In contrast, SMG surgical wounds treated with a single layer cell sheet displayed almost complete wound closure, exhibited signs of fibrosis and partial wound healing (Fig. 6b). Interestingly, SMG surgical wounds treated with a double layer cell sheet (Fig. 6c) displayed an approximately 90% wound closure with a similar morphology to sham controls (Fig. 6d). Together, the histological results demonstrate that a double layer cell sheet promotes regeneration in wounded mouse SMG after eight days.

Fig. 5

Double layer cell sheets can be directly transplanted to wounded SMGs. Skin incisions of approximately 1 cm in length were made along the anterior surface of the neck of a C57B/L6J and SMG were exposed (ac). Then, a 3 mm diameter biopsy punch was performed and d surgical wounds filled with a single or double layer cell sheet measuring approximately 1 cm of diameter of a semicircle (eg). Finally, the skin incision was sutured (h) and mice were placed in a recovery room

Fig. 6

Double layer cell sheets promote tissue organization to a similar extent as sham controls. H&E staining of wounded SMG that a remained untreated, b were treated with single cell sheets, c were treated with double cell sheets or d were unwounded (sham controls) was performed and specimens were analyzed by light microscopy using a Leica DMI6000B as described in the “Methods” section; bars = 1 mm with yellow dotted areas indicating wounded areas. Data are representative of results from three experiments

Double layer cell sheets promote tissue differentiation in vivo

Since a double layer cell sheet promotes regeneration in wounded mouse SMG, we determined whether the newly formed tissue displayed polarity and differentiation under these conditions. Our results show that untreated wounded SMG expressed both ZO-1 (Fig. 7a, green) and E-cadherin (Fig. 7a, red), with either protein expressing only a very weak staining together with a disorganized structure. In contrast, SMG treated with a single layer cell sheet expressed slightly organized apical ZO-1 (Fig. 7b, green) and basolateral E-cadherin (Fig. 7b, red). Interestingly, SMG treated with a double layer cell sheet expressed ZO-1 (Fig. 7c, green) and E-cadherin (Fig. 7c, red) with a strong apical and basolateral staining respectively, similar to sham controls (Fig. 7d, green and red) and indicating polarity. Moreover, untreated SMG barely expressed the acinar marker AQP5 (Fig. 7e, green) or the ductal marker cytokeratin 7 (Fig. 7e, red), with both proteins showing a weak staining and a disorganized pattern. In contrast, SMG treated with a single layer cell sheet partially expressed AQP5 (Fig. 7f, green) and cytokeratin-7 (Fig. 7f, red). Also, SMG treated with a double layer cell sheet expressed AQP5 (Fig. 7g, green) and cytokeratin-7 (Fig. 7g, red), where both proteins displayed strong apical and basolateral staining patterns, respectively, similar to sham controls (Fig. 7h, green and red) indicating differentiation. Likewise, untreated wounded SMG did not express the acinar marker transmembrane protein 16 (TMEM16, Fig. 7i, green) or the functional basolateral marker sodium potassium ATPase (Na+/K+-ATPase, Fig. 7i, red), with both proteins showing no staining. Conversely, SMG treated with a single layer cell sheet expressed weak apical TMEM16 (Fig. 7j green) and strong basolateral Na+/K+-ATPase (Fig. 7j, red), Finally, SMG treated with a double layer cell sheet expressed strong apical TMEM16 (Fig. 7k green) and basolateral Na+/K+-ATPase (Fig. 7k, red), similar to sham controls (Fig. 7l, green and red) indicating functionality.

Fig. 7

Double layer cell sheets promote tissue polarization and differentiation to a similar extent as sham controls. Confocal analysis of wounded SMG that remained untreated (a, e, i), were treated with single cell sheets (b, f, j), were treated with double cell sheets (c, g, k) or were unwounded (sham controls, d, h, l) was performed as follows: rabbit anti-ZO-1 (ad; green) and mouse anti-E-cadherin (ad; red), rabbit anti-aquaporin 5 (eh; green) and mouse anti-cytokeratin 7 (eh; red), rabbit anti-TMEM16A (il; green) and mouse anti-Na+/K+ ATPase (il; red). Data are representative of results from 5 experiments. White bars represent 100 µm

Double layer cell sheets promote saliva secretion in vivo

Our previous studies indicated a decrease in saliva flow rates wounded mouse SMG.18,19 Since saliva is critical for eating and swallowing, we determined the capability of the mice to perform these functions by measuring their body weight at various post-surgery times. Our results show that untreated mice exhibited a significant decrease in body weight (Fig. 8a). In contrast, mice treated with a single or double layer cell sheet displayed body weights comparable to sham controls (Fig. 8a). Since a double layer cell sheet promoted regeneration in wounded mouse SMG as compared to controls, we determined whether the newly formed tissue improved salivary secretory function under these conditions. Our results show that untreated mice exhibited a significant decrease in saliva flow rates (Fig. 8b). In contrast, mice treated with a double layer cell sheet exhibited saliva flow rates comparable to sham controls (Fig. 8b).

Fig. 8

Double layer cell sheets restore body weight and saliva secretion to a similar extent as sham controls. a After SMG wounds were made, mice received the indicated treatments and changes in body weight (%) of untreated (), single cell sheet () or double cell sheet () treated mice groups were compared with sham control group (■) over 8-day period. Data represent the means ± SD of n = 9 mice per condition where statistical significance was assessed by two-way ANOVA (P< 0.01) and Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons to the sham group. b After the various treatments, mice were anesthetized and stimulated with pilocarpine and isoproterenol as described in the “Methods” section. Then, saliva was collected for 5 min. Data represent the means ± SD of n = 6 mice per condition and statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA (ns not significant; ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001) and Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons to the sham control groups (*)


Given the success of cell sheets for tissue regeneration in a variety of organs (e.g., cartilage, heart, kidney, liver, endometrium, cornea, middle ear, periodontium, and esophageal living sheet transplants),35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52 they can be applied in salivary glands to promote cell differentiation and tissue integrity. Previous studies have shown that cell sheets can be used to enhance regeneration in a variety of organs as well as in multiple animal models.44,53,54,55 Additionally, clinical trials are ongoing to use cell sheets for treatment of esophageal stricture, ischemic heart disease, cholesteatoma, cardiomyopathy, ocular disease and air leaks.53,56,57,58,59,60,61,62 In light of the above findings as well as the current lack of effective treatments for hyposalivation, it would appear that cell sheet technology could thus present a viable alternative treatment to promote salivary gland regeneration and restore secretory function.

Some of the advantages of SMG cell sheets for in vitro studies is that cells grown under these conditions can be cultured as monolayers while maintaining all intrinsic ECM proteins, TJs and SG (Fig. 2). Additionally, double layer cell sheets are able to form acinar and ductal-like organoids with a three-dimensional shape containing lumens and consistent with salivary gland epithelium (Fig. 3) that respond to secretory agonists (Fig. 4). These features offer an improvement over freshly isolated SMG cells plated on plastic where they lose SG, form disorganized TJs and de-differentiate over time.63 For use of in vitro models, one could measure salivary gland cells’ ability to form cell sheets under conditions such as pro-inflammatory cytokine exposure or irradiation as well as perform phosphorylation and protein expression studies (given that these organoids are similar to native tissue).64 Likewise, each of these functions could in turn be measured in cell sheets derived from human SMG, given that such tissue is relatively easy to obtain and culture.65 Together, our studies demonstrate that cell sheets could be used as a good in vitro model for studying salivary gland cell signaling and function. Finally, apparent limitations of cell sheets for in vitro studies were noted, including their inability to be used for measurement of saliva secretion, the possibility of losing proteins during homogenization and their limited lifespan in culture due to lack of irrigation and innervation; nonetheless, these complicating factors should not significantly reduce the value of this model.

Regarding the advantages of cell sheets for in vivo studies, autologous cells could be used for transplantation, as cells sheets completely detach from temperature-responsive plate without carrying any chemicals or contaminants.66,67,68,69,70,71 Moreover, because cell sheets are able to maintain ECM proteins, they can rapidly attach to target organ surfaces without needing sutures, thereby facilitating regenerative treatments.66,67,68,69,70,71 In this regard, our results showed that a double layer cell sheet optimizes tissue formation (Fig. 6), cell differentiation (Fig. 7) and saliva secretion (Fig. 8). In contrast, single cell sheet-treated did not show these improvements. These results suggest that pre-formed cellular interactions within double layer cell sheets may help the tissue to differentiate by delivering paracrine factors while promoting functionality. Since single cell sheet-treated mice showed an improvement in weight (Fig. 8a) it is also possible that this treatment is also effective in delivering paracrine factors. A noteworthy limitation of cell sheet use in vivo is the inability to completely characterize the cell types forming these sheets, with only acinar and ductal markers employed in the current study and prior studies in other organ systems typically using well characterized cell systems or choosing to focus on a single cell type. To rectify this deficiency, it is recommended that future studies concentrate on better characterizing the various cell types present within the cell sheets before implantation and during regeneration using single RNA sequencing and cell lineage tracing studies respectively.72,73 Furthermore, it would be beneficial to extend the regeneration studies beyond the eight days observed here to determine whether regenerative effects identified herein will be maintained and, likewise, whether this technology could be successfully applied to other in vivo models of hyposalivation (e.g., mouse models for head and neck irradiation or SS-like mice). Finally, future studies are recommended to corroborate current findings and to identify relevant mechanisms for this promising approach to salivary gland regeneration.



Female C57BL/6J mice 6-weeks-old, weighing ~17–20 g, were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All animal usage, anesthesia, and surgeries were conducted with the approval of the University of Utah Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, in accordance with their strict guidelines.

Fresh SMG cell isolation

Mice were euthanized using carbon dioxide (CO2) followed by abdominal exsanguination. SMG were then removed, cut into small pieces and placed in a 35 ml GentleMACS C Tube containing 6.5% tumor dissociation enzyme mixture (Miltenyi Biotec Inc. Auburn, CA) in DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Subsequently, the tissue was dissociated using a GentleMACS (Miltenyi Biotec Inc.) and incubated in a shaking water bath at 37 °C for 30 min. After three such steps and two intervening incubations, SMG cells were centrifuged at 150 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and the dispersion medium was removed. The cells were then resuspended in 5 ml DMEM/F12 complete medium containing the following: 2.5% FBS, 2 nM triiodothyronine, 0.1 μM retinoic acid, 0.4 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 80 ng/ml EGF, 5 ng/ml sodium selenite, 5 mM glutamine, 5 μg/ml insulin and 5 μg/ml transferrin. Cells were then passed through 70 and 40 µm strainers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and seeded at 1.0 × 106 cells/plate on FBS coated 35-mm UpCell temperature-responsive dishes (Thermo Fisher Scientific), cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air-5% CO2 and used at confluence (a time when monolayer completely covers the plate), with the cell culture medium replaced every other day.

Cell sheet preparation

After 8 days of incubation, temperature was reduced below 25 °C for 30 min to allow the cell sheet to detach from the dish surface. After removing culture medium from single layer cell sheet, a wet transfer membrane was placed over the SMG monolayer and 20 µl of fresh medium was added to prevent the cells from drying out. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature, the attached cell layer was transferred to a new FBS coated culture dish and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, one milliliter of fresh medium was added on top of the membrane and gently removed from the cell layer. After aspirating the culture medium, the apical side of the first cell sheet layer was covered with the basolateral side of the second cell sheet and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Finally, the wet transfer membrane was gently withdrawn from the cell layers and a double layer cell sheet was cultured for one additional day for further experiments.

Intracellular free calcium levels

The intracellular free calcium concentration in both single and double layer cell sheets was measured using a Leica DMI6000B imaging system. Briefly, cell sheets were transferred into a Lab Tek Chamber Slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 1 day of incubation, they were treated with Fura-2-acetoxymethylester (Fura-2 AM, 4 μM) for 30 min at 37 °C in DMEM/F12 and washed two times with DMEM/F12 and two times with assay buffer (DMEM/F12 containing 10 mM glucose, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1% BSA). Then, cells were stimulated with carbachol (Cch, 100 μM). Subsequently, images were recorded and analyzed using a Leica Suite X software.

Animal model

The wounded SMG model was created following a method reported previously.18,19 Briefly, C57BL/6J mice were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane with an oxygen flow rate set at 2.0 L/min, SMG exposed and surgical wounds created using a 3 mm diameter biopsy punch in both glands and treated with a single or double layer cell sheet (experimental group), left untreated (untreated wounded controls) or were left unwounded (sham surgery controls). Then, the skin incision was sutured and post-surgical studies at day 8 were performed. For these purposes, SMG were dissected and processed for histological analysis and saliva secretion studies as described below.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining

Cell sheets were fixed in 4% PFA for 10 min, dehydrated in 70% ethanol solution, embedded in paraffin wax, and cut into 3 μm sections. Then, they were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated with serial ethanol solutions and distilled water. Finally, hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed, and specimens were examined using a Leica DMI6000B inverted microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

Saliva flow rate measurements

To collect stimulated saliva secretion, mice were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg), and injected with pilocarpine (50 mg/kg) and isoproterenol (0.5 mg/kg) via intraperitoneal injection.74,75 Then, stimulated saliva was collected using a micropipette for 5 min.19 Finally, statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA (P< 0.01) and Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons to the untreated group and sham control group.

Weight change

Mice were weighed at the start of each experiment and data was collected for 8 days. Then, statistical significance was assessed by two-way ANOVA (P < 0.01) and Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons to the untreated group.

Transmission electron microscopy

Cells sheets or tissues were fixed overnight at 4 °C in a solution containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 1% paraformaldehyde, 100 mM cacodylate buffer at pH 7.4, 6 mM CaCl2, and 4.8% sucrose. The next day, cells were washed three times for 5 min each with cacodylate buffer, post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide at room temperature for 45 min, washed twice for 5 min with cacodylate buffer, then washed once with distilled water for 5 min. Specimens were then stained with saturated uranyl acetate for 45 min at room temperature, washed three times for 5 min each with distilled water, then dehydrated with consecutive ethanol washes (30%, 50%, 70%, twice at 95%, and three times with 100%) for 15 min each. This was followed by dehydration with absolute acetone three times for 10 min each. Specimens were infiltrated with consecutive EPON epoxy resin incubations (30% for 5 h, 70% overnight, three times with 100% for 8 h). 70 nm thick sections were made using a Leica Ultra Cut 6 ultratome, and imaged using a JEOL JEM-2800 operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.

Confocal analysis

A detailed procedure of deparaffinization and antigen retrieval methods of 3 μm thick paraffin embedded samples can be obtained from a previous study.18 Specimens were then blocked in 5% goat serum in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, and incubated at 4 °C with the primary antibodies in 5% goat serum overnight as follows: rabbit anti-ZO-1 (Invitrogen, 1:50 dilution), mouse anti-E-cadherin (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, 1:100 dilution), rabbit anti-aquaporin 5 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA 1:200 dilution), mouse anti-cytokeratin 7 (Abcam, 1:250 dilution), rabbit anti-TMEM16A (Abcam, 1:50 dilution) and mouse anti-Na+/K+-ATPase α antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA1:100 dilution). Then, sections were incubated for 2 h with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568 secondary antibody solution at 1:200 dilutions in 5% goat serum at room temperature. Subsequently, specimens were counter-stained with TO-PRO-3 Iodide nuclear stain (Invitrogen) at room temperature for 15 min at 1:1000 dilutions. Finally, specimens were analyzed using a confocal Zeiss LSM 700 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at ×20 magnifications for in vivo studies and ×40 for in vitro studies. A total depth of 3 μm was acquired for each sample, and a total projection was visualized in the xy planes.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author(s) upon request.


  1. 1.

    Quock, R. L. Xerostomia: current streams of investigation. Oral. Surg., Oral. Med., Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. 122, 53–60 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vissink, A., Spijkervet, F. K. L. & Brennan, M. T. in The MASCC Textbook of Cancer Supportive Care and Survivorship (ed Olver, I.) 363–378 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018).

  3. 3.

    Pinto, A. Management of Xerostomia and other complications of Sjögren’s Syndrome. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 26, 63–73 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hasni, S. A., Teos, L. Y. & Alevizos, I. in Clinical Immunology (Fifth Edition) (eds Rich, R. R., et al.) 735–742.e731 (Content Repository Only!, London, 2019).

  5. 5.

    Thomas, K. et al. Interruptions of head and neck radiotherapy across insured and indigent patient populations. J. Oncol. Pract. 13, e319–e328 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wiedemann, H. R. Salivary gland disorders and heredity. Am. J. Med. Genet. 68, 222–224 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hajianpour, M. J. et al. Dental issues in lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital syndrome: an autosomal dominant condition with clinical and genetic variability. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 148, 157–163 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wolff, A. et al. A guide to medications inducing salivary gland dysfunction, xerostomia, and subjective sialorrhea: a systematic review sponsored by the world workshop on oral medicine VI. Drugs RD 17, 1–28 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tan, E. C. K., Lexomboon, D., Sandborgh-Englund, G., Haasum, Y. & Johnell, K. Medicat. That Cause Dry. Mouth Advers. Eff. Older People: A Syst. Rev. Metaanalysis. 66, 76–84 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Scully, C. 8 - Dry mouth (xerostomia and hyposalivation). in Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine 3rd edn (ed Scully, C.) 91–97 (Churchill Livingstone, London, UK, 2013).

  11. 11.

    Jensen, S. B. & Vissink, A. Salivary gland dysfunction and xerostomia in Sjogren’s syndrome. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 26, 35–53 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sroussi, H. Y. et al. Common oral complications of head and neck cancer radiation therapy: mucositis, infections, saliva change, fibrosis, sensory dysfunctions, dental caries, periodontal disease, and osteoradionecrosis. Cancer Med. 6, 2918–2931 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Scarantino, C. et al. Effect of pilocarpine during radiation therapy: results of RTOG 97-09, a phase III randomized study in head and neck cancer patients. J. Support. Oncol. 4, 252–258 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Noaiseh, G., Baker, J. F. & Vivino, F. B. Comparison of the discontinuation rates and side-effect profiles of pilocarpine and cevimeline for xerostomia in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 32, 575–577 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Baum, B. J. et al. Transfer of the AQP1 cDNA for the correction of radiation-induced salivary hypofunction. Biochim. et. Biophys. acta 1758, 1071–1077 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Alevizos, I. et al. Late responses to adenoviral-mediated transfer of the aquaporin-1 gene for radiation-induced salivary hypofunction. Gene Ther. 24, 176–186 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nam, K., Jones, J. P., Lei, P., Andreadis, S. T. & Baker, O. J. Laminin-111 peptides conjugated to fibrin hydrogels promote formation of lumen containing parotid gland cell clusters. Biomacromolecules 17, 2293–2301 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Nam, K. et al. L1 peptide-conjugated fibrin hydrogels promote salivary gland regeneration. J. Dent. Res. 96, 798–806 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nam, K. et al. Laminin-111-derived peptide conjugated fibrin hydrogel restores salivary gland function. PLoS ONE 12, e0187069 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kobayashi, F., Matsuzaka, K. & Inoue, T. The effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on regeneration in a surgical wound model of rat submandibular glands. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 8, 16–23 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pradhan-Bhatt, S. et al. Implantable three-dimensional salivary spheroid assemblies demonstrate fluid and protein secretory responses to neurotransmitters. Tissue Eng. Part A 19, 1610–1620 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang, B.-X. et al. Silk fibroin scaffolds promote formation of the ex vivo niche for salivary gland epithelial cell growth, matrix formation, and retention of differentiated function. Tissue Eng. Part A 21, 1611–1620 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Miyajima, H. et al. Hydrogel-based biomimetic environment for in vitro modulation of branching morphogenesis. Biomaterials 32, 6754–6763 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lombaert, I., Movahednia, M. M., Adine, C. & Ferreira, J. N. Concise review: salivary gland regeneration: therapeutic approaches from stem cells to tissue organoids. Stem Cells 35, 97–105 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bai, X. et al. Bioactive hydrogels for bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 3, 401–417 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Benatti, A. C. B. et al. in Materials for Biomedical Engineering (eds Holban, A.-M. & Grumezescu, A. M.) 83–116 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2019).

  27. 27.

    Lombaert, I. M. et al. Rescue of salivary gland function after stem cell transplantation in irradiated glands. PLoS ONE 3, e2063 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Pringle, S. et al. Human salivary gland stem cells functionally restore radiation damaged salivary glands. Stem Cells 34, 640–652 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    van Luijk, P., Langendijk, J. A. & Coppes, R. P. Understanding mechanisms yields novel approaches to reduce radiotherapy-related xerostomia. Ann. Transl. Med. 5, 63–63 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kurtz, A. Mesenchymal stem cell delivery routes and fate. Int. J. Stem Cells 1, 1–7 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Burdick, J. A., Mauck, R. L. & Gerecht, S. To serve and protect: hydrogels to improve stem cell-based therapies. Cell Stem Cell 18, 13–15 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Penna, V., Lipay, M. V., Duailibi, M. T. & Duailibi, S. E. The likely role of proteolytic enzymes in unwanted differentiation of stem cells in culture. Future Sci. OA 1, FSO28 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yang, J. et al. Cell sheet engineering: recreating tissues without biodegradable scaffolds. Biomaterials 26, 6415–6422 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kirby, G. T. S., Michelmore, A., Smith, L. E., Whittle, J. D. & Short, R. D. Cell sheets in cell therapies. Cytotherapy 20, 169–180 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sato, M. et al. Recent technological advancements related to articular cartilage regeneration. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 46, 735–743 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Matsuura, K., Haraguchi, Y., Shimizu, T. & Okano, T. Cell sheet transplantation for heart tissue repair. J. Control. Release 169, 336–340 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sekiya, S., Shimizu, T., Yamato, M. & Okano, T. Hormone supplying renal cell sheet in vivo produced by tissue engineering technology. BioResearch open access 2, 12–19 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Baimakhanov, Z. et al. Efficacy of multilayered hepatocyte sheet transplantation for radiation-induced liver damage and partial hepatectomy in a rat model. Cell Transplant. 25, 549–558 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kuramoto, G. et al. Endometrial regeneration using cell sheet transplantation techniques in rats facilitates successful fertilization and pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 110, 172–181.e174 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lai, J. Y., Chen, K. H. & Hsiue, G. H. Tissue-engineered human corneal endothelial cell sheet transplantation in a rabbit model using functional biomaterials. Transplantation 84, 1222–1232 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yamamoto, K. et al. Middle ear mucosal regeneration by tissue-engineered cell sheet transplantation. NPJ Regen. Med. 2, 6 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang, H. et al. Composite cell sheet for periodontal regeneration: crosstalk between different types of MSCs in cell sheet facilitates complex periodontal-like tissue regeneration. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 7, 168 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kanai, N., Yamato, M. & Okano, T. Cell sheets engineering for esophageal regenerative medicine. Ann. Transl. Med. 2, 28 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hasegawa, M., Yamato, M., Kikuchi, A., Okano, T. & Ishikawa, I. Human periodontal ligament cell sheets can regenerate periodontal ligament tissue in an athymic rat model. Tissue Eng. 11, 469–478 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yu, J., Wang, M.-Y., Tai, H.-C. & Cheng, N.-C. Cell sheet composed of adipose-derived stem cells demonstrates enhanced skin wound healing with reduced scar formation. Acta Biomater. 77, 191–200 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Shiroyanagi, Y., Yamato, M., Yamazaki, Y., Toma, H. & Okano, T. Transplantable urothelial cell sheets harvested noninvasively from temperature-responsive culture surfaces by reducing temperature. Tissue Eng. 9, 1005–1012 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Talab, S. S. et al. Bladder reconstruction using scaffold-less autologous smooth muscle cell sheet engineering: early histological outcomes for autoaugmentation cystoplasty. BJU Int. 114, 937–945 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bardag-Gorce, F. et al. Carrier-free cultured autologous oral mucosa epithelial cell sheet (CAOMECS) for corneal epithelium reconstruction: a histological study. Ocul. Surf. 13, 150–163 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Iwata, T. et al. Periodontal regeneration with autologous periodontal ligament-derived cell sheets – A safety and efficacy study in ten patients. Regen. Ther. 9, 38–44 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Fujita, J. et al. Myocard. Cell Sheet Ther. Card. Funct. 303, H1169–H1182 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Shudo, Y. et al. Layered smooth muscle cell–endothelial progenitor cell sheets derived from the bone marrow augment postinfarction ventricular function. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 154, 955–963 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Matsuura, K., Utoh, R., Nagase, K. & Okano, T. Cell sheet approach for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J. Control. Release 190, 228–239 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Nishida, K. et al. Functional bioengineered corneal epithelial sheet grafts from corneal stem cells expanded ex vivo on a temperature-responsive cell culture surface. Transplantation 77, 379–385 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Iwata, T. et al. Periodontal regeneration with multi-layered periodontal ligament-derived cell sheets in a canine model. Biomaterials 30, 2716–2723 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ebihara, G. et al. Cartilage repair in transplanted scaffold-free chondrocyte sheets using a minipig model. Biomaterials 33, 3846–3851 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ohki, T. et al. Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection using tissue-engineered cell sheets. Gastroenterology 143, 582–588.e582 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sawa, Y. et al. Tissue engineered myoblast sheets improved cardiac function sufficiently to discontinue LVAS in a patient with DCM: report of a case. Surg. Today 42, 181–184 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sawa, Y. et al. Safety and efficacy of autologous skeletal myoblast sheets (TCD-51073) for the treatment of severe chronic heart failure due to ischemic heart disease. Circ. J. 79, 991–999 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kanzaki, M., Takagi, R., Washio, K., Kokubo, M. & Yamato, M. Bio-artificial pleura using an autologous dermal fibroblast sheet. npj Regen. Med. 2, 26 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yamamoto, K. et al. Middle ear mucosal regeneration by tissue-engineered cell sheet transplantation. npj Regen. Med. 2, 6 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Miyagawa, S. et al. Phase I clinical trial of autologous stem cell-sheet transplantation therapy for treating cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 6, 1–12 (2017).

  62. 62.

    Yoshikawa, Y. et al. Myocardial regenerative therapy using a scaffold-free skeletal-muscle-derived cell sheet in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy even under a left ventricular assist device: a safety and feasibility study. Surg. today 48, 200–210 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Redman, R. S. On approaches to the functional restoration of salivary glands damaged by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, with a review of related aspects of salivary gland morphology and development. Biotech. Histochem. 83, 103–130 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Maruyama, C. L. et al. Stem cell-soluble signals enhance multilumen formation in SMG cell clusters. J. Dent. Res. 94, 1610–1617 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Maruyama, C. L., Monroe, M. M., Hunt, J. P., Buchmann, L. & Baker, O. J. Comparing human and mouse salivary glands: a practice guide for salivary researchers. Oral. Dis. 25, 403–415 (2018).

  66. 66.

    Yamato, M. & Okano, T. Cell sheet engineering. Mater. Today 7, 42–47 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sekine, H., Shimizu, T. & Okano, T. in Etiology and Morphogenesis of Congenital Heart Disease: From Gene Function and Cellular Interaction to Morphology (eds Nakanishi, T. et al.) 19–24 (Tokyo, Japan, 2016).

  68. 68.

    Yamaguchi, N. et al. Oral epithelial cell sheets engraftment for esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection of squamous cell carcinoma and airplane transportation. Sci. Rep. 7, 17460 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Akimoto, J., Nakayama, M., Takagi, S. & Okano, T. Improved In Vivo Subcutaneous Tumor Generation by Cancer Cell Sheet Transplantation. Anticancer Res 38, 671–676 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Akiyama, Y., Matsuyama, M., Yamato, M., Takeda, N. & Okano, T. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-grafted polydimethylsiloxane substrate for controlling cell adhesion and detachment by dual stimulation of temperature and mechanical stress. Biomacromolecules 19, 4014–4022 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Takahashi, H., Shimizu, T. & Okano, T. Engineered human contractile myofiber sheets as a platform for studies of skeletal muscle physiology. Sci. Rep. 8, 13932 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Aure, M. H., Konieczny, S. F. & Ovitt, C. E. Salivary gland homeostasis is maintained through acinar cell self-duplication. Dev. Cell 33, 231–237 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Gluck, C. et al. RNA-seq based transcriptomic map reveals new insights into mouse salivary gland development and maturation. BMC Genom. 17, 923 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Mazzuferi, M., Kumar, G., Rospo, C. & Kaminski, R. M. Rapid epileptogenesis in the mouse pilocarpine model: video-EEG, pharmacokinetic and histopathological characterization. Exp. Neurol. 238, 156–167 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Varghese, J. J. et al. Localized delivery of amifostine enhances salivary gland. Radioprotection 97, 1252–1259 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research/National Institutes of Health (NIDCR/NIH) under the following awards: R56DE021697, R01DE022971, and R01DE027884.

Author information




K.N. contributed to experimental design, data collection and interpretation, and writing of the main manuscript text. K.K. contributed to experimental design, data collection and interpretation. S.M.D., C.T.B., and R.S.D. contributed to data collection and interpretation. T.O. and O.J.B. contributed to experimental design, data interpretation, and writing of the main manuscript text. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Teruo Okano or Olga J. Baker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nam, K., Kim, K., Dean, S.M. et al. Using cell sheets to regenerate mouse submandibular glands. npj Regen Med 4, 16 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing