Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Observation of dimension-crossover of a tunable 1D Dirac fermion in topological semimetal NbSixTe2


Condensed matter systems in low dimensions exhibit emergent physics that does not exist in three dimensions. When electrons are confined to one dimension (1D), some significant electronic states appear, such as charge density wave, spin-charge separations, and Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) topological state. However, a clear understanding of how the 1D electronic properties connects with topology is currently lacking. Here we systematically investigated the characteristic 1D Dirac fermion electronic structure originated from the metallic NbTe2 chains on the surface of the composition-tunable layered compound NbSixTe2 (x= 0.40 and 0.43) using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. We found the Dirac fermion forms a Dirac nodal line structure protected by the combined \(\widetilde {M_y}\) and time-reversal symmetry T and proves the NbSixTe2 system as a topological semimetal, in consistent with the ab-initio calculations. As x decreases, the interaction between adjacent NbTe2 chains increases and Dirac fermion goes through a dimension-crossover from 1D to 2D, as evidenced by the variation of its Fermi surface and Fermi velocity across the Brillouin zone in consistence with a Dirac SSH model. Our findings demonstrate a tunable 1D Dirac electron system, which offers a versatile platform for the exploration of intriguing 1D physics and device applications.


Low dimensional electronic states bear fascinating emergent physics and have attracted great research interests in the past decade. For example, some of the two-dimensional (2D) electronic states under intensive investigation include electronic structure of van der Waals (vdW) materials in the atomic limit1,2,3,4,5,6,7, the quantum well states confined on the surface/interfaces of semiconductors1,8,9 and topological surface states of strong topological insulators10,11,12,13. They host profound physics including Ising superconductivity14,15,16, charge density wave17,18,19,20, spin-momentum locking21,22, and magnetism23,24,25. As electrons are confined into a one-dimensional (1D) wire, fundamentally important phenomena may emerge, such as Peierls phase transition (Perierls instability)26,27, Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) topological state28 and solitonic excitation29,30,31, topological edge32,33,34/hinge35,36,37 states, as well as Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid behavior38,39,40 due to electron correlation. These meaningful properties, together with the topological protection due to the bulk-surface correspondence in topologically nontrivial quantum materials, making low dimensional electronic states candidates for next-generation electronic devices.

Despite these great interests, the experimental realization of a tunable 1D electronic states appears to be rare. Physical systems with 1D electron systems include the self-assembly growth of metal wires on semiconductor surface (e.g., In41, Ge42,43, Si44, GaN45 wires on Si(111), Au wires on Ge(110)46 and Ge(001)47), MoOx48,49, Li0.9Mo6O1750, Rb0.3MoO351, TaSe352, XTe3 (X = Nb, V, Ti)53, NbSe354, etc. However, a few of them can be served as a stoichiometric compounds system for research on tunable 1D electronic states55,56,57. For the ease of investigation, manipulation and device fabrication, it would be desirable to search for stoichiometric compounds hosting tunable 1D electronic states.

Recently, the family of composition-tunable compounds NbSixTe2 (x = 0.33 to 0.5) or Nb2n+1SinTe4n+2 (n = 1, 2,…, ∞) offers an ideal platform for studying 1D electrons. Previous studies have revealed 1D metallic NbTe2 chain structure58,59, 1D unidirectional massless Dirac fermions (x = 0.45)60 and nodal lines structure protected by the nonsymmorphic glide mirror symmetry (x = 0.33)61,62. By changing n or x values, the spacing between neighboring chains could be altered, which results in the tunable electronic states63. The gapless nature, fast electron velocity (~105 m s−1), great tunability as well as thermal and air stability will facilitate its future applications in 1D electronics. However, the 1D nature of the Dirac fermion, its relationship with topology, as well as its evolution with different x values, has not been systematically investigated and carefully explained.

In this work, by using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), we systematically studied the electronic structure of NbSixTe2 with varying x values. Our result proves the 1D nature of the characteristic Dirac fermion, which forms a nodal line structure along the Brillouin zone (BZ) boundary protected by the nonsymmorphic symmetry, showing a good agreement with the ab-initio calculations. Interestingly, in samples with smaller x, the 1D Dirac fermion experiences a dimension-crossover from 1D to 2D as evidenced by the enhanced variation in the Fermi surface and the Dirac fermion velocity across the nodal line. Such dimension-crossover is due to the stronger interactions between the neighboring metallic NbTe2 chains, which could be nicely captured by our proposed Dirac SSH model that incorporates the important nonsymmorphic symmetry constraint into the conventional SSH model. Our observation demonstrates a tunable 1D Dirac fermion that could be utilized in device applications such as fast unidirectional conduction wires.


Crystal structure and characterizations of NbSixTe2

The NbSixTe2 are vdW crystals with layered structures. Each layer is constituted of three kinds of chain-like structures as building blocks (Fig. 1a, b): type I and II are semiconducting Nb2SiTe4 chains and type III are metallic NbTe2 chains. With the inclusion of the NbTe2 chains, NbSixTe2 or Nb2n+1SinTe4n+2 becomes metallic. With different n or x values, the lattice structure also changes from the orthorhombic lattice (space group Pnma, No. 62) with x = 0.33 (n = 1) to the monoclinic lattice (space group P121/c1, No. 14) with x = 0.50 (n = ), but the non-symmorphic glide mirror symmetry \(\widetilde {M_y}\) perpendicular to the b-axis is preserved. The BZ of x = 0.33 (n = 1) is shown in Fig. 1c. And STM topography image of NbSixTe2 clearly indicates the existence of the metallic chains, which are shown in form of bright lines in Fig. 1d (data from ref. 58).

Fig. 1: Crystal structure and characterizations of NbSixTe2.
figure 1

a Crystal structure of Nb2SiTe4 (n = ∞, x = 0.5). Type I and II are two kinds of chains along the a-axis as building blocks. b Crystal structure of Nb3SiTe6 (n = 1, x = 0.33). Type I, II and III are three kinds of chains as building blocks. c The Brillouin zone (BZ) and its projection to the (001) surface of Nb3SiTe6. d STM topography image of NbSixTe2. The bright lines show the metallic NbTe2 chain (type III). Scale bar represents 10 nm. e 3D volume plot of the overall band structure of x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample with Dirac nodal line labeled. f The photoemission spectrum along the high symmetry \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar \Gamma\) directions of x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample. Dirac point (DP) is labeled on the spectrum. g The photoemission spectrum along the high symmetry \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar S - \bar Y - \bar \Gamma\) direction of x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample. Dirac nodal line is labeled. h The ab-initio calculated band structure of x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample from ref. 63. Dirac nodal line is labeled. Data in Fig. 1e–g were collected at  = 56 eV with sample temperature 20 K. For STM topography measurement, the bias voltage is 0.7 V, and the tunneling current is 50 pA. The sample temperature is 4.2 K. Data from ref. 58 (Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref. 58. Copyright (2022) American Chemical Society).

The representative electronic bandstructure of x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample could be found in Fig. 1e–g. Dispersions across the Fermi level are observed, suggesting its metallic nature. We note a linear dispersion could be found along the \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar \Gamma\) direction (Fig. 1f) and the Dirac point forms a flat band along the \(\bar X - \bar S\) direction (Fig. 1g), indicating a Dirac nodal line structure protected by the combined \(\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}}\) and time-reversal symmetry T. Our measurement shows nice agreement with the ab-initio calculations (Fig. 1h, also see ref. 63) (The spin-orbit coupling effect in this system is fairly weak and only leads to very small band splitting thus could be neglected61,63, see discussion in Supplementary Fig. 1).

Band structure of the 1D Dirac fermion of x = 0.43 (n = 3) sample

We proved the 1D Dirac fermions nature by measuring its dispersion and evolution along all momentum directions (see the schematic of 1D Dirac fermion in Fig. 2b, c). The Dirac cone shape is pronounced along the \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar \Gamma\) (kx) direction, as could be observed in the second derivative of the spectrum of x = 0.43 (n = 3) sample (Fig. 2a). The estimated Fermi velocity is 1.07 eV Å (~1.63 × 105 m s−1). Along the X-S (ky) and X-U (kz) directions, the Dirac fermion does not show significant change, as evidenced by the constant energy contour of EF in the kx - ky (Fig. 2d) and kx - kz plane (Fig. 2f), as well as the evolution of the Dirac fermion dispersion measured at different ky values (Fig. 2e) and different photon energies (Fig. 2g). The clear dispersion along kx direction and dispersionless behavior along ky and kz directions demonstrate the 1D Dirac fermion behavior.

Fig. 2: Band structure of the 1D Dirac fermion of x = 0.43 (n = 3) sample.
figure 2

a Second derivative of the photoemission spectrum \(\frac{{d^2A}}{{d\omega ^2}}\) along \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar \Gamma\) with DP labeled. b, c Schematic of the 1D Dirac fermion along the S-X-S (ky) and U-X-U (kz) directions. d The constant energy contour at Fermi energy (EF) in the kxky plane with Dirac surface sates labeled and theoretical BZ appended (black solid lines). e Sliced cut in Fig. 2d at different ky (orange dashed lines indicated in 2d) with DP labeled. f The energy contour near Fermi energy (EF) of the kxkz plane with Dirac nodal line labeled. g Sliced cuts in Fig. 2f at different (kz - orange dashed lines) with DP labeled. To make a clear comparison, we symmetrized the dispersion according to the crystal symmetry. The data in Fig. 2a, d were collected at  = 55 eV.

Dimension-crossover of the Dirac fermion

Profoundly, we observed the shape of the 1D Dirac fermion shows obvious change with the silicon deficiency x (the x level is confirmed by BZ size measured from ARPES as well as the STM results, see Supplementary Fig. 3). As the x value is reduced (n is increased), the metallic NbTe2 chains are aligned closer and start to interact with each other by increasing the overlap between the electron wavefunctions from adjacent chains (e.g. the average distance between NbTe2 chains in samples with x = 0.43 (n = 3)/x = 0.33 (n = 1) are 27.7 Å/12.1 Å, respectively, see Fig. 3a, b). Previous STM results report such phenomenon with metallic chain distance varies with different x values63 (also see Fig. 1d). The interchain coupling allows electrons to hop between chains and drives the 1D to 2D dimension-crossover (see schematic in Fig. 3c, d). Such dimension-crossover is clearly demonstrated in the constant energy contour near EF which shows the Dirac cone feature as two parallel lines for x = 0.43 (n = 3) samples (Fig. 3e), and alternating shapes (rounded circle to thin line) from the \(\bar S\) to \(\bar X\) points for x = 0.40 (n = 2) samples (Fig. 3h). The evolution of the Dirac cone dispersion along the ky direction could be found in Fig. 3e–j. As for x = 0.43 (n = 3) sample, the Dirac velocity is 1.07 eV Å (~1.63 × 105 m s−1) along \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar \Gamma\) (Fig. 3f) and 0.98 eV Å (~1.49 × 105 m s−1) at ky = −0.30 Å−1 (Fig. 3g); while for x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample, the Dirac velocity is 1.44 eV Å (~2.19 × 105 m s−1) along \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar \Gamma\) (Fig. 3i) and 0.81 eV Å (~1.23 × 105 m s−1) at ky = 0.30 Å−1 (Fig. 3j). The rapid change of Dirac velocity is consistent with the schematic in Fig. 3c, d and suggests the 1D to 2D crossover of the Dirac fermions observed.

Fig. 3: Dimension-crossover of the Dirac fermion.
figure 3

a, b Crystal structure of (a) x = 0.43 (n = 3) and (b) x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample. c, d Schematic of the (c) 1D and (d) 2D Dirac fermion along the S-X-S direction (ky). e The energy contour near Fermi energy (EF) of the kxky plane with theoretical BZ appended (black solid lines). f, g The spectrum (f) along \(\bar \Gamma - \bar X - \bar \Gamma\) and the spectrum (g) at ky = −0.30 Å−1 (orange dashed lines) with linear fitting result of the Dirac fermion appended for x = 0.43 sample. hj Same as eg, but for x = 0.40 sample. Data in Fig. 3e–j were collected at  = 56 eV.

Dimension-crossover and the Dirac SSH model of the Dirac fermion

The Dirac velocity evolution across the BZ of the two x ratio samples are summarized in Fig. 4a (Dirac velocity evolution of other x ratios is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5). Clearly, we could see the Dirac fermion velocity exhibits a periodic variation from \(\bar X\) to \(\bar S\) with a difference (\(\frac{{V_{max} - V_{min}}}{{V_{max}}}\)) of ~55.1% for x = 0.40 (n = 2) sample. Meanwhile, there is much smaller variation (~17.7%) in the Dirac velocity for x = 0.43 (n = 3) sample, demonstrating the dimension-crossover.

Fig. 4: Dimension-crossover and the Dirac SSH model of the Dirac fermion.
figure 4

a The extracted Dirac fermion velocity along X-S in NbSixTe2 for x = 0.43 (n = 3) and x = 0.40 (n = 2) samples with the theoretical BZ period appended. b Schematic of a single NbTe2 chain. Sites A, B and intra-chain coupling t as well as glide mirror \(\widetilde {M_y}\) are labeled. c Schematic of the NbTe2 chains array extracted from the NbSixTe2 surface. NbTe2 chain distance along the y direction is marked by b, intra-chain coupling (t) and inter-chain coupling (t’) are labeled. d Plot of the extracted Dirac SSH model from Fig. 4c. Two sites A and B are included in the cell, related by glide mirror \(\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}}\). The lattice constants, the intra- and interchain hopping t and t’ are labeled. The dash line denotes the glide plane. e Corresponding BZ for the Dirac SSH model. The orange points denote the high symmetry points and red lines denote the location of nodal line at kx·a = ±π. f 1D Dirac SSH model derived dispersion with t = 0.177 eV. g 2D Dirac SSH model derived dispersion with t = 0.177 eV and t’ = 0.05 eV. h Calculated Fermi velocity of the Dirac fermion along the kx direction and its evolution along the ky direction with t = 0.177 eV (red curve) and t = 0.177 eV, t’ = 0.05 eV (blue curve).

Such behavior could be captured by the following simple model (detailed description could be found in Supplementary Discussion). The two low-energy bands that form the Dirac nodal line are mainly contributed from orbitals at Nb sites in the NbTe2 chains. We first construct a model for a single chain. As illustrated in Fig. 4b, the unit cell of the zigzag-shaped chain contains two sites A and B (which may be thought of as corresponding to the Nb sites, although such a correspondence is not necessary). Putting one active orbital per site and denoting the hopping strength between neighboring sites by t, the single-chain model takes the form of

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{{{\mathcal{H}}}}_{{{{\mathrm{Chain}}}}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0 & {t(1 + e^{ - {{{\mathrm{i}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a})} \\ {t\left( {1 + e^{{{{\mathrm{i}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a}} \right)} & 0 \end{array}} \right],} \end{array}$$

where we assume the chain is orientated along the x direction with a lattice constant a. This single chain model looks similar to the famous SSH model. However, there is a crucial distinction: the system here has an important constraint from the glide mirror symmetry \(\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}}\). As indicated in Fig. 4d, \(\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}}\) requires that the sites A and B must be equivalent and the hopping strengths between all neighboring sites must be the same. The algebraic relation \((T\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}})^2 = - 1\) for kxa = π further dictates that the bands must form Kramers like degeneracy at the BZ (Fig. 4e) boundary. In our single-chain model (1), we have

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0 & {e^{ - {{{\mathrm{i}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a}} \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}} \right],} \end{array}$$

and the spectrum \(E = \pm 2t\,{{{\mathrm{cos}}}}\left( {\frac{{k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a}}{2}} \right)\) is gapless with a 1D Dirac type crossing at kxa = π (Fig. 4f). This is in contrast with the conventional SSH model, where dimerization is allowed due to the lack of this glide mirror symmetry and it makes the spectrum typically gapped. To highlight the distinction, we call the single-chain model (1) a Dirac SSH model. Next, we extend this Dirac SSH model to 2D by forming an array of the chains. Denoting the lattice period along the y direction (inter-chain distance) by b and including the inter-chain coupling t’, as illustrated in Fig. 4c, our 2D Dirac SSH model can be expressed as \({{{\mathcal{H}}}}_{2{{{\mathrm{D}}}}} = {{{\mathcal{H}}}}_{{{{\mathrm{chain}}}}} + {{{\mathcal{H}}}}_{{{{\mathrm{inter}}}}}\) with the inter-chain coupling

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{{{\mathcal{H}}}}_{{{{\mathrm{inter}}}}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0 & {t^\prime e^{ - {{{\mathrm{i}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}b}\left( {1 + e^{ - {{{\mathrm{i}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a}} \right)} \\ {t^\prime e^{{{{\mathrm{i}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}b}\left( {1 + e^{{{{\mathrm{i}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a}} \right)} & 0 \end{array}} \right]} \end{array}.$$

Importantly, the inter-chain coupling cannot open a gap in the Dirac spectrum. Because \(\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}}\) is still preserved, no matter how big t′ is, the 2D model always has a symmetry enforced Dirac nodal line at the BZ boundary kxa = π. Nevertheless, the inter-chain coupling does change the dispersion around the nodal line. The spectrum of our 2D model can be readily found to be

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {E = \pm 2\cos \frac{{k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a}}{2}\sqrt {t^2 + 2tt^\prime {{{\mathrm{cos}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}b + t^{\prime 2}.} } \end{array}$$

Then the Fermi velocity around the Dirac line in the kx direction is given by

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left. {V_{{{\mathrm{f}}}}} \right|_{k_{{{\mathrm{x}}}}a = \pm {\uppi}} = \pm \frac{a}{\hbar }\sqrt {t^2 + 2tt^\prime {{{\mathrm{cos}}}}k_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}b + t^{\prime 2}} ,} \end{array}$$

which depends on ky when t’ is nonzero (Fig. 4g). Apparently, the magnitude of the velocity varies along the nodal line, as illustrated in Fig. 4h, in an interval \(\left[ {\left| {\left| t \right| - \left| {t^\prime } \right|} \right|\frac{a}{\hbar },\left| {\left| t \right| + \left| {t^\prime } \right|} \right|\frac{a}{\hbar }} \right]\) (see Supplementary Figs. 610 for more details of the models). This captures the qualitative features observed in our experiment. The discussion shows that our proposed Dirac SSH model offers a good starting point for understanding the physics in NbSixTe2 and for studying general dimension-crossover of Dirac fermions.


In summary, we systematically investigated the electronic structure of the composition-tunable layered compounds NbSixTe2 (x = 0.40 and 0.43) and confirmed the 1D Dirac fermion originated from the NbTe2 chains on the surface in the NbSixTe2 (x = 0.43) system. Dirac nodal line structure protected by the combined \(\widetilde {M_{{{\mathrm{y}}}}}\) and time-reversal symmetry T proves the NbSixTe2 system as a topological semimetal which is consistent with the ab-initio calculations. The interaction between NbTe2 chains increases as x decreases, and Dirac fermion goes through a dimension-crossover from 1D to 2D which can be explained by a Dirac SSH model. A tunable and unidirectional 1D Dirac electron system is demonstrated in our experiment, which offers a versatile platform for the exploration of intriguing 1D physics and device applications.


Sample preparation

High-quality NbSixTe2 (x = 0.33 to 0.5) single crystals were grown by the chemical vapor transport method by using iodine (I2) as the transport agent. For crystal growth, the polycrystalline powders were synthesized by the direct solid-state reaction using the stoichiometric mixture of high-purity Nb (Alfa Aesar 99.99%), Si (Alfa Aesar 99.999%), and Te powder (Alfa Aesar 99.999%) as staring materials. The ground mixture was sealed in a quartz tube under high vacuum, put in a box furnace, and subsequently heated at 900 °C for several days to prepare the polycrystalline samples. Then the obtained powder and high-purity I2 (Alfa Aesar, 99.9985%) powder were mixed, ground, sealed in another evacuated quartz tube, and placed in a double-zone furnace. The temperature profile in the furnace was set to be 850 °C (growth side) − 950 °C (source side) to grow crystals. After kept this temperature difference for over 10 days, the sheet-like crystals with metallic luster were obtained.

Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

Synchrotron-based ARPES measurements were performed at the Beamline 10.0.1 of the Advanced Light Source (ALS), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The samples were cleaved in situ and measurements were performed with the temperature of 20 K under UHV below 3 × 10−11 Torr. Data were collected by a Scienta R4000 analyzer. The total energy and angle resolutions were 10 meV and 0.2°, respectively.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Database for material sciences hosted at Institute of Physics and Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences contains the crystallographic data of this work. These data can be obtained free of charge via and


  1. Alidoust, N. et al. Observation of monolayer valence band spin-orbit effect and induced quantum well states in MoX2. Nat. Commun. 5, 4673 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Das, S., Chen, H. Y., Penumatcha, A. V. & Appenzeller, J. High performance multilayer MoS2 transistors with scandium contacts. Nano Lett. 13, 100–105 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, H. et al. Phosphorene: an unexplored 2D semiconductor with a high hole mobility. ACS Nano 8, 4033–4041 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marchiori, E. et al. Nanoscale magnetic field imaging for 2D materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 49–60 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qian, X., Liu, J., Fu, L. & Li, J. Quantum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science 346, 1344–1347 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Z. et al. Very large tunneling magnetoresistance in layered magnetic semiconductor CrI3. Nat. Commun. 9, 2516 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, C. et al. Robustness of topological order and formation of quantum well states in topological insulators exposed to ambient environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3694–3698 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, J. et al. Direct visualization and manipulation of tunable quantum well state in semiconducting Nb2SiTe4. ACS Nano 15, 15850–15857 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Y. L. et al. Experimental realization of a three-dimensional topological insulator, Bi2Te3. Science 325, 178–181 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu, L., Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, H. et al. Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 5, 438–442 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Y. et al. Crossover of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3 to the two-dimensional limit. Nat. Phys. 6, 584–588 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reyren, N. et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science 317, 1196–1199 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature 427, 423–426 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caviglia, A. D. et al. Electric field control of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface ground state. Nature 456, 624–627 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, Y. et al. Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 270–276 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xi, X. et al. Strongly enhanced charge-density-wave order in monolayer NbSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 765–769 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ugeda, M. M. et al. Characterization of collective ground states in single-layer NbSe2. Nat. Phys. 12, 92–97 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sipos, B. et al. From Mott state to superconductivity in 1T-TaS2. Nat. Mater. 7, 960–965 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo, S., He, L. & Li, M. Spin-momentum locked interaction between guided photons and surface electrons in topological insulators. Nat. Commun. 8, 2141 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, P. et al. Spin-momentum locking and spin-orbit torques in magnetic nano-heterojunctions composed of Weyl semimetal WTe2. Nat. Commun. 9, 3990 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Z. et al. Anisotropic two-dimensional electron gas at SrTiO3 (110). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3933–3937 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J.-G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fei, Z. et al. Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2. Nat. Mater. 17, 778–782 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peierls, R. E. Quantum theory of solids. Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. (1955).

  27. Kagoshima, S. Peierls phase transition. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 20, 1617–1634 (1981).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698–1701 (1979).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heeger, A. J., Kivelson, S., Schrieffer, J. R. & Su, W. P. Solitons in conducting polymers. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781–850 (1988).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jackiw, R. & Rebbi, C. Solitons with fermion number 1/2. Phys. Rev. D. 13, 3398–3409 (1976).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meier, E. J., An, F. A. & Gadway, B. Observation of the topological soliton state in the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model. Nat. Commun. 7, 13986 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao, L. et al. Observation of topological edge states in parity–time-symmetric quantum walks. Nat. Phys. 13, 1117–1123 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hafezi, M., Mittal, S., Fan, J., Migdall, A. & Taylor, J. M. Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics. Nat. Photon. 7, 1001–1005 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Drozdov, I. K. et al. One-dimensional topological edge states of bismuth bilayers. Nat. Phys. 10, 664–669 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schindler, F. et al. Higher-order topology in bismuth. Nat. Phys. 14, 918–924 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kunst, F. K., van Miert, G. & Bergholtz, E. J. Lattice models with exactly solvable topological hinge and corner states. Phys. Rev. B 97, 241405 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tomonaga, S.-I. Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems. Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 544–569 (1950).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luttinger, J. M. An exactly soluble model of a many-fermion system. J. Math. Phys. 4, 1154–1162 (1963).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mattis, D. C. & Lieb, E. H. Exact solution of a many-fermion system and its associated boson field. J. Math. Phys. 6, 304–312(1965).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahn, J. R. et al. Mechanism of gap opening in a triple-band Peierls system: in atomic wires on Si. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 106401 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jin, G., Tang, Y. S., Liu, J. L. & Wang, K. L. Growth and study of self-organized Ge quantum wires on Si(111) substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2471–2473 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kamins, T. I., Li, X., Williams, R. S. & Liu, X. Growth and structure of chemically vapor deposited Ge nanowires on Si substrates. Nano Lett. 4, 503–506 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Spurgeon, J. M. et al. Repeated epitaxial growth and transfer of arrays of patterned, vertically aligned, crystalline Si wires from a single Si(111) substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 032112 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Salomon, D. et al. Metal organic vapour-phase epitaxy growth of GaN wires on Si (111) for light-emitting diode applications. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 61 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Watanabe, T., Yamada, Y., Sasaki, M., Sakai, S. & Yamauchi, Y. Pt- and Au-induced monodirectional nanowires on Ge(110). Surf. Sci. 653, 71–75 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Blumenstein, C. et al. Au-induced quantum chains on Ge(001)—symmetries, long-range order and the conduction path. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 014015 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou, J. et al. Large-area nanowire arrays of molybdenum and molybdenum oxides: synthesis and field emission properties. Adv. Mater. 15, 1835–1840 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liang, R., Cao, H. & Qian, D. MoO3 nanowires as electrochemical pseudocapacitor materials. Chem. Commun. 47, 10305–10307 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, F. et al. New Luttinger-liquid physics from photoemission on Li0.9Mo6O17. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 196403 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang, L. X. et al. Bypassing the structural bottleneck in the ultrafast melting of electronic order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 266402 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen, C. et al. Observation of topological electronic structure in quasi-1d superconductor TaSe3. Matter 3, 2055–2065 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stonemeyer, S. et al. Stabilization of NbTe3, VTe3, and TiTe3 via nanotube encapsulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 4563–4568 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pham, T. et al. Torsional instability in the single-chain limit of a transition metal trichalcogenide. Science 361, 263–266 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jiang, B. Y. et al. Tunable plasmonic reflection by bound 1D electron states in a 2D Dirac metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086801 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, X. F. et al. Tunable electronic anisotropy in single-crystal A2Cr3As3 (A = K, Rb) quasi-one-dimensional superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 92, 020508 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Fan, Z.-Q., Jiang, X.-W., Wei, Z., Luo, J.-W. & Li, S.-S. Tunable electronic structures of GeSe nanosheets and nanoribbons. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 14373–14379 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang, B. et al. One-dimensional metal embedded in two-dimensional semiconductor in Nb2Six–1Te4. ACS Nano 15, 7149–7154 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Boucher, F., Zhukov, V. & Evain, M. MAxTe2 phases (M = Nb, Ta; A = Si, Ge; 1/3 ≤ x ≤ 1/2): an electronic band structure calculation analysis. Inorg. Chem. 35, 7649–7654 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang, T. Y. et al. Directional massless Dirac fermions in a layered van der Waals material with one-dimensional long-range order. Nat. Mater. 19, 27–33 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Li, S. et al. Nonsymmorphic-symmetry-protected hourglass Dirac loop, nodal line, and Dirac point in bulk and monolayer X3SiTe6 (X = Ta, Nb). Phys. Rev. B 97, 045131 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sato, T. et al. Observation of band crossings protected by nonsymmorphic symmetry in the layered ternary telluride Ta3SiTe6. Phys. Rev. B 98, 121111 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhu, Z. et al. A tunable and unidirectional one-dimensional electronic system Nb2n+1SinTe4n+2. npj Quant. Mater. 5, 35 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank W. Li, F. Yang and L. Zhang for the helpful discussion. We acknowledge the financial support from the National Key R&D program of China (Grants No.2017YFA0305400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51902152) and Singapore MOE AcRF Tier 2 (MOE-T2EP50220-0011). This research used resources of the Advanced Light Source, a U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Z.L. and Yulin Chen supervised the project. J.Z. performed the ARPES measurement with the help of A.L., S.-K.M., and C.C. S.A.Y. and X.F. provided the theoretical modeling support. Y.L. and Yanbin Chen synthesized the crystals. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yulin Chen or Zhongkai Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information


Supplementary Information for ’Observation of Dimension-Crossover of a Tunable 1D Dirac Fermion in Topological Semimetal NbSi<i><sub>x</sub></i>Te<sub>2</sub>’

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Lv, Y., Feng, X. et al. Observation of dimension-crossover of a tunable 1D Dirac fermion in topological semimetal NbSixTe2. npj Quantum Mater. 7, 54 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing