Abstract
Organic solids host various electronic phases. Especially, a milestone compound of organic solid, \(\beta ^{\prime}\)X[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} with X=EtMe_{3}Sb shows quantum spinliquid (QSL) properties suggesting a novel state of matter. However, the nature of the QSL has been largely unknown. Here, we computationally study five compounds comprehensively with different X using 2D ab initio Hamiltonians and correctly reproduce the experimental phase diagram with antiferromagnetic order for X=Me_{4}P, Me_{4}As, Me_{4}Sb, Et_{2}Me_{2}As and a QSL for X=EtMe_{3}Sb without adjustable parameters. We find that the QSL for X=EtMe_{3}Sb exhibits 1D nature characterized by algebraic decay of spin correlation along one direction, while exponential decay in the other direction, indicating dimensional reduction from 2D to 1D. The 1D nature indeed accounts for the experimental specific heat, thermal conductivity and magnetic susceptibility. The identified QSL, however, preserves 2D nature as well consistently with spin fractionalization into spinon with Diraclike gapless excitations and reveals duality bridging the 1D and 2D QSLs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Organic solids offer plenty of playgrounds of conspicuous phenomena including superconductivity competing with charge and spin orders, and semimetallic excitations with Dirac dispersions^{1,2}. However, the severe competitions of the diverse phases and mechanisms of the phenomena found in complex crystal structures of the organic solids remain challenges of condensed matter physics.
Despite a large number of atoms in the unit cell of such organic compounds, however, the band structure near the Fermi level is mostly simple consisting of only LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) and HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) around the Fermi level. Large intermolecular distance leads to narrow bandwidths while poor screening of Coulomb interaction due to the sparse bands near the Fermi level leads to strongly correlated electron systems with various types of Mott insulators.
Among them, the QSL phase was proposed as novel states of matter in two families of correlation driven Mott insulating compounds, namely, κ(ET)_{2}X (ET= bis(ethylenedithio) tetrathiafulvalene) with the anion X=Cu_{2}(CN)_{3}^{3} and \(\beta ^{\prime}\)X[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} (dmit=1,3dithiole2thione4,5dithiolate) with the cation X=EtMe_{3}Sb^{4}, where apparent spontaneous symmetry breaking including the antiferromagnetic (AF) order is unusually absent even at several orders of magnitude lower temperatures than the spinexchange interaction. Although the geometrical frustration arising from the triangular lattice structure of the dimerized Pd(dmit)_{2} or ET molecule hosting a spin1/2 electronic spin looks important for the absence of the AF order, its nature and mechanism of the emergence endorsed by a quantitative estimate are missing. In addition to the QSL, if one replaces X with other ions, it shows a variety of phases including the AF order, charge order and valence bond solid^{1,2,5}. Because of severe competitions of these phases, ab initio approaches without adjustable parameters are desired particularly for the enigmatic QSL to reach realistic understanding.
We focus on a typical candidate of QSL, X[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. In fact, it shows^{4,6} smaller broadening of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra than κ(ET)_{2}Cu_{2}(CN)_{3}^{1,7} implying smaller effects of extrinsic spatial inhomogeneity. At low temperatures of the QSL material, EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}, the specific heat^{8} and the thermal conductivity κ^{9} are reported to be proportional to temperature T, although controversies exist for the latter^{10,11,12}. The magnetic susceptibility stays at a nonzero constant^{13}. These are roughly similar to the conventional Fermiliquid metal but of course the electrons are frozen in the Mott insulator and the spin degrees of freedom must be responsible for them. In addition, the relaxation rate of NMR, 1/T_{1} seems to be scaled by T^{2} in the range 0.05K ≤ T < 1 K^{6} in contrast to the conventional Fermiliquid behavior ∝ T. It is then desired to gain insights into the experimental consistency from ab initio calculations.
Here, we thoroughly study purely ab initio electronic Hamiltonians without any adjustable parameters for five dmit compounds using the experimental structure without optimizing lattice structures except for positions of hydrogen atoms. This ab initio study allows us to correctly reproduce the overall experimental phase diagram at low temperatures of \(\beta ^{\prime}\)X[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} with X=Me_{4}P, Me_{4}As, Me_{4}Sb, Et_{2}Me_{2}As exhibiting the AF order and with X=EtMe_{3}Sb exhibiting QSL phases. We do not consider \(\beta ^{\prime}\)Et_{2}Me_{2}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}, because the observed charge order with the simultaneous spontaneous lattice distortion in this compound^{14,15} requires structural optimization, which is out of the scope of this paper. Then we conclude that the QSL phase has a character of primarily 1D spin liquid but combined with 2D nature, which accounts for the experimental properties consistently. From the study, we attempt to pin down the nature of QSL observed in the experiments, which is one of the central issues in condensed matter physics.
Results
Ab initio framework
Before going into our results, we summarize our framework of the calculation for the sake of readers to understand definitions of quantities, which we will analyze. We use ab initio lowenergy effective Hamiltonian consisting of the halffilled HOMO band crossing the Fermi level derived for \(\beta ^{\prime}\)X[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}^{16,17,18}. For the procedure and the obtained parameters for the Hamiltonians, see Methods. It is built on the weakly coupled twodimensional layers and the Pd(dmit)_{2} dimer forms an anisotropic triangular lattice within a layer. We assign the \(\tilde{a}\), \(\tilde{b}\) and \(\tilde{c}\) bonds, for which the Hamiltonian presented below (Eq. (1)) contains the transfer parameters t_{a}, t_{b} and t_{c}, respectively, as is illustrated in the middle panel of Fig. 1. The bonds are chosen so that t_{a}, t_{b} and t_{c} are ordered from the stronger to weaker amplitudes. In the actual calculation, we take a deformed lattice structure illustrated in the right panel of Fig. 1 just for computational simplicity. We sometimes use x and y axes for the plot of the 2D Brillouin zone and note that x and y correspond to \(\tilde{a}\) and \(\tilde{c}\) directions, respectively. (Do not confuse the crystallographic a, b and c axes with the present assignment of \(\tilde{a}\), \(\tilde{b}\) and \(\tilde{c}\) axes).
Because of very weak interlayer hopping (the largest interlayer hopping is less than 0.8 meV), the 2D plane is sufficient to capture physics of our interest about the ground state here. Then our Hamiltonian is built on the twodimensional plane of the dmit salts. We take into account the effect of interlayer interaction through the dimensional downfolding method established in organic solids and ironbased superconductors^{16} (see Methods). The maximally localized Wannier function of the HOMO orbital, whose band crosses the Fermi level, is constructed for the molecular orbital^{19,20}. The lattice structure in the simulation is depicted later in Fig. 6, which is, despite the deformation of the shape, able to sufficiently describe the ab initio Hamiltonian as the network of the Pd(dmit)_{2} dimers, where a Wannier orbital is extended over a dimer.
The resultant ab initio singleband effective Hamiltonian derived in refs. ^{17,18} has the form
where i, j represent the dimer indices, and \({c}_{i\sigma }^{{\dagger} }\) (c_{iσ}) is the creation (annihilation) operator of electrons with spin σ (=↑ or ↓) at the ith Wannier orbital, and the number operator is n_{i} = ∑_{σ}n_{iσ} with \({n}_{i\sigma }={c}_{i\sigma }^{{\dagger} }{c}_{i\sigma }\). Here, t_{ij} is the hopping parameters depending on the relative coordinate vector r_{i}−r_{j}, where r_{i} is the position vector of the center of the ith Wannier orbital. In the present study, for t_{ij}, we retain the nearest neighbor pair of r_{i} and r_{j} in each direction of \(\tilde{a}\), \(\tilde{b}\) and \(\tilde{c}\) as is illustrated in Fig. 1, while V_{ij} is retained up to the third neighbor (see Fig. 6). Here, U and V_{ij} are the screened onsite and offsite Coulomb interactions, respectively, as is illustrated in Fig. 6. Note that the Hamiltonian parameters of both transfer and interaction terms contain neither adjustable parameters nor fitting and are determined solely by using the experimental lattice structure at low temperatures and by following the established procedure of the maximally localized Wannier functions. The spatial ranges of the transfer and the interaction, which we take are sufficient to reach the convergence for the present study and the values at longer distance are small. We also ignore the direct exchange interactions because they are at most 3 meV and we expect it does not alter our conclusions. See Methods for the parameter values of Hamiltonian (1) used in the present study.
We apply a variational Monte Carlo (VMC) method^{21,22,23} to the ab initio Hamiltonians to reach highly accurate ground states. For details of the numerical method, see Methods.
Phase diagram
Figure 2 is one of our central results of this paper, showing the agreement between the experimental (bottom plane) and the calculated (vertical plane) material dependences of the lowtemperature phases. In the calculated results, the collinear AF and the QSL states are the two lowest energy states among severely competing various candidates all through the five compounds studied. Therefore, we plot the calculated energy difference between these two in the vertical plane. We find that the experimental QSL is reproduced in the calculated ground state for X=EtMe_{3}Sb. Aside from a severe competition for X=Et_{2}Me_{2}As, which is indeed suggested by the experimental coexistence of AF and QSL, Fig. 2 shows that our ab initio results successfully reproduce the AF ground state observed in the experiments of X=Me_{4}P, Me_{4}As, and Me_{4}Sb, as shown in the bottom plane. The AF state has the Bragg peak at (π, 0) in the notation of Fig. 1. The AF stability was recently studied by the quasi1D approach based on the random phase approximation^{24}.
Note that the abscissa of Fig. 2 shows only (t_{c} − t_{b})/t_{a} dependence among the ab initio parameters, while the plots of the five materials are the results of computation by using the full ab initio parameters. The overall monotonic dependence of Δe shows that (t_{c} − t_{b})/t_{a} is indeed a principally important parameter for the evaluation of the phase diagram. The experimental Néel temperature in the bottom plane is also consistently ordered with (t_{c} − t_{b})/t_{a} and further supports the relevance and accuracy of the ab initio effective Hamiltonian, because it is natural to expect that the Néel temperature is linked to the relative stability of the ground state. Within the parameter control of (t_{c} − t_{b})/t_{a}, the transition between the AF and QSL phases is a clear firstorder transition, represented by the level crossing. The importance of the full anisotropy of the transfer in the inequilateral triangular lattice to stabilize the QSL phase was pointed out by the projected BCS study of the Hubbardtype model by using the ab initio hopping^{25}.
Nature of quantum spin liquid and antiferromagnetic state
Figure 3 shows the spin structure factor S(q) (the spin correlation in the Fourier space) for X=Me_{4}P as a representative case of the AF ordered compounds and for the QSL compound, X=EtMe_{3}Sb (see Methods for details of the calculation method and definition of physical quantities). For the AF state of X=Me_{4}P, a strong sharp peak at q = (π, 0) indeed indicates the conventional collinear 2D AF order. The 2D ordering pattern is illustrated in Fig. 2. Other compounds, X=Me_{4}As, Me_{4}Sb, and Et_{2}Me_{2}As also show the same type of the order. In the QSL state for EtMe_{3}Sb, S(q) also has a peak at the same momentum q = (π, 0), but with a substantially reduced height. Interestingly, a ridge line along q_{x} = π emerges in S(q) of the QSL state, implying anisotropy between the x and y directions (namely between the chain (\(\tilde{a}\)) and interchain (\(\tilde{b}\)) directions). Such anisotropy is in sharp contrast with the isotropic order in the AF phase. Furthermore, the feature of the anisotropy is largely different from the previous numerical studies for the anisotropic triangular Hubbard or Heisenberg model^{26}. Figure 3(c) shows the size dependence of the peak value of S(q) divided by the system size N_{s} = L^{2}. Because the AF longrange order is signaled by a nonzero S(q)/N_{s} in the thermodynamic limit 1/L → 0, AF order exists for X=Me_{4}P and it is absent for X=EtMe_{3}Sb.
The spinspin correlations in real space C(r) for the QSL state of X=EtMe_{3}Sb shown in Fig. 3d with the loglog plot in the x (namely, t_{a}) direction indicates a power law C(r) ∝ ∣r∣^{−p} with p = 1.88 ± 0.01 suggesting the algebraic QSL with the gapless excitation. On the other hand, Fig. 3(e) shows a semilog plot of the correlations in the y direction, for which the exponential form \(C({{{\boldsymbol{r}}}})\propto \exp [ {{{\boldsymbol{r}}}} /{\xi }_{\perp }]\) with the correlation length ξ_{⊥} ~ 1.33 ± 0.04 is appropriate and thus the excitation is gapped in the interchain (y) direction at least within the system size studied here. Of course, the same exponential decay of the correlation is observed in the t_{b} (namely \(\tilde{b}\)) and t_{c} (namely, \(\tilde{c}\)) directions. The anisotropic correlation develops the ridge in the q_{y} dependence of S(q).
Finally, the spin Drude weight D_{s} calculated in the QSL state for X=EtMe_{3}Sb is shown in Fig. 4. The size dependence of D_{s} for the QSL shown in Fig. 4(b) assures that D_{s} is nonzero and large in the thermodynamic limit, consistently with the powerlaw decay of the spin correlation in the x direction. In contrast, the spin Drude weight for the interchain y component is vanishing.
All the results support that the QSL with onedimensional and gapless excitation is realized for X=EtMe_{3}Sb, which is our second central result of the paper.
Discussion
The QSL of \(\beta ^{\prime}\)EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} is characterized by the gapless spin excitation and associated algebraic powerlaw decay of the spin correlation in the direction of the largest transfer t_{a} (namely, along the chain direction). The power p ~ 1.9 for \(C({{{\boldsymbol{r}}}})\propto \exp [i{{{\boldsymbol{Q}}}}\cdot {{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}]{{{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}}^{p}\) is similar to the value obtained for the QSL in the squarelattice J_{1}–J_{2} Heisenberg model with the nearest (J_{1}) and the nextnearestneighbor (J_{2}) exchange interactions, where p ~ 1.4–1.7^{27}. However, in contrast to isotropic 2D spin correlation in the J_{1}–J_{2} model, the correlation decays exponentially in the interchain direction with the correlation length ξ_{⊥} ~ 1.3 lattice constant. The anisotropy makes the peak height of S(q) nondivergent in the thermodynamic limit in contrast with the 2D J_{1}–J_{2} model.
One might regard the present QSL as essentially the same as the 1D spin liquid^{26,28,29} smoothly connected to an effective 1D Heisenberg or Hubbard model. However, the revealed properties are not so simple. First, the nonzero correlation length in the interchain direction makes a prominent peak at (π, 0) in S(q) commonly to the case of the 2D J_{1}–J_{2} Heisenberg model. In the decoupled arrays of 1D Heisenberg chains, one would expect an equalheight ridge along the line (π, 0)(π, π) with logarithmically divergent height where p = 1 and without q_{y} dependence. In the present QSL, the ridge exists but the height is not divergent even at (π, 0) because p > 1. For the moment, we leave the issue about the possible presence or absence of the transition between the pure isolated chain and the present case for the future study. Substantial reduction of S(q) toward (π, π) from (π, 0), namely partially 2Dlike correlation implies a small but nonzero dispersion of the excitation in the interchain direction, which may make an energetic hierarchy.
For the 2D J_{1}–J_{2} model, it was suggested that the gapless excitation is well accounted for by the fractionalization of a spin into two spin1/2 spinons, where the spinon has the Diraclike linear dispersion at (±π/2, ±π/2)^{27,30}. Let us discuss the possibility of the fractionalization for the present QSL of \(\beta ^{\prime}\)EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. To gain insight into the possible existence of spinon and to elucidate its dispersion in the present QSL, we have analyzed the structure of our wavefunction for the QSL ground state of \(\beta ^{\prime}\)EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} as is described in Methods. The result shows that the elementary excitation is consistently described by the spinon born out as a consequence of the fractionalization of a spin, where the spinon has Diractype gapless dispersion around (±π/2, 0) and (±π/2, π) as is schematically illustrated in Fig. 5. Because the measurable spin is constructed from the twospinon excitation, the gapless points for the triplet excitations appear at around (0, 0), (±π, 0), (0, ±π), and (±π, ±π). This structure has an essential similarity to the 2D J_{1}–J_{2} Heisenberg model^{27}, implying the 2D nature of the QSL.
However, the exponential decay of the spin correlation and vanishing spin Drude weight in the interchain direction suggest a very anisotropic and small or incoherent dispersion away from the nodal point in the interchain direction in contrast to the isotropic conic dispersion for the 2D J_{1}–J_{2} model, generating the QSL of roughly 1Dlike nature.
By considering the onedimensional anisotropy, it is insightful to compare the present QSL with that of the 1D antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model defined by
with J > 0 for the spinhalf operator \({{{{\boldsymbol{S}}}}}_{i}=({S}_{i}^{x},{S}_{i}^{y},{S}_{i}^{z})\) at site i. The specific heat of the 1D Heisenberg model is given by the Tlinear coefficient \(\gamma =2{k}_{{{{\rm{B}}}}}^{2}{N}_{{{{\rm{A}}}}}/3J\) above 1K^{31}, where k_{B} is Boltzmann constant and N_{A} is Avogadro constant. If we employ the strong coupling expansion for the ab initio Hamiltonian, the superexchange interaction J_{a} for the two neighboring spins in the \(\tilde{a}\) (namely, t_{a}) direction is estimated as \({J}_{a}=4{t}_{a}^{2}/(U{V}_{1}) \sim 0.031\) eV for \(\beta ^{\prime}\)−EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}, by using the ab initio parameters listed in Table 1 of Methods. Then γ is estimated as γ ~ 15 mJ K^{−2} mole^{−1}, comparable with the experimental value for \(\beta ^{\prime}\)EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}, \({\gamma }^{\exp } \sim 15\!\!20\) mJ K^{−2} mole^{−1}^{8,12}.
The uniform magnetic susceptibility of the 1D Heisenberg model is \({\chi }_{{{{\rm{1D}}}}}={g}^{2}{\mu }_{{{{\rm{B}}}}}^{2}/({J}_{a}{\pi }^{2})\) with the gfactor and the Bohr magneton μ_{B}^{32,33}. By using J_{a} ~ 0.031eV, and g ~ 2, we obtain \(\chi /{\mu }_{{{{\rm{B}}}}}^{2} \sim 13\) eV^{−1}, while the experimental value is \(\chi /{\mu }_{{{{\rm{B}}}}}^{2} \sim 12\!\!24\) eV^{−1} per the dimer^{4,13}, which is consistent with each other by considering the experimental uncertainty.
Frequency dependent thermal conductivity κ of the 1D Heisenberg model is estimated to be κ^{1D}(ω) = κ_{s}δ(ω) with κ_{s}/T = π^{3}J/(6aℏ^{2}), where a is the lattice constant^{34}. If the delta function is replaced by the Lorentzian \({\omega }_{{{{\rm{W}}}}}/\pi ({\omega }^{2}+{\omega }_{{{{\rm{W}}}}}^{2})\) to take into account the lifetime τ = 2π/ω_{W}, we obtain \({\kappa }_{{{{\rm{s}}}}}^{{{{\rm{1D}}}}}(\omega =0)/T={\pi }^{2}{J}_{a}/(6a{\hslash }^{2}{\omega }_{{{{\rm{W}}}}})\). By considering a ~ 10^{−9}m and J_{a} ~ 0.031eV, \({\kappa }_{{{{\rm{s}}}}}^{{{{\rm{1D}}}}}(\omega =0)/T\) is estimated as 7.7 × 10^{22}/ℏω_{W}[Jms]^{−1}. Then if the experimental value reported in Ref. ^{9} is employed, and the onetoone correspondence between the 1D Heisenberg and the experimental value is assumed, \({\kappa }_{\exp }^{{{{\rm{dmit}}}}}/T \sim 0.2/{k}_{{{{\rm{B}}}}}^{2}\)[Jms]^{−1} corresponds to the carrier relaxation time τ = 2π/ω_{W} ~ 9.0 × 10^{−12}s. A simple expectation of the spin velocity v_{s} = J_{a}a/ℏ results in the mean free path ℓ_{s} = v_{s}τ = 0.42 μm, which is a value comparable to the reported estimate ~1 μm^{9}. More precisely, the experimental value interpreted by the 1D Heisenberg model suggests ℏω_{W}/J ~ 0.015 implying small damping in the order of 10^{−2} for the propagation induced plausibly by the spinon dynamics driven by the energy scale of J. Therefore, although controversies exist as is mentioned above, if a large thermal conductivity experimentally reported is intrinsic, it can be essentially accounted for by the interpretation of 1Dlike QSL. The obtained ℓ_{s} is substantially longer than that of the inorganic compound Cs_{2}CuCl_{4}^{35}, where a 1D QSL was claimed. The present result implies that the 1D QSL found here has potentially much longer τ. Then all of the above thermodynamic and transport properties can be interpreted by the essentially 1Dlike QSL found here.
The spinlattice relaxation time T_{1} reported as scaled by 1/T_{1} ∝ T^{2} below 1K^{6}, implying the pointlike gapless triplet excitation looks contradicting the Tlinear specific heat and nonzero magnetic susceptibility compatible with the constant density of states. However, a consistent picture may emerge, if a spinon with a highly anisotropic nodal and gapless dispersion exists at ~(±π/2, 0) and ~(±π/2, π), where the 2D nature could be detectable only at low temperatures below 1K and by measuring the gapless momenta with an appropriate form factor. The power of the dispersion around the node in the chain direction is an intriguing issue but is beyond the scope of the present paper.
It turned out that the Diractype gapless excitation for the 2D QSL can be connected to the vanishing spinon dispersion along the Fermi line for T > 1 K, which behaves as if it is essentially the 1D QSL. \(\beta ^{\prime}\)EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} is located in this parameter space close to the 1D QSL. Furthermore, the controversy and sensitivity of the thermal conductivity^{10,11,12} are well understood from the onedimensional nature: The exponential decay of the spin correlation and the vanishing Drude weight imply the vanishing thermal conductivity in the interchain direction. Then even small angle misalignment of the single crystal either in samples or in measurements causes serious reduction of κ and serious sample or measurement dependence. Effects of randomness may also seriously disturb the ideal behavior of the 1Dlike spin liquid^{11}. Observed very sensitive dependence might be able to be interpreted from the 1D nature of the QSL, which has also been pointed out in ref. ^{36} (See also Methods).
In summary, we have studied the family of dmit organic salts by using the ab initio Hamiltonians of 5 compounds. The obtained lowtemperature phases are consistent with the experimental reports as the AF state for X=Me_{4}P, Me_{4}As, Me_{4}Sb, Et_{2}Me_{2}As and the QSL for EtMe_{3}Sb. The relative stabilities of the four AF compounds increasing with decreasing t_{c} − t_{b} are correctly reproduced in the ab initio calculation in agreement with the experimental trend. Thanks to this firm correspondence, the nature of the QSL in the real material is identified as the 1Dlike spin liquid: The spin correlation decays exponentially and the spin Drude weight vanishes in the interchain direction. Though a controversy exists in the experimental reports of the thermal conductivity, the specific heat, the susceptibility and potentially the thermal conductivity show overall consistency with the experimentally observed values essentially in terms of the 1D QSL. However, the signature of the 2D properties is found in a prominent peak of the spin structure factor at (π, 0) and in the structure of the groundstate wavefunction itself. In addition, the exponent of the algebraic correlation is different from the known 1D QSL found in the Heisenberg or Hubbard model. The temperature dependence of NMR \({T}_{1}^{1}\) at T < 1 K (∝T^{2}) supports vanishing density of states of spin excitation around zero energy and implies the existence of highly anisotropic but pointlike nodes consistently with the present results. The present QSL offers a unified picture that bridges the 1D and 2D QSL.
It is desired to calculate the dynamical spin structure factor in the future to more directly clarify the spin dynamics with nodal excitation suggested by the structure of the wavefunction. An intriguing issue is the relation to recent studies on the charge dynamics above 2K for \(\beta ^{\prime}\)EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}^{37}. It might be associated with essentially the 1Dlike spin liquid, where the dynamical singlet formation may couple to the dimerization fluctuation of the lattice. The spin transport can be measured by attaching ferromagnetic metal leads and by estimating the difference of the spin conduction between the cases of parallel and antiparallel magnetization for the anode and cathode. The ac response may also help to estimate the spin Drude weight studied in the present study without the sensitivity to the misalignment or randomness. These are left for future studies to stringently verify the relevance of the present finding in the collaboration of experiment and theory.
Methods
Effective Hamiltonian parameters
We have used the parameters of the effective Hamiltonian (1) derived for the lowtemperature experimental crystal structure below 10 K and construct Hamiltonians on a 2D plane. Here the parameters are listed in Table 1 for the selfcontained description. The interaction is screened by the interlayer screening, which must be taken into account when one solves a single layer Hamiltonian. It is established that this dimensional downfolding effect is well represented by a constant reduction of all the interactions by the amount Δ_{DDF} from the values for the three dimensional Hamiltonian, if the subtracted value exceeds zero, and by truncation to zero if the subtracted value becomes negative^{16}. For dmit compounds, it was estimated as Δ_{DDF} = 0.18 eV. The interaction beyond the 3rd neighbor site (namely beyond V_{4} and its geometrically equivalent sites) becomes small after the dimensional downfolding and we ignore them. We take into account up to the first neighbor transfer in each \(\tilde{a},\tilde{b}\) and \(\tilde{c}\) direction. The exchange interaction is also ignored because it is not expected to play any visible role in the present study. In this work, we analyze the above Hamiltonian in the form of the lattice structure shown in Fig. 6 at half filling in the canonical ensemble, with N_{s} = L × L sites. We consider systems under the antiperiodicperiodic boundary condition. In all the cases of the compounds studied, the ground state is the Mott insulator.
Variational Monte Carlo method
In our simulations, we used a variational Monte Carlo method^{21,22,23}. Our variational wavefunction takes the following form:
with
Here, \({{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}^{{{{\rm{G}}}}}=\exp \left({\sum }_{i}{\alpha }_{i}^{{{{\rm{G}}}}}{n}_{i\uparrow }{n}_{i\downarrow }\right)\), \({{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}^{{{{{\rm{J}}}}}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}=\exp ({\sum }_{i\,{ < }\,j}{\alpha }_{ij}^{{{{{\rm{J}}}}}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}{n}_{i}{n}_{j})\) and \({{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}^{{{{{\rm{J}}}}}_{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}=\exp ({\sum }_{i,j}{\alpha }_{ij}^{{{{{\rm{J}}}}}_{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}{S}_{i}^{z}{S}_{j}^{z})\) are the Gutzwiller factor^{38}, the longrange Jastrow correlation factors^{39,40}, and the longrange spin Jastrow correlation factor^{41}, respectively. Here, \({S}_{i}^{z}={n}_{i\uparrow }{n}_{i\downarrow }\). In practice, we impose the translational symmetry on the Gutzwiller and Jastrow factors.
To enhance the accuracy and to make the variance extrapolation explained in the next subsection easy, we also used two types of restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) correlators^{23,42,43}\({{{{\mathcal{M}}}}}^{{{{\rm{s}}}}}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{M}}}}}^{{{{\rm{c}}}}}\), which are defined in the following equations:
Here, t in Eq. (5) represents a type of the RBM correlators, i.e. t = c or s. \({N}_{\alpha }^{t}\) denotes the ratio of the number of the hidden units in the hidden layer to the number of the physical sites N_{s}. \(\leftx\right\rangle\) is a real space configuration of electrons in the sector where the total S^{z} is zero. a, b, and W are complex variational parameters. For the measurements of the physical quantities defined in Methods, we use \({N}_{\alpha }^{c}=4\) and \({N}_{\alpha }^{c}={N}_{\alpha }^{s}=2\) for the nonmagnetic states and the antiferromagnetic state, respectively.
\(\left\phi \right\rangle\) in Eq. (3) is a fermionic wavefunction. As \(\left\phi \right\rangle\), the generalized pairing wavefunction is employed, which is defined by
where \({f}_{i\sigma ,j\sigma ^{\prime} }\) are variational parameters and N_{e} is the total number of electrons. The spin indices σ and \(\sigma ^{\prime}\) can be arbitrary with singlet and triplet combinations. This can accommodate the HartreeFockBogoliubov type wavefunction with antiferromagnetic (AF), charge and superconducting orders^{21,44}, and flexibly describes these states and further paramagnetic metals as well. In this study, we extend it by introducing the dependence on the local density of \(\leftx\right\rangle\). Our extended pairing wavefunction is defined as follows:
where n and m are electron’s indices in the sample \(\leftx\right\rangle\). PfM is the Pfaffian of a skewsymmetric matrix M. This extension improves accuracy of the fermionic part of the trial wavefunction especially for nonmagnetic states. We treated \({f}_{i\sigma ,j\sigma ^{\prime} }^{{{{\rm{ss}}}}}\), \({f}_{i\sigma ,j\sigma ^{\prime} }^{{{{\rm{sd}}}}}\), \({f}_{i\sigma ,j\sigma ^{\prime} }^{{{{\rm{ds}}}}}\), and \({f}_{i\sigma ,j\sigma ^{\prime} }^{{{{\rm{dd}}}}}\) as complex variational parameters.
In order to reduce the computational cost by saving the number of independent variational parameters, we assume that \({f}_{ij}^{{{{\rm{ext}}}}}\) have a sublattice structure such that \({f}_{ij}^{{{{\rm{ext}}}}}\) depends on the relative vector r_{i} − r_{j} and a sublattice index of the site j which is denoted as η(j). Thus, we can rewrite it as \({f}_{\eta (j)}^{{{{\rm{ext}}}}}({{{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}}_{i}{{{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}}_{j})\). In the present study on the nonmagnetic gapless states, we assumed a fully translational invariance (1 × 1 sublattice structure) and do not optimize triplet pairings (represented by the case\(\sigma =\sigma ^{\prime}\)). For studies on the AF states, we extended the sublattice structure of \({f}_{ij}^{{{{\rm{ext}}}}}\) to 2 × 2. We did not use \({{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}^{{{{{\rm{J}}}}}_{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{M}}}}}^{{{{\rm{s}}}}}\) for the optimization of the nonmagnetic states. All the variational parameters are simultaneously optimized by using the stochastic reconfiguration method^{45}.
Variance extrapolation
The AF and quantum spin liquid (QSL) states as well as the valence bond state are severely competing. To determine the lowest energy state among them, we performed extrapolations of energies to the limit of the zero energy variance^{45,46,47}. For this purpose, we combined with the restricted Boltzmann machine algorithm^{23,42} together with the 1st Lanczos step^{48}. To obtain the groundstate energy in the zerovariance limit, we perform the linear regression by using \({N}_{\alpha }^{c}=2\) and 4 for nonmagnetic states. For the collinear antiferromagnetic state, we use \({N}_{\alpha }^{c}={N}_{\alpha }^{s}=0\) and 2. Examples of the extrapolations in the present studies are found in Fig. 7, where the variance dependence of the groundstate energy for the ab initio Hamiltonian for X=EtMe_{3}Sb is plotted. The limit of the zero variance is our estimate of the groundstate energy. We find severe competition between the AF and the QSL. The energies of the correlated metal and the dimer state with a finite spin gap are much higher than those of the AF and the QSL. We note that the error bars in Fig. 2 of the main text are obtained based on the propagation of errors as \(\varepsilon =\sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{AF}}}}}^{2}+{\varepsilon }_{{{{\rm{QSL}}}}}^{2}}\), where ε_{AF} and ε_{QSL} are the error arising from the linear regression for the AF and QSL states, respectively.
Physical quantities
To elucidate the nature of the ground state, we analyze the following quantities: The primarily important quantity is the spin correlation
between the site r and \({{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}+{{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}^{\prime}\) and its Fourier transform called the spin structure factor
where S_{r} is the spin operator at the site r.
The spin Drude weight in u direction (u = x, y) is defined by the second derivative of the energy with respect to the vector potential^{49}
where A is inserted to the transfer by replacing as
The spin Drude weight is associated with the spin conductivity σ(ω) as
with the cutoff Λ to represent the weight around ω = 0. If the peak around ω = 0 is given by the delta function, it is reduced to
We compute the statistical error of a physical quantity O arising from the Monte Carlo sampling estimated as
where \({\left\langle O\right\rangle }_{i}\) is the expectation value of O at the ith bin in the Monte Carlo sampling. In general, we use about 10^{6}–10^{7} Monte Carlo samples in each bin. N_{bin} is the total number of bins and we typically set N_{bin} = 5–10.
Gapless structure of wavefunction
The method to analyze the structure of Fourier transform of the singlet pairing amplitude, f_{ij} = f_{i↑,j↓}, denoted by f(k) is discussed here. Although the correlation factors \({{{\mathcal{C}}}}\) in Eq. (4) and the densitydependent pairing amplitude in Eq. (9) largely modify the wavefunction character, the nodal structure is expected to be governed by f_{ij} in Eq. (8) for \(\sigma \,\ne\, \sigma ^{\prime}\). The Fourier transform f(k) can be interpreted as the solution of the BCS meanfield Hamiltonian
as^{50}
To obtain the fitted f(k) defined in Eq. (20), we use the following form of \(\tilde{\epsilon }({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})\) and \(\tilde{{{\Delta }}}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})\):
We also introduce the uniform scale factor C of f(k) because the original pairing amplitudes have the ambiguity for its norm. The parameters \(\tilde{{t}_{b}},\tilde{{t}_{c}},\tilde{\mu },\tilde{{{{\Delta }}}_{a}},\tilde{{{{\Delta }}}_{b}}\), \(\tilde{{{{\Delta }}}_{c}}\) and C are simultaneously optimized by using the differential evolution method^{51} implemented in SciPy^{52}, which is one of the global optimization methods. We confirmed that the optimized results are similar even when we use other optimization methods such as the simplicial homology global optimization^{53}. We ignore the pairing amplitudes smaller than 10^{−5} during the optimization. The fitting by \(\tilde{\epsilon }({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})\) and \(\tilde{{{\Delta }}}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})\) reproduces the original data Fig. 8b quite well and is not distinguishable in the color plot. Note that the original data are obtained from the optimized \({{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}^{{{{\rm{G}}}}}{{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}^{{{{{\rm{J}}}}}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}\left{\phi }^{{{{\rm{pair}}}}}\right\rangle\) for \(\sigma \,\ne\, \sigma ^{\prime}\) with the real variational parameters \({\alpha }_{i}^{{{{\rm{G}}}}},{\alpha }_{ij}^{{{{{\rm{J}}}}}_{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}\) and f_{ij}.
Figure 8b shows the fitted \(\tilde{\epsilon }({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})\) and \(\tilde{{{\Delta }}}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})\) by using Eq. (20). Since the excitation of the Hamiltonian is represented by \(\sqrt{\tilde{\epsilon }{({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})}^{2}+\tilde{{{\Delta }}}{({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})}^{2}}\), the gapless point appears at the cross points of \(\tilde{\epsilon }({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})=0\) and \(\tilde{{{\Delta }}}({{{\boldsymbol{k}}}})=0\), as are shown as red circles. Though change in quantitative slopes of dispersion and broadening may take place, these nodal points may not be seriously altered by the correlation factors such as the Gutzwiller factor \({{{{\mathcal{P}}}}}^{{{{\rm{G}}}}}\)^{30}. The Fourier transform of f_{ij} denoted by f(k) can be associated with the excitation spectra^{50} through the fitting to the ground state of a meanfield BCS Hamiltonian with the dwave type superconducting order. Since the quasiparticle excitation of the BCS Hamiltonian corresponds to the spin1/2 spinon, the excitation of the QSL is inferred to be characterized by the spin1/2 Diractype spinon around the nodes of the dwave superconducting state at around (±π/2, 0) and (±π/2, π). The spinon is an excitation resulted from the fractionalization of the spin and is confined. Measurable ordinary triplet excitations are given by a combination of two spinons generating the gapless points for the triplet excitations at around (0, 0), (±π, 0), (0, ±π), and (±π, ±π).
Strong coupling picture
The effective exchange coupling in the strong coupling expansion in terms of either t_{a}/(U − V_{1}), t_{b}/(U − V_{2}) or t_{c}/(U − V_{3}) can be easily derived using \({J}_{a}=4{t}_{a}^{2}/(U{V}_{1})\) etc., which is summarized in Table 2. For X=EtMe_{3}Sb, J_{a} = 30.5 meV, J_{b} = 19.6 meV, and J_{c} = 14.4 meV (we ignore the contribution from the direct exchange because its small and more or less isotropic values less than 3 meV^{18}, which have only minor effect): The onedimensionality is in fact as a consequence of not J_{b}/J_{a} (or J_{c}/J_{a}) but small (J_{c} − J_{b})/J_{a}. Nonetheless, this factor is 0.17, which is substantially larger than the value by Kenny et al., 0.053^{36}. In fact, with our present ab initio parameters, their way of estimate of the phase diagram using the above J_{a}, J_{b}, J_{c} and their estimate of the ring exchange interaction \({K}_{4}=80{t}_{b}^{2}{t}_{c}^{2}/{(U({V}_{1}+{V}_{2}+{V}_{3})/3)}^{3}\) giving K_{4}/J_{a} ~ 0.11 indicate that the EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} is located near the border of the antiferromagnetic phase but in the QSL side, consistently with our full quantum calculation. The estimates of the ground states for the other compounds based on their criterion are also consistent with our results. However, their recent estimate of the instability to the antiferromagnetic order contradicts our results^{24}. It could be related to the neglect of the ring exchange interaction and partly because of the limitation of the random phase approximation based on the quasionedimensionality employed by them^{24}. In any case, it is clear that the present analysis is quantitatively the most comprehensive and accurate analysis because all orders of expansion even beyond the ring exchange from the viewpoint of the strong coupling expansion are included and the present original itinerantelectron treatment is the most strict first principles analysis.
Data availability
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to imada@g.ecc.utokyo.ac.jp or ido@issp.utokyo.ac.jp.
Code availability
Code used in the present paper has been developed based on an open source software at https://www.pasums.issp.utokyo.ac.jp/mvmc/en/ and the algorithm is described in ref. ^{22}. Corrrespondence and requests for codes should be addressed to imada@g.ecc.utokyo.ac.jp or ido@issp.utokyo.ac.jp.
References
Zhou, Y., Kanoda, K. & Ng, T.K. Quantum spin liquid states. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003 (2017).
Kato, R. Development of πelectron systems based on [M(dmit)_{2}] (M= Ni and Pd; dmit: 1,3dithiole 2thione4,5dithiolate) Anion Radicals. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 87, 355–374 (2014).
Shimizu, Y., Miyagawa, K., Kanoda, K., Maesato, M. & Saito, G. Spin liquid state in an organic Mott insulator with a triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 107001 (2003).
Itou, T., Oyamada, A., Maegawa, S., Tamura, M. & Kato, R. Quantum spin liquid in the spin1/2 triangular antiferromagnet EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 77, 104413 (2008).
Kanoda, K. & Kato, R. Mott physics in organic conductors with triangular lattices. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 167–188 (2011).
Itou, T., Oyamada, A., Maegawa, S. & Kato, R. Instability of a quantum spin liquid in an organictriangularlattice antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 6, 673 (2010).
Shimizu, Y., Miyagawa, K., Kanoda, K., Maesato, M. & Saito, G. Emergence of inhomogeneous moments from spin liquid in the triangularlattice Mott insulator \(\kappa {({{{\rm{ET}}}})}_{2}{{{{\rm{Cu}}}}}_{2}{({{{\rm{CN}}}})}_{3}\). Phys. Rev. B 73, 140407 (2006).
Yamashita, S., Yamamoto, T., Nakazawa, Y., Tamura, M. & Kato, R. Gapless spin liquid of an organic triangular compound evidenced by thermodynamic measurements. Nat. Commun. 2, 275 (2011).
Yamashita, M. et al. Highly mobile gapless excitations in a twodimensional candidate quantum spin liquid. Science 328, 1246 (2010).
Yamashita, M. et al. Presence and absence of itinerant gapless excitations in the quantum spin liquid candidate EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 101, 140407(R) (2020).
BourgeoisHope, P. et al. Thermal conductivity of the quantum spin liquid candidate EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}: No evidence of mobile gapless excitations. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041051 (2019).
Ni, J. M. et al. Absence of magnetic thermal conductivity in the quantum spin liquid candidate EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 247204 (2019).
Watanabe, D. et al. Novel Pauliparamagnetic quantum phase in a Mott insulator. Nat. Commun. 3, 1090 (2012).
Nakao, A. & Kato, R. Structural study of low temperature chargeseparated phases of Pd(dmit)_{2}based molecular conductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 2754–2763 (2005).
Tamura, M. et al. Spectroscopic evidence for the lowtemperature chargeseparated state of [Pd(dmit)_{2}] salts. Chem. Phys. Lett. 411, 133–137 (2005).
Nakamura, K., Yoshimoto, Y. & Imada, M. Abinitio twodimensional multiband lowenergy models of EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} and κ(BEDTTTF)_{2}Cu(NCS)_{2} with comparisons to singleband models. Phys. Rev. B 86, 205117 (2012).
Misawa, T., Yoshimi, K. & Tsumuraya, T. Electronic correlation and geometrical frustration in molecular solids: A systematic ab initio study of \({\beta }^{\prime}{{\mbox{}}}{{\mbox{}}}X{[{{{\rm{Pd}}}}{({{{\rm{dmit}}}})}_{2}]}_{2}\). Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032072(R) (2020).
Yoshimi, K., Tsumuraya, T. & Misawa, T. Abinitio derivation and exact diagonalization analysis of lowenergy effective \({\beta }^{\prime}{{\mbox{}}}{{\mbox{}}}X{[{{{\rm{Pd}}}}{({{{\rm{dmit}}}})}_{2}]}_{2}\). Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043224 (2021).
Marzari, N. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands. Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997).
Souza, I., Marzari, N. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands. Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001).
Tahara, D. & Imada, M. Variational Monte Carlo method combined with quantumnumber projection and multivariable optimization. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 114701 (2008).
Misawa, T. et al. mVMC—Opensource software for manyvariable variational Monte Carlo method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 235, 447–462 (2019).
Nomura, Y., Darmawan, A. S., Yamaji, Y. & Imada, M. Restricted Boltzmann machine learning for solving strongly correlated quantum systems. Phys. Rev. B 96, 205152 (2017).
Kenny, E. P., Jacko, A. C. & Powell, B. J. x[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} as a quasionedimensional scalene Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. Materials 5, 084412 (2021).
Jacko, A. C., Tocchio, L. F., Jeschke, H. O. & Valentí, R. Importance of anisotropy in the spinliquid candidate Me_{3}EtSb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 88, 155139 (2013).
Tocchio, L. F., Gros, C., Valentí, R. & Becca, F. Onedimensional spin liquid, collinear, and spiral phases from uncoupled chains to the triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235107 (2014).
Nomura, Y. & Imada, M. Diractype nodal spin liquid revealed by refined quantum manybody solver using neuralnetwork wave function, correlation ratio, and level spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031034 (2021).
Weng, M. Q., Sheng, D. N., Weng, Z. Y. & Bursill, R. J. Spinliquid phase in an anisotropic triangularlattice Heisenberg model: Exact diagonalization and densitymatrix renormalization group calculations. Phys. Rev. B 74, 012407 (2006).
Yunoki, S. & Sorella, S. Two spin liquid phases in the spatially anisotropic triangular Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. B 74, 014408 (2006).
Ferrari, F. & Becca, F. Spectral signatures of fractionalization in the frustrated Heisenberg model on the square lattice. Phys. Rev. B 98, 100405(R) (2018).
Takahashi, M. Lowtemperature specific heat of spin1/2 anisotropic Heisenberg ring. Prog. Theor. Phys. 50, 1519–1536 (1973).
Griffiths, R. B. Magnetization curve at zero temperature for the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg linear chain. Phys. Rev. 133, A768–A775 (1964).
Yang, C. N. & Yang, C. P. Onedimensional chain of anisotropic spinspin interactions. II. Properties of the groundstate energy per lattice site for an infinite system. Phys. Rev. 150, 327–339 (1966).
Klümper, A. & Sakai, K. The thermal conductivity of the spin1/2 XXZ chain at arbitrary temperature. J. Phys. A 35, 2173 (2002).
Schulze, E. et al. Evidence of onedimensional magnetic heat transport in the triangularlattice antiferromagnet Cs_{2}CuCl_{4}. Phys. Rev. Research 1, 032022(R) (2019).
Kenny, E. P., David, G., Ferré, N., Jacko, A. C. & Powell, B. J. Frustration, ring exchange, and the absence of longrange order in \({{{{\rm{EtMe}}}}}_{3}{{{\rm{Sb}}}}{[{{{\rm{Pd}}}}{({{{\rm{dmit}}}})}_{2}]}_{2}\): From first principles to manybody theory. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 044403 (2020).
Fujiyama, S. & Kato, R. Algebraic charge dynamics of quantum spin liquid \(\beta ^{\prime}\)EtMe_{3}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 97, 035131 (2018).
Gutzwiller, M. C. Effect of correlation on the ferromagnetism of transition metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159–162 (1963).
Jastrow, R. Manybody problem with strong forces. Phys. Rev. 98, 1479–1484 (1955).
Capello, M., Becca, F., Fabrizio, M., Sorella, S. & Tosatti, E. Variatinal description of Mott insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026406 (2005).
Huse, D. A. & Elser, V. Simple variational wave functions for twodimensional Heisenberg spin1/2 antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2531–2534 (1988).
Carleo, G. & Troyer, M. Solving the quantum manybody problem with artificial neural networks. Science 355, 602–606 (2017).
Ferrari, F., Becca, F. & Carrasquilla, J. Neural Gutzwillerprojected variational wave functions. Phys. Rev. B 100, 125131 (2019).
Giamarchi, T. & Lhuillier, C. Phase diagrams of the twodimensional Hubbard model and tJ models by a variational Monte Carlo method. Phys. Rev. B 43, 12943 (1991).
Sorella, S. Generalized Lanczos algorithm for variatonal quantum Monte Carlo. Phys. Rev. B 64, 024512 (2001).
Kwon, Y., Ceperley, D. M. & Martin, R. M. Effects of threebody and backflow correlations in the twodimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 48, 12037 (1993).
Imada, M. & Kashima, T. Pathintegral renormalization group method for numerical study of strongly correlated electron systems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 2723 (2000).
Heeb, E. & Rice, T. Systematic improvement of variational Monte Carlo using Lanczos iterations. Z. Phys. B 90, 73–77 (1993).
Kohn, W. Theory of the insulating state. Phys. Rev. 133, A171–A181 (1964).
Capriotti, L., Becca, F., Parola, A. & Sorella, S. Resonating valence bond wave functions for strongly frustrated spin systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 097201 (2001).
Storn, R. & Price, K. Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 11, 341–359 (1997).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Endres, S. C., Sandrock, C. & Focke, W. W. A simplicial homology algorithm for Lipschitz optimisation. J. Glob. Optim. 72, 181–217 (2018).
Kato, R. & Hengbo, C. Cation dependence of crystal structure and band parameters in a series of molecular conductors, β’(Cation)[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} (dmit= 1, 3dithiole2thione4, 5dithiolate). Crystals 2, 861–874 (2012).
Nakamura, T., Takahashi, T., Aonuma, S. & Kato, R. EPR investigation of the electronic states in β’type [Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} compounds (where dmit is 2thioxo1, 3dithiole4, 5dithiolate). J. Mater. Chem. 11, 2159–2162 (2001).
Fujiyama, S. & Kato, R. Fragmented electronic spins with quantum fluctuations in organic Mott insulators near a quantum spin liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147204 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Reizo Kato for discussions and clarifications on the experimental results and Shigeki Fujiyama for notifying his unpublished result on the coexistence of AF and QSL phases for \(\beta ^{\prime}\)Et_{2}Me_{2}As[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2} and \(\beta ^{\prime}\)Me_{4}Sb[Pd(dmit)_{2}]_{2}. K.I. thanks Yusuke Nomura for useful comments and the implementation on the restricted Boltzmann machine correlator. T.M. and K.Y. thank Takao Tsumuraya for discussions on the derivation of the ab initio Hamiltonians. This work was supported in part by KAKENHI Grant No. 16H06345 and 19K14645 from JSPS. This research was also supported by MEXT as “program for Promoting Researches on the Supercomputer Fugaku"(Basic Science for Emergence and Functionality in Quantum Matter—Innovative Strongly Correlated Electron Science by Integration of Fugaku and Frontier Experiments, JPMXP1020200104). We thank the Supercomputer Center, the Institute for Solid State Physics, and The University of Tokyo for the use of the facilities. We also thank the computational resources of supercomputer Fugaku provided by the RIKEN Center for Computational Science (Project ID: hp200132 and hp210163) and OakbridgeCX in the Information Technology Center, The University of Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.I. together with T.M. coordinated and supervised the project. K.I. performed the VMC calculations. K.Y. provided the ab initio Hamiltonians presented in ref. ^{18}. K.I. and M.I. analyzed the calculated results and wrote the manuscript with inputs from other authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ido, K., Yoshimi, K., Misawa, T. et al. Unconventional dual 1D–2D quantum spin liquid revealed by ab initio studies on organic solids family. npj Quantum Mater. 7, 48 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535022004528
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535022004528
This article is cited by

Orbital hybridization of donor and acceptor to enhance the conductivity of mixedstack complexes
Nature Communications (2024)