Abstract
With a combination of numerical methods, including quantum Monte Carlo, exact diagonalization, and a simplified dynamical meanfield model, we consider the attosecond charge dynamics of electrons induced by strongfield laser pulses in twodimensional Mott insulators. The necessity to go beyond singleparticle approaches in these strongly correlated systems has made the simulation of twodimensional extended materials challenging, and we contrast their resulting highharmonic emission with more widely studied onedimensional analogues. As well as considering the photoinduced breakdown of the Mott insulating state and magnetic order, we also resolve the time and ultrahighfrequency domains of emission, which are used to characterize both the phototransition, and the subcycle structure of the electron dynamics. This extends simulation capabilities and understanding of the photomelting of these Mott insulators in two dimensions, at the frontier of attosecond nonequilibrium science of correlated materials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The nonlinear response of a material under a strong driving field is increasingly being exploited for the highharmonic generation (HHG) of coherent light, providing a powerful window into science on the shortest timescales^{1}. This has allowed for recent advances, including probes of attosecond electron dynamics^{2,3}, optical imaging of band structures^{4}, and control and manipulation of quantum phases^{5,6,7,8}, as well as answering some of the fundamental questions regarding the nature of decoherence in quantum systems^{9}. Simple phenomenological models for the charge dynamics which lead to this HHG have been proposed for atomic systems (the ‘threestep’ model of tunnelionization, acceleration and recombination)^{10,11,12,13}, with this more recently being extended to simple semiconductors, based on a fixed bandstructure and the buildup of inter and intraband electronic currents^{14,15,16}, where HHG was demonstrated experimentally only in the last decade^{14,17,18}. However, the interplay of these temporal nonlinear strongfield effects with nonperturbative strong electronic correlations, fundamentally changes the optical response of a material and enters a rich emergent regime of collective phenomena. This offers the possibility of emission of even higher harmonics due to coupling with these manybody interactions, and the proposal of engineering of photoinduced correlated phases^{19,20,21,22}. However, HHG and driving fields in strongly correlated materials are far from understood, and is emerging as a key research challenge in computational nonequilibrium science.
The introduction of strong correlation effects blurs the notion of welldefined band energies in the material, and complicates the simple interpretability of fixed bandstructurebased models. Regardless, the ‘singleparticle’ language of renormalized excitations to rationalize these phenomena remains important. This understanding is compounded by the difficulty in numerical simulation for these systems. In going beyond effective singleelectron models^{20}, reliable numerical investigations to date have been restricted to the consideration of onedimensional (1D) systems^{23,24,25,26,27}, where integrable models and matrix product states (MPS) are efficient, as well as dynamical meanfield theory approaches that work in an effective infinitedimensional framework^{28,29}. Exact diagonalization (ED) has also provided important insight in 1D^{24}, but restrictions to small system sizes have stymied progress in investigating bulk limits. These two limits of dimensionality almost exclusively dominate the theoretical understanding of nonlinear dynamics of correlated Mott insulators. Notwithstanding the important insight from these studies, many strongly correlated systems of interest concern 2D layered materials, such as the cuprates or organic chargetransfer salts, which can give rise to a multitude of emergent correlated phases^{30,31}.
In this work, we develop a timedependent Monte Carlo method to extend numerical tools to understand the nature of HHG in strongly correlated 2D materials in large system limits. We consider how the phenomenology of these materials can vary from their 1D or infinitedimensional analogues, and combine this with insight from ED to explore the effects of dimensionality and correlation on the timeaveraged and timeresolved emission. From our simulations, we also map different interaction strengths to a effective singleparticle model, exploring the extent to which singleparticle modifications to the bandstructure in response to the local correlations (e.g. opening of Mott gaps) are responsible for the observed features of HHG, as well as the limitation of these onebody models where explicit manybody interactions are ignored. This aims to extend the understanding of HHG in these domains, and provide a tool for their numerical treatment in more realistic systems.
Results and discussion
Photoinduced Mott transition
As a paradigmatic framework for correlated Mott insulating systems, we work with the singleband Hubbard model, defined in the “Methods” section^{32}. The system is subject to a monochromatic driving field with frequency ω_{L} and vector potential given by \(A(t)={E}_{0}/{\omega }_{{{\mbox{L}}}}{\sin }^{2}({\omega }_{{{\mbox{L}}}}t/2{N}_{{{\mbox{c}}}})\sin ({\omega }_{{{\mbox{L}}}}t)\), where E_{0} is the peak amplitude and N_{c} = 10 is the number of cycles. The electric field \(E(t)=\frac{{\rm{d}}A(t)}{{\rm{d}}t}\) is related to the Peierls phase by \({{{\mathbf{\Phi }}}}(t)=eaA(t)\hat{{{{\bf{e}}}}}\), where a is the lattice constant, and \(\hat{{{{\bf{e}}}}}\) controls the polarization of the pulse, which we take to be applied along the diagonal, \(\hat{{{{\bf{e}}}}}=(1,1)\). We can connect the model to experimentally realizable THz pulse setups, such that when the noninteracting lowenergy bandwidth of the material is ~2 eV and lattice constant ~ 4Å, the pulse considered has E_{0} = 10 MV cm^{−1} and ω_{L} = 32.9 THz, a physically realistic driving field with current technology in the midIR range^{33}. The specific model parameters that this corresponds to can be found in the “Methods” section, with these pulse and lattice parameters used for all simulations in this work.
We first compare the effect of this driving on the average number of doublonhole pairs, defined as \(D=\frac{1}{L}\mathop{\sum }\nolimits_{i = 1}^{L}\left\langle {\hat{c}}_{i\uparrow }^{{\dagger} }{\hat{c}}_{i\uparrow }{\hat{c}}_{i\downarrow }^{{\dagger} }{\hat{c}}_{i\downarrow }\right\rangle\), where L is the total number of sites in the lattice. The Mott ground state of this model at halffilling has growing antiferromagnetic (AFM) order as interactions increase, and the concept of ‘melting’ this Néel state via the elementary excitation of chargecarrying, nonmagnetic doublon–hole pairs is well established both experimentally and theoretically^{5,6,34,35,36}, and evidenced in Fig. 1. We consider the effect of dimensionality on this process, which requires excitations with energies above the Mott gap, Δ(U). For most correlation strengths considered here, this gap is considerably larger than the photon energy (in 1D, Δ > ω_{L} for approximately U > 2t_{0}), and the melting therefore requires a highly nonlinear excitation mechanism. The process responsible is determined by the Keldysh adiabaticity parameter, γ = ħω_{L}/ξE_{0}^{34,37}, where ξ(U) represents the correlation length of the excitations. Multiphoton absorption dominates for γ ≫ 1, which is replaced by quantum tunnelling when γ ≪ 1, as in this region the Hubbard band energies are distorted by the static component of the field to such an extent that electrons can tunnel through the Mott gap to produce doublons. The 1D systems in this study are firmly in the latter regime, where DC dielectric breakdown is observed with threshold behaviour that is controlled by the peak field strength E_{0}, as can be seen in Fig. 1, and is independent of ω_{L}. The threshold field strength required for breakdown is given by the Schwinger limit, E_{th} = Δ/2eξ^{34}. Analytic expressions for the Mott gap and correlation length in the thermodynamic limit from the Bethe ansatz^{38,39} allow for accurate predictions of E_{th}, which agree well with numerical results as seen in Fig. 1^{24,34}. In 1D, it is predicted that the threshold field is never exceeded (E_{th} > E_{0}) for U > 6t_{0}, above which the correlation is too large for this dynamical Mott transition to occur, as shown in Fig. 1.
A similar analysis of this photoinduced melting in 2D requires careful consideration to ensure that the restricted lattice sizes are still representative of the thermodynamic limit, and do not introduce spurious frustration caused by the boundary conditions (see Supplementary Discussion). However, the results of Fig. 1 are free from any other significant approximation. It is clear that the magnetic order is similarly melted, but now the transition continues to melt at higher correlation strengths than in 1D, as well as the spin correlation order demonstrating an earlier onset of melting in the pulse profile (see Supplementary Fig. 1). This indicates a lower threshold field strength, arising from the differences in bandstructure and correlation lengths between the models. However, finitesize effects must be considered carefully, especially at small interactions where ξ is large. To further investigate the effects of dimensionality, we develop approximate numerical approaches which can scale to larger system sizes and are more appropriate to probe the time and frequency dependence of the highharmonic emission in the thermodynamic limit.
For this, we have implemented the timedependent variational Monte Carlo (tVMC) method^{40}, which is combined with a projected Slater–Jastrow wavefunction form and stochastic reconfiguration to optimize the initial ground state within the mVMC package^{41,42,43,44}. These wave functions have been shown to accurately capture a multitude of correlated phases of the Hubbard model, as well as the dynamics of quenches and other timedependent phenomena^{40,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53}. Independent samples in a 4thorder RungeKutta integrator were required for stable and accurate simulation of the HHG in these strong and rapidly changing fields, as discussed in the “Methods” section. All tVMC and ED simulations were performed on 36 and 12 site lattices, respectively, with benchmarking of the accuracy of the tVMC method shown in Supplementary Fig. 2, as well as consideration of convergence with respect to lattice size shown in Supplementary Fig. 3.
Timeaveraged emission
In Fig. 2, we report the timeaveraged HHG spectra, defined by eq. (3), resulting from both 1D and 2D simulations under the driving pulse, calculated using tVMC extended to larger system sizes. Results in 1D corroborate those previously found in the literature for ED of small lattice sizes^{24}. These show low, oddharmonic emission in the low interaction strength regimes (see Supplementary Fig. 4), while stronger interactions rapidly give way to a broad spectrum of emission where peak harmonics increase linearly with interaction strength. These forms are rationalized in terms of distinct physical processes. The first relies on a fixed bandstructure picture, where the emission of sharp, distinct lowharmonics is a result of an intraband current driven by dynamical Bloch oscillations, as is the dominant paradigm in semiconductor studies^{14}. However, as interactions increase in 1D, a significant Mott gap (Δ) arises in the bandstructure and changes the mechanism of emission. Interband processes in this interacting regime dominate the emission, resulting from the driving field building polarization between the bands and forcing the creation of doublon–hole pairs and their subsequent recombination. For U/t_{0} ≫ 1, this gives rise to a broad band of highharmonic emission, with the majority of the emission falling between Δ and Δ + 8t_{0}, which covers the range of chargeconserving optical excitations from the correlated ground state according to the Bethe ansatz^{24,34}. This forms a shifting interval of just over 30 harmonics, which peaks in the region of N ~ U/ω_{L}. This is accompanied by the suppression of lower harmonics, resulting from the upper Hubbard band becoming saturated by doublonhole excitations, limiting the availability of quasimomenta states for intraband currents to form and thereby decreasing emission below the gap.
In the noninteracting (metallic) limit, the emission in 2D is entirely proportional to that of 1D, and similarly driven by the intraband current. However, as interactions increase, the presence of strong lowerharmonic emission persists, in contrast to 1D. Specifically, there is emission surrounding the first harmonic at all correlation strengths approximately an order of magnitude more intense than the equivalent 1D model, despite the formation of significant Mott gaps. This phenomenon is necessarily driven by a retention of significant levels of intraband current, indicating a persistence of mobile collective charge carriers which avoid recombination to the AFM state over substantial timescales. This also agrees with Fig. 1, which shows the melting of AFM order even at large interaction strengths beyond the threshold field strength in 1D, facilitated by these persistent charge carrying quasiparticles which are absent at large interactions in 1D. We hypothesize that this is due to the ability of excitations to avoid each other in this higher dimensionality, which is therefore able to continue to undergo driven dynamical oscillations without recombination. From a bandstructure perspective, this can be rationalized by noting that the singleparticle bandwidth of the 2D model is twice that of 1D (representative band structures of these models can be found in Supplementary Fig. 5). This increased number of highenergy quasimomenta states available in 2D ensures that the upper band does not become as saturated and can continue to support oscillations of itinerant doublons, leading to the persistence of lowharmonic emission.
As U/t_{0} increases in 2D, a separation develops between these intraband currentinduced lower harmonics, and higher frequency emission caused by localized doublonholon recombination that extend up to tens of harmonics. At U = 5t_{0}, interactions are sufficiently strong for local moments to begin to generate on the lattice, with the HHG shifted to lower orders than its 1D counterpart and dominated by a sharp peak near the 10th harmonic. The specifics of the van Hove singularities in the density of states for the 2D model, which are found closer to band edges in 2D than 1D (see Supplementary Fig. 5), can explain this shift of peak intensity to lower harmonics, with a greater number of lowenergy states around the Mott gap accessible in 2D. This changes considerably in the strongly correlated regime, as shown for U = 7t_{0}. Here the spectrum broadens over more than 40 harmonics, caused by the large bandwidth in 2D which allows for a larger number of accessible highenergy states, combined with the continued persistence of intraband currents at lower harmonics.
Timeresolved emission
The dynamics of the Mott transition and harmonic emission can also be timefrequency resolved on electronic timescales, using the wavelet analysis defined by eq. (4) to extract the temporal emission amplitude. Figure 3 shows that the signature of the transition is a brief and intense period of emission, which peaks following the threshold E_{th} being reached. This breakdown occurs within 2 field cycles in 1D and even more rapidly in 2D, and is followed by subcycle flaring at much lower intensities after the Mott gap has melted. In 2D, the peak emission occurs earlier, implying that the transitions happen more rapidly following irradiation, which is further corroborated by additional observations in the Supplementary Discussion, where the explicit melting of magnetic order is observed. We also find a stronger band of lowharmonic emission in 2D, corresponding to intraband dynamical oscillations in the current. This emission starts almost instantly upon irradiation and persists for the first 4 cycles, providing almost all of the initial emission processes before significant recombination events can occur to induce higher harmonics. The threshold field is proportional to the Mott gap, which makes Δ(U) an important factor in whether the transition can occur and how quickly after irradiation. That the gap for a given interaction strength is smaller in 2D can explain many of these observed differences, in particular the lower threshold field strength observed in Fig. 1 giving rise to a melting of Mott order at higher values of the interaction, as well as the earlier onset of transitions observed in Fig. 3. The Mott gaps in these different dimensionalities can be seen in the Supplementary Discussion, and are in qualitative agreement with cluster perturbation theory results^{54,55}.
The timeresolved spectrum also exhibits alignment between electric field peaks and the subcycle emission profiles, only visible at intensities orders of magnitude smaller than Fig. 3, where these features are masked by the highintensity emission derived from the dynamical Mott transition. Figure 4 allows this structure to be seen at intensities less than ~10^{−6} and emission frequencies significantly greater than the scale of ~U/ω_{L}. Due to the low intensity of this emission, the tVMC method struggles to resolve these subcycle details against the inherent stochastics, and so we show exact results benchmarked against the larger systems accessible with tVMC to ensure no spurious finitesize effects are introduced into our conclusions. In 1D there is highly regular emission, best understood in terms of an extended threestep model^{27,34}. In this picture in 1D, doublon–hole excitations are created through tunnelling, accelerated away by the field and then returned as the field oscillates back. The resulting recombination causes two emission peaks per cycle which are aligned with crests in the field strength, and primarily occur during the pulse’s central few cycles where E(t) is largest. In 2D, the HHG has a more featured subcycle structure, including multiple flares per half cycle which do not only coincide with peak field, and which persist longer into the pulse profile. This complexity likely arises from the larger number of trajectories that these correlated excitations can take in this higher dimensionality, leading to a more complicated structure of allowable constructive and destructive interference patterns within each cycle. These specific dynamical trajectories can be elucidated via an analysis of the complex phase of the dipole acceleration, which we will consider further in future work.
In both 1D and 2D, the observed characteristics of the HHG hold over a broad range of pulse and lattice parameters. In the frequency domain, properties such as cutoff and peak harmonic region do not vary significantly with E_{0}, which arises as all possible contributing excitations are already accessible^{24,34}, provided the field strength is sufficient to melt the Mott order via dielectric breakdown (E_{0} ≥ E_{th}). This holds in both dimensionality regimes, with the dominant mechanism of tunnelling via dielectric breakdown remaining valid. However, both E_{0} and the effective lattice constant do affect how rapidly the threshold field is reached, thereby changing the onset of the dynamical phase transition. Due to the tunnelling mechanism, the field frequency does not considerably affect this transition^{34}, but rather shifts the emission peaks to larger harmonics as the frequency is decreased.
Effective singleparticle model
The HHG of a Mott insulator is clearly determined by the correlated dynamics of the manyelectron problem. However, discussion of the dominant mechanisms generally considers the renormalized onebody dynamics described by the ground state bandstructure, with e.g. the effects of the Mott gap a central quantity for correlated materials. We aim to investigate the extent to which a characterization of this singleparticle bandstructure, as modified by the correlations, can account for some of the features we observe in the HHG. This will allow us to extract the simple bandstructuredriven features of the response, in isolation from explicit manybody correlated features which are harder to characterize.
We map the driven system onto a simplified noninteracting model shown explicitly in the “Methods” section, introducing fictitious degrees of freedom which couple locally to each physical site of the lattice with a strength parameterized by the scalarvalued V(U). These fictitious degrees of freedom hybridize with the physical lattice in such a way as to mimic the band splitting caused by the correlations of the interacting lattice. The parameter V(U) is optimized for each interaction strength by matching the first spectral moment of the particle and hole density of states of the ground state, given by \(\langle {{\Psi }} {\hat{c}}^{({\dagger} )}(\hat{H}E){\hat{c}}^{({\dagger} )} {{\Psi }}\rangle\), between the noninteracting model and the correlated system as described by variational Monte Carlo (VMC)^{56,57,58}. After tracing out the fictitious degrees of freedom, this can introduce a second band and open an effective Mott gap in the bandstructure of the noninteracting model, \(\widetilde{{{\Delta }}}(U)\), with the fictitious space representing a local selfenergy, comprising a single pole with spectral weight ∣V(U)∣^{2} at the Fermi level. This therefore represents a simplified dynamical meanfield model, with the physical space dynamics remaining normconserving under the applied pulse. This is similar to the physics captured by the ‘Hubbard I’ approximation, albeit in that approach the effective selfenergy pole is constructed from the atomic solution, rather than the VMC ground state solution to the full correlated lattice in this instance^{59}. Similarinspirit ‘semiconductor’ models designed to mimic the correlated bandstructure in a singleparticle model have also been considered elsewhere, in order to rationalize qualitative features of HHG emission^{29}. A description of the density of states and resulting band structures from this model can be found in the Supplementary Discussion.
While Mott physics can indeed emerge from this model, with the band gaps in qualitative agreement with results from cluster perturbation theory (2D) and the Bethe Ansatz (1D)^{54,55}, there are some significant limitations. Firstly, the effective minimal selfenergy is fixed by the ground state correlations, and does not change with time in response to the pulse, as opposed to the explicitly nonequilibrium selfenergy in the case of e.g. nonequilibrium DMFT^{28,29}. Secondly, these auxiliary sites are only locally coupled, precluding a momentumdependent, longrange modification to the effective correlations. Finally, no spindependent terms are optimized, so the system remains in a paramagnetic phase with no effective spindependent Heisenberg interactions arising from consideration of an explicit Hubbard term. This in itself precludes the formation of local moments, and therefore the melting of this order which features so prominently in the results of the timefrequency resolved emission of Fig. 3.
Nevertheless, the singleparameter simplicity of this bandstructureengineered model is appealing for its interpretability, as well as being simple to solve in the true bulk system limit. It manages to capture some of the broad features of the spectra arising from intra and interband processes, which can now be directly attributed to renormalized singleparticle dynamics on this modified bandstructure. At U/t_{0} = 0 the model is exact (V = 0). Figure 5 shows that as the effective interactions increase, the spectrum becomes dominated by a broad band of emission resulting from recombination events following interband excitations. This emission is mostly confined to harmonics between \(\widetilde{{{\Delta }}}\) and the largest excitation, and the peak emission amplitude goes as ~U/ω_{L}. These are properties shared by the explicitly correlated spectra in Fig. 2, particularly in 1D, and is a clear demonstration of the validity of simple bandstructure and Mott gap arguments for the main timeaveraged emission profiles. Furthermore, the model becomes increasingly accurate as U/t_{0} → ∞, where the system is further from dielectric breakdown. In this limit the upper band becomes sparsely populated, allowing the formation of intraband currents which cause the spectrogram to develop a clear separation between inter and intraband driven emission, as seen in Fig. 5 for U/t_{0} = 7, both of which cause fieldsynchronized HHG, with the former at high harmonics and the latter at lower ones. This also occurs in 1D and 2D systems at sufficiently large interactions, and numerical demonstration of this equivalence to the fully correlated dynamics in this limit is given in Supplementary Fig. 7. This shows that the model is more appropriate for use in the highU/t_{0} limit, where a singleparticle description within a static bandstructure picture is sufficient to capture most features of the subcycle dynamics. It is clear therefore that bandstructure changes alone leave important imprints on the HHG in correlated materials.
However, both the absolute emission amplitude, as well as the relative amplitudes between the lowharmonic intraband and highharmonic interband emission are not faithfully reproduced, with an exponential decay of emission intensity for increasing effective interaction strengths due to the persistence of the Mott gap. Overall, the model reproduces some important features of the correlated spectra but unsurprisingly struggles to capture the complexity of the interfering trajectories in 2D due to its lack of explicitly correlated dynamics. At effective U/t_{0} = 5, low harmonics are suppressed, which is observed in the 1D spectra but not in 2D where these low harmonics are retained. Furthermore, the lack of threshold behaviour introduces a sensitivity to the pulse parameters E_{0} and a which do not exist in the fully correlated model. Improvements can be made by matching both spin and charge gaps, as well as introducing a timedependence into this effective selfenergy of the auxiliary system. However, these will come at the cost of increased complexity and difficulty in the interpretation of the model.
We tackle the challenging simulation of highharmonic generation in twodimensional strongly correlated Mott insulators. By application of a timedependent stochastic technique, we are able to access the system sizes required to elucidate the emission profiles in both the temporal and frequency domains, as well as compare and contrast the emission with lowerdimensional models. We also map the system to a simplified, singleparameter dynamical meanfield picture, which allows for the salient Mottgap driven emission to be considered in isolation. These tools and insight will further the study of nonequilibrium correlated electron systems on their natural timescales, and extend the theoretical understanding of highharmonic probes of these critical manybody charge dynamics in attosecond science.
Methods
Model
We consider 1D and 2D (square lattice) Hubbard model with periodic boundary conditions at halffilling,
where 〈ij〉 denotes a hopping to nearest neighbours (such that in 1D these sites are arranged in a chain), and variations in the effective screened Coulomb interaction (U/t_{0}) dictate the importance of the correlated physics, and which can act as a proxy for other external parameters to induce quantum phase transitions. Simple spband systems such as graphene map to U ~ 1.5t_{0}^{60,61}, while strongly correlated cuprate parent materials of hightemperature superconductivity are modelled with U ~ 8t_{0}^{62,63}. Taking t_{0} = 1, the pulses considered in this work correspond to model parameters ω_{L} = 0.262, E_{0} = 5.325, and a = 1.444.
The electric current operator is defined as
where the emitted HHG is defined from the charge acceleration as
with \(J(t)=\langle \hat{{{{\mathcal{J}}}}}(t)\rangle\). The emission can also be resolved in time, allowing the Mott transition and electron dynamics to be directly observed. This was done using wavelet analysis, which takes the convolution of a wavelet ψ(η) with the acceleration a(t_{n}) = dJ(t_{n})/dt for n = 0, . . . , N − 1^{64}
where s are the wavelet scales and ψ(η) was taken as a Morlet wavelet.
Exact diagonalization
For small systems the Schrödinger equation
can be solved numerically without approximations in the expressibility of the state at any time. The initial state \(\left{{\Psi }}(0)\right\rangle\) is taken to be the ground state, calculated with exact diagonalization (ED)^{65}. The wavefunction \(\left{{\Psi }}(t)\right\rangle\) is then evolved forward in steps Δt using the 4thorder RungeKutta method (RK4). This uses a series of recursive steps
with update
Fig. 4 uses a square lattice, but Fig. 1 uses a tilted lattice to better capture the doublon density in the thermodynamic limit (see Supplementary Discussion).
Trial wavefunction
The dimension of the full Hilbert space increases exponentially with the number of sites in the lattice, which necessitates the use of alternative methods to probe the thermodynamic limit. Instead of working with the full manybody wavefunction, tVMC uses a trial wavefunction of the form \(\left{{\Psi }}\right\rangle =\left{{\Psi }}({\alpha }_{1},...,{\alpha }_{p})\right\rangle\), which depends on a set of p complexvalued variational parameters. The wavefunction used in this work was^{40,41}
where \({{{{\mathcal{L}}}}}_{K}\) is the momentum number projector, \({{{{\mathcal{L}}}}}_{P}\) is the pointgroup symmetry projector, \({{{\mathcal{P}}}}(t)\) is a JastrowGutzwiller correlation factor, and the Pfaffian wavefunction is given by \(\left\phi (t)\right\rangle ={\left(\mathop{\sum }\nolimits_{i,j}^{L}{f}_{ij}(t){\hat{c}}_{i\uparrow }^{{\dagger} }{\hat{c}}_{i\downarrow }^{{\dagger} }\right)}^{{N}_{{{\mbox{e}}}}/2}\left0\right\rangle\).
Stochastic methods
The parameters for the Hubbard ground state were optimized simultaneously using the stochastic reconfiguration (SR) method^{43}, which was then evolved in real time using the timedependent variational Monte Carlo (tVMC) method^{40}.
Both methods use the timedependent variational principle^{66,67}. In real time, at each step the parameters are calculated to minimize^{40}
This leads to a system of equations for the trajectory of the parameters
where Markov chain Monte Carlo is used to calculate the matrix S and vector g.
Equation (13) was propagated forward using RK4, and at each timestep the expectation value \(J(t)=\langle \hat{{{{\mathcal{J}}}}}(t)\rangle\) of the current operator was calculated using VMC. In SR, the ground state is found by evolving eq. (13) with the Euler method in imaginary time within the natural metric of the parameterization, under the substitution τ = it.
Effective singleparticle model
The Hamiltonian is given by
The second term couples each physical site to its respective auxiliary one via the Fermionic operators \({\hat{f}}^{({\dagger} )}\). This replaces the interaction term of the Hubbard Hamiltonian, and introduces a gap via the single parameter V(U). The advantage of this method is that the model is entirely noninteracting, so the system’s dynamics can be exactly and rapidly calculated using its timedependent onebody density matrix. This was done once again using the RK4 method.
The mapping between interacting (at a given U/t_{0}) and noninteracting systems is achieved by choosing V(U) to match the mean of the particle and hole distributions of the density of states. This is first calculated for the correlated system using VMC, by writing it as an expectation of the ground state wavefunction^{56,57,58}
where \({{{{\mathcal{D}}}}}_{\alpha \beta }\) is the onebody density matrix summed over nearest neighbour sites α and β, while D is the ground state double occupancy on each site. The parameter V is then optimized so that T in the physical system (once the auxiliary system is traced out) matches that of the correlated system. At a given V, the meanfield moment is given by
where μ is the chemical potential and (C; ϵ) are the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the fictitious composite system’s Hamiltonian, and α is restricted to indices of the physical (not auxiliary) system. The auxiliary system therefore acts as a entanglement bath to change the onebody dynamical properties of the model.
Data availability
Data available on request from the authors.
Code availability
The codes used to perform these calculations are available on request from the authors.
References
Krausz, F. & Ivanov, M. Attosecond physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163–234 (2009).
Li, J. et al. Attosecond science based on high harmonic generation from gases and solids. Nat. Commun. 11, 2748 (2020).
Ramasesha, K., Leone, S. R. & Neumark, D. M. Realtime probing of electron dynamics using attosecond timeresolved spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 67, 41–63 (2016).
Vampa, G. et al. Alloptical reconstruction of crystal band structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 193603 (2015).
Liu, M. et al. Terahertzfieldinduced insulatortometal transition in vanadium dioxide metamaterial. Nature 487, 345–348 (2012).
Mayer, B. et al. Tunneling breakdown of a strongly correlated insulating state in VO_{2} induced by intense multiterahertz excitation. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235113 (2015).
Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S. L. Equilibration and order in quantum Floquet matter. Nat. Phys. 13, 424–428 (2017).
Mitrano, M. et al. Possible lightinduced superconductivity in K_{3}C_{60} at high temperature. Nature 530, 461–464 (2016).
Vacher, M., Steinberg, L., Jenkins, A. J., Bearpark, M. J. & Robb, M. A. Electron dynamics following photoionization: decoherence due to the nuclearwavepacket width. Phys. Rev. A 92, 040502 (2015).
Lewenstein, M., Balcou, P., Ivanov, M. Y., L’Huillier, A. & Corkum, P. B. Theory of highharmonic generation by lowfrequency laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117–2132 (1994).
Corkum, P. B. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994–1997 (1993).
Schafer, K. J., Yang, B., DiMauro, L. F. & Kulander, K. C. Above threshold ionization beyond the high harmonic cutoff. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1599–1602 (1993).
Schafer, K. J. & Kulander, K. C. High harmonic generation from ultrafast pump lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 638–641 (1997).
Ghimire, S. et al. Observation of highorder harmonic generation in a bulk crystal. Nat. Phys. 7, 138–141 (2011).
Ghimire, S. & Reis, D. A. Highharmonic generation from solids. Nat. Phys. 15, 10–16 (2019).
Ikemachi, T. et al. Trajectory analysis of highorderharmonic generation from periodic crystals. Phys. Rev. A 95, 043416 (2017).
Hohenleutner, M. et al. Realtime observation of interfering crystal electrons in highharmonic generation. Nature 523, 572–575 (2015).
Luu, T. T. et al. Extreme ultraviolet highharmonic spectroscopy of solids. Nature 521, 498–502 (2015).
Oka, T. & Kitamura, S. Floquet engineering of quantum materials. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387–408 (2019).
TancogneDejean, N., Sentef, M. A. & Rubio, A. Ultrafast modification of Hubbard U in a strongly correlated material: ab initio highharmonic generation in NiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 097402 (2018).
McCaul, G., Orthodoxou, C., Jacobs, K., Booth, G. H. & Bondar, D. I. Controlling arbitrary observables in correlated manybody systems. Phys. Rev. A 101, 053408 (2020).
McCaul, G., Orthodoxou, C., Jacobs, K., Booth, G. H. & Bondar, D. I. Driven imposters: controlling expectations in manybody systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 183201 (2020).
Takayoshi, S., Murakami, Y. & Werner, P. Highharmonic generation in quantum spin systems. Phys. Rev. B 99, 184303 (2019).
Silva, R. E. F., Blinov, I. V., Rubtsov, A. N., Smirnova, O. & Ivanov, M. Highharmonic spectroscopy of ultrafast manybody dynamics in strongly correlated systems. Nat. Photonics 12, 266–270 (2018).
Imai, S., Ono, A. & Ishihara, S. High harmonic generation in a correlated electron system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 157404 (2020).
Zhu, W., Fauseweh, B., Chacon, A. & Zhu, J.X. Ultrafast laserdriven manybody dynamics and Kondo coherence collapse. Phys. Rev. B 103, 224305 (2021).
Murakami, Y., Takayoshi, S., Koga, A. & Werner, P. Highharmonic generation in onedimensional Mott insulators. Phys. Rev. B 103, 035110 (2021).
Murakami, Y. & Werner, P. Nonequilibrium steady states of electric field driven Mott insulators. Phys. Rev. B 98, 075102 (2018).
Murakami, Y., Eckstein, M. & Werner, P. Highharmonic generation in Mott insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 057405 (2018).
Wosnitza, J. Superconductivity of organic chargetransfer salts. J. Low Temp. Phys. 197, 250–271 (2019).
Foley, A., Verret, S., Tremblay, A.M. S. & Sénéchal, D. Coexistence of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in the Hubbard model for cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 99, 184510 (2019).
Macridin, A., Jarrell, M., Maier, T. & Sawatzky, G. A. Physics of cuprates with the twoband Hubbard model: the validity of the oneband Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B 71, 134527 (2005).
Shalaby, M. & Hauri, C. P. Demonstration of a lowfrequency threedimensional terahertz bullet with extreme brightness. Nat. Commun. 6, 5976 (2015).
Oka, T. Nonlinear doublon production in a Mott insulator: Landau–Dykhne method applied to an integrable model. Phys. Rev. B 86, 075148 (2012).
Oka, T. & Aoki, H. Photoinduced Tomonaga–Luttingerlike liquid in a Mott insulator. Phys. Rev. B 78, 241104 (2008).
Eckstein, M., Oka, T. & Werner, P. Dielectric breakdown of Mott insulators in dynamical meanfield theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 146404 (2010).
Keldysh, L. V. Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 20, 1307–1314 (1965).
Stafford, C. A. & Millis, A. J. Scaling theory of the Mott–Hubbard metalinsulator transition in one dimension. Phys. Rev. B 48, 1409–1425 (1993).
Essler, F. H. L., Frahm, H., Göhmann, F., Klümper, A. & Korepin, V. E. The Onedimensional Hubbard Model (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Ido, K., Ohgoe, T. & Imada, M. Timedependent manyvariable variational Monte Carlo method for nonequilibrium strongly correlated electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 92, 245106 (2015).
Misawa, T. et al. mVMCopensource software for manyvariable variational Monte Carlo method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 235, 447–462 (2019).
Tahara, D. & Imada, M. Variational Monte Carlo method combined with quantumnumber projection and multivariable optimization. J. Phys. Soc. 77, 114701 (2008).
Sorella, S. Generalized Lanczos algorithm for variational quantum Monte Carlo. Phys. Rev. B 64, 024512 (2001).
Sorella, S., Casula, M. & Rocca, D. Weak binding between two aromatic rings: feeling the van der Waals attraction by quantum Monte Carlo methods. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 014105 (2007).
Fauseweh, B. & Zhu, J.X. Laser pulse driven control of charge and spin order in the twodimensional Kondo lattice. Phys. Rev. B 102, 165128 (2020).
Ido, K., Ohgoe, T. & Imada, M. Correlationinduced superconductivity dynamically stabilized and enhanced by laser irradiation. Sci. Adv 3, e1700718 (2017).
Carleo, G., Becca, F., Schiró, M. & Fabrizio, M. Localization and glassy dynamics of manybody quantum systems. Sci. Rep. 2, 243 (2012).
Carleo, G., Becca, F., SanchezPalencia, L., Sorella, S. & Fabrizio, M. Lightcone effect and supersonic correlations in one and twodimensional bosonic superfluids. Phys. Rev. A 89, 031602 (2014).
Cevolani, L., Carleo, G. & SanchezPalencia, L. Protected quasilocality in quantum systems with longrange interactions. Phys. Rev. A 92, 041603 (2015).
Carleo, G. & Troyer, M. Solving the quantum manybody problem with artificial neural networks. Science 355, 602–606 (2017).
Schmitt, M. & Heyl, M. Quantum manybody dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 100503 (2020).
LopezGutierrez, I. & Mendl, C. Realtime evolution with neuralnetwork quantum states. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08831 (2020).
Fabiani, G. & Mentink, J. H. Investigating ultrafast quantum magnetism with machine learning. SciPost Phys. 7, 4 (2019).
Kohno, M. Mott transition in the twodimensional Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 076401 (2012).
Kohno, M. Spectral properties near the Mott transition in the twodimensional Hubbard model with nextnearestneighbor hopping. Phys. Rev. B 90, 035111 (2014).
Fertitta, E. & Booth, G. H. Energyweighted density matrix embedding of open correlated chemical fragments. J. Chem. Phys. 151, 014115 (2019).
Fertitta, E. & Booth, G. H. Rigorous wave function embedding with dynamical fluctuations. Phys. Rev. B 98, 235132 (2018).
Sriluckshmy, P. V., Nusspickel, M., Fertitta, E. & Booth, G. H. Fully algebraic and selfconsistent effective dynamics in a static quantum embedding. Phys. Rev. B 103, 085131 (2021).
Hubbard, J. & Flowers, B. H. Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci 276, 238–257 (1963).
Lichtenstein, A. I. & Katsnelson, M. I. Ab initio calculations of quasiparticle band structure in correlated systems: LDA++ approach. Phys. Rev. B 57, 6884–6895 (1998).
Ryee, S. & Han, M. J. The effect of double counting, spin density, and Hund interaction in the different DFT+U functionals. Sci. Rep. 8, 9559 (2018).
Delannoy, J.Y. P., Gingras, M. J. P., Holdsworth, P. C. W. & Tremblay, A.M. S.Lowenergy theory of the \(t{t}^{\prime}{t}^{^{\prime\prime} }U\) Hubbard model at halffilling: interaction strengths in cuprate superconductors and an effective spinonly description of La_{2}CuO_{4}. Phys. Rev. B 79, 235130 (2009).
Wang, Y. et al. Emergence of quasiparticles in a doped Mott insulator. Commun. Phys. 3, 210 (2020).
Torrence, C. & Compo, G. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79, 61–78 (1998).
Sun, Q. et al. PySCF: the Pythonbased simulations of chemistry framework. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1340 (2018).
Haegeman, J., Osborne, T. J. & Verstraete, F. Postmatrix product state methods: to tangent space and beyond. Phys. Rev. B 88, 075133 (2013).
McLachlan, A. A variational solution of the timedependent Schrodinger equation. Mol. Phys. 8, 39–44 (1964).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Gerard McCaul for helpful discussions on the manuscript. G.H.B. gratefully acknowledges support from the Royal Society via a University Research Fellowship, as well as funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 759063). We are also grateful to the UK Materials and Molecular Modelling Hub for computational resources, which is partially funded by EPSRC (EP/P020194/1 and EP/T022213/1), as well as A.Z. receiving funding from the Royal Society (RGS/R1/211053) C.O. acknowledges funding by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the Centre for Doctoral Training "Cross Disciplinary Approaches to NonEquilibrium Systems" (CANES, Grant No. EP/L015854/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.H.B. devised and supervised the project. C.O. performed all simulations, which were analyzed by all authors. G.H.B. and C.O. wrote the paper, with comments and contributions from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Orthodoxou, C., Zaïr, A. & Booth, G.H. High harmonic generation in twodimensional Mott insulators. npj Quantum Mater. 6, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535021003778
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535021003778
This article is cited by

Emerging ultrafast techniques for studying quantum materials
Nature Reviews Materials (2023)