Abstract
Quantum coherence, the physical property underlying fundamental phenomena such as multiparticle interference and entanglement, has emerged as a valuable resource upon which modern technologies are founded. In general, the most prominent adversary of quantum coherence is noise arising from the interaction of the associated dynamical system with its environment. Under certain conditions, however, the existence of noise may drive quantum and classical systems to endure intriguing nontrivial effects. In this vein, here we demonstrate, both theoretically and experimentally, that when two indistinguishable noninteracting particles copropagate through quantum networks affected by nondissipative noise, the system always evolves into a steady state in which coherences accounting for particle indistinguishabilty perpetually prevail. Furthermore, we show that the same steady state with surviving quantum coherences is reached even when the initial state exhibits classical correlations.
Introduction
The influence of random fluctuating environments over the evolution of dynamical systems has been a subject of intensive research since the beginning of modern science.^{1,2} Particularly in quantum physics, environmental noise represents a prominent adversary that precludes the generation, control, and preservation of fundamental properties such as coherence, entanglement, and quantum correlations.^{3,4,5,6,7} Conventionally, quantum systems interacting with the environment are termed open quantum systems (OQS), and as such they constitute the most common structures encountered in nature. In this regard, the standard phenomenological approach to describe the evolution of OQS is the socalled Born–Markov approximation.^{3} In such an approach, the systemofinterest is weakly coupled to a large unstructured environment in such a way that the statistical properties of the latter remain unaffected.^{8} Generally, in the study of OQS the main interest is to explore the quantum properties exhibited by the system itself and not of the environment; as a result one restricts the investigation to the dynamics of the reducedOQS only.^{3,9}
In its simplest configuration, reducedOQS subject to BornMarkov premises can be investigated in finite quantum networks in which environmental effects are modeled by introducing pure dephasing or, more generally, nondissipative noise, into the site energies.^{10} At the single particle level, the relevance of such dephasing models have been highlighted in an interdisciplinary framework of studies ranging from biology,^{11,12} via quantum chemistry,^{13,14} and electronics^{15} to photonics^{16} and ultracold atoms.^{17} As it turns out, singleparticle dephasing models do not show any divergence from wave mechanics.^{10,18,19,20,21} Rather the richness and complexity of genuine quantum processes are more prominent when a manifold of indistinguishable particles is considered.^{22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30}
In any setting affected by dephasing, the phase properties of the associated quantum mechanical waves are randomly distorted, as a result their interference capability or ‘coherence’ tends to vanish.^{31,32,33} Indeed, the fragility of quantum coherence is one of the main impediments for the development of quantumenhanced technologies.^{31} Clearly, identifying mechanisms to prevent or slow down decoherence effects in quantum systems is an issue of scientific and practical importance. In this respect, it has been demonstrated, theoretically^{34} and experimentally,^{35} that some types of quantum correlations can be arrested into judiciously prepared quantum states that resist the impact of nondissipative noise. More precisely, it has been recognized that when multiqubit Belldiagonal states are exposed to dephasing, quantum coherence defined with respect to certain reference basis remains unaffected indefinitely,^{35} that is, the ‘amount’ of quantum coherence becomes stationary. Beyond this particular framework, there exist certain special sets of states, termed decoherencefree subspaces, that exhibit some sort of symmetry that gives rise to a common coupling with the environment.^{36} Consequently, along evolution the entire subspace will undergo collective decoherence^{36} that can be factored out from the process leaving the state undistorted.^{37}
In the present work we investigate, theoretically and experimentally, the dynamics of single and two noninteracting particles in quantum networks affected by nondissipative noise, that is, networks subject to the Born–Markov approximation. In particular, we focus our attention on the theoretical description of the role of particle indistinguishability in the preservation of coherence of twoparticle states, bosons and fermions, propagating under the influence of dephasing. We stress that the choice of using nondissipative noise for our analysis is based on the fact that the number of particles has to be preserved.
To perform our experiments, we exploit the fact that the dynamics of true reducedOQS can be effectively reproduced in ensembles of subsystems where the fluctuating parameters, either site energies or coupling parameters, can be implemented physically.^{38} Notice, the simulation of OQS with Hamiltonian ensembles is only possible for systems under the influence of nondissipative noise. For our experiments, such reducedlike OQS are implemented in ensembles of photonic waveguide networks inscribed in fused silica glass by means of the femtosecond laser writing technique.^{39} In this photonic context, time is mapped onto the propagation coordinate (t → z), the waveguide propagation constants play the role of site energies, and the hopping rates result from the evanescent overlap between normal modes supported by adjacent waveguides (sites).^{39} We emphasize that within the single excitation manifold the mapping of the time parameter over the propagation coordinate allows one to literarilly observe the evolution of transition amplitudes with time.^{40} Further, dephasing effects can be produced in the waveguides by inducing random longitudinal fluctuations in the waveguides’ refractive indices as illustrated in Fig. 1a.
Results
Single particle dynamics
In order to produce stochastic fluctuations in the waveguide ‘siteenergies’, we have varied the inscription velocity while writing the waveguides at intervals of one centimeter. This effectively produces random changes in the siteenergies every ~33 ps. Mathematically, singleparticle dynamics in such photonic networks is governed by the stochastic Schrödinger equation \( {\mathrm{i}}\frac{d}{{dz}}\psi _n(z)\) = \(\beta _n(z)\psi _n(z)\) + \(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{m \ne n}^N {\kern 1pt} \kappa _{m,n}\psi _m(z)\). Here, we have set ħ = 1, ψ_{n} represents the singleparticle wavefunction at site n, and κ_{m,n} are the hopping rates between the (m, n) sites. Moreover, β_{n}(z) = β_{n} + ϕ_{n}(z) denotes the random site energy at the nth site with ϕ_{n}(z) describing a stochastic Gaussian process which satisfies the conditions \(\left\langle {\phi _n(z)} \right\rangle = 0\) and \(\left\langle {\phi _n(z)\phi _m(z\prime )} \right\rangle\) = \(\gamma _n\delta _{m,n}\delta \left( {z  z\prime } \right)\), with \(\left\langle \ldots \right\rangle\) denoting stochastic average, and γ_{n} representing the dephasing rates.^{10} Notice, the dephasing rates are directly obtained using the relation \(\gamma _n = \sigma _n^2{\mathrm{\Delta }}z\),^{41} where σ_{n} is the standard deviation used to inscribe the nth waveguide and Δz = 1 cm is the correlation length. It is important to note that the assumption of uncorrelated Gaussian fluctuations in the site energies corresponds to the socalled HakenStrobl model,^{12} which has been widely used to describe dephasing processes in realistic systems such as exciton transport in molecular aggregates and crystals, and photosynthetic complexes.^{10,12} Additionally, our experimental setup can be modified to reproduce more general, nonGaussian or nonMarkovian, stochastic processes. However, in such scenarios the number of particles is not necessarily preserved, as a result, we restrict our analysis to Gaussian noise.
In the presence of noise the proper instrument to describe quantum dynamical systems is the density matrix. Hence, by introducing the average singleparticle correlation functions \(\rho _{n,m} = \left\langle {\psi _n\psi _m^ \ast } \right\rangle\) one obtains the master equation for the reduced density matrix^{10} (see Methods)
Based on the fact that the optics of singleparticles, bosons and fermions, is analogous to wave mechanics, here we experimentally analyze singleexcitation dynamics utilizing laser light, see Fig. 1b for a sketch of the experimental setup. Throughout this work we consider as demonstrative models waveguide trimers involving two relatively stronglycoupled sites both of which interact weakly with a third site, Fig. 1a. To fulfill these coupling requirements, we chose the coupling coefficients between the upper sites to be κ_{1,2} = κ_{2,1} = 2 cm^{−1}, while their coupling with the lower waveguide is κ_{1,3} = κ_{2,3} = 0.6 cm^{−1}. For all experiments the length of the samples was 12 cm and the propagation constants were taken randomly from a Gaussian distribution with variance σ = 3 cm^{−1} (σ = 2 cm^{−1}) for the singleparticle (twoparticle) experiments, and mean values β_{1}(z) = β_{2}(z) = 1 cm^{−1} and β_{3}(z) = −1 cm^{−1} for the upper and lower waveguides, respectively (see Methods).
As reference case for the singleexcitation manifold, we depict in Fig. 1d the experimental intensity evolution of light traversing a noiseless trimer. Evidently, the light propagates in a coherent fashion hopping predominantly between the stronglycoupled sites (upper waveguides), and at most 10% of the total energy hops into the farthest site (lower waveguide). In contrast, when the trimers become disturbed by noise, the regular hopping of the wavefunctions is no longer sustained. Instead, the average wavepackets evolve into an incoherent superposition of delocalized states. These effects are demonstrated experimentally by injecting light into one of the upper sites of an ensemble containing 21 different dynamically disordered trimers. Then, after averaging the intensities over the ensemble we find the pattern displayed in Fig. 1f. Notice at the propagation distance of z = 12 cm our observations reveal an homogeneous intensity distribution covering all sites. Interestingly, such homogeneousness in the intensity occurs despite the fact the associated waveguides are inscribed at different separation distances.
Concurrently, theoretical inspection of the offdiagonal elements ρ_{n,m} elucidate a gradual decay of coherence. These effects are shown in Fig. 2 for different dephasing strengths. Notice in all cases the coherences ρ_{n,m} inherently decay demonstrating that dephasing transforms singleparticle states into stationary states with nullified coherence.^{11,12,13} These results can be explained from the fact that the offdiagonal elements ρ_{n,m} exhibit a complex propagation constant (β_{m} − β_{n}) − i(γ_{n} + γ_{m})/2, where the negative imaginary part implies attenuation. On the contrary, for the diagonal elements, ρ_{n,n}, such propagation constants turn out to be zero.
These theoretical findings along with our experimental observations unequivocally confirm that singleexcitations, subject to nondissipative noise, coherently evolve during a certain time, and eventually the system reaches a steady state constituted of a uniform incoherent mixture of states.^{11,12,13} For the sake of completeness, in Figs. 1c, e we compare the theoretically computed diagonal elements \(\rho _{n,n} = \left\langle {\psi _n\psi _n^ \ast } \right\rangle\), and the experimental intensity distributions for the coherent and the dephasing case, respectively. The good agreement between the experimental and numerical results suggest that Eq. (1) can be assumed valid.
Twoparticle dynamics
In stark contrast to singleexcitations, when two indistinguishable particles copropagate in the same type of structures, interesting effects occur revealing that some of the corresponding coherence terms resist the impact of dephasing. Our theoretical framework is based on the concept of twoparticle state Ψ_{p,q}, which describes jointly two particles populating sites (p, q).^{42} In terms of Ψ_{p,q} we define the twoparticle density matrix ρ_{(p, q), (p′, q′)} = \(\left\langle {{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p,q}{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p\prime ,q\prime }^ \ast } \right\rangle\), whose diagonal elements, ρ_{(p, q), (p, q)} = \(\left\langle {{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p,q}{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p,q}^ \ast } \right\rangle = \left\langle {\left {{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p,q}} \right^2} \right\rangle\), yield the joint probability density \(G_{p,q}^{(2)} = \rho _{(p,q),(p,q)}\), also termed coincidence rate.^{43} It is important to note that there have been some previous studies investigating the impact of static disorder on the dynamics of twoparticle intensity correlations, which represent the diagonal elements of the corresponding density matrix.^{23,43}
In the presence of dynamic disorder, the twoparticle master equation governing the system is given as (see Methods)
For our analysis, we consider the situations where the stochastic trimers are excited by two indistinguishable particles in pure separable states \(\left {{\mathrm{\Psi }}^{sep}} \right\rangle = \frac{1}{{\sqrt 2 }}\left( {\left {1_1,1_2} \right\rangle \pm \left {1_2,1_1} \right\rangle } \right)\), where the ± signs determine whether the particles are bosons (+) or fermions (−). It is worth noting that fermioniclike statistics with bosons is nowadays possible using the polarization degree of freedom of photons, e.g.^{22,44}. The density matrices corresponding to these initial states, \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{bos}\) = \(\left( {\left {1_1,1_2} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_1,1_2} \right + \left {1_1,1_2} \right\rangle \left {1_2,1_1} \right\rangle + H.C.} \right){\mathrm{/}}2\) and \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{fer}\) = \(\left( {\left {1_1,1_2} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_1,1_2} \right  \left {1_1,1_2} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_2,1_1} \right + H.C.} \right){\mathrm{/}}2\), are shown in Figs. 3a, h. For bosons we also examine the evolution of entangled twoparticle states, \(\left {{\mathrm{\Psi }}^{ent}} \right\rangle\) = \(\frac{1}{{\sqrt 2 }}\left( {\left {1_1,1_1} \right\rangle + \left {1_2,1_2} \right\rangle } \right)\), whose density matrix is depicted in Fig. 3b. Notice, throughout this work we use the compact notation \(\left {1_m,1_n} \right\rangle\) to represent states where one particle is populating site m and another site n, \(\left {1_m} \right\rangle \otimes \left {1_n} \right\rangle\), while states ∝\(\left( {\left {1_m,1_n} \right\rangle + \left {1_n,1_m} \right\rangle } \right)\), are symmetrized wavefunctions. In this convention the twoparticle state Ψ_{m,n} corresponds to \(\left {1_m,1_n} \right\rangle\). It is noteworthy that the offdiagonal terms present in the initial density matrices, Figs. 3a, h, arise by virtue of the wavefunction symmetrization needed to account for the indistinguishability and exchange statistics of the particles.^{24,45} In other words, such offdiagonal elements appear due to the identicalness of the particles and in their present form it is not possible to identify twoparticle coherence (entanglement).^{24} It is also important to remark that quantum theory demands that pure states involving identical particles have to be described by (anti)symmetrized state vectors. Otherwise, theoretical predictions may exhibit dramatic discrepancies with experimental observations, e.g.^{46,47}. We emphasize that the (anti)symmetrization is referred to the particle statistics (bosons or fermions), which is the meaningful physical property, and not to the structure of the state with respect to the fictitious labels introduced to distinguish the particles.
Integration of the twoparticle master equation Eq. (2) with the initial states \(\left {{\mathrm{\Psi }}^{sep}} \right\rangle\) and \(\left {{\mathrm{\Psi }}^{ent}} \right\rangle\) renders the density matrices displayed in Fig. 3. These results clearly show that after a propagation distance of about 12 cm, the density matrices for separable and entangled bosons become identical, and after 20 cm the systems reach the steady state. Once in steady state, a closer inspection of the diagonal elements reveals that both particles bunch into the same site with probability ρ_{(1,1),(1,1)} = ρ_{(2,2),(2,2)} = ρ_{(3,3),(3,3)} = 0.15, see Fig. 3d. Concurrently, the remaining diagonal elements, those quantifying particle antibunching, exhibit the probabilities ρ_{(1,2), (1,2)} = ρ_{(1,3), (1,3)} = ρ_{(2,1), (2,1)} = ρ_{(2,3), (2,3)} = ρ_{(3,1), (3,1)} = ρ_{(3,2), (3,2)} = 0.09.
Quite interestingly, our theory predicts the existence of some coherences in the resultant steady states as indicated by the offdiagonal elements exhibited in the density matrix, Fig. 3d. To better appreciate these effects we decompose the steady state into four submatrices, \(\rho _{bos}(z)\) = \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{sep} + \rho _{(1,3),(3,1)}^{sep}\) + \(\rho _{(2,3),(3,2)}^{sep} + \rho _{(n,n),(n,n)}^{mix}\), where \(\rho _{(n,n),(n,n)}^{mix}\) ∝ \(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{n = 1}^3 \left {1_n,1_n} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_n,1_n} \right\) represents an incoherent superposition of twoparticle states (classicallycorrelated twoparticle states^{42}), and \(\rho _{(p,q),(q,p)}^{sep}\) ∝ \(\left {1_p,1_q} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_p,1_q} \right + \left {1_p,1_q} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_q,1_p} \right + H.C.\) is a coherent superposition of twoparticle states. Indeed, the superposition \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{sep} + \rho _{(1,3),(3,1)}^{sep} + \rho _{(2,3),(3,2)}^{sep}\) implies that the particles coherently inhabit in all three sites with the same amplitude. Accordingly, within the steady state a mixture of both classicallycorrelated and coherent (indistinguishable) unentangled twoparticle states perpetually coexist. Likewise, for indistinguishable fermion pairs the steady state exhibits some offdiagonal terms, see Fig. 3j. However, unlike the bosonic case, the fermionic steady state is composed of only three submatrices \(\rho _{fer}(z)\) = \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{sep} + \rho _{(1,3),(3,1)}^{sep} + \rho _{(2,3),(3,2)}^{sep}\), thereby indicating the coexistence of quantum superpositions of indistinguishable twofermion states. In fact, the absence of the matrix elements \(\rho _{(n,n),(n,n)}^{mix}\) in the fermionic steady state is because according to the Pauli exclusion principle fermions cannot inhabit in the same site simultaneously.
To explain the existence of coherence in the steady state, we see that the twoparticle density matrix exhibits a complex propagationconstant given by the first two terms on the righthandside of Eq. (2). For the diagonal elements ρ_{(p,q),(p,q)} such propagationconstants turn out to be zero, and the same occurs for the offdiagonal elements accounting for particle indistinguishability ρ_{(p,q),(q,p)}. The lack of the complex propagationconstant in all diagonal and the offdiagonal elements ρ_{(p,q),(q,p)} directly implies that they will remain immune to the impact of dephasing. Quantum mechanically, each particle from a pair of identical particles that travel through sites p and q affected by dephasing strengths γ_{p} and γ_{q}, will experience the dephasing from both sites simultaneously. This implies that, due to the exchange symmetry, the coherences due to particle indistinguishability will undergo the same ‘amount’ of dephasing, as a result such coherences will remain undistorted. Indeed, this is an example of collective dephasing where the coherences are identically affected by the environment. Therefore, the subspace formed by the coherences ρ_{(p,q),(q,p)} is a decoherence free subspace.^{36,37} Conversely, for the remaining offdiagonal elements ρ_{(p,q),(p′,q′)} the propagationconstant is given as (−β_{p} − β_{q} + β_{p′} + β_{q′})−i(γ_{p} + γ_{q} + γ_{p′} + γ_{q′})/2. Owing to the negativity of the imaginary part, we determine that those elements will decay as they are affected by an attenuation factor arising from dephasing.
To shed light on the role of particle indistinguishability in the preservation of coherence, we consider the evolution of twoparticle states exhibiting classical probabilities, \(\rho _{(1,1),(2,2)}^{mix}\) = \(\left( {\left {1_1,1_1} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_1,1_1} \right + \left {1_2,1_2} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_2,1_2} \right} \right){\mathrm{/}}2\) and \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{inc}\) = \(\left( {\left {1_1,1_2} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_1,1_2} \right + \left {1_2,1_1} \right\rangle \left\langle {1_2,1_1} \right} \right){\mathrm{/}}2\). Physically, \(\rho _{(1,1),(2,2)}^{mix}\) involves two indistinguishable particles entering together into either one of the upper sites of the trimer with exactly the same classical probability. That is, \(\rho _{(1,1),(2,2)}^{mix}\) is a twoparticle state presenting the strongest possible classical correlation.^{42} Conversely, the state \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{inc}\) is made of identical particles that are initially distinguishable.
Remarkably, for the initial state \(\rho _{(1,1),(2,2)}^{mix}\), integration of the master equation, Eq. (2), renders a steady state which is identical to the ones obtained for separable and entangled bosons, Fig. 3d. In contrast, \(\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{inc}\) yields a different density matrix where the antibunching elements, (ρ_{(1,2), (1,2)} = ρ_{(1,3), (1,3)} = ρ_{(2,1), (2,1)} = ρ_{(2,3), (2,3)} = ρ_{(3,1), (3,1)} = 0.15), become larger than the bunching ones, ρ_{(1,1), (1,1)} = ρ_{(2,2), (2,2)} = ρ_{(3,3), (3,3)} = 0.09. Interestingly, even though the initial state involves two distinguishable bosons, we identify some signatures of coherence in the density matrix, see offdiagonal elements in Fig. 3g. The explanation behind the appearance of those coherences is that during evolution, the initially distinguishable particles can tunnel into the same site, and since the particles are identical when they reach the same site they become indistinguishable. Hence, a soon as the coherences manifest themselves in the state, our theory predicts that they will remain immune to dephasing.
In order to quantify the difference between all steady states we use the tracedistance criterion \(D\left( {\rho _m,\rho _n} \right)\) = \(\frac{1}{2}Tr\left {\rho _m  \rho _n} \right\), which yields zero if and only if ρ_{m} = ρ_{n}.^{48} In the present case ρ_{m,n} represents any combination of steady states arising from the initial states \(\left( {\rho _{(1,2),(2,1)}^{bos},\rho _{(1,1),(2,2)}^{ent},\rho _{(1,1),(2,2)}^{mix},\rho _{(1,2),(1,2)}^{inc}} \right)\). By doing so we find D (ρ_{m}, ρ_{n}) = 0 for all cases where the particles were indistinguishable since the begining, and D (ρ_{m}, ρ_{n}) = 0.25 for the cases comprising steady states of initially indistinguishable and distinguishable particles.
To quantify the amount of surviving coherence in the steady states, we use two different coherence measures, the physically intuitive norm of coherence \(C_n(\rho ) = \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i \ne j} \left {\rho _{i,j}} \right\),^{32} and the relative entropy of coherence C_{RE}(ρ) = S (ρ_{diag})−S (ρ),^{31} with S representing the von Neumann entropy and ρ_{diag} the matrix obtained from the density matrices ρ after removing all offdiagonal elements. Notice, in both measures, a totally mixed (incoherent) state is signaled by a vanishing coherence measure. In Fig. 4 we show the evolution of the norm of coherence and the entropy of coherence for the initial states separable (solid line), pathentangled (dashed line), and incoherent (dashdotted line) states, respectively. Importantly, when distinguishable particles are injected into the system (C_{n} = C_{RE} = 0), coherence due to indistinguishability rapidly emerges and the system evolves into a steadystate where C_{n} = 0.25 and C_{RE} = 0.06. From these theoretical results we convincingly state that under the influence of dephasing, identical particles always evolve into a steady state in which coherences due to indistingushability perpetually prevail. In the Methods section we present the resulting twoparticle steady states for different dephasing rates, and we demonstrate that the same steady state occurs even in the presence of strong dephasing, see Figs. 7 and 8. The extension of the theory to the case of N particles should be straightforward as indicated in the Methods.
As we pointed out above, the diagonal elements of the density matrices are equal to the joint particle probability density, \(G_{p,q}^{(2)} = \rho _{(p,q),(p,q)}\). Hence, to experimentally prove the validity of the twoparticle master equation, Eq. (2), we have performed twophoton intensity correlation measurements for separable, entangled, classically correlated, and distinguishable twophoton (twoboson) states using an ensemble of 37 waveguide trimers. The details regarding the state preparation and waveguide fabrication are given in the Methods section.
The experimental average photon coincidence measurements are depicted in Figs. 5e–g where it is clear that, under the influence of dephasing, initial states involving indistinguishable photons are driven to undergo identical correlation patterns. More specifically, for all three cases involving indistinguishable twoparticle states (separable, entangled, and classically correlated), the measurements reveal the tendency of the photons to bunch into the same site including the farthest weaklycoupled waveguide. Concurrently, photon coincidences (antibunching) occur with similar probabilities, but less frequently than bunching events as illustrated by the offdiagonal elements in Figs. 5e–g. Finally, when exciting the same stochastic networks with distinguishable (incoherent) photons coupled separately into the upper sites, the correlation patterns were found to exhibit the higher probabilities in the offdiagonals (antibunching) terms, Fig. 5h. Note the correlation matrices, \(G_{p,q}^{(2)} = \rho _{(p,q),(p,q)}\), have been arranged in a way that the bunching elements, (ρ_{(1,1),(1,1)}, ρ_{(2,2),(2,2)}, ρ_{(3,3),(3,3)}), are shown along the diagonal, while the antibunching terms, (ρ_{(1,2),(1,2)}, ρ_{(1,3),(1,3)}, ρ_{(2,1),(2,1)}, ρ_{(2,3),(2,3)}, ρ_{(3,1),(3,1)}, ρ_{(3,2),(3,2)}), are displayed in the offdiagonals entries.
Since the elements of the experimental correlation matrices represent the diagonal elements of the density matrix, we can compute the average fidelity between the experimental \(G_{p,q}^{(2)  exp}\) and theoretical \(G_{p,q}^{(2)  th} = \rho _{(p,q),(p,q)}\) twoparticle probability densities. This is done using the expression \(S\) = \(\left( {\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{p,q} \sqrt {G_{p,q}^{(2)  exp}G_{p,q}^{(2)  th}} } \right)^2\)/\(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{p,q} {\kern 1pt} G_{p,q}^{(2)  exp}\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{p,q} {\kern 1pt} G_{p,q}^{(2)  th}\),^{49,50} which gives fidelities of 0.9935, 0.9945, and 0.9948 for the entangled, separable, and incoherent input states, respectively. In the Methods section we compare the experimental correlations, Figs. 5e–h, versus the diagonal elements of the theoreticallycomputed density matrices displayed in Figs. 3d, g, see Fig. 6.
Discussion
At this point it is worth emphasizing that there is an ongoing debate regarding the observability or physical significance of correlations due to symmetrization.^{24,51,52} Indeed, the controversy arises because correlations of the type (ρ_{(p,q),(q,p)}, ρ_{(q,p),(p,q)}) represent superpositions of twoparticle states where the only difference is the order of the particles. Formally, such coherences do not represent manipulable superpositions, but their presence in the steady state implies that the particles retain their capability to interfere (indistinguishability) in experiments of the HongOuMandel type.^{46,53,54,55} Indeed, it has been shown that superpositions originated from the exchange symmetry can become accessible and exploitable.^{53,56,57,58,59}
We stress the results presented in this work differ from the ones reported in refs.^{34,35}. In the present case, we have shown that indistinguishable particles always evolve towards a steady state exhibiting some coherences that imply particle indistinguishability. On the other hand, in refs.^{34,35} it is demonstrated that under certain conditions the amount of coherence exhibited by certain Belldiagonal states remains stationary. Regarding our experimental setup, it differs from the one shown in ref.^{16}, in the fact that here we implement the effects of dephasing by modifying the properties of the waveguides. On the contrary, in^{16} the environmental effects are modeled by tuning the input field and the analysis is restricted to the singleexcitation manifold.
In this work, we have investigated, theoretically and experimentally, Born–Markov OQS within the single and twoexcitation manifolds. We showed that even when individual particles do not preserve any quantum coherence in the presence of noise, indistinguishable twoparticle states retain, on average, quantum coherence despite the impact of dephasing. More importantly, we have shown that due to the exchange symmetry the prevailing coherences undergo collective dephasing, as a result, the set of coherences due to particle indistinguishability form a decoherencefree subspace. Finally, we point out that quantum technologies are frequently based on identical particles, bosons or fermions. That is, identical particles constitute the elementary building blocks of quantum systems. Hence, one can in principle encode information in the correlations due to particle indistinguishability, and since those correlations are robust against dephasing, the information can be transmitted through dephasing channels without any distortion.
Methods
Devices fabrication and specifications
The waveguides samples employed in the experiments were inscribed in highpurity fused silica (Corning 7980, ArF grade) using a RegA 9000 seeded by a Mira Ti:Al2O3 femtosecond laser. Pulses centred at 800 nm with duration of 150 fs were used at a repetition rate of 100 kHz with energy of 450 nJ. The pulses were focused 250 μm under the sample surface using a numerical aperture = 0.6 objective while the sample was translated at different speeds ranging from 60 to 240 mm min^{−1} for the classical experiments and from 70 to 131 mm min^{−1} for the quantum. The samples were translated by a highprecision positioning stages (ALS130, Aerotech Inc.). The random changes in the speed inscription were chosen from a gaussian distribution at intervals of one centimeter, effectively producing stochastic fluctuations in the siteenergies every ~33 ps. Note we have used two different sigmas because for the singleparticle experiments the operation wavelength is 633 nm, while for two photons is 808 nm. Hence, the parameters have been adjusted to fabricate waveguides to operate at the desired wavelengths. The mode field diameters of the guided mode were 18 × 20 μm at 815 nm. At the wavelength of interest, propagation losses and birefringence were estimated at 0.3 dB cm^{−1} and in the order of 10^{−7}, respectively. The waveguides are equally spaced by 127 μm at the inputoutput facets to couple into standard Vgroove fibre arrays for the in and outcoupling of the photons. The waveguides then smoothly converge through fanning arrangements to their eventual configuration in the functional sections.
Experiments with classical light
To experimentally demonstrate the functionality of the suggested waveguide system, we use an ensemble of 21 different dynamically disordered waveguide trimers. The input signal is prepared by focusing a beam from a HeNe laser onto the front facet of the sample. Then, by exploiting the fluorescence from colour centres within the waveguides, we monitor the full intensity evolution from the input to the output plane by using a CCD camera. After recording the intensity from the 21 samples we perform the average intensity and the final result is presented in Fig. 1f. The average of the fluorescence images, Fig. 1f, clearly shows the emergence of a uniform redistribution of energy among all the waveguides.
Preparation of twophoton states
Photon pairs were generated at a wavelength λ = 815 nm using a standard typeI spontaneousparametricdownconversion source by pumping a BiBO crystal with a 407.5 nm continuouswave laser diode at 70 mW. We employed commercial Vgroove fiber arrays to couple the photons into the onchip trimers as well as to collect them at the output facet of individual waveguides. We use highNA multimode fibers to feed the photons into the respective avalanche photodiode. This in turn ensures low coupling losses at the output of the chip. From the data of the photodiodes, the photon probability distribution at the output, as well as the twopoint intensity correlations, can be extracted.
To prepare indistinguishable separable photon pairs from a SPDC source we additionally apply filters with 3 nm bandwidth as shown in Fig. 1b. Entangled twophoton states were readily created by simultaneously exciting the two input modes of an integrated 50:50 directional coupler with indistinguishable photons in a separable product state.^{49} Classicallycorrelated twophoton states were produced in a similar fashion with the difference that we induce a delay of ~2 ps in one of the output ports of the integrated 50:50 directional coupler such that we have two distinguishable twophoton states (classicallycorrelated states). Distinguishable twophoton pairs were produced by delaying one of the photons ~2 ps with respect to the other before entering the samples (this time without an additional integrated 50:50 directional coupler). We point out that a time delay of ~2 ps is sufficient to make the photons distinguishable and the distinguishability was verified by the absence of interference in a standard HongOuMandel setup.
Derivation of the single and twoparticle master equations
Singleexcitation manifold
We start by considering a stochastic network containing N coupled sites. In such configurations, the propagation of singleparticle probability amplitudes are governed by the stochastic Schrödinger equation^{10}
Here we have set ħ = 1, ψ_{n}(z) is the probability amplitude for a singleparticle propagating through site n, β_{n}(z) are the stochastic site energies which depend on the propagation distance z, and κ_{m,n} represents the coupling coefficients between sites m and n. In order to account for environmental effects, we assume random site energies varying according to the functions β_{n}(z) = β_{n} + ϕ_{n}(z), where ϕ_{n}(z) describes a stochastic Gaussian process satisfying the conditions
with \(\left\langle \ldots \right\rangle\) denoting stochastic average. Note we have assumed the simplest scenario in which the system is affected by white noise, described by Eq. (4b), where γ_{n} denotes the noise intensity, δ_{n,m} is the Kronecker delta used to indicate that each site energy fluctuates independently from each other, and δ(z−z′) is a Dirac delta describing the Markovian approximation.^{60}
Writing Eq. (3) in differential form we have
and by introducing the socalled Wiener increments^{41}
we can cast Eq. (5) as
We note that Eq. (7) has the socalled Stratonovich form.^{60} In order to compute the differential of the product \(\psi _n(z)\psi _m^ \ast (z)\), we use Itô’s product rule \(d\left( {\psi _m\psi _n^ \ast } \right)\) = \(d\left( {\psi _n} \right)\psi _m^ \ast + \psi _nd\left( {\psi _m^ \ast } \right)\) + \(d\left( {\psi _n} \right)d\left( {\psi _m^ \ast } \right)\),^{60} which demands dψ_{n} to be written in Itô’s form^{10}
Hence, using Eq. (8) we obtain the expression
where we have only considered terms up to first order in dz. Finally, by taking the stochastic average of Eq. (9) and defining the density matrix as \(\rho _{n,m} = \left\langle {\psi _n\psi _m^ \ast } \right\rangle\) we arrive to the evolution equation for the singleparticle density matrix presented in the main text, Eq. (1).
Twoexcitation manifold
We now follow a similar procedure described above to derive the evolution equation for twoparticle density matrices in coupled networks affected by dephasing. To do so, we start by considering pure twoparticle states at sites p and q within a network comprising N sites
where φ_{m,n} is the initial probability amplitude profile \(\left( {\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{n,m} \left {\varphi _{m,n}} \right^2 = 1} \right)\), and U_{r,s}(z) represents the impulse response of the system, that is, the unitary probability amplitude for a particle traveling into site r when it was initialized at site s. Moreover, the sign + and − determine whether the particles are bosons or fermions.
From Eq. (10) we define the product \({\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p,q}{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p\prime ,q\prime }^ \ast\), and using the Itô’s product rule^{60} we compute the zderivative as follows
To compute Eq. (11) we need the Itô’s form for the differential [dΨ_{p,q}], which is given by
Equation (12) can be easily obtained by taking the derivative of Eq. (10) and using the fact that U_{r,s} are singleparticle probability amplitudes which obey Eq. (7), namely
Then, by defining the density matrix \(\rho _{(p,q),(p\prime ,q\prime )} = \left\langle {{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p,q}{\mathrm{\Psi }}_{p\prime ,q\prime }^ \ast } \right\rangle\), and after some algebra we obtain the evolution equation for the twoparticle density matrix presented in the main text, Eq. (2).
The generalization to N indistinguishable particles is straightforward following similar steps as for the twoparticle case and introducing the Nparticle probability amplitude
where we have defined \(\chi _{a,b,c, \ldots }^{p,q,r, \ldots }\) = U_{p,a}(z) U_{q,b}(z) U_{r,c}(z)…, with U_{m,n} representing the probability amplitude for a singleparticle at site n when it was launched at site m, and the superscript per means cyclic permutations of superscripts p, q, r, ….
In order to integrate Eqs. (1) and (2) it is necessary to obtain the individual dephasing rates γ_{m} for m = 1, 2, 3. This is easily done using the relation \(\gamma _m = \sigma _m^2{\mathrm{\Delta }}z\),^{41,61} where σ_{m} is the standard deviation of the mth site, Δz is the correlation length. To perform the simulations shown in Figs. 2 and 3, we have used the σ_{m} obtained from the data utilized to inscribe the waveguides
In both cases, classical and quantum, Δz = 1 cm. Hence, using these σ_{exp} we obtain the individual dephasing rates for numerical integration of Eqs. (1) and (2)
Experimentaltheoretical comparison of twophoton correlations
In Fig. 6 we show the intensity correlation matrices for separable Figs. 6a, d, entangled Figs. 6b, e, and distinguishable (incoherent) photon pairs Figs. 6c, f after a propagation distance of z = 12 cm. The upper row depicts the experimental coincidence measurements, whereas the lower one shows our theoretical predictions.
Impact of strong dephasing on twophoton density matrices
In order to elucidate the impact of dephasing over twoboson states coupled into the upper sites of the waveguide trimer shown in Fig. 1a, we consider an entangled twophoton state
and perform numerical integration of Eq. (2) for two different dephasing rates. Specifically, we employ dephasing rates γ = 5γ_{exp}, and 50γ_{exp}, where γ_{exp} represents the dephasing rate utilized in our experiments. These dephasing values correspond to changing proportionally the variance of the Gaussian distribution used to chose the random energies of the waveguides. For a dephasing rate of γ = 5γ_{exp}, integration of Eq. (2) renders the density matrices shown in Fig. 7. These results indicate that for the initial state \(\rho _{(1,1),(2,2)}^{ent}(0)\), the steady state emerges at z ≈ 40 cm. That is, the system reaches the steady state at approximately twice the distance with respect to the case when γ = γ_{exp}. For the second case where the dephasing rate is increased to 50γ_{exp}, Fig. 8 indicates that the evolution towards the steady state becomes slower in comparison with the case γ = 5γ_{exp}. From these results we can state that in the presence of nondissipative noise, the system will evolve towards the steady state either much slower or much faster depending on the dephasing strength: weaktomoderate dephasing will drive the system into its steady state faster than strong dephasing will do. At first sight, these results seem to be counterintuitive, however, the effects of high dephasing can be thought of as an example of the quantum Zeno effect where the evolution of the system is suppressed by a rapid dephasing. That is, the Zeno effect will suppress the transport and keep the excitation localized in the two upper sites.
Data availability
Source code and data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
 1.
Brown, R. A brief account of microscopical observations made on the particles contained in the pollen of plants. Philos. Mag. 4, 161 (1828).
 2.
Einstein, A. On the motion of small particles suspended in liquids at rest required by the molecularkinetic theory of heat. Ann. Phys. 17, 549 (1905).
 3.
Breuer, H. P., Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford, 2002).
 4.
de Vega, I. & Alonso, D. Dynamics of nonMarkovian open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017).
 5.
Lo Franco, R., Bellomo, B., Maniscalco, S. & Compagno, G. Dynamics of quantum correlations in twoqubit systems within nonmarkovian environments. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1345053 (2013).
 6.
Benedetti, C., Buscemi, F., Bordone, P. & Paris, M. G. A. Dynamics of quantum correlations in colorednoise environments. Phys. Rev. A. 87, 052328 (2013).
 7.
Benedetti, C., Buscemi, F., Bordone, P. & Paris, M. G. A. NonMarkovian continuoustime quantum walks on lattices with dynamical noise. Phys. Rev. A. 93, 042313 (2016).
 8.
Hoeppe, U. et al. Direct observation of nonMarkovian radiation dynamics in 3D bulk photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 043603 (2012).
 9.
Alicki, R. & Lendi, K. Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications: Lecture Notes in Physics 717 (Springer, Berlin, 2007).
 10.
Eisfeld, A. & Briggs, J. S. Classical master equation for excitonic transport under the influence of an environment. Phys. Rev. E 85, 046118 (2012).
 11.
Plenio, M. B. & Huelga, S. F. Dephasingassisted transport: quantum networks and biomolecules. New J. Phys. 10, 113019 (2008).
 12.
Rebentrost, P., Mohseni, M., Kassal, I., Lloyd, S. & AspuruGuzik, A. Environmentassisted quantum transport. New J. Phys. 11, 033003 (2009).
 13.
Caruso, F., Chin, A. W., Datta, A., Huelga, S. F. & Plenio, M. B. Highly efficient energy excitation transfer in lightharvesting complexes: The fundamental role of noiseassisted transport. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 105106 (2009).
 14.
Park, H. et al. Enhanced energy transport in genetically engineered excitonic networks. Nat. Mater. 15, 211–216 (2016).
 15.
LeónMontiel, R.J. et al. Noiseassisted energy transport in electrical oscillator networks with offdiagonal dynamical disorder. Sci. Rep. 5, 17339 (2015).
 16.
Biggerstaff, D. N. et al. Enhancing coherent transport in a photonic network using controllable decoherence. Nat. Comm. 7, 11282 (2016).
 17.
Schönleber, D. W., Eisfeld, A., Genkin, M., Whitlock, S. & Wüster, S. Quantum simulation of energy transport with embedded Rydberg aggregates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 123005 (2015).
 18.
Briggs, J. S. & Eisfeld, A. Equivalence of quantum and classical coherence in electronic energy transfer. Phys. Rev. E 83, 051911 (2011).
 19.
Briggs, J. S. & Eisfeld, A. Coherent quantum states from classical oscillator amplitudes. Phys. Rev. A. 85, 052111 (2012).
 20.
Briggs, J. S. & Eisfeld, A. Quantum dynamics simulation with classical oscillators. Phys. Rev. A. 88, 062104 (2013).
 21.
LeónMontiel, R.J. & Torres, J. P. Highly efficient noiseassisted energy transport in classical oscillator systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 218101 (2013).
 22.
Sansoni, L. et al. Twoparticle bosonicfermionic quantum walk via integrated photonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 010502 (2012).
 23.
Di Giuseppe, G. et al. EinsteinPodolskyRosen spatial entanglement in ordered and Anderson photonic lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 150503 (2013).
 24.
Lo Franco, R. & Compagno, G. Quantum entanglement of identical particles by standard informationtheoretic notions. Sci. Rep. 6, 20603 (2016).
 25.
Beggi, A., Buscemi, F. & Bordone, P. Quantum correlations of identical particles subject to classical environmental noise. Quantum Inf. Process 15, 3711 (2016).
 26.
Bose, S. & Home, D. Duality in entanglement enabling a test of quantum indistinguishability unaffected by interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 140404 (2013).
 27.
Omar, Y. Particle statistics in quantum information processing. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 3, 201 (2005).
 28.
Paunkovic, N., Omar, Y., Bose, S. & Vedral, V. Entanglement concentration using quantum statistics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 187903 (2002).
 29.
Bellomo, B., Lo Franco, R. & Compagno, G. N identical particles and one particle to entangle them all. Phys. Rev. A. 96, 022319 (2017).
 30.
Sciara, S., Lo Franco, R. & Compagno, G. Universality of Schmidt decomposition and particle identity. Sci. Rep. 7, 44675 (2017).
 31.
Streltsov, A., Adesso, G. & Plenio, M. B. Colloquium: quantum coherence as a resource. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041003 (2017).
 32.
Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014).
 33.
Winter, A. & Yang, D. Operational resource theory of coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120404 (2016).
 34.
Bromley, T. R., Cianciaruso, M. & Adesso, G. Frozen quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 210401 (2015).
 35.
Silva, I. A. et al. Observation of timeinvariant coherence in a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 160402 (2016).
 36.
Lidar, D. A., Chuang, I. L. & Whaley, K. B. Decoherencefree subspaces for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998).
 37.
Kwiat, P. G., Berglund, A. J., Altepeter, J. B. & White, A. G. Experimental verification of decoherencefree subspaces. Science 290, 498 (2000).
 38.
Chen, H.B., Gneiting, C., Lo, P.Y., Chen, Y.N. & Nori, F. Simulating open quantum systems with Hamiltonian ensembles and the nonclassicality of the dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030403 (2018).
 39.
Szameit, A. & Nolte, S. Discrete optics in femtosecondlaserwritten photonic structures. J. Phys. B. 43, 163001 (2010).
 40.
Weimann, S. et al. Implementation of quantum and classical discrete fractional Fourier transforms. Nat. Comm. 7, 11027 (2016).
 41.
Laing, C. & Lord, G. J. Stochastic Methods in Neuroscience. (Clarendon, Oxford, 2008).
 42.
Abouraddy, A. F., Saleh, B. E. A., Sergienko, A. V. & Teich, M. C. Role of entanglement in twophoton imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 123602 (2001).
 43.
Gilead, Y., Verbin, M. & Silberberg, Y. Ensembleaveraged quantum correlations between pathentangled photons undergoing Anderson localization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 133602 (2015).
 44.
Crespi, A. et al. Particle statistics affects quantum decay and Fano interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 090201 (2015).
 45.
Sperling, J., PerezLeija, A., Busch, K. & Walmsley, I. A. Quantum coherences of indistinguishable particles. Phys. Rev. A. 96, 032334 (2017).
 46.
Herbut, F. How to distinguish identical particles. Am. J. Phys. 69, 207 (2001).
 47.
Bowles, T. J. & Garvey, G. T. Erratum: isovector radiative decays and secondclass currents in mass 8 nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 26, (2336 (1982).
 48.
Smirne, A., Cialdi, S., Anelli, G., Paris, M. G. A. & Vacchini, B. Quantum probes to experimentally assess correlations in a composite system. Phys. Rev. A. 88, 012108 (2013).
 49.
Lebugle, M. et al. Experimental observation of N00N state Bloch oscillations. Nat. Commun. 6, 8273 (2015).
 50.
Peruzzo, A. et al. Quantum walks of correlated photons. Science 329, 1500 (2010).
 51.
Benatti, F., Floreanini, R. & Titimbo, K. Entanglement of identical particles. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 21, 1440003 (2014).
 52.
Reusch, A., Sperling, J. & Vogel, W. Entanglement witnesses for indistinguishable particles. Phys. Rev. A. 91, 042324 (2015).
 53.
Killoran, N., Cramer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Extracting entanglement from identical particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 150501 (2014).
 54.
Zou, X. Y., Wang, L. J. & Mandel, L. Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 318 (1991).
 55.
Saleh, B. E. A., Abouraddy, A. F., Sergienko, A. V. & Teich, M. C. Duality between partial coherence and partial entanglement. Phys. Rev. A. 62, 043816 (2000).
 56.
Cavalcanti, D., Malard, L. M., Matinaga, F. M., TerraCunha, M. O. & Santos, M. F. Useful entanglement from the Pauli principle. Phys. Rev. B 76, 113304 (2007).
 57.
Roos, C. F., Alberti, A., Meschede, D., Hauke, P. & Häffner, H. Revealing quantum statistics with a pair of distant atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 160401 (2017).
 58.
Lo Franco, R. & Compagno, G. Indistinguishability of elementary systems as a resource for quantum information processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 240403 (2018).
 59.
Compagno, G., Castellini, A. & Lo Franco, R. Dealing with indistinguishable particles and their entanglement. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170317 (2018).
 60.
van Kampen, N. G. Itô versus Stratonovich. J. Stat. Phys. 24, 175 (1981).
 61.
LeónMontiel, R.J., Svozilík, J. & Torres, J. P. Generation of a tunable environment for electrical oscillator systems. Phys. Rev. E 90, 012108 (2014).
Acknowledgements
R.J.L.M. acknowledges financial support by CONACYTMéxico project CB201601/284372, and DGAPAUNAM project UNAMPAPIIT IA100718. Armando PerezLeija, Kurt Busch and Alexander Szameit acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PE 2602/22, BU 1107/122, and SZ 276/92, SZ 276/121).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
A.P.L., D.G.S. and R.J.L.M. contributed equally to this work. A.P.L. and R.J.L.M. initiated the project and developed the theory and simulations, D.G.S., M.G. and M.H. designed the samples and carried out the experiments, H.M.C, K.B. and A.S. supervised the project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
PerezLeija, A., GuzmánSilva, D., LeónMontiel, R.d.J. et al. Endurance of quantum coherence due to particle indistinguishability in noisy quantum networks. npj Quantum Inf 4, 45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s415340180094y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Topological protection versus degree of entanglement of twophoton light in photonic topological insulators
Nature Communications (2021)

Direct observation of the particle exchange phase of photons
Nature Photonics (2021)

Directly proving the bosonic nature of photons
Nature Photonics (2021)

Robust entanglement preparation against noise by controlling spatial indistinguishability
npj Quantum Information (2020)

Multiphoton quantumstate engineering using conditional measurements
npj Quantum Information (2019)