Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease among school-going adolescents worldwide. However, the burden of severe asthma is highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to explore teachers’ perceptions of asthma care across six African countries. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. FGDs were conducted in Kumasi(Ghana), Blantyre (Malawi), Lagos (Nigeria), Durban (South Africa), Kampala (Uganda), and Harare (Zimbabwe) between 01 November 2020 and 30 June 2021. We identified two key themes related to asthma care; barriers to asthma care and suggestions to improve the care of adolescents with asthma. Barriers reported by teachers included a lack of knowledge and skills among themselves, adolescents, and caregivers. In addition, some traditional beliefs of teachers on asthma exacerbated challenges with asthma care in schools. Regarding suggestions, most teachers identified a need for all-inclusive asthma training programmes for teachers, adolescents and caregivers, focusing on acute episodes and mitigating triggers. Utilising teachers with personal experiences with asthma to advocate and support these initiatives was suggested. Further suggestions included the need for annual screening to enable early identification of adolescents with asthma and clarify restrictions on teachers administering asthma medications. Teachers across African schools identify multiple barriers to asthma care. Structured school education programs and annual asthma screening are key to addressing some barriers to care.
Asthma is the most common non-communicable disease among adolescents, affecting one in ten worldwide1,2. In Sub-Saharan Africa (sSA), asthma symptom prevalence in adolescents in some urban settings is as high as 21.7% and is increasing in others2,3,4,5,6. Half of the adolescents with asthma in sSA have severe symptoms, contributing to high asthma morbidity and mortality in low to middle-income countries (LMICs)5,6. In addition, many adolescents with asthma remain largely undiagnosed. In those diagnosed, the proportion of poorly controlled asthma remains high and is linked with poor access to appropriate asthma treatments3,4,5,6.
The Global Asthma Network (GAN) report has shown that 36% of adolescents with asthma suffer from severe symptoms, 36% experience symptoms with exercise and sleep disturbance due to wheezing and 41% with nocturnal cough3,7. Poor asthma control has been associated with poor school attendance and academic performance8,9. Education on asthma is viewed as a key intervention that can assist in achieving better control, especially in low-resource settings where multiple healthcare system challenges exist7,10,11. The school environment and the active participation of teachers in asthma care, in particular, are important for the holistic provision of care12.
While studies from high-income countries have noted a perceived lack of knowledge among teachers on asthma, this data is lacking in Africa13. However, the role of teachers in asthma care and school support systems has been noted to be poorly organised13,14,15. A recent systematic review found that having written school health policies on acute asthma and sustained asthma education programs improved preparedness to deal with acute asthma episodes amongst adolescents and improved overall asthma knowledge in teachers16.
Against this backdrop, there is a need for evidence of the highest quality on the barriers to achieving good asthma control and what contributes to poor asthma outcomes in urban African school-going adolescents. Adolescents spend a large part of their lives in schools where teachers hold significant leadership positions and act as role models in most African communities. This study aimed to determine the role teacher’s play in the care of adolescents with asthma and to identify barriers and facilitators to this care that are specifically related to the urban school environment in sub-Saharan African countries. We also aimed to assess the perceptions of teachers on asthma care within the school environment.
This study was a component of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) funded Global Health Research Group “Achieving control of asthma in children in Africa” (ACACIA), an observational cohort study across six African countries: Ghana, Malawi, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe17. An objective of the ACACIA project was to determine the barriers to care for adolescents with asthma in the school environment. Using a Breathing Survey developed from questions in the Global Asthma Network (GAN) questionnaire, the project identified adolescents with a doctor’s diagnosis of asthma and those with symptoms of asthma but without a formal diagnosis in various schools in these countries17. To deepen the researchers’ team’s understanding of possible facilitators and enablers to effective asthma care and to determine possible components for a school-based asthma intervention, teachers from at least three schools in each city were selected to take part in focus group discussions (FGDs) with five to eight participants per school. The study plan, procedures, and methods were standardised across all countries17.
This included teachers at the three schools selected in each city involved in the ACACIA project. The teachers selected to participate in this study were drawn from schools where both adolescents with a doctor’s diagnosis of asthma and symptoms of asthma without a diagnosis were identified. A convenience sample of teachers who consented to be included in the study were the study participants.
The FGDs were held between 01 November 2020 and 30 June 2021 in schools (government, private, residential, and non-residential) in cities across six countries: Kumasi (Ghana), Blantyre (Malawi), Lagos (Nigeria), Durban (South Africa), Kampala (Uganda) and Harare (Zimbabwe). The in-country team of researchers and field workers facilitated the FGDs.
FGDs were conducted face-to-face, with adherence to in-country-specific COVID-19 regulations. All FGDs were moderated by at least two facilitators, one of whom was a study investigator at each site. FGDs took place in English. FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Discussions lasted between 40–60 minutes and followed a pre-defined question guide for all teacher FGDs (Table 1). The ACACIA core study team developed the discussion guide after multiple iterations. The underlying framework that informed the development of the discussion guide by this team was a literature review on barriers to asthma care amongst children with asthma worldwide17.
The transcripts from discussions were analysed using the NVivo 1.6 software program. We used an inductive analysis to examine the data18. A ten-member coding team was formed to standardise this analysis from across multiple countries. These ten members of the ACACIA research group from all the participating countries independently developed codes from the distributed transcripts. At least two investigators reviewed each transcript. Following this analysis, all members discussed the coding to develop a codebook using published guidelines18,19. This codebook was developed after multiple iterations by the ten-member coding team. A reiterative process was followed to apply the codebook to the transcribed data and determine whether further codes emerged from the team. When no new codes emerged, the codebook was assumed to be a valid representation of the data and finalised (Supplementary file 1).
Braun and Clarke’s six-step thematic analysis was then used as the analytic framework to identify the patterns and themes within the coded data20. Themes were initially identified based on those commonly occurring codes identified in the transcripts in all countries. The minor themes were highlighted and grouped into sub-themes based on commonly occurring patterns and relationships noted between the identified codes. The various sub-themes were then grouped into the major themes. The coding and theme identification were iterative and involved all members, and consensus was achieved after multiple iterations (Fig. 1 includes the coding tree used to identify the themes (minor themes, sub-themes, and major themes) after analysis. Quotes derived from the data were chosen to illustrate these themes and were specifically selected if they resonated across all countries.
Patient and public involvement
The FGDs were part of the wider ACACIA study and its patient and public involvement17. The FGDs set up, especially for teachers, was developed at each site with the local school staff to provide a friendly and safe experience in a familiar environment. Before other sites, we piloted the questions used in the FGDs in Nigeria to guide the study’s design. Adolescents and teachers were involved at several stages of the ACACIA study but not directly in the recruitment and conduct of the FGDs. A summary of all ACACIA study results will be disseminated to the participating schools, which will communicate it to teachers, adolescents, and parents.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Ethical approval was granted at all the study sites: Ghana, CHRPE/AP/074/19 and CHRPE/AP/071/20; Malawi, COMREC/P.10/18/2494; Nigeria, LREC/06/10/1084; Uganda, MHREC/1514, and UNCST/SS4940; Zimbabwe, MRCZ/A/2415; South Africa, BREC/BF002/19. Participants provided written informed consent in accordance with both country/local regulations and United Kingdom (UK) ethics regulations. Trial registration number: 269211. Data were de-identified and stored on a password-protected computer with access only to researchers.
The data were transcribed and analysed from 20 FGDs across six countries. A total of 153 teachers were included as study participants, averaging between seven and eight participants per FGD (Table 2). Of these teacher participants (n = 153), 66, 7% (n = 102) self-identified as female, 55.9% (n = 84) knew someone with asthma, 11.1% (n = 17) suffered themselves from asthma, and 29.4% (n = 45) indicated that they had had formal training in asthma.
After coding the data, multiple themes were identified that related to teacher perspectives on asthma care in school. Those themes were found to be common across all countries and were then selected and categorised as minor -themes. Investigators then clustered these 30 minor themes into seven sub-themes that reflected aspects of asthma care within schools. Minor themes had to resonate around a common aspect of care that affected teachers’ perspectives on managing adolescents with asthma in the school for these to be aggregated into a sub-theme. This iterative process focused on perspectives considered most influential on asthma care in all countries. These sub-themes were only finalised when all investigators from all countries had reached a consensus. Investigators’ perspectives then focused these sub-themes into major themes based on the overall aim of the study to determine factors either enabling better care or creating barriers to asthma care within schools. The two major themes were categorised as (1) barriers to caring for adolescents with asthma in school and (2) suggestions to improve the care of adolescents with asthma in school. Figure 1 illustrates the inter-relationship of the minor themes, sub-themes and major themes identified.
Within the first major theme, multiple sub-themes were identified: lack of knowledge and skills on mitigating asthma triggers and managing an acute asthma episode; traditional beliefs – this was defined as commonly held understandings by teachers on causes and management of asthma that are different than those understandings generally accepted within the allopathic understanding of asthma; Impact of asthma on adolescents (sick days, sport hesitancy, stigma from other adolescents, parental denial) and restrictions on teachers administering asthma care in school. In the second theme, the following subthemes were identified: providing inclusive asthma training (involving adolescents, caregivers, and teachers); appointing teachers who have personal experience with asthma to lead and promote care for adolescents with asthma in schools, and improving care for adolescents with asthma with annual asthma screening and provision of inhalers onsite in school.
Theme 1: Barriers to caring for adolescents with asthma
Lack of knowledge, skills and support in mitigating asthma triggers and managing acute asthma episodes was a universal finding in all FGDs. Teachers identified deficiencies in their knowledge and skills regarding asthma. This lack of knowledge was primarily attributed to a ‘lack of formal training’ on asthma care in schools and created a general ‘need (for) more information at school level, especially in relation to the technique issues.’ (ZA, FGD 1).
Teachers were particular about which aspects of knowledge and skills in asthma they perceived themselves, the adolescents and their families to have deficiencies in. The deficiencies were related to an inability to adequately care for adolescents during acute asthma episodes and to mitigate against asthma triggers, (Table 3, quotes 1 and 2). This lack of adequate knowledge influenced teachers’ experiences when managing adolescents with acute asthma attacks. Teachers experienced these episodes as ‘daunting’ and ‘scary’. Furthermore, teachers observed that adolescents were unaware of their condition as asthma or of the severity. There was also a lack of adequate understanding of the role of triggers (exercise, sporting activities, smoke, and dust) and how avoidance of these should be navigated within the school environment.
The most common traditional beliefs held were related to the dominant role emotions play in triggering asthma attacks and the use of alternative treatments for asthma, e.g., traditional herbs, (Table 3, quote 4). There were also various religious beliefs on the causes and potential cures for asthma. Attributing a religious aetiology to asthma was predominant in all FGDs across the countries but noticeably absent from South African FGDs, (Table 3, and quote 3). Within this sub-theme, teachers identified emotions as a major trigger for acute asthma episodes in schools. However, they also believed that some reported asthma episodes among adolescents were indeed more emotional outbursts than true asthma symptoms, (Table 3, quote 5). Teachers’ reflected on the impact that uncontrolled asthma had on various learning activities. These included taking frequent sick days and sports hesitancy, leading to many adolescents not participating in scheduled school and physical activities, (Table 3, quotes 7 and 8). Sport and physical activity hesitancy were noted with ‘some of those parents who do not allow the kids to even participate in sport’, and parents are seen to ‘molly-coddle’ or be ‘overprotective’. The impact of parental anxiety leads to adolescents ‘who shy away from participating because they believe that’s what they feel’. (ZA, FGD 4). Stigma associated with having an asthma diagnosis among adolescents was included in this sub-theme. Having asthma was stigmatising among adolescents with asthma and was associated with denial and failure to disclose the diagnosis to teachers, thereby delaying or preventing proper management, (Table 3, quote 9). The aspects noted in this sub-theme that impacted asthma care, included the limited scope of school health services in most African countries and the prohibition of teachers from administering medicines without parental consent. Regarding school health services, teachers noted that school nurses mostly focused on immunisation programmes and had little to do with health screening or first-line management of medical problems, (Table 3, quote 10). Secondly, teachers were not empowered by any legislation to administer medicines without parental consent. These restrictions make many teachers feel less comfortable giving adolescents’ inhalers when needed, (Table 3, quote 11).
Theme 2: Suggestions to improve the care of adolescents
Teachers suggested using all-inclusive training to improve asthma knowledge in parents, teachers and adolescents, (Table 4, quote 12). A strong willingness and openness to training in asthma were seen where teachers, parents and adolescents could create ‘an environment that is positive for the child to actually feel, if they have asthma, but they can still do exercise, they can still swim, they can still take part in sport because they are comfortable that the people around them are educated enough to know that when they are going to be in danger.’ (ZA, FGD 1). For training and information dissemination to be effective it should be for ‘everyone, for doctors, nurses, parents, learners, so it is not only learners or people that need to be taught about it…’ (ZA FGD 3). Teachers indicated that parents and adolescents must be involved in proposed asthma education for schools, emphasising an inclusive approach in these programmes. Using creative methods such as drama (plays) and music to educate adolescents, specifically on asthma, was seen as important as the training content, particularly to sustain learner interest, (Table 4, quote 13).
Teachers expressed a view that their colleagues with personal experiences with asthma (either being asthma sufferers themselves or caring for close members of their family with asthma) had a better understanding of how to relate to adolescents with asthma than teachers with no such experience, (Table 4, quotes 14 and 15). Teachers’ across most countries expressed concern that annual screening for asthma and other chronic diseases was not uniformly performed across all schools. They supported the interventions of annual health screening for common conditions, including asthma, which should include disclosing medical conditions by all adolescents. This would allow teachers to be aware of potential challenges with the adolescents during the year, (Table 4, quote 16). Teachers also indicated that providing metered dose inhalers in all schools, especially in residential (boarding) schools, would assist adolescents having acute asthma episodes, (Table 4, quote 17).
Our study has identified teachers’ perspectives on barriers to caring for adolescents living with asthma and their suggestions for modifying specific practices within schools to improve asthma care across six sub-Saharan African countries. These barriers and suggestions on asthma care were common to all countries, with little variation between them.
The perceived deficit in asthma knowledge expressed by teachers across our study has been frequently documented across urban, rural and low-resourced schools worldwide21,22,23. This lack of knowledge has been postulated to contribute to poor self-confidence and self-efficacy among teachers, especially when managing adolescents with acute asthma episodes13,14. The overall goal in asthma care is the provision of a ‘seamless blanket of care’ across home, school and health facilities, but that is compromised when teachers lack basic skills and knowledge for caring for adolescents with asthma9,11,24. This study identified that for effective improvement in asthma knowledge and care, all stakeholders (adolescents, parents and teachers) require exposure to training programmes. This need for all-inclusive training seems highly recommended for the sSA context, where parents often lack adequate knowledge and resources to manage asthmatic adolescents outside the school environment. In facilities with a limited healthcare workforce and multiple priorities, asthma training devolved to the school environment may offer a solution to improving asthma knowledge. This finding may also explain studies that have documented that while isolated asthma training for teachers in schools improves teacher knowledge, the overall impact on asthma care following this training remains guarded15,16. Thus, an inclusive approach should be prioritised as a model for comprehensive asthma education in schools. An all-inclusive asthma training approach may remedy low levels of ‘health literacy’ (‘defined as an “individual’s capacity to access, understand, communicate, utilise, and make decisions based on health information”) that exacerbate anxiety felt by teachers22. The emphasis on developing ‘health literacy’ among adolescents, their caregivers and teachers can potentially improve overall asthma control of children and adolescents25,26.
A tailored approach includes focusing on the practical aspects of using metered-dose inhalers during an acute episode and mitigating asthma triggers in the school environment. Similar findings have been reflected in studies that show knowledge deficiencies among teachers relate specifically to the technical aspects and fear of overdosing when using inhalers23,24.
Teachers further suggested alternative methods compared to traditional lecture formats would be more successful in sustaining interest in asthma education. Creative modalities, like drama and music involving adolescents and their parents, have the potential to address misconceptions leading to frequent school absences, restrictions on sporting activities and the stigma related to asthma21.
The call for selecting teachers with personal experiences in dealing with asthma as preferred ‘asthma champions’ has been documented globally and is a potential strategy to improve asthma outcomes15,27,28. The creation of ‘asthma champions’ amongst certain school teachers can help bridge the critical gap in advocacy. ‘Asthma champions’ improve self-confidence and self-efficacy among teachers and promote communication among healthcare providers, parents, teachers and community support groups27. This suggestion in our study addresses the lack of nurses in African schools. It strengthens the role of teachers within communities where health education and advocacy are often lacking for non-communicable diseases. Another advantage of teachers being ‘asthma champions’ is their potential role in dissipating certain beliefs that hinder acute and preventative asthma care within low-resource contexts29.
School health systems should make provisions for screening and documenting adolescents with asthma and clarify the roles of teachers in acute care. Teachers in this study reiterated formalising annual health screening with record keeping to identify adolescents with asthma or asthma symptoms. Information gathered could assist with potential acute asthma episodes and the possible need for trigger avoidance measures amongst adolescents. Record keeping with action plans in school healthcare systems has been shown to improve staff preparedness and decrease anxiety16.
Multiple concerns were raised regarding the lack of clarity with legislation restricting teachers from administering medication to adolescents without parental approval. In the context of inadequate provision of on-site school nurses noted in many LMICs, the calls for clear policy guidelines on the role of teachers in administering asthma treatment in acute episodes are crucial30.
This study’s strength is drawing on multiple African countries to comprehensively assess teachers’ perspectives in these LMICs. Most studies in Africa have been single-centre or in one country, limiting the inference to the diversity of countries across the continent. This study has some limitations as it was mainly focused on urban-based schools with no rural representation. We did not conduct member checks. We used an inductive approach with constant data comparisons and discussions to inform our understanding of the views expressed in the FGDs. We were aware of the risk of researcher bias in qualitative research and actively discussed reflexivity in the regular multidisciplinary team discussions, which aided analysis and informed interpretation.
With increasing asthma rates across sSA, a more significant role for teachers is being identified in managing asthma in adolescents. Barriers include a perceived lack of skills and knowledge and traditional beliefs about asthma. Asthma education is suggested for adolescents, their caregivers and teachers who use innovative methods focused on improving asthma knowledge and dispelling myths. Additionally, annual health screening and using teachers as ‘asthma champions’ who advocate for adolescents with asthma may assist in managing this common non-communicable condition.
Anonymised data is available from the corresponding author upon request, and there are no restrictions to data usage.
World Health Organization. The Global Asthma Report. http://globalasthmareport.org/resources/Global_Asthma_Report_2022.pdf (2022).
Lai, C. K., et al. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood Phase Three Study FGD. Global variation in the prevalence and severity of asthma symptoms: phase three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Thorax, 64, 476–483 (2009).
Carvalho Coelho, A. C., Barretto Cardoso, L. S., de Souza-Machado, C. & Souza-Machado, A. The impacts of educational asthma interventions in schools: a systematic review of the literature. Can. Respir. J. 2016, 8476206 (2016).
Stolbrink, M. et al. The availability, cost, and affordability of essential medicines for asthma and COPD in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob. Health 10, e1423–e1442 (2022).
Asher, M. I., et al. Global Asthma Network Phase I Study FDG. Worldwide trends in the burden of asthma symptoms in school-aged children: Global Asthma Network Phase I cross-sectional study. Lancet (London, England), 398, 1569–1580 (2021).
Baard, C. B., Franckling-Smith, Z., Munro, J., Workman, L. & Zar, H. J. Asthma in South African adolescents: a time trend and risk factor analysis over two decades. ERJ Open Res. 7, 00576-2020 (2021).
Rylance, S. et al. An enhanced care package to improve asthma management in Malawian children: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 76, 434–440 (2021).
Lundholm, C. et al. Asthma and subsequent school performance at age 15–16 years: a Swedish population-based sibling control study. Sci. Rep. 10, 7661 (2020).
Mitchell, R. J. et al. The impact of childhood asthma on academic performance: a matched population-based cohort study. Clin. Exp. Allergy 52, 286–296 (2022).
Mayosi, B. M. et al. The burden of non-communicable diseases in South Africa. Lancet (Lond., Engl.) 374, 934–947 (2009).
Arıkan-Ayyıldız, Z. et al. Efficacy of asthma education program on asthma control in children with uncontrolled asthma. Turk. J. Pediatr. 58, 383–388 (2016).
Mosler, G., Harris, K., Grigg, J. & Steed, L. Developing a theory-based multimedia intervention for schools to improve young people’s asthma: my asthma in school (MAIS). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 6, 122 (2020).
French, D. J. & Carroll, A. Western Australian primary school teachers’ knowledge about childhood asthma and its management. J. Asthma 34, 469–475 (1997).
Reznik, M., Greenberg, E., Cain, A., Halterman, J. S. & Ivanna Avalos, M. Improving teacher comfort and self-efficacy in asthma management. J. Asthma 57, 1237–1243 (2020).
Canitez, Y., Cekic, S., Celik, U., Kocak, A. & Sapan, N. Healthcare conditions in elementary schools and teachers’ knowledge of childhood asthma. Paediatr. Int Child Health 36, 64–71 (2016).
Kew, K. M., Carr, R., Donovan, T. & Gordon, M. Asthma education for school staff. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4, CD012255 (2017).
Mosler, G. et al. Achieving control of asthma in children in Africa (ACACIA): protocol of an observational study of children’s lung health in six sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ open 10, e035885 (2020).
Roberts, K., Dowell, A. & Nie, J. B. Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 19, 66 (2019).
Boyatzis, R. E. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA. (Sage Publications, 1998).
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).
Govender, D. & Graym, A. Knowledge of primary school teachers about asthma: a cross-sectional survey in the Umdoni sub-district, KwaZulu-Natal. S Afr. Fam. Pr. 54, 347–351 (2012).
Adeyeye, O. O., Kuyinu, Y. A., & Ozoh, O. B. Assessment of the knowledge of teachers about asthma and the availability of facilities for asthma care in public secondary schools in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr. J. Thorac. Crit. Care Med. 24, https://doi.org/10.7196/AJTCCM.2018.v24i2.192 (2018).
Abdel Gawwad, E. S. & El-Herishi, S. Asthma education for school staff in Riyadh city: effectiveness of pamphlets as an educational tool. J. Egypt Public Health Assoc. 82, 147–171, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Asthma-education-for-school-staff-in-Riyadh-city%3A-Gawwad-El-Herishi/6eb3ade63e9948b66edbec258077fbd3229a3f8c (2007).
Bruzzese, J. M. et al. Asthma knowledge and asthma management behavior in urban elementary school teachers. J. Asthma 47, 185–191 (2010).
Paasche-Orlow, M. K. et al. Tailored education may reduce health literacy disparities in asthma self-management. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 172, 980–986 (2005).
Tzeng, Y. F., Chiang, B. L., Chen, Y. H. & Gau, B. S. Health literacy in children with asthma: a systematic review. Pediatr. Neonatol. 59, 429–438 (2018).
Alkhamis, Z. N. & Hashim, S. A. Awareness of asthma and its management in primary school teachers in Eastern Province. Fam. Med. Prim. Care Rev. 8, 1908–1913 (2019).
Neuharth-Pritchett, S. & Getch, Y. Q. Asthma and the school teacher: the status of teacher preparedness and training. J. Sch. Nurs. 17, 323–328 (2001).
Rubin, B. K. Asthma myths, controversies, and dogma. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 16, 83–87 (2015).
Ramdzan, S. N. et al. Stakeholders’ views of supporting asthma management in schools with a school-based asthma programme for primary school children: a qualitative study in Malaysia. BMJ open 12, e052058 (2022).
We wish to express our gratitude to all the teachers who participated in this study and Mrs Leora Sewnarain and Ms Ayanda Khumalo for assistance with formatting and language review. This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (Trial number 269211) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research.
The author(s) declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article. The funder did not influence the results and compiling of the manuscript. J.G. reports personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Vifor Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from BV Pharma, and personal fees from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. R.M. reports consultancy and advisory board membership from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, and Organon.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Naidoo, K.L., Dladla, S., Mphahlele, R.E. et al. A cross-country qualitative analysis of teachers’ perceptions of asthma care in sub-Saharan Africa. npj Prim. Care Respir. Med. 33, 31 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00354-7