The prevalence of active smokers has remained relatively stable around 20% for several years in Denmark despite knowledge of the harmful effects. Smoking cessation is the most effective way to limit progression and reduce mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therefore, smoking cessation is particularly important among adults with COPD. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which adults 30–50 years of age with COPD redeem pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation, and to identify demographic factors that influence the use of smoking cessation medication. We conducted a national retrospective non-interventional registry study, including all Danish patients with COPD (ICD-10 code J.44: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) aged 30–50 years in the period 2009–2015. We identified 7734 cases, who were matched with controls (15,307) 1:2 on age, sex, and geography. Smoking status was not registered. We found that 18% of cases (with an estimated smoking prevalence at 33–50%) redeemed pharmacological smoking cessation medication in the study period compared to 3% of the controls (with an estimated smoking prevalence at 23%). The OR for cases collecting pharmacological smoking cessation medication was 5.92 [95% CI 5.24–6.70]. Male sex, being unemployed, and receiving social benefits were factors associated with less probability of redeeming pharmacological smoking cessation medication. Our study indicates that attention is needed on smoking cessation in adults aged 30–50 years with COPD, especially if unemployed or receiving social benefits, as these individuals are less likely to redeem pharmacological smoking cessation medication.
Tobacco smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the western world1. The overall mortality for people who smoke is three times higher than for people who have never smoked2. According to the Danish Health Authorities, tobacco smoking is the most influential factor for inequalities in health and mortality in Denmark3. Smoking is known to cause multiple diseases, e.g., lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)4,5. Without smoking cessation, the lifetime risk of developing COPD is one out of two6.
Due to extensive cigarette use, the prevalence and mortality of COPD in Denmark are among the highest in Europe7. Danish women have a 3.7 times higher risk of dying from COPD than the general European population7. Therefore, there is a great need to improve treatment and reduce the mortality of Danish patients with COPD.
COPD can be treated through pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions8,9. The most effective way to inhibit disease progression is smoking cessation10,11,12. Smoking cessation in patients with COPD is associated with decreased dyspnea, fewer exacerbations and hospitalizations, better lung function, increased quality of life, and increased survival13,14. Despite the positive effects of smoking cessation, ~33% of Danish patients with moderate or severe COPD are smoking15,16. Smoking cessation is essential in young adults since their lungs are more vulnerable to the harmful effects of smoking17. Hospitalization and mortality rates are increased in patients diagnosed with COPD at an early age (before 50 years of age) compared to patients who are diagnosed with COPD after 50 years of age18. Even though smoking cessation is the most effective way to inhibit disease progression, a recent study found that up to 50% of Danish patients with COPD under 50 years of age are active smokers18. One reason for the extensive tobacco use among young patients could be that they are more nicotine dependent and thus face more difficulties with smoking cessation than older patients with COPD16.
Three main strategies exist for smoking cessation: quitting without external aid, quitting by the help of professional counseling (e.g., motivational therapy), or quitting by means of smoking cessation medication19. In recent years smoking cessation by means of electronic cigarettes has been promoted, but the products have not been approved as pharmacological treatment, and the effect on smoking cessation rates is not well established20. Pharmacological treatment has proved to be more efficient than the other strategies, although successful smoking cessation is best achieved through a combination of counseling and pharmacological treatment19,21. Three main types of smoking cessation medication are available: nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion, and varenicline. Quitting rates varies between studies, but are ~20–30% for varenicline, 15–40% for NRT, and 10–20% for bupropion22,23,24,25,26.
COPD is a disease with a heavy socioeconomic gradient and socioeconomic status is considered an independent risk factor for the development of COPD27. The cost of the recommended 12-week treatment varies but is approximately EUR 120 for bupropion (Zyban®, GlaxoSmithKline Pharma) and EUR 360 for varenicline (Champix®, Pfizer). The price of NRT varies, depending on the dosage and duration of the treatment. In Denmark, as in several other European countries, smoking cessation medication is not covered by the national reimbursement system, and other means of financial support is limited28. In some municipalities in Denmark (including our study period 2009–2015), smoking cessation medication has experimentally been offered, for various time periods, free of charge to specific groups, e.g., heavy smokers, economically challenged individuals, and pregnant women, if they participated in smoking cessation programs offered by the Danish municipalities29. These programs have been a success but smoking cessation medication is still not part of the national reimbursement system30.
It is of great importance to increase focus on smoking cessation among young adults. A study from 2019 by Tibuakuu et al. showed that tobacco-dependent adults (18–39 years of age) in the United States received less smoking cessation advice from physicians than the rest of the population31. Although pharmacological smoking cessation has been proven effective there is still limited knowledge on the degree to which smoking cessation medication is offered to patients with COPD, particularly in young patients32,33.
The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which adults aged 30–50 years with COPD redeem pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation, and to explore how the use of smoking cessation medication is correlated to different demographic factors.
The study was designed as a national, retrospective, non-interventional, registry study.
The Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) is a national register that contains information on all Danish citizens. All residents in Denmark receive a unique 10-digit (CPR) number which is recorded in the Danish Civil Registration System. The CPR number enabled us to link data at an individual level across different registries34.
We included all Danish patients 30–50 years of age who were diagnosed with COPD in the period 2009–2015. Data were collected from the Danish National Patient Registry, which is a complete nationwide registry covering all non-psychiatric contacts to the secondary healthcare sector in Denmark34. We used code J44.x of the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) to identify patients with COPD. Cases and controls were included regardless of smoking status, since this information was not available from any national registry. We excluded patients who died in 2009 to allow for at least one year of eligibility to collect pharmacological smoking cessation medication.
Each case was matched with two controls without a COPD diagnosis in the period 1998–2015. We matched cases and controls on age, sex, and geography. We used descriptive statistics from the index year (2009).
We extracted data on age, sex, and geography from the Danish Civil Registration System35. Information about socioeconomic status, educational level, and marital status was obtained from Statistics Denmark. All redeemed prescriptions are registered in the Danish National Prescription Registry and can be linked to the individual CPR number36. We included all redeemed prescriptions with codes N07BA01 (NRT), N06AX12 (bupropion), and N07BA03 (varenicline) of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System37. NRT can be bought as over-the-counter medicine in Denmark. All medication sold as over-the counter medicine is not recorded in the national registries and therefore not included in the study. This applies only for NRT and not for varenicline or bupropion.
Figure 1 shows the inclusion process. A total of 142,273 cases with a COPD diagnosis in 2009–2015 were identified. A total of 721 were excluded due to missing demographic information, and 2698 cases were excluded because we were unable to identify at least one control. An additional 5756 cases were excluded because they died in the index year, and 123,063 cases were excluded due to age above 50 years. The remaining 7734 cases were individually matched with two controls. In total, we included 15,307 controls because we were able to identify only one control in 161 cases.
We used a conditional logistic regression model, with case = 1, control = 0, to compare socioeconomic factors for cases and controls. In the model we corrected for socioeconomic factors by using a variable (SOCIO13) from Statistic Denmark for the labor market affiliation status. The variable is based on information about the most important source of income or employment for the person in the year38. We used SAS 9.4 TS1M5 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to perform the statistical analyses.
A smoking cessation attempt was defined as the redemption of a prescription for smoking cessation medication. If the period between the redemption of two prescriptions on smoking cessation medication exceeded six month plus the number of treatment days of the previous prescription (measured as defined daily dosage (DDD)) it was categorized as a new smoking cessation attempt.
The outcome was the number of redeemed prescriptions for smoking cessation medicine with ATC code N07BA01 (NRT), N06AX12 (bupropion), or N07BA03 (varenicline).
The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. The design was a register-based study, which was based on anonymized data with no identifiable personal information. Therefore, approval was not required by the Danish health research ethics committee system and consent from patients not necessary according to Danish Law. The study complied with the ethical principles outlined by the World Medical Association in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
The demographic characteristics of the cohort are displayed in Table 1. The mean age was 44 years, with an even distribution of males and females. A total of 48.0% of the cases were married compared to 70.7% of the controls. Cases had lower employment rates than controls (42.9% of cases vs. 82.1% of controls). Cases more often received social benefits than controls; 30.4% on disability pension (vs. 6.6% of controls), 4.2% on sick pay (vs. 1.6% of controls), and 17.8% on social security (vs. 4.4% of controls). Cases had lower education level compared to controls; 9.2% of cases had a bachelor’s or higher degree (vs. 26.6% of controls).
Table 2 displays the number of cases and controls that redeemed a prescription for smoking cessation medication. A total of 18.3% of cases redeemed a prescription for smoking cessation medication, whereas only 3.3% of the controls did the same. Among both cases and controls, the age group 40–50 years redeemed more medication than the age group 30–39 years, independently of the subtype of medication. Among cases, 20.9% of females redeemed a prescription for smoking cessation medication, whereas this was 16.2% for males. There were no differences regarding sex in the control group (3.3%).
Low education level was associated with an increased likelihood of redeeming smoking cessation medication among both cases and controls. A total of 20.2% of cases with the primary school as their highest attained education redeemed a prescription, whereas only 8.1% for cases holding a master’s degree redeemed a prescription. A similar pattern was seen for controls, regardless of the type of medication.
Table 3 shows case data only. Male sex reduced the probability of redeeming a prescription for smoking cessation medication (Odds ratio (OR) 0.73 [95% CI (confidence interval) 0.65–0.82]). Civil status did not affect the probability of redeeming a prescription for smoking cessation medication. Cases on social security had the lowest probability of redeeming a prescription for smoking cessation medication (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.63–0.90]). Employed cases had the highest probability of redeeming a prescription for varenicline or bupropion (OR 1, reference).
Attempts to quit smoking
Table 4 displays a conditional logistic regression analysis of attempts to quit smoking among cases. The OR for cases to try smoking cessation medication once was 5.59 [95% CI 4.86–6.44] compared to controls, whereas the OR for three attempts was 10.00 [95% CI 2.87–11.06].
In this retrospective non-interventional registry-based study, we provide national data regarding adults 30–50 years of age with COPD. In a previous publication we addressed the pharmacological smoking cessation in patients with COPD of all ages, but in our present study we included only patients with early onset COPD, since there is a big knowledge gap regarding the treatment of this particular group of patients. In accordance with a previous study on all Danish patients with COPD, we found a higher likelihood among patients with COPD to redeem prescriptions for smoking cessation medication than among their matched controls39. We found that cases had an inferior social situation compared to controls. Cases were more likely to be single, have low education level, and to be on social benefits. These characteristics have also been found in other studies32,40,41,42. Furthermore, our study showed that among cases, male sex and receiving social security decreased the likelihood to redeem a prescription for smoking cessation medication. The inferior socioeconomic situation of the patients with COPD, lack of smoking cessation advice, and higher nicotine dependence might explain the low redemption rate of smoking cessation medication, but more studies are needed to identify contributing factors16,32,43.
We found that 18.3% of cases redeemed a prescription for smoking cessation medication at least once compared to only 3.3% of controls. Even though cases used more smoking cessation medication than controls, the number is discouraging. Young patients (under 50 years of age) with COPD have increased risk of hospitalizations and reduced life expectancy compared to their lung healthy peers18. Given the poor prognosis and the prospects of a life with potentially severe pulmonary symptoms, young patients with COPD is expected to be more motivated to smoking cessation. However, patients with early COPD often have fewer respiratory symptoms and are known to have more psychiatric comorbidities, which could be potential reasons for the limited use of smoking cessation medication in this group. Further, in Denmark there are no tailored smoking cessation programs for young individuals.
We found that cases were five times more likely to have one quit attempt (OR 5.59) and 10 times more likely to have three quit attempts (OR 10.00) compared to controls. There may be numerous reasons for this finding. First, COPD patients with symptoms of airway obstruction are more likely to stop smoking44. Second, young patients with COPD may have been advised to stop smoking during their annual routine checkup. Advice on smoking cessation is a mandatory part of the annual routine checkup according to the Danish COPD guidelines, and discussing smoking cessation with a health care professional has been shown to increase the chance of successful smoking cessation and prescription of relevant medications45,46,47. Lastly, the excessive attempts to quit smoking among cases as compared to controls may reflect a higher level of nicotine dependence among patients with COPD, resulting in difficulties with smoking cessation16,48.
Patients with COPD had the highest probability of redeeming a prescription of either varenicline or bupropion if they were employed. This might be due to the high prices of especially varenicline and bupropion. Surprisingly, we found that cases on early retirement had an OR of 6.51 for redeeming a prescription of NRT as compared to employed cases. A possible explanation for this finding could be that people on early retirement may prioritize medication that is available in small portions, which makes it more affordable in the short term. It may also be because they are reimbursed by some municipalities in Denmark as a part of a smoking cessation reimbursement program. Adding smoking cessation medication in the national reimbursement program, or even offering the medication free of charge, could be cost-effective strategies to help patients with COPD to smoking cessation. Studies from other countries, such as Spain, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands have showed, that funding of smoking cessation medication may increase quitting rates49,50,51.
The socioeconomic gradient in COPD remains a challenge, which may contribute to a delayed diagnosis, inferior medical treatment, and a poor prognosis32,43. Despite the well-known socioeconomic gradient of COPD, we were surprised to find that only 42.9% of adults aged 30–50 years with COPD were employed (compared to 82.1% of controls) and that 30.4% were on disability pension (compared to 6.6% of controls). Similar findings have been reported from other contries52,53,54. It is discouraging that so many adults aged 30–50 years with COPD experience such socioeconomic disadvantages, and it underlines the importance of early diagnosis and targeted treatment to inhibit disease progression.
We found that sex was related to collection of smoking cessation medication. Males redeemed significantly fewer prescriptions for smoking cessation medication compared to females. In Denmark, the prevalence of daily smoking is similar between males and females, so differences in smoking status cannot explain this finding55. A study by Watson et al. showed that women were more likely to experience dyspnea and more likely to take smoking cessation advice (OR 1.52)56. Therefore, a likely explanation could be that women redeem more prescriptions for smoking cessation medication because they experience more symptoms and seek advice on smoking cessation from health care professionals.
A limitation to this study is that we were not able to collect information about smoking status among cases and controls since this information is not routinely registered in any Danish database. According to the Danish COPD database, 33% of patients with COPD were current smokers in 2015, but other studies suggest, that the smoking prevalence among patients with COPD under the age of 50 years is as high as 50%18. The number was 23% for the general population in the same period. If we take the smoking prevalence among cases and controls into account, we find that ~36–55% (18 out of 33–50) of active smokers with COPD redeem a prescription on smoking cessation medication compared to 15% (3,3 out of 23) among smokers without COPD.
A strength of our study is the use of a national dataset on all Danish patients with an ICD-10 code for COPD. Unfortunately, the primary care sector in Denmark does not use ICD-10 coding. This means that patients with no contact to a Danish hospital or outpatient clinic is not included in the study. Still, this number is likely to be very low as the Danish Health Authorities recommend referral of all patients under 50 years of age diagnosed with COPD for further checkup with a pulmonary specialist57.
We could not validate the COPD diagnoses of the included cases since we had no access to lung function data. However, a previous study by Thygesen et al. found a positive predictive value of nearly 100% for a COPD diagnosis in the Danish National Patient Registry58.
The results on the use of NRT should be interpreted with caution. The majority of NRTs are sold as over-the-counter medicine in Denmark. Therefore, NRT are not recorded in the national registries. However, the use of over-the-counter NRTs should not differ between the case group and the control group.
We found that only 18% of young patients 30–50 years of age diagnosed with COPD redeemed a prescription of smoking cessation medication in the period 2009–2015. If we take the estimated smoking prevalence into account, only 36–55% of the expected active smokers with a COPD–diagnosis collected smoking cessation medication. Female sex and being employed were both associated with increased likelihood of collecting smoking cessation medication.
Making smoking cessation treatment equally available to all individuals requires more than offering free advice on smoking cessation. Socioeconomic factors must be considered before the type of smoking cessation treatment is chosen. Individually tailored smoking cessation treatment should be offered to patients with COPD to reduce the social inequality observed in this group. One way could be to permanently include smoking cessation medication in the national reimbursement system to lower the prices. To increase the success rates of smoking cessation, medical treatment should be combined with professional counseling.
Smoking cessation is the cornerstone in the treatment of COPD, especially in younger patients since their lungs seem particularly vulnerable to the damaging effects of tobacco use. Health promotion is a core task in general practice. Helping people to quit smoking is an action with considerable impact on public health. Our study emphasizes that there is room for better support and motivation to help young people with COPD to successful smoking cessation.
The data used in the study are available from the corresponding author upon e-mail request.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco Related Mortality. Accessed 10 November 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/tobacco_related_mortality/index.htm.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress A Report of the Surgeon General. A Rep Surg Gen. 1081 (2014).
Danish Health Authority. Social ulighed i sundhed og sygdom 2010-2017 [Social inequality in health and disease in Denmark 2010-2017]. 1–263 (2020). https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2020/Ulighed-i-sundhed/Social-ulighed-i-sundhed-og-sygdom-tilgaengelig.ashx.
Viegi, G. et al. Definition, epidemiology and natural history of COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 30, 993–1013 (2007).
Tashkin, D. P. & Murray, R. P. Smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir. Med. 103, 963–974 (2009).
Lundbäck, B. et al. Not 15 but 50% of smokers develop COPD?−Report from the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden Studies. Respir. Med. 97, 115–122 (2003).
Danish Health Authority. Anbefalinger for Tværsektorielle Forløb for Mennesker Med KOL / Recommentations for Cross-Sectorial Treatment of COPD. (2020).
Mirza, S., Clay, R. D., Koslow, M. A. & Scanlon, P. D. COPD Guidelines: A Review of the 2018 GOLD Report. Mayo Clin. Proc. 93, 1488–1502 (2018).
Tønnesen, P. Which drug to be used in smoking cessation? Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 118, 373–376 (2008).
Anthonisen, N. R. et al. Effects of Smoking Intervention and the Use of an Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator on the Rate of Decline of FEV1: The Lung Health Study. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 272, 1497–1505 (1994).
Xu, X., Dockery, D. W., Ware, J. H., Speizer, F. E. & Ferris, B. G. Effects of cigarette smoking on rate of loss of pulmonary function in adults: a longitudinal assessment. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 146, 1345–1348 (1992).
Camilli, A. E., Burrows, B., Knudson, R. J., Lyle, S. K. & Lebowitz, M. D. Longitudinal changes in forced expiratory volume in one second in adults. Effects of smoking and smoking cessation. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 135, 794–799 (1987).
Scanlon, P. D. et al. Smoking cessation and lung function in mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the lung health study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 161, 381–390 (2000).
Godtfredsen, N. S. & Tønnesen, P. Rygestop og KOL [Smoking cessation and COPD]. Ugeskr. Laege. 175, 1266–1269 (2013).
Regions of Denmark. DrKOL Dansk register for Kronisk Obstruktiv Lungesygdom - National årsrapport 2018 [Danish Register of COPD. - National rapport 2018]. Regionernes Kliniske Kvalitetsudviklingsprogram. 2018. Accessed 10 November 2021. https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/90/4690_drkol-aarsrapport-2018_offentlig.pdf.
Tøttenborg, S. S., Thomsen, R. W., Johnsen, S. P., Nielsen, H. & Lange, P. Determinants of smoking cessation in patients with COPD treated in the outpatient setting. Chest 150, 554–562 (2016).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK99242/.
Çolak, Y., Afzal, S., Nordestgaard, B. G., Vestbo, J. & Lange, P. Prevalence, characteristics, and prognosis of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. the Copenhagen General Population Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 201, 671–680 (2020).
Cahill, K. Stevens, S. Perera. R. & Lancaster, T. Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: An overview and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009329.pub2.
Wang, R. J., Bhadriraju, S. & Glantz, S. A. E-cigarette use and adult cigarette smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Public Health 111, 230–246 (2021).
Danish health authorities. Behandling af tobaksafhængighed - Anbefalinger til en styrket klinisk praksis [Treatment of tobacco dependance- recommendations to a good clinical practice]. https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2011/-/media/Udgivelser/2011/Publ2011/BOFO/Tobak/Behandling-af-tobaksafhængighed---Anbefalinger-til-en-styrket-klinisk-praksis.ashx.
Wagena, E. J., Knipschild, P. G., Huibers, M. J. H., Wouters, E. F. M. & Van Schayck, C. P. Efficacy of bupropion and nortriptyline for smoking cessation among people at risk for or with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 165, 2286–2292 (2005).
Gonzales, D. et al. Varenicline, an α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, vs sustained-release bupropion and placebo for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 296, 47–55 (2006).
Cahill, K., Lindson-Hawley, N., Thomas, K. H., Fanshawe, T. R. & Lancaster, T. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 1–211 (2016).
Yilmazel Ucar, E. et al. Effectiveness of pharmacologic therapies on smoking cessation success: three years results of a smoking cessation clinic. Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 9, 9 (2014).
Saylan, B., Baslilar, S. & Kartaloglu, Z. Comparative assessment of outcomes of smoking cessation therapies and role of free medications in successful long-term abstinence. Tob. Induc. Dis. 19, 51 (2021).
Kocabas, A. & Ozyilmaz, E. The effects of socioeconomic status on health outcomes in patients with COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 48, PA1030 (2016).
Dautzenberg, B., Dautzenberg, M. Smoking cessation drugs in France: First effects of reimbursement under the general regime. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, 5(Supplement), A65. https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/105207 (2019).
Danish Health Authority. Forstærket indsats overfor storrygere 2014–2017 [Increased treatment of heavy smokers 2014–2017]. https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Puljer/Forstærket-indsats-over-for-storrygere/Slutevaluering.ashx?sc_lang=da&hash=84D4189F9EB1E66E80D28778FE63E25A.
Danish Health Authority. Hjælp til rygestop til særlige grupper (rygestopsmedicin) [Help to smoking cessation to special groups (smoking cessation medication)]. 2018. https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2019/HJaelp-til-rygestop-til-saerlige-grupper-rygestopmedicin-evaluering.ashx.
Tibuakuu, M. et al. National trends in cessation counseling, prescription medication use, and associated costs among US adult cigarette smokers. JAMA Netw. open. 2, e194585 (2019).
Tøttenborg, S. S., Clark, A. J., Thomsen, R. W., Johnsen, S. P. & Lange, P. Socioeconomic inequality in the use of prescription medications for smoking cessation among patients with COPD: a nationwide study. Int. J. Copd. 13, 1775–1781 (2018).
Fazleen, A. & Wilkinson, T. Early COPD: current evidence for diagnosis and management. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 14, 1753466620942128 (2020).
Schmidt, M. et al. The Danish National patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin. Epidemiol. 7, 449–490 (2015).
Schmidt, M., Pedersen, L. & Sørensen, H. T. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 29, 541–549 (2014).
Wallach Kildemoes, H., Toft Sørensen, H. & Hallas, J. The Danish national prescription registry. Scand. J. Public Health 39, 38–41 (2011).
World Health Organization. Anatomical Therapeutical Index -Classification. Accessed 20 April 2022. https://www.who.int/tools/atc-ddd-toolkit/atc-classification.
Statistics Denmark. SOCIO13. Accessed 20 April 2022. https://www.dst.dk/da/TilSalg/Forskningsservice/Dokumentation/hoejkvalitetsvariable/personers-tilknytning-til-arbejdsmarkedet-set-over-hele-aaret--akm-/socio13.
Andelius, D. K., Hilberg, O., Ibsen, R. & Løkke, A. National epidemiological case-control study of pharmacological smoking cessation treatment in Danish patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 16, 2433–2443 (2021).
Prescott, E. & Vestbo, J. Socioeconomic status and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 54, 737 LP–737741 (1999).
Carlone, S. et al. Health and social impacts of COPD and the problem of under-diagnosis. Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-63 (2014).
Pleasants, R. A., Riley, I. L. & Mannino, D. M. Defining and targeting health disparities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 11, 2475–2496 (2016).
Gershon, A. S., Dolmage, T. E., Stephenson, A. & Jackson, B. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and socioeconomic status: a systematic review. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 9, 216–226 (2012).
Melzer, A. C. et al. Respiratory and bronchitic symptoms predict intention to quit smoking among current smokers with, and at risk for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 13, 1490–1496 (2016).
Danish society of respiratory medicine. Treatment of COPD. Accessed 27 September 2021. https://lungemedicin.dk/kol-behandling/.
Gorin, S. S. & Heck, J. E. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of tobacco counseling by health care providers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 13, 2012–2022 (2004).
Stead, L. F., Bergson, G. & Lancaster, T. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD000165 (2008).
Jiménez-Ruiz, C. A. et al. Smoking characteristics: differences in attitudes and dependence between healthy smokers and smokers with COPD. Chest 119, 1365–1370 (2001).
Jiménez-Ruiz, C. A. et al. Cost-benefit analysis of funding smoking cessation before surgery. Br. J. Surg. 107, 978–994 (2020).
Jiménez-Ruiz, C. A. et al. Budgetary impact analysis on funding smoking-cessation drugs in patients with COPD in Spain. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 10, 2027–2036 (2015).
van den Brand, F. A. et al. Does free or lower cost smoking cessation medication stimulate quitting? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands and UK Surveys. Tob. Control. 28, s61–s67 (2019).
Fitzsimmons, K., Pechter, E. & Sparer-Fine, E. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and employment among Massachusetts adults. Prev. Chronic Dis. 17, E144 (2020).
Thornton Snider, J. et al. The disability burden of COPD. COPD 9, 513–521 (2012).
Rai, K. K., Adab, P., Ayres, J. G. & Jordan, R. E. Systematic review: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and work-related outcomes. Occup. Med. 68, 99–108 (2018).
Danish Health Authority. Danskernes Rygevaner 2015 - udvalgte resultater [Smoking habits in Denmark 2015 – selected results]. 19–20 (2015). https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Nyheder/2016/Faktaark-Danskernes-rygevaner-2015---udvalgte-resultater.ashx?sc_lang=da&hash=A50BE441190F8B20F11A5FF34E49EFED.
Watson, L. et al. Gender differences in the management and experience of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Respir. Med. 98, 1207–1213 (2004).
The capital Region. COPD guideline, Denmark. https://www.sundhed.dk/sundhedsfaglig/information-til-praksis/hovedstaden/almen-praksis/patientforloeb/forloebsbeskrivelser-icpc/r-luftveje/kol/.
Thygesen, S. K., Christiansen, C. F., Christensen, S., Lash, T. L. & Sørensen, H. T. The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 11, 83 (2011).
The study was sponsored by Pfizer Denmark Aps.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Andelius, D.K., Hilberg, O., Ibsen, R. et al. Pharmacological smoking cessation of adults aged 30–50 years with COPD. npj Prim. Care Respir. Med. 32, 39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-022-00301-y