Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genetic predispositions of Parkinson’s disease revealed in patient-derived brain cells


Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurological disorder and has been the focus of intense investigations to understand its etiology and progression, but it still lacks a cure. Modeling diseases of the central nervous system in vitro with human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) is still in its infancy but has the potential to expedite the discovery and validation of new treatments. Here, we discuss the interplay between genetic predispositions and midbrain neuronal impairments in people living with PD. We first summarize the prevalence of causal Parkinson’s genes and risk factors reported in 74 epidemiological and genomic studies. We then present a meta-analysis of 385 hiPSC-derived neuronal lines from 67 recent independent original research articles, which point towards specific impairments in neurons from Parkinson’s patients, within the context of genetic predispositions. Despite the heterogeneous nature of the disease, current iPSC models reveal converging molecular pathways underlying neurodegeneration in a range of familial and sporadic forms of Parkinson’s disease. Altogether, consolidating our understanding of robust cellular phenotypes across genetic cohorts of Parkinson’s patients may guide future personalized drug screens in preclinical research.


Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a complex neurological disease, affecting approximately 2% of the population over 60 years of age. Since the first reports of PD correlation with the SNCA gene1,2,3,4,5, an increasing number of genomic predispositions has been identified as direct contributors or risk factors for the disease6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. In the last decade, advances in cellular reprogramming and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology have led to the development of patient-derived brain tissue engineering16,17,18. The culturing of live patient-derived neurons provides a unique opportunity to study the cellular mechanisms of genetically-linked diseases in vitro19,20. IPSC studies of brain disorders remain laborious and expensive, which limits the number of cell lines that can be studied in a single laboratory and may raise the issue of statistical power and reproducibility. The field is still in its infancy, and neuronal differentiation protocols are continuously improved upon, which makes technical harmonization between studies challenging21. Like any model, iPSC studies have their weaknesses, and current limitations are being addressed collectively by the research community22,23. Nevertheless, the urgent need for better treatments for brain disorders justifies the requirement for pioneering iPSC studies modeling those diseases in vitro now. Since 2011, more than 385 neuronal lines from PD patients (and control subjects) have been generated across 67 original independent studies24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92. Independent phenotypic characterization of these lines revealed known and novel impairments in a range of cellular functions associated with PD. Moving forward, it is essential to integrate and compare the results obtained from these studies to identify the most reliable disease neuronal phenotypes before expanding the work to large drug screens. The identification of robust phenotypes of neurons derived from Parkinson’s patients’ iPSCs may provide the basis for a new paradigm in preclinical drug development and accelerates the progression towards clinical trials.

To quantify the prevalence and penetrance of genes known to be associated with PD, we analyzed 50 epidemiological93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129 and 24 genomic studies8,10,11,12,13,14,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148 and a genome-wide association studies (GWAS) database149. Within this context, we then examined recent findings from human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) models that shed light on the interplay between genetic predispositions and brain cell phenotypes in people living with PD. We present an analysis of 385 human iPSC-derived neuronal lines from 67 studies, which point towards specific impairments of dopaminergic neurons from people living with PD. In comparison with the prevalence of causal PD genes in epidemiological studies, our analysis underlines the current bias of PD iPSC studies towards a subset of familial genetic predispositions. We also summarize the methodological overlap and differences between these studies, which use a broad range of reprogramming methods. Finally, our meta-analysis highlights the possibility of converging molecular and cellular pathways underlying neurodegeneration in familial and sporadic PD with diverse genetic predispositions. In particular, we discuss the convergence of various genetic predispositions on the impairment of cellular pathways underlying metabolic function, synaptic communication, inflammation, and the recycling of damaged protein and organelles. The collective insights from independent iPSC disease studies, which are pioneering this blooming field of preclinical research, may guide us towards translating fundamental discoveries into effective treatments for patients.

The interplay between genomic predispositions and environmental factors leads to Parkinson’s

In the mid-1990s, the connection between PD and underlying genetic mutations was established4,5,150. It is now evident that varying degrees of the interplay between genomic predispositions and aging and cellular stressors impose a risk for disease151 (Fig. 1a). Previous studies have shown vascular insults to the brain, repeated head trauma, neuroleptic drugs, exposure to pesticides, and manganese toxicity increase the risks of developing symptoms of PD152,153,154. In addition, advancing age can also cause a cascade of stressors within the substantia nigra, which weakens the neurons and their ability to respond to further insults155,156. Ultimately, the uniqueness of the interactions between genes and the environment makes the development of a single treatment for PD difficult as they give rise to a spectrum of neuronal phenotypes that can be unique to individual patients (Fig. 1c). The development of a model with the ability to replicate the genomic and epigenetic aspects of the disease is crucial (Fig. 1b). As increasing evidence suggests that genetic mutations are key modulators of disease initiation and progression, the identification and understanding of the various genomic predispositions are required for the development of better-targeted treatments to slow the disease progression.

Fig. 1: A combinatorial spectrum of genetic risks, cellular stressors, and brain cell dysfunctions causes Parkinson’s disease.

a Graphical overview of PD risk associated with genomic predispositions and epigenetic factors. b Schematic overview of PD etiological trajectories in iPSC models. c Unique cellular phenotypes may cause PD symptoms in a subset of patients (individualized etiology) and the convergence of various initial causes into common cellular phenotypes may cause other symptoms (convergent etiology).

Learning from genetic analyses of PD case–control studies

We analyzed the reports from 12 international studies94,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167, totaling 5650 persons living with PD in North America, Europe, and Australia. We confirmed that globally only 15% of patients report a family history of PD symptoms, while the remaining 85% of the PD population are classified as sporadic PD (Fig. 2a). However, the distinction between genetic predispositions in familial and sporadic PD is blurry. No single-gene mutation in PD has a 100% penetrance. Instead, most likely, multiple genetic risk factors act in synergy to increase the chances of both familial and sporadic PD. Such genetic susceptibilities interplay with aging and environmental factors in both familial and sporadic PD.

Fig. 2: The genomics of Parkinson’s disease: prevalence and penetrance.

a In the world-wide population of people living with PD, ~85% of PD cases are sporadic (sPD) and the remaining are familial (fPD) (n = 5650 PD cases combined, refer to “Methods”). b Genetic mutations occur at low (< 1%) and varying frequencies (Freq.) in the PD world population (n=488 patients carrying mutation, 32,012 total PD cases used for analysis, refer to “Methods”). Data represented as the mean±SEM. c GWAS data suggests risk variants (OR>1.5) in fPD genes tend to be less prevalent in PD cases (n = 25,243 PD cases, 41,945 healthy, refer to “Methods”). d Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in over 44 genomic regions show significant (p < 5 x 10−8) association to PD. Each point presents an independent SNP hit associated with PD.

Mounting evidence demonstrates the role of genetic predispositions in PD pathogenesis, and the prevalence and penetrance of each variant start to emerge. Typically, it appears that the most common PD gene variants found in the global population have the lowest penetrance. On the other hand, most penetrant mutations are rare, and most often associated with familial PD. Variants on at least 16 PARK genes, referred to as “causal” because they instigate a relatively high familial inheritance of PD or early-onset PD symptoms, have been identified and are highlighted in Table 15,119,132,135,147,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178. To estimate the frequency of these mutations in the Parkinson’s population, we examined the published reports from 50 epidemiological studies. The high penetrance and hereditary nature of causal mutations can amplify their occurrence in specific ethnic groups (i.e., Japanese134, Chinese133, and Ashkenazi Jews11). However, globally our analysis shows that the presence of any known causal PD mutation is rare, occurring in less than 2% of the PD population (Fig. 2b). The two most common mutated genes associated with familial PD are LRRK2 and PRKN and are reported in 0.7% and 0.3% of all the people showing PD symptoms, respectively (Fig. 2b). However, the frequency of at least some risk variants (OR > 1.5), which we measured in a large genomic data set including 25,243 total PD cases (combination of NHGRI-EBI catalog and 24 independent genetic studies), appears higher than in the epidemiological studies, which would tend to focus on the variants with the highest penetrance. For example, LRRK2 G2385R is present in >10% of the PD patients and PRKN exon rearrangements are present in >3% of the patients (Fig. 2c). Our analysis also highlights that known mutations in familial PARK genes confer a broad range of risks to develop PD symptoms. PRKN(exon rearrangements), LRRK2(G2019S), GBA (L444P, N370S), and CHCHD2(P2L) appear to be the most penetrant mutations, increasing the chances of getting PD symptoms by up to a factor 14, 10, 8 and 5, respectively (Fig. 2c). However, these penetrant variants are relatively rare, occurring in ~4%, 2%, 5%, and 2% of the PD population, respectively (Fig. 2c). Overall, the data tends to confirm that the most prevalent variants are less penetrant (See DJ-1 variants for example in Fig. 2c). Recent GWAS allowed for the detection of common low penetrance mutations associated with PD. To date, over 44 novel risk loci have been identified and associated with sporadic PD9,14,141,179,180. Mutations within these risk loci can be disease modulating (OR > 1) or protective (OR < 1) for PD (Fig. 2d). Despite GWAS and genetic studies pointing to several novel molecular targets and pathways in sporadic PD, many of them remain unconfirmed. The presence of mutations on a single risk locus often poses a low risk for disease, yet mutations in multiple risk loci can collectively be disease modulating. The lack of a preponderant single definitive causative gene for most PD patients is a challenge for both the design of experimental models and the discovery of well-targeted treatments. Novel approaches for disease modeling in vitro are required to unravel the polygenic and complex mechanisms underlying sporadic disease successfully. Brain tissue engineering from patient-derived stem cells provides a unique opportunity to fulfill such need.

Table 1 Summary of Parkinson’s genes first identified in familial and early-onset cases of PD and risk factors.

Studies of PD with patient-derived iPSCs

The discovery of iPSC technology181,182,183 has offered the capacity to generate live brain tissue from healthy subjects and patients for studying neurodegenerative diseases184. Directed reprogramming and neuronal differentiation of iPSCs allows the study of specific neuronal subtypes. Human-derived neurons offer a unique opportunity for modeling real cases of human genetic diseases in vitro. The ability to generate neurons both from PD patients and healthy control individuals allows the identification of early disease-linked phenotypes and provides a new paradigm for preclinical drug development and validation (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3: Using brain cells generated from patient-derived iPSC to study PD in vitro.

Data from this figure was extracted and analyzed from 67 iPSC-PD studies, refer to “Methods”. a A schematic pipeline of in vitro disease modeling and preclinical drug screening with patient-derived brain cells. b The number of iPSC studies that used human neuronal lines with corresponding mutations on specific genes associated with PD (also refer to Table 1). Categories in bold and darker bars represent the total number of studies examining that gene. c The types of control and PD cell lines are displayed as the percentage of total cell lines. d The number of PD and control cell lines used in iPSC-PD studies. Data presented as the mean ± SEM. e Donor cell types and reprogramming methods used in hiPSC-PD studies. N/R indicates that details were not reported in these studies. f The diagram summarizes the different type of tissue culture trajectories used to differentiate cultures of iPSCs into midbrain neurons. Line thickness and percentages (in the “neurons” box) represent the proportion of studies in corresponding trajectories. The percentage displayed for each intermediate stage shows the proportion of studies that uses the corresponding cell type. EB embryoid bodies, NPCs neural progenitors g Neural induction duration indicates the number of days (average + range) required for the generation of terminal neural precursor cell types (last stage before neuronal maturation: NPCs, neurospheres, rosettes, or EZ spheres depending the stages that were skipped) from iPSC. h Neural maturation duration indicates the average number of weeks from terminal neural precursor cell type (NPCs or previous stage if NPC stage was skipped) to the neuronal cells used for phenotypic evaluation. i Small molecules and growth factors were used at various stages of midbrain dopaminergic neuronal differentiation. Data presented as the percentage of hiPSC-PD studies that report the corresponding factors in the tissue culture media composition. j The proportions (mean + SEM) of neurons (bIII-Tub/DAPI) and midbrain dopamine neurons (TH/DAPI) in cultures vary between differentiation protocols and trajectories. Each data point is the average percentage reported in a single study (n = 33 independent studies, refer to “Methods”). The first column labeled as “all” groups all the studies regardless of their differentiation trajectories. Relevant immunohistochemistry quantification was not reported in studies using neural differentiation trajectories A and D.

Since 2011, over 385 hiPSC lines have been generated from PD patients (n = 215) and controls (n = 170). Despite the large epidemiological preponderance of sporadic cases of PD (85% sporadic vs. 15% familial PD, Fig. 2a), only a few studies have modeled sporadic PD with iPSCs (Fig. 3b). Majority of iPSC-PD studies modeled LRRK2-G2019S, PRKN exon deletions, PINK1 Q456X, SNCA triplication, and GBA N370S (Fig. 3b). When combined all together, less than 20% of the iPSC disease lines were sporadic and 80% of the disease cell lines modeled single causal mutations occurring in familial PD (Fig. 3c). Extended application of iPSC technology beyond monogenic disease to multigenic sporadic disease is required to reveal cellular features relevant to the majority of people affected by PD. An increasing number of iPSC-based models of neurological and psychiatric disorders show that even complex brain disorders with limited heritability lead to neuronal phenotypes in vitro185,186,187. Despite this current bias in the literature towards familial PD, these pioneer studies are extremely valuable and, in the sections below, we will compare their methods and summarize the overlap and discrepancies of the phenotypes reported in PD neuronal lines.

How many patient neuronal lines should we use for iPSC models of PD?

This is a crucial question for which a consensus remains difficult to reach. Due to the cumbersome and costly nature of iPSC studies, a balanced trade-off between a large number of neuronal lines and the depth of the analysis is inevitable. For comparison, other kinds of PD patient-control studies vary quite substantially from GWAS generally including thousands of case–control subjects to postmortem brain tissue studies including cohorts of 11 ± 5 patients and 8 ± 6 controls, on average188. We report here that current iPSC-PD studies, on average, use five individuals per study (two control and three patient lines) and a maximum of 12 controls and 11 PD line. Fewer than 12% (8/67) of published studies used more than ten cell lines (Fig. 3d)37,42,56,70,79,84,92. Interestingly, it has been estimated that sample sizes of 10–30 individuals per hiPSC study may be required to achieve a statistical power of 80%, assuming that the cellular readouts variance is high and the disease effect is small (>0.7 relative heterogeneity, which is the ratio between within-group standard deviation and mean group difference)189. In this situation, most iPSC studies of PD may fall below the suggested sample size requirements. However, it is important to note that due to the novelty of iPSC models, predicting the statistical power of a study remains approximative, and the number of lines required highly depends on the variance of the cellular phenotypes obtained with a specific analytical readout. It may be possible to reduce the variance without increasing the number of cell lines. For example, the patients from which the biopsies are taken may be selected based on gender, age, ethnicity, social context (i.e., farmers exposed to pesticides or professional athletes exposed to repetitive trauma), genotypes, and clinical severity of the symptoms. Ultimately, the clinical and genotypical homogeneity of the subjects may reduce the variance of the cellular phenotypes and may justify using a smaller number of cell lines. This may explain the current bias in the literature towards iPSC models of familial cases of PD (Fig. 3b, c). Contrastingly, there is an assumption that high genetic heterogeneity in sporadic disease contributes to a range of cellular phenotypes and therefore requires a higher number of cell lines to obtain statistical power19,45,190. However, this assumption might be wrong if multigenic sporadic PD predispositions converge to similar clinical symptoms caused by common brain cell phenotypes. Despite the current limitation of a relatively low number of cell lines used in each study, and regardless whether familial or sporadic patients were included, significant PD phenotypes have been reported, thus demonstrating the value of this research model. However, to translate these results into clinical trials and maximize their chance of success, validation in a larger number of cell lines is desired. Studies including a high number of cell lines will benefit from recent advances in high-content technologies. However, unfortunately, performing in-depth analysis of 10–30 cell lines requires substantial resources that most laboratories do not have access to. The strategy taken in this review to combine the results from several independent studies may be a necessary compromise between in-depth analysis and a high number of cell lines. The optimization and harmonization of tissue culture methods may also be key to facilitate the identification of robust phenotypes across studies and will be discussed below. In addition, new methods decreasing the variance of neuronal phenotypes in iPSC models and decreasing the cost of the analyses are necessary and will also be discussed in the next sections.

Choosing the right control: healthy matched subjects or genetically edited isogenic lines?

Disease-linked cellular phenotypes are identified by comparing neuronal lines from patients and controls. To date, healthy subjects are the most commonly used control cell lines (Fig. 3c). However, differences in genetic background may give rise to variance in neuronal phenotypes that are unrelated to the disease. Some studies try to address this by using asymptomatic carriers, which are typically siblings or first-degree relatives of the patient27,28,33,35,57,62,69,70. Despite reducing genetic variability by around 50%, the limited availability of these controls hampers their use. In addition, asymptomatic carriers may express mild disease phenotypes57,69,70, which can increase the threshold for detecting the early disease phenotypes of progressive neurodegenerative disorders in symptomatic carriers. In order to reduce further genetic heterogeneity between control and disease lines, the development of genetic editing techniques such as TALEN, ZFN, and CRISPR/Cas9 has enabled the generation of isogenic lines191,192,193,194. Differing in only one single known mutant gene, the comparison of isogenic neurons allows the precise analysis of the role played by a specific mutation in disease modulation. Gene editing techniques have been particularly useful for studying monogenic forms of PD. Specifically, restorative isogenic lines of common genetic variants including LRRK2, SNCA, and GBA have highlighted complex roles of these mutations in protein aggregation, autophagy, and lysosomal dysfunction observed in PD49,55,58. In addition, PD mutations have been introduced into healthy subject or embryonic stem cell lines34,43,51,53,66. Having access to isogenic lines minimizes genetic background variability between patient and control lines, thereby reducing the threshold of detection for disease-related cellular phenotypes. However, considering the low penetrance of most familial PD genes, it may also be argued that the “genetic background” of a patient contributes to the cellular phenotype in a multigenic synergic way.

Generating relevant neuronal cell types for PD

The cellular reprogramming toolbox for researchers is rapidly expanding and includes a panoply of neuronal differentiation protocols to generate cells representing various brain regions21. PD is a debilitating motor system disorder resulting from the selective degeneration of midbrain dopamine (mDA) neurons located in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Protocols have been established to specifically generate dopaminergic neurons and brain cells with a midbrain molecular profile195,196.

More than 86% of published hiPSC-PD studies started with donor skin cells (fibroblasts and keratinocytes) and only 5% used blood cells (peripheral blood mononuclear cells, CD34+ cord blood cells or lymphoblastoid cells) (Fig. 3e). More than 70% of iPSCs were generated using integrating viral vectors (retroviral and lentiviral), 17% used non-integrating viral vectors (Sendai virus) and only 2% used viral-free approaches (episomal) (Fig. 3e). Several neuronal differentiation methods used across the 67 iPSC-PD studies were also analyzed in this review26,36,39,44,86,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204. Different methods followed distinct neuronal differentiation trajectories (from iPSC to neurons), involving the generation of various intermediate cell types (Fig. 3f). The intermediate stages may include embryoid bodies (EB, stem cells in suspension), EZ sphere (aggregates of early neural stem cells in suspension), neural rosettes (early neural stem cells with radial arrangements), neurosphere (neural progenitors in suspension), and neural progenitor cells (NPC, neural precursors with bipolar morphology). The generation of cell types such as EBs, neural rosettes, and NPCs mimics various stages of in utero neurogenesis21. Few protocols also generated unconventional cell types such as EZ spheres202 or neurospheres205. Such alternatives aim to eliminate laborious differentiation steps involving EB formation and manual picking of rosettes. On average, the generation of precursor cell types such as EZ spheres, neurospheres, or NPCs can range from 11 to 45 days (Fig. 3g) and neural maturation can range between 2 and 28 weeks (Fig. 3h). Temporal manipulation of small molecules and growth factors is used to induce neural induction, selective brain region patterning, differentiation, and maturation (Fig. 3i). Diverse combinations of molecules and choice of neural reprogramming trajectory can increase the efficiency and specificity of mDA neuronal differentiation. Midbrain DA neurons can also be generated using only small molecules or with the aid of lentiviral vectors70,86,200. Varying differentiation protocols may influence the quality of cells. For example, neurons generated from floor-plate intermediates exhibited PD phenotypes, while cells generated on a stromal feeder layer from neural rosette intermediate did not31. Therefore, in some cases, phenotypic variability in iPSC-PD studies can be a consequence of varying neural differentiation protocols.

Harmonizing rigorous protocols across studies

Regardless of the differentiation method, cell cultures can be widely heterogeneous. On average, iPSC-PD studies, which use midbrain patterning protocols, yield 64% neurons and 27% dopaminergic neurons of the total cells (Fig. 3j). Proportions of neurons (bIII-Tub+) and dopaminergic neurons (TH+) vary vastly between studies even when using identical differentiation techniques (Fig. 3j). Quantitative analyses conducted at discordant timepoints along the maturation process may further contribute to differences in reported proportions of cell type between studies. In addition, arbitrary thresholds of immunocytochemical staining may alter the quantification of cell type numbers reported. Some studies exclusively focus on the analysis of dopaminergic neurons, but many others consistently report the presence of astrocytes, neural stem cells and multiple midbrain neuronal subtypes (i.e., glutaminergic and GABAergic) in their cultures41,74. Mixed cultures of human neurons and glia are more accurate in representing the neurophysiology of the human brain in vivo but add some variance in the model, which needs to be taken into consideration during experimental planning. For disease modeling, inconsistencies in both study design and analyses between laboratories can hinder the reproducibility of the results. The artificial nature of reprogramming protocols makes it difficult to agree on the superiority of a single protocol. As the field progresses, the gap between the quality of in vitro and in vivo brain tissue will tighten. The methods generating brain tissue as close as possible to their in vivo counterpart will become gold-standard methodologies, which will help to harmonize culture models between laboratories and may help expedite the clinical translation of the most robust and reproducible results. However, in some cases, for example large-scale studies requiring fast and cheap protocols, a trade-off between brain tissue quality and ease of the methods may be necessary.

An alternative and complementary strategy is to use a top-to-bottom approach, which consists of identifying homogenous cell types of interest in mixed cultures before comparative analysis206. The identification of desired cell types can be achieved with molecular or functional analyses. The selection or enrichment of specific cells, for example electrophysiologically mature dopaminergic neurons, can be achieved during the cellular reprograming process or right before the final comparative analysis. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) can facilitate the removal of non-neural cell types to focus the analysis on a pure population of mDA neurons68,69. However, homogeneity based on single markers may be insufficient. Recent large-scale single-cell transcriptomics revealed the complexity of multiple cell types in neuronal culture as well as brain in vivo207. We and others also reported that batch or tissue culture protocol variations, such as passage number or basal media, can generate a mixture of neurons at various electrophysiological states of maturity206,208. To ensure an unbiased comparison restricted to functionally mature neurons, a thorough analysis of neuronal properties using electrophysiological techniques is necessary. The recent development of Patch-Seq technology, which combines single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and patch clamping, enables electrophysiological, transcriptomic, and morphological profiling of single neurons206,209,210. The multimodal characterization of cellular subtypes can be used to eliminate functional immaturity bias in iPSC-based disease modeling206,210.

How environmental factors and aging can be recapitulated in vitro

An obvious limitation of in vitro models is the lack of environmental context. The influence of nongenetic factors is not recapitulated in the basal phenotype of patient-derived neurons. For example, the influence of head trauma of a boxer with sporadic PD will not be recapitulated by default in reprogrammed neurons. An alternative would be to transplant the patient-derived neurons in animals and simulate the trauma on the animal. Similarly, influence of decades of aging of the human brain is difficult to reproduce in vitro in a few months within the boundaries of feasible experimental design. Brains in a dish will always be an imperfect experimental model. However, many tricks can be used to recapitulate the environmental and aging stress in vitro. Table 2 summarizes a list of reagents that have already been used in iPSC neuronal culture to mimic oxidative stress, proteostatic stress, mitochondrial stress, synaptic stress, ER stress, inflammation, and cellular aging. An interesting example is progerin, a truncated form of lamin A associated with premature aging. Increasing the expression of progerin in iPSC neurons can recapitulate at least some aspect of cellular aging in vitro71. Human iPSC-derived dopamine neurons overexpressing progerin displayed specific phenotypes such as neuromelanin accumulation. In addition, PD patient-derived neurons revealed disease-related phenotypes that required both genetic susceptibility and induced-aging in vitro71.

Table 2 Cellular stressors used in hiPSC-PD models.

Human iPSC studies of PD highlight converging molecular and cellular pathways across genetic subgroups

Our analysis of 385 iPSC-derived cell lines from 67 published studies reveals that many PD neuronal phenotypes are shared between genetically heterogeneous familial and sporadic patients (Fig. 4a). Notably, impairments in mechanisms involved in cellular waste recycling, mitochondrial function, neuronal morphology and physiology, and sensitivity to reactive oxygen species (ROS) are most common across patient lines with varying genetic predispositions (Fig. 4b). The studies measured cellular phenotypes that occurred either spontaneously or in response to chemicals mimicking cellular aging and stress (Table 2 and Fig. 4a, c). It is important to note that the frequency of reported phenotypes in our meta-analysis may be biased because only few studies (~19%, 13/67) reported negative results (absence of phenotypes)31,32,36,37,40,45,48,52,59,64,74,76,86. In addition, most cell lines were not systematically phenotyped without prior hypothesis and thus, there is likely to be an ascertain bias in these phenotypes. Less hypothesis-driven multimodal or omics analysis will help to address such bias41,72,76,77,78,79,80,87,90. Phenotypes caused by genomic predispositions allude to crosstalk and impairments in multiple pathways that act collectively to mediate selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (Fig. 4d) and will be discussed in detail below.

Fig. 4: Phenotypic insights from iPSC studies of Parkinson’s disease.

a A heatmap representation of neuronal phenotypes reported in genetically heterogeneous PD lines examined in 67 hiPSC studies. Categories in bold represent a sum of all sub-phenotypes. Reported absences of phenotypes are not represented in the figure. b Summary of the impairments in cellular mechanisms which were reported in iPSC-PD studies. Data represented as total number of studies reporting impairment with or without induced stress (“after stress” or “basal”, respectively). c Types of artificial cellular stressors used across hiPSC-PD studies (refer to Table 2). Data presented as the number of studies that used stressor to induce or investigate PD. d Schematic representation of crosstalk between cellular mechanisms involved in PD pathogenesis.

Genetic predispositions reduce mitochondrial respiration in patient-derived neurons

Epidemiological studies outlined in Fig. 2 have pointed to several genes involved in mitochondrial function and recycling (e.g., CHCHD2, PRKN, PLA2G6, VSP13C, PINK1, LRRK2; see also Table 1). An increase in dysfunctional mitochondria was identified in 26 independent hiPSC-PD studies using LRRK2, PRKN, PINK1, GBA, and SNCA patient-derived neuronal lines24,27,31,32,37,38,39,52,55,57,59,61,62,64,67,68,70,71,73,74,77,85,89,90. Neurons derived from PD patients displayed an increase in mitochondrial copy number62 and a greater proportion of abnormal mitochondria31,39. Abnormal mitochondria exhibited either signs of enlargement31,71, shortening32, thinning64, irregular cristae structures and network59,74, or fragmentation24,70. Mitochondria in the proximal axon of neurons from individuals carrying the LRRK2 R1441C mutation were 20% shorter than individuals with LRRK2-G2019S mutations32. An increase in bidirectional mobility of mitochondria was also reported in LRRK2 lines but not in PINK132. Overall, cellular respiration and metabolism were altered in neuronal lines derived from LRRK2, PRKN, SNCA, PINK1, DJ-1, and GBA patients27,37,55,58,59,61,67,70,73,83,85. Basal mitochondrial respiration is consistently compromised across PD lines, exhibited as reductions in maximal oxygen consumption rate, diminished ADP and ATP levels and NAD+/NADH redox states27,55,58,59,61,67,73,85. Impaired mitochondrial respiration was also associated with an increase in mitochondrial ROS and lysosomal hyperactivity67. The glycolytic rate of patient-derived neurons was higher in PINK170 and PRKN lines77. This was not observed in the transcriptomic analysis of SNCA lines90. An increase of passive proton leakage from the inner membrane was reported in PINK1 mutant neurons but not in LRRK232. In addition, the degradation and translocation of mitochondrial membrane proteins such as PARKIN and MIRO1 were impaired in LRRK2 and PRKN neurons38,62,73.

Overall neuronal metabolism may be impaired by endogenous dysfunction of mitochondria25,31,37,38,39,52,55,57,59,61,64,67,68,70,73,74,77,85,89,90, or indirect external stressors24,32,62,71,90, or by abnormal recycling of damaged mitochondria38,39,52,68. For example, some patient neurons displayed signs of impaired mitochondrial quality control related to aberrant mitophagy38,52,68, mitochondrial DNA damage37,57 and consistent decreases in mitochondrial membrane potential24,38,67,83,85.

Genetic predispositions that reduce the constant supply of energy to neurons ultimately disrupt the functioning of brain circuits. Mitochondrial impairments can confer increased neuronal vulnerability to oxidative, nitro-oxidative stress, and metal ions24,32,39,55,58,67,68,74. The high metabolic demand of substantia nigra neurons might explain their selective degeneration211.

Impaired oxidative stress-buffering capacity increases neuronal susceptibility to cell death in PD

Impairments in multiple cellular mechanisms increase oxidative burden in patient-derived neurons with mutations in LRRK2, PRKN, PINK1, GBA, DJ-1, and SNCA (20 studies)24,27,28,29,32,33,38,40,42,46,48,53,55,58,68,77,88,89. Elevated basal ROS levels reported in patient-derived neurons increase cell susceptibility to cell death such that patient lines treated with oxidative and mitochondrial stressors (i.e., H2O2, rotenone and paraquat) exhibit significantly higher levels of the cell death marker caspase-3 compared with healthy controls27,28,29,33,39,46,68,77,88. Notably, antioxidant buffering in patient lines is reduced, marked by a low level of antioxidant enzymes and the downregulation of antioxidant pathways such as NRF2 and target gene NQO129,39,77. In addition, ten studies, which did not report oxidative stress phenotypes in basal conditions, reported and increase vulnerability when oxidative stress was induced with chemicals24,31,32,40,42,48,53,55,58,89. This suggests that PD genetic predispositions could be compensated by upregulating endogenous antioxidant pathways or providing antioxidant supplements. Several clinical trials testing antioxidants treatments are ongoing. However, unfortunately, so far, clinical trials failed to show that antioxidants such as MitoQ significantly slow down the progression of symptoms212. Antioxidants may need to be combined with other treatments for more positive outcomes.

Genetic predispositions increase the probability of protein aggregation in PD neurons

Alpha-synuclein and Tau protein accumulation constitute the most common phenotype reported in 28 studies investigating LRRK2, PRKN, PINK1, GBA, SNCA, and MAPT lines25,26,27,28,29,30,31,34,35,36,39,41,43,46,48,49,50,51,53,55,56,58,60,65,67,69,73,83. The upregulation MAPT (microtubule-associated protein tau) transcripts were associated with protein aggregation, which impaired axonal mitochondria movement and induced neurite aberrations in patient neurons25,53,213. The accumulation of α-synuclein and Tau has also been noted in the varicosities of contorted and fragmented axons of patients41. Elevated expression of SNCA mRNA was associated with the dysregulation of oxidative stress, protein aggregation, and cell death regulatory genes, proposed to induce or increase selective sensitivity of mDA neurons to these factors28,29. Alpha-synuclein protein levels were also elevated in patient-derived neurons27,28,29,30,34,35,36,39,41,46,50,51,55,56,65,69,73,83. Notably, the level of soluble27 and monomeric28,46 conformations of α-synuclein were increased. Increased events of α-synuclein oligomerization73, elevated levels of insoluble oligomers27,31,55 and the formation of inclusion bodies65 were also reported. Neurons derived from SNCA mutant iPSCs55 displayed an increase in the phosphorylation of α-synuclein at residue S129; this was not detected in LRRK251 derived neurons. Alpha-synuclein oligomers mediated neurotoxicity through metal redox reactions and increased the formation of fibril aggregates, forming Lewy bodies33. Nevertheless, neurotoxicity mediated by protein aggregation can be a consequence of impairments in various contributing cellular mechanisms including inflammation, mitochondrial function, autophagy and stress, suggesting a role in late PD pathogenesis36,39,44.

Dysregulation of autophagy and protein ubiquitination contributes to neurodegeneration

Across 15 hiPSC studies, evidence of impaired protein degradation in LRRK2, PRKN, GBA, DJ-1, SNCA, and sporadic PD lines has been reported26,27,29,36,45,48,49,50,53,56,58,63,69,75. Unbiased pathway analysis of cysteine-modified proteins revealed an enrichment of proteins involved in the ubiquitination and removal of unfolded protein76. Accumulation of autophagosomes and increased expression of key autophagy regulators (i.e., beclin1, p62) were also consistently noted in PD neurons, suggestive of an upregulation of autophagy initiation26,36,48,49,56,74. Increased protein levels of the autophagy marker LC3B-II in LRRK2 I2020T were associated with increased markers of protein oxidation48. However, reductions in microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) and lysosomal marker colocalization reflective of unsuccessful autolysosome formation and maturation implied disturbances in autophagy progression45,56. Increasing genetic, epidemiological, and clinical studies draw biochemical and cellular links between PD and lysosomal storage disorders214,215. Mutations in lysosomal genes such as GBA, SMPD1, and ATP13A2 have been shown to impact the bidirectional feedback loop for processing and clearance of α-synuclein in PD124,146,216. Signs of enlarged lysosomal compartments paired with decreased lysosomal enzymatic activity suggested that poor autophagy completion contributed to protein aggregation in PD27,36,47,58,69,92. Interestingly, lysosomal impairment in sporadic patient-derived neurons was observed at a later timepoint (180 days) compared with DJ-1 mutant neurons (70 days)27. Young-onset iPSC models of PD revealed cycloheximide treatment specifically slowed the degradation rate of α-synuclein92. The dysregulation of ubiquitin genes also increased the susceptibility of patient neurons to proteasome stress29. Dysregulated autophagy and ubiquitin–proteasome mechanisms were associated with an increase in extracellular α-synuclein in patient’s dopamine neurons36,58. In addition, patient-derived neurons exhibited poor ability to degrade mutant LRRK2 protein compared with wildtype50. LRRK2 (G2019S) mutant protein displayed enhanced-binding to the lysosomal membrane and prevented the assembly of chaperone-mediated autophagy50. The inhibitory effect resulted in decreased degradation of long-lived proteins, which may result in unwanted protein–protein interactions mediating neurodegeneration50. PD genetic predispositions favoring either aberrant protein degradation or accumulation in patient-derived neurons were associated with increased vulnerability to proteasomal and oxidative stresses, and contributed to accelerated neurodegeneration27,29,48,53,58.

Patient-derived neurons exhibit morphological signs of neurodegeneration

Fifteen hiPSC-PD studies investigating LRRK2, PRKN, SNCA, and sporadic patient-derived lines reported alterations in neurite process morphology26,42,45,49,51,53,54,56,60,65,67,71,76,82,88. Consistently, studies reported reductions in neurite length, branching, and network complexity42,45,49,51,53,54,56,60,65,67,71,76,82,88. However, incidences of hyperbranching26 and lack of neurite alterations have also been reported37. In addition, irregular presynaptic membranous inclusions and dystrophic synaptic structures were reported in a neuronal model of synucleinopathy73. The exact mechanism underlying neurite alterations in PD neurons remains unclear and can be attributed either to dysfunction in neurite morphogenesis or increased neurite deterioration42. Elevation in autophagic flux, in response to α-synuclein and Tau accumulation, was associated with the reduction of neurite structure and outgrowth in patient lines49,53. Induction of the initiation of autophagy or inhibition of its completion also greatly exacerbated the neurite alterations in patient dopamine neurons26,56. Microtubule instability induced by the depolymerizing agent colchicine and loss of PRKN function also resulted in neural aberrations, though not specifically in TH+ cells54. Both autophagy and microtubule polymerization play key roles in neurite injury, growth and axonal formation, and impairments in either of these mechanisms can mediate the neurite alterations observed in PD neurons217,218.

Synaptic dysfunction increases dopamine oxidation in PD leading to neurodegenerative processes

Twelve human iPSC studies examining LRRK2, SNCA, GBA, and sporadic PD reported signs of impaired synaptic function27,31,40,41,42,47,48,49,56,60,69,71,91. Dysregulation of genes involved in synaptogenesis, synaptic vesicle mechanisms, synaptic transmission, and regulation of neurotransmitter release have been identified in SNCA, LRRK2, and PRKN patient-derived lines41,42,49,92. LRRK2 I2020T mutation decreased the spontaneous calcium-dependent release of dopamine48 but not PRKN mutant40. The loss of PARKIN in patient midbrain neurons has been shown to downregulate dopamine reuptake machinery40. Downregulation of synaptic proteins involved in synaptic vesicle endocytosis was associated with an increase of cytosolic dopamine47. Elevated levels of cytosolic dopamine mediate dopamine toxicity and contribute to neural damage and degeneration27,31,40,69,75. Excessive oxidation of dopamine by variants of monoamine oxidases in the cytoplasm increases the formation of ROS and toxic quinones, contributing to neurodegeneration40,69. Disruption of calcium homeostasis and endoplasmic reticular (ER) stress may mediate excessive neurotransmitter release. RNA-seq analyses also revealed an enrichment of genes associated with ER stress in PD patient-derived neurons80,90. More than 50% of generated patient lines overexpressing α-synuclein displayed signs of impaired electrophysiological activity, most notably demonstrated by reduced action potentials upon stimulation49. Neurons derived from SNCA, LRRK2, GBA, and sporadic patients also exhibited delayed or the absence of firing synchronicity, a decrease in the number of active channels and firing rates, as well as reduced spontaneous activity41,42,43,49,56,69. It has been suggested that, in vivo, neurons may go successively through hypo- and hyperactive phases, possibly as a homeostatic response to the cytotoxic effect of synaptic dysfunction219. Such phases remain to be described with human iPSC-derived neurons in vitro, but multiple genetic predispositions appear to directly or indirectly impair synaptic function, which contributes to a vicious neurodegenerative cascade.

Neuroinflammation exacerbates neurodegeneration in sporadic PD

Midbrain neurons derived from sporadic patients showed increased susceptibility to the effects of adaptive immune cells72. Sporadic patient neuronal lines co-cultured with T-lymphocytes exhibited substantial signs of cell death mediated by IL-17–IL-17R signaling and activation of NFkB72. Similarly, IL-17 treatment resulted in increased neuronal death72. Inflammation in the central nervous system and periphery are key hallmarks of PD220. Increasing evidence implicates the role of microglia in neuronal loss, though the underlying mechanisms remain to be determined221,222. RNA-seq analysis of astrocytes derived from LRRK2-G2019S iPSCs highlighted dysregulation in genes involved in the extracellular matrix, which may reduce the neuroprotective capacity of astrocytes in PD78. Investigating the role of neuroinflammation in patient-derived microglia may also contribute to the understanding of the selective vulnerability of mDA neurons in sporadic and late-onset PD223.

Genetic predispositions reducing differentiation yield of mDA neurons

In vitro neural development was impaired in neural lines derived from patients carrying LRRK2, PRKN, SNCA, and sporadic mutations43,49,74,93. In four independent studies, the differentiation potential of neural progenitor cells derived from patients was significantly reduced, demonstrated by low yields of neurons in comparison with control lines43,49,74,81,94. A recent review presented the idea that PD is attributed to significant neurodevelopmental defects, which may increase the susceptibility for disease onset224. If confirmed, identifying genetic predispositions that contribute to early developmental defects in iPSC-PD may assist the development of novel PD therapies. However, these phenotypes may appear in conflict with other studies53,55,76 capable of generating functional neurons from cell lines with similar mutations. The differences could be due to varying protocols, which may be more or less stressful for the cells.

Epigenomic alterations linked with PD in patient-derived neurons

The ability to capture unique epigenomic alterations associated with PD remains an important challenge. Reprogramming fibroblasts to iPSCs may erase age-associated225 and naive epigenetic signatures which could contribute to sporadic PD pathophysiology226. However, an epigenetic phenotype was reported in iPSC-derived PD patient neurons79,89. Neuronal lines derived from LRRK2 and sporadic patients exhibited epigenomic alterations when compared with healthy controls79. Hypermethylation was prominent in gene regulatory regions associated with the downregulation of transcription factors FOXA1, NR3C1, HNF4A, and FOSL279. Interestingly, LRRK2 mutant and sporadic PD patient neurons shared similar methylation patterns, which were absent in the original donor fibroblasts79. A spontaneous increase in the number of DNA strand breaks and genomic damage89 in PD patient-derived neurons could indirectly impact genomic regulation.

Do iPSC-PD models exhibit similar neural phenotypes to those observed in rodent models?

The use of rodent models to simulate human pathologies associated with PD has been extensively reviewed227,228,229,230. PD pathogenesis is mostly induced in animal models with 6-OHDA, rotenone, MPTP, paraquat, and amphetamine231. These models induce substantia nigra dopaminergic neuron death through inhibition of mitochondrial function and increasing production of ROS229. Rats and mice systemically exposed to rotenone and paraquat exhibited signs of Lewy body formation232,233. Knockout and transgenic rodent models are designed to investigate the consequential pathological impacts of known PD genetic mutations. Genetic mouse models have provided a platform for the functional studies of proteins associated with PD such as PARKIN, LRRK2, DJ-1, and α-synuclein234,235. However, the human genetic background of idiopathic PD cannot be fully recapitulated with animal models.

iPSC-PD patient-derived neurons displayed a reduction in striatal dopamine release, a reduction in neurite complexity, an increased in tau phosphorylation, impairments of dopamine neurotransmission, autophagy, and mitochondrial abnormalities (Fig. 4a, b). These impairments were also observed in transgenic mice PD models236,237,238. Such correlation between models is interesting, even though some of the hypothesis-driven studies in iPSC neurons may have been biased by previous animal studies. IPSC models can also shed light on cellular phenotypes absent in animal models. For example, dopamine oxidation was present in PD iPSC-derived neurons but was not observed in neurons derived from DJ-1 KO mice iPSC27. Any model has its advantages and limitations and animal and patient-derived neuronal models complement each other. Animal models provide the organism context that is lacking in tissue culture models, whereas patient-derived neuronal models more accurately represent human genetics, which may in turn increase chances of translational success.

Omics analysis of patient-derived PD neurons

To date 10/67 iPSC-PD studies analyzed have used proteomic, transcriptomic, or epigenomic profiling to phenotype PD patient-derived neurons41,72,76,77,78,79,80,87,90. Omics analyses may be less biased and data-driven as opposed to purely hypothesis-driven239. Data from omics studies can also help to describe biological relationships between complex intertwined cellular pathways and identify relevant druggable molecular pathways.

Genes associated with clinical PD phenotypes such as abnormal nervous physiology phenotypes, abnormal motor capabilities, coordination, and movement phenotypes were dysregulated in iPSC neurons derived from LRRK2-G2019S patients87. RNA-seq and proteomics analysis also revealed a heavy dysregulation of genes and proteins associated with mitochondrial function, protein ubiquitination, unfolded protein response, ER/calcium regulation, and oxidative stress in PD patient-derived neurons in comparison with healthy controls41,69,72,77,78,80,84,87,90. In addition, the epigenome in PD-derived lines was described as uniquely aberrant compared with healthy controls79. Together, omics studies highlighted that the proteomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic profiles of PD patient-derived neurons exhibited disease-specific alterations, which can also correlate with other neurological diseases41. Identifying genes that are consistently dysregulated in the same direction in PD genetic lines across independent studies will help to confirm the key common pathways involved in PD pathogenesis. Much work remains to be done in this field. New human molecular insights into PD pathogenesis will help form a stronger foundation for therapeutic development, and may also benefit other neurological diseases.

Will findings from PD iPSC models translate to human clinical trials?

One of the most exciting applications of patient-derived iPSC models of PD is to validate pharmacological treatments before clinical trials. The field is still at the stage of improving human brain tissue engineering, and many different protocols are being tested and developed. However, the need for progress in clinical translation for brain disorders is extremely high, and there is no time to wait for brain tissue models to be perfect. Pioneering iPSC studies pave the road to success and identify limitations which help the community to reach a consensus on the minimal requirements to model brain disorders in vitro most accurately. It seems essential to improve the efficiency of reprogramming and differentiation protocols while trying to make those models as physiological and realistic as possible208,240. Some concerns are raised that in vitro neuronal development, maturation and function might be too artificial, suggesting that the model may overlook some of the critical processes that occur in vivo. Nevertheless, some defects observed in iPSC-derived neurons have already been confirmed in human postmortem brain tissues39,43,241,242,243. Although this is very encouraging, it is unclear whether significant in vitro phenotypes that cannot be confirmed in postmortem brain tissue should be disregarded. Most postmortem brains also have technical limitations and may represent later stages of the disease, whereas iPSC models may represent earlier stages, preceding neurodegeneration.

Given the apprehensions that in vitro studies may be too artificial, human iPSC-derived neural progenitors may be transplanted into animal brains244,245,246,247. Besides ethical barriers, xenografts also raise the possibility that the healthy host tissue compensate for the impairment of the transplanted cells. Yet, if the phenotypes observed in vitro are recapitulated in vivo, pharmacological treatments could be assessed in a systemic environment, with much more realistic dosage and administration methods.

Concluding remarks

PD is increasingly described as a spectrum disorder, with patients experiencing a multitude of motor and non-motor symptoms in a unique way. Similarly, PD genetic predispositions are broad. Hundreds of gene variants increase the risk of PD, but no genetic mutation causes a complete penetrance. We estimated the prevalence of each of the most penetrant mutations (increasing risks by >5 times) to occur in <5% of the global PD population. Despite the broad representation of genetic predispositions in PD patients, our review of current studies using iPSC-derived brain cells demonstrates commonality in cellular impairment susceptibilities. Independent reports highlight a recurring theme around dysfunction of mitochondria, proteasomal mechanisms, synapses, inflammation, and oxidative stress regulation. Constitutive and simultaneous dysregulation of multiple pathways can become overbearing, resulting in accelerated neurodegeneration. As a result, there may be an exaggerated emphasis on pathways which may represent later stages of pathogenesis. Future work will further establish the interdependence of these cellular functions and will help to isolate the initial cause from the downstream consequence of a cellular phenotype. It is also possible that current studies are biased towards studying already known or arbitrarily chosen phenotypes, and the integration of multi-omics analysis will help address this issue. Further optimization of the brain tissue engineering methods will also reduce the threshold for detecting disease-related phenotypes from tissue culture artefacts, facilitating the identification of early cellular phenotypes. Future studies also will have to include the analysis of larger pools of patients including sporadic PD with genetic predispositions more representative of the epidemiology.

The rapid expansion of iPSC disease modeling studies of PD is exciting. Altogether, the current work reviewed here suggests that a neuroprotective therapy, which will stop the neurodegeneration in people living with PD, will most likely require to target multiple pathways at once. The prospect of investigating the impact of multigenic predispositions on brain cell functions will provide information on key modulators of neurodegeneration in PD, and preclinical data for more personalized medicine.


Meta-analysis of epidemiological PD studies

Data from Fig. 2a was obtained from epidemiological studies sourced from PubMed and Google Scholar search engines using keywords “Parkinson’s disease”, “prevalence”, “incidence”, and “epidemiology”. Twelve international studies94,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167 including a total of 5650 persons living with PD were used for the analysis. Datasets were each obtained from single independent studies (Finnish, European, Canadian, Fareo Islands, Swedish, Australian, and Norwegian populations) or combined from two independent studies (American and Caucasian populations). We estimated the proportion of fPD patients in the world population with a formula (% fPD = fPD population/total PD population).

Data from Fig. 2b was obtained from epidemiological studies were identified through Google Scholar search utilizing keywords “Parkinson”, “genetic”, “population”, “familial”, and the relevant gene names (i.e. LRRK2, PRKN/PARK2, ATP13A2, SNCA, VPS35, PINK1, DJ-1, and DNAJC6). A total of 50 epidemiological studies93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129 were used for the analysis (total n = 488 patients carrying various mutations and 32,012 PD cases). The frequency of mutation (PD population with mutation/total PD population) was averaged across studies examining the same gene. Only studies containing sample sizes of >100 subjects were included in the analysis.

Meta-analysis of genetic and GWAS studies

A meta-analysis of genetic and GWAS studies is displayed in Fig. 2c. Raw GWAS data were extracted 24 independent genetic studies8,10,11,12,13,14,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148 (identified through Google scholar search with gene name and keywords “Parkinson’s”, “variant”, and “odds ratio”) combined with GWAS database (NHGRI-EBI Catalog, accessed 14th Jan 2019, and filtered for “Parkinson’s” as phenotype trait149). The collated data set consisted of 25,243 PD cases and 41,945 healthy controls. The frequency (%) of each variant was measured in 25,243 total PD cases. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated by dividing the frequency of the variant among patients by the frequency of the variant in healthy controls. Only variants with OR greater than 1.5 were plotted against the frequency.

Data extraction from PDgene GWAS database

GWAS data were extracted from PDgene database141 was accessed on 18th Jan 2019 (n = 19,061 PD cases and healthy controls). Datasets for the genes listed under “Top Results” were filtered for p < 5 × 10–8 and OR values were plotted on Fig. 2d.

Literature search of and meta-analysis of iPSC-PD studies

Original research papers were identified through Google Scholar search utilizing keywords “Parkinson”, “iPSC”, “induced pluripotency stem cell”, “patient-derived”, and “models”. Papers published between 2011 and 2020 which included phenotypic and/multimodal analysis of the patient-derived PD lines were selected for analysis (n = 6724,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92). The meta-analyses of these studies were displayed in Fig. 3b–j.

In Fig. 3j, we meta-analyzed immunocytochemistry quantifications from 33 independent iPSC-PD studies. Studies reporting TUJ1 and TUBBIII were used for calculating the percentages of neurons, both label the bIII-Tubulin protein, and the names are used interchangeably. The percentage of neurons (bIII-Tub/DAPI) was reported by 23 studies (including two of them not reporting trajectories). Percentage of TH neurons (TH+/DAPI) is averaged for 32 studies. However, 12 of these 32 studies did not directly report the percentage of TH+/DAPI but instead reported TH+/TUJ1 and TUJ1+/DAPI. In this instance, for consistency in our analysis, we estimated the proportion of TH+/DAPI with a formula (TH/DAPI = TUJ1/DAPI × TH/TUJ1).


  1. 1.

    Venda, L. L., Cragg, S. J., Buchman, V. L. & Wade-Martins, R. α-Synuclein and dopamine at the crossroads of Parkinson's disease. Trends Neurosci. 33, 559–568 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nussbaum, R. L. The identification of alpha-synuclein as the first Parkinson disease. Gene. J. Parkinsons Dis. 7, S43–S49 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Athanassiadou, A. et al. Genetic analysis of families with Parkinson disease that carry the Ala53Thr mutation in the gene encoding alpha-synuclein. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 555–558 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Munoz, E. et al. Identification of Spanish familial Parkinson's disease and screening for the Ala53Thr mutation of the alpha-synuclein gene in early onset patients. Neurosci. Lett. 235, 57–60 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Polymeropoulos, M. H. et al. Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease. Science 276, 2045–2047 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wood-Kaczmar, A., Gandhi, S. & Wood, N. W. Understanding the molecular causes of Parkinson’s disease. Trends Mol. Med. 12, 521–528 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Escott-Price, V. et al. Polygenic risk of Parkinson disease is correlated with disease age at onset. Ann. Neurol. 77, 582–591 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Simón-Sánchez, J. et al. Genome-wide association study reveals genetic risk underlying Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Genet. 41, 1308–1312 (2009).

  9. 9.

    Chang, D. et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 17 new Parkinson’s disease risk loci. Nat. Genet. 7, e1002142 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Edwards, T. L. et al. Genome-wide association study confirms SNPs in SNCA and the MAPT region as common risk factors for Parkinson disease. Ann. Hum. Genet. 74, 97–109 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu, X. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies candidate genes for Parkinson's disease in an Ashkenazi Jewish population. BMC Med. Genet. 12, 104 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pankratz, N. et al. Genomewide association study for susceptibility genes contributing to familial Parkinson disease. Hum. Genet. 124, 593–605 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Saad, M. et al. Genome-wide association study confirms BST1 and suggests a locus on 12q24 as the risk loci for Parkinson's disease in the European population. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 615–627 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Satake, W. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies common variants at four loci as genetic risk factors for Parkinson's disease. Nat. Genet. 41, 1303–1307 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lesage, S. & Brice, A. Parkinson's disease: from monogenic forms to genetic susceptibility factors. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, R48–R59 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Parr, C. J. C., Yamanaka, S. & Saito, H. An update on stem cell biology and engineering for brain development. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 808–819 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yamanaka, S. Induced pluripotent stem cells: past, present, and future. Cell Stem Cell 10, 678–684 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dolmetsch, R., Geschwind & Daniel, H. The human brain in a dish: the promise of iPSC-derived neurons. Cell 145, 831–834 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Soldner, F. & Jaenisch, R. Stem cells, genome editing, and the path to translational medicine. Cell 175, 615–632 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Soldner, F. & Jaenisch, R. iPSC disease modeling. Science 338, 1155 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mertens, J., Marchetto, M. C., Bardy, C. & Gage, F. H. Evaluating cell reprogramming, differentiation and conversion technologies in neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 424–437 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saha, K. & Jaenisch, R. Technical challenges in using human induced pluripotent stem cells to model disease. Cell Stem Cell 5, 584–595 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Haston, K. M. & Finkbeiner, S. Clinical trials in a dish: the potential of pluripotent stem cells to develop therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 56, 489–510 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aboud, A. A. et al. PARK2 patient neuroprogenitors show increased mitochondrial sensitivity to copper. Neurobiol. Dis. 73, 204–212 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Beevers, J. E. et al. MAPT genetic variation and neuronal maturity alter isoform expression affecting axonal transport in iPSC-derived dopamine neurons. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 587–599 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Borgs, L. et al. Dopaminergic neurons differentiating from LRRK2 G2019S induced pluripotent stem cells show early neuritic branching defects. Sci. Rep. 6, 33377 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Burbulla, L. F. et al. Dopamine oxidation mediates mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Science 357, 1255 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Byers, B. et al. SNCA triplication Parkinson's patient's iPSC-derived DA neurons accumulate [alpha]-synuclein and are susceptible to oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 6, e26159 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chang, K.-H. et al. Impairment of proteasome and anti-oxidative pathways in the induced pluripotent stem cell model for sporadic Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 24, 81–88 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chung, C. Y. et al. Identification and rescue of α-synuclein toxicity in Parkinson patient-derived neurons. Science 342, 983 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chung, SunY. et al. Parkin and PINK1 patient iPSC-derived midbrain dopamine neurons exhibit mitochondrial dysfunction and α-synuclein accumulation. Stem Cell Rep. 7, 664–677 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cooper, O. et al. Pharmacological rescue of mitochondrial deficits in iPSC-derived neural cells from patients with familial Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 141ra190 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Deas, E. et al. Alpha-synuclein oligomers interact with metal ions to induce oxidative stress and neuronal death in Parkinson's disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 24, 376–391 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dettmer, U. et al. Parkinson-causing α-synuclein missense mutations shift native tetramers to monomers as a mechanism for disease initiation. Nat. Commun. 6, 7314 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Devine, M. J. et al. Parkinson's disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the α-synuclein locus. Nat. Commun. 2, 440 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fernandes, HugoJ. R. et al. ER stress and autophagic perturbations lead to elevated extracellular α-synuclein in GBA-N370S parkinson's iPSC-derived dopamine neurons. Stem Cell Rep. 6, 342–356 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Howlett, E. H. et al. LRRK2 G2019S-induced mitochondrial DNA damage is LRRK2 kinase dependent and inhibition restores mtDNA integrity in Parkinson's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 4340–4351 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hsieh, C.-H. et al. Functional impairment in miro degradation and mitophagy is a shared feature in familial and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Cell Stem Cell 19, 709–724 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Imaizumi, Y. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress and α-synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons and postmortem brain tissue. Mol. Brain 5, 35 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jiang, H. et al. Parkin controls dopamine utilization in human midbrain dopaminergic neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 3, 668 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kouroupi, G. et al. Defective synaptic connectivity and axonal neuropathology in a human iPSC-based model of familial Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3679–E3688 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lin, L. et al. Molecular features underlying neurodegeneration identified through in vitro modeling of genetically diverse Parkinson’s disease patients. Cell Rep. 15, 2411–2426 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liu, G.-H. et al. Progressive degeneration of human neural stem cells caused by pathogenic LRRK2. Nature 491, 603 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    López de Maturana, R. et al. Mutations in LRRK2 impair NF-κB pathway in iPSC-derived neurons. J. Neuroinflammation 13, 295 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Marrone, L. et al. Generation of iPSCs carrying a common LRRK2 risk allele for in vitro modeling of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. PLoS ONE 13, e0192497 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nguyen, Ha. N. et al. LRRK2 mutant iPSC-derived DA neurons demonstrate increased susceptibility to oxidative stress. Cell Stem Cell 8, 267–280 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nguyen, M. & Krainc, D. LRRK2 phosphorylation of auxilin mediates synaptic defects in dopaminergic neurons from patients with Parkinson's disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5576–5581 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ohta, E. et al. I2020T mutant LRRK2 iPSC-derived neurons in the Sagamihara family exhibit increased Tau phosphorylation through the AKT/GSK-3β signaling pathway. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 4879–4900 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Oliveira, L. M. A. et al. Elevated α-synuclein caused by SNCA gene triplication impairs neuronal differentiation and maturation in Parkinson's patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 6, e1994 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Orenstein, S. J. et al. Interplay of LRRK2 with chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 394 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Qing, X. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 and piggyBac-mediated footprint-free LRRK2-G2019S knock-in reveals neuronal complexity phenotypes and α-Synuclein modulation in dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cell Res. 24, 44–50 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rakovic, A. et al. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1)-dependent ubiquitination of endogenous Parkin attenuates mitophagy: study in human primary fibroblasts and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 2223–2237 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Reinhardt, P. et al. Genetic correction of a LRRK2 mutation in human iPSCs links Parkinsonian neurodegeneration to ERK-dependent changes in gene expression. Cell Stem Cell 12, 354–367 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ren, Y. et al. Parkin mutations reduce the complexity of neuronal processes in iPSC‐derived human neurons. STEM CELLS 33, 68–78 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ryan, ScottD. et al. Isogenic human iPSC Parkinson’s model shows nitrosative stress-induced dysfunction in MEF2-PGC1α transcription. Cell 155, 1351–1364 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sánchez‐Danés, A. et al. Disease‐specific phenotypes in dopamine neurons from human iPS‐based models of genetic and sporadic Parkinson's disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 4, 380–395 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sanders, L. H. et al. LRRK2 mutations cause mitochondrial DNA damage in iPSC-derived neural cells from Parkinson's disease patients: reversal by gene correction. Neurobiol. Dis. 62, 381–386 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Schöndorf, D. C. et al. iPSC-derived neurons from GBA1-associated Parkinson’s disease patients show autophagic defects and impaired calcium homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 5, 4028 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Schöndorf, D. C. et al. The NAD + precursor nicotinamide riboside rescues mitochondrial defects and neuronal loss in iPSC and fly models of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Rep. 23, 2976–2988 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Schwab, AndrewJ., Ebert & Allison, D. Neurite aggregation and calcium dysfunction in iPSC-derived sensory neurons with Parkinson’s disease-related LRRK2 G2019S mutation. Stem Cell Rep. 5, 1039–1052 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Schwab, A. J. et al. Decreased sirtuin deacetylase activity in LRRK2 G2019S iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 1839–1852 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Seibler, P. et al. Mitochondrial Parkin recruitment is impaired in neurons derived from mutant PINK1 induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Neurosci. 31, 5970 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Shaltouki, A., Hsieh, C. H., Kim, M. J. & Wang, X. Alpha-synuclein delays mitophagy and targeting Miro rescues neuron loss in Parkinson's models. Acta neuropathologica 136, 607–620 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Shiba-Fukushima, K. et al. Evidence that phosphorylated ubiquitin signaling is involved in the etiology of Parkinson's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 3172–3185 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Skibinski, G., Nakamura, K., Cookson, M. R. & Finkbeiner, S. Mutant LRRK2 toxicity in neurons depends on LRRK2 levels and synuclein but not kinase activity or inclusion bodies. J. Neurosci. 34, 418–433 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Soldner, F. et al. Generation of isogenic pluripotent stem cells differing exclusively at two early onset parkinson point mutations. Cell 146, 318–331 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Su, Y.-C. & Qi, X. Inhibition of excessive mitochondrial fission reduced aberrant autophagy and neuronal damage caused by LRRK2 G2019S mutation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 4545–4561 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Suzuki, S. et al. Efficient induction of dopaminergic neuron differentiation from induced pluripotent stem cells reveals impaired mitophagy in PARK2 neurons. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 483, 88–93 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Woodard, ChrisM. et al. iPSC-derived dopamine neurons reveal differences between monozygotic twins discordant for Parkinson’s disease. Cell Rep. 9, 1173–1182 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Azkona, G. et al. LRRK2 expression is deregulated in fibroblasts and neurons from Parkinson patients with mutations in PINK1. Mol. Neurobiol. 55, 506–516 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Miller, J. D. et al. Human iPSC-based modeling of late-onset disease via progerin-induced aging. Cell Stem Cell 13, 691–705 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Sommer, A. et al. Th17 lymphocytes induce neuronal cell death in a human iPSC-based model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Stem Cell 23, 123–131.e126 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Prots, I. et al. alpha-Synuclein oligomers induce early axonal dysfunction in human iPSC-based models of synucleinopathies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7813–7818 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Shaltouki, A. et al. Mitochondrial alterations by PARKIN in dopaminergic neurons using PARK2 patient-specific and PARK2 knockout isogenic iPSC lines. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 847–859 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Aflaki, E. et al. A new glucocerebrosidase chaperone reduces alpha-synuclein and glycolipid levels in iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from patients with Gaucher disease and Parkinsonism. J. Neurosci. 36, 7441–7452 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Bogetofte, H. et al. Perturbations in RhoA signalling cause altered migration and impaired neuritogenesis in human iPSC-derived neural cells with PARK2 mutation. Neurobiol. Dis. 132, 104581 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Bogetofte, H. et al. PARK2 mutation causes metabolic disturbances and impaired survival of human iPSC-derived neurons. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13, 297 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Booth, H. D. E. et al. RNA sequencing reveals MMP2 and TGFB1 downregulation in LRRK2 G2019S Parkinson's iPSC-derived astrocytes. Neurobiol. Dis. 129, 56–66 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Fernández-Santiago, R. et al. Aberrant epigenome in iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from Parkinson's disease patients. EMBO Mol. Med. 7, 1529–1546 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Heman-Ackah, S. M. et al. Alpha-synuclein induces the unfolded protein response in Parkinson’s disease SNCA triplication iPSC-derived neurons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 4441–4450 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Iannielli, A. et al. Pharmacological inhibition of necroptosis protects from dopaminergic neuronal cell death in Parkinson’s disease models. Cell Rep. 22, 2066–2079 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Korecka, J. A. et al. Neurite collapse and altered ER Ca2+ control in human Parkinson disease patient iPSC-derived neurons with LRRK2 G2019S mutation. Stem Cell Rep. 12, 29–41 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Ludtmann, M. H. R. et al. alpha-synuclein oligomers interact with ATP synthase and open the permeability transition pore in Parkinson's disease. Nat. Commun. 9, 2293 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Momcilovic, O. et al. Derivation, characterization, and neural differentiation of integration-free induced pluripotent stem cell lines from Parkinson's disease patients carrying SNCA, LRRK2, PARK2, and GBA mutations. PloS ONE 11, e0154890–e0154890 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Morais, V. A. et al. PINK1 loss-of-function mutations affect mitochondrial complex I activity via NdufA10 ubiquinone uncoupling. Science 344, 203 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Reinhardt, P. et al. Derivation and expansion using only small molecules of human neural progenitors for neurodegenerative disease modeling. PLOS ONE 8, e59252 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Sandor, C. et al. Transcriptomic profiling of purified patient-derived dopamine neurons identifies convergent perturbations and therapeutics for Parkinson's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 552–566 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Tabata, Y. et al. T-type calcium channels determine the vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons to mitochondrial stress in familial Parkinson disease. Stem Cell Rep. 11, 1171–1184 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Vasquez, V. et al. Chromatin-bound oxidized α-synuclein causes strand breaks in neuronal genomes in in vitro models of Parkinson's disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 60, S133–S150 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Zambon, F. et al. Cellular α-synuclein pathology is associated with bioenergetic dysfunction in Parkinson’s iPSC-derived dopamine neurons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 28, 2001–2013 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Zhong, P., Hu, Z., Jiang, H., Yan, Z. & Feng, J. Dopamine induces oscillatory activities in human midbrain neurons with Parkin mutations. Cell Rep. 19, 1033–1044 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Laperle, A. H. et al. iPSC modeling of young-onset Parkinson's disease reveals a molecular signature of disease and novel therapeutic candidates. Nat. Med. 26, 289–299 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Ahn, T. B. et al. alpha-Synuclein gene duplication is present in sporadic Parkinson disease. Neurology 70, 43–49 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Bentley, S. R. et al. Pipeline to gene discovery—analysing familial Parkinsonism in the Queensland Parkinson's Project. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 49, 34–41 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Blanckenberg, J., Ntsapi, C., Carr, J. A. & Bardien, S. EIF4G1 R1205H and VPS35 D620N mutations are rare in Parkinson's disease from South Africa. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 445.e441–445.e443 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Brueggemann, N. et al. Re: Alpha-synuclein gene duplication is present in sporadic Parkinson disease. Neurology 71, 1294 (2008). author reply 1294.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Camacho, J. L. G. et al. High frequency of Parkin exon rearrangements in Mexican-mestizo patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 27, 1047–1051 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Chen, Y. et al. VPS35 Asp620Asn and EIF4G1 Arg1205His mutations are rare in Parkinson disease from Southwest China. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 1709.e1707–1709.e1708 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Djarmati, A. et al. ATP13A2 variants in early-onset Parkinson's disease patients and controls. Mov. Disord. 24, 2104–2111 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Djarmati, A. et al. Detection of Parkin(PARK2) and DJ1(PARK7) mutations in early-onset Parkinson disease: Parkinmutation frequency depends on ethnic origin of patients. Hum. Mutat. 23, 525–525 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Erer, S. et al. Mutation analysis of the PARKIN, PINK1, DJ1, and SNCA genes in Turkish early-onset Parkinson's patients and genotype-phenotype correlations. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 148, 147–153 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Fiala, O. et al. Parkin (PARK 2) mutations are rare in Czech patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease. PLoS ONE 9, e107585 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Guo, J. F. et al. VPS35 gene variants are not associated with Parkinson's disease in the mainland Chinese population. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 18, 983–985 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Healy, D. G. et al. Phenotype, genotype, and worldwide genetic penetrance of LRRK2-associated Parkinson's disease: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 7, 583–590 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Hedrich, K. et al. DJ-1 (PARK7) mutations are less frequent than Parkin (PARK2) mutations in early-onset Parkinson disease. Neurology 62, 389–394 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Khan, N. L. et al. Mutations in the gene LRRK2 encoding dardarin (PARK8) cause familial Parkinson's disease: clinical, pathological, olfactory and functional imaging and genetic data. Brain 128, 2786–2796 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Klein, C. et al. PINK1, Parkin, and DJ-1 mutations in Italian patients with early-onset parkinsonism. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13, 1086–1093 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Kumar, K. R. et al. Frequency of the D620N mutation in VPS35 in Parkinson disease. Arch. Neurol. 69, 1360–1364 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Longo, G. S. et al. Alpha-synuclein A53T mutation is not frequent on a sample of Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 73, 506–509 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Macedo, M. G. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Dutch patients with early onset Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 24, 196–203 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Mata, I. F. et al. Lrrk2 pathogenic substitutions in Parkinson's disease. Neurogenetics 6, 171–177 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Mellick, G. D. et al. Screening PARK genes for mutations in early-onset Parkinson's disease patients from Queensland, Australia. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 15, 105–109 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Moura, K. C. et al. Exon dosage variations in Brazilian patients with Parkinson's disease: analysis of SNCA, PARKIN, PINK1 and DJ-1 genes. Dis. Markers 32, 173–178 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Nichols, W. C. et al. Genetic screening for a single common LRRK2 mutation in familial Parkinson's disease. Lancet 365, 410–412 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Sharma, M. et al. A multi-centre clinico-genetic analysis of the VPS35 gene in Parkinson disease indicates reduced penetrance for disease-associated variants. J. Med Genet. 49, 721–726 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Sheerin, U. M. et al. Screening for VPS35 mutations in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 838 e831–835 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Sudhaman, S. et al. VPS35 and EIF4G1 mutations are rare in Parkinson's disease among Indians. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 2442.e2441–2442.e2443 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Valente, E. M. et al. PINK1 mutations are associated with sporadic early-onset parkinsonism. Ann. Neurol. 56, 336–341 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Vilarino-Guell, C. et al. VPS35 mutations in Parkinson disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 162–167 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Wu, Y. R. et al. Genetic analysis of Parkin in early onset Parkinson's disease (PD): novel intron 9 g> a single nucleotide polymorphism and risk of Taiwanese PD. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 153B, 229–234 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Zimprich, A. et al. A mutation in VPS35, encoding a subunit of the retromer complex, causes late-onset Parkinson disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 168–175 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Abou-Sleiman, P. M., Healy, D. G., Quinn, N., Lees, A. J. & Wood, N. W. The role of pathogenic DJ-1 mutations in Parkinson's disease. Ann. Neurol. 54, 283–286 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Alcalay, R. N. et al. Frequency of known mutations in early-onset Parkinson disease: implication for genetic counseling: the consortium on risk for early onset Parkinson disease study. Arch. Neurol. 67, 1116–1122 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Alcalay, R. N. et al. SMPD1 mutations, activity, and alpha-synuclein accumulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 34, 526–535 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Anwarullah et al. Absence of SNCA polymorphisms in Pakistani Parkinsons disease patients. Jpma. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 67, 1512–1516 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Hattori, N. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of a novel Parkin gene in Japanese families with autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism: evidence for variable homozygous deletions in the Parkin gene in affected individuals. Ann. Neurol. 44, 935–941 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Johnson, J. et al. SNCA multiplication is not a common cause of Parkinson disease or dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 63, 554–556 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Lucking, C. B. et al. Association between early-onset Parkinson's disease and mutations in the parkin gene. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1560–1567 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Rogaeva, E. et al. Analysis of the PINK1 gene in a large cohort of cases with Parkinson disease. Arch. Neurol. 61, 1898–1904 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Simón-Sánchez, J. et al. Genome-wide association study confirms extant PD risk loci among the Dutch. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 655 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    De Marco, E. V. et al. DJ-1 is a Parkinson's disease susceptibility gene in southern Italy. Clin. Genet. 77, 183–188 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Deng, H., Wu, Y. & Jankovic, J. The EIF4G1 gene and Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 132, 73–78 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Foo, J. N., Liu, J. & Tan, E.-K. CHCHD2 and Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 14, 681–682 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Funayama, M. et al. Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 G2385R variant is a risk factor for Parkinson disease in Asian population. Neuroreport 18, 273–275 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Funayama, M. et al. CHCHD2 mutations in autosomal dominant late-onset Parkinson's disease: a genome-wide linkage and sequencing study. Lancet Neurol. 14, 274–282 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Gómez-Garre, P. et al. Systematic mutational analysis of FBXO7 in a Parkinson's disease population from southern Spain. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 727.e725–727.e727 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Huttenlocher, J. et al. Heterozygote carriers for CNVs in PARK2 are at increased risk of Parkinson's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 5637–5643 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Kay, D. M. et al. Heterozygous parkin point mutations are as common in control subjects as in Parkinson's patients. Ann. Neurol. 61, 47–54 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Krüger, R. et al. A large-scale genetic association study to evaluate the contribution of Omi/HtrA2 (PARK13) to Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol. aging 32, 548.e549–548.e545.548E518 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Maraganore, D. M. et al. High-resolution whole-genome association study of Parkinson disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 685–693 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Nalls, M. A. et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease. Nat. Genet. 46, 989 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Pihlstrøm, L. et al. Supportive evidence for 11 loci from genome-wide association studies in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 1708.e1707–1708.e1713 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Ran, C. et al. Strong association between glucocerebrosidase mutations and Parkinson's disease in Sweden. Neurobiol. Aging 45, 212.e215–212.e211 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Ross, O. A. et al. Analysis of Lrrk2 R1628P as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease. Ann. Neurol. 64, 88–92 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Semenova, E. V. et al. Analysis of PARK2 gene exon rearrangements in Russian patients with sporadic Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 27, 139–143 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Sidransky, E. & Lopez, G. The link between the GBA gene and parkinsonism. Lancet Neurol. 11, 986–998 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Zhang, Y. et al. The contribution of GIGYF2 to Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Neurological Sci. : Off. J. Ital. Neurological Soc. Ital. Soc. Clin. Neurophysiol. 36, 2073–2079 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Puschmann, A. et al. Heterozygous PINK1 p.G411S increases risk of Parkinson's disease via a dominant-negative mechanism. Brain 140, 98–117 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D896–D901 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Scott, W. K. et al. Genetic complexity and Parkinson's disease. Deane Laboratory Parkinson Disease Research Group. Science 277, 387–388 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Shulman, J. M., De Jager, P. L. & Feany, M. B. Parkinson’s disease: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 6, 193–222 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Adler, C. H. Differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Med Clin. North Am. 83, 349–367 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Langston, J. W., Ballard, P., Tetrud, J. W. & Irwin, I. Chronic Parkinsonism in humans due to a product of meperidine-analog synthesis. Science 219, 979–980 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Brown, T. P., Rumsby, P. C., Capleton, A. C., Rushton, L. & Levy, L. S. Pesticides and Parkinson's disease-is there a link? Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 156–164 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Reeve, A., Simcox, E. & Turnbull, D. Ageing and Parkinson's disease: why is advancing age the biggest risk factor? Ageing Res Rev. 14, 19–30 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Levy, G. The relationship of Parkinson disease with aging. Arch. Neurol. 64, 1242–1246 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Autere, J. M., Moilanen, J. S., Myllyla, V. V. & Majamaa, K. Familial aggregation of Parkinson's disease in a Finnish population. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. psychiatry 69, 107–109 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Bonifati, V., Fabrizio, E., Vanacore, N., De Mari, M. & Meco, G. Familial Parkinson's disease: a clinical genetic analysis. Can. J. Neurol Sci. 22, 272–279 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Elbaz, A. et al. Familial aggregation of Parkinson's disease: a population-based case-control study in Europe. EUROPARKINSON Study Group. Neurology 52, 1876–1882 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Kurz, M., Alves, G., Aarsland, D. & Larsen, J. P. Familial Parkinson's disease: a community-based study. Eur. J. Neurol. 10, 159–163 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Linder, J., Stenlund, H. & Forsgren, L. Incidence of Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism in northern Sweden: a population-based study. Mov. Disord. 25, 341–348 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    McDonnell, S. K. et al. Complex segregation analysis of Parkinson's disease: the Mayo Clinic Family Study. Ann. Neurol. 59, 788–795 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Payami, H., Larsen, K., Bernard, S. & Nutt, J. Increased risk of Parkinson's disease in parents and siblings of patients. Ann. Neurol. 36, 659–661 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Petersen, M. S., Bech, S., Nosova, E., Aasly, J. & Farrer, M. J. Familial aggregation of Parkinson's disease in the Faroe Islands. Mov. Disord. 30, 538–544 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Shino, M. Y. et al. Familial aggregation of Parkinson's disease in a multiethnic community-based case-control study. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 25, 2587–2594 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Uitti, R. J. et al. "Familial Parkinson's disease"-a case-control study of families. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 24, 127–132 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Olgiati, S. et al. DNAJC6 mutations associated with early-onset Parkinson's disease. Ann. Neurol. 79, 244–256 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Yamamura, Y. The long journey to the discovery of PARK2: the 50th anniversary of Japanese Society of Neuropathology. Neuropathol. Off. J. Jpn. Soc. Neuropathol. 30, 495–500 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Funayama, M. et al. A new locus for Parkinson's disease (PARK8) maps to chromosome 12p11.2-q13.1. Ann. Neurol. 51, 296–301 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Bonifati, V. et al. Mutations in the DJ-1 gene associated with autosomal recessive early-onset Parkinsonism. Science 299, 256 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Gandhi, S. et al. PINK1 protein in normal human brain and Parkinson's disease. Brain 129, 1720–1731 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Di Fonzo, A. et al. ATP13A2 missense mutations in juvenile parkinsonism and young onset Parkinson disease. Neurology 68, 1557–1562 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Edvardson, S. et al. A deleterious mutation in DNAJC6 encoding the neuronal-specific clathrin-uncoating co-chaperone auxilin, is associated with juvenile parkinsonism. PLoS ONE 7, e36458 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Burchell, V. S. et al. The Parkinson's disease-linked proteins Fbxo7 and Parkin interact to mediate mitophagy. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1257 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Quadri, M. et al. Mutation in the SYNJ1 gene associated with autosomal recessive, early-onset Parkinsonism. Hum. Mutat. 34, 1208–1215 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Lu, C.-S. et al. PLA2G6 mutations in PARK14-linked young-onset parkinsonism and sporadic Parkinson's disease. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 159B, 183–191 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Strauss, K. M. et al. Loss of function mutations in the gene encoding Omi/HtrA2 in Parkinson's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 2099–2111 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Schormair, B. et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing in early-onset Parkinson's disease confirms VPS13C as a rare cause of autosomal-recessive Parkinson's disease. Clin. Genet. 93, 603–612 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Keller, M. F. et al. Using genome-wide complex trait analysis to quantify ‘missing heritability’ in Parkinson's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 4996–5009 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium & Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 A two-stage meta-analysis identifies several new loci for Parkinson's disease. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002142–e1002142 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Yamanaka, S. Strategies and new developments in the generation of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1, 39–49 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Marchetto, M. C., Brennand, K. J., Boyer, L. F. & Gage, F. H. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and neurological disease modeling: progress and promises. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, R109–R115 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Bardy, C., Greenberg, Z., Perry, S. W. & Licinio, J. in Personalized Psychiatry (ed Baune, B. T.) 127–146 (Academic Press, 2020).

  186. 186.

    Burkhardt, M. F. et al. A cellular model for sporadic ALS using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 56, 355–364 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Israel, M. A. et al. Probing sporadic and familial Alzheimer’s disease using induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 482, 216–220 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Sutherland, G. T. et al. A cross-study transcriptional analysis of Parkinson's disease. PLOS ONE 4, e4955 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Hoekstra, S. D., Stringer, S., Heine, V. M. & Posthuma, D. Genetically-informed patient selection for iPSC studies of complex diseases may aid in reducing cellular heterogeneity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 11, 164–164 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Soldner, F. et al. Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 136, 964–977 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Byrne, S. M., Mali, P. & Church, G. M. in Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 546 (eds Doudna J. A. & Sontheimer E. J.) 119–138 (Academic Press, 2014).

  192. 192.

    Li, M., Suzuki, K., Kim, N. Y., Liu, G.-H. & Izpisua Belmonte, J. C. A cut above the rest: targeted genome editing technologies in human pluripotent stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 4594–4599 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Ding, Q. et al. A TALEN genome-editing system for generating human stem cell-based disease models. Cell Stem Cell 12, 238–251 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Wang, G. et al. Efficient, footprint-free human iPSC genome editing by consolidation of Cas9/CRISPR and piggyBac technologies. Nat. Protoc. 12, 88 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    La Manno, G. et al. Molecular diversity of midbrain development in mouse, human, and stem cells. Cell 167, 566–580.e519 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Arenas, E., Denham, M. & Villaescusa, J. C. How to make a midbrain dopaminergic neuron. Development 142, 1918 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Kriks, S. et al. Dopamine neurons derived from human ES cells efficiently engraft in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Nature 480, 547 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Chambers, S. M. et al. Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 275 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Perrier, A. L. et al. Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12543 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Sanchez-Danes, A. et al. Efficient generation of A9 midbrain dopaminergic neurons by lentiviral delivery of LMX1A in human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum. gene Ther. 23, 56–69 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Swistowski, A. et al. Efficient generation of functional dopaminergic neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells under defined conditions. Stem Cells 28, 1893–1904 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    Ebert, A. D. et al. EZ spheres: a stable and expandable culture system for the generation of pre-rosette multipotent stem cells from human ESCs and iPSCs. Stem Cell Res. 10, 417–427 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Matsumoto, T. et al. Functional neurons generated from T cell-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for neurological disease modeling. Stem Cell Rep. 6, 422–435 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Zhang, X. Q. & Zhang, S. C. Differentiation of neural precursors and dopaminergic neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 584, 355–366 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Zhou, S. et al. Neurosphere based differentiation of human iPSC improves astrocyte differentiation. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 15 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Bardy, C. et al. Predicting the functional states of human iPSC-derived neurons with single-cell RNA-seq and electrophysiology. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 1573–1588 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    van den Hurk, M. & Bardy, C. Single-cell multimodal transcriptomics to study neuronal diversity in human stem cell-derived brain tissue and organoid models. J. Neurosci. Methods 325, 108350 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Bardy, C. et al. Neuronal medium that supports basic synaptic functions and activity of human neurons in vitro. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112, E2725 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Cadwell, C. R. et al. Electrophysiological, transcriptomic and morphologic profiling of single neurons using Patch-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 199 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    van den Hurk, M., Erwin, J. A., Yeo, G. W., Gage, F. H. & Bardy, C. Patch-Seq protocol to analyze the electrophysiology, morphology and transcriptome of whole single neurons derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11, 261 (2018).

  211. 211.

    Pacelli, C. et al. Elevated mitochondrial bioenergetics and axonal arborization size are key contributors to the vulnerability of dopamine neurons. Curr. Biol. 25, 2349–2360 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. 212.

    Snow, B. J. et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ as a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 25, 1670–1674 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. 213.

    Kawakami, F. et al. LRRK2 phosphorylates tubulin-associated Tau but not the free molecule: LRRK2-mediated regulation of the Tau-tubulin association and neurite outgrowth. PLOS ONE 7, e30834 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  214. 214.

    Shachar, T. et al. Lysosomal storage disorders and Parkinson's disease: Gaucher disease and beyond. Mov. Disord. 26, 1593–1604 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. 215.

    Klein, A. D. & Mazzulli, J. R. Is Parkinson's disease a lysosomal disorder? Brain 141, 2255–2262 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    Dehay, B. et al. Lysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson disease: ATP13A2 gets into the groove. Autophagy 8, 1389–1391 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  217. 217.

    Sainath, R. & Gallo, G. Cytoskeletal and signaling mechanisms of neurite formation. Cell Tissue Res. 359, 267–278 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    Winans, A. M., Collins, S. R. & Meyer, T. Waves of actin and microtubule polymerization drive microtubule-based transport and neurite growth before single axon formation. eLife 5, e12387 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  219. 219.

    Michel, PatrickP., Hirsch, Etienne, C. & Hunot, S. Understanding dopaminergic cell death pathways in Parkinson disease. Neuron 90, 675–691 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  220. 220.

    Doorn, K. J. et al. Microglial phenotypes and toll-like receptor 2 in the substantia nigra and hippocampus of incidental Lewy body disease cases and Parkinson's disease patients. Acta neuropathologica Commun. 2, 90 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  221. 221.

    Phani, S., Loike, J. D. & Przedborski, S. Neurodegeneration and inflammation in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 18, S207–S209 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. 222.

    McGeer, P. L. & McGeer, E. G. Inflammation and neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 10, S3–S7 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Muffat, J. et al. Efficient derivation of microglia-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Med. 22, 1358 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    Schwamborn, J. C. Is. Parkinson's Disease a neurodevelopmental disorder and will brain organoids help us to understand it? Stem Cells Dev. 27, 968–975 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. 225.

    Rando, T. A. & Chang, H. Y. Aging, rejuvenation, and epigenetic reprogramming: resetting the aging clock. Cell 148, 46–57 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    de Boni, L. & Wüllner, U. Epigenetic analysis in human neurons: considerations for disease modeling in PD. Front Neurosci. 13, 276 (2019).

  227. 227.

    Magen, I. & Chesselet, M.-F. in Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 184 (eds Anders Björklund & M. Angela Cenci) 53–87 (Elsevier, 2010).

  228. 228.

    Potashkin, J. A., Blume, S. R. & Runkle, N. K. Limitations of animal models of Parkinson's disease. Parkinson#39;s. Dis. 2011, 7 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Terzioglu, M. & Galter, D. Parkinson’s disease: genetic versus toxin-induced rodent models. FEBS J. 275, 1384–1391 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. 230.

    Koprich, J. B., Kalia, L. V. & Brotchie, J. M. Animal models of alpha-synucleinopathy for Parkinson disease drug development. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 515–529 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    Jagmag, S. A., Tripathi, N., Shukla, S. D., Maiti, S. & Khurana, S. Evaluation of models of Parkinson's disease. Front. Neurosci. 9, 503–503 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  232. 232.

    Cicchetti, F. et al. Systemic exposure to paraquat and maneb models early Parkinson's disease in young adult rats. Neurobiol. Dis. 20, 360–371 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Sherer, T. B. et al. Mechanism of toxicity in rotenone models of Parkinson's disease. J. Neurosci. 23, 10756–10764 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Dawson, T. M., Ko, H. S. & Dawson, V. L. Genetic animal models of Parkinson's disease. Neuron 66, 646–661 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  235. 235.

    Lim, K. L. & Ng, C. H. Genetic models of Parkinson disease. Biochim Biophys. Acta 1792, 604–615 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Ramonet, D. et al. Dopaminergic neuronal loss, reduced neurite complexity and autophagic abnormalities in transgenic mice expressing G2019S mutant LRRK2. PLOS ONE 6, e18568 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Li, Y. et al. Mutant LRRK2R1441G BAC transgenic mice recapitulate cardinal features of Parkinson's disease. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 826–828 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  238. 238.

    Gubellini, P., Picconi, B., Di Filippo, M. & Calabresi, P. Downstream mechanisms triggered by mitochondrial dysfunction in the basal ganglia: from experimental models to neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1802, 151–161 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. 239.

    Robert, C. Microarray analysis of gene expression during early development: a cautionary overview. Reproduction 140, 787–801 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. 240.

    Brennand, K. J. et al. Creating patient-specific neural cells for the in vitro study of brain disorders. Stem Cell Rep. 5, 933–945 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  241. 241.

    Toulorge, D., Schapira, A. H. & Hajj, R. Molecular changes in the postmortem parkinsonian brain. J. neurochemistry 139(Suppl 1), 27–58 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  242. 242.

    Hartmann, A. Postmortem studies in Parkinson's disease. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 6, 281–293 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  243. 243.

    Chailangkarn, T. et al. A human neurodevelopmental model for Williams syndrome. Nature 536, 338–343 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  244. 244.

    Emborg, M. E. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural cells survive and mature in the nonhuman primate brain. Cell Rep. 3, 646–650 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  245. 245.

    Kikuchi, T. et al. Survival of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the brain of a primate model of Parkinson's disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 1, 395–412 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. 246.

    Kikuchi, T. et al. Human iPS cell-derived dopaminergic neurons function in a primate Parkinson's disease model. Nature 548, 592–596 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  247. 247.

    Steinbeck, J. A. et al. Optogenetics enables functional analysis of human embryonic stem cell-derived grafts in a Parkinson's disease model. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 204–209 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to thank Prof. Christopher Proud, Prof Stuart Brierley, Dr Tim Sargeant, A/Prof. Ville Petteri Makinen, Dr Mark van den Hurk, and the other members of the Bardy lab for the feedback. This work was generously supported by The Parkinson’s South Australia Foundation, Perpetual Impact Philanthropy, the Brain Foundation, Flinders Foundation, Rebecca L. Cooper Foundation, Ian Potter Foundation, Angelique and Michael Boileau Corporate Philanthropy, MRFF Australian Government and Department of Health (CB), and The Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (JT).

Author information




J.T. performed the meta-analysis of all iPSC studies and genomics studies. H.A. performed the meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. C.B. designed the study and supervised J.T. and H.A. J.T., H.A., and C.B. prepared the figures. C.B. and J.T. wrote the paper. All authors have approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cedric Bardy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, J., Anastacio, H. & Bardy, C. Genetic predispositions of Parkinson’s disease revealed in patient-derived brain cells. npj Parkinsons Dis. 6, 8 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing