Abstract
Nuclear power plants are aging around the world, and a precise assessment of irradiation damage in their components is needed. One key component, concrete, and specifically the silicates in its aggregates, can undergo significant expansion upon neutron radiation, which can lead to cracking and, ultimately, structural failure. However, assessing and predicting the extent of damage via neutron radiation is challenging due to reasons such as residual radioactivity and, most importantly, the high time involved. Here, we evaluate whether ion radiation can be a viable surrogate. Specifically, by employing Si2+ ion radiations and a comprehensive multi-modal imaging protocol, we report mineral-specific responses for key silicates such as quartz, albite, anorthite, and microcline. We find that 10 MeV Si2+ ions result in mineral expansions that are remarkably comparable to neutron radiation equivalent expansions (R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 1.29%), opening up pathways towards rapid assessment of silicates subject to irradiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In the United States, electricity generation from commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) began in 1958. Since 1990, NPPs have consistently supplied 20% of the total annual U.S. electricity1. As of 2021, the US had 93 operating commercial nuclear reactors at 55 nuclear power plants in 28 states2. With the average age of nuclear reactors at 40 years old, there is a growing interest in extending the operation of aging NPPs from the typical 60 years to 80 years3,4. This 20-year lifetime extension necessitates understanding and predicting the irradiation damage that occurs in the structural components of the NPPs. One of these components, the concrete biological shield (CBS), is known to undergo severe deterioration upon exposure to extended nuclear radiation5,6,7.
Broadly, past literature has indicated that at a neutron fluence of 1 × 1019 n.cm-2, concrete sees a marked decrease in compressive strength, tensile strength, and elastic modulus8. Specifically, within the concrete component, the cement paste is prone to gamma radiation9,10,11, and the aggregates are prone to radiation-induced volumetric expansion (RIVE)12. Given that aggregates comprise nearly 70% of concrete by volume, the associated RIVE is a significant concern13. It is well known that siliceous aggregates such as granites are much more prone to RIVE as opposed to carbonaceous aggregates such as limestones14,15. Specifically, expansions for various minerals present in these aggregates are in the following ranges: quartz ~18%, feldspars ~8%, pyroxenes ~3%, hornblendes ~1.5%, and carbonates less than 1%16,17. This mineral expansion is largely driven by radiation-induced amorphization, also known as metamictization18,19. While these expansions can lead to cracking20,21, amorphized aggregates can also contribute to the alkali-silica reaction (ASR)—a deleterious, expansive phenomenon in concrete22. Beyond the aggregate mineralogy, other reactor conditions such as the neutron flux, fluence, and temperature also influence the irradiation response of concrete23.
In order to better understand and document the response of individual siliceous minerals to neutron radiation, various studies have employed ion radiation as a surrogate24,25,26,27,28,29. The reason for employing ion radiation has been primarily to avoid the extensive time and costs involved with neutron radiation experiments30. Additionally, exposing concrete aggregates to neutron radiation generates isotopes 42K, 24Na, 47Ca that can contribute to gamma activity in the first month after radiation whereas 59Fe, 41Ca, and trace element isotopes (65Zn, 54Mn) contribute to residual radioactivity31. On the other hand, ion radiation experiments eliminates the need for handling potentially radioactive samples. It also allow precise control over the radiation conditions32. However, identifying the appropriate set of ion radiation conditions that can appropriately simulate neutron damage is a challenging task. This is particularly true given the scarcity of ion radiation studies focusing on siliceous minerals relevant to concrete. Nevertheless, recent studies14,15,26,33,34 have begun to address this gap by focusing on key, individual siliceous minerals of interest. There is considerable room to contribute to these efforts via studies of multiple siliceous minerals present in complex, spatial arrangements in actual aggregate samples. Such a direction is also needed to complement the modeling efforts in this sphere, e.g., the recent development of a fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based numerical simulation code: MOSAIC (Microstructure-Oriented Scientific Analysis of Irradiated Concrete)35, which takes mm-scale 2D mineral maps as inputs to simulate damage in the complex microstructures present in concrete aggregates.
In this study, we employ a comprehensive multi-modal correlative characterization approach where we use multiple complementary imaging and analytical tools such as optical imaging, laser profilometry, electron imaging, Raman imaging, and nanoindentation in tandem, often on the same sample surfaces, before and after ion irradiation, to obtain mineral-specific radiation responses from a variety of complex aggregate samples. Broadly, we reveal how RIVE and Young’s modulus evolve for various siliceous minerals as a function of increasing fluence and energy. Specifically, upon exposure to 10 MeV, 1016 ions/cm2 Si2+ radiation induces distinct volumetric expansions in quartz, albite, anorthite, and microcline. Simultaneously, under these conditions, the relative modulus experiences reductions: quartz to 80.3%, albite to 79%, anorthite to 81.2%, and microcline to 83.9%. Coincidentally, the RIVE and relative modulus values of irradiated quartz (SiO2) as a pure phase are in good agreement with values obtained on quartz present as an inclusion in a complex environment like granite (mean deviations <2.9%). Most importantly, we find that our experimental ion RIVE values, for a series of key siliceous minerals, are in good agreement with calculated RIVE values for equivalent neutron radiation exposure (for e.g. with 10 MeV Si2+ ions, Root Mean Square Error = 1.29%) – suggesting that the more rapid, ion-radiation experiments can be effectively used to simulate neutron radiation damage in siliceous aggregates of concrete.
Results and discussion
Generation of Si2+ ions and precise irradiation of chosen areas on six siliceous rocks
Amorphization of a material exposed to radiation can result from ionization and collision cascades of atoms. Their relative influence on the extent of damage is usually determined by the mass and energy of the incident radiation source, as well as the type of target material36. Neutron radiation, in particular interacts with atoms in the target material to produce energetic ions with a continuum of energies ranging from a few tens of electron volts (eV) to upwards of 100,000 eV37. A fast neutron traversing a solid will occasionally impart sufficient energy to a target nucleus to dislodge the target atom from its stationary lattice site. This newly moving target atom is then responsible for subsequent displacement damage in the solid (damage is only indirectly due to the neutron). The displaced atom is known as a Primary Knock-on Atom (PKA). The PKA will depart its lattice site with kinetic energy ranging from 101 to 105 eV (the maximum PKA energy for light target atoms can be even higher). The ensemble of possible knock-on energies, convoluted with the probabilities of specific energy transfers (from neutron to stationary lattice atom) is known as the PKA spectrum38. In mineral phases present in granite, the PKA spectrum is much more complicated than in a monoatomic metal, because the PKA species can be either a light anion such as oxygen or a much heavier cation such as calcium. These PKA species variations themselves lead to different characteristics in the PKA spectrum associated with each species.
Light ions such as oxygen predominantly induces changes in a material through the loss of electronic energy (via ionization), whereas when exposed to heavy ion radiation39, the change is triggered predominantly by the loss of nuclear energy (due to collisional damage). Hence, the PKA spectrum created by neutrons impinging on granitic silicates creates a broad range of electronic to nuclear stopping ratios. Therefore, utilizing medium-weight ions such as Silicon is a strategic choice, as it emulates the broak range of the PKA spectrum generated by neutrons impinging on granitic silicates, as Si2+ ions introduces competing effects of atomic displacement due to nuclear energy loss and localized non-equilibrium disorder and excitation arising from electronic energy loss40. Hence, Si2+ ions were chosen for irradiating the minerals, utilizing two unique energies: 2 MeV and 10 MeV. The ion ranges, as determined by SRIM-200841, are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Specifically, for 2 MeV Si2+ ions, the range is in the order of 1600–1730 nm, while for 10 MeV Si2+ ions, it extends to about 4060–4340 nm. The selection of these energies aims to investigate the impact of varied ion penetration depths, including both shallow and deep ranges, on the swelling behavior and the overall loss in nanoindentation modulus.
The irradiations were conducted employing a Source of Negative Ions by Cesium Sputtering (SNICS) ion source and a tandem accelerator as shown in Fig. 1, with specific radiation conditions detailed in Table 1. The peak displacement per atom (DPA—a measure of cumulative damage in irradiated materials due to atomic displacements arising from nuclear and electronic collisions) resulting from ion radiation and the corresponding ion penetration depths are illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 2, which includes data from the current study and previous studies22,25,26,27,28,29,33,42,43,44,45,46 that utilized ion radiation on silicate minerals.
Coarse-grained igneous rocks typically used as aggregates in concrete were examined. The minerals of specific interest were quartz and feldspars (albite, anorthite, and microcline) as they compose a significant fraction of granitic rocks. The entire range of samples, comprising 6 samples and 12 windows, is illustrated in Fig. 1c. A copper mask was used to shield and protect the region outside the windows during the irradiation process, delineating the contrast between the irradiated and pristine regions, as depicted in Fig. 1b. The Raman images showing the mineral distribution within the different windows are displayed in Fig. 2. The corresponding mineral compositions quantified using a Raman imaging quantification protocol adopted by Polavaram and Garg47 are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The samples, comprising multiple minerals, were classified into granite and diorite rock types using the chart shown in Supplementary Fig. 3 and the known mineral composition of the rocks (listed in Supplementary Table 2). The presence of coarse crystals on the order of 1 mm indicated that the samples were granites and diorites, as rhyolites and andesites have a very fine-grained texture with crystals that are not visible to the naked eye.
Relating local phase chemistry with volumetric expansions using multi-modal imaging
Multimodal imaging, integrating information from diverse imaging techniques, enables the investigation of structural, chemical, and mechanical changes induced by dynamic phenomena48,49, facilitating the analysis of common effects resulting from irradiation50,51,52,53. This allows for a thorough examination of manifestations arising from irradiation, contributing to a deeper understanding of its underlying mechanisms, and has broader applications in assessing degradation in various systems exposed to different conditions54,55,56. In this study, Fig. 3 displays the images obtained through various imaging techniques, including optical, laser profilometry, Raman, and SEM-EDS imaging, for one of the sample windows (sample 6, window 2 irradiated with 10 MeV, 1016 ions/cm2 Si2+ radiation). For the sake of brevity, all correlative images for the other samples and their corresponding windows are reported in Supplementary Figs. 5–15.
The mineral distribution within the area depicted in Fig. 3 was identified through Raman imaging, with corresponding Raman images presented in Fig. 3C. The analysis revealed the presence of two distinct types of albite (NaAlSi3O8) and biotite (K(Mg,Fe)3AlSi3O10(F,OH)2), exhibiting different Raman spectra despite sharing the same chemical composition (as determined from the SEM-EDS images shown in Fig. 3B). The back-scattered image in Fig. 3A clearly illustrates the contrast between the biotite and albite-quartz regions, with the latter consisting of lower atomic weight elements as compared to biotite which contains iron. When considering the albite in both the windows of samples 5 and 6, the elemental ratio by weight was determined from SEM-EDS images as follows: 0.93 ± 0.06 for Na/Al, 0.13 ± 0.08 for Ca/Al, and 0.03 ± 0.03 for K/Al. These ratios are consistent with the composition of the albite region in the feldspar ternary diagram57. Moreover, the SEM-EDS images in Fig. 3B reveal that the regions in the SEM-EDS images corresponding to the two biotite minerals revealed by Raman imaging exhibit identical elemental distributions, indicating that they could be either polymorphs or grains with different crystalline orientations49. Therefore, any potential variations in the irradiation behavior of these phases can be attributed to differences in crystalline structure or orientation, despite having identical elemental composition.
The height images presented in Fig. 3A represent the height profiles of the same surface, measured before (height-pre) and after (height-post) irradiation. These images provide a direct visual comparison of the surface topography before and after irradiation These images were normalized using the same reference plane as the height-pre image, allowing for direct comparison and measurement of the expansions and contractions resulting from irradiation. The height difference image in Fig. 3A is obtained by directly subtracting the height-pre image from the height-post image, where darker shades of blue indicate more expansion. The small red areas in the center of the image are not indicative of mineral contraction, but rather the result of surface chip-off that occurred during irradiation. Moreover, a distinct contrast can be observed among the areas corresponding to albite, quartz, and biotite minerals in Fig. 3A, arising from their unique response to radiation exposure. For instance, the intensity of the blue shade is higher for quartz compared to albite, indicating a higher RIVE for quartz.
The irradiation response of silicate minerals such as those present in granites depends on various properties including the ionicity and proportion of Si-O bonds, the dimensionality of silicate polymerization (DOSP), atomic packing efficiency, composition, and physical properties (density, melting point, elastic moduli)25. Specifically, the nature of chemical bonding plays a crucial role in the crystalline-amorphous transition, with highly covalent bonds being susceptible to irradiation damage58,59,60. The Si-O bond, being the most covalent in silicates, acts as a potential ‘weak link’ in terms of irradiation damage accumulation. This bond is less likely to recombine into the crystalline state, favoring the assumption of a regular local coordination geometry, making it a weak bond during amorphization. Consequently, the proportion of these ‘weak links’ or Si-O bonds relative to the total number of bonds in a mineral influences its irradiation behavior. Additionally, using weight % of SiO2 as a criterion for amorphization offers another measure of the covalent bond proportion in the structure. Furthermore, the degree of structural connectivity, quantified by DOSP, is crucial for deducing amorphization behavior25. In minerals like quartz (SiO2), the Radiation-Induced Volumetric Expansion (RIVE) tends to be highest due to the substantial proportion of Si-O bonds.
Atomic density, as measured by packing density, directly influences particle trajectories resulting from ion bombardment. Alternatively, atomic packing may be more closely related to the probability of in-cascade recombination of defects during irradiation58. Packing efficiency measures the proportion of atomic-scale space-filling relative to the unit cell volume but does not represent structural topology, as does DOSP. The melting point is also crucial, characterizing the breakdown of a mineral structure under highly energetic conditions and is related to bonding and composition. The shear modulus correlates with the critical amorphization dose as it relates to the material’s ability to attenuate energy elastically within collision cascades25.
The total RIVE of granite, or any composite rock for that matter, is typically higher than the sum of the individual RIVE values of its constituent minerals16,61,62. This phenomenon arises due to various factors, such as the overall structural and compositional characteristics of the rock, the presence of interfaces and grain boundaries, stress transfer mechanisms between different minerals, and the collective response of the microstructure of the rock to irradiation. As a result, the non-uniform RIVE of minerals within the rock leads to the formation of voids and cracks. These cracks are influenced by the heterogeneous distribution of phases present in the rock, exacerbating the variations in expansion and contraction behavior across different mineral constituents. Subsequently, these cracks propagate and contribute to additional expansion within the grains and crystals, amplifying the overall volumetric changes resulting from their internal damage16. Together, these effects are accounted in the reported overall expansions measured using laser profilometry in this study.
When ions bombard the surface of a rock, they induce expansion within a superficial layer of rock. This expansion is constrained by the underlying substrate. In contrast, when exposed to neutron radiation, the bulk of the rock experiences unconstrained expansion. However, this expansion is regulated by the heterogeneously expanding rock-forming minerals. Hence, the ion RIVE observed at the surface of a rock differs from neutron RIVE occurring across the entire bulk of a rock due to variations in physical constraints and the depth of irradiation damage. Despite these disparities, one of the primary goals of this study is to evaluate if ion radiation can be utilized effectively to mimic neutron radiation damage.
To ensure reliable comparisons across multiple radiation conditions, we found it was meaningful to focus on step-height measurements directly obtained from laser profilometry. Step height, quantified using a method described in Supplementary Note 1, is a difference in roughness between the irradiated and pristine surfaces and provides a consistent and reliable metric for quantifying and comparing the extent of damage. From Supplementary Fig. 18a, it is evident that, overall, the step height of each mineral increases as the fluence increases, for each energy of the Si2+ ions. Similarly, when the energy is increased while maintaining a constant fluence in Supplementary Fig. 18b, the step-height increases for each mineral, suggesting that RIVE is indeed occurring under the chosen ion radiation conditions. Additionally, we determined the apparent deformations (calculated as the ratio of experimental step-height to ion range derived from SRIM-200841) for each mineral. For instance, quartz exhibits a variation of 4.2% – 14.8% across diverse radiation conditions. Similarly, albite exhibits a range of 3.3% – 6.8%, anorthite 3.1% – 8%, and microcline 5.1% – 6%. In general, higher Si2+ ion fluence or energy results in more pronounced mineral damage, leading to volumetric expansion and density reduction. Overall, these values are in the ranges comparable to their RIVE values upon neutron radiation16,17.
Microscale mineral-specific mapping of modulus variation on damaged surfaces
The overall elastic modulus of a polycrystalline rock upon irradiation is predominantly governed by the change in elastic modulus of individual crystals and the combined characteristics of grain boundaries within the rock63,64. The presence of grain boundaries in minerals can significantly influence their overall behavior and may lead to alterations in the irradiated modulus compared to that of pure, single-phase minerals65. Additionally, grain boundaries can introduce structural discontinuities, such as lattice defects and mismatched interfaces, which can affect the mechanical response and elastic properties of the material. Moreover, there can be significant differences in the measured modulus between the grain center and the grain boundaries at higher radiation fluences, attributed to defect annihilation processes66. It is practical to assume that the Poisson’s ratio of minerals, such as quartz and feldspars, remains consistent upon radiation at both the grain centers and boundaries. Moreover, it is shown later that the change in Poisson’s ratio upon irradiation is relatively insensitive to the determination of irradiated modulus.
Supplementary Fig. 19 depicts a fused Raman and optical image of sample 4, window 2, where distinct ROIs labeled 1–20 are identified on both the pristine and irradiated locations of augite and anorthite. Corresponding nanoindentation modulus maps are also presented. Supplementary Fig. 20 shows a plot illustrating the reduced modulus derived from different peak loads applied to the ROIs outlined in Supplementary Fig. 19. This plot provides strong evidence of consistency in the reduced modulus across diverse peak loads (coefficient of variation <0.03). Moreover, the standard errors for reduced modulus of augite and anorthite are below 0.77 GPa and 0.66 GPa, respectively. These values also serve as evidence for the consistency in the reduced modulus of a mineral within a specific window.
Previous work by Oliver and Pharr67 has established the existence of a well-defined representative depth of indentation associated with a specific peak load when using a Berkovich tip. The stress zone beneath the surface probed by the nanoindenter tip represents a statistically significant fraction of the material at maximum load, suggesting that it characterizes the volume representative of the material68. To ensure accurate results, a peak load of 10 mN was selected for modulus mapping, which corresponded to the highest capacity of the instrument. It is essential to note that the maximum depth of penetration, specifically 910 nm for irradiated anorthite (494 nm for quartz, 1330 nm for albite, and 1436 nm for microcline), with a peak load of 10 mN, remains confined within the irradiated layer. Importantly, the depth of the irradiated layer determined from SRIM-200841 exceeds 1600 nm for all minerals considered. As a result, the mechanical properties determined by the indenter likely represent the characteristics of the irradiated layer. Moreover, these properties account for the collective behavior of all phases present throughout the entire depth, extending to the end of the representative depth. Additionally, the analysis of Raman images reveals that in locations where the specific mineral phase images do not overlap, the observed mineral is consistently present from the surface down to a depth of 1450 nm, which is within the axial resolution limit of the Raman microscope. Moreover, using EDS images to ensure the presence of a single mineral along the indentation depth would result in inaccuracies, as it cannot differentiate polymorphs and mineral grains with different crystalline orientations. Therefore, we can make a reasonable assumption that the indents were made at locations where only a single phase was present throughout the indentation depth.
Based on the above considerations, we conducted nanoindentation, specifically at the center of the grains. Considering that a peak load of 10 mN results in both elastic and plastic deformations, we adopted the relationship between the reduced modulus measured from nanoindentation (\({E}_{R}\)) and the elastic modulus of the film (\({E}_{F}\)), as reported by Pharr et al.69. We further established a direct dependence of the relative elastic modulus on the relative reduced modulus, in the context of this study, as outlined in Supplementary Note 3.
In the previously mentioned window depicted in Fig. 3, we present nanoindentation mapping in Fig. 4 illustrating variations among different minerals and individual grains. To ensure accurate analysis, we integrated the optical image (shown in Fig. 4a) of sample 6-window 2 with the corresponding Raman image. From this integrated image, we carefully selected multiple regions (54 × 54 μm, 3 μm spacing, as indicated in Fig. 4a) that are located within a grain in the phase map of a specific mineral. Subsequently, nanoindentation modulus maps were collected for these selected areas. The pristine data was collected from areas on the same grain that extended beyond the irradiated window, while the irradiated data was collected from areas within the irradiated region on the same grain, to make a reliable comparison. The corresponding fused images for the other windows can be found in Supplementary Figs. 21–32. These images specifically highlight the nanoindentation areas where modulus maps were collected. The reduced moduli of these minerals measured before and after irradiation are provided in Supplementary Table 4. In Fig. 4b, we present the individual nanoindentation modulus maps obtained from both the pristine and irradiated regions of the indicated minerals (Supplementary Figs. 21–32 shows the corresponding maps for the other windows). Specifically, for the two types of albites (Al-1 and Al-2), the probability density distribution of the reduced modulus reveals a noticeable leftward shift, indicating a reduction in modulus upon irradiation. The mean modulus decreased from 75 GPa to 70 GPa for albite-1 and from 92 GPa to 59 GPa for albite-2, as depicted in Fig. 5c, d. Remarkably, the spread of the curves remain consistent, indicated by low relative changes in standard deviation of 9.6% and 3.7% for albite-1 and albite-2, respectively. This consistent spread suggests a uniform reduction in modulus across the entire surface of the minerals.
To quantify the extent of irradiation damage incurred, we analyze the mechanical properties by examining the drop in elastic modulus, which allows us to understand the stiffness and integrity of different minerals upon radiation exposure. The nanoindentation modulus of a specific mineral can exhibit variations from grain to grain, even within the same window. In the case of pristine quartz, we observed a 10.8% coefficient of variation in modulus between different windows, while for pristine anorthite, we observed a 7.9% coefficient of variation within the same window among different grains. To account for these variations and ensure meaningful comparisons, we chose to compare the modulus of a specific grain before and after radiation exposure. As described earlier, nanoindentation modulus maps were collected on both the pristine and irradiated locations of the same grains. By calculating the ratio of the irradiated modulus to the pristine modulus, we obtained the relative modulus, which allowed for comparisons across multiple radiation conditions. Notably, the relative modulus exhibited a low coefficient of variation for a particular mineral grain within a specific window (2.8% for anorthite). This approach helped mitigate the influence of variations in modulus observed between different grains and windows, enabling a more meaningful and consistent analysis of the relative changes in modulus due to radiation exposure. From Supplementary Fig. 33a, it can be observed that the relative modulus decreases as the fluence increases under constant energy conditions. Likewise, when the energy is increased while maintaining a constant fluence (Supplementary Fig. 33b), the relative modulus also decreases for each mineral. In general, as the fluence or energy of the Si2+ ions increases, the extent of damage incurred by the minerals becomes more pronounced, leading to a loss of structural integrity of the sample and, ultimately, resulting in increased levels of amorphization.
Figure 5a shows the comparison of the relative modulus with integrated DPA (listed in Supplementary Table 1) for quartz, albite, anorthite, and microcline. The integrated DPA is represented by the area under the Displacement Per Atom (DPA) versus the depth profile (shown in Supplementary Fig. 4) obtained from SRIM-200841. It provides a measure of the cumulative displacement experienced by atoms within a material, reflecting the total atomic-scale rearrangements occurring within a specific volume of the mineral. By considering factors such as fluence, target mineral, ion species, and ion energy, the integrated DPA serves as a comprehensive parameter for comparing the extent of damage across different minerals and irradiation conditions. It combines these diverse parameters into a single metric, enabling meaningful comparisons and facilitating the integration of findings from various studies. By comparing the relative modulus with integrated DPA, both from this study and data from Luu et al.26 (Fig. 5a), the mean relative errors are observed to be 8.9% for quartz, 5.8% for albite, and 2.3% for microcline. Notably, although Luu et al.26 utilized 3 MeV Si2+ ions, the relative modulus exhibits good agreement for microcline while showing some disagreement for the 10 MeV cases of quartz and albite. The overall trend aligns with the observed decrease in relative modulus with an increase in integrated DPA. Figure 5b presents a comparison between the relative modulus obtained in this study through ion radiation with that obtained from Luu et al. (R2 = 0.53). The curves for this study show that irrespective of the energy of the ions (2 and 10 MeV), the drop in relative modulus is directly linked to the total atomic-scale displacements quantified using integrated DPA. Hence, although 10 MeV Si2+ ions produce the highest concentration of DPA at higher depths of ~ 4060-4340 nm (compared to ~ 1600-1730 nm for 2 MeV Si2+ ions), the relative modulus could still be comparable if the integrated DPA values are similar.
Zhang et al.70 and Krishnan et al.21 conducted Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations and reported the relative modulus at maximum volume change upon irradiation (at saturation of defects or full amorphization) as shown in Supplementary Table 5. The corresponding deviations from the experimental relative modulus quantified in this study are also reported. In 2019, Krishnan et al.71 found a power law scaling relationship between the relative modulus and the cube of relative density of siliceous minerals during disordering. Leveraging this relationship, we calculated the relative modulus from the relative density (shown in Supplementary Note 4) and plotted it in Fig. 5a for comparison. By comparing the fitted relative modulus with experimental relative modulus obtained from nanoindentation, the mean relative errors are observed to be 8.3% for quartz, 5.0% for albite, 10.3% for anorthite, and 3.4% for microcline.
It should be noted that discrepancies may arise due to variations in mineral purity between previous studies and our research. For instance, the albite mineral in samples 5 and 6 could have been classified as oligoclase or anorthoclase if it had a slightly different Ca/Al or K/Al ratio, respectively. Moreover, studies using simulations to determine damage parameters often assume pure samples in their model. Such variations in mineral composition would result in distinct irradiation behaviors, leading to potential differences in the observed effects.
Comparing extent of irradiation damage: minerals in pure form vs inclusions in composite rocks
While irradiation damage in pure minerals has been extensively studied using neutron16, ion25, and electron72 radiation, investigations on multi-phase rocks have been relatively scarce in the past. In the previous sections, we emphasized the significance of analyzing the irradiation behavior of minerals within composite environments. Therefore, it is crucial to compare the behavior of pure, single-phase minerals with their behavior as inclusions in a composite environment when exposed to identical radiation conditions. In this study, we investigated the behavior of quartz in different settings: as a pure phase in samples 1 and 2, and as an inclusion in samples 5 and 6 within the composite rocks (Fig. 6a). To evaluate the irradiation-induced changes, we compared the relative modulus with fluence for pure quartz and quartz as an inclusion in Fig. 6a (corresponding Raman images are shown in Fig. 6a). Additionally, we compared the apparent deformation (calculated as the ratio of experimental step-height to ion range obtained from SRIM-200841) with integrated displacement per atom (DPA) for both scenarios in Fig. 6c. Notably, a rapid increase in apparent deformation is observed at lower integrated DPA values, suggesting an initial phase where the silicate microstructure accommodates expansive processes more readily. Subsequently, a more gradual increase occurs at higher DPA values, indicating a diminishing capacity for further expansion, possibly reaching the limit of maximum volume change or full amorphization. Our findings also indicate a high level of agreement, with a mean deviation (δ) of 0.6% for the relative modulus and 2.8% for apparent deformation between the two cases. To provide a direct visual comparison, Fig. 7d, e illustrate the relative modulus and apparent deformation, respectively, for both pure and inclusion quartz.
These findings indicate a reasonable consistency between the irradiation response of pure quartz and that of quartz present as inclusion within a composite environment, such as granite. The similarity in irradiation behavior suggests that the results obtained here on various minerals are widely applicable and inherent to each mineral, giving a high degree of confidence to mineral-specific irradiation responses documented here.
Comparisons with prior literature and calculated neutron radiation equivalent expansions
Using ion radiation as a surrogate to mimic neutron radiation damage is receiving growing attention despite being challenged by factors such as differences in the primary knock-on atom spectrum, accelerated damage rates, the effect of the injected interstitial, and the shallow penetration depth giving rise to surface effects and a limited analysis volume73. Despite these challenges, ion radiation offers several advantages for emulating reactor conditions, including the ability to induce high damage rates in a short time frame, minimal activation, availability of ion beam laboratories with suitable accelerators, and precise control over experimental parameters such as temperature, damage rate, and damage level74. However, in order to successfully replicate reactor conditions, it is crucial to accurately capture the complete extent of the irradiated microstructure formed in the reactor73. In this study, we have successfully characterized the physical (expansions) and mechanical (modulus) properties of ion-irradiated surfaces with nano- and micron-scale resolution, respectively. The subsequent step involves establishing the comparability of the resulting damage levels with those induced by neutron radiation. This validation is pivotal in confirming the viability of ion radiation as a reliable method for emulating the neutron radiation damage and ensuring the fidelity of our experimental approach.
To obtain a comparison between ion and neutron radiation, the fundamental hypothesis is that displacements per atom is an effective measure of irradiation-induced damage independently of the particle used for the experiment. Additionally, assuming that aggregates can be reasonably described as randomly oriented polycrystalline assemblages, the effective irradiation behavior such as dimensional change and change of elastic properties of neutron-irradiated aggregates is considered isotropic75. Ion radiation-induced DPA profiles along the implanted depth are determined using SRIM-200841 assuming Kinchin and Pease (K-P) models76 and are provided as displaced atoms per volume per ion fluence, as
where \(M\) denotes the molar weight of the pristine mineral, \({da}\) signifies the number of displaced atoms calculated from SRIM, \(\rho\) denotes the density of the pristine mineral, \({v}\) is the volume, \(\phi\) is the ion fluence, and \({\rm{{\rm N}}}\) represents Avogadro’s constant. Abundant findings from a comprehensive study by Bykov et al.77 on neutron-irradiated rock-forming minerals in test reactors has led to the formulation of empirical models correlating the RIVE of minerals with factors like fast-neutron fluence and irradiation temperature. Monte Carlo N-particles (MCNP) simulations show that neutrons with energies higher than 10 keV produce nearly 100% of the cumulative DPA in minerals. Using MCNP on common rock-forming minerals to model irradiation in Russian reactors AM, BR-5 (OK-50), BR-5 (M-1), BR-10 (OK-70), and BOR-60 VEK16, it becomes feasible to find the correspondence between cumulative DPA and neutron fluence, expressed as
where \(\kappa\) is a constant for a specific mineral and a specific reactor (ranges between 1.4 × 10–22 and 5.8 × 10–22 dpa/n.cm–2), relating neutron irradiation-induced DPA and integrated neutron fluence, and \(\Phi\) is the neutron fluence.Consequently, the empirical RIVE models can be reformulated to express them as functions of the DPA and irradiation temperature. The ion RIVE estimates are derived from the following expression, hypothesizing that Eqs. (1), (2) can be related (\({{dpa}}_{i}\) ~ \({{dpa}}_{n})\):
Where \({\widetilde{\varepsilon }}^{* }\) corresponds to the unconstrained volumetric expansion, \(\xi\) is the ratio of fluence at energy E > 10 keV against the integrated fluence, and \({T}_{{irr}}\) denotes the irradiation temperature (25–40 °C). It is assumed here that the ion irradiation-induced heating is dissipated by convection.
Ion-irradiation produces non-uniform DPA profiles, and the implanted film is structurally constrained by the pristine substrate. Hence, the development of high lateral stresses (in the order of 0.5–1 GPa) is inevitable. While the existence of mechanisms including irradiation-induced assisted viscous or plastic flow can be hypothesized, it has been observed in several studies28,78,79 that the post-ion irradiation step height approaches the total expected change of volume multiplied by the implanted depth at full amorphization. The apparent deformation in the direction opposite to the beamline is obtained by the integration of \({\widetilde{\varepsilon }}^{* }\) over the implanted depth (illustrated as blue solid lines in Fig. 7a). Additionally, when the implanted depth is fully amorphized, it is observed that the apparent deformation along the direction of the ion beam, is comparable to the neutron irradiation-induced volumetric expansion, or the cumulative contribution of the dimensional change in all directions14,26,28. Finally, it is assumed that expansions in this study are fully redistributed in the vertical direction opposite to the beamline given the constraint posed by the thick unirradiated volume of substrate and masked material around the exposed windows.
Figure 7a presents the apparent deformations of quartz, albite, anorthite, and microcline resulting from Si2+ ion radiations at fluences of 1015 and 1016 ions/cm2. It also includes the apparent deformation profiles calculated using the neutron radiation equivalent expansions from Eq. (3), encompassing a fluence range of 1014–1017 ions/cm2 Si2+ radiation. Each plot presents two solid blue lines enclosing an envelope region shown in light blue as the RIVE estimates obtained from Eq. (3) depends on \(\kappa\) and \({T}_{{irr}}\) which have a range of values (\(\kappa\) ranges between 1.4 × 10-22 and 5.8 × 10–22 dpa/n.cm-2 and the irradiation temperature ranges between 25 and 40 °C). At full amorphization for quartz, the calculated neutron radiation equivalent expansions correspond to an apparent deformation of 17.2% when irradiated with 10 MeV Si2+ ions. Similarly, albite, anorthite, and microcline have expansions of 6.9% and 6.8%, and 7.4%, respectively, under the same radiation conditions. Comparing these neutron radiation equivalent results with experimental ion radiation expansions in Fig. 6b, c reveals a high level of agreement, with overall mean deviations (δ) of 2.6% for quartz, 0.8% for albite, 1.0% for anorthite, and 1.5% for microcline. Interestingly, the case of 10 MeV Si2+ ions (Fig. 7c) demonstrates a lower RMSE of 1.29% volumetric expansion (with a mean relative error of 19.3% and a higher coefficient of determination of 0.86) compared to the 2 MeV case (Fig. 7b, RMSE of 1.82% volumetric expansion, mean relative error of 26.3%, and coefficient of determination of 0.76).
Observing the apparent deformations (reported in Supplementary Table 3), it is evident that the values could be higher for 2 MeV cases compared to 10 MeV cases (for e.g., anorthite expands 8.0% with 2 MeV and 7.2% with 10 MeV Si2+ ions). However, 10 MeV Si2+ ions produce higher step-heights compared to 2 MeV Si2+ ions (29.4 nm v/s 129.7 nm) as the expansion is directly linked to the total atomic-scale displacements quantified using integrated DPA. On the other hand, apparent deformations consider the penetration depth of ions, normalize the damage, and the obtained ratio may not follow the same trend as the expansion. For a given energy level, it increases with increasing fluence and also provides a consistent metric to make a comparison with other ion radiation conditions.
Figure 7a also includes a comparison of the apparent deformation with the findings from Luu et al.26, demonstrating mean relative errors of 34.0% for quartz, 29.7% for albite, and 11.4% for microcline. Although Luu et al. used 3 MeV Si2+ ions, the apparent deformations can be compared, as it normalizes the expansion values with respect to the penetration depth of the ions, which increases with increasing energy of the ions. The maximum experimental expansions for various minerals quantified in this study are also consistent with the expansion ranges resulting from neutron radiation: quartz ~ 18%, feldspars ~8% (δ < 3.2%)16,17. These findings validate the effectiveness of ion radiation as a reliable method for emulating neutron radiation in siliceous aggregates in concrete, confirming the comparability of resulting damage levels and validating the fidelity of our experimental approach.
Limitations and opportunities
Ion radiation presents a set of limitations and opportunities in the context of studying irradiation damage. We note three major limitations as follows. First, ion radiations involve interstitial ion depositions and can introduce altered swelling behavior at the stopping depth of incident particles80. Second, exposure of a material to ion radiation turns its surface into a point defect sink. This results in enhanced damage, enabling inhomogeneous swelling and a distinct microstructural evolution in the vicinity of the surface. Third, the controlled penetration depth of ions restricts the extent of potential damage to shallow depths81. However, despite these limitations, ion radiation offers immense potential for understanding and emulating neutron radiation damage in siliceous minerals. For e.g., the ability to inflict targeted damage at specific depths in a material result in the creation of thin, damaged layers on the surface which can be easily analyzed from an analytical instrumentation point of view. Specifically, in this study, we were able to quantitatively record mineral-specific step-height changes due to the formation of such thin layers. These step-height changes were then transformed to apparent deformation values which were found to be in strong agreement with RIVE values expected for these minerals upon neutron radiation. Thus, these ion radiation results open promising pathways for replicating neutron radiation damage in siliceous minerals.
In summary, ion radiation is emerging as a powerful surrogate for neutron radiation, offering advantages in replicating reactor conditions with high damage rates, minimal activation, and precise experimental control. In this study, we were able to precisely evaluate irradiation damage induced by ion radiation by seamlessly integrating diverse yet complementary imaging techniques. Specifically, our findings facilitate the determination of mineral-specific apparent deformations and relative elastic modulus values in siliceous minerals commonly found in the aggregates of the concrete component of the nuclear power plants. By investigating such key siliceous minerals prone to irradiation damage, we report apparent deformations of 14.8% for quartz, followed by albite at 6.8%, anorthite at 7.2%, and microcline at 6% under 10 MeV, 1016 ion/cm2 Si2+ radiation. Concurrently, the relative modulus experiences distinct reductions: quartz descends to 80.3%, albite to 79%, anorthite to 81.2%, and microcline to 83.9%. To add to the validity of these mineral-specific measurements, we report strong similarity between damage manifestations (apparent deformation and relative modulus) in quartz irrespective of its presence as inclusion in granite or existence in a pure, monolithic form (mean deviation<2.9%) underscoring the broad applicability and intrinsic nature of mineral-specific irradiation responses, resulting in high confidence in our reported results. Finally and most importantly, the remarkable agreement (R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 1.29% for 10 MeV Si2+) between ion radiation-based deformations and neutron radiation equivalent expansions proves that ion radiation can be a dependable surrogate for simulating neutron radiation damage in silicates. Collectively, this study firmly establishes the validity of ion radiation as an effective and reliable surrogate for neutron radiation damage in silicate minerals, opening up pathways toward rapid assessment of aging concrete in nuclear power plants.
Methods
Sample preparation
Rock samples were obtained using a core cutter with a diameter of 12.7 mm. Subsequently, the cores were sliced at 10 rpm using a Buehler Isomet low-speed saw equipped with a diamond sectioning blade. The sectioned cores were manually polished using moderate pressure for approximately 3 min per stage. The samples were polished using a series of grit sizes of SiC paper (400, 600, 800, and 1200), followed by diamond pastes with particle sizes of 5, 3, 1, and 0.25 μm, with water as a lubricant. Samples were cleaned between polishing stages by immersing them in an ultrasonic water bath to remove any residual debris between each polishing stage.
Ion-beam radiation using Si2+ ions
Ion-beam radiation experiments were conducted using 2 MeV and 10 MeV Si2+ ions at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The experimental setup used for irradiation is depicted in Fig. 1a. A total of six specimens, each containing two windows (as illustrated in Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1), were utilized, resulting in a total of 12 combinations of radiation conditions. Details of the specimens, fluences, and energies can be found in Table 1. During the irradiation process, copper masks (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1) were employed for cooling and exposing specific the regions of interest on the samples. The irradiations were performed using a tandem accelerator (depicted in Fig. 1) with an ion flux of 1.16 × 1012 ions.cm–2s–1, specifically chosen to minimize surface temperature. To estimate the ion range and displacement damage profiles, SRIM-200841 was utilized, where a displacement threshold energy (Ed) of 40 eV was assumed for all atoms. Kinchin and Pease (K-P) models76 were used to calculate the SRIM profiles and estimate the irradiation-induced DPA as previous studies82,83 found the DPA generated using the K-P model to be comparable with the Norgett-Robinson-Torrens (NRT) model84, which is typically used as a standard to assess irradiation damage effects in fast reactor materials. The calculated profiles and the corresponding damage depths can be found in Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 1, respectively.
Raman imaging
Raman imaging was performed on both the windows (2.5 mm × 5 mm) of all pristine samples (1–6) using a Raman confocal microscope (WITec Alpha 300 series SNOM microscope). To obtain polarized Raman spectra, a 532 nm excitation laser with an excitation power of 10 mW was employed. An integration time of 0.1 s/point was used totaling 135 min per window. The system was equipped with a 600 gr/mm grating and a charged coupled device (CCD) for data acquisition. The lateral resolution achieved was 0.65 µm, and the depth resolution was approximately ±1490 nm. The spectral resolution was set at 4.9 cm-1, and Raman spectra were collected within the wavenumber range of 150 cm–1 to 3700 cm–1. Prior to analysis, the raw Raman data underwent several pre-processing steps. Cosmic ray removal was performed using a filter size of 2 and a dynamic factor of 8 to eliminate artifacts. Baseline correction was applied to remove any underlying trends in the spectra, ensuring an accurate representation of the molecular vibrations. Furthermore, normalization was carried out by scaling the maximum intensity peak to 1, allowing for easier comparison between spectra. Raman phase mapping was conducted using true component analysis with external reference spectra, implemented using the Project FIVE software developed by WITec.
Scanning electron microscopy
SEM- Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) imaging was conducted on both the windows (2.5 mm × 5 mm) of all pristine samples (1–6) using a scanning electron microscope coupled with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (ThermoFisher Axia ChemiSEM). Backscattered images were acquired in low vacuum mode with an accelerating voltage of 10.00 kV, a spot size of 5 nm, and a chamber pressure of 130 Pa. The images were captured at a working distance of 10 mm and a magnification of 40x, providing detailed surface information. SEM-EDS images were captured using a frame time of 60 s, 30 frames per image totaling 30 min per sample window, and a resolution of 768 × 512 pixels.
Elastic modulus mapping via nanoindentation
Modulus mapping was performed using a nanoindenter (Hysitron TI-950 Triboindenter) equipped with a Berkovich tip and an accelerated property mapping (XPM) module. The XPM measurements were strategically performed on specific regions of interest, including the boundaries between pristine and irradiated areas as well as the interior of mineral grains. Each scanning area measured 54 × 54 µm, with a grid spacing of 3 µm and a scan time of 10 min. This was achieved using the scanning capability of the indenter transducer, allowing for precise positioning of the indents. Additionally, the scan areas had a maximum roughness of 250 nm, which was well under the depth of indentation for all indented minerals. The scans were performed with force control, using linear loading for a duration of 0.1 s until reaching the maximum force of 10 mN. This was followed by a 0.1 s holding period and a subsequent 0.1 s linear unloading phase. Care was taken to ensure that the maximum force and spacing values were chosen appropriately, to avoid any interference between individual indents.
Surface profiling using confocal laser microscopy
Surface profiling was performed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM Keyence VK-X1000) to obtain optical images and height profiles of the surfaces. Specifically, regions of interest measuring (ROI) 2.5 × 5 mm were scanned using a 20× objective (scan time of 30 min), achieving a high-resolution measurement of 0.05 µm in the x- and y-dimensions, and 0.02 µm in the z-dimension. To capture the full surface topography, the laser scan range was adjusted to encompass the highest and lowest elevation levels within each ROI. To ensure accurate surface profiles, MultiFileAnalyzer, a proprietary software developed by Keyence, was utilized to correct for planarity and curvature effects.
Data availability
All data are available in the main text and the supplementary material.
Code availability
The accompanying Python source code for image alignment and quantification of mineral-specific expansions are available as related manuscript files.
References
Nuclear power plants - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/nuclear-power-plants.php.
U.S. nuclear industry - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/us-nuclear-industry.php.
Griffith, G. et al. Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program Integrated Program Plan. (2012).
Field, K. G., Remec, I. & Le Pape, Y. Radiation effects in concrete for nuclear power plants–Part I: Quantification of radiation exposure and radiation effects. Nucl. Eng. Des. 282, 126–143 (2015).
Khmurovska, Y. & Štemberk, P. Mechanisms behind radiation-induced deterioration of concrete. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 596, 12035 (2019).
Cheniour, A. et al. A structural model of the long-term degradation of the concrete biological shield. Nucl. Eng. Des. 405, 112217 (2023).
Kambayashi, D., Sasano, H., Sawada, S., Suzuki, K. & Maruyama, I. Numerical analysis of a concrete biological shielding wall under neutron irradiation by 3D RBSM. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 18, 618–632 (2020).
Hilsdorf, H. K., Kropp, J. & Koch, H. J. The effects of nuclear radiation on the mechanical properties of concrete. Spec. Publ. 55, 223–254 (1978).
Vodák, F., Vydra, V., Trtík, K. & Kapičková, O. Effect of gamma irradiation on properties of hardened cement paste. Mater. Struct. Constr. 44, 101–107 (2011).
Maruyama, I. et al. Impact of gamma-ray irradiation on hardened white Portland cement pastes exposed to atmosphere. Cem. Concr. Res. 108, 59–71 (2018).
Baral, A. et al. Ultra-high gamma irradiation of calcium silicate hydrates: Impact on mechanical properties, nanostructure, and atomic environments. Cem. Concr. Res. 158, 106855 (2022).
Pape, Y. L., Alsaid, M. H. F. & Giorla, A. B. Rock-forming minerals radiation-induced volumetric expansion - Revisiting literature data. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 16, 191–209 (2018).
Sasano, H. et al. Meso-scale modelling of the mechanical properties of concrete affected by radiation-induced. Aggreg. Expansion. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 18, 648–677 (2020).
Pignatelli, I. et al. Direct experimental evidence for differing reactivity alterations of minerals following irradiation: The case of calcite and quartz. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–10 (2016).
Hsiao, Y.-H. et al. The effect of irradiation on the atomic structure and chemical durability of calcite and dolomite. npj Mater. Degrad. 3, 36 (2019).
Denisov, A., Dubrovskii, V. & Solovyov, V. Radiation resistance of mineral and polymer construction materials. ZAO MEI Publ. House (2012).
Zubov, V. G. & Ivanov, A. T. Expansion of quartz caused by irradiation with fast neutrons. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 11, 372–374 (1966).
Ewing, R. C., Meldrum, A., Wang, L. & Wang, S. Radiation-induced amorphization. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 39, 319–361 (2000).
Weber, W. J. Models and mechanisms of irradiation-induced amorphization in ceramics. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 166–167, 98–106 (2000).
Fillmore, D. L. Literature Review of the Effects of Radiation and Temperature on the Aging of Concrete. OSTI ID : 910954, Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States) https://doi.org/10.2172/910954 (2004).
Krishnan, N. M. A., Le Pape, Y., Sant, G. & Bauchy, M. Effect of irradiation on silicate aggregates’ density and stiffness. J. Nucl. Mater. 512, 126–136 (2018).
Ichikawa, T. & Koizumi, H. Possibility of radiation-induced degradation of concrete by alkali-silica reaction of aggregates. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 39, 880–884 (2002).
Le Pape, Y., Giorla, A. & Sanahuja, J. Combined effects of temperature and irradiation on concrete damage. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 14, 70–86 (2016).
Templier, C. et al. Ion beam amorphization of muscovite mica. J. Mater. Res. 11, 1819–1824 (1996).
Eby, R. K., Ewing, R. C. & Birtcher, R. C. The amorphization of complex silicates by ion-beam irradiation. J. Mater. Res. 7, 3080–3102 (1992).
Luu, V. N. et al. Changes in properties of alpha-quartz and feldspars under 3 MeV Si-ion. Irradiat. J. Nucl. Mater. 545, 152734 (2021).
Cartz, L., Karioris, F. G. & Fournelle, R. A. Heavy ion bombardment of silicates and nitrides. Radiat. Eff. 54, 57–64 (1981).
Harbsmeier, F. & Bolse, W. Ion beam induced amorphization in α quartz. J. Appl. Phys. 83, 4049–4054 (1998).
Sickafus, K. E. et al. Radiation damage effects in zirconia. J. Nucl. Mater. 274, 66–77 (1999).
Was, G. S. Simulation of neutron irradiation effects with ions. Fundam. Radiat. Mater. Sci. Met. Alloy. 545–577 (2007).
Zagar, T. & Ravnik, M. Measurement of neutron activation in concrete samples. Nuclear Energy in Central Europe, Golf Hotel, Bled, Slovenia, (September 11–14, 2000).
Was, G. S. et al. Emulation of reactor irradiation damage using ion beams. Scr. Mater. 88, 33–36 (2014).
Luu, V. N. et al. Swelling of alpha-quartz induced by MeV ions irradiation: Critical dose and swelling mechanism. J. Nucl. Mater. 539, 152266 (2020).
Hsiao, Y.-H. et al. Role of electrochemical surface potential and irradiation on garnet-type almandine’s dissolution kinetics. J. Phys. Chem. C. 122, 17268–17277 (2018).
Torrence, C. E. et al. MOSAIC: An effective FFT-based numerical method to assess aging properties. Concr. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 19, 149–167 (2021).
Howitt, D. G. et al. A comparison between electron and ion damage in quartz. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 112, 39–45 (1990).
Chadderton, L. T. Radiation damage in crystals. (Methuen,J. Wiley, 1965).
Averback, R. S. & De La Rubia, T. D. Displacement damage in irradiated metals and semiconductors. in Solid state physics vol. 51 281–402 (Elsevier, 1998).
Wang, L. M. & Ewing, R. C. Ion-Beam-Induced Amorphization of Complex Ceramic Materials—Minerals. MRS Bull. 17, 38–44 (1992).
Zhang, Y. et al. Competing effects of electronic and nuclear energy loss on microstructural evolution in ionic-covalent materials. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 327, 33–43 (2014).
Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D. & Biersack, J. P. SRIM – The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 268, 1818–1823 (2010).
Katenkamp, U., Karge, H. & Prager, R. Radiation defects and optical properties of ion implanted silicon dioxide. Radiat. Eff. 48, 31–34 (1980).
Boccanfuso, M., Benyagoub, A., Schwartz, K., Toulemonde, M. & Trautmann, C. Study of ion beam induced swelling in fluorite as an inert matrix model. Prog. Nucl. Energy 38, 271–274 (2001).
Toulemonde, M. et al. MeV gold irradiation induced damage in α-quartz: Competition between nuclear and electronic stopping. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 178, 331–336 (2001).
Devanathan, R., Yu, N., Sickafus, K. E. & Nastasi, M. Structure and mechanical properties of irradiated magnesium aluminate spinel. J. Nucl. Mater. 232, 59–64 (1996).
Kacimi, L., Simon-Masseron, A., Salem, S., Ghomari, A. & Derriche, Z. Synthesis of belite cement clinker of high hydraulic reactivity. Cem. Concr. Res. 39, 559–565 (2009).
Polavaram, K. C. & Garg, N. Enabling phase quantification of anhydrous cements via Raman imaging. Cem. Concr. Res. 150, 106592 (2021).
Burnett, T. L. & Withers, P. J. Completing the picture through correlative characterization. Nat. Mater. 18, 1041–1049 (2019).
Polavaram, K. C. & Garg, N. High-fidelity and high-resolution phase mapping of granites via confocal Raman imaging. Sci. Rep. 11, 8022 (2021).
Idrees, Y., Yao, Z., Kirk, M. A. & Daymond, M. R. In situ study of defect accumulation in zirconium under heavy ion irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 433, 95–107 (2013).
Das, S. Recent advances in characterising irradiation damage in tungsten for fusion power. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1614 (2019).
Wollenberger, H. Phase transformations under irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 216, 63–77 (1994).
Liu, P. et al. A coupled effect of nuclear and electronic energy loss on ion irradiation damage in lithium niobate. Acta Mater. 105, 429–437 (2016).
Maddison, C., Sathish, C. I., Lakshmi, D., Wayne, O. & Palanisami, T. An advanced analytical approach to assess the long-term degradation of microplastics in the marine environment. npj Mater. Degrad. 7, 59 (2023).
Moore, S. et al. Observation of stress corrosion cracking using real-time in situ high-speed atomic force microscopy and correlative techniques. npj Mater. Degrad. 5, 3 (2021).
Kabir, H. & Garg, N. Rapid prediction of cementitious initial sorptivity via surface wettability. npj Mater. Degrad. 7, 52 (2023).
Tuttle, O. F. & Bowen, N. L. Origin of granite in the light of experimental studies in the system NaAlSi3O8–KAlSi3O8–SiO2–H2O. in GSA MEMOIRS (Geological Society of America, 1958).
Thompson, D. A. High density cascade effects. Radiat. Eff. 56, 105–150 (1981).
Naguib, H. M. & Kelly, R. Criteria for bombardment-induced structural changes in non-metallic solids. Radiat. Eff. 25, 1–12 (1975).
Hobbs, L. W. Electron-beam sensitivity in inorganic specimens. Ultramicroscopy 23, 339–344 (1987).
Le Pape, Y., Sanahuja, J. & Alsaid, M. H. F. Irradiation-induced damage in concrete-forming aggregates: revisiting literature data through micromechanics. Mater. Struct. 53, 1–35 (2020).
Vaitová, M., Štemberk, P. & Rosseel, T. M. Fuzzy logic model of irradiated aggregates. Neural Netw. World, Int. J. Non-Stand. Comput. Artif. Intell. 29, https://doi.org/10.14311/nnw.2019.29.001 (2019).
Jagielski, J. et al. Nanohardness and brittleness of irradiated spinel ceramics. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 286, 196–199 (2012).
Liang, K. et al. Effects of grain size distributions on the macro-mechanical behavior of rock salt using micro-based multiscale methods. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 138, 104592 (2021).
Kurpaska, L. & Jagielski, J. Mechanical properties of irradiated Gd2Zr2O7 pyrochlores as studied by nanoindentation technique – Effect of grains and grain boundaries. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 379, 107–111 (2016).
Jagielski, J. et al. Mechanical properties of irradiated spinel ceramics. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 268, 2977–2979 (2010).
Oliver, W. C. & Pharr, G. M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992).
Wornyo, E., Gall, K., Yang, F. & King, W. Nanoindentation of shape memory polymer networks. Polym. (Guildf.) 48, 3213–3225 (2007).
Pharr, G. M. & Oliver, W. C. Measurement of thin film mechanical properties using nanoindentation. MRS Bull. 17, 28–33 (1992).
Zhang, W., Liu, H., Zhou, Y., Liao, K. & Huang, Y. Effects of neutron irradiation on densities and elastic properties of aggregate-forming minerals in concrete. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 55, 2147–2157 (2023).
Krishnan, N. M. A. et al. Density–stiffness scaling in minerals upon disordering: Irradiation vs. vitrification. Acta Mater. 166, 611–617 (2019).
Maruyama, I. & Muto, S. Change in relative density of natural rock minerals due to electron irradiation. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 14, 706–716 (2016).
Was, G. S. Challenges to the use of ion irradiation for emulating reactor irradiation. J. Mater. Res. 30, 1158–1182 (2015).
Abromeit, C. Aspects of simulation of neutron damage by ion irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 216, 78–96 (1994).
Maruyama, I. et al. Development of soundness assessment procedure for concrete members affected by neutron and gamma-ray irradiation. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 15, 440–523 (2017).
Kinchin, G. H. & Pease, R. S. The displacement of atoms in solids by radiation. Rep. Prog. Phys. 18, 1–51 (1955).
Bykov, V. N. et al. Effect of irradiation temperature on the radiation expansion of quartz. Sov. Energy 51, 593–595 (1981).
Harbsmeier, F., Conrad, J. & Bolse, W. Generation and relief of mechanical stresses in ion irradiated SiC and SiO2. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 136, 505–510 (1998).
Snoeks, E., Polman, A. & Volkert, C. A. Densification, anisotropic deformation, and plastic flow of SiO2 during MeV heavy ion irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2487–2489 (1994).
Lee, E. H., Mansur, L. K. & Yoo, M. H. Spatial variation in void volume during charged particle bombardment — the effects of injected interstitials. J. Nucl. Mater. 85–86, 577–581 (1979).
Heintze, C., Bergner, F., Akhmadaliev, S. & Altstadt, E. Ion irradiation combined with nanoindentation as a screening test procedure for irradiation hardening. J. Nucl. Mater. 472, 196–205 (2016).
Stoller, R. E. et al. On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 310, 75–80 (2013).
Saha, U., Devan, K. & Ganesan, S. A study to compute integrated dpa for neutron and ion irradiation environments using SRIM-2013. J. Nucl. Mater. 503, 30–41 (2018).
Norgett, M. J., Robinson, M. T. & Torrens, I. M. A proposed method of calculating displacement dose rates. Nucl. Eng. Des. 33, 50–54 (1975).
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out in part in the Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities and Core Facilities at the Carl R. Woese Institute of Genomic Biology at the University of Illinois. The authors acknowledge support from the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT) and the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) for executing the irradiations. This work was funded by U.S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Energy University Program grant DOE-NEUP: DE- NE0008886. Finally, the authors acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers who greatly helped in improving this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.C.P, S.K.E., S.N.D., E.T.R., M.G.A., C.J.W., K.P., J.S.P., K.E.S., W.L.P., and N.G. contributed to the design of the experiments. K.C.P. performed the characterization experiments and analyzed the data. S.K.E. developed the code for image alignment. Y.L.P. provided data and analysis for neutron radiation equivalent expansions. K.C.P. and N.G. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. N.G., J.S.P., C.J.W., K.E.S., and Y.L.P. acquired funding. N.G. supervised the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Polavaram, K.C., Evani, S.K., Drewry, S.M. et al. Silicon ion radiation as a viable surrogate for emulating neutron radiation damage in silicates. npj Mater Degrad 8, 89 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-024-00506-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-024-00506-1