Abstract
Variations in parameters associated with the ambient environment can introduce noise in soft, body-worn sensors. For example, many piezoresistive pressure sensors exhibit a high degree of sensitivity to fluctuations in temperature, thereby requiring active compensation strategies. The research presented here addresses this challenge with a multilayered 3D microsystem design that integrates four piezoresistive sensors in a full-Wheatstone bridge configuration. An optimized layout of the sensors relative to the neutral mechanical plane leads to both an insensitivity to temperature and an increased sensitivity to pressure, relative to previously reported devices that rely on similar operating principles. Integrating this 3D pressure sensor into a soft, flexible electronics platform yields a system capable of real-time, wireless measurements from the surface of the skin. Placement above the radial and carotid arteries yields high-quality waveforms associated with pulsatile blood flow, with quantitative correlations to blood pressure. The results establish the materials and engineering aspects of a technology with broad potential in remote health monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases represent leading causes of mortality, emphasizing the necessity for effective and continuous monitoring systems to facilitate proactive management of these conditions1,2. Most existing approaches rely on wired systems confined to use in hospitals3. Despite the development of advanced technologies that overcome some of these limitations4,5,6,7, challenges remain in monitoring of dynamic processes such as time-dependent pressures associated with pulsatile blood flow8,9, in ways that are insensitive to variations in temperature and other characteristics of the ambient.
The research summarized here contributes to this field through the introduction of a three-dimensional (3D) piezoresistive sensor that automatically compensates for temperature variations by use of a Wheatstone bridge architecture and an optimized mechanical layout. Combining these sensors with Bluetooth wireless communication technology in systems that exploit the design principles of soft electronics9,10,11,12, yields capabilities in continuous measurements of hemodynamic properties, including correlations to blood pressure, in skin-interfaced platforms that mount gently on the wrist or neck. The result can support monitoring in home settings with minimal disruption to normal daily activities. The following presents all of the materials and engineering details associated with these devices and illustrates their use in monitoring of cardiovascular conditions, with quantitative comparisons to standard methods.
Results
Figure 1a shows an exploded view schematic illustration of a lithographically fabricated multilayer stack that includes (i) a layer of polyimide (PI; PI2545, HD MicroSystems; 4 μm in thickness) on the bottom as a support, (ii) a network of interconnects and two resistive strain gauges connected in series (a trace of Cr/Au in a serpentine geometry; width 3 μm; thickness 5/45 nm; resistance 520 ohms), (iii) a layer of PI (4 μm in thickness) as a middle separating layer, (iv) a network of interconnects and two strain gauges (a trace of Cr/Au; width 3 μm; thickness 5/50 nm; resistance, 480 ohms), and (v) a layer of PI (4 μm in thickness) on the top as encapsulation. Mechanically guided assembly13,14,15,16,17,18 transforms a microfabricated 2D multilayer stack with this layout into a 3D Multiple strain gauge Integrated smart Sensor (3MIS) (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 1). The two sets of gold traces located on the four legs of the resulting table-shaped 3D structure have similar resistance (~500 ohms). This layout defines a Wheatstone full bridge circuit to convert the resistance change associated with the strain sensors (R1, R2, R3, and R4) into a voltage change. The bridge circuit has two parallel resistive branches that act as voltage dividers for the reference voltage (VREF; 3.3 V). The voltage output of the bridge (VO) is 0 V when the bridge is balanced (i.e., \(\frac{{R}_{1}}{{R}_{1}+{R}_{4}}=\frac{{R}_{2}}{{R}_{2}+{R}_{3}}\)), according to the following equation.
Application of normal pressure onto the 3MIS induces tensile and compressive deformations of the metal traces placed above and below the mechanical neutral plane. The result is an increase (R1 and R3) and decrease (R2 and R4) in the resistances of the metal traces (Fig. 1c–e). The circuit increases the bridge output following changes in the resistance of each strain sensor. A subsequent amplifier (AMP) amplifies this output with a fixed gain of 6 V/V, resulting in an AMP output voltage (VP) of VP = 6VO.
Figure 1f shows a linear correlation (\({pressure}=400\times {V}_{p}/{V}_{{ref}})\) between the AMP output voltage change (VP/VREF) and the applied pressure, measured while simultaneously recording the associated deformation using a force measurement system (FMS; motorized force tester, Mark-10, Supplementary Fig. 2). The sensors exhibit reliable values under different loading pressures (Supplementary Fig. 3). The designs and material selections of the 3MIS optimize for linear response in a relatively low-pressure range of interest for measurements of superficial pressure (0–200 mmHg) on the skin associated with pulsatile blood flow.
Encapsulating a 3MIS in a silicone elastomer (Ecoflex 00-30) with an acrylic ring as a frame, with serpentine PI layers (SPL) ensures mechanically stable operation and resistance to shear stresses. The dimensions of the 3MIS and the assembled sensor are 1.2 mm × 0.5 mm and 2.8 mm × 875 μm, respectively (radius × thickness, Fig. 2a). Placing the assembled sensor on a layer of conductive epoxy (8331 Silver Adhesive; MG Chemicals) on a flexible printed circuit board (PCB) forms an electrical connection. Piezoresistive strain sensors of this general type19,20,21 respond both to changes in deformation and temperature. The quarter-bridge (QB) configuration shown in Fig. 2b exploits one microfabricated piezoresistive sensor (\({R}_{4}\)) and 3 commercial resistors (\({R}_{c}\) 500 ohm, SMD 0201 thick film resistor). The changes in the resistance of \({R}_{4}\) and \({R}_{c}\) with temperature are different, such that \({V}_{P}\) varies with ambient temperature in the absence of deformation. By comparison, four microfabricated piezoresistive sensors in a full-bridge (FB) configuration exhibit identical changes in resistance with temperature, thus eliminating significant variations for temperatures between 25 and 40 °C (Fig. 2c). The result in Fig. 2d compares the pressure responses of devices with the FB and QB designs. The sensitivity of the FB case (slope = 0.0031) is three times higher than that of the QB (slope = 0.009). Following Eq. (1), when normal pressure is applied to the 3MIS sensor, the value of \({R}_{1}\) increases due to tensile deformation. In contrast, the value of \({R}_{2}\) decreases due to compressive deformations. Both responses depend linearly on pressure (R2 = 0.995) over a range of 200 mmHg. These comparisons of sensitivity to pressure and temperature highlight the advantages of the FB design in the 3MIS sensor. Measurements to explore the thermal effects involve both sensors in an ambient condition (Supplementary Fig. 4) and on a hot plate at a temperature of 30 °C, while applying pressure (100 mmHg) using a metal disc at room temperature (23 °C) (Fig. 2e). Cycling between these two temperatures induces thermal drifts (QB sensor requires more than 30 s for recovery) that lead to hysteresis and associated inaccuracies in measurements of pressure with the QB design (Fig. 2f, g).
Tests of the response under shear stresses validate design choices to ensure responses only to normal pressure. Here, the geometry of the SPL is important. Tests using a motorized force tester and modeling by FEA summarized in Fig. 3a indicate an insensitivity of the encapsulated 3MIS system to shear stresses. Specifically, the application of force (0.1 N) against the side of the PI cylinder placed on top of the sensor oriented along the n-axis (Fig. 3b) and the m-axis (Fig. 3c) leads to stresses concentrated near the periphery of the interface between the assembled sensor and the bottom substrate. Stresses around the 3D sensing structure are negligible. In experiments to validate the enhanced mechanical stability of the pressure sensor induced by the SPL, a motorized force tester applies a normal load onto the side of the sensors (Supplementary Fig. 5). In Fig. 3d, the sensor without the SPL malfunctions under shear stress. In contrast, the sensor with the SPL is stable under a shear stress of 0.1 N. After removing the shear stress, the sensor recovers its original shape and returns a reading of 0 mmHg (Fig. 3e). In separate tests using the FMS to apply normal pressures from 0 to 100 mmHg indicates stable operation over 1000 cycles (Fig. 3f).
The 3MIS pressure sensors reported have optimized dynamic range, accuracy, and time response for measurements of variations of superficial pressures (less than 100 mmHg) associated with blood flow through near-surface blood vessels22,23. The recorded pressure waveforms provide insights into cardiovascular health through measurements of heart rate and, with appropriate calibration, blood pressure. Elastomeric tubing embedded in artificial skin and pumped with water using a system to simulate pulsatile hemodynamics24 serves as the basis for benchtop validation, as shown in Fig. 4a. Specifically, this setup consists of a pulse generator, two water cylinders, and tubing to simulate the heart, blood supply, and blood vessels, respectively. The phantom skin consists of a silicone-based elastomer (Young’s modulus E = 60 kPa for Ecoflex 00-30). The 3MIS rests on the surface of the artificial skin above the artificial blood vessel, which consists of a different silicone elastomer formulation (E = ~ 2.0 MPa) with outer and inner diameters of 4.5 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively (Fig. 4b). A metal post rests on the top of the sensor to provide a fixed downward pressure of ~35 mmHg. Transformation of pressures measured with the 3MIS to the pressures produced by the artificial heart system exploits a dimensionless factor k that depends on the mechanical properties of the phantom skin25 and experimental data, according to the following equation;
The coefficient of proportionality k is experimentally determined to 2.1. Figure 4c shows the results of this transformation for the case of data recorded at four different pulse frequencies (50 Hz, 70 Hz, 90 Hz, 110 Hz) over a period of 120 s. A reference pressure sensor in the simulator system and the 3MIS on the skin phantom measure changes in pressure (Fig. 4c, d). The normalized waveforms recorded in this manner show excellent agreement for these four different pulse frequencies (Fig. 4e).
A complete wireless system that integrates this technology includes a flexible printed circuit board (PCB) with the following constituent layers and components: silicone encapsulation, a coin cell battery (CR1229), a 3MIS pressure sensor (R1, R2, R3, R4), an NTC temperature sensor (RT) and other standard electronics (Fig. 5a, b). The substrate is a thin, flexible copper-clad polyimide (PI) film (AP8535R, Pyralux) processed with a laser cutting tool (ProtoLaser U4, LPKF) to yield conductive traces that interconnect a Bluetooth low energy (BLE) system on a chip and Wheatstone bridge circuits configured with the NTC (Fig. 5c). The thin, flexible and lightweight construction yields a soft, comfortable interface to the skin at the locations of the radial and carotid arteries (Fig. 5d, f). Data collected with this system yield clear pulse waveforms with features that correspond to expected systolic peaks (SP) and diastolic peaks (DP) and notches (Fig. 5e, g).
Practical studies involve normal healthy subjects. A reference measurement set-up (Finapress® NOVA) mounts on a finger and at the chest for recordings captured simultaneously with a 3MIS device held at the radial artery with an adjustable wristband (Fig. 6a). Adhesive tape on the backside of the device provides secure attachment on the radial artery. The wristband applies a stable pressure of ~40 mmHg on the pressure sensor and ensures adhesion between the device and skin (Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Video 1). The value of k depends on the skin modulus. For the sensor applied onto the radial artery, the k value is 2.1. A calibration process enables precise measurements for individual subjects. In Fig. 6b, experimentally acquired k from the 3MIS and reference system (subject 1: 2.2, subject 2: 2.1, subject 3: 2.15) transforms \({P}_{{sensor}}\) to BP. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) serves as a metric to compare results from the 3MIS and reference system, according to,
The experiments involve recording cardiovascular information for 10 min as the subject performs a Valsalva maneuver (a forceful attempt of exhalation against a closed airway) for 30 s, a breath hold for 90 s and an immersion of the opposite hand into ice water for 70 s (Supplementary Fig. 7). A sequence of rapid changes in preload and after load stress causes changes in heart rate (HR) and MAP due to an increase in intrathoracic pressure appear, as expected, in the data collected from these two different measurement systems (Fig. 6c). Expected changes also appear from elevations in MAP and HR due to breath holding and elevations in MAP and decreases in HR due to ice water immersion. MAP, HR, SP and DP collected by the reference and 3MIS devices from three healthy subjects show excellent agreement in the Bland-Altman plot (Fig. 6d, e). The system performs pressure measurements at a 100 Hz sampling rate and transmits an averaged pressure value every 0.25 s (4 Hz) to a smart device. The replaceable battery for these measurements (CR 1220; 3 V, 37 mA h) has an expected lifetime of 30 days.
Discussion
In this research, we developed a soft, 3D piezoresistive sensor system for continuous monitoring of pressure, with a focus on applications in healthcare. The designs offer advantages in sensitivity to pressure and insensitivity to temperature compared to previously reported devices that use similar sensing principles. The key feature is a full Wheatstone bridge configuration that eliminates the need to calibrate the sensor for variations in temperature. This design also improves the sensitivity for measurements of pressure relevant to cardiovascular conditions.
The system exhibits a linear response, free of hysteresis with optimized performance in measurements of superficial pressure on the skin. Soft elastomeric polymers for encapsulation and rigid framing structures ensure comfortable, but robust interfaces to the body with sensitivity only to normal pressures. A system level embodiment integrates the sensor into a flexible PCB platform that supports wireless communication via BLE technology. Practical studies involving normal healthy subjects validate the performance of the sensor system, showing good agreement with a reference standard measurement setup for capturing cardiovascular information such as MAP and HR. These results suggest the potential for broad applications in healthcare management, through early interventions and personalized care.
Methods
Fabrication of the 3MIS sensor
Preparation of 2D precursor structures began with spin coating (3000 rpm for 30 s) and curing (180 °C for 2 min) a thin layer of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) on a clean glass slide, followed by spin coating and fully curing (260 °C for 1 h) a layer of PI (4 μm; PI-2545, HD MicroSystems). Electron beam evaporation formed thin films of chrome (Cr, 5 nm) and gold (Au, 45 nm) on the PI. Photolithography and lift-off processes yielded bottom serpentine gold patterns in these thin metal films. Spin coating and curing another layer of PI (4 μm) created an insulating polyimide film on these conductive features. Electron beam evaporation formed thin films of Cr and Au (5 nm and 50 nm) ona PI film; top gold serpentine patterns were prepared by photolithography. Spin coating and curing the final layer of PI (4 μm) created an insulating top film. A thin layer of copper (Cu, 100 nm) deposited on the PI by sputtering and patterned by photolithography and wet etching served as a hard mask for oxygen plasma etching (220 mT, 200 W, 120 min) of the exposed regions of the PI. Immersion in acetone overnight dissolved the underlying PMMA, thereby allowing the structures to be retrieved from the glass slide. Transferring this 2D precursor onto the surface of a poly(dimethylsiloxane) stamp and again onto the surface of a water-soluble tape prepared the system for the geometry transformation. This process involved laminating the 2D precursor/poly(vinyl alcohol) tape on top of an elastomer substrate prestretched to an equal biaxial strain of 30%. Dissolving the PVA tape with water and releasing the pre-stretch transformed the 2D precursors into 3D mesostructures, with the rectangular-shaped contact areas as bonding sites. Encapsulating the 3D structure in Ecoflex 00-30 (Smooth-On, PA, USA) using a mold (diameter, 3 mm; height, 500 μm) completed the fabrication. Placing the encapsulated 3D structures on an FPCB allowed for electrical interconnection using a conductive epoxy. A ring-shaped structure of acrylic and PI layers stacked on the 3D sensor provided mechanical stability. Illustrations in Supplementary Fig. 1 feature each step in detail.
Fabrication of the electronics
The FPCB design layouts were created using EAGLE CAD version 9 (Autodesk). To fabricate the FPCB, a sheet of FPCB with a thickness of 12 μm for the top and bottom copper layers and 25 μm for the middle PI layer (AP7164R, DuPont) was patterned into the required shapes using an ultraviolet laser cutter (LPKF U4). The 3D pressure sensor, along with various surface-mount components including the BLE SoC (nRF52832, Nordic Semiconductor), BLE antenna (2450AT18A100, Johanson Technology Inc.), AMP (INA333, Texas Instruments), reference resistors (RMCF0201FT, Stackpole Electronics Inc.), and temperature sensor components (NTC; NCP03XH, Murata), were joined to the FPCB using solder paste (Chip Quik TS391LT) and reflowed using a heat gun (AOYUE Int866). The temperature sensor components were chosen for their high accuracy in resistance and long-term stability.
Assembly of wireless systems
To begin the encapsulation process, a soft silicone film (SILBIONE RTV 4420; A&B, Bluestar Silicones) was spin-cast at 250 rpm and thermally cured at 100 °C in an oven for 20 min onto a glass slide, forming the bottom layer. Aluminum molds with specific geometries, defined by 3D computer-aided design drawings generated using SOLIDWORKS 2020, were created using a milling machine (Roland MDX-540). The capping membrane was formed by casting a liquid precursor of a silicone polymer (SILBIONE RTV 4420; A&B, Bluestar Silicones) and thermally curing it in an oven at 100 °C for 20 min. A CO2 laser cutting process (Universal Laser Systems, Inc.) created an opening on the capping layer for the pressure sensor and a replaceable battery. A manual alignment process aligned the openings on the capping layer with the pressure sensor and battery on the FPCB.
Characterizing the pressure sensors
Changes in resistance and calibrated pressure readings from the 3D sensor as a function of pressure applied using an FMS (RSA-G2 Solids Analyzer, TA Instruments) were stored through wireless communication.
Characterizing the temperature-independent property of sensors
QB sensor and FB (compensated 0 mmHg at 30 °C) sensors were placed on the hot plate (30 °C) for 10 min and the pressure of QB sensor is compensated as 0 mmHg. Calibrated pressure from both sensors was stored through a digital multimeter while FMS applied 100 mmHg pressure using metal disk (Room temperature, 23 °C).
Feasibility tests of the wireless devices
The studies involved a volunteer (subject 1: male, 29 years old, subject 2: male, 38 years old, subject 3: male, 40 years old) with a pressure sensor placed on the radial artery. While lying on a medical bed, pressures were measured and compared with reference measurement set-up. The same volunteer performed various activities (Valsalva maneuver and holding breath, and ice-bag) with the 3MIS.
Processing sensor data
To process the sensor data, calculated pressure values were transferred from the sensor to smart devices using Bluetooth wireless system. The Python scipy.signal.find_peaks algorithm was used to find the systolic and diastolic peaks.
Finite element analysis
3D finite element analysis (FEA) was performed in the software package Abaqus to capture the nonlinear postbuckling behaviors of 2D precursor structures, and to analyze the mechanical performance of the 3D structures and the wireless electronic device. Linear buckling analysis was performed for the 2D precursor structure to determine the critical buckling strain and corresponding buckling mode. Initial geometric imperfections according to the buckling mode were implemented in postbuckling analysis. The deformed configurations and stress/strain distributions of the 3D mesoscale structure were obtained from FEA. Eight-node solid elements and four-node shell elements were chosen for the silicone materials (e.g., assembly substrate, encapsulation, etc.) and the 2D precursor structures (i.e., PI thin films with metal traces), based on the design specifics. The Mooney-Rivlin strain energy potential model was used for elastomeric materials with hyperelastic behavior. PDMS (10:1) was modeled as incompressible, with an elastic modulus EPDMS = 1.8 MPa. Ecoflex 00-30 was modeled as incompressible, with an elastic modulus EEcoflex = 60 kPa. PI and PMMA were modeled with linear elastic behavior, with an elastic modulus of EPI = 2.5 GPa and a Poisson’s ratio of νPI = 0.34 for PI, and an elastic modulus of EPMMA = 3.1 GPa and a Poisson’s ratio of νPMMA = 0.37 for PMMA, respectively. Metal materials, such as gold (Au) and copper (Cu), were modeled as elastoplastic (without hardening; yield strain chosen as 0.3%). The elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio are EAu = 78 GPa and νAu = 0.44 for Au and ECu = 119 GPa and νCu = 0.34 for Cu, respectively.
Clinical studies
This study was approved by Northwestern University’s Institutional Review Board, under trial registration numbers STU00202449 and STU00212522. After informed consent from all participants, participants wore reference measurement set-up and the 3MIS system was placed on the radial artery by trained research staff, and interface pressures through 3MIS were recorded.
Data availability
Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Sana, F. et al. Wearable devices for ambulatory cardiac monitoring: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 75, 1582 (2020).
Bayoumy, K. et al. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 18, 581–599 (2021).
Drew, B. J. et al. Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings. Circulation 110, 2721–2746 (2004).
Kuehn, B. M. Telemedicine helps cardiologists extend their reach. Circulation 134, 1189–1191 (2016).
Rha, J. Y. et al. What drives the use of wearable healthcare devices? A cross-country comparison between the US and Korea. 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221120319 (2022).
Hobensack, M., Song, J., Scharp, D., Bowles, K. H. & Topaz, M. Machine learning applied to electronic health record data in home healthcare: a scoping review. Int J. Med Inf. 170, 104978 (2023).
White, E. M., Wetle, T. F., Reddy, A. & Baier, R. R. Front-line nursing home staff experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Am. Med Dir. Assoc. 22, 199–203 (2021).
Kim, J. et al. Soft wearable pressure sensors for beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring. Adv. Health. Mater. 8, 1900109 (2019).
Kwon, K. et al. An on-skin platform for wireless monitoring of flow rate, cumulative loss and temperature of sweat in real time. Nat. Electron. 2021 4, 302–312 (2021).
Bandodkar, A. J., Jeang, W. J., Ghaffari, R. & Rogers, J. A. Wearable sensors for biochemical sweat analysis. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 12, 1–22 (2019).
Kwon, K. et al. Wireless, soft electronics for rapid, multisensor measurements of hydration levels in healthy and diseased skin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2020398118 (2021).
Shin, J. et al. Wireless, soft sensors of skin hydration with designs optimized for rapid, accurate diagnostics of dermatological health. Adv. Health. Mater. 12, 2202021 (2023).
Kim, B. H. et al. Three-dimensional silicon electronic systems fabricated by compressive buckling process. ACS Nano 12, 4164–4171 (2018).
Park, Y. et al. Three-dimensional, multifunctional neural interfaces for cortical spheroids and engineered assembloids. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf9153 (2021).
Ning, X. et al. Mechanically active materials in three-dimensional mesostructures. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat8313 (2018).
Xu, S. et al. Assembly of micro/nanomaterials into complex, three-dimensional a by compressive buckling. Science 347, 154–159 (2015).
Wang, X. et al. Three-dimensional electronic scaffolds for monitoring and regulation of multifunctional hybrid tissues. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 35, 1–9 (2020).
Park, Y., Chung, T. S., Lee, G. & Rogers, J. A. Materials chemistry of neural interface technologies and recent advances in three-dimensional systems. Chem. Rev. 122, 5277–5316 (2022).
Park, Y. et al. Wireless, skin-interfaced sensors for compression therapy. Sci. Adv. 6, 1–10 (2020).
Won, S. M. et al. Multimodal sensing with a three-dimensional piezoresistive structure. ACS Nano 13, 10972–10979 (2019).
Kwak, J. W. et al. Wireless sensors for continuous, multimodal measurements at the skin interface with lower limb prostheses. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, 4327 (2020).
Webb, R. C. et al. Epidermal devices for noninvasive, precise, and continuous mapping of macrovascular and microvascular blood flow. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500701 (2015).
Chi, Y. W., Tseng, K. H., Li, R. & Pan, T. Comparison of piezoresistive sensor to PicoPress® in in-vitro interface pressure measurement. Phlebology 33, 315–320 (2018).
Kwon, K. et al. A battery-less wireless implant for the continuous monitoring of vascular pressure, flow rate and temperature. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2023 3, 1–14 (2023).
Li, S. et al. Measurement of blood pressure via a skin-mounted, non-invasive pressure sensor. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. 88, 101008 (2021).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from Kyung Hee University in 2022 (KHU-20220916). We thank the Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics for its support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.P., H.L., and K.K. contributed equally to this work. Y.P. and J.A.R. conceived of the overall research goals and aims; Y.P., H.L., and J.A.R. performed the designs and engineering investigation of the sensor. Y.P., K.K., T.S.C., G.C., J.K., H.-P.P., and S.K. manufactured the sensors and wireless devices. K.K., S.Y., and S.S.K. designed the hardware for the wireless electronics platform. K.K., S.O., and J-.Y.Y. performed software design and software validation. H.L. performed mechanical modeling. Y.P., J.S., W.S.M., Y.J., and T.S.C. performed in vitro characterizations. Y.P., J.C., H.J., J-.Y.Y., J.S., H-.J.Y., and T.S.C. performed clinical data collection and analysis. Y.P. and J.A.R. were responsible for original drafting of the manuscript and all authors assisted in critical editing and review of the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, Y., Luan, H., Kwon, K. et al. Soft, full Wheatstone bridge 3D pressure sensors for cardiovascular monitoring. npj Flex Electron 8, 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-024-00294-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-024-00294-3