Abstract
ANO5 encodes transmembrane protein 16E (TMEM16E), an intracellular calcium-activated chloride channel in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mutations in ANO5 are associated with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia (GDD), a skeletal disorder causing the jaw deformity and long bone fractures. However, the coordinated mechanism by which ANO5 mediates bone homeostasis in GDD remains poorly defined. Here, we show that ablation of Ano5 reduced intracellular calcium transients, leading to defects in osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis and thus bone dysplasia. We found a causative de novo ANO5 frameshift insertion mutation (p.L370_A371insDYWRLNSTCL) in a GDD family with osteopenia, accompanied by a decrease in TMEM16E expression and impaired RANKL-induced intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) oscillations in osteoclasts. Moreover, using Ano5 knockout (KO) mice, we found that they exhibited low bone volume, abnormal calcium deposits, and defective osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. We also showed that Ano5 deletion in mice significantly diminished [Ca2+]i oscillations in both osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which resulted in reduced WNT/β-Catenin and RANKL-NFATc1 signaling, respectively. Osteoanabolic treatment of parathyroid hormone was effective in enhancing bone strength in Ano5 KO mice. Consequently, these data demonstrate that Ano5 positively modulates bone homeostasis via calcium signaling in GDD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Skeletal bone is continuously remodeled by the bone formation and resorption achieved by the coordinated action of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in both time and space1; thus, imbalances in bone homeostasis cause various skeletal disorders2. As we previously reported in an affected family, gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia (GDD) is a rare autosomal dominant (AD) skeletal syndrome involving skeletal abnormalities such as fibro-osseous lesions of the jawbones, bone fragility, bowing of the lower limbs, and frequent severe fractures at early onset3,4,5.
Heterozygous mutations in the ANO5 gene are by far the most common cause of GDD6,7,8,9. In addition, homozygous mutations in ANO5 are also associated with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2L (LGMD2 L) and Miyoshi-like distal myopathy (MMD3)10,11,12. TMEM16E is highly expressed in bone and skeletal muscle, suggesting its important role in the musculoskeletal system6,7. Concerning this issue, few Ano5 gene editing animal models have been applied to investigate and dissect the function of Ano5 in skeletal and muscular disease13,14,15,16,17. Although some aspects of the muscular phenotype were successfully displayed in Ano5-deficient mice and rabbits13,15, recapitulation of the stable skeletal phenotype has encountered some obstacles and difficulties14,16. Specifically, a study showed that marked increases in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone matrix mineralization were observed in Ano5 knockout (KO) mice15; however, a similar skeletal phenotype could not be produced in another study16.
TMEM16E, encoding 913 amino acids, specifically localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), is a member of the TMEM16/anoctamin protein family with 10 membrane-spanning helices. These proteins are involved in a variety of functions, including ion transients (Ca2+-activated Cl channels, CaCCs), calcium-dependent phospholipid scrambling (PLS), and regulation of other membrane proteins18,19,20,21,22,23,24. It was proposed that TMEM16E plays a role in muscle repair through a mechanism involving Ca2+ transients at the ER and annexins25,26 or Ca2+-activated phospholipid scramblases (PLSases)27,28. However, GDD‐related mutations are postulated to confer constitutive scrambling activity without the requirement of elevated cytosolic calcium29, so the exact molecular function of TMEM16E-regulated Ca2+ transients in bone homeostasis remains elusive.
Here, we report a de novo pathogenic ANO5 frameshift insertion mutation in a GDD family. We also show that loss-of-function (LOF) of TMEM16E is associated with decreased mandibular and trabecular bone volume due to reduced osteoblast number, maturation, and bone-forming activity, as well as more significantly reduced osteoclast number and activity, in humans and mice. Moreover, TMEM16E is a regulator of Ca2+ transients via ER membrane-mediated Ca2+ signaling pathways, which are critical for WNT/β-Catenin activation for proper osteoblast generation and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-induced nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) activation of osteoclast generation. Accordingly, osteoanabolic treatment, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) supplementation, can be used to ameliorate skeletal metabolism disorders in GDD patients. Overall, our data strongly suggest that Ano5 constitutes a target for the treatment of bone homeostasis disorders.
Results
Patients with GDD and osteopenia carrying ANO5 insertion mutations present loss of TMEM16E
A 22‐year‐old female was recruited at our hospital for recurrence of a large benign tumor in her oral cavity from 6 years old. Gradual and incessant enlargement involving the entire corpus of the maxilla caused severe facial disfigurement, and diaphyseal cortical thickening and mild bowing of tubular bones were also observed (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Fig. 1 a, b, III6). The patient sought to treat the maxillary mass and improve the mandibular deformity caused by the last operation 10 years ago. Therefore, we performed surgical treatment, and the histology of the jawbone lesions showed fibroblastic tissue proliferation intermixed with predominantly “cementum-like deposits” (Supplementary Fig. 1d, III6). We observed that similar skeletal abnormalities also occurred in other family members (Supplementary Fig. 1a–d). Moreover, the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan revealed low BMD with low T and Z scores in the lumbar spine L1–L4 and right femoral neck in patients and even showed osteoporosis in the proband’s two daughters (IV5, IV6) (Fig. 1 c, d). Laboratory serum tests further revealed low levels of the bone formation markers N-terminal/midregion (N-MID), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and bone resorption marker beta isomer of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (beta-CTx) in young patients IV5 and IV6, and a severe deficiency in the calcium uptake marker 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-VitD) in most patients (Fig. 1f). The detailed clinical findings of the probands and other affected patients are provided in Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1. The grandfather of the proband passed away before we established connection with him, and he also suffered from slightly swollen jawbones without any surgical treatment, according to family members. When hereditary, histologic and laboratory features were taken into consideration with clinical and radiographic features, GDD was the most appropriate diagnosis.
We illustrated the distribution of affected members in four generations of this family (Fig. 1e) and selectively performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) on 4 patients (II4, III6, III10, IV5) and 4 controls (II5, II10, III5, III8). After filtering, 9 gene variants remained (Supplementary Table 1, see the section “Methods”). Sanger sequencing of 1 other patient (IV6) and 4 other controls (II2, II7, III14, III15) confirmed a heterozygous ANO5 frameshift insertion mutation (c.1080_1081insGATTATTGGAGACTAAATAGTACGTGTTTG, p.L370_A371insDYWRLNSTCL) (NM_213599.3) in exon 11 that was strongly predicted to be causative and a stop codon (Fig. 1g, Supplementary Table 2, see the section “Methods”). The TMEM16E insertion lies near the second transmembrane domain (TMD), which may cause the loss of predicted TMDs after the first TMD in the mutant TMEM16E protein (Fig. 1h). To assess the possible intracellular involvement of TMEM16E by using its antibody (aa 792–819), we studied TMEM16E expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) extracted from patients and controls. TMEM16E protein expression in patients was significantly lower in the GDD patients than in the controls (Fig. 1i). Taken together, these findings indicate that the heterozygous frameshift insertion mutation in exon 11 of the ANO5 gene results in downregulated TMEM16E protein and the occurrence of GDD.
Ano5 deletion decreases bone formation and resorption, resulting in reduced bone volume in mice
To substantiate the role of the loss of TMEM16E as a trigger of the GDD phenotype, we used a well-established Ano5 KO mouse model17 and age- and sex-matched C57BL6/J mice as wild-type (WT) controls. Genotyping RT–PCR analysis revealed the presence of the KO allele in the heterozygous and homozygous mice, as expected, and the WT allele was not detected in the homozygous mice (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Four weeks after birth, bone microstructure μCT imaging of heterozygous Ano5+/− and homozygous Ano5−/−mice revealed modest decreases in bone volume in both the femur and mandible, characterized by lower bone indices, including bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) and BMD (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). Ano5+/−mice were phenotypically similar to Ano5−/− mice and exhibited GDD-like skeletal phenotypes. To further identify changes in bone remodeling at an age similar to that of onset in humans, we analyzed 8-week-old Ano5−/− homozygous mice. μCT analysis of the femur revealed that the femoral tubercular BV/TV was 23% lower, the trabecular thickness (Tb. Th) was 14% lower, and the trabecular separation (Tb. Sp) was 1.2-fold higher in Ano5−/− mice than in control mice (Fig. 2a). In cortical bone, bone indices, including BV/TV, percent cross-sectional bone area (B.Ar/T. Ar), and percent cross-sectional bone perimeter (B. Pm/T. Pm) were not different between the groups (Supplementary Fig. 2d). The low bone volume phenotype was also reproduced in the mandible: the BV/TV was 34% lower, and the Tb. N was 10% lower in Ano5−/− mice than in controls (Fig. 2e).
Bone sections with Von Kossa staining also showed decreased trabecular bone surface area in Ano5−/− versus WT mice (Fig. 2b). To elucidate the involved mechanisms, we assessed osteoblast and osteoclast activity status in bone sections by analyzing dynamic bone formation and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP). Bone sections subjected to calcein green/alizarin red (AR) double labeling showed a decreased mineral apposition rate (MAR) in Ano5−/− versus WT mice (Fig. 2c). Concerning osteoclast status, TRAP-stained bone sections exhibited a reduction in osteoclast numbers and osteoclast surface size in Ano5−/− versus WT mice (Fig. 2d, f). These data suggest that the absence of Ano5 results in an intrinsic defect in bone formation and resorption in vivo.
Ano5 positively regulates osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation
To determine the cellular basis for the role of Ano5 in osteoblast generation, we compared the differentiation capacity and bone-forming potential of primary calvarial osteoblasts and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) from WT and Ano5−/− mice. Additionally, to assess whether the alterations detected in Ano5-deficient osteoblasts were attributable to Ano5 compensatory mechanisms, we re-expressed Ano5 in WT and Ano5−/− calvarial osteoblasts by administration of adenoviruses encoding either Ano5 or control vector (Fig. 3a). Cell proliferation rates were lower in Ano5−/− than WT osteoblasts over a 7-day culture period, and they remained unchanged upon Ano5 re-expression (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 3a). Ano5−/− osteoblast cultures showed reduced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 3b, d) and significantly fewer bone nodules than WT cultures after 3 weeks in differentiation media (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). After Ano5 re-expression, ALP activity was slightly increased in Ano5−/− osteoblasts, and the mineral nodule formation ability was obviously improved in WT osteoblasts and partly improved in Ano5−/− osteoblasts (Fig. 3c, d). Likewise, decreased differentiation potential was confirmed by reduced mRNA expression of osteocalcin (Ocn) and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (Spp1) in differentiating Ano5−/− osteoblasts (Fig. 3e), and the expression of those genes was markedly upregulated after Ano5 re-expression in Ano5−/− and WT osteoblasts (Fig. 3f). Thus, similar to their counterparts in vivo, Ano5−/− osteoblasts differentiated poorly and showed functional defects in matrix deposition and bone formation.
To determine the intrinsic cellular role of Ano5 in osteoclast generation, we compared the proliferation rates of Ano5−/− and WT bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) and those after Ano5 re-expression in vitro (Fig. 4a). When purified BMMs were induced to become mature osteoclasts with RANKL, significantly fewer TRAP+ multinucleated cells (MNCs) were observed in Ano5−/− BMMs than in WT BMMs, and they returned to control levels after re-expressing Ano5 in Ano5−/− BMMs (Fig. 4b). We also revealed that the levels of Trap, Nfatc1, c-Fos, and cathepsin K (Ctsk), which are markers of differentiated osteoclasts, were significantly lower (Fig. 4c) but markedly upregulated after Ano5 re-expression in Ano5−/− cells (Fig. 4d). These results suggest that Ano5 is a crucial regulator of osteoclast differentiation, as its absence reduced the number of mature osteoclasts. Overall, Ano5 is directly responsible for the cellular functions of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, including differentiation, bone remodeling, and gene transcription.
LOF of TMEM16E impairs intracellular calcium oscillations
To assess whether TMEM16E may regulate Ca2+ homeostasis in bone metabolism by regulating intracellular Ca2+ oscillations, we analyzed the dynamic [Ca2+]i changes in Ano5−/− BMM-induced osteoclasts. We showed that RANKL-induced [Ca2+]i slowly increased and returned to baseline in Ano5−/− osteoclasts compared with WT osteoclasts, whereas no changes were observed for BMMs cultured without RANKL (Fig. 5a left). After stimulation with ionomycin, the average number of peaks of [Ca2+]i oscillations was dramatically enhanced in Ano5−/− osteoclasts and remained the same in WT osteoclasts (Fig. 5a right). We next studied TMEM16E-mediated Ca2+ changes in osteoclasts cultured from PBMCs in GDD patients and normal controls. We did observe few differences in the [Ca2+]i oscillations between normal control macrophages and GDD patient macrophages (Fig. 5b left). Furthermore, we examined RANKL-induced [Ca2+]i oscillations, which were impaired in patients’ osteoclasts, exhibiting much lower and slower returns to baseline levels (Fig. 5b left). After being induced by ionomycin, Ca2+ transients were significantly elevated in both groups (Fig. 5b right). To investigate RANKL-dependent signaling pathways and the calcium-NFATc1 pathway driving osteoclastogenesis, we performed Western blotting on RANKL-treated BMMs. After long-term stimulation with RANKL, the nuclear expression levels of c-Fos and NFATc1 were decreased in Ano5−/− BMMs compared with WT BMMs (Fig. 5d). These data suggest that LOF of TMEM16E can block RANKL-induced c-Fos and NFATc protein translocation into the cell nucleus.
Given the role of Ano5 in matrix deposition and bone formation, we explored whether [Ca2+]i oscillations might be changed in Ano5−/− osteoblasts. Consistent with the results in osteoclasts, sustained [Ca2+]i oscillations were observed in WT cells; however, [Ca2+]i oscillations were abolished in osteoblasts from Ano5−/− mice (Fig. 5c). To investigate the calcium-related WNT/β-Catenin pathway during ossification, we performed immunoblotting of total proteins from osteoblasts with antibodies specific for WNT1, β-Catenin, disheveled homolog (Dvl2) and its negative regulator's glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β) and Axin1. The expression of WNT1 was highly downregulated during differentiation in Ano5−/− osteoblasts compared with that in WT osteoblasts, and the expression of β-Catenin and Dvl2 was also downregulated in Ano5−/− osteoblasts compared with WT osteoblasts after 7 days of differentiation (Fig. 5e), whereas the expression of the negative regulators GSK-3β and Ainx1 was upregulated in Ano5−/− and WT osteoblasts (Fig. 5f). Thus, modulation of the WNT/β-Catenin pathway by TMEM16E is necessary for subsequent calcium uptake-induced osteoblast mineralization. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that [Ca2+]i oscillations are substantially decreased in Ano5−/− osteoblasts and osteoclasts, resulting in a reduction in WNT/β-Catenin signaling and NFATc1 activation, which suggests that TMEM16E might function as an intercellular Ca2+-permeable channel in bone metabolism.
PTH enhances bone strength in osteopenia
To find treatment to increase bone density and prevent long bone fractures in GDD patients, we next evaluated the therapeutic potential of the osteoanabolic medicine PTH in osteopenic Ano5−/− and WT mice. After 3 weeks of treatment, there was no effect on the body weight in the four groups (Fig. 6a). PTH achieves an outstanding therapeutic effect in femoral trabecular bone in PTH-treated WT mice, while it exhibits a significant therapeutic effect in femoral cortical bone in Ano5−/− mice. μCT analysis showed that BMD and BV/TV of trabecular femurs were significantly higher in PTH-treated WT mice, while BMD of cortical femurs was typically higher in PTH-treated Ano5−/− mice (Fig. 6b). After PTH treatment in both Ano5−/− and WT mice compared to vehicle-treated controls, histomorphometric Von Kossa staining analysis of the BV/TV ratio was increased (Fig. 6c); double-labeled bone sections also showed obviously increased MAR (Fig. 6d); the number of mature OCN-expressing osteoblasts was higher (Fig. 6e); and the number of TRAP+ matured osteoclasts was higher (Fig. 6f). Overall, our data strongly suggest that PTH, as a calcium intake mediator, partly improved the bone strength and structural characteristics of the femur in the Ano5 loss mouse model.
Discussion
GDD is a rare hereditary systemic skeletal syndrome that includes the maxillofacial bone along with the rest of the bones. To achieve a radical cure and prevent the recurrence of maxillofacial disorders, appropriate surgical management and facial reconstruction are needed in GDD patients5,30,31. However, GDD abnormalities in long bones, the ilium, the skull, and bone mass density lack effective treatments and are also the key factors that distinguish it from common genetic maxillofacial diseases4,32,33,34. Although most patients suffer from similar thickening of the diaphyseal cortex of the femur and frequent fractures, which affect body weight support and daily movement, GDD patients with different ANO5 mutations show diverse phenotypes. Patients with ANO5 p.L370_A371ins mutation in our study showed decreased trabecular dense bony deposits associated with low-bone-mass disorder4,8,32, while those with ANO5 p.Ser500Phe mutation showed increased high bone turnover pathology accompanied by high-bone-mass disorder9,35. Additionally, the mechanisms by which different ANO5 mutations contribute to aberrant bone homeostasis remain unclear. In that case, the identification of ANO5 mediating bone homeostasis will facilitate the development of new therapies and may improve responses to currently available therapies. In this study, by measuring genotypes and phenotypes in a GDD family with low bone mass osteopenia, we report a de novo pathogenic ANO5 frameshift insertion mutation (c.1080_1081insGATTATTGGAGACTAAATAGTACGTGTTTG, p.L370_A371insDYWRLNSTCL). Our results also confirm that the mutation resulted in partial instead of complete LOF of the TMEM16E protein. First, our GDD family with the mutation did not have a history of severe bone fractures, although it presented decreased BMD throughout the body. Besides, we show that the phenotypes of bone loss in heterozygous Ano5+/− mice are similar to but less severe than those in homozygous Ano5−/− mice. Moreover, the introduction of Ano5 into Ano5−/− primary osteoblasts and BMMs was sufficient to rescue osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Thus, our results suggest that ANO5 is dosage-sensitive and that LOF of the TMEM16E protein caused by the heterozygous ANO5 mutation in one allele is partly compensated by another normally functional allele.
The [Ca2+]i concentration in bone cells is high, and maintenance of its concentration and external Ca2+ balance is crucial for bone homeostasis. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of intracellular Ca2+ signaling for osteoclast differentiation36,37,38. There are two sources of intracellular calcium in cells: inflow from the extracellular space and release from intracellular stores, such as the ER39. Notably, Ca2+-mobilized from ER stores increases the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and calcium oscillations and then activates NFATc1, which translocates to the nucleus and induces osteoclast-specific gene transcription, promoting osteoclast differentiation40,41. On the other hand, RANKL also evokes calcium oscillations, leading to the activation of NFATc136. Moreover, intercellular communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts through calcium oscillations contributes to efficient osteoclastogenesis in vivo. Recent data have highlighted the WNT/β-Catenin pathway as a regulator of bone mass that mediates multiple mechanisms, including the renewal of stem cells, stimulation of primary osteoblast replication, induction of osteoblastogenesis, and inhibition of osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis2,42,43. These reports are consistent with our finding that LOF of TMEM16E inhibits [Ca2+]i oscillations and inactivates the WNT/β-Catenin and RANKL–NFATc1 pathways decreasing osteogenesis gene translation and calcium deposition by osteoblasts and impairing osteoclastogenesis gene translation, osteoclast differentiation, and activity. Furthermore, inhabited Ano5−/− osteoblast maturation also results in decreased stimulation of RANKL, greatly impeding the differentiation of osteoclasts from BMMs. In those ways, a more dramatic impaired osteoclast phenotype was found in Ano5−/− mice with significantly reduced bone resorption, leading to disruption of the homeostasis of bone formation. When old osseous tissue cannot be absorbed by osteoclasts, signals are unable to be sent to osteoblasts to generate new osseous tissue, bringing about a decrease in bone mass and degenerated osteoclast resorption activity and thus leading to a vicious cycle of bone homeostasis. Based on these data, our study also sheds light on how bone homeostasis, which involves the balance of bone formation and resorption, can be changed to induce skeletal abnormalities in humans and mice when ANO5 function is lost.
Meanwhile, Zanni et al. found that some GDD-related amino acid substitutions caused gain-of-function (GOF) of TMEM16E, which gives rise to constitutive phospholipid scrambling activity without the requirement for elevated cytosolic calcium, while MMD‐related amino acid substitutions have been identified to cause a loss of TMEM16E Ca2+‐activated phospholipid scramblase function44. In our study, we found that the PLS activity of Ano5−/− osteoblasts and osteoclasts in Annexin V binding assays were similar to that of WT osteoblasts and osteoclasts either in the presence or absence of cytosolic Ca2+ (Supplementary Fig. 4). In that case, GOF of TMEM16E protein results in high-bone-mass phenotype GDD by hyperfunction of PLS with increased osteoblast and osteoclast indices, while LOF of TMEM16E protein causes low-bone-mass phenotype GDD by impaired function of calcium oscillations with decreased osteoblast and osteoclast indices. Overall, our results suggest the existence of GDD-sub-entities with high and low BMD phenotypes due to different GOF and LOF mutations and functions.
Recently, Jin, L. et al. noticed that expression levels of two mutant TMEM16E proteins (p.Cys356Tyr, p.Cys360Tyr) were much lower than those of wild-type TMEM16E, which is consistent with our finding of low TMEM16E expression with the LOF ANO5 frameshift mutation45. In their study, the 73-year-old proband did not experience frequent fractures and exhibited thickening of the cortical long bones in the family with ANO5 p.Cys360Tyr mutation, while the 15-year-old proband suffered repeated fractures in the family with ANO5 p.Cys365Tyr mutation45. Our observations also showed a more obvious severe clinical phenotype and abnormal bone turnover markers in patients of young ages, especially in childhood and adolescence. Additionally, Li, H. et al., Kim, J. H. et al., and our study reached the same conclusion that Ano5 significantly enhanced RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption via multiple signal transduction processes46,47. Therefore, low bone resorption activities in elderly GDD patients explain why their bone mass is still maintained at normal or even increased levels when ordinary elderly people develop osteoporosis. Similarly, Wang, X. et al. and Jin, L. et al. found that Ano5-deficient and Ano5KI/KI p.Cys360Tyr mutation mice showed increased BMD in cortical bones but reduced trabecular thickness in femurs and tibias by using 12- and 16-week-old mouse models as research objects15,45. As an age-related disease, the onset of GDD occurs at a very young age, mostly in juveniles between 10 and 16 years old; thus, by using 12-week-old and even 16-week-old mice as models of young adults and middle-aged humans, osteoporosis symptoms may be masked by aging changes in mice. The authors also noticed that calvaria-derived Ano5−/− and Ano5KI/KI osteoblasts show increased mineralization and osteoblastogenesis, which partly contradicts our conclusions15,45. According to our Von Kossa staining, OCN immunohistochemistry, and calcein/AR double-labeled sections of Ano5−/− mouse femurs and osteoblast differentiation, Ano5 strongly contributes to osteoblast maturation and bone formation. Based on the diversities in the development of the patient and mouse biological bone metabolic rhythm in different ages and skeletal locations, this observation may be due to the uneven distribution of calcium salt deposits depending on various times and spaces, so it is reasonable for the slight discrepancy to exist when generalizing the systemic osteogenesis situation, and different ANO5 mutations contribute to aberrant bone homeostasis.
Another study showed that 12- and 24-week-old Ano5 KO and knock-in (KI) mouse models harboring the p.Ter491Phe mutation represented no significant GDD-like phenotype with p.Ser500Phe mutation16. The ages of the mice used for analysis are also too advanced to successfully recapitulate GDD-like phenotypes. Moreover, the amino acid sequence is not conserved between humans and mice at that mutation site, where Ser is mutated to Phe in humans while Ter is mutated to Phe in mice. Because there are some differences between Ser and Ter in structure and biological function, it is possible that Ano5 KI mice with p.T491F amino acid exchange did not display alterations in skeletal microarchitecture or mandible morphology. For example, threonine is an essential amino acid made up of an α-amino group, but serine is not. Serine plays an important role in catalytic function in many enzymes, such as trypsin, but threonine does not. Thus, we used 6- to 8-week-old mice as the “juvenile” range to reduce the likelihood that a late bloomer would develop during the experiment, and after 8 weeks of age, the mice were considered adults with all organs, like bone, maturely developed. By using 8-week-old Ano5 KO mice for animal models, we simulated the low-bone-mass GDD phenotype with osteoporosis at the age of onset.
Our results also initially confirm that the Ano5 gene expression is a necessary stage for PTH to promote bone homeostasis. After intermittent administration of PTH to WT and Ano5−/− mice, structural parameters related to bone formation were markedly increased in PTH-treated WT mice, whereas in Ano5−/− mice, although PTH partly treated them by increased cortical thickness and matrix mineralization, there were no significant differences compared to the WT groups. We concluded that the absence of Ano5 might partially hinder PTH-driven bone anabolism and bone formation. For the osteoporosis-like phenotype GDD with low bone mass and low bone turnover, injectable PTH could be the best osteoanabolic treatment currently available for bone formation and activating WNT signaling in osteoblasts48,49. Additional calcium supplementation can also be used to prevent bone loss. For GDD with high bone mass and a high bone turnover phenotype, we can choose antiresorptive treatments, such as bisphosphonates and denosumab, which help to inhibit the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts and reduce bone resorption. There are no established guidelines for the management of fracture risk in these patients. Physicians should assess the patient’s skeletal status more accurately, understand the mechanisms of drugs, and formulate a treatment plan under consideration of individual differences in patients.
Although some important discoveries were revealed by our studies, there are also limitations. The jawbone phenotypes of GDD, such as cemento-ossifying fibroma and impacted teeth, are generally regarded as calcified odontogenic tumors. Odontogenesis relies upon a series of reciprocal signaling interactions between the oral epithelium and adjacent neural crest-derived mesenchyme, the molecular mechanisms of which involve intracellular MAPK, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways50,51. ANO5 mutations must be related to abnormal odontogenic tumor development and/or to an epithelial–mesenchymal transition proposed to occur during normal root formation. According to our patients’ pathological results of jaw lesions, normal cancellous bones of the jaw were structurally destroyed and poorly mineralized, occupied by a large amount of fibrous tissue and cementum, leading to fibrous cementum-like lesions. We also identified decreased cancellous bone thickness and density in Ano5−/− mouse mandibles, although some developmental odontogenic phenotypes were not observed. It is possible that some additional factors triggering the manifestation of certain aspects of the disorder are different in mice and humans, such as mandibular development, metabolism, or other biological characteristics. Multiple animal models have been used to study GDD but have not been met with complete success. To fully represent the characteristic pathologic changes observed in GDD, some large animal models could be used, such as horses, sheep, dogs, and pigs, which are arguably the most powerful models of human organ systems, including the jaw and other bones, and offer the advantages of anatomical, physiological, metabolic and genetic similarities with humans. Second, to fully address why GOF and LOF mutations both lead to GDD, a KI model with specific patient mutations would be more suitable to recapitulate GDD. In addition, cell-type-specific gene edits of Ano5, such as osteoblast, osteoclast, and odontogenic-like cell lines, still require future studies.
In summary, this study of individuals carrying the ANO5 mutation p.L370_A371insDYWRLNSTCL improved our understanding of the causative pattern of LOF of TMEM16E in GDD families. Importantly, our data support the view that TMEM16E at the ER membrane of bone cells sustains Ca2+ transitions to the cytoplasm (Fig. 7). The effects on Ca2+ oscillations may explain the role of Ano5 in the maintenance of bone homeostasis and related processes, such as matrix mineralization and osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and function. Therefore, our research proposes ANO5 as a therapeutic target for counteracting the development of skeletal diseases related to GDD.
Methods
Human subjects and clinical assessments
This research was supported by the Clinical Research Center, Scientific Research and Planning Department at Ninth People’s Hospital (SH9H), Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JYHJB01). The human samples used in this research project were obtained with evaluation and approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Ninth People’s Hospital (SH9H-2020-T99-3), and all ethical guidelines conformed to the 2008 Helsinki Declaration. The project was registered under the Ninth People’s Hospital Tissue Bank (C01). All patients (or the parents of patients) and family members provided written informed consent, and they also consented to have their photographs and clinical data used for publication. Five affected individuals and eight unaffected family members from the pedigree were included in this study. When participants were enrolled in the rare diseases research project, ancillary study procedures to measure aBMD, X-ray, and CT scans of the maxillofacial and lower extremities were performed. aBMD was measured by DXA using a Lunar iDXA X-ray bone densitometer system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The aBMD, X-ray and CT scans were performed by qualified technologists and interpreted by radiologists who were not involved in the design or implementation of the study. Bone turnover markers in plasma were measured by the certified clinical diagnostic laboratory of Ninth People’s Hospital. There are no reference ranges for bone turnover markers in children from Ninth People’s Hospital, so we used the reference intervals recommended by the journal Bone52.
Mice
This project has been assessed favorably by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee from Ninth People’s Hospital (JY-IACUC): the IACUC deemed that the abovementioned project complies with standard ethical regulations (SH9H-2020-A42-1). All animal work was approved and conducted according to ARRIVE guidelines. C57BL/6 mice were purchased from JieSiJie Laboratory Animal Corporation (Shanghai, China). Ano5 KO mice (C57BL/6-Ano5<tm1Itak>) were obtained from RIKEN BioResource Center (Kyoto, Japan) and maintained at the Animal Resources Center at Ninth People’s Hospital under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions; they were backcrossed with C57BL/6J mice. The genomic DNA from KO mice was amplified by PCR using a forward primer (5′-GGTTGTATTGGTTCTTAAATTGTGG) and two reverse primers (5′-AACCGAAGACTGTCACATGTGGAAT for the 257 bp-WT allele and 5′-AATTCATTCTCGATTCTTGATGG for the 407 bp-mutant allele) as described. Both male and female mice were used in this study; age- and sex-matched 4- to 6-week-old mice were used for in vivo studies, and 6- to 8-week-old mice were used for in vitro studies. For PTH-treated Ano5−/− mice, recombinant human PTH 1–34 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) (80 µg/kg) and vehicle (NaCl) subcutaneous injections were administered 5 days per week over 3 weeks when the mice were 5–8 weeks old. Mice were maintained with a 12 h light/dark cycle and were fed standard chow. Cohoused animals were used for in vivo analyses. Littermates were used where indicated.
Cell culture
Human PBMCs were isolated from the peripheral blood of patients and controls using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) followed by standard operating procedures. PBMCs were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 media (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Calvarial osteoblasts were prepared and cultured from postnatal day 1 mouse calvariae. The calvariae were digested in PBS (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) containing 0.02% type II collagenase (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.05% trypsin for 10 min at 37 °C with shaking. BMSCs and BMMs were obtained from cultures of bone marrow collected from 4- to 6-week-old female mouse tibias and femurs as described53. Calvarial osteoblasts, BMSCs and BMMs were cultured in α-MEM (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (1% p/s) (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). All cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. FBS was heat-inactivated before use.
WES
A Blood Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract genomic DNA from participant peripheral blood samples. The concentration and purity of the gDNA were determined by a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). WES was further used to detect potential causal single nucleotide variants, insertions, and deletions (indels) in 4 patients (II4, III6, III10, IV5) and 4 controls (II5, II10, III5, III8) in the family. The hybridization capture procedure was performed with an Agilent SureSelect Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with the 180–200 bp paired-end read module. The mean coverage depth was 100×, with ~99.5% coverage of the target region. Clean reads were aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA; v.0.7.12). Whole-genome SNP scanning was performed using the Illumina Asian Screening Array. Linkage analysis was performed by the parametric linkage analysis package of MERLIN (ver. 1.1.2). Variants were filtered by the following criteria. Variants in the intronic, upstream, and downstream sites were removed, and those in the exonic and splicing functional regions were retained. New variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and Genomics criteria as being pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or of uncertain clinical significance, and variants classified as benign, or likely benign, were excluded. Variants were not considered if they had a read depth < 5× and a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.005 in databases including the dbSNP138, 1000 Genomes Project, Complete Genomics 69, Exome Variant Server, and Exome Sequencing Project databases. To assess the variant novelty, the Human Gene Mutation Database and ClinVar were used. GDD patients exhibit AD inheritance, so autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance pattern variants and variants carried by normal controls were also excluded. Thus, 9 new genetic variants were considered after the initial filtering step, which is listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Sanger sequencing
Primer3 software was used to design primers for the 9 pathogenic variants detected. Nine variants were subsequently validated by Sanger sequencing of 2 controls (II2, II7). According to the GDD AD inheritance pattern, variants carried by normal controls were also excluded, and ANO5, NANOS1, and WDR90 gene variants were determined. Again, we performed Sanger sequencing to confirm the 3 variants in 1 patient (IV6) and 2 other controls (III14, III15). After filtering the criteria, the new ANO5 variant was ultimately considered a disease-causing mutation, and the results and detailed primers of Sanger sequencing are listed in Supplementary Tables 2 and 4.
µCT
µCT of mandibles and femurs was performed using a micro-CT (Skyscan1176, USA, Bruker Siemens Inveon, Eschborn, Germany) with the following parameter settings: source voltage, 50 kV; source current, 450–500 μA; AI, 0.5 mm filter; pixel size, 9 μm; rotation step, 0.4°. Mandibles and femurs from 4- and 8-week-old male WT mice and Ano5−/− mice were dissected, cleaned of soft tissue, and wrapped in PBS-soaked gauze. Threshold segmentation of bone from marrow and soft tissue was performed in conjunction with a constrained Gaussian filter to reduce noise. Mandibular bone parameters were measured by analyzing ~400 slices of trabecular bone under the first molar. Trabecular bone parameters were measured by analyzing 201 slices of the proximal metaphysis. Cortical bone parameters were measured by analyzing 51 slices in the mid-diaphysis, where the central portion was between the proximal and distal ends of the femur. Analyses were performed in agreement with guidelines for the assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using µCT54.
Histology and histomorphometry
Histology and histomorphometry were performed as previously described55. Briefly, the mouse mandibles and femurs from 8-week-old mice were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin followed by decalcification in 10% EDTA for 3 weeks, paraffin embedding, TRAP staining and OCN immunohistochemistry. OCN was detected using a polyclonal OCN antibody (Cat# 23418-1-AP, 1:500 dilution, Proteintech, Sankt Leon-Rot, Germany) for 2 h, followed by Alexa 488-labeled secondary antibody (1:200 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) for 60 min. As indicated, DAPI staining (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was also performed. Undecalcified femurs were embedded in paraffin for sectioning. Von Kossa staining was performed to determine osteoblast and osteoclast parameters. To determine the MAR, 25 mg/kg Alizarin red (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was injected at 14 days, and 20 mg/kg calcein (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was injected 7 days before bone collection. The indices were measured and analyzed using Bioquant Osteo 2009 v9.0 (Bioquant, Nashville, TN, USA). Bone histomorphometric parameters were calculated according to the standardized nomenclature for bone histomorphometry56. Pannoramic 250 Flash was used for slide scanning (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary). An Olympus Fluoview 1000 laser confocal imaging system (Olympus, Shinjuku City, Tokyo, Japan) was used for microscope photography. Histological viewing and analysis were performed with Case Viewer (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary) and ImageJ2/FIJI (NIH).
Cell proliferation assay
Cells were seeded at 1 × 104 cells per well in 96-well plates, and proliferation was determined using the cell proliferation reagent Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
In vitro osteoclast differentiation
Mature osteoclasts were generated as previously described57. Mouse BMMs or human PBMCs were cultured in α-MEM (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) containing 10% FBS (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 30 ng/mL recombinant mouse/human M-CSF and 50 ng/mL recombinant mouse/human RANKL (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 5–7 days in tissue culture dishes to induce osteoclast formation. Mature osteoclasts were characterized by staining for TRAP activity using the Acid Phosphatase Leukocyte Kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and TRAP-positive multinucleated cells (>3 nuclei/cell) were counted.
In vitro osteoblast differentiation
For osteogenesis, BMSCs or calvarial osteoblasts were seeded at 2.5 × 104 cells per cm2 in 6- or 48-well tissue culture plates. The next day, the cells were transferred to osteogenic media: α-MEM medium (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), 1% P/S (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), 50 µg/mL l-ascorbic acid (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 5 mM β-glycerol phosphate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). RNA isolation was performed at 0, 3 and 7 days. ALP staining was performed at 7 days using the BCIP/NBT Alkaline Phosphatase Color Development Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), and Alizarin red staining (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) of minerals was conducted at 21 days according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Lentiviral gene transduction
The Ano5 gene was subcloned into the pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-GFP-puro (CD513B-1) lentiviral vector by Shanghai IBS Biological Technology Co., Ltd. according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Ano5−/− BMMs and calvarial osteoblasts were transduced with recombinant lentiviral particles in the presence of 8 mg/mL polybrene (IBS Bio, Shanghai, China). Two days after lentivirus transduction, the cells were selected for approximately one week with 2–4 µg/mL puromycin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in the culture media. The expression of the recombinant RNA was confirmed by qPCR.
RNA extraction and gene expression analysis
RNA was isolated from cultured cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and purified using an AxyPrep Multisource RNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen, USA). RNA quality was confirmed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Mouse complementary DNA (cDNA) was reverse-transcribed from 1 μg total RNA with PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan). qPCR was performed in triplicate using TB Green Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each transcript examined, mRNA expression was normalized to Actin. Primer sequences for each gene are provided in Supplementary Table 3.
Calcium oscillations
A total of 1 × 104 BMMs or human PBMCs were seeded on 35-mm confocal dishes and cultured with 30 ng/mL M-CSF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in the presence of 50 ng/mL RANKL (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or without RANKL as controls for 72 h. BMSCs (2 × 104) were cultured on confocal dishes with osteogenic media for 7 days. The assay buffer consisted of Hank’s buffered salt solution (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, without CaCl2), 2% FCS, and 1 mM probenecid solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (pH 7.4). The cells were then incubated in the presence of 5 µM Fluo-4 AM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 0.05% Pluronic F-127 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in the dark at 37 °C for 45 min in assay buffer. The cells were washed twice with assay buffer and then incubated in fresh assay buffer for 20 min. The cells were viewed on the inverted stage of a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). At an excitation wavelength of 488 nm, Fluo-4 was analyzed simultaneously at 5 s intervals for BMMs or human PBMCs and at 10 s intervals for BMSCs. The increase from the basal level was determined by adding 10 μM ionomycin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Peak analysis was performed to obtain parameters with ImageJ2/FIJI (NIH).
Flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine (PS)
To induce PS translocation, BMMs and primary osteoblasts were seeded at a density of 10 × 4 cells/cm2, cultured, and differentiated for 48 h and 7 days, respectively. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed first in growth medium and then washed in PBS (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 0.5 mM CaCl2. Subsequently, the cells were treated with 10 mM ionomycin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or ethanol for 5 min or 2.5 μM staurosporine (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 8 h at 37 °C. Ionomycin was removed by washing in ice-cold PBS. Treated cells were then washed in annexin-binding buffer and stained with Alexa Fluor® 488 annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to standard operating procedures. Gating strategy: (1) implement FSC/SSC gate for living cells, (2) define the gate for FITC- or FITC + cells, (3) apply this gate to all samples. Flow cytometric analysis was conducted using a BD LSR Fortessa (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany), and the data were processed with FlowJo v.10.7.
Confocal fluorescence microscopy
Cells were seeded in cell culture dishes with glass bottoms (Greiner Bio, Monroe, NC, USA). Live cell imaging was performed using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with ×40 oil immersion objectives. Final images represent the average of 4–12 acquisitions. No filtering was applied.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer in the presence of phosphatase and protease inhibitor cocktails (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A standard protocol was used for Western blotting. In brief, samples were separated on 4–20% SurePage gels (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and transferred onto a 0.45-μm PVDF membrane (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Antigen detection was performed using antibodies directed against GAPDH (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 5174), β-Actin (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 3700), β-Catenin (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 8480), NFATc1 (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 8032), c-Fos (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 2250), GSK-3β (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 12456), Axin1 (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 2087), and Dvl2 (1:1000 dilution, Cat# 3224) from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; WNT1 (1:1000 dilution, Cat# abs131412) from Absin Bioscience Inc., Shanghai, China; ANO5/TMEM16E (1:100 dilution, Cat# LS‑C330335) from LSBio, Seattle, WA, USA. The bound primary antibodies were detected with anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Cat# 5257) and anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (DyLight™ 800 4× PEG Conjugate) (Cat# 5151) (diluted to 1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) using the Odyssey CLx system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Western blot images were quantified with Image Studio Lite (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). All blots or gels were derived from the same experiment and processed in parallel. Uncropped and unprocessed scans of blots in this study are provided in Supplementary Fig. 5.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 software. We used the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test for comparisons between two groups and the multiple t test or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction for multiple comparisons. Bar graphs present the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). No statistical methods were used to determine the sample size, and incomplete data were excluded from the analysis performed in this manuscript. Statistical details about the sample size (n) and p value are reported in the figure legends.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
In accordance with informed consent signed by participants, sharing of supporting details is subject to ethical review by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Ninth People’s Hospital. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (X.J.Q.) upon reasonable request. The whole-exome sequencing and Sanger-sequencing data of all patients and controls have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the primary accession code PRJNA817717.
References
Hattner, R., Epker, B. N. & Frost, H. M. Suggested sequential mode of control of changes in cell behaviour in adult bone remodelling. Nature 206, 489–490 (1965).
Zelzer, E. & Olsen, B. R. The genetic basis for skeletal diseases. Nature 423, 343–348 (2003).
Wang, H. W., Yu, M., Qin, X. J. & Zhang, C. P. Familial gigantiform cementoma: distinctive clinical features of a large Chinese pedigree. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 53, 83–85 (2015).
Ma, C., Wang, H., He, G. & Qin, X. Familial gigantiform cementoma. Medicine 95, e2956 (2016).
Wang, H.-W., Ma, C.-Y., Qin, X.-J. & Zhang, C.-P. Management strategy in patient with familial gigantiform cementoma. Medicine 96, e9138 (2017).
Tsutsumi, S. et al. The novel gene encoding a putative transmembrane protein is mutated in gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia (GDD). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 1255–1261 (2004).
Mizuta, K. et al. Molecular characterization of GDD1/TMEM16E, the gene product responsible for autosomal dominant gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 357, 126–132 (2007).
Marconi, C. et al. A novel missense mutation in ANO5/TMEM16E is causative for gnathodiaphyseal dyplasia in a large Italian pedigree. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 21, 613–619 (2013).
Rolvien, T. et al. A novel ANO5 mutation causing gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia with high bone turnover osteosclerosis. J. Bone Min. Res. 32, 277–284 (2017).
Bolduc, V. et al. Recessive mutations in the putative calcium-activated chloride channel anoctamin 5 cause proximal LGMD2L and distal MMD3 muscular dystrophies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86, 213–221 (2010).
Hicks, D. et al. A founder mutation in Anoctamin 5 is a major cause of limb girdle muscular dystrophy. Brain 134, 171–182 (2011).
Penttilä, S. et al. Eight new mutations and the expanding phenotype variability in muscular dystrophy caused by ANO5. Neurology 78, 897–903 (2012).
Sui, T. et al. Development of muscular dystrophy in a CRISPR-engineered mutant rabbit model with frame-disrupting ANO5 mutations. Cell Death Dis. 9, 609 (2018).
Xu, J. et al. Genetic disruption of Ano5 in mice does not recapitulate human ANO5-deficient muscular dystrophy. Skelet. Muscle 5, 43 (2015).
Wang, X. et al. Genetic disruption of anoctamin 5 in mice replicates human gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia (GDD). Calcif. Tissue Int. 104, 679–689 (2019).
Rolvien, T. et al. Gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia is not recapitulated in a respective mouse model carrying a mutation of the Ano5 gene. Bone Rep. 12, 100281 (2020).
Gyobu, S. et al. A role of TMEM16E carrying a scrambling domain in sperm motility. Mol. Cell. Biol. 36, 645–659 (2016).
Pedemonte, N. & Galietta, L. J. V. Structure and function of TMEM16 proteins (Anoctamins). Physiol. Rev. 94, 419–459 (2014).
Schroeder, B. C., Cheng, T., Jan, Y. N. & Jan, L. Y. Expression cloning of TMEM16A as a calcium-activated chloride channel subunit. Cell 134, 1019–1029 (2008).
Suzuki, J., Umeda, M., Sims, P. J. & Nagata, S. Calcium-dependent phospholipid scrambling by TMEM16F. Nature 468, 834–838 (2010).
Yang, H. et al. TMEM16F forms a Ca2+-activated cation channel required for lipid scrambling in platelets during blood coagulation. Cell 151, 111–122 (2012).
Dang, S. et al. Cryo-EM structures of the TMEM16A calcium-activated chloride channel. Nature 552, 426–429 (2017).
Brunner, J. D., Lim, N. K., Schenck, S., Duerst, A. & Dutzler, R. X-ray structure of a calcium-activated TMEM16 lipid scramblase. Nature 516, 207–212 (2014).
Paulino, C., Kalienkova, V., Lam, A. K. M., Neldner, Y. & Dutzler, R. Activation mechanism of the calcium-activated chloride channel TMEM16A revealed by cryo-EM. Nature 552, 421–425 (2017).
Chandra, G. et al. Dysregulated calcium homeostasis prevents plasma membrane repair in Anoctamin 5/TMEM16E-deficient patient muscle cells. Cell Death Discov. 5, 118 (2019).
Foltz, S. J., Cui, Y. Y., Choo, H. J. & Hartzell, H. C. ANO5 ensures trafficking of annexins in wounded myofibers. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202007059 (2021).
Griffin, D. A. et al. Defective membrane fusion and repair in Anoctamin5-deficient muscular dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 1900–1911 (2016).
Whitlock, J. M., Yu, K., Cui, Y. Y. & Hartzell, H. C. Anoctamin 5/TMEM16E facilitates muscle precursor cell fusion. J. Gen. Physiol. 150, 1498–1509 (2018).
Zanni, E. D., Gradogna, A., Picco, C., Scholz‐Starke, J. & Boccaccio, A. TMEM16E/ANO5 mutations related to bone dysplasia or muscular dystrophy cause opposite effects on lipid scrambling. Hum. Mutat. 41, 1157–1170 (2020).
Merlini, A., Garibaldi, J., Giorgis, L. & Balbi, P. Gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia: surgical treatment and prosthetic rehabilitation of 2 members of the same family. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 74, 2441–2446 (2016).
Said, M., Otomaru, T., Kanazaki, A., Fujita, H. & Taniguchi, H. Prosthodontic treatment of a patient with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia: 30-year follow-up. Int J. Prosthodont 31, 138–141 (2018).
Otaify, G. A. et al. Gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia: Severe atypical presentation with novel heterozygous mutation of the anoctamin gene (ANO5). Bone 107, 161–171 (2018).
Kuroda, T. et al. Recurrent femoral shaft fractures in a child with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet. Dis. 20, 92 (2019).
Moshref, M. et al. Autosomal dominant gigantiform cementoma associated with bone fractures. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 146A, 644–648 (2008).
McInerney‐Leo, A. M. et al. COL1A1 C‐propeptide cleavage site mutation causes high bone mass, bone fragility and jaw lesions: a new cause of gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia? Clin. Genet. 88, 49–55 (2015).
Takayanagi, H. et al. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev. Cell 3, 889–901 (2002).
Masuyama, R. et al. TRPV4-mediated calcium influx regulates terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Cell Metab. 8, 257–265 (2008).
Kim, H. et al. Tmem64 modulates calcium signaling during RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation. Cell Metab. 17, 249–260 (2013).
Bagur, R. & Hajnóczky, G. Intracellular Ca2+ sensing: its role in calcium homeostasis and signaling. Mol. Cell 66, 780–788 (2017).
Gwack, Y., Feske, S., Srikanth, S., Hogan, P. G. & Rao, A. Signalling to transcription: store-operated Ca2+ entry and NFAT activation in lymphocytes. Cell Calcium 42, 145–156 (2007).
Park, Y.-J., Yoo, S.-A., Kim, M. & Kim, W.-U. The role of calcium–calcineurin–NFAT signaling pathway in health and autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 11, 195 (2020).
Harada, S. & Rodan, G. A. Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature 423, 349–355 (2003).
Karsenty, G. & Wagner, E. F. Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev. Cell 2, 389–406 (2002).
Zanni, E. D., Gradogna, A., Scholz-Starke, J. & Boccaccio, A. Gain of function of TMEM16E/ANO5 scrambling activity caused by a mutation associated with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 75, 1657–1670 (2018).
Jin, L. et al. Three novel ANO5 missense mutations in Caucasian and Chinese families and sporadic cases with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia. Sci. Rep.-uk 7, 40935 (2017).
Li, H. et al. Introduction of a Cys360Tyr mutation in ANO5 creates a mouse model for gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia. J. Bone Min. Res. 37, 515–530 (2022).
Kim, J. H. et al. Role of anoctamin 5, a gene associated with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia, in osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Bone 120, 432–438 (2019).
Neer, R. M. et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1434–1441 (2001).
Guo, J. et al. Suppression of Wnt signaling by Dkk1 attenuates PTH-mediated stromal cell response and new bone formation. Cell Metab. 11, 161–171 (2010).
Xavier, G. M. et al. Activated WNT signaling in postnatal SOX2-positive dental stem cells can drive odontoma formation. Sci. Rep.-uk 5, 14479 (2015).
Guimarães, L. M., Coura, B. P., Gomez, R. S. & Gomes, C. C. The molecular pathology of odontogenic tumors: expanding the spectrum of MAPK pathway driven tumors. Front. Oral Health 2, 740788 (2021).
Diemar, S. S. et al. Reference intervals in Danish children and adolescents for bone turnover markers carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX), pro-collagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), osteocalcin (OC) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP). Bone 146, 115879 (2021).
Soleimani, M. & Nadri, S. A protocol for isolation and culture of mesenchymal stem cells from mouse bone marrow. Nat. Protoc. 4, 102–106 (2009).
Bouxsein, M. L. et al. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography. J. Bone Min. Res. 25, 1468–1486 (2010).
Weske, S. et al. Targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase as an anabolic therapy for bone loss. Nat. Med. 24, 667–678 (2018).
Dempster, D. W. et al. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J. Bone Min. Res. 28, 2–17 (2013).
Lee, S.-H. et al. v-ATPase V0 subunit d2-deficient mice exhibit impaired osteoclast fusion and increased bone formation. Nat. Med. 12, 1403–1409 (2006).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071099); Interdisciplinary Fund of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (No. JYJC202007); Rare Diseases Project of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (No. JYHJB01) to the corresponding author Dr. Xingjun Qin. The study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 92068102, 81772373, and 81572167); Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support; Shanghai Institute of Precision Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SHIPM-pi fund Nos. JY201804 and JC201801); Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (No. JYJC202015); and the Foundation of National Facility for Translational Medicine (Shanghai) (No. TMSK-2020-119) to the corresponding author Dr. An Qin. We thank patients and family members for their participation in this study. The authors acknowledge the affected families for their exceptional cooperation and support. The authors would like to thank Tonghai Dou, Yanyan Zhang, Cheng Xu, and Tianjiao Fang from Amplicongene (Shanghai, China) for the deep sequencing service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.Q. and X.J.Q. conceptualized the project and designed the experiments. X.L. performed all mouse genotyping, mouse experiments, statistical data analysis, figures creation and wrote the manuscript. L.W. performed human blood measurements and clinical examinations of patients. H.W.W. recruited patients for the clinical study and genotyped human samples. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Wang, L., Wang, H. et al. Ano5 modulates calcium signaling during bone homeostasis in gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia. npj Genom. Med. 7, 48 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-022-00312-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-022-00312-1