Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Most myopathic lamin variants aggregate: a functional genomics approach for assessing variants of uncertain significance


Hundreds of LMNA variants have been associated with several distinct disease phenotypes. However, genotype–phenotype relationships remain largely undefined and the impact for most variants remains unknown. We performed a functional analysis for 178 variants across five structural domains using two different overexpression models. We found that lamin A aggregation is a major determinant for skeletal and cardiac laminopathies. An in vitro solubility assay shows that aggregation-prone variants in the immunoglobulin-like domain correlate with domain destabilization. Finally, we demonstrate that myopathic-associated LMNA variants show aggregation patterns in induced pluripotent stem cell derived-cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) in contrast to non-myopathic LMNA variants. Our data-driven approach (1) reveals that striated muscle laminopathies are predominantly protein misfolding diseases, (2) demonstrates an iPSC-CM experimental platform for characterizing laminopathic variants in human cardiomyocytes, and (3) supports a functional assay to aid in assessing pathogenicity for myopathic variants of uncertain significance.


The nuclear lamina is composed of the intermediate filament protein lamins A/C, B1 and B2 encoded by LMNA, LMNB1, and LMNB2, respectively1. Through interactions with numerous integral membrane proteins, the nuclear lamina performs myriad functions such as providing shape and support to the nucleus, linking the nucleus with the cytoplasm, regulating transcription, and serving as a platform for proteins involved in signal transduction1. Over 600 missense LMNA variants (the dominant variant type) have been reported in ClinVar, a variant interpretation database, and are associated with more clinical disease phenotypes than any other gene, collectively referred to as laminopathies2. Each can largely be grouped into one or more of four broad categories with ~80% associated with autosomal dominant (a) skeletal muscle (e.g., Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy)3 or (b) cardiac muscle disease (e.g., Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM))4 with the remaining <20% associated with (c) lipodystrophy (e.g., Dunnigan type familial partial lipodystrophy)5 or the extremely rare (d) premature aging syndromes (e.g., Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS))6. In addition, a homozygous recessive Charcot_Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT2B1)—associated variant has also been characterized7.

Lamins have a short N-terminal domain, long rod domain consisting of four coiled-coil domains (CCDs) (1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B)8, and a C-terminal protein interaction rich immunoglobulin-like domain (IgD)9, which polymerize to form intermediate filaments in the nucleus. For skeletal and heart muscle cells, where lamin A/C is highly expressed, mechanical stress and altered gene expression hypotheses have been suggested, and both mechanisms likely contribute to cardiac and skeletal myopathies10,11. For lipodystrophy, mechanisms of altered adipocyte differentiation and extracellular matrix have been described among others12. For premature aging syndromes, the best-understood mechanism is abnormal prelamin A processing due to a de novo cryptic splice site variant (LMNA c.1824C > T, p.G608G) resulting in a 50aa deletion protein called progerin13 that causes nuclear deformation. In fact, nuclear membrane abnormalities including “blebs”, “honeycombs”, and lamin A/C foci are a hallmark of all classes of laminopathies14,15,16.

Despite these mechanisms, ascribing LMNA variants to tissue-specific phenotypes is a challenge. Further, most LMNA variants have not been functionally characterized with over 400 remaining classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in ClinVar. To address the challenges of genotype–phenotype relationships and pathogenicity, we undertook a systematic lamin A analysis of 178 missense variants - the most common variant type—across five structural domains using two mammalian overexpression models (HEK 293 cells and mouse C2C12 myoblasts). We studied aggregation because (1) misfolding and aggregation are dominant mechanisms underlying inherited diseases and may help reveal genotype–phenotype relationships17, (2) aggregation of several LMNA variants has been reported in a variety of model systems10,14,15,18,19,20, and (3) it could serve as a relatively simple functional test to support pathogenic classification as defined by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines for variant classification21. We then tested IgD stability for each variant to compare with the lamin A aggregation results22. Finally, we evaluated the pathogenicity and stability prediction tools FoldX23 and REVEL24 for each LMNA variant characterized. In this study, we show that up to 78% of striated muscle disease (84% skeletal and 52% cardiac) variants tested form aggregates in the nucleus, whereas only 35% of lipodystrophy and 17% of progeria variants do; the latter two only showing aggregation when a skeletal muscle phenotype is also present. Overall, REVEL performed well for myopathic variants but not for other types. In addition, aggregation for variants in the IgD is associated with loss of domain stability and misfolding and supported by FoldX analysis with only a few exceptions. Combined, our results could serve as a functional test as part of supporting data toward pathogenic classification as defined by the ACMG21. Finally, we show lamin A aggregation in human induced pluripotent stem cell derived-cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) for a subset of variants, further validating aggregation as a major determinant of striated muscle laminopathies. These results (1) are a valuable resource for further studies investigating laminopathies, (2) demonstrate an in vitro functional assay to assist in classifying LMNA VUS associated with striated muscle disease, (3) establish a human cardiac cell model for studying cardiac laminopathies, and (4) point to lamin A aggregation as a potential therapeutic target for the majority of myopathic variants.


Selection of LMNA variants for functional studies

We chose to perform a comprehensive analysis of all LMNA missense variants listed in the Universal Mutational Database (UMD-LMNA) in lamin A’s five structural domains (no linker regions) and several in the much larger ClinVar database that occur in the general population, which are included as negative controls (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Tables 15). We chose UMD missense variants because they list associated phenotypes for all variants to help draw genotype–phenotype relationships. We chose to study missense variants in structural regions to gain insight into structure-(dys)function relationships toward more definitive variant classification. Next, based on ClinVar, all 178 missense variants were classified as either pathogenic/likely pathogenic (64), VUS (103), or conflicting interpretation (11). None were reported as benign/likely benign. (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Tables 15). We then generated a cDNA library containing all 178 variants in the CCDs and IgD in a mammalian expression vector and 56 IgD variants in an Escherichia coli expression vector for functional studies (Fig. 1c). At least one western blot was performed to confirm the correct size for each variant in HEK 293 cells with several representative examples shown in Fig. 1d and Supplementary Figure 1. A comprehensive image-based lamin A aggregation analysis was performed for all variants in both HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts and for a small subset iPSC-CMs. Figure 1e shows representative images of diffuse GFP-WT lamin A nuclear expression in contrast to nuclear foci or aggregates using GFP-L35P lamin A as an example (see Supplementary Figures 2 and 3 for more examples). Each variant was also mapped to helical locations of the CCD8 and IgD crystal structure9 to identify any potential structure-phenotype correlations (Fig. 1f). A solubility assay we recently reported was then used as a proxy to test each variant’s effects on IgD stability (Fig. 1g)22. All variants that we characterized by aggregation were then grouped into one of four clinical phenotypic categories (104 skeletal muscle disease (red), 73 cardiac muscle disease (blue), 21 lipodystrophy (yellow), or 20 premature agings (gray)) in order to identify potential genotype–phenotype correlations (Fig. 1h). Some variants were associated with more than one clinical phenotype with the most frequent overlap being between cardiomyopathy and skeletal muscular dystrophy. Finally, we tested two in silico pathogenic prediction tools FOLDX23 and REVEL24 against our large aggregation data set (Fig. 1i).

Fig. 1: Lamin characterization workflow.
figure 1

a Schematic of lamin A showing each structural domain and locations of the GFP tag and NLS. Numbers indicate the number of missense variants from Universal Mutational Database studied herein/total number of missense variants in ClinVar (and UMD) for indicated domains. b Sequence variants grouped by their clinical significance are described in ClinVar (linker variants not included). Numbers for each category indicate the number of missense variants we studied/total number of missense variants reported in ClinVar as of July 2021. c Variant library construction. d Representative western blots of full-length lamin A expressed in HEK 293 cells (lamin A (74kD) + GFP (27kD) = 101kD). e Representative images (20 μm scale bar) of L35P nuclear aggregation compared to WT for the three cell types used. f Mapping of the variants to the IgD structure and CCD locations (pink and blue indicate hydrophobic and ionic dimerization interacting residues, respectively and gray indicates variable surface residues. g Solubility (i.e., stability) assay described previously22. h Venn diagram showing disease classification for all disease-linked variants studied. i In silico tools used to compare to lamin A variant aggregation results. GFP green fluorescent protein, NLS nuclear localization signal, IgD immunoglobin-like domain, UMD, Universal Mutational Database, VUS variants of uncertain significance, CCD coiled-coil domain, LIC ligation-independent subcloning, HEK human embryonic kidney cells, mouse myoblasts (C2C12), iPSC-CMs induced pluripotent stem cell-induced cardiomyocytes, REVEL Rare Exome Ensemble Learner, genomAD Genome Aggregation Database.

Aggregation propensity of LMNA variants in the CCDs

Lamin A contains a heptad repeat Coil 1A (aa 28–67) and hendecad repeat patterns Coil 1B (aa 79–222), Coil 2A (240–277), and 2B (aa 278–385) (Supplementary Figures 4 and 5)8. Using a GFP-tagged lamin A construct, we overexpressed 24 Coil 1A variants, 47 Coil 1B variants, 12 Coil 2A variants, and 39 Coil 2B variants in HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts and determined the percentage of GFP-positive cells that exhibit nuclear aggregation (n ≥ 3, where n equals the number of transfections analyzed) (Supplementary Tables 14). Figure 2a, b, d, and e show the percentage of GFP-positive cells containing aggregates for C2C12 myoblasts (color-coded to their disease phenotype(s) compared with HEK 293 results (in white) for each CCD, respectively. Strikingly, 53/70 (76%) of skeletal and 27/60 (45%) of cardiac disease-associated variants formed aggregates in either HEK 293 cells or C2C12 myoblasts. In contrast, 1/7 (14%) of lipodystrophy and 2/13 (15%) of progeria variants aggregated but all also had crossover cardiac or skeletal muscle disease (e.g., R60G, A57P, L59R). Figure 2c highlights this contrast showing the variant aggregation distribution grouped by phenotype (variants with crossover disease are plotted more than once for each phenotype). Overall, there was a good correlation between models for Coil 1A, 1B, and 2B (R2 = 0.59–0.84) but less so for Coil 2A (R2 = 0.46), which could be due to the small number of variants compared (Fig. 2a, b, d and e insets). However, several variants that aggregated in HEK 293 cells did not aggregate in C2C12 myoblasts (L52P, A57P, L59R, R60G, I63S, I63N, E203G, R298C, A350P, Q353R, and R377C/H) and vice versa (I46V, R50S, R249W, and R349L), highlighting some variability between overexpression models. We then mapped each variant studied and all variants listed in the UMD and ClinVar databases to locations on the CCD (Supplementary Figures 4 and 5). Although numerous variants are located at ionic interaction sites “e” and “g” important for dimerization, residue “a” important in hydrophobic packing has the most. Site “f”, which has the second most, is located at the surface and these variants may disrupt higher-order assemblies. Together, our CCD results show that most myopathic laminopathies form nuclear aggregates and therefore, this assay might serve as a functional assessment tool towards myopathic variant classification for most variants in the CCDs.

Fig. 2: Lamin A aggregation for CCD variants.
figure 2

a Percentage (%) of cells showing lamin A aggregation plotted for each CCD 1A variant (mean ± SD, n ≥ 3). C2C12 myoblast results are color-coded as follows: skeletal disease-associated variants in red, cardiac in blue, lipodystrophy in yellow, progeria in gray. HEK 293 results are plotted in white or outlined in color if C2C12 myoblast values are zero (e.g., gray and blue for A57P). Inset shows the correlation between HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts. b CCD 1B variants color-coded as above. c % aggregation distribution for all CCD variants grouped by phenotype for HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts with average values outlined in black. Variants with crossover disease are plotted more than once for each phenotype. d CCD 2A variants color-coded as above. e CCD 2B variants color-coded as above. Asterisks indicate statistically significant increases in aggregation over WT (p < 0.05).

Aggregation propensity of LMNA variants in the IgD

The IgD spans amino acids 428–549 and contains 104 reported disease-associated variants (Fig. 1a). We tested aggregation for 56 LMNA variants in HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts and plotted bar graphs (n ≥ 3) as described for Coil 1A (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 5). Seventeen of 27 (63%) of skeletal and 8/22 (36%) of cardiac variants form aggregates in HEK 293 cells or C2C12 myoblasts. 6/14 (43%) of lipodystrophy and 2/9 (22%) of progeria variants formed aggregates but all had crossover skeletal muscle disease except for G465D. Although there is some overlap between cell models, 23 variants that aggregated in HEK 293 cells did not in C2C12 myoblasts (e.g., V440M) and a few showed small increases in aggregation in C2C12 myoblasts but not in HEK 293 cells (e.g., T488P). Overall and in contrast to the CCDs, IgD variants are more prone to aggregate in HEK 293 cells compared to C2C12 myoblasts, which is underscored in Fig. 3b.

Fig. 3: Lamin A aggregation for IgD variants.
figure 3

a Percentage (%) of cells showing lamin A aggregation are plotted for each variant (mean ± SD, n ≥ 3). C2C12 myoblast variants are color-coded as follows: skeletal disease-associated variants in red, cardiac in blue, lipodystrophy in yellow, progeria in gray. HEK 293 results are plotted in white. Inset shows the correlation between HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts. b % aggregation distribution for all IgD variants grouped by phenotype for HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts with average values outlined in black. c Variants, color-coded as above, are mapped to regions of the IgD structure by disease (red, blue, yellow, and gray balls). The first structure shows the location of each variant followed by surface representations with the last one rotated 180°. Arrow indicates surface patch where progeria-linked variants are located. d Representative immunoblots for recombinant IgD variants expressed in E. coli. Bars represent relative solubility (% of WT) determined by dot blot for each variant (mean ± SD, n ≥ 3). e Relative solubility distribution (% of WT determined by dot blot) for all IgD variants grouped by phenotype (n ≥ 3) with average values outlined in black. Variants with crossover disease are plotted more than once for each phenotype. f Solubility results plotted along with the HEK 293 aggregation results for comparison with inset showing an inverse relationship between aggregation and solubility. Asterisks indicate statistically significant increases in aggregation over WT (p < 0.05). IgD immunoglobulin-like domain.

LMNA variants’ effects on IgD domain stability

IgD variants were then mapped to its crystal structure (PDB:1IFR)9, a beta-sandwich fold, and color-coded by phenotype (Fig. 3c). Although progeria variants group to one surface suggesting an important protein–protein interaction region (black arrow), lipodystrophy, cardiac, and skeletal variants are scattered throughout. Scharner and co-authors used in silico analyses to show that the cardiac and skeletal myopathy variants are largely buried (Supplementary Table 5); a property commonly associated with loss of stability and also supported by their FoldX computational analysis25. Supporting in vitro studies of skeletal disease-associated variants G449V, N456I, and W514R also show IgD destabilization18,26. To further validate destabilization as the major cause of aggregation for lamin A IgD variants, we tested 53 variants using an in vitro solubility assay we recently reported where decreased solubility serves as a proxy for protein instability22. Figure 3d and Supplementary Figure 1 show representative western and dot blots for seven variants that correlate with our HEK 293 aggregation results; aggregation-prone V442A and D446V showed decreased solubility in contrast to the other five non-aggregating variants that showed no change in solubility compared with WT. Figure 3e and Supplementary Table 5 show the in vitro solubility results for each variant relative to WT (n ≥ 3) with direct comparisons with HEK 293 aggregation results plotted in Fig. 3f. Indeed, the inset shows an inverse trend between IgD solubility and lamin A aggregation (R2 = 0.35) where aggregation-prone IgD variants exhibit less solubility and vice versa. Aggregation results for C2C12 myoblasts also show an inverse trend with IgD solubility (Supplementary Figure 6). Combined, these results help validate misfolding as a major pathogenic mechanism for IgD variants as well as those that do not lead to lamin A aggregation (e.g., P485R, Y481H). Interestingly, several variants have normal solubility but still, aggregate (e.g., V445E, R541G) suggesting more complex misfolding mechanism(s) are involved.

Aggregation propensity of LMNA variants in iPSC-CMs

Substantiating disease mechanisms in human cardiomyocytes is important for validation and iPSC-based models have been reported for HGPS, FPLD, LGMD1B, and DCM27. Although these models recapitulate various nuclear abnormalities and other molecular mechanisms, lamin A aggregation has yet to be shown in human CMs to our knowledge. Further, for a rapid large-scale assay, generating patient iPSCs are not a practical solution and an overexpression system would be advantageous for characterizing a large number of variants. Towards that end, we created iPSC-CMs using a modified “GiWi” protocol28 followed by a lactate purification step29 to generate ~90% pure cardiomyocytes, based on cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and ventricular myosin light chain-2 (MLC2v) expression as assessed by flow cytometry (Fig. 4a, b). Figure 4c shows representative images for a subset of mostly cardiac disease-linked GFP-tagged lamin A variants overexpressed in SIRPa (CM cell surface marker) positive cells (see Supplementary Figure 3 for examples with a larger field of view). Figure 4d shows the percent aggregation for all variants (n ≥ 3) compared with WT (see also Supplementary Table 6). In all cases, variants that aggregate in HEK 293 cell and C2C12 myoblast models also aggregate in human cardiac myocytes. This validates a cell-specific mechanism of protein abnormality associated with cardiomyopathy.

Fig. 4: Lamin A nuclear aggregation in iPSC-CMs.
figure 4

a A small molecule “GiWi” protocol was used28 followed by lactate purification29 to generate (b) ~90% pure iPSC-CMs (cTnT and MLC2v positive). c Representative images of disease-linked lamin A variants (green) overexpressed in SIRPa (cardiomyocyte surface marker) positive cells (red) showing nuclear aggregation53. d Bars ± SD represents the % of cells showing aggregation for all variants studied color-coded as above (n ≥ 3). e Representative images of mCherry-WT lamin A (red) co-expressed with GFP-L35P lamin A (green). Asterisks indicate statistically significant increases in aggregation over WT (p < 0.05). GiWi Gsk3 inhibitor: Wnt inhibitor, SIRPa CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha.

As cardiac and skeletal laminopathies are autosomal dominant diseases, it is important to test aggregation upon co-expression with WT. Figure 4e shows co-assembly and diffuse nuclear expression for both GFP-WT and mCherry-WT lamin A upon co-expression. In contrast, GFP-L35P aggregates and induces mCherry-WT to aggregate upon co-assembly (Fig. 4e). These results show that at least some aggregating disease-linked variants cause dominant-negative effects in human cardiomyocytes further supporting this disease mechanism.

In silico analysis of Lamin A variants

Given our relatively large lamin A aggregation and IgD solubility (i.e., deleterious) data sets, we tested the performances of the protein stability prediction program FoldX23 and a leading pathogenic prediction program REVEL24 for assessing lamin A variants studied herein. Using FoldX ΔΔG values reported by Scharner and co-authors25, we found good agreement with our IgD solubility results. Approximately 85% of variants predicted to be destabilizing by FoldX (ΔΔG ≥2) were also less soluble (≤75%) than WT IgD (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5: In silico analysis of LMNA variants.
figure 5

a Comparison of FoldX and IgD solubility data was reported herein using stability cutoffs of ΔΔG ≤ 2 for FoldX and ≥75% of WT for solubility. The shaded area highlights variants that agree. Color code: cardiac (blue), skeletal (red), lipodystrophy (yellow) and premature aging (gray). b Dot plot showing REVEL score distribution of variants with myopathic disease variants (red and/or blue dots) that are not in the gnomAD control population (137 total) compared to all lipodystrophy and/or progeria variants without myopathic crossover disease (yellow and/or gray dots) (20 total). Some myopathic variants also have lipodystrophy/progeria but were not color-coded for simplicity. Variants above the threshold of 0.76 (dashed line) are considered deleterious. IgD immunoglobulin-like domain.

Next, we analyzed REVEL scores (larger values are more deleterious) for each variant (Supplementary Tables 15). To determine an optimal threshold, we searched the large gnomAD reference data sets30 to find variant allele frequencies for variants we studied (Supplementary Table 7). Of the myopathic variants that did not aggregate, 15 variants are reported in the gnomAD control population further suggesting they are not causative. Using these as negative controls (Supplementary Tables 15) along with 16 pathogenic control variants (P or LP in ClinVar and aggregate in HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts) we performed a ROC analysis which gave a very good AUC of 93% suggesting that REVEL scores might be predictive of lamin A pathogenicity (Supplementary Figure 7). Using an optimal threshold of 0.76 (where sensitivity equaled specificity) shown in Supplementary Figure 7, we analyzed each variant labeled P/LP by ClinVar or aggregated herein (Supplementary Tables 15) and found that 112 variants agreed and 14 did not (~89% accuracy). Interestingly, 7 of the 14 variants that did not agree were lipodystrophy and/or progeria variants labeled P/LP in ClinVar. Further, a dot plot comparing REVEL scores of skeletal/cardiac variants versus lipodystrophy/progeria variants suggests REVEL is a very good classifier of myopathic VUS but not the other types (Fig. 5b).

Clinical significance of aggregation results

Remarkably, our results reveal that ~80% of the skeletal disease and ~47% of the cardiac disease-linked variants we studied cause significant aggregation, revealing that myopathic laminopathies are predominantly protein misfolding, aggregation-prone diseases (Supplementary Figure 8). Although aggregation for cardiac disease is less, it is a low estimate since most all muscular dystrophies eventually develop cardiomyopathy31. In ClinVar, at least 391 LMNA missense variants are reported as uncertain with much more undefined or with conflicting interpretations (114 total in our study and listed in Supplementary Tables 15). The lack of variant classification represents a significant barrier to providing clinically actionable patient recommendations. Using our nuclear lamin A aggregation results in HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts as functional evidence of a variant being deleterious, we propose a functional assessment strategy depicted in Fig. 6 adapted from one similarly reported for another protein32 to aid in classifying myopathic (and not other types) LMNA variants per ACMG guidelines21. As shown in Fig. 6, functional assays are just one of several criteria used to help determine pathogenicity and our aggregation assay meets the criteria for functionally supporting pathogenicity (PS3) for myopathic variants (aggregation has been reported by several other groups10,14,15,19,20 and a suitable number of controls were used to validate the assay33). Further, we performed a ROC-curve analysis using our aggregation data set and HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts exhibit AUCs of 91% and 77%, respectively, which supports aggregation as being a good predictor for myopathic disease compared to lipodystrophy and progeria laminopathies (Supplementary Figure 9).

Fig. 6: Summary of how our data can support myopathic LMNA variant classification per ACMG guidelines.
figure 6

Flowchart showing the different ACMG classification criteria21 and how our data could be incorporated towards classification. PS3 represents functional pathogenic support; the level of which can vary depending on how many of the assays show aggregation. We propose that at least 46 VUS (including those listed as uncertain, not reported, or have conflicting interpretations) meet the criteria for PS3 as they show aggregation in two cell models (Tables S1–S5). The dashed black rectangle for BS3 is to highlight that lack of aggregation is not indicative of benign functional support (particularly for cardiac variants) since there are many other possible pathogenic mechanisms. PP3 and BP4 represent pathogenic and benign computational (REVEL and FoldX) support, respectively with 81 VUS predicted to be pathogenic by REVEL (Tables S1S5). Lack of variants in the control population from databases like genomAD (PM2) can further strengthen support for the pathogenic classification of LMNA variants in conjunction with the functional and in silico data. ACMG American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, REVEL Rare Exome Ensemble Learner, genomAD Genome Aggregation Database.

Our data supports PS3 assignment per ACMG guidelines for 65 myopathic VUS that significantly increased aggregation in at least one cell type (HEK 293 cells or C2C12 myoblasts). However, 46 increased in both cell types and consequently exhibit stronger functional support for pathogenicity so we propose categorizing these as PS3 (Fig. 6, Supplementary Tables 15). We think this more conservative interpretation of the data is preferable until these differences between cell types are understood and more validation studies are done in cardiac and skeletal myocytes. Also of importance in interpreting this assay is that lack of aggregation is not indicative of benign support (BS3) since alternative pathogenic mechanisms may exist and further functional studies are needed, which is highlighted in Fig. 6. We also show that REVEL and FoldX are good predictors of myopathic variants being deleterious and thus can provide computational support for pathogenicity (PP3/BP4) (Fig. 6, Supplementary Tables 15). Further, lack of variants in the control population in genomAD also supports pathogenicity (PM2) (Fig. 6). Combined, we show a functional, computational, and population data framework using lamin A aggregation, REVEL/FoldX, and genomAD, respectively that could be applied to nearly all skeletal and most cardiac laminopathic VUS towards pathogenic assessment per ACMG guidelines.


In this study, we use a data-driven approach to establish the formation of misfolded lamin A aggregates as a major consequence of striated muscle laminopathies. This result builds on previous studies showing aggregation of myopathic variants in many different cell types consistent with our results. For example, N195K, E358K, and M371K also aggregate in mouse embryonic fibroblasts10 and HeLa cells19, R527P in patient fibroblasts14, R166P and I210S in COS7 cells15 and K97E, L183P, K260N, and Y267C in C2C12 myoblasts20. This new insight is important because protein misfolding and aggregation are common disease mechanisms (e.g., neurodegenerative proteinopathies)17,34,35 and holds promise for developing therapeutics to restore protein homeostasis and improve clinical outcomes34,36,37. Most advances towards the treatment of striated muscle laminopathies involve in vitro strategies targeting signal transduction pathways that are upregulated38. Our results show that targeting lamin A misfolding and aggregation either directly or indirectly could also be a promising therapeutic strategy applicable to most striated muscle laminopathies. Further, although LMNA variant location (i.e., upstream of the NLS in CCDs but not IgD) is a good predictor of cardiac phenotype severity39, it would be intriguing to test, similar to ALS35, whether aggregation propensity could be used to predict disease severity for each variant rather than general location alone. This could help in patient management as well as clinical prognostication.

The second key advance from our data-driven approach helps address the gap in variant classification. At present, the number of newly identified variants through genome and exome sequencing30 is outpacing their classification, contributing to the excessive number of unclassified rare variants. Understanding the functional impact of variants on disease is essential for classifying variants (i.e., benign, likely benign, uncertain, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic), determining actionability, and advancing personalized medicine40. Guidelines have been developed to interpret sequence variation; one being the use of robust in vitro assays as strong evidence towards pathogenic classification21 when using an appropriate experimental framework33. Several recent studies have taken this approach to systematically analyze a large number of VUS including our previous studies of Long QT Syndrome-associated Kv11.1 variants22,41 among several others32,42,43. We show lamin A aggregation functionally supports pathogenicity (PS3) for at least 45 myopathic VUS and could be applied to others. Functionally analyzing the ever-growing number of VUS is a big challenge but recent advances in deep mutational scanning combined with workable high-throughput (HTP) functional assays make this goal slightly less daunting44,45. Based on our results, LMNA may also be amenable to massively parallel functional studies using flow cytometry-based analysis of nuclear protein aggregates46.

In silico analyses can be powerful methods of variant classification21,40 and gaining rapid structural insight into LMNA pathogenicity25. We found FoldX (~85% prediction) and REVEL (~89% prediction) to be very good predictors of lamin A pathogenicity. However, 10–15% are still incorrectly classified, and REVEL performed poorly for lipodystrophy and progeria variants. This is likely owing to REVEL being biased towards deleterious changes where many pathogenic variants are not destabilizing (i.e., lipodystrophy and progeria variants) but may disrupt protein-protein interactions for example. As supported by other studies47, these computational tools are best used as a complement to functional data analytic tools such as the assays tested here. In addition, we used our results to map each variant to its location within the CCD repeats to reveal any potential phenotype-location or aggregation propensity-location correlations. Overall, variants are over-represented at the ionic interaction residue “e” but largely distributed evenly across all CCD residues making location-based pathogenic predictions unlikely (Supplementary Figure 8). Similarly, myopathic variants mapped to the IgD are scattered but generally buried25 (Supplementary Table 5) suggesting IgD instability, which we confirmed here. However, not all destabilized IgD variants caused lamin A aggregation suggesting other mechanisms. For example, IgD is a hotspot for protein-protein interactions and variants could lead to numerous downstream effects without aggregation48. Nevertheless, our dataset may be useful for optimizing protein stability and aggregation prediction tools47 and gaining further insight into the structural basis of lamin A aggregation.

Mouse models have largely led the way in understanding laminopathies49 along with a variety of different overexpression systems showing some mechanistic differences, which are unavoidable limitations in biological research. Our large side-by-side comparison between HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts shows good agreement for CCD variants but less so for IgD variants, which were more aggregation-prone in HEK 293 cells compared to C2C12 myoblasts. This result shows that aggregation propensity is cell type-dependent. Since, nuclear envelope proteomes differ between tissues50, lamin A aggregation may be dependent on cell type-specific partners. Perhaps lamin A aggregation is more common for lipodystrophy and progeria variants when using more appropriate tissue models such as adipocytes and fibroblasts, respectively. Studying aggregation in human myocytes would therefore be particularly useful for characterizing IgD and other variants where there was no agreement between models. Also, aggregation propensity was significant for most variants but less obvious for a few (e.g., I63S, G465D, Y481H) and a more quantitative HTP method would be better to overcome uncertainties due to transfection variability, our relatively small sample size, and user error from manually counting cells46,51. Further, the absence of aggregation does not signify a lack of functional support (i.e., BS3) since numerous other mechanisms have been described. This important limitation of this assay is underscored by the skeletal disease-linked variant R545C, which in our study did not aggregate, IgD solubility was similar to WT, and missense variants at that residue are present in the general population. However, R545C was reported as a loss of function using patient myoblasts52 highlighting the difficulties of using only heterologous systems or only patient cells, where the loss of function could be attributable to other unknown genomic variables. Cases like these need further functional studies such as iPS cells with isogenic controls. Finally, with the exception of L35P that showed dominant-negative interactions, all of our aggregations results were from variant expression alone and it is possible that aggregation propensity may be dependent on WT co-expression. Moreover, it is possible that aggregation propensity is exaggerated in overexpression models compared to native tissue where expression levels are much lower. With these caveats, it is important to emphasize that aggregation is not a universal functional screen for myopathic laminopathies, but potentially a useful tool to assess uncertain variants. For cardiac variants, in particular, many mechanisms have been described53 and while some might just be the downstream effects of lamin A aggregation, ~50% are not and need further study.

Our data-driven approach here demonstrates that lamin A aggregation is a major mechanism underlying striated muscle laminopathies and establishes a functional assay to assist the classification of LMNA rare coding variants.


Variant databases and bioinformatic tools

Laminopathy-associated LMNA variants were identified from the Universal Mutational Database (, ClinVar (, and cross-checked for accuracy. Each variant’s disease classification is listed in the Supporting Information (most CMT2B1 designations under “conditions” in ClinVar were not supported and left out of Supplementary Tables). IgD FoldX values were obtained from a study by Scharner and co-authors25. ΔΔG values ≥2 were considered destabilizing. REVEL scores were obtained from Ioannidis and co-authors24 by entering chromosomal coordinates of variants obtained from ClinVar into the VariED database ( ROC-curve and AUC analyses were performed using the EPITOOLS web server ( 15 negative controls identified in the control population in genomAD (see Supplementary Tables 15) and 16 pathogenic controls (classified P or LP in ClinVar and aggregated in HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts herein) were used to determine an optimal REVEL score threshold of 0.76 where sensitivity equaled specificity. This threshold was used to decide agreement between REVEL scores and pathogenic predictions.

DNA plasmid construction

All missense variants were made using the QuikChange II XL kit (Agilent) using primers designed by Integrated DNA Technologies and listed in Supplementary Table 10. The template for mutagenesis was pcDNA3 N195K lamin A (Addgene #32708)54, which we mutated back to WT using forward primer CGGGTGGATGCTGAGAACAGGCTGCAGA and reverse primer TCTGCAGCCTGTTCTCAGCATCCACCCG and fully sequenced. Restriction digest analysis was used to test the integrity of all variant constructs, which were then sequenced at the UW-Biotechnology Center. For E. coli expression constructs, PCR was used to amplify the IgD (amino acids 435–553) for ligation-independent cloning into a 6X His-tagged pET3 plasmid previously described22.

Cell culture

HEK 293 cells (ATCC) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 1 g/L glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 4 mM l-glutamine, and 10% FBS. C2C12 myoblasts (MilliporeSigma) were maintained in DMEM containing 4.5 g/L glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 4 mM l-glutamine, and 10% FBS. iPS cells (DF19-9-11T.H cells from WiCell Stem Bank) were maintained on Matrigel-coated plates using StemFlex media (ThermoFisher) before differentiation. iPSC-CMs older than Day 30 were maintained on Matrigel-coated 6-well plates in RPMI + B27 (ThermoFisher) until transient transfection and imaging experiments. All cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

Lamin A immunoblotting

For western blot of full-length GFP-lamin A, HEK 293 cells or C2C12 myoblasts of similar confluence (~90%) were transiently transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) using a DNA/lipofectamine ration of 1:3. Cells were grown at 37 °C for 24 h and GFP-lamin A bands were detected by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis. In brief, cells were lysed in HEK 293 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, protease inhibitor cocktail) and the insoluble material was spun down at 15,000 × g for 10 min. Supernatants were mixed with an equal amount of Laemmli sample buffer, separated by SDS/7% PAGE, and detected with 1:1000 anti-GFP-HRP antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-9996-HRP). Blots were derived from the same experiment and processed in parallel.

IgD solubility assay

Our solubility assay was performed as previously reported22. In brief, single colonies of BL21(DE3) cells (New England BioLabs) transformed with each 6X His-tagged variant construct were grown overnight (~18 h) at 37° in 2 ml of auto-induction media. An equal number of cells were harvested, washed (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) once, and lysed in E. coli lysis buffer (Wash buffer, Cell Lytic B ® (Sigma), and 100 μM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) for 10 min at room temperature. In all, 5 μL of total cell lysate was diluted in 25 μL of wash buffer and added to an equal volume of 2x Laemmli sample buffer before western blot. Soluble protein was collected from the supernatant after a 15,000 × g spin for 10 min and diluted in equal amounts of 2× sample buffer for western blot or serially diluted 1:2 for dot blot (1 μL). All samples were boiled for 1–2 mins, run on SDS/12% PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose paper, and probed with 1:1000 anti-His-HRP antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-8036-HRP). Densitometry was performed using ImageJ (NIH) to quantify immunoblots. For dot blots, one representative row from each serially diluted dot blot was quantified (n ≥ 3). Blots were derived from the same experiment and processed in parallel.

Lamin A aggregation analysis

For HEK 293 cells and C2C12 myoblasts, similarly confluent cells (~80–90%) in 12 or 24 well plates were transfected with 1–2 μg of GFP-lamin A cDNA using a DNA/Lipofectamine 2000 (Qiagen) ratio of 1:3 and grown at 37 °C for 24 h before imaging. For iPSC-CMs, similarly confluent cells (~80–90%) in six-well dishes were transfected with 3 μg of either GFP- WT lamin A or mCherry- WT lamin A (Addgene #55068) using a DNA/ViaFect (Promega) ratio of 1:3. For co-transfections, 1.5 μg of each plasmid was used and grown at 37 °C for 24 h before imaging at ×20 or ×40 magnification using an EVOS FL Imaging System (ThermoFisher). The percentage of cells with lamin A aggregates were obtained by counting ≥100 cells from different fields of view averaged over at least three transfections. All images analyzed were done blinded except for WT to test the quality of the transfected cells (i.e., no cytotoxicity and normal WT-like levels). Counts included cells that had foci of varying sizes and numbers spread throughout the nucleus (the vast majority), some with just one or two large aggregates on one or opposite ends of the nucleus, and some that aggregated into a “honeycomb”-like pattern. For iPSC-CMs, 1:400 APC-anti-CD172a (SIRPa)55 (Biolegend #144013) was added directly to cells for 30 min before washing out and imaging. Only cells that were SIRPa positive and/or beating were counted. Examples used to count aggregates are shown in Supplementary Figures 2 and 3. For each set of transfections, WT was also included to check for quality (see large n for WT in Supplementary Tables 15), and counting for all variants was done blinded.

Human iPSC-cardiomyocytes differentiation

19-9-11 hiPSCs were differentiated into hiPSC-CMs using a modified procedure previously described28. In brief, hiPSCs maintained on StemFlex/Matrigel were dissociated into single cells and seeded onto Matrigel-coated six-well plates. Cells were cultured for ~5 days in StemFlex medium until they reached 100% confluence. The differentiation (Day 0) started with changing the medium to RPMI + B27 supplement without insulin and 6 µM CHIR99021 (Tocris Bioscience). After 24 h (Day 1), the medium was changed to RPMI + B27 without insulin. After 48 h (Day 3), 5 μM IWP2 (Tocris Bioscience) was added in a combined medium of 1.5 mL of spent medium from the wells and 1.5 ml of fresh RPMI + B27 without insulin. After 48 h (Day 5), the medium was changed to RPMI + B27 without insulin. After 48 h (Day 7), the medium was changed to RPMI + B27 with insulin. The differentiated cells (beating observed ~Day 10) were maintained with medium changes until Day 15 and cryostorage. After the thaw, differentiated hiPSC-CMs were lactate purified in lactate medium (RPMI without glucose, B27 supplement, and 5 mM Sodium DL-lactate) for 10 days29. hiPSC-CMs were then maintained in RPMI with B27 supplement. All experiments were done using hiPSC-CMs after Day 30.

Flow cytometry

Approximately one million iPSC-CMs were dissociated to single cells with 0.25% Trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid at 37 °C for 5 min and then pelleted at 1000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, and cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde at 37 °C for 10 min in the dark, pelleted, and then resuspended in ice-cold 90% methanol for 30 min. Cells were then pelleted and washed with 3 ml fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (DPBS without Ca2+/Mg2+, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% NaN3) to remove methanol, pelleted again and resuspended in 100 μL FACS buffer. For labeling, 1:200 dilutions of mouse anti-cTnT (ThermoFisher #MA5-12960) and rabbit anti-MLC2v (Proteintech #10906) antibodies were added to the cells in FACS buffer for a final sample volume of 100 μL and incubated at 4 °C overnight (negative control did not receive primary antibody). Cells were then washed in 3 ml of FACS buffer, pelleted, and supernatant was discarded leaving 50 μL. In all, 1:1000 anti-mouse AlexaFluor 568 (Invitrogen #A11031) and 1:1000 anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488 (Invitrogen #A-11035) secondary antibodies were then added for a final sample volume of 100 μL. Samples were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, washed in FACS buffer, and resuspended in 300–500 μL FACS buffer for analysis. Data were collected on an Attune Nxt flow cytometer (ThermoFisher) and analyzed with FlowJo. The gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Figure 10.

Statistical analysis

All aggregation data are presented as mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance with Dunn’s post hoc test was used to determine differences between variants and WT. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

This research is in accordance with NIH and the University of Wisconsin-Madison policy for responsible conduction of research. All experiments and procedures have been approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison policy. The iPSC experiments have been approved by UW Stem Cell Research Oversight (SCRO-1701), and also comply with guidance from NIH Guidelines for Human Stem Cell Research.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All variants referenced here can be accessed from ClinVar ( and/or the Universal Mutational Database ( ClinVar accession numbers are listed for each variant in the Supplementary Tables. Materials and aggregation data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Dittmer, T. A. & Misteli, T. The lamin protein family. Genome Biol. 12, 222 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Worman, H. J. & Bonne, G. “Laminopathies”: a wide spectrum of human diseases. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 2121–2133 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bonne, G. et al. Mutations in the gene encoding lamin A/C cause autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat. Genet. 21, 285–288 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fatkin, D. et al. Missense mutations in the rod domain of the lamin A/C gene as causes of dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction-system disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 1715–1724 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cao, H. & Hegele, R. A. Nuclear lamin A/C R482Q mutation in Canadian kindreds with Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 109–112 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Eriksson, M. et al. Recurrent de novo point mutations in lamin A cause Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome. Nature 423, 293–298 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sandre-Giovannoli, A. D. et al. Homozygous defects in LMNA, encoding lamin A/C nuclear-envelope proteins, cause autosomal recessive axonal neuropathy in human (charcot-marie-tooth disorder type 2) and mouse. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 726–736 (2002).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ahn, J. et al. Structural basis for lamin assembly at the molecular level. Nat. Commun. 10, 3757 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dhe-Paganon, S., Werner, E. D., Chi, Y.-I. & Shoelson, S. E. Structure of the globular tail of nuclear lamin. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17381–17384 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zwerger, M. et al. Myopathic lamin mutations impair nuclear stability in cells and tissue and disrupt nucleo-cytoskeletal coupling. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 2335–2349 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Osmanagic-Myers, S. & Foisner, R. The structural and gene expression hypotheses in laminopathic diseases—not so different after all. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 1786–1790 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Vigouroux, C. et al. Lipodystrophic syndromes due to LMNA mutations: recent developments on biomolecular aspects, pathophysiological hypotheses and therapeutic perspectives. Nucleus 9, 1–32 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Broers, J. L. V., Ramaekers, F. C. S., Bonne, G., Yaou, R. B. & Hutchison, C. J. Nuclear lamins: laminopathies and their role in premature ageing. Physiol. Rev. 86, 967–1008 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Muchir, A. et al. Nuclear envelope alterations in fibroblasts from patients with muscular dystrophy, cardiomyopathy, and partial lipodystrophy carrying lamin A/C gene mutations. Muscle Nerve 30, 444–450 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cowan, J., Li, D., Gonzalez-Quintana, J., Morales, A. & Hershberger, R. E. Morphological analysis of 13 LMNA variants identified in a cohort of 324 unrelated patients with idiopathic or familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 3, 6–14 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tienen, F. H. Jvan. et al. Assessment of fibroblast nuclear morphology aids interpretation of LMNA variants. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 27, 389–399 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Baets, G. D., Doorn, L. V., Rousseau, F. & Schymkowitz, J. Increased aggregation is more frequently associated to human disease-associated mutations than to neutral polymorphisms. Plos Comput. Biol. 11, e1004374 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dutta, S. et al. Skeletal muscle dystrophy mutant of lamin A alters the structure and dynamics of the Ig fold domain. Sci. Rep. UK 8, 13793 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hübner, S., Eam, J. E., Wagstaff, K. M. & Jans, D. A. Quantitative analysis of localization and nuclear aggregate formation induced by GFP‐lamin A mutant proteins in living HeLa cells. J. Cell Biochem. 98, 810–826 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bhattacharjee, P., Dasgupta, D. & Sengupta, K. DCM associated LMNA mutations cause distortions in lamina structure and assembly. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1861, 2598–2608 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–423 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Anderson, C. L. et al. A rapid solubility assay of protein domain misfolding for pathogenicity assessment of rare DNA sequence variants. Genet. Med. 22, 1642–1652 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schymkowitz, J. et al. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 382–388 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ioannidis, N. M. et al. REVEL. An ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 877–885 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Scharner, J., Lu, H., Fraternali, F., Ellis, J. A. & Zammit, P. S. Mapping disease‐related missense mutations in the immunoglobulin‐like fold domain of lamin A/C reveals novel genotype–phenotype associations for laminopathies. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 82, 904–915 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dialynas, G. et al. Myopathic lamin mutations cause reductive stress and activate the Nrf2/Keap-1 pathway. Plos Genet. 11, e10052 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Crasto, S. & Di Pasquale, E. Induced pluripotent stem cells to study mechanisms of laminopathies: focus on epigenetics. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 6, 172 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lian, X. et al. Directed cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells by modulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling under fully defined conditions. Nat. Protoc. 8, 162–175 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tohyama, S. et al. Distinct metabolic flow enables large-scale purification of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cell Stem Cell 12, 127–137 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Peretto, G. et al. Cardiac and neuromuscular features of patients with LMNA-related cardiomyopathy. Ann. Intern. Med. 171, 458–463.

  32. 32.

    Hong, J. H. et al. Functional characterization guides classification of novel BAP1 germline variants. NPJ Genom. Med. 5, 50 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Brnich, S. E. et al. Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med. 12, 3 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sweeney, P. et al. Protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases: implications and strategies. Transl. Neurodegener. 6, 6 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, Q., Johnson, J. L., Agar, N. Y. R. & Agar, J. N. Protein aggregation and protein instability govern familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient survival. Plos Biol. 6, e170 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hipp, M. S., Park, S.-H. & Hartl, F. U. Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 506–514 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Liguori, L. et al. Pharmacological chaperones: a therapeutic approach for diseases caused by destabilizing missense mutations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 489 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Schreiber, K. H. & Kennedy, B. K. When lamins go bad: nuclear structure and disease. Cell 152, 1365–1375 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Captur, G. et al. Lamin mutation location predicts cardiac phenotype severity: combined analysis of the published literature. Open Heart 5, e000915 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Peterson, T. A., Doughty, E. & Kann, M. G. Towards precision medicine: advances in computational approaches for the analysis of human variants. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4047–4063 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Anderson, C. L. et al. Large-scale mutational analysis of Kv11.1 reveals molecular insights into type 2 long QT syndrome. Nat. Commun. 5, 5535 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Woods, N. T. et al. Functional assays provide a robust tool for the clinical annotation of genetic variants of uncertain significance. Npj Genom. Med. 1, 16001 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wiltshire, T. et al. Functional characterization of 84 PALB2 variants of uncertain significance. Genet. Med. 22, 622–632 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Starita, L. M. et al. Variant interpretation: functional assays to the rescue. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 315–325 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Weile, J. et al. A framework for exhaustively mapping functional missense variants. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 957 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Whiten, D. R. et al. Rapid flow cytometric measurement of protein inclusions and nuclear trafficking. Sci. Rep. 6, 31138 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Khan, S. & Vihinen, M. Performance of protein stability predictors. Hum. Mut. 31, 675–684 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Dittmer, T. A. et al. Systematic identification of pathological lamin A interactors. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 1493–1510 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Stewart, C. L., Kozlov, S., Fong, L. G. & Young, S. G. Mouse models of the laminopathies. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 2144–2156 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Korfali, N. et al. The nuclear envelope proteome differs notably between tissues. Nucleus 3, 552–564 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Scotter, E. L., Narayan, P., Glass, M. & Dragunow, M. High throughput quantification of mutant huntingtin aggregates. J. Neurosci. Methods 171, 174–179 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kandert, S., Wehnert, M., Müller, C. R., Buendia, B. & Dabauvalle, M.-C. Impaired nuclear functions lead to increased senescence and inefficient differentiation in human myoblasts with a dominant p.R545C mutation in the LMNA gene. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 88, 593–608 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Crasto, S., My, I. & Di Pasquale, E. The broad spectrum of LMNA cardiac diseases: from molecular mechanisms to clinical phenotype. Front. Physiol. 11, 761 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gilchrist, S. et al. Altered protein dynamics of disease-associated lamin A mutants. BMC Cell Biol. 5, 46 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Dubois, N. C. et al. SIRPA is a specific cell-surface marker for isolating cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1011–1018 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Krishanu Saha, Jianhua Zhang, Gina Kim, Mitch Biermann, and Mariana Anderson for helpful suggestions and technical assistance. This study was supported by NIH R01 HL07887 (T.J.K.), Ruth L Kirschstein F32 HL128091 NRSA postdoctoral fellowship (C.L.A.), NIH R01 HL139738-01 (L.L.E), NIH R01 HL128598 (L.L.E.), and in part by funds from the Gary and Marie Weiner Professor in Cardiovascular Medicine (L.L.E).

Author information




C.L.A., E.R.L., T.C.R., S.F.M. and I.B. performed the experiments. C.L.A. designed the study and C.L.A., E.R.L., T.C.R., S.F.M., T.J.K. and L.L.E. contributed to manuscript generation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Corey L. Anderson or Lee L. Eckhardt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.J.K. serves as a consultant for Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics, which is a stem cell technology company. The other authors declare no other conflict of interests or financial disclosures to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, C.L., Langer, E.R., Routes, T.C. et al. Most myopathic lamin variants aggregate: a functional genomics approach for assessing variants of uncertain significance. npj Genom. Med. 6, 103 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing