Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Vitamin D ointment for prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients

Subjects

Abstract

Radiation dermatitis occurs frequently during adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer. Prevention of radiation dermatitis by applying various creams and ointments has a limited success, and Aqua cream which has urea as one of its active ingredients is used in many institutions as a preventive treatment. The primary goal of this study is to assess the effect of vitamin D (calcipotriol) ointment in prevention of radiodermatitis in breast cancer patients compared to Aqua cream. Twenty-three women with localized breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and opted to receive adjuvant radiotherapy to breast only were enrolled in this study. A cream containing an active vitamin D analog, calcipotriol (Daivonex), was randomly applied either to the medial or to the lateral half of the irradiated breast, while Aqua cream was applied to the complimentary half of the same breast along the whole treatment days, each day, after the delivery of radiation. Skin reaction was recorded and compared between the two halves of the breast. Vitamin D was well tolerated by patients with no local or systemic allergic reactions. Radiation dermatitis was not significantly different between both treatment arms. Topical vitamin D ointment is not superior to Aqua cream for prevention of radiation-induced dermatitis in women treated with adjuvant radiation for breast cancer.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in women in the western world.1 Breast conserving surgery, followed by breast radiation was shown to be equivalent to total mastectomy, and turned to be a standard of care for patients with breast cancer.2 Adjuvant breast radiation decreases local recurrence of breast cancer, and is well tolerated. Acute side effects of breast radiation include radiation dermatitis which can range from mild to severe reactions.3 Prevention of radiation dermatitis using local therapies is so far disappointing.4

We have previously showed that in laboratory conditions, the active vitamin D metabolite, calcitriol, protects proliferating keratinocytes from the damage inflicted by ionizing radiation.5 Calcitriol inhibits both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent programmed cell death and increases the colony formation capacity of irradiated keratinocytes.5 These positive preliminary results, prompted us to evaluate the role of topical active vitamin D, calcipotriol, as a measure for preventing skin-induced radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients.

Results

Patients clinical characteristics

Thirty patients were assessed for eligibility. Four patients were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria, and three patients declined to participate. From the 30 patients assessed, 23 patients were enrolled in the study and final analysis (Fig. 1). The trial was stopped after completion of the recruitment of the necessary number of patients. Mean age was 63 years (range, 37–74 years) (Table 1). Fifteen patients (65%) were of Ashkenazi, and eight patients (35%) were of Sephardic Jewish descent (Table 2). Seventeen of the 23 patients had no drug or food allergies. Four patients were allergic to penicillin, one to sesame, and one to sulfa. Six patients suffered from Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and 17 patients from Invasive Ductal Carcinoma. Clinical staging of all patients with invasive cancer was T1-2N0M0 (primary tumor diameter less than 5 cm). Twelve patients (52%) had radiation treatment to the left breast, while eleven patients (48%) had radiation treatment to the right breast.

Fig. 1
figure1

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flowchart

Table 1 Patient’s characteristics
Table 2 Breast skin toxicity according to RTOG scale in the parts of the breast treated with Daivonex or Aqua cream

Randomization of calcipotriol and Aqua cream to the treated parts of the irradiated breast skin

Fourteen patients (61%) applied calcipotriol to the lateral side of the breast, while nine patients (39%) applied calcipotriol to the medial side of the breast.

Skin reaction

Vitamin D was well tolerated by patients with no localized or systemic allergic reactions. Skin toxicity was evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale for skin toxicity6 (Table 2). Photographic documentation of the breast was available for 15 patients (Fig. 2). The intensity of radiation dermatitis increased during treatment, and reached its highest intensity by the conclusion of radiation therapy. By the last day of radiation therapy, no grade 4 toxicity was detected. One patient suffered from grade 3 toxicity in both the calcipotriol treated breast half and the Aqua cream treated control half. Grade 2 skin toxicity was noted in 16 patients in both the part of the breast treated with calcipotriol and in the control part of the breast treated with Aqua cream. One patient suffered from grade 2 skin toxicity in the Aqua cream treated breast half, while having grade 1 skin reaction, in the breast half treated with the investigation cream, calcipotriol (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Breast skin reaction during radiation therapy. The irradiated breast was photographed each week, and at each follow-up visit. Each raw refers to the same patient. Lateral (L) or medial (M) parts of the irradiated breast were treated with Calcipotriol (C) or Aqua cream (A)

Assessment of skin toxicity in the part of the breast treated with calcipotriol, compared to the part of breast treated with Aqua cream, according to the research physician and patient subjective judgment are described in Table 3. Clinical evaluation revealed that in 20 out of 23 patients (87%) there was no difference in the skin reaction between the calcipotriol and the Aqua cream treated skin parts of the breast. In two patients the skin reaction in the calcipotriol treated part of the breast was more intense compared to the Aqua cream treated part, while one patient had lesser skin toxicity in the calcipotriol treated breast part, compared to the breast part treated with Aqua cream (Table 3). There was no correlation between breast size, eye color, ethnic background or age, and radiation dermatitis.

Table 3 The patient and the treating physician compared the effect of Daivonex vs. Aqua cream on radiation dermatitis at the conclusion of the treatment

Discussion

Radiation dermatitis is one of the most bothersome side effects of adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer.6 Here we show that topical vitamin D is not superior to the skin hydrating ointment, Aqua cream, in preventing radiation-induced skin toxicity. Vitamin D ointment was well tolerated, and breast skin areas treated with it suffered from similar skin toxicities compared to those inspected in the Aqua cream treated parts. The current study was powered to detect 20% improvement in skin toxicity, and was not powered to detect non-inferiority of vitamin D ointment. Due to the lower costs of skin hydrating ointments compared to the vitamin D ointments, our results show that there is no added benefit of using vitamin D ointment for the indication of preventing radiation dermatitis. Possible explanation to the discrepancy between our laboratory results5 and the current clinical data, is that in the laboratory study, vitamin D effect was tested on keratinocytes cell culture, while in the current study the skin tissue contain several cell types7 and layers on which, in the sum, vitamin D seems to have no radiation protecting effect. Another explanation is that the decreased cell death that potentially results from vitamin D may not be in correlation with radiation dermatitis.

Zhang et al. published a meta-analysis of 20 reports of clinical trials using topical agents for prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis.8 The analysis which included 3098 patients showed that the current topical agents do not prevent or treat radiation dermatitis effectively.8 Chan et al.9 provided an overview of six systematic reviews of published interventions for the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis.1015 The authors found that the methodological quality of the studies varied, and methodological shortfalls in these reviews might create biases to the overall results or recommendations for clinical practice.9 Using experimental radiation in mice, Chen et al. demonstrated that topical steroid cream significantly attenuated radiation-induced inflammation.16 A double-blind randomized study showed that mometasone furoate, a potent corticosteroid cream, significantly reduces acute radiation dermatitis.17 Several other studies showed benefit for mometasone furoate.18, 19 Schmuth et al. 20 randomized patients treated with radiotherapy to prophylactic methylprednisolone vs. dexpanthenol but didn’t proved added value of corticosteroids. A phase III randomized trial comparing Calendula officinalis with trolamine for the prevention of acute dermatitis during radiation therapy for breast cancer showed an improved outcomes with Calendula,21 but results from another randomized blinded trial showed no differences between Calendula cream and aqueous cream in the prevention of acute radiation skin reactions.22 Recently, several studies focused on changing the radiation technique for adjuvant breast cancer in an effort to reduce skin toxicity.23, 24 A multicenter randomized trial showed that Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for the breast cancer results in less radiation dermatitis.24, 25 Several systemic approaches for preventing radiation induced dermatitis were described, focusing on antioxidant nutrients,26, 27 but currently there is no randomized study which proved benefit of such approach.

In conclusion, topical vitamin D is not superior to the skin hydrating ointment, Aqua cream, in the prevention of radiation induced skin toxicity during adjuvant radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The Ethics Committee of Rabin Medical Center approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to study entry. Consent to publish unidentifiable photos of the irradiated breast was obtained from each patient. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00445250.

Eligibility

The study was performed at the Rabin Medical Center (Petach Tikva, Israel) between April 2007 and May 2012. Inclusion criteria for the study were women aged 18 to 75 years with a confirmed histological diagnosis of localized breast cancer. All patients were after breast lumpectomy, and scheduled to receive adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients were excluded from the study if they had scleroderma, large breast with an inter-field of more than 25 cm, or prior radiotherapy to the same breast. Patients with indication to lymph node irradiation were not included in this study. Patients were enrolled by the treating radiation oncologist.

Radiation therapy

Treatment simulation was performed using computerized tomography planning. Radiation therapy to the involved breast was delivered by two tangential fields. Radiation therapy was delivered as a single fraction per day, 5 days a week. Radiation dose was either 42.72 Gy in 16 fractions or 50 Gy in 25 fractions. When indicated, a boost was provided to the tumor bed, to a total dose of 10 Gy administered in 5 fractions of 2 Gy each.

Topical ointments

The medial and lateral parts of the irradiated breast were randomly assigned by coin flipping, by the study coordinator, to receive either Daivonex (LEO Pharmaceutical Products Ltd., Ballerup, Denmark) or Aqua cream. After 15 min of receiving the daily radiation dose, Daivonex was applied to half of the breast and Aqua cream to the other half, by the patient under supervision of the study nurse. The study arms were open to the patients and the investigators.

Clinical evaluation

Adverse skin effects were assessed by a physician and a nurse according to the RTOG scoring system.6 A questionnaire about the efficacy and safety of the cream was given to each patient. Evaluation was performed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 weeks following the initiation of treatment. The irradiated breast was photographed at each follow-up visit.

Statistical analysis

Sample size was calculated to detect a change of 20% or more in radiation dermatitis, and it was calculated that 20 assessable patients were required. An interim analysis was planned to stop the trial in case any detrimental effect, or grade 4 or 5 toxicities, were observed among the first eight treated patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical soft ware program Microsoft Office Excel 2007.

References

  1. 1.

    Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 7–30 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fisher, B. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 347, 1233–1241 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Di Franco, R. et al. Preventing the acute skin side effects in patients treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer: the use of corneometry in order to evaluate the protective effect of moisturizing creams. Radiat. Oncol. 8, e1–e7 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dendaas, N. Toward evidence and theory-based skin care in radiation oncology. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 16, 520 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Langberg, M., Rotem, C., Fenig, E., Koren, R. & Ravid, A. Vitamin D protects keratinocytes from deleterious effects of ionizing radiation. Brit. J. Dermatol. 160, 151–161 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cox, J. D., Stetz, J. & Pajak, T. F. Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 31, 1341–1346 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Turesson, I. et al. A low-dose hypersensitive keratinocyte loss in response to fractionated radiotherapy is associated with growth arrest and apoptosis. Radiother. Oncol. 94, 90–101 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhang, Y., Zhang, S. & Shao, X. Topical agent therapy for prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 21, 1025–1031 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chan, R. J., Larsen, E. & Chan, P. Re-examining the evidence in radiation dermatitis management literature: an overview and a critical appraisal of systematic reviews. Int.J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 84, e357–e362 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bolderston, A. et al. The prevention and management of acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy: a systematic review and practice guideline. Support Care Cancer. 14, 802–817 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Richardson, J., Smith, J. E., McIntyre, M., Thomas, R. & Pilkington, K. Aloe vera for preventing radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic literature review. Clin. Oncol. 17, 478–484 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Salvo, N. et al. Prophylaxis and management of acute radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic review of the literature. Curr. Oncol. 17, 94 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Butcher, K. & Williamson, K. Management of erythema and skin preservation; advice for patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the breast: a systematic literature review. J. Radiother. Pract. 11, 44–54 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Koukourakis, G. V., Kelekis, N., Kouvaris, J., Beli, I. K. & Kouloulias, V. E. Therapeutics interventions with anti-inflammatory creams in post radiation acute skin reactions: a systematic review of most important clinical trials. Recent Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 4, 149–158 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kedge, E. M. A systematic review to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for moist desquamation in radiotherapy patients. Radiography 15, 247–257 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen, M.-F. et al. Predictive factors of radiation-induced skin toxicity in breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 10, 508 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Boström, Å., Lindman, H., Swartling, C., Berne, B. & Bergh, J. Potent corticosteroid cream (mometasone furoate) significantly reduces acute radiation dermatitis: results from a double-blind, randomized study. Radiother. Oncol. 59, 257–265 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Hindley, A. et al. Mometasone furoate cream reduces acute radiation dermatitis in patients receiving breast radiation therapy: results of a randomized trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 90, 748–755 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miller, R. C. et al. Mometasone furoate effect on acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a phase 3 double-blind, randomized trial from the north central cancer treatment group n06c4. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 79, 1460–1466 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Schmuth, M. et al. Topical corticosteroid therapy for acute radiation dermatitis: a prospective, randomized, double‐blind study. Brit. J. Dermatol. 146, 983–991 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pommier, P. et al. Phase III randomized trial of Calendula officinalis compared with trolamine for the prevention of acute dermatitis during irradiation for breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 1447–1453 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sharp, L. et al. No differences between calendula cream and aqueous cream in the prevention of acute radiation skin reactions – Results from a randomised blinded trial. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 17, 429–435 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Morganti, A. G. et al. Phase I–II studies on accelerated IMRT in breast carcinoma: technical comparison and acute toxicity in 332 patients. Radiother. Oncol. 90, 86–92 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pignol, J.-P. et al. A multicenter randomized trial of breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce acute radiation dermatitis. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2085–2092 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Haffty, B. G., Buchholz, T. A. & McCormick, B. Should intensity-modulated radiation therapy be the standard of care in the conservatively managed breast cancer patient? J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2072–2074 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Weiss, J. F. & Landauer, M. R. Protection against ionizing radiation by antioxidant nutrients and phytochemicals. Toxicology 189, 1–20 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Morganti, A. G. et al. Radioprotective effect of moderate wine consumption in patients with breast carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 74, 1501–1505 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Aaron Allen, Dr. Aaron Popovtzer, Dr. Yulia Kundel, Dr. Salem Billan, Dr. Dror Limon, Dr. Claude Koren, and the nursing and radiation therapists' teams at Davidoff Center for their technical assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: E.F., R.K., A.R.; Provided reagents: E.F.; Acquisition and analysis of data: N.J.N., S.F., A.N., N.O., S.G., E.F.; Drafting of Manuscript: N.J.N, S.F., E.f.; Critical Revision: N.J.N., S.F., A.R., A.N., N.O., S.G., R.K, E.F. E.F. is the guarantor of this study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Fenig.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasser, N.J., Fenig, S., Ravid, A. et al. Vitamin D ointment for prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients. npj Breast Cancer 3, 10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0006-x

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links