The resistance and resilience provided by functional redundancy, a common feature of microbial communities, is not always advantageous. An example is nitrite oxidation in partial nitritation-anammox (PNA) reactors designed for nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment, where suppression of nitrite oxidizers like Nitrospira is sought. In these ecosystems, biofilms provide microhabitats with oxygen gradients, allowing the coexistence of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. We designed a disturbance experiment where PNA biofilms, treating water from a high-rate activated sludge process, were constantly or intermittently exposed to anaerobic sidestream wastewater, which has been proposed to inhibit nitrite oxidizers. With increasing sidestream exposure we observed decreased abundance, alpha-diversity, functional versatility, and hence functional redundancy, among Nitrospira in the PNA biofilms, while the opposite patterns were observed for anammox bacteria within Brocadia. At the same time, species turnover was observed for aerobic ammonia-oxidizing Nitrosomonas populations. The different exposure regimens were associated with metagenomic assembled genomes of Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira, and Brocadia, encoding genes related to N-cycling, substrate usage, and osmotic stress response, possibly explaining the three different patterns by niche differentiation. These findings imply that disturbances can be used to manage the functional redundancy of biofilm microbiomes in a desirable direction, which should be considered when designing operational strategies for wastewater treatment.
Disturbances are common phenomena affecting both natural and engineered systems leading to changes in biodiversity, as well as impacting ecosystem functioning1. Protection against the loss of ecosystem services even when ecosystems are exposed to disturbances can be provided by highly diverse communities, as stated by the insurance hypothesis2. This is because functional redundancy, a direct result of biodiversity, is predicted to provide resilience and resistance against environmental change3,4. Furthermore, biodiversity is linked to multifunctionality and the capability of a community or population to provide a multitude of ecosystem services5,6,7. In highly diverse microbial systems such as soils, sediments and wastewater treatment bioreactors, a high degree of multifunctionality and functional redundancy should consequently lead to high resilience and a resistant supply of ecosystem services. These are preferred features for many ecosystems, protecting them from anthropogenically induced changes8,9. However, in engineered systems certain ecosystem services are unwanted (so called disservices)10,11. Functional redundancy of disservices within an engineered system can hinder the tuning of these systems towards the desired reactor function.
In wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), enhanced biological nitrogen removal is used to reduce the amount of reactive nitrogen in the effluent, which otherwise would lead to impaired water quality and eutrophication in recipient waterways12. The recent focus on energy neutrality at WWTPs has promoted processes based on nitritation. This can be achieved with partial nitritation-anammox (PNA) by maintaining two ecosystem services; aerobic oxidation of half of the influent ammonia to nitrite by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), and anaerobic oxidation of the remaining ammonia with reduction of nitrite to form nitrogen gas by anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria13. In PNA, further oxidation of nitrite to nitrate by nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) is undesired14 and hence an ecosystem disservice. The two steps of aerobic and anaerobic ammonium oxidation can take place either in separate reactors (two-stage) or in the same reactor (one-stage). Because of the slow growth rate of the AOB and anammox bacteria, biofilm systems are commonly used to maintain the biomass in the WWTP bioreactors15. Moreover, biofilms provide oxygen gradients allowing the coexistence of the AOB and anammox bacteria in the same biofilm, in the case of one-stage reactors16.
AOB and NOB belong to multiple genera, where Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira and Nitrotoga are the most common in WWTPs. Furthermore, multiple subpopulations are often reported to coexist for the AOB Nitrosomonas17,18 and the NOB Nitrospira19,20. This microdiversity within populations might represent ecotypes, closely related populations that can occupy different ecological niches21. For example, closely related Nitrosomonas and Nitrospira populations are known to differ in their preferences for substrate concentration22,23,24 and temperature23,25, as well as their ability to use alternative energy sources such as urea, cyanate, formate, and hydrogen24,26,27,28. In addition, some Nitrospira are nitrite oxidizers, while other closely related Nitrospira are capable of complete ammonia oxidation to nitrate29,30,31,32. In the case of anammox bacteria, microdiversity within wastewater treatment microbiomes is less documented but has been demonstrated in marine ecosystems33,34. It is also evident that ecotypes within Brocadia, common in anammox wastewater treatment reactors, differ in their substrate preferences and responses to reactor operation35,36. As opposed to the autotrophic processes of aerobic ammonia- and nitrite oxidation, and anammox, denitrification is a process carried out by a large number of taxa, distributed across multiple phyla, with considerable metabolic versatility37.
PNA has been implemented at many WWTPs to treat the dewatering liquor from anaerobic digestion of sludge (“sidestream water”), which is warm (>25 °C) and ammonium rich (>500 mg NH4-N/L)13. However, treating municipal wastewater (“mainstream water”) that has less ammonium (<100 mg NH4-N/L) has been challenging, in particular for temperate regions with cold water (<15 °C)15,38. Here, both modeling approaches and experimental results have shown that it is difficult to simultaneously maintain high activities of AOB and anammox bacteria and inhibit unwanted NOB activity15,39.
Multiple strategies have been used to inhibit NOB in the mainstream, such as short solids retention time, dissolved oxygen limitation, intermittent aeration, free ammonia exposure, free nitrous acid exposure and acidic nitritation38,40,41,42. Recent studies have shown that it is important to understand how NOB populations respond to changes in environmental conditions to devise effective inhibition strategies20,43. Exposing mainstream communities to sidestream wastewater has previously been proposed as a method to inhibit NOB40,44. The inhibition could occur due to multiple mechanisms, such as increased competition for nitrite and oxygen with anammox bacteria and AOB, respectively, and the presence of higher free ammonia concentrations45,46,47. Therefore, a disturbance management with sidestream exposure may reduce the biodiversity and functional redundancy of NOB in PNA bioreactors. However, for disturbance management with sidestream exposure to be a viable approach, the functional diversity of AOB and anammox bacteria must not be negatively affected. Shifts in the composition of NOB, AOB, and anammox bacteria can be expected, but the effects on abundance, biodiversity, and functional redundancy are unknown. It is also important to consider the frequency and intensity of disturbances, which in bioreactors have been shown to have impact in microbial community composition and ecosystem function48,49,50.
At the Sjölunda WWTP (Malmö, Sweden), one-stage mainstream and sidestream pilot PNA reactors harbored biofilm communities with Nitrospira, Nitrosomonas and Brocadia populations, which have been previously characterized to contain various degrees of microdiversity51. In this study, we designed a disturbance experiment where mainstream PNA biofilms during winter were repeatedly exposed to sidestream wastewater for specific time periods and compared the treatment with PNA biofilms kept in the mainstream bioreactor (Fig. 1). We ask if such a disturbance regimen could be utilized to shift the microbial community of biofilms towards a desired state. To address this question, we describe the effects of a temporal gradient of sidestream exposure on the abundance, microdiversity, and functional diversity of NOB, AOB, anammox- and denitrifying bacteria.
Our main hypothesis is that the effect of sidestream wastewater would differ across functional groups. More specifically, we hypothesize that the microdiversity of Nitrospira, Nitrosomonas and Brocadia will shift due to the disturbances, but that the denitrifying microbiome, which is dispersed across multiple phyla, will be less affected by the disturbances.
Results and discussion
Biofilm carriers from a mainstream PNA moving bed biofilm bioreactor (MBBR) were transferred to sidestream wastewater in another MBBR at time intervals corresponding to 21%, 50%, 79% and 100% in the sidestream (S21%, S50%, S79% and S100%) over the course of 58 days. A mainstream control (S0%) as well as the initial seed sample (Seed, time zero) were also included in the study (Fig. 1).
Rare taxa were particularly sensitive to sidestream wastewater
In PNA biofilms, nitrifiers are restricted to a thin oxic layer at the surface of the biofilm, and hence their relative abundance in the biofilm is low16,51; therefore, beta-diversity metrics, sensitive to rare taxa, are well-suited to elucidate their distribution patterns. For metrics based on Hill-numbers, this sensitivity can be controlled with the q parameter (diversity order). When q = 0, which is a presence-absence metric, the index is insensitive to the relative abundances of taxa (equivalent to the Sørensen index) while for increasing q, the index is more sensitive to abundant taxa52,53.
The entire PNA mainstream biofilm community appears to be sensitive to sidestream wastewater, as we observed differences between treatments for both rare and abundant taxa in the 16S dataset (PERMANOVA q = 0, 1 & 2; p < 0.001; F4,40 = 7.4, 42 & 41, respectively; Fig. 2a). In fact, there was a beta-diversity gradient between S0% and S100%, corresponding to the extent of sidestream exposure (Fig. 2a). Between group beta-diversity was the highest at q = 0 and was also higher than within group dissimilarity at low q-values (Fig. 2b), implying that rare taxa were more sensitive to sidestream exposure than abundant taxa. Similar beta-diversity patterns were seen in the metagenome dataset (Fig. 2c, d), with differences for rare taxa (PERMANOVA q = 0 and q = 1; p < 0.001; F4,10 = 1.3 & 1.6, respectively), but not the abundant ones (PERMANOVA q = 2; p = 0.16; F4,10 = 1.5).
Response in alpha-diversity and abundance to sidestream exposure varies between taxa
The relative abundance and alpha-diversity of Nitrospiraceae in the biofilms decreased with sidestream exposure, as assessed by marker genes (Fig. 3a, b). As an alternative to the marker gene-based assessment of species diversity, we assigned taxonomy to individual genes in the metagenome assembly, and thus estimate a rough distribution of those genes across samples. From this analysis, it was clear that the number of Nitrospira genes also decreased with increasing sidestream exposure (Fig. 3c).
In contrast to the Nitrospira, for the AOB Nitrosomonas, a higher relative abundance, alpha-diversity and number of genes occurred at intermittent exposure to sidestream water (S21–S79%; Fig. 3), akin to predictions by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis48,54. Among the anammox bacteria (Brocadia) an average of ~15 genotypes were detected across all treatments, but the number of Brocadia genes steadily increased with increasing sidestream exposure (Fig. 3). Thus, negative (Nitrospira/Nitrospiraceae), intermediate (Nitrosomonas) and positive (Brocadia) effects on intra-genera diversity were clearly observed in response to the varying levels of disturbance.
The pangenome, coined to refer to all the genes that can be found in a clade including the core and all accessory genes55,56, is assumed to be responsible for niche differentiation and allows the discrimination of different ecotypes, defined as populations of cells adapted to a given ecological niche. We grouped all genes taxonomically classified as Nitrospira into gene clusters, which, accordingly, could be considered as the Nitrospira pangenome (Fig. 3d). We show that the number of Nitrospira gene clusters has a downward trend, suggesting a decrease in functional potential with increased sidestream exposure. This reduction in functional redundancy within Nitrospira is beneficial when managing a disservice, as is the case of nitrite oxidation in PNA processes. Similar observations were made for Nitrospira in a recent study in nitrifying activated sludge57. The opposite pattern occurred for Brocadia, leading to increased diversity (Fig. 3d), and thus enhanced redundancy in the functional group of anammox bacteria. For Nitrosomonas, the number of gene clusters followed the pattern of the alpha-diversity, i.e., higher numbers at intermediate disturbances.
At the Sjölunda WWTP, relative nitrate production was higher in the mainstream PNA MBBR than in the sidestream PNA MBBR51. In addition, other studies have shown that for mainstream communities, exposure to sidestream water leads to nitrite accumulation due to the inhibition of NOB20,40,43,44. Together, with the results from this report, this data highlights how sidestream wastewater disturbance management regimens can be used to inhibit NOB populations in PNA biofilms and preserve AOB and anammox.
Distinct Nitrosomonas populations were present in the sidestream and mainstream
Differences between communities (beta-diversity) can arise because of species turnover (when one species is replaced by another) or nestedness (when one community is a subset of the other)58. The turnover/nestedness framework has been used extensively in community ecology59 and has contributed to our understanding of biofilm assembly60. For Nitrospira and Brocadia genes, beta-diversity between S0% and S100% was increasingly caused by dissimilarity due to nestedness (Fig. 4). For Nitrospira, alpha-diversity decreased with sidestream exposure (Fig. 3) making the Nitrospira sidestream (S100%) community a subset of the mainstream (S0%) community. Opposite patterns were observed for Brocadia where the mainstream community was a subset of the sidestream one. Notably, this was not the case for Nitrosomonas, where the beta-diversity between S0% and S100% was increasingly caused by turnover (Fig. 4). Thus, different Nitrosomonas populations were present in S0% and S100%. Similar results were observed in the 16S dataset, where a single Nitrosomonas ASV was dominant in the mainstream wastewater and its abundance was lower in all samples exposed to sidestream wastewater, while another Nitrosomonas ASV dominated samples exposed to sidestream wastewater (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Distinct Nitrosomonas MAGs were observed in the sidestream and mainstream
To characterize the populations that were responsible for beta-diversity, metagenomic reads were assembled and resulting contigs were binned, resulting in 430 metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs). Of these, five MAGs were affiliated to Nitrosomonas (Fig. 5). For four of them, their completeness ranged from 88 to 97%. A fifth MAG, SJ328, was only 58% complete (File S1). The MAG SJ754 made up more than 90% of the Nitrosomonas community in S0% but decreased sharply in abundance with increasing sidestream exposure to about ~13% in the S100% samples (Fig. 5C, D). With increasing sidestream exposure the relative abundance of the other four Nitrosomonas MAGs increased.
Genome reconstruction suggests that the AOB differed in their tolerance to osmotic stress, ability to use urea or hydrogen, tolerance to oxygen limiting conditions, and ability to fix carbon during low and fluctuating CO2 concentrations (See supporting information for details). These differences could lead to niche differentiation between the AOB and possibly explain the observed AOB turnover.
Alternatively, or concurrently, fluctuations in abundance of the AOB MAGs could be due to stochastic processes rather than niche differentiation18, as migration of AOB from upstream to downstream processes is known to occur in WWTPs61. Thus, the high abundance of SJ754 in the mainstream samples could have been caused by continuous immigration from the upstream activated sludge, akin to the mass-effect perspective in the metacommunity framework62. However, given the low sludge retention time (2–3 days) in the preceding high-rate activated sludge with no signs of nitrification in the investigated period, such stochastic effects were likely negligible for both the Nitrosomonas and the Nitrospira communities.
A lineage I Nitrospira was resistant to sidestream exposure
In general, the Nitrospira populations were sensitive to sidestream exposure, with the relative abundance of three of the four detected MAGs decreasing in abundance with increasing sidestream exposure (Fig. 5b). These results align with the observed decrease in Nitrospira alpha-diversity (Fig. 3). The sole exception was SJ521, a Nitrospira lineage I NOB, whose relative abundance remained the same regardless of sidestream exposure (Fig. 5b).
As SJ521 was the dominant Nitrospira MAG in S100%, it was hypothesized that this MAG would encode genes providing this species with niche differentiating traits absent in the other Nitrospira and thus provide a competitive advantage. Previously, several Nitrospira species have been shown to possess genes that enable use of alternative energy sources such as ammonium, formate, or hydrogen and are able to engage in reciprocal feeding with AOB through the turnover of urea or cyanate26,27,28.
Three of the four Nitrospira MAGs, including SJ521, encode a very similar suite of genes for these alternative metabolisms (File S1). However, the dominant MAG SJ521, is the only one that contains a Na+/H+ antiporter complex, which can regulate cytoplasmic pH and/or Na+ concentration and confer halotolerance63. To date, the only Nitrospira genomes observed to encode this kind of antiporter complex have been found in highly saline/alkaline environments64. Interestingly, similar Na+/H+ antiporter complexes were also found in four of the five Nitrosomonas MAGs (File S1).
The presence of halotolerant populations of Nitrospira and Nitrosomonas after sidestream exposure is unexpected, as the concentrations of Na+ ions were the same in the mainstream and sidestream (Supplementary Table S1). Nonetheless, the conductivity, which is a measure of the total concentration of ions in the water, was more than five-fold higher in the sidestream, indicating a higher osmotic stress in the sidestream. In this environment, adaptations to osmotic stress might offer a competitive advantage to halotolerant populations. Hence, it is possible that uncharacterized adaptations to osmotic stress in Nitrospira SJ521 could explain the persistence of this population.
Abundance of Brocadia fulgida increased with sidestream exposure
Three Brocadia MAGs were present in the PNA biofilms (Fig. 5e). SJ692 was the dominant anammox MAG in the dataset, and its abundance did not change with sidestream exposure.
SJ251 had its highest abundance in the S100% samples (Fig. 5f), which explains the increase in functional diversity of anammox genes with sidestream exposure (Fig. 3c). Unlike the other MAGs, it has two pathways to incorporate acetate (See Supplementary Results and Discussion). Anaerobic biodigesters were located upstream of the sidestream reactor which resulted in much higher concentrations of volatile fatty acids (VFA) (196 mg COD/L) in the sidestream than the mainstream feed (< 20 mg COD/L). Due to the availability of acetate and other VFA, SJ251 might have a competitive advantage that differentiates their niche from the other anammox bacteria and allows them to prosper in the sidestream.
Genes for denitrification were ubiquitous in the PNA biofilms
To test if sidestream exposure had an effect on the abundance of denitrifiers, we estimated the overall abundance of MAGs having the genes nirK, nirS, norB and nosZ. The effect varied among the denitrifying genes. Sidestream exposure and abundance did not correlate for MAGs with nirS and norB, while there was slight increase in abundance of MAGs with nosZ and NirK (Supplementary Fig. 2). In addition, shifts were observed within the distribution of MAGs having nirK, nirS, norB and nosZ (Supplementary Fig. 3–6). Since denitrification is a trait with a wide phylogenetic distribution, it is likely to be more resistant to disturbances than traits with a narrow phylogenetic distribution like nitrification and anammox
Potential links in abundance between some AOB MAGs (SJ328, 624, 634) and denitrifiers were found, and for Nitrosomonas SJ754 its abundance was linked to Nitrospira SJ669 and SJ846 (Supplementary Fig. 7). If they are co-dependent, inhibition of Nitrosomonas SJ754 alone, might explain the decrease in abundance of Nitrospira SJ669 and SJ846 or vice versa. This may have importance for successful management of PNA biofilms.
In summary, this study shows that it is possible to manipulate the microbial community of a mature biofilm towards a desired state. With increased sidestream wastewater exposure, the functional versatility of PNA biofilms, and hence their functional redundancy, decreased for the unwanted functional group (NOB), and increased for the wanted functional groups (AOB and anammox bacteria). The observed responses to the disturbances demonstrate that exposure of sidestream wastewater has potential as a tool to regulate PNA biofilm communities. Our metagenomic analyses show that the pangenomes of nitrifiers and anammox bacteria included genes for osmotic stress response, organic matter and inorganic nitrogen usage. This provides not only multifunctionality but also functional redundancy, and thus resistance to the loss of services and disservices in ecosystems. For WWTPs, our findings imply that knowledge about the versatility of pangenomes should be considered when designing long-term operational strategies. Although we observed a range of effects of sidestream exposure on the Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira, and Brocadia populations, the detailed mechanisms remain unclear. Future studies using other approaches, like metatranscriptomics and activity measurements, may shed further light on the stress response to sidestream exposure.
Two parallel pilot PNA MBBRs at the Sjölunda WWTP (Malmö, Sweden) were fed with either mainstream wastewater from a high-rate activated sludge plant for organic carbon removal or sidestream wastewater, i.e. sludge liquor from anaerobic sludge digestion. Their volumes were 2.6 m3 and 1.5 m3, respectively. Both bioreactors were filled with biofilm carriers (K1®, Veolia Water Technologies AB—AnoxKaldnes, Lund, Sweden), which offer a protected biofilm surface. The reactors are described in detail elsewhere51. Conditions in the bioreactors are shown in Table 1.
In this study, biofilm carriers were transferred between the mainstream and sidestream MBBRs at varying time intervals over 58 days. To differentiate these carries from others in the MBBRs, the biofilm carriers sampled in this study were kept isolated from the other carriers in the MBBRs in cylindrical cages. A steel mesh bottom of the cages allowed water circulation (immersed volume 2.5 L, 30% filling). All the cages were filled with biofilm carriers from the mainstream MBBR on November 11, 2015 and sampled on January 7, 2016. In addition, samples were taken directly from the mainstream PNA MBBR at the start of the experiment on November 11, before filling the cages. These samples are referred as Seed.
The layout of the study is described in Fig. 1. One cage with biofilm carriers was kept in the mainstream MBBR the entire experimental period, and hence spent zero time in the sidestream MBBR (S0%). Another cage was put in the sidestream MBBR the entire period (S100%). Three other cages were moved between the mainstream- and sidestream MBBRs at varying time intervals over the 58 days. Cage S21% spent 21% of its time in the sidestream MBBR in cycles of 3 days in the sidestream MBBR and 11 days in the mainstream MBBR; cage S50% had cycles of 7 days in mainstream MBBR and 7 days in sidestream MBBR; and cage S79% had cycles of 3 days in mainstream MBBR and 11 days in sidestream MBBR.
Biofilm sampling and DNA extraction
For each treatment (the five cages and the Seed samples), DNA was separately extracted from nine biofilm carriers. The carriers were snap-frozen in an ethanol-dry ice mixture immediately at sampling, kept frozen in dry ice during transportation and then stored at −80 °C. The biofilm was removed from the carrier compartments and added to the lysis matrix tube E (MP biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) with 800 µl of lysis solution of the ZR-duet MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research). Mechanical disruption of the biofilm was done with a FastPrep-24 5 G (MP biomedicals) at speed 6 for 40 s. Subsequent steps of the DNA extraction were done with the ZR-duet kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
16S amplicon sequencing
Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4 region (16S) was conducted for each of the nine DNA extractions in each treatment, resulting in 54 samples being sequenced. PCR amplification was done with primers the 515ʹF65 and 806 R66, using dual indexing of the primers67. PCR products were purified with Ampure XP (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and PCR amplicons were then pooled in equimolar amounts. Sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). DADA2 version 1.1668 was used to infer amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), with settings pool = TRUE. SILVA 13869 was used for taxonomic classification of the 16S amplicons.
For each treatment, three samples were selected for shotgun metagenomics, resulting in a total of 18 sequenced samples. Libraries were prepared with a TruSeq PCR-free kit (Illumina). Samples were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 with a 2 × 151 setup, resulting in 800 million pair-reads. Low quality reads and adapters were removed with Trimmomatic v0.3970. Co-assembly of short reads was done with Megahit71 using the --presets meta-large setting, resulting in 1,975,712 contigs of ≥1 kb, and N50 of 4375 bp. Reads were mapped to the co-assembly using Bowtie2 v2.3.572. Protein coding sequences in all the assembled contigs were identified with Prodigal v.2.6.373, using the meta prediction mode.
SingleM (https://github.com/wwood/singlem) was used to create an OTU-like table of 14 single copy marker genes, which was used to estimate alpha- and beta-diversity in the metagenomics dataset. After subsampling to even depth, alpha-diversity was estimated as species richness for both the ASVs, based on the 16S amplicon sequencing, and the metagenomics marker genes.
Using the R package hilldiv74, dissimilarity indices were calculated based on partitioning of Hill numbers75 with a Sørensen-type overlap for both the 16S dataset and the metagenomics one. Beta-diversity was estimated from q = 0 to q = 3 in 0.1 intervals. Among samples taken at day 58, permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA)76 was used to test for significant differences between group centroids.
Kaiju77 was used for taxonomic classification of assembled genes against the NCBI BLAST nr database. Richness (number of classified genes) was estimated for Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira and Brocadia. Using the Kaiju data, the presence-absence Sørensen index, and its two components, turnover and dissimilarity due to nestedness58, were also estimated. To identify gene clusters, the proteins classified as Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira and Brocadia were aligned against each other with DIAMOND78 using --ultra-sensitive parameter, followed by clustering with MCL78, with an inflation factor of 8.
Hidden Markov models (HMM) from the FunGene database79 were used to search for AOB, Nitrospira or Archaea amoA in the metagenomics assembly with HMMER 3.3 (hmmer.org). The lowest E-value and highest bit score always corresponded to the amoA_AOB profile. In addition, the recovered amoA sequences were analyzed with an LG + F + G4 phylogenetic tree.
Metagenome assembled genomes
Metagenomic binning was done in MetaBAT280, resulting in 877 bins. Completeness, contamination, and relative abundance of the bins was estimated with CheckM81. 430 metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) had more than 50% completion and less than 10% contamination. Taxonomic classification of these MAGs was done using GTDB-Tk82 with the GTDB r89 taxonomy83,84. To study evolutionary relationships of the Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira and Brocadia MAGs, the MAGs were compared with genomes from the NCBI assembly database. Phylogenomic trees based on single-copy genes were made with GtoTree v1.2.185, using the Betaproteoabacteria HMM-set (203 genes) for Nitrosomonas, and the Bacteria HMM-set (74 genes) for Nitrospira and Brocadia. The multiple sequence alignment from GtoTree was used to generate maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees in IQ-TREE v.2.0.386 with 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates; a substitution model for each gene in the alignment was chosen with ModelFinder87 using the partition files generated by GtoTree. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) estimations were done with FastANI88. The online version of eggNOG-mapper89,90 was used to annotate the Nitrosomonas, Nitrospira and Brocadia genomes. The Nitrosomonas and Nitrospira genomes were compared to each other and against previously sequenced nitrifiers using the integrated microbial genomes (IMG) database and the comparative analysis system91, as well as Genoscope92. With HMMER we searched for the presence of the genes amoA, nirS, nirK, norB and nosZ in all the MAGs. Network analysis based on the relative abundance of the MAGs was carried out using the R package SPIEC-EASI93 with the glasso method (lambda.min.ratio = .01, nlambda = 30, rep.num = 100).
Three water samples from sidestream and mainstream at the Sjölunda WWTP were collected in January 2021. Conductivity was measured using a CO11 conductivity sensor (VWR, Radnor, Pennsylvania, United States). The concentration of Na+, Cl−, NH4+, K+, PO43−, Mg2+, Ca2+ and SO42− was measured with an ICS-900 ion chromatograph (Dionex Sunnyvale, California, USA).
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Amplicon sequencing reads, raw shotgun metagenomics reads, and metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) are available at NCBI under bioproject PRJNA611787. All data generated or analyzed during this study will be available upon request to the corresponding author.
Computer code used in this study is available upon request from the first author.
Allison, S. D. & Martiny, J. B. H. Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11512–11519 (2008).
Yachi, S. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463 (1999).
Isbell, F. et al. Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526, 574–577 (2015).
Tilman, D. & Downing, J. A. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367, 363–365 (1994).
Hector, A. & Bagchi, R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448, 188–190 (2007).
Lefcheck, J. S. et al. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nat. Commun. 6, 6936 (2015).
Peter, H. et al. Multifunctionality and diversity in bacterial biofilms. PLoS One 6, e23225 (2011).
Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).
Worm, B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787 (2006).
Lyytimäki, J., Petersen, L. K., Normander, B. & Bezák, P. Nature as a nuisance? ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environ. Sci. 5, 161–172 (2008).
Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K. & Swinton, S. M. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 64, 253–260 (2007).
Erisman, J. W. et al. in The European Nitrogen Assessment: Sources, Effects, and Policy Perspectives (eds Mark A Sutton et al.) Ch. 2 (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Lackner, S. et al. Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences—an application survey. Water Res. 55, 292–303 (2014).
Winkler, M. K. H. & Straka, L. New directions in biological nitrogen removal and recovery from wastewater. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 57, 50–55 (2019).
Cao, Y., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & Daigger, G. T. Mainstream partial nitritation–anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: status, bottlenecks, and further studies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101, 1365–1383 (2017).
Vlaeminck, S. E. et al. Aggregate size and architecture determine microbial activity balance for one-stage partial nitritation and anammox. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 900–909 (2010).
Gao, J.-F., Luo, X., Wu, G.-X., Li, T. & Peng, Y.-Z. Quantitative analyses of the composition and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in eight full-scale biological wastewater treatment plants. Bioresour. Technol. 138, 285–296 (2013).
Ofiţeru, I. D., Lunn, M. & Curtis, T. P. Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15345–15350 (2010).
Gruber-Dorninger, C. et al. Functionally relevant diversity of closely related Nitrospira in activated sludge. ISME J. 9, 643–655 (2014).
Law, Y. et al. High dissolved oxygen selection against Nitrospira sublineage I in full-scale activated sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 8157–8166 (2019).
Moore, L. R., Rocap, G. & Chisholm, S. W. Physiology and molecular phylogeny of coexisting Prochlorococcus ecotypes. Nature 393, 464–467 (1998).
Kits, K. D. et al. Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle. Nature 549, 269–272 (2017).
Nowka, B., Off, S., Daims, H. & Spieck, E. Improved isolation strategies allowed the phenotypic differentiation of two Nitrospira strains from widespread phylogenetic lineages. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91, fiu031 (2015).
Sedlacek, C. J. et al. A physiological and genomic comparison of Nitrosomonas cluster 6a and 7 ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Microb. Ecol. 78, 985–994 (2019).
Lebedeva, E. V. et al. Isolation and characterization of a moderately thermophilic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium from a geothermal spring. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 75, 195–204 (2011).
Koch, H. et al. Growth of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria by aerobic hydrogen oxidation. Science 345, 1052 (2014).
Koch, H. et al. Expanded metabolic versatility of ubiquitous nitrite-oxidizing bacteria from the genus Nitrospira. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11371–11376 (2015).
Palatinszky, M. et al. Cyanate as an energy source for nitrifiers. Nature 524, 105 (2015).
Daims, H. et al. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria. Nature 528, 504–509 (2015).
Palomo, A. et al. Metagenomic analysis of rapid gravity sand filter microbial communities suggests novel physiology of Nitrospira spp. ISME J. 10, 2569–2581 (2016).
Pinto, A. J. et al. Metagenomic evidence for the presence of comammox Nitrospira-like bacteria in a drinking water system. mSphere 1, e00054–15 (2015).
van Kessel, M. A. H. J. et al. Complete nitrification by a single microorganism. Nature 528, 555–559 (2015).
Woebken, D. et al. A microdiversity study of anammox bacteria reveals a novel Candidatus Scalindua phylotype in marine oxygen minimum zones. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 3106–3119 (2008).
Ganesh, S. et al. Single cell genomic and transcriptomic evidence for the use of alternative nitrogen substrates by anammox bacteria. ISME J. 12, 2706–2722 (2018).
Narita, Y. et al. Enrichment and physiological characterization of an anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacterium ‘Candidatus Brocadia sapporoensis’. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 40, 448–457 (2017).
Bhattacharjee, A. S. et al. Whole-community metagenomics in two different anammox configurations: process performance and community structure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 4317–4327 (2017).
Graf, D. R. H., Jones, C. M. & Hallin, S. Intergenomic comparisons highlight modularity of the denitrification pathway and underpin the importance of community structure for N2O emissions. PLoS One 9, e114118 (2014).
Qiu, S. et al. What’s the best way to achieve successful mainstream partial nitritation-anammox application? Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 1045–1077 (2021).
Pérez, J., Lotti, T., Kleerebezem, R., Picioreanu, C. & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Outcompeting nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in single-stage nitrogen removal in sewage treatment plants: A model-based study. Water Res. 66, 208–218 (2014).
Wang, Q. et al. Achieving stable mainstream nitrogen removal via the nitrite pathway by sludge treatment using free ammonia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 9800–9807 (2017).
Duan, H., Ye, L., Lu, X. & Yuan, Z. Overcoming nitrite oxidizing bacteria adaptation through alternating sludge treatment with free nitrous acid and free ammonia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1937–1946 (2019).
Wang, Z. et al. Robust nitritation sustained by acid-tolerant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 2048–2056 (2021).
Madill, M. B. W., Luo, Y., Sampara, P., Ziels, R. M. & Gilbert, J. A. Activity-based cell sorting reveals resistance of functionally degenerate Nitrospira during a press disturbance in nitrifying activated sludge. mSystems 6, e00712–e00721 (2021).
Piculell, M. et al. The inhibitory effects of reject water on nitrifying populations grown at different biofilm thickness. Water Res. 104, 292–302 (2016).
Anthonisen, A. C., Loehr, R. C., Prakasam, T. B. S. & Srinath, E. G. Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 48, 835–852 (1976).
Blackburne, R., Vadivelu, V. M., Yuan, Z. & Keller, J. Kinetic characterisation of an enriched Nitrospira culture with comparison to Nitrobacter. Water Res. 41, 3033–3042 (2007).
Ushiki, N. et al. Nitrite oxidation kinetics of two Nitrospira strains: The quest for competition and ecological niche differentiation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 123, 581–589 (2017).
Santillan, E., Seshan, H., Constancias, F., Drautz-Moses, D. I. & Wuertz, S. Frequency of disturbance alters diversity, function, and underlying assembly mechanisms of complex bacterial communities. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 5, 8 (2019).
Santillan, E., Phua, W. X., Constancias, F. & Wuertz, S. Sustained organic loading disturbance favors nitrite accumulation in bioreactors with variable resistance, recovery and resilience of nitrification and nitrifiers. Sci. Rep. 10, 21388 (2020).
Santillan, E., Constancias, F. & Wuertz, S. Press disturbance alters community structure and assembly mechanisms of bacterial taxa and functional genes in mesocosm-scale bioreactors. mSystems 5, e00471–20 (2020).
Gustavsson, D. J. I., Suarez, C., Wilén, B.-M., Hermansson, M. & Persson, F. Long-term stability of partial nitritation-anammox for treatment of municipal wastewater in a moving bed biofilm reactor pilot system. Sci. Total Environ. 714, 136342 (2020).
Chao, A., Chiu, C.-H. & Jost, L. Unifying species diversity, phylogenetic diversity, functional diversity, and related similarity and differentiation measures through Hill numbers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 297–324 (2014).
Modin, O. et al. Hill-based dissimilarity indices and null models for analysis of microbial community assembly. Microbiome 8, 132 (2020).
Connell, J. H. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral Reefs. Science 199, 1302 (1978).
Tettelin, H. et al. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: Implications for the microbial “pan-genome”. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 102, 13950 (2005).
Vernikos, G., Medini, D., Riley, D. R. & Tettelin, H. Ten years of pan-genome analyses. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 23, 148–154 (2015).
Wang, Z. et al. Unravelling adaptation of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in mainstream PN/A process: Mechanisms and counter-strategies. Water Res. 200, 117239 (2021).
Baselga, A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 134–143 (2010).
Soininen, J., Heino, J. & Wang, J. A meta-analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 96–109 (2018).
Brislawn, C. J. et al. Forfeiting the priority effect: turnover defines biofilm community succession. ISME J. 13, 1865–1877 (2019).
Wells, G. F. et al. Microbial biogeography across a full-scale wastewater treatment plant transect: evidence for immigration between coupled processes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 4723–4736 (2014).
Leibold, M. A. et al. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 601–613 (2004).
Swartz, T. H., Ikewada, S., Ishikawa, O., Ito, M. & Krulwich, T. A. The Mrp system: a giant among monovalent cation/proton antiporters? Extremophiles 9, 345–354 (2005).
Daebeler, A. et al. Exploring the upper pH limits of nitrite oxidation: diversity, ecophysiology, and adaptive traits of haloalkalitolerant Nitrospira. ISME J. 14, 2967–2979 (2020).
Hugerth, L. W. et al. DegePrime, a program for degenerate primer design for broad-taxonomic-range PCR in microbial ecology studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 5116–5123 (2014).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 4516–4522 (2011).
Kozich, J. J., Westcott, S. L., Baxter, N. T., Highlander, S. K. & Schloss, P. D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5112–5120 (2013).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581 (2016).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Li, D. et al. MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 102, 3–11 (2016).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 11, 119 (2010).
Alberdi, A. & Gilbert, M. T. P. hilldiv: an R package for the integral analysis of diversity based on Hill numbers. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/545665 (2019).
Jost, L. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88, 2427–2439 (2007).
Anderson, M. J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46 (2001).
Menzel, P., Ng, K. L. & Krogh, A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat. Commun. 7, 11257 (2016).
Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368 (2021).
Fish, J. et al. FunGene: the functional gene pipeline and repository. Front. Microbiol. 4, 291 (2013).
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2020).
Parks, D. H. et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1079–1086 (2020).
Parks, D. H. et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 996–1004 (2018).
Lee, M. D. GToTree: a user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics 35, 4162–4164 (2019).
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evolution 32, 268–274 (2015).
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).
Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T. & Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9, 5114 (2018).
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2115–2122 (2017).
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D309–D314 (2018).
Chen, I. M. A. et al. IMG/M: integrated genome and metagenome comparative data analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D507–D516 (2017).
Vallenet, D. et al. MicroScope: a platform for microbial genome annotation and comparative genomics. Database 2009, bap021 (2009).
Kurtz, Z. D. et al. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLOS Computational Biol. 11, e1004226 (2015).
This work was funded by FORMAS (contract no. 2018-01423). The authors acknowledge the support from the National Genomics Infrastructure in Stockholm funded by Science for Life Laboratory, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation and the Swedish Research Council, and SNIC/Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science for assistance with massively parallel sequencing and access to the UPPMAX computational infrastructure. Assembly and binning were performed on resources provided by SNIC through UPPMAX under the projects SNIC 2020-15-14 and 2020-16-18. We also acknowledge the colleagues at the Sjölunda WWTP, for monitoring the pilot reactors.
Open access funding provided by Chalmers University of Technology.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Suarez, C., Sedlacek, C.J., Gustavsson, D.J.I. et al. Disturbance-based management of ecosystem services and disservices in partial nitritation-anammox biofilms. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 8, 47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00308-w
This article is cited by
Scientific Data (2023)