Reduction of alternative electron acceptors drives biofilm formation in Shewanella algae

Martín-Rodríguez, Alberto J.; Reyes-Darias, José A.; Martín-Mora, David; González, José M.; Krell, Tino; Römling, Ute

doi:10.1038/s41522-020-00177-1

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 27 January 2021

Reduction of alternative electron acceptors drives biofilm formation in Shewanella algae

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes volume 7, Article number: 9 (2021) Cite this article

2944 Accesses
14 Citations
9 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Shewanella spp. possess a broad respiratory versatility, which contributes to the occupation of hypoxic and anoxic environmental or host-associated niches. Here, we observe a strain-specific induction of biofilm formation in response to supplementation with the anaerobic electron acceptors dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and nitrate in a panel of Shewanella algae isolates. The respiration-driven biofilm response is not observed in DMSO and nitrate reductase deletion mutants of the type strain S. algae CECT 5071, and can be restored upon complementation with the corresponding reductase operon(s) but not by an operon containing a catalytically inactive nitrate reductase. The distinct transcriptional changes, proportional to the effect of these compounds on biofilm formation, include cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) turnover genes. In support, ectopic expression of the c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase YhjH of Salmonella Typhimurium but not its catalytically inactive variant decreased biofilm formation. The respiration-dependent biofilm response of S. algae may permit differential colonization of environmental or host niches.

Diverse and abundant phages exploit conjugative plasmids

Article Open access 12 April 2024

Natalia Quinones-Olvera, Siân V. Owen, … Michael Baym

Electrochemically coupled CH4 and CO2 consumption driven by microbial processes

Article Open access 10 April 2024

Yue Zheng, Huan Wang, … Feng Zhao

Single-cell RNA-seq of the rare virosphere reveals the native hosts of giant viruses in the marine environment

Article 11 April 2024

Amir Fromm, Gur Hevroni, … Assaf Vardi

Introduction

A hallmark of members of the genus Shewanella is their remarkable respiratory versatility since they can respire on an array of organic and inorganic compounds comprising virtually any electron acceptor more electronegative than sulfate^1,2. The respiratory capacity of Shewanella is reinforced by mediator-directed electron transfer mechanisms enabling the efficient reduction of insoluble substrates such as metal oxides³. This respiratory flexibility results in an extraordinary physiological versatility that contributes to the environmental abundance of the chemoorganotroph shewanellae as versatile colonizers of oxic, hypoxic, and anoxic marine and freshwater habitats². Some species, primarily Shewanella algae and close relatives such as Shewanella chilikensis, have been associated with human disease^4,5.

Biofilm formation promotes the colonization of biotic and abiotic substrata in Shewanella spp. and many other bacterial species⁶. This predominantly sedentary lifestyle is a developmental process initiated by an attachment of single cells that subsequently form microcolonies prior to the establishment of mature biofilms. The intracellular second messenger cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP) is known to play a key role in the lifestyle switch from planktonic to sessile and vice versa in a plethora of Gram-negative species^7,8. Integration of extra- and intracellular stimuli modulates different features of this multicellular microbial lifestyle in response to changes in nutrient availability, temperature, oxygen tension, quorum sensing, and various chemical signals^9,10. For example, reduced oxygen tension differentially regulates biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Shewanella putrefaciens CN32^11,12. For Shewanella spp., life within a biofilm provides structural and functional advantages, spanning from maintenance of redox balance to enhanced extracellular electron transfer^13,14,15. Shewanella spp. thrive in hypoxic and anoxic environments including sediments, hypoxic water bodies, and the intestinal tract of fish and invertebrates^16,17,18, where these non-fermentative species use some of the most abundant inorganic and organic alternative electron acceptors (AEAs). While biofilm formation on insoluble metal oxides has been well documented¹⁹, knowledge on the behavioral and physiological biofilm responses upon use of the broad array of AEAs is limited in Shewanella species, as is the repertoire of terminal reductases enabling the respiration of AEAs.

Here we show that supplementation of a seawater-mimicking medium with organic or inorganic AEAs induces differential, strain-specific biofilm formation in S. algae. Assessment of the respiratory capacity of the strains combined with mutant analyses of the type strain S. algae CECT 5071 demonstrated that respiration is required, but not sufficient per se to increase biofilm production upon AEA supplementation. Transcriptome analyses showed that the number of differentially regulated genes positively correlated with the amount of biofilm formed by S. algae CECT 5071 upon addition of the electron acceptors DMSO and nitrate. Several of the differentially regulated genes encoded proteins that participate in c-di-GMP turnover. Altogether, our study suggests that differential biofilm formation in S. algae strains is governed beyond respiration by the induction of distinct biofilm developmental programs.

Results

Alternative electron acceptors promote strain-specific biofilm formation in S. algae

While screening chemical libraries for biofilm inhibitors, we noticed that an addition of 35 mM DMSO enhanced biofilm formation of S. algae CECT 5071 static cultures ~2-fold compared to the non-supplemented control. Since a similar phenomenon had not been observed with other DMSO-respiring bacteria, we reasoned that this phenotype could be specific to S. algae. We therefore analyzed DMSO-mediated biofilm formation in a selection of 20 S. algae strains from various environmental and clinical sources (Supplementary Table 1). Biofilm formation in plain Marine Broth (MB) varied substantially between isolates, from poor biofilm formers to proficient biofilm producers (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). Biofilm formation values in MB were taken as baseline levels for comparisons upon AEA supplementation. Thus, for 9 of the 20 strains we observed a more than 1.5-fold induction of biofilm formation in response to DMSO (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2).

**Fig. 1: Biofilm formation response of *S. algae* strains in the absence or presence of supplemented alternative electron acceptors.**

Since the respiratory repertoire of Shewanella spp. is broad, we wondered whether other AEAs provoked a similar strain-specific biofilm response. To that end, we analyzed the biofilm response of the type strain S. algae CECT 5071 and the other 20 S. algae isolates towards 35 mM nitrate, another representative AEA during anaerobic respiration (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 3). With an increase of more than 4-fold, S. algae CECT 5071 showed the most pronounced increase in biofilm formation as determined by CV staining. Further 9 strains, 2 of which are different to those reported above for DMSO, responded with increased biofilm formation to nitrate supplementation.

To ensure that the observed biofilm induction was not due to pH changes upon utilization of the different AEAs, experiments were validated by testing the type strain S. algae CECT 5071 in the absence or presence of AEAs in MB buffered by 30 mM HEPES pH = 7.5, which minimized pH oscillations during 24-h static incubation (Supplementary Fig. 4a). The corresponding results were similar to those recorded in unbuffered medium (Supplementary Fig. 4b) showing that AEA-induced changes in biofilm formation are not caused by pH changes. Taken together, these results indicate that DMSO and nitrate-induced biofilm formation is a strain-specific phenotype independent of pH.

DMSO respiration is not conserved in S. algae

We hypothesized that respiration of the supplemented compounds triggered the biofilm formation response. However, we wondered whether the respiratory activity differed for strains that responded with enhanced biofilm formation. To answer this question, we qualitatively assessed nitrate reductase activity in S. algae strains by measuring the accumulation of nitrite in static cultures supplemented with 35 mM nitrate. A straightforward colorimetric assay with endpoint determination of nitrate reductase activity in live bacteria²⁰ showed similar overall nitrate reductase activity in all strains (Fig. 2a). This indicates that the biofilm formation response is not related to an intrinsic capacity of a given strain to reduce the supplemented AEA.

**Fig. 2: Nitrate and DMSO reduction capacity of *S. algae* strains.**

The genomes of these and other S. algae strains have been sequenced as part of ongoing comparative genomics studies (Martín-Rodríguez et al., unpublished). In S. algae, nitrate reduction occurs in the periplasm and relies in a duo-NAP system, comprised of NAP-α (encoded by the napEDABC operon) and NAP-β (encoded by the napDAGHB operon), being NapA-α and NapA-β the major catalytic subunits, respectively. To investigate genomic determinants for the observed biofilm phenotypes, BLASTp searches were conducted to identify CECT 5071 NapA-α and NapA-β orthologs in the S. algae strains used. Both components of the NAP system were present in all S. algae genomes analyzed, with amino acid sequence identities between 97.1–99.9% for NapA-α and 98.1–99-1% for NapA-β with respect to the corresponding protein in the type strain (data not shown), thus indicating that the two nitrate reductases are conserved across S. algae isolates.

The terminal DMSO reductase DmsEFABGH is involved in extracellular DMSO respiration and uses several sulfoxides and N-oxides as substrates^21,22, with DmsA being the major catalytic subunit. We next performed BLASTp searches of S. algae CECT 5071 DmsA orthologs to identify the presence of DMSO reductases in our sequenced S. algae genomes. We could retrieve hits for all S. algae strains except for A41, A57, and 97087. Genes predicted to encode the dmsEFABGH operon are located between accB and rpmE on the S. algae CECT 5071 chromosome. Inspection of the WGS of strains S. algae A41, S. algae A57, and S. algae 97087 revealed absence of this operon (data not shown). Besides, DmsA orthologs with a significantly lower sequence identity were found in S. algae A56 and S. algae CCUG 58400 (not used in this study, originally described as Shewanella upenei²³ but demonstrated to be a later heterotypic synonym of S. algae²⁴) that shared only modest sequence identity (55.8% both) with the reference protein. Interestingly, their sequence was almost identical to the DmsA homolog of S. chilikensis (GenBank accession: WP_165565699.1). A maximum-likelihood reconstruction of the evolutionary relationships of S. algae DmsA in relation with other Shewanella spp. DmsA orthologs is presented in Fig. 2b. DmsA orthologs from S. algae A56 and S. algae CCUG 58400 are within a well-supported separate clade, that is only distantly related to the housekeeping S. algae DmsA. Altogether, these findings suggest DMSO respiration is a variable, potentially adaptive feature in S. algae, with evidence of selective loss or acquisition from other Shewanella spp.

Surface-associated electron acceptors enhance S. algae substrate colonization

Since S. algae encounters diverse AEAs in its native ecosystems, we hypothesized that biofilm formation could be a selective response promoting bacterial colonization of distinct substrata that are abundant in AEAs, a process that could lead to differential ecological niche occupation by distinct isolates. To test this hypothesis, we selected DMSO and nitrate as two representative AEAs and two S. algae strains, the DMSO and nitrate responder S. algae CECT 5071 and the non-responder S. algae A291. To mimic an environmentally relevant situation, the AEAs were incorporated into an agarose pad (Fig. 3a), and biofilm formation of each strain was examined using non-supplemented agarose as a control. The release of immobilized AEAs from the solid agarose pad could be visualized using the colored cobalt (II) nitrate as illustrated in Fig. 3b. S. algae CECT 5071 exhibited substantially increased biofilm formation on the agarose surface upon incorporation of DMSO or nitrate (Fig. 3c), as observed with supplemented medium. Consistently, while a monolayer of cells was observed in non-supplemented agarose, elaborated biofilm structures were observed primarily in the presence of nitrate and to a lesser degree with DMSO. Conversely, non-responsive S. algae A291 showed a similar low biofilm formation compared to the non-supplemented agarose pad irrespective of whether DMSO or nitrate had been added to the agarose (Fig. 3c). Thus, induction of biofilm formation is preserved upon incorporation of soluble AEAs into an agarose pad and their gradual release from a surface. This experimental set-up mimics environmentally relevant situations S. algae may find, for example, when bacteria encounter decaying organic matter in the aquatic milieu or on the surface of organisms such as fish or algae.

**Fig. 3: Electron acceptors promote strain-specific biofilm formation of *S. algae*.**

Respiration and biofilm formation are intimately related in S. algae

To investigate the physiological basis of AEA-induced biofilm formation in S. algae CECT 5071, we next questioned whether respiration of the supplemented AEA is required for biofilm formation. To provide experimental evidence of an association between biofilm formation and reduction of AEAs, we first deleted the dmsB gene encoding the DMSO reductase subunit B of the DmsEFABGH reductase (Fig. 4a). To assess DMSO reduction by the WT strain and its ΔdmsB mutant derivative, we quantified the generation of dimethylsulfide (DMS), the product of DMSO respiration, in static cultures supplemented with 35 mM DMSO. Deletion of dmsB impaired the capacity to reduce DMSO by >75% (Fig. 4b) as determined by GC-MS.

**Fig. 4: Disruption of terminal reductase activity abrogates the biofilm response.**

We next studied biofilm formation in static cultures of the WT and mutant strain in MB in the absence or presence of 35 mM DMSO. In the absence of DMSO, both the WT strain and its ΔdmsB mutant exhibited similar biofilm formation and growth patterns; the latter characterized by preferential growth as a pellicle at the air–liquid interface (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 5a). In the presence of DMSO, WT growth was stimulated as compared to the non-supplemented control and occurred at the air–liquid interface as well as in the lower layers of the well. In contrast, growth of the ∆dmsB mutant in the presence of DMSO was similar to that in non-supplemented MB (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Biofilm formation in the WT was increased ~2-fold with respect to non-supplemented cultures as previously observed (Fig. 4c), an increase caused by higher biofilm formation on the bottom of the well (Supplementary Fig. 5a), whereas the ΔdmsB mutant generated a similar amount of biofilm compared to the control without DMSO (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 5a), indicating that DMSO respiration is required for the increase in relative biofilm formation upon supplementation with DMSO.

In S. algae CECT 5071 supplementation of MB with nitrate caused a more pronounced increase in biofilm formation than supplementation with DMSO (Fig. 3c). To extend the hypothesis of respiration-driven biofilm formation in S. algae, we deleted the nitrate reductase subunits A-C (napABC) from NAP-α, and the nitrate reductase subunit A (napA) from NAP-β (Fig. 4d) in the CECT 5071 genetic background that resulted in the single in-frame deletion mutants ΔnapABC (hereafter referred to as α⁻) and ΔnapA (hereafter referred to as β⁻), and the double deletion mutant ΔnapABC ΔnapA (hereafter referred to as αβ⁻). To assess the capacity of the WT versus the mutant strains to respire nitrate, we measured the production of nitrite, the product of nitrate reduction, in static cultures supplemented with 35 mM nitrate. Deletion of NAP-α genes reduced nitrite accumulation by almost 80%, whereas deletion of NAP-β genes did not significantly affect nitrate reduction in comparison to the WT (Fig. 4e). Thus, the catalytic activity of NAP-α represents the major fraction of the nitrate reduction capacity compared to NAP-β under the assay conditions used for S. algae CECT 5071. Deletion of napABC and napA rendered S. algae unable to produce nitrite upon addition of nitrate (Fig. 4e).

We next analyzed biofilm formation of the mutants in static cultures with and without 35 mM nitrate. In the absence of nitrate, the WT and all mutants formed a similar amount of biofilm (Fig. 4f), and the patterns of growth and biofilm formation on the walls and bottom of the wells were also similar (Supplementary Fig. 5b). In the presence of nitrate, growth in the anoxic layers of the wells was observed for the WT and mutants lacking a functional NAP-α or NAP-β, but not in the nitrate reduction null mutant αβ⁻ (Supplementary Fig. 5b). While biofilm formation in the β⁻ mutant was not significantly different from that of the WT strain, the α⁻ mutant formed significantly more biofilm than the WT (Fig. 4f), an increase that was due to higher biofilm formation on the bottom of the well as visually determined by CV staining (Supplementary Fig. 5b). In contrast, the double mutant αβ⁻, unable to reduce nitrate, did not respond to nitrate supplementation with increased biofilm formation with respect to non-supplemented cultures (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 5b). This indicates that, in analogy to DMSO, nitrate respiration drives biofilm formation in S. algae CECT 5071, and suggests that each nitrate reductase plays a distinct role on biofilm formation upon nitrate addition.

Reductase activity is required to elicit biofilm formation

So far, our genetic analyses demonstrate that respiration of AEAs can selectively act as driver for biofilm formation. In WT S. algae CECT 5071, AEA-induced biofilm formation is dose-dependent, as shown by dose-response measurements up to a DMSO or nitrate concentration of 70 mM (Supplementary Fig. 6). These experiments also showed that the onset of AEA mediated stimulation of biofilm formation was at ~4 mM for nitrate and 8 mM for DMSO. The ΔdmsB mutant did not respond with enhanced biofilm formation upon addition of DMSO. In contrast, single mutants of nitrate reductases NAP-α (ΔnapABC) and NAP-β (ΔnapA) showed a dose-dependent response. As expected, the αβ⁻ mutant did not respond to nitrate.

To demonstrate that the mutant phenotypes were specific for the deletion of reductase subunits and not a consequence of secondary mutations, we complemented the ∆dmsB mutant with the dmsEFABGH operon cloned under the lac promoter in the pSRK-Km vector. In the complemented ΔdmsB mutant, DMS production was duplicated with respect to WT levels (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 7), compatible with overexpression of the reductase upon β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction. The introduction of the empty pSRK-Km plasmid in the WT or ΔdmsB strains did not significantly change DMS production with respect to the corresponding parental strains (data not shown). Introduction of the empty vector pSRK-Km per se increased biofilm formation, leading to a higher baseline level of biofilm formation (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 8) that masked the effect of DMSO addition. While no significant differences were observed between biofilm levels of the WT and ∆dmsB harboring the empty plasmid, the complemented mutant though showed increased biofilm formation (Fig. 5b). This could also be qualitatively assessed visually as the WT and ∆dmsB pSRK-Km::dmsEFABGH strains tended to form more biofilm on the bottom of the wells in the presence of DMSO, although the effect of the electron acceptor was negligible compared to the high level of biofilm formation at the air–liquid interface caused by plasmid introduction (Fig. 5c).

**Fig. 5: Ectopic expression of terminal reductases restores catalytic activity and biofilm formation.**

To complement the nitrate reductase mutants α⁻, β⁻, and αβ⁻, individual napEDABC and napDAGHB operons and both operons in tandem were cloned under the lac promoter into the pSRK-Km vector. Nitrate reductase activity was partially restored to ~40% by ectopic expression of napEDABC in the α⁻ mutant with low levels of nitrate reductase (Fig. 5d). Nitrate reductase activity of the β⁻ mutant, which presented a nitrate reduction capacity similar to the WT, was significantly increased upon expression of napDAGHB. Complementation of the αβ⁻ strain with napDAGHB only marginally restored nitrate reductase activity, whereas expression of napEDABC, or both napDAGHB and napEDABC, restored nitrate reductase activity to ~40 and 60% of the WT levels, respectively. As the induction of biofilm formation caused by nitrate is higher than that caused by DMSO, the effect of nitrate supplementation was not abrogated by plasmid introduction. Thus, complemented α⁻ and β⁻ mutants showed similar biofilm formation phenotypes than the WT strain upon nitrate supplementation (Fig. 5e). Partial complementation of the WT biofilm phenotype upon nitrate addition was recorded for the αβ⁻ pSRKKm-NAP-β strain, whereas levels comparable to the WT were recorded for the αβ⁻ pSRKKm-NAP-α and αβ⁻ pSRKKm-NAP-α-NAP-β strains (Fig. 5e). Altogether, these data indicate that restoration of reductase activity restores the biofilm formation response in the presence of the electron acceptors.

To demonstrate the specificity of our results, we engineered a napEDABC operon containing a catalytically inactive NAP-α reductase by replacing three of the four cysteines, Cys48, Cys51, and Cys55 responsible for coordination of the 4Fe-4S cluster of NapA, with serine. Overexpression of the resulting mutant NAP-α* in the pSRK-Km plasmid in the αβ⁻ background did not restore nitrite production (Fig. 5d), and biofilm formation remained at the αβ⁻ mutant levels upon supplementation with nitrate (Fig. 5e). This demonstrates that the reductase activity, and not the mere expression of the reductase per se in the periplasm, triggers the biofilm formation response.

Global transcriptional changes induced by alternative electron acceptors

To gain a deeper understanding of the physiological responses induced by different AEAs, transcriptional profiles were obtained from S. algae CECT 5071 grown in static culture in the absence or presence of 35 mM DMSO or nitrate (Supplementary Data 1). Statistically significant changes in transcript levels (P-adj ≤ 0.05) of a total of 3553 genes were noted in S. algae CECT 5071 exposed to DMSO or nitrate (Fig. 6a). There was a tendency between the number of transcripts changed in the presence of a given AEA and the corresponding effect on biofilm formation, since more genes had altered transcript levels in the presence of nitrate as compared to DMSO. Thus, there were 1573 genes with altered transcript levels in the presence of DMSO (Fig. 6b–d; 798 upregulated and 775 downregulated) and 3254 in the presence of nitrate (Fig. 6b, c, e; 1594 upregulated and 1660 downregulated). There was a substantial overlap in the transcriptional response to both AEAs, with 1323 genes having altered transcript levels (either upregulated or downregulated) in either condition (Fig. 6a).

**Fig. 6: Transcriptomic profiles of *S. algae* CECT 5071 static cultures supplemented with DMSO or nitrate.**

Next, genes were classified according to functionality in clusters of orthologous genes (COGs). In the DMSO response, the highest number of upregulated and downregulated transcripts (132 genes, 65 upregulated, and 67 downregulated) belonged to the COG category signal transduction mechanisms [T] (Fig. 6f). This was also the case for nitrate, that modulated transcript levels of 273 genes belonging to this category (136 upregulated and 137 downregulated, Fig. 6g). These data suggest that respiration of AEAs involves downstream intracellular signaling events resulting in increased biofilm formation, consistent with the transcriptional landscape described above. An enrichment analysis using PANTHER²⁵ showed a significant enrichment (P < 0.05) for the ‘sulfate assimilation’ and ‘de novo purine biosynthesis’ categories for both treatments, although the high number of transcripts showing altered expression levels in the presence of DMSO and nitrate suggest that both electron acceptors elicit global physiological changes. We also classified upregulated and downregulated transcripts for each condition into gene ontology (GO) categories. GO terms of the categories “biological processes” and “molecular function” are presented for DMSO (Supplementary Fig. 9a, b) and nitrate (Supplementary Fig. 9c, d). In both treatments, the most populated GO terms under “biological processes” were metabolic processes (GO:0008152) and cellular processes (GO:0009987), irrespective of the directionality of the expression change, indicative of a major physiological reprogramming imposed by AEA supplementation. Likewise, “catalytic activity” (GO:0003824) was the most represented GO term of the “molecular function” category for both DMSO and nitrate supplementation, which is also consistent with the notion that both compounds induce a physiological re-adaptation.

A putative role of c-di-GMP signaling

As noted above, signal transduction mechanisms were highly affected by DMSO or nitrate supplementation. A hallmark of the genus Shewanella is the abundance of proteins that catalyze the synthesis or breakdown of c-di-GMP, suggesting a central role of c-di-GMP-mediated signaling in Shewanella biology. We identified 63 putative c-di-GMP turnover proteins in the genome of S. algae CECT 5071 as part of ongoing genomic studies (Martín-Rodríguez et al., in preparation). In the absence of specific gene nomenclature, we refer to the genes encoding these proteins with provisional generic names, but the corresponding GenBank locus tags are given in parentheses to unambiguously identify the genes. To investigate their transcriptional changes induced by DMSO or nitrate supplementation, we plotted the transcriptome of the 63 genes encoding putative diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) and c-di-GMP phosphodiesterases (PDEs) containing GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP domains in a heatmap (Fig. 7a). This analysis revealed discrete changes caused by DMSO addition, with gene WT_00831 (E1N14_04100) encoding a PAS-GGDEF domain containing protein being the most differentially upregulated by 2.4-fold with respect to the control without electron acceptor supplementation. Nitrate supplementation caused more extensive changes in the c-di-GMP turnover transcriptome, with the putative DGCs WT_00655 (E1N14_03230) and WT_00831 (E1N14_04100) being the most differentially upregulated by 8.5- and 6.8-fold, respectively, with respect to control cultures. Another gene encoding a GGDEF-domain protein, WT_00826 (E1N14_04075) was the most downregulated, 0.14-fold, with respect to the control. Altogether, these data support the notion of an involvement of c-di-GMP signaling in respiration-mediated regulation of biofilm formation in S. algae CECT 5071.

**Fig. 7: Putative role of c-di-GMP signaling on AEA-induced biofilm formation.**

We reasoned that if c-di-GMP signaling mediates AEA-dependent biofilm formation, a decrease of intracellular c-di-GMP pools would revert the phenotype upon AEA supplementation. To artificially alter c-di-GMP levels, the heterologous c-di-GMP PDE YhjH from S. Typhimurium and the catalytically inactive derivative YhjH E136A were cloned into plasmid pBBR1MCS-2, introduced in S. algae CECT 5071, and the biofilm phenotypes of YhjH and YhjH E136A expressing strains were compared with respect to that of the control strain harboring the empty vector in plain MB and MB supplemented with 35 mM DMSO or nitrate (Fig. 7b). Expression of YhjH significantly decreased biofilm formation in MB, whereas biofilm formation of the strain expressing YhjH E136A was not significantly different than that of the vector control. In the presence of DMSO there were no statistically significant differences between the vector control and the YhjH or YhjH E136A expressing strains, although a trend towards lower biofilm formation was noted in the strain expressing the active PDE. In the presence of nitrate, YhjH expressing cells formed significantly lower biofilm than the vector control whereas cells expressing YhjH E136A formed statistically significantly higher biofilm. Taken together, these results suggest that a decrease of intracellular [c-di-GMP] decreases biofilm formation in static culture and counteracts to some extent the effect of AEA supplementation.

Finally, to validate RNA-seq results and to test the reproducibility of our data, RNA was isolated from static S. algae CECT 5071 cultures as performed for transcriptomic analysis, and the expression of six relevant genes was tested by qRT-PCR and compared to transcript levels obtained by RNA-seq: dmsB (E1N14_09855); napA-α (E1N14_17675); napA-β (E1N14_03175); WT_00826 (E1N14_04075); WT_00831 (E1N14_04100); and WT_00655 (E1N14_03230) (Supplementary Fig. 10). The differential expression of these genes was similar in the transcriptomic and qRT-PCR analyses, which validates the RNA-seq data.

Discussion

In this study we demonstrate a specific differential induction of biofilm formation in response to respiration in S. algae. We show that the presence and subsequent utilization of soluble electron acceptors in a seawater-mimicking growth medium induces biofilm formation in some but not all S. algae strains tested. Disruption of the corresponding respiratory pathway as well as mutant complementation with a catalytically inactive variant abolished the capacity of DMSO or nitrate to stimulate biofilm formation.

In S. algae, biofilm formation is strain-specifically upregulated upon supplementation with various electron acceptors. Thereby, respiration and biofilm formation are directly coupled as mutants in the respective terminal reductase did not respond with altered biofilm formation. A physiological link between cellular respiration and regulation of biofilm formation has been observed in other bacteria. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, nitrate respiration has been found to contribute to biofilm formation and development under static growth²⁶, while in Burkholderia pseudomallei, nitrate respiration was found to inhibit biofilm formation by decreasing global c-di-GMP cellular pools²⁷. Anaerobic respiration has been reported to induce biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae and Staphylococcus epidermidis, thereby promoting host colonization^28,29. In Staphylococcus aureus, biofilm formation is promoted under anoxic conditions in response to the oxidation state of the membrane quinone pool³⁰. Opposite roles for oxygen have been reported for other Shewanella spp. where low oxygen promoted c-di-GMP-mediated biofilm formation in S. putrefaciens CN32¹¹ or induced biofilm detachment in S. oneidensis MR-1¹². Altogether, these findings suggest the existence of an extensive, but variable interplay between biofilm formation and the nature of the electron acceptor in respiration.

In our study we used two representative electron acceptors, nitrate and DMSO. Our results implicate that the two periplasmic nitrate reductases of S. algae play different, non-redundant roles under nitrate-rich conditions. Thus, a mutant lacking a functional NAP-β does not show alterations in biofilm formation and global nitrate reductase activity in comparison to the WT as determined by nitrite assessment in culture supernatants, but a mutant lacking a functional NAP-α exhibits a strong impairment in nitrate reduction capacity and altered biofilm formation patterns. The greater contribution of NAP-α to nitrate reduction under static growth conditions is also reflected by a higher expression of this reductase than the other isoform, NAP-β. The nitrate reductase is a complex multidomain protein consisting of the core subunits NapA and NapB, the chaperone NapD and variable accessory subunits³¹. NapA is the catalytic subunit containing a [4Fe-4S] cluster, whereas NapB shuttles electrons from the membrane electron transport protein CymA to NapA. Replacement of NapA-α Cys48, Cys51, and Cys55 involved in the coordination of the [4Fe-4S] cluster³² with serine was shown to prevent nitrate reduction and we show that a nitrate reduction-null mutant expressing such a catalytically deficient NapA-α is unable to induce biofilm formation upon nitrate supplementation. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to functionally analyze nitrate reductase activity (and their contribution to biofilm formation) in a Shewanella species harboring both NAP isoforms, as is the case for most shewanellaceae as shown by whole-genome sequencing³¹, thus establishing a functional link between respiration and biofilm formation, two prima facie independent processes.

Like nitrate, DMSO also elicited strain-specific biofilm formation. Remarkably, genome sequence analysis of S. algae strains showed the DMSO reductase DmsEFABGH not to be conserved across the sequenced isolates, and in some cases, not present at all. In some S. algae isolates, high sequence identity of the catalytic subunit DmsA with orthologs from other Shewanella spp. was noted and demonstrated by phylogenetic analysis. The diversity of gene clusters encoding DMSO reductases in different Shewanella species has been shown²². However, the intra-species variability of the DMSO reductase operon indicates that DMSO respiration is under strong evolutionary pressure in S. algae. Loss or lateral acquisition of respiratory features by S. algae from other Shewanella spp. points to currently unexplored ecological and physiological advantages.

The ability to reduce a given electron acceptor was not necessarily associated with increased biofilm formation. As illustrated for nitrate, while all S. algae isolates reduced nitrate to nitrite, not all of them responded with enhanced biofilm formation indicating that AEA sensing with subsequent upregulation of biofilm formation can be functionally uncoupled from AEA respiration. Sensory domains in signal transduction systems have been reported to detect nitrate and directly couple it to enhanced biofilm formation through increased levels of c-di-GMP, a ubiquitous biofilm activator. For example, in P. aeruginosa, nitrate sensing by the GGDEF-EAL domain containing protein MucR via its MHYT domain induces expression of the exopolysaccharide alginate³³. Another study showed that homologs of the nitrate-sensing two-component system NarX/NarL in B. pseudomallei is involved in the regulation of biofilm formation by potentially interfering with c-di-GMP levels²⁷. Furthermore, accumulation close to insoluble electron acceptors has been observed to require chemotaxis and electron transport chain components^34,35.

The habitat of S. algae includes coastal and oceanic sediments as well as the water column², where microbial reduction of inorganic and organic soluble and insoluble electron acceptors are a central part of the Earth’s global biogeochemical cycles^22,36,37. DMSO is a relatively abundant compound in seawater thought to play a key role in the global sulfur cycle³⁸. Most of DMSO is produced from DMS, a climate active gas responsible for the main exchange of sulfur between the oceans and the atmosphere. DMS is the main end product of the degradation of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP), an algal osmolyte synthetized by phytoplankton³⁹ at an estimated rate of 10⁹ tons per year in the oceans^40,41. As an adaptive trait, two differentially expressed dms operons are found in Shewanella piezotolerans WP3¹⁸. Local pools of AEAs are also available in certain host body niches colonized by Shewanella spp. including the intestinal tract¹⁷. Niche partitioning with the emergence of specific ecotypes that have lost the ability to respire on certain AEAs such as DMSO, TMAO, or thiosulfate has evolved in S. baltica. This type of genomic evolution is thought to have led to the existence of carbon source and redox-specialized S. baltica communities in sediments of the Baltic Sea^42,43. In S. algae, niche partitioning, at least in the case of nitrate, is more complex since it combines enhanced biofilm formation with the ability to respire the AEA. Both biofilm and non-biofilm responsive strains have been found to perform dissimilatory reduction of nitrate as an AEA prototype. While the concentration of DMSO and nitrate used as a reference in this study (35 mM) is higher than that in the natural habitat, i.e. seawater, local mM concentrations of these AEAs may be found in certain niches. For example, DMSO concentrations of 30–90 mM have been reported in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi⁴⁴. A study has shown S. oneidensis to perform positive chemotaxis towards senescent E. huxleyi cells⁴⁵, supporting the notion that Shewanella spp. is attracted by gradients of AEAs permitting their metabolization. The genera of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria Beggiatoa and Thioploca accumulate up to 500 mM nitrate intracellularly as an electron acceptor for sulfide oxidation⁴⁶. Likewise, high nitrate concentrations could occur at the interface with nitrate-rich fecal or decaying organic material⁴⁷.

In the natural environment, AEAs are rarely encountered homogeneously, but are present in gradients that can be sensed by microorganisms. Sedimented organic material or phytoplankton are sources of nitrate and DMSO^48,49,50. Solid agarose colonization upon incorporation of the AEAs DMSO and nitrate has given direct evidence that sensing and respiration promote substrate colonization by S. algae. Positive chemotaxis towards soluble and insoluble AEAs has been reported for S. oneidensis MR-1 and S. putrefaciens^35,51,52 and may contribute to the elevated biofilm development on abiotic or biotic surfaces containing AEAs⁵³. Shewanella spp. exploit surface attachment and biofilm formation in conjunction with respiration of insoluble AEAs^54,55. However, whether surface attachment and biofilm formation play a role in the respiration of highly diffusible AEAs is poorly characterized. Electroactivity measurements revealed increases in Shewanella biofilm formation upon elevation of c-di-GMP levels¹³, thus enhanced biofilm formation could correlate with improved electrical transfer.

Because of their outstanding metabolic and respiratory flexibility, regulation of gene expression, including terminal reductases, is complex in Shewanella spp. The anaerobic reduction pathways of Shewanella spp. have been shown to be promiscuous, sometimes involving the simultaneous utilization of several electron acceptors⁵⁶. Oxygen limitation has been shown to elicit swift changes in energy metabolism, cytochrome production, and formation of conductive nanowires in S. oneidensis MR-1⁵⁷. Transcriptomic analyses under defined anaerobic conditions have shown that anaerobic reduction pathways, such as nitrate and Mn(IV) reduction, are deeply intertwined in S. algae^58,59. There is an oxygen gradient within biofilms, which adds another layer to the complexity of oxygen-mediated regulatory processes⁶⁰.

Following the trend observed in biofilm formation experiments, the extension of the global transcriptional changes induced on S. algae CECT 5071 was higher for nitrate than for DMSO, consistent with transcriptomic analyses reported for S. oneidensis MR-1 upon exposure to these electron acceptors⁶¹. Conclusively, this observation indicates fundamental metabolic differences, and perhaps biofilm characteristics, between growth conditions to accompany the combined respiration and biofilm-driven niche adaptation. Since signal transduction genes corresponded to the most populated family under both conditions, environmental sensing and regulation are likely to play key roles in conferring the enhanced biofilm phenotype. Among the signal transduction pathways of Shewanella spp. that regulate biofilm formation, c-di-GMP signaling occupies a prevalent position with Shewanella spp. having one of the largest number of c-di-GMP turnover proteins among prokaryotes⁷. Transcription of the putative DGC with an N-terminal PAS sensory domain WT_00831 (E1N14_04100) was found to be upregulated in the presence of both DMSO and nitrate, thus constituting a primary candidate for future studies aimed at deciphering the underlying molecular mechanism of the biofilm response. Transcript levels of other two DGCs, WT_00826 (E1N14_04075) and WT_00655 (E1N14_03230) were found to be significantly shifted by nitrate. This suggests c-di-GMP, or another second messenger cyclic dinucleotide signaling pathway, as a candidate pathway regulating respiration-mediated biofilm formation in S. algae. This notion is further supported by differential biofilm formation upon expression of the heterologous PDE YhjH and its catalytic mutant YhjH E136A from S. Typhimurium, presumably as a consequence of artificially altered intracellular c-di-GMP pools.

In summary, in this work we have provided evidence that reductase activity is required for AEA-induced biofilm formation in S. algae. Deletion mutants in the different reductases characterized the physiological role of respiration in terms of activity and biofilm induction. Given the complexity of the electron transport systems and signal transduction pathways in S. algae, and the strain-specific nature of this phenomenon, this work provides an entry point for follow-up studies of comparative transcriptomic analyses of responsive and non-responsive S. algae isolates as well as extensive mutational analyses to identify and characterize specific regulatory pathways linking respiration with biofilm formation. Furthermore, we report that biofilm formation is closely interwoven with the use of different electron acceptors by S. algae. We show that the two NAP isoforms of S. algae play substantially different roles on cellular nitrate reduction and nitrate reduction-mediated biofilm formation. We also demonstrate DMSO reduction to be a variable feature in S. algae with evidence of loss or horizontal acquisition in certain isolates. Respiration-driven biofilm formation may therefore constitute a mechanism of niche colonization by specialized S. algae strains, not only in anoxic environments where certain AEAs are abundant, but also in moderately oxygenated environments by taking advantage of their broad respiratory repertoire and reducing thereby the consequences of microbial competition for oxygen. Apart from deciphering the underlying molecular mechanisms, this work provides a sound basis for future research aimed at establishing the phylogenetic spread of the phenomenon studied here.

Methods

Strains and growth conditions

The Shewanella strains used in this study (Supplementary Table 1) were routinely grown in MB or on marine agar (MA) (Difco). Escherichia coli strains (Supplementary Table 1) were routinely grown in Luria broth (LB) or on Luria agar (LA). When necessary, the medium was supplemented with kanamycin (50 µg ml⁻¹), streptomycin (200 µg ml⁻¹), IPTG (0.5 mM), and/or diaminopimelic acid (0.3 mM).

Genetic manipulations

The R6K-origin plasmid pKNG101 was used for allelic replacement in S. algae CECT 5071. For in-frame deletion of the target genes dmsB (minor subunit of the DMSO reductase DmsAB), napABC (periplasmic nitrate reductase NAP-α, subunits A, B, and C) and napA (periplasmic nitrate reductase NAP-β, subunit A), the chromosomal regions immediately up- and down-stream the genes of interest were PCR-amplified and fused in plasmid pKNG101 using the primers and restriction sites indicated in Supplementary Table 2. To create the dmsB deletion, the DNA fragments comprising the 347-bp upstream and 355-bp downstream the dmsB gene were initially cloned into pUC18Not using the restriction sites indicated in Supplementary Table 2, and then subcloned into pKNG101 at the NotI site. The resulting plasmids were propagated in E. coli DH5α λpir, isolated, and electroporated into E. coli MFDpir from which they were mobilized into S. algae CECT 5071 by conjugation. Recombinants generated by single-crossover recombination were selected on LA plates containing Sm. Double crossover was induced upon re-streaking merodiploids on plates containing 10% (w/v) sucrose. In-frame gene deletion mutants were confirmed by PCR using primers flanking the recombination sites (Supplementary Table 2) followed by Sanger sequencing. To complement the mutations, the relevant operons dmsEFABGH, napDAGHB and napEDABC were cloned individually or in tandem under the control of the plac promoter in pSRK-Km using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 2. The cloning strains E. coli TOP10 and NEB-5α were used for plasmid propagation. All plasmid constructs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

The wild-type yhjH gene from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium ATCC 14028 Nal^R (UMR1) and the catalytically inactive derivative YhjH E136A were cloned into pBBR1MCS-2 with primers yhjH-F-HindIII and yhjH-R-XbaI (Supplementary Table 2) using S. Typhimurium UMR1 genomic DNA or plasmid pRGS4⁶² as templates, respectively, followed by Sanger DNA sequencing.

Generation of catalytically inactive NapA

To generate a catalytically inactive NapA-α enzyme, three of the four cysteines coordinating the 4Fe-4S cluster in the nitrate reductase α catalytic subunit NapA were replaced by serine (C48S, C51S and C55S). Nucleotide exchanges were introduced with the Q5 site-directed mutagenesis kit (NEB) following the manufacturer’s instructions (primers in Supplementary Table 2). The nucleotide replacements were verified by Sanger sequencing.

Biofilm formation assays

In total, 200 µl bacterial cultures were incubated statically in 96-well plates (TPP, #92096) at 30 °C for 24 h in MB in the absence or presence of 35 mM of DMSO or sodium nitrate. Concentration-dependent biofilm formation was assessed in the absence or presence of 0.55-70 mM DMSO and nitrate. Adherent cells were quantified by crystal violet (CV) staining as previously described with minor modifications⁶³. Briefly, after staining adherent cells with a 0.2% (w/v) CV solution, the biofilm-associated dye was dissolved with 30% (v/v) acetic acid. Total biofilm biomass is reported as OD₅₉₀ absorbance. Biofilm formation patterns including pellicle formation were documented using 96-well strip plates (Greiner Bio-One, #762070).

Phylogenetic analyses

Identification of S. algae CECT 5071 dimethyl sulfoxide reductase DmsA and nitrate reductase NapA orthologs was performed by BLASTp against the whole-genome sequencing contigs of 41 S. algae strains (Martín-Rodríguez et al., unpublished) using the Uppmax computational cluster (National Genomics Infrastructure, Sweden), followed by manual inspection of the corresponding genomic loci. The evolutionary history of terminal reductases DmsA and NapA was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and the Whelan and Goldman model⁶⁴ after 1000 bootstrap replications as implemented in MEGA X⁶⁵. The nucleotide sequences of dmsA orthologs are available at the NCBI GenBank (accession numbers: MT953034-MT953072).

Confocal microscopy

To assess biofilm formation on surfaces containing AEAs, 35 mM DMSO and nitrate were added to 2.5 ml 2.5% (w/v) ultrapure agarose (Bio-Rad), which was dispensed in 6-well tissue culture plates and allowed to solidify. Non-supplemented agarose was used as a control surface. Agarose disks were overlaid with 8 ml of bacterial suspensions containing ~1 × 10⁶ CFU ml⁻¹ of S. algae CECT 5071, a strain responding to both AEAs with increased biofilm formation, and S. algae A291, a strain that does not exhibit a AEA-mediated biofilm response, and then incubated statically overnight. The bacterial cultures were then removed by aspiration and the agarose disks washed three times with sterile PBS. Biofilm bacteria were stained using the BacLight viability kit (Invitrogen). Sections of ~0.5 × 0.5 cm were excised with a sterile scalpel for imaging in an Olympus FluoView FV1000 confocal microscope. Experiments involved two biological replicates with two technical replicates each, and a minimum of three sections were imaged per technical replicate.

Gas chromatography

Determination of DMSO reductase activity in static bacterial cultures in MB supplemented with 35 mM DMSO was performed by quantification of DMS production by GC-MS (Varian 450GC-240MS). In all, 10 ml vials containing 5 ml bacterial cultures adjusted to an initial OD₆₀₀ of 0.05 in MB medium supplemented with DMSO were sealed and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Controls included a culture of S. algae CECT 5071 WT in MB not supplemented with DMSO, as well as sterile medium supplemented with 35 mM DMSO. The cultures were pre-conditioned at 30 °C for 2 min under agitation before extraction of 0.1 ml gas using a Head Space syringe and injection at 250 °C in split mode. A DB5-MS UI (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) column was used with He as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 ml min^–1. The GC oven was programmed to rise from 40 °C (3 min) to 220 °C at 100 °C min^-1 (1 min). DMS was detected by a mass spectrometer with an EI ion source running in TIC Full Scan mode (scanning m/e 32–300). Experiments involved three biological replicates.

Determination of nitrate reductase activity

Nitrate reductase activity in static cultures of strains grown in MB supplemented with 35 mM nitrate was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the accumulation of nitrite in supernatants upon addition of 0.02% (w/v) N-(1-napthyl)ethylenediamine in 95% (v/v) ethanol and 1% sulfanilamide (w/v) in 1.5 N HCl as previously described²⁰. Optical readings were taken at OD₅₄₀ in 96-well plates. Experiments involved at least three biological replicates.

RNA isolation and sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from static overnight cultures of S. algae CECT 5071 in non-supplemented MB or the same medium supplemented with 35 mM DMSO or 35 mM nitrate. Prior to RNA isolation, cultures (three biological replicates per test condition) were homogenized by inverting the tubes to ensure representative sampling of the entire bacterial population. RNA purification was performed with the Direct-Zol RNA Miniprep Plus kit (Zymo Research) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Residual genomic DNA was removed by DNase treatment with the Turbo DNA-free kit (Ambion). DNA contamination was assessed with a 40 cycle PCR using the DNase-treated RNA samples as templates. The RNA quality was examined on a 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent). The relative integrity (RIN) values were 9.6–10.

Prior to sequencing, rRNA was depleted from 550 ng of total RNA using Illumina Ribo-Zero rRNA removal kit for Gram-negative bacteria. Sequencing libraries were then prepared using Illumina TruSeq stranded total RNA kit. The libraries were pooled and 1% of PhiX control library was added to the pool. The pool was sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 machine in High Output run mode using v4 chemistry. The read length was PE125.

Low quality sequence reads and adapters were removed with AfterQC⁶⁶ using default parameters and the remaining contaminating rRNA was removed with SortMeRNA⁶⁷. Read counts per gene were obtained using the package Salmon⁶⁸ with default parameters. To identify differentially expressed genes, the DESeq2 R/Bioconductor package was used⁶⁹. RNA-seq reads were deposited at the NCBI database (accession number: GSE133627).

The annotation of S. algae CECT 5071 genes was classified into functional families using the Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) by BLASTP with 60% minimum alignment coverage, 50 minimum bitscore, and 35% minimum percent identity.

Proteins were classified into families and subfamilies with an ontology term (GO), PANTHER protein class, and PANTHER pathway using its classification system (www.pantherdb.org²⁵). Statistical enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes was considered as significant when the FDR-adjusted P-value was inferior to 0.05. Analyses were assisted by Python scripts.

qRT-PCR validation of RNA-seq data

Quantitative real time PCR was used to validate differential gene transcript levels using RNA isolated from S. algae CECT 5071 cultures under the same conditions as described above. The primers used in qRT-PCR reactions are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized with the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) using 1 μg of RNA. Quantitative PCR reactions were prepared with the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and run on a LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche) using the pre-defined SYBR Green reaction protocol. Relative gene expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method⁷⁰.

Reporting summary

Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank with the accession code GSE133627. The Whole Genome Shotgun project of S. algae CECT 5071 is available at the NCBI GenBank under the accession code SMNR00000000. The nucleotide sequences of dmsA orthologs used for phylogenetic analysis are available at the NCBI GenBank under accession codes MT953034-MT953072.

References

Nealson, K. H. & Scott, J. Ecophysiology of the genus Shewanella. In The Prokaryotes. 1133–1151 (Springer New York, 2006).
Hau, H. H. & Gralnick, J. A. Ecology and biotechnology of the genus Shewanella. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61, 237–258 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kotloski, N. J. & Gralnick, J. A. Flavin electron shuttles dominate extracellular electron transfer by Shewanella oneidensis. MBio 4, e00553–12 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martín-Rodríguez, A. J., Martín-Pujol, O., Artiles-Campelo, F., Bolaños-Rivero, M. & Römling, U. Shewanella spp. infections in Gran Canaria, Spain:retrospective analysis of 31 cases and a literature review. JMM Case Rep. 4, e005131 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martín-Rodríguez, A. J., Suárez-Mesa, A., Artiles-Campelo, F., Römling, U. & Hernández, M. Multilocus sequence typing of Shewanella algae isolates identifies disease-causing Shewanella chilikensis strain 6I4. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, fiy210 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dang, H. & Lovell, C. R. Microbial Surface Colonization and biofilm development in marine environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 91–138 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Römling, U., Galperin, M. Y. & Gomelsky, M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 1–52 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Martín-Rodríguez, A. J. & Römling, U. Nucleotide second messenger signaling as a target for the control of bacterial biofilm formation. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 17, 1928–1944 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kolter, R. & Greenberg, E. P. The superficial life of microbes. Nature 441, 300–302 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Toyofuku, M. et al. Environmental factors that shape biofilm formation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 80, 7–12 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wu, C. et al. Oxygen promotes biofilm formation of Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 through a diguanylate cyclase and an adhesin. Sci. Rep. 3, 1945 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thormann, K. M. et al. Control of formation and cellular detachment from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms by cyclic di-GMP. J. Bacteriol. 188, 2681–2691 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, T. et al. Enhanced Shewanella biofilm promotes bioelectricity generation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 112, 2051–2059 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Xiang, Y., Sun, G., Wu, W.-M. & Xu, M. Electron acceptor-dependent respiratory and physiological stratifications in biofilms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 196–202 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. et al. Extracellular polymeric substances are transient media for microbial extracellular electron transfer. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700623 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Caro-Quintero, A. et al. Genome sequencing of five Shewanella baltica strains recovered from the oxic-anoxic interface of the Baltic Sea. J. Bacteriol. 194, 1236 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
King, G. M., Judd, C., Kuske, C. R. & Smith, C. Analysis of stomach and gut microbiomes of the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from coastal Louisiana, USA. PLoS ONE 7, e51475 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xiong, L., Jian, H., Zhang, Y. & Xiao, X. The two sets of DMSO respiratory systems of Shewanella piezotolerans WP3 are involved in deep sea environmental adaptation. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1418 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. C. et al. Role of outer membrane c-type cytochromes MtrC and OmcA in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 cell production, accumulation, and detachment during respiration on hematite. Geobiology 10, 355–370 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Streeter, J. G. & Devine, P. J. Evaluation of nitrate reductase activity in Rhizobium japonicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46, 521–524 (1983).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sambasivarao, D. & Weiner, J. H. Differentiation of the multiple S- and N-oxide-reducing activities of Escherichia coli. Curr. Microbiol. 23, 105–110 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gralnick, J. A., Vali, H., Lies, D. P. & Newman, D. K. Extracellular respiration of dimethyl sulfoxide by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4669–4674 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, K.-K. et al. Shewanella upenei sp. nov., a lipolytic bacterium isolated from bensasi goatfish Upeneus bensasi. J. Microbiol. 49, 381–386 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thorell, K., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Sjöling, Å. & Martín-Rodríguez, A. J. Whole-genome sequencing redefines Shewanella taxonomy. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1861 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Ebert, D., Huang, X. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D419–D426 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Van Alst, N. E., Picardo, K. F., Iglewski, B. H. & Haidaris, C. G. Nitrate sensing and metabolism modulate motility, biofilm formation, and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 75, 3780–3790 (2007).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Mangalea, M. R., Plumley, B. A. & Borlee, B. R. Nitrate sensing and metabolism inhibit biofilm formation in the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei by reducing the intracellular concentration of c-di-GMP. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1353 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marrero, K. et al. Anaerobic growth promotes synthesis of colonization factors encoded at the Vibrio pathogenicity island in Vibrio cholerae El Tor. Res. Microbiol. 160, 48–56 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Uribe-Alvarez, C. et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis: metabolic adaptation and biofilm formation in response to different oxygen concentrations. Pathog. Dis. 74, ftv111 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Mashruwala, A. A., van de Guchte, A. & Boyd, J. M. Impaired respiration elicits SrrAB-dependent programmed cell lysis and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Elife 6, e23845 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Simpson, P. J. L., Richardson, D. J. & Codd, R. The periplasmic nitrate reductase in Shewanella: the resolution, distribution and functional implications of two NAP isoforms, NapEDABC and NapDAGHB. Microbiology 156, 302–312 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dias, J. M. et al. Crystal structure of the first dissimilatory nitrate reductase at 1.9 Å solved by MAD methods. Structure 7, 65–79 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Hay, I. D., Rehman, Z. U. & Rehm, B. H. A. Membrane-anchored MucR mediates nitrate-dependent regulation of alginate production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 7253–7265 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harris, H. W., El-Naggar, M. Y. & Nealson, K. H. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 chemotaxis proteins and electron-transport chain components essential for congregation near insoluble electron acceptors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 1167–1177 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bencharit, S. & Ward, M. J. Chemotactic responses to metals and anaerobic electron acceptors in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J. Bacteriol. 187, 5049–5053 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Meysman, F. J. R., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Malkin, S. Y. & Nielsen, L. P. The geochemical fingerprint of microbial long-distance electron transport in the seafloor. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 152, 122–142 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Orcutt, B. N. et al. Microbial activity in the marine deep biosphere: progress and prospects. Front. Microbiol. 4, 189 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hatton, A., Malin, G., Turner, S. & Liss, P. In Biological and Environmental Chemistry of DMSP and Related Sulfonium Compounds (eds. Kiene, R. P., Visscher, P. T., Keller, M. D. & Kirst, G. O.) 405–412 (Plenum Press, 1996).
Moran, M. A. & Durham, B. P. Sulfur metabolites in the pelagic ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 665–678 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kettle, A. J. & Andreae, M. O. Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans: a comparison of updated data sets and flux models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 105, 26793–26808 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Malin, G. & Kirst, G. O. Algal production of dimethyl sulfide and its atmospheric role. J. Phycol. 33, 889–896 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Deng, J. et al. Divergence in gene regulation contributes to sympatric speciation of Shewanella baltica strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e02015–e02017 (2017).
Google Scholar
Deng, J. et al. Stability, genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Shewanella baltica in the redox transition zone of the Baltic Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 1854–1866 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sunda, W., Kieber, D. J., Kiene, R. P. & Huntsman, S. An antioxidant function for DMSP and DMS in marine algae. Nature 418, 317–320 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Petit, M. et al. Dynamic of bacterial communities attached to lightened phytodetritus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 13681–13692 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Teske, A. & Nelson, D. C. In The Prokaryotes. 784–810 (Springer New York, 2006).
Szpak, P., Millaire, J. F., White, C. D. & Longstaffe, F. J. Influence of seabird guano and camelid dung fertilization on the nitrogen isotopic composition of field-grown maize (Zea mays). J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 3721–3740 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hatton, A. D. & Wilson, S. T. Particulate dimethylsulphoxide and dimethylsulphoniopropionate in phytoplankton cultures and Scottish coastal waters. Aquat. Sci. 69, 330–340 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Speeckaert, G., Borges, A. V., Champenois, W., Royer, C. & Gypens, N. Annual cycle of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) related to phytoplankton succession in the Southern North Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 622–623, 362–372 (2018).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zehr, J. P. & Ward, B. B. Nitrogen cycling in the ocean: new perspectives on processes and paradigms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1015–1024 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baraquet, C., Théraulaz, L., Iobbi-Nivol, C., Méjean, V. & Jourlin-Castelli, C. Unexpected chemoreceptors mediate energy taxis towards electron acceptors in Shewanella oneidensis. Mol. Microbiol. 73, 278–290 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nealson, K. H., Moser, D. P. & Saffarini, D. A. Anaerobic electron acceptor chemotaxis in Shewanella putrefaciens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1551–1554 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Harris, H. W., El-Naggar, M. Y. & Nealson, K. H. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 chemotaxis proteins and electron-transport chain components essential for congregation near insoluble electron acceptors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 1167–1177 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Ginn, B. R., DiChristina, T. J. & Stack, A. G. Adhesion of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 to iron (oxy)(hydr)oxides: microcolony formation and isotherm. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1602–1609 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marsili, E. et al. Shewanella secretes flavins that mediate extracellular electron transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3968–3973 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Drewniak, L., Stasiuk, R., Uhrynowski, W. & Sklodowska, A. Shewanella sp. O23S as a driving agent of a system utilizing dissimilatory arsenate-reducing bacteria responsible for self-cleaning of water contaminated with arsenic. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 14409–14427 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Barchinger, S. E. et al. Regulation of gene expression in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 during electron acceptor limitation and bacterial nanowire formation. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 82, 5428–5443 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Aigle, A., Bonin, P., Iobbi-Nivol, C., Méjean, V. & Michotey, V. Physiological and transcriptional approaches reveal connection between nitrogen and manganese cycles in Shewanella algae C6G3. Sci. Rep. 7, 44725 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aigle, A. et al. The nature of the electron acceptor (MnIV/NO₃) triggers the differential expression of genes associated with stress and ammonium limitation responses in Shewanella algae C6G3. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, fny068 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Teal, T. K., Lies, D. P., Wold, B. J. & Newman, D. K. Spatiometabolic stratification of Shewanella oneidensis biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7324–7330 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beliaev, A. S. et al. Global transcriptome analysis of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 exposed to different terminal electron acceptors. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7138–7145 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Simm, R., Morr, M., Kader, A., Nimtz, M. & Römling, U. GGDEF and EAL domains inversely regulate cyclic di-GMP levels and transition from sessility to motility. Mol. Microbiol. 53, 1123–1134 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martín-Rodríguez, A. J. et al. On the influence of the culture conditions in bacterial antifouling bioassays and biofilm properties: Shewanella algae, a case study. BMC Microbiol. 14, 102 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Whelan, S. & Goldman, N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 691–699 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, S. et al. AfterQC: automatic filtering, trimming, error removing and quality control for fastq data. BMC Bioinform. 18, 80 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kopylova, E., Noé, L. & Touzet, H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics 28, 3211–3217 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔC_T method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Lone Gram (DTU, Denmark), Dr. Margarita Bolaños (Hospital Unversitario Insular de Gran Canaria), and Dr. Fernando Artiles-Campelo (Hospital Dr. Negrín de Gran Canaria) for provision of Shewanella algae strains, and Prof. Didier Mazel (Institut Pasteur, Paris) for the kind gift of E. coli MFDpir. AJM-R acknowledges funding from FEMS (RG2015-0084), the Karolinska Institutet Research Foundation (FS-2018:0007), the Hans Dahlbergs Foundation, the Lars Hiertas Minne Foundation (FO2018-0196), and the Längmanska Kulturfonden (BA19-1128). J.M.G. acknowledges funding from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CTM2016-80095-C2-2-R). Work at the EEZ was supported by grants to TK from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BIO2013-42297 and BIO2016-76779-P). U.R. was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Natural Sciences and Engineering (project numbers 621-2013-4809 and 2017-04465) and Karolinska Institutet. The GC-MS experiments were conducted by Dr. Rafael Núñez Gómez from the Scientific Instrumentation Service of the Estación Experimental del Zaidín (Granada, Spain). RNA sequencing was performed at the Science for Life Laboratory (SciLife Lab), Uppsala, Sweden. The authors are grateful to Dr. K. Thorell (University of Gothenburg) for bioinformatics support and to Dr. M. A. Matilla (EEZ-CSIC), funded by the Spanish Ministry for Science, Innovation and Universities (PID2019-103972GA-I00), for experimental assistance during the revision of this work.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by Karolinska Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
Alberto J. Martín-Rodríguez & Ute Römling
Department of Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Granada, Spain
José A. Reyes-Darias, David Martín-Mora & Tino Krell
Department of Microbiology, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain
José M. González

Authors

Alberto J. Martín-Rodríguez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
José A. Reyes-Darias
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David Martín-Mora
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
José M. González
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tino Krell
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ute Römling
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study - original idea: A.J.M.-R. Study - design and conceptualization: A.J.M.-R. and U.R. Experiments: A.J.M.-R., assisted by J.A.R.-D. and D.M.-M. Data analysis: A.J.M.-R., J.M.G., T.K., and U.R. Writing - original draft: A.J.M.-R. Writing - review and editing: A.J.M.-R., T.K., and U.R., with the input of all co-authors. All authors read and approved the final version before submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alberto J. Martín-Rodríguez or Ute Römling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data 1

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martín-Rodríguez, A.J., Reyes-Darias, J.A., Martín-Mora, D. et al. Reduction of alternative electron acceptors drives biofilm formation in Shewanella algae. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-020-00177-1

Download citation

Received: 05 December 2019
Accepted: 11 December 2020
Published: 27 January 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-020-00177-1

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.