Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Selecting the best candidates for resurrecting extinct-in-the-wild plants from herbaria

Nature Plants volume 8, pages 1385–1393 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

This article has been updated

Abstract

Resurrecting extinct species is a fascinating and challenging idea for scientists and the general public. Whereas some theoretical progress has been made for animals, the resurrection of extinct plants (de-extinction sensu lato) is a relatively recently discussed topic. In this context, the term ‘de-extinction’ is used sensu lato to refer to the resurrection of ‘extinct in the wild’ species from seeds or tissues preserved in herbaria, as we acknowledge the current impossibility of knowing a priori whether a herbarium seed is alive and can germinate. In plants, this could be achieved by germinating or in vitro tissue-culturing old diaspores such as seeds or spores available in herbarium specimens. This paper reports the first list of plant de-extinction candidates based on the actual availability of seeds in herbarium specimens of globally extinct plants. We reviewed globally extinct seed plants using online resources and additional literature on national red lists, resulting in a list of 361 extinct taxa. We then proposed a method of prioritizing candidates for seed-plant de-extinction from diaspores found in herbarium specimens and complemented this with a phylogenetic approach to identify species that may maximize evolutionarily distinct features. Finally, combining data on seed storage behaviour and longevity, as well as specimen age in the novel ‘best de-extinction candidate’ score (DEXSCO), we identified 556 herbarium specimens belonging to 161 extinct species with available seeds. We expect that this list of de-extinction candidates and the novel approach to rank them will boost research efforts towards the first-ever plant de-extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data in Materials and Methods are included in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, as some original data were provided under a confidentiality clause.

The following databases were consulted for the revision of extinct plant species:

BGCI | Botanic Gardens Conservation International (https://www.bgci.org/)

ENSCOBASE (http://enscobase.maich.gr/)

IUCN, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. V. 2021-3 (2022) (https://www.iucnredlist.org/)

Millennium Seed Bank—Seed List (http://apps.kew.org/seedlist/SeedlistServlet)

Threatened Species Programme | SANBI Red List of South African Plants (http://redlist.sanbi.org/index.php)

A Database of the World’s Recently Extinct Species: Plants, Animals and Fungi – The Recently Extinct Plants and Animals Database (https://recentlyextinctspecies.com/)

Virtual herbaria specimens were researched using:

Biodiversity Center of Japan (https://www.biodic.go.jp/index_e.html)

Calflora - Information on wild California plants (https://www.calflora.org/)

Chinese Virtual Herbarium - 中国数字植物标本馆 (CVH) - 国家植物标本资源库在线共享平台 (https://www.cvh.ac.cn/index.php)

GBIF (https://www.gbif.org/)

JACQ - Virtual Herbaria (https://www.jacq.org/#database)

e-ReColNat Infrastructure (https://www.recolnat.org/en/)

RM Herbarium Specimen Search (http://rmh.uwyo.edu/data/browse_scientific.php)

AVH - The Australasian Virtual Herbarium (https://avh.chah.org.au/)

Tropicos - Home (https://www.tropicos.org/home)

Change history

  • 27 January 2023

    In the version of this article initially published, the surname of Christian Bräuchler was misspelled as “Bräeuchler,” and has now been amended in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pimm, S. L. et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, 6187 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Humphreys, A. M., Govaerts, R., Ficinski, S. Z., Nic Lughadha, E. & Vorontsova, M. S. Global dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscovery. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1043–1047 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brondizio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S. & Ngo, H. T. IPBES (2019): Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

  5. Maschinski, J. & Albrecht, M. A. Center for Plant Conservation’s best practice guidelines for the reintroduction of rare plants. Plant Divers. 39, 390–395 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pimm, S. L. & Raven, P. H. The fate of the world’s plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 317–320 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Antonelli, A. et al. State of the World’s Plants and Fungi 2020 (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2020) https://doi.org/10.34885/172

  8. Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M. & Petersen, T. WWF (2020) Living Planet Report 2020 - Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (WWF, 2020).

  9. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 3.1 (IUCN, 2012).

  10. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2021-3 (IUCN, 2022).

  11. IUCN SSC Guiding Principles on Creating Proxies of Extinct Species for Conservation Benefit (IUCN Species Survival Commission, 2016).

  12. Greely, H. T. Is de-extinction special? Hastings Cent. Rep. 47, S30–S36 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seddon, P. J. The ecology of de-extinction. Funct. Ecol. 31, 992–995 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Slater, M. H. & Clatterbuck, H. A pragmatic approach to the possibility of de-extinction. Biol. Philos. 33, 1–21 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abeli, T. et al. Ex situ collections and their potential for the restoration of extinct plants. Conserv. Biol. 34, 303–313 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lerman, J. C. & Cigliano, E. M. New carbon-14 evidence for six hundred years old Canna compacta seed. Nature 232, 568–570 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sallon, S. et al. Germination, genetics, and growth of an ancient date seed. Science 320, 1464 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen-Miller, J., Mudgett, M. B., Schopf, J. W., Clarke, S. & Berger, R. Exceptional seed longevity and robust growth: Ancient Sacred Lotus from China. Am. J. Bot. 82, 1367–1380 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen-Miller, J. Sacred lotus, the long-living fruits of China Antique. Seed Sci. Res. 12, 131–143 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Daws, M. I., Davies, J., Vaes, E., van Gelder, R. & Pritchard, H. W. Two-hundred-year seed survival of Leucospermum and two other woody species from the Cape Floristic region, South Africa. Seed Sci. Res. 17, 73–79 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Molnár, V. A. et al. Seed of the threatened annual legume, Astragalus contortuplicatus, can survive over 130 years of dry storage. Preslia 87, 319–328 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Telewski, F. W. & Zeevaart, J. A. D. The 120-yr period for Dr. Beal’s seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 89, 1285–1288 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Godefroid, S., van de Vyver, A., Stoffelen, P., Robbrecht, E. & Vanderborght, T. Testing the viability of seeds from old herbarium specimens for conservation purposes. Taxon 60, 565–569 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thiers, B. M. The World’s Herbaria 2021: A Summary Report Based on Data from Index Herbariorum (Index Herbariorum, 2021) http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/

  25. Bowles, M. L., Betz, R. F. & DeMauro, M. M. Propagation of rare plants from historic seed collections: Implications for species restoration and herbarium management. Restor. Ecol. 1, 101–106 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magrini, S., Olmati, C., Onofri, S. & Scoppola, A. Recovery of viable germplasm from herbarium specimens of Osmunda regalis L. Am. Fern J. 100, 159–166 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakahama, N. et al. Recovery of genetic diversity in threatened plants through use of germinated seeds from herbarium specimens. Plant Ecol. 216, 1635–1647 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Albani Rocchetti, G. et al. Reversing extinction trends: new uses of (old) herbarium specimens to accelerate conservation action on threatened species. New Phytol. 230, 433–450 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Albani Rocchetti, G. et al. A pragmatic and prudent consensus on the resurrection of extinct plant species using herbarium specimens. Taxon 71, 168–177 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolkis, D., Jones, K., Flynn, T., DeMotta, M. & Rønsted, N. Germination of seeds from herbarium specimens as a last conservation resort for resurrecting extinct or critically endangered Hawaiian plants. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e576 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–254 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Redding, D. W. & Mooers, A. O. Incorporating evolutionary measures into conservation prioritization. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1670–1678 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Molina-Venegas, R. Conserving evolutionarily distinct species is critical to safeguard human well-being. Sci. Rep. 11, 24187 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Quill, E. These are the extinct animals we can, and should, resurrect. Smithsonian Magazine https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/these-are-extinct-animals-we-can-should-resurrect-180954955/ (2015).

  35. Shultz, D. Bringing extinct species back from the dead could hurt—not help—conservation efforts. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAL0828 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seddon, P. J., Griffiths, C. J., Soorae, P. S. & Armstrong, D. P. Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. Science 345, 406–412 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Seddon, P. J., Moehrenschlager, A. & Ewen, J. Reintroducing resurrected species: Selecting DeExtinction candidates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 140–147 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dalrymple, S. E., Godefroid, S., Orsenigo, S. & Abeli, T. Frankenstein’s work or everyday conservation? How reintroductions are informing the de-extinction debate. J. Nat. Conserv. 56, 125870 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Novak, B. J. De-Extinction. Genes 9, 548 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lughadha, E. N. et al. The use and misuse of herbarium specimens in evaluating plant extinction risks. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 1763 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Colville, L. & Pritchard, H. W. Seed life span and food security. New Phytol. 224, 557–562 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Probert, R. J., Daws, M. I. & Hay, F. R. Ecological correlates of ex situ seed longevity: A comparative study on 195 species. Ann. Bot. 104, 57–69 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Walters, C., Wheeler, L. M. & Grotenhuis, J. M. Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: Species characteristics. Seed Sci. Res. 15, 1–20 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bridson, D. & Forman, L. Herbarium Handbook 3rd edn (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2000).

  45. Jaganathan, G. K., Dalrymple, S. E. & Pritchard, H. W. Seed survival at low temperatures: A potential selecting factor influencing community level changes in high altitudes under climate change. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 39, 479–492 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Prokopiev, I. A., Filippova, G. V. & Shein, A. A. Effect of different conditions of Welsh onion seed storage on germination and cytogenic characteristics of its seedlings. Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res. 4, 614–617 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Godefroid, S., Van De Vyver, A., Stoffelen, P. & Vanderborght, T. Effectiveness dry heat as a seed sterilisation technique: Implications for ex situ conservation. Plant Biosyst. 151, 1054–1061 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cosac, A. C., Teodorescu, G., Buord, S., Isac, V. & Nicola, C. Exploration of regeneration potential of extinct plants starting from old seeds, by in vitro technology. Ann. Valahia Univ. Targoviste Agric. 10, 68–71 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination 2nd edn (Academic Press, 2014).

  50. International Rules for Seed Testing (ISTA, 2022).

  51. Paparella, S. et al. Seed priming: State of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 34, 1281–1293 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Tilman, D. in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity In: Levin, S.A., Ed., Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Academic Press, Cambridge, 109-120 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00132-2

  53. Abeli, T. et al. Seventeen ‘extinct’ plant species back to conservation attention in Europe. Nat. Plants 7, 282–286 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Campomanesia lundiana. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1998 (World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1998). https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1998.RLTS.T35330A9927286.en

  55. Wolkis, D. & Deans, S. Picking from the past in preparation for a pest: Seed banks outperform herbaria as sources of preserved 'ōhi'a seed. Biopreserv Biobank. 17, 583–590 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Plants of the World Online (Kew Science); accessed: Dec. 2021; https://powo.science.kew.org/

  57. Holmes, B. The recently extinct plants and animals database; accessed: Dec. 2021 https://recentlyextinctspecies.com/

  58. The National Red List Project- IUCN | Zoological Society of London; accessed: Dec. 2021 https://www.nationalredlist.org/

  59. Knapp, W. M. et al. Vascular plant extinction in the continental United States and Canada. Conserv. Biol. 35, 360–368 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. González-Espinosa, M., Meave, J. A., Lorea-Hernández, F. G., Ibarra-Manríquez, G. & Newton, A. C. The Red List of Mexican Cloud Forest Trees (Fauna and Flora International, Cambridge, 2011).

  61. González Torres, L. R. et al. Lista roja de la flora de Cuba. Bissea 10, 1–352 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Threatened Species Programme. Red List of South African Plants (SANBI); accessed: Dec. 2021; http://redlist.sanbi.org/index.php

  63. Kameswara Rao, C., Geetha, B. L. & Geetha, S. Red List of Threatened Vascular Plant Species in India: Compiled from the 1997 Iucn Red List of Threatened Plants (ENVIS, Botanical Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2003).

  64. Markey, A. By their fruit you will recognise them: Species notes and typifications in western Australian species of Opercularia (Rubiaceae: Anthosperminae). Nuytsia 29, 119–140 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Smith, M. & Jones, A. Threatened and Priority Flora List (Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Government of Western Australia, 2018) https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/plants-and-animals/threatened-species-and-communities/threatened-plants

  66. Woinarski, J. C. Z. et al. Reading the black book: The number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia. Biol. Conserv. 239, 108261 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Silcock, J. L., Field, A. R., Walsh, N. G. & Fensham, R. J. To name those lost: Assessing extinction likelihood in the Australian vascular flora. Oryx 54, 167–177 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. de Lange, P. J. et al. Conservation Status of New Zealand Indigenous Vascular Plants, 2017 https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/nztcs22entire.pdf (2018).

  69. Wood, K. R., Oppenheimer, H. & Keir, M. A Checklist of Endemic Hawaiian Vascular Plant Taxa from the Hawaiian Islands that are Considered Possibly Extinct in the Wild https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332933164 (2020).

  70. Wyse, S. V. & Dickie, J. B. Taxonomic affinity, habitat and seed mass strongly predict seed desiccation response: A boosted regression trees analysis based on 17 539 species. Ann. Bot. 121, 71–83 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Isaac, N. J. B., Turvey, S. T., Collen, B., Waterman, C. & Baillie, J. E. M. Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2, e296 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Molina-Venegas, R. & Lima, H. Should we be concerned about incomplete taxon sampling when assessing the evolutionary history of regional biotas? J. Biogeogr. 48, 2387–2390 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302–314 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Daru, B. H., Karunarathne, P. & Schliep, K. Phyloregion: R package for biogeographical regionalization and macroecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 1483–1491 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following herbarium personnel for assistance in examining specimens, including verifying the presence of seeds/fruits: S. Asencio (DAO), R. De Guzman (CAS), P. W. Fritsch (BRIT), C. Gallagher (MEL), A. D. S. Braganca Gil (MG), B. Lepschi (CANB), C. Loup (MPU), L. Loze (G), E. B. Magnaghi (CAS), A. Mcardle (MEL), P. Milne (former manager of collections at MEL), C. A. Morse (KANU), R. K. Rabeler (MICH), D. Ranatunga (AK), D. Schiavinato (BAA), M. A. Spencer (LINN), L. A. Standley (NEBC) and F. Zich (CNS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science, University of Roma Tre, Rome, Italy

    Giulia Albani Rocchetti, Giulia Caneva & Thomas Abeli

  2. Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Angelino Carta

  3. Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

    Andrea Mondoni

  4. Research Department, Meise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium

    Sandrine Godefroid

  5. Service général de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche scientifique, Fédération Wallonie, Brussels, Belgium

    Sandrine Godefroid

  6. Laboratory of Plant Ecology and Biogeochemistry, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Sandrine Godefroid

  7. Department of Organismic Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Charles C. Davis

  8. Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Charles C. Davis

  9. Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, MO, USA

    Matthew A. Albrecht

  10. Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Karla Alvarado

  11. Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Botany Section, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Roxali Bijmoer & Jan J. Wieringa

  12. Royal Botanic Gardens, Richmond, Surrey, UK

    Renata Borosova & Marie Briggs

  13. Department of Botany, Natural History Museum Vienna, Wien, Austria

    Christian Bräuchler

  14. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst; Ardingly, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, UK

    Elinor Breman

  15. Conservatoire botanique national de Brest, Brest, France

    Stephane Buord

  16. Tasmanian Herbarium, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

    Lynette H. Cave

  17. Departamento de Botânica, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Nílber Gonçalves Da Silva

  18. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Alexandra H. Davey

  19. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Seed and Lab-Based Collections, Sussex, UK

    Rachael M. Davies & John B. Dickie

  20. Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane Botanic Gardens Mt Coot-tha, Toowong, Queensland, Australia

    Melodina Fabillo & Andrew Franks

  21. Botanische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-BSM), and GeoBio-Center LMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

    Andreas Fleischmann

  22. Centre sur la biodiversité de l’Université de Montréal (CITES CA-035), Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Geoffrey Hall

  23. Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia

    Gintaras Kantvilas

  24. Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    Cornelia Klak

  25. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wellcome Trust Millennium Building, West Sussex, England, UK

    Udayangani Liu

  26. Real Jardín Botánico-CSIC, Madrid, Spain

    Leopoldo Medina

  27. The Bergius Botanic Garden, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Lars Gunnar Reinhammar

  28. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa

    Ramagwai J. Sebola

  29. School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand; WITS, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Ramagwai J. Sebola

  30. Allan Herbarium, Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand

    Ines Schönberger

  31. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Patrick Sweeney

  32. Department for Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Hermann Voglmayr

  33. CSIRO Black Mountain Laboratories, Black Mountain, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    Adam White

  34. Dahlem Seed Bank, Botanical Garden and Botanic Museum Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Elke Zippel

  35. IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Thomas Abeli

Authors
  1. Giulia Albani Rocchetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angelino Carta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Mondoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sandrine Godefroid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charles C. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giulia Caneva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matthew A. Albrecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Karla Alvarado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Roxali Bijmoer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Renata Borosova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Christian Bräuchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Elinor Breman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Marie Briggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Stephane Buord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Lynette H. Cave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Nílber Gonçalves Da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Alexandra H. Davey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Rachael M. Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. John B. Dickie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Melodina Fabillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Andreas Fleischmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Andrew Franks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Geoffrey Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Gintaras Kantvilas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Cornelia Klak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Udayangani Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Leopoldo Medina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Lars Gunnar Reinhammar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Ramagwai J. Sebola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Ines Schönberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Patrick Sweeney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Hermann Voglmayr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Adam White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Jan J. Wieringa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Elke Zippel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Thomas Abeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.A.R., T.A. and A.C. conceptualized the project. G.A.R., T.A. and A.C. developed the methodology. G.A.R. and T.A. conducted the investigations. G.A.R. performed visualization. T.A. administered the project. T.A., G.C. and C.C.D. supervised the project. G.A.R. and T.A. wrote the original draft. A.C., A.M., S.G., C.C.D., G.C., M.A.A., K.A., R. Bijmoer, R. Borosova, C.B., E.B., M.B., S.B., L.H.C., N.G.D.S., A.H.D., R.M.D., J.B.D., M.F., A. Fleischmann, A. Franks, G.H., G.K., C.K., U.L., L.M., L.G.R., R.J.S., I.S., P.S., H.V., A.W., J.J.W. and E.Z. reviewed and edited the manuscript. G.A.R., T.A., A.C., A.M., S.G., C.C.D., M.A.A., K.A., R. Bijmoer, R. Borosova, C.B., E.B., M.B., S.B., L.H.C., N.G.D.S., A.H.D., R.M.D., J.B.D., M.F., A. Fleischmann, A. Franks, G.H., G.K., C.K., U.L., L.M., L.G.R., R.J.S., I.S., P.S., H.V., A.W., J.J.W. and E.Z. contributed data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Albani Rocchetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Plants thanks Philip Seddon, Stuart Pimm and Matthew Slater for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Tables 1–6

Table 1. Table of Materials and Methods references. Table 2. List of globally extinct taxa. Table 3. List of ED index per genus. Table 4. List of extinct species without digitized specimens. Table 5. List of herbarium specimens with seeds or fruits. Table 6. List of candidate species.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albani Rocchetti, G., Carta, A., Mondoni, A. et al. Selecting the best candidates for resurrecting extinct-in-the-wild plants from herbaria. Nat. Plants 8, 1385–1393 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01296-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01296-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing