Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Optogenetic control of plant growth by a microbial rhodopsin


While rhodopsin-based optogenetics has revolutionized neuroscience1,2, poor expression of opsins and the absence of the essential cofactor all-trans-retinal has complicated the application of rhodopsins in plants. Here, we demonstrate retinal production in plants and improved rhodopsin targeting for green light manipulation of plant cells using the Guillardia theta light-gated anion channelrhodopsin GtACR13. Green light induces a massive increase in anion permeability and pronounced membrane potential changes when GtACR1 is expressed, enabling non-invasive manipulation of plant growth and leaf development. Using light-driven anion loss, we could mimic drought conditions and bring about leaf wilting despite sufficient water supply. Expressed in pollen tubes, global GtACR1 activation triggers membrane potential depolarizations due to large anion currents. While global illumination was associated with a reversible growth arrest, local GtACR1 activation at the flanks of the apical dome steers growth direction away from the side with increased anion conductance. These results suggest a crucial role of anion permeability for the guidance of pollen tube tip growth. This plant optogenetic approach could be expanded to create an entire pallet of rhodopsin-based tools4, greatly facilitating dissection of plant ion-signalling pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Ret–eYFP-expressing N. tabacum plants produce retinal and show similar growth characteristics to WT plants.
Fig. 2: Functional expression of improved ACR1 2.0 in N. tabacum.
Fig. 3: Optogenetic manipulation of pollen tube growth by ACR1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The source data and DNA sequences of this study are provided as supplementary data files. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Nagel, G. et al. Light activation of channelrhodopsin-2 in excitable cells of Caenorhabditis elegans triggers rapid behavioral responses. Curr. Biol. 15, 2279–2284 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G. & Deisseroth, K. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263–1268 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Govorunova, E. G., Sineshchekov, O. A., Janz, R., Liu, X. & Spudich, J. L. Natural light-gated anion channels: A family of microbial rhodopsins for advanced optogenetics. Science 349, 647–650 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Govorunova, E. G., Sineshchekov, O. A., Li, H. & Spudich, J. L. Microbial rhodopsins: diversity, mechanisms, and optogenetic applications. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 845–872 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedrich, R. & Marten, I. 30-year progress of membrane transport in plants. Planta 224, 725–739 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Palmgren, M. G. Plant plasma membrane H+-ATPases: powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 817–845 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedrich, R. Ion channels in plants. Physiol. Rev. 92, 1777–1811 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fromm, J. & Lautner, S. Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 249–257 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedrich, R., Salvador-Recatala, V. & Dreyer, I. Electrical wiring and long-distance plant communication. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 376–387 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagel, G. et al. Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13940–13945 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reyer, A. et al. Channelrhodopsin-mediated optogenetics highlights a central role of depolarization-dependent plant proton pumps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20920–20925 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cosentino, C. et al. Engineering of a light-gated potassium channel. Science 348, 707–710 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Papanatsiou, M. et al. Optogenetic manipulation of stomatal kinetics improves carbon assimilation, water use, and growth. Science 363, 1456–1459 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ullrich, S., Gueta, R. & Nagel, G. Degradation of channelopsin-2 in the absence of retinal and degradation resistance in certain mutants. Biol. Chem. 394, 271–280 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schroll, C. et al. Light-induced activation of distinct modulatory neurons triggers appetitive or aversive learning in Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 16, 1741–1747 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dawydow, A. et al. Channelrhodopsin-2–XXL, a powerful optogenetic tool for low-light applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13972–13977 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, Y. S., Kim, N. H., Yeom, S. J., Kim, S. W. & Oh, D. K. In vitro characterization of a recombinant Blh protein from an uncultured marine bacterium as a β-carotene 15,15′-dioxygenase. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 15781–15793 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen, B. R. et al. An optimized transit peptide for effective targeting of diverse foreign proteins into chloroplasts in rice. Sci. Rep. 7, 46231 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raven, J. A. Chloride: essential micronutrient and multifunctional beneficial ion. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 359–367 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roelfsema, M. R. G., Hedrich, R. & Geiger, D. Anion channels: master switches of stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 221–229 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shepard, B. D., Natarajan, N., Protzko, R. J., Acres, O. W. & Pluznick, J. L. A cleavable N-terminal signal peptide promotes widespread olfactory receptor surface expression in HEK293T cells. PLoS ONE 8, e68758 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Battle, M. W., Vegliani, F. & Jones, M. A. Shades of green: untying the knots of green photoperception. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 5764–5770 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, H. L., McAusland, L. & Murchie, E. H. Don’t ignore the green light: exploring diverse roles in plant processes. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2099–2110 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Battle, M. W. & Jones, M. A. Cryptochromes integrate green light signals into the circadian system. Plant Cell Environ. 43, 16–27 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumari, A., Chetelat, A., Nguyen, C. T. & Farmer, E. E. Arabidopsis H+-ATPase AHA1 controls slow wave potential duration and wound-response jasmonate pathway activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 20226–20231 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seo, P. J. et al. The MYB96 transcription factor regulates cuticular wax biosynthesis under drought conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 1138–1152 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gutermuth, T. et al. Pollen tube growth regulation by free anions depends on the interaction between the anion channel SLAH3 and calcium-dependent protein kinases CPK2 and CPK20. Plant Cell 25, 4525–4543 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gutermuth, T. et al. Tip-localized Ca2+-permeable channels control pollen tube growth via kinase-dependent R- and S-type anion channel regulation. N. Phytol. 218, 1089–1105 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Michard, E., Simon, A. A., Tavares, B., Wudick, M. M. & Feijo, J. A. Signaling with ions: the keystone for apical cell growth and morphogenesis in pollen tubes. Plant Physiol. 173, 91–111 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang, L. Y. et al. Visualization of plastids in pollen grains: involvement of FtsZ1 in pollen plastid division. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 904–908 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schulte, F., Mader, J., Kroh, L. W., Panne, U. & Kneipp, J. Characterization of pollen carotenoids with in situ and high-performance thin-layer chromatography supported resonant Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 81, 8426–8433 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zonia, L., Cordeiro, S., Tupy, J. & Feijó, J. A. Oscillatory chloride efflux at the pollen tube apex has a role in growth and cell volume regulation and is targeted by inositol 3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate. Plant Cell 14, 2233–2249 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Müller, K. et al. A red light-controlled synthetic gene expression switch for plant systems. Mol. Biosyst. 10, 1679–1688 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ochoa-Fernandez, R. et al. Optogenetic control of gene expression in plants in the presence of ambient white light. Nat. Methods 17, 717–725 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gradinaru, V. et al. Molecular and cellular approaches for diversifying and extending optogenetics. Cell 141, 154–165 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Twell, D., Yamaguchi, J. & McCormick, S. Pollen-specific gene expression in transgenic plants: coordinate regulation of two different tomato gene promoters during microsporogenesis. Development 109, 705–713 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Projektnummer 374031971 TRR 240 A04 and 417451587. G.N. acknowledges the support provided by the Prix Louis-Jeantet. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is accredited to K.R.K. (DFG KO3657/2-3). Y.Z., M.D. and X.D. are supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council. We acknowledge A. Reyer for help with plant cell impalement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



G.N., S.G., M.K., M.J.M., R.H. and K.R.K. conceived the project. S.G., K.R.K. and G.N. designed and supervised the experiments. Y.Z., M.D., J.Y.-S. and S.G. performed the plant experiments and analysed the data. J.Y.-S. and X.D. performed the Xenopus oocyte experiments. M.K. performed the retinal and carotenoids analysis. J.L. and M.R. performed the leaf cuticular wax analysis. S.G., K.R.K. and G.N. wrote the paper. All authors edited and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shiqiang Gao, Kai R. Konrad or Georg Nagel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Plants thanks Toshinori Kinoshita, Matias Zurbriggen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Figs. 1–8, legends for Videos and DNA sequences used in this study.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Transient expression of RC2–eYFP in pollen tubes. Pollen transiently transformed with RC2–eYFP were pre-incubated in semi-solid pollen germination medium for 5–7 h at room temperature in the dark. Real time is indicated in the top left corner. eYFP fluorescence is indicated by yellow colour. Scale bar, 10 μm.

Supplementary Video 2

Growths of WT, LeLAT52::Ret–eYFP and LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 pollen tubes in response to the global illumination. WT, LeLAT52::Ret–eYFP #1 and LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 #1 transgenic expressed pollen were pre-incubated in semi-solid pollen germination medium for 5–7 h at room temperature in the dark. Red light was used to perform the bright-field imaging. Pollen tubes growing in 10 min dark, 10 min green light illumination and then 20 min dark were captured. Both WT and Ret–eYFP-expressing pollen tubes showed no response to green light (532 nm, 2 mW mm−2 (9,600 μmol m−2 s−1)) illumination. Global illumination had a negative effect on the growth of Ret–ACR1 2.0-expressing transgenic pollen tubes. Real time (min:s) is indicated in the top left corner.

Supplementary Video 3

Growth of LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 #1-1 pollen tubes in response to local illumination.

Supplementary Video 4

Growth of LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 #1-2 pollen tubes in response to local illumination.

Supplementary Video 5

Growth of LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 #1-3 pollen tubes in response to local illumination.

Supplementary Video 6

Growth of LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 #2-1 pollen tubes in response to local illumination.

Supplementary Video 7

Growth of LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 #2-2 pollen tubes in response to local illumination.

Supplementary Video 8

Growth of LeLAT52::Ret–ACR1 2.0 #2-3 pollen tubes in response to local illumination.

Supplementary Video 9

Growth of WT pollen tubes in response to local illumination #1.

Supplementary Video 10

Growth of WT pollen tubes in response to local illumination #2.

Supplementary Video 11

Growth of WT pollen tubes in response to local illumination #3.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Ding, M., Gao, S. et al. Optogenetic control of plant growth by a microbial rhodopsin. Nat. Plants 7, 144–151 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing