Intercropping, the simultaneous production of multiple crops on the same field, provides opportunities for the sustainable intensification of agriculture if it can provide a greater yield per unit land and fertilizer than sole crops. The worldwide absolute yield gain of intercropping as compared with sole crops has not been analysed. We therefore performed a global meta-analysis to quantify the effect of intercropping on the yield gain, exploring the effects of crop species combinations, temporal and spatial arrangements, and fertilizer input. We found that the absolute yield gains, compared with monocultures, were the greatest for mixtures of maize with short-grain cereals or legumes that had substantial temporal niche differentiation from maize, when grown with high nutrient inputs, and using multirow strips of each species. This approach, commonly practised in China, provided yield gains that were (in an absolute sense) about four times as large as those in another, low-input intercropping strategy, commonly practised outside China. The alternative intercropping strategy consisted of growing mixtures of short-stature crop species, often as full mixtures, with the same growing period and with low to moderate nutrient inputs. Both the low- and high-yield intercropping strategies saved 16–29% of the land and 19–36% of the fertilizer compared with monocultures grown under the same management as the intercrop. The two syndromes of production in intercropping uncovered by this meta-analysis show that intercropping offers opportunities for the sustainable intensification of both high- and low-input agriculture.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The R code used for the analysis is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R. & Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671–677 (2002).
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G. & Swift, M. J. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277, 504–509 (1997).
Cassman, K. G. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5952–5959 (1999).
Willey, R. W. Resource use in intercropping systems. Agric. Water Manage. 17, 215–231 (1990).
Vandermeer, J. H. The Ecology of Intercropping (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989).
Ren, W. Z. et al. Can positive interactions between cultivated species help to sustain modern agriculture? Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 507–514 (2014).
Martin-Guay, M. O., Paquette, A., Dupras, J. & Rivest, D. The new green revolution: sustainable intensification of agriculture by intercropping. Sci. Total Environ. 615, 767–772 (2018).
Liebman, M. & Dyck, E. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol. Appl. 3, 92–122 (1993).
Trenbath, B. Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crops Res. 34, 381–405 (1993).
Zhu, Y. et al. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406, 718–722 (2000).
Zhang, L. et al. Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Res. 107, 29–42 (2008).
Mao, L. L. et al. Yield advantage and water saving in maize/pea intercrop. Field Crops Res. 138, 11–20 (2012).
Yang, C., Huang, G., Chai, Q. & Luo, Z. Water use and yield of wheat/maize intercropping under alternate irrigation in the oasis field of northwest China. Field Crops Res. 124, 426–432 (2011).
Tan, M. et al. Dynamic process-based modelling of crop growth and competitive water extraction in relay strip intercropping: model development and application to wheat–maize intercropping. Field Crops Res. 246, 107613 (2020).
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. et al. Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Res. 113, 64–71 (2009).
Jensen, E. S. Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea–barley intercrops. Plant Soil 182, 25–38 (1996).
Cong, W. F. et al. Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1715–1726 (2015).
Li, L. et al. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11192–11196 (2007).
Li, C. et al. Crop diversity for yield increase. PLoS ONE 4, e8049 (2009).
Bedoussac, L. et al. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 911–935 (2015).
Mead, R. & Willey, R. The concept of a ‘land equivalent ratio’ and advantages in yields from intercropping. Exp. Agric. 16, 217–228 (1980).
Yu, Y., Stomph, T.-J., Makowski, D. & van der Werf, W. Temporal niche differentiation increases the land equivalent ratio of annual intercrops: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 184, 133–144 (2015).
Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76 (2001).
Li, L., Zhang, L. & Zhang, F. in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 2nd edn (ed. Levin, S.A.) 382–395 (Academic Press, 2013).
Lithourgidis, A., Dordas, C., Damalas, C. A. & Vlachostergios, D. Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5, 396–410 (2011).
Hong, Y. et al. Intercropping and agroforestry in China—current state and trends. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 244, 52–61 (2017).
Gou, F. et al. On yield gaps and yield gains in intercropping: opportunities for increasing grain production in northwest China. Agric. Syst. 151, 96–105 (2017).
Xu, Z. et al. Intercropping maize and soybean increases efficiency of land and fertilizer nitrogen use: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 246, 107661 (2020).
Brooker, R. W. et al. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytol. 206, 106–117 (2015).
Voisin, A. S. et al. Legumes for feed, food, biomaterials and bioenergy in Europe: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34, 361–380 (2014).
Barbieri, P., Pellerin, S. & Nesme, T. Comparing crop rotations between organic and conventional farming. Sci. Rep. 7, 13761 (2017).
Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B., Dhima, K. V., Dordas, C. A. & Yiakoulaki, M. D. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Res. 99, 106–113 (2006).
Bedoussac, L. et al. in Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures (eds. Bellon, S. & Penvern, S.) 47–63 (Springer, 2014).
Li, C. J. et al. Yield gain, complementarity and competitive dominance in intercropping in China: a meta-analysis of drivers of yield gain using additive partitioning. Eur. J. Agron. 113, 125987 (2020).
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. & Jensen, E. S. Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability. Field Crops Res. 72, 185–196 (2001).
Andow, D. A. & Hidaka, K. Experimental natural history of sustainable agriculture: syndromes of production. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 27, 447–462 (1989).
Vandermeer, J. Syndromes of production: an emergent property of simple agroecosystem dynamics. J. Environ. Manage. 51, 59–72 (1997).
Hong, Y., Heerink, N., Zhao, M. & van der Werf, W. Intercropping contributes to a higher technical efficiency in smallholder farming: evidence from a case study in Gaotai County, China. Agric. Syst. 173, 317–324 (2019).
Li, L. et al. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Res. 71, 123–137 (2001).
Liu, X. et al. Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize–soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Res. 224, 91–101 (2018).
Anten, N. & Hirose, T. Shoot structure, leaf physiology, and daily carbon gain of plant species in a tallgrass meadow. Ecology 84, 955–968 (2003).
Anten, N. & Hirose, T. Interspecific differences in above-ground growth patterns result in spatial and temporal partitioning of light among species in a tall-grass meadow. J. Ecol. 87, 583–597 (1999).
Fujita, K., Ofosubudu, K. G. & Ogata, S. Biological nitrogen-fixation in mixed legume–cereal cropping systems. Plant Soil 141, 155–175 (1992).
Knörzer, H., Graeff-Hönninger, S., Guo, B., Wang, P. & Claupein, W. in Climate Change, Intercropping, Pest Control and Beneficial Microorganisms (Ed. Lichtfouse, E.) 13–44 (Springer, 2009).
Du, J. B. et al. Maize–soybean strip intercropping: achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability. J. Integr. Agric. 17, 747–754 (2018).
Ju, X. T. et al. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3041–3046 (2009).
Whitmore, A. P. & Schröder, J. J. Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield: a modelling study. Eur. J. Agron. 27, 81–88 (2007).
Li, C. J. et al. Crop nitrogen use and soil mineral nitrogen accumulation under different crop combinations and patterns of strip intercropping in northwest China. Plant Soil 342, 221–231 (2011).
Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., Nyamangara, J. & Giller, K. E. Maize–grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Res. 136, 12–22 (2012).
Raseduzzaman, M. & Jensen, E. S. Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Agron. 91, 25–33 (2017).
Peñuelas, J. & Filella, I. Responses to a warming world. Science 294, 793–795 (2001).
Menzel, A. & Fabian, P. Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397, 659 (1999).
Hu, F. L. et al. Improving N management through intercropping alleviates the inhibitory effect of mineral N on nodulation in pea. Plant Soil 412, 235–251 (2017).
Hu, F. L. et al. Boosting system productivity through the improved coordination of interspecific competition in maize/pea strip intercropping. Field Crops Res. 198, 50–60 (2016).
Pelzer, E. et al. Pea–wheat intercrops in low-input conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts. Eur. J. Agron. 40, 39–53 (2012).
Ngwira, A. R., Aune, J. B. & Mkwinda, S. On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi. Field Crops Res. 132, 149–157 (2012).
Viguier, L., Bedoussac, L., Journet, E.-P. & Justes, E. Yield gap analysis extended to marketable grain reveals the profitability of organic lentil–spring wheat intercrops. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38, 39 (2018).
Iqbal, N. et al. Comparative analysis of maize–soybean strip intercropping systems: a review. Plant Prod. Sci. 22, 131–142 (2019).
Fletcher, A. L. et al. Prospects to utilise intercrops and crop variety mixtures in mechanised, rain-fed, temperate cropping systems. Crop Pasture Sci. 67, 1252–1267 (2017).
Wezel, A. et al. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34, 1–20 (2014).
Chai, Q., Qin, A. Z., Gan, Y. T. & Yu, A. Z. Higher yield and lower carbon emission by intercropping maize with rape, pea, and wheat in arid irrigation areas. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34, 535–543 (2014).
Stomph, T. et al. in Advances in Agronomy (ed. Donald, L.S.) Vol. 160, 1–50 (Academic Press, 2020).
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014); http://www.R-project.org/
Pinheiro, J. et al. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-147 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (2020).
Zuur, A., Ieno, E., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. & Smith, G. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer Science & Business Media, 2009).
Gaudio, N. et al. Current knowledge and future research opportunities for modeling annual crop mixtures: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 39, 20 (2019).
We acknowledge funding from the Chinese National Basic Research Program (grant no. 2015CB150400) and the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2017YFD0200200/2017YFD0200207). We also acknowledge the financial support of the Wageningen University Sandwich Scholarship. We acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme for Research & Innovation under grant agreement no. 727217 (www.remix-intercrops.eu). We also thank L. Bedoussac, L. Viguier, J. Du and W. Yang for providing the photographs included in Fig. 1.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Plants thanks Frederick Stoddard, David Tilman and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, C., Hoffland, E., Kuyper, T.W. et al. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nat. Plants 6, 653–660 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0680-9
Nature Plants (2020)
Identification of species traits enhancing yield in wheat-faba bean intercropping: development and sensitivity analysis of a minimalist mixture model
Plant and Soil (2020)
Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2020)
Plant and Soil (2020)
Science China Life Sciences (2020)