Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A mobile ELF4 delivers circadian temperature information from shoots to roots

Nature Plants volume 6, pages 416–426 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The circadian clock is synchronized by environmental cues, mostly by light and temperature. Explaining how the plant circadian clock responds to temperature oscillations is crucial to understanding plant responsiveness to the environment. Here, we found a prevalent temperature-dependent function of the Arabidopsis clock component EARLY FLOWERING 4 (ELF4) in the root clock. Although the clocks in roots are able to run in the absence of shoots, micrografting assays and mathematical analyses show that ELF4 moves from shoots to regulate rhythms in roots. ELF4 movement does not convey photoperiodic information, but trafficking is essential for controlling the period of the root clock in a temperature-dependent manner. Low temperatures favour ELF4 mobility, resulting in a slow-paced root clock, whereas high temperatures decrease movement, leading to a faster clock. Hence, the mobile ELF4 delivers temperature information and establishes a shoot-to-root dialogue that sets the pace of the clock in roots.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Prevalent function of ELF4 sustaining circadian rhythms in roots.
Fig. 2: ELF4 moves from shoots to regulate rhythms in roots.
Fig. 3: Mobile ELF4 does not regulate the photoperiod-dependent phase in roots.
Fig. 4: Mobile ELF4 sets the temperature-dependent pace of the root clock.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and materials generated in this study are available without restriction upon request from the corresponding author. Next-generation sequencing data are deposited in NCBI BioProject with accession code PRJNA610472 (BioSample accessions SAMN14299292, SAMN14299293 and SAMN14299294). Source data for all figures are provided with the paper.

References

  1. Zhang, E. E. & Kay, S. A. Clocks not winding down: unravelling circadian networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 764–776 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenham, K. & McClung, C. R. Integrating circadian dynamics with physiological processes in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 598–610 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagel, D. H. & Kay, S. A. Complexity in the wiring and regulation of plant circadian networks. Curr. Biol. 22, R648–R657 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Oakenfull, R. J. & Davis, S. J. Shining a light on the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 2571–2585 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hogenesch, J. B. & Ueda, H. R. Understanding systems-level properties: timely stories from the study of clocks. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 407 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Portolés, S. & Más, P. The functional interplay between protein kinase CK2 and CCA1 transcriptional activity is essential for clock temperature compensation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001201 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, L. L., van den Burg, H. A. & van Ooijen, G. Sumoylation contributes to timekeeping and temperature compensation of the plant circadian clock. J. Biol. Rhythms 32, 560–569 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall, C. M., Tartaglio, V., Duarte, M. & Harmon, F. G. The Arabidopsis sickle mutant exhibits altered circadian clock responses to cool temperatures and temperature-dependent alternative splicing. Plant Cell 28, 2560–2575 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Salomé, P., Weigel, D. & McClung, C. The role of the Arabidopsis morning loop components CCA1, LHY, PRR7, and PRR9 in temperature compensation. Plant Cell 22, 3650–3661 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards, K. D., Lynn, J. R., Gyula, P., Nagy, F. & Millar, A. J. Natural allelic variation in the temperature-compensation mechanisms of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock. Genetics 170, 387–400 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards, K. D. et al. FLOWERING LOCUS C mediates natural variation in the high-temperature response of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 18, 639–650 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ito, S. et al. FLOWERING BHLH transcriptional activators control expression of the photoperiodic flowering regulator CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3582–3587 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gould, P. D. et al. Network balance via CRY signalling controls the Arabidopsis circadian clock over ambient temperatures. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 650 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagel, D. H., Pruneda-Paz, J. L. & Kay, S. A. FBH1 affects warm temperature responses in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14595–14600 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, M. A., Morohashi, K., Grotewold, E. & Harmer, S. L. Arabidopsis JMJD5/JMJ30 acts independently of LUX ARRHYTHMO within the plant Circadian clock to enable temperature compensation. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 57 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gould, P. D. et al. The molecular basis of temperature compensation in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 18, 1177–1187 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Doyle, M. R. et al. The ELF4 gene controls circadian rhythms and flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 419, 74–77 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolmos, E. et al. Integrating ELF4 into the circadian system through combined structural and functional studies. HFSP J. 3, 350–366 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Herrero, E. et al. EARLY FLOWERING4 recruitment of EARLY FLOWERING3 in the nucleus sustains the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 24, 428–443 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nusinow, D. A. et al. The ELF4–ELF3–LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth. Nature 475, 398–402 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Khanna, R., Kikis, E. A. & Quail, P. H. EARLY FLOWERING 4 functions in phytochrome B-regulated seedling de-etiolation. Plant Physiol. 133, 1530–1538 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. McWatters, H. G. et al. ELF4 is required for oscillatory properties of the circadian clock. Plant Physiol. 144, 391–401 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Helfer, A. et al. LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a nighttime repressor of circadian gene expression in the Arabidopsis core clock. Curr. Biol. 21, 126–133 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Onai, K. & Ishiura, M. PHYTOCLOCK 1 encoding a novel GARP protein essential for the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Genes Cells 10, 963–972 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hazen, S. P. et al. LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a Myb domain protein essential for circadian rhythms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10387–10392 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hicks, K. A. et al. Conditional circadian dysfunction of the Arabidopsis early-flowering 3 mutant. Science 274, 790–792 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang, H. et al. Identification of Evening Complex associated proteins in Arabidopsis by affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 201–217 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, G. et al. Coordinated transcriptional regulation underlying the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 616–622 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mizuno, T. et al. Ambient temperature signal feeds into the circadian clock transcriptional circuitry through the EC night-time repressor in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 958–976 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siddiqui, H., Khan, S., Rhodes, B. M. & Devlin, P. F. FHY3 and FAR1 act downstream of light stable phytochromes. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 175 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ezer, D. et al. The evening complex coordinates environmental and endogenous signals in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 3, 17087 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, Y. et al. ELF4 regulates GIGANTEA chromatin access through subnuclear sequestration. Cell Rep. 3, 671–677 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nieto, C., López-Salmerón, V., Davière, J.-M. & Prat, S. ELF3–PIF4 interaction regulates plant growth independently of the evening complex. Curr. Biol. 25, 187–193 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sai, J. & Johnson, C. H. Different circadian oscillators control Ca2+ fluxes and lhcb gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11659–11663 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Thain, S. C., Murtas, G., Lynn, J. R., McGrath, R. B. & Millar, A. J. The circadian clock that controls gene expression in Arabidopsis is tissue specific. Plant Physiol. 130, 102–110 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Michael, T. P., Salome, P. A. & McClung, C. R. Two Arabidopsis circadian oscillators can be distinguished by differential temperature sensitivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6878–6883 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bordage, S., Sullivan, S., Laird, J., Millar, A. J. & Nimmo, H. G. Organ specificity in the plant circadian system is explained by different light inputs to the shoot and root clocks. New Phytol. 212, 136–149 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Muranaka, T. & Oyama, T. Heterogeneity of cellular circadian clocks in intact plants and its correction under light-dark cycles. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600500 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Thain, S. C., Hall, A. & Millar, A. J. Functional independence of circadian clocks that regulate plant gene expression. Curr. Biol. 10, 951–956 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fukuda, H., Nakamichi, N., Hisatsune, M., Murase, H. & Mizuno, T. Synchronization of plant circadian oscillators with a phase delay effect of the vein network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 098102 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wenden, B., Toner, D. L. K., Hodge, S. K., Grima, R. & Millar, A. J. Spontaneous spatiotemporal waves of gene expression from biological clocks in the leaf. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6757–6762 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Greenwood, M., Domijan, M., Gould, P. D., Hall, A. J. W. & Locke, J. C. W. Coordinated circadian timing through the integration of local inputs in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000407 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Endo, M., Shimizu, H., Nohales, M. A., Araki, T. & Kay, S. A. Tissue-specific clocks in Arabidopsis show asymmetric coupling. Nature 515, 419–422 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Yakir, E. et al. Cell autonomous and cell-type specific circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 68, 520–531 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gould, P. D. et al. Coordination of robust single cell rhythms in the Arabidopsis circadian clock via spatial waves of gene expression. eLife 7, e31700 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Fukuda, H., Ukai, K. & Oyama, T. Self-arrangement of cellular circadian rhythms through phase-resetting in plant roots. Phys. Rev. E 86, 041917 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Takahashi, N., Hirata, Y., Aihara, K. & Mas, P. A hierarchical multi-oscillator network orchestrates the Arabidopsis circadian system. Cell 163, 148–159 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. James, A. B. et al. The circadian clock in Arabidopsis roots is a simplified slave version of the clock in shoots. Science 322, 1832–1835 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nimmo, H. G. Entrainment of Arabidopsis roots to the light:dark cycle by light piping. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 1742–1748 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. de Montaigu, A., Tóth, R. & Coupland, G. Plant development goes like clockwork. Trends Genet. 26, 296–306 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kolmos, E. et al. A reduced-function allele reveals that EARLY FLOWERING3 repressive action on the circadian clock is modulated by phytochrome signals in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 3230–3246 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Dixon, L. E. et al. Temporal repression of core circadian genes is mediated through EARLY FLOWERING 3 in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 21, 120–125 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kikis, E., Khanna, R. & Quail, P. ELF4 is a phytochrome-regulated component of a negative feedback loop involving the central oscillator components CCA1 and LHY. Plant J. 44, 300–313 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lu, S. X. et al. CCA1 and ELF3 interact in the control of hypocotyl length and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 158, 1079–1088 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Huang, H. & Nusinow, D. A. Into the evening: complex interactions in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Trends Genet. 32, 674–686 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Corbesier, L. et al. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316, 1030–1033 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Jaeger, K. E. & Wigge, P. A. FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 17, 1050–1054 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mathieu, J., Warthmann, N., Küttner, F. & Schmid, M. Export of FT protein from phloem companion cells is sufficient for floral induction in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 17, 1055–1060 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen, X. et al. Shoot-to-root mobile transcription factor HY5 coordinates plant carbon and nitrogen acquisition. Curr. Biol. 26, 640–646 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Flis, A. et al. Defining the robust behaviour of the plant clock gene circuit with absolute RNA timeseries and open infrastructure. Open Biol. 5, 150042 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Salomé, P. A. & McClung, C. R. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 7 and 9 are partially redundant genes essential for the temperature responsiveness of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 17, 791–803 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Edwards, K. D. et al. Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 424 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Nakagawa, T. et al. Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104, 34–41 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nakagawa, T. et al. Improved gateway binary vectors: high-performance vectors for creation of fusion constructs in transgenic analysis of plants. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71, 2095–2100 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simlified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Plautz, J. D. et al. Quantitative analysis of Drosophila period gene transcription in living animals. J. Biol. Rhythms 12, 204–217 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Czechowski, T., Stitt, M., Altmann, T., Udvardi, M. K. & Scheible, W.-R. Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 139, 5–17 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotech. 29, 24–26 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Michael, T. P. et al. Network discovery pipeline elucidates conserved time-of-day-specific cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet. 4, e14 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Mockler, T. et al. The Diurnal project: Diurnal and circadian expression profiling, model-based pattern matching, and promoter analysis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 72, 353–363 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Katari, M. S. et al. VirtualPlant: A software platform to support systems biology research. Plant Physiol. 152, 500–515 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Takens, F. in Dynamical Systems and Turbulence (eds Rand, D. & Young, L. S.) 366–381 (Springer, 1981).

  77. Stark, J. Delay embeddings for forced systems I. Deterministic forcing. J. Nonlinear Sci. 9, 255–332 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Marwan, N., Romano, C. M., Thiel, M. & Kurths, J. Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys. Rep. 438, 237–329 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Hirata, Y., Horai, S. & Aihara, K. Reproduction of distance matrices and original time series from recurrence plots and their applications. Eur. Phys. J. 164, 13–22 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Tanio, M., Hirata, Y. & Suzuki, H. Reconstruction of driving forces through recurrence plots. Phys. Lett. A 373, 2031–2040 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Hirata, Y., Komuro, M., Horai, S. & Aihara, K. Faithfulness of recurrence plots: a mathematical proof. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 25, 1550168 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Khor, A. & Small, M. Examining k-nearest neighbour networks: superfamily phenomena and inversion. Chaos 26, 043101 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Small, M. Applied Nonlinear Time Series Analysis: Applications in Physics, Physiology and Finance (World Scientific, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Mas laboratory for helpful discussion and suggestions; T. Nakagawa and M. Seika Kaisha for the Gateway vectors; J. E. Salazar-Henao for tips on the western blot protocol in roots; and I. Rubio-Somoza for sharing the GFP antibody. Research in the Y.H. laboratory is supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP18K11461). The S.J.D. laboratory is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N018540/1). S.A.K. acknowledges support from the National Institutes of Health (GM067837). The Mas laboratory is funded by the FEDER/Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, the Ramon Areces Foundation and the Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR). The P.M. laboratory also acknowledges financial support from the CERCA Program, Generalitat de Catalunya and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Severo Ochoa Program for Centers of Excellence in R&D 2016–2019 (SEV-2015-0533). W.W.C. is a recipient of a Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) fellowship.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Wei Wei Chen, Nozomu Takahashi.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

    Wei Wei Chen, Nozomu Takahashi & Paloma Mas

  2. Mathematics and Informatics Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Yoshito Hirata

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

    Yoshito Hirata

  4. Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK

    James Ronald & Seth J. Davis

  5. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Silvana Porco & Steve A. Kay

  6. Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China

    Seth J. Davis

  7. Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Dmitri A. Nusinow

  8. Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

    Steve A. Kay

  9. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain

    Paloma Mas

Authors
  1. Wei Wei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nozomu Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshito Hirata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James Ronald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Silvana Porco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Seth J. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dmitri A. Nusinow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Steve A. Kay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Paloma Mas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.W.C, N.T. and J.R. performed the biological experiments. Y.H. performed the mathematical analysis. S.P., S.J.D., D.A.N. and S.A.K. contributed reagents and comments. P.M. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors read, revised and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paloma Mas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Comparative analyses of rhythmic circadian oscillation in shoots and roots.

Luminescence of a, LHY::LUC (n=6 for Sh, n=6 for Rt), and b, TOC1::LUC (n=16 for Sh, n=15 for Rt) rhythms simultaneously measured in shoots (Sh) and roots (Rt). Root luminescence signals in a, are represented in the right Y-axis. c, Circadian period (left Y-axis, n=16 for Sh, n=14 for Rt) and amplitude (right Y-axis, n=16 for Sh, n=15 for Rt) estimates of TOC1::LUC luminescence signals (data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile). *** p-value<0.0001; two-tailed t-tests with 95% of confidence. d, Luminescence of CCA1::LUC rhythms in elf4-1 Rt (n=8) (from Fig. 1d) showing the weak rhythms of the mutant. e, Circadian time course analyses of ELF4 mRNA expression in WT and elf4-1 mutant Rt. f, Luminescence of LHY::LUC rhythms in WT (n=6) and elf4-1 mutant Rt (n=6). g, Circadian time course analyses of LHY mRNA expression in roots of WT and elf4-1. h, Circadian time course analyses of ELF4 mRNA expression in WT and elf4-1 mutant Sh (also in Extended Data Fig. 3c). i, Luminescence of LHY::LUC (n=6) and j, CCA1::LUC (n=9) rhythms in WT and elf4-1 mutant Sh. k, Circadian period estimates of LHY::LUC in WT (n=12) and ELF4-ox (n=14) roots; data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile). *** p-value<0.0001; two-tailed t-tests with 95% of confidence. a-b, d-j, Data are represented as the means + SEM. The mRNA expression and promoter activity analyses were performed under constant light conditions previous synchronization of plants under LD cycles at 22°C. The “n” values refer to independent samples. a-k, Two biological replicates were performed for all experiments, with measurements taken from distinct samples grown and processed at different times.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 RNA-Seq analyses of WT and elf4-1 mutant roots.

a, Quantitative analysis of DEGs in elf4-1 versus WT roots. The statistical analyses of the DEGs are detailed in Materials and Methods. b, Heatmap of the median-normalized expression (Z-scaled FPKM values) of the oscillator genes in WT and elf4-1 roots. Analyses by RT-QPCR of c, ELF4, d, PRR7, e, CCA1 and f, LUX mRNA expression in roots at CT75 after three days in LL. Visualization of RNA-seq reads by using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) browser for g, ELF4, h, PRR7, i, and CCA1. j, Number of lateral roots per cm in the Ws-2 (WT, n=86), elf4-1 (n=28) or ELF4-ox lines (n=48). Plants were grown for 12 days under short day (8h light:/16h darkness) photoperiod with a constant temperature of 22°C. Letters signify significant difference (p<0.01) as determined by a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey HSD post hoc test. Data is represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile). Data represents an average of two independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Analyses of circadian rhythmicity of the micrografting assays.

Luminescence of PRR9::LUC in a, shoots (n=3) and b, roots (n=3) of WT scion into WT rootstocks and its comparison with luminescence in (non-grafted) WT roots (n=4). c, Circadian time course analyses of ELF4 mRNA expression in shoots of WT, elf4-1 and ELF4-ox (also in Extended Data Fig. 1h). d Individual waveform of CCA1::LUC rhythmic recovery in roots of ELF4-ox scion and elf4-1 rootstocks. Water instead of luciferin was added to the wells containing ELF4-ox shoots. e, CCA1::LUC luminescence in shoots and roots of elf4-2 mutant plants (n=5 for each). f, Individual waveform of CCA1::LUC rhythmic recovery in roots of E4MG scion into elf4-1 rootstocks. Water instead of luciferin was added to the wells containing E4MG shoots. a-f, Data are represented as the means + SEM. The mRNA expression and promoter activity analyses were performed under constant light conditions previous synchronization of plants under LD cycles at 22°C. The “n” values refer to independent samples. a-f, Two biological replicates were performed for all experiments, with measurements taken from distinct samples grown and processed at different times.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Mathematical analyses of the micrografting effects on rhythms.

Two-dimensional plots of CCA1::LUC rhythms in roots a, before and b, after grating ELF4-ox scion into elf4-1 rootstocks. c, Reconstructed waveforms and d, autocorrelation analyses in roots before and after grafting. e, g, Recurrence plots for the driver obtained by delay coordinates and autocorrelation analyses f, before and h, after ELF4-ox scion grafting into elf4-1 rootstock. Number of surrogates for each test: 10000. Before grafting: 95% confidence interval: [−1 0.2932]; effect size: 0.0975; p-value: 0.2339. After grafting: 95% confidence interval: [−1 0.2720]; effect size: 0.5752; p-value: 0.00045.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Analyses of ELF4 movement from shoots to roots.

a, ELF4 and b, GFP proteins purified from bacteria and c, injected in shoots of elf4-1 mutant plants to examine rhythmic recovery in roots. d, e, Representative images showing fluorescence signals in roots of ELF4-ox-GFP scion and elf4-1 rootstock. Scale bars: 100µm. f, Gene expression analyses of ELF4 mRNA expression in WT and different ELF4-x3GFPs lines. Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. g, Hypocotyl length of different lines expressing ELF4-x3GFPs (E43GFP) (E43GFP1 n=34; E43GFP3 n=35) transformed into elf4-1 mutant plants. Hypocotyl length was also assayed for WT (n=27), elf4-1 (n=48) and plants over-expressing ELF4 fused to 1 GFP (E41GFP) (n=19). *** p-value<0.0001; two-tailed t-tests with 95% of confidence. Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. Circadian time course analyses of h, ELF4, and i, PRR9 mRNA expression by RT-QPCR in shoots of WT and ELF4-x3GFPs. j, Luminescence of elf4-1 scion into elf4-1 rootstocks elf4-1 (Sh)/elf4-1(Rt) (n=4) and its comparison with luminescence in WT (Sh)/WT(Rt) roots (n=5). k, Luminescence signals of elf4-1 (Sh)/elf4-1(Rt) from j, shown in a separate graph. Water instead of luciferin was added to the wells containing WT and elf4-1 shoots. h-k, Data are represented as the means + SEM. a-k, At least two biological replicates were performed for all experiments, with measurements taken from distinct samples grown and processed at different times.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Shoot excision advances the phase and shortens the circadian period in roots.

Luminescence of a, PRR9::LUC (n=5) and b, LHY::LUC (n=8) circadian rhythms in WT excised roots. c, Comparison of PRR9::LUC circadian rhythms in WT intact (n=6) versus excised roots (n=6). d, Period estimates of LHY::LUC (left graph) (n=8) and PRR9::LUC (right graph) (n=8) rhythms in WT intact versus excised roots. Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. *** p-value<0.0001; two-tailed t-tests with 95% of confidence. Circadian time course analyses of e, PRR9 and f, PRR7 mRNA expression in WT intact versus excised roots. Circadian time course analyses of g, PRR9 and h, PRR7 mRNA expression in WT and ELF4-ox intact roots. Circadian time course analyses of i, PRR9 and j, PRR7 mRNA expression in WT excised and ELF4-ox excised roots. a-c, e-j, Data are represented as the means + SEM. k, Visualization of PRR9 RNA-seq reads by using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) browser. l, Circadian phases of overlapped DEGs in elf4-1 and WT excised roots relative to WT intact roots. Radial axis represents the subjective time (hours). White and gray areas represent subjective day and night, respectively. The mRNA expression and promoter activity analyses were performed under constant light conditions previous synchronization of plants under LD cycles at 22°C. The “n” values refer to independent samples. a-l, Two biological replicates were performed for all experiments, with measurements taken from distinct samples grown and processed at different times.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 The lack of ELF4 movement affects gene expression in roots.

Schematic drawing depicting the RNA-Seq comparison of different root genotypes (elf4-1 mutant versus WT) and conditions (intact versus excised). The proportion of overlapped DEGs (67%) is highly significant (P-value < 0.0001, chi-square test for equality of proportions) compared to the overlapped proportion of genes (30%) using random gene lists with the same counts as the DEGs in WT excised roots. The overlapped genes cannot be the result of excision because the data of elf4-1 mutant roots come from intact roots.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Excision advances the phase of ELF4 protein accumulation in roots under entraining conditions.

a, Western-blot analysis and b, quantification of ELF4 protein accumulation in ELF4 minigene (E4MG) intact and excised roots under ShD (also in Fig. 3c, d). c, Western-blot analysis and d, quantification of ELF4 protein accumulation in E4MG intact and excised roots under LgD (also in Fig. 3e, f). e, Western-blot analysis and f, quantification of ELF4 protein accumulation in E4MG excised roots under ShD and LgD (also in Fig. 3e, f). b, d, f, Data are represented as the means + SEM. a-f, Two biological replicates were performed for all experiments, with measurements taken from distinct samples grown and processed at different times.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 The root clock is not temperature-compensated.

a, Luminescence waveforms of LHY::LUC rhythmic oscillation in WT roots at 28°C (n=8), 18°C (n=8) and 12°C (n=8) and b, circadian period estimates of LHY::LUC rhythmic oscillation in WT roots at 28°C (n=12), 18°C (n=23) and 12°C (n=14). Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. c, Luminescence waveforms of PRR9::LUC rhythmic oscillation in roots at 28°C (n=8), 18°C (n=16) and 12°C (n=8) and d, circadian period estimates of PRR9::LUC rhythmic oscillation in roots at 28°C (n=14), 18°C (n=16) and 12°C (n=12). Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. e, Luminescence waveforms and f, circadian period estimates of CCA1::LUC rhythmic oscillation in roots at 28°C (n=6), 22°C (n=6) and 12°C (n=6) Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. b d, f, *** p-value<0.0001; ** p-value<0.005; two-tailed t-tests with 95% of confidence. a, c, e, Data are represented as the means + SEM. The “n” values refer to independent samples. a-f, Two biological replicates were performed for all experiments, with measurements taken from distinct samples grown and processed at different times.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Circadian rhythms in excised roots at various temperatures.

Circadian period estimates of a, LHY::LUC in intact (n=8) versus excised WT roots (n=7) at 12°C and 28°C (n=8 for intact and n=8 for excised) and b, PRR9::LUC in intact (n=12) versus excised WT roots (n=13) at 12°C and 28°C (n=14 for intact and n=16 for excised). Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. *** p-value<0.0001; * p-value<0.05; ns: non-significant p=0.369; two-tailed t-tests with 95% of confidence. Luminescence rhythmic oscillation in WT intact and excised roots (n=8 for each) at 12°C of c, LHY::LUC, d, PRR9::LUC (n=8 for each) and e, CCA1::LUC (n=4 for excised, n=5 for intact). f, Luminescence of PRR9::LUC rhythmic oscillation in WT intact and excised roots at 18°C (n=16 for each). c-f, Data are represented as the means + SEM. g, Circadian period estimates of LHY::LUC in WT (n=12) and ELF4-ox (n=17) at 28°C. Data are represented as the median ± max and min; 25-75 percentile. Promoter activity analyses were performed under constant light conditions previous synchronization of plants under LD cycles at 22°C. h, Coomassie Blue staining of protein extracts from roots of ELF4-ox-GFP scion (E4-ox) grafted into elf4-1 rootstock (e4-1) at 12°C and 28°C. i, Western-blot analyses of ELF4-GFP protein accumulation (arrows) in roots of ELF4-ox-GFP scion (E4-ox) grafted into elf4-1 rootstock (e4-1) at 12°C and 28°C. WT protein extracts were used as a control. Asterisks denote non-specific bands. Ponceau S staining of the membrane is shown in the right panel. j, Western-blot analyses of ELF4 protein accumulation (arrow) in shoots of ELF4 minigene (E4MG) grafted into elf4-1 rootstock (e4-1) at 12°C and 28°C. elf4-1 protein extracts were used as a control. Ponceau S staining of the membrane is shown in the right panel. The “n” values refer to independent samples. a-j, Two biological replicates were performed for all experiments, with measurements or analyses taken from distinct samples grown and processed at different times.

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

RNA-Seq analyses of WT roots versus elf4-1 mutant roots. Roots from 14-day old intact WT and elf4-1 mutant plants synchronized under LD cycles in MS3 medium plates were transferred to LL conditions for 3 days. Samples were collected at the fourth day under LL at circadian time 75 (CT75). The Table includes up-regulated genes, down-regulated genes, Molecular Funtion of the up-regulated genes and Molecular Function of the down-regulated genes.

Supplementary Table 2

RNA-Seq analyses of WT intact roots versus WT excised roots. Analyses of 14-day old WT plants synchronized under LD cycles in MS3 medium plates. Roots were excised just before transference to LL conditions for 3 days. WT intact and excised roots were collected at the fourth day under LL at circadian time 75 (CT75). The Table includes up-regulated genes, down-regulated genes, Molecular Funtion of the up-regulated genes and Molecular Function of the down-regulated genes.

Supplementary Table 3

Comparison of DEGs in elf4-1 intact roots and WT excised roots. Overlapping DEGs of elf4-1 intact roots (from Supplementary Table 1) and WT excised roots (from Supplementary Table 2). The Table also includes the Molecular Function of the overlapping genes.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Unprocessed gels.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Unprocessed western blots.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W.W., Takahashi, N., Hirata, Y. et al. A mobile ELF4 delivers circadian temperature information from shoots to roots. Nat. Plants 6, 416–426 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0634-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0634-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing