Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Annual transcriptome dynamics in natural environments reveals plant seasonal adaptation

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 08 February 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

As most organisms have evolved in seasonal environments, their environmental responses should be adapted to seasonal transitions. Here we show that the combination of temperature and day length shapes the seasonal dynamics of the transcriptome and adaptation to seasonal environments in a natural habitat of a perennial plant Arabidopsis halleri subsp. gemmifera. Weekly transcriptomes for two years and bihourly diurnal transcriptomes on the four equinoxes/solstices, identified 2,879 and 7,185 seasonally- and diurnally-oscillating genes, respectively. Dominance of annual temperature changes for defining seasonal oscillations of gene expressions was indicated by controlled environment experiments manipulating the natural 1.5-month lag of temperature behind day length. We found that plants have higher fitness in ‘natural’ chambers than in ‘unnatural’ chambers simulating in-phase and anti-phase oscillations between temperature and day length. Seasonal temperature responses were disturbed in unnatural chambers. Our results demonstrate how plants use multiple types of environmental information to adapt to seasonal environments.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Seasonal dynamics of transcriptomes in a natural habitat.
Fig. 2: Diurnal dynamics of transcriptomes in the natural seasonal environment.
Fig. 3: Seasonally and diurnally oscillating genes in the flowering pathways.
Fig. 4: Dominant effect of temperature on transcriptome dynamics.
Fig. 5: Adaptation to seasonal temperature lagging behind day length.
Fig. 6: Discordance of information from seasonal temperature and day length disturbed transcriptome responses to temperature.

Data availability

The sequence data that support the findings of this study are available in the DDBJ Short Read Archive repository, with the accession numbers DRA005871, DRA005872, DRA005873, DRA005874, DRA005875 and DRA005876. Database of detailed results of individual genes is at http://sohi.ecology.kyoto-u.ac.jp/AhgRNAseq/.

Change history

  • 08 February 2019

    In Fig. 3b of the version of this Article originally published, a number of arrows indicating repression of downstream processes were mistakenly formatted as arrows indicating activation of downstream processes. This has now been amended in all versions of the Article.

References

  1. 1.

    Kudoh, H. Molecular phenology in plants: In natura systems biology for the comprehensive understanding of seasonal responses under natural environments. New Phytol. 210, 399–412 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Elzinga, J. A. et al. Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 432–439 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Penfield, S. & MacGregor, D. R. Effects of environmental variation during seed production on seed dormancy and germination. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 819–825 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hepworth, J. & Dean, C. Flowering Locus C’s lessons: conserved chromatin switches underpinning developmental timing and adaptation. Plant Physiol. 168, 1237–1245 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Polgar, C. A. & Primack, R. B. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytol. 191, 926–941 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Keskitalo, J. A cellular timetable of autumn senescence. Plant Physiol. 139, 1635–1648 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chaiwanon, J., Wang, W., Zhu, J. Y., Oh, E. & Wang, Z. Y. Information integration and communication in plant growth regulation. Cell 164, 1257–1268 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aikawa, S., Kobayashi, M. J., Satake, A., Shimizu, K. K. & Kudoh, H. Robust control of the seasonal expression of the Arabidopsis FLC gene in a fluctuating environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11632–11637 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Satake, A. et al. Forecasting flowering phenology under climate warming by modelling the regulatory dynamics of flowering-time genes. Nat. Commun. 4,2303 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nagano, A. J. et al. Deciphering and prediction of transcriptome dynamics under fluctuating field conditions. Cell 151, 1358–1369 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Plessis, A. et al. Multiple abiotic stimuli are integrated in the regulation of rice gene expression under field conditions. eLife 4, e08411 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Burow, M. & Halkier, B. A. How does a plant orchestrate defense in time and space? Using glucosinolates in Arabidopsis as case study. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 38, 142–147 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Stief, A. et al. Arabidopsis miR156 regulates tolerance to recurring environmental stress through SPL transcription factors. Plant Cell 26, 1792–1807 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Charng, Y. Y. et al. A heat-inducible transcription factor, HsfA2, is required for extension of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 143, 251–262 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lämke, J., Brzezinka, K., Altmann, S. & Bäurle, I. A hit-and-run heat shock factor governs sustained histone methylation and transcriptional stress memory. EMBO J. 35, 162–175 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bieniawska, Z. et al. Disruption of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is responsible for extensive variation in the cold-responsive transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 147, 263–279 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Murayama, Y. et al. Low temperature nullifies the circadian clock in cyanobacteria through Hopf bifurcation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5641–5646 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nakamichi, N. et al. Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 447–462 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Koo, A. J. K., Chung, H. S., Kobayashi, Y. & Howe, G. A. Identification of a peroxisomal acyl-activating enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 33511–33520 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bouché, F., Lobet, G., Tocquin, P. & Périlleux, C. FLOR-ID: an interactive database of flowering-time gene networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1167–D1171 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shim, J. S., Kubota, A. & Imaizumi, T. Circadian clock and photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS is a hub for signal integration. Plant Physiol. 173, 5–15 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Niwa, Y. et al. Genetic linkages of the circadian clock-associated genes, TOC1, CCA1 and LHY, in the photoperiodic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 48, 925–937 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nakamichi, N. et al. Transcriptional repressor PRR5 directly regulates clock-output pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17123–17128 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dopico, X. C. et al. Widespread seasonal gene expression reveals annual differences in human immunity and physiology. Nat. Commun. 6, 7000 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jones, H. G. Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology 3rd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Costa, J. M., Grant, O. M. & Chaves, M. M. Thermography to explore plant–environment interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3937–3949 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Travers, S. E. et al. Variation in gene expression of Andropogon gerardii in response to altered environmental conditions associated with climate change. J. Ecol. 98, 374–383 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chew, Y. H. et al. Linking circadian time to growth rate quantitatively via carbon metabolism. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/105437 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Endo, M., Shimizu, H., Nohales, M. A., Araki, T. & Kay, S. A. Tissue-specific clocks in Arabidopsis show asymmetric coupling. Nature 515, 419–422 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gould, P. D. et al. Coordination of robust single cell rhythms in the Arabidopsis circadian clock via spatial waves of gene expression. eLife 7, e31700 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shimizu, H. et al. Decentralized circadian clocks process thermal and photoperiodic cues in specific tissues. Nat. Plants 1, 1–6 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dodd, A. N. et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309, 630–633 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kidokoro, S. et al. Different cold-signalling pathways function in the responses to rapid and gradual decreases in temperature. Plant Cell 29, 760–774 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kudoh, H., Honjo, M. N., Nishio, H. & Sugisaka, J. The long-term “in natura” study sites of Arabidopsis halleri for plant transcription and epigenetic modification analyses in natural environments. Methods Mol. Biol. 1830, 41–57 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, L. et al. A low-cost library construction protocol and data analysis pipeline for illumina-based strand-specific multiplex RNA-seq. PLoS ONE 6, e26426 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hu, T. T. et al. The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet. 43, 476–483 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kamitani, M., Nagano, A. J., Honjo, M. N. & Kudoh, H. RNA-Seq reveals virus-virus and virus-plant interactions in nature. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92, fiw176 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).

  41. 41.

    Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. Voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, 1–17 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Iwayama, K., Aisaka, Y., Kutsuna, N. & Nagano, A. J. FIT: statistical modeling tool for transcriptome dynamics under fluctuating field conditions. Bioinformatics 33, 1672–1680 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Berardini, T. Z. et al. The Arabidopsis information resource: making and mining the ‘gold standard’ annotated reference plant genome. Genesis 53, 474–485 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Y. Kobayashi, K. Yoneya and Y. Sato for assistance and A. Dodd and N. Nakamichi for valuable discussion. This study was supported by JSPS Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research (S) no. 26221106 and JST CREST no. JPMJCR15O1 to H.K., and JST CREST no. JPMJCR15O2 and JSPS Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research nos. JP16H06171 and JP16H01473 to A.J.N.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.K. designed the project collaboratively with all co-authors. T.K. and J.S. conducted field experiments. J.S. and A.J.N. conducted GC experiments. M.N.H. conducted RNA-Seq experiments. A.J.N. and K.I. analysed data. A.J.N. and H.K. wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Kudoh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–7.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Tables 1–9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagano, A.J., Kawagoe, T., Sugisaka, J. et al. Annual transcriptome dynamics in natural environments reveals plant seasonal adaptation. Nature Plants 5, 74–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0338-z

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing