Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The persistence of carbon in the African forest understory

Abstract

Quantifying carbon dynamics in forests is critical for understanding their role in long-term climate regulation1,2,3,4. Yet little is known about tree longevity in tropical forests3,5,6,7,8, a factor that is vital for estimating carbon persistence3,4. Here we calculate mean carbon age (the period that carbon is fixed in trees7) in different strata of African tropical forests using (1) growth-ring records with a unique timestamp accurately demarcating 66 years of growth in one site and (2) measurements of diameter increments from the African Tropical Rainforest Observation Network (23 sites). We find that in spite of their much smaller size, in understory trees mean carbon age (74 years) is greater than in sub-canopy (54 years) and canopy (57 years) trees and similar to carbon age in emergent trees (66 years). The remarkable carbon longevity in the understory results from slow and aperiodic growth as an adaptation to limited resource availability9,10,11. Our analysis also reveals that while the understory represents a small share (11%) of the carbon stock12,13, it contributes disproportionally to the forest carbon sink (20%). We conclude that accounting for the diversity of carbon age and carbon sequestration among different forest strata is critical for effective conservation management14,15,16 and for accurate modelling of carbon cycling4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Example of a wood core (Greenwayodendron suaveolens, TreeID 765) showing the 1948 nail trace.
Fig. 2: Variation in tree age inferred from growth-ring patterns in 55 trees where nail traces accurately mark the year 1948.
Fig. 3: Estimation of mean carbon age and contribution to above-ground carbon (AGC) sink per crown illumination category for 23 permanent inventory plots in Central Africa.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The input data and R-scripts to generate the figures and tables are available for download using the following private link: https://figshare.com/s/06c793575d3b52ef5574. Images of wood cores are available using the following link: https://figshare.com/s/e6101fe7d330f8ea140a. This folder also contains all annotation documents needed to visualize growth ring boundaries on the wood samples (please consult the README document for guidelines). Wood samples used to conduct this analysis are stored in the Tervuren xylarium (http://www.africamuseum.be/collections/browsecollections/naturalsciences/earth/xylarium). These samples may be studied, within the Tervuren xylarium, on request addressed to the curator H.B. (hans.beeckman@africamuseum.be) or the corresponding author W.H. (whubau@gmail.com).

References

  1. Lewis, S. L. et al. Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests. Nature 457, 1003–1006 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brienen, R. J. W. et al. Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nature 519, 344–348 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Körner, C. A matter of tree longevity. Science 355, 130–131 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Galbraith, D. et al. Residence times of woody biomass in tropical forests. Plant Ecol. Divers. 6, 139–157 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brienen, R. J. W., Schöngart, J. & Zuidema, P. A. in Tropical Tree Physiology Vol. 6 (eds. Goldstein, G. & Santiago, L. S.) 439–461 (Springer, New York, 2016).

  6. Worbes, M. One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics – a brief history and an outlook to future challenges. Dendrochronologia 20, 217–231 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vieira, S. et al. Slow growth rates of Amazonian trees: consequences for carbon cycling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18502–18507 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chambers, J. Q., Higuchi, N. & Schimel, J. P. Ancient trees in amazonia. Nature 391, 135–136 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bigler, C. Trade-offs between growth rate, tree size and lifespan of mountain pine (Pinus montana) in the Swiss national park. PLoS ONE 11, 1–18 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleczewski, N. M., Herms, D. A. & Bonello, P. Effects of soil type, fertilization and drought on carbon allocation to root growth and partitioning between secondary metabolism and ectomycorrhizae of Betula papyrifera. Tree Physiol. 30, 807–817 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sass-Klaassen, U. Tree physiology: tracking tree carbon gain. Nat. Plants 1, 15175 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bastin, J.-F. et al. Seeing Central African forests through their largest trees. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–8 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bastin, J. -F. et al. Pan-tropical prediction of forest structure from the largest trees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1366–1383 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lutz, J. A. et al. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 849–864 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Memiaghe, H. R., Lutz, J. A., Korte, L., Alonso, A. & Kenfack, D. Ecological importance of small-diameter trees to the structure, diversity and biomass of a tropical evergreen forest at Rabi, Gabon. PLoS ONE 11, 1–15 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burton, J. I., Ares, A., Olson, D. H. & Puettmann, K. J. Management trade-off between aboveground carbon storage and understory plant species richness in temperate forests. Ecol. Appl. 23, 1297–1310 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyd, J. & Farquhar, G. D. The CO2 dependence of photosynthesis, plant growth responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations and their interaction with soil nutrient status. I. General principles and foreste cosystems. Funct. Ecol. 10, 4–32 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurance, W. F. et al. Inferred longevity of Amazonian rainforest trees based on a long-term demographic study. Forest Ecol. Manag. 190, 131–143 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stephenson, N. L. et al. Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature 507, 90–93 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wright, S. J. et al. Functional traits and the growth — mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology 91, 3664–3674 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Synnott, T. J. A Manual of Permanent Plot Procedures for Tropical Rain Forests Tropical Forestry Papers No. 14 (Department of Forestry Commonwealth Forestry Institute, Oxford Univ., 1979).

  22. Dawkins, H. C. & Field, D. R. B. A Long-term Surveillance System for British Woodland Vegetation C.F.I. Occasional Papers 1 (Oxford Univ., 1978).

  23. Lewis, S. L. et al. Above-ground biomass and structure of 260 African tropical forests. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120295 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall, J. S., Harris, D. J., Medjibe, V. P. & Ashton, M. S. The effects of selective logging on forest structure and tree species composition in a Central African forest: implications for management of conservation areas. Forest Ecol. Manage. 183, 249–264 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Couralet, C., Van den Bulcke, J., Ngoma, L. M., Van Acker, J. & Beeckman, H. Phenology in functional groups of Central African trees. J. Trop. For. Sci. 25, 361–374 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vico, G., Dralle, D., Feng, X., Thompson, S. & Manzoni, S. How competitive is drought deciduousness in tropical forests? A combined eco-hydrological and eco-evolutionary approach. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 65006 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bennett, A. C., McDowell, N. G., Allen, C. D. & Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide. Nat. Plants 1, 15139 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. The Charcoal Transition : Greening the Charcoal Value Chain to Mitigate Climate Change And Improve Local Livelihoods (FAO, 2017).

  29. Lewis, S. L., Malhi, Y. & Phillips, O. L. Fingerprinting the impacts of global change on tropical forests. Philos.T. Roy. Soc. B 359, 437–462 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rapport Annuel INEAC-Luki (INEAC, 1947).

  31. Coppieters, G. Inventaris van het archief van de Rijksplantages en de Regie der Plantages van de Kolonie, het Nationaal Instituut voor de Landbouwkunde in Belgisch-Congo en de Documentatiedienst voor Tropische Landbouwkunde en Plattelandsontwikkeling 1901–1999 (REPCO, 2013).

  32. Biographie Coloniale Belge/Biographie Belge d’Outre-Mer IX (Académie Royale des Sciences d’outre-mer, 2015).

  33. Rapport Annuel INEAC-Luki (INEAC,1946).

  34. Rapport Annuel INEAC-Luki (INEAC,1948).

  35. De Mil, T., Vannoppen, A., Beeckman, H., Van Acker, J. & Van Den Bulcke, J. A field-to-desktop toolchain for X-ray CT densitometry enables tree ring analysis. Ann. Bot. 117, 1187–1196 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gärtner, H. & Nievergelt, D. The core-microtome: a new tool for surface preparation on cores and time series analysis of varying cell parameters. Dendrochronologia 28, 85–92 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dierick, M. et al. Recent micro-CT scanner developments at UGCT. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 324, 35–40 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vlassenbroeck, J. et al. Software tools for quantification of X-ray microtomography at the UGCT. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 580, 442–445 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Worbes, M. in Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences Vol. 2 (eds. Burley, J., Evans, J. & Youngquist, J. A.) 586–599 (Academic Press, Cambridge, 2004).

  40. Tarelkin, Y. et al. Growth-ring distinctness and boundary anatomy variability in tropical trees. IAWA J. 37, 275–294 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hietz, P. A simple program to measure and analyse tree rings using Excel, R and SigmaScan. Dendrochronologia 29, 245–250 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Lewis, S. L., Burkitt, M. & Phillips, O. L. ForestPlots.net: a web application and research tool to manage and analyse tropical forest plot data. J. Veg. Sci. 22, 610–613 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Core Team, 2008).

  44. Chave, J. et al. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3177–3190 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Feldpausch, T. R. et al. Tree height integrated into pantropical forest biomass estimates. Biogeosciences 9, 3381–3403 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Sullivan, M. J. P. & Baker, T. R. BiomasaFP package. Tools for analysing data downloaded from ForestPlots.net. R package version 0.2.1 (ForestPlots/BiomasaFDP, 2015); http://www.forestplots.net/en/resources/analysis.

  47. Aalde, H. et al. Forest Land. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Vol. 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Ch 4, 1–29 (IPCC, 2006).

  48. Talbot, J. et al. Methods to estimate aboveground wood productivity from long-term forest inventory plots. Forest Ecol. Manage. 320, 30–38 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Clark, D. A. et al. Measuring net primary production in forest concepts and field methods. Ecol. Appl. 11, 356–370 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Nkulapark: W.H. and T.D.M. were both funded by the Brain programme of the Belgian Federal Government (BR/132/A1/AFRIFORD and BR/143/A3/HERBAXYLAREDD). The PhD project of T.D.M and the tenure track of J.V.d.B. were supported by Ghent University Special Research Fund (BOF). Fieldwork was sponsored by the King Leopold III fund for nature exploration and conservation. B.A.I. is supported by the Institut National pour l’Étude et la Recherche Agronomiques en R.D.Congo (INERA- RDC- Luki) and the École Régionale Postuniversitaire d’Aménagement et de Gestion intégrés des Forêts et Territoires tropicaux (ERAIFT Kinshasa). We thank WWF-RDC (G. Lejeune), INERA and ERAIFT for facilitating fieldwork in the Luki Reserve. We thank the INERA employees (J.-B. Ndunga, J.-M., F. Mbungu Phaka, L. Ngoma, P. Noble), the WWF ecoguards and the students of the Universities of Kinshasa (UNIKIN) and Boma for assistance in the field. For assistance with datasets we thank M. De Groot, K. Lievens, P. Dekeyser, S. Willen and J. Kempenaers. The 23 permanent inventory plots: This paper is also a product of the AfriTRON network, for which we are indebted to hundreds of institutions, field assistants and local communities for establishing and maintaining the plots. This network has been supported by the European Research Council (291585, ‘T-FORCES’ – Tropical Forests in the Changing Earth System, Advanced Grant to O.L.P. and S.L.L.), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (no. 283080, ‘GEOCARBON’) and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Consortium Grant ‘TROBIT’ (no. NE/D005590/1), ‘BIO-RED’ (no. NE/N012542/1) and a NERC New Investigators Grant, the Royal Society, the Centre for International Forestry (CIFOR) and Gabon’s National Parks Agency (ANPN). We are indebted to the University of Yaounde I, the National Herbarium of Yaounde, Rougier-Gabon, the Marien Ngouabi University of Brazzaville, WCS-Congo, Salonga National Park, WCS-D.R.Congo and the University of Kisangani for logistical support in Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.H., T.D.M., J.V.d.B., J.V.A. and H.B. conceived and designed the Nkulapark study and S.L.L. conceived the AfriTRON plot network. T.D.M. and B.A.I. coordinated collection of Nkulapark data and wood cores. T.D.M. and J.V.d.B. measured growth ring series. W.H. carried out the data analysis and wrote the paper. S.L.L., O.L.P., T.R.B. and Y.M. conceived the ForestPlots.net database, and most co-authors helped collecting AfriTRON forest census data. S.L.L., B.S., S.K.B., A.C.S., W.H., T.S., T.R.F., T.S., C.E.N.E. and L.W.W. coordinated forest plots data collection. M.J.P.S., G.L.G., S.L.L., O.L.P., T.R.B. and G.P. contributed tools to analyse and curate data. All co-authors commented on or approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wannes Hubau.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–4

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Number of growth rings, growth-ring formation rate, tree age and mean carbon age of all 55 Nkulapark trees with 1,948 nail traces used for this analysis

Supplementary Table 2

List of all 23 plots included in this analysis, with geographic coordinates, plot size, dates of first and last census, and the main researchers for each plot

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hubau, W., De Mil, T., Van den Bulcke, J. et al. The persistence of carbon in the African forest understory. Nature Plants 5, 133–140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0316-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0316-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing