Brief Communication | Published:

Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing

Nature Plantsvolume 4pages766770 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Genome editing holds great promise for increasing crop productivity, and there is particular interest in advancing breeding in orphan crops, which are often burdened by undesirable characteristics resembling wild relatives. We developed genomic resources and efficient transformation in the orphan Solanaceae crop ‘groundcherry’ (Physalis pruinosa) and used clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated protein-9 nuclease (Cas9) (CRISPR–Cas9) to mutate orthologues of tomato domestication and improvement genes that control plant architecture, flower production and fruit size, thereby improving these major productivity traits. Thus, translating knowledge from model crops enables rapid creation of targeted allelic diversity and novel breeding germplasm in distantly related orphan crops.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

Raw data from this study have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under accession number SRP142654. Transcriptome and genome assemblies have been deposited at the Sol Genomics Network (ftp://ftp.solgenomics.net).

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Scheben, A., Wolter, F., Batley, J., Puchta, H. & Edwards, D. New Phytol. 216, 682–698 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Bohra, A., Jha, U. C., Kishor, P. B. K., Pandey, S. & Singh, N. P. Biotechnol. Adv. 32, 1410–1428 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Wolff, X. Y. HortScience 26, 1558–1559 (1991).

  4. 4.

    Särkinen, T., Bohs, L., Olmstead, R. G. & Knapp, S. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 214 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Van der Knaap, E. et al. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 227 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Soyk, S. et al. Nat. Genet. 49, 162–168 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Menzel, M. Y. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 95, 132–183 (1951).

  8. 8.

    Paran, I. & van der Knaap, E. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 3841–3852 (2007).

  9. 9.

    Van Eck, J. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 49, 35–41 (2018).

  10. 10.

    Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z. B. & Van Eck, J. Plant Physiol. 166, 1292–1297 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Garzón-Martínez, Ga, Zhu, Z. I., Landsman, D., Barrero, L. S. & Mariño-Ramírez, L. BMC Genomics 13, 151 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Xu, C. et al. Nat. Genet. 47, 784–792 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Soyk, S. et al. Cell 169, 1142–1155 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Park, S. J., Eshed, Y. & Lippman, Z. B. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 17, 70–77 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Pnueli, L. et al. Development 125, 1979–1989 (1998).

  17. 17.

    Rodríguez-Leal, D., Lemmon, Z. H., Man, J., Bartlett, M. E. & Lippman, Z. B. Cell 171, 470–480 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Cermak, T. et al. Plant Cell 29, 1196–1217 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Altpeter, F. et al. Plant Cell 28, 1510–1520 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Lowe, K. et al. Plant Cell 28, 1998–2015 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Lippman and Van Eck laboratories for valuable discussions. We thank T. Mulligan, S. Vermylen, A. Krainer and S. Qiao for assistance with plant care. We thank C. Pei for assistance with CRISPR analysis. This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology grant (IOS-1523423) to Z.H.L., and the National Science Foundation Plant Genome Research Program (IOS-1732253) to J.V.E. and Z.B.L.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Nathan T. Reem, Justin Dalrymple, Sebastian Soyk.

Affiliations

  1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA

    • Zachary H. Lemmon
    • , Justin Dalrymple
    • , Sebastian Soyk
    • , Daniel Rodriguez-Leal
    •  & Zachary B. Lippman
  2. The Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, NY, USA

    • Nathan T. Reem
    • , Kerry E. Swartwood
    •  & Joyce Van Eck
  3. Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    • Joyce Van Eck
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA

    • Zachary B. Lippman

Authors

  1. Search for Zachary H. Lemmon in:

  2. Search for Nathan T. Reem in:

  3. Search for Justin Dalrymple in:

  4. Search for Sebastian Soyk in:

  5. Search for Kerry E. Swartwood in:

  6. Search for Daniel Rodriguez-Leal in:

  7. Search for Joyce Van Eck in:

  8. Search for Zachary B. Lippman in:

Contributions

Z.H.L., N.T.R., J.D., J.V.E. and Z.B.L. designed and planned the experiments. All authors performed the experiments and collected the data. Z.H.L performed all bioinformatics analyses. All authors analysed the data. Z.H.L., J.V.E. and Z.B.L. designed the research. Z.H.L., S.S., J.V.E. and Z.B.L. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joyce Van Eck or Zachary B. Lippman.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Methods, Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1

  2. Reporting Summary

  3. Supplementary Data

    Raw quantification data for Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 1

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x