Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

The demise of the largest and oldest African baobabs

Matters Arising to this article was published on 17 May 2024

An Author Correction to this article was published on 02 July 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

The African baobab is the biggest and longest-living angiosperm tree. By using radiocarbon dating we identified the stable architectures that enable baobabs to reach large sizes and great ages. We report that 9 of the 13 oldest and 5 of the 6 largest individuals have died, or at least their oldest parts/stems have collapsed and died, over the past 12 years; the cause of the mortalities is still unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Life and death of the historic Chapman baobab.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 02 July 2018

    In Supplementary Table 1 originally published with this Brief Communication, the authors gave an incorrect GPS easterly coordinate for tree number 12 (Makulu Makete Big baobab); the coordinate ‘2° 34.584' S, 25° 52.261' E’ should have read ‘22° 34.584' S, 28° 52.261' E’. This has now been amended in the online Supplementary Information file for this Brief Communication.

References

  1. Wickens, G. E. & Lowe, P. The Baobabs: Pachycauls of Africa, Madagascar and Australia (Springer, Dordrecht, 2008).

  2. Wickens, G. E. Kew Bull. 47, 173–209 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baum, D. A. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82, 440–471 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patrut, A. et al. Ann. For. Sci. 68, 993–1003 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patrut, A., von Reden, K. F., Mayne, D. H., Lowy, D. A. & Patrut, R. T. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Rev. B 294, 622–626 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patrut, A. et al. PLoS ONE 10, e0117193 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Patrut, A. et al. Radiocarbon 59, 435–448 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patrut, A. et al. Tree Physiol. 27, 1569–1574 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander, J., McGregor, J. A. & Ranger, T. Violence & Memory, One Hundred Years in the ‘Dark Forests’ of Matabeleland (Currey, Oxford, 2000).

  10. Mullin, L. J. Historic Trees of Zimbabwe (CBC, Bath, 2003).

  11. Patrut, A. et al. Radiocarbon 52, 717–726 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Engelbrecht, F. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 085004 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bronk Ramsey, C. et al. Radiocarbon 51, 337–360 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogg, A. G. et al. Radiocarbon 55, 1889–1903 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The investigation and collection of samples from the trees was approved and authorised by the South African National Parks, the Kruger National Park, the Mapungubwe National Park, the Ministry of Environment and Tourism of Namibia and the Department of Wildlife and National Parks of Botswana, the South Luangwa National Park. We thank H. and D. van Heerden, P. Philips and J. Chidgey, C. and Y. Liversage, L. Duplessis and R. and A. Whittall for granting permission for on-site investigation of baobabs located on their private lands. We also thank D.H. Mayne, M. Hofmeyr, S. Venter, A. Alberts, R. Wittmann, D. Dube and O. (Leon) Tsamkgao for helping to obtain permits and for participating at several field investigations. Special thanks go to J. Alexander for providing the photograph of Panke. This research was supported by the Romanian Ministry of National Education CNCS-UEFISCDI under grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2013-76 and by the Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation CNCS-UEFISCDI under grant PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0776, no. 90/2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.P. conceived the research. A.P., S.W., R.T.P., L.R. and G.H. performed field investigations and collected samples. K.F.v.R. performed AMS measurements. A.P., S.W., R.T.P. and D.A.L. interpreted results and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Patrut.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patrut, A., Woodborne, S., Patrut, R.T. et al. The demise of the largest and oldest African baobabs. Nature Plants 4, 423–426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0170-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0170-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing