Abstract

The magnitude of future climate change could be moderated by immediately reducing the amount of CO2 entering the atmosphere as a result of energy generation and by adopting strategies that actively remove CO2 from it. Biogeochemical improvement of soils by adding crushed, fast-reacting silicate rocks to croplands is one such CO2-removal strategy. This approach has the potential to improve crop production, increase protection from pests and diseases, and restore soil fertility and structure. Managed croplands worldwide are already equipped for frequent rock dust additions to soils, making rapid adoption at scale feasible, and the potential benefits could generate financial incentives for widespread adoption in the agricultural sector. However, there are still obstacles to be surmounted. Audited field-scale assessments of the efficacy of CO2 capture are urgently required together with detailed environmental monitoring. A cost-effective way to meet the rock requirements for CO2 removal must be found, possibly involving the recycling of silicate waste materials. Finally, issues of public perception, trust and acceptance must also be addressed.

  • Subscribe to Nature Plants for full access:

    $62

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • Correction 25 May 2018

    In the version of this Perspective originally published, ‘acidification’ was incorrectly spelt as ‘adification’ in Fig. 4. This has now been corrected.

References

  1. 1.

    Rosenzweig, C. et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3268–3273 (2014).

  2. 2.

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2014).

  3. 3.

    Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 810–818 (2010).

  4. 4.

    Amundson, J. et al. Soil and human security in the 21st Century. Science 348, 1261071 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Paris Agreement: UNFCCC secretariat, available at http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php

  6. 6.

    Hansen, J. et al. Young people’s burden: requirement of negative CO2 emissions. Earth Syst. Dynam 8, 577–616 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Gasser, T. et al. Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nat. Commun. 6, 7958 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Anderson, K. & Peters, G. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Rockstrom, J. et al. A roadmap for rapid decarbonisation. Science 355, 1269–1271 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Lee, H. Turning the focus to solution. Science 350, 1007 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Schuiling, R. D. & Krijgsman, P. Enhanced weathering: an effective and cheap tool to sequester CO2. Clim. Change 74, 349–354 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Kohler, P., Hartman, J. & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20228–20233 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Taylor, L. L. et al. Enhanced weathering strategies for stabilizing climate and averting ocean acidification. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 402–406 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis(eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013).

  15. 15.

    Renforth, P. & Henderson, G. Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration. Rev. Geophys. 55, 636–674 (2017).

  16. 16.

    West, T. O. & McBride, A. C. The contribution of agricultural lime to carbon dioxide emissions in the United States: dissolution, transport, and net emissions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 108, 145–154 (2005).

  17. 17.

    Thorley, R. M. S., Taylor, L. L., Banwart, S. A., Leake, J. R. & Beerling, D. J. The role of forest trees and their mycorrhizal fungi in carbonate rock weathering and its significance for global carbon cycling. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 1947–1961 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Hartmann, J. et al. Enhanced chemical weathering as a geoengineering strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, supply nutrients, and mitigate ocean acidification. Rev. Geophys. 51, 113–149 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Cripps, G., Widdicombe, S., Spicer, J. I. & Findlay, H. S. Biological impacts of enhanced alkalinity in Carcinus maenas. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 71, 190–198 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Albright, R. et al. Reversal of ocean acidification enhances net coral reef calcification. Nature 531, 362–365 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Edwards, D. P. et al. Climate change mitigation: potential benefits and pitfalls of enhanced rock weathering in tropical agriculture. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160715 (2017).

  22. 22.

    Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Field, C. B. & Mach, K. J. Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal. Science 356, 706–707 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Peters, S. C., Blum, J. D., Driscoll, C. T. & Likens, G. E. Dissolution of wollastonite during the experimental manipulation of Hubbard Brook Watershed 1. Biogeochemistry 67, 309–329 (2004).

  25. 25.

    Shao, S. et al. Long-term responses in soil solution and stream-water chemistry at Hubbard Brook after experimental addition of wollastonite. Environ. Chem. 13, 528–540 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Hartmann, J. & Kempe, S. What is the maximum potential for CO2 sequestration by “simulated” weathering at the global scale? Naturwissenschaften 95, 1159–1164 (2008).

  27. 27.

    Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1022 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Fritz, S. et al. Downgrading recent estimates of land area available for biofuel production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 1688–1694 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Kantola, I. B. et al. Potential of global croplands and bioenergy crops for climate change mitigation through deployment for enhanced weathering. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160714 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Renforth, P. The potential of enhanced weathering in the UK. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Cont. 10, 229–243 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Hangx, S. J. T. & Spiers, C. J. Coastal spreading of olivine to control atmospheric CO2 concentrations: a critical analysis of viability. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Cont. 3, 757–767 (2009).

  32. 32.

    Kohler, P. et al. Geoengineering impact of open ocean dissolution of olivine on atmospheric CO2, surface ocean pH and marine biology. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014009 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Meysman, F. J. R. & Montserrat, F. Negative emissions via enhanced silicate weathering in coastal environments. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160905 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Montserrat, F. et al. Olivine dissolution in seawater: implications for CO2 sequestration through enhanced weathering in coastal environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 3980–3972 (2017).

  35. 35.

    ten Berge, H. F. M. et al. Olivine weathering in soil, and its effects on growth and nutrient uptake in ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): a pot experiment. PLoS ONE 7, e42098 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Renforth, P., von Strandmann, P. A. E. & Henderson, G. M. The dissolution of olivine added to soil: implications for enhanced weathering. Appl. Geochem 61, 109–118 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Shoji, S., Nanzyo, M., Dahlgren, R. A. (eds). Volcanic Ash Soils: Genesis, Properties and Utilization. (Development in Soil Sciences 21, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993).

  38. 38.

    Hinsinger, P. et al. Plant-induced weathering of basaltic rock: experimental evidence. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65, 137–152 (2001).

  39. 39.

    Brantley, S. L., Kubicki, J. D. & White, A. F. Kinetics of Water-Rock Interaction (Springer, New York, 2008).

  40. 40.

    Beerling, D. J. et al. Defining the ‘negative emission’ capacity of global agriculture deployed for enhanced rock weathering. In American Geophysical Union Fall General Assembly abstract GC21J-04 (American Geophysical Union, 2016).

  41. 41.

    Wollenberg, E. et al. Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3859–3864 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Taylor, L. L., Beerling, D. J., Quegan, S. & Banwart, S. A. Simulating carbon capture by enhanced weathering with croplands: an overview of key processes highlighting areas of future model development. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160868 (2017).

  43. 43.

    Moosdorf, N., Renforth, P. & Hartmann, J. Carbon dioxide efficiency of terrestrial weathering. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4809–4816 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Harley, A. D. & Gilkes, R. J. Factors influencing the release of plant nutrient elements from silicate rock powders: a geochemical review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 56, 11–26 (2000).

  45. 45.

    Akter, M. & Akagi, T. Effect of fine root contact on plant-induced weathering of basalt. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 51, 861–871 (2005).

  46. 46.

    Akter, M. & Akagi, T. Dependence of plant-inducaed weathering of basalt and andesite on nutrient conditions. Geochem. J. 44, 137–150 (2010).

  47. 47.

    Burghelea, C. et al. Mineral nutrient mobilization by plants from rock: influence of rock type and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Biogeochemistry 124, 187–203 (2015).

  48. 48.

    Goulding, K. W. T. Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use Manag 32, 390–399 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Reichl, C., Schatz, M. & Zsak, G. World Mining Data Vol. 32 (International Organization Committee for the World Mining Congress, 2017).

  50. 50.

    Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331–345 (2017).

  51. 51.

    Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 8, 605–649 (2016).

  52. 52.

    Hansen, J. et al. Assessing ‘‘dangerous climate change’’: required reduction of carbon emissions to protect young people, future generations and nature. PLoS ONE 8, e81648 (2013).

  53. 53.

    Renforth, P. et al. Silicate production and availability for mineral carbonation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 2035–2041 (2011).

  54. 54.

    Nunes, J. M. G., Kautzmann, R. M. & Oliveira, C. Evaluation of the natural fertilizing potential of basalt dust wastes from the mining district of Nova Prata (Brazil). J. Clean. Prod. 84, 649–656 (2014).

  55. 55.

    White, J. W., Holben, F. J. & Jeffries, C. D. The Agricultural Value of Specially Prepared Blast-furnace Slag Report No. 341 (Pennsylvania State College Agricultural Experiment Station, 1937).

  56. 56.

    Yi, H. et al. An overview of utilization of steel slag. Proc. Environ. Sci. 16, 791–801 (2012).

  57. 57.

    Barry, G. A., Price, A. M. & Lynch, P. J. Some implications of the recycling of sugar industry by-products. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 20, 52–55 (1998).

  58. 58.

    Kingston, G. A role for silicon, nitrogen and reduced bulk density in yield responses to mill ash and filter mud/ash mixtures. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 21, 114–121 (1999).

  59. 59.

    Berthelsen, S. et al. Plant cane responses to silicated products in the Mossman, Innisfail and Bundaberg districts. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 23, 297–303 (2001).

  60. 60.

    Bryan, S. E. & Ernst, R. E. Revised definition of Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). Earth Sci. Rev. 86, 175–202 (2008).

  61. 61.

    Montgomery, D. R. Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13268–13272 (2007).

  62. 62.

    Sanderman, J., Hengl, T. & Fiske, G. J. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9575–9580 (2017).

  63. 63.

    Agri-environmental Indicator—Soil Erosion (Eurostat, 2015); http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agri-environmental_indicator_-_soil_erosion

  64. 64.

    Gillman, G. P. The effect of crushed basalt scoria on the cation exchange properties of a highly weathered soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 465–468 (1980).

  65. 65.

    Gillman, G. P., Burkett, D. C. & Coventry, R. J. A laboratory study of application of basalt dust to highly weathered soils: effect on soil cation chemistry. Aust. J. Soil Res. 39, 799–811 (2001).

  66. 66.

    Wright, S. F. & Upadhyaya, A. A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 198, 97–107 (1998).

  67. 67.

    Baldock, J. A. & Skjemstad, J. O. Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Organ. Geochem 31, 697–710 (2000).

  68. 68.

    Lai, R. Beyond Copenhagen: mitigating climate change and achieving food security through soil carbon sequestration. Food Sec. 2, 169–177 (2010).

  69. 69.

    Yu, G. et al. Mineral availability as a key regulator of soil carbon storage. Env. Sci. Tech. 51, 4960–4949 (2017).

  70. 70.

    Minasny, B. et al. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292, 59–86 (2017).

  71. 71.

    Shewry, P. R., Pellny, T. K. & Lovegrove, A. Is modern wheat bad for our health? Nat. Plants 2, 16097 (2016).

  72. 72.

    Guntzer, F., Keller, C. & Meunier, J.-D. Benefits of plant silicon for crops: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 201–213 (2012).

  73. 73.

    Guntzer, F. et al. Long-term removal of wheat straw decreases soil amorphous silica at Broadbalk, Rothamsted. Plant Soil 352, 173–184 (2012).

  74. 74.

    Klotzbücher, T. et al. Plant-available silicon in paddy soils as a key factor for sustainable rice production in Southeast Asia. Basic Appl. Ecol. 16, 665–673 (2015).

  75. 75.

    Tubana, B. S., Babu, T. & Datnoff, L. E. A review of silicon in soils and plants and its role in US agriculture: history and future perspectives. Soil Sci. 181, 393–411 (2016).

  76. 76.

    Mecfel, J. et al. Effect of silicon fertilizers on silicon accumulation in wheat. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 170, 769–772 (2007).

  77. 77.

    Marxen, A. et al. Interaction between silicon cycling and straw decomposition in a silicon deficient rice production system. Plant Soil 398, 153–163 (2016).

  78. 78.

    Vandevenne, F. I. et al. Silicon pools in human impacted soils of temperate zones. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1439–1450 (2015).

  79. 79.

    Leonardos, O. H., Fyfe, W. S. & Kronberg, B. I. The use of ground rocks in laterite systems: an improvement to the use of conventional soluble fertilizers? Chem. Geol. 60, 361–370 (1987).

  80. 80.

    Van Straaten, P. Farming with rocks and minerals: challenges and opportunities. Ann. Braz. Acad. Sci. 78, 731–747 (2006).

  81. 81.

    Anda, M., Shamshuddin, J. & Fauziah, C. I. Improving chemical properties of a highly weathered soil using finely ground basalt rocks. Catena 124, 147–161 (2015).

  82. 82.

    Anda, M., Shamshuddin, J. & Fauziah, C. I. Increasing negative charge and nutrient contents of a highly weathered soil using basalt and rice husk to promote cocoa growth under field conditions. Soil Till. Res. 132, 1–11 (2013).

  83. 83.

    de Villiers, O. D. Soil rejuvenation with crushed basalt in Mauritius. Part I – consistent results of world-wide interest. Int. Sugar J. 63, 363–364 (1961).

  84. 84.

    Albert, R. Untersuchungen über die Verwendbarkeit von Gesteinsabfällen verschiedener Herkunft und Art zur Verbesserung geringwertiger Waldöden. Forstarchiv 14, 237–240 (1938).

  85. 85.

    Albert, R. Untersuchungen über Tiefenwirkung des Vollumbruches und der Basaltdüngung. Forstarchiv 16, 231–232 (1940).

  86. 86.

    Basak, B. B. et al. Bio-intervention of naturally occurring silicate minerals for alternative source of potassium: challenges and opportunities. Adv. Agron. 141, 115–145 (2017).

  87. 87.

    Ma, J. F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 50, 11–18 (2004).

  88. 88.

    Rizwan, M., Meunier, J.-D., Miche, H. & Keller, C. Effect of silicon on reducing cadmium toxicity in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. cv. Claudio W.) grown in a soil with aged contamination. J. Hazard. Mat. 209, 326–334 (2012).

  89. 89.

    Seyfferth, A. L. & Fendorf, S. Silicate mineral impacts on the uptake and storage of arsenic and plant nutrients in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Env. Sci. Technol. 46, 13176–13183 (2012).

  90. 90.

    Ning, D. et al. Impacts of steel-slag-based silicate fertilizer on soil acidity and silicon availability and metals-immobilization in a paddy soil. PLoS ONE 11, e0168163 (2016).

  91. 91.

    Bogdan, K. & Schenk, M. K. Arsenic in rice (Oryza sativa L.) related to dynamics of arsenic and silicic acid in paddy soils. Env. Sci. Technol. 42, 7885–7890 (2008).

  92. 92.

    Greger, M., Kabir, A. H., Landberg, T., Maity, P. J. & Lindberg, S. Silicate reduces cadmium uptake into cells of wheat. Environ. Poll. 211, 90–97 (2016).

  93. 93.

    Ma, J. F. & Yamaji, N. A cooperative system of silicon transport in rice. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 435–442 (2015).

  94. 94.

    Yamaji, N. et al. Orchestration of three transporters and distinct vascular structures in node for intervascular transfer of silicon in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11401–11406 (2015).

  95. 95.

    Van Bockhaven, J., De Vleesschauwer, D. & Höfte, M. Towards establishing broad-spectrum disease resistance in plants: silicon leads the way. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1281–1291 (2013).

  96. 96.

    Alvarenga, R. et al. Induction of resistance of corn plants to Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) by application of silicon and gibberellic acid. Bull. Entomol. Res. 107, 527–533 (2017).

  97. 97.

    Yang, L. et al. Silicon amendment to rice plants impairs sucking behaviors and population growth in the phloem feeder Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Sci. Rep. 7, 1101 (2017).

  98. 98.

    Swarbrick, P. J. et al. Global patterns of gene expression in rice cultivars undergoing a susceptible or resistant interaction with the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica. New Phytol. 179, 515–529 (2008).

  99. 99.

    Mutuku, J. M. et al. The WRKY45-dependent signaling pathway is required for resistance against Striga hermonthica parasitism. Plant Physiol. 168, 1153–1163 (2015).

  100. 100.

    Yoder, J. I. & Scholes, J. D. Host plant resistance to parasitic weeds; recent progress and bottlenecks. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 478–488 (2010).

  101. 101.

    Hamilton, S. K. et al. Evidence for carbon sequestration by agricultural liming. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB2021 (2007).

  102. 102.

    Gibbons, J. M. et al. Sustainable nutrient management at field, farm and regional level: soil testing, nutrient budgets and the trade-off between lime application and greenhouse gas emissions. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 188, 48–56 (2014).

  103. 103.

    Kantola, I. B., Masters, M. D., Wolz, K. J. & DeLucia, E. H. Climate change mitigation through enhanced weathering in bioenergy crops. In American Geophysical Union Fall General Assembly abstract H13B-1358 (American Geophysical Union, 2016).

  104. 104.

    Reay, D. S. et al. Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 410–416 (2012).

  105. 105.

    Sommer, U. et al. Pelagic food web configurations at different levels of nutrient richness and their implications for the ratio fish production: primary production. Hydrobiologia 484, 11–20 (2002).

  106. 106.

    Ragueneau, O., Conley, D. J., Leynaert, A., Longphuirt, S. N. & Slomp, C. P. in The Silicon Cycle: Human Perturbations and Impacts on Aquatic Systems (eds Ittekkot, V. et al.) 163–195 (Island, Washington DC, 2006).

  107. 107.

    Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).

  108. 108.

    The Emissions Gap Report 2017 (United Nations Environment Programme, 2017).

  109. 109.

    Wright, M. J., Teagle, D. A. H. & Feetham, P. M. A quantitative evaluation of the public response to climate engineering. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 106–110 (2014).

  110. 110.

    Pidgeon, N. F. & Spence, E. Perceptions of enhanced weathering as a biological negative emissions option. Biol. Lett. 13, 20170024 (2017).

  111. 111.

    Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/Res/70/1 (United Nations, 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the Leverhulme Trust through a Leverhulme Research Centre Award (RC-2015-029). L.L.T. was supported by an ERC advanced grant awarded to D.J.B. (CDREG, 322998). R. Thorley is thanked for assistance with Fig. 1. We dedicate this paper to the memory of Professor William (Bill) G. Chaloner FRS (1928–2016), a passionate scientific polymath and extraordinary mentor to generations of researchers.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Leverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    • David J. Beerling
    • , Jonathan R. Leake
    • , Julie D. Scholes
    • , Jurriaan Ton
    • , Euripides Kantzas
    • , Lyla L. Taylor
    • , Binoy Sarkar
    •  & Mike Kelland
  2. Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    • Stephen P. Long
    • , Evan DeLucia
    •  & Ilsa Kantola
  3. Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    • Stephen P. Long
    •  & Evan DeLucia
  4. Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

    • Stephen P. Long
  5. College of Science and Engineering and Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

    • Paul N. Nelson
    •  & Michael Bird
  6. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

    • Christoph Müller
  7. Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    • Greg Rau
  8. Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    • James Hansen

Authors

  1. Search for David J. Beerling in:

  2. Search for Jonathan R. Leake in:

  3. Search for Stephen P. Long in:

  4. Search for Julie D. Scholes in:

  5. Search for Jurriaan Ton in:

  6. Search for Paul N. Nelson in:

  7. Search for Michael Bird in:

  8. Search for Euripides Kantzas in:

  9. Search for Lyla L. Taylor in:

  10. Search for Binoy Sarkar in:

  11. Search for Mike Kelland in:

  12. Search for Evan DeLucia in:

  13. Search for Ilsa Kantola in:

  14. Search for Christoph Müller in:

  15. Search for Greg Rau in:

  16. Search for James Hansen in:

Contributions

D.J.B. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with contributions from J.R.L., S.P.L. and J.H. All authors provided input on sections and the addition of appropriate references in later drafts. E.K., L.L.T. and M.K. undertook data analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Beerling.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0108-y

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.