Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

HYPOXIC RESPONSE

First hints of new sensors

Nature Plants volume 3, pages767–768(2017)Cite this article

Subjects

A mechanism by which plants detect and respond to oxygen starvation has been known for some years. Three recent papers suggest that we haven’t been seeing the full picture.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Functional relationships between known and unknown oxygen sensors.

References

  1. 1.

    The Impact of Natural Hazards and Disasters on Agriculture and Food Security and Nutrition (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2015).

  2. 2.

    Kelliher, T. & Walbot, V. Science 337, 345–348 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Abbas, M. et al. Curr. Biol. 25, 1483–1488 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bailey-Serres, J. & Voesenek, L. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 313–339 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Giuntoli, B. et al. Plant Cell Environ. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13037 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Eysholdt-Derzso, E. & Sauter, M. Plant Physiol. 175, 412–423 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang, F., Chen, Z.-H. & Shabala, S. Plant Cell Physiol. 58, 1126–1142 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gibbs, D. J. et al. Nature 479, 415–418 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Licausi, F. et al. Nature 479, 419–422 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gibbs, D. J. et al. Mol. Cell 53, 369–379 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Weits, D. A. et al. Nature Commun. 5, 3425 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kosmacz, M. et al. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 1094–1103 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    van Dongen, J. T. & Licausi, F. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 345–367 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gibbs, D. J. et al. Plant Physiol. 169, 23–31 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Papdi, C. et al. Plant J. 82, 772–784 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK

    Michael J. Holdsworth

Authors
  1. Michael J. Holdsworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Holdsworth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holdsworth, M.J. First hints of new sensors. Nature Plants 3, 767–768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0031-7

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing