Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

HYPOXIC RESPONSE

First hints of new sensors

Nature Plants volume 3, pages 767–768 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

A mechanism by which plants detect and respond to oxygen starvation has been known for some years. Three recent papers suggest that we haven’t been seeing the full picture.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Functional relationships between known and unknown oxygen sensors.

References

  1. The Impact of Natural Hazards and Disasters on Agriculture and Food Security and Nutrition (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2015).

  2. Kelliher, T. & Walbot, V. Science 337, 345–348 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abbas, M. et al. Curr. Biol. 25, 1483–1488 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey-Serres, J. & Voesenek, L. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 313–339 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giuntoli, B. et al. Plant Cell Environ. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13037 (2017).

  6. Eysholdt-Derzso, E. & Sauter, M. Plant Physiol. 175, 412–423 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, F., Chen, Z.-H. & Shabala, S. Plant Cell Physiol. 58, 1126–1142 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbs, D. J. et al. Nature 479, 415–418 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Licausi, F. et al. Nature 479, 419–422 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs, D. J. et al. Mol. Cell 53, 369–379 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Weits, D. A. et al. Nature Commun. 5, 3425 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kosmacz, M. et al. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 1094–1103 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Dongen, J. T. & Licausi, F. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 345–367 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbs, D. J. et al. Plant Physiol. 169, 23–31 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Papdi, C. et al. Plant J. 82, 772–784 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK

    Michael J. Holdsworth

Authors
  1. Michael J. Holdsworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Holdsworth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holdsworth, M.J. First hints of new sensors. Nature Plants 3, 767–768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0031-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0031-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing