Abstract
Plants possess cell surface-localized immune receptors that detect microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and initiate defenses that provide effective resistance against microbial pathogens. Many MAMP-induced signaling pathways and cellular responses are known, yet how pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) limits pathogen growth in plants is poorly understood. Through a combined metabolomics and genetics approach, we discovered that plant-exuded proline is a virulence-inducing signal and nutrient for the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, and that MAMP-induced depletion of proline from the extracellular spaces of Arabidopsis leaves directly contributes to PTI against P. syringae. We further show that MAMP-induced depletion of extracellular proline requires the amino acid transporter Lysine Histidine Transporter 1 (LHT1). This study demonstrates that depletion of a single extracellular metabolite is an effective component of plant induced immunity. Given the important role for amino acids as nutrients for microbial growth, their depletion at sites of infection may be a broadly effective means for defense against many pathogens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
All organisms must detect and defend against pathogens. In both plants and animals, pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) protect against infection by detecting conserved microbial features termed microbe or pathogen associated molecular patterns (M/PAMPs)1,2. In animals, recognition of MAMPs by PRRs activates specialized mobile immune cells that coordinate their functions with local tissues to kill and clear pathogens from infection sites3. In contrast, plants do not possess mobile immune cells that seek out and destroy invading pathogens. Rather, individual cells that constitute plant tissues are capable of directly detecting and mitigating threats locally at sites of infection4. Because many plant pathogens remain outside of host cells during infection, PRR-mediated resistance must be capable of hindering microbial growth within the apoplast, or extracellular space, of plant tissues. In this regard, activation of PRRs triggers apoplast-localized defense responses, including the production of reactive oxygen species, secretion of antimicrobial compounds, and cell wall reinforcement5. Collectively, MAMP-induced defenses provide effective resistance termed MAMP- or pattern-triggered immunity (PTI)4. However, the exact mechanism(s) of how PTI limits pathogen infection of the apoplast remain(s) largely unknown.
Pseudomonas syringae are Gram-negative bacteria that cause disease on economically important crops as well as the model plant Arabidopsis6. P. syringae are primarily foliar pathogens and enter leaves through openings such as stomata or wounds. Once inside, P. syringae can multiply to high levels within the leaf apoplast. A key virulence factor for P. syringae is its type III secretion system (T3SS), a syringe-like apparatus that delivers PTI-suppressing effector proteins into plant cells6. Although the T3SS is critical for virulence, T3SS-encoding genes are not constitutively expressed and must be induced during infection. To this end, P. syringae relies on plant-exuded metabolites, namely sugars and specific amino acids, as signals to induce its T3SS-encoding genes7. P. syringae receptors and signaling pathways required for detecting specific host signals are known, and mutants lacking these signaling components are less virulent7,8,9. On the host side, the extracellular release of T3SS-inducing metabolites by plant cells is genetically-regulated, as evidenced by the discovery of an Arabidopsis mutant lacking MAP KINASE PHOSPHATASE1 (MKP1) that exudes lower amounts of several T3SS-inducing metabolites and as a consequence is more resistant to P. syringae infection10,11. Collectively, these observations reveal that the abundance of virulence-inducing metabolites encountered by P. syringae in plant tissues is an important determinant of infection outcomes.
Pathogenic bacteria must express specific virulence genes to infect a host. As such, the signaling events that initiate the expression of these genes represent a vulnerability that can be targeted by host defenses7. A long-standing observation is that activation of plant immunity can prevent P. syringae from injecting type III effectors into plant cells. In this regard, P. syringae is restricted in its ability to inject effectors into Arabidopsis and tobacco leaf cells pre-treated with MAMPs12. A similar restriction occurs when P. syringae infects MAMP-treated Arabidopsis seedlings10. More recent transcriptome analyses revealed that expression of T3SS-encoding genes is inhibited during P. syringae infection of MAMP-treated Arabidopsis leaves, suggesting that PTI limits P. syringae growth by interfering with T3SS gene induction13,14. In this work we investigated MAMP-induced changes in the metabolic composition of the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast. Our goal was to determine whether any observed changes in metabolite levels within the apoplast may be causal for the MAMP-induced restriction in T3SS deployment by P. syringae.
Results
Pattern-triggered immunity restricts expression of P. syringae type III secretion-encoding genes
We first verified that PTI restricts the expression of T3SS-encoding genes in P. syringae under our experimental conditions. We syringe-infiltrated P. syringae pathovar tomato strain DC3000 (herein DC3000) into Arabidopsis wild-type Col-0 leaves pre-treated for five hours with the MAMP flg22 or a mock treatment, then used immunoblotting to detect the levels of type III effector AvrPto in the infected tissue. AvrPto levels were greatly diminished in flg22-treated leaves infected with DC3000 for five hours (Fig. 1a). The reduced amount of AvrPto was not due to differences in leaf bacteria populations at this early time point (Fig. 1a). We observed identical results with leaves treated with the MAMP elf26, indicating that decreased AvrPto accumulation occurs in response to multiple MAMPs (Fig. 1a). Flg22 and elf26 are recognized by the PRRs FLS2 and EFR, respectively15,16. AvrPto levels were not altered in fls2 or efr mutants pretreated with either flg22 or elf26, respectively, confirming the observed phenotype is receptor-dependent (Fig. 1a).
Plant defense responses including PTI are severely compromised in an Arabidopsis dde2 ein2 pad4 sid2 quadruple knockout (QKO) mutant deficient in the production of defense hormones salicylic acid, ethylene and jasmonic acid17. In contrast to reduced AvrPto accumulation in flg22-treated Col-0 leaves, no decrease in AvrPto abundance was detected in flg22-treated QKO leaves infected with DC3000 (Fig. 1b). We also infiltrated Col-0 and QKO leaves with a DC3000 hrpLpromoter:gfp reporter strain and, based on GFP fluorescence from the infected tissue, observed that expression of T3SS regulator hrpL was significantly decreased in flg22-treated Col-0 leaves, whereas a significant flg22-dependent decrease in hrpL expression did not occur in QKO leaves (Fig. 1c). Indeed, hrpL expression was significantly higher in mock-treated QKO compared to mock-treated Col-0, possibly due to the attenuated response of QKO to endogenous DC3000 MAMPs (Fig. 1c). Together, these results confirm that flg22-and elf26-induced defenses restrict the expression of T3SS genes in P. syringae, and reveal that flg22-induced restriction of T3SS genes does not occur in QKO mutant leaves.
Apoplastic wash fluid from MAMP-treated leaves inhibits P. syringae growth and T3SS deployment
To investigate how PTI restricts T3SS deployment, we isolated apoplastic wash fluid (AWF) from mock- and MAMP-treated Arabidopsis leaves. For this procedure, we syringe-infiltrated leaves with water containing flg22 or the solvent DMSO as a mock control. After eight hours, we then syringe-infiltrated the same leaves with water and used low-speed centrifugation to isolate AWF from the infiltrated leaves (Fig. 2a). Using a malate dehydrogenase (MDH) enzyme assay to detect cytoplasmic proteins, we confirmed that our AWF isolation procedure did not result in substantial cytoplasmic leakage (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, no significant difference in MDH activity between AWF from mock-treated (mock-AWF) or flg22-treated (flg22-AWF) leaves was detected (Fig. 2b).
The leaf apoplast is rapidly alkalinized following MAMP perception18,19. Consistent with these previous observations, the average pH of our mock-AWF samples was 6.17, whereas the average pH of flg22-AWF samples was 6.63 (Fig. 2c). We measured a similar increase in pH between mock- and flg22-AWF from PTI-deficient QKO leaves (Fig. 2c). Based on these data, alkalization of the apoplast is likely not causal for flg22-induced restriction of T3SS genes.
We next tested whether T3SS deployment is altered when P. syringae are cultured in AWF from flg22-treated Col-0 leaves. To alleviate possible pH effects, we mixed the extracted AWF with a phosphate-buffered minimal medium (MM). The added MM was sufficient to adjust the pH of both mock-AWF and flg22-AWF to 6.0 (Fig. S1a). We then cultured DC3000 hrpLpromoter:gfp in the buffered AWF and, based on GFP fluorescence, observed significantly decreased hrpL expression in bacteria cultured in flg22-AWF compared to mock-AWF (Fig. 2d). To further investigate this difference in AWF bioactivity, we chloroform-extracted mock-AWF and flg22-AWF, lyophilized the resulting aqueous and organic phases to dryness, then resuspended the dried samples directly into MM. We cultured DC3000 hrpLpromoter:gfp in these extracted samples and observed that nearly all of the hrpL-inducing activity was present in the aqueous fraction (Fig. S1b). Furthermore, decreased hrpL-inducing activity of flg22-AWF relative to mock-AWF was evident in the aqueous but not in the organic fractions (Fig. S1b). Immunoblot detection of AvrPto in the treated bacteria confirmed the difference in bioactivity of aqueous mock- and flg22-AWF fractions (Fig. 2e). We also incubated DC3000 hrpLpromoter:gfp in mock-AWF and flg22-AWF isolated from QKO leaves. In contrast to AWF from Col-0 leaves, no significant decrease in hrpL-inducing activity was detected between mock-AWF and flg22-AWF isolated from QKO leaves (Fig. 2f).
In addition to T3SS induction, we also tested for DC3000 growth in AWF. Similar to the pattern for hrpL expression, DC3000 grew in mock-AWF from Col-0 leaves, and this growth was significantly reduced in flg22-AWF from Col-0 leaves (Fig. 2g). After chloroform extraction of AWF samples, the growth-stimulating activity in AWF was present in only the aqueous fraction (Fig. S1c, d). No difference in bacterial growth was observed for DC3000 cultured in mock- and flg22-AWF from QKO plants (Fig. 2g). Based on these results, we conclude that the aqueous phase of AWF isolated from flg22-treated Col-0 leaves has decreased T3SS- and bacterial growth-inducing activity.
Metabolomics analysis of apoplastic wash fluid from flg22-treated Arabidopsis leaves
To determine the molecular basis for the decreased T3SS-inducing activity of flg22-AWF, we used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to profile flg22-induced changes in the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast metabolome. From samples collected in eight independent experiments, we identified a total of 96 features from both mock- and flg22-AWF, 62 of which could be identified based on comparisons of peak retention times and mass spectra to entries in the FiehnLib library20. Based on p < 0.05 and >2 fold-change cutoffs, four features increased and six decreased in flg22-AWF compared to mock-AWF (Fig. 3a). Notably, the defense hormone salicylic acid increased 13-fold in flg22-AWF, thus confirming that defense responses were elicited in flg22-treated leaves21. We grouped the identified metabolites into categories of amino acids (Fig. 3b), organic acids (Fig. 3c) and sugars (Fig. 3d). Despite surprisingly few changes overall, significant differences in metabolite abundance between mock- and flg22-AWF occurred in each of these three categories. Notably, threonic acid was the only sugar that differentially accumulated between treatments, increasing four-fold in flg22-AWF. We also profiled metabolites present in mock-AWF and flg22-AWF collected from QKO leaves (Fig. 3e). Of those metabolites that significantly changed in abundance in flg22-AWF from Col-0 leaves, only threonic acid and succinic acid also significantly accumulated in flg22-AWF from QKO (Fig. 3f), indicating that flg22-induced accumulation of these two metabolites is not causal for decreased T3SS-inducing bioactivity of flg22-AWF.
We next measured the absolute concentrations of metabolites that differentially accumulated in AWF in response to flg22 treatment. In mock-AWF, all of these metabolites were detected at concentrations <20 μM except for proline and serine that were present at 120 μM and 194 μM, respectively (Fig. 4a, S2a, b). We then tested each of these metabolites for hrpL-inducing activity at their measured concentrations. Only proline and serine significantly induced hrpL expression (Fig. 4b and S2c). Based on the abundance and T3SS-inducing activity of proline and serine, we hypothesized that decreased abundance of these specific amino acids is causal for the decreased T3SS-inducing bioactivity of flg22-AWF. We focused on proline because, compared to serine, proline was a more potent inducer of hrpL expression (Fig. S2c) and showed the greatest flg22-dependent fold-change of all metabolites except for salicylic acid (Fig. 3a). We added 100 μM of proline, a similar concentration to the ~90 μM difference in proline between mock- and flg22-AWF (Fig. 4a), to both mock- and flg22-AWF. The added proline restored hrpL expression in flg22-AWF back to levels observed with mock-AWF (Fig. 4c). Moreover, adding proline to the flg22-AWF partially yet significantly restored DC3000 growth to levels measured in mock-AWF (Fig. 4d). Together these results revealed that decreased proline contributed to the reduced T3SS- and growth-inducing activity of flg22-AWF.
Flg22 stimulates an increased rate of proline removal from the leaf apoplast
We next examined whether flg22 treatment alters the rate of proline depletion from the apoplast of Arabidopsis leaves. As a first step, we infiltrated a solution of 500 μM 13C-labelled proline and 164 μM ribitol as an internal standard into naïve Col-0 leaves, and used GC-MS to measure the abundance of 13C-proline and ribitol in AWF isolated from the infiltrated leaves. 13C-proline and endogenous 12C-proline were clearly differentiated based on shifts in mass spectra peaks (Fig. S3a). 13C-proline levels in AWF rapidly decreased over a 40 min time course, whereas levels of ribitol remained unchanged (Fig. 5a). A similar rate of 13C-proline depletion was observed in AWF from leaves detached from the rosette, thus ruling out long distance vascular transport contributing to 13C-proline depletion, though these data do not rule out local uptake of 13C-proline into vascular tissues (Fig. S3b). We then examined the rate of 13C-proline depletion from the apoplast of Col-0 and QKO leaves pre-treated with flg22 for six hours. In comparison to mock-AWF from Col-0 leaves, the levels of 13C- proline in flg22-AWF from Col-0 leaves were significantly reduced by more than 35% at both 20 and 40 min post-infiltration (Fig. 5b). In comparison, no significant difference in 13C-proline levels was observed between mock-AWF and flg22-AWF isolated from QKO leaves at any time point (Fig. 5c).
PutA is required for P. syringae T3SS gene expression and virulence during infection of Arabidopsis
Proline utilization A (PutA) is a bacterial enzyme that catabolizes proline to glutamate (Fig. 6a)22. The expression of putA is induced by environmental proline23. To monitor proline perception by DC3000, we fused the promoter sequence of putA upstream of gfp and introduced this reporter construct into DC3000 to generate a DC3000 putApromoter:gfp strain. We first tested the specificity of putA expression by culturing DC3000 putApromoter:gfp in M9 medium supplemented with individual amino acids. Importantly, proline was the only amino acid tested that significantly induced putA expression (Fig. S4a). Using putA expression as a proxy for the levels of environmental proline, we cultured DC3000 putApromoter:gfp in AWF samples and confirmed that flg22-AWF has decreased putA-inducing activity compared to mock-AWF (Fig. S4b). To assess proline levels within the leaf apoplast, we syringe-infiltrated DC3000 putApromoter:gfp into mock- and flg22-treated Arabidopsis leaves. Based on GFP fluorescence from the infiltrated leaf tissue, putA was rapidly induced in mock-treated leaves with significant induction detected 4.5 h after infiltration (Fig. S4c). In comparison, putA expression in flg22-treated leaves was significantly lower (Fig. S4d). Together, these results indicate that DC3000 encounters proline within the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast and that apoplastic proline levels are lower in flg22-treated tissue.
We next deleted putA from the DC3000 genome and tested the resulting ΔputA mutant strain for altered proline-induced responses and virulence. Similar to proline-specific expression of putA, DC3000ΔputA was unable to use proline as a growth substrate, but its ability to use other amino acids as growth substrates was unaffected (Fig. 6b, c). To assess the role of putA in T3SS induction, we introduced a hrpLpromoter:gfp reporter plasmid into DC3000ΔputA and cultured the resulting ΔputA hrpLpromoter:gfp strain in MM supplemented with proline or other known T3SS-inducing metabolites including aspartic acid and citric acid9,10. The induction of hrpL in response to proline, but not other T3SS-inducing metabolites, was completely compromised in DC3000ΔputA (Fig. 6d). Next, we infiltrated DC3000 and DC3000ΔputA individually into Arabidopsis Col-0 leaf tissue, and detected significantly decreased AvrPto abundance and decreased bacterial growth in DC3000ΔputA-infected tissue (Fig. 6e, f). We also isolated a DC3000 putA::Tn5 strain and confirmed that the observed phenotypes are due to loss of putA (Fig. S4e–h). Taken together, these data show that proline is a T3SS-inducing signal within the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast and is essential for maximal DC3000 T3SS deployment and growth during infection.
Arabidopsis prot2 leaves have elevated levels of apoplastic proline and are more susceptible to P. syringae infection
We hypothesized that flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline may be due to altered activity of one or more plasma membrane-localized amino acid transporters. Among possible candidates, the transporters ProT1, ProT2 and ProT3 are known to transport proline, gamma-aminobutyric acid and glycine betaine24. We used GC-MS to measure proline levels in AWF isolated from leaves of Arabidopsis mutants lacking functional ProT1, ProT2 or ProT3 genes. Four-fold higher levels of proline were detected in AWF from prot2-3 leaves but not in AWF from prot1-1 or prot3-2 leaves (Fig. 7a and Fig. S5a). To confirm that prot2-3 leaves have increased levels of apoplastic proline, we infiltrated Col-0 and prot2-3 leaves with DC3000 putApromoter:gfp and detected significantly higher levels of putA expression in the infected prot2-3 tissue (Fig. 7b).
Next, we assessed the impact of increased apoplastic proline in prot2-3 leaves on DC3000 T3SS deployment and virulence. In DC3000-infected prot2-3 leaves we detected significantly higher levels of hrpL expression, AvrPto accumulation and bacterial growth (Fig. 7c, d and Fig. S5b). Increased DC3000 growth also occurred in leaves of a mutant carrying an alternate non-functional prot2-1 allele (Fig. S5d). In contrast, increased bacterial growth was not observed in DC3000-infected prot1-1 or prot3-2 (Fig. S5c). A similar increase in bacterial growth did not occur in prot2-3 leaves infected with DC3000ΔputA (Fig. 7e), indicating that increased apoplastic proline is indeed causal for the enhanced virulence of DC3000 in prot2 leaves. Together, these data reveal that ProT2 negatively regulates the levels of apoplastic proline in naïve Arabidopsis leaves, and demonstrate that apoplastic proline is a key virulence-inducing signal for DC30000 during infection.
In Arabidopsis, ProT2 is rapidly induced by flg22 treatment25, suggesting a possible role for ProT2 in flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline. However, flg22-dependent decrease in apoplastic proline and inhibition of DC3000 growth remained intact in prot2-3/prot3-2 and prot2-3 leaves, respectively (Fig. 7f, g). Furthermore, increased 13C proline uptake occurred in flg22-treated prot2-3 leaves (Fig. 7h). Based on these data, we conclude that ProT2 is not required for flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline.
The Arabidopsis amino acid transporter LHT1 is required for flg22-triggered depletion of apoplastic proline
We hypothesized that a transporter other than ProT2 may be responsible for the observed flg22-dependent depletion of apoplastic proline. We focused our efforts on LYSINE HISTIDINE TRANSPORTER 1 (LHT1), a plasma membrane-localized protein that transports neutral and acidic amino acids including proline into Arabidopsis mesophyll cells26,27,28,29. LHT1 is transcriptionally induced by biotic and abiotic stressors including flg22 treatment25,29. First, we measured proline levels in AWF isolated from leaves of a loss-of-function lht1-7 mutant treated with flg22 or a mock solution. In contrast to the flg22-induced reduction in apoplastic proline in Col-0 leaves, we detected no significant difference in apoplastic proline levels between mock- and flg22-treated lht1-7 leaves (Fig. 8a). We observed the same phenotype with lht1-5, a mutant carrying an alternative loss-of-function allele (Fig. S6b). Using 13C-proline to directly assess the rate of proline depletion, we found that the flg22-induced depletion observed in Col-0 leaves did not occur in lht1-7 leaves (Fig. 8b). To determine if the lack of apoplastic proline depletion in lht1-7 impacts the expression of T3SS genes in DC3000, we incubated DC3000 hrpLpromoter:gfp in AWF from mock or flg22-treated Col-0 and lht1-7 leaves. No significant difference in hrpL expression was observed in DC3000 incubated in AWF from mock or flg22-treated lht1-7 leaves (Fig. 8c). Together, these data show that LHT1 is required for flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline.
We hypothesized that LHT1-mediated depletion of apoplastic proline directly contributes to PTI against P. syringae infection. To test this hypothesis, we measured the growth of DC3000 and DC3000ΔputA in mock- and flg22-treated Col-0 and lht1-7 leaves. Because DC3000ΔputA is specifically compromised in its ability to respond to proline (Fig. 6), the growth of this mutant relative to DC3000 provides a measure of apoplastic proline levels in infected leaf tissue and its impact on P. syringae virulence. Our hypothesis predicts three outcomes of these infection assays. First, because apoplastic proline is depleted in Col-0 in response to flg22, DC3000 and DC3000ΔputA should grow to similar levels in flg22-treated Col-0 leaves. Indeed, in flg22-treated Col-0 leaves, growth of DC3000 and DC3000ΔputA was indistinguishable (Fig. 8d, gray color). Second, because flg22 treatment does not alter levels of apoplastic proline in lht1-7 leaves (Fig. 8a), sufficient levels of proline should remain in flg22-treated lht1-7 leaves to function as a T3SS-inducing signal and promote DC3000 growth. Consistent with this prediction, in flg22-treated lht1-7 leaves, DC3000 grew to significantly higher levels than DC3000ΔputA (Fig. 8d, green color). Third, the magnitude of flg22-induced suppression of DC3000 growth should be smaller in lht1-7 plants if proline depletion from the apoplast contributes to PTI. In this regard, the effect size of flg22 treatment on DC3000 growth was significantly smaller in lht1-7 leaves compared to Col-0 leaves (Fig. 8d, Δ1 vs. Δ2, inset). For DC3000ΔputA-infected plants, the presence or absence of LHT1 did not significantly impact the effect size of flg22 treatment (Fig. 8d, Δ3 vs. Δ4, inset), indicating that the contribution of LHT1 to PTI is linked to the presence of putA in DC3000.
Arabidopsis mutants lacking LHT1 have constitutively increased salicylic acid-dependent resistance to P. syringae30 and this enhanced resistance was observed in our experiments (Fig. 8d). To address whether SA is required for the contribution of LHT1 to PTI against DC3000, we first measured apoplastic proline levels in mock- and flg22-treated leaves of Col-0 and an SA-deficient sid2-1 mutant. No significant difference in flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline was observed in sid2-1 compared to Col-0 (Fig. 8e). We then measured the growth of DC3000 in mock- and flg22-treated leaves of sid2-1 and an lht1-7 sid2-1 double mutant. DC3000 grew to similar levels in leaves of mock-treated sid2-1 and lht1-7 sid2-1 plants, confirming that constitutive resistance of lht1 to P. syringae is SA-dependent (Fig. 8f). In contrast, in flg22-treated leaves, DC3000 grew to significantly higher levels in lht1-7 sid2-1 compared to sid2-1 (Fig. 8f), indicating that LHT1 contributes to PTI in the absence of SA. These data are consistent with our observation that LHT1-dependent removal of proline is SA-independent (Fig. 8e). Based on these results, we conclude that LHT1-dependent removal of apoplastic proline directly contributes to flg22-induced PTI against P. syringae infection. Importantly, flg22 treatment significantly decreased the growth of DC3000 in lht1-7 sid2-1 leaves (Fig. 8f). Therefore, additional LHT1- and SA-independent factors must contribute to flg22-induced resistance.
Discussion
Pathogenic microbes deploy virulence factors to suppress host defenses and establish a habitable niche. In many cases, the production of virulence factors is induced by signals from the host environment7. Here, we investigated how flg22-induced changes in the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast restricts P. syringae from producing its T3SS. Through a combined metabolomics and genetics approach, we discovered that flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline, mediated by the amino acid transporter LHT1, directly contributes to restriction of the P. syringae T3SS and PTI against P. syringae infection. These results uncover a mechanism of plant disease resistance, whereby depletion of a single extracellular metabolite, rather than accumulation of antimicrobial compounds or increased physical barriers, effectively limits the virulence of a bacterial pathogen.
Proline is involved in many cellular processes including regulation of osmotic pressure, redox potential and nutrient availability31,32. In plants, proline can be synthesized de novo or acquired from the soil, and can be transported through the vasculature, where its accumulation in specific tissues is intricately linked to developmental stage and nutrient status33. It is well established that proline accumulates in plant tissues in response to many biotic and abiotic stresses, primarily due to increased biosynthesis in stressed cells34. Yet, less is known about how levels of extracellular proline are regulated. Our data reveal that proline levels within the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast are highly dynamic and controlled by complex processes. In mock-treated leaf tissue, our 13C-proline probe was rapidly depleted within one hour from the apoplast of Col-0 leaves (Fig. 5a). Depletion of 13C-proline also occurred in mock-treated prot2 and lht1 leaves (Fig. S3c, d), suggesting ProT2 and LHT1 may act partially or redundantly to modulate apoplastic proline levels, or that additional membrane transporters may also contribute to proline uptake. In mock-treated tissue, loss of PROT2 but not LHT1 increased the total levels of apoplastic proline (Figs. 7a and 8a). These differences may be due to the relative affinities and/or transport rates of PROT2 and LHT1 for proline, or possibly altered activity of yet-to-be-identified efflux transporters responsible for loading proline into the apoplastic space.
In flg22-treated leaves we detected decreased levels of apoplastic proline as well as increased rates of 13C-proline depletion, and both of these phenotypes were completely dependent on LHT1 (Fig. 8a, b). Furthermore, flg22-induced restriction of DC3000 growth was significantly compromised in lht1 mutant leaves (Fig. 8d). These results suggest that MAMP perception may alter LHT1 abundance and/or transport activity, resulting in increased proline uptake. In this regard, LHT1 transcripts accumulate within 30 min after flg22 treatment (Fig. S6a)25, and this increase likely results in more LHT1 at the plasma membrane. However, in a previous study, constitutive over-expression of LHT1 did not decrease proline levels within the Arabidopsis leaf apoplast29. Therefore, increased LHT1 transcription may be insufficient to stimulate increased proline uptake. Alternatively, LHT1 activity may be post-translationally regulated, perhaps similar to phosphorylation-dependent regulation of NADPH oxidase RBOHD and sugar transporter STP13 by flg22-stimulated kinases35,36.
Arabidopsis mutants lacking LHT1 have increased salicylic acid-dependent resistance to P. syringae (Fig. 8d)30. Mutants lacking immune signaling components often have constitutive defense phenotypes37,38,39,40, in some cases due to activation of intracellular immune receptors that “guard” immune signaling pathways, as exemplified by CSA1/CHS3 monitoring of the BAK1-BIR3 complex41,42,43. Because LHT1 contributes to PTI, it may be guarded in a similar manner. Heightened resistance of lht1 may also be due to altered cellular redox status30. Regardless of the underlying mechanism(s) for constitutively elevated resistance, in lht1 leaves we detected a significant decrease in the magnitude of flg22-induced inhibition of DC3000 growth (Fig. 8d). Furthermore, our experiments with SA-deficient sid2 and sid2 lht1 mutants revealed that LHT1 significantly contributes to PTI against DC3000 infection even in the absence of SA (Fig. 8f). Together, these data demonstrate that LHT1 functions in resistance against DC3000 in two genetically distinct ways. First, in the absence of any MAMP pre-treatment, LHT1 negatively regulates SA-mediated defenses. Second, in MAMP-treated leaves, LHT1 positively regulates a portion of PTI that is SA-independent. These conclusions, based on DC3000 growth data, are consistent with our observation that depletion of apoplastic proline in response to flg22 is SA-independent (Fig. 8e).
Flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline was completely compromised in the QKO mutant (Fig. 3e, f). Among the four genes that are mutated in QKO, DDE2 and EIN2 are required for JA- and ethylene-dependent responses, respectively, whereas PAD4 is involved both SA-dependent and -independent defense signaling44,45,46,47,48. Because flg22-induced depletion of apoplastic proline was intact in sid2 leaves, loss of DDE2, EIN2 or PAD4 individually may be causal for loss of apoplastic proline depletion in flg22-treated QKO leaves. Alternatively, PTI is robust to single mutant perturbation due to compensatory signaling through hormone-mediated defense pathways17,49. Therefore, SA, JA, ethylene, and PAD4 signaling sectors may coordinately regulate LHT1-dependent proline depletion. In future experiments, measuring apoplastic proline levels in flg22-treated leaves of mutants carrying higher order combinations of sid2, dde2, ein2 and pad4 mutant alleles may provide important clues about PRR-activated signaling pathways that regulate LHT1 activity.
The importance of host-derived proline for bacterial virulence has been previously demonstrated for both plant and animal pathogens32,50,51. For entomopathogenic Photorhabdus, high proline levels encountered within the insect hemolymph stimulates the production of virulence factors including insecticidal toxins52, whereas for plant pathogenic Agrobacterium, host-derived proline in infected tissues promotes quorum sensing and the inter-bacterial exchange of virulence plasmids50,51. In DC3000, the requirement of putA for proline-induced hrpL expression suggests proline catabolism may be necessary for proline induction of the T3SS. In all organisms, proline is catabolized to glutamate which, in turn, can be converted to the TCA cycle intermediate α-ketoglutarate53. In many Gram-negative bacteria including pseudomonads, PutA catalyzes both of the enzymatic steps necessary to catabolize proline to glutamate53. Here we show that loss of putA in DC3000 completely abolishes proline-induced expression of hrpL and reduces DC3000 virulence (Fig. 6). Based on the predicted enzymatic functions of PutA, it is possible that one or both of the catabolites produced by PutA, rather than proline itself, may be T3SS-inducing signals. Alternatively, DC3000 PutA possesses a predicted DNA-binding domain that may directly or indirectly regulate the expression of T3SS-encoding genes. In support of this possibility, PutA in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum directly binds to the promoter of virulence-associated gene epsA and upregulates epsA expression in a proline-dependent manner54.
In addition to proline, other metabolites such as aspartate and glutamate9,10, as well as simple sugars such as fructose8,55, also induce T3SS genes in DC3000 and were detected in our AWF samples (Fig. 3). Similar to phenotypes of DC3000 ΔputA, DC3000 mutants that are less responsive to these host metabolite signals are also less virulent8,9. Together, these observations suggest that, in naïve leaf tissue, DC3000 encounters a mixture of T3SS-inducing metabolites, with each metabolite quantitatively contributing to observed levels of T3SS induction and virulence (Fig. S7). In support of this model, a proline-insensitive DC3000 ΔputA strain is more virulent than a T3SS-deficient DC3000 hrcC- strain (Fig. S4i), indicating that additional proline-independent signals must be present in the apoplast. In our metabolomics analysis, the abundance of T3SS-inducing aspartate, glutamate and simple sugars did not change in the apoplast in response to flg22 treatment (Fig. 3). These metabolites are likely responsible for residual T3SS inducing activity observed in flg22-AWF (Fig. 4c). Despite the presence of these additional T3SS-inducing signals, we propose that depletion of proline from the apoplast is sufficient to decrease the magnitude of T3SS induction below a threshold level required for maximal virulence (Fig. S7).
Previous studies have investigated the role of extracellular amino acids and sugars in PTI. Flg22-treated Arabidopsis seedlings had enhanced uptake of glucose and fructose36, and exuded lower amounts of sixteen amino acids56. These changes in sugars and amino acids required STP13 and LHT1, respectively36,56. Additionally, Arabidopsis mkp1 seedlings and MAMP-treated Arabidopsis suspension cell cultures exuded lower levels of many metabolites including several T3SS-inducing organic acids and amino acids10,57. In this study we did not observe similar large-scale changes in amino acid and sugar levels within the apoplast of flg22-treated leaves, suggesting that MAMP-induced changes to the exometabolome of seedlings and suspension cells are distinct from those that occur within the leaf apoplast. Though, a caveat to this conclusion is that the single time point in our metabolomics analysis likely does not capture the full spectrum of MAMP-induced changes that occur. In this regard, a recent study reported that nine different amino acids significantly accumulated within the apoplast of Arabidopsis leaves 24 h after flg22 treatment58. Because high concentrations of amino acids can repress T3SS genes in P. syringae, the authors concluded that increased amino acid levels within the apoplast contributes to flg22-induced T3SS repression and PTI58. However, these late-occurring changes are unlikely to be causal for T3SS repressive environment that is established within ten hours after MAMP perception (Fig. 1)12. Additionally, in light of recent evidence that some type III effectors promote the extracellular release of nutritive metabolites59,60, it is not clear why increasing the amino acid levels within the apoplast would be an effective mechanism of resistance. A detailed time course analysis of MAMP-induced changes to the metabolic composition of the apoplast, including during P. syringae infection, will be necessary to understand the full scope of metabolic changes that occur.
The primary objective of this study was to understand how PTI restricts T3SS deployment. From this perspective, our data fully support a model wherein depletion of apoplastic proline as a T3SS-inducing signal directly contributes to PTI against P. syringae. However, our data also reveal that proline is likely a nutrient for P. syringae during infection (Fig. 4d), and it is clear from our experiments with DC3000 ΔputA that proline catabolism and T3SS gene induction are intricately linked (Fig. 6). Because of these intertwined functions, it is not possible to discern from our data whether loss of proline as a nutrient source also contributes to decreased growth of DC3000 in MAMP-treated tissues. For many pathogens, successful infection requires a period of rapid pathogen growth that is fueled by host-produced nutrients61,62. Thus, it is logical that restricting access to nutrients in the apoplast could be an effective means to limit infection by many pathogens, as previously proposed10,26,29,61,63. In addition to PTI, effector-triggered immunity (ETI) also restricts P. syringae from delivering type III effectors64, and a recent study reported that LHT1 is required for ETI initiated by RPS2 recognition of effector AvrRpt265. Whether LHT1-mediated changes to the apoplast metabolome also contribute to ETI will be important to address in future work. From a broader perspective, nutrient exchange is fundamental to plant-microbe symbioses, including those with non-pathogenic endophytes66. Furthermore, plant innate immunity and the establishment of communities of plant microbiota appear to be intimately linked67,68. In this light, whether PRR-mediated restriction of apoplastic proline impacts plant-associated commensal and beneficial microbes, as well as diseases caused by other pathogenic microbes, is an interesting question for future research.
Methods
Preparation of peptide stocks
Flg22 and elf26 peptides were synthesized by Genscript and stored at −20 °C as 1 mM stocks in DMSO.
Plant material and growth conditions
Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized, stratified and sown on the surface of MS agar as described previously10. The seeds were placed in a Percival CU41L4 growth chamber with environmental conditions set to 40% light strength, 22.5 °C/21 °C day/night temperatures, and a 10 h day cycle. After 10 days, seedlings were transplanted to Sunshine Mix soil (Sun Gro Horticulture) and grown for 3 to 4 weeks in the same Percival chamber under the same environmental conditions. The fls2 (SALK_093905)69, efr-2 (SALK_068675)16, dde2 ein2 pad4 sid217, lht1-5 (SALK_115555C)30, lht1-7 (SALK_083700C)30 and sid2-146 alleles are in the Col-0 ecotype background. The lht1-7 sid2-1 mutant was generated by crossing of lht1-7 and sid2-1. The homozygous lht1-7 sid2-1 mutant was identified in the F2 generation by PCR genotyping for wild-type and mutant alleles. The prot1 (SALK_018050), prot2-3 (SALK_067508), and prot3-2 (SALK_083340) mutants are in the Col-0 background, and the prot2-2 (CSJ1230) mutant is in the Wassilewskija ecotype background70.
Construction of GFP transcriptional reporter plasmids
Construction of the reporter plasmid hrpLpromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT was described previously57. To construct the putApromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT reporter plasmid. the oligonucleotides 5’-actctagaggatccccGTTGTTGGTGGAGCGATAC-3’ and 5’- ttcgagctcggtacccGTATTGTCCTCATTGTAGCCAC-3’ were used to PCR amplify a DNA fragment corresponding to 643 bp upstream of the DC3000 putA coding region, and the Gibson assembly method used to clone the amplified PCR product into SmaI-digested pProbe-NT.
Generation of DC3000 ΔputA and putA::Tn5 mutants
The DC3000 putA deletion mutant was generated by suicide vector-mediated allelic exchange. Oligonucleotides 5’-ttcgagctcggtacccCAGGCCGGACATGTAGATAG-3’, 5’-atcatcctatcgtcatAGTGGTGGTGGCCATGTATTG-3’, 5’-catggccaccaccactATGACGATAGGATGATGCGATAG-3’ and 5’-actctagaggatccccGCTGGCAGATGACAAATACG-3’ were used to PCR amplify two ~750 bp DNA fragments corresponding to regions immediately upstream and downstream of the putA coding sequence. The Gibson method was used to assemble the two fragments into SmaI-digested pK18mobsacB. The assembled plasmid was introduced into DC3000 by triparental mating and a double recombinant ΔputA strain isolated as described previously9. The putA::Tn5 mutant strain was identified from a collection of DC3000 strains that were randomly mutagenized by transposon Tn5 as described previously8. The Tn5 insertion site was confirmed by PCR-based genotyping.
Preparation of P. syringae inoculum
P. syringae pv tomato DC3000 strains were maintained at −80 °C as frozen suspensions in 20% glycerol. Prior to use, the bacteria were streaked onto a modified King’s B (KB) medium8 solidified with 1.5% agar and supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics for both strain and plasmid selection. For experiments that included Tn5::putA or ΔputA strains, the bacteria were grown on KB agar for two days at room temperature, then inoculated into 40 mL of KB broth supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics. The starting optical density at λ = 600 nm (OD600) of the cultures was 0.1. The cultures were placed into a 250 rpm shaking incubator at 28 °C for 7 h, then centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min. After discarding the supernatant, the pelleted bacteria were washed in one mL of sterile H2O prior to use. For experiments that did not include DC3000 Tn5::putA or ΔputA strains, the bacteria were grown on KB agar for two days at room temperature, scraped off the surface of the agar plate, resuspended in one mL of sterile water, and washed three times with sterile water prior to use.
GFP transcriptional reporter assays
Measurements of GFP fluorescence from liquid cultures of DC3000 carrying hrpLpromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT or putApromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT reporter plasmids was done as described previously9. For measurements of hrpL and putA expression in DC3000-infected leaf tissue, a needle-less syringe was used to infiltrate fully expanded leaves of 4- to 5-week-old plants with sterile H2O containing either 100 nM flg22 or a DMSO control. After five hours, the same leaves were syringe-infiltrated with an OD600 = 0.5 inoculum of DC3000 carrying hrpLpromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT, putApromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT, or an empty vector pProbe-NT plasmid. After three hours, twelve 0.3 cm2 leaf disks were excised from tissue infected with each strain and GFP fluorescence from each leaf disk measured as described previously8.
Detection of AvrPto in P. syringae-infected leaf tissue
Fully expanded leaves of 4- to 5-week-old plants were syringe-infiltrated with sterile water containing either 100 nM flg22, 100 nM elf26 or an equivalent amount of DMSO as a solvent only control. Five hours after infiltration, the same leaves were syringe-infiltrated with an OD600 = 0.5 solution of DC3000. After five hours, four 0.3 cm2 leaf disks were collected from infected tissue and frozen at −80 °C. Immunoblot detection of AvrPto in the collected leaf tissue was done as described previously10.
Measurement of DC3000 growth in Arabidopsis leaves
For measurement of DC3000 growth in planta, a needle-less syringe was used to infiltrate an OD600 = 0.001 solution of DC3000 into fully expanded leaves of a 4- to 5-week-old Arabidopsis plants. DC3000 levels in the infected tissue were measured by serial dilution plating of leaf extracts as described previously71.
Isolation of apoplastic wash fluid from Arabidopsis leaves
Apoplastic wash fluid (AWF) was isolated from leaves of 5- to 6-week-old Arabidopsis plants treated with flg22 or a mock control. To initiate MAMP responses, a needle-less syringe was used to infiltrate leaves with a solution of 100 nM flg22 in water, or with DMSO in water as a negative control. Six to eight leaves were infiltrated on each plant, and a total of six plants were infiltrated for each treatment. After eight hours, AWF was isolated by syringe-infiltrating the mock- and flg22-treated leaves with sterile H2O containing 164 µM ribitol. Immediately after infiltration, the aerial portion of the plant was removed by cutting the primary stem and briefly washed with H2O to remove surface contaminants. The infiltrated leaves were detached from the rosette and stacked between layers of parafilm. The parafilm booklet of leaves was wrapped with tape and suspended inside a 15 mL conical centrifuge tube. The tube was centrifuged at 750 x g for seven minutes. The AWF that collected at the bottom of the tube was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, then centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube. After addition of 50 µL of chloroform, the samples were vortexed for 10 seconds and centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. The upper aqueous phase was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and the volume recovered was measured with a pipette. The AWF samples were then lyophilized to dryness and stored at −80 °C. Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) activity in AWF was measured as described previously72. To separate the contents of AWF into water- and chloroform-soluble fractions, 50 μL of chloroform was added to 300 µL of isolated AWF. The mixture was briefly vortexed and centrifuged at 21,000 x g. The resulting aqueous and organic phases were transferred to separate tubes, frozen at −80 °C, lyophilized to dryness, and resuspended in 300 µL of sterile H2O.
Measurements of P. syringae T3SS deployment and growth in apoplastic wash fluid
Lyophilized apoplastic wash fluid (AWF) was resuspended in a minimal medium (MM) [10 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 (pH 6.0), 7.5 mM (NH4)2SO4, 3.3 mM MgCl2, 1.7 mM NaCl] to the original volume of AWF prior to lyophilization. For measurements of AvrPto abundance, 180 μL of the resuspended AWF was combined with 20 µL of an OD600 = 1.0 solution of DC3000 within a single well of a 24 well polystyrene assay plate. The assay plate was incubated at room temperature on a shaking platform rotating at 130 rpm. After 6 h, the bacteria were transferred into a microcentrifuge tube and pelleted by centrifugation at 21,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and the bacterial pellet was frozen in liquid nitrogen. Immunoblot detection of AvrPto in the pelleted bacteria was done as described previously10. For measurements of hrpL and putA promoter activity and DC3000 growth in AWF, 40 μL of the resuspended AWF and 10 μL of an OD600 = 0.5 solution of DC3000 carrying either hrpLpromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT, putApromoter:gfp::pProbe-NT or empty:gfp::pProbe-NT were mixed within a single well of a 384 well assay plate. A Tecan Spark 10 M plate reader was used to measure GFP fluorescence and OD600 of the cultures in each well as described previously9. GFP fluorescence measurements were first normalized to Abs600 and then to fluorescence from wells containing a DC3000 empty:gfp::pProbe-NT strain under the same treatment conditions.
Measurement of P. syringae growth in defined media
Growth of P. syringae in defined liquid media was measured in a 96-well plate format. A volume of 90 µL of KB broth, a modified M9 minimal medium9 lacking glucose and ammonium chloride, or the same modified M9 minimal medium supplemented with 10 mM of an individual amino acid was mixed with 10 µL of an OD600 = 1.0 inoculum of DC3000, DC3000 ΔputA or DC3000 putA::Tn5. A Tecan Spark 10 M plate reader was used to take OD600 measurements of cultures in each well every 30 min. Between readings, the plate was shaken at 216 rpm and maintained at ambient temperature within the plate reader. A humidity cassette was used to limit evaporation from plate wells during the timecourse.
GC-MS detection of metabolites in apoplastic wash fluid
For each sample, a 20 µL aliquot of the aqueous phase from chloroform-extracted AWF was lyophilized to dryness and resuspended in 10 µL of 30 mg/mL methoxyamine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) in pyridine (Sigma-Aldrich). The resuspended sample was incubated at 37 °C and shaken at 1800 rpm for 90 minutes. After adding 20 µL of N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) with 1% trimethylchlorosilane (CovaChem), the sample was incubated at 37 °C and shaken at 1800 rpm for 30 minutes. Each derivatized sample was injected with a 10:1 split into an Agilent 7890B GC system with a 30 m + 10 m Duraguard x 0.25 mm x 0.25 μm DB-5MS + DG Agilent column. The oven temperature was kept at 60 °C for 1 min, then ramped to 300 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and held at 300 °C for 10 min. Analytes were detected with an Agilent 5977B MSD in EI mode scanning from 50 m/z to 600 m/z. Mass spectrum analysis, component identification and peak area quantification were performed with AMDIS. Statistics were performed with MetaboAnalyst73 and MetaboAnalystR74. Two to three technical replicates were analyzed for each sample and averaged to produce a single sample value. Absolute concentrations of metabolites in AWF were determined by spiking known concentrations of purified compounds into AWF samples and analyzing the resulting change in GC-MS peak areas. Peak areas for each external standard were normalized by the internal standard ribitol, and a standard curve was generated and fit with a linear trend line. The normalized peak areas obtained for the metabolites in AWF samples were converted into concentrations by using the slope of the line calculated from the standard curve and the average normalized peak area abundances measured in the AWF metabolomics analysis±SE.
Measurements of 13C-proline uptake in leaves
Fully expanded Arabidopsis leaves were syringe-infiltrated with either 100 nM flg22 or a DMSO only control. After six to eight hours, a solution of 164 µM ribitol and 500 µM 13C L-proline was syringe-infiltrated into the same leaves and the plants were placed into a humidity chamber to prevent evaporation from the infiltrated leaves. AWF was extracted from the infiltrated leaves as described above either immediately or after 20, 40 or 60 min. The peak area of 13C L-proline was measured with AMDIS using a custom library entry of the fragmentation pattern and retention time of a 13C L-proline standard.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) transcript analysis
Leaves of 4- to 5-week-old Col-0 plants were syringe-infiltrated with sterile water containing either 100 nM flg22 or a DMSO only control. After 40 min, TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to isolate total RNA from the infiltrated leaf tissue. The isolated RNA was reverse transcribed and qRT-PCR was performed as previously described11. The abundance of AT2G28390 transcripts measured in each sample was used for normalization. The following sequences were used as oligonucleotides for qRT-PCR to measure transcripts from the indicated genes: AT2G28390, 5’-AACTCTATGCAGCATTTGATCCACT-3’ and 5’-TGATTGCATATCTTTATCGCCATC-3’; AT5G40780 (LHT1), 5’-CGTTGAAATCGGTGTTTGCATCGT-3’ and 5’-GCGATTGTTGAGTAGCTGAGAGAC-3’.
Statistics
Statistical analyses of data were done using Microsoft Excel, Metaboanalyst 5.073, R with the MetaboAnalyst for R package74, and Jamovi software75. For all experiments n equals the number of measurements from distinct samples. All t-tests were two-tailed with no correction for multiple comparisons.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Raw GC-MS data files are deposited in the National Metabolomics Data Repository (www.metabolomicsworkbench.org) as study number ST002917. All other source data are provided in Supplementary Information/Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Janeway, C. A. Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in Immunology. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 54, 1–13 (1989).
Zipfel, C. Plant pattern-recognition receptors. Trends Immunol. 35, 345–351 (2014).
Akira, S., Uematsu, S. & Takeuchi, O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124, 783–801 (2006).
Jones, J. D. G. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329 (2006).
DeFalco, T. A. & Zipfel, C. Molecular mechanisms of early plant pattern-triggered immune signaling. Mol. Cell 81, 3449–3467 (2021).
Xin, X.-F., Kvitko, B. & He, S. Y. Pseudomonas syringae: what it takes to be a pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 316–328 (2018).
Anderson, J. C. Ill communication: Host metabolites as virulence-regulating signals for plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 61, 49–71 (2023).
Turner, S. E. et al. A DeoR-type transcription regulator is required for sugar-induced expression of type III secretion-encoding genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 33, 509–DC3518 (2020).
Yan, Q., Rogan, C. J., Pang, Y.-Y., Ii, E. W. D. & Anderson, J. C. Ancient co-option of an amino acid ABC transporter locus in Pseudomonas syringae for host signal-dependent virulence gene regulation. PLOS Pathog. 16, e1008680 (2020).
Anderson, J. C. et al. Decreased abundance of type III secretion system-inducing signals in Arabidopsis mkp1 enhances resistance against Pseudomonas syringae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 6846–6851 (2014).
Anderson, J. C. et al. Arabidopsis MAP Kinase Phosphatase 1 (AtMKP1) negatively regulates MPK6-mediated PAMP responses and resistance against bacteria. Plant J. 67, 258–268 (2011).
Crabill, E., Joe, A., Block, A., van Rooyen, J. M. & Alfano, J. R. Plant immunity directly or indirectly restricts the injection of type III effectors by the Pseudomonas syringae type III secretion system. Plant Physiol. 154, 233–244 (2010).
Lovelace, A. H., Smith, A. & Kvitko, B. H. Pattern-triggered immunity alters the transcriptional regulation of virulence-associated genes and induces the sulfur starvation response in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 31, 750–765 (2018).
Nobori, T. et al. Transcriptome landscape of a bacterial pathogen under plant immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, E3055–E3064 (2018).
Gómez-Gómez, L. & Boller, T. FLS2: an LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 5, 1003–1011 (2000).
Zipfel, C. et al. Perception of the bacterial pamp EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 125, 749–760 (2006).
Tsuda, K., Sato, M., Stoddard, T., Glazebrook, J. & Katagiri, F. Network properties of robust immunity in plants. PLOS Genet 5, e1000772 (2009).
Felix, G., Duran, J. D., Volko, S. & Boller, T. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J. 18, 265–276 (1999).
Felle, H. H., Herrmann, A., Hanstein, S., Hückelhoven, R. & Kogel, K.-H. Apoplastic pH signaling in barley leaves attacked by the powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17, 118–123 (2004).
Kind, T. et al. Fiehnlib: mass spectral and retention index libraries for metabolomics based on quadrupole and time-of-flight gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 81, 10038–10048 (2009).
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A. & Klessig, D. F. Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 47, 177–206 (2009).
Menzel, R. & Roth, J. Regulation of the genes for proline utilization in Salmonella typhimurium: Autogenous repression by the putA gene product. J. Mol. Biol. 148, 21–44 (1981).
Vı́lchez, S., Manzanera, M. & Ramos, J. L. Control of expression of divergent Pseudomonas putida put promoters for proline catabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 5221–5225 (2000).
Grallath, S. et al. The AtProT family. Compatible solute transporters with similar substrate specificity but differential expression patterns. Plant Physiol. 137, 117–126 (2005).
Denoux, C. et al. Activation of defense response pathways by OGs and flg22 elicitors in arabidopsis seedlings. Mol. Plant 1, 423–445 (2008).
Tünnermann, L., Colou, J., Näsholm, T. & Gratz, R. To have or not to have: expression of amino acid transporters during pathogen infection. Plant Mol. Biol. 109, 413–425 (2022).
Chen, L. & Bush, D. R. LHT1, a lysine- and histidine-specific amino acid transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 115, 1127–1134 (1997).
Svennerstam, H., Ganeteg, U., Bellini, C. & Näsholm, T. Comprehensive screening of Arabidopsis mutants suggests the Lysine Histidine Transporter 1 to be involved in plant uptake of amino acids. Plant Physiol. 143, 1853–1860 (2007).
Hirner, A. et al. Arabidopsis LHT1 is a high-affinity transporter for cellular amino acid uptake in both root epidermis and leaf mesophyll. Plant Cell 18, 1931–1946 (2006).
Liu, G. et al. Amino acid homeostasis modulates salicylic acid–associated redox status and defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22, 3845–3863 (2010).
Szabados, L. & Savouré, A. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 89–97 (2010).
Christgen, S. L. & Becker, D. F. Role of proline in pathogen and host interactions. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 30, 683–709 (2019).
Tegeder, M. & Rentsch, D. Uptake and partitioning of amino acids and peptides. Mol. Plant 3, 997–1011 (2010).
Alvarez, M. E., Savouré, A. & Szabados, L. Proline metabolism as regulatory hub. Trends Plant Sci. 27, 39–55 (2022).
Castro, B. et al. Stress-induced reactive oxygen species compartmentalization, perception and signalling. Nat. Plants 7, 403–412 (2021).
Yamada, K., Saijo, Y., Nakagami, H. & Takano, Y. Regulation of sugar transporter activity for antibacterial defense in Arabidopsis. Science 354, 1427–1430 (2016).
Bartels, S. et al. MAP KINASE PHOSPHATASE1 and PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE1 are repressors of salicylic acid synthesis and SNC1-mediated responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2884–2897 (2009).
Kemmerling, B. et al. The BRI1-associated kinase 1, BAK1, has a brassinolide-independent role in plant cell-death control. Curr. Biol. 17, 1116–1122 (2007).
He, K. et al. BAK1 and BKK1 regulate brassinosteroid-dependent growth and brassinosteroid-independent cell-death pathways. Curr. Biol. 17, 1109–1115 (2007).
Petersen, M. et al. Arabidopsis MAP Kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell 103, 1111–1120 (2000).
Schulze, S. et al. The Arabidopsis TIR-NBS-LRR protein CSA1 guards BAK1-BIR3 homeostasis and mediates convergence of pattern- and effector-induced immune responses. Cell Host Microbe 30, 1717–1731 (2022).
Wu, Y. et al. Loss of the common immune coreceptor BAK1 leads to NLR-dependent cell death. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 27044–27053 (2020).
Yang, Y. et al. Allelic variation in the Arabidopsis TNL CHS3/CSA1 immune receptor pair reveals two functional cell-death regulatory modes. Cell Host Microbe 30, 1701–1716 (2022).
Glazebrook, J. et al. Topology of the network integrating salicylate and jasmonate signal transduction derived from global expression phenotyping. Plant J. 34, 217–228 (2003).
Jirage, D. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana PAD4 encodes a lipase-like gene that is important for salicylic acid signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 96, 13583–13588 (1999).
Wildermuth, M. C., Dewdney, J., Wu, G. & Ausubel, F. M. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature 414, 562–565 (2001).
Alonso, J. M., Hirayama, T., Roman, G., Nourizadeh, S. & Ecker, J. R. EIN2, a Bifunctional Transducer of Ethylene and Stress Responses in Arabidopsis. Science 284, 2148–2152 (1999).
Park, J. et al. A knock‐out mutation in allene oxide synthase results in male sterility and defective wound signal transduction in Arabidopsis due to a block in jasmonic acid biosynthesis. Plant J. 31, 1–12 (2002).
Hillmer, R. A. et al. The highly buffered Arabidopsis immune signaling network conceals the functions of its components. PLOS Genet 13, e1006639 (2017).
Lang, J. & Faure, D. Plant GABA:proline ratio modulates dissemination of the virulence Ti plasmid within the Agrobacterium tumefaciens hosted population. Plant Signal. Behav. 11, e1178440 (2016).
Lang, J., Gonzalez‐Mula, A., Taconnat, L., Clement, G. & Faure, D. The plant GABA signaling downregulates horizontal transfer of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence plasmid. N. Phytol. 210, 974–983 (2016).
Crawford, J. M., Kontnik, R. & Clardy, J. Regulating alternative lifestyles in entomopathogenic bacteria. Curr. Biol. 20, 69–74 (2010).
Tanner, J. J. Structural biology of proline catabolism. Amino Acids 35, 719–730 (2008).
Ye, P. et al. Proline utilization A controls bacterial pathogenicity by sensing its substrate and cofactors. Commun. Biol. 5, 496 (2022).
Huynh, T. V., Dahlbeck, D. & Staskawicz, B. J. Bacterial blight of soybean: Regulation of a pathogen gene determining host cultivar specificity. Science 245, 1374–1377 (1989).
Zhang, X. et al. MAMP-elicited changes in amino acid transport activity contribute to restricting bacterial growth. Plant Physiol. 189, 2315–2331 (2022).
Yan, Q., Rogan, C. J. & Anderson, J. C. Development of a Pseudomonas syringae – Arabidopsis suspension cell infection system for investigating host metabolite-dependent regulation of type III secretion and pattern-triggered immunity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 32, 527–539 (2019).
Zhang, X. et al. Elicitor-induced plant immunity relies on amino acids accumulation to delay the onset of bacterial virulence. Plant Physiol. 192, 601–615 (2023).
Gentzel, I. et al. Dynamic nutrient acquisition from a hydrated apoplast supports biotrophic proliferation of a bacterial pathogen of maize. Cell Host Microbe 30, 502–517 (2022).
Nomura, K. et al. Bacterial pathogens deliver water- and solute-permeable channels to plant cells. Nature 621, 586–591 (2023).
Bezrutczyk, M. et al. Sugar flux and signaling in plant–microbe interactions. Plant J. 93, 675–685 (2018).
Solomon, P. S., Tan, K.-C. & Oliver, R. P. The nutrient supply of pathogenic fungi; a fertile field for study: The nutrient supply of pathogenic fungi. Mol. Plant Pathol. 4, 203–210 (2003).
Sonawala, U., Dinkeloo, K., Danna, C. H., McDowell, J. M. & Pilot, G. Review: Functional linkages between amino acid transporters and plant responses to pathogens. Plant Sci. 277, 79–88 (2018).
Zhao, B., Dahlbeck, D., Krasileva, K. V., Fong, R. W. & Staskawicz, B. J. Computational and biochemical analysis of the Xanthomonas effector AvrBs2 and its role in the modulation of Xanthomonas type three effector delivery. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002408 (2011).
Yoo, H. et al. Translational regulation of metabolic dynamics during effector-triggered immunity. Mol. Plant 13, 88–98 (2020).
Hacquard, S. et al. Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe 17, 603–616 (2015).
Sohrabi, R., Paasch, B. C., Liber, J. A. & He, S. Y. Phyllosphere microbiome. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74, 539–568 (2023).
Chen, T. et al. A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere. Nature 580, 653–657 (2020).
Lakshmanan, V. et al. Microbe-associated molecular patterns-triggered root responses mediate beneficial rhizobacterial recruitment in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 160, 1642–1661 (2012).
Lehmann, S. et al. In planta function of compatible solute transporters of the AtProT. Fam. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 787–796 (2011).
O’Malley, M. R., Weisberg, A. J., Chang, J. H. & Anderson, J. C. Re-evaluation of a Tn5::gacA mutant of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 uncovers roles for uvrC and anmK in promoting virulence. PLOS ONE 14, e0223637 (2019).
O’Leary, B. M. et al. Early changes in apoplast composition associated with defence and disease in interactions between Phaseolus vulgaris and the halo blight pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 2172–2184 (2016).
Pang, Z. et al. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W388–W396 (2021).
Chong, J. & Xia, J. MetaboAnalystR: an R package for flexible and reproducible analysis of metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 34, 4313–4314 (2018).
The jamovi project (2023). jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
Acknowledgements
We thank Scott Peck and Jeff Chang for helpful discussions and critical reading of this manuscript. This work was supported by National Science Foundation CAREER grant IOS-1942898 awarded to J.C.A. and Swiss National Science Foundation grants SNSF 3100-064918 and 31003A_149229 awarded to D.R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.A. and C.R. conceived the project; C.R., Y.Y.P., S.M., S.T. and A.W. performed the experiments; J.A., C.R., Y.Y.P. and A.W. analyzed the data, D.R. and S.L. generated and provided mutant lines and shared unpublished data; J.A. and C.R. wrote an initial draft; J.A., C.R., Y.Y.P, S.M., S.T., S.L. and D.R. reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks David Mackey and Andreia Figueiredo, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rogan, C.J., Pang, YY., Mathews, S.D. et al. Transporter-mediated depletion of extracellular proline directly contributes to plant pattern-triggered immunity against a bacterial pathogen. Nat Commun 15, 7048 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51244-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51244-6