Abstract
Permafrost, characterized by its frozen soil, serves as a unique habitat for diverse microorganisms. Understanding these microbial communities is crucial for predicting the response of permafrost ecosystems to climate change. However, large-scale evidence regarding stratigraphic variations in microbial profiles remains limited. Here, we analyze microbial community structure and functional potential based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and metagenomic data obtained from an ∼1000 km permafrost transect on the Tibetan Plateau. We find that microbial alpha diversity declines but beta diversity increases down the soil profile. Microbial assemblages are primarily governed by dispersal limitation and drift, with the importance of drift decreasing but that of dispersal limitation increasing with soil depth. Moreover, genes related to reduction reactions (e.g., ferric iron reduction, dissimilatory nitrate reduction, and denitrification) are enriched in the subsurface and permafrost layers. In addition, microbial groups involved in alternative electron accepting processes are more diverse and contribute highly to community-level metabolic profiles in the subsurface and permafrost layers, likely reflecting the lower redox potential and more complicated trophic strategies for microorganisms in deeper soils. Overall, these findings provide comprehensive insights into large-scale stratigraphic profiles of microbial community structure and functional potentials in permafrost regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Permafrost is defined as any ground that remains continuously frozen at or below 0 °C for a minimum of two consecutive years1. Despite the persistent freezing temperatures and oligotrophic conditions, permafrost harbors a pronounced array of microorganisms, which possess the capacity to execute highly intricate metabolic pathways, such as soil organic matter degradation, carbon fixation, methanogenesis, methane oxidation, nitrogen metabolism, and others1,2. These diverse microbial metabolisms are critical for biogeochemical processes in permafrost ecosystems, especially in the context of the ongoing permafrost thawing under climate warming3. The acceleration of microbial-mediated biogeochemical cycles may promote the emission of greenhouse gases (e.g., CO2, CH4, and N2O), ultimately leading to both carbon-climate and non-carbon-climate feedbacks in permafrost regions3,4. Recognizing the crucial role of microorganisms in governing biogeochemical processes in permafrost ecosystem, and deciphering their compositional and functional profiles can enhance our comprehension of how biogeochemical processes will respond to climate changes in this globally important ecosystem3.
Due to the crucial role of microorganisms in mediating the biogeochemical processes in permafrost regions, recent research in these areas has concentrated on revealing the microbial profiles3. However, given that these studies have primarily addressed permafrost microorganisms at the site-specific level, mainly focusing on the active layer (0–50 cm)5,6,7,8, there still lacks a systematic profiling of the large-scale stratigraphic characteristics of microorganisms in permafrost regions. In fact, microbial biogeographic patterns and assemblage mechanisms may differ among soil layers due to lateral and vertical variations in water phase, osmotic potential, and nutrient availability across permafrost regions1. Specifically, recurrent freeze-thaw cycles in the active layer act as disruptive events that directly induce fluctuations in microbial population sizes via demographic processes9,10, which may consequently lead to prominent effects of ecological drift on the microbial assemblages. Additionally, soil structure, moisture, and substrate availability vary with the freeze-thaw cycles11,12, potentially leading to niche differentiation (selection) due to the difference in microbial physiologic traits12. Compared with the active layer, the frozen permafrost soils have a higher ice content, which acts as a physical barrier that impedes microbial migration due to the lack of continuous water pathways13,14, potentially resulting in pronounced dispersal limitation. Meanwhile, niche selection mediated by harsh conditions (e.g., oxygen depletion, nutrient scarcity, or freezing temperature) may reduce microbial diversity in permafrost soils during prolonged frozen periods, while speciation via mutation may increase it1,15. However, the strength of both niche selection and speciation may be muted in the permafrost layer by lower metabolic activity or a resistant survival strategy, such as dormancy16. Overall, the interplay of the aforementioned ecological processes can induce distinct biogeographic patterns among the soil layers, but our understanding on this issue is still in its infancy15.
Besides the community assemblage, microbial metabolic potential could also vary over the vertical soil profile. One notable characteristic of deep permafrost soils is that the microbial community structures are affected by the redox status due to the limited oxygen availability17,18. In such conditions, microorganisms are more likely to engage in anaerobic respiration and fermentation for soil organic matter degradation19. These processes necessitate a series of reductive reactions involving diverse alternative electron acceptors, such as nitrate, sulfate, ferric iron, carbon dioxide, and small organic molecules2. Therefore, genes associated with reduction reactions pertinent to the aforementioned elements may become more prevalent, and the corresponding taxa involved in these reduction pathways may be more diverse, showing a greater contribution to the community-level metabolic profiles with soil depth. Alternatively, microorganisms may also be less reliant on alternative electron acceptors due to the slower microbial activities in deeper soils20. Despite the recognitions of these microbial processes, there exists a dearth of knowledge concerning their variability across different soil strata, and that of their corresponding functional groups, as well as their respective contributions to the overall community metabolism across permafrost regions.
To fill the aforementioned knowledge gaps, we established 22 sampling sites along an ~1000 km permafrost transect on the Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table 1), the largest permafrost region outside the high latitudes21. We collected soil samples from the 0–10 cm and, 30–50 cm layers, and from the uppermost 50 cm thick permafrost layer, representing the surface, subsurface, and permafrost layers of the soil profile, respectively. We employed both amplicon and metagenomic sequencing methods to examine the microbial community structure and functional profiles. Additionally, we retrieved climatic, plant, and anthropogenic factors, and determined environmental variables, including substrate properties and edaphic factors, to explore the environmental effects on structuring the microbial communities. With these measurements, we aimed to test the following two hypotheses: (1) microbial assembly mechanisms differ among soil layers, with the contribution of stochastic drift decreasing, but that of dispersal limitation increasing with soil depth. (2) The relative abundance of genes participating in reduction reactions related to alternative electron acceptors is higher, and the taxa engaged in the redox reactions become more diverse with increasing soil depth. Consistent with the hypotheses, our results show that microbial alpha diversity declines, while beta diversity increases, down the soil profile. Microbial assemblages are primarily governed by dispersal limitation and drift. The importance of drift decreases from the surface active layer to the deep permafrost deposits, while that of dispersal limitation increases. In the subsurface and permafrost layers, functional genes related to reduction reactions are enriched, and the corresponding taxa participating in redox reactions are more diverse and contribute highly to community-level metabolic profiles. These findings lay the groundwork for a comprehensive understanding of microbial biogeographic patterns, assembly mechanisms, and metabolic attributes in high-altitude permafrost regions.
Results and discussion
Decreasing microbial alpha, but increasing beta diversity with soil depth
To discern disparities in microbial diversity among soil strata, we first determined the alpha diversity indices, including the Shannon-Wiener index and Faith’s index, and beta diversity metrics such as the Bray-Curtis distance and β-mean nearest taxon distance based on the amplicon data. Our results showed that microbial alpha diversity declined, while beta diversity (spatial variations) increased with soil depth (Fig. 1b–e), which is consistent with our first hypothesis. The lower alpha diversity in permafrost deposits could be due to permafrost habitats being typically oligotrophic, having temperatures below freezing, and low water availability. Such harsh conditions may impose higher selective pressure on microorganisms living in permafrost deposits than those in the active layer, and ultimately lead to lower diversity1,22. In contrast to alpha diversity, we observed increasing spatial variability (beta diversity) of microorganisms with soil depth (Fig. 1d–e), indicating that taxonomic heterogenization and phylogenetic divergence were occurring within the permafrost soils. Generally, microorganisms in the active layer can transport via wind and pore water channels, thereby increasing species migration among communities and leading to a more homogeneous community composition23. In contrast to those in the active layer, microbes in permafrost deposits are believed to have been entrained during permafrost formation by microbial taxa from ancient paleoenvironments2,24,25. Over their prolonged evolution within the permafrost, microbial communities are highly isolated, particularly as a result of the soil freezing which acts as a physical barrier26. Consequently, microbial communities at different sites will diverge from one another, resulting in significant spatial variations.
Multivariable statistics utilizing Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices unveiled a notable differentiation in taxonomic compositions among different soil layers (Supplementary Table 2). Specifically, we identified a total of 12,855 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), primarily belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria (Supplementary Fig. 1). Of these ASVs, 9850 (76.6%) shared among the three soil layers, with the permafrost layer harboring the highest number of unique species (269 ASVs), followed by the surface layer (187 ASVs) (Fig. 1f). Microbes in the surface soils were dominated by Proteobacteria, whereas Actinobacteria displayed an elevated relative abundance within the subsurface and permafrost layers (Fig. 1g; Supplementary Fig. 1). Such a pattern can be ascribed to the intrinsic attributes of these two microbial groups. It has been suggested that the higher abundance of Proteobacteria in the surface layer may be linked to elevated levels of carbon and nutrients27. For the Actinobacteria, they are distinguished by an expansive repertoire of secondary metabolites and these attributes could enhance their resistance to selective pressure, thereby promoting their survival in permafrost deposits27,28. The occupancy (the relative frequency of a given species occurs within all samples) and specificity (the average abundance of a given species within all samples) analysis29 revealed that the numbers of specialist species in surface, subsurface, and permafrost layers were 181, 27, and 30, respectively (Fig. 2a). Specialist species in the surface layer were mostly α-Proteobacteria, γ-Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria (Fig. 2b), but Bacteroidia, γ-Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota were found to be both specific and common in the subsurface layer (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, the Thermoleophilia organisms (i.e., Solirubrobacterales and Gaiellales), belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria, were specialist species in the permafrost layer (Fig. 2d). Thermoleophilia are generally regarded as thermophilic taxa, frequently found to inhabit geothermal hot springs30. However, several studies have reported that Thermoleophilia organisms are also cold-adapted and thrive in cold extreme environments, such as Antarctic soil and permafrost soil in Alaska7,31. Their higher habitat occupancy in extreme environments might be attributed to specific features, including being strict chemoorganotrophs, halophilic, and possessing DNA repair mechanisms32,33, which may enhance the adaptability of these microorganisms to extreme environments.
Microbial communities are more shaped by dispersal limitation in the permafrost layer
Based on the partial Mantel test and null model analysis, we explored the differences in the microbial community assembly mechanisms across soil layers. We first reduced the variable redundancy by using cluster analysis, and thirteen variables [e.g., mean annual air temperature (MAT), soil pH, and clay content] were retained for the partial Mantel test (Supplementary Fig. 2). Most of the selected environmental variables exhibited significant correlations with microbial compositional variations, with pH and the aridity index (AI: determined by dividing mean annual precipitation by mean annual potential evapotranspiration34) emerging as the primary predictors of microbial assemblages (Fig. 3a). Specifically, the microbial community structure in the surface layer was most significantly associated with pH and AI, followed by Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), plant species richness, clay content, soil moisture, and the labile carbon pool I (listed in order of decreasing partial Mantel’s r) (Fig. 3a). In the subsurface layer, the microbial community structure exhibited significant correlations with pH and AI, followed by soil moisture and plant species richness. However, no environmental variables displayed significant associations with microbial community structure in the permafrost layer (Fig. 3a). Generally, soil pH and AI are considered to be good predictors for discerning soil microbial community structure in surface soils35,36. They wield the capacity to exert environmental selection over the microbial structure by altering resource availability, energy-related processes, and the prevalence of inhibitory substances36,37,38. In spite of the detected importance of soil pH and AI, the effects of other variables on microbial communities should not be neglected. For example, soil redox status was observed to exert a prominent effect on community composition and diversity in tundra soils18. Therefore, future studies are encouraged to include more explanatory environmental variables, such as ferric irons (Fe3+) and electrical conductivity, to further advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms for microbial communities in permafrost ecosystems. Overall, these results emphasize the crucial roles of environmental selection in shaping the microbial communities in Tibetan alpine permafrost region.
Despite the significant effects of environmental factors (selection) on microbial community structure, the null model analysis produced compelling evidence that two stochastic ecological processes [i.e., dispersal limitation, drift (and others)] predominantly governed the microbial communities (Fig. 3b), but their relative importance varied with soil depth (Fig. 3c). Specifically, drift (and others) had the highest relative importance in shaping the microbial assemblages, followed very closely by dispersal limitation (Fig. 3b). For both the subsurface and permafrost layers, dispersal limitation was identified as making the greatest contribution to structuring microbial communities, followed by the drift (and others) (Fig. 3b). Further results showed that the relative contribution of dispersal limitation was higher in permafrost deposits than in the other two soil layers, while the importance of drift (and others) significantly decreased with soil depth (Fig. 3c). The disparity in the contribution of these ecological processes among the soil layers may be attributed to differences in habitat conditions. Diurnal and seasonal freeze-thaw cycles act as perturbations that induce periodic declines in microbial populations, thus giving rise to discernible fluctuations in population size and instigating a conspicuous drift effect39. Given that the frequency of the freeze-thaw cycles declines with soil depth (Supplementary Fig. 3), the effects of drift (and others) in shaping microbial structure decreases from the surface layer to the deep soil layers. Conversely, since permafrost deposits are frozen, with limited water availability, the lack of continuous water pathways impedes microbial mobility and ultimately engenders a more pronounced dispersal limitation40. This intensified dispersal limitation may be posited as a contributory factor to the higher spatial variability observed within the permafrost layer (Fig. 1d-e). Besides stochastic processes, deterministic processes, particularly the homogeneous selection, also played an important role in structuring the microbial communities. This process had its highest relative importance in the subsurface layers (Fig. 3c). Such a pattern may reflect the situation in which subsoils usually have relatively uniform environmental conditions. Species adapted to these specific conditions are more likely to thrive, consequently leading to homogeneous selection41.
Enriched functional genes involved in reduction reactions in deeper layers
To discern the microbial functional profiles, we annotated metagenome reads by comparing them to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (http://www.kegg.jp) database. Our results revealed that functional genes were mainly involved in carbohydrate, amino acid, and energy metabolism (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Functional compositions differed significantly with soil depth and were more analogous in the two deeper soil layers (i.e., subsurface and permafrost layers) (Supplementary Table 2; Supplementary Fig. 4b). The functional gene composition in the permafrost layer exhibited higher spatial variability than in the other two layers (Supplementary Fig. 4c), and their relative abundance varied among soil layers (Fig. 4). In particular, we observed a higher abundance of genes related to assimilatory nitrate reduction (nasB, NIT-6, and nirA), nitrogen fixation (nifDKH), and organic nitrogen metabolism (gdh, glsA, and ureAC) in the surface layer (Fig. 4). The elevation of these genes suggested that microorganisms may have higher demand for nitrogen in the topsoil, which may be induced by higher nitrogen limitation42 and more intense competition for N between plants and soil microorganisms43. We also found that genes participating in assimilatory sulfate reduction (cysDNC) and sulfide oxidation (sqr and fccAB) enriched in surface soil (Fig. 4), indicating the higher demand for reduced sulfur for the formation of amino acids and energy generation.
In contrast to the surface layer, we observed an elevation in the abundance of genes linked to the degradation of hemicellulose, cellulose, and pectin in the subsurface and permafrost layers (Fig. 4a). These genes are regarded as important in mediating the responses of permafrost carbon cycle to climate warming on the Tibetan Plateau44. The majority of genes involved in fermentation processes, such as pyruvate oxidation, pyruvate formate lyase, and acetogenesis, showed an increase in abundance in the deeper soils (Fig. 4a). Other genes related to reduction reactions, including dissimilatory nitrate reduction (NarGHI and napB), denitrification (nirS and nosZ), polysulphide reduction (sreB, gydABDG, and psrAC), sulfite reduction (dsrAB and asrABC), tetrathionate reduction (ttrABC), Fe3+ reduction (MtrCAB), SeO42- reduction (ygfMK and xdhD), and methanogenesis (mcrA), were also found to increase with soil depth (Fig. 4b–d). The augmentation of fermentation and reduction in inorganic compounds reflected the fact that microbes had adapted to thrive in deeper soils via anaerobic metabolic pathways. Such adaptation is probably due to redox conditions that are highly selective for species that can survive under anoxic conditions for prolonged periods. Generally, the utilization of organic carbon by microorganisms necessitates the availability of terminal electron acceptors, with the preferred order being O2, NO3-, Fe3+, and SO42-, followed by methanogenesis and other small organic molecules1,2. Given that both the subsurface and permafrost layer are more anoxic than the surface layer, microorganisms colonized in these layers tend to utilize the alternative electron acceptors (e.g., NO3-, Fe3+, and SO42-) to facilitate the anaerobic degradation process2,19.
Taxa are diversely engaged in the redox reactions in deeper layers
To decipher the differences in metabolic profiles across the soil layers, we binned the metagenomic reads into metagenomic-assembled genomes (MAGs) and explored their functional capabilities in biogeochemical processes. In total, we obtained 274 medium-quality MAGs (>70% completeness and <10% contamination) (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Data 1). Most of the genomes were annotated as Actinobacteria (e.g., Thermoleophilia, UBA4738), Acidobacteria, or Proteobacteria (Fig. 5a; Supplementary Fig. 5). Most of the genomes (273 MAGs) possessed a capacity for iron reduction (Fig. 5b; Supplementary Note 1), implying that iron reduction contributed highly to organic material oxidation by serving as the terminal electron acceptor during microbial anaerobic respiration19. The amino acids utilization process was also ubiquitously among the genomes (Fig. 5b; Supplementary Note 1), indicating that microorganisms were compelled to utilize less energetically favorable substrates, possibly due to the inaccessibility of carbohydrate-rich organic materials25. The prevalence of other pathways, including acetogenesis, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, acetate to acetyl-CoA, chitin degrading, and sulfur oxidation, suggested exceptional metabolic versatility of the microbial groups in the permafrost ecosystem (Fig. 5b; Supplementary Note 1). Furthermore, principal coordinate analysis revealed a notable separation of microbial communities among the three soil layers, with the communities in the permafrost layer being more similar to those in the subsurface layer (Fig. 5c; Supplementary Table 2). Additionally, we observed a diminishment in average genome size down the soil profile (Fig. 5d), indicating that microorganisms inhabiting permafrost environments possessed relatively compact and simplified genomes. This finding suggests that microorganisms may employ the genome reduction strategy that aims at mitigating the metabolic expenditure entailed in DNA replication, enhancing their fitness in the face of the nutrient-scarce environment of permafrost deposits45,46. It should be noted that the difference in the recovery rate of MAGs during the binning process (Supplementary Fig. 6) may also lead to variation in the estimation of genome size47, which could, potentially, induce the decreasing pattern observed in this study.
To further evaluate the importance of metabolic pathways and the functional capacity of each microbial taxa at the community level, we calculated community-level metabolic weight scores (MW-scores) for each functional pathway, along with the percentage contribution of each microbial phylum to these scores48. A higher MW-score indicates a larger contribution of a specific pathway to the community-level metabolic profiles and vice versa48. Our results showed that both heterotrophic pathways (e.g., amino acid utilization, fermentation, complex carbon degradation, and fatty acid degradation) and autotrophic processes (e.g., CO oxidation, sulfur oxidation, and hydrogen oxidation) exhibited important contributions to the microbial community-level metabolic profiles (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Note 2), demonstrating the intricacies of microbial energy conservation49,50. The percentage contribution of microbial taxa showed that the metabolic contributions of the microorganisms in the surface soil were chiefly accounted for by α-Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria (Fig. 6b). The higher percentage contribution of α-Proteobacteria in surface soils may be ascribed to the higher soil carbon and nutrition content in surface soil (Supplementary Fig. 7), which provide more favorable substrate conditions that match the growth requirements of these taxa51,52. These observations align with our findings of the heightened metabolic contributions of α-Proteobacteria in carbon decomposition (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Note 3). Additionally, Actinobacteria made a substantial contribution to the microbial metabolic activities in the surface layer (Fig. 6b). Actinobacteria were ubiquitous in the extremobiosphere and involved in a variety of functional processes, including complex carbon degradation, nitrogen cycling, and stress response5. Their extraordinary aptitude for producing a wide range of enzymes and secondary metabolites enables them to flourish and persevere in the face of arduous environmental stress53. In line with this argument, we also observed notable contributions of Actinobacteria to diverse metabolic pathways, including most of the complex carbon oxidation and the redox reactions involved in the nitrogen, sulfur, and iron metabolic pathways (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Note 3).
In contrast to the surface layer observations, we found that not only Actinobacteria but also more diverse taxa such as Desulfobacterota, γ-Proteobacteria, Chloroflexota, Acidobacteriota, and Methylomirabilota, occupied a significant functional fraction related to the redox reactions in the subsoils and permafrost soils (Fig. 6b; Supplementary Note 3). Given that soil conditions become more anoxic with depth, microbial anaerobic respiration and fermentation are essential pathways for the anaerobic decomposition of soil organic matter19,54. The majority of identified anaerobic respiration genes, including those for nitrate reduction (narGH), sulfate reduction, and iron reduction, were prevalent in taxa within Actinobacteriota (as shown by the higher contribution on the metabolic weight scores in Fig. 6a). Likewise, genes encoding fermentation including pyruvate oxidation, pyruvate formate lyase, and acetogenesis were abundant in Actinobacteriota and several other taxa (e.g., Acidobacteriota and Proteobacteria) (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 8). This evidence illustrated the versatile metabolic potential of Actinobacteria, implying the critical role of Actinobacteria in mediating biogeochemical processes in permafrost ecosystems. Additionally, other taxa had adapted to thrive in specific redox niches within the electron transfer reactions. For instance, Desulfobacterota appeared to be the primary sulfite reducers, also played important roles in thiosulfate disproportionation and nitrite reduction (octR) (Fig. 6a). Populations belonging to γ-Proteobacteria were essential contributors to oxidation processes (including Nitrite ammonification, Sulfide oxidation, Thiosulfate oxidation, Iron oxidation, and Arsenite oxidation) (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Note 3). The Chloroflexi, are reported to have many fermentative members, which play crucial roles in anaerobic carbon degradation in permafrost55. However, in this study, we observed only a moderate contribution of Chloroflexi to fermentation, and these taxa appeared to be important to the nitrite reduction process (nirKS and octR) (Fig. 6a). Moreover, taxa belonging to Methylomirabilota are characterized for their capacity to couple anaerobic methane oxidation with nitrite reduction in anoxic environments56, which allows them to adapt better in anaerobic environments. Likewise, Acidobacteria made large contributions to arsenate reduction, selenate reduction, nitrate reduction (napAB), thiosulfate disproportionation, and iron oxidation (Fig. 6a). Such diverse redox metabolism may enable their survival in anoxia and nutrient-poor conditions, consequently allowing them to be widely present in global soils57. These various taxa, which have adapted to thrive in specific redox niches, ultimately co-dominant the biogeochemical processes in deeper soils18. Collectively, these results highlighted the diverse microbial species engaged in redox reactions and the more complicated trophic strategies for microorganisms in subsoils and permafrost deposits.
Although the present study revealed the large-scale stratigraphic profile of microbial community structure and functional potentials in Tibetan alpine permafrost regions, there are three limitations that need to be addressed. First, our experiments rely on DNA-based metagenomic techniques that cannot provide insight into which genes are actively expressed and what specific biochemical functions are being carried out at a given time2,58. Therefore, there may be a disconnection between the functional potentials we measured and the actual functions being realized. Second, ~40% of the DNA was found to be extracellular or originated from cells that were no longer intact59. Constant subzero temperatures provide ideal preservation conditions for inactive or dead cells in permafrost deposits, potentially leading to an even higher proportion of relic DNA1. This could introduce some bias into our assessments of microbial structure and function, although some studies have suggested that removing relic DNA does not substantially impact microbial community structure in permafrost60. Consequently, the extent to which relic DNA, originating from deceased cells, may affect the veracity of the conclusions drawn in soil DNA-based investigations remains unresolved25. Third, despite the positive associations observed between biogeochemical processes and gene abundance across our study area (Supplementary Fig. 9), there is still a gap between the realistic microbial activity and geochemical processes in situ. In light of these limitations, further studies should seek to employ methods that remove relic DNA or use approaches such as RNA-based metatranscriptomics or protein-based metaproteomics. Furthermore, integrating microbial measurements with biogeochemical data determined in situ could provide a deeper mechanistic understanding of the relationships between microbial and biogeochemical processes in permafrost ecosystems.
In summary, based on systematic measurements of microbial amplicon and metagenomic data obtained from an ~1000 km transect across the Tibetan Plateau—the world’s largest permafrost region outside the high latitudes, this study expands our understanding of the large-scale stratigraphic microbial profiles, from the taxonomic, genetic, and genome-centric view, in the understudied alpine permafrost ecosystem (Supplementary Note 4, Supplementary Tables 3, 4). We found that microbial communities were distinct among soil strata, with the alpha diversity decreasing, but β diversity (spatial variability) increasing, with soil depth. Microbial assemblages were predominantly shaped by dispersal limitation and ecological drift, with a heightened emphasis on dispersal limitation within the permafrost layer. These findings illustrate that the ongoing permafrost thawing, particularly the active layer deepening, may cause regional- to global-scale variations in microbial biogeographic patterns and assemblage mechanisms in permafrost ecosystems. We also found that functional genes involved in reduction reactions (such as nitrite reduction, polysulfide reduction, ferric iron reduction, and methanogenesis) were enriched, and microbial taxa involved in redox reactions were more diverse and contributed significantly to community-level metabolic profiles in the deeper layers. These findings highlight the vital role of biogeochemical cycling of ecologically important elements (e.g., nitrogen, sulfur, iron), which serve as electron acceptors for organic matter oxidation and may have profound effects on soil carbon dynamics in permafrost regions. Overall, this study advances our understanding of taxonomic and functional biogeography across soil strata in permafrost regions and underscores the necessity of incorporating vertical variations of microbial attributes in future modeling endeavors to forecast the dynamics of biogeochemical cycles within this critical ecosystem, particularly in the context of climate warming.
Methods
Study area and field sampling
Permafrost is distributed extensively across the Tibetan Plateau, covering ~1.1 × 106 km2, which constitutes 40% of the total plateau area61. Much of the permafrost on the plateau are mainly comprised of discontinuous and sporadic types62, which were formed during the Last Glaciation Maximum in the late Pleistocene and the Neoglaciation period in the late Holocene61,63. The active layer thickness varies across the region, with a mean value of 1.9 m64. In 2016, soil samples were collected at 24 sites along a ~1000 km permafrost transect on the plateau65,66 (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table 1). At two of these sites, there were problems obtaining a sufficient DNA yield during DNA extraction and so only samples from 22 sites were processed in this study. The mean annual air temperature across all sites ranges from −4.5 to 1.8 °C, and the mean annual precipitation varies from 245 to 504 mm66. The primary vegetation types are alpine steppe, alpine meadow, and swamp meadow, which are dominated by Stipa purpurea and Carex moorcroftii, Kobresia pygmaea and Kobresia humilis, and Kobresia tibetica, respectively67. The soil types encompass Cambisols, Calcisols, and Cryosols, as classified by the World Reference Base for Soil Resources68.
In each site, a 10 m × 10 m plot with five 1 m × 1 m quadrats along the diagonal lines was established66. We used a borehole drill to extract soil cores within each quadrat, with core depths varying between 1.5 and 3.5 m according to the active layer thickness. Soil samples in the active layer were collected at depths of 0–10 cm (SUR: surface) and 30–50 cm (SUB: subsurface). Simultaneously, we collected permafrost samples from the uppermost 50 cm thick layer (PL: permafrost layer). During the collection of permafrost soils, we meticulously excluded unfrozen active layer soil and soil from the transitional zone between the active layer and the permafrost deposits66. Soil cores were maintained in a frozen state and transported to the laboratory. To prevent potential surface contaminants being introduced during the drilling procedures, the outer layer of each core was scraped with autoclaved knives and chisels66. Notably, five replicates within the 10 m × 10 m plot were expected to represent the average condition at each site, which enables regional sampling to assess large-scale patterns of microbial compositional and functional attributes. With this aim, the soil samples from each layer at each site were homogenized through sterile hammering under cold conditions. Afterwards, the composite soils were divided into two parts: one part was subjected to air-drying for subsequent soil physicochemical measurements, the other was preserved at −80 °C for subsequent DNA extraction.
Characterization of soil physicochemical variables as well as climatic, anthropogenic and plant properties
Soil physicochemical variables were measured to explore the underlying drivers of microbial compositional variations. Specifically, soil moisture was determined by oven-drying 10 g of fresh soil at 105 °C until it reached a constant weight. Soil pH was measured using a pH meter (PB-10, Sartorius, Germany) with a 1:2.5 soil-to-water mixture. Soil texture data were obtained from ref. 65. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content was determined via the potassium dichromate method69. A two-step acid hydrolysis procedure was employed to determine soil labile and recalcitrant C pools70. Briefly, soil samples underwent initial hydrolysis with 2.5 M H2SO4 at 105 °C for 30 min. The resulting hydrolysates were separated from the residue, which was then rinsed with distilled water. The supernatant combined with the initial hydrolysate formed labile carbon pool I (mainly polysaccharides). The remaining residue underwent further hydrolysis with 13 M H2SO4, and was shaken overnight at room temperature. After dilution to 1 M H2SO4 with distilled water for above hydrolysates, the sample was hydrolyzed at 105 °C for 3 h, constituting labile carbon pool II (mostly cellulose). Finally, the residue was rinsed with distilled water, dried at 60 °C, and identified as the recalcitrant SOC pool. Dissolved organic carbon and total dissolved nitrogen were quantified using a multi-NC-analyzer (Analytik Jena, Thuringia, Germany). The NH4+-N and NO3--N content were determined by a flow injection analyzer (AutoAnalyzer 3 SEAL, Bran and Luebbe, Norderstedt, Germany). Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was then calculated by deducting dissolved inorganic N from total dissolved N.
In consideration of the important effects of climatic, plant, and anthropogenic variables on affecting microbial communities, we retrieved climatic variables, consisting MAT and AI, plant variables including plant species richness and NDVI, and human footprint index from public databases. Specifically, MAT was obtained through the spatial interpolation of meteorological information sourced from 73 meteorological stations across the Tibetan Plateau, spanning the period from 1985 to 2014, which matched the sampling time of 2016. An interpolation procedure was conducted within ArcMap 10.6 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA, USA), employing the Kriging interpolation technique, and achieving a spatial resolution of 10 km × 10 km. The original MAT data were provided by the China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System (http://cdc.nmic.cn/home.do). The AI was retrieved from the CGIAR-CSI Global-Aridity and Global-PET database (http://www.cgiar-csi.org)34. For the plant variables, plant species richness at each site was extracted from the species richness map with 1- km resolution provided by ref. 71. Additionally, maximum-value composite NDVI was used to characterize plant greenness, which were obtained from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aboard NASA’s Terra satellites (http://neo.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/) with ~1 km resolution for every 16-day interval between July to August in 2016 (when soil sampling was conducted). To characterize human disturbance of the sampling sites involved in this study, we retrieved the human footprint index from the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center (https://doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.933)72. This index is a quantitative measurement of human pressures on Earth’s land surface, which is determined by summing the weighted values (where 0 denotes unpressured and 10 denotes maximum pressure) of five categories of human disturbance (i.e., land use/cover, night-time light, population density, grazing density, and road/railway distributions)72. These data were collected at four time points (i.e., 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015) at 1 km resolution72, and the scores of human pressure for each grid at the four time points were averaged to represent the human footprint value at our sampling sites. The human footprint values among our sampling sites were lower than those in typical cities on the Tibetan Plateau (Supplementary Fig. 10), suggesting that most of the sampling sites had been subjected to only minor human disturbance.
DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis
Soil DNA was extracted using the DNeasy PowerMax Soil Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and was subsequently purified by DNeasy PowerClean Pro Cleanup Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA quality was checked by using 1% agarose and a NanoDrop ND-8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham, MA, USA). Final DNA concentrations were quantified using PicoGreen (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) with a FLUO star OPTIMA fluorescence plate reader (BMG LabTech, Jena, Germany). The primers 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′)73 were used to amplify the hypervariable V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Subsequently, the PCR products were assessed through a 2% agarose gel, purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit from Axygen Biosciences, and quantified using QuantiFluor™ -ST Fluorometer (Promega, USA). Sequencing libraries were constructed using the TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) and evaluated by a Qubit@ 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbron, Germany). Finally, the libraries were sequenced using the Illumina Miseq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
Paired-end raw sequences were merged using Vsearch v2.15.274 with the --fastq_mergepairs function, and quality filtered using the --fastx_filter function with a maximum expected error threshold of 0.01. Filtered reads were then dereplicated using the --derep_fulllength function. Afterwards, unique sequences were denoised and clustered into ASVs using the unoise3 algorithm75. The most abundant sequence within each ASV was selected as the representative sequence and aligned against the Silva 138 database for taxonomic annotation (https://www.arb-silva.de/). Mitochondria and chloroplasts were subsequently removed. Finally, we used MUSCLE v5.176 to align the representative sequences and constructed the phylogenetic tree with FastTree v2.1.1077.
Metagenome sequencing and analysis
DNA extracts were fragmented using a Covaris M220 (Gene Company Limited, China). The resulting fragments had an approximate average size of 400 bp. A paired-end library was prepared using NEXTFLEX Rapid DNA-Seq (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using the NovaSeq 6000 S4 Reagent Kit v1.5 (300 cycles) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The workflow for the analysis of metagenomic sequence data is shown in Supplementary Fig. 11. Specifically, fastp v0.21.078 was employed to perform quality control and adapter trimming. After the quality control process, we obtained 995.8 gigabases (Gb) of metagenomic clean reads, with average value of 14.5 Gb data per sample (range from 12.3 to 17.5 Gb). Filtered reads were then assembled to contigs using megahit v1.2.979 with default k-mers. Only contigs with a length longer than 500 bp were translated to protein-coding ORFs using Prodigal v2.6.380 with metagenomic mode as default. Then, CD-HIT v4.8.181 was used to remove redundancy and generate a gene catalog by clustering ORFs at sample level and globally with a 95% sequence identity cutoff. The abundance of each gene (gene counts per KEGG Orthology-KO) was quantified using Salmon v1.5.182 and normalized to transcript per million (TPM) based on the gene length and sequencing depth. Then genes were mapped to the eggNOG 5.0 database for functional annotation using eggnog-mapper v2.1.383 with the DIAMOND mode.
Assembled contigs were further binned to metagenome-assembled genomes using metaWRAP v1.3.284 with the self-implemented MaxBin285, metaBAT, and metaBAT286 binning modules. MAGs were refined with the bin_refinement module in metaWRAP and deduplicated by dRep v3.4.387. During the bin deduplication process, the quality of MAGs was evaluated by checkM v1.2.288, and good quality MAGs (≥70% completeness and ≤10% contamination) were retained for further analysis. The bin abundance was quantified by Salmon, and their taxonomic information was annotated using GTDB-Tk v2.1.1 with the GTDB r207 database89. The recruitment rates of the MAGs were determined by aligning the qualified reads to all MAGs using bowtie2 v2.3.5.190. To determine the metabolic potential of the MAGs, we first used the Prodigal module of METABOLIC v4.048 to predict the protein-coding ORFs on all genomes. The hmmsearch program was then performed to annotate proteins against the HMM databases (KEGG KOfam, Pfam, TIGRfam, and custom HMMs) implemented within METABOLIC v4.0 with the default options. To explore the functional capacity of each metabolic pathway, metabolic weight scores (MW-scores) were calculated based on the results of metabolic profiling and gene coverage obtained from metagenomic read mapping (Supplementary Note 5). Moreover, to reveal the variations of metabolic groups and their corresponding contributions to the metabolic pathways across soil depth, we first resampled (100 times) MAGs in subsurface and permafrost layers to the same MAGs number as in the surface layer to minimize the potential bias induced by different MAGs sizes. We then computed the percentage contribution of each microbial phylum to the MW-score of each metabolic pathway with each resampled dataset (Supplementary Note 5). The average value was used as the final value of the percentage contribution. High percentage contribution indicates that microbial groups can better represent the function from both gene presence and abundance48.
Statistical analyses
A series of statistical analyses were conducted to investigate the microbial stratigraphic profile. Specifically, we used the estimate_richness function within the phyloseq91 package to calculate the Shannon-Wiener index. Faith index was determined by the pd function in the picante92 package to characterize microbial phylogenetic diversity. To explore the microbial spatial variation (β diversity), we determined the Bray-Curtis metric to characterize taxonomic variation. The βMNTD was measured by the comdistnt function of the picante92 package to characterize the phylogenetic variation. Pairwise Wilcoxon test was employed to compare the difference in above metrics among the soil layers by using the compare_means function of the ggpubr93 package. Three multivariate statistical analyses, including permutational multivariate analysis of variance (Adonis), analysis of similarities (ANOSIM), and multi-response permutation procedure (MRPP), were conducted to test the overall effect of soil layers on microbial community structure94. Furthermore, the specificity and occupancy of each ASV were calculated in each soil layer to characterize specialist ASVs29,95. Specificity is operationally defined as the average abundance of a given ASV within a set of habitat samples, while occupancy is characterized as the relative frequency with which ASV occurs within the same set of habitat samples29,95. ASVs with specificity and occupancy greater or equal to 0.7 were defined as specialist species, which indicated that they were specific to a habitat and common in most sites95.
To explore the underlying drivers of the microbial community structure, we first employed variable clustering to assess the collinearity of the eighteen environmental variables and remove redundant variables (variables with a high correlation (Spearman’s ρ2 > 0.7)) as calculated by the varclus procedure in the Hmisc96 R package. Thirteen non-redundant variables (e.g., AI, pH, NDVI; Supplementary Fig. 2) were then employed to detect correlations between the microbial community structure and environmental variables using the partial Mantel test. In this analysis, microbial compositional variation among soil samples was determined using Bray-Curtis distance, while the environmental dissimilarity matrices were calculated using Euclidean distance. Both dissimilarity matrices were computed using the vegdist function of vegan97 package. Moreover, a general framework of phylogenetic-bin-based null model analysis (iCAMP)98 was used to quantify the effects of ecological processes in shaping the microbial community. The framework employed the β-net relatedness index and the Raup-Crick index to infer phylogenetic beta diversity and taxonomic beta diversity98,99. The relative importance of five assembly processes: heterogeneous selection, homogeneous selection, dispersal limitation, homogenizing dispersal, and drift (and others such as diversification, weak selection, and/or weak dispersal) was calculated, and their differences among soil layers determined by means of the Wilcoxon test.
To better elucidate the difference in functional profiles across three soil layers, we initially identified genes associated with key biogeochemical processes related to essential elements such as carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and iron (see Supplementary Data 2). We then employed a generalized linear model (GLM) with a negative binomial distribution to estimate differences in gene expression among these soil layers. Significance was determined using a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate with P value threshold of <0.05. The GLM modeling was carried out using the glmFit function from the edgeR100 package. Further, we utilized principal coordinate analysis to assess variations in genome composition across the soil layers. Multivariate statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the overall effect of soil layers on genome composition. Additionally, we employed the Wilcoxon test to detect differences in mean genome size amongst the three soil layers. All P values generated by Wilcoxon test in this study were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate procedure. All the statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.3101.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The 16S rRNA gene sequence data and the metagenomic sequence data generated in this study are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under the BioProject number PRJNA1037019. Data for the main results of this study are publicly available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11829921. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The R code used for the statistical analyses is available at https://github.com/kangluyao/Microbes_in_Tibetan_permafrost and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11829921102.
References
Jansson, J. K. & Taş, N. The microbial ecology of permafrost. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 414–425 (2014).
Mackelprang, R., Saleska, S. R., Jacobsen, C. S., Jansson, J. K. & Taş, N. Permafrost meta-omics and climate change. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44, 439–462 (2016).
Brouillette, M. How microbes in permafrost could trigger a massive carbon bomb. Nature 591, 360–362 (2021).
Schuur, Ea. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015).
Woodcroft, B. J. et al. Genome-centric view of carbon processing in thawing permafrost. Nature 560, 49–54 (2018).
Johnston, E. R. et al. Responses of tundra soil microbial communities to half a decade of experimental warming at two critical depths. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15096–15105 (2019).
Taş, N. et al. Landscape topography structures the soil microbiome in arctic polygonal tundra. Nat. Commun. 9, 777 (2018).
Wu, M.-H. et al. Reduced microbial stability in the active layer is associated with carbon loss under alpine permafrost degradation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2025321118 (2021).
Schimel, J. P. & Clein, J. S. Microbial response to freeze-thaw cycles in tundra and taiga soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 1061–1066 (1996).
Schostag, M. et al. Bacterial and protozoan dynamics upon thawing and freezing of an active layer permafrost soil. ISME J. 13, 1345–1359 (2019).
Ren, J. et al. Shifts in soil bacterial and archaeal communities during freeze-thaw cycles in a seasonal frozen marsh, Northeast China. Sci. Total Environ. 625, 782–791 (2018).
Yergeau, E. & Kowalchuk, G. A. Responses of Antarctic soil microbial communities and associated functions to temperature and freeze–thaw cycle frequency. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2223–2235 (2008).
Bottos, E. M. et al. Dispersal limitation and thermodynamic constraints govern spatial structure of permafrost microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, fiy110 (2018).
Doherty, S. J. et al. The transition from stochastic to deterministic bacterial community assembly during permafrost thaw succession. Front. Microbiol. 11, 596589 (2020).
Ernakovich, J. G. et al. Microbiome assembly in thawing permafrost and its feedbacks to climate. Glob. Chang. Biol. 28, 5007–5026 (2022).
Nemergut, D. R. et al. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 342–356 (2013).
Rivkina, E., Gilichinsky, D., Wagener, S., Tiedje, J. & McGrath, J. Biogeochemical activity of anaerobic microorganisms from buried permafrost sediments. Geomicrobiol. J. 15, 187–193 (1998).
Lipson, D. A. et al. Changes in microbial communities along redox gradients in polygonized Arctic wet tundra soils. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7, 649–657 (2015).
Lipson, D. A. et al. Metagenomic insights into anaerobic metabolism along an Arctic peat soil profile. PLoS ONE 8, e64659 (2013).
Hinkel, K. M., Paetzold, F., Nelson, F. E. & Bockheim, J. G. Patterns of soil temperature and moisture in the active layer and upper permafrost at Barrow, Alaska: 1993–1999. Glob. Planet. Chang. 29, 293–309 (2001).
Zhang, T., Barry, R. G., Knowles, K., Heginbottom, J. A. & Brown, J. Statistics and characteristics of permafrost and ground-ice distribution in the northern hemisphere. Polar Geogr. 31, 47–68 (2008).
Chen, Y. et al. Distinct microbial communities in the active and permafrost layers on the Tibetan Plateau. Mol. Ecol. 26, 6608–6620 (2017).
Hanson, C. A., Fuhrman, J. A., Horner-Devine, M. C. & Martiny, J. B. H. Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 497–506 (2012).
Mackelprang, R. et al. Microbial survival strategies in ancient permafrost: insights from metagenomics. ISME J. 11, 2305–2318 (2017).
Waldrop, M. P. et al. Permafrost microbial communities and functional genes are structured by latitudinal and soil geochemical gradients. ISME J. 17, 1224–1235 (2023).
Steven, B., Pollard, W. H., Greer, C. W. & Whyte, L. G. Microbial diversity and activity through a permafrost/ground ice core profile from the Canadian high Arctic. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 3388–3403 (2008).
Müller, O. et al. Disentangling the complexity of permafrost soil by using high resolution profiling of microbial community composition, key functions and respiration rates. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 4328–4342 (2018).
Gittel, A. et al. Site- and horizon-specific patterns of microbial community structure and enzyme activities in permafrost-affected soils of Greenland. Front. Microbiol. 5, 541 (2014).
Dufrêne, M. & Legendre, P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67, 345–366 (1997).
Hu, D., Zang, Y., Mao, Y. & Gao, B. Identification of molecular markers that are specific to the class Thermoleophilia. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1185 (2019).
Pulschen, A. A. et al. Isolation of uncultured bacteria from Antarctica using long incubation periods and low nutritional media. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1346 (2017).
Severino, R. et al. High‐quality draft genome sequence of Gaiella occulta isolated from a 150 meter deep mineral water borehole and comparison with the genome sequences of other deep‐branching lineages of the phylum Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Open 8, e00840 (2019).
Chen, R.-W. et al. Diversity and distribution of uncultured and cultured Gaiellales and Rubrobacterales in South China Sea sediments. Front. Microbiol. 12, 657072 (2021).
Zomer, R. J., Trabucco, A., Bossio, D. A. & Verchot, L. V. Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 126, 67–80 (2008).
Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R. & Fierer, N. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5111–5120 (2009).
Maestre, F. T. et al. Increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance in global drylands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15684–15689 (2015).
Gray, N. D. et al. Soil geochemistry confines microbial abundances across an arctic landscape; implications for net carbon exchange with the atmosphere. Biogeochemistry 120, 307–317 (2014).
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Increases in aridity lead to drastic shifts in the assembly of dryland complex microbial networks. Land Degrad. Dev. 31, 346–355 (2020).
Darcy, J. L., Lynch, R. C., King, A. J., Robeson, M. S. & Schmidt, S. K. Global distribution of Polaromonas phylotypes-evidence for a highly successful dispersal capacity. PLoS One 6, e23742 (2011).
Bollag, J.-M. & Stotzky, G. Soil Biochemistry: Volume 8. (CRC Press, 2021).
Kim, H.-S., Park, K., Jo, H. Y. & Kwon, M. J. Weathering extents and anthropogenic influences shape the soil bacterial community along a subsurface zonation. Sci. Total Environ. 876, 162570 (2023).
Zhang, D. et al. Microbial nitrogen and phosphorus co-limitation across permafrost region. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 3910–3923 (2023).
Xu, X. et al. Spatio-temporal variations determine plant–microbe competition for inorganic nitrogen in an alpine meadow. J. Ecol. 99, 563–571 (2011).
Chen, Y. et al. Large-scale evidence for microbial response and associated carbon release after permafrost thaw. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 3218–3229 (2021).
Giovannoni, S. J., Cameron Thrash, J. & Temperton, B. Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology. ISME J. 8, 1553–1565 (2014).
Frey, B. et al. Microbial diversity in European alpine permafrost and active layers. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92, fiw018 (2016).
Rodríguez-Gijón, A. et al. A genomic perspective across Earth’s microbiomes reveals that genome size in archaea and bacteria is linked to ecosystem type and trophic strategy. Front. Microbiol. 12, 761869 (2022).
Zhou, Z. et al. METABOLIC: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. Microbiome 10, 33 (2022).
Cordero, P. R. F. et al. Atmospheric carbon monoxide oxidation is a widespread mechanism supporting microbial survival. ISME J. 13, 2868–2881 (2019).
Islam, Z. F. et al. A widely distributed hydrogenase oxidises atmospheric H2 during bacterial growth. ISME J. 14, 2649–2658 (2020).
Nemergut, D. R., Cleveland, C. C., Wieder, W. R., Washenberger, C. L. & Townsend, A. R. Plot-scale manipulations of organic matter inputs to soils correlate with shifts in microbial community composition in a lowland tropical rain forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 2153–2160 (2010).
Goldfarb, K. et al. Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance. Front. Microbiol. 2, 94 (2011).
Bull, A. T. Actinobacteria of the Extremobiosphere. in Extremophiles Handbook (ed. Horikoshi, K.) 1203–1240 (Springer Japan, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53898-1_58.
Tveit, A., Schwacke, R., Svenning, M. M. & Urich, T. Organic carbon transformations in high-Arctic peat soils: key functions and microorganisms. ISME J. 7, 299–311 (2013).
Altshuler, I., Goordial, J. & Whyte, L. G. Microbial Life in Permafrost. in Psychrophiles: From Biodiversity to Biotechnology (ed. Margesin, R.) 153–179 (Springer International Publishing, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57057-0_8.
Ettwig, K. F. et al. Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 464, 543–548 (2010).
Yergeau, E. et al. Shifts in soil microorganisms in response to warming are consistent across a range of Antarctic environments. ISME J. 6, 692–702 (2012).
Hultman, J. et al. Multi-omics of permafrost, active layer and thermokarst bog soil microbiomes. Nature 521, 208–212 (2015).
Carini, P. et al. Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16242 (2016).
Burkert, A., Douglas, T. A., Waldrop, M. P. & Mackelprang, R. Changes in the active, dead, and dormant microbial community structure across a pleistocene permafrost chronosequence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e02646–18 (2019).
Zou, D. et al. A new map of permafrost distribution on the Tibetan Plateau. Cryosphere 11, 2527 (2017).
Cheng, G. & Wu, T. Responses of permafrost to climate change and their environmental significance, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 112, F02S03 (2007).
Jin, H. J., Chang, X. L. & Wang, S. L. Evolution of permafrost on the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau since the end of the late Pleistocene. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 112, F02S09 (2007).
Zhao, L. & Sheng, Y. Permafrost and Its Changes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. (Science Press Beijing, 2019).
Mao, C. et al. Permafrost nitrogen status and its determinants on the Tibetan Plateau. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 5290–5302 (2020).
Qin, S. et al. Temperature sensitivity of permafrost carbon release mediated by mineral and microbial properties. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe3596 (2021).
Zhang, J., Wang, J., Chen, W., Li, B. & Zhao, K. Vegetation of Xizang (Tibet). (Science Press Beijing, 1988).
IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015: International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 203 (FAO, Rome, 2014).
Nelson, D. W. & Sommers, L. E. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. in Methods of Soil Analysis 961–1010 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1996). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34.
Rovira, P. & Vallejo, V. R. Labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen in organic matter decomposing at different depths in soil: an acid hydrolysis approach. Geoderma 107, 109–141 (2002).
Cheng, C. et al. Plant species richness on the Tibetan Plateau: patterns and determinants. Ecography 2023, e06265 (2023).
Luo, L., Duan, Q., Wang, L., Zhao, W. & Zhuang, Y. Increased human pressures on the alpine ecosystem along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway. Reg. Environ. Chang. 20, 33 (2020).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4516–4522 (2011).
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).
Edgar, R. C. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv 081257 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1101/081257.
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Method. Biochem. Anal. 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Method. Biochem. Anal. 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinf 11, 119 (2010).
Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Method. Biochem. Anal. 22, 1658–1659 (2006).
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernández-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5825–5829 (2021).
Uritskiy, G. V., DiRuggiero, J. & Taylor, J. MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome 6, 158 (2018).
Wu, Y.-W., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Method. Biochem. Anal. 32, 605–607 (2016).
Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3, e1165 (2015).
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Method. Biochem. Anal. 36, 1925–1927 (2020).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).
Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).
Kassambara, A. Ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. (2020).
Ramette, A. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 142–160 (2007).
Gweon, H. S. et al. Contrasting community assembly processes structure lotic bacteria metacommunities along the river continuum. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 484–498 (2021).
Harrell Jr, Frank E. Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous (2022).
Oksanen, J. et al. Package ‘vegan’. Community Ecology Package, version. 2, 1–295 (2013).
Ning, D. et al. A quantitative framework reveals ecological drivers of grassland microbial community assembly in response to warming. Nat. Commun. 11, 4717 (2020).
Stegen, J. C. et al. Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J. 7, 2069–2079 (2013).
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Method. Biochem. Anal. 26, 139–140 (2010).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020).
Kang et al. Metagenomic insights into microbial community structure and metabolism in alpine permafrost on the Tibetan Plateau. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11829921 (2024).
Brown, J. O. Ferrians, J. A. Heginbottom & Melnikov, E. Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground-ice conditions, version 2. (2002) https://doi.org/10.7265/skbg-kf16.
Foster, Z., Sharpton, T. & Grünwald, N. Metacoder: an R package for visualization and manipulation of community taxonomic diversity data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, 1–15 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank the members of the IBCAS Sampling Team (Drs. Dan Kou, Yongliang Chen, and Chao Mao) for permafrost sampling on the Tibetan Plateau. We also thank Dr. Changjin Cheng (South China Botanical Garden, the Chinese of Academy of Sciences) for providing data on plant species richness. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0801901), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31988102 and 32425004), and New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Y. and L.K. conceived the study. L.K. and Y.S. analyzed the data. L.K. performed the laboratory experiments. L.K. and Y.Y. wrote the manuscript. R.M., D.Z., S.Q., L.C., L.W., and Y.P. contributed to subsequent revisions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Binu Tripathi and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, L., Song, Y., Mackelprang, R. et al. Metagenomic insights into microbial community structure and metabolism in alpine permafrost on the Tibetan Plateau. Nat Commun 15, 5920 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50276-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50276-2
This article is cited by
-
Dual roles of microbes in mediating soil carbon dynamics in response to warming
Nature Communications (2024)