Abstract
The prominence and versatility of propargylic fluorides in medicinal chemistry, coupled with the potency of F/H and F/OH bioisosterism, has created a powerful impetus to develop efficient methods to facilitate their construction. Motivated by the well-established conversion of propargylic alcohols to allenes, an operationally simple, organocatalysis-based strategy to process these abundant unsaturated precursors to propargylic fluorides would be highly enabling: this would consolidate the bioisosteric relationship that connects propargylic alcohols and fluorides. Herein, we describe a highly regioselective fluorination of unactivated allenes based on I(I)/I(III) catalysis in the presence of an inexpensive HF source that serves a dual role as both nucleophile and Brønsted acid activator. This strategy enables a variety of secondary and tertiary propargylic fluorides to be prepared: these motifs are prevalent across the bioactive small molecule spectrum. Facile product derivatisation, concise synthesis of multi-vicinal fluorinated products together with preliminary validation of enantioselective catalysis are disclosed. The expansive potential of this platform is also demonstrated through the highly regioselective organocatalytic oxidation, chlorination and arylation of allenes. It is envisaged that the transformation will find application in molecular design and accelerate the exploration of organofluorine chemical space.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In the suite of molecular editing strategies that are routinely leveraged in contemporary drug discovery, fluorination is privileged1,2. The subtle bioisosteric exchange of H or OH to F introduces a powerful physicochemical modulator that enables key parameters to be precisely tailored with negligible steric consequences3,4,5,6,7,8. In the case of hydroxyl to fluorine substitution, the elimination of specific hydrogen bonds can be achieved whilst preserving the local electronic and steric environment: this frequently elicits striking changes on pKa, lipophilicity, and metabolic stability9,10,11,12,13. The juxtaposition of the small van der Waals radius of fluorine (1.47 Å)3 and its high electronegativity also manifests itself in an array of fluorine-specific conformational effects14,15: these are inextricably linked to the low-lying antibonding orbital of the C–F bond (σ*C–F). It logically follows that the introduction of C(sp3)–F bonds proximal to π-systems permits a range of stabilizing non-covalent interactions to operate, and this often gives rise to structural pre-organization in a manner complementary to steric control16. Propargylic fluorides are the simplest exemplar of this structural group, and their prevalence across the pharmaceutical and agrochemical landscapes is conspicuous17,18. In particular, the success of secondary (2°) and tertiary (3°) propargylic fluoride motifs19,20 (Fig. 1A) is a persuasive argument for continued innovation in the development of effective synthetic methods to enable construction21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28.
Motivated by the arsenal of synthetic methods to convert propargylic alcohols to allenes29,30, it was envisaged that a strategy to access the corresponding propargylic fluorides from these abundant starting materials would strengthen the bioisosteric relationship between two important drug discovery modules (Fig. 1B). Although deceptively unassuming, the title transformation presents a series of historically persistent regioselectivity challenges that must be overcome. Skeletal rearrangements31,32, and the formation of isomeric mixtures (branched versus linear)33 continue to complicate the development of a regioselective I(I)/I(III)-catalyzed fluorination of allenes. However, the ability of I(III)-species to activate allenes towards fluorination provides an important foundation for reaction development. Elegant studies by Murphy and co-workers have established that stoichiometric hypervalent iodine reagents, working in concert with a boron trifluoride etherate Lewis acid activator, allow phenyl-substituted allenes to undergo a difluorination / phenonium ion rearrangement sequence to liberate α-(difluoromethyl)styrenes (Fig. 1C)31. In contrast to this Lewis acid-based stoichiometric process to liberate geminally difluorinated products, it was envisaged that a catalytic paradigm operating under Brønsted acid activation might enable divergent selectivity to be achieved (Fig. 1D). Cognisant of the aptitude of I(I)/I(III) catalysis to orchestrate the selective fluorination of short π-systems34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41, a conceptual platform was developed that hinged on the in situ formation of an ArIF2 species by chemical oxidation42,43. In a reversal of circumstances, it was reasoned that the I(III) species would selectivity engage the terminal unit of the allene through ligand exchange (I). Formation of the C(sp3)–F bond would then generate an alkenyl iodonium species (II) that would be susceptible to elimination to liberate the product and regenerate the ArI catalyst. This would constitute an operationally simple approach to generate 2° and 3° propargylic fluorides and address a long-standing regioselectivity challenge (branched versus linear) in the I(III)-mediated fluoro-functionalization of allenes.
Herein we report a highly regioselective fluorination of unactivated allenes based on I(I)/I(III) catalysis to generate variety of secondary and tertiary propargylic fluorides. By merging this process with subsequent downstream manipulations, it has been possible to create a broad platform from which to expand the organofluorine chemical space.
Results and discussion
Reaction development
To establish the viability of a regioselective, organocatalytic fluorination platform, allene S1 was selected as a model substrate for reaction development. This aliphatic derivative was chosen to eliminate the possibility of phenonium ion rearrangement chemistry. A screen of inexpensive aryl iodide catalysts was then conducted in the presence of an amine•HF complex (1:5.0) and Selectfluor® as the terminal oxidant (Fig. 2A). This revealed 1-iodo-2,4-dimethylbenzene to be a highly effective catalyst for the title transformation, furnishing the desired propargylic fluoride 1 in 78% yield. Importantly, the reaction proved to be highly regioselective with the desired branched product being preferentially formed over the linear product (>20:1). It is important to note that 1,2-difluorination was not observed under the reaction conditions.
Reactions performed in the absence of the catalyst, oxidant, and amine•HF complex were not productive (entries 1–3), which supports the involvement of an I(I)/I(III) cycle. Modifying the oxidant (entry 4) or the amine:HF ratio (entries 5 and 6, vide infra), proved to be detrimental to efficiency. Lowering the catalyst loading to 20 mol% (entry 7) had a minor impact on efficiency, whereas reactions performed at 10 mol% (entry 8) had a more noticeable effect.
To further demonstrate the influence of Brønsted acidity on the reaction outcome44, the amine:HF ratio was plotted against the yield of fluorination as determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 2B). This revealed a plateau with the 1:5 amine:HF ratio, and is highly reminiscent of the role of TFA in chlorination reactions involving the venerable Willgerodt Reagent (PhICl2)45,46.
Since electron-rich iodobenzene derivatives pose the risk of reacting directly with Selectfluor®47, a control experiment with stoichiometric quantities of the catalyst (1-iodo-2,4-dimethylbenzene) was performed (Fig. 2C). This enabled the propargylic fluoride 1 to be generated in 80% yield, and 1-iodo-2,4-dimethylbenzene to be recovered in 41% yield. No fluorination of the catalyst was observed in the crude reaction mixture or post-reaction. Repeating this analysis on the catalytic reaction revealed closely similar results, with 70% of 1-iodo-2,4-dimethylbenzene recovered (determined by 1H NMR). Based on these preliminary data, the involvement of a fluorinated 1-iodo-2,4-dimethylbenzene derivative in the catalytic cycle can be discounted.
Substrate scope
Having established suitable reaction conditions for the regioselective fluorination of allenes, the scope and limitations of the transformation were explored. Since the organocatalyst is commercially available and inexpensive, a catalyst loading of 30 mol% was employed to maximize product formation. Subtle variations in the amine:HF ratio were also found to modulate reaction efficiency, which is fully in line with our previous observations pertaining to the influence of Brønsted acidity in I(I)/I(III)-catalyzed fluorinations39,40,41. To that end, representative substrates were exposed to four amine:HF ratios ranging from 1:4.5 through to 1:6.0, and the most effective was reported (Fig. 3, Methods A to D). To differentiate this study from previous work on activated allenes, various alkyl allenes were initially evaluated. Gratifyingly, simple alkyl and cycloalkyl derivatives were compatible with the reaction conditions, as exemplified by fluorides 1, 2, and 12. Functional groups including halides (3), ethers (4), alcohols (6), tosylates (7), and phthalimides (8) were all tolerated (up to 77% yield), and the presence of potentially sensitive benzylic positions also proved to be unproblematic (5).
Pleasingly, medicinally relevant heterocycles such as pyridines (9) and thiazoles (10) were also compatible with the reaction conditions (up to 82% yield). Moreover, the transformation proved to be highly chemoselective for the allene motif in substrates containing cyclopropanes (11) or cinnamoyl motifs (15). Allenes derived from estrone (13) and ibuprofen (14) were smoothly processed to branched propargylic fluorides in good yields and regioselectivities (>20:1), demonstrating the synthetic utility of the method in more complex settings.
To extend the scope of the method further, aryl allenes were then examined as substrates. Under stoichiometric conditions with a Lewis acid activator, these substrates are known to undergo phenonium ion rearrangements to generate α-(difluoromethyl)styrenes (Fig. 1C)31. However, this catalytic protocol with Brønsted acid activation switched the selectivity to enable a variety of electron-deficient propargylic fluorides with varying substitution patterns to be generated in a highly regioselective manner (up to 17:1, branched:linear). This is exemplified by the trifluoromethyl derivatives 16 and 17, ester 18, amide 19, and the methylsulfonyl derivative 21. Gratifyingly, aryl triflates were also compatible with the reaction conditions, which provides a handle for subsequent downstream synthetic manipulations (20). Finally, the regioselective fluorination of the l-menthol substituted aryl allene was also achieved to access compound 22.
To enable the construction of tertiary propargylic fluorides, attention was turned to exploring the regioselective fluorination of 1,1-disubstituted allenes (Fig. 4). A range of α-chloroalkylated allenes with aryl and alkyl substituents were initially subjected to the general catalysis conditions, and this led to the formation of tertiary propargylic fluorides (up to 78%) which contain alkyne and C(sp3)-Cl handles for facile derivatization (23–26). It is interesting to note that this method enables products, such as 23 and 24, to be forged which contain C(sp), C(sp2), and C(sp3) substituent directly bound to the fluorine-bearing center.
Moreover, the tertiary propargylic fluoride 23 could be generated with only a slight reduction in yield using 20 mol% catalyst loading. Replacing CH2Cl by CH2F as the allene substituent was also successful, enabling a vicinal difluoride motif (27) to be generated in 66% yield15. Given the importance of homopropargyl ether and amine fragments in the synthesis of bioactive molecules, α-oxy and aminoalkylated allenes were introduced [28 (61%) and 29 (55%)], in addition to the unsubstituted derivative 30. The compatibility of the method with a d-menthol derived allene was also validated (31, 73%).
Synthetic applications
Telescoping the reaction from 0.1 mmol to 1.5 and 2.0 mmol scale was then demonstrated with compounds 23 and 26, respectively (Fig. 5A). These experiments illustrate the synthetic utility of this approach in generating versatile fluorinated linchpins. To further demonstrate this, alkyne 23 was converted to aryl and acyl substituted internal alkynes 32 and 33 through Pd-catalyzed Sonogashira coupling (Fig. 5B). Complete and semi-hydrogenation of alkyne 1 proved facile, affording alkane and alkene products 34 and 35, respectively. Ag-catalyzed oxidation of alkyne 1 enabled the α-fluoro ketone 36 to be prepared in an operationally simple manner48. Finally, triazole 37 was generated through a copper-catalyzed click reaction, further underscoring the value of propargylic fluorides in heterocycle formation. To demonstrate the synthetic potential of the transformation in generating multiply fluorinated scaffolds, a sequential I(I)/I(III) catalysis-based protocol was devised (Fig. 5C)49. Crabbé reaction of alkyne 26 enabled the allene 38 to be prepared in 56% yield: this species was then subjected to an I(I)/I(III) catalysis cycle, enabling regioselective 1,2-difluorination to afford 39 as the sole product (>20:1 Z/E). Moreover, preliminary validation of enantioselective catalysis was achieved using chiral resorcinol-derived aryl iodides as chiral mediators50,51. This enabled the tertiary propargylic fluoride 25 to be obtained in 73.5:26.5 er and 76.5:23.5 er (Fig. 5D). These results constitute an encouraging platform for the future development of enantioselective, organocatalytic allene fluorination protocols.
General catalytic functionalization of allenes
To explore the expansiveness of this transformation, the aptitude of the catalysis to orchestrate related allene functionalization reactions was investigated. It was envisaged that the introduction of exogenous nucleophiles other than fluoride, which would necessarily be accompanied by variations in Brønsted acidity, may reveal unprecedented structural motifs (Fig. 6). Our initial investigation focused on replacing HF by AcOH to generate propargyl acetates as surrogates of the bioisosteric alcohols described in Fig. 1. Under the standard catalysis conditions, the reaction proved ineffective. However, the introduction of hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) as the reaction medium proved to be effective in unlocking the desired reactivity52,53,54: this allowed the propargyl acetate 40 to be prepared in good yield and regioselectivity. This further underscores the value of HFIP in I(I)/I(III)-catalyzed acetoxylation reactions. Attempts to synthesize the propargyl amine regioselectively using NHTs2 as the nucleophile were unsuccessful (see Supplementary Information)33. Leveraging benzene as a non-protic nucleophilic solvent was then explored. This led to a selectivity switch such that diarylation occurred to yield the highly functionalized styrene 41 (55%, Z:E = 5.5:1). Moreover, a similar strategy utilizing CsCl as the nucleophile enabled the 1,2-dichloride 42 to be generated in 70% yield (Z:E = 2.5:1)55,56. In all cases, the removal of the organocatalyst completely suppressed the acetoxylation, arylation, and chlorination of allene S16. It is tempting to speculate that these data open up a wealth of possibilities for the regioselective difunctionalization of simple allenes by I(I)/I(III) catalysis.
Inspired by the functional diversity of propargylic fluorides in the small molecule agrochemical and pharmaceutical arena, a highly regioselective fluorination of unactivated allenes has been realized by a metal-free I(I)/I(III) catalysis platform. This blueprint enables readily available allenes to be processed to an array of secondary and tertiary propargylic fluorides with broad functional group tolerance. By operating under the auspices of I(I)/I(III) catalysis, in which HF serves as a source of nucleophile and Brønsted acid activator, regiochemical challenges and skeletal rearrangements are mitigated, unlocking divergent selectivity that is complementary to that is observed using stoichiometric I(III) reagents. The synthetic utility of the transformation is demonstrated through facile product derivatization, scale-up experiments, and preliminary validation of enantioselective catalysis. Integrating this process in a reaction sequence has also been achieved to generate a multiply fluorinated product with clearly defined sites for yet further modification. The expansive potential of the transformation has been demonstrated in acetoxylation, and the ability to modulate regioselection, are illustrated in diarylation and dichlorination reactions. Further expanding the generality of this organocatalytic functionalization of allenes beyond the construction of C–F, C–O, C–Cl, and C–C bonds will be the subject of future investigations.
Methods
General procedure for regioselective fluorination of allenes
Unless otherwise stated, a Teflon® vial was equipped with a 1 cm stirring bar followed by the addition of allene (0.1 mmol, 1.0 eq.), 1-iodo-2,4-dimethylbenzene (7 mg, 0.03 mmol, 30 mol%) and DCM (0.25 mL). The stated amine:HF mixture was added (0.25 mL) via syringe. After stirring for 1 min, Selectfluor® (71 mg, 0.2 mmol, 2.0 eq.) was added in one portion. The reaction vessel was then sealed with a Teflon® screw cap. After stirring (350 rpm) at ambient temperature for 24 h, the reaction mixture was poured into 100 mL of a saturated solution of NaHCO3 (CAUTION, generation of CO2!). The Teflon® vial was rinsed with DCM and dropped into another flask of saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 to guarantee the removal of excess HF. The organics were extracted with DCM (3 × 30 mL), the combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent was carefully removed under reduced pressure. An internal standard (ethyl fluoroacetate) was added to the crude residue. The NMR yield and regioselectivity ratio (branched:linear) were analyzed by 19F NMR spectroscopy against the internal standard. The NMR sample was recombined with the crude residue and purification by column chromatography or preparative thin-layer chromatography yielded the desired product.
Data availability
Supplementary Information is available for this paper. All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. Data supporting the findings of this manuscript are also available from the authors upon request.
References
Müller, K., Faeh, C. & Diederich, F. Fluorine in pharmaceuticals: looking beyond intuition. Science 317, 1881–1886 (2007).
Liang, T., Neumann, C. N. & Ritter, T. Introduction of fluorine and fluorine-containing functional groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 8214–8264 (2013).
O’Hagan, D. Understanding organofluorine chemistry. An introduction to the C–F bond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 308–319 (2008).
Purser, S., Moore, P. R., Swallow, S. & Gouverneur, V. Fluorine in medicinal chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 320–330 (2008).
Gillis, E. P., Eastman, K. J., Hill, M. D., Donnelly, D. J. & Meanwell, N. A. Applications of fluorine in medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 58, 8315–8359 (2015).
Meanwell, N. A. Fluorine and fluorinated motifs in the design and application of bioisosteres for drug design. J. Med. Chem. 61, 5822–5880 (2018).
Molnár, I. G., Thiehoff, C., Holland, M. C. & Gilmour, R. Catalytic, vicinal difluorination of olefins: creating a hybrid, chiral bioisostere of the trifluoromethyl and ethyl groups. ACS Catal. 6, 7167–7173 (2016).
Bentler, P. et al. Inverting small molecule-protein recognition by the fluorine gauche effect: selectivity regulated by multiple H → F bioisosterism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 10990–10994 (2018).
Hagmann, W. K. The many roles for fluorine in medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 51, 4359–4369 (2008).
Wang, J. et al. Fluorine in pharmaceutical industry: fluorine-containing drugs introduced to the market in the last decade (2001–2011). Chem. Rev. 114, 2432–2506 (2014).
Zhou, Y. et al. Next generation of fluorine-containing pharmaceuticals, compounds currently in phase II–III clinical trials of major pharmaceutical companies: new structural trends and therapeutic areas. Chem. Rev. 116, 422–518 (2016).
Champagne, P. A., Desroches, J., Hamel, J.-D., Vandamme, M. & Paquin, J.-F. Monofluorination of organic compounds: 10 years of innovation. Chem. Rev. 115, 9073–9174 (2015).
Inoue, M., Sumii, Y. & Shibata, N. Contribution of organofluorine compounds to pharmaceuticals. ACS Omega 5, 10633–10640 (2020).
Aufiero, M. & Gilmour, R. Informing molecular design by stereoelectronic theory: the fluorine gauche effect in catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1701–1710 (2018).
Thiehoff, C., Rey, Y. P. & Gilmour, R. The fluorine gauche effect: a brief history. Isr. J. Chem. 57, 92–100 (2017).
Zimmer, L. E., Sparr, C. & Gilmour, R. Fluorine conformational effects in organocatalysis: an emerging strategy for molecular design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 11860–11871 (2011).
Jeschke, P. The unique role of fluorine in the design of active ingredients for modern crop protection. Chembiochem 5, 570–589 (2004).
Fujiwara, T. & O’Hagan, D. Successful fluorine-containing herbicide agrochemicals. J. Fluor. Chem. 167, 16–29 (2014).
Pacheco, M. C., Purser, S. & Gouverneur, V. The chemistry of propargylic and allylic fluorides. Chem. Rev. 108, 1943–1981 (2008).
Arimitsu, S. Syntheses and synthetic applications of functionalized propargylic and allylic fluorides. Chem. Rec. 23, e202300021 (2023).
Carroll, L., Pacheco, M. C., Garcia, L. & Gouverneur, V. Synthesis of propargylic fluorides from allenylsilanes. Chem. Commun. 4113–4115 (2006).
Carroll, L., McCullough, S., Rees, T., Claridge, T. D. W. & Gouverneur, V. Stereospecific anti SE2′ fluorination of allenylsilanes: synthesis of enantioenriched propargylic fluorides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 6, 1731–1733 (2008).
Yang, H., Xu, B. & Hammond, G. B. Highly regioselective fluorination and iodination of alkynyl enolates. Org. Lett. 10, 5589–5591 (2008).
Jiang, H. et al. Target-directed organocatalysis: a direct asymmetric catalytic approach to chiral propargylic and allylic fluorides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7153–7157 (2009).
Cheng, L.-J. & Cordier, C. J. Catalytic nucleophilic fluorination of secondary and tertiary propargylic electrophiles with a copper–N-heterocyclic carbene complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 13734–13738 (2015).
Hachem, A., Grée, D., Chandrasekhar, S. & Grée, R. Synthesis of propargylic fluorides toward carbo- and heterocycles with mono- and gem-difluorinated side chains. Synthesis 49, 2101–2116 (2017).
Bochatay, V. N., Chemla, F., Ferreira, F., Jackowski, O. & Perez-Luna, A. β-amino propargylic fluorides through stereoselective electrophilic fluorodesilylation of 4-amino-1-allenylsilanes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 3862–3866 (2018).
Yuan, S. & Zheng, W.-H. Enantioselective construction of tertiary α-alkyl fluoride via BTM-catalyzed fluorination of α-alkynyl-substituted acetic acids. J. Org. Chem. 87, 713–720 (2022).
Yu, S. & Ma, S. How easy are the syntheses of allenes? Chem. Commun. 47, 5384–5418 (2011).
Du, S., Zhou, A.-X., Yang, R., Song, X.-R. & Xiao, Q. Recent advances in the direct transformation of propargylic alcohols to allenes. Org. Chem. Front. 8, 6760–6782 (2021).
Zhao, Z., Racicot, L. & Murphy, G. K. Fluorinative rearrangements of substituted phenylallenes mediated by (difluoroiodo)toluene: synthesis of α-(difluoromethyl)styrenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 11620–11623 (2017).
Moriarty, R. M., Hopkins, T. E., Vaid, R. K., Vaid, B. K. & Levy, S. G. Hypervalent Iodine oxidation of allenes: synthesis of 3-acetoxy-3-alkoxypropynes, 2-alkoxy-3-tosyloxypropanals and phenyl-substituted propenals and propenones. Synthesis 847, 849 (1992).
Purkait, N., Okumura, S., Souto, J. A. & Muñiz, K. Hypervalent iodine mediated oxidative amination of allenes. Org. Lett. 16, 4750–4753 (2014).
Arnold, A. M., Ulmer, A. & Gulder, T. Advances in iodine (iii)-mediated halogenations: a versatile tool to explore new reactivities and selectivities. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 8728–8739 (2016).
Meyer, S., Häfliger, J. & Gilmour, R. Expanding organofluorine chemical space: the design of chiral fluorinated isosteres enabled by I(I)/I(III) catalysis. Chem. Sci. 12, 10686–10695 (2021).
Lee, J. H., Choi, S. & Hong, K. B. Alkene difunctionalization using hypervalent iodine reagents: progress and developments in the past ten years. Molecules 24, 2634 (2019).
Hara, S. et al. Difluorination of alkenes with iodotoluene difluoride. Synlett 1998, 495–496 (1998).
Banik, S. M., Medley, J. W. & Jacobsen, E. N. Catalytic, diastereoselective 1,2-difluorination of alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5000–5003 (2016).
Molnár, I. G. & Gilmour, R. Catalytic difluorination of olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 5004–5007 (2016).
Scheidt, F. et al. Enantioselective, catalytic vicinal difluorination of alkenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 16431–16435 (2018).
Meyer, S. et al. A chiral pentafluorinated isopropyl group via iodine(i)/(iii) catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 6430–6434 (2021).
Ye, C., Twamley, B. & Shreeve, J. M. Straightforward syntheses of hypervalent iodine(III) reagents mediated by selectfluor. Org. Lett. 7, 3961–3964 (2005).
Sarie, J. C. et al. Deconstructing the catalytic, vicinal difluorination of alkenes: HF-free synthesis and structural study of p-TolIF2. J. Org. Chem. 82, 11792–11798 (2017).
Longuet, M. et al. Determination of the Hammett acidity of HF/base reagents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c02344 (2024).
Cotter, J. L., Andrews, L. J. & Keefer, R. M. The trifluoroacetic acid catalyzed reaction of iodobenzene dichloride with ethylenic compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84, 793–797 (1962).
Sarie, J. C., Neufeld, J., Daniliuc, C. G. & Gilmour, R. Willgerodt-type dichloro(aryl)-λ3-iodanes: a structural study. Synthesis 51, 4408–4416 (2019).
Capilato, J. N. & Lectka, T. Arene amination instead of fluorination: substitution pattern governs the reactivity of dialkoxybenzenes with selectfluor. J. Org. Chem. 86, 5771–5777 (2021).
Thuong, M. B. T., Mann, A. & Wagner, A. Mild chemo-selective hydration of terminal alkynes catalysed by AgSbF6. Chem. Commun. 48, 434–436 (2012).
Häfliger, J., Ruyet, L., Stübke, N., Daniliuc, C. G. & Gilmour, R. Integrating I(I)/I(III) catalysis in reaction cascade design enables the synthesis of gem-difluorinated tetralins from cyclobutanols. Nat. Commun. 14, 3207 (2023).
Schäfer, M., Stünkel, T., Daniliuc, C. G. & Gilmour, R. Regio- and enantioselective intermolecular aminofluorination of alkenes via iodine(I)/iodine(III) catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202205508 (2022).
Zhang, X., Liu, M., Ge, H. & Zhang, Z. Second-layer chiral environment-induced steric hindrance enables catalyst conformation lockdown in enantioselective hypervalent iodine organocatalysis. ACS Catal. 13, 8273–8280 (2023).
Pozhyddaiev, V., Power, M., Gandon, V., Moran, J. & Leboeuf, D. Exploiting hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) in Lewis and Bronsted acid-catalysed reactions. Chem. Commun. 56, 11548–11564 (2020).
Piejko, M., Moran, J. & Leboeuf, D. Difunctionalization processes enabled by hexafluoroisopropanol. ACS Org. Inorg. Au https://doi.org/10.1021/acsorginorgau.3c00067 (2024).
Arnold, A. M., Pöthig, A., Drees, M. & Gulder, T. NXS, morpholine, and HFIP: the ideal combination for biomimetic haliranium-induced polyene cyclizations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4344–4353 (2018).
Sarie, J. C., Neufeld, J., Daniliuc, C. G. & Gilmour, R. Catalytic vicinal dichlorination of unactivated alkenes. ACS Catal. 9, 7232–7237 (2019).
Zhao, Z. & Murphy, G. K. Chlorination of phenylallene derivatives with 1-chloro-1,2-benziodoxol-3-one: synthesis of vicinal-dichlorides and chlorodienes. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 14, 796–802 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the technical departments of the Institute for Organic Chemistry at the University of Münster. We acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant RECON 818949, R.G.), the China Scholarship Council (Y.X.), and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Z.-X.W.).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Z.-X.W., R.G.; Methodology: Z.-X.W., R.G.; Investigation: Z.-X.W., Y.X.; Funding acquisition: Z.-X.W., R.G.; Project administration: Z.-X.W., R.G.; Writing: Z.-X.W., R.G.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, ZX., Xu, Y. & Gilmour, R. Regioselective fluorination of allenes enabled by I(I)/I(III) catalysis. Nat Commun 15, 5770 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50227-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50227-x