Abstract
Bats are natural reservoirs for several zoonotic viruses, potentially due to an enhanced capacity to control viral infection. However, the mechanisms of antiviral responses in bats are poorly defined. Here we established a Jamaican fruit bat (JFB, Artibeus jamaicensis) intestinal organoid model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Upon infection with SARS-CoV-2, increased viral RNA and subgenomic RNA was detected, but no infectious virus was released, indicating that JFB organoids support only limited viral replication but not viral reproduction. SARS-CoV-2 replication was associated with significantly increased gene expression of type I interferons and inflammatory cytokines. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 also caused enhanced formation and growth of JFB organoids. Proteomics revealed an increase in inflammatory signaling, cell turnover, cell repair, and SARS-CoV-2 infection pathways. Collectively, our findings suggest that primary JFB intestinal epithelial cells mount successful antiviral interferon responses and that SARS-CoV-2 infection in JFB cells induces protective regenerative pathways.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bats are considered important natural reservoirs for a variety of emerging zoonotic viruses that cause several illnesses in humans and other mammals1, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), Hendra virus, and Nipah virus2,3,4,5,6. The COVID-19 pandemic was caused by severe acute respiratory coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)7, which also is thought to have its evolutionary origin in bats. This hypothesis is based on multiple studies that demonstrated a high level of genetic similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and several bat-borne coronaviruses such as RatG13 (96.1% identity7) and BANAL-52 (96.8% identity8), which have been detected in bat feces. Studies from a number of different bat species have shown that bat viruses, including coronaviruses, achieve long-term colonization of intestinal tissues without causing apparent disease9,10,11,12. In a study by Watanabe et al. on wild bats captured in the Philippines10, enteric coronaviruses were detected in >50% of the animals, but clinical signs of disease were absent. Similarly, Subudhi et al. found that 30% of North American little brown bats harbored coronaviruses in their intestines but did not display any signs of illness11. Becker et al. describe a similar level of coronavirus infection, 21%, in rectal swabs of vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus), with no significant impact on serum proteome composition13. Tong et al. analyzed rectal swabs and intestinal tissues from asymptomatic fruit bats in Peru and identified a novel influenza A virus, H18N1112. In contrast to bats, where gastrointestinal infections with eukaryotic viruses are frequent and are commonly asymptomatic14, a similar colonization of the human gut with non-pathogenic eukaryotic viruses has not been reported, pointing to species-specific mechanisms15.
Studying coronavirus infection in the GI tracts of bats is difficult, since few institutions maintain bat colonies for in vivo infection experiments, and cell lines from the GI tract of bats are not available, limiting in vitro analyses16,17. Organoid cultures have excellent potential as a model to study the mechanisms of viral infection in bat cells in vitro18,19, since organoid lines can be derived from multiple species and tissues and can be maintained long-term. Organoids are permanent three-dimensional cultures that replicate the physiological and functional characteristics of their tissues of origin and that allow controlled studies of complex primary GI epithelial tissues in vitro20. Organoids from various human and murine tissues have been developed from tissue-derived stem cells and have been successfully used to investigate a wide range of disease processes, including viral infections18,19,21,22. Importantly, growth conditions for organoids appear similar across multiple species23. In a recent study, Chan et al. successfully generated 3-D airway organoids from tracheal epithelial monolayer cultures of cave nectar bats, Eonycteris spelaea24. Two previous reports describe the generation of intestinal organoid cultures from bat species25,26. Intestinal organoids developed from Chinese horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus sinicus, showed susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, but lacked long-term active proliferation past 4-5 weeks27. Intestinal organoids derived from Leschenault’s rousette, Rousettus leschenaultii, showed susceptibility to Pteropine orthoreovirus, but not SARS-CoV-225. However, neither of these studies evaluated the cellular antiviral mechanisms of bat organoid tissues25,27.
The hypothesis that altered IFN responses in bats compared to other species promote increased viral tolerance is a central paradigm in bat immunology28,29,30. In Australian black flying foxes (P. alecto) and lesser short-nosed fruit bats (C. brachyotis), a high level of constitutive IFN-α expression was detected30, which has led to the concept that an “always on” IFN signaling system in bats can effectively suppress viral replication and prevent disease early on after infection28,31. Increased basal gene expression in bats also was described for several other genes involved in innate viral recognition and response, including IRF1, IRF3 and IRF732 and the ISG oligoadenylate synthase 1 (OAS1)33. Conversely, gene expression of type I IFNs in multiple tissues from Egyptian fruit bats (R. aegyptiacus) was low at baseline, but was inducible upon viral infection34. Other studies have reported dampened activation of stimulator of IFN genes (STING), a nucleic acid sensor involved in the regulation of IFN expression upon viral infection35,36. These reports highlight that the mechanisms of IFN expression, regulation, and signaling appear to be unique to individual bat species, pointing to a need for more detailed analyses.
Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis, JFBs) are thought to be natural carriers of zoonotic pathogens such as rabies virus, West Nile virus and dengue virus37,38,39,40. JFBs are New World bats that are among the most common bats in the Americas and often live close to human settlements, so that spillover of zoonotic pathogens may occur. JFBs also are susceptible to experimental infection with Zika virus and MERS-CoV4,41. Based on the recently annotated genome42,43, JFBs have one interferon (IFN)-β, four IFN-α, one INF-κ, one IFN-ε and four IFN-ω genes. Multiple interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) have also been identified. Therefore, JFBs are considered a relevant and tractable model system for studies of viral infection and antiviral immunity.
Here we established and characterized gut organoids from JFBs to study the susceptibility and immune response of the JFB intestinal epithelium to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Importantly, our organoid model was developed for a New World bat species, which have generally been underinvestigated44,45. We found that JFB intestinal epithelial cells supported modest viral replication that did not result in the release of infectious virions or cytopathic effects. Importantly, the organoids mounted a robust interferon response following exposure with infectious SARS-CoV-2. Proteomics and pathway analysis revealed that the JFB organoid proteome profiles matched profiles found in other SARS-CoV-2 infection studies in human nasal epithelium and multiple cell lines46,47,48,49,50. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection activated innate inflammatory and cellular repair responses in the intestinal organoid model.
Results
Development and characterization of JFB gastrointestinal organoids
We established JFB gastrointestinal organoid cultures from fresh and cryopreserved stomach and from proximal and distal intestine (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). The microscopic anatomy of the proximal and distal intestinal tissue used for organoid derivation was consistent with that of the small intestine, with prominent villi and few goblet cells (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 3b). Organoids formed within one day of crypt/gland isolation and were successfully maintained in a simple growth medium containing DMEM and 50% L-WRN-conditioned medium (Supplementary Fig. 1c). The murine noggin, R-spondin, and Wnt3a secreted by the L-WRN cells51 show protein sequence similarities of 98%, 86%, and 99% with the orthologous JFB proteins, suggesting that these factors would be active in JFB cells (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Established JFB organoids mimicked the epithelial structure of JFB gastrointestinal tissue, with a simple columnar epithelium, a basal nucleus, and a defined luminal space (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). Mucus-secreting goblet cells were more common in organoids derived from distal intestine than those from proximal intestine, similar to the cellular composition of the respective tissues of origins (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). Morphometric analysis with OrganoSeg52 showed that organoid size varied between different passages, but with no clear trends, and organoid shape also did not change significantly over six consecutive passages (Fig. 1c).
We next performed transcriptional analysis of the organoids to confirm tissue-specific gene expression patterns. The distal and proximal intestinal organoids expressed the intestine-specific genes Vil1 and Cdx2 as well as Ace2, while the gastric organoids showed increased expression of the chief cell marker pepsinogen C (Pgc) (Fig. 1d). For two representative lines of the distal intestine, expression of the intestinal markers Muc2, Vil1 and Cdx2 remained relatively stable over eight passages (Fig. 1e), with a significant increase of villin expression in p7 but no clear trends overall. Expression of Pgc and Ace2 also remained stable (Fig. 1e). While Pgc is predominantly expressed in the stomach, expression in the small intestine has been described in humans53. Notably, copy numbers for Ace2 were very low compared to the other targets.
We focused our further analyses on organoids from the intestine as a putative site for SARS-CoV-2 replication. To confirm the identity of the distal intestinal epithelium in our organoid model, we used immunofluorescence staining with cross-reactive antibodies and reagents. The majority of organoids had a typical apical-in conformation, with apical villin expression and strong phalloidin staining of the apical cell portions, indicative of the terminal actin web and microvilli formation (Fig. 2a). All cells also expressed intracellular epithelial cytokeratin. ACE2 expression was detected on the apical cell surface, with some weak basal staining. Transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 2b) confirmed the presence of characteristic microvilli on the apical surface of the epithelial cells, along with electron-dense apical junctional complexes consistent with an enterocyte phenotype. We further characterized the JFB distal intestinal organoids by performing an unbiased proteome analysis using data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry. Several key proteins characteristic of small intestinal epithelial cells in other mammals such as villin, E-cadherin, keratin 18 and 19, Na+/K+ ATPase, claudin 18, and a mucin (MUC5AC-like) were detected (Fig. 2c)54. Measurement of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) across organoid monolayers seeded on transwell inserts showed that the gastrointestinal organoids established a physiological epithelial barrier, with the stomach having the highest TEER compared to the intestinal organoids (Fig. 2d). Collectively, these analyses demonstrate that gastrointestinal organoids from JFBs replicate key features of the gut epithelium.
Infection of intestinal organoids from JFBs with SARS-CoV-2 leads to replication of viral genomes
To determine whether the JFB intestine supports SARS-CoV-2 infection, organoids were dissociated and then inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 at MOIs of 0.1, 1 and 10. We selected distal intestinal organoids for these experiments, based on several previous publications that demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 replication in human ileal organoids55,56,57. Quantitative PCR analysis of viral genomes in JFB organoid cell lysates revealed a significant, concentration-dependent increase (> 1 log, P ≤ 0.05) in SARS-CoV-2 gene E RNA at 48 and 72 h post infection (hpi, Fig. 3a). The SARS-CoV-2 PCR in culture supernatants showed a similar increase at an MOI of 1 at 48 hpi (Fig. 3b). Importantly, significant expression of subgenomic (sg)RNA (> 2 log-fold above baseline) for gene E indicating active viral replication in the organoids also was identified58, albeit at low levels (Fig. 3c). However, plaque assays performed on the culture supernatants failed to detect the presence of infectious SARS-CoV-2 above baseline values derived from the inoculum, suggesting incomplete or ineffective viral replication or failure to secrete infectious progeny virus (Fig. 3d). Notably, SARS-CoV-2 incubation in medium for 48 h did not impact detection of viral copy numbers by PCR but did reduce the viral titer measured by plaque assay by >1 log-fold, suggesting a loss of infectivity over time (Supplementary Fig. 4). Interestingly, immunofluorescence analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in infected JFB organoids revealed only a few positive cells, and these cells were not associated with morphologically intact organoids (Fig. 3e).
Lack of cytopathic effect but Increased growth in SARS-CoV-2-infected JFB organoids
We also evaluated the cell viability of JFB distal intestinal organoids following SARS-CoV-2 infection by measuring caspase-3 activity with NucView® 59 (Fig. 4a). In Vero E6 cells, infection with SARS-CoV-2 induced a strong upregulation of caspase-3, consistent with the well-characterized cytopathic effect of the virus in this cell type. A small number of apoptotic cells were present in all JFB organoid cultures, likely due to physiological cell turnover. However, in contrast to observations in Rhinolophus sinicus organoids27, SARS-CoV-2 did not appear to have a cytopathic effect in JFB organoids (Fig. 4a, b), since the proportion of apoptotic cells did not change upon infection. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 caused a significant increase in organoid size and in the number of organoids that had re-formed from single cells after 48 h of infection (Fig. 4c, d), indicating that viral infection triggered increased cell proliferation in the bat intestinal epithelium.
SARS-CoV-2 induces expression of type I interferons and proinflammatory cytokines in JFB organoids
Unique characteristics of the interferon (IFN) system have been linked to the increased viral tolerance observed in many bat species28. Therefore, we used quantitative RT-PCR to analyze gene expression of type I interferons and proinflammatory cytokines in JFB distal intestinal organoids following 48 h exposure to SARS-CoV-2. As shown in Fig. 5a, expression of Ifna was upregulated at 48 hpi with an MOI of 10, while an MOI of 1 caused significant upregulation of the gene at 72 hpi. Gene expression of Ifnb also was significantly increased with both MOIs at 48 hpi and remained elevated with the lower viral dose at 72 hpi (Fig. 5b). Type III IFNs are known to play a role in mucosal antiviral immunity and SARS-CoV-2 infection and also may have unique functions in bats60,61,62. However, the type III IFN loci in JFBs are poorly annotated42,43, and we were unable to generate functional primers based on the published genome. Interestingly, organoid infection with SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 1 significantly increased expression of the proinflammatory cytokines Tnf and Il6 at 48 hpi, and Il6 remained elevated at 72 hpi (Fig. 5c, d). The above data suggest that JFB distal organoids exhibited an anti-viral and pro-inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
To determine whether active viral infection was responsible for the observed induction of antiviral and inflammatory genes, or whether gene expression was induced by unspecific activation of pattern recognition receptors, we also treated the JFB organoids with a panel of TLR agonists targeting TLR2, 3, 7, and 9 and with UV-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 for 48 h. Notably, stimulation with TLR2/1 and TLR3 agonists led to increased expression of interferon and inflammatory cytokines 6 h post inoculation (Supplementary Fig. 5). However, no significant upregulation of these genes was observed with any of the stimuli at 48 h (Fig. 5e–h). These observations suggest that active infection with SARS-CoV-2 is required for sustained upregulation of antiviral and inflammatory gene expression.
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the JFB intestinal epithelial cell proteome
A quantitative proteomic workflow based on data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry was used to perform a comprehensive analysis of the cellular responses of JFB organoids to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The DIA analysis of SARS-CoV-2-infected and mock-infected enteroids after 48 h yielded a total of 8321 proteins and protein isoforms, based on protein FASTA files retrieved from the A. jamaicensis reference genome63,64. Interestingly, all detected proteins were present in both experimental conditions. A comparative analysis of mock-infected and SARS-CoV-2 infected JFB organoids revealed 63 upregulated and 155 downregulated proteins, including isoforms, with a ≥ 2-fold change at P ≤ 0.05 (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Data 1). To better understand antiviral responses in the JFB intestine, we next compared the identified proteins to a comprehensive list of human interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs, Supplementary Data 2)65. Interestingly, 100 of all identified JFB proteins could tentatively be classified as ISGs. However, only one of the ISG proteins, ribonucleases P/MRP protein subunit POP1 (POP1), was significantly upregulated in response to SARS-CoV-2, while four ISG proteins (ERLEC1, CFB, ARMCX3 and ITIH2) were significantly downregulated (Fig. 6b). Overall, top upregulated proteins, based on fold change in abundance, were hepatocyte growth factor-like protein/macrophage stimulatory protein (HGFL/MST1), CUB domain-containing protein 1-like, acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5 (ACBD5), ketosamine-3-kinase (KT3K) and insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1, Fig. 6c). Top down-regulated proteins included BTB/POZ domain-containing adapter for CUL3-mediated RhoA degradation protein 3 (KCTD10), CSC1-like protein 1 (TMEM63A), nuclear complex protein 3 homologue, histone H2A-β, and cell division complex protein 45 homologue (CDC45). Several of these proteins are involved in regulation of cell turnover and posttranslational modifications. We next performed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and Enrichr analysis66 to assess more complex functional changes induced by SARS-CoV-2. IPA revealed acute phase response signaling, a key innate pathway triggered by infection and injury, as the most significantly regulated pathway, followed by Apelin liver signaling67, which is involved in intestinal inflammation, repair, and wound healing (Fig. 6d). Top regulated cellular functions were cell assembly, organization, maintenance, movement, signaling and morphology (Fig. 6d). These findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 triggers regenerative response pathways, consistent with the increased organoid size observed in the SARS-CoV-2-infected compared to mock-infected cultures. Similarly, Enrichr identified significant upregulation of pathways associated with cell viability and differentiation, such as PI3/AKT signaling and the longevity regulating pathway, along with signatures associated with intestinal epithelial infection and chemokine signaling when using the human 2021 KEGG pathways database (Fig. 6e). Importantly, Enrichr analysis also found multiple significant matches for protein signatures that were previously found to be upregulated in SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vero E6 cells46,47,50, MA-104 cells50, a human hepatocyte line48, and human nasal epithelium49 (Fig. 6f). Overall, the proteomics analysis points to the activation of innate inflammatory and regenerative pathways along with characteristic COVID-19 signatures upon SARS-CoV-2 infection of the JFB intestinal epithelium.
Discussion
In this study, we established and characterized organoid cultures from the proximal and distal intestine and stomach of JFBs, a frugivorous species of New World bats, which have generally been underrepresented in immunological and virological studies44,45. Using this organoid model, we investigated the response of JFB intestinal epithelial cells to infection with SARS-CoV-2. Considering that JFBs are susceptible to MERS-CoV, Zika virus, and rabies virus4,40,41, we evaluated the susceptibility of the JFB distal intestinal organoids to SARS-CoV-2. We found evidence of limited, non-productive infection with induction of antiviral genes. Notably, JFBs are not thought to be natural carriers of SARS-CoV-2 or of related sarbecoviruses, and a recent preprint describing in vivo infection experiments in JFBs indicated that SARS-CoV-2 leads to an abortive infection of the intestine without development of clinical disease68. Since SARS-CoV-2 is not adapted to JFBs, we assume that no host-specific viral immune evasion mechanisms have evolved, enabling activation of innate response pathways. Considering the vast number and associated genetic diversity of bat species, it is not surprising that SARS-CoV-2 infection experiments in other bat species have yielded conflicting results. In Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus), transient asymptomatic respiratory tract infection with viral replication in lung and trachea and oral and fecal shedding was achieved upon experimental SARS-CoV-2 inoculation69. Conversely, American big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) appeared resistant to infection with SARS-CoV-270. Two independent studies on Brazilian free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) by Bosco-Lauth71 and Hall72 found variable levels of susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the absence of clinical signs. Likewise, intestinal organoids derived from two different bat species responded differently to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Organoids from Chinese horseshoe bats, where SARS-CoV-2-like virus has been detected7, produced infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions at similar levels as human intestinal organoids27. In contrast, intestinal organoids from Leschenault’s rousette bats (Rousettus leschenaultii) failed to support SARS-CoV-2 replication25, and airway organoids from cave nectar bats (Eonycteris spelaea) allowed ACE2-dependent viral entry, but no productive viral replication24. In our hands, the JFB intestinal organoids consistently expressed low levels of ACE2 that could support viral entry. Interestingly, PCR analysis revealed a significant increase in viral and sgRNA in the JFB distal organoids at 48 and 72 hpi, which demonstrates initiation of viral replication in the organoids. SARS-CoV-2 genomes also were significantly increased in organoid culture supernatants, whereas plaque-forming units were detected but did not increase over time. Thus, it remains unclear whether any infectious or non-infectious virions were released. Using immunohistochemistry, we detected SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in individual cells, but not in morphologically intact JFB organoids. This observation may reflect shedding of viable virus-infected cells from the epithelial monolayer, as described for other viral infections73. Overall, our data suggest that JFB intestinal organoids support incomplete SARS-CoV-2 infection. A similar limited and incomplete replication of SARS-CoV-2 was also reported in cell lines from several different bat species, even after transduction with human ACE2, in a recent study by Aicher et al.74. However, the presence of sgRNA and of SARS-CoV-2 protein in some cells suggest that entry and replication of the virus did occur in the JFB organoids. This interpretation is consistent with a study by Yan et al. that predicted a moderate ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect JFB cells based on the protein sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE275 and our observations of low ACE-2 gene expression in the JFB organoids. Loss of the furin cleavage site in the WA01 reference stain of SARS-CoV-2 also may have had an impact on the efficacy of infection76. Further experiments are needed to evaluate at which stage of the viral replication cycle SARS-CoV-2 replication stalls in the JFB organoid model and upon in vivo infection of JFBs68. Notably, many previous studies on viral infection in bats have relied solely on viral nucleic acids to measure infection10,11,12,39,70,77. Therefore, it is difficult to assess whether the failure to detect replication-competent virions was unique to our infection model.
Our results demonstrate that active SARS-CoV-2 virus induced a robust anti-viral immune response, with increased expression of IFN-α and IFN-β at 48 h after SARS-CoV-2 infection. This induction of interferons in response to viral infection was surprising, since it has been proposed that the interferon system in bats is constitutively active, based on studies in Australian black flying foxes (P. alecto)28,78. Conversely, potent interferon responses were detected in serotine bats (Eptesicus serotinus) and David’s myotis bat cells upon SARS-CoV-2 infection74. These observed differences point to species-specific immune system characteristics in bats, consistent with the high level of genetic diversity in the order Chiroptera, which comprises over 1400 species.
The lack of a cytopathic effect in SARS-CoV-2-infected JFB organoids was an intriguing observation. It has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 causes neither apoptotic nor necrotic cell death in the gastrointestinal tract of infected human patients. Whether SARS-CoV-2 impacts viability of organoid cultures is still a matter of debate. Lamers et al.55 observed increased apoptotic cell death in human enteroids at 60 hpi, and Zhou et al.27 state that both human and horseshoe bat enteroids developed a cytopathic effect after SARS-CoV-2 inoculation. Conversely, studies by Stanifer et al.60 and Zang et al.79 did not describe increased cell death in human SARS-CoV-2 infected enteroids. Data from several studies in bat cells suggest that heightened IFN responses in these cultures may prolong viral infection by limiting pathogen-induced cell death through induction of anti-apoptotic genes including BCL-2 and PMAIP139,80. While we did not detect an upregulation in anti-apoptotic factors in our proteome screen of SARS-CoV-2-infected JFB organoids, we found a significant upregulation of pathways associated with cell growth and repair, including apelin liver signaling and wound healing signaling. These observations were consistent with the increase in organoid size and organoid formation that we detected by microscopic analysis and indicate activation of growth and repair pathways in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Taken together, our findings suggest that bat organoids activate protective repair pathways upon viral infection that may enable the bats to tolerate viral infection in the absence of tissue damage and associated clinical signs.
We used a DIA-based proteomic approach to gain deeper insights into the cellular responses induced in the SARS-CoV-2 infected JFB intestinal epithelium. Notably, only few studies in bats and other non-model organisms have included proteomics81,82, although proteomics techniques can be particularly useful in species where few specific reagents are available83. We confirmed the identity of the organoids as small intestinal epithelial cells based on expression of key enterocyte markers. Consistent with the increased gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in SARS-CoV-2-infected JFB organoids that we detected, inflammatory pathways including the acute phase response and chemokine signaling also were induced at the protein level. Conversely, although SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced expression of type I interferon transcripts in JFB organoids, no significant increase in ISGs was detected on the protein level. This lack of ISG regulation is inconsistent with proteomics results obtained in SARS-CoV-2-infected human Calu-3 cells, which showed a strong induction of the antiviral ISG signature84, and may reflect a JFB-specific disconnect between transcriptional activation of interferons and downstream ISGs that warrants further studies. Alternatively, downregulation of ISG proteins may have been caused by active downregulation of antiviral ISG pathways by SARS-CoV-2 accessory proteins. Importantly, Enrichr analysis also revealed that some of the activated pathways matched those identified by other studies on SARS-CoV-2 infection. Notably, there are several limitations to the proteomics approach undertaken in our study. First, the non-targeted DIA approach may not be sensitive enough to identify strongly regulated targets with a low overall expression level85. Second, an annotated proteome of the JFB is currently not available and thus had to be inferred from the genome, which may lead to misidentified proteins. Lastly, pathway analysis was based on human databases, which again may miss JFB-specific signaling pathways.
Importantly, we successfully validated JFB organoids as an experimental tool and demonstrated that these JFB organoids can be maintained long-term without the need for bat-specific growth factors. Wnt, noggin and R-spondin are highly conserved in mammalian species, with a high degree of sequence identity between mice and JFBs. The growth requirements for our JFB organoids are consistent with growth conditions previously described for Chinese horseshoe bats27 and Rousettus bats25. Similar culture conditions also have been successfully used to culture intestinal organoids from cat, dog, cow, horse, pig and sheep23. We demonstrate that JFB organoids from stomach, proximal and distal intestine recapitulate the histology and morphology of the tissue of origin, with polarized columnar epithelial cells, mucus secretion, development of an intact epithelial barrier and expression of tissue-specific genes and proteins. Thus, we have developed and validated a research tool that will allow experimental analysis of the physiology and function of the gastrointestinal epithelium of Jamaican fruit bats in future studies.
To summarize, we established and characterized JFB gastrointestinal organoids that recapitulated the organ-specific multicellular composition of JFB gastrointestinal tissue. We demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA replication at a low efficiency in JFB distal intestinal organoids via qPCR but were unable to detect release of infectious virus. SARS-CoV-2 infection induced a robust upregulation of interferons and pro-inflammatory genes in the organoid cells. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection of JFB organoids led to increased growth and activation of cellular regeneration and healing pathways, which might contribute to the improved viral tolerance in this bat species.
Methods
Ethics statement
The research presented here complies with all relevant ethical regulations and was approved by the Colorado State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocol #1034.
Tissue samples
Male and female Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) aged between one and eight years were maintained as an outbred breeding colony in an AAALAC-accredited facility at Colorado State University (CSU). For organoid derivation, five bats (4 males, bat001, 002, 004 and 005; and 1 female, bat 003) were euthanized by 5% isoflurane in O2 followed by thoracotomy. The gastrointestinal tracts were harvested in RPMI-1640 medium and were shipped overnight on ice from CSU to Montana State University (MSU).
Crypt and gland isolation methods
Bat tissues were processed immediately upon arrival or were cryopreserved and then thawed rapidly if needed86. To derive organoids, proximal intestinal and distal small intestinal tissues were washed in cold PBS and cut into ~1 mm pieces. The minced tissue was incubated in 15 mM EDTA in PBS supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, and Fungizone (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) with gentle shaking for 10 min increments until crypts appeared in the supernatant. Large tissues pieces were removed by sedimentation. The supernatant containing the crypts was transferred into a new 50 mL tube and pelleted by centrifugation for 8 min at 150 g. Gastric tissues were digested for one hour at 37 °C using a digestion solution containing 5 U/mL collagenase type IV and 0.2 mg/mL DNAse (both Sigma-Aldrich), following our published protocols87,88. Recovered crypts/glands were resuspended in 10 µl of Matrigel and plated in 96-well plates. After the gel was polymerized, 200 µl of medium (Supplementary Table 1) was added, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for one week.
Maintenance of JFB organoids
For passaging, the Matrigel patties containing organoids were digested for 3 min in TrypLE (Gibco) at 37 °C and pipetted up and down 50 times. The digested organoids were harvested by centrifugation for 5 min, 200 g at 4 °C, then were resuspended in Matrigel and plated in a 24-well plate. After the gel had polymerized, 500 µl of 50% L-WRN-conditioned medium51 (Supplementary Table 1) was added and the plate was incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The medium was changed every other day and the organoids were passaged every 5–7 days. In general, organoids at passages three to ten were used for experiments.
Optimization of growth conditions
In addition to the basic growth medium, termed L-WRN medium, described above, we also tested a commercially available growth medium, IntestiCult™ (StemCell), a complex medium termed “colonoid medium” described by Tsai et al.86, and analyzed medium supplementation with a number of different growth factors commonly used in organoid culture protocols (Supplementary Table 1). We prepared a medium with all available growth factors (L-WRN Plus) and then eliminated one reagent at a time from L-WRN Plus to determine the influence of the reagent on organoid growth. For this assay, the organoids were digested with TrypLE for 3 min and plated in a 96-well plate with the different media. Cell viability and proliferation were measured using the CellTiter-Glo luminescence assay (Promega).
Microscopic analyses
Images of organoid cultures were captured using a Keyence BZ-X800 microscope with BZ-X800 Viewer software, v01.02.03.02 or an EVOS FL Auto System (ThermoFisher). Size and morphology of organoids was analyzed using OrganoSeg software52 and phase contrast images. Measurements were performed on digital images by blinded investigators using ImageJ software. For histological analyses, organoids were recovered from the culture plates and treated with Histogel (ThermoFisher) prior to formalin fixation and paraffin embedding, following standard protocols. Slides were stained with hematoxylin/eosin and with Alcian Blue to visualize mucus production. TEM was performed as previously described for human organoids87. Briefly, organoids were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde, processed for ultrathin sectioning, and then were imaged on a Zeiss LEO 912AB TEM.
Immunofluorescence staining
To detect enterocyte markers and ACE2, we used antibodies to epithelial cytokeratin (1: 50, ThermoFisher, #4545; clone C11), villin (1: 100, Invitrogen, PIMA516408, clone SP145) and ACE2 (1: 100, R&D Systems, AF933, goat polyclonal) that have known reactivity across multiple different species. To detect SARS-CoV-2 protein in the organoid cultures, a monoclonal antibody to SARS-CoV-2 (11G10-F8) was generated in house, using a standard hybridoma protocol89. Briefly, mice were immunized with 10 µg UV-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 (USA-WA1/2020)90 in Titermax adjuvant (Sigma) three times separated by at least two weeks. 11G10-F8 was then generated from a fusion of mouse splenocytes with SP2/0 cells. Mouse sera were screened for reactivity to the virus by ELISA. Clone 11G10-F8 recognizes the RBD region of the S1 subunit of the spike protein, as determined by ELISA, and was used at a concentration of 10 µg/mL. For immunofluorescence analysis, organoids were fixed with 4% PFA, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, and then treated with blocking buffer (DPBS with 10% FBS, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.1% BSA, and 0.05% Tween) overnight. After washing, samples were incubated with primary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Then the secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit IgG AlexaFluor 555, 1:50, Southern Biotechnology, #4050-32; goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) AlexaFluor 594, 1: 100, Invitrogen, A11005; or rat anti-mouse IgG1 eFluor660, 1: 100, eBiosciences, 50-112-4348), were added and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The nuclei were stained with 5 µM DAPI (MP Biomedicals, 0215757405). Actin filaments were stained with ActinGreen 488 ReadyProbes reagent (Invitrogen, R37110). Stained organoids were imaged on an inverted SP5 Confocal Scanning Laser Microscope or an inverted DMI8 Stellaris (Leica) with LAS X software version 4.5.0 or earlier using a 20x objective (W 2010; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Z-stacks of 2-11 randomly selected organoids with intact morphology for each experiment and condition were recorded.
Transepithelial resistance
To assess development of barrier function, organoids were dissociated and re-seeded on transwell inserts (Costar, Corning, 3 µm pore size) coated with collagen I. Transepithelial resistance was measured daily using a Voltohmmeter (EVOM2™, World Precision Instruments) and is expressed as Ω*cm2.
SARS-CoV-2 infection of JFB organoids
Bat organoids were dissociated by incubation with 350 µL TrypLE to expose the apical and basolateral epithelial surface to the virus. Dissociated organoids were transferred to a BSL3 laboratory and then inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 (strain USA-WA1/2020, BEI Resources), at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1, 1 and 10 for 2 h at 37 °C with frequent gentle agitation. Notably, the SARS-CoV-2 strain used was shown to have a defective furin cleavage site91, but readily infected inducible pluripotent stem cell-derived human intestinal organoids in control experiments. Following incubation with the virus, organoids were collected into 500 µL DMEM and centrifuged at 200 g for 5 min to wash. Then cells were resuspended in 30 µL Matrigel and plated. After 10 min to allow gelation of the Matrigel, medium was added to the organoids. This medium was removed and fresh medium added to eliminate free viral particles. Then the plates were incubated at 37 °C for the indicated intervals. Infectious particles in culture supernatants were detected for each time point by plaque assay on Vero E6 cells, as previously described90.
Treatment of JFB organoids with TLR agonists and inactivated virus
To analyze the transcriptional response of JFB organoids to stimulation with pathogen-associated molecular patterns, organoids were trypsinized and then re-embedded into Matrigel in the presence of the following TLR agonists (Human TLR1-9 agonist kit, InvivoGen): TLR1, Pam3CSK4, 1 µg/mL; TLR2, heat-killed Listeria monocytogenes (108/mL); TLR3, low molecular weight poly I:C, 10 µg/mL; TLR7, imiquimod, 1 µg/mL; TLR9, ODN2006, 5 µM. Alternatively, organoids were treated with UV-inactivated SARS-CoV-290 (10 µg/mL). After 48 h, organoids were lysed in TRI Reagent (Sigma) and processed for RNA isolation and RT-PCR.
Quantitative RT-PCR
To analyze gene expression and cell-associated viral RNA, RNA was extracted from organoids using the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep-Plus (Zymo Research). The RNA was converted to cDNA using iScript Reverse Transcription Super mix for RT-qPCR (BioRad). Primers for gastric and intestinal epithelial cell-specific genes and cytokines were designed using NCBI primer blast using the JFB genome (Artibeus jamaicensis, NCBI:txid9417,) and are listed in Supplementary Table 2. GAPDH was amplified as housekeeping gene in each PCR reaction. For each gene, a standard curve was created, and gene copy numbers for each gene of interest were normalized to the copy numbers of the housekeeping gene, GAPDH. To quantify SARS-CoV-2 in the organoid supernatant, viral RNA was extracted from culture supernatants using the QIA®Amp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen). Viral genomes were then quantified in a single-step RT-PCR reaction using primers and a TaqMan probe to the SARS-CoV-2 envelope (E) gene, as previously described90, and the Quanta Bio ToughMix Master Mix. In addition, a forward primer to the leader sequence was used together with the reverse primer and probe to detect E gene sgRNA as described by Wölfel et al.58. An RNA standard curve generated from a T7 in vitro transcribed gBlock™ sequence (Integrated DNA Technologies) was used for normalization.
Cell viability and organoid growth
To measure caspase-3 activity in SARS-CoV-2-infected organoids, NucView488 (Biotium) was added to the medium at 3 µM once the organoids were re-plated following incubation with the virus. For measuring caspase-3 activity, the organoids were imaged using Life Technologies EVOS FL Auto system with a 10x objective. The images were analyzed using ImageJ version 1.48 V and NucView positive pixels were counted automatically on the thresholded images. Brightfield images of the organoid cultures were used to measure organoid size for normalization of the NucView data and for assessment of organoid growth.
Proteomics analyses
Triplicate samples of distal intestinal organoids were infected with SARS-CoV-2, MOI 10, for 48 h as described above and then were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (25 mM Tris/Cl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% SDS, 1% protease inhibitor) by passing the samples through a 26.5 G needle 5 times on ice. Samples were stored at −80 °C until they were analyzed at the IDeA National Resource for Quantitative Proteomics. An Orbitrap Exploris 480 was used for data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry with a 60 min gradient per sample and gas-phase fractionation to obtain comprehensive proteomic profiles of the organoids. Chromatogram libraries were constructed using Prosit92, and proteins were identified and quantified using EncyclopeDIA, based on protein FASTA files retrieved from NCBI RefSeq for the Jamaican fruit bat (BioProject PRJNA673233)63,64. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE93 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD036016. False discovery thresholds of 1% were applied. The ProteiNorm app was used to optimize data normalization94, and Scaffold DIA version 3.3.1 (Proteome Software, Portland, OR) was used for visualization. The MS2 exclusive intensities were normalized using cyclic loess and linear models for microarray (limma), and lmfit with empirical Bayes smoothing was used for the analysis95. Proteins with an FDR-adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 and an absolute fold change ≥2 were considered significant. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Qiagen)96 and Enrichr66 with combined score ranking (c=log(p) * z, where c = the combined score, P=Fisher exact test P-value, and z=z-score) were used to identify cellular signaling pathways. Relevant public databases queried by Enrichr were Human KEGG pathways 2021 (https://www.kegg.jp/) and COVID-19 Related Gene Sets 202197 (https://maayanlab.cloud/covid19/). To analyze the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on ISGs, proteins identified in the JFB organoids were compared to a comprehensive list of ISGs65 using a Python script.
Statistical analyses
All data, except the proteome data, were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.1 or earlier versions and are shown as individual data points with mean ± SD. Comparisons between two treatments were made using a 2-tailed Student’s t test or the Kruskal–Wallis test for data that was not normally distributed, and comparisons between multiple treatments were made using one-or two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s or Tukey’s post hoc tests. Each sample was analyzed one time.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE93 partner repository with under accession code PXD036016. The raw data underlying bar charts and scatter plots that support the findings of this study are provided in the Source Data file and in Figshare under accession code https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2353679798. Raw imaging data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Relevant public databases queried by Enrichr are Human KEGG pathways 2021 (https://www.kegg.jp/) and COVID-19 Related Gene Sets 2021 (https://maayanlab.cloud/covid19/). Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Irving, A. T., Ahn, M., Goh, G., Anderson, D. E. & Wang, L.-F. Lessons from the host defences of bats, a unique viral reservoir. Nature 589, 363–370 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03128-0 (2021).
Olival, K. J. & Hayman, D. T. S. Filoviruses in bats: current knowledge and future directions. Viruses 6, 1759–1788, https://doi.org/10.3390/v6041759 (2014).
Memish, Z. A. et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in bats, Saudi Arabia. Emerg Infect Dis 19, 1819–1823, https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1911.131172 (2013).
Munster, V. J. et al. Replication and shedding of MERS-CoV in Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis). Sci Rep 6, 21878, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21878 (2016).
Anderson, D, A., 3rd, Murphy, K. M., Briseno, C. G. Development, Diversity, and Function of Dendritic Cells in Mouse and Human. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 10 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a028613 (2018).
Wang, L. F. & Anderson, D. E. Viruses in bats and potential spillover to animals and humans. Curr. Opin. Virol. 34, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2018.12.007 (2019).
Zhou, P. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 (2020).
Mallapaty, S. Closest known relatives of virus behind COVID-19 found in Laos. Nature 597, 603, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02596-2 (2021).
Schountz, T. Immunology of bats and their viruses: challenges and opportunities. Viruses 6, 4880–4901, https://doi.org/10.3390/v6124880 (2014).
Watanabe, S. et al. Bat coronaviruses and experimental infection of bats, the Philippines. Emerg Infect Dis 16, 1217–1223, https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1608.100208 (2010).
Subudhi, S. et al. A persistently infecting coronavirus in hibernating Myotis lucifugus, the North American little brown bat. J. Gen. Virol. 98, 2297–2309, https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.000898 (2017).
Tong, S. et al. New world bats harbor diverse influenza A viruses. PLoS Pathog 9, e1003657, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003657 (2013).
Becker, D. J., et al. Serum Proteomics Identifies Immune Pathways and Candidate Biomarkers of Coronavirus Infection in Wild Vampire Bats. Front. Virol. 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/fviro.2022.862961 (2022).
Carding, S. R., Davis, N. & Hoyles, L. Review article: the human intestinal virome in health and disease. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 46, 800–815, https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14280 (2017).
Vemuri, R., Shankar, E. M., Chieppa, M., Eri, R., Kavanagh, K. Beyond Just Bacteria: Functional Biomes in the Gut Ecosystem Including Virome, Mycobiome, Archaeome and Helminths. Microorganisms 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8040483 (2020).
Muñoz-Fontela, C. et al. Animal models for COVID-19. Nature 586, 509–515, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2787-6 (2020).
Banerjee, A., Misra, V., Schountz, T. & Baker, M. L. Tools to study pathogen-host interactions in bats. Virus Res. 248, 5–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2018.02.013 (2018).
Clevers, H. Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids. Cell 165, 1586–1597, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082 (2016).
Saxena, K. et al. Human Intestinal Enteroids: a New Model To Study Human Rotavirus Infection, Host Restriction, and Pathophysiology. J. Virol. 90, 43–56, https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01930-15 (2016).
de Souza, N. Organoids. Nature Methods 15, 23–23, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4576 (2018).
Rookmaaker, M. B., Schutgens, F., Verhaar, M. C. & Clevers, H. Development and application of human adult stem or progenitor cell organoids. Nature Rev. Nephrol. 11, 546, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.118 (2015).
Blutt, S. E., Crawford, S. E., Ramani, S., Zou, W. Y. & Estes, M. K. Engineered Human Gastrointestinal Cultures to Study the Microbiome and Infectious Diseases. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 241–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.001 (2018).
Powell, R. H. & Behnke, M. S. WRN conditioned media is sufficient for in vitro propagation of intestinal organoids from large farm and small companion animals. Biol. Open 6, 698–705, https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.021717 (2017).
Chan, L. L. Y. et al. Generation of self-replicating airway organoids from the cave nectar bat Eonycteris spelaea as a model system for studying host-pathogen interactions in the bat airway epithelium. Emerg Microbes Infect. 12, e2148561, https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2022.2148561 (2023).
Elbadawy, M., et al. Establishment of Intestinal Organoid from Rousettus leschenaultii and the Susceptibility to Bat-Associated Viruses, SARS-CoV-2 and Pteropine Orthoreovirus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910763 (2021).
Lei, X. et al. Activation and evasion of type I interferon responses by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Commun. 11, 3810, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17665-9 (2020).
Zhou, J. et al. Infection of bat and human intestinal organoids by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26, 1077–1083, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0912-6 (2020).
Clayton, E. & Munir, M. Fundamental Characteristics of Bat Interferon Systems. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 10, 527921, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.527921 (2020).
De La Cruz-Rivera, P. C. et al. The IFN Response in Bats Displays Distinctive IFN-Stimulated Gene Expression Kinetics with Atypical RNASEL Induction. J. Immunol. 200, 209–217, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1701214 (2018).
Zhou, P. et al. Contraction of the type I IFN locus and unusual constitutive expression of IFN-alpha in bats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2696–2701, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518240113 (2016).
Subudhi, S., Rapin, N., Misra, V. Immune System Modulation and Viral Persistence in Bats: Understanding Viral Spillover. Viruses 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/v11020192 (2019).
Irving, A. T. et al. Interferon Regulatory Factors IRF1 and IRF7 Directly Regulate Gene Expression in Bats in Response to Viral Infection. Cell Rep. 33, 108345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108345 (2020).
Sarkis, S. et al. A potential robust antiviral defense state in the common vampire bat: Expression, induction and molecular characterization of the three interferon-stimulated genes -OAS1, ADAR1 and PKR. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 85, 95–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2018.04.006 (2018).
Pavlovich, S. S. et al. The Egyptian Rousette Genome Reveals Unexpected Features of Bat Antiviral Immunity. Cell 173, 1098–1110.e1018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.070 (2018).
Xie, J. et al. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell Host Microbe 23, 297–301.e294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.006 (2018).
Franz, K. M., Neidermyer, W. J., Tan, Y. J., Whelan, S. P. J. & Kagan, J. C. STING-dependent translation inhibition restricts RNA virus replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2058–E2067, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716937115 (2018).
Machain-Williams, C. et al. Serologic evidence of flavivirus infection in bats in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. J. Wildl Dis. 49, 684–689, https://doi.org/10.7589/2012-12-318 (2013).
Strumpf, A. A., Malmlov, A., Ayers, J. D., Schountz, T. & Kendall, L. V. Hematologic Values of Jamaican Fruit Bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) and the Effects of Isoflurane Anesthesia. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 59, 275–281, https://doi.org/10.30802/aalas-jaalas-19-000056 (2020).
Gerrard, D. L. et al. Transcriptomic Signatures of Tacaribe Virus-Infected Jamaican Fruit Bats. mSphere 2, https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00245-17 (2017).
Reid, J. E. & Jackson, A. C. Experimental rabies virus infection in Artibeus jamaicensis bats with CVS-24 variants. J. Neurovirol. 7, 511–517, https://doi.org/10.1080/135502801753248097 (2001).
Malmlov, A. et al. Experimental Zika virus infection of Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) and possible entry of virus into brain via activated microglial cells. PLoS Negl. Trop Dis. 13, e0007071, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007071 (2019).
Shaw, T. I. et al. Transcriptome sequencing and annotation for the Jamaican fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). PloS One 7, e48472, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048472 (2012).
Wang, K., Tian, S., Galindo-Gonzalez, J., Davalos, L. M., Zhang, Y. & Zhao, H. Molecular adaptation and convergent evolution of frugivory in Old World and neotropical fruit bats. Mol. Ecol. 29, 4366–4381, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15542 (2020).
Crowley, D., Becker, D., Washburne, A., Plowright, R. Identifying Suspect Bat Reservoirs of Emerging Infections. Vaccines 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8020228 (2020).
Cohen, L. E., Fagre, A. C., Chen, B., Carlson, C. J., Becker, D. J. Coronavirus sampling and surveillance in bats from 1996-2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-023-01375-1 (2023).
Bouhaddou, M. et al. The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Cell 182, 685–712.e619, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.034 (2020).
Riva, L. et al. Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing. Nature 586, 113–119, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2577-1 (2020).
Baggen, J. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screening identifies TMEM106B as a proviral host factor for SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Genet. 53, 435–444, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00805-2 (2021).
Gamage, A. M. et al. Infection of human Nasal Epithelial Cells with SARS-CoV-2 and a 382-nt deletion isolate lacking ORF8 reveals similar viral kinetics and host transcriptional profiles. PLoS Pathog 16, e1009130, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009130 (2020).
DeDiego, M. L. et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus envelope protein regulates cell stress response and apoptosis. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002315, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002315 (2011).
Miyoshi, H. & Stappenbeck, T. S. In vitro expansion and genetic modification of gastrointestinal stem cells in spheroid culture. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2471–2482, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.153 (2013).
Borten, M. A., Bajikar, S. S., Sasaki, N., Clevers, H. & Janes, K. A. Automated brightfield morphometry of 3D organoid populations by OrganoSeg. Sci. Rep. 8, 5319, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18815-8 (2018).
Fagerberg, L. et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 13, 397–406, https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.035600 (2014).
Kip, A. M. et al. Proteomics analysis of human intestinal organoids during hypoxia and reoxygenation as a model to study ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cell Death Dis. 12, 95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03379-9 (2021).
Lamers, M. M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science 369, 50–54, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc1669 (2020).
Triana, S. et al. Single-cell analyses reveal SARS-CoV-2 interference with intrinsic immune response in the human gut. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10232, https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110232 (2021).
Jang, K. K. et al. Variable susceptibility of intestinal organoid-derived monolayers to SARS-CoV-2 infection. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001592, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001592 (2022).
Wolfel, R. et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature 581, 465–469, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x (2020).
Cen, H., Mao, F., Aronchik, I., Fuentes, R. J., Firestone, G. L. DEVD-NucView488: a novel class of enzyme substrates for real-time detection of caspase-3 activity in live cells. 22, 2243-2252 https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-099234 (2008).
Stanifer, M. L. et al. Critical Role of Type III Interferon in Controlling SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Cell Rep. 32, 107863, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107863 (2020).
Stanifer, M. L., Guo, C., Doldan, P. & Boulant, S. Importance of Type I and III Interferons at Respiratory and Intestinal Barrier Surfaces. Front. Immunol. 11, 608645, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.608645 (2020).
Zhou, P. et al. Type III IFNs in pteropid bats: differential expression patterns provide evidence for distinct roles in antiviral immunity. J. Immunol. 186, 3138–3147, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1003115 (2011).
Searle, B. C. et al. Chromatogram libraries improve peptide detection and quantification by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 9, 5128, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07454-w (2018).
Pruitt, K. D. et al. RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 42, D756–763, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1114 (2014).
OhAinle M. et al. A virus-packageable CRISPR screen identifies host factors mediating interferon inhibition of HIV. Elife 7, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39823 (2018).
Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 128, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-128 (2013).
Wang, X., Zhang, L., Li, P., Zheng, Y., Yang, Y. & Ji, S. Apelin/APJ system in inflammation. Int Immunopharmacol. 109, 108822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108822 (2022).
Burke, B. et al. Regulatory T Cell-like Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Jamaican Fruit Bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) Transduced with Human ACE2. bioRxiv, 2023.2002.2013.528205, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.13.528205 (2023).
Schlottau, K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 in fruit bats, ferrets, pigs, and chickens: an experimental transmission study. Lancet Microbe 1, e218–e225, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30089-6 (2020).
Hall, J. S. et al. Experimental challenge of a North American bat species, big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), with SARS-CoV-2. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 68, 3443–3452, https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13949 (2021).
Bosco-Lauth, A. M., Porter, S. M., Fox, K. A., Wood, M. E., Neubaum, D., Quilici, M. Experimental Infection of Brazilian Free-Tailed Bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) with Two Strains of SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081809 (2022).
Hall, J. S. et al. Experimental Infection of Mexican Free-Tailed Bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) with SARS-CoV-2. mSphere 8, e0026322, https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00263-22 (2023).
Lin, W. W., Tsay, A. J., Lalime, E. N., Pekosz, A., Griffin, D. E. Primary differentiated respiratory epithelial cells respond to apical measles virus infection by shedding multinucleated giant cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013264118 (2021).
Aicher, S. M. et al. Species-Specific Molecular Barriers to SARS-CoV-2 Replication in Bat Cells. J. Virol. 96, e0060822, https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00608-22 (2022).
Yan, H. et al. ACE2 receptor usage reveals variation in susceptibility to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection among bat species. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 600–608, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01407-1 (2021).
Johnson, B. A. et al. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature 591, 293–299, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03237-4 (2021).
Leroy, E. M. et al. Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus. Nature 438, 575–576, https://doi.org/10.1038/438575a (2005).
Schountz, T., Baker, M. L., Butler, J. & Munster, V. Immunological Control of Viral Infections in Bats and the Emergence of Viruses Highly Pathogenic to Humans. Front. Immunol. 8, 1098, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01098 (2017).
Zang, R. et al. TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4 promote SARS-CoV-2 infection of human small intestinal enterocytes. Sci. Immunol. 5, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abc3582 (2020).
Brook, C. E. et al. Accelerated viral dynamics in bat cell lines, with implications for zoonotic emergence. Elife 9, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48401 (2020).
Hecht-Höger, A. M. et al. Plasma proteomic profiles differ between European and North American myotid bats colonized by Pseudogymnoascus destructans. Mol. Ecol. 29, 1745–1755, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15437 (2020).
Neely, B. A., Janech, M. G., Fenton, M. B., Simmons, N. B., Bland, A. M. & Becker, D. J. Surveying the Vampire Bat (Desmodus rotundus) Serum Proteome: A Resource for Identifying Immunological Proteins and Detecting Pathogens. J. Proteome Res. 20, 2547–2559, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00995 (2021).
Heck, M. & Neely, B. A. Proteomics in Non-model Organisms: A New Analytical Frontier. J. Proteome Res. 19, 3595–3606, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00448 (2020).
Mosbauer, K. et al. The Effect of Allicin on the Proteome of SARS-CoV-2 Infected Calu-3 Cells. Front. Microbiol. 12, 746795, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.746795 (2021).
Vidova, V. & Spacil, Z. A review on mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics: Targeted and data independent acquisition. Anal. Chim. Acta. 964, 7–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.01.059 (2017).
Tsai, Y. H. et al. A Method for Cryogenic Preservation of Human Biopsy Specimens and Subsequent Organoid Culture. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 218–222.e217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.04.008 (2018).
Sebrell, T. A. et al. Live imaging analysis of human gastric epithelial spheroids reveals spontaneous rupture, rotation and fusion events. Cell Tissue Res. 371, 293–307, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-017-2726-5 (2018).
Sebrell, T. A. et al. A Novel Gastric Spheroid Co-culture Model Reveals Chemokine-Dependent Recruitment of Human Dendritic Cells to the Gastric Epithelium. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 157–171.e153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.02.010 (2019).
Ridley, R. G. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, 2009/04/14 edn. Cambridge University Press (1989), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300028548.
Loveday, E. K. et al. Effect of Inactivation Methods on SARS-CoV-2 Virion Protein and Structure. Viruses 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/v13040562 (2021).
Hedges, J. F. et al. An ADAM17-Neutralizing Antibody Reduces Inflammation and Mortality While Increasing Viral Burden in a COVID-19 Mouse Model. Front. Immunol. 13, 918881, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.918881 (2022).
Gessulat, S. et al. Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning. Nat. Methods 16, 509–518, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0426-7 (2019).
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucl. Acids Res. 47, D442–D450, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1106 (2019).
Graw, S. et al. proteiNorm - A User-Friendly Tool for Normalization and Analysis of TMT and Label-Free Protein Quantification. ACS Omega 5, 25625–25633, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02564 (2020).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucl. Acids Res. 43, e47, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007 (2015).
Kramer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. Jr. & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 30, 523–530, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 (2014).
Kuleshov, M. V. et al. The COVID-19 Drug and Gene Set Library. Patterns 1, 100090, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100090 (2020).
Bimczok, D. H. et al. Antiviral responses in a Jamaican Fruit Bat intestinal organoid model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Figshare Dataset), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23536797 (2023).
Acknowledgements
Funding from the National Institutes of Health (U01EB029242-02S1 to D.B., C.B.C., M.A.J., S.T.W., and J.N.W.; R21AI169536 to D.B.; and R01AI140442 to T.S.), the Montana State University Office of Research, Economic Development and Graduate Education (D.B., C.B.C.), the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station (D.B., M.A.J.), and the Kopriva Family Foundation (M.H.) is gratefully acknowledged. We greatly appreciate the support of Dr. Aga Rynda-Apple, Evelyn Benson, and Caylee Falvo for help with developing bat-specific experimental methods, B. Tegner Jacobson for preparing a Python script to compare comprehensive protein lists, and Conner Killeen and Travis Van Leeuwen for performing OrganoSeg analyses. We also would like to thank Drs. Raina Plowright, Arinjay Banerjee, Vincent Munster, Emi DeWit, Steve Smith, and Alyssa Evans for helpful discussions about this study. The National Resource for Quantitative Proteomics is supported by NIH grant R24GM137786.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.H.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft; T.A.S.: methodology, investigation, formal analysis; J.F.H.: investigation, methodology, formal analysis; D.Snyder: investigation; K.N.L.: investigation, methodology; S.D.B.: investigation, methodology, formal analysis; S.G.M.: investigation, methodology; M.D.C.: investigation, methodology; D.S.: investigation; D.C.: methodology; A.R.: investigation; B.S.: investigation, visualization; A.K.: methodology, investigation, supervision; E.K.L.: resources, methodology; M.P.T.: resources, methodology, supervision; C.C.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, Supervision; J.N.W.: conceptualization, funding acquisition; S.W.: conceptualization, funding acquisition; T.S.: resources; M.J.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision; D.B.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, formal analysis, writing—original draft and revisions, supervision. All authors have reviewed the final draft of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hashimi, M., Sebrell, T.A., Hedges, J.F. et al. Antiviral responses in a Jamaican fruit bat intestinal organoid model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Commun 14, 6882 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42610-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42610-x