Enhanced multi-year predictability after El Niño and La Niña events

Several aspects of regional climate including near-surface temperature and precipitation are predictable on interannual to decadal time scales. Despite indications that some climate states may provide higher predictability than others, previous studies analysing decadal predictions typically sample a variety of initial conditions. Here we assess multi-year predictability conditional on the phase of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) at the time of prediction initialisation. We find that predictions starting with El Niño or La Niña conditions exhibit higher skill in predicting near-surface air temperature and precipitation multiple years in advance, compared to predictions initialised from neutral ENSO conditions. This holds true in idealised prediction experiments with the Community Climate System Model Version 4 and to a lesser extent also real-world predictions using the Community Earth System Model and a multi-model ensemble of hindcasts contributed to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 Decadal Climate Prediction Project. This enhanced predictability following ENSO events is related to phase transitions as part of the ENSO cycle, and related global teleconnections. Our results indicate that certain initial states provide increased predictability, revealing windows of opportunity for more skillful multi-year predictions.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or or Methods section.

n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as as a discrete number and unit of of measurement A statement on on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.

A description of of all covariates tested
A description of of any assumptions or or corrections, such as as tests of of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g.means) or or other basic estimates (e.g.regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or or associated estimates of of uncertainty (e.g.confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g.F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on on the choice of of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of of outcomes Estimates of of effect sizes (e.g.Cohen's d, Pearson's r), ), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or or software that are central to to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be be made available to to editors and reviewers.We We strongly encourage code deposition in in a community repository (e.g.GitHub).See the Nature Portfolio guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data Policy information about availability of of data
All manuscripts must include a data availability statement This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or or web links for publicly available datasets -A description of of any restrictions on on data availability -For clinical datasets or or third party data, please ensure that the statement adheres to to our policy Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research.If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Blinding
Behavioural & social sciences study design All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Study description
Use the terms sex (biological attribute) and gender (shaped by social and cultural circumstances) carefully in order to avoid confusing both terms.Indicate if findings apply to only one sex or gender; describe whether sex and gender were considered in study design; whether sex and/or gender was determined based on self-reporting or assigned and methods used.Provide in the source data disaggregated sex and gender data, where this information has been collected, and if consent has been obtained for sharing of individual-level data; provide overall numbers in this Reporting Summary.Please state if this information has not been collected.Report sex-and gender-based analyses where performed, justify reasons for lack of sex-and gender-based analysis.
Please specify the socially constructed or socially relevant categorization variable(s) used in your manuscript and explain why they were used.Please note that such variables should not be used as proxies for other socially constructed/relevant variables (for example, race or ethnicity should not be used as a proxy for socioeconomic status).Provide clear definitions of the relevant terms used, how they were provided (by the participants/respondents, the researchers, or third parties), and the method(s) used to classify people into the different categories (e.g.self-report, census or administrative data, social media data, etc.) Please provide details about how you controlled for confounding variables in your analyses.
Describe the covariate-relevant population characteristics of the human research participants (e.g.age, genotypic information, past and current diagnosis and treatment categories).If you filled out the behavioural & social sciences study design questions and have nothing to add here, write "See above." Describe how participants were recruited.Outline any potential self-selection bias or other biases that may be present and how these are likely to impact results.
Identify the organization(s) that approved the study protocol.
Describe how sample size was determined, detailing any statistical methods used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient.
Describe any data exclusions.If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, describe the exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.
Describe the measures taken to verify the reproducibility of the experimental findings.If all attempts at replication were successful, confirm this OR if there are any findings that were not replicated or cannot be reproduced, note this and describe why.
Describe how samples/organisms/participants were allocated into experimental groups.If allocation was not random, describe how covariates were controlled OR if this is not relevant to your study, explain why.
Describe whether the investigators were blinded to group allocation during data collection and/or analysis.If blinding was not possible, describe why OR explain why blinding was not relevant to your study.
Briefly describe the study type including whether data are quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods (e.g.qualitative cross-sectional, quantitative experimental, mixed-methods case study).