The commercialization of DNA tagging is a growing trend that demonstrates the increasing practicality of this novel approach. This interdisciplinary technology is based on the distinctive characteristics of DNA as a molecule that can remain stable in varying environmental conditions and store data following appropriate preparation. Moreover, newly developed technologies could simplify DNA synthesis and the encoding of data within DNA. The implementation of DNA tagging presents distinctive benefits in comparison to conventional labelling techniques, including universal product code (UPC) barcoding, radio-frequency identification (RFID), quick response (QR) codes, and Bluetooth technologies, by surmounting the limitations encountered by these systems. The discourse pertains to extant DNA-tagging mechanisms along with prospective implementations in a wide range of domains, including but not limited to art, the metaverse, forensics, wildlife monitoring, and the military. The potential of DNA labelling in various contexts underscores the importance of continued research and development in this rapidly evolving field.
DNA-tagging technology
At present, several technologies are used to enable the tagging of physical objects, such as universal product code (UPC) barcoding, radio-frequency identification (RFID), near-field communication (NFC), quick response (QR) codes, and Bluetooth technologies1,2. While these technologies have many advantages, such as simplicity of application and the ability to automate the tagging and reading processes, they also have drawbacks. For instance, they cannot be applied to very small, flexible, numerous and physically changing objects or when the tag is to be hidden2,3. DNA-based tagging systems avoid these limitations.
DNA is a polymer that was found to be the primary source of data for living cells regarding their structure and function. Due to its high density, DNA is a potentially massive storage medium. For instance, assuming that data are kept in ssDNA (single-stranded DNA) molecules with two bits per nucleotide (nt; for example, A = 00, T = 01, C = 10, and G = 11), we can store 455 exabytes of data in 1 g of DNA4. Archaeological studies have also determined that DNA information is very stable, since it is possible to read the sequence of mitochondrial DNA from samples that are 300,000 years old5.
DNA taggant design is the crucial step in tagging technology, which involves determining (i) the type and size (in bits) of information contained in DNA tags, (ii) the information coding method, (iii) the method of storing information in a tag, and (iv) the method of reading or extracting the data.
Notably, the concept of a DNA-tagging system is not a recent proposal as it was developed beginning in the 1980s. The early approaches to the technology were addressed in patent WO19870063836, published in 1986, which outlines an invention that encompasses a distinctive labelling procedure. The method entails the application of a preselected macromolecular compound (referred to as the “signal compound”) to label the item or substance. The aforementioned signal compound possesses the ability to bind with a complementary compound, thereby indicating the presence of the initial compound and verifying the genuineness of the item or substance. The authors posit that the “signal compound” could potentially be DNA. Shortly afterwards, Cetus Corporation, a renowned entity recognized for its breakthroughs in PCR technology, filed a patent application under the reference WO19900144417, presenting a new technique for monitoring the presence of a particular substance. The method involves the attachment of a nucleic acid to the substance, the collection of the substance, and the detection of the aforementioned nucleic acid. In the years that followed, patent applications were filed for using nucleic acids to tag various physical items, including liquids8,9,10,11,12,13. However, due to the limitations of this technology, work on its improvement is still ongoing.
A major challenge in DNA tagging is the instability of nucleic acids caused by external factors, including temperature, humidity, UV light, molecular oxygen, nucleases, or metal ions2,14. Therefore, one of the primary steps in building DNA-tagging systems is protecting DNA against degrading agents by creating a physical barrier between the DNA and the environment. For this purpose, silica, polymers, and gels are frequently used15,16.
Another obstacle is decoding the DNA tag. PCR (polymerase chain reaction) or its variants are methods for determining the presence of a specific tag. Berk et al.17 described a method for reading DNA security tags either by sight or with a smartphone. In this approach, sequence-specific strand-displacement assays, placed on a paper ticket, are arranged in a specific way, allowing a fluorescent spot pattern to appear after exposure to an appropriate taggant. The validating pattern can be generated by a taggant only if it contains the appropriate DNA sequence(s).
Ongoing research has also demonstrated that the implementation of CRISPR-based readout techniques, including SHERLOCK, exhibits considerable potential in the area of DNA tag identification and decoding18. The utilization of the SHERLOCK system, which combines recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with a Cas13a-based nucleic acid detection assay, has been implemented for the identification of tags present within synthetic spores referred to as barcoded microbial spores (BMS). The solution has been tested on different surfaces in simulated real-world environments, demonstrating its potential for wide-ranging applications in determining the origins of objects and tracking their movement19.
DNA sequencing represents an alternative approach, enabling either verification of the DNA tag’s identity or decoding of the tag’s data3. Although the application of these technologies still requires a well-equipped laboratory and complex procedures, these obstacles can be surmounted by rapidly developing portable technologies such as SmidgION20, developed by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT).
Its core concept is explained in Fig. 1.
Existing DNA-tagging systems
Porcupine, developed in a partnership between the University of Washington and Microsoft (USA), is a complete DNA-tagging system described in the scientific literature3. The specifics of its design and functionality are therefore known. The molecular bits (molbits) used in this portable end-to-end molecular tagging system, which does not require access to specialized laboratories or equipment, incorporate highly separable nanopore signals to facilitate subsequent readout. In the molecular tag mixture, the presence or absence of particular molbits is represented by 1 and 0, respectively. They categorize molecular tags directly from the raw nanopore signal using a portable nanopore device provided, for instance, by ONT third-generation sequencers, thereby omitting the base calling process of converting DNA back to sequence at the readout stage.
Other concepts related to the utilization of DNA tags are expounded in the scientific literature. The development of DNA ink involves the combination of synthetic DNA with printing inks21. Another approach involved the combination of double-stranded DNA with a pigment that is sensitive to infrared light and exhibits fluorescence when exposed to ultraviolet light. In another study, DNA molecular tags were integrated into lactose tablets or pharmaceutical-grade printing ink as a potential anti-counterfeiting monitor in the pharmaceutical industry22,23. The study conducted by Puddu et al.24 involved the encapsulation of DNA within magnetic particles that are both heat-resistant and inert, demonstrating potential for food tracing.
Apart from the scientific investigation of DNA tagging, commercial enterprises offer DNA-oriented technologies for the purpose of labelling tangible objects. Although many of these organizations do not divulge the precise details of their inventions, it is possible to uncover certain aspects to some degree25,26,27.
SigNature DNA is a botanical DNA-tagging technique that has been developed by Applied DNA Sciences. The detection of DNA taggants is accomplished by PCR with specific primers and capillary electrophoresis (CE). SigNature DNA taggants have the capability to be incorporated into a range of marking systems, including but not limited to RFID devices, labels, serial numbers, and holograms22,25,28,29,30,31.
The Haelixa company provides a DNA taggant that is enclosed in silica capsules with a diameter of ~100 nm. This enables the protection of delicate DNA and its attachment to tangible goods32,33. In addition, this company offers a liquid solution that contains DNA. The identification of a DNA tag is accomplished through the utilization of PCR or modifications34,35.
Next, SelectaDNA (the brand of Selectamark Security Systems) developed a two-step system whereby DNA serves as an alternative authentication solution if the primary method is unavailable. In scenarios of property theft recovery, law enforcement officials utilize a UV lamp to identify adhesive markings and a magnifying glass to locate microdots. This enables them to extract the registration code and contact information, which can then be used to retrieve the owner’s details from the service provider’s database. If microdots are not present, a laboratory analyses the unique DNA composition to identify the owner. The genetic material’s structure involves the integration of two discrete synthetic nucleotide oligomers, each of which encompasses a binding sequence for a primer and an identifier sequence. The tag appears to be read by DNA sequencing26,36,37.
CypherMark technology (TraceTag) is designed with a pair of primer sequences, also known as keys, and the detection of tags is executed through the utilization of qPCR (quantitative PCR)15. A suggested utilization entails the dissemination of a composite comprising the nucleic acid marker and marking fluid onto objects, such as currency notes. TraceTag offers a range of DNA inks suitable for different applications27,38.
Holoptica offers DNA SmartMarks, which combines distinctive DNA segments, additional biological markers, and visual indications. Optical indicators utilize a laser scanner that is calibrated to generate spectral and temporal signals to electronically or visually confirm the existence and legitimacy of a mark. The DNA component is a molecule consisting of 100 base pairs that can be incorporated into an inkjet cartridge39,40. The patent filed by Holoptica delineates a technological innovation that involves a base layer of metallized foil with an integrated QR code. This is further augmented by the application of moulded layers of synthetic DNA, nanoparticles and, finally, a protective transparent film41.
DNA Technologies has developed a technology that incorporates DNA-laced ink for tagging and safeguarding valuable products, brands, and intellectual property. The technology, known as “DNA Matrix™” involves adding DNA taggants with unique photoluminescent properties, including activation frequency and fluorescence fading patterns, to printing inks. These characteristics render each mark machine-readable, enabling differentiation between genuine and counterfeit items through specialized scanners. Originating as an art authentication system, DNA Technologies has since expanded its applications across various industries, including pharmaceuticals42,43.
Tagsmart introduced Smart DNA Tags in 2016. The company specializes in the authentication and security of artworks. The utilization of synthetic DNA tags for identification purposes is facilitated by linking them to an online platform. Each individual tag possesses a distinct reference number that is associated with the artwork’s secure certificate of authenticity and its corresponding digital version. The aforementioned technology has also been applied to the manufacturing of premium books44,45.
The DNA Guardian system employs technologies that are subject to limited information availability. It involves the use of a marking agent that contains nucleic acid, along with a UV-detectable stain46,47.
Aanika Biosciences has been developing microbial tags that can be used as biological barcodes for various food items, such as grains, fruit, and vegetables. The aforementioned tags employ bacterial spores. However, many technical details about genetically engineered bacterial spores remain undisclosed. The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Aanika Biosciences’ technology also raises concerns regarding the potential release of these organisms into the environment, and their presence in food may elicit distress among consumers48,49,50.
Table 1 presents all the companies described in the text, selected features of the technologies they use, and the markets that are described in terms of the application of individual DNA-tagging technologies.
A considerable fraction of the abovementioned companies employ short DNA strands, with a maximum length of a few hundred nucleotides, which are recognized through conventional PCR, qPCR, or occasionally DNA sequencing. The lack of information pertaining to the implementation of sophisticated technologies, such as the storage of larger quantities of data inside longer DNA molecules, is evident. This could be supported by the increased probability of the perseverance of molecules with shorter lengths in diverse conditions51. Nevertheless, a diverse array of mechanisms are employed to protect DNA, spanning from silica microbeads to bacterial cells. In particular cases, DNA is employed as an additional means of verification, rather than serving as the principal method of recognizing an object. SelectaDNA, for instance, is a company that utilizes microdots as its principal taggant technology while simultaneously incorporating DNA as an extra layer of security26,36,37. The main justification for this is that the validation of a DNA marker’s presence within a laboratory increases the expense of the procedure and prolongs the timeframe for the delivery of results.
Notwithstanding the potential advantages of DNA-tagging technologies, it is crucial to consider their drawbacks and limitations. The current use of laboratory analysis of samples to identify DNA tags may limit the ability of these technologies to scale up. On the other hand, PCR’s great sensitivity allows the use of minimal quantities of DNA tags, since the tag could theoretically be detected from as little as one DNA molecule52. However, high sensitivity may also lead to false positives or increase susceptibility to contamination. Finally, the claim that DNA tags cannot be copied, which is supported by numerous companies, may be contested by the prospective use of next-generation sequencing methods that do not require DNA fragment amplification before sequencing53.
Future prospects
The characteristics of DNA, including its capacity for extended preservation, resilience, and amplification, make it a potent tool for the identification and tracking of physical objects. While tangible item tagging methods have been utilized in commercial settings for many years, DNA-based tagging holds promise as a next-generation approach to the advancement of such technologies. Despite the presence of numerous DNA-tagging service providers in the market, it seems that the exploitation of this technology is still limited compared to the widespread utilization of QR, RFID, and UPC technologies. Furthermore, novel applications for DNA-tagging technology are expected to be limited in the future, and its development will be predominantly propelled by technological advancements, particularly in synthesis and tag encoding, which could make existing applications more practical to address by molecular tagging.
Currently, significant improvements are being made in the field of sequencing technology, as exemplified by the arrival of third-generation sequencers, such as those manufactured by ONT. Notably, these sequencers are anticipated to be compatible with mobile devices, which could potentially facilitate the application of these sequencers as instruments for DNA tag reading without requiring a laboratory environment54.
The labelling of DNA exhibits significant potential for application across diverse market segments. Many of these technologies are currently available, but mostly with a limited commercial starting point. Several startups are seeking to create and implement these technologies and their corresponding applications49,55. Possible uses may involve the verification and monitoring of the ownership of high-value artwork or its packaging, facilitating reliable and straightforward authentication. The monitoring and tracing of pharmaceutical products from their production site to their point of purchase could be deemed a crucial application, as it guarantees the authenticity and security of declared products.
This new technology has the potential to become a widespread system of authentication for premium luxury goods, such as high-end watches and designer handbags. Furthermore, the implementation of DNA tagging could potentially serve as a dependable method for authenticating human-associated documentation, such as passports and driver’s licences. The implementation of this technology within administration scenarios could render counterfeiting of these documents highly challenging, if not impossible.
The potential to generate synthetic DNA strands and subsequently encode information in the form of a nucleotide sequence presents opportunities not only for the creation of identification tags but also for the broadening of their prospective applications in the field of cryptography. Numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of utilizing the characteristics and mechanisms of nucleic acids to construct cryptographic systems of substantial complexity56. The implementation of the aforementioned ideas is exemplified by Cui et al.57,58. The study proposed by the authors incorporated encoded data into microdots of DNA fragments, which were subsequently applied to paper via spray deposition. This method rendered the information imperceptible to the naked eye and presented a formidable challenge to any individual attempting to decode the encrypted content. This technology has the potential for broader application in the fields of secure data storage and sensitive communications in sectors such as defence, intelligence, or healthcare data protection.
DNA tagging turns out to be essential in connecting material objects or specific aspects of them to their tangible representations55. Employing this technology, it becomes plausible to devise analogues to nonfungible tokens (NFT) for concrete items. Immutable and tamper-proof DNA tags could lay the groundwork for constructing systems that facilitate the application of principles such as nonrepudiation, authenticity, and accountability to real-world objects. Such principles, until now, have been predominantly associated with the digital domain.
The application of DNA to the identification and surveillance of tangible objects can be expanded to include the connection with corresponding virtual entities or items within the realm of the metaverse. A tangible entity present in the physical realm can be linked to its digital representation through the application of a unique DNA tag.
DNA tags have the potential to be attached to a diverse range of objects, such as clothes, weapons, and various other items. There is a possibility that DNA tagging of clothes, such as that offered by companies such as Applied DNA Science and DNA Security Solutions, will eventually become a widespread practice22,25,56. The footwear and clothing industry has experienced significant economic losses due to the proliferation of counterfeit products59. This implies that the currently implemented preventive systems for such issues lack effectiveness. Another potential application involves the implementation of tagging technology on weaponry, including bullets, to ascertain the origin of weapons used in military conflicts. Additionally, the method has the potential to monitor the displacement of armed forces and resources in times of armed conflict. As proposed by Aanika Biosciences, DNA tagging could become a widespread, mainstream method to monitor the movement of agricultural products along the entire supply chain. Additional potential applications include tracing the provenance of valuable and scarce minerals, such as diamonds, which are listed in the description of the applicability of the Haelixa tagging system60. The widespread utilization of DNA-tagging technology could potentially become a significant component in tracking diamonds from their mining origins to the importation stage. This system could become a component of larger initiatives such as the Kimberley Process Certificate, which certifies that raw diamonds originate from conflict-free regions61. This becomes particularly significant as diamonds are used by rebel movements or partners to fund their military actions.
Another possible application might be monitoring endangered animals by following marked individuals or cohorts, for instance, via spray-marking. The use of DNA tags on the various components, products, and wastes of industrial processes has the potential to enhance efficiency, minimize waste, and ensure adherence to regulatory standards.
Figure 2 summarizes the main directions and areas of application for the possible use of DNA tagging in the future.
The field of DNA tagging is an interdisciplinary area that involves cooperation among experts from various domains, including chemistry, biotechnology, computer science, materials science, biology, and physics, to address significant challenges. Ongoing technological advances may lead to a rise in the popularity of DNA tagging in the market, potentially revolutionizing various industries.
Data availability
We do not analyse or generate any datasets.
References
Basker, E. & Simcoe, T. Upstream, downstream: diffusion and impacts of the universal product code. J. Political Econ. 129, 1252–1286 (2020).
Meiser, L. C. et al. Synthetic DNA applications in information technology. Nat. Commun. 13, 352 (2022).
Doroschak, K. et al. Rapid and robust assembly and decoding of molecular tags with DNA-based nanopore signatures. Nat. Commun. 11, 5454 (2020).
Church, G. M., Gao, Y. & Kosuri, S. Next-generation digital information storage in DNA. Science 337, 1628 (2012).
Grass, R. N., Heckel, R., Puddu, M., Paunescu, D. & Stark, W. J. Robust chemical preservation of digital information on DNA in silica with error-correcting codes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 2552–2555 (2015).
Le Page, R. W. F. & Slater, J. H. Labelling articles it is wished to authenticate. WO patent WO1987006383A1 (1987).
Dollinger, G. D. Methods for tagging and tracing materials with nucleic acids. WO patent WO1990014441A1 (1990).
Slater, J. H. & Minton, J. E. A method of marking a liquid. WO patent WO1994004918A1 (1994).
Slater, J. H. & Minton, J. E. An ultrasensitive microtrace procedure for monitoring the origin, movement and fate of any liquid or solid material. WO patent WO1991017265A1 (1991).
Slater, J. H. & Minton, J. E. A security device using an ultrasensitive microtrace for protecting materials, articles and items. WO patent WO1995002702A1 (1995).
Aleström, P. Chemical labelling of objects. WO patent WO1996017954A1 (1996).
Han, S., Guo, X., Jin, X. & Shen, X. Methode a Technique Analytique de Code D’acide Nucleique Utilisee Dans des Etiquettes Infalsifiables. WO patent WO1998006084A1 (1998).
DNA Technologies Inc. Labeling technique for countering product diversion and product counterfeiting. WO patent WO1999034984A1 (1999).
Lindahl, T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362, 709–715 (1993).
Pierre, A., Bonnet, J., Vekris, A. & Portier, J. Encapsulation of deoxyribonucleic acid molecules in silica and hybrid organic-silica gels. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 12, 51–55 (2001).
Ponnuswamy, N. et al. Oligolysine-based coating protects DNA nanostructures from low-salt denaturation and nuclease degradation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15654 (2017).
Berk, K. L. et al. Rapid visual authentication based on DNA strand displacement. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 19476–19486 (2021).
Gootenberg, J. S. et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 356, 438–442 (2017).
Qian, J. et al. Barcoded microbial system for high-resolution object provenance. Science 368, 1135–1140 (2020).
SmidgION. Oxford nanopore technologies. https://nanoporetech.com/products/smidgion (2023).
Hashiyada, M. Development of biometric DNA ink for authentication security. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 204, 109–117 (2004).
Sharief, S. A., Chahal, P. & Alocilja, E. Application of DNA sequences in anti-counterfeiting: current progress and challenges. Int. J. Pharm. 602, 120580 (2021).
Altamimi, M. J. et al. Anti-counterfeiting DNA molecular tagging of pharmaceutical excipients: an evaluation of lactose containing tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 571, 118656 (2019).
Puddu, M., Paunescu, D., Stark, W. J. & Grass, R. N. Magnetically recoverable, thermostable, hydrophobic DNA/silica encapsulates and their application as invisible oil tags. ACS Nano 8, 2677–2685 (2014).
Hogan, M. E., Jung, L., Richter, N., Sun, Y. & Szczepanik, M. Nucleic acid coated submicron particles for authentication. WO patent WO2018156352A1 (2018).
Brown, J. & Reichert, B. Compositions for use in security marking. US patent US20120135413A1 (2019).
Sleat, R. & Van Lint, G. Marking apparatus for nucleic acid marking of items. US patent US8783194B2 (2014).
Jung, L., Hayward, J. A., Liang, M. B. & Berrada, A. DNA marking of previously undistinguished items for traceability. US patent US9919512B2 (2018).
Crowley, J., Rademan, K. & Tan, E. The textile tracer assessment. Fashion for good reports. https://reports.fashionforgood.com/report/textile-tracer/chapterdetail?reportid=712&chapter=8 (2022).
Securing Industry. Inkjet codes with sigNature® Molecular tags for supply chain traceability and brand protection. https://www.securingindustry.com/free-papers-and-media/inkjet-codes-with-signature-molecular-tags-for-supply-chain-traceability-and-brand-protection/s60/a7378/ (2018).
Mead, B. K. et al. The role of DNA-stained currency in gang robberies within the United Kingdom. J. Forensic Sci. 59, 264–267 (2014).
Sniderman, D. Are synthetic chemical markers needed in lubricants?Tribol. Lubr. Technol. 73, 38–46 (2017).
Ullrich, C., Luescher, A. M., Koch, J., Grass, R. N. & Sax, H. Silica nanoparticles with encapsulated DNA (SPED) to trace the spread of pathogens in healthcare. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 11, 4 (2022).
DENIMSANDJEANS. How soorty is leveraging haelixa DNA to get brands into traceability—Denimandjeans | Global trends, news and reports | Worldwide. https://www.denimsandjeans.com/news/how-soorty-is-leveraging-haelixa-dna-to-get-brands-into-traceability/58183 (2022).
Paunescu, D., Puddu, M., Soellner, J. O. B., Stoessel, P. R. & Grass, R. N. Reversible DNA encapsulation in silica to produce ROS-resistant and heat-resistant synthetic DNA ‘fossils’. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2440–2448 (2013).
SelectaDNA. SelectaDNA forensic coding. https://www.selectadna.co.uk (2023).
Pakendorf, M. Combinatorial DNA Barcoding for Security Applications (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leicester, Leicester, 2019).
Bonnell, A. Covert Tagging (Pira International Ltd, United Kingdom, 2010).
Brand Integrity International. DNA smartMarks—BrandProtection. https://brandintegrity.com.au/dna-smartmarks (2023).
Holoptica. DNA technology. https://holoptica.com/dna-technology/ (2023).
Perkous, J., Taylor, R., Shriram, L. & Miltner, P. Security diffractive element of quick response provided with a conglomerate of DNA and nanoparticles of highly variable properties. CZ patent CZ26616U1 (2014).
Anis, M., AlTaher, G., Sarhan, W. & Elsemary, M. Printing applications. in Nanovate: Commercializing Disruptive Nanotechnologies (eds Anis, M. et al.) 153–162 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017).
DNA Technologies. Applications. https://dnatechnologies.com/applications (2023).
TAGSMART. Products: tagsmart | An artancestry service. https://tagsmart.com/products (2022).
Kordic, A. How tagsmart is providing trusted provenance and certificate of authenticity services for the art market | Widewalls. https://www.widewalls.ch/magazine/tagsmart-tom-toumazis-interview (2018).
Taft, A. J. Security system and method. AU patent AU2009201984A1 (2013).
Tecsec Security Technology. DNA security solutions | DNA tagging | Tecsec security Perth. https://www.tecsec.com.au/dna-tagging (2023).
Aanika Biosciences Inc. Carverr is now aanika biosciences! Medium. https://aanikabio.medium.com/carverr-is-now-aanika-biosciences-20c03a84758f (2020).
Bottaro, G. Aanika biosciences embeds insurance coverage in biotechnology. SG voice. https://www.sgvoice.net/strategy/technology/22675/aanika-biosciences-embeds-insurance-coverage-in-biotechnology/ (2023).
The Counter. Foodborne diseases kill thousands of Americans each year. Tracing food with genetically engineered spores could help. https://thecounter.org/bioengineered-spores-trace-foodborne-outbreaks-safety-experts-skeptical/ (2021).
Matange, K., Tuck, J. M. & Keung, A. J. DNA stability: a central design consideration for DNA data storage systems. Nat. Commun. 12, 1358 (2021).
Yehezkel, T. B. et al. De novo DNA synthesis using single molecule PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e107 (2008).
Shokralla, S., Spall, J. L., Gibson, J. F. & Hajibabaei, M. Next-generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1794–1805 (2012).
Oliva, M. et al. Portable nanopore analytics: are we there yet? Bioinformatics 36, 4399–4405 (2020).
DNAverse. DNA NFTs. https://dnaverse.io (2023).
Clelland, C. T., Risca, V. & Bancroft, C. Hiding messages in DNA microdots. Nature 399, 533–534 (1999).
Cui, G. et al. An encryption scheme based on DNA microdots technology. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 12, 1434–1439 (2015).
Cui, G. et al. An improved encryption scheme based on DNA sequence. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 12, 1368–1372 (2015).
Shet, A. U., Ibrahim, S. R., Joshi, M., Menezes, S. L. & Ramalingam, H. M. Implementation of efficient inception V2 model for apparel counterfeit detection. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 7, 871–877 (2022).
Haelixa. Marking raw materials with DNA to identify your product. https://www.haelixa.com (2023).
Borsky, S. & Leiter, A. M. International trade in rough diamonds and the Kimberley process certification scheme. World Dev. 152, 105786 (2022).
Koch, J. et al. A DNA-of-things storage architecture to create materials with embedded memory. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 39–43 (2020).
Pathak, R., Gaur, V., Sankrityayan, H. & Gogtay, J. Tackling counterfeit drugs: the challenges and possibilities. Pharm. Med. 37, 281–290 (2023).
White, C. M. Counterfeit drugs: a major issue for vulnerable citizens throughout the world and in the United States. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 61, e93–e98 (2021).
Sabri, Y., Harchi, S. & El Kamoun, N. Managing health supply chain using blockchain technology: state of art challenges and solution. Int. J. Reconfigurable Embed. Syst. 11, 258 (2022).
Acknowledgements
Figure cartoons created with BioRender.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.K. wrote the manuscript. M.M., H.S., W.M., and J.N. added selected paragraphs and corrected the content of the manuscript. B.K. corrected the content of the manuscript, the team leader.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuzdraliński, A., Miśkiewicz, M., Szczerba, H. et al. Unlocking the potential of DNA-based tagging: current market solutions and expanding horizons. Nat Commun 14, 6052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41728-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41728-2