Abstract
Tumor recognition by T cells is essential for antitumor immunity. A comprehensive characterization of T cell diversity may be key to understanding the success of immunomodulatory drugs and failure of PD-1 blockade in tumors such as multiple myeloma (MM). Here, we use single-cell RNA and T cell receptor sequencing to characterize bone marrow T cells from healthy adults (n = 4) and patients with precursor (n = 8) and full-blown MM (n = 10). Large T cell clones from patients with MM expressed multiple immune checkpoints, suggesting a potentially dysfunctional phenotype. Dual targeting of PD-1 + LAG3 or PD-1 + TIGIT partially restored their function in mice with MM. We identify phenotypic hallmarks of large intratumoral T cell clones, and demonstrate that the CD27− and CD27+ T cell ratio, measured by flow cytometry, may serve as a surrogate of clonal T cell expansions and an independent prognostic factor in 543 patients with MM treated with lenalidomide-based treatment combinations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
T cells mediate antitumour immunity after the recognition of antigenic peptides, presented by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) or human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I molecules on tumor cells1,2. Accordingly, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are central players in the tumor microenvironment (TME), shaping fundamental clinical properties such as progression from benign to malignant states and response to immunotherapies3,4. Indeed, re-activation and clonal expansion of tumor-reactive T cells are critical to the success of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), adoptive transfer of TILs and immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs)5.
Host immune surveillance mediated by tumor-reactive T cells and some immunotherapy drugs rely in the interaction of unique T cell receptors (TCR) with cognate peptide-MHC molecules6. Increasing evidence indicate that only a proportion of TILs are able to recognize tumor antigens7. Thus, the lack of intrinsic tumor reactivity in a large fraction of intratumoral T cells implies that studies examining T cell differentiation and exhaustion states in the tumor microenvironment (TME) will essentially be assessing the phenotypic state of a large number of bystander T cells that are irrelevant to tumor control8. Therefore, knowledge about the phenotype of tumor-reactive T cells is a prerequisite for informative immune monitoring of malignant transformation and immunotherapy response5.
Despite the extensive use of immunotherapies in hematological malignancies, the single-cell landscape of TILs in these patients lags behind what has been accomplished in solid tumors. One such example is multiple myeloma (MM), an incurable plasma cell malignancy for which treatment is being redefined by immunotherapies9, where single-cell studies of TILs are scarce10,11,12 and the phenotype of clonotypic T cells remains unknown. MM is an exceptional model to study intratumoral T cells because of three singularities. First, it progresses from well-defined pre-malignant conditions through different immune escape mechanisms13 and immunotherapies are being investigated to prevent malignant transformation14,15. Second, IMIDs are a backbone of MM treatment, but there are no T cell markers to predict clinical benefit. Third, other immunotherapies relying on the activity of MM-clonal T cells such as PD-1 blockade failed to prolong patient’s survival16,17.
Here, we aimed to define the phenotype of individual T cell clones throughout myelomagenesis. To this end, we performed single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing of bone marrow (BM) T cells from patients with newly diagnosed MM and its precursor states, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). We identify large clonotypic expansions characterized by the expression of distinct combinations of immune checkpoint molecules. We also evaluate the effect of ICB treatments corresponding to each of these phenotypes in experimental MM models. Lastly, we identify T cell phenotypes that are predictive of survival in patients who received lenalidomide-based treatment combinations.
Results
The T cell compartment in healthy, benign, and malignant bone marrow
We used fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate BM T cells from four healthy adults, eight cases with the precursor states, MGUS and SMM (n = 4 each), and ten patients with active, newly-diagnosed MM (Fig. 1A and Table S1). Droplet-based 5′ scRNA-seq and paired scTCR-seq was performed to analyze the clonal relationship and functional states among BM T cells. After stringent quality control filtering, scTCR-seq yielded one or more complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) of both α and β chains in 41,018 T cells with paired transcriptomes.
Because there is limited data on the effect of tumor progression in global T cell phenotypes determined by scRNA-seq10,11,18, we first mapped BM T cell states across healthy adults, MGUS/SMM and MM patients. Overall, 63 million mRNA transcripts in 41,018 T cells from the 22 subjects described above, were sequenced. Transcriptional profiles of individual T cells allowed grouping of similar cells into clusters, which were named according to the expression levels of well-known genes (Fig. S1 and Supplementary Dataset 1). Thus, 16 subsets were identified including γδ-like T cells, double negative and double positive T cells, T regulatory (Treg) cells, five CD4+ T cell clusters (naïve, stem cell memory [SCM], central memory [CM], effector memory [EM], effector granzyme K [GZMK+] CD4+ T cells), and seven CD8+ T cell subsets (naïve, CM, effector GZMK+, EM GZMK+, GZMK+ perforin 1 [PRF1+], granzyme B [GZMB+] cells, plus an additional subset of potentially exhausted CD8+ T cells with increased expression of TOX) (Fig. 1B).
Because these T cell subsets are similar to those expected to be circulating in the peripheral blood, we investigated the quality of the aspirates based on the percentages of BM specific cell types such as B-cell precursors, mast cells and nucleated red blood cells, determined by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) whenever this method was performed simultaneously to scRNA- and scTCR-seq (i.e., in 5 MGUS/SMM and 7 MM patients). The three cell types were systematically detected and their percentages were within the quartile percentages observed in a previously reported reference dataset19 (Table S2). These results preclude the risk of severe hemodilution in the BM aspirates analyzed in this study.
All 16 clusters except CD8+ TOX+ T cells were present in healthy adults, MGUS/SMM and MM patients (Fig. 1C and Table S3). The subset of potentially exhausted CD8+ TOX+ T cells was detected exclusively in the BM of 4 of the 10 MM patients (Fig. S2). Only four of the 16 clusters showed altered distribution across normal, benign and malignant BM. Namely, MM patients displayed increased percentages of Treg, CD8+ CM cells, and CD8+ effector GZMK+, together with a reduced frequency of CD8+ GZMB+ T cells (Fig. 1C and Table S3).
The phenotype of clonal T cells during disease progression
A total of 33,243 distinct clonotypes defined by unique TCRα and TCRβ genes sequences were identified amongst the 41,018 T cells from the 22 subjects described above (Fig. 1D). Based on the percentage of each clonotype within total T cells, these were categorized as small (range, 0–<0.01), medium (range, 0.01–≤ 0.1) and large (range, 0.1–≤ 1). Overall, most clonotypes were small (average of 69% within total T cells); medium and large expanded T cell clones were less frequent (averages of 12% and 19% within total T cells, respectively). Of note, the relative distribution of small, medium and large T cell clones was similar across healthy adults, MGUS/SMM and MM (Fig. 1E, F). Accordingly, there were no significant differences in the Shannon’s and inverse Simpson indexes (Fig. S3). By contrast, healthy adults showed significantly higher TCR diversity when compared to MGUS/SMM and MM patients (Fig. S3), as measured by the index scores of Chao1 (338, 187, and 185, respectively; p = 0.014) and abundance-based coverage estimator (407, 193, and 196, respectively; p = 0.022).
Elicited by these findings, we next analyzed the transcriptional phenotype of small, medium and large T cell clones in BM aspirates from healthy adults, MGUS/SMM and MM patients (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Dataset 2). Small clones were predominant in the various CD4+ clusters including Tregs, as well as in double negative and double positive T cells. By contrast, medium and large clones were seen at greater percentages in γδ-like T cells and all CD8+ clusters except for the naïve subset (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Dataset 2). These results are consistent with the fact that, amongst large clones, the ratio between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was 1:1.4. Interestingly, the ratio between CD4+ and CD8+ large T cell clones progressively increased in BM aspirates of healthy adults, MGUS/SMM and MM patients (1:1.2, 1:1.7 and 1:2.1, respectively; Fig. S4).
We then compared the distribution of T cell clusters among small, medium and large clones (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Dataset 3). Significant differences between normal, benign and malignant BM aspirates were observed in medium and large clones. In healthy adults, these were enriched in CD8+ GZMB+ T cells (p < 0.05), followed by CD8+ EM GZMK+, γδ-like and CD8+ effector GZMK+ T cells. In MGUS/SMM, there was a predominance of CD8+ EM GZMK+ (p < 0.05) and CD8+ GZMB+ T cells. By contrast, large clones from MM patients were enriched in CD8+ GZMK+ PRF1+ (p < 0.01), CD8+ effector GZMK+ (p < 0.05) and CD8+ TOX+ (p < 0.01) T cells. Indeed, potentially exhausted CD8+ TOX+ T cells, which were uniquely detected in the BM of MM patients, were particularly enriched in large clones (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Dataset 2). Collectively, these results suggest that albeit similar expansion of T cell clones in the BM of healthy adults, MGUS/SMM and MM patients, there is reduced TCR diversity in benign and malignant bone marrow, and a potentially increased dysfunction of large T cell clones in MM. Accordingly, these showed increased expression of PD1 and TIGIT when compared to large T cell clones from healthy adults and MGUS/SMM patients (Fig. S5).
ICB combination therapy tailored to the phenotype of large T cell clones
To corroborate the potential dysfunction of large T cell clones in MM, we investigated the effect of ICB in a genetically engineered BIcγ1 mouse model that results from transgenic BCL2 and IKK2NF-κB expression in mature germinal center B lymphocytes by the cγ1-cre allele20 (Fig. S6). Upon T cell driven immunization with sheep red blood cells, mice spontaneously develop MM fulfilling two important characteristics of human disease: the evolution of pre-malignant MGUS into full-blown MM, and the interplay between tumor and the BM immune microenvironment during progression (Fig. S6)20. A total of 16,043 BM T cells from control, MGUS and MM bearing mice were characterized by scRNA-seq and scTCR-seq (Fig. 3A and Table S4). MGUS was defined as <10% GFP+CD138+B220−sIgM− BM plasma cells and no CRAB-like features (hypercalcemia, renal disease, anemia, and bone disease), whereas MM was diagnosed when mice presented >10% tumor cells and/or CRAB (Fig. S6). Similar to humans, we observed few differences in the distribution of T cell clusters in control vs MGUS and MM mice, one of which being once again the increased percentage of CD8+ GZMK+ T cells in the later (Fig. 3B and Table S5).
Another similarity with humans was the different cluster distribution within large T cell clones from control vs MGUS and MM mice. The predominant cluster within medium and large clones from control mice was composed of CD8+ GZMB+ LAG3+ (p < 0.05) and CD8+ naïve (p < 0.01) T cells, whereas in MM bearing mice it was composed of CD8+ GZMK+ T cells (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3C, Supplementary Dataset 4). Furthermore, large clones from MM mice showed increased expression of CD8, CD38, Pd1 and Tigit when compared to large clones from control and MGUS mice (Fig. 3D). Collectively, tumor progression in immunocompetent mice that spontaneously develop MM showed similarities with human cancer, and could therefore be used to investigate if the possible dysfunction of large T cell clones in MM could be restored using ICB.
Because large T cell clones showed co-expression of multiple immune checkpoints, the combined administration of anti-PD1 plus anti-LAG3 or anti-TIGIT was tested in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice intravenously injected with the MM5080 murine MM cell line, which was established from BIcγ1 mice with an additional P53 deletion (Fig. S7). This model is characterized by the progressive accumulation of tumor cells in the BM, together with increased percentages of CD8+ T cells overexpressing PD1, LAG3 and TIGIT (Fig. S7). Mice were treated with ICB (single-agent or dual combinations) at days +3, +10 and +17. Interestingly, none of the ICB used in monotherapy prolonged survival; by contrast, the co-administration of anti-PD1 plus anti-LAG3, or anti-PD1 plus anti-TIGIT, resulted in longer overall survival (OS) (Fig. 3E). Thus, the blockade of two immune checkpoints significantly delayed MM growth.
T cell markers of clonality and prognosis in MM
We then aimed at identifying phenotypic hallmarks of large T cell clones that could be leveraged for MFC immune monitoring. Among the 656 deregulated genes between small, medium and large T cell clones from MGUS/SMM and MM patients (Supplementary Dataset 5), 35 coded for cell surface proteins. Namely, small clones showed decreased expression of CD3, CD8, CD16, CD48, CD52, CD53 CD63, CD74, CD99, CD247, CD320, CXCR3, and LAG3, as well as higher mRNA levels of CD27, CD28, CD55, CD62L, CD127, CCR6, and CCR7 (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Dataset 5).
One of the differentially expressed antigens across small, medium and large T cell clones was CD27; the latter showing significantly lower mRNA levels (Fig. 4B, C). This was an important observation because CD27 is amongst the markers that are routinely evaluated through MFC for the screening of plasma cell clonality in patients with monoclonal gammopathies21,22. Of note, there was a significant correlation between the number of T cell clones and the ratio between CD27− and CD27+ T cells (CD27−:CD27+), as determined by scRNA-seq and MFC whenever these were simultaneously performed in BM aspirates from MGUS/SMM and MM patients (Fig. 4D, E). Thus, the extent of clonal T cell expansions could be estimated in larger series of patients with available immunophenotypic data, according to the CD27−:CD27+ ratio.
To investigate its prognostic value, we analyzed 271 and 272 MM patients that were respectively enrolled in the transplant-ineligible GEM-CLARIDEX23 and transplant-eligible GEM2012MENOS6524 phase 3 clinical trials. Both series yielded unique opportunities to investigate the prognostic value of the CD27−:CD27+ ratio as a surrogate of clonal T cell expansions in patients treated with regimens including lenalidomide, an IMID that requires tumor-reactive T cells to mediate its anti-MM effect25.
Using computational flow cytometry, we identified 22 BM clusters including CD27− and CD27+ T cell subsets (Fig. 5A and Fig. S8). The presence of a CD27−:CD27+ ratio higher than the median value (i.e., ≥0.3) was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in both transplant-ineligible (hazard ratio: 0..597, 95% confidence interval: 0.366–0.975; p = 0.0402) (Fig. 5B) and transplant-eligible patients (hazard ratio: 0.493, 95% confidence interval: 0.289–0.840; p = 0.0052) (Fig. 5C). The presence of a CD27−:CD27+ ratio ≥0.3 was significantly associated with longer OS in transplant-eligible patients (Fig. S9). Furthermore, multivariate analysis including the prognostic factors that define the revised International Staging System (i.e., ISS, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] and cytogenetic risk) demonstrated that the CD27−:CD27+ ratio showed independent prognostic value for PFS (Fig. 5D). The CD27−:CD27+ ratio was not associated with patients’ staging and LDH levels (Table S6), nor the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities such as +1q, del(1p), del(17p) and IgH chromosomal translocations (Table S7). Furthermore, there were no differences in the mutational burden and transcriptional profile of tumor cells, respectively assessed by whole-exome sequencing (n = 23) and RNA-seq (n = 102), between patients with <0.3 and ≥0.3 CD27−:CD27+ratio (Fig. S10).
To gain further insight into a putative association between clonal T cell expansions in the TME (i.e., high CD27−:CD27+ ratio) and their re-activation upon exposure to lenalidomide, we cultured whole-BM aspirates from MM patients (n = 3) in a 3D organoid for 5 days, and treated with 1 µM lenalidomide +/− an anti-HLA antibody to block TCR-MHC interactions. The significant tumor cell killing induced by lenalidomide was nearly abrogated following HLA blockade (Fig. 5E). Collectively, these data reinforce the possible association between the prognostic value of the CD27−:CD27+ ratio and the re-activation of clonal T cell expansions upon lenalidomide-based combination therapy.
Discussion
Tumor recognition by T cells is essential for anticancer immunity and a deeper knowledge of clonal T cells is needed for informative immune profiling of patients. To our knowledge, we performed one of the largest studies of TILs in MM and its precursor states, which shed light into the evolving phenotype of large, expanded T cell clones during disease progression and identified an immune biomarker to predict survival in MM patients treated with lenalidomide-based combination therapy.
A major limitation to understand the origin and fate of T cells in tumor immunity is the lack of quantitative and qualitative information on the distribution of individual T cell clones26. Here, we showed that the extent of T cell clonality could be similar between healthy adults and patients with benign and malignant monoclonal gammopathies. This observation may be partially related to the fact that the BM acts as a reservoir of memory T cells, as well as a primary lymphoid organ13, which could help explaining the presence of larger clones in healthy adults. In fact, the inability to discriminate BM-derived from blood-derived T cells is a limitation of the methods used in this study. However, the TCR repertoire in MGUS/SMM and MM patients was less diverse when compared to healthy adults, which would suggest that part of the intratumoral clones may recognize tumor antigens. In such a case, the long-lasting interaction between T cells and neoplastic plasma cells in the BM, would result in a more dysfunctional phenotype. The findings of altered cluster distribution within large T cell clones from healthy adults vs. MGUS/SMM or MM patients, together with a higher proportion of cytotoxic over helper subsets, and the increased expression of consensus markers of T cell exhaustion in large clones from MM patients, support this hypothesis. As such, this study provides evidence about the mechanisms of tumor immune evasion during the progression of monoclonal gammopathies.
TILs include bystander and tumor-specific T cells with partially overlapping phenotypes7,8. Although selected markers have been utilized to exclude T cells recognizing a wide range of epitopes unrelated to cancer (e.g., PD-1, CD39, CD103), these may generate false-negative selection in tumors with limited data about their phenotype. Here, we provided a detailed list of 656 genes, including 35 coding for cell surface proteins, differentially expressed between small, medium and large T cell clones from patients with monoclonal gammopathies. As expected, large clones showed overexpression of CD8 and markers related to antigen-dependent differentiation such as CD53, CD74, CD99, CD247 and CXCR3, as well as markers of T cell exhaustion such as LAG3, PD-1, and TIGIT. These data confirms and extends previous observations in MM27, and could help explaining the limited clinical benefits of anti–PD-1 blockade in recent phase 3 clinical trials16,17. In particular, if large and possible tumor-reactive T cell clones express multiple immune checkpoints, anti–PD-1 alone may be insufficient to restore their function.
Whether ICB combination therapy is needed to reactivate and expand MM-specific T cells, similarly to solid tumors28,29,30,31, remains unexplored in humans. Thus, we leveraged recently developed experimental models that recapitulate MM pathogenesis including mechanisms of immune evasion20, to investigate the effect of ICB combination therapy in this tumor. As in humans, large T cell clones in mice exhibited potentially dysfunctional phenotypes involving the co-expression of various immune checkpoints at the MM stages. Interestingly, we observed prolonged survival with anti-PD1 plus anti-LAG3 or anti-TIGIT combination therapy. These results build upon previous pre-clinical evidence of an immune-inhibitory role of LAG3 and TIGIT in MM, and a possible benefit when blocking these immune checkpoints32,33,34.
Lenalidomide is a backbone in the treatment of newly-diagnosed MM patients35,36. IMIDs bind to the E3 ligase substrate-recognition adapter protein cereblon and, therefore, the protein is essential for the therapeutic effect of these drugs. Surprisingly though, more than two thirds of patients do not show point mutations, copy losses/structural variations or specific variant transcripts of cereblon by the time they become refractory to IMIDs37. Thus, determinants of response and resistance remain largely unknown and there are no routine biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes prior lenalidomide treatment38,39,40,41. Our results suggest that the efficacy of IMIDs could depend on the extent of clonal T cell expansions. Namely, we showed that the ratio between CD27− and CD27+ T cells in the TME predicted progression-free survival in two independent series of patients, representative of both transplant-eligible and ineligible MM. The lack of impact of the CD27−:CD27+ T cell ratio in the OS of transplant-ineligible patients could be related to the different treatment protocols. In the GEM-CLARIDEX clinical trial, patients received lenalidomide-based combinations until disease progression; hence, these were considered as IMID-refractory at relapse which could have limited the options of salvage regimens. By contrast, transplant-eligible patients enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 clinical trial received fixed-duration therapy and might have been eligible to IMID-containing salvage regimens at relapse.
One limitation of this study is the lack of paired MFC and scRNA/TCR-seq (or bulk TCR-seq) data in a large series of MM patients to compare the prognostic value of the CD27−:CD27+ T cell ratio with other metrics of T cell clonality. Thus far, scRNA/TCR-seq data has been generated in small cohorts11,12, which probably reflects the economical challenge of performing these methods in large series. Indeed, this is what elicited us to investigate phenotypic hallmarks of large intratumoral T cell clones to rely on more commonly available MFC data. Of note, CD27 is a well-known marker of T cell activation and antigen-dependent differentiation, and there might be better surrogates of clonal T cell expansions (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Dataset 5). We specifically selected CD27 for subsequent analysis because of its inclusion in the MFC panels used for the screening of newly-diagnosed MM patients.
A strength of the observed relationship between the CD27−:CD27+ T cell ratio and outcome, is that it is agnostic to the clone target. This is important because the clonal T cell repertoire will vary markedly within and between individuals and thus, a generalized surrogate biomarker is required for translation to patient care. Future studies, namely those including more recent standards of care such as anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, will determine the extent to which the CD27−:CD27+ T cell ratio is a useful maker of tumor specificity and response to lenalidomide-based combinations in MM. As noted above, CD27 is commonly used to screen for plasma cell clonality in patients with monoclonal gammopathies21,22, and MFC is considered as an obligatory diagnostics test in MM35. Thus, there is potential for the CD27 ratio to become a biomarker of patients with different T cell composition who may display distinct clinical behavior upon treatment with lenalidomide. Such hypothesis should be confirmed in additional series, particularly those treated with more recent immunotherapies.
As human cancers arise in an immunocompetent host, tumor development is shaped by immunoediting and malignant cells develop the capacity to escape tumor antigen responses42. Indeed, the classical paradigm of host-tumor interaction—i.e., elimination, equilibrium and escape –, is reflected in the clinical behavior of MM which progresses from MGUS and SMM13. Our results suggest that large T cell clones in patients with precursor conditions appear to be less dysfunctional than those from cases with active disease. If confirmed in larger series, this finding could help to better understand the effects of lenalidomide (alone or in combination with dexamethasone) in modulating T cell phenotypes43 and in prolonging time-to progression of high risk SMM patients treated in two phase 3 clinical trials14,15. Therefore, this study illustrates the power of combining transcriptomic with TCR analysis to shed light on the functional impairment of T cell mediated immunity in the TME, and how the systematic interrogation of TILs is key to future development of immunotherapy, and the prediction of clinical responses in cancer.
Methods
Patients and treatment
A total of 565 BM samples from healthy adults (n = 4) or patients with MGUS (n = 4), SMM (n = 4) or newly-diagnosed MM (n = 553) were analyzed (median ages of 62, 68, 47, and 66 years, respectively). Only samples with >90% viability (according to the percentage of debris observed by flow cytometry) were used for analysis. Of the 553 MM patients, 272 were enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2012MENOS65 clinical trial and 271 in the PETHEMA/GEMCLARIDEX clinical trial (registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01916252 and #NCT02575144, respectively). These two cohorts were selected to determine the prognostic value of the CD27 ratio measured in intratumoral T cells. Briefly, in the PETHEMA/GEM2012MENOS65 clinical trial, patients received six induction cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation conditioned with Bu-Mel or Mel-200 high-dose therapy, and received two consolidation cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In the PETHEMA/GEMCLARIDEX clinical trial, patients received either clarithromycin, lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone or lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Navarra (2017.022) and was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Combined single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing (scRNA/TCR-seq)
scRNA-seq + scTCR-seq were performed in 22 BM aspirates from 4 healthy adults, 4 MGUS, 4 SMM, and 10 MM patients, as well as 8 BM aspirates from 2 control (Ycɣ1), 3 MGUS (BIcɣ1) and 3 MM (BIcɣ1) bearing mice. In order to discriminate BM samples with peripheral blood contamination, we implemented a quality control check, which is to analyze the presence of BM specific cell types using flow cytometry: B cell precursors, mast cells and nucleated red blood cells. If these are absent, we conclude that the level of hemodilution is high and the sample cannot be considered representative of a BM aspirate. We compared the data from our samples with a large reference dataset19 and only used those in which the percentages of these cell populations were inside the reported ranges (Table S2). Cells were FACS sorted (a mix of 0.8 × 105 CD3+ T cells + 0.8 × 105 CD56+ NK cells + 0.25 × 105 CD300e+ monocytes + 0.15 × 105 CD19+ B cells) in 100 µL of PBS + 0.05% BSA. Samples with at least 90% viability were processed using the 10X Genomics (CA, USA) scRNA/TCRseq kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Chromium Next GEM Single Cell V(D)J v1.1 protocol rev F for human samples and Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5′ v2 Dual Index protocol rev B for mice samples). Quality control was performed with Qubit Fluorometric Quantification (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA) using the double-stranded DNA high-sensitivity assay kit, and with TapeStation (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) using high-sensitivity screentapes. Libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 550 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with the sequencing depth and run parameters indicated by 10X Genomics instructions. scRNAseq data is available at the NCBI GEO under accession GSE205393.
scRNA-seq and scTCR-seq data from humans and mice were analyzed separately. Sample demultiplexing, alignment to the hg38 human reference genome (or the respective mice genome) and single-cell gene count was performed using the Cell Ranger Single-Cell Software Suite v.6.0 (https://www.10xgenomics.com/). Expression matrixes were analyzed with the R package seurat 4.0 (https://satijalab.org/seurat/) and cells were filtered according to <10% mitochondrial expression and at least 200 (but less than 2500) mRNA counts per cell. Once scaled and normalized, a genelist including the most variable genes was obtained by the FindVariableFeatures function. After removing genes belonging to the immunoglobulin families (which could work as a confounding factor during clustering), the genelist was used to derive the principal component analysis (PCA) vectors for each sample. The first 100 PCA were used to align samples (batch removal) using the R package harmony v.0.1.144. The new harmonized coordinates were used to develop UMAPs (dimensionality reduction). The shared nearest neighbor (SNN) algorithm based on 50 batch-corrected dimensions was used for clustering the cells into homogeneous groups that were manually identified according to the expression of canonical genes (see Supplemental Information) obtained from curated gene-sets. A sequential subclustering strategy (which consists basically in repeating the same steps as before on a specific subpopulation) to focus on clonotypic T cells was performed. Annotation of T cell clusters was performed taking into account the expression of genes reported in Fig. S1.
T cell clones defined by their unique CDR3 of both α and β chains were obtained from Cell Ranger v.6.0 and using the scRepertoire v.1.10.1 R package. This information was added to the Seurat object to analyze the transcriptome of these cells. scRepertoire R package was also used to assess clonotype distribution as well as to investigate clonal “diversity”, characterized by clones frequency, repertoire richness and convergence45,46. To estimate clonal expansions and richness we used Shannon, Inverse Simpson, Chao and ACE indices47,48,49,50 which have been developed to deal with under sampling (i.e., “unseen species”), and could therefore mitigate the fact that for technical reasons, only a fraction of repertoires is sequenced and analyzed45.
Multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC)
The phenotype of T cells in BM samples from newly-diagnosed MM (n = 553) was analyzed using MFC. Samples were stained following the EuroFlow lyse, wash and stain standard sample preparation protocol, adjusted to 106 nucleated cells. EDTA-anticoagulated BM aspirates were stained with the following combination of the monoclonal antibodies: CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCPCy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC, and CD81-APCH7 (Table S8).
Computational flow cytometry
FCS files from 553 BM aspirates from newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed using the semi-automated algorithm named “FlowCT” v.0.0.951, which is based on the analysis of multiple files by automated cell clustering. Briefly, FCS files were merged, underwent quality control, were normalized through batch removal steps and clustered using FlowSOM. After the computational clustering, the Infinicyt software v.2.0 (Cytognos SL, Salamanca, Spain) was used for the identification of each cluster. Statistical analysis was then performed based on the output of the software.
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)
Normal plasma cells from healthy adults (n = 25) and tumor cells from MGUS (n = 12) and newly-diagnosed MM patients (n = 216) were isolated from total BM aspirates, in a FACSAriaII and according to patient-specific aberrant phenotypes. Bulk RNA-seq was performed using a protocol adapted from single-cell massively parallel single-cell RNA-sequencing52, which enabled preparing libraries with as few as 20.000 cells as starting material. Briefly, we barcoded RNA from each sample in a retrotranscription (RT) reaction with AffinityScript Multiple Temperature Reverse Transcriptase (Agilent) and different RT primers. After qPCR, cDNA with similar Ct values were pooled together. cDNA was purified with SPRIselect 1.2X (Beckman Coulter -BC-, Brea, CA) and amplified using the T7 promotor as template previously introduced in the RT reaction. T7 polymerase (NEB) was added for 16 h at 37 °C. RNA molecules were fragmented with 2 µL of 10X Zn2+ fragmentation buffer (Ambion™, ThermoFisher Scientific) for 1 min at 70 °C and purified with SPRIselect 2X. Afterwards, a ssRNA adapter (Illumina) was ligated to the 3′-end of the RNA fragments in presence of DMSO, 100 mM ATP, 50% PEG and T4 RNA ligase I (NEB) for 2 h at 22 °C. A second RT reaction was performed with AffinityScript Multiple Temperature Reverse Transcriptase and resulting cDNA was purified with SPRIselect 1.5X. Finally, cDNA was amplified with 12.5 µL Kappa Hifi ready mix + 1 µL 25 µM primer mix per sample and purified with SPRIselect 0.7X. Qubit, TapeStation and qPCR analysis were done as quality controls and 4 nM of the final library were sequenced in a NextSeq 550 (Illumina). Differential gene expression across all pairwise comparisons between groups was analyzed with Deseq2 v.1.40.2 R package followed by k-means clustering of genes in R.
Whole-exome sequencing (WES)
We performed WES in tumor cells from BM aspirates and peripheral blood T cells of MM patients (n = 23). We sorted approximately 20,000 tumor cells in 100 µL of Lysis/Binding Buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA), using the same strategy described above for bulk RNA-seq. The quality of genomic DNA extracted from tumor and peripheral blood T cells was evaluated by Agilent 4200 Tape Station using Genomic DNA ScreenTape system (Agilent, USA), and DNA concentration quantified by Qubit System (Invitrogen, USA). Genomic DNA was captured for each sample in a 10X Chromium instrument using the Chromium Genome Reagent Kit V2 for Exome Assays (10X Genomics, USA). DNA was then fragmented to an average size of 225 bp using a Covaris S220 ultrasonicator (Covaris, USA) and subjected to DNA library construction using Chromium Genome Reagent Kit V2 for Exome Assays (10X Genomics, USA). Target enrichment was performed with SureSelectXT Human All Exon V6 Capture Library (Agilent Technologies, USA) and sequence targets were captured and amplified in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. Enriched libraries were used for 150 base sequencing in a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Raw FASTQ files were processed using LongRanger (v2.2.2, 10xGenomics) with default parameters. Variants were annotated using the bioinformatics software HD Genome One (DREAMgenics, Oviedo, Spain), using several databases containing functional (Ensembl, CCDS, RefSeq, Pfam), populational (dbSNP, 1000 Genomes, ESP6500, ExAC) and cancer-related (COSMIC—Release 87, ICGC—Release 27) information. In addition, 9 scores from algorithms for prediction of the impact caused by non-synonymous variants on the structure and function of the protein were used (SIFT, PROVEAN, Mutation Assessor, Mutation Taster, LRT, MetaLR, MetaSVM, FATHMM, and FATHMM-MKL), and 1 score (GERP + +) for evolutionary conservation of the affected nucleotide. Indel realignment was performed to correct underestimated allele frequencies. Variants with a population allele frequency higher than 0.01 were excluded. Variants detected in germline DNA (i.e., T cells) were excluded. Only mutations with a coverage higher than 6 in all samples from a patient were selected. Only variants detected in a sample with a variant frequency >=0.15, with a mutated allele count >=4 and droplet count >=4 were selected. Class A HLA haplotypes were identified using optiType (v1.3.3) genotyping algorithm53.
Mouse model of MM for scRNAseq + scTCRseq analysis
B6(Cg)-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(Ikbkb)Rsky/J mice (stock #008242) with constitutively active NF-κB signaling by IKK2 expression and a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter54, B6.Cg-Tg(BCL2)22Wehi/J mice (stock #002319) with BCL2 expression55, and B6.129P2-Trp53tm1Brn/J mice (stock #008462) with p53 deletion56 were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Transgenic activation in germinal center B lymphocytes was obtained by crossing mice with the cre-recombinase mouse line cγ1-cre (B6.129P2(Cg)-Ighg1tm1(cre)Cgn/J, stock #010611) obtained from the Jackson laboratory57. Strains were intercrossed by conventional breeding to obtain the corresponding compound mice with heterozygous alleles, termed BIcγ1, as this carries BCL2 and IKK2 expression by the cγ1-cre allele, and P53-BIcγ1, which also carries P53 deletion. BIcγ1 mice (n = 20) and P53-BIcγ1 mice (n = 20) consistently developed human-like MM, with a median OS of 296 and 258 days, respectively. As controls, cγ1-cre mice crossed to B6.129X1-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(EYFP)Cos/J mice (stock #006148, The Jackson Laboratory), which carry a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) reporter, were also generated (n = 20)58. All mice were maintained in a hybrid C57BL6/129 Sv genetic background under specific pathogen-free conditions in the animal facilities of the Center for Applied Medical Research CIMA at the University of Navarra. To induce the formation of GFP+ transgenic plasma cells, animals were subjected to T cell-mediated immunization with sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) intraperitoneally administered at 8 weeks of age, and then repeated every 21 days for 4 months. After immunization, mice were monitored twice a week for tumor development or end-point criteria such as reduction of mobility, labored respiration, or bristly hair. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation when signs of disease appeared, being then characterized. To this end, flow cytometry was applied to cell suspensions from bone marrow (flushed from femurs with DPBS) with the following murine monoclonal antibodies to detect tumor and immune cell subpopulations: CD138-PE, B220-APC, CD19-APC-Cy7, IgM-BV421, CD3-PE-Cy7, CD4-APC, CD8-BV510, NK1.1-BV421, FoxP3-PE, CD25-BV510, PD1-BV421, TIGIT-PE, LAG3-APC-Cy7, CD11b-BV510 and Gr1_PE-Cy7 (Table S8). Data acquisition was performed in a FACS CantoII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJoTM V10.7.1 software. In addition, serum protein electrophoresis of blood samples was used to measure the gamma-globulin (γ) fraction in a semi-automated Hydrasys 2 device, along with an isotyping multiplex assay to quantify Ig isotypes in serum using the MILLIPLEX® Mouse Immunoglobulin Isotyping kit on the Luminex® xMAP® platform. Tumor clonality was determined by genomic amplification of IgHV gene sequences by PCR in DNA isolated from GFP + -sorted MM cells in diseased mice, using specific VHA, VHE, and VHB forward primers and a reverse primer for JH4. Survival rates of mice were estimated using Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves. Mice of both sexes were used in the study and were kept under specific-pathogen-free conditions in the animal facilities of the Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) at the University of Navarra. Animal experimentation was approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of the University of Navarra and by the Health Department of the Navarra Government.
In vivo pre-clinical trial in a syngeneic MM model using immune checkpoint inhibitors
The MM-derived MM5080 cell line was established from an original MM developed in P53-BIcγ1 mice. Establishment of syngeneic transplants was performed by injecting 10 × 106 MM5080 cells in DPBS into the tail veins of 8- to 10-week-old immunocompetent C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice (strain code: 057, Envigo). Three days upon injection of MM cells, animals of both sexes were randomly divided into experimental groups, which received anti-PD1 (200 µg; RMP1-14), anti-TIGIT (200 µg; 1G9), or anti-LAG3 (200 µg; C9B7W) administered intraperitoneally alone or in combination for the following 3 weeks, while control mice received vehicle. Therapy responses were estimated by Kaplan–Meier survival curves, which were compared using the log-rank test using v7 GraphPad Prism software.
3D cultures
A 3D organoid was developed to test the effect of lenalidomide (1 µM), alone or in combination with 10 µg/mL of an anti-HLA I (BioXCell, Lebanon, NH), on tumor plasma cell killing from bone marrow aspirates of MM patients (n = 3). Cells were lysed with 1X BulkLysis buffer (Cytognos) and 5 × 106 cells were embedded in 60 µL of Matrigel Matrix (Corning) and fibronectin (ratio matrigel:fibronectin 2:1). This mix was seeded per well in a 24-well plate (Cellstar®) and left 40 min in the incubator, so that the matrigel may solidify Afterwards, we added 1 mL of RPMI1640 medium (10% FBS, 1% L-Glu, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin) supplemented with 10% of plasma from the same BM sample, IL-6 100 nM and IGF1 100 nM per well. Organoids were maintained in culture for 5 days at 37 °C. Finally, organoids were desegregated with Cell Recovery Solution (Corning) and labeled with CD138-BV421, CD3-BV510, CD38-FITC, CD4-PE, CD45-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD19-PE-Cy7, AnnexinV-APC and CD8-APCH7 (Table S8). Data acquisition was performed in a FACSCantoII flow cytometer using the FACSDiva software and data analysis was performed using the Infinicyt software.
Statistical analysis
Survival probabilities were estimated by using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the use of a two-sided stratified log-rank test. The effect of CD27 ratio on the risk of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]), with its two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI), were estimated with a logistic Cox regression model. PFS was defined from the time of MFC assessment at diagnosis until disease progression or death from any cause. OS was defined from the time of MFC assessment at diagnosis until death. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed to explore the independent effect on PFS of prognostic factors defining the revised International Staging System (R-ISS). Patients were stratified into groups according to the median value of the CD27 ratio or the abundance of T cell subsets in the whole population. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to estimate the statistical significance observed between groups in the comparison between T cells ranging from healthy adults to newly-diagnosed MM patients. Student’s T test was used to evaluate differences between groups in the 3D culture experiment. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism software (version 7, San Diego, CA), R version 4.0 and SPSS (version 25.0.0, IBM, Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
scRNAseq read data are submitted at NCBI GEO under accession GSE205393. hg38 human and mm10 mice reference genome were obtained from https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/release-notes/build. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Waldman, A. D., Fritz, J. M. & Lenardo, M. J. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 651–668 (2020).
Jhunjhunwala, S., Hammer, C. & Delamarre, L. Antigen presentation in cancer: insights into tumour immunogenicity and immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 298–312 (2021).
Zheng, L. et al. Pan-cancer single-cell landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cells. Science 374, abe6474 (2021).
van der Leun, A. M., Thommen, D. S. & Schumacher, T. N. CD8+ T cell states in human cancer: insights from single-cell analysis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 218–232 (2020).
Liu, Z. et al. Detecting tumor antigen-specific T cells via interaction-dependent fucosyl-biotinylation. Cell 183, 1117–1133.e19 (2020).
Schumacher, T. N. & Schreiber, R. D. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69–74 (2015).
Simoni, Y. et al. Bystander CD8+ T cells are abundant and phenotypically distinct in human tumour infiltrates. Nature 557, 575–579 (2018).
Scheper, W. et al. Low and variable tumor reactivity of the intratumoral TCR repertoire in human cancers. Nat. Med. 25, 89–94 (2019).
Rasche, L., Hudecek, M. & Einsele, H. What is the future of immunotherapy in multiple myeloma? Blood 136, 2491–2497 (2020).
Zavidij, O. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals compromised immune microenvironment in precursor stages of multiple myeloma. Nat. Cancer 1, 493–506 (2020).
Friedrich, M. J. et al. The pre-existing T cell landscape determines the response to bispecific T cell engagers in multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell 41, 711–725.e6 (2023).
Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, R. et al. Immune biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma. Cancer Cell 40, 1358–1373.e8 (2022).
Joshua, D. E. et al. Treg and oligoclonal expansion of terminal effector CD8+ T cell as key players in multiple myeloma. Front. Immunol. 12, 6–12 (2021).
Mateos, M.-V. et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 438–447 (2013).
Lonial, S. et al. Randomized trial of lenalidomide versus observation in smoldering multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 1126–1137 (2020).
Usmani, S. Z. et al. Pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with treatment-naive multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-185): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 6, e448–e458 (2019).
Mateos, M.-V. et al. Pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-183): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 6, e459–e469 (2019).
Schinke, C. et al. Characterizing the role of the immune microenvironment in multiple myeloma progression at a single-cell level. Blood Adv. 6, 5873–5883 (2022).
Puig, N. et al. Reference values to assess hemodilution and warn of potential false-negative minimal residual disease results in myeloma. Cancers 13, 4924 (2021).
Larrayoz, M. et al. Preclinical models for prediction of immunotherapy outcomes and immune evasion mechanisms in genetically heterogeneous multiple myeloma. Nat. Med. 29, 632–645 (2023).
van Dongen, J. J. M. et al. EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes. Leukemia 26, 1908–1975 (2012).
Flores-Montero, J. et al. Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 31, 2094–2103 (2017).
Puig, N. et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without clarithromycin in patients with multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous transplant: a randomized trial. Blood Cancer J. 11, 101 (2021).
Rosiñol, L. et al. Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy prior to autologous transplant in multiple myeloma. Blood 134, 1337–1345 (2019).
Quach, H. et al. Mechanism of action of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDS) in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 24, 22–32 (2010).
Wu, T. D. et al. Peripheral T cell expansion predicts tumour infiltration and clinical response. Nature 579, 274–278 (2020).
Suen, H. et al. Multiple myeloma causes clonal T-cell immunosenescence: identification of potential novel targets for promoting tumour immunity and implications for checkpoint blockade. Leukemia 30, 1716–1724 (2016).
Zhou, F., Qiao, M. & Zhou, C. The cutting-edge progress of immune-checkpoint blockade in lung cancer. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 279–293 (2021).
Cohen, R. et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition in colorectal cancer: microsatellite instability and beyond. Target. Oncol. 15, 11–24 (2020).
Michel, L. L. et al. Immune checkpoint blockade in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Target. Oncol. 15, 415–428 (2020).
de Almeida, D. V. P., Fong, L., Rettig, M. B. & Autio, K. A. Immune checkpoint blockade for prostate cancer: niche role or next breakthrough? Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. B. e89–e106. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_278853 (2020).
Guillerey, C. et al. TIGIT immune checkpoint blockade restores CD81 T-cell immunity against multiple myeloma. Blood 132, 1689–1694 (2018).
Minnie, S. A. et al. Myeloma escape after stem cell transplantation is a consequence of T-cell exhaustion and is prevented by TIGIT blockade. Blood 132, 1675–1688 (2018).
Bae, J. et al. Targeting LAG3/GAL-3 to overcome immunosuppression and enhance anti-tumor immune responses in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 36, 138–154 (2022).
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann. Oncol. 32, 309–322 (2021).
Kumar, S. K. et al. Multiple myeloma, version 3.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw. 18, 1685–1717 (2020).
Gooding, S. et al. Loss of COP9 signalosome genes at 2q37 is associated with IMiD resistance in multiple myeloma. Blood 140, 1816–1821 (2022).
Zhu, Y. X. et al. Identification of cereblon-binding proteins and relationship with response and survival after IMiDs in multiple myeloma. Blood 124, 536–545 (2014).
Zhu, Y. X. et al. Identification of lenalidomide resistance pathways in myeloma and targeted resensitization using cereblon replacement, inhibition of STAT3 or targeting of IRF4. Blood Cancer J. 9, 19 (2019).
Jones, J. R. et al. Mutations in CRBN and other cereblon pathway genes are infrequently associated with acquired resistance to immunomodulatory drugs. Leukemia 35, 3017–3020 (2021).
Haertle, L. et al. Cereblon enhancer methylation and IMiD resistance in multiple myeloma. Blood 138, 1721–1726 (2021).
Schreiber, R. D., Old, L. J. & Smyth, M. J. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science 331, 1565–1570 (2011).
Paiva, B. et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring and immune profiling in multiple myeloma in elderly patients. Blood 127, 3165–3174 (2016).
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
Chiffelle, J. et al. T-cell repertoire analysis and metrics of diversity and clonality. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 65, 284–295 (2020).
Borcherding, N., Bormann, N. L. & Kraus, G. scRepertoire: an R-based toolkit for single-cell immune receptor analysis. F1000Research 9, 47 (2020).
Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948).
Simpson, E. H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688–688 (1949).
Chao, A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11, 265–270 (1984).
Chao, A. & Lee, S. M. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 210–217 (1992).
Botta, C. et al. FlowCT for the analysis of large immunophenotypic data sets and biomarker discovery in cancer immunology. Blood Adv. 6, 690–703 (2022).
Jaitin, D. et al. Massively Parallel Single-Cell RNA-Seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 343, 776–779 (2014).
Szolek, A. et al. OptiType: precision HLA typing from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 30, 3310–3316 (2014).
Singh, A. K. et al. TBI with lung dose reduction does not improve hematopoietic cell homing to BM during allogeneic transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 45, 25–30 (2010).
Strasser, A. et al. Enforced BCL2 expression in B-lymphoid cells prolongs antibody responses and elicits autoimmune disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 88, 8661–8665 (1991).
Marino, S., Vooijs, M., van Der Gulden, H., Jonkers, J. & Berns, A. Induction of medulloblastomas in p53-null mutant mice by somatic inactivation of Rb in the external granular layer cells of the cerebellum. Genes Dev. 14, 994–1004 (2000).
Casola, S. et al. Tracking germinal center B cells expressing germ-line immunoglobulin 1 transcripts by conditional gene targeting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 103, 7396–7401 (2006).
Srinivas, S. et al. Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev. Biol. 1, 1–8 (2001).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III/Subdireccion General de Investigacion Sanitaria and co-financed by FEDER funds (CB16/12/00233, CB16/12/00369, PI17/01243, PI19/00818 and PI20/00048), and together with Fundación Científica de la Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (FCAECC) for iMMunocell Transcan-2 (AC17/00101), FCAECC Predoctoral Grant Junta Provincial Navarra, the Cancer Research UK (C355/A26819), FCAECC and Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) under the Accelerator Award Program (EDITOR), 2017 Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Immunotherapy Networks of Excellence, Black Swan Research Initiative of the International Myeloma Foundation, European Hematology Association nonclinical advanced research grant (3680644), European Research Council 2015 Starting Grant (MYELOMANEXT grant 680200), the Cancer Research Innovation in Science Cancer Foundation (PR_EX_2020-02), the Leukemia Lymphoma Society, unrestricted grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene and Takeda, Roche imCORE program (NAV-4 and NAV-15), Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica (Regione Lombardia) (Project ID 065 JTC 2016), ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2, and by My First AIRC Grant 2020 (n. 24534, 2021/2026), and by the Riney Family Multiple Myeloma Research Program Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
C.B., C.P., and B.P. conceived of the idea and designed the study protocol; C.P. performed scRNA-seq and scTCR-seq experiments; C.P. and S.S. performed next-generation sequencing; S.R. performed exome sequencing experiments; C.B., C.P., and I.G. analyzed sequencing data; C.B., C.P., N.P., M.-T.C., R.T., and A.Z. analyzed flow cytometric data; A.L. performed cell sorting; M.L. performed in vivo experiments; C.P. and L.B. performed in vitro experiments; D.M.P., M.-N., and D.B. developed the machine learning model; M.G., S.S., A.Oriol, M.E.G.-G., A.S., F.d.A., R.R.T., J.-M.M., M.G., M.T.H., J. Bargay, L.P., A.P.-M., H.G., H.A.-L., A.R., A. Orfao, J.M.-L., J.-J.L., L.R., J. Blade, M.-V.M., J.-A.M.C., and J.F.S.-M. provided study material and/or patients and/or support; C.B. and C.P. performed statistical analyses; C.B., C.P., and B.P. wrote the manuscript; and all authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
C.B. has served as a member on advisory boards for Amgen, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and Oncopeptides; A.R. has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, and Janssen and a research grant from AstraZeneca and the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): AIRC-IG-24689. H.G. has received speakers bureau honoraria from Academy2, KG, Agentur Hogg Robinson Germany, Amgen, ArtTempi, Beupdated Helbig Consulting and Research AG Schweiz, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chop, Chugai, Congress Culture Concept Dr. S. Stocker München, Connectmedia Warschau/Polen, Dr. Hubmann Tumorzentrum München, FomF, GlaxoSmithKline, GWT Forschung und Innovation Dresden, Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Onkologie GbR, Janssen, Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome, MedConcept, Medical Communication, Münchner Leukämie Labor Prof. Haferlach, New Concept Oncology, Novartis, Omnia Med Deutschland, Onko Internetportal DKG-web, Sanofi, STIL Forschungs, and Veranstaltungskonzept Gesundheit Mechernich, has served as a member on advisory boards for Adaptive Biotechnology, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda, and has received research grants and/or materials such as investigational medicinal products from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation, Janssen, John Hopkins University, and Sanofi. A. Oriol participated in advisory boards for Amgen, Celgene and Janssen. M.-V.M. has received honoraria for lectures from or participated in advisory boards for Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVie, Adaptive, GSK, Pharmamar, EDO, and Oncopeptides. L.R. reports honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, and Takeda. J.B. reports honoraria for lectures from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, Takeda, and Oncopeptides. J.-J.L. reports honoraria from and membership on boards of directors or advisory committees with Takeda, Amgen, Celgene, and Janssen. J.F.S.-M. reports consultancy for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Novartis, Takeda, Amgen, MSD, Janssen, and Sanofi and membership on a board of directors or advisory committee with Takeda. J.A.M.-C. has received research grants from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, and Janssen. B.P. reports honoraria for lectures from and membership on advisory boards with Adaptive, Amgen, Becton Dickinson, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda; unrestricted grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, EngMab, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; and consultancy for Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jonathan Chee, Xianwen Ren and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Botta, C., Perez, C., Larrayoz, M. et al. Large T cell clones expressing immune checkpoints increase during multiple myeloma evolution and predict treatment resistance. Nat Commun 14, 5825 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41562-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41562-6
This article is cited by
-
A comeback for checkpoint inhibition in multiple myeloma
Nature Cancer (2024)
-
Immune dysfunction prior to and during vaccination in multiple myeloma: a case study based on COVID-19
Blood Cancer Journal (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.