Diterpene synthase VenA is responsible for assembling venezuelaene A with a unique 5-5-6-7 tetracyclic skeleton from geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate. VenA also demonstrates substrate promiscuity by accepting geranyl pyrophosphate and farnesyl pyrophosphate as alternative substrates. Herein, we report the crystal structures of VenA in both apo form and holo form in complex with a trinuclear magnesium cluster and pyrophosphate group. Functional and structural investigations on the atypical 115DSFVSD120 motif of VenA, versus the canonical Asp-rich motif of DDXX(X)D/E, reveal that the absent second Asp of canonical motif is functionally replaced by Ser116 and Gln83, together with bioinformatics analysis identifying a hidden subclass of type I microbial terpene synthases. Further structural analysis, multiscale computational simulations, and structure-directed mutagenesis provide significant mechanistic insights into the substrate selectivity and catalytic promiscuity of VenA. Finally, VenA is semi-rationally engineered into a sesterterpene synthase to recognize the larger substrate geranylfarnesyl pyrophosphate.
Terpenoids (terpenes and modified terpenes with heteroatoms) represent the largest family of natural products with over 100,000 members1. These important primary and secondary metabolites, which are widely distributed in plants, animals, and microbes, hold diverse physiological and ecological functions2,3,4,5. Biosynthetically, the diversity of polycyclic and chiral hydrocarbon skeletons derive from various cyclization modes of a small number of acyclic and achiral polyprenyl pyrophosphates, which are catalyzed by highly diversified terpene synthases (TPSs)6. These elegant transformations are initiated by a highly reactive carbocation, followed by a cascade of intramolecular olefin-to-cation cyclizations, hydride shifts, proton transfer, Wagner–Meerwein rearrangements, and terminal deprotonation7,8. Typical TPSs are divided into two main classes based on sequence characteristics and initial carbocation forming mechanisms9,10,11,12: the type I TPSs containing two conserved motifs including the Asp-rich motif DDXX(X)D/E and NSE/DTE motif with a consensus sequence of (N/D)DXX(S/T)XXXE, which co-mediate the ionization of substrate by pyrophosphate (PPi) abstraction; and the type II TSs possessing an Asp-rich DXDD motif to protonate the olefin or epoxy group of the substrate.
Approximately one-quarter of discovered terpenoids are diterpenoids (C20), many of which have been successfully applied as medicines, perfumes, food additives, and fine chemicals, and also provided abundant target molecules for both synthetic chemistry and synthetic biology1,13. For example, paclitaxel from Pacific yew is a first-line antitumor agent clinically used in cancer therapies14; vitamin A, an essential micronutrient of humans, plays important roles in growth, development, vision, and reproduction15; gibberellins, mainly produced by plants (and some microbes), are vital plant hormones for regulation of growth and development16; ambroxide, as a commercial perfume fragrance, is semi-synthesized from sclareol that is a diterpenoid natural product isolated from Salvia sclarea17. To date, over 100 carbon skeleton types (e.g., labdane-, beyerene-, kaurene-type, etc.) of diterpenes have been discovered, demonstrating fascinating structural and functional diversities and many interesting but unknown catalytic mechanisms of diterpene synthases (DTSs). Thus, it is a long-term goal for biochemists, structural biologists, computational chemists, and synthetic chemists/biologists to understand how versatile DTSs assemble these diverse, complex, and useful skeletons (Fig. 1a, b)18,19,20,21.
Plant-derived TPSs used to catch much attention since over 70% of terpenoids originated from plants1,22,23. With the explosively increased genomic data, bacteria have been found to be another important source of TPSs and terpenoids24,25. Recently, we discovered a fragrant and low-toxic diterpene venezuelaene A (1) with an unusual 5-5-6-7 tetracyclic skeleton (Fig. 1c) from the model actinomycetic strain Streptomyces venezuelae ATCC 15439 by genome mining and silent gene activation26, which has been attracting growing interests from both perfume industry and (bio)chemists due to its trans-fused bicyclo[3.3.0]octane ring system27,28. A promiscuous DTS VenA containing an atypical 115DSFVSD120 motif was characterized to catalyze the unique cyclization of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP, C20), giving rise to 1. VenA is also capable of converting farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP, C15) into hedycaryol (2), germacrene A (3), β-farnesene (4), and germacrene D (5), and of accepting geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP, C10) to form geraniol (6) with relatively lower efficiencies (Fig. 1c). However, VenA cannot use geranylfarnesyl pyrophosphate (GFPP, C25) as a substrate. The mechanism for 1 biogenesis was proposed to be initiated by Markovnikov 1,10-cyclization based on isotopic labeling experiments26. However, the structural basis and molecular mechanisms for the atypical 115DSFVSD120 motif and unique cyclization modes of VenA remained unsolved.
In this study, we resolved the crystal structures of VenA in both apo form and holo form in complex with a trinuclear magnesium cluster and PPi group. With the resolved structures, substrate docking analysis, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations were comprehensively performed to rationalize the broad substrate spectrum and unique cyclization modes of VenA. Guided by the structure information, the amino acid residues in active site for substrate recognition/binding and carbocation stabilization and the role of 115DSFVSD120 motif were explored in detail by extensive site-directed mutagenesis. Characterization of 12 terpenoids produced by different VenA mutants (but not by the wild-type enzyme) provided important mechanistic insights into the tunable substrate preference, cyclization modes, and product profiles of this bacterial DTS. Moreover, a VenA hexamutant was semi-rationally engineered as a sesterterpene synthase (STS).
Resolution of crystal structures of VenA
To provide structural basis for the substrate promiscuity and unique cyclization mode of VenA, we first sought to crystallize VenA in its substrate-free form. However, we did not obtain any crystals of the wild-type VenA (VenAWT) and supposed that the N-terminal flexible loop region (1-15 aa) might prevent the protein crystallization. Thus, the truncated form VenAΔ1-15 with the N-terminal fifteen amino acids removed was expressed and purified. Of note, the in vitro enzymatic assays indicated this modification did not affect the activity of VenA (Supplementary Fig. 1, we use “VenA” to stand for “VenAΔ1-15” unless otherwise specified). Upon this truncation, we successfully determined the high-resolution three-dimensional structure of substrate-free VenA (apo form) at 2.03 Å resolution (PDB ID: 7Y9H, Fig. 2a, Supplementary Table 1). In the crystal structure, VenA is dimeric, which is consistent with the result of size exclusion chromatographic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2), indicating that VenA forms a homodimer in solution as well. The monomer of VenA holds a typical isoprenoid synthase α-fold comprised of twelve core α-helices and four additional short α-helices. Helices B2, C, G1, G2, H, J, and α4 form the active site cavity, and helices A, B1, and C-terminal loop contribute to the dimer interface with a buried area of 2350.5 Å2. Similar to dimeric CotB2 and SVS-A2, the two monomers are organized in an antiparallel arrangement and each active site points away from the dimer interface29,30,31.
Next, we attempted to use the substrates (GPP, FPP, and GGPP) and substrate analogues (GSPP: geranyl thiopyrophosphate, FSPP: farnesyl thiopyrophosphate, and GGSPP: geranylgeranyl thiopyrophosphate) to acquire the ligand-bound structures of VenA by soaking the substrates or more stable analogues with the crystals of apo form. However, only the PPi group released from GGPP and a trinuclear Mg2+ cluster were observed in the active site of VenA when soaking with GGPP, the crystal structure of which was determined at 2.18 Å (PDB ID: 7Y9G, Fig. 2b, Supplementary Table 1). Of note, when GSPP, FSPP, or GGSPP were used as substrate analogues which are supposed to resist hydrolysis; still, we only observed the hydrolyzed product thiopyrophosphate remaining in the active site. The PPi-Mg2+-bound and apo forms of VenA show slightly different conformations with a Cα root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value of 0.327 Å. The obvious movements were found in C and H helices, which resulted from the binding of metal ions and PPi group by the catalytic motifs, including the atypical Asp-rich motif (115DSFVSD120) located on C-helix and NSE motif (256NDLLSWRKE264) on H-helix (Fig. 2b). These conformational changes would shield the active site from bulk solvent to avoid the premature quenching of carbocation intermediates by water12.
Analysis of the active site of PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound VenA
In the PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound form, a trinuclear magnesium cluster is coordinated in an octahedral manner by the conserved amino acid residues in the Asp-rich and NSE motifs, PPi group and water molecules (Fig. 2c). Specifically, Mg2+A and Mg2+C are coordinated by ten oxygen atoms of Asp115, PPi group, and surrounding water molecules on the same side of the active site. In the opposite side of the active site, Mg2+B is coordinated by six oxygen atoms of NSE triad (Asn256, Ser260 and Glu264), PPi group, and one water molecule. The hydrogen bonds between coordinated water molecules and Glu192, Ser214, and Asp257 were also observed in the PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound form of VenA. Upon coordination with the trinuclear magnesium cluster, Asp115 and NSE motif stretch towards the active site and lead to the movement of C and H helices, which reduces the volume of substrate binding cavity (Fig. 2b, c). Meanwhile, the PPi group forms a number of hydrogen bonds with the “PPi sensor” residues Arg211 and Lys263 in the NSE motif, and the 344RY345 dimer in the active site of VenA, which play crucial roles in substrate trapping and conversion12. The “PPi sensor” Arg and RY dimer are strictly conserved among most bacterial type I TPSs for PPi binding and known as the catalytically important basic motifs32. Besides the amino acid residues in metal-binding motifs, Arg344 and Tyr108 in the active site of PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound VenA rotate by a wide margin compared with those in apo form (Supplementary Fig. 3). The side chain of Tyr108 forms hydrogen bonds with the guanidine group of Arg344 in the apo form, but is rotated to the opposite direction in the holo form. This movement may reduce the spatial hindrance for the substrate entry. Meanwhile, the guanidine group of Arg344 is rotated towards the PPi group, thereby forming a hydrogen bond. Ser116 and Gln83 in the PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound form may help maintaining the hydrophobic catalytic pocket by interacting with Arg344 (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 3).
To explore the key interactions observed in the active site of PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound VenA, we constructed an array of mutants and analyzed their catalytic activities (Fig. 3). Unsurprisingly, the three single mutants VenAN256L, VenAS260A, and VenAE264L completely lost their activity toward GGPP, FPP, and GPP in vitro, indicating that the coordination between Mg2+B and the NSE triad is required for VenA catalysis. VenAR221K could not accept GPP and its activity toward GGPP and FPP decreased by 49.8% and 36.4%, respectively (Fig. 3a). Interestingly, the substrate preference of VenAR344K was shifted to favoring FPP, giving rise to two main products, 2 and germacradien-6-ol (18, Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). VenAY345L turned out to be a dead mutant, while VenAY345F retained 23.4% and 50.8% activities toward GGPP and FPP, respectively (Fig. 3a), and produced diterpenes and sesquiterpenoids in the product ratios substantially different from that of VenAWT (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5, Supplementary Table 2) perhaps due to perturbation of the hydrogen bond network. These results revealed that the hydrogen bonds established by Tyr345, Arg211, and Arg344 with the PPi group are important for substrate binding and conversion. Taken together, VenA utilizes both metal ions and basic residues to trigger the departure of the substrate PPi group, thereby generating the highly reactive allylic cation as other type I TPSs12.
Investigation on the atypical “Asp-rich” motif
In the past twenty-six years, a wealth of biochemical studies have demonstrated that the typical Asp-rich motif (DDXX(X)D/E) of TPSs is essential for coordinating divalent metal ions (Mg2+/Mn2+) to initiate substrate binding and subsequent catalysis12,33,34. The literature research and investigation on the Asp-rich motifs of representative crystal structures (Supplementary Fig. 6) indicate that normally two (among three) aspartates, or three all aspartates in some cases, are catalytically essential for the bacterial type I TPSs. In most bacterial type I TPSs, the first Asp in the Asp-rich motif is coordinated with Mg2+A and Mg2+C, whereas the second Asp usually forms a salt bridge or hydrogen bond with a conserved arginine for shielding the active site from bulk solvent, the essential role of which was characterized by site-specific mutagenesis of CotB229, EIZS35, and pentalenene synthase36. The third Asp/Glu is usually located outside of the catalytic pocket and hence dispensable for the catalytic activity, or in some cases coordinated with Mg2+C as selinadiene synthase37 (Supplementary Fig. 6).
The crystal structures of VenA are the representative structures holding an atypical DXXXXD motif, which is a counterpart of the canonical Asp-rich motif in most type I TPSs. To explore the roles of the two Asp residues, the in vitro activities of VenAD115N and VenAD120N were determined in our previous work26. The results clearly indicated that only the first Asp115 is required for VenA’s activity; supporting this, Asp120 was found to be located outside of the active site and far from the PPi group (9.4 Å), Mg2+A (7.9 Å) and Mg2+C (9.1 Å) (Fig. 2c).
It is evident that the second Asp is missing from the “Asp-rich” motif of VenA. Without the second Asp in a canonical Asp-rich motif that forms a salt bridge with the conserved Arg in RY dimer of CotB2 and 1,8-cineole synthase from Streptomyces clavuligerus38 (Supplementary Fig. 6), we revealed that Ser116 and Gln83 are utilized to form a hydrogen bond network with Arg344 of the conserved RY dimer in VenA (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 3). To examine the role of these interactions, the in vitro enzymatic assays of VenAS116A were carried out; and it entirely lost the activity toward GPP and the activities against GGPP and FPP decreased by 29.9% and 71.5%, respectively, compared with that of VenAWT (Fig. 3a), indicative of the importance of the hydrogen bonds between Ser116 and Arg344. The function of Ser116 might be similar to that of Asp100 in EIZS39, which forms hydrogen bonds with the conserved Arg (Supplementary Fig. 6). Subsequently, we mutated Ser116 into Asp to restore the classical Asp-rich motif. Surprisingly, VenAS116D showed a decreased activity (Fig. 3a). We reason that the larger side chain of Asp might cause a steric hindrance for Arg344, thus negatively influencing the interaction of Arg344 with the PPi group. The remaining activity of VenAS116A might be attributed to the hydrogen bond between Gln83 and Arg344, which maintains the favorable conformation of Arg344 despite the loss of hydrogen bonds between Ser116 and Arg344 (Fig. 2c). However, we failed to confirm this hypothesis because the Gln83 mutants including VenAQ83L, VenAQ83K, and VenAQ83N formed inclusion bodies when expressed in Escherichia coli. These results suggest that Glu83 in B1/B2-helix-break might be critical for the correct protein folding of VenA.
Interestingly, the previous functional analysis of a similar atypical “Asp-rich” motif (94DNAMVD99) in another bacterial type I DTS Bnd4 from Streptomyces sp. CL12-440 also revealed that only Asp94 is necessary for Bnd4 activity. Based on sequence similarity network (SSN)-based homologues search, sequence alignment analysis of VenA, Bnd4 and VenA homologues collected from UniProt database, and AlphaFold241 predicted structures (Supplementary Figs. 7–10), we putatively proposed that Glu62 and Asn95 of Bnd4 might function as the counterparts of Gln83 and Ser116 in VenA, respectively, to form a hydrogen bond network with Arg322 of the RY dimer in Bnd4. Additionally, we observed analogous hydrogen bonds existing between Glu56, Ser95, and Arg300 of the RY dimer in the crystal structure of the fungal FgGS42 with a corresponding motif of 94DSVLE98 (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 10). Thus, we used these three motif sequences as probes to screen the NCBI databases and revealed dozens of putative microbial type I TPSs containing the non-classical “Asp-rich” motif, which fall into two main groups (bacterial and fungal origins) upon phylogenetic analysis. Strikingly, a conserved Glu or Gln residue is unanimously located at ~30 amino acid upstream of the “DXXX(X)D/E” motif lacking the second Asp in all these proteins (Fig. 2d). These results suggest a previously unidentified subclass of type I microbial TPSs containing a “D(S/T/N)XX(X)D/E” motif together with a far but conserved Q/E residue.
Understanding the substrate flexibility and initial cyclization modes of VenA
This study provides the important referential crystal structures of a DTS mediating the initial 1,10-cyclization of GGPP. Also, the molecular mechanisms for catalytically promiscuous type I DTSs to accept GPP, FPP, and GGPP were underexplored32. Thus, to understand the reaction mechanism for the specific 1,10-cyclization of GGPP as well as molecular basis for the broad substrate spectrum, we first docked GGPP/FPP/GPP into the hydrophobic reaction chamber of VenA (PDB ID: 7Y9G) using Autodock vina43, then equilibrated enzyme-substrate complex conformations by classical MD simulations using Amber20 package44, and finally validated the binding poses and probed the initial reaction steps by combined QM/MM calculations using the modified QChem/Tinker interface45.
In the optimal GGPP binding pose captured by QM/MM modelling (Fig. 4a), the acyclic substrate is folded into a specific bending conformation via π-stacking interactions owing to the enriched aromatic amino acids around substrate in the active site of VenA. With regard to the reactive geranylgeranyl cation (intermediate A, Figs. 4b and 5), the distances from C1 to C10=C11 double bond (3.4 and 4.0 Å for C10 and C11, respectively) are shorter than those from C1 to C6=C7 double bond (4.3 and 4.1 Å, respectively) and from C1 to C14=C15 double bond (4.8 and 4.3 Å, respectively), as detected by QM/MM optimization calculations. Evidently, the initial C1 carbocation is more inclined to attack C10 than C11 due to the shorter distance to C1 (3.4 versus 4.0 Å). Besides, the orientations of p-orbital between C1 and C10 show a high potency for a head-to-head overlap to form σ bond (Supplementary Fig. 11). These observations are well consistent with the fact that VenA prefers to catalyzing the Markovnikov 1,10-cyclization of GGPP (Fig. 5). This is further confirmed by reaction thermodynamic and kinetic estimations based on QM/MM calculations, as summarized in Table 1. The PPi cleavage procedure was predicted to be the rate-limiting step with a barrier of 25.4 kcal/mol and endothermicity of 13.8 kcal/mol (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 12), which is well known for type I TPSs11,46 and the reaction energetics is similar with our previous studies for other TPSs6,47,48,49. Moreover, the subsequent 1,10-cyclization of intermediate A is easily attainable with zero barrier and exothermicity of −4.0 kcal/mol, while other cyclization modes (including 1,6-/1,7-/1,14-/1,15-cyclization) are impracticable owing to much higher barriers (Table 1, Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14). To further probe the preference of 1,10-cyclization reaction step, several pico-second QM/MM MD simulations were performed based on intermediate A, and it was found that C1 and C10 would quickly (only take about 0.3 ps) approach and stably maintain at a distance of approximately 1.8 Å (Supplementary Fig. 15).
Furthermore, the computational protocol for GGPP was also applied for FPP and GPP binding VenA models (Supplementary Fig. 16). The QM/MM predicted that the reaction barriers of PPi cleavage are 24.9 and 24.8 kcal/mol for FPP and GPP, respectively (Table 1, Supplementary Figs. 17 and 18). Similarly, both 1,6- and 1,7-cyclization modes are infeasible owing to the high reaction barriers for FPP and GPP (Table 1, Supplementary Figs. 19 and 20). That is, VenA can only catalyze GPP to release the PPi group, forming an active carbocation that would be easily quenched by a water molecule instead of further cyclization, thus leading to the final product 6 (Fig. 1c) as experimental validation. Differently, the initial C1 carbocation of farnesyl cation is more inclined to attack C10 than C11 due to the shorter distance to C1 (3.5 versus 3.8 Å), and the 1,10-cyclization is feasible with a low barrier (only 2.5 kcal/mol) for FPP (Table 1, Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figs. 17 and 21). Thus, VenA shows the cyclase activity towards FPP to generate the cyclic products 2, 3, and 5, but the cyclization reaction could also be prematurely halted to yield the acyclic product 4 (Fig. 1c). Taken together, all these computational modeling results well explained the substrate specificity of VenA, which is able to accommodate GGPP/FPP/GPP to promote the initial carbocation ionization by cleaving the native charged PPi group. With the solved crystal structures, these QM/MM models also provide crucial initial substrate conformations for understanding the mono-, sesqui-, and diterpene biosynthetic mechanisms of VenA.
Elucidating the catalytic mechanism of VenA by QM/MM calculations and mutagenesis analysis of key active site residues
In the active site of TPSs, certain aromatic amino acids have been proven to be essential for stabilizing the progressively formed carbocation species, thereby directing the first carbocation intermediate to the final product via a series of C+−π interactions11,12,50. Based on the optimal substrate binding poses of VenA as detected in QM/MM calculations and discussed above, it is promising to generate unnatural terpenoids by reprograming the aromatic residues in VenA active site. Meanwhile, the resulting terpenoid products could provide critical mechanistic insights into the cyclization process controlled by TPS. Thus, we scanned the amino acid residues within 5 Å of the GGPP in VenA, and revealed seven aromatic amino acids in addition to Tyr345 of RY dyad, including Tyr88, Trp107, Tyr108, Phe185, Phe215, Trp219, and Phe338 (Fig. 4a).
After the initial 1,10-cyclization (GGPP→intermediate A→intermediate B), to reveal the key residues involved in the following cascade reaction steps from intermediate B to product 1 under VenA catalysis, we conducted the reaction coordinate driven QM/MM scan calculations (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. 22–24). As shown in Fig. 5, the 1,3-hydride (Ha) transfer would overcome a reaction barrier of 12.4 kcal/mol and show a notable exothermicity of 8.9 kcal/mol. This feasible hydride transfer reaction generates a metastable intermediate, denoted as C. Despite being a secondary carbocation, it can be effectively stabilized by the conjugative effect with the C2=C3 double bond as well as cation-π interactions with Tyr88 and Phe215, which contribute the binding energies with the intermediate C of 9.6 and 6.8 kcal/mol, respectively (Supplementary Table 3). Since the distance between C1 and C14 is only 4.1 Å and their orbital orientations are well prepared, the 1,14-cyclization to append a six-membered ring in intermediate D is also kinetically (9.7 kcal/mol for barrier) and thermodynamically (3.2 kcal/mol for heat release) very feasible.
Different from our previously proposed mechanism (Supplementary Fig. 25)26, the following cyclization reaction at C15 site of intermediate D is triggered by C2 instead of C3. Even though the C3-C15 distance could be set as the reaction coordinate for QM/MM scan calculation, C15 is favorable for approaching C2 to construct a four-membered ring in intermediate E, with a barrier of 4.3 kcal/mol and heat release of 7.7 kcal/mol. Then C15 would attack C3 and make C2-C15 bond breakage to expand the four-membered ring to five-membered ring; meanwhile, C2 would attack C6=C7 double bond to yield a stable non-classical carbocation (intermediate F), which is termed as “protonated cyclopropane” and has been extensively studied51,52,53,54,55. The key characteristic of protonated cyclopropane is delocalization of the positive charge of the carbocation onto the three-membered ring. These steps need to conquer a barrier of 16.0 kcal/mol and release heat of 7.1 kcal/mol. Considering that the C2-C6 and C2-C7 distances are 1.8 Å and 1.7 Å (longer than a normal C−C single bond), respectively, and that the atomic charges of C2/C6/C7 are 0.49/0.25/0.08 (lower than normal C+ appeared in most TPS catalysis)12, the originally high positive charge on C2 is likely delocalized to C6 and C7. Subsequently, the structure of C2-C6-C7 protonated cyclopropane is disrupted, with C2 separating from C7 and approaching C6 to form a regular C-C single bond; as a result, the positive charge is transferred to C7 to afford intermediate G. This reaction procedure is kinetically very facile with a barrier of 5.8 kcal/mol. Although it shows endothermy of 4.5 kcal/mol, the highly positive C7 cooperates with the PPi group to promote the final deprotonation reaction of Hb on C6, which undergoes a reaction barrier of 6.4 kcal/mol and heat release of 8.7 kcal/mol to yield the ultimate product 1.
Taken together, the calculated four-membered ring intermediate E and protonated cyclopropane intermediate F led to a substantially revised biosynthetic mechanism for 1 (Fig. 5), which is energetically and structurally plausible and avoids the unreasonable intermediates in our previous proposal26 (Supplementary Fig. 25). In view of the whole catalytic reaction process, the rate-limited step is the initial PPi cleavage step with the highest barrier of 25.4 kcal/mol, and the overall heat release is about 21.3 kcal/mol (Supplementary Fig. 23). Tyr88 is mostly responsible for the first half of the reaction, while Phe185 and Trp107 are essential residues for regulating the second half of the reaction. Differently, Phe215 serves as an important residue during the whole reaction (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table 3). Of note, we took into consideration of the conformational changes of the active-site residues before and after the reaction in comparison to the crystal structure, and the low RMSD values validated the calculations (Supplementary Fig. 26).
To further investigate the function of each GGPP-surrounding aromatic amino acid (Fig. 4a) during the VenA-mediated cyclization, we performed alanine scanning for these residues. Except VenAY108A and VenAF338A which formed inclusion bodies, other mutants were successfully expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3), suggesting that Tyr108 and Phe338 might be crucial for correct protein folding of VenA. According to GC-MS and NMR analyses of the purified diterpene products from the recombinant E. coli strain Eco-AY88AD co-expressing VenAY88A and VenD (for overproduction of GGPP, Supplementary Table 4), the Y88A mutation led to accumulation of the acyclic product β-springene (7) and the 1,14-cyclization product (S)-(+)-cembrene A (8) (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Figs. 27–35, Supplementary Tables 2 and 5), but entirely lost the ability to produce 1. The activity of VenAY88A towards GGPP decreased by 78.3% compared with that of VenAWT (Fig. 3a). This result suggests that Tyr88 in B2-helix might be crucial for maintaining the conformation of intermediate A by steric restriction and stabilizing intermediate B via cation-π interactions (Supplementary Table 3), thus leading the biosynthetic route to the 1,10-cyclization product 1 (Fig. 5). Upon replacement of the bulky Tyr88 by Ala, the initial intermediate A with a changed conformation due to the expanded active site might undergo either direct deprotonation to give 7 or the electrophilic attacking of C14=C15 double bond by C1 cation to yield 8. Similarly, VenAY88A accepted FPP to form the acyclic product β-farnesene (4) as the main product, and small amounts of 3, α-farnesene (15), nerolidol (16), and farnesol (17). VenAY88A was unable to generate 2, suggesting that stabilization of 11-germacryl cation requires the presence of Tyr88 (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Figs. 4, 5 and 16).
VenAW107A converted GGPP to 1 and 9 in lower efficiency compared with VenAWT (Figs. 3 and 5, Supplementary Table 2). Compound 9 was isolated from Eco-AW107AD and identified as a diterpene (1 S,3E,7E,11 R,12 S)−3,7,18-dolabellatriene, the titer of which reached 275.5 ± 9.4 mg/L upon 4-day fermentation in shaking flasks (Supplementary Table 6, Supplementary Figs. 36–44). Based on 13C-tracer NMR experiments, 9 was confirmed to be initiated by 1,11-cyclization of intermediate A (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 45). With regard to the sesquiterpenoid products from FPP, the percentages of acyclic products (4, 16, and 17) of VenAW107A were enhanced compared with those of VenAWT (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). Mechanistically, VenAW107A prefers anti-Markovnikov 1,11-cyclization might result from the subtle changes of the GGPP’s conformation in the modified active site, which might also explain the result that VenAF219A converted GGPP into 9 in a lower yield than the co-product 1 (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 2). Compared with VenAWT, the increased total product percentage of the acyclic sesquiterpenoids (4, 16, and 17) generated by VenAF219A also suggests the important role of Phe219 for the 1,10-cyclization of FPP. When we combined the mutations of W107A and F219A aiming to enhance the titer of 9, which could be used as a potential semi-synthesis precursor for bioactive agents (Supplementary Fig. 46)56, the expected synergetic effect did not show since the double mutant VenAW107A/F219A produced a lower amount of 9 than each single mutant (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 2). Starting from either FPP or GGPP, VenAW107A/F219A generated the acyclic and hydrated sesqui- and diterpenoids, including geranyllinalool (13), geranylgeraniol (14), 16 and 17, likely owing to the significantly enlarged and hence leaking active site (Figs. 3b and 5, Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5, Supplementary Table 2).
The mutation of Phe185 in F-helix into Ala led to two mono-hydroxy diterpenoids together with 25.8% of 1, including 11 (named as venezuelaenol A) with the same 5-5-6-7 skeleton of 1, and the main product 12 (named as venezuelaenol B, see Supporting Information for details) with a unique 6-5-6-6 skeleton, in which the five-membered ring is merged with all three six-membered rings (Figs. 3 and 5, Supplementary Figs. 47–63, Supplementary Tables 2 and 7-8). Of note, VenAF185A appeared as a strict DTS (24.4% activity of VenAWT) without any detectable activity towards GPP and FPP (Fig. 3a). When Phe185 was mutated into the smallest amino acid Gly, the mutant VenAF185G was completely inactivated (Fig. 3a). These results strongly suggest that Phe185 is an essential gatekeeper to keep strict hydrophobic environment in the closed form of VenA. Once this barrier is broken by changing it into a smaller amino acid residue, the entrance of water molecule(s) would disrupt the hydrophobic environment and hydrogen bond network to influence substrate binding and to prematurely quench the carbocation intermediates. Evidently, 11 could be formed from the quenching of intermediate G by water. Similarly, 12 is proposed to be generated from quenching of intermediate F at C6 site by water. Considering the delocalized nature of the non-classical carbocation intermediate F, we hypothesized that 11 could be alternatively derived from the quenching of protonated cyclopropane at C7 site by water. (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 64). Taken together, Phe185 is important for stabilizing intermediates F and G during the biosynthesis of 1 together with Phe215 (Supplementary Table 3).
As previously reported30,37, the amino acid residues located in the G1/2 helix-break motif of type I bacterial TPSs are usually non-aromatic due to the flexibility in this region (Supplementary Fig. 9), which are considered catalytically important for selinadiene synthase from Streptomyces pristinaespiralis37. By contrast, an aromatic amino acid residue Phe215 is located in the G1/2 helix-break region of VenA (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 9). When Phe215 was mutated into Ala, the diterpene product diversity was significantly improved compared with that of VenAWT according to the in vitro enzymatic assays (Fig. 3b). However, we did not structurally identify all the diterpene products due to the cost-prohibitive isolation of these compounds in very low yields. The two main products of VenAF215A were determined to be 9 and 10 (named as dictytriene C, Figs. 3 and 5, Supplementary Figs. 65–73, Supplementary Table 9). Of note, 10 is the representative diterpene with a 5-7 skeleton assembled by a bacterial DTS, which was confirmed to be initiated by 1,10-cyclization of intermediate A based on our 13C-NMR tracer experiments (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 74). These results combined with the above-described MD and QM/MM simulation results indicate that Phe215 should be involved in the stabilization of all the intermediates A−G (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table 3). When using FPP as substrate, VenAF215A synthesized the acyclic 4, 16, and 17 as main products, suggesting that Phe215 might participate in stabilizing 11-germacryl cation; this is also supported by our QM/MM simulations (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Figs. 4, 5 and 16).
Structure-guided engineering of substrate specificity
A few type I DTSs have been identified to show considerable substrate promiscuity for polyprenyl phosphate substrates with different chain-length, and even totally unexpected prenyltransferase activities for small molecules42,57,58. Previously, the substrate specificities of such DTSs (e.g., SvS-A2) could be changed through screening the active-site residues by site-directed mutagenesis30,59. However, due to paucity of structural information for the substrate-, substrate analogue-, or Mg2+/Mn2+-PPi-bound forms of bacterial type I DTSs, it is still challenging to rationally engineer the substrate specificity of these DTSs. Herein, VenA with significant substrate promiscuity and resolved crystal structures provides an ideal DTS to practice the structure-guided engineering of substrate specificity.
We collected a number of representative structures of di-, sesqui- and monoterpene synthases from the PDB database and calculated the average volumes to accommodate the prenyl chains of GGPP (~526 Å3), FPP (~438 Å3) and GPP (~372 Å3), which suggest the possibility of engineering a DTS to favor FPP or GPP by rationally reshaping the active site59 (Supplementary Table 10). Thus, we sought to manipulate the key residues near the top and bottom of the substrate binding pocket. To change the substrate preference of VenA towards FPP or GPP, we used the largest proteinogenic hydrophobic amino acid Trp to scan the four residues within 4 Å range of GGPP, including Tyr88, Val111, Thr112, and Leu220 (Fig. 4a, see the different visual angle in Supplementary Fig. 75). As expected, VenAY88W became a strict monoterpene synthase, specifically catalyzing the reaction of GPP to 6 likely due to the steric hindrance and reduced volume of active pocket resulted from the larger side chain of Trp (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 2). VenAT112W became a strict sesquiterpene synthase by converting FPP to the two main products 5 and 18 (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). These results suggest that the steric hindrance endowed by Trp on top of the active pocket could restrict the size of substrates (Supplementary Fig. 75). The sesquiterpenoid products of VenAV111W were the same as those of VenAWT, but this mutant could not accept GPP and showed decreased activities towards GGPP and FPP (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 2). Surprisingly, the diterpene product diversity was expanded by the V111W mutation (Fig. 2b). As for VenAL220W, we were unable to test its activity since this mutant formed an inclusion body in E. coli.
Semi-rational engineering of VenA into a sesterterpene synthase
Sesterterpenoids, mainly isolated from plants, fungi, and some marine organisms, represent a rare structural class of terpenoids1. The reports of bacterial sesterterpenoids and STSs are even fewer60. Given our understanding of the molecular basis for VenA’s substrate specificity, we sought to engineer this DTS into a STS, which, to the best of our knowledge, is an unprecedented challenge. To enlarge the active pocket to accept the C25 hydrocarbon chain of GFPP, thorough alanine scanning of the active site residues was performed. Unfortunately, all the soluble single mutants showed no activity toward GFPP (Fig. 6a), which was chemically synthesized by following the established protocols21,61 due to its commercial unavailability (Supplementary Figs. 76–78). Next, a number of double mutants (VenAY88A/F215A and VenAW107A/F219A), triple mutants (VenAY88A/W107A/F219A, VenAY88A/W107A/F215A, and VenAY88A/F215A/F219A), and quadruple mutant (VenAY88A/W107A/F215A/F219A) were constructed by combining the alanine mutations of the key aromatic residues that would not cause protein precipitation. Again, all these multiple mutants were inactive towards GFPP. We reasoned that these active pockets might not be large enough to accommodate GFPP. Thus, we elected to mutate all the mutation sites (except Phe185) that resulted in soluble proteins into alanine at once, thereby making a very spacious active site. Notably, Phe185 was not included due to its gatekeeper role in maintaining the hydrophobic chamber as described above. As a result, the sextuple mutant VenAY88A/W107A/V111A/T112A/F215A/F219A was successfully expressed and purified from E. coli BL21(DE3). To our delight, this hexamutant converted GFPP into a main product 19 (Fig. 6b, accounting for 92.6% of total sesterterpene products). The product was purified from in vitro enzymatic reactions and identified as a known sesterterpene (S)-cericerene containing a 14-membered macrocyclic ring (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Figs. 79–87, Supplementary Table 11)62.
To understand the cyclization mechanism of the VenA-derived STS, GFPP was modelled into its active site. Not surprisingly, the active site volume of this hexamutant (641.5 Å3) is much larger than that of VenAWT (516.1 Å3). The optimal binding conformation of GFPP well supports an initial C1−C14 cyclization since the distance from C1 to C14 (3.2 Å) is shorter than those from C1 to C15 (3.9 Å), C6=C7 (4.7 & 5.6 Å), C10=C11 (6.0 & 5.4Å) and C18=C19 (3.9 and 3.9 Å) double bonds (Fig. 6d). Mechanistically, the biosynthesis of 19 could be rationalized by enzymatic abstraction of PPi group, the carbocation-initiated intramolecular C1−C14 bond formation, and direct deprotonation to form the C15−C23 double bond (Fig. 6c).
At present, most of identified bacterial TPSs are sesquiterpene synthases32. Comparatively, the functions, structures, and mechanisms of DTSs that show higher functional complexity and plasticity, and product diversity are much less studied63,64. A phylogenetic tree built from VenA and 26 identified bacterial type I DTSs reveals a scattered distribution of DTSs with different cyclization modes (Supplementary Fig. 88), indicating that the prediction of function and mechanism from primary amino acid sequence of a bacterial DTS is difficult. This further emphasize the significance of elucidating the structure-function relationship of bacterial DTSs for understanding the mechanisms behind the highly diversified cyclization modes. Although de novo protein folding tools have shown promising prospects for (semi)rational design of TPSs41, precise prediction of the positions of metal ions and polyprenyl pyrophosphate substrates remains challenging. Thus, more real structures of TPSs are still required to be resolved to further our mechanistic and engineering studies. However, to the best of knowledge, there have been only three reported crystal structures of bacterial type I DTSs that use GGPP as the substrate, including CotB229,31, the reconstructed ancestor of SvS (SvS-A2)30 and CyS65. Since the length of CotB2 (307 aa) is significantly shorter than most identified type I DTSs (340–390 aa) and the structural information for the holo form of SvS-A2 is unavailable, we propose that the VenA and CyS structures could serve as structure-modeling templates to guide the future enzyme engineering efforts for other bacterial DTSs.
This study provides significant structural insights into a bacterial type I TPS containing an unusual 115DSFVSD120 motif. Based on bioinformatics and mutagenesis analyses, as well as the analogous hydrogen bond networks (e.g., Ser116-Arg344-Gln83 in VenA) observed in the crystal structures of VenA, FgGS and the predicted structure of Bnd4 (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 10), we propose a subclass of type I microbial TPSs containing the “D(S/T/N)XX(X)D/E” motif and a conserved Glu/Gln residue ~30 amino acid upstream. These findings suggest that the previously neglected Glu/Gln might have co-evolved with the atypical “Asp-rich” motif in both bacterial and fungal TPSs, thus lowering the selection pressure for the second Asp in the canonical Asp-rich motif. Aside from the variability of the second and third Asp in the atypical “Asp-rich” motif of VenA and Bnd440 (Supplementary Fig. 10), recently, the sesterterpene synthase SmTS1 from Streptomyces mobaraensis was predicted to have an unusual 86NDLTV90 motif, of which the first Asp is replaced by Asn60,66. These natural alterations not only demonstrate the evolvability of the conserved Asp-rich motif in bacterial type I TPSs, but also suggest the possible existence of some bacterial type I TPSs that may contain a single or even none Asp in an “unrecognizable” Mg2+ binding motif. This finding will complicate, but eventually benefit the future bioinformatics-based mining of novel TPSs and terpenoids.
The initial cyclization is the most decisive step for the catalysis mediated by type I TPSs. To the best of our knowledge, only six structures of type I DTSs using GGPP as the substrate from plant, fungi, and bacteria have been elucidated prior to this study, which catalyze the initial 1,11-cyclization (CotB2, SvS-A2, CyS, and PaFS67) and 1,14-cyclization of GGPP (taxadiene synthase68 and ErTC-269) (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Table 12, Supplementary Fig. 89). On the basis of the crystal structure resolution of a DTS (i.e., VenA) that initiates 1,10-cyclization of GGPP, relevant multiscale simulations, and site-directed mutagenesis analyses, a more reasonable biosynthetic mechanism for construction of the unique 5-5-6-7 tetracyclic skeleton in 1 was proposed (Fig. 5).
Guided by structural information, the mutation of key amino acids in VenA could turn this DTS to prefer 1,11- or 1,14-cyclization of GGPP, displaying the functional plasticity of VenA. In particular, VenAY88A was found to favor 1,14-cyclization of GGPP. Together with the predicated key residues in the active pockets of several identified bacterial type I DTSs (Supplementary Table 13), we propose that the aromatic amino acid in B-helix might be responsible for directing the C1 carbonation to attack C10=C11 or C14=C15 double bonds. This sequence characteristic in combination with the structure(s) of diterpene product(s) may help predicting the initial cyclization mode by type I DTS, which however requires more experimental evidences. Despite recent progresses from this and other laboratories on TPSs70,71, it is still difficult to predict the initial cyclization mode and final product structures simply based on protein sequence analysis. We envision that the growing understanding of the mechanisms and structure-function relationships of TPSs, together with the AlphaFold241-based TPS structures prediction and fast-advancing machine learning technologies may eventually accomplish this “impossible mission” in the future.
By replacing each GGPP-surrounding residues with a Trp or Ala, we successfully engineered a geraniol synthase (VenAY88W), a sesquiterpene synthase (VenAT112W), and a DTS with higher selectivity for GGPP (VenAF185A) than VenAWT. Together with structural information, these mutant TPSs with different substrate specificity provide important clues for understanding the molecular mechanisms for the substrate promiscuity of VenA. In particular, we successfully converted VenA into an STS by expanding the active pocket to a large extent, which presents an example of engineering a DTS to accept the larger unnatural substrate GFPP. These results suggest that semi-rational modification of the active site volume by using differently sized hydrophobic amino acids could be an effective strategy for engineering substrate specificity and expanding substrate scope of TPSs62,66. It is worth noting that the steric hindrance would sometimes lead to undesired perturbations in the active site, thus unexpectedly affecting substrate recognition and conversion.
Chemical synthesis of polycyclic terpenes in a regio- and stereoselective manner is challenging and the traditional isolation strategy from natural resources is unsustainable and suffers from low yields and high costs72. TPSs catalyzing the most complex cyclization reactions of polyprenyl pyrophosphates in nature under mild conditions override many chemical catalysts6, indicating that the development of biocatalysts based on structural and mechanistic information of TPSs is promising. Thus, construction of microbial cell factories based on the rewired polyprenyl pyrophosphate biosynthetic pathways and engineered TPSs could provide an alternative cost-effective way for production of high-value-added terpenoids73. The VenA mutants showing different product portfolios enrich the synthetic biology toolbox and would enable new approaches for production of the diterpenes as bioactive agents or useful (bio)synthetic precursors. For instance, commercial fragrances or bioactive terpenoids (4, 6, 7, 13–17, and 19), the biosynthetic precursors for diverse bioactive terpenoids (2, 3, 5, 8, and 18), and the unusual diterpenoids (9–12) could be prepared by wild-type or certain mutant VenA enzymes. Among these, 10 and 11 showed moderate inhibitory activities to a select number of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria with some of which are plant pathogens (Supplementary Table 14), suggesting the application potential of 5-7 and 5-5-6-7 skeleton terpenoids in pharmaceutical and agricultural industries. It is noteworthy that hundreds of dolabellane-type natural products have been isolated from metazoans and plants, which show diverse bioactivities including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antifeedant, antivirus, and cytotoxic activities (Supplementary Fig. 46), thus holding great application potentials in pharmaceutical industry56. The highest titer (275.5 mg/L) of microbial dolabellatriene skeleton reported in this study could provide a low-cost and sustainable resource for preparation of useful derivatives by semi-synthesis or biotransformation.
During submission of this work, a remarkable paper on Bnd4 mutagenesis was published74. Interestingly, some Bnd4 mutants also generate 7, 13, and 14 as VenA mutants. VenAF338A is insoluble while the corresponding mutant of Bnd4W316A is soluble and active. VenAF185A generates the mono-hydroxy diterpenoids 11 with a 5-5-6-7 skeleton and 12 with a 6-5-6-6 skeleton, but the counterpart mutant Bnd4F162A yields acyclic diterpenoids. These results further demonstrate the big challenge of the rational design of TPSs.
In summary, we elucidated the structural basis for the substrate promiscuity and initial cyclization mechanisms of the bacterial type I DTS VenA, which will benefit the prediction and understanding of the catalytic functions of VenA homologues and other DTSs from bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 7). In the crystal structure of the PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound form of VenA, we revealed a number of crucial hydrogen bond networks (PPi–Arg211/Lys263/Arg344/Tyr345–H2O) and coordination bonds (Mg2+A–Asp115–Mg2+C–PPi–H2O and Mg2+B–Asn256/Ser260/Glu264–PPi–H2O). The role and mode of action of the atypical “Asp-rich” motif (15DSFVSD120, unlike the canonical DDXX(X)D/E motif) in VenA was determined by structural analysis and structure-guided mutational analysis in detail. The mechanisms for the broad substrate spectrum, initial 1,10-cyclization mode, and following complex cyclization process of VenA were elucidated by molecular docking, MD, and QM/MM analyses. We also explored the functions of the key residues in VenA for carbocation stabilization and maintenance of the hydrophobic contour of the active site. As an additional result, four unusual diterpenoids were obtained during our tuning of the cyclization modes of VenA. Furthermore, manipulation of a number of specific residues reshaped the substrate preference and released the catalytic potential of VenA by tuning the volume and shape of the active pocket and hence the substrate binding conformation.
All chemicals and antibiotics used in this study were obtained from Cayman, Sigma Aldrich, or Sinopharm Chemical Reagent, unless otherwise specified. Fast-digest restriction endonucleases were purchased from Monad. Isolation of plasmid DNA from E. coli was performed using the MonPure™ Plasmid Mini Prep Kit from Qingdao Baisai Biotechnology. Purification of DNA fragments from PCR reactions or agarose gels was performed using a MonPure™ Gel & PCR Clean Kit from Qingdao Baisai Biotechnology. ClonExpress Ultra One Step Cloning Kit was purchased from Vazyme. Spark HiFi Seamless Cloning Kit was bought from Shandong Sparkjade Biotechnology Co., Ltd. I-5™ 2× High-Fidelity Master Mix and 2 × T5 Super PCR Mix (Colony) was purchased from Tsingke Biological Technology. n-Alkanes (C10-C40) standard mixture was bought from O2Si. Ni-NTA SefinoseTM Resin (Settled Resin) for protein purification was purchased from Sangon Biotech. The FlexiRunTM premixed gel solution for SDS-PAGE, GelRed, Luria-Bertani broth (LB), and Terrific broth (TB) were obtained from MDBio. Primer synthesis and DNA sequencing were performed by Tsingke Biological Technology.
Protein crystallization and diffraction data collection
Initial crystallization screening of VenAWT and VenAΔ1-15 was performed with >1000 different reservoir compositions from Hampton research (Laguna Niguel, California, USA), Rigaku Corporation (Akishima-shi, Tokyo), and Molecular Dimensions (Newmarket, England, United Kingdom). All the crystallization experiments were conducted at 25 °C, using the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method. In general, 1 μL protein solution (at a concentration of 20 mg/mL) was mixed with 1 μL reservoir solution in 96-well Cryschem plates (Hampton Research) and equilibrated against 80 μL reservoir solution. Initial crystals of VenAΔ1-15 were obtained within 7 days using the BCS Screen 1 Tubes 16 (0.1 M HEPES [pH = 7.5] and 25% PEG Smear Medium). The cryo-protectant contained 0.1 M HEPES [pH = 7.5], 25% PEG Smear Medium, 10% ethylene glycol, and 20 mM MgCl2. Soaking apo form crystals in cryo-protectant containing 5 mM substrate/analogues (geranyl diphosphate, GPP; geranyl S-thiopyrophosphate, GSPP; farnesyl pyrophosphate, FPP; farnesyl S-thiopyrophosphate, FSPP; geranylgeranyl diphosphate, GGPP; or geranylgeranyl S-thiopyrophosphate, GGSPP), and venezuelaene A (1) was performed for at least 30 min. Moreover, prior to data collection, crystals were mounted in a cryo-loop and flash cooled with liquid nitrogen. All data sets were collected using an in-house X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8 VENTURE of SX-XRD) of Hubei University. Data were processed by using the program PROTEUM3.
Structure determination and refinement of VenA
The crystal structure of VenA was solved by molecular replacement with the Phaser program75 of CCP4i using terpene cyclase SvS-A230 from Streptomyces sp. CWA1 (PDB ID: 6TBD, 23% identity) as a search model. The initial model was further optimized by using AutoBuild in PHENIX76. Prior to structure refinement, 5% of randomly selected reflections were set aside for calculating Rfree as a monitor of model quality. Model adjustment and refinement were carried out using Refmac577 and Coot78. All graphics for the protein structures were prepared using the PyMOL program (http://pymol.sourceforge.net/). Data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
Auotodock vina software43 was used for the molecular docking analysis of VenA with GPP, FPP, GGPP, and GFPP. Reagents and water molecules in PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound VenA wild type (PDB ID: 7Y9G) and VenAY88A/W107A/V111A/T112A/F215A/F219A were removed in Pymol before docking except for the water molecules directly coordinated with the trinuclear magnesium cluster. The center grid box was set as center_x = 37.757, center_y = −38.968, and center_z = 4.867. The rest parameters remained as their default values by following the official protocol43. Considering several chiral centers in products, we manually checked these docking poses to avoid any irrational conformations. The optimal pose for each substrate was used as the initial structure for the following classical MD simulations.
Classical MD simulations
The Amber FF99SB79 force field was employed for the protein and the TIP3P80 model was used for solvent water molecules. Meanwhile, the restrained electrostatic potential (RESP)81 charges of ligands were calculated at the HF/6-31(G)* level using the Gaussian 16 package82. The force field parameters of ligands were generated from the AMBER GAFF force field83. The MD simulations were carried out using the Amber20 package44, and the periodic boundary condition with cubic models were employed to all systems. The initial coordinates and topology files were generated by the tleap modules in Amber20. Sodium ions were utilized to neutralize these systems. Three steps of minimization were taken to relax the solvent molecules and protein-ligand complexes. First, only water molecules in the systems were minimized, then side chains of residues, and finally all atoms were minimized. After minimization, each system was heated from 0 K to 300 K gradually under the NVT ensemble, followed by another 100 ps NPT ensemble MD simulations for equilibration at a constant temperature of 300 K and a pressure of 1.0 atm. Afterwards, a 30 ns NVT ensemble production MD simulation with a time step of 2 fs was performed for each model. During these simulations, general restraints were employed to keep the conformation of these substrates owing to the well-known poor treatment of metal-ligand coordination interaction and ligand conformation by force field. The SHAKE84 algorithm was used for constraint hydrogens during MD simulations. A cutoff of 12 Å was set for both van der Waals and electrostatic interactions. After these systems were stable, snapshots of each system were chosen to build the initial structures for the subsequent QM/MM simulations.
All QM/MM models were prepared by deleting the solvent beyond 30 Å from the C6 atom of these substrates based on above protein-substrate complexes equilibrated by classical MD simulations. As for the selection of the QM region, all substrate atoms, the three Mg2+ atoms together with aromatic residues Phe215 and Tyr88 were considered as the QM region during the potential energy scan (PES) processes from GGPP to intermediate D, since these two residues are close to the substrates and likely to stabilize the carbon cations. The Phe185 and Trp107 residues were appended into the QM region during the subsequent PES processes because the carbocations were approaching the two residues as the reaction progressed. During the QM/MM MD process based on intermediate A (Fig. 5) which was captured from the first PES process on GGPP, the PPi with its coordinated Mg2+ atoms were removed from the defined QM region since this strongly charged group would not be involved in the subsequent cyclization reaction after PPi cleavage in our simulation process. Only GFPP and three coordinated Mg2+ atoms were included in the QM region for optimizing the GFPP model, since the critical aromatic residues had already been substituted to alanine. All atoms in the QM subsystem were treated by M06-2X85,86/6-31 G(d) method, which is widely used in studies of cyclization reactions87,88. The QM/MM boundary was treated by the improved pseudo approach89,90,91. The Amber FF99SB force field was used for all the remaining atoms as in previous classical MD simulations. Spherical boundary condition was employed, and the atoms more than 30 Å from the spherical center were fixed. A 12 Å cutoff was employed for van der Waals and 18 Å for electrostatic interactions. The system temperature was controlled by Langevin thermostat method92 at 300 K, and the Newton equation of motion was integrated by the Beeman algorithm93 during the QM/MM MD process. The prepared structures were minimized by the QM/MM method. These optimized structures were used to map out the PES curves with the reaction coordinate driving method94,95. All these QM/MM calculations were performed with the modified QChem96 and Tinker97 programs developed by Prof. Yingkai Zhang’s group (http://www.nyu.edu/projects/yzhang/). And the similar QM/MM protocol had also been employed in our previous studies of other TPSs6,47,98.
In vitro enzymatic assay
To test the in vitro activity of VenA wild type or mutants, a standard 50 μL reaction mixture containing 2 μM enzyme, 100 μM substrate (GPP, FPP, GGPP or GFPP), 10 mM MgCl2 in Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, 10% glycerol, pH = 7.4) was incubated at 30 °C for 2 h. The boiling-inactivated enzyme was added to the control experiment. The in vitro enzymatic reaction was quenched by adding a two-fold volume of ethyl acetate, vortexed for 10 min, and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min. Subsequently, the organic extract was taken and directly used for GC or GC-MS analysis.
13C-tracer NMR experiments
To prepare the randomly 13C-labelled 9 and 10 at eight odd-numbered carbons (C1, C3, C5, C7, C9, C11, C13, and C15) in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 90), a 0.5 L TB culture of Eco-AV111WD and Eco-AW107AD were individually fed with 0.4 g/L (1-13C)-CH3COONa at the time point of protein expression induction. Similarly, to prepare the 13C-labelled 9 and 10 at the left twelve carbons (C2, C4, C6, C8, C10, C12, C14, C16, C17, C18, C19 and C20), a 0.5 mL TB culture of Eco-AV111WD and Eco-AW107AD were individually fed with 0.4 g/L (2-13C)-CH3COONa when inducing the expression of proteins. After 4 d fermentation at 18 °C, the fermentation broth was extracted by an equal volume of ethyl acetate three times, and the 13C-labelled 9 and 10 (the mixture of isotopomers) were purified for 13C-NMR analysis (Supplementary Figs. 45 and 74).
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
The structural data of apo form and PPi-(Mg2+)3-bound form of VenA generated in this study have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database under accession codes 7Y9H and 7Y9G, respectively. The crystal structure of SvS-A2 used in this study is available in the PDB database under accession code 6TBD. The structural data of 9 and 11 generated in this study have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under accession codes 2163519 and 2184782, respectively. All other relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available in this manuscript and Supplementary Information.
Zeng, T. et al. TeroKit: a database-driven web server for terpenome research. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 2082–2090 (2020).
Gershenzon, J. & Dudareva, N. The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 408–414 (2007).
Beller, H. R., Lee, T. S. & Katz, L. Natural products as biofuels and bio-based chemicals: fatty acids and isoprenoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32, 1508–1526 (2015).
Yuan, Y. et al. Efficient exploration of terpenoid biosynthetic gene clusters in filamentous fungi. Nat. Catal. 5, 277–287 (2022).
Minami, A., Ozaki, T., Liu, C. & Oikawa, H. Cyclopentane-forming di/sesterterpene synthases: widely distributed enzymes in bacteria, fungi, and plants. Nat. Prod. Rep. 35, 1330–1346 (2018).
Wang, Y.-H. et al. Catalytic role of carbonyl oxygens and water in selinadiene synthase. Nat. Catal. 5, 128–135 (2022).
Tantillo, D. J. Biosynthesis via carbocations: Theoretical studies on terpene formation. Nat. Prod. Rep. 28, 1035–1053 (2011).
Raz, K., Levi, S., Gupta, P. K. & Major, D. T. Enzymatic control of product distribution in terpene synthases: insights from multiscale simulations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 65, 248–258 (2020).
Tao, H. et al. Discovery of non-squalene triterpenes. Nature 606, 414–419 (2022).
Hu, D. Discovery and analysis of a new class of triterpenes derived from hexaprenyl pyrophosphate. Eng. Microbiol. 2, 100035 (2022).
Christianson, D. W. Structural biology and chemistry of the terpenoid cyclases. Chem. Rev. 106, 3412–3442 (2006).
Christianson, D. W. Structural and chemical biology of terpenoid cyclases. Chem. Rev. 117, 11570–11648 (2017).
Hanson, J. R., Nichols, T., Mukhrish, Y. & Bagley, M. C. Diterpenoids of terrestrial origin. Nat. Prod. Rep. 36, 1499–1512 (2019).
Singla, A. K., Garg, A. & Aggarwal, D. Paclitaxel and its formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 235, 179–192 (2002).
Huang, Z., Liu, Y., Qi, G., Brand, D. & Zheng, S. G. Role of vitamin A in the immune system. J. Clin. Med. 7, 258 (2018).
MacMillan, J. Occurrence of gibberellins in vascular plants, fungi, and bacteria. J. Plant Growth Regul. 20, 387–442 (2001).
Leavell, M. D., McPhee, D. J. & Paddon, C. J. Developing fermentative terpenoid production for commercial usage. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 37, 114–119 (2016).
Chan, H.-C. et al. Structure and inhibition of tuberculosinol synthase and decaprenyl diphosphate synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 2892–2896 (2014).
Gao, Y., Honzatko, R. B. & Peters, R. J. Terpenoid synthase structures: a so far incomplete view of complex catalysis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 29, 1153–1175 (2012).
Scesa, P. D., Lin, Z. & Schmidt, E. W. Ancient defensive terpene biosynthetic gene clusters in the soft corals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 659–663 (2022).
Qin, B. et al. An unusual chimeric diterpene synthase from Emericella variecolor and its functional conversion into a sesterterpene synthase by domain swapping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 1658–1661 (2016).
Geu-Flores, F. et al. An alternative route to cyclic terpenes by reductive cyclization in iridoid biosynthesis. Nature 492, 138–142 (2012).
Boutanaev, A. M. et al. Investigation of terpene diversification across multiple sequenced plant genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E81–E88 (2015).
Yamada, Y. et al. Terpene synthases are widely distributed in bacteria. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 857–862 (2015).
Rudolf, J. D., Alsup, T. A., Xu, B. & Li, Z. Bacterial terpenome. Nat. Prod. Rep. 38, 905–980 (2021).
Li, Z. et al. Fragrant venezuelaenes A and B with a 5–5–6–7 tetracyclic skeleton: discovery, biosynthesis, and mechanisms of central catalysts. ACS Catal. 10, 5846–5851 (2020).
Hill, R. A. & Sutherland, A. Hot off the Press. Nat. Prod. Rep. 37, 747–751 (2020).
Zhang, W., Li, L. & Li, C.-C. Synthesis of natural products containing highly strained trans-fused bicyclo[3.3.0]octane: historical overview and future prospects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 9430–9442 (2021).
Driller, R. et al. Towards a comprehensive understanding of the structural dynamics of a bacterial diterpene synthase during catalysis. Nat. Commun. 9, 3971 (2018).
Schriever, K. et al. Engineering of ancestors as a tool to elucidate structure, mechanism, and specificity of extant terpene cyclase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 3794–3807 (2021).
Tomita, T. et al. Structural insights into the CotB2-catalyzed cyclization of geranylgeranyl diphosphate to the diterpene cyclooctat-9-en-7-ol. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1621–1628 (2017).
Dickschat, J. S. Bacterial terpene cyclases. Nat. Prod. Rep. 33, 87–110 (2016).
Lesburg, C. A., Zhai, G., Cane, D. E. & Christianson, D. W. Crystal structure of pentalenene synthase: mechanistic insights on terpenoid cyclization reactions in biology. Science 277, 1820–1824 (1997).
Starks, C. M., Back, K., Chappell, J. & Noel, J. P. Structural basis for cyclic terpene biosynthesis by tobacco 5-epi-aristolochene synthase. Science 277, 1815–1820 (1997).
Aaron, J. A., Lin, X., Cane, D. E. & Christianson, D. W. Structure of epi-isozizaene synthase from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), a platform for new terpenoid cyclization templates. Biochemistry 49, 1787–1797 (2010).
Seemann, M. et al. Pentalenene synthase. Analysis of active site residues by site-directed mutagenesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 7681–7689 (2002).
Baer, P. et al. Induced-fit mechanism in class I terpene cyclases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 7652–7656 (2014).
Karuppiah, V. et al. Structural basis of catalysis in the bacterial monoterpene synthases linalool synthase and 1,8-cineole synthase. ACS Catal. 7, 6268–6282 (2017).
Ronnebaum, T. A., Gardner, S. M. & Christianson, D. W. An aromatic cluster in the active site of epi-isozizaene synthase is an electrostatic toggle for divergent terpene cyclization pathways. Biochemistry 59, 4744–4754 (2020).
Xu, B., Tantillo, D. J. & Rudolf, J. D. Mechanistic insights into the formation of the 6,10-bicyclic eunicellane skeleton by the bacterial diterpene synthase Bnd4. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 23159–23163 (2021).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
He, H. et al. Discovery of the cryptic function of terpene cyclases as aromatic prenyltransferases. Nat. Commun. 11, 3958 (2020).
Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2010).
Case, D. A., et al. Amber 2021. University of California, San Francisco (2021).
Wang, S., Hu, P. & Zhang, Y. Ab Initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulation of enzyme catalysis: the case of histone lysine methyltransferase SET7/9. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 3758–3764 (2007).
Cane, D. E., Chiu, H.-T., Liang, P.-H. & Anderson, K. S. Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of the trichodiene synthase reaction pathway. Biochemistry 36, 8332–8339 (1997).
Zhang, F., Chen, N., Zhou, J. & Wu, R. Protonation-dependent diphosphate cleavage in FPP cyclases and synthases. ACS Catal. 6, 6918–6929 (2016).
Zhang, F., Wang, Y.-H., Tang, X. & Wu, R. Catalytic promiscuity of the non-native FPP substrate in the TEAS enzyme: non-negligible flexibility of the carbocation intermediate. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 15061–15073 (2018).
Zhuang, J. et al. Insights into the enzymatic catalytic mechanism of bCinS: the importance of protein conformational change. Catal. Sci. Technol. 12, 1651–1662 (2022).
Faraldos, J. A. et al. Probing eudesmane cation−π interactions in catalysis by aristolochene synthase with non-canonical amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 13906–13909 (2011).
Thulasiram, H. V., Erickson, H. K. & Poulter, C. D. Chimeras of two isoprenoid synthases catalyze all four coupling reactions in isoprenoid biosynthesis. Science 316, 73–76 (2007).
Hong, Y. J. & Tantillo, D. J. C–H⋯π interactions as modulators of carbocation structure-implications for terpene biosynthesis. Chem. Sci. 4, 2512–2518 (2013).
Sandbeck, D. J. S., Markewich, D. J. & East, A. L. L. The carbocation rearrangement mechanism, clarified. J. Org. Chem. 81, 1410–1415 (2016).
Lee, J. K. & Houk, K. N. Cation-cyclization selectivity: variable structures of protonated cyclopropanes and selectivity control by catalytic antibodies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 36, 1003–1005 (1997).
Bojin, M. D. & Tantillo, D. J. Nonclassical carbocations as C−H hydrogen bond donors. J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 4810–4816 (2006).
Lei, H. Diterpenoids of gorgonian corals: chemistry and bioactivity. Chem. Biodivers. 13, 345–365 (2016).
Xu, B., Li, Z., Alsup, T. A., Ehrenberger, M. A. & Rudolf, J. D. Bacterial diterpene synthases prenylate small molecules. ACS Catal. 11, 5906–5915 (2021).
Jia, M., Mishra, S. K., Tufts, S., Jernigan, R. L. & Peters, R. J. Combinatorial biosynthesis and the basis for substrate promiscuity in class I diterpene synthases. Metab. Eng. 55, 44–58 (2019).
Xu, H. & Dickschat, J. S. Mechanistic investigations on microbial type I terpene synthases through site-directed mutagenesis. Synthesis 54, 1551–1565 (2021).
Hou, A. & Dickschat, J. S. The biosynthetic gene cluster for sestermobaraenes—discovery of a geranylfarnesyl diphosphate synthase and a multiproduct sesterterpene synthase from Streptomyces mobaraensis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19961–19965 (2020).
Serizawa, H., Arcade, A., Datwam, A., Spencer, N. Geranylgeranylacetone Derivatives. U.S.A. Patent WO 2013/052148 A1 (2013).
Chen, Y.-G. et al. A cryptic plant terpene cyclase producing unconventional 18- and 14-membered macrocyclic C25 and C20 terpenoids with immunosuppressive activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 25468–25476 (2021).
Dickschat, J. S. Bacterial diterpene biosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 15964–15976 (2019).
Li, Z. et al. First trans-eunicellane terpene synthase in bacteria. Chem 9, 698–708 (2023).
Xing, B. et al. Crystal structure based mutagenesis of cattleyene synthase leads to the generation of rearranged polycyclic diterpenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202209785 (2022).
Hou, A. & Dickschat, J. S. Targeting active site residues and structural anchoring positions in terpene synthases. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 17, 2441–2449 (2021).
Chen, M., Chou, W. K. W., Toyomasu, T., Cane, D. E. & Christianson, D. W. Structure and function of fusicoccadiene synthase, a hexameric bifunctional diterpene synthase. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 889–899 (2016).
Köksal, M., Jin, Y., Coates, R. M., Croteau, R. & Christianson, D. W. Taxadiene synthase structure and evolution of modular architecture in terpene biosynthesis. Nature 469, 116–120 (2011).
Burkhardt, I., de Rond, T., Chen, P. Y.-T. & Moore, B. S. Ancient plant-like terpene biosynthesis in corals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 664–669 (2022).
Chow, J.-Y. et al. Computational-guided discovery and characterization of a sesquiterpene synthase from Streptomyces clavuligerus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5661–5666 (2015).
Chen, R. et al. Systematic mining of fungal chimeric terpene synthases using an efficient precursor-providing yeast chassis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023247118 (2021).
Schneider, F., Samarin, K., Zanella, S. & Gaich, T. Total synthesis of the complex taxane diterpene canataxpropellane. Science 367, 676–681 (2020).
Paddon, C. J. et al. High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature 496, 528–532 (2013).
Xu, B., Ning, W., Wei, X. & Rudolf, J. D. Mutation of the eunicellane synthase Bnd4 alters its product profile and expands its prenylation ability. Org. Biomol. Chem. 20, 8833–8837 (2022).
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum‐likelihood. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240–255 (1997).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Vagin, A. A. et al. REFMAC 5 dictionary: organization of prior chemical knowledge and guidelines for its use. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2184–2195 (2004).
Paul, E. & C, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Duan, Y. et al. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1999–2012 (2003).
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).
Baily, C. J., Cieplak, P., Cornell, W. D. & Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269–10280 (1993).
Frisch, M. J., et al. Gaussian 16, revision B.01. Gaussian, Inc. (2016).
Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).
Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06 functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 119, 525–525 (2008).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Exploring the limit of accuracy of the global hybrid meta density functional for main-group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 1849–1868 (2008).
Chen, N., Wang, S., Smentek, L., Hess, B. A. Jr. & Wu, R. Biosynthetic mechanism of lanosterol: cyclization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 8693–8696 (2015).
Chen, N., Zhou, J., Li, J., Xu, J. & Wu, R. Concerted cyclization of lanosterol C-ring and D-ring under human qxidosqualene cyclase catalysis: an ab initio QM/MM MD study. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 1109–1120 (2014).
Chen, X., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, J. Z. An efficient approach for ab initio energy calculation of biopolymers. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 184105 (2005).
Zhang, Y. Pseudobond ab initio QM/MM approach and its applications to enzyme reactions. Theor. Chem. Acc. 116, 43–50 (2005).
Zhang, Y., Lee, T.-S. & Yang, W. A pseudobond approach to combining quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical methods. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 46–54 (1999).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).
Beeman, D. Some multistep methods for use in molecular dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 20, 130–139 (1976).
Rothman, M. J. & Lohr, L. L. J. Analysis of an energy minimization method for locating transition states on potential energy hypersurfaces. Chem. Phys. Lett. 70, 405–409 (1980).
Zhang, Y., Liu, H. & Yang, W. Free energy calculation on enzyme reactions with an efficient iterative procedure to determine minimum energy paths on a combinedab initioQM/MM potential energy surface. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3483–3492 (2000).
Shao, Y. et al. Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 3172–3191 (2006).
Ponder, J. W. TINKER, software tools for molecular design, version 4.2. (2004).
Diao, H. et al. Biosynthetic mechanism of lanosterol: a completed story. ACS Catal. 10, 2157–2168 (2020).
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2021YFA0911500 to L.D. and 2019YFA0905100 to S.L.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32200017 to Z.L., 32025001 to S.L., 32000039 to X.Z. and 32170088 to L.D.), the China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20220191 to Z.L.), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M701989 to Z.L. and 2022M710080 to Y.J.), the Shandong Provincial Postdoctoral Innovation Project (SDCX-ZG-202201005 to Y.J.), and the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019ZD20 to S.L. and ZR2022QC070 to Z.L.). The authors thank Guannan Lin, Jing Zhu, Zhifeng Li, and Haiyan Sui from the State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University for their assistance in the collection of HRMS, CD, GC-MS, NMR, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. We also thank Professor Dehai Li at the Ocean University of China for his assistance in ECD analysis.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Z., Zhang, L., Xu, K. et al. Molecular insights into the catalytic promiscuity of a bacterial diterpene synthase. Nat Commun 14, 4001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39706-9