Cyclic di-AMP is the only known essential second messenger in bacteria and archaea, regulating different proteins indispensable for numerous physiological processes. In particular, it controls various potassium and osmolyte transporters involved in osmoregulation. In Bacillus subtilis, the K+/H+ symporter KimA of the KUP family is inactivated by c-di-AMP. KimA sustains survival at potassium limitation at low external pH by mediating potassium ion uptake. However, at elevated intracellular K+ concentrations, further K+ accumulation would be toxic. In this study, we reveal the molecular basis of how c-di-AMP binding inhibits KimA. We report cryo-EM structures of KimA with bound c-di-AMP in detergent solution and reconstituted in amphipols. By combining structural data with functional assays and molecular dynamics simulations we reveal how c-di-AMP modulates transport. We show that an intracellular loop in the transmembrane domain interacts with c-di-AMP bound to the adjacent cytosolic domain. This reduces the mobility of transmembrane helices at the cytosolic side of the K+ binding site and therefore traps KimA in an inward-occluded conformation.
In bacteria and archaea, potassium ions are essential, playing roles in osmoregulation1,2, pH homeostasis3,4,5, regulation of protein synthesis6, enzyme activation7,8 such as the ribosome9,10, membrane potential adjustment11 and electrical signalling12,13,14. K+ homeostasis must be strictly maintained as deviations and fluctuations of potassium levels have lethal consequences for the cell15,16. In Gram-positive bacteria like Bacillus subtilis the second messenger cyclic di-AMP (c-di-AMP) is essential for the regulation of channels and transporters that maintain potassium homeostasis17. At elevated intracellular K+ concentrations, c-di-AMP is present at increased concentrations and regulates potassium-transporting proteins in two ways: Firstly, it directly binds its target proteins, leading to the inhibition of potassium uptake systems like K+ channel KtrAB18,19 and K+/H+ symporter KimA17,20 or the activation of potassium exporters like CpaA21 and KhtTU22; secondly, c-di-AMP suppresses gene expression by binding to the ydaO riboswitch23 that among others controls the transcription of the kimA and ktrAB genes. The ability of c-di-AMP to modulate both the expression and the activity of the same proteins makes it a key player in potassium homeostasis24. However, while the control of gene expression is well understood, it remains unclear how c-di-AMP binding controls the activity of potassium transporters and channels.
The c-di-AMP-sensitive, high-affinity K+/H+ symporter KimA from B. subtilis is particularly required for the uptake of potassium at low external potassium concentrations in acidic environments. KimA exploits the inward-directed proton gradient to accumulate K+ against its concentration gradient. As a member of the amino acid-polyamine-organocation (APC) superfamily it has the classical LeuT-fold with the first ten transmembrane helices (TMHs) adopting a 5 + 5 inverted repeat. TMHs 11 and 12 connect the transmembrane domain (TMD) to the cytosolic domain (CD) of KimA, which consists of four alpha helices and a five-stranded beta sheet25. KimA is a homodimer, stabilised by the swapping of the cytosolic domains with respect to the transmembrane domain. A long loop connects the swapped cytosolic domain to the last helix of the TMD. The dimeric cytosolic domains adopt a fold similar to a phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase (PPAT) domain and have been suggested to bind c-di-AMP25,26. However, no structural information is available for the c-di-AMP binding site and, consequently, the inhibition mechanism of potassium uptake by c-di-AMP remains elusive. In this study, we report structural and functional insights into the binding of c-di-AMP to KimA and how it inhibits the transporter.
C-di-AMP binds to KimA in a cooperative manner and inhibits potassium uptake
The uptake of potassium ions through KimA is known to be impaired by c-di-AMP16,20. Here, we confirmed the hypothesis and showed that binding of c-di-AMP leads to a significant decrease of potassium uptake velocity under in vivo conditions. We co-produced KimA with the inactive diadenylate cyclase variant CdaAD171N27 in Escherichia coli LB2003 cells, a strain that lacks all endogenous potassium uptake systems28, and determined potassium uptake into the potassium-depleted cells, obtaining a Vmax of 269.3 ± 24.0 nmol*mg dw−1*min−1 and a Km of 0.49 ± 0.09 mM. Upon the co-expression of KimA with active, c-di-AMP-synthesising CdaA, the Vmax was reduced by ~64% to 96.7 ± 10.1 nmol*mg dw−1*min−1, while the Km did not change (0.66 ± 0.31 mM) (Fig. 1a, Table 1).
In our previous structural study25, when c-di-AMP was added to KimA purified in styrene maleic-acid lipid particles (SMALPs) before EM grid preparation, binding of c-di-AMP to KimA was not observed. In agreement with this we show here that the melting temperature of detergent-purified KimA did not significantly change upon the titration of increasing concentrations of c-di-AMP in differential scanning fluorometry (DSF) measurements (Fig. 1b), suggesting that c-di-AMP did not bind in these conditions. To overcome this limitation, we co-produced KimA with the diadenylate cyclase CdaA in E. coli LB2003 cells, as this combination showed KimA inhibition in vivo, and then purified KimA from this condition. Interestingly, this sample already had a slightly increased melting temperature from 48.1 ± 0.8 °C to 50.7 ± 1.9 °C, prior to the addition of c-di-AMP. The addition of a three-fold molar excess of c-di-AMP led to a further 6.6 °C increase of the melting temperature to 54.7 ± 0.7 °C (Fig. 1b). Hence, during purification, a fraction of c-di-AMP appeared to remain bound to KimA, which enabled the binding of further c-di-AMP under ex vivo conditions. This suggests a cooperative behaviour of c-di-AMP binding to KimA at least under in vitro conditions.
Structural characterisation of the binding of c-di-AMP to KimA
To determine the binding site of c-di-AMP and the effect of c-di-AMP binding on the overall structure of KimA, cryo-EM specimens of purified KimA that had been co-expressed with cdaA were prepared in both DDM and amphipols. KimA in DDM was additionally incubated with a ten-fold molar excess of c-di-AMP after purification. 332k and 296k particles were processed to reconstruct cryo-EM maps at 3.3 Å and 3.8 Å resolution, respectively. The overall structure of KimA obtained from the preparation in DDM resembles the previous structure obtained in SMALPs25 (RMSDs of TMD (residues 30–462): 1.31 Å, CD (residues 462–606): 1.65 Å, global RMSD: 1.74 Å). The two TMDs are tilted towards each other, forming a dimer interface at the extracellular side that would enforce a bending of the membrane by ~130° against its natural curvature. As speculated for the preparation of KimA in SMALPs, the tilting likely was caused by a loss of lipids between the TMDs during purification. In contrast, the map of KimA in amphipols shows the upright dimer architecture of the TMDs (Supplementary Fig. 1a). At the extracellular side an elongated non-protein density is visible between both protomers, indicating that amphipol molecules wrapped around both TMDs individually. The structure resembles the upright dimer that was previously obtained following molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of KimA in a lipid bilayer25, with an RMSD of only 3.4 Å (Supplementary Fig. 1b). The pivot point for the tilting of TMDs is located around the C-terminal end of TMH 12, which extends out of the membrane (residues 459–464). Otherwise, the architectures of the TMDs (RMSD 0.55 Å for residues 30–462) and of the cytosolic domains (RMSD 0.66 Å for residues 462–606) of KimA reconstituted in amphipols and in DDM are very similar (global RMSD 1.26 Å). Also, the dimer interfaces that are mainly formed by the long connecting loops (residues 462–474) and by a beta-sheet connecting the two cytosolic domains are not affected (Fig. 2a). A comparison of the resulting structures of KimA in DDM and in amphipols with the previously reported structure from SMALPs25 suggests that all of them represent a similar inward-occluded conformation. In agreement with this, a strong density for the bound substrate potassium ion is observed in the 3.3 Å cryo-EM map (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 2a). The potassium ion is coordinated by Tyr43 (2.9 Å), the carbonyl and carboxyl of Asp36 (2.8 Å and 3.3 Å, respectively), hydroxyl and carbonyl of Thr230 (2.9 and 3.2 Å, respectively) and Tyr377 (3.2 Å). The map from KimA obtained in SMALPs suggested that Ser125 is also part of the K+ binding site, but in MD simulations this was not the case25. The higher resolution map shows that the distance between Ser125 and the potassium ion (4.9 Å) is too long for coordination (Fig. 2b), confirming the MD simulations. In contrast to the previous map, no extra densities are localized below Asp36 and Tyr377. Asp36 and Tyr377 are suggested to function as an intracellular gate. Potassium ions below them were hypothesized to hinder the opening of the gate by a trans-inhibition mechanism25. An explanation for the lack of the inhibitory ions could be the locking of KimA in the inward-occluded conformation by other means, namely the binding of c-di-AMP, which could prohibit K+ binding to the trans-inhibitory site from the cytosolic side. In fact, both cryo-EM maps of KimA in DDM and in amphipols clearly show two non-protein densities in the CDs, which were modelled as c-di-AMP (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Each binding site is formed mostly by the cytosolic domain of one monomer (Fig. 2c): One of the phosphodiesters of c-di-AMP is coordinated through two hydrogen bonds and a salt bridge between the non-esterified oxygen atoms and the amide groups of Gln581 and Ser582 and the guanidinium group of Arg337. One adenosine moiety forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone carbonyls of Val506 and Pro479. The hydroxyl group of the ribose of the second adenosine moiety forms hydrogen bonds with His579 and the backbone amide of Asn580. Only the second adenosine moiety is coordinated by residues of the neighbouring protomer; it is stacked between Val457 and Leu461 of TMH 12 that extends out of the membrane and Arg337, located in the loop between TMHs 8 and 9. Arg337 is the only residue of the TMD that engages in a strong interaction with c-di-AMP, making it a prime candidate for the transmission of the inhibitory effect of bound c-di-AMP.
C-di-AMP binding to one binding site primes the other
The structural insights were used to further investigate the binding of c-di-AMP to KimA. In particular, we strove to understand how pre-binding of c-di-AMP facilitates further c-di-AMP binding, as suggested by DSF measurements. To this end, MD simulations were run of the KimA dimer either with or without c-di-AMP, with c-di-AMP remaining stably bound to KimA throughout the simulations where present, with an RMSD relative to the protein of 0.25 ± 0.07 nm over 3 repeats of ca. 2.2 µs each. Analysis of the data led to the identification of a cooperativity pathway between the two binding sites (Fig. 3a): Ser582, which is in direct contact with c-di-AMP, connects through Phe565 and Arg587 with Trp592. Trp592 links both CDs through a contact with Ile569 across the dimer interface. Ile569 is a direct neighbour of Phe568 which, like Phe565, delimits the c-di-AMP binding pocket. The root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of almost all these residues was significantly reduced compared to the apo-protein when c-di-AMP was present in both binding sites, suggesting a stabilising effect of c-di-AMP binding on the CD (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). Surprisingly, if only one binding site was occupied by c-di-AMP, a similar stabilising effect was observed and all connecting residues of the apo-protomer also showed lower RMSF as if c-di-AMP was bound (Supplementary Fig. 3, grey highlighted, Supplementary Movie 3). Only the non-liganded Arg337 retains the high RMSF. It is possible that the more stable sidechain of Trp592 (Fig. 3c) restricts the motion of its counterpart Ile569 in the other protomer, which via the described network facilitates the priming of the second, empty c-di-AMP binding site.
Arg337 increases the affinity for c-di-AMP but is not essential for the inhibition
As Arg337 was the only residue of the TMD identified to strongly interact with c-di-AMP in the binding pocket, it was suspected to transmit the inhibitory effect of c-di-AMP binding from the cytosolic domain to the TMD. DSF measurements showed that the mutated variant KimAR337A, which should be unable to link c-di-AMP binding to the TMD, was still able to bind c-di-AMP when co-expressed with cdaA; however, a 20-fold excess was required for reaching the same thermal stabilisation as with a three-fold excess for the wild type (Fig. 4a), suggesting a decreased affinity for c-di-AMP.
To determine how the mutation affects the inhibition by c-di-AMP, in vivo potassium uptake studies were performed. In the presence of active CdaA, the potassium uptake velocity remained rather high (Fig. 4b), but the inhibition by c-di-AMP was not completely abolished. The Vmax value for K+ uptake by KimAR337A in the presence of active CdaA was reduced by ~44% to 111.7 ± 25.5 nmol*mg dw−1*min−1 when compared to the co-expression of KimAR337A with inactive CdaAD171N, where a Vmax value for K+ of 198.9 ± 35.8 nmol*mg dw−1*min−1 was determined (Table 1). To address whether the remaining inhibition was related to c-di-AMP binding to KimA or caused by the production of c-di-AMP in general, variant KimAA481WS582W that should be unable to bind c-di-AMP because of a sterically blocked binding pocket, was analysed. The loss of c-di-AMP binding was confirmed by DSF measurements (Supplementary Fig. 4a). This loss of binding was accompanied by the insensitivity of the in vivo potassium uptake through KimAA481WS582W to inhibition by c-di-AMP (Supplementary Fig. 4b). The uptake velocities were comparable in the presence of an active and inactive cyclase, respectively (Table 1). In conclusion, Arg337 appears to be important for high-affinity c-di-AMP binding but is not necessarily required for communicating c-di-AMP binding to the TMD for inhibition.
C-di-AMP-induced inhibition of KimA
C-di-AMP does not directly interact with the TMD, and long-range communication is required because the c-di-AMP binding site is ~37 Å away from the substrate K+ binding site. The question remains how c-di-AMP binding to the CDs of KimA controls K+ transport at a distance. To address this question, we further evaluated the MD simulations performed in the presence and absence of c-di-AMP. They showed a significant stabilisation of the whole intracellular loop between TMH8 and TMH9 upon c-di-AMP binding, not just Arg337 (Fig. 5a). This might suggest that inhibition by c-di-AMP is transmitted to the TMD via this loop.
The MD simulations further revealed that one consequence of c-di-AMP being removed from the system was a movement of TMH6 away from TMH3, leading to an opening of the TMD at the cytosolic end. This effect can be seen by measuring the distance between two residues sitting underneath the intracellular gate, Tyr118 (TMH3) and Asn237 (TMH6). These typically interacted closely (<4 Å) when c-di-AMP is bound (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 5a), which likely contributes to locking the TMD in an inward-occluded conformation. When c-di-AMP was removed this interaction was broken (Fig. 5b), and the distance frequently shifted from about 4 Å to 8 Å (Supplementary Fig. 5b).
The increased distance of Tyr118 and Asn237 can be observed using principal component analysis (PCA) of the MD data (see Methods). This reveals that the principal changes observed in the MD data involve a rearrangement of the central TMHs, with TMH6 straightening and moving ca. 4 Å away from TMH3 and TMH8. This occurs in both eigenvector 1 (Fig. 5c) and eigenvector 2 (Supplementary Fig. 6). Analysis of the separate conditions reveals that these more open conformations are exclusively sampled by the no-liganded conditions, with the ligand-bound states instead resembling the input structure (Fig. 5c). Analysis of the MD data reveals that, whilst the initial bound K+ remain tightly bound in the c-di-AMP-bound state, they are free to rapidly exchange with the bulk solvent in the c-di-AMP-free state, suggesting that the conformational changes seen in the PCA represent a switch to an inward-open conformation. In support of this observation, comparison of the inward-facing cavity reveals a clear widening in the ligand-free simulations (Supplementary Fig. 7a and b). This is accompanied by an increase in the number of waters present in the cavity (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Comparing the number of waters in the inward-facing cavity to the Tyr118-Asn237 distance reveals that the no-ligand system samples are considerably more open and more solvated states than the liganded system (Supplementary Fig. 7d). Comparison of the post-simulation ligand-bound and ligand-free states to the open-to-in structure of the structurally similar amino acid transporter BasC (PDB 6F2W)29, as identified using a FoldSeek30 search on the no-ligand KimA structure, also supports the adoption of an inward open state for no-ligand bound KimA (Supplementary Fig. 8).
In agreement with the MD simulations, a mutation of Tyr118 or Asn237 to alanine led to a loss of inhibition by c-di-AMP in potassium uptake assays, while binding of c-di-AMP was still possible (Fig. 6a, Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 9). The mutations seem to have abolished the observed interaction from the MD simulations, and therefore reduce the ability of c-di-AMP to lock KimA in an inward-occluded state. The significantly increased Km of 19 mM and 8 mM for KimAY118A and KimAN237A, respectively, is in agreement with the assumption that these residues line the exit pathway to the cytosol and suggests their involvement in ion release.
In conclusion, the MD simulations together with the functional data suggest that the binding of c-di-AMP (Fig. 6b-1) communicates to the TMD via a stabilisation of the TMH8-TMH9 loop (Fig. 6b-2, blue), which in turn affects the positioning of TMH8 and TMH3 relative to TMH6 (Fig. 6b-3 purple, green, yellow). These conformations would appear to regulate the switching between inward-occluded and inward-open, thereby presenting a possible mechanism of c-di-AMP inhibition of KimA.
Our results provide first structural and functional insights into how c-di-AMP inhibits proteins of the KUP transporter family. Interestingly, the binding mode differs from other c-di-AMP-regulated transport proteins such as potassium channel KtrAB19, osmolyte transporters OpuC31 and OpuA32, and potassium exporter KhtTU22, where c-di-AMP binds at dimer interfaces in a symmetric binding pocket. In KimA, two c-di-AMP molecules bind to the dimer in an asymmetric binding pocket. Different to the binding sites in the RCK_C domains of KtrA and KhtT and in the CBS domains of OpuA and OpuC, in which two arginine residues, one per protomer, coordinate both phosphate esters, only one of the two phosphate esters of c-di-AMP is coordinated by an arginine (Arg337) in KimA. In fact, Arg337 clearly supports the high-affinity binding of c-di-AMP and the communication of its presence to the TMD, but is not essential for the ligand binding or its inhibitory function. Instead, our data suggest that the major linker to the TMD is the entire binding loop between TMH8 and 9, which as a whole becomes more restricted in its movement once c-di-AMP is bound. This stabilisation may limit the freedom of movement of TMH8, which then restrains TMH3 and TMH6, for instance through interactions between Leu325, Tyr118 and Asn237. MD simulations indicate that through these interactions, opening of the inner gate is hindered, arresting KimA in an inward-occluded conformation. Consequently, the rocker switch movement can no longer take place (Fig. 7). When c-di-AMP is removed, KimA is once again able to open up to exchange K+ with the bulk solvent, as seen in our simulations. To corroborate the role of the binding loop, additional mutations (e.g., glycine) could be added to the loop in KimAR337A to increase its flexibility. This could ultimately abolish inhibition by c-di-AMP despite its binding. However, this could also have unpredictable side effects on the stability of the protein, affecting the activity of KimA in unforeseen ways.
To elucidate how conserved the inhibition mechanism is among other KUPs we performed a structure-based sequence alignment with AlphaFold predictions of four other KUPs of gram-positive bacteria as well as Kup from the gram-negative E. coli, which have been functionally but not structurally characterized (Supplementary Fig. 10). While Kup from E. coli is not regulated by c-di-AMP because the second messenger is lacking in E. coli, KimA from Listeria monocytogenes (KimALmo)26, and KupA and KupB from Lactococcus lactis IL140333 showed growth inhibition by c-di-AMP. Further, c-di-AMP binding was shown for KupA and with lower efficiency for KupB. The regulation of KimA from Staphylococcus aureus (KimASau) by c-di-AMP remains unclear26. In agreement with the lack of c-di-AMP in E. coli, Kup from E. coli does not share any of the characteristic residues Arg337, Tyr118 or Asn237 with KimA from B. subtilis. In contrast, Arg337 is conserved in KimALmo, KimASau and KupA. KupB lacks an equivalent amino acid, which could explain the weaker c-di-AMP binding. KupB is still inhibited by c-di-AMP, supporting our assumption that Arg337 is not required for transmission of the inhibition to the TMD. Residues Tyr118 and Asn237 are only conserved in KimASau, while KupA, KupB and KimALmo share a glycine and a serine, respectively, at those positions. In the binding pocket, KimASau shows conservation for Pro479, His579, Asn580, Gln581 and similarity for Val457 and Ser582 (Ile/Thr in KimASau, respectively). The KUPs show conservation only for Gln581 and like KimASau have a Thr at the position of Ser582, with the exception of Kup from E. coli, which has a lysine and leucine. Therefore, inhibition of KimASau by c-di-AMP is likely to be similar to KimA from B. subtilis, while for the other homologues some variations are to be expected.
A surprising observation was that c-di-AMP only bound to KimA in vitro when at least a proportion of c-di-AMP was co-purified along with KimA. Structurally, there is no obvious reason for this observation. The MD simulations showed that c-di-AMP stably binds to both the upright- and the tilted-dimer arrangement. The superposition of the previously solved structure in the absence of c-di-AMP with the c-di-AMP-bound structures does not show any significant conformational changes in the binding pocket, apart from a general stabilisation when c-di-AMP is bound. However, binding of the first c-di-AMP molecule by KimA appears to be unfavourable. A direct hand over of c-di-AMP from the cyclase could lower the energetic barrier for ligand binding. Binding of a second molecule then appears to be strongly cooperative within dimeric KimA. In agreement with this hypothesis, the only membrane-bound diadenylate cyclase CdaA in B. subtilis is described as the major cyclase maintaining the internal c-di-AMP concentration required for cell growth34. In other bacteria like the pathogenic L. monocytogenes35,36 and S. aureus37 as well as L. lactis38 CdaA is the only c-di-AMP cyclase. Since the majority of proteins regulated by c-di-AMP are membrane bound, the co-localisation of the cyclase appears advantageous if direct interaction is necessary.
In summary, we revealed key elements for the inhibition of potassium uptake through KimA by c-di-AMP. We show the structure of a KUP transporter with bound secondary messenger c-di-AMP and confirmed its inhibitory binding. Based on our findings we propose a network for the inhibition of KimA by c-di-AMP at a distance. Structures of outward-open and inward-open KimA are necessary to confirm the proposed transport cycle and validate the mode of inhibition by c-di-AMP.
Cloning of KimA variants using site-directed mutagenesis
Point mutations were introduced into pB24KimA using site-directed mutagenesis (SDM). Primer pairs of 20–40 bp length including a 1–3 bp mismatch were used to introduce point mutations (Supplementary Table 1). PCR product was digested with DpnI to remove template DNA and subsequently used to transform E. coli DH5α. Colonies grown on LB agar plates with 100 µg/ml ampicillin were picked and cultured in 5 ml LB with 100 µg/ml ampicillin over day. Plasmids were isolated from cells using NucleoSpin Plasmid, Mini kit for plasmid DNA (Macherey-Nagel). Correct mutation of the plasmids was verified by sequencing performed by MicroSynth GmbH Göttingen.
Expression and protein purification of KimA
A colony of E. coli LB2003 cells transformed with the expression plasmids for KimA or variants thereof (pB24KimA) and, if indicated, CdaA variants (pB33CdaA) where grown at 37 °C o/d with 180 rpm shaking in 5 ml KML (1% KCl, 1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract (w/v)) with 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 30 µg/ml chloramphenicol if needed. An overnight culture of 200 ml KML with respective antibiotics was inoculated from the o/d culture and incubated at 37 °C with 180 rpm. 6 l KML were inoculated with the o/n culture to an OD600 of 0.1 and incubated at 37 °C with 180 rpm. Gene expression was induced with 0.002% arabinose at an OD600 of 1. Cells were grown for 1.5 h and then harvested by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in buffer containing 420 mM NaCl, 180 mM KCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 supplemented with 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PMSF, 0.3 mM benzamidine and DNase I. Cells were disrupted by passing through a cell homogeniser (Stansted Pressure Cell Homogeniser FPG 12800) at 1 kbar. Cell debris was removed by centrifuging at 15,000 × g for 15 min. Membranes were harvested o/n by centrifuging at 100,000 × g. Membranes were resuspended in aforementioned buffer (100 mg/ml) and homogenised. Membranes were solubilised for 1 h at 4 °C with 1% of DDM (Glycon). Unsolubilised proteins were removed by centrifuging 30 min at 135,000 × g. Supernatant was incubated with 2 ml Ni2+-NTA resin for 1 h at 4 °C. Ni-NTA was washed with 50 column volumes of buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 60 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 and 0.04% DDM supplemented with 50 mM imidazole. Protein was eluted by using 500 mM imidazole in aforementioned buffer. Protein was further purified via size exclusion chromatography using a Superose6 Increase column (GE Healthcare/Cytiva) preequilibrated with aforementioned buffer without imidazole addition. Protein was concentrated and incubated with c-di-AMP if needed for DSF, HPLC-MS and cryo-EM experiments.
Preparation of KimA in amphipols
Protein expression and purification were performed as described above until binding to Ni2+-NTA. The beads were washed with 50 column volumes of buffer (140 mM NaCl, 60 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8) containing 60 mM imidazole and a reduced DDM concentration of 0.025%. KimA was eluted by making use of the C-terminal HRV-3C-Protease cleavage site. Therefore, the beads were incubated with 3C-Protease for 1.5 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed twice with buffer containing 0.025% DDM. The elution fraction containing KimA was concentrated and filtered. For the detergent/amphipol exchange, KimA at a concentration of 12 mg/ml and amphipols PMAL C8 (10% in water; Anatrace) were incubated at w/w ratio of 1:10 for 1 h at 4 °C. To remove excess detergent, the sample was incubated with biobeads at a detergent-to-biobeads weight ratio of 1:100 overnight. The biobeads were removed and the sample was loaded onto a Superose6 Increase 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated to cryo-EM buffer (50 mM NaCl, 50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8). KimA-containing fractions were pooled and concentrated to 2.25 mg/ml for cryo-EM.
In vivo whole-cell potassium uptake
Protocol was adapted from25,39. A colony of E. coli LB2003 cells transformed with the expression plasmids for KimA variants (pB24KimA) and CdaA variants (pB33CdaA) was grown at 37 °C o/d with 180 rpm shaking in 5 ml KML with 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 30 µg/ml chloramphenicol. 75 ml of K30 minimal media supplemented with the respective antibiotics were inoculated with 3 ml of o/d KML culture and incubated o/n at 37 °C. 500 ml of K30 minimal media with antibiotics were inoculated to an OD600 of 0.15 and incubated at 37 °C with 180 rpm. Gene expression was induced at an OD600 of 0.4–0.6 with 0.002% arabinose. Cells were grown 1.5 h before being harvested with 6000 × g at 20 °C for 10 min. The cell pellet was washed twice in 10 ml 120 mM Tris-HCl pH 8. Cells were adjusted to an OD600 of 30 and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C in a water bath (130 rpm shaking). To permeabilize cells for internal potassium, 1 mM EDTA was added and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 7 min shaking at 130 rpm in a water bath. Cells were centrifuged with 4500 × g for 7 min at 20 °C and washed twice in 200 mM HEPES TEA pH 7.5 to remove EDTA and internal potassium. Cells were adjusted to an OD600 of 30. For uptake, cells were diluted to an OD600 of 3 with 200 mM HEPES TEA pH 7.5 and energized with 0.2% glycerol and 0.002% arabinose. Different potassium concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 7.5, 10, 15 mM) were added and 1 ml samples were taken at 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 10 min after addition. Potassium uptake was stopped as cells were centrifuged through 200 µl of silicone oil (ρ = 1.04) at 17,000 × g for 2 min. Media and oil was removed and the 1.5 ml reaction tube tip containing the cell pellet was cut off. Cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 5% TCA. Cells were lysed by freezing at −20 °C and subsequent boiling at 95 °C for 10 min. Supernatant was diluted with 3 ml of 6.7 mM CsCl and 4 ml 5 mM CsCl. Cell debris was pelleted by centrifuging 20 min at 4000 × g. Internal potassium concentration was determined using flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (F-AAS). Graphs and kinetic analysis were made with Prism 6.0e GraphPad.
Differential Scanning Fluorometry/Thermal Shift Assay (DSF/TSA)
When ligands bind their target, they stabilize or destabilize the protein leading to a shifted protein melting temperature. The melting temperature is detected via the increasing fluorescence of the 7-diethylamino-3-(4-maleimidophenyl)-4-methylcoumarin (CPM) dye which binds cysteine residues that become accessible during the unfolding process40,41. 0.5 mg/ml purified KimA protein, co-expressed with and without cdaA, was incubated with 0–100x molar excess of c-di-AMP overnight at 4 °C. The next day 16.67 µg/ml CPM dye was added with subsequent incubation for 15 min on ice in the dark. 10 min centrifugation at 17,000 × g at 4 °C removed aggregates. Melting curves were recorded in a Rotor-Gene Q 5Plex HRM system (Qiagen) using a temperature range of 25–85 °C with 1 °C steps each 30 s and 90 s prewarm. CPM was excited at 365 nm and emission was detected at 460 nm. Samples were measured in technical triplicates. Melting temperatures were determined at the inflection point of the resulting fluorescence curve using Prism 6.0e GraphPad. Graphs were plotted with Prism 6.0e GraphPad.
Cryo-EM specimen preparation and data acquisition
UltrAuFoil R1.2/1.3 400 mesh gold grids were glow-discharged twice before the application of 3 µl of either a 4.0 mg/ml solution of KimA in DDM or 2.25 mg/ml KimA reconstituted in amphipols. The sample was then plunge-frozen using a FEI Vitrobot Mark IV. The chamber and Whatman 595 blotting paper were equilibrated at 4 °C and 100% relative humidity.
A Titan Krios (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a Gatan K3 camera in counting mode and energy filter was used for imaging with the software EPU 2.9 (Thermo Scientific). The fluence over a broken hole was adjusted to 1.1 electrons/Å2 per frame. Micrographs were acquired as 50-frame movie stacks in 2.7 s or 2.3 s exposures, respectively, at a nominal magnification of ×105,000 with a resulting pixel size of 0.83 Å. Defocus values were set in the range of −1.1 to −2.5 µm.
Image processing and model refinement
Micrographs were processed using Relion-3.142 (Supplementary Fig. 11). The Relion implementation of MotionCor243 was used for drift correction and dose weighting. Gctf44 was used for the initial CTF estimation. Initially, 950k coordinates were picked from 2349 micrographs by Topaz45 after training the neural network with 726 particles that were manually picked from 30 micrographs of KimA in DDM. After two rounds of 3D classification 332k particles remained that yielded a 3.6 Å map of KimA. Per particle drift correction and dose-weighting during Bayesian polishing46 and two iterations of CTF refinement improved the resolution to 3.5 Å. The two protomers in the dimer did not show deviations from C2 symmetry and applying the symmetry yielded a final map at 3.3 Å resolution (Supplementary Fig. 12a).
In the case of KimA in amphipols, 5.18 million coordinates were picked from 4303 micrographs by Topaz after training the neural network with 530 particles that were manually selected from 20 micrographs. Bad picks were removed by two consecutive 3D classifications yielding 1.99 million and 861k particles, respectively. A lowpass filtered map of KimA solubilized in SMA25 was used as an initial 3D template. Additional rounds of 3D classification resulted in a set of 296k particles from the 3417 best micrographs yielding a 4.1 Å map of KimA. The resolution was also improved by Bayesian polishing and two iterations of CTF refinement to 4.0 Å (C1) and 3.8 Å (C2 symmetry) (Supplementary Fig. 12b). Further improvement of the map was achieved through focused classification of symmetry expanded particles. The particles of the last refinement were C2 symmetry expanded. Then density outside a wide mask that contained one TMD and the cytosolic domain of the other protomer was subtracted from the particle image with a Relion Particle Subtraction job. 3D classification of these particles with four classes, local searches only and the same mask used for the particle subtraction as a reference mask yielded one class with 307k particles. 3D-autorefinement of these particles resulted in a 3.7 Å map of one half of the dimer (Supplementary Fig. 12c).
Individual domains of the model of KimA in SMA (pdb ID 6s3k)25 were rigid body fitted into the map of the upright dimer with Coot47 and manually rebuilt. Models were optimised using Phenix real space refinement48 (Supplementary Table 2).
Molecular dynamics simulations
Atomistic simulations were built using the coordinates of dimeric KimA bound to c-di-AMP from this study. The systems were described with the CHARMM36m force field49,50 and built into 6:3:1 POPE, POPG, cardiolipin membranes with TIP3P waters and K+ and Cl− to 150 mM, using CHARMM-GUI51,52. Three bound K+ from each subunit were preserved from the input structure. The c-di-AMP molecules were parameterised in CHARMM-GUI, and either included in both subunits, a single subunit, or in neither subunit. Each system was minimized and equilibrated according to the standard CHARMM-GUI protocol. For the system with no c-di-AMP molecule present, the molecule was deleted and an additional 30 ns equilibration simulation was run with restraints on the protein backbone. Production simulations were run in the NPT ensemble, with temperatures held at 303.5 K using a velocity-rescale thermostat and a coupling constant of 1 ps, and pressure maintained at 1 bar using a semi-isotropic Parrinello-Rahman pressure coupling with a coupling constant of 5 ps53,54. Short range van der Waals and electrostatics were cut-off at 1.2 nm. Simulations were run in triplicate, to ca. 2.2 µs for the wild-type systems with c-di-AMP present or apo, or to 500 ns for asymmetric c-di-AMP occupancy systems. In total, ca. 14.7 µs of data were gathered.
PCA was carried out on the C-alpha atoms of each KimA monomer. The trajectories for each subunit and each of the 3 repeats were concatenated before analysis for a total of 13.2 µs sampling. A covariance matrix using all data was constructed using gmx covar, and eigenvectors were analysed using gmx anaeig. Ca. 1700 eigenvectors were found, of which eigenvectors 1 and 2 contributed ca. 45% of the total variance (see Supplementary Fig. 13). Using the data for each of the ligand and no ligand conditions, separate 2D heatmaps of eigenvector 1 and 2 sampling were constructed using Prism.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data supporting the findings of this manuscript are available from the corresponding authors upon request. The cryo-EM maps were deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession codes EMD-15895 (KimA with c-di-AMP in amphipols) and EMDB-15894 (KimA with c-di-AMP in DDM). Atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession codes 8B71 (KimA with c-di-AMP in amphipols) and 8B70 (KimA with c-di-AMP in DDM). 6S3K (KimA in SMA) used for model building is available in the PDB. Source data are provided as a Source data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
Holtmann, G., Bakker, E. P., Uozumi, N. & Bremer, E. KtrAB and KtrCD: two K+ uptake systems in Bacillus subtilis and their role in adaptation to hypertonicity. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1289–1298 (2003).
McLaggan, D., Naprstek, J., Buurman, E. T. & Epstein, W. Interdependence of K+ and glutamate accumulation during osmotic adaptation of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1911–1917 (1994).
Ochrombel, I., Ott, L., Krämer, R., Burkovski, A. & Marin, K. Impact of improved potassium accumulation on pH homeostasis, membrane potential adjustment and survival of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 444–450 (2011).
Bakker, E. P. & Mangerich, W. E. The effects of weak acids on potassium uptake by Escherichia coli K-12 inhibition by low cytoplasmic pH. Biochim Biophys. Acta 730, 379–386 (1983).
Booth, I. R. & Kroll, R. G. Regulation of cytoplasmic pH (pH1) in bacteria and its relationship to metabolism. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 11, 70–72 (1983).
Willis, D. B. & Ennis, H. L. Ribonucleic acid and protein synthesis in a mutant of Bacillus subtilis defective in potassium retention. J. Bacteriol. 96, 2035–2042 (1968).
Gohara, D. W. & Di Cera, E. Molecular mechanisms of enzyme activation by monovalent cations. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 20840–20848 (2016).
Suelter, C. H. Enzymes activated by monovalent cations. Science 168, 789–795 (1970).
Rozov, A. et al. Importance of potassium ions for ribosome structure and function revealed by long-wavelength X-ray diffraction. Nat. Commun. 10, 2519 (2019).
Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Ban, N., Moore, P. B. & Steitz, T. A. The structural basis of ribosome activity in peptide bond synthesis. Science 289, 920–930 (2000).
Epstein, W. The roles and regulation of potassium in bacteria. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 75, 293–320 (2003).
Prindle, A. et al. Ion channels enable electrical communication in bacterial communities. Nature 527, 59–63 (2015).
Humphries, J. et al. Species-independent attraction to biofilms through electrical signaling. Cell 168, 200–209.e12 (2017).
Liu, J. et al. Coupling between distant biofilms and emergence of nutrient time-sharing. Science 356, 638–642 (2017).
Radchenko, M. V. et al. Potassium/proton antiport system of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 19822–19829 (2006).
Stautz, J. et al. Molecular mechanisms for bacterial potassium homeostasis. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166968 (2021).
Gundlach, J. et al. Control of potassium homeostasis is an essential function of the second messenger cyclic di-AMP in Bacillus subtilis. Sci. Signal 10, eaal3011 (2017).
Corrigan, R. M. et al. Systematic identification of conserved bacterial c-di-AMP receptor proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9084–9089 (2013).
Kim, H. et al. Structural studies of potassium transport protein KtrA regulator of conductance of K+ (RCK) C domain in complex with cyclic diadenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP). J. Biol. Chem. 290, 16393–16402 (2015).
Gundlach, J. et al. Sustained sensing in potassium homeostasis: cyclic di-AMP controls potassium uptake by KimA at the levels of expression and activity. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 9605–9614 (2019).
Chin, K.-H. et al. Structural insights into the distinct binding mode of cyclic Di-AMP with SaCpaA_RCK. Biochemistry 54, 4936–4951 (2015).
Cereija, T. B., Guerra, J. P. L., Jorge, J. M. P. & Morais-Cabral, J. H. c-di-AMP, a likely master regulator of bacterial K+ homeostasis machinery, activates a K+ exporter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2020653118 (2021).
Nelson, J. W. et al. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger c-di-AMP. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 834–839 (2013).
Stülke, J. & Krüger, L. Cyclic di-AMP signaling in bacteria. Annu Rev. Microbiol 74, 159–179 (2020).
Tascón, I. et al. Structural basis of proton-coupled potassium transport in the KUP family. Nat. Commun. 11, 626 (2020).
Gibhardt, J. et al. c-di-AMP assists osmoadaptation by regulating the Listeria monocytogenes potassium transporters KimA and KtrCD. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 16020–16033 (2019).
Rosenberg, J. et al. Structural and biochemical analysis of the essential diadenylate cyclase CdaA from Listeria monocytogenes. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 6596–6606 (2015).
Stumpe, S. & Bakker, E. P. Requirement of a large K+-uptake capacity and of extracytoplasmic protease activity for protamine resistance of Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 167, 126–136 (1997).
Errasti-Murugarren, E. et al. L amino acid transporter structure and molecular bases for the asymmetry of substrate interaction. Nat. Commun. 10, 1807 (2019).
van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol., online ahead of print, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 (2023).
Huynh, T. N. et al. Cyclic di-AMP targets the cystathionine beta-synthase domain of the osmolyte transporter OpuC. Mol. Microbiol. 102, 233–243 (2016).
Sikkema, H. R. et al. Gating by ionic strength and safety check by cyclic-di-AMP in the ABC transporter OpuA. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd7697 (2020).
Quintana, I. M. et al. The KupA and KupB proteins of Lactococcus lactis IL1403 are novel c-di-AMP receptor proteins responsible for potassium uptake. J. Bacteriol. 201, e00028–19 (2019).
Mehne, F. M. P. et al. Cyclic di-AMP homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis: both lack and high level accumulation of the nucleotide are detrimental for cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 2004–2017 (2013).
Woodward, J. J., Iavarone, A. T. & Portnoy, D. A. c-di-AMP secreted by intracellular Listeria monocytogenes activates a host type I interferon response. Science 328, 1703–1705 (2010).
Rismondo, J. et al. Phenotypes associated with the essential diadenylate cyclase CdaA and its potential regulator CdaR in the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. J. Bacteriol. 198, 416–426 (2016).
Chaudhuri, R. R. et al. Comprehensive identification of essential Staphylococcus aureus genes using Transposon-Mediated Differential Hybridisation (TMDH). BMC Genom. 10, 291 (2009).
Zhu, Y. et al. Cyclic-di-AMP synthesis by the diadenylate cyclase CdaA is modulated by the peptidoglycan biosynthesis enzyme GlmM in Lactococcus lactis. Mol. Microbiol. 99, 1015–1027 (2016).
Bakker, E. P. & Mangerich, W. E. Interconversion of components of the bacterial proton motive force by electrogenic potassium transport. J. Bacteriol. 147, 820–826 (1981).
Alexandrov, A. I., Mileni, M., Chien, E. Y. T., Hanson, M. A. & Stevens, R. C. Microscale fluorescent thermal stability assay for membrane proteins. Structure 16, 351–359 (2008).
Semisotnov, G. V. et al. Study of the ‘molten globule’ intermediate state in protein folding by a hydrophobic fluorescent probe. Biopolymers 31, 119–128 (1991).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. A Bayesian approach to beam-induced motion correction in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. IUCrJ 6, 5–17 (2019).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D. Biol. Crystallogr 66, 486–501 (2010).
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).
Best, R. B. et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3257–3273 (2012).
Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017).
Jo, S., Kim, T. & Im, W. Automated builder and database of protein/membrane complexes for molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS ONE 2, e880 (2007).
Lee, J. et al. CHARMM-GUI input generator for NAMD, GROMACS, AMBER, OpenMM, and CHARMM/OpenMM simulations using the CHARMM36 additive force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 405–413 (2016).
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Gromacs 2020.1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685920 (2020).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph 14, 33–38 (1996).
Schwede, T., Kopp, J., Guex, N. & Peitsch, M. C. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3381–3385 (2003).
We thank the Central Electron Microscopy Facility of the Max Planck Institute of Biophysics for cryo-EM infrastructure and technical support, and Juan Castillo-Hernández and Özkan Yildiz for support in cryo-EM data processing. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation via SPP1879 to J.V. and I.H. (VO 1449/1-1 and HA 6322/4-1), and the Heisenberg programme to I.H. (HA 6322/5-1). Research in PJS’s lab is also funded by Wellcome (208361/Z/17/Z) and BBSRC (BB/P01948X/1, BB/R002517/1 and BB/S003339/1). This project made use of time on ARCHER2 and JADE2 granted via the UK High-End Computing Consortium for Biomolecular Simulation, HECBioSim (http://hecbiosim.ac.uk), supported by EPSRC (grant no. EP/R029407/1). This project also used Athena and Sulis at HPC Midlands+, which were funded by the EPSRC on grants EP/P020232/1 and EP/T022108/1. We thank the University of Warwick Scientific Computing Research Technology Platform for computational access.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Wojciech Kopec, Jorg Stulke and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fuss, M.F., Wieferig, JP., Corey, R.A. et al. Cyclic di-AMP traps proton-coupled K+ transporters of the KUP family in an inward-occluded conformation. Nat Commun 14, 3683 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38944-1