Controlled sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly of a fluorogenic cisplatin prodrug for cancer theranostics

Wen, Xidan; Zhang, Rui; Hu, Yuxuan; Wu, Luyan; Bai, He; Song, Dongfan; Wang, Yanfeng; An, Ruibing; Weng, Jianhui; Zhang, Shuren; Wang, Rong; Qiu, Ling; Lin, Jianguo; Gao, Guandao; Liu, Hong; Guo, Zijian; Ye, Deju

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36469-1

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 13 February 2023

Controlled sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly of a fluorogenic cisplatin prodrug for cancer theranostics

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 800 (2023) Cite this article

11k Accesses
56 Citations
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Temporal control of delivery and release of drugs in tumors are important in improving therapeutic outcomes to patients. Here, we report a sequential stimuli-triggered in situ self-assembly and disassembly strategy to direct delivery and release of theranostic drugs in vivo. Using cisplatin as a model anticancer drug, we design a stimuli-responsive small-molecule cisplatin prodrug (P-CyPt), which undergoes extracellular alkaline phosphatase-triggered in situ self-assembly and succeeding intracellular glutathione-triggered disassembly process, allowing to enhance accumulation and elicit burst release of cisplatin in tumor cells. Compared with cisplatin, P-CyPt greatly improves antitumor efficacy while mitigates off-target toxicity in mice with subcutaneous HeLa tumors and orthotopic HepG2 liver tumors after systemic administration. Moreover, P-CyPt also produces activated near-infrared fluorescence (at 710 nm) and dual photoacoustic imaging signals (at 700 and 750 nm), permitting high sensitivity and spatial-resolution delineation of tumor foci and real-time monitoring of drug delivery and release in vivo. This strategy leverages the advantages offered by in situ self-assembly with those of intracellular disassembly, which may act as a general platform for the design of prodrugs capable of improving drug delivery for cancer theranostics.

Self-propelled assembly of nanoparticles with self-catalytic regulation for tumour-specific imaging and therapy

Article Open access 11 January 2024

Bioinspired carrier-free peptide conjugated BF₂-oxasmaragdyrin dye-based nano self-assemblies: a photostable NIR cancer theragnostic agent

Article Open access 04 December 2020

In situ self-assembly for cancer therapy and imaging

Article 29 August 2023

Introduction

Self-assembly and disassembly is a reverse process pervasive in biology, participating in many essential physiological processes and functions^1,2,3. Learned from nature, people have utilized the self-assembly process to synthesize nano/microstructures, and the disassembly process to control drug release in biology^4,5,6. Of particular interest is the stimuli-triggered in situ self-assembly process that allows on-site synthesis of high-order nanostructures in living subjects^7,8. In this respect, small-molecule compounds with a well-defined chemical structure are administrated instead of preformed nanomaterials, which are shown to enter disease tissues and self-assemble into nanocomposites upon activation by biological targets. The small size of molecules permits facile diffusion into disease tissues, while the on-site formed nanocomposites are not cleared as easily benefited from the increased molecular size, which retards diffusion and leads to a higher local accumulation in the target tissues. This stimuli-triggered in situ self-assembly strategy has offered versatile applications that range from molecular imaging to controlled drug delivery^{9,10,11,12,13}. Integration of this process with stimuli-triggered disassembly could permit not only enhanced drug delivery but also on-demand drug release in disease tissues, which would be promising to improve therapeutic efficacy^14,15,16,17. However, the design of a small-molecule prodrug capable of undergoing in situ self-assembly and intracellular disassembly to direct delivery and release of drugs in vivo remains elusive. The highly dynamic and complex in vivo environment presents significant difficulties to precisely control and monitor this delicate process. Recently, we reported an alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-triggered in situ self-assembly approach that enabled to design an activatable near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) small-molecule probe for in vivo imaging of ALP activity¹². In this paper, using cisplatin (CDDP) as a model drug, we report a sequential stimuli-triggered in situ self-assembly and disassembly system amenable to design a fluorogenic small-molecule cisplatin prodrug (P-CyPt) for cancer theranostics.

Cisplatin is one of the first-line anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of various malignant tumors in clinic. However, the therapeutic efficacy is compromised by the non-specific biodistribution and insufficient tumor uptake that cause systemic toxicities (e.g., nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity) and drug resistance^18,19. While myriads of cisplatin prodrugs and nanocarrier-based delivery systems have been developed to overcome the side-toxicity and drug resistance^{20,21,22,23,24}, the in vivo therapeutic efficacy is still not satisfied, probably due to that the delivery of cytotoxic CDDP in tumor tissues is not substantially improved²⁵.

Here, by leveraging membrane-bound ALP-triggered in situ self-assembly with intracellular glutathione (GSH)-triggered disassembly, we demonstrate that P-CyPt can potentiate delivery and release of CDDP in tumor cells, thus greatly improving the therapeutic efficacy as compared with CDDP or preformed Pt(IV) nanoparticles. Application of P-CyPt in vivo allows us to successfully visualize and treat orthotopic HepG2 liver tumors in living mice. Moreover, this sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly process can be monitored in real time via complemental fluorescence (FL) and photoacoustic (PA) bimodality imaging. This strategy is important for cancer theranostics and may act as a general approach able to improve delivery and direct release of therapeutic agents in solid tumors after systemic administration.

Results

Design of P-CyPt

P-CyPt is designed to (1) offer activatable near-infrared (NIR) FL and PA signals for bimodality imaging through ALP-mediated in situ self-assembly and (2) release CDDP for on-demand therapy via GSH-triggered disassembly (Fig. 1a). P-CyPt comprises (1) a NIR merocyanine fluorophore (mCy)^26,27 capped with an ALP-recognition phosphate group (PO₃H)²⁸, (2) a GSH-reducible CDDP prodrug (Pt(IV))^29,30, and (3) a hydrophobic _D-Phe-_D-Phe (FF) dipeptide³¹, which shows low NIR FL, low PA signal and low cytotoxicity. After systemic administration, P-CyPt as a small molecule can extravasate and penetrate deeply into tumor tissues (Fig. 1b). In tumor tissues that are membrane-bound ALP positive, rapid dephosphorylation of P-CyPt by the membrane-bound ALP generates CyPt, switching on NIR FL (λ_em = 710 nm) and PA signals (λ = 700 nm); moreover, CyPt with increased hydrophobicity is susceptible to self-assembly into Pt(IV) nanoparticles (Pt^IVNPs), which turns on another PA signal (λ = 750 nm) resulting from the aggregation-caused bathochromic shift. The on-site formed Pt^IVNPs can anchor on the cell membranes, which attenuate diffusion, prolong retention, and enhance translocation into cells^32,33. Within tumor cells, the abundant endogenous GSH can reduce Pt(IV) into Pt(II), producing negatively charged Cy-COOH that promotes NPs disassembly and accelerates release of CDDP intracellularly. This process dramatically raises intracellular CDDP’s concentration while depletes GSH’s level to effectively kill tumor cells³⁴. Moreover, the disassembly of Pt^IVNPs into Cy-COOH further increases NIR FL (called as “ON-ON”) as the aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) effect is eliminated; however, the PA signal at 750 nm is turned off but the PA signal at 700 nm is kept at “ON” state. The sequential switches in NIR FL and PA bimodal imaging signals can allow P-CyPt to reliably monitor the ALP-triggered in situ self-assembly and GSH-driven disassembly process in vivo, facilitating to guide precise chemotherapy of tumors. By contrast, in normal tissues that are ALP deficient, P-CyPt cannot be dephosphorylated and shows poor cellular uptake, resulting in rapid clearance from normal tissues, beneficial to lower systemic toxicities.

**Fig. 1: General design and proposed mechanism of P-CyPt for cancer theranostics.**

ALP-triggered in situ self-assembly and GSH-driven disassembly in vitro

P-CyPt was synthesized according to the procedure illustrated in Supplementary Methods. We first monitored the ALP-triggered dephosphorylation and self-assembly of P-CyPt into Pt^IVNPs in solution. To ensure efficient enzymatic reaction with P-CyPt in Tris buffer (pH 8.0), 100 U/L ALP was chosen for in vitro studies (Supplementary Fig. 1). On incubation with ALP, P-CyPt was completely converted into CyPt after 30 min (Fig. 2a, h, and Supplementary Fig. 2), and the LogP value distinctly increases from 0.68 ± 0.03 to 2.50 ± 0.03. Molecular simulations predicted that P-CyPt as a hydrophilic probe was basically present at a disperse state in aqueous solutions, while CyPt with an increased hydrophobicity was prone to closely pack into aggregates benefited from strong intermolecular interactions (e.g., π-π stacking, van der Waals interaction and hydrogen bonding) (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analysis showed bare NPs for P-CyPt, which progressively assembled into spherical Pt^IVNPs, with a mean size of ~160 nm after 30 min (Fig. 2b–d). The UV-vis-NIR absorption of P-CyPt bathochromically shifted from 605 and 652 nm to 690 nm plus a shoulder peak at 750 nm (Fig. 2e, j); the initially quenched NIR FL at 710 nm was switched on by ~8-fold (Fig. 2f, k), and the PA signals at 700 and 750 nm both increased by more than sixfold after 30 min (Fig. 2g, l). Importantly, P-CyPt displays fast enzymatic kinetics, high sensitivity, and specificity toward ALP (Supplementary Figs. 5–7).

**Fig. 2: Characterization of ALP-triggered in situ self-assembly and GSH-driven disassembly of P-CyPt in vitro.**

We next investigated the GSH-triggered reduction and disassembly of Pt^IVNPs to release CDDP. Pt^IVNPs hold a good stability in aqueous solutions, attributable to the low critical micellar concentration (CMC ≈ 0.3 μM) of CyPt (Supplementary Fig. 8). On addition of 5 or 10 mM GSH that can mimic different intracellular centration of GSH in tumor cells^35,36, CyPt in Pt^IVNPs could be completely reduced into Cy-COOH after 60 min (Fig. 2a, h, Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10). ¹⁹⁵Pt nuclear magnetic resonance (¹⁹⁵Pt-NMR) spectrometric and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis confirmed the reduction of Pt(IV) to Pt(II) by GSH (Supplementary Fig. 11). We then quantified the amount of released Pt(II) using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), which showed nearly complete release of CDDP after 60 min (Fig. 2h). DLS analysis showed that the size of Pt^IVNPs progressively declined, with bare NPs observed after 60 min (Fig. 2b, i), aligning well with TEM images (Fig. 2c, i). Accompanying with the disassembly, the NIR absorption at 700 nm slightly increased while the shoulder peak at 750 nm gradually decreased to the baseline (Fig. 2e, j). Accordingly, the NIR FL at 710 nm further increased by ~4.5-fold (Fig. 2f, k); concurrently, the PA signal at 750 nm progressively decreased by approximately sixfold, but the PA signal at 700 nm remained strong (Fig. 2d, e). These findings demonstrate that GSH efficiently reduces Pt^IVNPs and triggers disassembly to release Cy-COOH and Pt(II) drug, resulting in (1) a further enhancement in NIR FL at 710 nm and (2) a decline in PA signal at 750 nm (not at 700 nm). The increased 710 nm FL but decreased 750 nm PA signal could be used to complementally monitor the GSH-triggered disassembly process that synchronized CDDP release, and the unchanged 700 nm PA signal could act as an internal standard for calibration.

P-CyPt empowers FL and PA bimodality imaging of ALP-positive tumor cells

We first employed the immunofluorescence staining assay to validate the overexpression of ALP on the membranes of HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 12)³⁷. On incubation with P-CyPt, ALP-positive HeLa cells displayed distinct mCy’s FL around the cell membranes, which intensified with the concentration and incubation time of P-CyPt (Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14). When extending the incubation time to over 40 min, strong NIR FL punctate also appeared in the lysosomes through clathrin-dependent endocytosis (Supplementary Figs. 15 and 16). By contrast, the mCy’s FL was negligibly observed neither in HeLa cells pretreated with Na₃VO₄ (an inhibitor of ALP³⁸) nor in ALP-deficient HEK-293T cells (Fig. 3a). The incubation of HeLa cells with preformed fluorescent Pt^IVNPs produced strong mCy’s FL in the culture medium only, contrary to that of P-CyPt (Supplementary Fig. 17). We then acquired the macrofluorescence and PA images of cell pellets and culture mediums. Consistent with the epifluorescence images, bright NIR FL and PA images (at 700 and 750 nm) appeared in the pellets of HeLa cells incubated with P-CyPt (Group I), which could be largely prohibited by Na₃VO₄ (Group III). In contrast, weak NIR FL and PA signals appeared either in HeLa cells incubated with preformed Pt^IVNPs (Group IV) or in HEK-293T cells incubated with P-CyPt (Group V). These results were recapitulated with the appearance of green color in P-CyPt-treated HeLa cell pellets (Fig. 3b). Meanwhile, only the medium of HeLa cells treated with preformed Pt^IVNPs (Group IV) displayed strong NIR FL and PA signals, indicating that most of the preformed Pt^IVNPs were remaining disperse in the culture medium (Supplementary Fig. 18). Note that the appearance of strong 750 nm PA signal in P-CyPt-treated HeLa cell pellets could imply the formation of Pt^IVNPs (Group I). Then, the P-CyPt-treated cells continued incubation in refreshed blank mediums for another 3 h to allow intracellular translocation of in situ formed Pt^IVNPs (Supplementary Fig. 19). It was found that the NIR FL in the pellets increased by ~1.5-fold, but the PA signal at 750 nm (not at 700 nm) decreased by ~3.5-fold (Fig. 3c, d, Group II). These results imply the efficient disassembly of Pt^IVNPs after entering HeLa cells.

**Fig. 3: Evaluation of P-CyPt in cells.**

We next employed TEM to image the in situ formed Pt^IVNPs on HeLa cells incubated with P-CyPt (10 μM, 1 h). TEM images of the separated HeLa cell fractions^32,38, including membranes (M), lysosomes and mitochondria (L), nuclei (N), and cytosol (C) showed the presence of NPs in fractions M and L (Fig. 3e), with size and morphology according well with that of Pt^IVNPs (Fig. 2d); element mapping analysis revealed the existence of Pt and Cl elements in the observed NPs (Fig. 3e). In contrast, no Pt^IVNPs appeared neither in fractions N and C of P-CyPt-treated HeLa cells nor in all the fractions of blank HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 20). Then, HPLC analysis of cell lysates and culture mediums showed that CyPt was predominantly present in the lysates of HeLa cells incubated with P-CyPt (10 μM, 30 min), while negligible CyPt was observed in the lysates of HEK-293T cells or Na₃VO₄-pretreated HeLa cells (Fig. 3f). On incubation of HeLa cells with preformed Pt^IVNPs, negligible CyPt appeared in the lysates and most CyPt remained in the culture mediums (Supplementary Fig. 18d). Moreover, when P-CyPt-treated HeLa cells were kept incubated in refreshed mediums for additional 3 h, nearly all formed CyPt was reduced into Cy-COOH (Fig. 3f, Group II), correlating to that of increased NIR FL but reciprocally reduced PA signal at 750 nm in HeLa cells (Fig. 3b). These findings validate that (1) the uptake of P-CyPt by HeLa cells was more efficient than preformed Pt^IVNPs via the membrane-bound ALP-triggered dephosphorylation and in situ self-assembly processes; (2) most intracellular Pt^IVNPs could be reduced by endogenous GSH that facilitates disassembly and intracellular release of CDDP.

P-CyPt augments cytotoxicity against tumor cells

We first quantified the amount of Pt(II) in HeLa cells by ICP-OES, which showed a large amount of Pt (24.60 ± 3.5 fmol/cell) in P-CyPt-treated HeLa cells, equal to 36.9 ± 5.3% of P-CyPt added (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Table 1). In contrast, a much lower amount of Pt was present in HeLa cells incubated with CDDP (0.73 ± 0.09 fmol/cell), Pt^IVNPs (1.73 ± 0.2 fmol/cell) or Na₃VO₄ plus P-CyPt (0.07 ± 0.01 fmol/cell). Notably, more intracellular GSH (~37.3%) could be depleted in HeLa cells treated with P-CyPt than that with CDDP (~8.3%) (Supplementary Table 2), which could synergize cytotoxicity via disrupting the intracellular redox homeostasis and breaking double-strand DNA molecules (Supplementary Fig. 21). We then analyzed the subcellular distribution of Pt element in HeLa cells. Figure 3h showed that the intracellular Pt was majorly distributed in the cytosol of CDDP-treated HeLa cells (76.22%), approximately twofold higher than that of P-CyPt-treated cells (38.82%). However, ~29.05% of intracellular Pt was distributed in the nucleus of P-CyPt-treated HeLa cells, which was significantly fivefold higher than that of CDDP-treated HeLa cells (~5.65%). Moreover, the distribution of Pt drug in the mitochondria and lysosomes was also much higher in HeLa cells treated with P-CyPt (~26.11%) than that with CDDP (~4.11%) (Supplementary Table 3). These results reveal that the subcellular distribution of Pt drug in HeLa cells was dramatically different between P-CyPt and CDDP, which could be presumably owing to the different internalization pathway and uptake of different amount of Pt(II) drugs between them (Supplementary Fig. 22). The enhanced distribution in the nucleus and mitochondria, two major organelles for CDDP, could have benefits to improve cytotoxicity against HeLa cells^39,40,41.

We next evaluated the cytotoxicity of P-CyPt against HeLa, HepG2, and HEK-293T cells, respectively (Supplementary Table 4). On incubation of P-CyPt for 48 h, the IC₅₀ values toward HeLa (6.76 ± 0.68 μM) and HepG2 tumor cells (10.27 ± 0.87 μM) were smaller than CDDP (14.47 ± 1.60 μM for HeLa and 16.30 ± 1.69 μM for HepG2) or Pt^IVNPs (13.52 ± 1.02 μM for HeLa and 14.64 ± 0.74 μM for HepG2), but the IC₅₀ value of P-CyPt toward HEK-293T cells (48.60 ± 4.24 μM) was significantly higher than CDDP (17.41 ± 1.05 μM) or Pt^IVNPs (15.19 ± 1.44 μM) (Fig. 3i and Supplementary Fig. 23). To avoid extracellular reduction of P-CyPt or Pt^IVNPs that may release CDDP to cause cytotoxicity toward either ALP-positive or negative cells, we turned to incubate cells with these three Pt-drugs for only 2 h instead of 48 h, and then continued incubation in refreshed mediums for another 48 h (Fig. 3j and Supplementary Fig. 24). The IC₅₀ values of CDDP or preformed Pt^IVNPs against HeLa, HepG2 and HEK-293T cells all increased to >150 μM; but the IC₅₀ values of P-CyPt toward HeLa and HepG2 cells remained at 14.56 ± 1.24 and 18.12 ± 1.78 μM, respectively, significantly smaller than that toward HEK-293T cells. The much lower IC₅₀ values of P-CyPt than CDDP or preformed Pt^IVNPs toward HeLa cells matched that of a significantly higher uptake of Pt(II) drug in P-CyPt-treated HeLa cells than that in CDDP- or preformed Pt^IVNPs-treated HeLa cells (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Table 1). The subsequent flow cytometry analysis revealed a significantly larger apoptosis population in HeLa cells incubated with P-CyPt (~64.5%) relative to that with CDDP (~5.20%) or Pt^IVNPs (7.33%) (Supplementary Fig. 25), supporting that P-CyPt was efficient in improving cytotoxicity against tumor cells via the successive ALP-mediated in situ self-assembly and GSH-driven disassembly process.

To demonstrate the ability to penetrate and kill deep-seated tumor cells, we further evaluated the cytotoxicity of P-CyPt and Pt^IVNPs against HeLa cells in multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) using propidium iodide (PI) staining. Figure 3k showed that P-CyPt as a small molecule could deeply penetrate MCTS, producing bright NIR FL distributed throughout the MCTS (at a depth of ~200 μm). PI staining revealed a large population of cell death in the MCTS, which coincided with the NIR FL. In contrast, Pt^IVNPs with a large size (~160 nm) showed a much shallower penetration depth in comparison to P-CyPt, and could only kill the superficially located cells (at a depth of only ~50 μm, Supplementary Fig. 26). These results validate the superior penetrability of P-CyPt over pre-formed Pt^IVNPs, which was more efficient to kill deep-seated tumor cells.

FL and PA bimodality imaging-guided therapy of s.c. tumors

After intravenous (i.v.) injection of P-CyPt into subcutaneous (s.c.) HeLa tumor-bearing mice, tumors displayed strong FL at 1 h, which was maintained for over 4 h (Fig. 4a). In contrast, though preformed fluorescent Pt^IVNPs also produced bright tumor FL at 1 h, which declined quickly thereafter; the FL intensity was significantly ~4.9-fold lower than that in P-CyPt-treated tumors at 4 h (Fig. 4c). PA images showed that the tumor PA intensities at 700 and 750 nm both reached the maximum at 2 h post-injection of P-CyPt, significantly ∼3.4-fold and ∼4.3-fold higher than those injected with Pt^IVNPs (Fig. 4b, d). Note that the 750 nm PA signals in P-CyPt-treated tumors nearly decreased to the baseline after 4 h, but the NIR FL and 700 nm PA signals remained strong. These imaging results imply that P-CyPt was majorly converted into Pt^IVNPs in HeLa tumor tissues at 2 h, which then mostly disassembled within tumors after 4 h. Ex vivo FL imaging revealed that P-CyPt-treated tumors hold significantly brighter FL than other main organs at 4 h. The FL intensity in P-CyPt-treated tumor was ~3.2-fold higher than that of Pt^IVNPs-treated tumors (Supplementary Fig. 27), matching that of FL imaging of resected tumor tissue slices (Supplementary Fig. 28). Furthermore, we demonstrated that P-CyPt was also amenable to detect s.c. HeLa tumors with a size of only 3.8 ± 0.8 mm³ in living mice via sensitive NIR FL imaging, suggesting the high potential of P-CyPt to visualize the tumors in vivo in the early stages (Supplementary Fig. 29). HPLC analysis of tumor lysates showed that most P-CyPt was converted to CyPt and Cy-COOH in HeLa tumors at 4 h; the amount of Cy-COOH was significantly ~5-fold and ~23-fold higher than that of CyPt and P-CyPt, respectively (Fig. 4e). ICP-OES analysis of Pt revealed that the ID% g⁻¹ in P-CyPt-treated tumors reached ∼20.3% at 4 h, significantly higher than that in Pt^IVNPs-treated (∼4.7%) or CDDP-treated tumors (~3.6%) (Fig. 4f). Notably, P-CyPt-treated tumors hold the highest ID% g⁻¹ among all the resected organs, different to that in Pt^IVNPs-treated tumor (in liver) or CDDP-treated tumors (in kidneys).

**Fig. 4: NIR FL/PA bimodal imaging and therapy of s.c. HeLa tumors in living mice with P-CyPt.**

We then evaluated the antitumor activity against s.c. HeLa tumors in mice receiving i.v. injection of CDDP, Pt^IVNPs or P-CyPt (Fig. 4g). The tumor growth was significantly prohibited in mice treated with P-CyPt than that treated with PBS, CDDP or Pt^IVNPs (Supplementary Fig. 30). On day 21, no apparent tumor growth was observed in P-CyPt-treated mice, however, the tumor volume significantly grew ~21.2-, ~15.8- and 13.0-fold in PBS-, CDDP- and Pt^IVNPs-treated mice, respectively (Fig. 4h). Accordingly, the average weight of P-CyPt-treated tumors was significantly smaller than the other three groups (Fig. 4i), verifying from the photographs of dissected tumors and immunofluorescence staining of tumor tissue slices (Supplementary Figs. 31 and 32). During the treatment, the body weights were similar between P-CyPt- and PBS-treated mice (Fig. 4j). However, the body weights obviously decreased in CDDP- or Pt^IVNPs-treated mice (Fig. 4j). The subsequent measurement of renal injury-related biomarkers, including blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CRE), showed that the BUN and CRE levels in CDDP-treated mice significantly increased by ~1.6- and ~1.4-fold, which were not obviously upregulated in P-CyPt-treated mice (Fig. 4k, l). Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining of major organs showed no apparent cell death occurred in major organs of P-CyPt-treated mice, while hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity appeared in Pt^IVNPs- and CDDP-treated mice, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 33). These findings demonstrate that (1) Pt^IVNPs and CDDP could cause obvious side toxicity; (2) P-CyPt was efficient in reducing low side toxicity to mice, but eliciting strong therapeutic efficacy against s.c HeLa tumors.

P-CyPt imaging and chemotherapy in orthotopic liver tumors

We further applied P-CyPt for imaging-guided treatment of orthotopic HepG2/Luc liver tumors. Strong NIR fluorescence appeared in the liver of mice implanted with a HepG2/Luc tumor at 1 h post-injection of P-CyPt, which was maintained for over 4 h and matched well with the bioluminescence (BL) imaging region (Fig. 5a). By contrast, mice injected with preformed Pt^IVNPs displayed strong NIR FL throughout the whole liver and gastrointestinal tract at 1 h, which was difficult to pinpoint the tumor locations. Thereafter, the liver FL fast declined, and the FL intensity in the orthotopic liver tumor was significantly ~2.7-fold lower than that in the P-CyPt-treated mice at 4 h (Fig. 5b). These results suggest that P-CyPt could be efficiently activated and produce strong NIR FL to accurately locate the orthotopic liver tumors, which was more efficient than preformed Pt^IVNPs.

**Fig. 5: NIR FL imaging and treatment of orthotopic HepG2/Luc liver tumors in mice with P-CyPt.**

Guided by the imaging results, therapy of orthotopic HepG2/Luc liver tumors with P-CyPt, CDDP, Pt^IVNPs or PBS was conducted (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 34). BL imaging showed that the tumor BL in P-CyPt-treated mice did not obviously increase over the course of treatment, while the BL in PBS-, CDDP- or Pt^IVNPs-treated tumors all markedly increased (Fig. 5d). On day 15, the average BL intensity in PBS-, CDDP- and Pt^IVNPs-treated tumors was significantly ~13.0-, ~10.7- and ~5.7-fold higher than that in P-CyPt-treated tumors, respectively (Fig. 5e). Ex vivo BL imaging affirmed that the tumor size in each P-CyPt-treated mouse was significantly smaller than that in each PBS-, CDDP- or Pt^IVNPs-treated mouse (Fig. 5f). No metastatic tumor foci appeared in the livers of P-CyPt-treated mice, contrary to that in PBS-, CDDP- or Pt^IVNPs-treated mice. After BL imaging, ex vivo FL imaging by spraying P-CyPt on these livers showed bright mCy’s FL that clearly delineated the tumor locations in livers (Fig. 5g). Note that a strong correlation between the tumor FL intensity and BL intensity was achieved in these four groups of livers, showcasing the potential use of P-CyPt for fluorescence-guided surgery of residual liver tumors after chemotherapy^42,43 (Fig. 5h).

Evaluation of pharmacokinetics, metabolism, clearance, and biosafety of P-CyPt

We first examined the pharmacokinetics of P-CyPt, Pt^IVNPs, and CDDP following i.v. injection into mice. It was found that P-CyPt as a hydrophilic small-molecule probe held a similar blood circulation half-life (t_1/2 = 0.54 ± 0.06 h) to CDDP (0.73 ± 0.04 h), which was shorter than Pt^IVNPs (1.65 ± 0.23 h) (Supplementary Fig. 35). Next, HPLC analysis of urine and faeces of P-CyPt-treated mice showed that P-CyPt was majorly observed in the urine (~11.3%), not in the faeces within 0–2 h, while both P-CyPt and Cy-COOH were obviously present in the urine within 2–4 h and 4–8 h (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 5). In the faeces, some P-CyPt (~4.5%) appeared within 2–4 h, but CyPt (~9.7%) and Cy-COOH (~11.1%) predominantly appeared within 4–8 h (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Table 6). In the following 8–12 h, Cy-COOH dominated in both urine and faeces. By contrast, mice injected with Pt^IVNPs showed that CyPt and Cy-COOH were mainly present in the faeces within 2–4 h and 4–8 h (Fig. 6c, d). Quantification of mCy-containing compounds showed that ~44.8% and ~37.0% of injected P-CyPt were respectively excreted via renal and hepatobiliary system over 12 h; however, ~65.9% of Pt^IVNPs were excreted via the hepatobiliary system, much larger than that via the renal system (~22.4%) (Fig. 6e, f and Supplementary Tables 7, 8). ICP-OES analysis revealed that the Pt-containing compounds were mainly cleared to the urine in P-CyPt-treated mice within 0–2 h, and then cleared via both renal and hepatobiliary pathways (Fig. 6g, h), matching that of HPLC analysis. As a comparison, the Pt was excreted majorly via the renal system in CDDP-treated mice, and via the hepatobiliary system in Pt^IVNPs-treated mice. Note that ~69.4% of Pt could be accumulatively cleared from the P-CyPt-treated mice during 12 h, much higher than that in CDDP-treated (~45.3%) or Pt^IVNPs-treated mice (~55.0%) (Supplementary Tables 9 and 10). These results demonstrate that P-CyPt was more efficient in clearing Pt from normal organs compared with free CDDP or preformed Pt^IVNPs, which could be important in mitigating systemic toxicities of CDDP^18,44 (Supplementary Fig. 36).

**Fig. 6: Evaluation of the metabolism, clearance, and biosafety of P-CyPt in vivo.**

Discussion

Selective delivery and control release of drugs in tumor tissues are of prime importance in improving therapeutic efficacy while reducing side-toxicity to patients in clinic⁴⁵. Though many intelligent nanocarriers have been designed to potentiate drug delivery into tumors, the dense extracellular matrix and high interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors have presented significant barriers for nanomedicines^5,46,47,48, which generally resulted in <1% of systemically administrated nanodrugs that could accumulate in tumor tissues²⁵. To augment tumor accumulation of administrated drugs for improving anticancer efficacy, here, we have presented a stimuli-triggered sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly strategy to temporally control delivery and release of anticancer drugs in tumors following systemic administration. Different from previously reported nanomedicines, this strategy markedly enhances tumor accumulation via ALP-triggered in situ self-assembly of a small-molecule prodrug (e.g., P-CyPt), and achieves a burst release of parent drug molecules (e.g., CDDP) via succeeding GSH-driven disassembly of in situ formed NPs, consequently eliciting a strong therapeutic efficacy in mice with s.c. HeLa tumors and orthotopic HepG2 liver tumors. Moreover, this strategy also provides activated NIR FL and PA bimodal imaging signals to enable high sensitivity and spatial-resolution visualization of the tumors as well as real-time monitoring of drug delivery and release in vivo for guiding chemotherapy³⁵.

We have utilized this strategy to design P-CyPt, which holds many advantages to manipulate CDDP delivery for improving treatment efficacy. P-CyPt is a water soluble small-molecule prodrug able to overcome the barriers of solid tumors, ensuring faster extravasation and deeper penetrability into tumor tissues as compared with conventional nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems (e.g., Pt^IVNPs, Fig. 3k). ALP-triggered dephosphorylation and in situ self-assembly of P-CyPt into Pt^IVNPs helps them to adhere on cell membranes (where the ALP locates) and enhance cellular uptake (via clathrin-dependent endocytosis), permitting higher accumulation in the tumor tissues than that of free CDDP or preformed Pt^IVNPs. The intracellular GSH-mediated reduction and disassembly of in situ formed Pt^IVNPs affords a burst release of CDDP intracellularly, which augments CDDP’s concentration (24.60 ± 3.5 fmol/cell, Fig. 3g), enhances delivery into nucleus and mitochondria (Fig. 3h), and concurrently depletes GSH’s levels in tumor cells (Supplementary Table 2), promising to synergize cytotoxicity and overcome drug resistance. P-CyPt is highly specific for tumors as it is activated by a combination of membrane-bound ALP and endogenous GSH, both of which are upregulated in many tumor cells (e.g., HeLa, HepG2)^49,50. It is noteworthy that P-CyPt leverages the enzymatic catalysis of ALP that triggers continuous dephosphorylation and in situ self-assembly of P-CyPt, allowing to trap many activated molecules in tumor tissues (Fig. 4f). Finally, P-CyPt harnesses both renal and hepatobiliary systems to enhance excretion from body (Fig. 6e–h), essential to lower systemic toxicities of CDDP following multiple dosing regimens⁵¹.

In addition to efficiently treat mice with s.c. HeLa and orthotopic HepG2 liver tumors, P-CyPt was also capable of lighting up tumor cells and serially monitoring the accumulation and release of CDDP in tumors via NIR FL and PA bimodality imaging. The tumor FL reached the maximum at 1 h, and persisted for 4 h after i.v. injection of P-CyPt, (Fig. 4a), implying the rapid activation and accumulation of P-CyPt in the tumors. Meanwhile, we observed that the tumors displayed strong dual PA imaging signals (at 700 and 750 nm) at 2 h post-injection of P-CyPt; however, the PA signal at 700 nm remained strong (similar to that of tumor FL) but the PA signal at 750 nm in tumors declined to the baseline at 4 h (Fig. 4b). These dual PA imaging results indicated the formation of Pt^IVNPs in the tumor tissues at 2 h, which then mostly disassembled into Cy-COOH that was resided in the tumors at 4 h, matching that of HPLC analysis (Fig. 4e). P-CyPt with dual PA imaging performance could provide us a powerful tool to noninvasively monitor the in situ self-assembly and disassembly process, which mirrored the delivery and release of CDDP in the tumors. Moreover, P-CyPt was also found capable of producing sensitive NIR FL images to precisely pinpoint the tumor foci by simply spraying it on the livers, which reported efficient inhibition of orthotopic liver tumor growth and metastasis in P-CyPt-treated mice (Fig. 5f). These sensitive and localized NIR FL signals may provide valuable information to monitor therapeutic efficacy and guide liver tumor surgery in clinic. This, in conjunction with noninvasive dual PA imaging and largely improved treatment outcomes, suggests that P-CyPt is highly efficient in improving cancer theranostics by leveraging the stimuli-triggered sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly.

In conclusion, we report a strategy by leveraging extracellular ALP-triggered in situ self-assembly and intracellular GSH-driven disassembly, and demonstrate its utility for the design of a fluorogenic small-molecule cisplatin prodrug (P-CyPt) for cancer theranostics. We have performed a series of experiments to interrogate this sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly process in vitro and in vivo. The ALP-triggered in situ self-assembly and GSH-triggered intracellular disassembly of P-CyPt allows for temporal control of cisplatin delivery and release in tumors, substantially improving antitumor efficacy while mitigating off-target toxicity in mice with orthotopic HepG2 liver tumors. P-CyPt was also highly feasible for the detection of tumor foci and noninvasive monitoring of drug release via synergetic combination of NIR FL and dual PA imaging. This strategy may also be adopted to the construction of other stimuli-responsive small-molecule theranostic probes capable of improving imaging and treatment of cancer and other malignant diseases^11,52.

Methods

Synthesis and characterization of probes

Detailed procedures for the synthesis of P-CyPt, CyPt, and Cy-COOH were described in the Supplementary Methods (Supplementary Figs. 37–39). After purification by semi-prepared HPLC (Supplementary Tables 11–13), their chemical structures were characterized by NMR and mass spectroscopy (Supplementary Figs. 40–65).

Evaluation of the self-assembly and disassembly processes in solutions

To evaluate the ALP-triggered dephosphorylation and in situ self-assembly process, a solution of P-CyPt (10 μM) in Tris buffer (1 mL) was incubated with ALP (100 U/L) at 37 °C. HPLC, DLS, and TEM analyses were performed at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min. To evaluate the GSH-triggered reduction and disassembly process, P-CyPt (10 μM) in Tris buffer (1 mL) was first incubated with ALP (100 U/L) at 37 °C for 30 min to allow the formation of Pt^IVNPs. The solution was then treated with 10 mM GSH at 37 °C, which was monitored by HPLC, DLS, and TEM at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min.

Monitoring of the NIR FL and PA imaging signals in solutions

To monitor the NIR FL and PA imaging signals of P-CyPt in response to ALP, P-CyPt (10 μM) in Tris buffer (1 mL) was incubated with ALP (100 U/L) at 37 °C for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min. To monitor the NIR FL and PA imaging signals of Pt^IVNPs in response to GSH, P-CyPt (10 μM) in Tris buffer (1 mL) was first incubated with ALP (100 U/L) at 37 °C for 30 min and then incubated with 10 mM GSH at 37 °C for another 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min. The NIR FL spectra of these solutions at each time point were acquired on a HORIBA Jobin Yvon Fluoromax-4 fluorescence spectrometer, with excitation at 680 nm. For PA imaging, the incubation solutions at each time point were loaded into a fine bore polythene tube (0.86 mm OD, 1.27 mm OD). The tubes were then sealed and immersed in water. The PA images at both 700 and 750 nm were acquired on the Vevo 2100 LAZR system (FUJIFILM VisualSonics).

Cell culture

Human cervical cancer HeLa cells, human liver hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells and human embryonic kidney HEK293T cells were obtained from Stem Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All cells were cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) medium, and routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination. The mediums were supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units /mL penicillin, and 100 units/mL streptomycin. All cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO₂).

NIR FL and PA bimodality imaging of cell pellets

To examine the ability for NIR FL and PA bimodality imaging of ALP activity in cells, HeLa or HEK29T cells were seeded in 10-cm dishes at a density of 4 × 10⁶ cells/well and allowed to grow overnight. Then, P-CyPt (10 μM) or Pt^IVNPs (10 μM) in FBS free DMEM (4 mL) was added into wells and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. To inhibit the ALP activity, cells were pretreated with ALP inhibitor Na₃VO₄ (10 mM) for 20 min, and then incubated with P-CyPt (10 μM) for another 30 min. To examine NIR FL and PA bimodality imaging of intracellular GSH-triggered disassembly process, P-CyPt (10 μM) in FBS free DMEM (4 mL) was added into HeLa cells, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, the medium was removed and the cells were incubated in refreshed DMEM medium (10% FBS) for another 3 h. Then, the mediums of above mentioned cells were removed, and the cells were washed with PBS (1 mL) once. Trypsin (1 mL) was added to detach the cells, and the cell pellets were then collected after centrifugation at 161 × g for 4 min. The NIR FL images (λ_ex/em = 670/750 ± 50) of the cell pellets were acquired on the IVIS Lumina XR III system (PerkinElmer), and the PA images of the cell pellets at both 700 and 750 nm were acquired on the Vevo 2100 LAZR system (FUJIFILM VisualSonics).

Evaluation of cytotoxicity

HeLa cells were seeded on flat-bottomed 96-well plates (5000 cells per well) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Varying concentrations of P-CyPt, Pt^IVNPs or CDDP (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, and 200 μM) in DMEM medium (100 μL) were added. Cells were either incubated for 48 h, or firstly incubated with these three compounds for 2 h, washed with PBS and then incubated with refreshed blank DMEM medium for another 48 h. Then, 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)−3,5-di-phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT, 50 μL, 1 mg /mL in PBS) was added into each well. The cells were kept at 37 °C for 4 h, and the solution in each well was carefully removed, followed by addition of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 150 μL). The absorbance (OD) at 490 nm in each well was acquired on the microplate reader (Tcan). The absorbance of non-treated blank cells (OD control) was used as the control. The percentage of cell viability was calculated by dividing OD to the OD control.

Animals and tumor models

The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Nanjing University (Approval No: IACUC-2107004), and carried out under the guidelines of the IACUC of Nanjing University. BALB/c female nude mice at 5–6 weeks old and 6–8 weeks old were purchased from the Model Animal Research Center (MARC) of Nanjing University (Nanjing, China), and were grouped and housed under a 12 h light-dark cycle, 50–70% humidity, and at 18–22 °C ambient temperature, with free access to water and food. To establish subcutaneous (s.c.) HeLa tumors, 2 × 10⁶ HeLa cells suspended in 100 μL of 33 v/v% mixture of matrigel and DMEM were injected s.c. into the selected positions of nude mice (5–6 weeks’ old). The tumors were allowed to grow for around 10 days to reach the size of around 100 mm³, which were used for FL and PA imaging. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, the tumors were allowed to grow for around 7 days to reach the size of around 70~80 mm³. To establish the orthotropic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors, nude mice under anesthesia (by pentobarbital sodium) were performed with a midline incision on the anterior abdominal wall, and 2 × 10⁶ luciferase-transfected HepG2 (Luc/HepG2) cells suspended in 100 μL Matrigel and DMEM (33 v/v%) were directly injected into the left lobe of the liver. The growth of the orthotopic HepG2 tumors in mice was monitored by bioluminescence imaging (BLI). After 10 days, the orthotropic liver tumors were successfully established.

NIR FL and PA bimodality imaging of tumors in vivo

For NIR FL imaging in vivo, mice with s.c. HeLa tumors or orthotopic Luc/HepG2 liver tumors were i.v. injected with P-CyPt or Pt^IVNPs (100 μM, in 200 μL saline). Whole body FL images of mice prior to (pre) and at 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h post injection of P-CyPt or Pt^IVNPs were acquired on the IVIS Lumina XR III imaging system, using a 660 nm excitation filter and a 750 ± 50 nm emission filter. Each experiment was conducted in three mice. The FL intensities were quantified by the region of interest (ROI) measurement using Living Image Software (4.5.2, PerkinElmer, MA, U.S.A). For PA imaging, mice with s.c. HeLa tumors were i.v. injected with P-CyPt or Pt^IVNPs (500 μM, in 200 μL saline). The PA images of the s.c. HeLa tumors in mice prior to (pre), and at 1, 2, 4 h post injection were captured on the Vevo 2100 LAZR system (FUJIFILM VisualSonics), with excitation at 700 and 750 nm. The PA intensities were quantified by the equipped software.

Chemotherapy of s.c. HeLa tumors in vivo

Sixteen mice with s.c. HeLa tumor at a size of 70–80 mm³ were randomly divided into four groups, which were received i.v. injection of PBS (200 μL, Group 1), CDDP (Group 2), Pt^IVNPs (Group 3), and P-CyPt (Group 4), respectively. The dose of Pt drug for each injection was 2.25 mg kg⁻¹ Pt), and the treatment was performed on day 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12, with a total of 5 injections. The tumor volumes and body weights of mice were measured every three days, and lasted for 21 days. On day 21, all the mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were excised and photographed. Each experiment was conducted in four mice.

Chemotherapy of orthotopic liver tumors

Sixteen mice with orthotopic Luc/HepG2 tumors were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1 (PBS only), Group 2 (CDDP), Group 3 (Pt^IVNPs), and Group 4 (P-CyPt). PBS (200 μL) or each Pt drug (2.25 mg kg⁻¹ Pt) was i.v. injected into mice on day 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12, with a total of 5 injections. To monitor the therapeutic effect, mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with _D-luciferin (150 mg/kg), and after 10 min, the whole body BL images of mice (face-up) were acquired on the IVIS Lumina XR III system using BL imaging mode (Open). The BL imaging was repeated every 3 days and lasted for 15 days. The BL intensities were quantified by the ROI measurement in the liver region using the Living Image Software (4.5.2, PerkinElmer, MA, U.S.A). During the treatment, the body weights of mice were also measured every three days. On day 15, all mice were sacrificed, the whole liver were excised and photographed. Then, P-CyPt (10 μM) and _D-luciferin (5 mM) were sprayed on the surface of each liver to performed ex vivo BL and NIR FL imaging. The BL images were acquired at 10 min using the BL imaging mode (Open), and the NIR FL images were acquired at 30 min, using a 660 nm excitation filter and a 750 ± 50 nm emission filter. The average BL and FL intensities were quantified by the ROIs measurement in the tumor region of liver using the Living Image Software (4.5.2, PerkinElmer, MA, U.S.A). Each experiment was conducted in four mice.

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons between two groups were performed by two-sided Student’s t-test, and analyzed on Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA). Results are present as mean ± s.d. and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the main text and its Supplementary Information file. Source data is provided as Source Data file. Data is also available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Capito, R. M., Azevedo, H. S., Velichko, Y. S., Mata, A. & Stupp, S. I. Self-assembly of large and small molecules into hierarchically ordered sacs and membranes. Science 319, 1812–1816 (2008).
Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Jenkyn-Bedford, M. et al. A conserved mechanism for regulating replisome disassembly in eukaryotes. Nature 600, 743–747 (2021).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baker, R. W. & Hughson, F. M. Chaperoning snare assembly and disassembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 465–479 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Levin, A. et al. Biomimetic peptide self-assembly for functional materials. Nat. Rev. Chem. 4, 615–634 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mura, S., Nicolas, J. & Couvreur, P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat. Mater. 12, 991–1003 (2013).
Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Shen, H. et al. De novo design of self-assembling helical protein filaments. Science 362, 705–709 (2018).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liang, G., Ren, H. & Rao, J. A biocompatible condensation reaction for controlled assembly of nanostructures in living cells. Nat. Chem. 2, 54–60 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He, H. et al. Enzymatic noncovalent synthesis. Chem. Rev. 120, 9994–10078 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. et al. Furin-mediated intracellular self-assembly of olsalazine nanoparticles for enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and tumour therapy. Nat. Mater. 18, 1376–1383 (2019).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ye, D. et al. Bioorthogonal cyclization-mediated in situ self-assembly of small-molecule probes for imaging caspase activity in vivo. Nat. Chem. 6, 519–526 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
An, H.-W. et al. A tumour-selective cascade activatable self-detained system for drug delivery and cancer imaging. Nat. Commun. 10, 4861 (2019).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yan, R. et al. Activatable NIR fluorescence/MRI bimodal probes for in vivo imaging by enzyme-mediated fluorogenic reaction and self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10331–10341 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, H. et al. In situ monitoring of molecular aggregation using circular dichroism. Nat. Commun. 9, 4961 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. et al. Intracellular Self-assembly and disassembly of ¹⁹F nanoparticles confer respective “off” and “on” ¹⁹F NMR/MRI signals for legumain activity detection in zebrafish. ACS Nano 9, 5117–5124 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Feng, Z., Wang, H., Zhou, R., Li, J. & Xu, B. Enzyme-instructed assembly and disassembly processes for targeting downregulation in cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3950–3953 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, M., Li, B., Fan, Y. & Zhang, F. In vivo assembly and disassembly of probes to improve near-infrared optical bioimaging. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1801650 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Meng, J. et al. A multistage assembly/disassembly strategy for tumor-targeted CO delivery. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba1362 (2020).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kelland, L. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 573–584 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rottenberg, S., Disler, C. & Perego, P. The rediscovery of platinum-based cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 37–50 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Johnstone, T. C., Suntharalingam, K. & Lippard, S. J. The next generation of platinum drugs: targeted Pt(II) agents, nanoparticle delivery, and Pt(IV) prodrugs. Chem. Rev. 116, 3436–3486 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, X., Wang, X., Jin, S., Muhammad, N. & Guo, Z. Stimuli-responsive therapeutic metallodrugs. Chem. Rev. 119, 1138–1192 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cao, Q. et al. CAIX platins: highly potent platinum(IV) prodrugs selective against carbonic anhydrase IX for the treatment of hypoxic tumors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 18556–18562 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Nanoparticle-mediated convection-enhanced delivery of a DNA intercalator to gliomas circumvents temozolomide resistance. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1048–1058 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. In situ supramolecular self-assembly of Pt(IV) prodrug to conquer cisplatin resistance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2101826 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wilhelm, S. et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16014 (2016).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Zeng, Z., Liew, S. S., Wei, X. & Pu, K. Hemicyanine-based near-infrared activatable probes for imaging and diagnosis of diseases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 26454–26475 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Activity-based NIR fluorescent probes based on the versatile hemicyanine scaffold: design strategy, biomedical applications, and outlook. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 1795–1835 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, D. et al. Tandem molecular self-assembly selectively inhibits lung cancer cells by inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Research 2019, 4803624 (2019).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wan, X. et al. Drug combination synergy in worm-like polymeric micelles improves treatment outcome for small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. ACS Nano 12, 2426–2439 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Xu, Z. & Zhu, G. A platinum(IV) anticancer prodrug targeting nucleotide excision repair to overcome cisplatin resistance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 15564–15568 (2016).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Reches, M. & Gazit, E. Casting metal nanowires within discrete self-assembled peptide nanotubes. Science 300, 625–627 (2003).
Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, Y. et al. Enzyme-mediated in situ self-assembly promotes in vivo bioorthogonal reaction for pretargeted multimodality imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 18082–18093 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhan, J., Cai, Y., He, S., Wang, L. & Yang, Z. Tandem molecular self-assembly in liver cancer cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 1813–1816 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhu, Z. et al. Glutathione boosting the cytotoxicity of a magnetic platinum(IV) nano-prodrug in tumor cells. Chem. Sci. 7, 2864–2869 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lucero, M. Y. & Chan, J. Photoacoustic imaging of elevated glutathione in models of lung cancer for companion diagnostic applications. Nat. Chem. 13, 1248–1256 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Umezawa, K., Yoshida, M., Kamiya, M., Yamasoba, T. & Urano, Y. Rational design of reversible fluorescent probes for live-cell imaging and quantification of fast glutathione dynamics. Nat. Chem. 9, 279–286 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Du, X., Yamagata, N. & Xu, B. Enzyme-instructed self-assembly of small _D-peptides as a multiple-step process for selectively killing cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3813–3823 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cohn, S. A., Ingold, A. L. & Scholey, J. M. Correlation between the ATPase and microtubule translocating activities of sea urchin egg kinesin. Nature 328, 160–163 (1987).
Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Shi, J., Yuan, D. & Xu, B. Imaging enzyme-triggered self-assembly of small molecules inside live cells. Nat. Commun. 3, 1033 (2012).
Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Xue, X. et al. Photoactivated lysosomal escape of a monofunctional Pt(II) complex pt-bdpa for nucleus access. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 12661–12666 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Deng, Z. et al. A photocaged, water-oxidizing, and nucleolus-targeted Pt(IV) complex with a distinct anticancer mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7803–7812 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, J., Li, J., Lyu, Y., Miao, Q. & Pu, K. Molecular optical imaging probes for early diagnosis of drug-induced acute kidney injury. Nat. Mater. 18, 1133–1143 (2019).
Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Zeng, Z. & Pu, K. Activatable molecular probes for fluorescence-guided surgery, endoscopy and tissue biopsy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 566–593 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marsh, S. et al. Pharmacogenetic assessment of toxicity and outcome after platinum plus taxane chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: the scottish randomised trial in ovarian cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 4528–4535 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Manzari, M. T. et al. Targeted drug delivery strategies for precision medicines. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 351–370 (2021).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 20–37 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lim, E.-K. et al. Nanomaterials for theranostics: recent advances and future challenges. Chem. Rev. 115, 327–394 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
El-Sawy, H. S., Al-Abd, A. M., Ahmed, T. A., El-Say, K. M. & Torchilin, V. P. Stimuli-responsive nano-architecture drug-delivery systems to solid tumor micromilieu: past, present, and future perspectives. ACS Nano 12, 10636–10664 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, Z. et al. Cell environment-differentiated self-assembly of nanofibers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11128–11131 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Robby, A. I., Lee, G., Lee, K. D., Jang, Y. C. & Park, S. Y. GSH-responsive self-healable conductive hydrogel of highly sensitive strain-pressure sensor for cancer cell detection. Nano Today 39, 101178 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Elia, I. & Haigis, M. C. Metabolites and the tumour microenvironment: from cellular mechanisms to systemic metabolism. Nat. Metab. 3, 21–32 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ren, H. et al. A bioactivated in vivo assembly nanotechnology fabricated NIR probe for small pancreatic tumor intraoperative imaging. Nat. Commun. 13, 418 (2022).
Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA0910003 (D.Y.), 2020YFA0713801 (D.Y.)), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22137003 (D.Y.), 22293051 (Z.G.), 21632008 (H.L.)), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20202004 (Z.G.)), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (020514380251 (D.Y.)) and Excellent Research Program of Nanjing University (ZYJH004 (D.Y.)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Road, Nanjing, 210023, China
Xidan Wen, Yuxuan Hu, Luyan Wu, He Bai, Ruibing An, Jianhui Weng & Deju Ye
State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 555 Zu Chong Zhi Road, Shanghai, 201203, China
Rui Zhang & Hong Liu
State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Road, Nanjing, 210023, China
Dongfan Song, Shuren Zhang, Rong Wang & Zijian Guo
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environment, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Road, Nanjing, 210023, China
Yanfeng Wang & Guandao Gao
NHC Key Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Wuxi, 214063, China
Ling Qiu & Jianguo Lin

Authors

Xidan Wen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rui Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuxuan Hu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Luyan Wu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
He Bai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dongfan Song
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yanfeng Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ruibing An
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jianhui Weng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shuren Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rong Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ling Qiu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jianguo Lin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guandao Gao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hong Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zijian Guo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Deju Ye
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.Y., H.L., Z.G., and X.W. conceived the research plan. X.W., R.Z., and Y.H. synthesized the probes. L.W. established the orthotopic liver tumor model. H.B. performed TEM analysis. D.S. and S.Z. acquired ¹⁹⁵Pt-NMR spectra. Y.W. and G.G. performed ICP-OES analysis. R.A. and J.W. performed flow cytometric and in vivo metabolism experiments. R.W. performed the dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulation. L.Q. and J.L. performed the molecular simulation. X.W., Z.G., H.L., and D.Y. analyzed the data. X.W., H.L., Z.G., and D.Y. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hong Liu, Zijian Guo or Deju Ye.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Dongfang Zhou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, X., Zhang, R., Hu, Y. et al. Controlled sequential in situ self-assembly and disassembly of a fluorogenic cisplatin prodrug for cancer theranostics. Nat Commun 14, 800 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36469-1

Download citation

Received: 31 May 2022
Accepted: 02 February 2023
Published: 13 February 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36469-1

This article is cited by

Artificial urinary biomarker probes for diagnosis
- Cheng Xu
- Kanyi Pu
Nature Reviews Bioengineering (2024)
In situ self-assembly for cancer therapy and imaging
- Jaewon Kim
- Sungkyu Lee
- Jong Seung Kim
Nature Reviews Materials (2023)
Nitrate attenuates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by promotion of mitophagy and reduction of oxidative stress
- Haibo Wang
- Chunyan Song
- Wenbin Li
Current Medicine (2023)
Recent Advances in Multifunctional Reticular Framework Nanoparticles: A Paradigm Shift in Materials Science Road to a Structured Future
- Maryam Chafiq
- Abdelkarim Chaouiki
- Young Gun Ko
Nano-Micro Letters (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.