Abstract
A substantial proportion of cancer patients do not benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) due to the emergence of drug resistance. Here, we apply elemental imaging to the mapping of CT biodistribution after therapy in residual colorectal cancer and achieve a comprehensive analysis of the genetic program induced by oxaliplatin-based CT in the tumor microenvironment. We show that oxaliplatin is largely retained by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) long time after the treatment ceased. We determine that CT accumulation in CAFs intensifies TGF-beta activity, leading to the production of multiple factors enhancing cancer aggressiveness. We establish periostin as a stromal marker of chemotherapeutic activity intrinsically upregulated in consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) tumors and highly expressed before and/or after treatment in patients unresponsive to therapy. Collectively, our study underscores the ability of CT-retaining CAFs to support cancer progression and resistance to treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
More than four decades after their first approval, platinum drugs still stand among the most widely utilized anti-cancer agents1. Nowadays, almost 50% of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (CT) are indeed treated with systemic platinum-based regimen1,2. Notwithstanding platinum drugs’ effectiveness in eradicating cancer cells by means of adducts and crosslinks accumulation in the DNA, a large number of tumors are able to bypass the cytotoxic effect of platinum through primary or acquired resistance1. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the improvement in survival provided by oxaliplatin-based regimens is estimated to be no more than 20% in stage III and less than 5% in stage II localized cancer patients3,4. Similarly, metastatic CRC patients that are initially responding to therapy often experience disease progression due to the emergence of acquired drug-resistance5.
For these reasons, elucidating the determinants of platinum-based treatment effectiveness is paramount to improve the standard of care for cancer patients. Much effort has been made to decipher the mechanisms of platinum resistance intrinsic to epithelial cancer cells1,6 and multiple molecular classifications were developed in the recent years, enabling the identification of CRC subtypes associated with worse patient’s outcome7,8,9,10 and lack of benefit from CT, including oxaliplatin10,11. Initially, there was no apparent molecular consensus between the poor prognostic subtypes of CRC, which were either enriched in Wnt signaling and markers associated with cancer stem cells (Stem-like)7, in serrated tumors (CCS3)9, or in mesenchymal tumors with deficient mismatch repair machinery (C-type)10. In an effort to integrate the previously published classification algorithms, Guinney and colleagues defined four Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) of CRC, namely CMS1 (MSI immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic) and CMS4 (mesenchymal), from which CMS4 tumors showed the worse clinical outcome8. However, these classification systems and advances in the genetics of cancer have not yet translated into efficient treatment synergizing with platinum drugs and failed so far to provide biomarkers of therapeutic response12,13.
Importantly, cancer cells do not exist as isolated entities, but rather reside in an interactive tumor microenvironment (TME) composed of non-malignant cells that largely contributes to cancer progression. For instance, the activation of the TGF-beta pathway in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) populating the TME is considered as a hallmark of worse prognosis for CRC patients whereas low stromal TGF-beta activity associates with increased disease-free survival14. In this line, growing evidence indicates that systemic CT affects non-malignant cells in the TME of cancers from distinct origin15,16. However, the mechanisms through which CT regulates stromal functions and to what extent these processes influence cancer progression as well as patient’s susceptibility to treatment remain unclear.
In this work, we assess the presence of oxaliplatin in residual tumors after treatment and investigate the impact of platinum-based therapy on stroma-originating pro-oncogenic signaling. Surprisingly, we observe that significant amount of oxaliplatin is retained by the TME long time after CRC patient treatment. We functionally dissect the influence of platinum-stimulated TME on cancer progression and demonstrate that the accumulation of platinum in CAFs participates to the acquisition of stromal cues that associate with increased cancer aggressiveness and resistance to treatment.
Results
Platinum-based drug accumulates in fibroblasts resilient to treatment
We first aimed to investigate the immediate impact of CT on the TME. For this, we used a model of aggressive CRC grown from mouse tumor organoids (MTO) carrying compound genetic alterations (Apc, Kras, Trp53, Tgfbr2) injected into the caecum wall of immunocompetent C57BL/6J mice (see “Methods”)17. Mice were administered with oxaliplatin 96 and 24 h before tumor resection (see “Methods”). Bioluminescence tracking in vivo showed a reduction of cancer cells abundance upon treatment (Fig. 1a). Following resection, tumor samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess α-SMA (+) CAFs, CD31 (+) endothelial and CD45 (+) immune cells abundance. We observed a significant reduction of blood vessels density and immune cells infiltration following therapy (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). On the other hand, CAFs abundance remained unchanged (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a) therefore suggesting that in contrast to cancer, endothelial and immune cells, CAFs are highly resistant to oxaliplatin. We next assessed oxaliplatin cytotoxicity against cultured colonic fibroblasts (CCD-18Co), CAFs derived from CRC patients (CAF1, CAF2, CAF3), immune cells (PBMC), endothelial cells (HUVEC), CRC cell line (HT29-M6) and patient-derived CRC organoids (PDO, PDO2). In accordance with in vivo findings, we observed that CRC (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1b), immune (Supplementary Fig. 1c) and endothelial cells (Supplementary Fig. 1d) were highly sensitive to oxaliplatin compared to fibroblasts (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1e). In order to determine the tumor cells response to CT over time, we treated cultured CCD-18Co, CAF1 and CAF2 as well as HT29-M6 cells, PDO and PDO2 with oxaliplatin for 12 days. Cancer cells did not survive to 9 days of treatment (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1f). In contrast, about 50–80% of fibroblasts resisted to up to 12 days CT (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1f). Yet, ICP-MS analysis indicated an increased oxaliplatin absorption in cultured fibroblasts compared to CRC cells (Fig. 1d). Interestingly, traces of platinum were still detectable in fibroblasts long after oxaliplatin retrieval (Fig. 1d).
Prompted by these findings, we sought explore the patterns of platinum drug biodistribution in tumors from CRC patients. To this end, we applied laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) to the detection of oxaliplatin in samples from patients with advanced CRC. Tumor tissues were obtained from surgical resection achieved few days and up to 2.5 years after CT (see “Methods”). Histological analysis by expert pathologists and LA-ICP-MS bioimaging on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin revealed that oxaliplatin was predominantly retained in tumor areas enriched with fibroblasts (Fig. 1e, f and Supplementary Fig. 2a). Accordingly, IHC analysis indicated that the expression of FAP—a marker of CAFs—overlapped with tumor areas displaying increased platinum uptake (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Of note, oxaliplatin uptake remained measurable at least 845 days after the last cycle of therapy (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 1a).
Collectively, our data argue that in contrast to any other cell subtype present in the tumor, fibroblasts—the most prominent cell type within the TME18,19—display great resistance to oxaliplatin cytotoxicity and are particularly prone to absorb and retain platinum-based drug. These results also suggest that endothelial and immune cells present at the time of CT are cleared from the tumor, being eventually replaced over time by cells recruited after the treatment ceased. Therefore, our findings indicate that long-term platinum retention after CT occurs in the TME of CRC patients and suggest that this process is largely dependent on resilient CAFs present at the time of treatment.
Platinum-stimulated fibroblasts promote CRC progression
We sought to functionally dissect the effect of oxaliplatin-retaining fibroblasts on cancer progression. To this end, HT29-M6 cells were inoculated into nude mice together with CCD-18Co that had been previously treated in vitro with oxaliplatin. Cells were transplanted subcutaneously in quantities that generated suboptimal engraftment in control conditions. In contrast to the non-treated ones, oxaliplatin-preactivated fibroblasts significantly reduced disease latency and increased the engraftment of cancer cells in recipient mice (Fig. 2a). After initiation, tumor growth followed a similar trend in both conditions (Supplementary Fig. 3a), suggesting that pre-treated fibroblasts co-injected with CRC cells promote tumor initiation rather than tumor expansion. This result may also be explained by the transitory impact of co-injected fibroblasts on the tumor development. Indeed, mouse stroma is actively recruited during tumor expansion and CAFs of murine origin are replacing co-injected fibroblasts over time14. Next, we administrated the conditioned media (CM; see “Methods”) obtained from oxaliplatin-stimulated CCD-18Co to cultured HT29-M6 cells that were then treated with oxaliplatin. We realized that pre-treated CCD-18Co CM significantly enhanced cancer cells resistance to platinum-based therapy (Fig. 2b). Conversely, CM derived from pre-treated cancer, endothelial or immune cells failed to protect target CRC cells from CT (Supplementary Fig. 3b).
These findings led us to investigate whether the gene program induced by platinum absorption in fibroblasts may be enriched with markers inherently associated with disease aggressiveness in CRC patients. For this, we used as surrogate the set of genes identified by transcriptomic analysis in CCD-18Co activated by oxaliplatin (aFib-RS; activated fibroblasts response signature; see “Methods” and Supplementary Data 1). We applied gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to the study of aFib-RS in CRC cells and CAFs purified from patient tumors (GSE39396)14. GSEA indicated that aFib-RS was enriched in CAFs compared to cancer cells, thus suggesting that genes in the aFib-RS are preferentially expressed by CAFs (Supplementary Fig. 3c). In order to decouple the confounding effect of the CAFs hallmarks, we identified the CAF-specific and CAF non-specific aFib-RS probe sets (FAP (+) aFib-RS and FAP (−) aFib-RS respectively) in FAP (+) CAFs compared to CD31 (+), CD45 (+) or EpCAM (+) cell subtypes (GSE39396; FC > 1; p < 0.05; FDR < 0.01; Supplementary Data 1). We tested the predictive value of each probe set in two representative cohorts of 177 (GSE17536) and 519 CRCs (GSE39582) for which transcriptomic profiles and clinical history were publicly available20,21. High aFib-RS was an independent predictor of worse outcome in both cohorts (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Table 1a). Similar results were obtained with FAP (+) and FAP (−) aFib-RS (Supplementary Table 1b). We realized that aFib-RS levels were distinctly upregulated in CMS4 tumors (Fig. 2e), a CRC subtype characterized by abundant stroma8. In order to test their prognosis value in tumors with high stromal content, we further analyzed our signatures in the CMS4 population from GSE39582 (n = 121; see “Methods”). Remarkably, high expression of the full aFIB-RS but also of FAP (+) and FAP (−) aFib-RS subsets robustly predicted poor outcome in this particular subtype (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Table 1b), thus indicating the superior predictive power of aFib-RS over CMS.
We wondered whether aFib-RS levels may identify as well patients unresponsive to treatment. To address this question, we selected transcriptomic data from two subsets of advanced CRC patients that had received adjuvant platinum-based CT (FOLFOX) after intended curative surgery either annotated for response to therapy status (GSE72970; 32 stage III–IV patients) or disease relapse (GSE14333; 51 stage III patients)22,23. GSEA showed that the levels of aFib-RS, FAP (+) aFib-RS and FAP (−) aFib-RS were significantly upregulated in tumors from patients unresponsive (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Table 1c) or relapsing after CT (Fig. 2h and Supplementary Table 1c). While not reaching statistical significance, an upregulation trend of aFib-RS did also associate with resistance to CT in the limited (n = 10) CMS4 population identified in GSE14333 (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Altogether, these data indicate an association between the gene program activated in fibroblasts upon oxaliplatin treatment and the lack of benefit from CT.
Stromal platinum accumulation induces an autocrine activation of the TGF-beta pathway
We next sought to achieve a comprehensive analysis of the molecular pathways activated by oxaliplatin in resilient fibroblasts. To do so, we used as surrogates ∼220 gene sets representing biological states, processes and cellular pathways dysregulated in cancer, either available publically or generated by manual curation24. We determined by GSEA that hallmarks of P53 pathway, DNA repair and cellular apoptosis were among the top signatures enriched upon treatment in cultured fibroblasts, therefore underscoring the cytotoxic stress imposed by oxaliplatin to these cells (Supplementary Table 2a). However, GSEA also revealed a robust upregulation of genes associated with senescence (SenRS; Senescence response signature) and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP-S; SASP signature) (Fig. 3a). Corroborating these data, fibroblasts displayed high mRNA levels of senescence and SASP markers—CDKN1A25, CDKN2A25, IL1B26, CXCL826, GDF1527 (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 4a) as well as increased senescence‐associated β-galactosidase activity following treatment with oxaliplatin (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 4b). Of note, we observed that CAFs are intrinsically enriched in SASP-S compared to CRC cells (Supplementary Table 2b). Yet, we realized that while given senescence markers are more abundantly expressed by CAFs (CXCL8, CDKN1A), others (IL1B, GDF15, CDKN2A) are either enriched in CRC cells or equally expressed by both cell subtypes (Supplementary Fig. 4c). As for aFib-RS, we identified FAP (+) and FAP (−) SASP-S probe sets (Supplementary Data 1) and tested their capacity to segregate relapsing and non-relapsing patients as well as patients responsive and unresponsive to CT. FAP (+) SASP-S failed to identify disease recurrence in the CMS4 subset (Supplementary Table 2c) and relapsing patients after therapy (Supplementary Table 2d). Yet, SASP-S and FAP (−) SASP-S were upregulated in relapsing and unresponsive patients in all cases (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Table 2c, d).
Given the above findings, we hypothesized that the pro-tumorigenic support provided by platinum-stimulated fibroblasts may depend on secreted factors related to SASP. In this line, the analysis of paired tumor tissue samples obtained from CRC patients before and after CT (see “Methods”) revealed that the mRNA expression of TGF-beta 1, a SASP factor28,29,30 associated with stromal activation and progression to metastasis in CRC14, was significantly increased after CT (Fig. 3e). We observed that TGFB1 upregulation over time was also detected in cultured fibroblasts following oxaliplatin treatment (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Fig. 4d). In contrast, this increase was not apparent in any other tumor cell subtype upon treatment (Supplementary Fig. 4e). The levels of both TGFB1 and the gene expression program activated by TGF-beta 1 in colon fibroblasts (Fib-TBRS; see “Methods”) were robustly correlated with aFib-RS in patients’ tumors (Fig. 3g), therefore indicating that these processes are concurrently modulated in CRC. Correspondingly, the Fib-TBRS was significantly enriched in oxaliplatin-treated CCD-18Co (Fig. 3h). We further explored TGF-beta pathway activation by IHC in MTO-injected mice using P-SMAD3 as a surrogate marker of TGF-beta activity14. Of note and similar to a significant proportion of aggressive CRCs, MTOs are unresponsive to TGF-beta due to compound mutation in the TGF-beta receptor 2 (Tgfbr2). We observed that P-SMAD3 was increased upon oxaliplatin treatment in the TME of MTO-injected mice (Supplementary Fig. 4f, g). Corroborating this data, CCD-18Co displayed increased levels of P-SMAD3 upon oxaliplatin administration (Supplementary Fig. 4h). We next used Fib-TBRS levels as an indicator of TGF-beta activity in patients and explored its association with clinical outcome. In contrast to aFib-RS, high Fib-TBRS expression failed to segregate relapsing patients in the CMS4 CRC subtype (Supplementary Table 2c), yet elevated expression of Fib-TBRS and FAP (+) or (−) Fib-TBRS subsets were associated with an increased risk of relapse in the overall CRC population (Supplementary Table 2c). With the exception of the FAP (+) subset in GSE72970, Fib-TBRS and FAP (+) or (−) Fib-TBRS were also dramatically upregulated in tumors unresponsive to CT (Fig. 3i and Supplementary Table 2d).
Collectively, these data indicate that the cellular stress imposed by long-lasting accumulation of platinum to CRC-associated fibroblasts may influence disease progression and response to therapy by increasing TGF-beta activity in the TME.
Platinum drug induces a pro-oncogenic secretory phenotype in CRC fibroblasts
IHC analyses in tumors from MTOs-injected mice showed increased P-STAT3 nuclear staining after therapy (Supplementary Fig. 5a), indicating the activation of STAT3 signaling upon treatment. Remarkably, the expression of interleukin 11 (IL11), one of the activators of STAT3 phosphorylation31 previously reported as a downstream effector of the TGF-beta pathway involved in cancer progression14, was significantly correlated with aFib-RS levels in CRC patients (Fig. 4a). In line with this, IL11 expression was upregulated in CCD-18Co (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 5b), CAF1 and CAF2 (Fig. 4c) upon oxaliplatin administration. IL11 upregulation was maintained over time after treatment (Fig. 4d) and reduced upon administration of TGF-beta pathway inhibitor (Fig. 4e). In addition and similar to aFib-RS, high IL11 mRNA expression was an independent predictor of poor prognosis in the two analyzed patient cohorts (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 5c, d). Accordingly, IL11 levels were distinctly upregulated in CMS4 tumors (Fig. 4g). As for aFib-RS, the increased expression of IL11 robustly segregated relapsing patients in this particular subset (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 5d).
In order to assess the relevance of IL11 pathway activation in patients treated with CT, we used as surrogate a signature of response to IL11 in CRC cells (CRC-IL11RS)14. We observed that CRC-IL11RS was robustly upregulated in patients either unresponsive to therapy (Supplementary Fig. 5e) or relapsing after treatment (Fig. 4i). We thus investigated whether increased intratumoral levels of IL11 may enhance tumor initiation in CRC. To this end, we inoculated nude mice subcutaneously with epithelial CRC cells (HT29-M6) engineered to autonomously produce IL11 (CRC-IL11). Forced secretion of IL11 drastically increased the frequency of tumor formation and reduced the disease latency period (Fig. 4j).
We next explored the relation between stromal TGF-beta pathway activation and IL11 activity in epithelial CRC cells during cancer progression. To this end, we engineered HT29-M6 cells simultaneously knocked down for IL11 receptor subunit alpha (IL11RA) and secreting active TGF-beta 1 that we injected subcutaneously into nude mice. The elevated secretion of TGF-beta 1 by shCt/TGF-beta 1 cancer cells (CRC-shCt/T) robustly enhanced tumor initiation compared to control (CRC-shCt) and to CRC-shIL11RA cells (Fig. 4k; dashed red, dashed blue and red lines). However, reducing the expression of IL11RA restricted the capacity of shIL11RA/TGF-beta 1 CRC cells (CRC-shIL11RA/T) to initiate tumors in a TGF-beta enriched environment (Fig. 4k; blue line).
Taken together, these data indicate that platinum uptake induces TGF-beta pathway autocrine activation in stromal cells leading to the production of IL11. In turn, secreted IL11 is capable of enhancing epithelial CRC cells tumor initiation capacity.
POSTN is a marker of oxaliplatin-induced TGF-beta activity in the TME
Given the robust association of aFib-RS whole gene program with poor outcome and resistance to therapy, we hypothesized that additional stromal biomarkers of response to CT may be critical for CRC patient treatment. We thus extended our analysis of genes modulated by oxaliplatin in fibroblasts and identified periostin (POSTN), a CAF-specific secreted factor32,33,34 promoting CRC progression and metastasis35,36, as one of the most upregulated gene in aFib-RS (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). IHC evaluation in consecutive sections of CRC tumors performed by expert pathologist indicated that POSTN and FAP were expressed by tumor-associated fibroblasts (Supplementary Fig. 6c), thus corroborating the POSTN expression by CRC CAFs reported in previous studies32,33. We observed that POSTN levels were largely upregulated in CCD-18Co, CAF1 and CAF2 upon oxaliplatin administration (Fig. 5b, c and Supplementary Fig. 6d). Accordingly, IHC analysis in tumors from MTOs-injected mice showed increased stromal expression of POSTN following oxaliplatin administration (Fig. 5d). Oxaliplatin-induced POSTN expression was maintained after treatment over time (Supplementary Fig. 6e) and was abrogated upon administration of a TGF-beta inhibitor (Fig. 5b). Accordingly, POSTN expression correlated robustly with aFib-RS, Fib-TBRS and TGFB1 in CRC patients (Fig. 5e).
These findings led us to test the clinical utility of POSTN protein expression as a stromal marker of chemotherapeutic and/or TGF-beta activity in FFPE samples from CRC patients. It is worth mentioning that CRC patients are currently treated with oxaliplatin combination regimens rather than oxaliplatin alone, thus complicating the determination of platinum specific impact on POSTN expression. To overcome this problem, we used an experimental approach allowing the ex vivo maintenance and treatment of tumor explants that recapitulate the intratumoral heterogeneity—CRC cells and TME—specific to a given patient (see “Methods”). For this, freshly resected tumor samples from four untreated CRC patients were administered ex vivo with oxaliplatin monotherapy. IHC analysis indicated that treated tumors displayed abundant stromal accumulation of POSTN compared to untreated tumor samples from the same patients (Fig. 5f, g; upper and middle panels). The addition of a TGF-beta pathway inhibitor to the regimen largely reduced POSTN upregulation ex vivo (Fig. 5f, g; lower panel), therefore indicating that POSTN protein expression associates with TGF-beta pathway autocrine activation occurring upon oxaliplatin administration.
POSTN protein levels identify CMS4 subtype and tumors unresponsive to therapy
Similar to aFib-RS, POSTN mRNA levels were increased in the CMS4 patient subset (Supplementary Fig. 7a) and independently predicted poor outcome in the overall CRC population (Supplementary Fig. 7b–d). POSTN mRNA segregated as well relapsing and non-relapsing patients in the CMS4 subtype (Supplementary Fig. 7d, e).
In view of the clinical need for biomarkers that can be evaluated by IHC, we assessed the prognostic value of POSTN protein expression patterns in FFPE tumor samples from a cohort of 109 CMS-classified CRC patients (IHC cohort)37. Staining analyses showed that stromal POSTN expression (Fig. 6a) and stromal abundance (Fig. 6b) were both significantly increased in CMS4 tumors compared to any other CMS. However, the tumor stromal load did not correlate with POSTN staining intensity (Supplementary Fig. 7f). Accordingly, only elevated POSTN protein expression predicted decreased disease-free survival (DFS) (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. 7d) while stromal abundance failed to segregate patients with higher risk of relapse (Fig. 6d). We reproduced POSTN protein analyses in the subset of 39 CMS4 cases from IHC cohort. Here again, POSTN expression did not correlate with stromal load (Supplementary Fig. 7g) and increased stromal abundance did not associate with higher risk of relapse (Supplementary Fig. 7h). Yet, low POSTN intensity segregated a small subset of CMS4 patients with no observed recurrences (Supplementary Fig. 7i). Although it did not reach statistical significance, this result corroborates the transcriptomic data that associate increased POSTN levels with reduced survival in CMS4 patients (Supplementary Fig. 7d,e). Prompted by these findings, we evaluated the prognosis power of POSTN protein expression in tumors with low or high stromal content. Remarkably, increased POSTN levels was associated with worse outcome in patients with tumors displaying either high (>30%; Fig. 6e) or low (<30%; Fig. 6f) stromal load. Collectively, these data indicate that POSTN is a robust prognostic marker of disease relapse, reflecting stromal activation state rather than stromal abundance in CRC including CMS4 tumors.
As mentioned previously, recent studies have associated the CMS4 subtype with a reduced susceptibility to systemic therapies8,11,38. We thus evaluated the clinical potential of POSTN protein expression as a stromal marker of response to CT. We performed IHC analyses in tumors from 28 advanced CRC patients obtained before and after CT and realized that POSTN levels were overall upregulated after treatment (Fig. 6g; gray box). Remarkably, a comparative analysis of patients responsive (R, n = 17) or unresponsive to treatment (NR, n = 11) tumors showed that POSTN expression was already significantly higher in unresponsive tumors samples obtained before treatment compared to the responsive ones (Fig. 6g; blue dots). This difference was further accentuated between R and NR tumor samples obtained after CT (Fig. 6g; red dots). Analysis of pre and post CT paired samples indicated that NR tumors were either inherently displaying high levels of POSTN before CT or increased their expression of POSTN upon CT (Fig. 6g, h). In contrast, POSTN levels were low before CT and remained unchanged after CT in patients responding to therapy (Fig. 6g).
High expression of POSTN isoform 4 reduces CRC susceptibility to treatment
We next investigated the contribution of POSTN to the reduced susceptibility to CT observed in resistant CRC tumors. Of note, eight POSTN splicing variants with distinct patterns of expression have been reported in human39. A comparative analysis revealed that POSTN isoform 4 (POSTNi4; NM_001135936.2) was the variant most upregulated in CCD-18Co upon CT (Fig. 7a). Similarly, oxaliplatin robustly increased POSTNi4 levels in CAF1 and CAF2 (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, POSTNi4 expression was maintained over time after treatment (Fig. 7d) and TGF-beta pathway inhibition abrogated POSTNi4 upregulation (Fig. 7c).
Given the prevalence of this variant, we sought to assess the contribution of POSTNi4 to cancer progression. We engineered patient-derived organoids (PDO) to autonomously produce this secreted factor (PDO-POSTNi4; Fig. 7e) and inoculated them subcutaneously into NSG mice. Forced POSTNi4 expression didn’t impact either tumor initiation (Supplementary Fig. 8a) or tumor expansion (Supplementary Fig. 8b). We next treated macroscopic tumor-bearing mice with oxaliplatin for 20 days and monitored tumor growth kinetics upon therapy. Oxaliplatin treatment significantly reduced tumors expansion in control conditions (Fig. 7f; left panel). In contrast, the growth rate of tumors enriched with POSTNi4 were not affected by therapy (Fig. 7f; right panel), thus suggesting that elevated levels of POSTNi4 increase the resistance to CT in CRC tumors.
Discussion
Current CRC standard-of-care involves either fluoropyrimidines (5-fluorouracil, capecitabine) alone or in combination with oxaliplatin. As demonstrated by several studies, oxaliplatin administration offers little additive benefit to fluoropyrimidines, and a high proportion of patients will still relapse/progress1,2,40. Yet, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines regimen remains one of the main treatment option in CRC40,41,42. Hence, much efforts are being made to decipher and improve the response to oxaliplatin in epithelial CRC cells5. Conversely, data reporting the impact of oxaliplatin on non-malignant cells from the TME are still scarce15,16.
Here, we have characterized the pattern of oxaliplatin accumulation in tumor tissue from CRC patients using elemental imaging technique originally developed in the field of geology and adapted to biological samples43. Surprisingly, we realized that the TME is the main tumor compartment retaining oxaliplatin long after the treatment ceased. We hypothesized that stroma reprogramming by platinum may diminish the drug cytotoxicity against epithelial cancer cells and impact cancer progression. In agreement with this assumption, our data argue that oxaliplatin incorporation induces a senescent state in resilient fibroblasts, which leads to enhanced SASP supporting residual cancer cells survival and aggressiveness. As previously reported by multiple works, TGF-beta is one of the components of the SASP44,45,46 and is mainly expressed by CAFs in CRC47,48,49. Our results indicate that oxaliplatin-induced SASP in CAFs leads to increased TGF-beta production, which in turn activates the downstream TGF-beta pathway14,49,50. Accordingly, both aFib-RS and Fib-TBRS described in this study could be used to determine tumors with poor outcome according to their stromal composition. However, the predictive power of aFib-RS remains superior to that of Fib-TBRS in stromal (CMS4) CRC tumors, which suggests that expression of aFib-RS can further identify CRC with tumor promoting/protective stroma.
Resulting from the association between platinum absorption and the activation of the TGF-beta pathway, CAFs upregulate IL11 and POSTNi4 expression upon oxaliplatin treatment. Our data show that, in turn, increased IL11 and POSTNi4 respectively contribute to enhanced tumor initiation and resistance to therapy, thus providing original insights on the mechanism behind relapses in CRC patients that fail to respond to platinum-based CT. Although in non-treatment conditions, the expression of both IL11 and POSTN could be mediated by other signaling pathways such as oncogenic Ras for IL1151 or IL6 and Notch for POSTN35,52, TGF-beta remains the main inducer of IL11 and POSTN expression in CAFs14,33,34,53,54,55,56,57,58. Of note, TGFB1, IL11, POSTN and POSTNi4 upregulation remained detectable in cultured fibroblasts long after the treatment ended. Yet, their expression consistently followed a decreasing trend over time paralleling the one observed for oxaliplatin uptake, thus suggesting a potential association between platinum intracellular concentration and TGF-beta activity.
The fact that platinum-activated TME may weaken CT efficacy does not undermine the direct cytotoxicity of platinum-based CT against epithelial cancer cells. Yet, our findings advocate for combinatorial therapies involving senolytics59,60, TGF-beta pathway inhibitors61 or anti-IL11 therapies62 to improve the response to current platinum-based regimens. Our data further suggest that future strategies blocking POSTNi4 expression may restore treatment efficiency in unresponsive patients. Transcriptomic analyses indicate that multiple additional soluble factors are upregulated in CAFs stimulated by platinum-based therapy (Supplementary Data 1). Among them, VCAN63, HBEGF64, NRG165,66, GDF1527, MMP167 and ANGPTL468 were also associated with increased cancer aggressiveness. These findings suggest a coordinate activation of pro-oncogenic signals originating from non-malignant stromal cells upon platinum absorption and provide an extensive array of potentially actionable biomarkers in CRC.
The use of molecular markers guiding patient’s treatment is crucial for bringing precision medicine into practice. However, no biomarkers of response to CT have been identified up until now. On the other hand, the clinical utility of molecular classifications based on whole-tumor transcriptomics remains limited due to gene expression variations arising from changes in cancer cells and stromal abundance69,70. Here, we report that high stromal expression of POSTN detected by IHC identifies CMS4 patients, associates with increased TGF-beta activity and predicts worse outcome independently of the tumor stromal load. In addition, low POSTN levels segregate a subset of CMS4 patients that will not face disease recurrence. We establish that POSTN protein is highly expressed before and/or after treatment in tumors unresponsive to therapy. Of note, not all treated tumors upregulate TGF-beta activity/POSTN expression upon CT. Indeed, tumors responsive to CT show low and stable levels of POSTN before and after treatment. The recent discovery of different subtypes of CAFs populating the tumors could explain these differences and further investigation may uncover specific CAF subtypes associated with response or resistance to CT. Nevertheless, our data argue that the evaluation of POSTN protein levels in patient samples before and after CT holds the potential to provide key information about primary or acquired resistance to therapy. Our findings further imply that the elevated expression of POSTN observed in CMS4 CRC could explain the primary resistance to CT associated with this molecular subtype. Alternatively, the increased expression of POSTN detected after CT in resistant tumors may indicate a transition upon treatment of the TME into a CMS4-like stroma in patients becoming unresponsive to therapy.
Methods
Study approval
Biological samples and clinical data were obtained under patient informed consent and approval of Clinical Research Ethics Committees (CEIC; 2016/6958/I, 2020/9113/I, 2020/9038/I) Parc de Salut MAR Biobank, IMIM, Spain. Informed consent authorizes the use of clinical information and biological surplus from diagnostic or therapeutic procedures for biomedical research projects. There was no active recruitment of patients for this study. There was no participant compensation. Experiments with mouse models were approved by the Animal Research Ethical Committee of Barcelona Biomedical Research Park and the Catalan government (CEEA-PRBB; FUE-2018-00801894).
Generation of gene expression signatures and association with clinical parameters
To assess associations between gene expression profiles and clinical information, we used publicly available datasets: GSE1753620, GSE3958221, GSE1433323 and GSE7297022. GSE17536 and GSE39582 contain respectively a pool of 177 and 519 CRC patients with clinical annotations. Patients from GSE39582 and GSE14333 were classified using the Random Forest method from CMSclassifier v.1.0.0 package in R v.3.5.18. Patients with a CMS4 probability above 0.5 were selected to discard ambiguous results. A total of 121 (GSE39582_CMS4) and 10 samples (GSE14333_CMS4) were classified as CMS4. For GSE72970 and GSE14333, we studied respectively the subset of 32 advanced CRC patients and the subset of 51 stage III patients that had received standard adjuvant 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin regimen. Data were downloaded from GEO microarray data repositories. Preprocessed series matrixes provided by the authors were used in the analyses.
To obtain the gene set activated by oxaliplatin in fibroblasts (aFib-RS), CCD-18Co cells were seeded at 80% confluence and treated with oxaliplatin (100 μM) for 6 days. For TGF-beta response signature in fibroblasts (Fib-TBRS), CCD-18Co cells were seeded at 60% confluence and treated with recombinant human TGF-beta 1 (Peprotech; 5 ng/ml) for 8 h. Gene expression profiles were measured in duplicate using PrimeView or HG-133+PM microarrays (Affymetrix). Analyses were performed with Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC v.4.0) Software (Applied Biosystems) applying RMA summarization. aFib-RS includes genes upregulated two folds with p value <0.05 in oxaliplatin-treated cells. Fib-TBRS includes genes upregulated 1.5 folds with p value <0.05 in TGF-beta 1-treated cells. Gene signatures for hallmarks of P53 pathway, DNA repair and for cellular apoptosis were obtained from the Broad Institute database24. Senescence and senescence-associated secretory signatures (SenRS and SASP-S respectively) have been previously described27,29. For FAP (+) and (−) aFib-RS, Fib-TBRS and SASP-S subsets, FAP (+) specific probe set was obtained (FC > 1; p < 0.05; FDR < 0.01) using transcriptomic gene profiles of EpCAM (+), CD31 (+), CD45 (+) and FAP (+) FACS purified cell subsets retrieved from previous studies (GSE39396)14. Gene signatures are summarized in probe sets (g:Profiler v.2020-10-12) in Supplementary Data 1.
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA v.4.1.0) was performed as previously described to obtain an enrichment score (ES), a normalized enrichment score (NES) which accounts for the size of the gene set being tested, a p value and an estimated False Discovery Rate (FDR)71. For single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA), ssGSEA module v.10.0.12 (GenePattern) was used as previously described72. ssGSEA projection provides data transformation from genes to geneset thereby allowing to characterize biological processes and pathways rather than individual genes. Datasets were interrogated for generated signatures and correlation analyses between signatures were performed using Prism software (GraphPad v.8.0.1). We assessed signatures and single gene predictive significance on recurrence. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for patients with low and high average signature scores were obtained using Prism software (GraphPad v.8.0.1) and significance was assessed by log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Optimal cutoff points were defined as the value giving the most significant split calculated by log-rank test using surv_cutpoint, survfit and coxph functions as implemented in Survival v.3.5-0 and Survminer v.0.4.9 R packages. Multivariate Cox regression model included available clinical variables as adjustment covariates. For CMS characterization, publically available merged expression data were obtained from Synapse repository (doi:10.7303/syn2623706) and analyzed as described elsewhere8.
Cell culture
MTOs were previously derived from primary tumors arising in genetically engineered mouse models with compound genetic alterations (Apc, Kras, Trp53, Tgfbr2)17. For bioluminescence tracking, MTOs were infected with a lentivirus encoding an eGFP–firefly luciferase fusion reporter construct under the control of the Pgk1 promoter73. For culture expansion, MTOs were embedded in basement-membrane extract (BME) medium (Cultrex BME Type 2, Amsbio) and cultured at 37 °C with 85–90% humidity, atmospheric O2 and 5% CO2 in advanced DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, Glutamax, B-27 without retinoid acid (all Life Technologies), 100 ng/ml recombinant NOGGIN and 50 ng/ml recombinant EGF (Peprotech). HUVEC (CRL-1730) and CCD-18Co (CRL-1459) were provided by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). HT29-M6 cells were provided by the Cancer Cell Line Repository (CCLR) from MARBiobanc (Spain). Cell lines used in this study were not listed as known misidentified cell lines by the International Cell Line Authentication Committee. Cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% glutamine. CRC patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs)33 were grown with PDO-specific media (Advanced DMEM/F12; 1x B-27 without retinoic acid; 1x Glutamax; 1x N-2, 1 mM N-Acetyl-L-cysteine and 50 ng/ml EGF) in BME (Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Matrix, Type 2; Bio-Techne R&D Systems S.L.). PBMCs were purified from blood samples with Lymphoprep™ following manufacturers’ protocols. To derive primary fibroblasts from patients, minced tissue samples were incubated with DMEM plus DNAse (10 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) and Collagenase IV (100 U/ml; R&D) for 30 min. Pieces were seeded in plates and incubated at 37 °C in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% glutamine, 20 ng/ml of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)−2 (Peprotech), P/S and normocin. Once fibroblasts adhered to the plate, pieces were removed. Fibroblasts were grown using standard methods at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
To compare the biological activity of oxaliplatin after a 3-day treatment, half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of oxaliplatin was defined for each cell subtype. In order to compare tumor cells response to CT over time, cultured cells were treated with oxaliplatin (100 µM) for 12 days. For pre-stimulation experiments, each cell subtype was treated for 6 days with its own oxaliplatin concentration EC50 in order to avoid complete cell death. Media were changed every 3 days. For conditional media (CM) experiments, cultured cells were treated as mentioned above. After 6 days, oxaliplatin-containing media were discarded and cell cultures were washed 3 times with HBSS (Lonza) to ensure the removal of residual free CT. Next, fresh DMEM supplemented with 0.2% FBS was added to the culture. CM was collected after 48 h. To compare oxaliplatin and CPP-OX effect, fibroblasts were treated with 3 μM of each drug. When indicated, cells were treated with 5 µM TGFBR1 receptor inhibitor (SB431542; Life Science, Sigma-Aldrich).
pReceiver-Lv105 Expression plasmids containing the cDNA sequences of interest under the control of a CMV promoter were used to generate IL11 and POSTNi4 overexpressing cells (Genecopeia) by lentiviral infection. CRC cells secreting active TGF-beta 1 were generated after infection with a lentiviral vector (FUW) encoding the biologically active form of human TGF-beta 1. Empty vector was used to generate control cells. Knockdown experiments were conducted by lentiviral infection using short hairpin (sh) RNA targeting IL11RA (shIL11RA) (Sigma-Aldrich). Non-targeting shRNA sequence was used as control (shCt) (Sigma-Aldrich). Genetic engineering efficiency was confirmed by qRT-PCR.
For bioluminescent tracking, cancer cells were infected with a fusion protein reporter construct encoding firefly luciferase. For cell survival experiments, XTT assay kit (Biological Industries) was used following manufacturer’s protocol. Alternatively, cell survival was measured by bioluminescent tracking or by crystal violet assay as described elsewhere74. To detect senescent cells, ß-galactosidase staining kit was used as described in manufacturer protocol (Cell Signaling Technology®).
Clinical material
For LA-ICP-MS analyses (Fig. 1e, f and Supplementary Fig. 2), FFPE biological samples were obtained from eight CRC patients previously treated with oxaliplatin-based CT (5 males; 3 females; median age at diagnosis: 56 years). For POSTN and stroma analyses in CMS (Fig. 6a–f and Supplementary 7f–i), we used FFPE tumor samples from 67 males and 42 females (median age at diagnosis: 71 years). For ex vivo experimentation (Fig. 5f, g), freshly resected primary tumor samples from two male and two female untreated CRC patients over 50 years old were collected and cultured at 37 °C/5% CO2 in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, P/S and normocin75. Samples were treated ex vivo with oxaliplatin (100 µM) for 48 h and compared to untreated control from the same patient. When indicated, explants were treated with 5 µM TGFBR1 inhibitor (SB431542; Life Science, Sigma-Aldrich). For response to CT analyses (Figs. 3e and 6g, h), FFPE tumor samples were obtained from 28 CRC patients before and after oxaliplatin-based CT (16 males; 12 females; median age at diagnosis: 74 years). All samples were collected within the usual clinical practice and were utilized in this study per availability. Clinical information was anonymized by medical doctors collaborating to the project. International standards of Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human subjects (code of ethics, Declaration of Helsinki, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013) were followed in accordance with legal regulations on data confidentiality (Organic Law 3/2018 -December the 5th- on the Protection of Personal Data and Digital Rights Guarantee) and on biomedical research (Law 14/2007 -July the 3rd-).
Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
LA-ICP-MS analyses were performed in 6 μm-thick sections of paraffin-embedded tumor samples previously stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E). Areas of interest were identified by expert pathologist. Laser ablation was achieved with an Analyte G2 instrument (Photonmachines Inc.). Of note, LA-ICP-MS results in the destruction of the tissue thus preventing further analysis of the same area. Levels of isotopes 194Pt and 195Pt were recorded with an ICP-QMS 7700 instrument (Agilent). Data were correlated with H&E to identify histological features at the microscopic level. Origin v.9.5 (OriginLab Corp.) and ImageJ v.1.53i were used to perform analyses and to generate Pt distribution maps.
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Cells were exposed to 3 μM of oxaliplatin for 4 h. After incubation, cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Cell pellets were suspended in 300 μl of mQ H2O and sonicated during 30 min. Cell suspension was transferred into a Teflon reactor with 300 μl of HNO3 65% and mineralized at 90 °C for 18 h. The samples were diluted with mQ H2O until 2% HNO3 concentration was reached. Platinum determination was performed with an Agilent 7500ce Series Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer and normalized by protein quantity.
Western blot
Protein extracts were obtained by lysing cells in RIPA buffer (Tris HCl 50 mM ph 7.4, NP-40 1%, Na-Deoxycholate 0.25%, NaCl 150 mM, EDTA 1 mM). Protein concentration was measured using the Bio-rad kit Protein Assay. Proteins were separated by SDS gel electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore). Antibodies (Supplementary Table 3) were incubated o/n at 4 °C in 2% BSA TBS-Tween 0.1% (1/250 dilution). Anti-β-Actin antibody (ab20272, Abcam) was incubated 1 h at 4 °C in 2% BSA TBS-Tween 0.1% (1/30.000 dilution). Secondary antibodies (1/2.000 dilution) coupled to peroxidase were incubated for 1 h at RT. Membranes were washed in TBS-Tween 0.1%. Immuno-complexes were detected using Immobilon Western HRP (Millipore). Uncropped and unprocessed scans are shown in Source Data file (for Fig. 7e) and in Supplementary Fig. 9 (for Supplementary Figs. 4h, 5b and 6d).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunostainings were carried out on 3 μm-thick tissue sections according to standard procedures. Briefly, after antigen retrieval, samples were blocked with Peroxidase-Blocking Solution (Dako, S202386) for 10 min at RT. Primary antibodies (please refer to Supplementary Table 3) were incubated o/n at 4 °C. Slides were washed with EnVision™ FLEX Wash Buffer (Dako, K800721). Secondary antibody was incubated for 45 min at RT. For anti-rat Biotin Donkey IgG, additional 20 min incubation at RT with streptavidin HRP (Sigma, S2438, 1/1000 dilution) was performed. Samples were developed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine, counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted. Staining analyses were performed with either QuPath software v.0.3.276 or H-Score77. In more details, H-Score representing overall stromal POSTN protein levels was assessed for each sample by expert pathologist using intensity scores (from 0 to 3) and intensity scores frequencies (from 0 to 100%). H-Score was calculated as follow: (% of scored 1 stromal area) × 1 + (% of scored 2 stromal area) × 2 + (% of scored 3 stromal area) × 3.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Reverse transcription was performed using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative PCR was achieved using TaqMan and SYBR green reagents (Applied Biosystems) following manufacturer’s instructions in a 7900HT Fast Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems). TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems; CDKN1A: Hs00355782_m1, CDKN2A: Hs00923894_m1, TGFB1: Hs00998133_m1, IL11: Hs01055414_m1, POSTN: Hs00170815_m1, IL1B: Hs01555410_m1, CXCL8: Hs00174103_m1, GDF15: Hs00171132_m1, B2M: Hs99999907_m1, GAPDH: Hs99999905_m1, PPIA: Hs99999904_m1) and SYBR Green primers (POSTNi1 (F: GTGATTGAAGGCAGTCTTCAGCC; R: CTCCCTGAAGCAGTCTTTTA), POSTNi2 (F: AATCCCCGTGACTGTCTATAAGCCA; R: CTCCCTGAAGCAGTCTTTTA), POSTNi3 (F: AATCCCCGTGACTGTCTATAGACC; R: TCCTCACGGGTGTGTCTTCT), POSTNi4 (F: AATCCCCGTGACTGTCTATAAGCCA; R: TCCTCACGGGTGTGTCTTCT), POSTNi5 (F: AATCCCCGTGACTGTCTATAGACC; R: CTCCCTGAAGCAGTCTTTTA), POSTNi6 (F: AATCCCCGTGACTGTCTATAGTCCT; R: CTCCCTGAAGCAGTCTTTTA), POSTNi7 (F: AATCCCCGTGACTGTCTATAGTCCT; R: TCCTCACGGGTGTGTCTTCT), POSTNi8 (F: GTGATTGAAGGCAGTCTTCAGCC; R: TCCTCACGGGTGTGTCTTCT), GAPDH (F: GGAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGTA; R: GGCAACAATATCCACTTTACCAGAGT) were used. Quantitative RT-PCR Data were analyzed using SDS v2.4 software (Applied Biosystems). For pre/post CT tumor patient analysis, samples with similar cancer cells/ stromal cells ratio were selected. RNA was extracted from FFPE section following manufacturer’s instruction (RNeasy FFPE Kit, QIAGEN).
In vivo studies
Animals were maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions with controlled temperature/humidity (22 °C/55%) environment on a 12-h light-dark cycle and with standard diet and water ad libitum. Sample size was predetermined empirically according to previous experience using the same strains and treatments. The general condition of animals was monitored using animal fitness and weight controls by authors, facility technicians and by an external veterinary scientist responsible for animal welfare.
For intracaecum CRC model, 0.1 × 106 cells in 70% BME were injected with a 30 G syringe under binocular guidance into the submucosal wall of the distal caecum of 7–9 weeks old female C57BL/6J (strain #:C57BL/6JRj) mice purchased from Janvier Labs. Mice bearing tumors were randomly assigned to treatment (n = 8) and control groups (n = 5). Treated mice were injected IP with oxaliplatin (12 mg/kg) 96 h and 24 h before tumor resection. Tumor growth was monitored using bioluminescence. For subcutaneous CRC model, cells were injected subcutaneously in 5–6 weeks old female NSG NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (Strain #:005557) or nude NU/J (Strain #: 002019) mice (Jackson Laboratories). Subcutaneous tumor appearance was assessed by palpation. For resistance to CT experiments, macroscopic tumor-bearing mice (average tumor size 50 mm3) were injected IP once per week with oxaliplatin (12 mg/kg). Tumor volume was measured twice a week by caliper until sacrifice. Maximal tumor burden permitted is 1500 mm3. In some cases, this limit has been exceeded the last day of measurement and mice were immediately euthanized. In one case, the limit was exceeded with the approval of veterinarians. At experimental end point, mice were euthanized in a chamber with saturated CO2 atmosphere. Euthanasia was confirmed by cervical dislocation.
Statistics
Sample size was chosen following previous experience in the assessment of experimental variability (generally all measurements were performed with n ≥ 3 biological replicates). Statistical analyses of between-group differences were performed using Student’s t test (Graphpad Prism 8.0.1). Two-tailed p values <0.05 were considered significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The transcriptomic datasets generated for this study have been deposited in NCBI GEO repository under the accession numbers GSE181020 and GSE181026. Hallmarks gene signatures were obtained from the Broad Institute database (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/). Publicly available merged expression data were obtained from Synapse repository (doi:10.7303/syn2623706). GSE39396, GSE17536, GSE39582, GSE72970 and GSE14333 datasets used in this study are publicly available in the NCBI GEO database. The remaining data are available within the Article, Supplementary Information or Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Rottenberg, S., Disler, C. & Perego, P. The rediscovery of platinum-based cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 211, 37–50 (2020).
Thiabaud, G. et al. Oxaliplatin Pt(IV) prodrugs conjugated to gadolinium-texaphyrin as potential antitumor agents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 7021–7029 (2020).
Schmoll, H. J. et al. Effect of adjuvant capecitabine or fluorouracil, with or without oxaliplatin, on survival outcomes in stage III colon cancer and the effect of oxaliplatin on post-relapse survival: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from four randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1481–1492 (2014).
Cunningham, D. et al. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 375, 1030–1047 (2010).
Hammond, W. A., Swaika, A. & Mody, K. Pharmacologic resistance in colorectal cancer: a review. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 8, 57–84 (2016).
Martinez-Balibrea, E. et al. Tumor-related molecular mechanisms of oxaliplatin resistance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 14, 1767–1776 (2015).
Sadanandam, A. et al. A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy. Nat. Med. 19, 619–625 (2013).
Guinney, J. et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 21, 1350–1356 (2015).
De Sousa, E. et al. Poor-prognosis colon cancer is defined by a molecularly distinct subtype and develops from serrated precursor lesions. Nat. Med. 19, 614–618 (2013).
Roepman, P. et al. Colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes predict chemotherapy benefit, deficient mismatch repair and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Int. J. Cancer 134, 552–562 (2014).
Song, N. et al. Clinical outcome from oxaliplatin treatment in stage II/III colon cancer according to intrinsic subtypes. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1162–1169 (2016).
Shuford, R. A., Cairns, A. L. & Moaven, O. Precision approaches in the management of colorectal cancer: current evidence and latest advancements towards individualizing the treatment. Cancers 12, 1–23 (2020).
Zhou, J. et al. The drug-resistance mechanisms of five platinum-based antitumor agents. Front. Pharmacol. 0, 343 (2020).
Calon, A. et al. Dependency of colorectal cancer on a TGF-beta-driven program in stromal cells for metastasis initiation. Cancer Cell 22, 571–584 (2012).
Ham, I. H., Lee, D. & Hur, H. Cancer-associated fibroblast-induced resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancers 13, 1–17 (2021).
Mikuła-Pietrasik, J. et al. Comprehensive review on how platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy of ovarian cancer affects biology of normal cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 681 (2019).
Tauriello, D. V. F. et al. TGFβ drives immune evasion in genetically reconstituted colon cancer metastasis. Nature 554, 538–543 (2018).
Pietras, K. & Ostman, A. Hallmarks of cancer: interactions with the tumor stroma. Exp. Cell Res. 316, 1324–1331 (2010).
Wang, W., Cheng, B. & Yu, Q. Cancer-associated fibroblasts as accomplices to confer therapeutic resistance in cancer. Cancer Drug Resist. 5, 889–901 (2022).
Smith, J. J. et al. Experimentally derived metastasis gene expression profile predicts recurrence and death in patients with colon cancer. Gastroenterology 138, 958–968 (2010).
Marisa, L. et al. Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value. PLoS Med. 10, e1001453 (2013).
Del Rio, M. et al. Molecular subtypes of metastatic colorectal cancer are associated with patient response to irinotecan-based therapies. Eur. J. Cancer 76, 68–75 (2017).
Jorissen, R. N. et al. Metastasis-associated gene expression changes predict poor outcomes in patients with Dukes stage B and C colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 7642–7651 (2009).
Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740 (2011).
Kumari, R. & Jat, P. Mechanisms of cellular senescence: cell cycle arrest and senescence associated secretory phenotype. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 645593 (2021).
Coppé, J. P., Desprez, P. Y., Krtolica, A. & Campisi, J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 5, 99–118 (2010).
Guo, Y. et al. Senescence-associated tissue microenvironment promotes colon cancer formation through the secretory factor GDF15. Aging Cell 18, e13013 (2019).
Hoare, M. et al. NOTCH1 mediates a switch between two distinct secretomes during senescence. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 979–992 (2016).
Lasry, A. & Ben-Neriah, Y. Senescence-associated inflammatory responses: aging and cancer perspectives. Trends Immunol. 36, 217–228 (2015).
Hubackova, S., Krejcikova, K., Bartek, J. & Hodny, Z. IL1- and TGFβ-Nox4 signaling, oxidative stress and DNA damage response are shared features of replicative, oncogene-induced, and drug-induced paracrine ‘bystander senescence’. Aging 4, 932–951 (2012).
Ernst, M. & Putoczki, T. L. Molecular pathways: IL11 as a tumor-promoting cytokine-translational implications for cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 5579–5588 (2014).
Kikuchi, Y. et al. Periostin is expressed in pericryptal fibroblasts and cancer-associated fibroblasts in the colon. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 56, 753–764 (2008).
Calon, A. et al. Stromal gene expression defines poor-prognosis subtypes in colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 47, 320–329 (2015).
Ouanouki, A., Lamy, S. & Annabi, B. Periostin, a signal transduction intermediate in TGF-β-induced EMT in U-87MG human glioblastoma cells, and its inhibition by anthocyanidins. Oncotarget 9, 22023 (2018).
Ma, H. et al. Periostin promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through integrin-FAK-Src pathway-mediated YAP/TAZ activation. Cell Rep. 30, 793–806.e6 (2020).
Bao, S. et al. Periostin potently promotes metastatic growth of colon cancer by augmenting cell survival via the Akt/PKB pathway. Cancer Cell 5, 329–339 (2004).
Ragulan, C. et al. Analytical validation of multiplex biomarker assay to stratify colorectal cancer into molecular subtypes. Sci. Rep. 9, 7665 (2019).
Hoorn, S., ten, Back, T. R., de, Sommeijer, D. W. & Vermeulen, L. Clinical value of consensus molecular subtypes in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 114, 503–516 (2022).
Cai, L. et al. Distinct expression pattern of periostin splice variants in chondrocytes and ligament progenitor cells. FASEB J. 33, 8386–8405 (2019).
André, T. et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2343–2351 (2004).
André, T. et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 3109–3116 (2009).
Haller, D. G. et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1465–1471 (2011).
Theiner, S., Schoeberl, A., Schweikert, A., Keppler, B. K. & Koellensperger, G. Mass spectrometry techniques for imaging and detection of metallodrugs. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 61, 123–134 (2021).
Lopes-Paciencia, S. et al. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype and its regulation. Cytokine 117, 15–22 (2019).
Ou, H. L. et al. Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanisms to detection. Mol. Oncol. 15, 2634–2671 (2021).
Coryell, P. R., Diekman, B. O. & Loeser, R. F. Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of cellular senescence in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 17, 47–57 (2021).
Massagué, J. TGFβ in cancer. Cell 134, 215–230 (2008).
Chandra, R. et al. The colorectal cancer tumor microenvironment and its impact on liver and lung metastasis. Cancers 13, 6206 (2021).
Calon, A., Tauriello, D. V. F. & Batlle, E. TGF-beta in CAF-mediated tumor growth and metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 25, 15–22 (2014).
Kalluri, R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 582–598 (2016).
Shin, S. Y., Choi, C., Lee, H. G., Lim, Y. & Lee, Y. H. Transcriptional regulation of the interleukin-11 gene by oncogenic Ras. Carcinogenesis 33, 2467–2476 (2012).
Kongkavitoon, P. et al. Regulation of periostin expression by Notch signaling in hepatocytes and liver cancer cell lines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 506, 739–745 (2018).
Yashiro, R. et al. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates interleukin-11 production by human periodontal ligament and gingival fibroblasts. J. Clin. Periodontol. 33, 165–171 (2006).
Tang, W., Yang, L., Yang, Y. C., Leng, S. X. & Elias, J. A. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates interleukin-11 transcription via complex activating protein-1-dependent pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5506–5513 (1998).
Nanri, Y. et al. The cross-talk between TGF-ß and periostin can be targeted for pulmonary fibrosis. in PA1292 (European Respiratory Society (ERS), 2019). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1292.
Yue, H. et al. Stromal POSTN induced by TGF-β1 facilitates the migration and invasion of ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 160, 530–538 (2021).
Corden, B., Adami, E., Sweeney, M., Schafer, S. & Cook, S. A. IL-11 in cardiac and renal fibrosis: late to the party but a central player. Br. J. Pharmacol. 177, 1695–1708 (2020).
Schafer, S. et al. IL-11 is a crucial determinant of cardiovascular fibrosis. Nature 552, 110–115 (2017).
Xu, M. et al. Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age. Nat. Med. 24, 1246–1256 (2018).
Chang, J. et al. Clearance of senescent cells by ABT263 rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Nat. Med. 22, 78–83 (2016).
Gachpazan, M. et al. Therapeutic potential of targeting transforming growth factor-beta in colorectal cancer: rational and progress. Curr. Pharm. Des. 25, 4085–4089 (2019).
Putoczki, T. L. et al. Interleukin-11 is the dominant Il-6 family cytokine during gastrointestinal tumorigenesis and can be targeted therapeutically. Cancer Cell 24, 257–271 (2013).
Du, W. W., Yang, W. & Yee, A. J. Roles of versican in cancer biology—tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis. Histol. Histopathol. 28, 701–713 (2013).
Bos, P. D. et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature 459, 1005–1009 (2009).
Yun, S. et al. Clinical significance of overexpression of NRG1 and its receptors, HER3 and HER4, in gastric cancer patients. Gastric Cancer 21, 225–236 (2018).
Zhang, Z. et al. Tumor microenvironment-derived NRG1 promotes antiandrogen resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 38, 279–296.e9 (2020).
Gabasa, M. et al. MMP1 drives tumor progression in large cell carcinoma of the lung through fibroblast senescence. Cancer Lett. 507, 1–12 (2021).
Padua, D. et al. TGFbeta primes breast tumors for lung metastasis seeding through angiopoietin-like 4. Cell 133, 66–77 (2008).
Michiels, S., Ternès, N. & Rotolo, F. Statistical controversies in clinical research: prognostic gene signatures are not (yet) useful in clinical practice. Ann. Oncol. 27, 2160–2167 (2016).
Dunne, P. D. et al. Challenging the cancer molecular stratification dogma: intratumoral heterogeneity undermines consensus molecular subtypes and potential diagnostic value in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 4095–4104 (2016).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Barbie, D. A. et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS -driven cancers require TBK1. Nature 462, 108–112 (2009).
Cañellas-Socias, A. et al. Metastatic recurrence in colorectal cancer arises from residual EMP1+ cells. Nature 611, 603–613 (2022).
Feoktistova, M., Geserick, P. & Leverkus, M. Crystal violet assay for determining viability of cultured cells. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2016, pdb.prot087379 (2016).
Lo, R. D. et al. Increased immune cell infiltration in patient-derived tumor explants treated with Traniplatin: an original Pt(iv) pro-drug based on Cisplatin and Tranilast. Chem. Commun. 54, 8324–8327 (2018).
Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–7 (2017).
Meyerholz, D. K. & Beck, A. P. Principles and approaches for reproducible scoring of tissue stains in research. Lab. Investig. 98, 844–855 (2018).
Rivas, E. I. et al. Targeted immunotherapy against distinct cancer-associated fibroblasts overcomes treatment resistance in refractory HER2+ breast tumors. Nat. Commun. 13, 5310 (2022).
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by grants from Fundación científica AECC -Asociación Española contra el Cáncer- (GCAEC20030CERV) to A.Ce., from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) co-funded by the European Union (CP16/00151, PI17/00211, PI20/00011; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) to A.Ca. and PI20/00625 to P.N., from la Caixa Foundation (LCF/PR/HR19/52160018) and MICINN (PID2020-119917RB-I00) to E.B., from Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) and FEDER funds (PID2019-104948RB-I00) to R.R.G. This work was supported by Grant PT20/00023, funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by the European Union, and the Xarxa de Bancs de tumors sponsored by Pla Director d’Oncologia de Catalunya (XBTC). A.Ca. is the recipient of funding from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III co-funded by the European Union (MS16/00151; CPII21/00012). J.L. is the recipient of a Junior Clinician fellowship from Fundación científica AECC (CLJUN19004LINA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.Ca. conceived and designed the study. J.L., A.S.A., A.R.B. and E.I.R. set up the experimental models and performed treatment analyses. N.T., M.O. and N.S. managed patients’ data and samples collection. C.M., A.Ce., J.T. and E.E. performed clinical analyses. C.M.C. and M.I. performed histopathological analyses. J.L., A.S.A., A.R.B. and M.Z. performed the biomolecular analyses. N.M.R. and P.N. performed proteomics analyses. D.L.R. and M.V. performed chemical analyses. A.M. and J.P. performed LA-ICP-MS analyses. M.Ga. and A.S.A. performed immunostaining experiments. R.R.G., E.B., X.H.M., J.B.R., A.C.S. and M.Gu. designed and performed in vivo experiments. J.L., A.Ce., C.M., E.B., R.R.G., J.P. and A.Ca. interpreted and discussed the results. A.Ca. and J.B.R. performed transcriptomic analyses. A.Ca. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved this manuscript for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.Ce. declares institutional research funding from Genentech, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Beigene, Bayer, Servier, Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, Astellas, Takeda and Fibrogen; and advisory board or speaker fees from Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, Bayer, Servier and Pierre Fabre in the last 5 years. J.T. reports personal financial interest in form of scientific consultancy role for Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Ikena Oncology, Inspirna Inc, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Ona Therapeutics, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Scandion Oncology, Scorpion Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Sotio Biotech, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics and TheraMyc. Stocks: Oniria Therapeutics and also educational collaboration with Imedex/HMP, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education and Physicians Education Resource (PER). N.T. declares the following: Advisory Role: Merck Serono, Guardant Health, Speaking: Amgen, Servier, Pfizer, Merck Serono, ESMO, SEOM. C.M. reports personal financial interest in form of scientific consultancy role for Amgen, Biocartis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, also educational collaboration with Amgen, Guardant Health, Merck Serono. The remaining authors declare no other competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Soonmyung Paik and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Linares, J., Sallent-Aragay, A., Badia-Ramentol, J. et al. Long-term platinum-based drug accumulation in cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes colorectal cancer progression and resistance to therapy. Nat Commun 14, 746 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36334-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36334-1
This article is cited by
-
Mechanisms of metastatic colorectal cancer
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2024)
-
Drug tolerant persister cell plasticity in cancer: a revolutionary strategy for more effective anticancer therapies
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2024)
-
Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between ubiquitin-specific protease 21 (USP21) and prognosis, tumor microenvironment infiltration, and therapy response in colorectal cancer
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy (2024)
-
Role and recent progress of P2Y12 receptor in cancer development
Purinergic Signalling (2024)
-
Genetic polymorphisms as potential pharmacogenetic biomarkers for platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Molecular Biology Reports (2024)