Searching for evidence of life on Mars is a major impetus for exploration. A new study published in Nature Communications finds that current Mars mission instruments lack the essential sensitivity to identify life traces in Chilean desert samples that strongly resemble the martian area currently under study by NASA’s Perseverance rover.
Almost half a century ago the NASA Viking landers searched for evidence of life in Mars soils by attempting to detect active metabolism and measuring organic compounds by heating to vaporize them for detection via Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). When no organic compounds were detected even at levels of parts per billion1, this provided a puzzle. Since organic compounds are continuously delivered to Mars by meteorites, comets, and interplanetary dust particles they should be ubiquitous and comprise up to 2% of Mars soil2. But where are they? This curious lack of organics argued both against a biological interpretation for results of the metabolism experiments, and for the presence of strong soil oxidants that actively destroy these compounds3. However, decades later the Viking GC-MS results were explained by the presence of high levels of perchlorate salts in the Martian soil4 that oxidized organics during pyrolysis in the Viking GC-MS instrument5.
While Viking lander results seemed unpromising for surface life in the cold, dry martian conditions, data from Viking orbiters and later missions showed that Mars had surface liquid water early in its history (3 to 4 billion years ago)6 where life may have thrived. This led later NASA rover missions to seek evidence of ancient habitable environments hosting organic remnants of life. The SAM (Sample Analysis on Mars) instrument on the Curiosity rover detected organics in ancient lakebed deposits7,8, but they are found at low levels (parts per billion) and appear to be highly altered. The Perseverance rover, now exploring an ancient illuvial fan river delta, has detected aromatic organic compounds using fluorescence spectroscopy9. But in these cases, the simple organics detected could have been delivered to Mars from space so proving a biological origin is impossible.
The paper by Azua-Bustos et al.10 in Nature Communications describes analysis of samples collected from “Red Stone”, an alluvial fan river delta more than 100 million years old in the Atacama Desert of Chile, Earth’s oldest and driest desert. Red Stone has similar geology to the delta area currently being studied by NASA’s Perseverance rover11 (Fig. 1). The Red Stone location (near the ocean) frequently experiences fogs that provide water for sparse but active microbial life that was detected by DNA extraction and gene sequencing, microscopy, and growth of a few microbial strains cultured from the samples. Most microbes identified consist of “microbial dark matter” i.e., genetic information is from organisms that have not yet been described.
Samples from Red Stone were also analyzed by instruments that simulate those used on Mars, but even finding organics in these samples was challenging. A GC-MS instrument comparable to but ten times more sensitive than Curiosity rover’s SAM instrument was barely able to detect specific biogenic organic compounds at the limit of detection, suggesting that SAM could not have detected them. There was more success with organic detection after sample extraction with a powerful solvent that was also implemented on the SAM instrument. Indeed, the SAM instrument detected organics in both sedimentary mudstones and dune sands on Mars by using solvent extraction and derivatization (a chemical treatment to make organic compounds easier to detect)8.
Red Stone samples were analyzed with a testbed of the MOMA (Mars Organic Molecular Analysis) instrument12 planned for the European ExoMars rover payload. No organics were detected when flash pyrolysis was used, but a few organic molecules were identified in evaporite samples when they were first extracted with a solvent and derivatized.
Red Stone samples were also analyzed with the SOLID-LDChip (Signs of Life Detector-Life Detector Chip)13, an instrument based on the technology of immunoassay that is commonly used in biomedicine. SOLID was designed for life detection on Mars but no scheduled missions plan to use it. Interestingly, the LDChip detected evidence of cyanobacteria that were not seen in the modern microbiota so Azua-Bustos et al.10 posit these biosignatures were deposited along with the delta sediments at least 100 million years ago.
This Red Stone sample analysis10 shows how critical it is to test instruments designed for life detection on other planets by using samples from relevant Earth analogs prior to selecting them for flight missions. If the biosignatures can’t be detected in Earth samples, where both current and ancient life is clearly documented, we should not expect these instruments to be capable of detecting evidence of life from Mars’ early history.
Azua-Bustos et al.10 argue that detection of ancient life signatures will require sample analysis in sophisticated terrestrial laboratories. This same view has led to the current plans for searching for life: the Perseverance rover is collecting samples that are to be retrieved and brought to Earth by a future mission14. But any biological activity in these samples presumably took place billions of years ago, and only a few small samples can be brought to Earth for study. It remains to be seen if unambiguous signatures of life can be found in those limited samples. We must be cautious about interpreting absence of strong evidence of life as evidence of its absence!
References
Biemann, K. & Lavoi, J. M. Jr Some final conclusions and supporting experiments related to the search for organic compounds on the surface of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 8385–8390 (1979).
Flynn, G. J. & McKay, D. S. An assessment of the meteoritic contribution to the Martian soil. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 14,497–14,509 (1990).
Klein, H. P. The Viking biological experiments on Mars. Icarus 34, 666–674 (1978).
Hecht, M. H. et al. Detection of perchlorate and the soluble chemistry of martian soil: findings from the Phoenix Mars Lander. Science 325, 64–67 (2009).
Navarro‐González, R. et al. Reanalysis of the Viking results suggests perchlorate and organics at midlatitudes on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 115, E12010 (2010).
Carr, M. H. & Head, J. W. III Geologic history of Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 294, 185–203 (2010).
Eigenbrode, J. L. et al. Organic matter preserved in 3-billion-year-old mudstones at Gale crater, Mars. Science 360, 1096–1101 (2018).
Millan, M. et al. Sedimentary organics in Glen Torridon, Gale Crater, Mars: Results from the SAM instrument suite and supporting laboratory analyses. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 127, e2021JE007107 (2022).
Scheller, E. L. et al. Aqueous alteration processes in Jezero Crater Mars- implications for organic geochemistry. Science 378, 1105–1110 (2022).
Azua-Bustos, A. et al. Dark microbiome and extremely low organics in an Atacama fossil river delta unveil the limits of life detection on Mars. Nat. Commun. this issue. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36172-1 (2023).
Farley, K. A. et al. Aqueously altered igneous rocks sampled on the floor of Jezero Crater. Science 377, 1512 (2022).
Goesmann, F. et al. The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) instrument: characterization of organic material in martian sediments. Astrobiology 17, 655–685 (2017).
Parro, V. et al. SOLID3, a multiplex antibody microarray-based optical sensor instrument for in situ life detection in planetary exploration. Astrobiology 11, 15–28 (2011).
Haltigen, T. et al. Rationale and Proposed Design for a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Science Program. Astrobiology 22, S27–S55 (2022).
A small segment of a panorama comprised of Perseverance Rover MastCam-Z images (image PIA24921_Main-20k.jpg) taken June 2022. The full panoramic image is available for download at https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/26978/detailed-panorama-of-mars-jezero-crater-delta/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CRS is the sole author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stoker, C.R. Life on Mars, can we detect it?. Nat Commun 14, 807 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36176-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36176-x