Conformational plasticity of NaK2K and TREK2 potassium channel selectivity filters

The K+ channel selectivity filter (SF) is defined by TxGYG amino acid sequences that generate four identical K+ binding sites (S1-S4). Only two sites (S3, S4) are present in the non-selective bacterial NaK channel, but a four-site K+-selective SF is obtained by mutating the wild-type TVGDGN SF sequence to a canonical K+ channel TVGYGD sequence (NaK2K mutant). Using single molecule FRET (smFRET), we show that the SF of NaK2K, but not of non-selective NaK, is ion-dependent, with the constricted SF configuration stabilized in high K+ conditions. Patch-clamp electrophysiology and non-canonical fluorescent amino acid incorporation show that NaK2K selectivity is reduced by crosslinking to limit SF conformational movement. Finally, the eukaryotic K+ channel TREK2 SF exhibits essentially identical smFRET-reported ion-dependent conformations as in prokaryotic K+ channels. Our results establish the generality of K+-induced SF conformational stability across the K+ channel superfamily, and introduce an approach to study manipulation of channel selectivity.

Nature Portfolio wishes to to improve the reproducibility of of the work that we we publish. This form provides structure for consistency and transparency in in reporting. For further information on on Nature Portfolio policies, see our Editorial Policies and the Editorial Policy Checklist Statistics For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as as a discrete number and unit of of measurement A statement on on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of of all covariates tested A description of of any assumptions or or corrections, such as as tests of of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or or associated estimates of of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on on the choice of of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of of outcomes Estimates of of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), ), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or or software that are central to to the research but not yet described in in published literature, software must be be made available to to editors and reviewers. We We strongly encourage code deposition in in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Portfolio guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or or web links for publicly available datasets -A description of of any restrictions on on data availability -For clinical datasets or or third party data, please ensure that the statement adheres to to our policy Colin G Nichols Oct 27, 2022 The script that converts .tif movie files to to .pma files for later data processing is is available upon request. IDL scripts developed by by the Ha Ha group (fully described in in refs. 66,67) were used for movie data processing (.pma files). Subsequent analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel, Matlab and GraphPad Prism 6. 6.
The script that converts .tif movie files to to .pma files for later data processing is is available upon request. IDL scripts developed by by the Ha Ha group (fully described in in refs. 66,67) were used for movie data processing (.pma files). Subsequent analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel, Matlab and GraphPad Prism 6. 6.
All data generated or or analyzed during this study are included in in this article (and the Supplementary Information files), and are available from the corresponding 2 nature portfolio | reporting summary

Human research participants
Policy information about studies involving human research participants and Sex and Gender in Research.

Reporting on sex and gender
Population characteristics

Recruitment
Ethics oversight Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative. n/a n/a n/a n/a Sample sizes were chosen to assertain reproducibir some experiments, e.g. single channel analyses, a fixed number of experimental days were used, and this led to variation in the number of achieved replicates.
There were no data exclusions, other than rejected traces for smFRET using the pre-established criteria.
As discussed in the text, all experiments were repeated a minimum of 3 times to test reproducibility.
Randomization of experimental order was used wherever possible in carrying out test and experiment replicates.
Blinding was used where practical for trace analysis smFRET data.
Briefly describe the study type including whether data are quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods (e.g. qualitative cross-sectional, quantitative experimental, mixed-methods case study).
State the research sample (e.g. Harvard university undergraduates, villagers in rural India) and provide relevant demographic information (e.g. age, sex) and indicate whether the sample is representative. Provide a rationale for the study sample chosen. For studies involving existing datasets, please describe the dataset and source.
Describe the sampling procedure (e.g. random, snowball, stratified, convenience). Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient. For qualitative data, please indicate whether data saturation was considered, and what criteria were used to decide that no further sampling was needed.
Provide details about the data collection procedure, including the instruments or devices used to record the data (e.g. pen and paper, computer, eye tracker, video or audio equipment) whether anyone was present besides the participant(s) and the researcher, and whether the researcher was blind to experimental condition and/or the study hypothesis during data collection.
Indicate the start and stop dates of data collection. If there is a gap between collection periods, state the dates for each sample cohort.
If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, provide the exact number of exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.

March 2021
Non-participation

Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Reporting for specific materials, systems and methods
We require information from authors about some types of materials, experimental systems and methods used in many studies. Here, indicate whether each material, system or method listed is relevant to your study. If you are not sure if a list item applies to your research, read the appropriate section before selecting a response.
State how many participants dropped out/declined participation and the reason(s) given OR provide response rate OR state that no participants dropped out/declined participation.
If participants were not allocated into experimental groups, state so OR describe how participants were allocated to groups, and if allocation was not random, describe how covariates were controlled.
Briefly describe the study. For quantitative data include treatment factors and interactions, design structure (e.g. factorial, nested, hierarchical), nature and number of experimental units and replicates.
Describe the research sample (e.g. a group of tagged Passer domesticus, all Stenocereus thurberi within Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument), and provide a rationale for the sample choice. When relevant, describe the organism taxa, source, sex, age range and any manipulations. State what population the sample is meant to represent when applicable. For studies involving existing datasets, describe the data and its source.
Note the sampling procedure. Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient.
Describe the data collection procedure, including who recorded the data and how.
Indicate the start and stop dates of data collection, noting the frequency and periodicity of sampling and providing a rationale for these choices. If there is a gap between collection periods, state the dates for each sample cohort. Specify the spatial scale from which the data are taken If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, describe the exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.
Describe the measures taken to verify the reproducibility of experimental findings. For each experiment, note whether any attempts to repeat the experiment failed OR state that all attempts to repeat the experiment were successful.
Describe how samples/organisms/participants were allocated into groups. If allocation was not random, describe how covariates were controlled. If this is not relevant to your study, explain why.
Describe the extent of blinding used during data acquisition and analysis. If blinding was not possible, describe why OR explain why blinding was not relevant to your study.
Describe the study conditions for field work, providing relevant parameters (e.g. temperature, rainfall).
State the location of the sampling or experiment, providing relevant parameters (e.g. latitude and longitude, elevation, water depth).
Describe the efforts you have made to access habitats and to collect and import/export your samples in a responsible manner and in compliance with local, national and international laws, noting any permits that were obtained (give the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information).
Describe any disturbance caused by the study and how it was minimized.

March 2021
Materials & experimental systems None of the cell lines used were authenticated by the authors.
The cell lines were not tested for mycoplasma contamination.
None were used here.
Indicate task or resting state; event-related or block design.
Specify the number of blocks, trials or experimental units per session and/or subject, and specify the length of each trial or block (if trials are blocked) and interval between trials.
State number and/or type of variables recorded (e.g. correct button press, response time) and what statistics were used to establish that the subjects were performing the task as expected (e.g. mean, range, and/or standard deviation across subjects).

Specify in Tesla
Specify the pulse sequence type (gradient echo, spin echo, etc.), imaging type (EPI, spiral, etc.), field of view, matrix size, slice thickness, orientation and TE/TR/flip angle.
State whether a whole brain scan was used OR define the area of acquisition, describing how the region was determined.
Provide detail on software version and revision number and on specific parameters (model/functions, brain extraction, segmentation, smoothing kernel size, etc.).
If data were normalized/standardized, describe the approach(es): specify linear or non-linear and define image types used for transformation OR indicate that data were not normalized and explain rationale for lack of normalization.
Describe the template used for normalization/transformation, specifying subject space or group standardized space (e.g. original Talairach, MNI305, ICBM152) OR indicate that the data were not normalized.
Describe your procedure(s) for artifact and structured noise removal, specifying motion parameters, tissue signals and physiological signals (heart rate, respiration).