Abstract
While climate models project that Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) melt will continue to accelerate with climate change, models exhibit limitations in capturing observed connections between GrIS melt and changes in high-latitude atmospheric circulation. Here we impose observed Arctic winds in a fully-coupled climate model with fixed anthropogenic forcing to quantify the influence of the rotational component of large-scale atmospheric circulation variability over the Arctic on the temperature field and the surface mass/energy balances through adiabatic processes. We show that recent changes involving mid-to-upper-tropospheric anticyclonic wind anomalies – linked with tropical forcing – explain half of the observed Greenland surface warming and ice loss acceleration since 1990, suggesting a pathway for large-scale winds to potentially enhance sea-level rise by ~0.2 mm/year per decade. We further reveal fingerprints of this observed teleconnection in paleo-reanalyses spanning the past 400 years, which heightens concern about model limitations to capture wind-driven adiabatic processes associated with GrIS melt.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) melt, a significant source of current barystatic sea-level rise, has accelerated over recent decades and constitutes a key indicator of human influence on the climate system1,2,3,4,5. Indeed, the anthropogenically forced response—multi-model means, or single-model large ensemble means—of GrIS surface conditions in CMIP5/6 climate models is mostly consistent with GrIS surface temperature and mass balance changes derived from satellite-based observations and reanalyses2,6,7,8. However, it seems that observed melting processes are not fully captured in CMIP5/6 and that some of the models produce a portion of GrIS warming for wrong reasons. Previous studies suggest that the observed increase in the frequency and persistence of anticyclonic circulation (blocking) anomalies since about 1990 has contributed to enhanced GrIS melt over the last three decades9,10,11,12,13,14. On the contrary, climate models (both single-model ensembles15 and individual models16,17,18,19) fail to depict changes in blocking conditions associated with surface temperature warming around much of the GrIS, which raises concerns about existing discrepancies between the mechanisms causing GrIS melt in the observational and model worlds. These uncertainties hinder the quantification of the GrIS’s sensitivity to anthropogenic forcing and affect sea-level rise projections4,7.
Anthropogenic emissions driven diabatic warming—i.e. radiative forcing, which is further amplified by the surface-albedo feedbacks in the ablation zone and widespread cloud radiative effects20,21,22,23,24—and processes related to large-scale atmospheric and oceanic circulation variability together shape the recent changes of the GrIS9,10,11,12,13,17,25,26,27,28. Regarding the physical mechanisms, circulation-driven surface friction is key to creating adiabatic warming around the core of the anticyclone, which together with advective effects cause enhancement of longwave radiation anomalies (both clear-sky and cloud radiative) in the lower troposphere21,22,29,30,31. Synchronously, beneath the centre of the high-pressure, clear skies favour incoming shortwave radiation anomalies that tend to amplify GrIS surface melt especially in coastal regions with their lower albedo12,20,24. The regional circulation-driven process is further suggested to be sensitive to tropical forcing through Rossby-wave activity excited by anomalous sea surface temperatures (SST) in the tropical Pacific32,33,34,35.
Current understanding suggests that GrIS surface conditions are determined by a quantitatively yet uncertain combination of (i) atmospheric circulation changes primarily via the aforementioned adiabatic warming process and (ii) anthropogenic diabatic warming, which may also cause wind changes due to proportional relationships between air temperature and pressure. Nonetheless, previous analyses of state-of-the-art climate model simulations indicate weak Arctic wind changes in response to anthropogenic forcing and suggest forced temperature changes are vertically rather uniform in the summer season15,27. Although one cannot rule out that model biases impact the forced temperature response in the Arctic, the observed mid-to-upper-level wind-driven process, which causes vertically non-uniform temperature changes15,27, is an acknowledged contributor in shaping GrIS surface conditions during recent decades9,10,11,12,13,14.
Given the above considerations, we hypothesize that the separation of the physical mechanisms behind GrIS surface warming into adiabatic (causing vertically non-uniform warming) and diabatic (causing vertically uniform warming) processes offers the potential for not only showcasing the divergent physical mechanisms behind observed and modelled GrIS warming, but also for quantifying the contribution of large-scale winds to accelerating sea-level rise. This is only possible by taking a conceptually different, dynamical approach contrary to previous studies that have mainly applied diagnostic and statistical approaches to observations and model simulations forced by constant or varying greenhouse gases over the past 40–150 years when examining the effects of atmospheric circulation on GrIS melt11,12,13,25,26.
Here we impose observed winds from the surface to the top-of-the-atmosphere into a fully coupled model (CESM1), while keeping anthropogenic forcing-fixed, and compare our 10-member wind-nudging experiment to the CESM1 40-member large ensemble (CESM-LE36). This comparison reveals the importance of observed winds in causing the recent acceleration of GrIS melt and corresponding increase in the rate of barystatic sea-level rise relative to simulated GrIS changes in the ensemble mean (forced response) and the ensemble spread (internal variability) in the CESM-LE. While nudged winds may show an anthropogenic forcing signature, the comparison between our nudging-run and the CESM-LE mean may more clearly reveal the relative importance of internal/external forcing of observed wind changes. Further, forced wind changes might be affected by model structural biases, which complicates the quantification of the internal/forced observed wind changes. Therefore, we compare our nudging experiment to simulations of 31 climate models participating in the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Phase 5 (CMIP5), which helps to clarify whether any structural bias in the CESM-LE may be common across other models. In addition, we extend our analysis beyond the observational era by utilizing two recently available paleoclimatic proxy-data-assimilated reconstructions (paleo-reanalyses) in addition to independent Greenland ice core and oceanic coral proxy records spanning the past 400 years. These analyses offer the opportunity to derive further insights into the persistence and robustness of the observed wind-driven GrIS warming mechanisms during periods with much less influence from anthropogenic emissions. By doing so we expect to advance the current understanding of large-scale atmospheric forcing driven GrIS surface changes since the early 17th century and contribute to contextualizing uncertainties of current model projections of sea-level rise.
Results
Observed and modelled summer GrIS melt and overlying circulation changes
We first describe past changes in GrIS surface conditions using mass balance estimates from the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE6) in addition to surface mass balance (SMB, Eq. 1 in Methods) and surface air temperature (SAT) simulations from a widely used and GrIS optimized37,38,39 regional climate model, Modéle Atmosphérique Régional, (MAR, Methods), which is 6-hourly forced by the ERA539,40 reanalysis at its boundaries. We also characterize synchronous changes in the overlying atmospheric circulation in ERA5 since 1980 alongside increasing GrIS mass loss3,6.
Both the satellite-observed rate of annual total mass change6 and MAR climate model simulations of summer (June–July-August, JJA) SAT and SMB anomalies over Greenland show substantial interannual variability during 1980–2018 (Fig. 1a). Similar year-to-year variability is observed with sea surface temperatures (SST, Methods) over Baffin Bay (60°−80°N; 50°−70°W) (rSST;SAT = 0.78 (0.67); rSST;SMB = 0.85 (0.77) for raw (linearly detrended) data), indicating a possible shared driving mechanism behind Greenland and proximate ocean surface changes beyond anthropogenic forcing (Fig. 1b). We further reveal concomitant changes in atmospheric circulation over the GrIS by re-creating an often used metric—the Greenland Blocking Index (GBI14,16,41, Methods)—and developing the Greenland Streamfunction Index (GSI, Fig. 1c). The GSI is calculated from the ERA5 500 hPa streamfunction (Ψ500) by spatially averaging the area-weighted Ψ500 anomaly field over the GrIS (20º–80°W; 60º–80°N) in JJA (Methods). The GSI is strongly correlated (r~0.88) with the GBI in summer, but because it reflects the rotational features of large-scale circulation that control the adiabatic warming process in the lower troposphere, it better represents the physical mechanisms discussed herein (Methods).
The ERA5 GSI explains significant part of the interannual variability in MAR-simulated summer SAT/SMB and Baffin Bay SSTs over 1980–2018, regardless of whether the underlying trend is removed or maintained, suggesting that this relationship results primarily from internal variability (r2GSI;SAT = 0.56 (0.46); r2GSI;SMB = 0.69 (0.61); r2GSI;SST = 0.56 (0.53) for raw (linearly detrended) data). The accompanying spatial trends in the MAR-simulated GrIS SAT (0.446 K decade−1) and circulation—as described by ERA5 500hPa geopotential height (Z500; 12–15 m decade−1) and horizontal winds (GSI; 0.844 106 m2 s−1 decade−1)—show synchronous changes over 1980–2018. Such trends suggest that the aforementioned high-pressure-driven adiabatic warming process has likely acted in concert with anthropogenic forcing in shaping GrIS climate variability over the past four decades (Fig. 1d).
Contrary to the observed synchrony between GrIS surface and overlying atmospheric circulation changes, 31 CMIP5 climate models and the 40-member CESM1-LE also indicate less of an influence from wind changes on GrIS warming (Supplementary Fig. 1). It is also the case in version 2 of CESM42 and more generally in the CMIP6 models4,11. These findings suggest the possibility that climate models may misrepresent driving mechanisms; hence, to further interpret the potential consequences, we conduct a wind-nudging model experiment (see Methods).
Separating diabatic vs. adiabatic mechanisms driving GrIS melt
To distinguish between the two dominant mechanisms of observed GrIS summer warming as manifested in the circulation-driven adiabatic component (vertically non-uniform warming) and the radiative forcing-induced diabatic warming (vertically uniform warming), we take a two-step approach in a dynamical modelling framework: first, we use the fully coupled Community Earth System Model 1.2 (nominal 1 degree resolution), and then we employ the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM) Glimmer with a higher spatial resolution (~5 km) to conduct atmospheric wind-nudging experiments without interaction from time-varying anthropogenic forcing. To do so, we set external forcing (greenhouse gases, aerosols, solar) to constant values at the level of the year 2000 (367 ppm), which roughly represent the climatological mean values over 1980–2018. This allows us to directly compare the nudging experiment with ERA5, MAR and the CESM-LE to reveal the relative responses of the GrIS to atmospheric circulation changes and greenhouse gas forcing (see further details in Methods).
Constraining winds in the CESM1 results in the model closely resembling the interannual variability in ERA5 GSI (Fig. 1c, r = 0.81), in MAR GrIS SAT (Fig. 1a, r = 0.84) and in ERSSTv5 Baffin Bay SSTs (Fig. 1b, r = 0.64). As for the summertime spatial trend patterns, on average, 53% of observed SAT, 74% of the Z500 and 35% of the Baffin Bay SST changes between 1980–2018 are captured in the nudging experiment (Fig. 1d, f). A further comparison between our nudging-run-derived GrIS surface conditions and those simulated by each of the CESM-LE members reinforces the differences between the simulated and observed sensitivity of the ice sheet to wind changes seen in other CMIP models4,11,42 (Supplementary Fig. 1). We highlight the contrast between the summer GrIS SAT/GSI trends over 1980–2018 in the observations and simulated in individual members comprising the CESM-LE, which underestimate the ERA5 GSI trend while encompassing the observed SAT trend during 1980–2018 (Fig. 1e). Furthermore, the correlations between GSI and GrIS spatial-averaged SAT are weaker in each individual CESM-LE member than in ERA5 (r~0.75), and only three of these members exhibit equal or greater correlations compared to the nudging experiment (r~0.6) (Fig. 1g).
To account for observed wind changes that may stem from anthropogenic forcing we examine wind changes in the CESM-LE mean and in the multi-model mean of 31 CMIP5 models. Although the CESM-LE (CMIP5) mean GrIS SAT trend is ~90% (~60%) of its ERA5 counterpart, the equivalent value for the GSI is only ~10% (~2%). Compared to the significant wind changes in ERA5, the year-to-year GSI series (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1b) show only subtle changes over 1980–2018 in both CESM-LE and CMIP5 ensemble means. These findings are similar to both the weak trend in 500 hPa horizontal winds in the CESM-LE mean (Supplementary Fig. 2a) and the uniform geopotential height response simulated by other single-model large ensembles15. While <10% of observed wind changes may be affected by anthropogenic forcing, a note of caution is warranted as models may also suffer from structural biases that can obstruct a realistic wind response to anthropogenic emissions, and this shortcoming may limit the certainty of calculations that are currently available.
We further interpret the implications of the lack of circulation changes in models for GrIS melt-driven processes and assess SMB changes, which are directly linked to sea-level rise. First, we separately assess the surface energy balance (SEB; Eq. 2 in Methods) and total precipitation in the nudging simulation, which are the two key SMB components43 (Eq. 1 in Methods). Similar to what we have seen for the GrIS SAT, imposing observed winds in our model experiment is sufficient to simulate a close match with both the summer and annual SEB interannual variabilities (Fig. 2a, b) seen in the ERA5 (1980–2018) and the satellite product (CERES-EBAF44, 2001–2020; Methods). As for interdecadal time scales, the linear trends in the SEB also indicate an overall adequate simulation of satellite-observed changes in the nudging experiment in JJA (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b) and annual means (Supplementary Fig. 3d, e). These results suggest a decisive role for atmospheric circulation in controlling GrIS climate variability from an energy balance perspective. However, in line with the above-demonstrated limitations of the CESM-LE in capturing the circulation-related adiabatic component of GrIS melt, all members of the CESM-LE show relatively small year-to-year coupling between SEB and the GSI compared with ERA5 and the nudging simulation (Supplementary Fig. 4b) and show SEB changes with opposite sign compared with the EBAF over 2001–2020 (Supplementary Fig. 3c, f, g). As for the total precipitation averaged over the GrIS, the nudging experiment performs reasonably well in replicating ERA5 summer and annual mean precipitation (Fig. 2c, d). Although our experiment seems to overestimate precipitation variability over the GrIS, especially before 2000 (~2.8 (~1.6) times greater standard deviation between 1980–2000 (2000–2018)), we conclude that precipitation is highly sensitive to imposed winds in the nudging-run and, therefore, in reality.
To shed light on the contribution of wind-driven circulation directly to SMB variability, we force Glimmer-CISM with the daily output from one member of the nudging experiment (Methods). The resulting Glimmer-CISM annual mean GrIS SMB exhibit similar climatology to the ERA5-forced MAR simulation, albeit with overestimating the ablation zone melt during 1980–2018 (Supplementary Fig. 6). Despite the climatological bias, our experiment qualitatively reproduces the observed features of SMB variability of the past four decades, as shown by the comparison between the spatially averaged SMB anomaly time series from our Glimmer-CISM experiment and the ERA5-forced MAR simulation (Fig. 2f; r = 0.85; Supplementary Fig. 5c).
Wind-driven GrIS mass loss and sea-level rise acceleration
We have seen that, alongside anthropogenically forced diabatic warming, atmospheric circulation changes are an important influence on the energy budget, precipitation and hence surface mass balance of the ice sheet. Besides the total cumulative ice loss from the GrIS, that has led to 10.8 ± 0.9 mm increase in global mean sea-levels over the past three decades6, an additional key aspect is the observed acceleration in the rate of GrIS mass loss (–132.8 Gt yr−1 decade−1) over 1990–20126 that was a dominant contributor to enhanced sea-level rise45,46 (1.2 ± 0.7 mm yr−1 decade−1 over 1993–2017). During 1990–2012, both the ERA5 and the nudging-derived GSI show concomitant increase, followed by a levelling-off until 2018 (Fig. 1c), which corresponds with the lack of tropical forcing and a generally positive North Atlantic Oscillation phase (and less Greenland Blocking) linked to colder conditions over Greenland12,34. Quantifying the contribution of wind-driven circulation to increased GrIS melt and resulting sea-level rise over 1990–2012 is crucial to better contextualize not only the misrepresentation of the adiabatic/diabatic driving mechanisms in the CESM-LE, but also identify the future potential of atmospheric circulation to further amplify as well as to counteract anthropogenically forced GrIS changes.
Our model experiment suggests that atmospheric circulation alone explains 56% (55%) of the observed GrIS SAT (Baffin Bay SST) warming during 1990–2012 (Fig. 3a, b). Areas located along the west, northwest, and north coasts of Greenland and in the north Labrador Sea show the largest contribution from atmospheric circulation toward explaining the observed SAT trends. These patterns are in line with the spatial structure of the high-pressure anomaly above the ice sheet that favours anomalous moisture fluxes to the northwest of the ice sheet30 and subsidence over the west and southwest regions (Fig. 3b; Fig. 1d, f).
About half of the observed total Greenland ice loss is due to reduced SMB-driven meltwater runoff, which we have addressed in the nudging simulations. However, the other half is attributable to glacier dynamical imbalance6. Since the CISM-Glimmer model used in this study is developed to simulate SMB in relatively slow-flowing regions of the GrIS, rather than fast outlet glacier changes, we statistically assess how the melting rates of 260 Greenland outlet glaciers/ice caps47 may be regulated by overlying wind changes. To do so, we utilize the nudging-run-derived GSI that explains significant interannual variability over 1980–2018 of 94 glaciers flanking the southwest (SW), central west (CW) and northwest (NW) of the island (Supplementary Fig. 7a; raverage = 0.43, with up to rmaximum = 0.6). The underlying trend in the glaciers’ mass balance time series, which is a combination of the anthropogenic forcing-induced diabatic warming and the wind-driven adiabatic warming, influences the correlations and only 41 glaciers, located mostly in the SW, show significant correlations after removing the linear trends from the data (raverage = 0.39; rmaximum = 0.48). Based on our nudging simulations, we speculate that winds may influence Greenland glacier surface melt in a similar manner as SAT and SMB. Nonetheless, targeted high-resolution model experiments are needed to support this finding.
In an effort to account for Baffin Bay upper-ocean (0–50 m) warming that influences air-sea-ice interactions, we utilize the ocean component of the nudging experiment to compare upper-ocean temperature trends in the wind-imposed simulation with the ORAS5 reanalysis during 1990–2012. We find significant upper-ocean warming in the wind-nudging simulation over the north Labrador Sea—Baffin Bay area (50º–70°W; 50º–78°N), resembling the vertical cross-section of warming along the west coast of Greenland in the reanalysis (Fig. 3c, d). A comparison of the spatially and vertically averaged upper-ocean temperature time series (Supplementary Fig. 7b) in the nudging experiment with its reanalysis counterpart reveals that about third of the trend can be simulated in our model via the sole imposition of Arctic winds (>60°N). This warming seems to be closely related to the surface net fluxes from the atmosphere into the upper-ocean (Qnet; Supplementary Fig. 7c) with a prominent lead-lag relationship developing in early summer Qnet that leads ocean temperatures until September in both the reanalysis and the nudging experiment (Supplementary Fig. 8). These findings suggest that atmospheric circulation plays an important role in governing Baffin Bay upper-ocean temperatures. Similar findings have recently been shown for other parts of the Arctic Ocean48. We note that those ocean waters that primarily force Greenland termini retreat tend to be situated at the grounding lines of the glaciers49 (>300 m), whose depths extend beyond the scope of this study. However, climate models’ inability to simulate observed wind-driven circulation over the GrIS likely translates into uncertainties involving the simulation of Atlantic Water intrusion into the Baffin Bay, which is of importance, for example, to the destabilization of GrIS outlet glaciers49,50,51 and thus warrants future analysis.
Lastly, motivated by the results from the nudging experiment, we estimate the total Greenland ice loss acceleration driven by the changes in the GSI and its contribution to the increasing rate of sea-level rise. The summer GSI obtained from the nudging-run accounts for about 40% of the interannual variability in the GrIS annual mean mass balance (MB)6 whether or not the underlying trend is removed over 1980–2018 (rGSI;MB = −0.67 (−0.62) for raw (linearly detrended) data). Similar correlations using detrended and raw data motivates the construction of a simple linear regression model to quantify the GSI-driven Greenland ice mass loss acceleration since 1990. After regressing out the summer GSI time series derived from the nudging experiment from the GrIS annual mean rate of mass balance anomaly over 1980–2018 (Fig. 3e), we find that the GSI contributed ~54% of the GrIS mass loss acceleration over 1990–2012 regardless of using linearly detrended or raw data to construct our regression model. This indicates that a substantial portion, –71.7 Gt yr−1 decade−1 (out of the –132.8 Gt yr−1 decade−1) total ice mass change equalling ~0.2 mm yr−1 decade−1 sea-level rise acceleration related to wind-induced adiabatic warming between 1990–2012, which holds potential for atmospheric circulation to affect the rate of sea-level rise to a similar extent in the coming decades.
Fingerprints of remote forcing on the GrIS since AD 1602
We have discussed challenges in quantifying the relative contributions from internal/forced sources behind the observed GrIS ice loss and consequent sea-level rise. We follow-on this discussion first by studying the extent to which the local GrIS circulation variability is excited by remote forcing, i.e. teleconnections induced by tropical sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies. Examining the large-scale picture is important to shed more light on the sources of model biases in simulating the local GrIS circulation-surface coupling, since known limitations of climate models to replicate tropical-Arctic linkages are likely to play a role in the aforementioned model uncertainties15. Then we assess whether this large-scale mechanism is stable beyond the observational era by utilizing paleoclimatic proxy-data-assimilated model experiments and ice core/oceanic coral derived temperature proxies over the past 400 years. Through these analyses, we strive to refine the pathway by which large-scale winds impact GrIS melt, particularly during the period before 1850 under less anthropogenic forcing relative to present day, as a next step to contextualize the model sensitivity issues.
In an effort to address these complexities we utilize that besides describing the local atmosphere-GrIS coupling, the GSI inherently contains information from the rotational feature of large-scale atmospheric circulation. This enables us to study how the local atmospheric circulation variability may be excited by forcing from the lower latitudes. The linearly detrended correlations between the GSI and global Z500 and SST, despite differences in the magnitudes between the JJA and annual mean correlations (Supplementary Fig. 9), show features of a teleconnection linking tropical Pacific cold SST anomalies with anomalous Greenland warming as seen in previous studies32,34,35. Using maximum covariance analysis (MCA, Methods, Supplementary Discussion), we reveal the primary internal coupled mode of variability between Z500 and SST. The MCA(1) spatial patterns of Z500 (Fig. 4a) and SST (Fig. 4b) exhibit a hemispheric teleconnection bridging atmospheric circulation variability over the GrIS with opposite sign (negative Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)-like) changes in the tropical Pacific, and same-sign (positive Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO)-like) changes in the tropical Atlantic. This mode explains ~55% co-variability between large-scale circulation and SST (Fig. 4c) and shows robust correspondence with the observed rate of Greenland ice loss especially between 1990–2012 (r~0.6). The regression of 200hPa streamfunction onto the Z500 expansion coefficient time series (Fig. 4a) resembles the Pacific-Arctic (PARC) teleconnection34 and hence indicates the key role of tropical forcing in forming the mid-tropospheric high-pressure pattern over Greenland through the propagation of stationary Rossby-waves32 (Fig. 4a). This result, alongside a regression of Z500 time series on the year-to-year variability of 200hPa horizontal winds and GrIS SAT in Fig. 4d support the idea that a substantial portion of the observed local GrIS high-pressure is likely driven by remote tropical forcing, however the quantification remains uncertain (see Supplementary Discussion).
Previous studies have raised concerns about non-stationary features of tropical-Arctic teleconnections52 that cast doubt on the reliability of using this framework to guide future climate projections over Greenland. Therefore, we address this point by evaluating the observed teleconnection’s impact on GrIS warming over centennial time scales using the Ensemble Kalman Filter 400 (EKF400) paleo-reanalysis version 253 spanning 1603–2002 AD. This dataset was created by assimilating early instrumental temperature, surface pressure and precipitation observations, temperature and moisture sensitive proxies from tree-ring measurements into the ECHAM5.3 atmospheric general circulation model.
Having repeated the MCA between Z500 and SST, the leading internal SST-Z500 coupled mode in the EKF400 explains nearly the same (~50%) covariance as the PARC and features strikingly similar spatial patterns to their observed counterparts (Fig. 5a, b vs. Fig. 4a, b). To further emphasize the dynamical linkage between the tropics and Greenland, we regress the 200hPa streamfunction from EKF400 onto the Z500 expansion coefficient time series. The resulting regression map closely resembles the one seen using reanalysis (Fig. 5a vs. Fig. 4a). Furthermore, the significant correlations between the SST MCA(1) time series and the PDO* (~−0.9, Methods) or the AMO* (~0.4, Methods) indices calculated from the EKF400 as well as an Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) index reconstruction54 altogether suggest that the notable multidecadal low-frequency variabilities seen in the Z500 and SST MCA(1) time series are analogous to these well-known indices of multidecadal climate variability. In addition, 15 out of the 30 ice core ∆18O records available across the ice sheet, and 10 out of 33 available oceanic coral ∆18O records from PAGES2k show statistically significant correlations with the EKF400-derived GSI (triangles in Fig. 5c, d; Supplementary Table 1, Methods). These observational constraints along with the regression maps of the Z500 expansion coefficient time series onto the SAT and 200hPa horizontal winds over the ice sheet (Fig. 5d) closely match the circulation-surface coupling seen in the observations, and together bolster confidence that the observed large-scale wind-driven Greenland changes are part of a mode of large-scale variability that is consistent over at least the past 400 years. To verify the EKF400 results, we repeat the MCA using the Last Millennium Reanalysis55 (Supplementary Discussion). Although discrepancies exist between the two paleo-reanalyses (Supplementary Figs. 11–12), they altogether support the idea that the significant enhancement of GrIS melting between 1990 and 2012 and associated acceleration in the rate of sea-level rise have been a manifestation of low-frequency variability in the climate system, predominantly arising from natural variability27,34.
Discussion
Our wind-nudging experiment highlights the contribution of large-scale winds to rapid Greenland warming, the acceleration in GrIS mass loss and related sea-level rise since the early 1990s through a tropically-excited teleconnection that modulates the high-pressure driven adiabatic warming over the ice sheet. This constitutes a new framework for tropical decadal variability to influence global sea-levels through GrIS-related barystatic sea-level rise in addition to regulating ocean thermal expansion56,57. The out-of-phase relationship between tropical Pacific SST and Greenland SAT anomalies associated with the PARC teleconnection results in accelerated GrIS melt and thus an increase in sea-levels during PDO-negative, which counteracts the coherent decrease in ocean thermal expansion and the increase in ocean-to-land water transport yielding a drop in sea-levels58. This may explain why GrIS-driven barystatic sea-level rise shows acceleration since the 1990s, whereas the rate of thermal expansion-related sea-level rise is rather constant46. Although the quantification of the tropical forcing in regulating the local wind-driven process remains unclear (Supplementary Discussion), evidence based on paleo-reanalyses and proxy records lends temporal credibility to the persistence of the abovementioned pathway.
To further our previous discussion on the forced/internal nature of observed GrIS surface and overlying circulation changes, we show the contrast between temperature changes over the GrIS in ERA5 and in the forced response in the CESM-LE (ensemble mean) by examining the summertime trend in temperature, geopotential height, and vertical motion (omega) zonally averaged over the ice sheet (Supplementary Fig. 10). In contrast to the vertical structure of temperature and geopotential height changes accompanied by significant downward motion in the lower troposphere in ERA5 (Supplementary Fig. 10a), the 40-member ensemble mean reflects anthropogenically-induced warming processes by simulating vertically uniform temperature and geopotential height changes associated with upward vertical motion (Supplementary Fig. 10b). Imposing ERA5 winds in the CESM1, however, captures the observed vertical temperature and geopotential height structures as well as the downward motion (Supplementary Fig. 10c) albeit with differences in the boundary layer likely related to vertical resolution of the CESM1. These features are also seen on the corresponding correlation maps between the GSI and the zonally averaged temperature over the ice sheet (Supplementary Fig. 10d–f). This analysis may offer a guide to future efforts targeting the nudging of winds in other climate models—possibly at higher resolution to better account for boundary layer processes, e.g. inversions, which are suggested to be a key contributor to GrIS surface changes59—, and also points to a possible source of model deficiency that needs further attention and evaluation to better constrain the forced temperature response over the ice sheet.
Improved simulation of the GrIS’s observed sensitivity to wind-driven changes in climate models may thus provide a means of significantly improving predictions of the GrIS’s future contribution to global environmental crises, including freshwater discharge into the Atlantic Ocean that may influence the recently observed AMOC slow-down54,60, global sea-level rise1,7,61 and toxic mercury export from the ice sheet to the global oceans62. We hypothesize that the local atmospheric circulation bias may also be linked to model limitations in simulating tropical-Arctic teleconnections and their sensitivity to low-frequency tropical SST variability and/or high-latitude sea-ice-ocean-atmosphere interactions15,19, which, according to previous studies63,64, could arise from biases in simulating low-frequency SST and rainfall variability over the tropical eastern Pacific and the climatological mean flow over the North Pacific.
In a recent study Hofer et al. showed4 that improvements in CMIP6 models, partially related to better radiative (cloud) feedbacks22, led to simulating unprecedented GrIS melting rates by 2100 even without substantial improvements in modelling connections of large-scale circulation with local warming processes in the Arctic and over Greenland16,18,19. Thus, the misrepresented sensitivity of Greenland to large-scale winds in climate models prioritizes a need to refocus model evaluation efforts from expecting the models to match observed surface warming rates in their forced responses and instead assess model skill in simulating the observed sensitivity of the GrIS to overlying circulation changes. Identifying those CMIP5/6 models that have a better representation of Arctic atmospheric circulation—even if these models are currently regarded as ‘low sensitivity models’65—may help to provide alternative, dynamically coherent future GrIS climate projections that can enable more effective adaptation and mitigation plans to sea-level rise.
Methods
IMBIE 2019 Greenland ice sheet mass balance data
We use the rate of annual Greenland ice sheet mass balance data from the IMBIE 2019 Greenland Dataset as the satellite-based observational estimate of ice mass changes in the GrIS over 1980–2018. The dataset represents reconciled mass balance estimates from three independent satellite-based techniques (gravimetry, altimetry and input-output method) that are part of the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE6).
Modéle Atmosphérique Régional (MAR)
We use model output from the MAR, which is a regional climate model66 specifically designed and physically optimized for polar areas67. The MAR combines atmospheric modelling66 with the Soil Ice Snow Vegetation Atmosphere Transfer Scheme37 and has been thoroughly evaluated and used to simulate surface energy balance and mass balance processes over the GrIS38,68. We use model version 3.11 6-hourly forced at its lateral boundaries (temperature, specific humidity, wind speed, pressure, sea surface temperature, and sea-ice concentration) by ERA5 reanalysis at 1 × 1 km2 spatial resolution at monthly time steps during 1980–2018. We use the SMB and near surface temperature variables from the MAR simulations’ monthly means. The MAR near surface temperature fields are considered to be the closest match (relative to ERA-I or ERA5 reanalyses) to satellite-observed GrIS surface temperatures39. The SMB is calculated in the MAR according to Eq. 1.
Reanalysis, satellite and large ensemble climate model data
We use the ERA5 reanalysis40 and the Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) dataset version 569 from 1980 to 2018 and the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF44) edition 4.1 monthly means of surface net long- and shortwave data for a satellite-based, simplified (excluding latent and sensible heat fluxes, indicated by SEB*) estimate for Greenland surface energy balance for 2001–2020. EBAF is considered to be a leading benchmarking tool for evaluating the Arctic radiative budget in model simulations70. We also use the ORAS5 ocean reanalysis product71.
CESM1 large ensemble simulations
We use the 40-member CESM1 large ensemble (CESM-LE36) to place observed GrIS changes in the context of simulated internal variability and the ensemble mean is used to approximate the forced response of the climate system to anthropogenic radiative forcing. The CESM-LE is forced by CMIP5 historical forcing72 until 2005 and RCP8.5 forcing for 2006–2020 with slight perturbations in the initial conditions for each member to simulate internal variability of the climate system underlying the externally forced climate change.
Greenland streamfunction/blocking index
To characterize wind-driven circulation aloft the GrIS while synchronously taking into consideration large-scale hemispheric variability, we compute the mean of the area-weighted 500hPa streamfunction calculated from the 500hPa horizontal wind field in ERA5 over the GrIS (80°−20°W; 60°−80°N) to get the Greenland streamfunction index (GSI). The 200 hPa GSI is calculated in a similar way. This GSI is similar to and strongly correlated (r = 0.88) with the Greenland Blocking Index (GB216). GB2 is commonly used to represent GrIS atmospheric circulation/blocking changes and is calculated by subtracting the area-weighted mean Z500 over the whole 60º–80°N hemispheric zonal band from the area-weighted mean Z500 over the GrIS (20°−80°W 60°−80°N). The GSI has the advantage that it considers rotational features of large-scale atmospheric circulation, which are the driving mechanisms behind atmospheric teleconnections, and we therefore use the GSI in our study.
Nudging experiments with the CESM1 fully coupled model
First, we use the fully coupled CESM1, including atmosphere (CAM5), ocean (POP2), sea-ice (CICE4) and land (CLM4.5) components, to conduct nudging experiments to explore and quantify the influence of circulation changes on the GrIS. We use 6-hourly zonal and meridional winds from ERA5 to constrain the Arctic (>60°N) circulation in the CESM1 from the surface to top-of-atmosphere while keeping all external forcing agents (solar, GHG, aerosols, etc.) constant at their year 2000 levels. Note, that the response of CESM1 to nudged winds appeared to be insensitive to whether we imposed winds only above the boundary layer (>850 hPa) or from the surface of the model. During the nudging procedure, simulated winds are relaxed in each time step to corresponding ERA5 winds (interpolated from 6 h interval to model time steps (1800 s)) by adding an additional tendency term in the momentum equations, which is calculated as the difference between ERA5 winds and models’ winds at each grid in each step. In our experiments, full nudging is utilized so that zonal and meridional winds are forced to vary exactly as observed in the model within the Arctic. In this way, we can perfectly ‘replay’ observed circulation variability in the Arctic atmosphere while other components respond to these specified wind changes. In addition, a long spin-up run is conducted before the 10-member nudging runs to ensure that the nudging simulation has no significant ‘numerical shock’ in the early period when reanalysis winds are suddenly added in the Arctic. To do so, a 150-year long external forcing-fixed (at year 2000 levels) nudging simulation is performed with the model perpetually nudged to winds of year 1979 in the Arctic in the same setting as what we will use in the following 10-member nudging runs. 150 years was deemed an adequate period for the model to well adjust to perpetually imposed reanalysis winds (year 1979) in the Arctic and to reach an equilibrium state. The model states on 1 January of the last 10 years of this spin-up are then used as initial conditions to reinitiate a set of new 10 members of 40-yr nudging simulations in which nudged winds in the Arctic began to vary from 1979 to 2020. We mainly focus on the ensemble mean of the 10 members in the CESM1 nudging experiments.
Nudging experiments with the CESM1.0 Glimmer-CISM v.1.6 ice sheet model
Second, due to computational limitations and the need for forcing fields at high temporal resolution (3-hourly), we select the output fields derived from one member (no. 4) of the 10-member nudging experiments to drive the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM) Glimmer version 1.673 and study the model variable “acab = accumulation and ablation rate [m/yr]; land ice surface specific mass balance” as a counterpart for MAR SMB. We select this member because the GSI trend generated in this member is the closest to the ensemble mean GSI trend, which we consider to best represent an averaged effect of circulation changes produced by all the members in the nudging experiment. The Glimmer model requires atmospheric 3-hourly (precipitation, solar radiation, temperature, pressure, humidity and winds at the surface) forcing fields that specify the state of the atmosphere and the radiative fluxes above the GrIS. All these 3-hourly forcing fields are generated by CESM1 in which the models’ winds are nudged to ERA5 reanalysis in the Arctic (>60°N). Although the CISM-Glimmer’s positive-degree-day (PDD) scheme relating surface air temperatures to ice melting (for further details see Section 1.5 in https://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm1.0/cism/docs/glimmer.pdf) is insufficient to properly model future climate changes (because the empirical formulae used for present climate may change under climate change), it is adequate for use in our nudging approach where we only qualitatively investigate circulation-driven GrIS accumulation/ablation rates. Since the CISM-Glimmer’s “acab” approximates the MAR surface mass balance, forcing the CISM-Glimmer with a member from the CESM1 fully coupled nudging simulations enables wind-driven adiabatic Greenland surface mass balance changes to be distinguished from diabatic processes. Caveats of the CISM-Glimmer nudging experiment include climatological biases in the simulation of surface mass balance and an overestimated melting over the period 1980–2018 compared to MAR (Supplementary Fig. 6) that is probably related to known limitations of the CISM-Glimmer such as the only available shallow ice-dynamics and the PDD scheme. Nevertheless, the qualitative comparison is still viable, as seen in Fig. 2 and surrounding discussions in the main text.
Paleo-reanalyses and ice core data
We utilize two paleoclimatic data-assimilated climate model experiments, the Ensemble Kalman Fitting (EKF) 400 version 253 and the Last Millennium Reanalysis version 2.155. Both products assimilate early instrumental observations along with proxy data including tree ring width (TRW), maximum latewood density (MXD), oceanic coral and other sediment proxy data, but only the LMR2.1 assimilates ice cores from the GrIS. For assimilated data details see refs. 53,55. We primarily focus on the EKF400 and its timescale (AD 1602–2003) because of slight differences in available variables from the two reanalyses; the advantage of EKF400 is that it provides horizontal winds at 200hPa to calculate streamfunction from, which is a key metric used to measure circulation-driven changes over the Greenland ice sheet. The main goal of the application of these extended reanalysis datasets is to provide evidence for the consistency of observed circulation-driven GrIS climate variability over centennial time scales.
When comparing the expansion coefficient time series derived from the MCA between large-scale circulation variability and sea surface temperatures (SST) in the EKF400 to known decadal SST variability indices, we compute the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO*) index along with the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO*) index from the EKF400, marked with an asterisk in the main text. The PDO* is defined as the first principal component time series of the EOF of SST poleward of 20°N, while the AMO* is the spatially averaged SST in the North Atlantic basin over 0º–80°N after having removed the global mean SST (for both the PDO* and AMO*).
We further utilize 30 ice core records (with record lengths varying between 194 and 384 years) from the ISO2k database74 that are not assimilated in the EKF400 and 33 coral records (Supplementary Table 1) from PAGES2k75 that are assimilated in the EKF40053 as the basis of observational constraints when evaluating the EKF400 simulated past 400 years Greenland surface temperatures and the tropical-Arctic teleconnection in Fig. 5b, d. We have selected the ice core and coral proxy records that were available with at least annual resolution.
Statistical analysis and significance
Maximum Covariance Analysis (MCA76) is applied to reveal the maximum coupled variability in large-scale circulation and sea surface temperatures using singular value decomposition of the covariance matrix between Z500 and SST. The effective sample size (N) is used to determine the statistical significance in the study as computed by
where r1 and r2 are lag-one autocorrelation coefficients of each variable and M is the original sample size. A 95% confidence level is used to determine the significance.
Data availability
The MAR model simulations (ftp://ftp.climato.be/fettweis/MARv3.11), the ERA5 reanalysis (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=overview), the Greenland satellite derived mass balance data (http://imbie.org/data-downloads/), the CESM-LE simulations (https://www.cesm.ucar.edu/projects/community-projects/LENS/data-sets.html), the EKF400 version 2 simulation (https://doi.org/10.26050/WDCC/EKF400_v2.0) and the LMR2.1 data (https://atmos.washington.edu/~hakim/lmr/LMRv2/) are freely available using the access links above. The Source Data used in this study are available in Zenodo under accession code https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7081743. The nudging experiments (due to their large size) are available upon request from Q.D.
Code availability
Previous and current CESM1 versions are freely available at www.cesm.ucar.edu:/models/cesm2/. Fortran and Python codes of the analysis are available from D.T. on reasonable request.
References
Briner, J. P. et al. Rate of mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet will exceed Holocene values this century. Nature 586, 70–74 (2020).
Fettweis, X. et al. GrSMBMIP: Intercomparison of the modelled 1980–2012 surface mass balance over the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 14, 3935–3958 (2020).
Hanna, E. et al. Mass balace of the ice sheets and glaciers – progress since AR5 and challenges. Earth Sci. Rev. 201, 102976 (2020).
Hofer, S. et al. Greater Greenland Ice Sheet contribution to global sea level rise in CMIP6. Nat. Commun. 11, 6289 (2020).
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Masson-Delmotte, V.). (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
The IMBIE Team, Shepherd, A. et al. Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018. Nature 579, 233–239 (2020).
Slater, T., Hogg, A. E. & Mottram, R. Ice-sheet losses track high-end sea-level rise projections. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 879–881 (2020).
Noël, B., van Kampenhout, L., Lenaerts, J. T. M., van de Berg, W. J. & van den Broeke, M. R. A 21st century warming threshold for sustained Greenland ice sheet mass loss. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL090471 (2021).
Fettweis, X. et al. Brief communication: Important role of the mid-tropospheric atmospheric circulation in the recent surface melt increase over the Greenland ice sheet. Cryosphere 7, 241–248 (2013).
Ballinger, T. J. et al. Greenland coastal air temperatures linked to Baffin Bay and Greenland Sea ice conditions during autumn through regional blocking patterns. Clim. Dyn. 50, 83–100 (2018).
Delhasse, A., Fettweis, X., Kittel, C., Amory, C. & Agosta, C. Brief communication: Impact of the recent atmospheric circulation change in summer on the future surface mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 12, 3409–3418 (2018).
Bevis, M. et al. Accelerating changes in ice mass within Greenland, and the ice sheet’s sensitivity to atmospheric forcing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1934–1939 (2019).
Tedesco, M. & Fettweis, X. Unprecedented atmospheric conditions (1948–2019) drive the 2019 exceptional melting season over the Greenland ice sheet. Cryosphere 14, 1209–1223 (2020).
Hanna, E. et al. Greenland surface air temperature changes from 1981 to 2019 and implications for ice-sheet melt and mass-balance change. Int. J. Climatol. 41, E1336–E1352 (2021).
Topál, D. et al. An internal atmospheric process determining summertime Arctic Sea ice melting in the next three decades: lessons learned from five large ensembles and multiple CMIP5 climate simulations. J. Clim. 33, 7431–7454 (2020).
Hanna, E., Fettweis, X. & Hall, R. J. Brief communication: recent changes in summer Greenland blocking captured by none of the CMIP5 models. Cryosphere 12, 3287–3292 (2018).
Ballinger, T. et al. Anomalous blocking over Greenland preceded the 2013 extreme early melt of local sea ice. Ann. Glaciol. 59, 181–190 (2018).
Delhasse, A., Hanna, E., Kittel, C. & Fettweis, X. Brief communication: CMIP6 does not suggest any atmospheric blocking increase in summer over Greenland by 2100. Int. J. Climatol. 41, 2589–2596 (2021).
Luo, R. et al. Summertime atmosphere–sea ice coupling in the Arctic simulated by CMIP5/6 models: Importance of large-scale circulation. Clim. Dyn. 56, 1467–1485 (2021).
Bennartz, R. et al. 2012 July Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds. Nature 496, 83–86 (2013).
Tedesco, M. et al. The darkening of the Greenland ice sheet: trends, drivers, and projections (1981–2100). Cryosphere 10, 477–496 (2016).
Van Tricht, K. et al. Clouds enhance Greenland ice sheet meltwater runoff. Nat. Commun. 7, 10266 (2016).
Zelinka, M. D. et al. Causes of higher climate sensitivity in CMIP6 models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, 1–12 (2020).
Hofer, S. et al. Cloud microphysics and circulation anomalies control differences in future Greenland melt. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 523–528 (2019).
Hanna, E. et al. The influence of North Atlantic atmospheric and oceanic forcing effects on 1900–2010 Greenland summer climate and ice melt/runoff. Int. J. Climatol. 33, 862–880 (2013).
Sherman, P., Tziperman, E., Deser, C. & McElroy, M. Historical and future roles of internal atmospheric variability in modulating summertime Greenland Ice Sheet melt. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL086913 (2020).
Ding, Q. et al. Influence of high-latitude atmospheric circulation changes on summertime Arctic sea ice. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 289–295 (2017).
Hermann, M., Papritz, L. & Wernli, H. A Lagrangian analysis of the dynamical and thermodynamic drivers of large-scale Greenland melt events during 1979–2017. Weather Clim. Dynam. 1, 497–518 (2020).
Huang, Y. et al. Summertime low clouds mediate the impact of the large-scale circulation on Arctic sea ice. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 38 (2021).
Noël, B., van de Berg, W. J., Lhermitte, S. & van den Broeke, M. R. Rapid ablation zone expansion amplifies north Greenland mass loss. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0123 (2019).
Hofer, S., Tedstone, A. J., Fettweis, X. & Bamber, J. L. Decreasing cloud cover drives the recent mass loss on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700584 (2017).
Ding, Q. et al. Tropical forcing of the recent rapid Arctic warming in northeastern Canada and Greenland. Nature 509, 209–212 (2014).
Hanna, E. et al. Greenland blocking index daily series 1851–2015: Analysis of changes in extremes and links with North Atlantic and UK climate variability and change. Int. J. Climatol. 38, 3546–3564 (2018).
Baxter, I. et al. How tropical pacific surface cooling contributed to accelerated sea ice melt from 2007 to 2012 as ice is thinned by anthropogenic forcing. J. Clim. 32, 8583–8602 (2019).
Ballinger, T. J. et al. The role of blocking circulation and emerging open water feedbacks on Greenland cold-season air temperature variability over the last century. Int. J. Climatol. 41, E2778–E2800 (2021).
Kay, J. et al. The Community Earth System Model (CESM) Large Ensemble Project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1333–1349 (2015).
Fettweis, X. et al. Reconstructions of the 1900–2015 Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance using the regional climate MAR model. Cryosphere 11, 1015–1033 (2017).
Fettweis, X., Tedesco, M., van den Broeke, M. & Ettema, J. Melting trends over the Greenland ice sheet (1958–2009) from spaceborne microwave data and regional climate models. Cryosphere 5, 359–375 (2011).
Delhasse, A. et al. Brief communication: evaluation of the near-surface climate in ERA5 over the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 14, 957–965 (2020).
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Hanna, E., Cropper, T. E., Hall, R. J. & Cappelen, J. Greenland blocking index 1851–2015: a regional climate change signal. Int. J. Climatol. 36, 4847–4861 (2016).
Noël, B. et al. Brief communication: CESM2 climate forcing (1950–2014) yields realistic Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance. Cryosphere 14, 1425–1435 (2020).
Lenaerts, J. T. M., Medley, B., Broeke, M. R. & Wouters, B. Observing and modeling ice sheet surface mass balance. Rev. Geophys. 57, 376–420 (2019).
Kato, S. et al. Surface Irradiances of Edition 4.0 Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Data Product. J. Clim. 31, 4501–4527 (2018).
Ablain, M. et al. Uncertainty in satellite estimate of global mean sea level changes, trend and acceleration. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2, 1–26 (2019).
Chen, X. et al. The increasing rate of global mean sea-level rise during 1993–2014. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 492–495 (2017).
Mouginot, J. et al. Forty-six years of Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance from 1972 to 2018. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9239–9244 (2019).
Li, Z. et al. Recent upper Arctic Ocean warming expedited by summertime atmospheric processes. Nat. Commun. 13, 362 (2022).
Wood, M. et al. Ocean forcing drives glacier retreat in Greenland. Sci. Adv. 7, eaba7282 (2021).
Rignot, E., Fenty, I., Menemenlis, D. & Xu, Y. Spreading of warm ocean waters around Greenland as a possible cause for glacier acceleration. Ann. Glaciol. 53, 257–266 (2012).
Holland, D. M., Thomas, R. H., de Young, B., Ribergaard, M. H. & Lyberth, B. Acceleration of Jakobshavn Isbræ triggered by warm subsurface ocean waters. Nat. Geosci. 1, 659–664 (2008).
Bonan, D. B. & Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E. Nonstationary teleconnection between the Pacific Ocean and Arctic sea ice. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085666 (2020).
Valler, V., Franke, J., Brugnara, Y. & Brönnimann, S. An updated global atmospheric paleo-reanalysis covering the last 400 years. Geosci. Data J. 00, 1–19 (2021).
Rahmstorf, S. et al. Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 475–480 (2015).
Tardif, R. et al. Last Millennium Reanalysis with an expanded proxy database and seasonal proxy modeling. Clim. Past 15, 1251–1273 (2019).
Han, W. et al. Intensification of decadal and multi-decadal sea level variability in the western tropical Pacific during recent decades. Clim. Dyn. 43, 1357–1379 (2014).
Hamlington, B. D. et al. The dominant global modes of recent internal sea level variability. J. Geophys Res. Oceans 124, 2750–2768 (2019).
Boening, C., Willis, J. K., Landerer, F. W., Nerem, R. S. & Fasullo, J. The 2011 La Niña: so strong, the oceans fell. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L19602 (2012).
Shahi, S., Abermann, J., Heinrich, G., Prinz, R. & Schöner, W. Regional variability and trends of temperature inversions in Greenland. J. Clim. 33, 9391–9940 (2020).
Caesar, L. et al. Current Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation weakest in last millennium. Nat. Geosci. 14, 118–120 (2021).
Frederikse, T. et al. The causes of sea-level rise since 1900. Nature 584, 393–397 (2020).
Hawkings, J. R. et al. Large subglacial source of mercury from the southwestern margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Nat. Geosci. 14, 496–502 (2021).
Ding, Q. & Wang, B. Circumglobal teleconnection in the northern hemisphere summer. J. Clim. 18, 3483–3505 (2005).
Ding, Q., Wang, B., Wallace, J. M. & Branstator, G. Tropical–extratropical teleconnections in boreal summer: observed interannual variability. J. Clim. 24, 1878–1896 (2011).
Zhu, J., Poulsen, C. J. & Otto-Bliesner, B. L. High climate sensitivity in CMIP6 model not supported by paleoclimate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 378–379 (2020).
Gallée, H. & Schayes, G. Development of a three-dimensional meso-γ primitive equation model: Katabatic winds simulation in the area of Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica. Mon. Weather Rev. 122, 671–685 (1994).
Amory, C. et al. Comparison between observed and simulated aeolian snow mass fluxes in Adélie Land, East Antarctica. Cryosphere 9, 1373–1383 (2015).
Fettweis, X. Reconstruction of the 1979–2006 Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance using the regional climate model MAR. Cryosphere 1, 21–40 (2007).
Huang, B. et al. NOAA Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST), version 5 [global]. https://doi.org/10.7289/V5T72FNM. (2018).
Loeb, N. G. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product. J. Clim. 31, 895–918 (2018).
Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M. A., Tietsche, S., Mogensen, K. & Mayer, M. The ECMWF operational ensemble reanalysis-analysis system for ocean and sea ice: a description of the system and assessment. Ocean Sci. 15, 779–808 (2019).
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).
Rutt, I., Hagdorn, M., Hulton, N. & Payne, A. The Glimmer community ice sheet model. J. Geophys. Res. 114, F02004 (2009).
Konecky, B. L. et al. The Iso2k database: a global compilation of paleo-δ18O and δ2H records to aid understanding of Common Era climate. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2261–2288 (2020).
PAGES2k Consortium. A global multiproxy database for temperature reconstructions of the Common Era. Sci. Data 4, 170088 (2017).
Bretherton, C. S., Smith, C. & Wallace, J. M. An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data. J. Clim. 5, 541–560 (1992).
Acknowledgements
This project is jointly supported by Climate Variability & Predictability (NA18OAR4310424, Q.D.) and Modeling, Analysis, Predictions and Projections (NA19OAR4310281, Q.D.) programs as part of NOAA’s Climate Program Office, NSF’s Polar Programs (OPP-1744598, Q.D.) and the ÚNKP-20-3 (D.T.) New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology. The paper was prepared with the professional support of the Doctoral Student Scholarship Program of the Co-operative Doctoral Program of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology (D.T.) in addition to the 2019-2.1.11-TÉT-2020-00114 (D.T.) and FK135115 (D.T.) financed from the National Research, Development and Innovation fund. Computational resources used to perform MAR simulations have been provided by the Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif (CÉCI), funded by the F.R.S.FNRS under grant 2.5020.11 and the Tier-1 supercomputer (Zenobe) of the Fédération Wallonie Bruxelles infrastructure funded by the Walloon Region under grant agreement 1117545. We acknowledge the CESM Large Ensemble Community Project and supercomputing resources provided by NSF/CISL/Yellowstone (https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX).
Funding
Open access funding provided by ELKH Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.D., T.B. and D.T. equally conceived the study. D.T. analyzed the data, created the figures and wrote the first draft with input from Q.D. and T.B. Q.D. created the nudging simulations involving D.T., T.B. provided valuable feedback to D.T. on data analysis, Z.L. processed the ocean data. E.H. provided feedback on the GSI comparisons with the GBI. T.B. and E.H. contributed with insightful comments on the presentation and the structure of the manuscript. X.F. provided MARv3.11 outputs. X.F. and I.P. contributed with discussions and helpful comments on the text. All authors participated in revising the manuscript led by D.T., Q.D. and T.B.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Topál, D., Ding, Q., Ballinger, T.J. et al. Discrepancies between observations and climate models of large-scale wind-driven Greenland melt influence sea-level rise projections. Nat Commun 13, 6833 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34414-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34414-2
This article is cited by
-
Role of atmospheric rivers in shaping long term Arctic moisture variability
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Short- and long-term variability of the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2024)
-
Atmospheric circulation-constrained model sensitivity recalibrates Arctic climate projections
Nature Climate Change (2023)
-
A dynamic link between spring Arctic sea ice and the Tibetan Plateau snow increment indicator
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2023)