Abstract
Hox transcription factors play fundamental roles during early patterning, but they are also expressed continuously, from embryonic stages through adulthood, in the nervous system. However, the functional significance of their sustained expression remains unclear. In C. elegans motor neurons (MNs), we find that LIN-39 (Scr/Dfd/Hox4-5) is continuously required during post-embryonic life to maintain neurotransmitter identity, a core element of neuronal function. LIN-39 acts directly to co-regulate genes that define cholinergic identity (e.g., unc-17/VAChT, cho-1/ChT). We further show that LIN-39, MAB-5 (Antp/Hox6-8) and the transcription factor UNC-3 (Collier/Ebf) operate in a positive feedforward loop to ensure continuous and robust expression of cholinergic identity genes. Finally, we identify a two-component design principle for homeostatic control of Hox gene expression in adult MNs: Hox transcriptional autoregulation is counterbalanced by negative UNC-3 feedback. These findings uncover a noncanonical role for Hox proteins during post-embryonic life, critically broadening their functional repertoire from early patterning to the control of neurotransmitter identity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Information flow in the nervous system critically relies on the ability of distinct neuron types to synthesize and package into synaptic vesicles specific chemical substances, known as neurotransmitters (NTs). Hence, a core functional feature of each neuron type is its NT identity, defined by the co-expression of genes encoding proteins necessary for the synthesis, packaging, and breakdown of a particular NT. Although rare instances of NT identity switching have been described in the nervous system1,2, it is generally accepted that individual neuron types acquire a specific NT identity during development and maintain it throughout life.
In the case of cholinergic neurons, the enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) synthesizes acetylcholine (ACh) from its precursor choline, the vesicular ACh transporter (VAChT) packages ACh into synaptic vesicles, and the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) breaks down ACh upon its release into choline. The choline transporter (ChT) reuptakes choline back into the cholinergic neuron (Fig. 1a)3. Co-expression of all these proteins throughout the life of a cholinergic neuron ensures the continuation of ACh biosynthesis, and thereby the communication of cholinergic neurons with their post-synaptic targets. Importantly, reduced expression of ACh pathway proteins has been associated with multiple neurological disorders4,5,6. Despite the widespread use of ACh in every nervous system7,8, how the co-expression of ACh pathway proteins is controlled over time, from development through adulthood, is poorly understood. A handful of studies in C. elegans and mice identified LIM and POU homeodomain transcription factors as necessary during development for ACh pathway gene expression in various types of cholinergic neurons9,10,11,12. However, the mechanisms that maintain the expression of ACh pathway genes during post-embryonic life are largely unknown.
Motor neurons (MNs) in the spinal cord of vertebrates and the ventral nerve cord of many invertebrates use ACh to communicate with their muscle targets. The nematode C. elegans contains six different classes (types) of MNs within its ventral nerve cord that are cholinergic13. Five classes (DA, DB, VA, VB, AS) control locomotion and are sex-shared (found in C. elegans males and hermaphrodites), whereas one class (VC) controls egg-laying and is found only in hermaphrodites. Each MN class contains several members (DA = 9 neurons, DB = 7, VA = 12, VB = 11, AS = 11, VC = 6) that intermingle along the nerve cord. The cholinergic identity of these MNs is defined by the expression of unc-17 (VAChT), cha-1 (ChAT), ace-2 (AChE), and cho-1 (ChT) (Fig. 1a)14,15. The rapid life cycle of C. elegans (~3 days from embryo to adult), the established methods to inactivate transcription factor activity in the adult, and the availability of reporter animals for all ACh pathway genes offer a unique opportunity to probe in vivo, and with single-cell resolution, the molecular mechanisms that maintain cholinergic identity during post-embryonic life.
Members of the HOX family of homeodomain transcription factors play fundamental roles during early development in anterior–posterior patterning and body plan formation16,17. Seminal studies in worms, flies, zebrafish, and mice have also established critical roles for Hox genes during the early development of the nervous system18,19,20,21,22. For example, Hox gene inactivation can affect the specification and/or survival of neuronal progenitors, as well as the differentiation, survival, migration, and/or connectivity of young post-mitotic neurons18,19,20,21,22. The focus on early development, however, combined with a lack of temporally controlled gene inactivation approaches that bypass early Hox pleiotropies (e.g., lethality, effects on neural progenitors) has resulted in an incomplete understanding of Hox gene functions in the nervous system. Emerging evidence in C. elegans, Drosophila, mice, and humans shows that Hox genes are expressed continuously, from development throughout adulthood, in certain neuron types23,24,25,26,27,28,29. However, the functional significance of sustained Hox gene expression in adult post-mitotic neurons remains unknown.
Individual neuron types acquire their NT identity during development and maintain it throughout life. Previous work in C. elegans showed that the Hox gene lin-39 (Scr/Dfd/Hox4-5) is required for the production of serotonergic neurons in males and egg-laying (VC class) motor neurons in hermaphrodites30,31,32,33,34, but whether lin-39 acts in post-mitotic neurons to regulate NT identity genes was not tested. Hence, the role of Hox proteins in the control of NT identity remains unclear. Here, we show that LIN-39 is continuously required to maintain the expression of ACh pathway genes in cholinergic MNs, thereby securing their NT identity and function. In MNs that control locomotion, LIN-39 cooperates with another Hox protein MAB-5 (Antp/Hox6-8), and the transcription factor UNC-3 (Collier/Ebf) to directly activate the expression of ACh pathway genes. Moreover, LIN-39 and MAB-5 also regulate the expression levels of unc-3, thereby generating a positive feedforward loop that ensures the robustness of ACh pathway gene expression throughout life. Importantly, we find that Hox gene expression is under homeostatic control and propose a two-component design principle that maintains optimal levels of Hox gene expression in MNs over time: Hox transcriptional autoregulation (component 1) is counterbalanced by negative UNC-3 feedback (component 2). Because Hox genes are expressed in the adult nervous system of invertebrate and vertebrate animals, their functional role in the maintenance of NT identity may be deeply conserved.
Results
The Hox gene lin-39 maintains the identity of motor neurons necessary for egg laying
We initially focused on the hermaphrodite-specific VC MNs, for which regulators of their cholinergic identity remain unknown. The Hox gene lin-39 (Scr/Dfd/Hox4-5) is continuously expressed in VC neurons, from the time they are born (larval stage 1, L1) until adulthood (Fig. 1b) (Supplementary Fig. 1)35. However, animals carrying strong loss-of-function alleles for lin-39 lack VC neurons (lin-39 controls VC survival)31,33, preventing us from testing its role in the regulation of VC cholinergic identity determinants unc-17/VAChT and cho-1/ChT (Supplementary Fig. 1)15. To bypass this, we generated double mutant animals for lin-39 and ced-3 (VC cell death depends on ced-3 caspase activity)31,33, and indeed observed that VC neurons are normally generated in these animals (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1d, e). Compared to controls, the number of VC neurons expressing unc-17 and cho-1 reporters was significantly reduced in lin-39(n1760); ced-3(n1286) double mutants in the adult (day 1) stage (Fig. 1c, d). Subsequent fluorescence intensity analysis with higher resolution revealed that expression of the cholinergic marker unc-17::gfp is significantly reduced, but not completely eliminated (Fig. 1e). For the unc-17 and cho-1 expression analysis, we used fosmid (~30 kb-long genomic clone)-based reporters, which despite their multicopy nature (overexpression), tend to faithfully recapitulate endogenous gene expression patterns15. Altogether, these findings suggest that, during larval development, lin-39 controls the expression of VC cholinergic identity determinants (Fig. 1f).
The sustained expression of lin-39 in VC MNs during adulthood raises the question of whether it is continuously required to maintain cholinergic identity. Because the lin-39(n1760) allele removes gene activity starting in early development, we used a previously validated lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AID allele that codes for a LIN-39 protein fused to mNG::3xFLAG (serves as an endogenous reporter) and auxin-inducible degron (AID) (enables LIN-39 depletion in a temporally-controlled manner)36,37 (Fig. 1g). We initiated auxin treatment at the last larval stage (L4) and maintained animals on auxin until the first day of adulthood (Fig. 1h). This led to efficient LIN-39 depletion in VC neurons and other nerve cord MNs that normally express lin-39 (Fig. 1h). In day 1 adults, although we observed a hypomorphic effect on unc-17 expression in the control group (ethanol [EtOH] treatment), we did witness a statistically significant decrease in the number of VC neurons expressing the unc-17 reporter in animals treated with auxin (Fig. 1i). This indicates that lin-39 is required to maintain the expression of unc-17/VAChT at later life stages. Lastly, we examined two additional markers of VC terminal differentiation, ida-1 (ortholog of human protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N [PTPRN])38 and glr-5 (ortholog of human glutamate ionotropic receptor GRIK1)39. We found that lin-39 is continuously required to maintain ida-1 and glr-5 expression during late larval and adult stages (Supplementary Fig. 1d–f). In conclusion, lin-39, in addition to promoting VC survival during the L1 stage, is continuously required at later stages of life to control cholinergic identity gene expression (e.g., unc-17) and other features (ida-1, glr-5) of VC terminal differentiation (Fig. 1f).
lin-39 controls the identity of motor neurons necessary for locomotion
Prompted by our findings in MNs that control egg-laying, we next asked whether the control of NT identity by lin-39 extends to MNs that control locomotion. Using the endogenous lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AID reporter allele, we found lin-39 to be continuously expressed, from development to adulthood, in 28 of the 39 cholinergic MNs necessary for locomotion (Fig. 2a) (Supplementary Fig. 1b)35. These neurons survive in animals carrying the strong loss-of-function lin-39 allele (n1760) used in Fig. 140, enabling assessment of putative lin-39 effects on their cholinergic identity. Indeed, we found a significant decrease in the number of MNs expressing cho-1/ChT at L4 (Fig. 2b, c). We obtained similar results for two additional cholinergic identity markers using an endogenous reporter for unc-17 (unc-17::mKate) and a fosmid-based reporter for ace-2/AChE (Fig. 2d, e), suggesting lin-39 co-regulates the expression of several ACh pathway genes in MNs necessary for locomotion. The observed reduction in ACh pathway gene expression may account for the previously described locomotion defects of lin-39 mutant animals36.
Due to its maintenance role in egg-laying MNs (Fig. 1g–i), we next asked whether lin-39 is also required to maintain in the adult the cholinergic identity of MNs critical for locomotion. Again, we found that depletion of LIN-39 specifically during late larval and adult stages resulted in a decrease in the number of MNs expressing unc-17/ChAT (Fig. 2f, g), strongly suggesting a continuous LIN-39 requirement in these neurons.
lin-39 cooperates with mab-5 and unc-3 to control the identity of motor neurons
Compared to the strong effects observed in VC MNs (Fig. 1d), we observed modest effects on ACh pathway gene expression upon lin-39 loss in MNs that control locomotion (Fig. 2c–f), suggesting additional factors partially compensate for lin-39 in these neurons (Fig. 2h). To identify them, we followed a candidate approach. First, we reasoned that mab-5 (Antp, Hox6-8), another Hox gene with continuous expression in a subset of lin-39-expressing MNs (Fig. 3a) (Supplementary Fig. 2)26, may work together with lin-39 to control NT identity features. To test this, we generated double lin-39(n1760); mab-5(e1239) mutant animals. All MNs that control locomotion are normally generated in this mutant40. However, we observed a decrease in the number of MNs expressing the cholinergic marker unc-17/VAChT in double lin-39(n1760); mab-5(e1239) mutants compared to single lin-39(n1760) mutant animals (Fig. 3d). Moreover, the residual expression of unc-17/VAChT in MNs of lin-39; mab-5 double mutants suggests that, besides MAB-5, additional regulatory factors must cooperate with LIN-39. The transcription factor UNC-3, a member of the Collier/Olf/Ebf (COE) family, is selectively expressed in MNs that control locomotion (Fig. 3a) and is the only factor previously known to control their cholinergic identity14. Hence, if unc-3 compensates for the combined loss of lin-39 and mab-5, we would predict stronger effects on ACh pathway gene expression in MNs of triple mutant unc-3(n3435); lin-39(n1760); mab-5(e1239) animals than in single unc-3 or double lin-39; mab-5 mutants. Indeed, this was the case for cho-1/ChT and ace-2/AChE expression (Fig. 3b, c, e). Because animals carrying the strong loss-of-function unc-3 allele (n3435)41 display a striking reduction in the number of MNs expressing unc-17/VAChT (UNC-3 is absolutely required for unc-17/VAChT) (Fig. 3d), we used a hypomorphic (weaker loss-of-function) unc-3 allele (ot837)36 to test the notion of cooperation. Indeed, we observed stronger effects on unc-17/VAChT expression in unc-3 (ot837); lin-39(n1760); mab-5(e1239) compared to unc-3 (ot837), and double lin-39; mab-5 mutants (Fig. 3d). We extended the analysis of the hypomorphic unc-3 allele (ot837) to cho-1/ChT, and again observed stronger effects in triple mutant animals (Fig. 3b, c, e). Although the magnitude of the observed effects differs in Hox and unc-3 mutants, this genetic analysis suggests that lin-39, mab-5, and unc-3 synergize to control the expression of several ACh pathway genes in MNs necessary for C. elegans locomotion (Fig. 3f).
LIN-39 and UNC-3 act through distinct binding sites to activate ACh pathway gene expression
Interrogation of available ChIP-Seq datasets provided biochemical evidence of UNC-3 binding to the cis-regulatory regions of ACh pathway genes (unc-17/VAChT, cho-1/ChT, ace-2/AChE) (Fig. 4a, d) (Supplementary Fig. 3)42. These bound regions contain cognate sites for UNC-3, and their previous mutational analysis strongly suggested UNC-3 acts directly to activate ACh pathway gene expression in cholinergic MNs14. Next, we examined available ChIP-Seq datasets for LIN-39 and MAB-543, and witnessed coincident binding of LIN-39, MAB-5, and UNC-3 at cis-regulatory regions of unc-17/VAChT, cho-1/ChT, and ace-2/AChE (Fig. 4a, d, Supplementary Fig. 3). We hypothesized that these co-bound regions (putative enhancers) are sufficient to drive reporter (yfp) gene expression in MNs. Indeed, a 280bp-long fragment of the cho-1 cis-regulatory region, as well as two fragments (1000 and 125 bp) of the unc-17 region, are sufficient to drive yfp expression in MNs (Fig. 4a, b, d–f). The yfp expression driven by these putative enhancer regions (cho-1_280bp, unc-17_1000bp, unc-17_125bp) is unc-3- and Hox-dependent (Fig. 4b, c, e, f), as evidenced by a reduction in the number of MNs expressing the yfp reporter. Similar to our observations with an endogenous reporter for unc-17 and a fosmid-based reporter for cho-1 (Fig. 3c, d), we corroborated the notion of synergy between UNC-3 and Hox by using the hypomorphic unc-3 allele (ot837). Stronger effects were observed in unc-3 (ot837); lin-39; mab-5 triple mutants compared to unc-3(ot837) single or lin-39; mab-5 double mutant animals (Fig. 4c, e, f). Altogether, our enhancer analysis in unc-3 and Hox mutants identified specific cis-regulatory regions that require both UNC-3 and Hox (LIN-39, MAB-5) input to drive unc-17/VAChT and cho-1/ChT expression in cholinergic MNs.
Within the cho-1_280bp and unc-17_125bp enhancer regions, a single UNC-3 binding site (COE motif) is necessary for reporter gene expression in MNs (Fig. 4a, d)14. We bioinformatically searched for the presence of consensus LIN-39-binding sites (GATTGATG), which, unlike MAB-5 sites, are well-defined in C. elegans43. We found a single LIN-39 binding site 60 bp upstream of the UNC-3 site in the cho-1_280bp region (Fig. 4a) and four LIN-39 sites flanking the UNC-3 binding site in the unc-17_125bp region (Fig. 4d). We tested the functional importance of the 4 LIN-39 sites by simultaneously deleting them in the context of transgenic reporter (unc-17_125bp::yfp) animals, and found a dramatic decrease in yfp expression in MNs (Fig. 4d). Altogether, this analysis combined with the ChIP-Seq results provide strong evidence that LIN-39 and UNC-3 bind directly to the cis-regulatory region of ACh pathway genes, and recognize distinct binding sites (Fig. 4g).
A positive feed-forward loop (FFL) for the control of cholinergic motor neuron identity
Our findings suggest that Hox proteins LIN-39 and MAB-5, like UNC-3, directly control the expression of ACh pathway genes in MNs. However, LIN-39 and MAB-5 also bind extensively on the cis-regulatory region of unc-3 (Fig. 5a), suggesting they directly regulate its expression as well. Indeed, expression of an endogenous gfp reporter for unc-3 (UNC-3::GFP protein fusion) is significantly reduced in MNs of lin-39 single mutants, and this effect is exacerbated in lin-39; mab-5 double mutants (Fig. 5b, c). The number of MNs that express UNC-3::GFP is lower in lin-39 and lin-39; mab-5 animals (left graph in Fig. 5c). Compared to WT, we also observed a striking reduction in UNC-3::GFP fluorescence intensity in MNs of Hox mutant animals (34% reduction in lin-39 and 43% in lin-39; mab-5) (middle graph in Fig. 5c), suggesting lin-39 and mab-5 are required for normal levels of UNC-3 expression.
The binding of LIN-39 and MAB-5 on the unc-3 locus strongly suggests these Hox proteins control unc-3 expression by acting at the level of transcription. Four lines of evidence support this possibility. First, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation of a predicted LIN-39 binding site in the context of the endogenous unc-3::gfp reporter (UNC-3::GFP LIN-39 site MUT) resulted in decreased expression in MNs (right graph in Fig. 5a, c). Second, we quantified endogenous unc-3 mRNA levels with single-cell resolution using RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (RNA FISH)44. Compared to wild-type animals, we observed a consistent decrease of unc-3 mRNA levels in cholinergic MNs of lin-39; mab-5 mutants (Fig. 5d). Similar results were obtained with RT-PCR in animals carrying a hypomorphic lin-39 allele (Supplementary Fig. 4). Third, a small 223 bp-long cis-regulatory element upstream of the first unc-3 exon is sufficient to drive reporter gene (mCherry) expression in wild-type MNs (Fig. 5a, e). When we quantified the number of MNs expressing this reporter, as well as its fluorescence intensity, we observed statistically significant differences in Hox mutant animals (Fig. 5f, g). Like our observations with the UNC-3::GFP fusion (Fig. 5b, c), we observed a 28% reduction in fluorescence intensity of the unc-3_223bp::mCherry reporter in lin-39 single mutants, which was exacerbated (34% reduction) in lin-39; mab-5 double mutants (Fig. 5g). Lastly, we generated two fosmid-based reporters, in which we replaced two different parts of the unc-3 locus (exon 3–11 [ΔExon3–11], exon7–11 [ΔExon7–11]) with mCherry while leaving the upstream and downstream cis-regulatory elements intact (Fig. 5a). In both cases, we found a significant reduction in the number of mCherry-expressing MNs in lin-39; mab-5 double mutant animals (Fig. 5h, i). We note that unc-3 expression is not completely abolished in motor neurons of lin-39; mab-5 mutants (Fig. 5b–i), indicating that there must be additional, yet-to-be-identified factors that activate unc-3 and compensate for the combined loss of lin-39 and mab-5.
Altogether, Hox proteins (LIN-39, MAB-5) act directly to activate the expression of ACh pathway genes in MNs (Hox → ACh genes, Figs. 3 and 4). Further, Hox proteins act at the level of transcription to control unc-3, which also controls ACh genes (Hox → unc-3 → ACh genes), thereby generating a positive feed-forward loop (FFL) (Fig. 5j).
lin-39 and mab-5 maintain their expression through transcriptional autoregulation
How is Hox gene expression maintained in adult MNs? Available ChIP-Seq data show LIN-39 binding at its own locus in vivo (Fig. 6a), consistent with in vitro observations45. This raises the possibility of lin-39 maintaining its own expression in MNs through transcriptional autoregulation. To test this, we first determined which cis-regulatory elements of the lin-39 locus are sufficient to drive reporter (TagRFP) expression in MNs. A 6.2 kb element upstream of the lin-39 locus fused to TagRFP only shows low levels of expression in a small number of nerve cord MNs (~6) during larval stages (Fig. 6a). This prompted us to study intronic elements. When intron 1 of lin-39 was fused to TagRFP, we detected robust TagRFP expression in ~23 nerve cord MNs, consistent with a previous study45. These lin-39 intron 1::TagRFP animals display continuous expression in both larval and adult MNs (Fig. 6a, b), similar to animals carrying the endogenous lin-39 reporter allele (lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AID), enabling us to test the idea of transcriptional autoregulation. Indeed, the number of TagRFP-expressing MNs is significantly reduced in lin-39 homozygous mutants carrying a null allele (n1760) (Fig. 6b), suggesting lin-39 gene activity is necessary for its expression in MNs.
Because the lin-39 (n1760) allele removes gene activity starting in the early embryos, the above findings do not address whether LIN-39 is continuously required to maintain its expression at later stages. To test this, we again used the AID system and efficiently depleted LIN-39 protein levels during late larval stages (Fig. 6c). Upon auxin administration, we found a significant reduction in the number of MNs expressing the lin-39intron 1::TagRFP reporter (Fig. 6d), suggesting lin-39 is continuously required to maintain its own expression.
These findings pinpoint the entirety of intron 1 as a putative cis-regulatory region used by LIN-39 to directly control its own expression. Next, we generated transgenic reporter animals that split intron 1 into two fragments (832 and 776 bp). Animals carrying the 776 bp fragment (lin-39776bp::TagRFP) revealed reporter gene expression in nerve cord MNs, but that was not the case for the 832 bp fragment (Fig. 6a). Within the 776 bp fragment, we found 11 predicted LIN-39 binding sites (motifs) (Fig. 6a), and employed CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to simultaneously mutate all of them in the context of the endogenous lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AID reporter allele (SunyBiotech). This led not only to a decrease in the number of MNs expressing the endogenous lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AIDsites 1-11 MUT reporter (Fig. 6e) but also to a reduction of its expression levels (Fig. 6f). These findings support a transcriptional autoregulation model where LIN-39 recognizes its cognate binding sites within intron 1 to regulate its expression in nerve cord MNs (Fig. 6i). Importantly, we observed functional consequences when lin-39 autoregulation was selectively disrupted; the expression levels of cho-1/ChT in cholinergic MNs were significantly reduced in animals carrying the lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AIDsites 1–11 MUT allele (Fig. 6g).
To investigate which of the 11 LIN-39 sites are functionally important, we mutated two sites with the highest bioinformatic prediction scores (sites #1 and #9 in Fig. 6a, see the “Methods” section). Mutation of either site in the context of lin-39 776bp::TagRFP animals significantly decreased the number of TagRFP-expressing MNs (Fig. 6h), indicating that these sites are necessary for autoregulation.
Lastly, we asked whether the Hox gene mab-5, like lin-39, controls its own expression in MNs. Supporting this possibility, ChIP-Seq data show extensive MAB-5 binding at its own locus, and expression of a mab-5::gfp reporter is significantly reduced in MNs of mab-5 mutant animals (Supplementary Fig. 5). Altogether, these findings uncover a positive feedback mechanism (transcriptional autoregulation) required to maintain Hox gene expression in MNs (Fig. 6j).
UNC-3 (Collier/Ebf) prevents high levels of Hox gene (lin-39, mab-5) expression
Low levels of LIN-39 lead to a failure to maintain ACh pathway gene expression at appropriate levels (Figs. 1 and 2), whereas high levels of LIN-39 in cholinergic MNs result in locomotion defects36. Hence, we hypothesized that the levels of lin-39 in cholinergic MNs must be tightly controlled to avoid detrimental effects on MN function (see the “Discussion” section). The findings described below suggest that tight control of Hox gene expression in MNs is achieved through a two-component mechanism, that is, Hox transcriptional autoregulation is counterbalanced by negative UNC-3 feedback.
Because UNC-3 ChIP binding peaks are observed in lin-39 and mab-5 loci (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Fig. 6a), we reasoned that UNC-3 acts directly to prevent high levels of Hox gene expression in cholinergic MNs. Multiple lines of evidence support this idea. First, the expression levels of the endogenous lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AID reporter are increased in MNs of unc-3 mutant animals (Fig. 7b, c). Second, the lin-39 intron 1::TagRFP reporter showed increased TagRFP expression in MNs of unc-3 null (Fig. 7d, e) and hypomorphic (Supplementary Fig. 7a) mutants. Lastly, RNA FISH revealed increased levels of lin-39 mRNA molecules in individual MNs of unc-3 mutants (Fig. 7f). Importantly, we extended this analysis to mab-5, and obtained similar results; unc-3 gene activity is necessary to prevent high levels of mab-5 expression in MNs (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c).
We next asked whether reducing UNC-3 levels by selectively disrupting the Hox input onto the unc-3 locus can affect the expression of cholinergic identity genes. For this, we used the UNC-3::GFP LIN-39 site MUT allele, in which we observed lower levels of UNC-3 expression in motor neurons (Fig. 5a–c). We found that the expression levels of cholinergic identity genes (unc-17/VAChT, cho-1/ChT) are increased in motor neurons of animals carrying this allele (Supplementary Fig. 8), consistent with our model of low UNC-3 levels leading to a lack of efficient Hox gene repression (Fig. 7g).
Taken together, our findings uncover an intricate gene regulatory network for the maintenance of cholinergic identity in C. elegans MNs. This network contains a positive FFL, where Hox proteins (LIN-39 and MAB-5) not only activate the expression of ACh pathway genes but also control the expression of unc-3, a critical regulator of cholinergic identity in MNs (Fig. 7g). Moreover, the top level of this FFL, i.e., Hox, is under homeostatic control, ensuring that optimal levels of Hox gene expression are maintained in MNs. This is achieved through Hox transcriptional autoregulation counterbalanced by negative UNC-3 feedback (Fig. 7g).
Discussion
Hox genes play fundamental roles in early patterning and body plan formation, but their functions in later stages of development and post-embryonic life remain largely unknown. In the context of the nervous system, Hox genes are known to control early events, such as specification, survival, and/or migration of progenitor cells and young post-mitotic neurons18,19,20,21,22. Here, we identify a critical role for Hox proteins during the later stages of nervous system development and post-embryonic life, critically extending their functional repertoire beyond early patterning. Using C. elegans nerve cord MNs as a model, we found that Hox gene activity is continuously required from development through adulthood for the control of NT identity, a core element of neuronal function. Moreover, Hox genes operate in a positive feedforward loop to safeguard the cholinergic identity of MNs: they not only control directly ACh pathway genes (e.g., unc-17/VAChT, cho-1/ChT), but also the expression of unc-3 (Collier/Ebf), a master regulator of MN identity14. Lastly, we propose a homeostatic mechanism that maintains Hox gene expression in MNs at optimal levels, thereby ensuring the robust expression of cholinergic identity determinants throughout life.
Hox genes lin-39 (Scr/Dfd, Hox4-5) and mab-5 (Antp, Hox6-8) act as terminal selectors of cholinergic MN identity
Transcription factors that are continuously expressed in individual neuron types and act directly to co-regulate the expression of NT pathway genes have been termed “terminal selectors”46,47,48. Terminal selectors have been described to date for various neuron types in C. elegans, flies, simple chordates, and mice, indicating the evolutionary conservation of terminal selector-based mechanisms for the control of NT identity49,50. The sustained expression of terminal selectors in specific neuron types suggests they are continuously required to maintain NT identity. However, a continuous requirement has been experimentally demonstrated only for a handful of terminal selectors to date51.
Recent work in C. elegans, flies, and mice indicates that certain Hox genes are continuously expressed, from development through adulthood, in distinct neuron types23,24,25,26,27,28,29. Functional studies in peptidergic neurons in Drosophila, as well as hindbrain and spinal neurons in mice, showed that Hox proteins control early facets of neuronal development (e.g., specification, survival, migration, connectivity)18,19,20,21,22,52, but whether they function as terminal selectors remains unknown—in part due to a lack of temporally controlled studies for Hox gene inactivation later in life. Through constitutive (genetic null alleles) and post-embryonic (inducible protein depletion) approaches, we found that the Hox gene lin-39 is continuously required to maintain the cholinergic identity of C. elegans MNs. Biochemical (ChIP-Seq) and genetic evidence strongly suggest that LIN-39 and another Hox protein (MAB-5) act directly to co-regulate the expression of genes that encode integral components of the ACh biosynthetic pathway (unc-17/VAChT, cho-1/ChT, ace-2/AChE). Collectively, these findings reveal that Hox proteins can act as terminal selectors, uncovering a noncanonical role for these highly conserved transcription factors.
Because Hox genes are expressed in various neuron types in C. elegans29, we surmise they may function as terminal selectors in other neurons as well. Supporting this notion, expression of a single marker of serotonergic identity (tph-1, tryptophan hydroxylase 1 [TPH1]) is affected in CP neurons of lin-39 mutant animals53,54. Similarly, expression of a dopaminergic identity marker (cat-2/tyrosine hydroxylase [TH]) is affected in tail sensory neurons of animals lacking activity of the posterior Hox gene egl-5 (AbdB)55. Future work is needed, however, to establish whether in those neurons LIN-39 and EGL-5 act as bona fide terminal selectors.
Hox and other subfamilies of homeodomain proteins act as terminal selectors
Homeodomain proteins are defined by a 60 amino acid motif (homeodomain) that directly contacts DNA56. Based on sequence similarities and/or the presence of other domains, several subfamilies of homeodomain proteins (e.g., HOX, LIM, POU, PRD) have been identified in every animal genome. In C. elegans, accumulating evidence suggests that members of LIM, POU, and PRD subfamilies can function as terminal selectors in specific neuron types35,57. Here, we show that members of the HOX subfamily can act as terminal selectors in cholinergic MNs. A synthesis of our findings and previous studies on LIM, POU, and PRD proteins reveals an overarching theme: a single transcription factor family, the homeodomain proteins, is broadly used in the C. elegans nervous system to control neuronal identity by acting as terminal selectors. Supporting the evolutionary conservation of this theme, a number of LIM and POU homeodomain transcription factors can function as terminal selectors in the mouse nervous system9,10,58,59,60.
Hox proteins cooperate with the terminal selector UNC-3 (Collier/Ebf) to control motor neuron cholinergic identity
Besides NT identity, terminal selectors are known to control additional neuron type-specific features of terminal differentiation, such as the expression of ion channels, neuropeptides, NT receptors, and cell adhesion molecules46,48. We find this to be the case for LIN-39. In sex-specific MNs that control egg laying, LIN-39 is required for continuous expression of ACh pathway genes and additional terminal differentiation markers (e.g., glr-5/GluR, ida-1/PTPRN). Similarly, in MNs necessary for locomotion, LIN-39 controls ACh pathway genes (this study) and a handful of terminal differentiation markers (e.g., del-1/sodium channel SCNN1, slo-2/potassium–sodium-activated channel KCNT)26,36. But how can the same Hox protein (LIN-39) operate as a terminal selector in two different types of MNs?
Our findings support the idea of LIN-39 cooperating with distinct transcription factors in different MN types. In MNs that control locomotion, LIN-39 synergizes with MAB-5 and UNC-3; the latter is known to function as a terminal selector in these neurons14. Mechanistically, LIN-39 and UNC-3 control the same ACh pathway genes by recognizing distinct binding sites. However, whether LIN-39 and UNC-3 are being recruited to these sites in an additive or cooperative manner remains unresolved. In MNs that control egg-laying61, UNC-3 is not present14. HLH-3 (bHLH protein of Achaete-Scute family) and LIN-11 (LIM homeodomain protein) are expressed in VC neurons62,63, constituting putative LIN-39 collaborators for the control of cholinergic identity in VC.
Hox and UNC-3 in a positive feed-forward loop (FFL): a form of redundancy engineering to ensure robust expression of cholinergic identity genes
Complex gene regulatory networks are composed of simple gene circuits called “network motifs”64. One of the most widely used motifs is the feed-forward loop (FFL), where transcription factor X activates a second transcription factor Y, and both activate their shared target gene Z (Fig. 5j). Our findings uncovered a FFL in cholinergic MNs, where a Hox protein (LIN-39) activates UNC-3, and both activate their shared targets (ACh pathway genes) (Fig. 5j). FFLs have been described in transcriptional networks across species64,65,66. Based on systems biology classifications, there are 8 different types of FFLs—each characterized by the signs (“+” for activation, “–” for repression) of the transcriptional interactions within the motif. The FFL in MNs is coherent type 1 because all interactions are activating (Fig. 5j).
Why is there a need for this type of FFL in C. elegans MNs? Computational models and studies in bacteria indicate that a coherent type 1 FFL can ensure robust gene expression against perturbations through a process called “sign-sensitive delay”66,67,68. That is, a perturbation can decrease the levels of transcription factor X (LIN-39), but Z (ACh pathway genes) responds only at a delay once X levels decrease. The delay is due to the presence of Y (UNC-3). After X is decreased, it takes time for Y levels to decrease (depending on the degradation rate of Y) to a level insufficient to activate Z. Hence, the coherent type 1 FFL can be viewed as a form of redundancy engineering (or filter) to protect the shared target genes (Z) from fluctuations in the input (transcription factor X). Based on computational modeling and functional studies in bacteria66,67,68, we propose that, in our system, LIN-39 (X) and UNC-3 (Y) operate in a coherent type 1 FFL to maintain robust expression levels of ACh pathway genes in MNs throughout life (Fig. 5j). Lastly, we note that coherent and incoherent FFLs can serve various functions in the developing nervous system. For example, they can act as developmental timers (by allowing a given transcription factor to control different genes at successive developmental stages)69,70,71, or as means to generate neuronal subtype diversity72,73.
The FFL we identified in C. elegans MNs forms the backbone of a transcriptional network, but it does not function in isolation. Rather, it is embedded within at least two additional loops: (a) a positive feedback loop that activates LIN-39 expression through transcriptional autoregulation, and (b) negative feedback provided by UNC-3 to reduce LIN-39 expression (Fig. 7g). The significance of both is discussed below.
Consistent with our observations on Hox (LIN-39, MAB-5) and unc-3, two other C. elegans Hox proteins (CEH-13, EGL-5) control the transcription of another terminal selector (mec-3) in peripheral touch receptor neurons74. Although a FFL was not identified in that cellular context, the findings on mec-3 and unc-3 (this study) strongly suggest that Hox-mediated transcriptional control of terminal selectors may be a broadly applicable strategy to ensure the robustness of gene expression in post-mitotic neurons.
A two-component design principle for homeostatic control of Hox gene expression in motor neurons
Mechanisms for the initiation of Hox gene expression are well-studied. It is known, for example, that during embryonic patterning, Polycomb Group (PcG) and trithorax Group (trxG) genes determine the levels and spatial expression of Hox genes75,76,77,78,79. It is also known that, during early nervous system development, morphogenetic gradients initially establish Hox gene expression, and this is further refined via Hox cross-regulatory interactions22,80. However, the mechanisms that maintain Hox gene expression in post-mitotic neurons during later developmental and post-embryonic stages remain unknown.
Our constitutive (genetic null alleles) and temporally controlled (AID system) approaches combined with mutagenesis of Hox binding sites within the endogenous lin-39 locus strongly suggest that LIN-39 maintains its own expression in MNs through transcriptional autoregulation (Fig. 6i). Subsequently, LIN-39 is required to maintain the expression of ACh pathway genes by operating at the top of a coherent FFL (Fig. 6j). However, the lin-39 expression levels are critical: low levels lead to a failure to maintain ACh pathway gene expression (Figs. 1 and 2), whereas high levels of LIN-39 in cholinergic MNs cause locomotion defects and “mixed neuronal identity”, i.e., genes normally expressed in GABA neurons became ectopically expressed in cholinergic MNs36. We found that lin-39 expression in MNs is under homeostatic control. The terminal selector UNC-3 prevents high levels of lin-39 expression, thereby counterbalancing the positive effect of the transcriptional autoregulation of lin-39. From the perspective of Hox binding site affinity81,82, this mechanism may enable LIN-39 (when present at optimal levels) to bind at high-affinity sites in the cis-regulatory region of ACh pathway genes. The negative UNC-3 feedback prevents high levels of LIN-39, potentially avoiding LIN-39 binding to low-affinity sites in the cis-regulatory region of alternative (e.g., GABA) identity genes.
Altogether, we identified a two-component design principle (positive feedback of LIN-39 to itself, negative feedback from the terminal selector UNC-3) for the homeostatic control of Hox gene expression in motor neurons. These two components are embedded in a coherent FFL, which we propose to be necessary for the maintenance of NT identity (Fig. 7g). Because Hox genes are continuously expressed in the adult fly, mouse, and human nervous systems, the gene regulatory architecture described here for the control of NT identity may constitute a broadly applicable principle.
Methods
C. elegans strains
Worms were grown at 15, 20, or 25 °C on nematode growth media (NGM) plates seeded with bacteria (E. coli OP50) as food source83. Mutant alleles used in this study: unc-3 (n3435) X, lin-39 (n1760) III, mab-5 (e1239) III, ced-3 (n1286) IV. CRISPR-generated alleles: unc-3 (ot837 [unc-3::mNG::3xFLAG::AID]) X, lin-39 (kas9 [lin-39::mNG::3xFLAG::AID]) III.
All reporter strains used in this study are shown in Supplementary Data 1.
Generation of transgenic reporter animals
Reporter gene fusions for cis-regulatory analysis were made using either PCR fusion84 or Gibson Assembly Cloning Kit (NEB #5510S). Targeted DNA fragments were fused (ligated) to the tagrfp-coding sequence, which was followed by unc-54 3’ UTR. Mutations or deletions of LIN-39-binding sites were introduced via PCR mutagenesis. The product DNA fragments were either injected into young adult pha-1(e2123) hermaphrodites at 50 ng/µl using pha-1 (pBX plasmid) as co-injection marker (50 ng/µl) and further selected for survival, or injected into young adult N2 hermaphrodites at 50 ng/µl (plus 50 ng/µl pBX plasmid) using myo-2::gfp as co-injection marker (3 ng/µl) and further selected for GFP signal.
Targeted genome engineering
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was employed to generate: (a) PHX2477 strain carrying the lin-39(syb2477 [lin-39_site1-11_MUT::mNG::3xFLAG::AID]) III allele, and (b) PHX5816 strain carrying the unc-3(syb5816 [unc-3_LIN-39 site_MUT_GFP]) X allele. Gene editing was performed by SunyBiotech.
Temporally controlled protein degradation
AID-tagged proteins are conditionally degraded when exposed to auxin in the presence of TIR137. Animals carrying auxin-inducible alleles of lin-39 (kas9 [lin-39::mNG::AID]) were crossed with ieSi57 animals that express TIR1 ubiquitously or with otTi28 animals that express TIR-1 pan-neuronally. Auxin (indole-3-acetic acid [IAA], Catalog number A10556, Alfa Aesar) was dissolved in ethanol (EtOH) to prepare 400 mM stock solutions which were stored at 4 °C for up to one month. NGM agar plates were poured with auxin or ethanol added to a final concentration of 4 mM and allowed to dry overnight at room temperature. Plates were seeded with OP50 bacteria. To induce protein degradation, worms of the experimental strains were transferred onto auxin-coated plates and kept at 25 °C. As a control, worms were transferred onto EtOH-coated plates instead. Auxin solutions, auxin-coated plates, and experimental plates were shielded from light.
Single molecule RNA in situ hybridization (sm RNA-FISH)
Egg preparation was performed before harvesting the synchronized L1 worms. Next, worms were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), washed twice with PBS, and permeabilized with 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. Then, samples were hybridized with diluted mRNA probes (Stellaris; unc-3: unc-3 best Quasar 670 (SMF-1065-5); lin-39: lin-39 best Quasar 670 (SMF-1065-5)) in hybridization buffer (Stellaris#174; RNA FISH hybridization buffer (SMF-HB1-10)) following manufacturing protocols. Finally, samples were stained with DAPI, washed, and equilibrated with GLOX buffer. Worms were imaged at a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Axio Imager.Z2).
Real-time PCR assay for unc-3 and lin-39 expression level analysis
Synchronized L4 stage C. elegans animals were collected from different genotypes (see figure legends), and mRNA was extracted. cDNA library was prepared using the Superscript first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen #11904-018). RT-PCR TaqMan assays for the genes unc-3 (assay ID: Ce02402729_g1), lin-39 (assay ID: Ce02406896_m1), and pmp-3 (Ce02485188_m1) were performed, and the expression level of unc-3 and lin-39 were determined in each genotype after normalizing to the expression of the housekeeping gene pmp-3.
Microscopy
Worms were anesthetized using 100 mM of sodium azide (NaN3) and mounted on a 4% agarose pad on glass slides. Images were taken using an automated fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Axio Imager.Z2). Acquisition of several Z-stack images (each ~1 µm thick) was taken with Zeiss Axiocam 503 mono using the ZEN software (Version 2.3.69.1000, Blue edition). Representative images are shown following max-projection of 1–8 µm Z-stacks using the maximum intensity projection type. Image reconstruction was performed using Image J software85.
Motor neuron identification
Motor neurons were identified based on a combination of the following factors: (i) co-localization with fluorescent markers with known expression pattern, (ii) invariant cell body position along the ventral nerve cord, or relative to other MN subtypes, (iii) MN birth order, and (iv) number of MNs that belong to each subtype.
Bioinformatic analysis
To predict the UNC-3-binding site (COE motif) in the cis-regulatory region of target genes, we used the MatInspector program from Genomatix86. The position weight matrix (PWM) for the LIN-39-binding site is cataloged in the CIS-BP (Catalog of Inferred Sequence Binding Preferences database)87. To identify putative LIN-39 sites, we used FIMO (Find Individual Motif Occurrences)88, which is one of the motif-based sequence analysis tools of multiple expectation maximization for motif elicitation (MEME) bioinformatics suites (http://meme-suite.org/). The p-value threshold for the analysis of LIN-39 target genes was set at p < 0.001 for unc-17 and cho-1, and at p < 0.01 for lin-39.
Fluorescence intensity (FI) quantification
To quantify FI of individual MNs in the VNC, images of worms from different genetic backgrounds were taken with identical parameters through full-thickness Z-stacks that cover the entire cell body. Image stacks were then processed and quantified for FI via FIJI. The focal plane in Z-stacks that has the brightest FI was selected for quantification to minimize background signals. Cell outline was manually selected, and FIJI was used to quantify the FI and area to get the mean value for FI. After quantifying the FI of all MNs of interest, representative average image background FI was quantified and subtracted from the individual MN FI quantifications to get the mean FI in arbitrary units (a.u.).
Statistical analysis and reproducibility
For quantification, box and whisker plots were adopted to represent the quartiles in graph. The box includes data points from the first to the third quartile value with the horizontal line in box representing the mean value. Upper and lower limits indicate the max and min, respectively. Unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction was performed and p-values were annotated. Visualization of data and p-value calculation were performed via GraphPad Prism Version 9.2.0 (283). Each experiment was repeated twice.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are included in the figures and supporting files. The ChIP-Seq data for UNC-3, LIN-39 and MAB-5 used in this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession codes: GSE143165GSE25785GSE15625. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Dulcis, D. et al. Neurotransmitter switching in the adult brain regulates behavior. Science 340, 449–453 (2013).
Li, H. Q. et al. Decoding neurotransmitter switching: the road forward. J. Neurosci. 40, 4078–4089 (2020).
Rand, J. B. Acetylcholine. WormBook 1–21 (2007).
Casas, C. et al. Early presymptomatic cholinergic dysfunction in a murine model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Behav. 3, 145–158 (2013).
McKinley, J. W. et al. Dopamine deficiency reduces striatal cholinergic interneuron function in models of Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 103, 1056–1072 e6 (2019).
Zheng, L. F. et al. Reduced expression of choline acetyltransferase in vagal motoneurons and gastric motor dysfunction in a 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 1420, 59–67 (2011).
Gu, X. & Wang, X. An overview of recent analysis and detection of acetylcholine. Anal. Biochem. 632, 114381 (2021).
Phillis, J. W. Acetylcholine release from the central nervous system: a 50-year retrospective. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 17, 161–217 (2005).
Cho, H. H. et al. Isl1 directly controls a cholinergic neuronal identity in the developing forebrain and spinal cord by forming cell type-specific complexes. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004280 (2014).
Lopes, R. et al. Transcription factor LIM homeobox 7 (Lhx7) maintains subtype identity of cholinergic interneurons in the mammalian striatum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3119–3124 (2012).
Wenick, A. S. & Hobert, O. Genomic cis-regulatory architecture and trans-acting regulators of a single interneuron-specific gene battery in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 6, 757–770 (2004).
Zhang, F. et al. The LIM and POU homeobox genes ttx-3 and unc-86 act as terminal selectors in distinct cholinergic and serotonergic neuron types. Development 141, 422–435 (2014).
Von Stetina, S. E., Treinin, M. & Miller, D. M.3rd The motor circuit. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 69, 125–167 (2006).
Kratsios, P. et al. Coordinated regulation of cholinergic motor neuron traits through a conserved terminal selector gene. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 205–214 (2012).
Pereira, L. et al. A cellular and regulatory map of the cholinergic nervous system of C. elegans. Elife 4, e12432 (2015).
Hughes, C. L. & Kaufman, T. C. Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evol. Dev. 4, 459–499 (2002).
Mallo, M., Wellik, D. M. & Deschamps, J. Hox genes and regional patterning of the vertebrate body plan. Dev. Biol. 344, 7–15 (2010).
Di Bonito, M., Glover, J. C. & Studer, M. Hox genes and region-specific sensorimotor circuit formation in the hindbrain and spinal cord. Dev. Dyn. 242, 1348–1368 (2013).
Estacio-Gomez, A. & Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. Roles of Hox genes in the patterning of the central nervous system of Drosophila. Fly (Austin) 8, 26–32 (2014).
Joshi, R., Sipani, R. & Bakshi, A. Roles of Drosophila Hox genes in the assembly of neuromuscular networks and behavior. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 786993 (2021).
Parker, H. J. & Krumlauf, R. A Hox gene regulatory network for hindbrain segmentation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 139, 169–203 (2020).
Philippidou, P. & Dasen, J. S. Hox genes: choreographers in neural development, architects of circuit organization. Neuron 80, 12–34 (2013).
Allen, A. M. et al. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the adult Drosophila ventral nerve cord. Elife 9, e54074 (2020).
Coughlan, E. et al. A Hox code defines spinocerebellar neuron subtype regionalization. Cell Rep. 29, 2408–2421 e4 (2019).
Hutlet, B. et al. Systematic expression analysis of Hox genes at adulthood reveals novel patterns in the central nervous system. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 1223–1243 (2016).
Kratsios, P. et al. An intersectional gene regulatory strategy defines subclass diversity of C. elegans motor neurons. Elife 6, e25751 (2017).
Lizen, B. et al. HOXA5 localization in postnatal and adult mouse brain is suggestive of regulatory roles in postmitotic neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 525, 1155–1175 (2017).
Takahashi, Y. et al. Expression profiles of 39 HOX genes in normal human adult organs and anaplastic thyroid cancer cell lines by quantitative real-time RT-PCR system. Exp. Cell Res. 293, 144–153 (2004).
Zheng, C., Lee, H. M. T. & Pham, K. Nervous system-wide analysis of Hox regulation of terminal neuronal fate specification in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010092 (2022).
Clark, S. G., Chisholm, A. D. & Horvitz, H. R. Control of cell fates in the central body region of C. elegans by the homeobox gene lin-39. Cell 74, 43–55 (1993).
Liu, H. et al. Direct regulation of egl-1 and of programmed cell death by the Hox protein MAB-5 and by CEH-20, a C. elegans homolog of Pbx1. Development 133, 641–650 (2006).
Loer, C. M. & Kenyon, C. J. Serotonin-deficient mutants and male mating behavior in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 13, 5407–5417 (1993).
Potts, M. B., Wang, D. P. & Cameron, S. Trithorax, Hox, and TALE-class homeodomain proteins ensure cell survival through repression of the BH3-only gene egl-1. Dev. Biol. 329, 374–385 (2009).
Salser, S. J., Loer, C. M. & Kenyon, C. Multiple HOM-C gene interactions specify cell fates in the nematode central nervous system. Genes Dev. 7, 1714–1724 (1993).
Reilly, M. B. et al. Unique homeobox codes delineate all the neuron classes of C. elegans. Nature 584, 595–601 (2020).
Feng, W. et al. A terminal selector prevents a Hox transcriptional switch to safeguard motor neuron identity throughout life. Elife 9, e50065 (2020).
Zhang, L. et al. The auxin-inducible degradation (AID) system enables versatile conditional protein depletion in C. elegans. Development 142, 4374–4384 (2015).
Hatzihristidis, T. et al. A Drosophila-centric view of protein tyrosine phosphatases. FEBS Lett. 589, 951–966 (2015).
Brockie, P. J. et al. Differential expression of glutamate receptor subunits in the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans and their regulation by the homeodomain protein UNC-42. J. Neurosci. 21, 1510–1522 (2001).
Stefanakis, N., Carrera, I. & Hobert, O. Regulatory logic of pan-neuronal gene expression in C. elegans. Neuron 87, 733–750 (2015).
Prasad, B. et al. unc-3-dependent repression of specific motor neuron fates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 323, 207–215 (2008).
Li, Y. et al. Establishment and maintenance of motor neuron identity via temporal modularity in terminal selector function. Elife 9, (2020).
Boyle, A. P. et al. Comparative analysis of regulatory information and circuits across distant species. Nature 512, 453–456 (2014).
Ji, N. & van Oudenaarden, A. Single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) of C. elegans worms and embryos. WormBook 1–16 (2012).
Wagmaister, J. A. et al. Identification of cis-regulatory elements from the C. elegans Hox gene lin-39 required for embryonic expression and for regulation by the transcription factors LIN-1, LIN-31 and LIN-39. Dev. Biol. 297, 550–565 (2006).
Hobert, O. Regulatory logic of neuronal diversity: terminal selector genes and selector motifs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20067–20071 (2008).
Hobert, O. Regulation of terminal differentiation programs in the nervous system. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 681–696 (2011).
Hobert, O. Terminal selectors of neuronal identity. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 116, 455–475 (2016).
Hobert, O. A map of terminal regulators of neuronal identity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 5, 474–498 (2016).
Hobert, O. & Kratsios, P. Neuronal identity control by terminal selectors in worms, flies, and chordates. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 56, 97–105 (2019).
Deneris, E. S. & Hobert, O. Maintenance of postmitotic neuronal cell identity. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 899–907 (2014).
Dasen, J. S. & Jessell, T. M. Hox networks and the origins of motor neuron diversity. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 88, 169–200 (2009).
Kalis, A. K. et al. Patterning of sexually dimorphic neurogenesis in the Caenorhabditis elegans ventral cord by Hox and TALE homeodomain transcription factors. Dev. Dyn. 243, 159–171 (2014).
Kalis, A. K. et al. Hox proteins interact to pattern neuronal subtypes in Caenorhabditis elegans males. Genetics 220, iyac010 (2022).
Lints, R. & Emmons, S. W. Patterning of dopaminergic neurotransmitter identity among Caenorhabditis elegans ray sensory neurons by a TGFbeta family signaling pathway and a Hox gene. Development 126, 5819–5831 (1999).
Burglin, T. R. & Affolter, M. Homeodomain proteins: an update. Chromosoma 125, 497–521 (2016).
Hobert, O. Homeobox genes and the specification of neuronal identity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 627–636 (2021).
Serrano-Saiz, E. et al. BRN3-type POU homeobox genes maintain the identity of mature postmitotic neurons in nematodes and mice. Curr. Biol. 28, 2813–2823.e2 (2018).
Song, N. N. et al. Adult raphe-specific deletion of Lmx1b leads to central serotonin deficiency. PLoS ONE 6, e15998 (2011).
Zhao, Z. Q. et al. Lmx1b is required for maintenance of central serotonergic neurons and mice lacking central serotonergic system exhibit normal locomotor activity. J. Neurosci. 26, 12781–12788 (2006).
Loots, G. G. et al. Genomic deletion of a long-range bone enhancer misregulates sclerostin in Van Buchem disease. Genome Res. 15, 928–935 (2005).
Perez, L. M. & Alfonso, A. The conserved ASCL1/MASH-1 ortholog HLH-3 specifies sex-specific ventral cord motor neuron fate in Caenorhabditis elegans. G3 (Bethesda) 10, 4201–4213 (2020).
Hobert, O. et al. Control of neural development and function in a thermoregulatory network by the LIM homeobox gene lin-11. J. Neurosci. 18, 2084–2096 (1998).
Alon, U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 450–461 (2007).
Mangan, S. & Alon, U. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11980–11985 (2003).
Kalir, S., Mangan, S. & Alon, U. A coherent feed-forward loop with a SUM input function prolongs flagella expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 1, 2005.0006 (2005).
Le, D. H. & Kwon, Y. K. A coherent feedforward loop design principle to sustain robustness of biological networks. Bioinformatics 29, 630–637 (2013).
Mangan, S., Zaslaver, A. & Alon, U. The coherent feedforward loop serves as a sign-sensitive delay element in transcription networks. J. Mol. Biol. 334, 197–204 (2003).
Baumgardt, M. et al. Specification of neuronal identities by feedforward combinatorial coding. PLoS Biol. 5, e37 (2007).
Gabilondo, H. et al. Segmentally homologous neurons acquire two different terminal neuropeptidergic fates in the Drosophila nervous system. PLoS ONE 13, e0194281 (2018).
Salser, S. J. & Kenyon, C. A C. elegans Hox gene switches on, off, on and off again to regulate proliferation, differentiation and morphogenesis. Development 122, 1651–1661 (1996).
Hobert, O. Development of left/right asymmetry in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system: from zygote to postmitotic neuron. Genesis 52, 528–543 (2014).
Johnston, R. J. Jr. Lessons about terminal differentiation from the specification of color-detecting photoreceptors in the Drosophila retina. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 1293, 33–44 (2013).
Zheng, C., Jin, F. Q. & Chalfie, M. Hox proteins act as transcriptional guarantors to ensure terminal differentiation. Cell Rep. 13, 1343–1352 (2015).
Afzal, Z. & Krumlauf, R. Transcriptional regulation and implications for controlling hox gene expression. J. Dev. Biol. 10, 4 (2022).
Deschamps, J. et al. Initiation, establishment and maintenance of Hox gene expression patterns in the mouse. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 43, 635–650 (1999).
Gentile, C. & Kmita, M. Polycomb repressive complexes in hox gene regulation: silencing and beyond: the functional dynamics of polycomb repressive complexes in Hox gene regulation. Bioessays 42, e1900249 (2020).
Kassis, J. A., Kennison, J. A. & Tamkun, J. W. Polycomb and Trithorax group genes in Drosophila. Genetics 206, 1699–1725 (2017).
Mallo, M. & Alonso, C. R. The regulation of Hox gene expression during animal development. Development 140, 3951–3963 (2013).
Frank, D. & Sela-Donenfeld, D. Hindbrain induction and patterning during early vertebrate development. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 941–960 (2019).
Crocker, J. et al. Low affinity binding site clusters confer hox specificity and regulatory robustness. Cell 160, 191–203 (2015).
Delker, R. K. et al. Low affinity binding sites in an activating CRM mediate negative autoregulation of the Drosophila Hox gene Ultrabithorax. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008444 (2019).
Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).
Hobert, O. PCR fusion-based approach to create reporter gene constructs for expression analysis in transgenic C. elegans. Biotechniques 32, 728–730 (2002).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Cartharius, K. et al. MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 21, 2933–2942 (2005).
Weirauch, M. T. et al. Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell 158, 1431–1443 (2014).
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. & Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017–1018 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC), which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440), for providing strains. We are grateful to Oliver Hobert and members of the Kratsios lab (Edgar Correa, Nidhi Sharma, Filipe Marques, Manasa Prahlad, Anthony Osuma) for their comments on this manuscript. This work was funded by two NIH grants (R01 NS116365-01, R01 NS118078-01) to P.K.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
W.F. Conceptualization, data curation, investigation, visualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; H.D., J.J.S. Formal analysis, validation, investigation, P.K. Conceptualization, supervision, investigation, funding acquisition, project administration, writing—original draft, review, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jennifer Ross-Wolff and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, W., Destain, H., Smith, J.J. et al. Maintenance of neurotransmitter identity by Hox proteins through a homeostatic mechanism. Nat Commun 13, 6097 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33781-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33781-0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.